Investments | 5. Investments Fixed Maturity AFS Securities The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, losses and other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities (in millions) were as follows: As of June 30, 2019 Amortized Gross Unrealized Fair Cost Gains Losses OTTI (1) Value Fixed maturity AFS securities: Corporate bonds $ 77,806 $ 7,327 $ 340 $ 3 $ 84,790 ABS 1,042 59 4 ( 20 ) 1,117 U.S. government bonds 381 49 - - 430 Foreign government bonds 380 60 - - 440 RMBS 3,089 193 11 ( 21 ) 3,292 CMBS 920 41 - ( 4 ) 965 CLOs 2,418 9 7 ( 5 ) 2,425 State and municipal bonds 4,594 1,079 4 - 5,669 Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities 560 70 25 - 605 Total fixed maturity AFS securities $ 91,190 $ 8,887 $ 391 $ ( 47 ) $ 99,733 As of December 31, 2018 Amortized Gross Unrealized Fair Cost Gains Losses OTTI (1) Value Fixed maturity AFS securities: Corporate bonds $ 79,623 $ 2,980 $ 2,263 $ ( 8 ) $ 80,348 ABS 916 42 6 ( 14 ) 966 U.S. government bonds 390 29 2 - 417 Foreign government bonds 406 42 - - 448 RMBS 3,308 118 67 ( 14 ) 3,373 CMBS 811 6 16 ( 3 ) 804 CLOs 1,746 3 24 ( 5 ) 1,730 State and municipal bonds 4,647 716 18 - 5,345 Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities 582 45 34 - 593 Total fixed maturity AFS securities $ 92,429 $ 3,981 $ 2,430 $ ( 44 ) $ 94,024 (1) Includes unrealized (gains) and losses on credit-impaired securities related to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date. The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities by contractual maturities (in millions) as of June 30, 2019, were as follows: Amortized Fair Cost Value Due in one year or less $ 3,340 $ 3,324 Due after one year through five years 15,342 15,844 Due after five years through ten years 17,216 18,385 Due after ten years 47,823 54,381 Subtotal 83,721 91,934 Structured securities (ABS, MBS, CLOs) 7,469 7,799 Total fixed maturity AFS securities $ 91,190 $ 99,733 Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations. The fair value and gross unrealized losses, including the portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”), of fixed maturity AFS securities (dollars in millions), aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows: As of June 30, 2019 Less Than or Equal Greater Than to Twelve Months Twelve Months Total Gross Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Fair Losses and Fair Losses and Fair Losses and Value OTTI Value OTTI Value OTTI Fixed maturity AFS securities: Corporate bonds $ 1,188 $ 42 $ 6,168 $ 309 $ 7,356 $ 351 ABS 36 - 86 10 122 10 RMBS 11 - 480 11 491 11 CLOs 481 2 204 5 685 7 State and municipal bonds 115 1 82 3 197 4 Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities 72 1 109 24 181 25 Total fixed maturity AFS securities $ 1,903 $ 46 $ 7,129 $ 362 $ 9,032 $ 408 Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position 890 As of December 31, 2018 Less Than or Equal Greater Than to Twelve Months Twelve Months Total Gross Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Fair Losses and Fair Losses and Fair Losses and Value OTTI Value OTTI Value OTTI Fixed maturity AFS securities: Corporate bonds $ 32,493 $ 1,530 $ 7,228 $ 735 $ 39,721 $ 2,265 ABS 117 2 143 14 260 16 U.S. government bonds 70 1 23 1 93 2 RMBS 472 10 863 60 1,335 70 CMBS 470 11 82 5 552 16 CLOs 1,124 21 103 3 1,227 24 State and municipal bonds 404 8 96 10 500 18 Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities 96 6 133 28 229 34 Total fixed maturity AFS securities $ 35,246 $ 1,589 $ 8,671 $ 856 $ 43,917 $ 2,445 Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position 3,414 The fair value, gross unrealized losses, the portion of OTTI recognized in OCI (in millions) and number of fixed maturity AFS securities where the fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by greater than 20% were as follows: As of June 30, 2019 Number Fair Gross Unrealized of Value Losses OTTI Securities (1) Less than six months $ 44 $ 15 $ 1 15 Six months or greater, but less than nine months 47 16 - 5 Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months 2 1 - 2 Twelve months or greater 214 93 14 33.0 35 Total $ 307 $ 125 $ 15 57 As of December 31, 2018 Number Fair Gross Unrealized of Value Losses OTTI Securities (1) Less than six months $ 395 $ 124 $ 1 45 Six months or greater, but less than nine months 96 49 - 11 Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months 11 8 - 2 Twelve months or greater 143 74 8 32 Total $ 645 $ 255 $ 9 90 (1) We may reflect a security in more than one aging category based on various purchase dates. We regularly review our investment holdings for OTTI. Our gross unrealized losses, including the portion of OTTI recognized in OCI, on fixed maturity AFS securities decreased by $ 2.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2019. As discussed further below, we believe the unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2019, did not represent OTTI as (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the estimated future cash flows were equal to or greater than the amortized cost basis of the debt securities. Based upon this evaluation as of June 30, 2019, management believes we have the ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations (e.g., insurance premiums and fees and investment income) to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety without requiring the sale of our temporarily-impaired securities. As of June 30, 2019, the unrealized losses associated with our corporate bond securities were attributable primarily to widening credit spreads and rising interest rates since purchase. We performed a detailed analysis of the financial performance of the underlying issuers and determined that we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each temporarily-impaired security. As of June 30, 2019, the unrealized losses associated with our mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and ABS were attributable primarily to widening credit spreads and rising interest rates since purchase. We assessed for credit impairment using a cash flow model that incorporates key assumptions including default rates, severities and prepayment rates. We estimated losses for a security by forecasting the underlying loans in each transaction. The forecasted loan performance was used to project cash flows to the various tranches in the structure, as applicable. Our forecasted cash flows also considered, as applicable, independent industry analyst reports and forecasts and other independent market data. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral compared to our subordination or other credit enhancement, we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each temporarily-impaired security. As of June 30, 2019, the unrealized losses associated with our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities were attributable primarily to wider credit spreads caused by illiquidity in the market and subordination within the capital structure, as well as credit risk of underlying issuers. For our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities, we evaluated the financial performance of the underlying issuers based upon credit performance and investment ratings and determined that we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each temporarily-impaired security. Changes in the amount of credit loss of OTTI recognized in net income (loss) where the portion related to other factors was recognized in OCI (in millions) on fixed maturity AFS securities were as follows: For the Three For the Six Months Ended Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2019 2018 2019 2018 Balance as of beginning-of-period $ 359 $ 378 $ 355 $ 378 Increases attributable to: Credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized 5 1 11 2 Credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized - - 2 1 Decreases attributable to: Securities sold, paid down or matured ( 111 ) ( 4 ) ( 115 ) ( 6 ) Balance as of end-of-period $ 253 $ 375 $ 253 $ 375 During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized as we determined the cash flows expected to be collected would not be sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security. The credit losses we recorded on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized were attributable primarily to one or a combination of the following reasons: Failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; Deterioration of creditworthiness of the issuer; Deterioration of conditions specifically related to the security; Deterioration of fundamentals of the industry in which the issuer operates; and Deterioration of the rating of the security by a rating agency. We recognize the OTTI attributed to the noncredit portion as a separate component in OCI referred to as unrealized OTTI on fixed maturity AFS securities. Determination of Credit Losses on Corporate Bonds As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, we reviewed our corporate bond portfolio for potential shortfalls in contractual principal and interest based on numerous subjective and objective inputs. The factors used to determine the amount of credit loss for each individual security, include, but are not limited to, near-term risk, substantial discrepancy between book and market value, sector or company-specific volatility, negative operating trends and trading levels wider than peers. Credit ratings express opinions about the credit quality of a security. Securities rated investment grade, those rated BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) Rating Services or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), are generally considered by the rating agencies and market participants to be low credit risk. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, 96 % of the fair value of our corporate bond portfolio was rated investment grade. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the portion of our corporate bond portfolio rated below investment grade had an amortized cost of $ 3.2 billion and a fair value of $ 3.2 billion and $ 3.0 billion, respectively. Based upon the analysis discussed above, we believe as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, that we would recover the amortized cost of each corporate bond. Determination of Credit Losses on MBS and ABS As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, default rates were projected by considering underlying MBS and ABS loan performance and collateral type. Projected default rates on existing delinquencies vary depending on loan type and severity of delinquency status. In addition, we estimate the potential contributions of currently performing loans that may become delinquent in the future based on the change in delinquencies and loan liquidations experienced in the recent history. Finally, we develop a default rate timing curve by aggregating the defaults for all loans in the pool (delinquent loans, foreclosure and real estate owned and new delinquencies from currently performing loans) and the associated loan-level loss severities. We use certain available loan characteristics such as lien status, loan sizes and occupancy to estimate the loss severity of loans. Second lien loans are assigned 100 % severity, if defaulted. For first lien loans, we assume a minimum of 30 % severity with higher severity assumed for investor properties and further adjusted by housing price assumptions. With the default rate timing curve and loan-level loss severity, we derive the future expected credit losses. Mortgage Loans on Real Estate The following provides the current and past due composition of our mortgage loans on real estate (in millions): As of June 30, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Commercial Residential Total Commercial Residential Total Current $ 14,436 $ 645 $ 15,081 $ 13,029 $ 239 $ 13,268 60 to 90 days past due - 5 5 - 1 1 Greater than 90 days past due - 2 2 - - - Valuation allowance - ( 2 ) ( 2 ) - - - Unamortized premium (discount) ( 17 ) 21 4 ( 17 ) 8 ( 9 ) Total carrying value $ 14,419 $ 671 $ 15,090 $ 13,012 $ 248 $ 13,260 We establish a valuation allowance to provide for the risk of credit losses inherent in our portfolio. The valuation allowance includes specific valuation allowances for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as general valuation allowances for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property risk or market specific risk has not been identified but for which we anticipate a loss has occurred. For our commercial mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of June 30, 2019, or December 31, 2018. For our residential mortgage loans, no specifically identified loans were impaired as of June 30, 2019, or December 31, 2018. The general allowance established on residential mortgage loans as of June 30, 2019 was $ 2 million. As of December 31, 2018, the general allowance established on residential mortgage loans was less than $ 1 million. The changes in the valuation allowance associated with impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) were as follows: For the Three For the Six Months Ended Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2019 2018 2019 2018 Balance as of beginning-of-period $ - $ 3 $ - $ 3 Additions - - - - Charge-offs, net of recoveries - ( 1 ) - ( 1 ) Balance as of end-of-period $ - $ 2 $ - $ 2 Additional information related to impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) was as follows: For the Three For the Six Months Ended Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2019 2018 2019 2018 Average carrying value for impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate $ - $ 7 $ - $ 7 Interest income recognized on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate - - - - Interest income collected on impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate - - - - We use the loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios as credit quality indicators for our commercial mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows: As of June 30, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Debt- Debt- Service Service Carrying % of Coverage Carrying % of Coverage Loan-to-Value Ratio Value Total Ratio Value Total Ratio Less than 65% $ 12,989 90.1 % 2.32 $ 11,716 90.1 % 2.30 65% to 74% 1,429 9.9 % 1.81 1,238 9.5 % 1.76 75% to 100% 1 0.0 % 1.09 58 0.4 % 0.95 Total $ 14,419 100.0 % $ 13,012 100.0 % We use loan performance status as the primary credit quality indicator for our residential mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) as follows: As of June 30, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Carrying % of Carrying % of Performance Indicator Value Total Value Total Performing $ 664 99.0 % $ 247 99.6 % Nonperforming 7 1.0 % 1 0.4 % Total $ 671 100.0 % $ 248 100.0 % Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the U.S. with the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 23 % of commercial mortgage loans on real estate as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, and Texas, which accounted for 12 % of commercial mortgage loans on real estate as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018. Our residential mortgage loan portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the U.S. with the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 32 % and 34 % of residential mortgage loans on real estate as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively, and Florida, which accounted for 20 % and 19 % of residential mortgage loans on real estate as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. Alternative Investments As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, alternative investments included investments in 248 and 237 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 1 % of our overall invested assets . Realized Gain (Loss) Details underlying realized gain (loss) (in millions) reported on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows: For the Three For the Six Months Ended Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2019 2018 2019 2018 Fixed maturity AFS securities: Gross gains $ 20 $ 1 $ 32 $ 16 Gross losses ( 17 ) ( 11 ) ( 44 ) ( 42 ) Gross OTTI ( 5 ) ( 1 ) ( 13 ) ( 3 ) Gain (loss) on other investments (1) ( 4 ) 4 1 6 Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds ( 5 ) ( 6 ) ( 7 ) ( 11 ) Total realized gain (loss) related to certain investments ( 11 ) ( 13 ) ( 31 ) ( 34 ) Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments (2) ( 37 ) 23 ( 158 ) 24 Indexed annuity and IUL contracts net derivatives results: (3) Gross gain (loss) ( 41 ) ( 5 ) ( 76 ) ( 6 ) Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL 8 - 9 - Variable annuity net derivatives results: (4) Gross gain (loss) ( 43 ) ( 11 ) ( 259 ) 22 Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL 7 ( 1 ) 35 ( 1 ) Total realized gain (loss) $ ( 117 ) $ ( 7 ) $ ( 480 ) $ 5 (1) Includes market adjustments on equity securities still held of $ 2 million and $ 8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $ 2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. (2) Represents changes in the fair values of certain derivative investments (not including those associated with our variable and indexed annuity and IUL contracts net derivative results), reinsurance related embedded derivatives and trading securities. See Note 8 for information regarding modified coinsurance. (3) Represents the net difference between the change in the fair value of the S&P 500 Index ® (“S&P 500”) call options that we hold and the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities of our indexed annuity and IUL contracts along with changes in the fair value of embedded derivative liabilities related to index call options we may purchase in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations applicable to future reset periods for our indexed annuity products. (4) Includes the net difference in the change in embedded derivative reserves of our guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) riders and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge the change in embedded derivative reserves on our GLB riders and the benefit ratio unlocking on our GLB and GDB riders, including the cost of purchasing the hedging instruments. Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in net income (loss) and included in realized gain (loss) on fixed maturity AFS securities above and the portion of OTTI recognized in OCI (in millions) were as follows: For the Three For the Six Months Ended Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2019 2018 2019 2018 OTTI Recognized in Net Income (Loss) Fixed maturity AFS securities: Corporate bonds $ ( 5 ) $ ( 1 ) $ ( 11 ) $ ( 3 ) ABS - - ( 1 ) - RMBS - - ( 1 ) - Gross OTTI recognized in net income (loss) ( 5 ) ( 1 ) ( 13 ) ( 3 ) Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL 1 - 1 - Net OTTI recognized in net income (loss) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 1 ) $ ( 12 ) $ ( 3 ) OTTI Recognized in OCI Gross OTTI recognized in OCI $ - $ - $ 16 $ - Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL - - ( 1 ) - Net OTTI recognized in OCI $ - $ - $ 15 $ - Payables for Collateral on Investments The carrying value of the payables for collateral on investments included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the fair value of the related investments or collateral (in millions) consisted of the following: As of June 30, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Value Value Value Value Collateral payable for derivative investments (1) $ 1,140 $ 1,140 $ 637 $ 637 Securities pledged under securities lending agreements (2) 156 152 88 85 Securities pledged under repurchase agreements (3) 156 189 150 185 Investments pledged for Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”) (4) 4,180 6,314 3,930 5,923 Total payables for collateral on investments $ 5,632 $ 7,795 $ 4,805 $ 6,830 (1) We obtain collateral based upon contractual provisions with our counterparties. These agreements take into consideration the counterparties’ credit rating as compared to ours, the fair value of the derivative investments and specified thresholds that if exceeded result in the receipt of cash that is typically invested in cash and invested cash. See Note 6 for additional information. (2) Our pledged securities under securities lending agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally obtain collateral in an amount equal to 102 % and 105 % of the fair value of the domestic and foreign securities, respectively. We value collateral daily and obtain additional collateral when deemed appropriate. The cash received in our securities lending program is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. (3) Our pledged securities under repurchase agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 80 % to 95 % of the fair value of the securities, and our agreements with third parties contain contractual provisions to allow for additional collateral to be obtained when necessary. The cash received in our repurchase program is typically invested in fixed maturity AFS securities. (4) Our pledged investments for FHLBI are included in fixed maturity AFS securities and mortgage loans on real estate on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 105 % to 115 % of the fair value for fixed maturity AFS securities and 155 % to 175 % of the fair value for mortgage loans on real estate. The cash received in these transactions is primarily invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. Increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments (in millions) consisted of the following: For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 2018 Collateral payable for derivative investments $ 503 $ ( 297 ) Securities pledged under securities lending agreements 68 ( 80 ) Securities pledged under repurchase agreements 6 379 Investments pledged for FHLBI 250 280 Total increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments $ 827 $ 282 We have elected not to offset our repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions in our financial statements. The remaining contractual maturities of repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings (in millions) were as follows: As of June 30, 2019 Overnight and Continuous Up to 30 Days 30 - 90 Days Greater Than 90 Days Total Securities Lending Corporate bonds $ 156 $ - $ - $ - $ 156 Repurchase Agreements Corporate bonds - - - 156 156 Total gross secured borrowings $ 156 $ - $ - $ 156 $ 312 As of December 31, 2018 Overnight and Continuous Up to 30 Days 30 - 90 Days Greater Than 90 Days Total Securities Lending Corporate bonds $ 88 $ - $ - $ - $ 88 Repurchase Agreements Corporate bonds - - - 150 150 Total gross secured borrowings $ 88 $ - $ - $ 150 $ 238 We accept collateral in the form of securities in connection with repurchase agreements. In instances where we are permitted to sell or re-pledge the securities received, we report the fair value of the collateral received and a related obligation to return the collateral in the financial statements. In addition, we receive securities in connection with securities borrowing agreements which we are permitted to sell or re-pledge. As of June 30, 2019, the fair value of all collateral received that we are permitted to sell or re-pledge was $ 558 million. As of June 30, 2019, we have re-pledged $ 450 million of this collateral to cover initial margin and over-the-counter collateral requirements on certain derivative investments. Investment Commitments As of June 30, 2019, our investment commitments were $ 2.2 billion, which included $ 969 million of LPs, $ 739 million of mortgage loans on real estate and $ 521 million of private placement securities. Concentrations of Financial Instruments As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, our most significant investments in one issuer were our investments in securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation with a fair value of $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.4 billion, respectively, or 1 % of our invested assets portfolio, and our investments in securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association with a fair value of $ 1.3 billion or 1 % of our invested assets portfolio. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, our most significant investments in one industry were our investments in securities in the financial services industry with a fair value of $ 15.7 billion and $ 14.2 billion, respectively, or 12 % of our invested assets portfolio, and our investments in securities in the consumer non-cyclical industry with a fair value of $ 15.5 billion and $ 14.5 billion, respectively, or 12 % and 13 %, respectively, of our invested assets portfolio. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities. |