Wang v. Loxo Oncology, Inc., et. al., Case No.1:19-cv-00133-UNA (the “Wang Complaint”). The Wang Complaint asserts that Loxo Oncology and certain of its directors violated sections 14(e), 14(d), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making untrue statements of material fact and omitting certain material facts related to the Transactions in the Schedule14D-9. The Wang Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining defendants from consummating the Transactions and money damages.
On January 24, 2019, Colleen Witmer, a purported stockholder of Loxo Oncology, also filed a putative securities class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Loxo Oncology, the individual members of the Board, Lilly and Purchaser, captionedWitmer v. Loxo Oncology, Inc., et. al., Case No.1:19-cv-00135-UNA (the “Witmer Complaint”). The Witmer Complaint asserts that Loxo Oncology, certain of its directors, Lilly and Purchaser violated sections 14(e), 14(d), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making untrue statements of material fact and omitting certain material facts related to the Transactions in the Schedule14D-9. The Witmer Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining defendants from consummating the Transactions and money damages.
On January 28, 2019, Katie Elasmar, a purported stockholder of Loxo Oncology, also filed a putative securities class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Loxo Oncology and the individual members of the Board, captionedElasmar v. Loxo Oncology, Inc., et. al., Case No.1:19-cv-00133-UNA (the “Elasmar Complaint”). The Elasmar Complaint asserts that Loxo Oncology and certain of its directors violated sections 14(e) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making untrue statements of material fact and omitting certain material facts related to the Transactions in the Schedule14D-9. The Elasmar Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining defendants from consummating the Transactions and money damages.
On January 31, 2019, Michael Stevens, a purported stockholder of Loxo Oncology, also filed a putative securities class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Loxo Oncology and the individual members of the Board, captionedMichael Stevens v. Loxo Oncology, Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:19-ct-00034 (the “Stevens Complaint”). The Stevens Complaint asserts that Loxo Oncology and certain of its directors violated sections 14(e), 14(d) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making untrue statements of material fact and omitting certain material facts related to the Transactions in the Schedule 14D-9. The Stevens Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining defendants from consummating the Transactions and money damages.”
Item 12. Exhibits.
Item 12 of the Schedule TO is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following exhibit:
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
(a)(5)(B) | | Joint Press Release issued by Eli Lilly and Company and Loxo Oncology, Inc. on February 1, 2019. |