Fair Value Measurements | 3 Months Ended |
2-May-14 |
Fair Value Measurements | ' |
Fair Value Measurements | ' |
Note 2: Fair Value Measurements - Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements establishes a three-level hierarchy, which encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 1 - inputs to the valuation techniques that are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 2 - inputs to the valuation techniques that are other than quoted prices but are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 3 - inputs to the valuation techniques that are unobservable for the assets or liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis |
|
The following tables present the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 2, 2014, May 3, 2013, and January 31, 2014, classified by fair value hierarchy: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
(In millions) | May 2, 2014 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Money market funds | $ | 51 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
Certificates of deposit | 21 | | | 21 | | | — | | | — | |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations | 20 | | | — | | | 20 | | | — | |
|
Municipal obligations | 18 | | | — | | | 18 | | | — | |
|
Total short-term investments | $ | 110 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 38 | | | $ | — | |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations | $ | 347 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 347 | | | $ | — | |
|
Municipal obligations | 13 | | | — | | | 13 | | | — | |
|
Total long-term investments | $ | 360 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 360 | | | $ | — | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
(In millions) | May 3, 2013 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Money market funds | $ | 51 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations | 15 | | | — | | | 15 | | | — | |
|
Municipal obligations | 52 | | | — | | | 52 | | | — | |
|
Total short-term investments | $ | 118 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | — | |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations | $ | 231 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 231 | | | $ | — | |
|
Municipal obligations | 41 | | | — | | | 41 | | | — | |
|
Total long-term investments | $ | 272 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 272 | | | $ | — | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
(In millions) | January 31, 2014 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Money market funds | $ | 128 | | | $ | 128 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
Certificates of deposit | 21 | | | 21 | | | — | | | — | |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations | 18 | | | — | | | 18 | | | — | |
|
Municipal obligations | 18 | | | — | | | 18 | | | — | |
|
Total short-term investments | $ | 185 | | | $ | 149 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | — | |
|
Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations | $ | 265 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 265 | | | $ | — | |
|
Municipal obligations | 14 | | | — | | | 14 | | | — | |
|
Total long-term investments | $ | 279 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 279 | | | $ | — | |
|
|
There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during any of the periods presented. |
|
When available, quoted prices were used to determine fair value. When quoted prices in active markets were available, investments were classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. When quoted prices in active markets were not available, fair values were determined using pricing models, and the inputs to those pricing models were based on observable market inputs. The inputs to the pricing models were typically benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads and benchmark securities, among others. |
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis |
|
During the three months ended May 2, 2014 and May 3, 2013, the Company’s only significant assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition were certain assets subject to long-lived asset impairment. |
|
The Company reviews the carrying amounts of long-lived assets whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. With input from retail store operations, the Company’s accounting and finance personnel that organizationally report to the chief financial officer, assess the performance of retail stores quarterly against historical patterns and projections of future profitability for evidence of possible impairment. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the asset (disposal) group is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The Company estimated the fair values of assets subject to long-lived asset impairment based on the Company’s own judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets and on observable market data, when available. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3. |
|
In the determination of impairment for operating locations, the Company determined the fair values of individual operating locations using an income approach, which required discounting projected future cash flows. When determining the stream of projected future cash flows associated with an individual operating location, management made assumptions, incorporating local market conditions and inputs from retail store operations, about key variables including the following unobservable inputs: sales growth rates, gross margin, controllable expenses, such as payroll and occupancy expense, and asset residual values. In order to calculate the present value of those future cash flows, the Company discounted cash flow estimates at a rate commensurate with the risk that selected market participants would assign to the cash flows. In general, the selected market participants represented a group of other retailers with a location footprint similar in size to the Company’s. |
|
During the three months ended May 2, 2014, four operating locations experienced a triggering event and were evaluated for recoverability. Two of these four operating locations were determined to be impaired due to a decline in cash flow trends and an unfavorable sales outlook at these two locations, resulting in an impairment loss of $23 million. The discounted cash flow model used to estimate the fair value of the two impaired operating locations assumed average annual sales growth rates ranging from 3.5% to 6.0% over the remaining lives of the locations and applied a discount rate of approximately 6.5%. |
|
The other two operating locations that experienced a triggering event during 2014 were determined to be recoverable and, therefore, were not impaired. For these two locations, the expected undiscounted cash flows substantially exceeded the net book value of each location's assets. A 10% reduction in projected sales used to estimate future cash flows at the latest date these two operating locations were evaluated for impairment would have resulted in their impairment and increased recognized impairment losses by $28 million. We analyzed other assumptions made in estimating the future cash flows of these other two operating locations evaluated for impairment, but the sensitivity of those assumptions was not significant to the estimates. |
|
The following table presents the Company’s non-financial assets measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the resulting long-lived asset impairment losses included in earnings. Because assets subject to long-lived asset impairment were not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, certain fair value measurements presented in the table may reflect values at earlier measurement dates and may no longer represent the fair values at May 2, 2014 and May 3, 2013. |
|
Fair Value Measurements - Nonrecurring Basis |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| May 2, 2014 | | May 3, 2013 |
| Fair Value | | | Impairment | | | Fair Value | | | Impairment | |
|
(In millions) | Measurements | | Losses | | Measurements | | Losses | |
|
Assets-held-for-use: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Operating locations | $ | 9 | | | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
Total | $ | 9 | | | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company’s financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt and are reflected in the financial statements at cost. With the exception of long-term debt, cost approximates fair value for these items due to their short-term nature. The fair values of the Company’s unsecured notes classified as Level 1 were estimated using quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s mortgage notes classified as Level 2 were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the future cash outflows associated with these arrangements and discounted using the applicable risk-free borrowing rate. |
|
Carrying amounts and the related estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, excluding capitalized lease obligations, are as follows: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| May 2, 2014 | | May 3, 2013 |
| Carrying | | | Fair | | | Carrying | | | Fair | |
|
(In millions) | Amount | | | Value | | | Amount | | | Value | |
|
Unsecured notes (Level 1) | $ | 9,617 | | | $ | 10,777 | | | $ | 8,628 | | | $ | 10,089 | |
|
Mortgage notes (Level 2) | 17 | | | 19 | | | 18 | | | 22 | |
|
Long-term debt (excluding capitalized lease obligations) | $ | 9,634 | | | $ | 10,796 | | | $ | 8,646 | | | $ | 10,111 | |
|