Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-2464
MFS SERIES TRUST IX
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
500 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
500 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: April 30
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2010*
* | This Form N-CSR pertains to the following series of the Registrant: MFS Bond Fund, MFS Limited Maturity Fund, MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund, MFS Research Bond Fund and MFS Research Bond Fund J. The remaining series of the Registrant, MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund, has a fiscal year end of October 31. |
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
10/31/10
MFB-SEM
Table of Contents
Dear Shareholders:
After an extended rebound in the financial markets, uncertainty returned in early 2010 as investors began to question the durability of the recovery for global economies and markets. That uncertainty led to increased risk aversion, especially as investors saw the eurozone struggle with the debt woes of many of its members. In September, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s promises to further loosen monetary policy helped assuage market fears and drive asset prices off their recent lows. A combination of solid earnings and improving economic data gave an additional boost to investor sentiment. As we near the end of 2010, we are cautiously optimistic that economic growth will continue to improve and that the global economies will recover from the shocks of the past few years. We expect the pace of recovery worldwide will be uneven and volatile.
As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is in times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with their advisors to research and identify investment opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 58.6% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 27.0% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 6.6% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 4.8% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 1.2% | |||
Floating Rate Loans | 0.4% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | 0.2% | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 0.1% | |||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (o) | 0.0% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 2.5% | |||
AA | 5.9% | |||
A | 14.5% | |||
BBB | 48.0% | |||
BB | 24.3% | |||
B | 3.4% | |||
CCC (o) | 0.0% | |||
C (o) | 0.0% | |||
U.S. Agency (NR) | 0.1% | |||
Other Fixed Income (NR) | 0.2% | |||
Cash & Other | 1.1% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 5.2 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 8.2 yrs. |
(a) | The rating categories include debt securities, fixed-income structured products, and securities underlying credit default swaps where these have long-term public ratings. The credit default swap itself is not rated. All ratings are assigned in accordance with the following hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moody’s, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moody’s, then a Standard & Poor’s rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Ratings from Moody’s are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Agency (NR) includes unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
Agency mortgage-backed securities. Other Fixed Income (NR) includes unrated long-term fixed income securities, interest rate swaps and fixed income futures. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(o) | Less than 0.1%. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/10.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Expense Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/10 | Ending Account Value 10/31/10 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/10-10/31/10 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.85% | $1,000.00 | $1,066.49 | $4.43 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.85% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.92 | $4.33 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,061.86 | $8.32 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,062.70 | $8.32 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,067.00 | $3.13 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.18 | $3.06 | ||||||||||||||
R1 | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,062.68 | $8.32 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
R2 | Actual | 1.10% | $1,000.00 | $1,065.18 | $5.73 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.10% | $1,000.00 | $1,019.66 | $5.60 | ||||||||||||||
R3 | Actual | 0.85% | $1,000.00 | $1,066.50 | $4.43 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.85% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.92 | $4.33 | ||||||||||||||
R4 | Actual | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,067.77 | $3.13 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.18 | $3.06 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
Table of Contents
10/31/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 96.8% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Aerospace - 1.2% | ||||||||
BE Aerospace, Inc., 8.5%, 2018 | $ | 6,830,000 | $ | 7,649,600 | ||||
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | 7,685,000 | 8,530,350 | ||||||
$ | 16,179,950 | |||||||
Airlines - 1.2% | ||||||||
American Airlines Pass-Through Trust, 6.817%, 2012 | $ | 6,831,000 | $ | 6,950,543 | ||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., 7.25%, 2019 | 2,155,000 | 2,392,050 | ||||||
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 7.57%, 2010 | 6,955,000 | 6,989,776 | ||||||
$ | 16,332,369 | |||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 6.1% | ||||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.616%, 2019 (z) | $ | 3,258,914 | $ | 2,444,185 | ||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “G”, 6.076%, 2045 (z) | 2,150,000 | 225,750 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.855%, 2040 (z) | 2,218,632 | 991,728 | ||||||
BlackRock Capital Finance LP, 7.75%, 2026 (n) | 477,702 | 64,346 | ||||||
Brazilian Merchant Voucher Receivables Ltd., 5.911%, 2011 (z) | 1,069,941 | 1,085,990 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (z) | 8,469,596 | 8,469,596 | ||||||
Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 6.6%, 2029 (z) | 1,046,981 | 1,106,883 | ||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.322%, 2049 | 3,851,426 | 4,017,436 | ||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.366%, 2049 | 2,920,000 | 2,666,228 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Acceptance Corp., FRN, 1.731%, 2030 (i) | 9,989,196 | 467,813 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, “A4”, 5.306%, 2046 | 2,990,290 | 3,137,635 | ||||||
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificate, 5.311%, 2039 | 3,415,000 | 3,595,398 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 (z) | 2,519,435 | 2,393,463 | ||||||
DLJ Commercial Mortgage Corp., 6.04%, 2031 (z) | 2,486,221 | 2,574,585 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, 6.5%, 2014 (z) | 1,325,937 | 1,127,046 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.272%, 2025 (i)(z) | 11,958,373 | 948,299 | ||||||
First Union-Lehman Brothers Commercial Mortgage Trust, 7%, 2029 (n) | 1,693,879 | 1,775,144 | ||||||
GMAC LLC, FRN, 6.02%, 2033 (z) | 4,140,000 | 4,275,581 | ||||||
GMAC LLC, FRN, 7.643%, 2034 (n) | 3,212,000 | 3,063,331 | ||||||
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp., FRN, 5.883%, 2038 | 2,125,000 | 2,133,878 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.42%, 2049 | $ | 7,161,947 | $ | 7,498,198 | ||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.38%, 2042 (n) | 4,734,928 | 1,926,701 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.817%, 2049 | 1,467,768 | 1,557,929 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.99%, 2051 | 9,792,112 | 10,439,676 | ||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “C”, FRN, 1.826%, 2021 (n) | 3,651,630 | 2,884,788 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 0.881%, 2030 (i) | 9,567,307 | 232,051 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.826%, 2050 | 1,561,000 | 444,049 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.748%, 2050 | 3,070,000 | 3,191,180 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.148%, 2030 (i)(n) | 18,264,855 | 455,248 | ||||||
PNC Mortgage Acceptance Corp., 7.1%, 2032 (z) | 2,468,718 | 2,468,705 | ||||||
Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corp., FRN, 7.285%, 2013 (z) | 3,468,000 | 3,506,605 | ||||||
Spirit Master Funding LLC, 5.05%, 2023 (z) | 2,303,402 | 2,069,606 | ||||||
$ | 83,239,051 | |||||||
Broadcasting - 2.3% | ||||||||
CBS Corp., 8.875%, 2019 | $ | 4,240,000 | $ | 5,493,352 | ||||
CBS Corp., 5.75%, 2020 | 1,010,000 | 1,119,411 | ||||||
CBS Corp., 5.9%, 2040 | 2,543,000 | 2,463,046 | ||||||
Inmarsat Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | 6,896,000 | 7,378,720 | ||||||
NBC Universal, Inc., 5.95%, 2041 (n) | 5,281,000 | 5,393,311 | ||||||
News America, Inc., 8.5%, 2025 | 4,931,000 | 6,161,985 | ||||||
WPP Finance, 8%, 2014 | 2,744,000 | 3,268,656 | ||||||
$ | 31,278,481 | |||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.4% | ||||||||
TD Ameritrade Holding Co., 4.15%, 2014 | $ | 5,138,000 | $ | 5,477,175 | ||||
Building - 1.4% | ||||||||
Mohawk Industries, Inc., 6.875%, 2016 | $ | 11,332,000 | $ | 12,111,075 | ||||
Owens Corning, Inc., 6.5%, 2016 | 5,936,000 | 6,455,038 | ||||||
$ | 18,566,113 | |||||||
Cable TV - 3.7% | ||||||||
Cablevision Systems Corp., 8%, 2020 | $ | 5,895,000 | $ | 6,521,344 | ||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 4.625%, 2013 | 6,087,000 | 6,576,127 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Cable TV - continued | ||||||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 6.25%, 2018 (n) | $ | 1,735,000 | $ | 2,003,810 | ||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | 10,380,000 | 11,625,600 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 5.875%, 2019 | 3,310,000 | 3,770,186 | ||||||
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | 4,300,000 | 4,521,450 | ||||||
TCI Communications, Inc., 9.8%, 2012 | 3,539,000 | 3,909,201 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | 6,150,000 | 8,004,022 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5%, 2020 | 1,480,000 | 1,605,973 | ||||||
Time Warner Entertainment Co. LP, 8.375%, 2033 | 1,734,000 | 2,190,666 | ||||||
$ | 50,728,379 | |||||||
Chemicals - 2.6% | ||||||||
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 2017 | $ | 8,963,000 | $ | 10,329,858 | ||||
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | 8,354,000 | 10,729,351 | ||||||
Dow Chemical Co., 9.4%, 2039 | 2,072,000 | 2,935,817 | ||||||
Nalco Co., 8.25%, 2017 | 9,967,000 | 11,100,746 | ||||||
$ | 35,095,772 | |||||||
Computer Software - 0.8% | ||||||||
Seagate Technology HDD Holdings, 6.375%, 2011 | $ | 11,013,000 | $ | 11,315,858 | ||||
Conglomerates - 0.2% | ||||||||
Kennametal, Inc., 7.2%, 2012 | $ | 3,091,000 | $ | 3,210,313 | ||||
Construction - 0.8% | ||||||||
D.R. Horton, Inc., 7.875%, 2011 | $ | 9,945,000 | $ | 10,342,800 | ||||
Consumer Products - 1.7% | ||||||||
Hasbro, Inc., 6.35%, 2040 | $ | 7,446,000 | $ | 7,494,823 | ||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 4,425,000 | 4,815,736 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 2020 | 4,091,000 | 4,252,836 | ||||||
Whirlpool Corp., 8%, 2012 | 5,627,000 | 6,140,194 | ||||||
$ | 22,703,589 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
Service Corp. International, 7.375%, 2014 | $ | 5,360,000 | $ | 5,855,800 | ||||
Containers - 1.3% | ||||||||
Crown Americas LLC, 7.625%, 2017 | $ | 6,044,000 | $ | 6,587,960 | ||||
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 5,864,000 | 6,113,220 | ||||||
Owens-Illinois, Inc., 7.375%, 2016 | 4,150,000 | 4,523,500 | ||||||
$ | 17,224,680 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Defense Electronics - 0.7% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.375%, 2019 (n) | $ | 7,642,000 | $ | 8,912,383 | ||||
Electronics - 1.4% | ||||||||
Flextronics International Ltd., 6.25%, 2014 | $ | 8,200,000 | $ | 8,353,750 | ||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 6.55%, 2017 | 2,450,000 | 2,860,250 | ||||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 7.125%, 2037 | 6,818,000 | 8,043,829 | ||||||
$ | 19,257,829 | |||||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 3.2% | ||||||||
BNDES Participacoes S.A., 6.5%, 2019 (n) | $ | 2,560,000 | $ | 2,953,600 | ||||
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, 3.75%, 2020 (z) | 1,855,000 | 1,838,416 | ||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 6.375%, 2016 (z) | 5,780,000 | 5,725,471 | ||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 7.375%, 2020 (z) | 1,655,000 | 1,627,648 | ||||||
Gaz Capital S.A., 8.125%, 2014 (n) | 2,914,000 | 3,311,033 | ||||||
KazMunaiGaz Finance B.V., 11.75%, 2015 (n) | 2,061,000 | 2,558,216 | ||||||
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | 3,549,000 | 4,347,525 | ||||||
Pemex Finance Ltd., 10.61%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 2,027,160 | ||||||
Qatari Diar Finance Q.S.C., 5%, 2020 (n) | 4,670,000 | 4,887,795 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 3.375%, 2016 (z) | 227,000 | 226,185 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 7.875%, 2019 (n) | 626,000 | 769,059 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 7.875%, 2019 | 1,539,000 | 1,890,706 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 4.75%, 2021 (z) | 1,991,000 | 1,971,074 | ||||||
VEB Finance Ltd., 6.902%, 2020 (n) | 3,051,000 | 3,261,519 | ||||||
VTB Capital S.A., 6.465%, 2015 (n) | 1,781,000 | 1,843,335 | ||||||
VTB Capital S.A., 6.551%, 2020 (z) | 4,490,000 | 4,535,798 | ||||||
$ | 43,774,540 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 3.9% | ||||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.375%, 2017 | $ | 4,953,000 | $ | 5,502,347 | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.45%, 2036 | 4,296,000 | 4,274,163 | ||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.2%, 2040 | 3,600,000 | 3,458,891 | ||||||
Newfield Exploration Co., 6.625%, 2016 | 10,285,000 | 10,696,400 | ||||||
Nexen, Inc., 6.4%, 2037 | 1,924,000 | 2,102,289 | ||||||
Nexen, Inc., 7.5%, 2039 | 1,060,000 | 1,295,484 | ||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 6.65%, 2017 | 6,900,000 | 7,449,792 | ||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 7.5%, 2020 | 3,237,000 | 3,645,830 | ||||||
Southwestern Energy Co., 7.5%, 2018 | 10,149,000 | 11,671,350 | ||||||
Talisman Energy, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | 1,930,000 | 2,497,636 | ||||||
$ | 52,594,182 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Energy - Integrated - 0.5% | ||||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.5%, 2020 | $ | 4,127,000 | $ | 4,274,854 | ||||
Hess Corp., 8.125%, 2019 | 1,452,000 | 1,915,197 | ||||||
$ | 6,190,051 | |||||||
Financial Institutions - 2.1% | ||||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 10.25%, 2017 | $ | 8,479,372 | $ | 8,744,352 | ||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.75%, 2014 | 2,587,000 | 2,762,445 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.5%, 2020 | 8,500,000 | 9,355,984 | ||||||
GMAC, Inc., 7.25%, 2011 | 3,680,000 | 3,730,600 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 8.75%, 2017 (n) | 555,000 | 631,313 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | 3,221,000 | 3,543,100 | ||||||
$ | 28,767,794 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 4.2% | ||||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.2%, 2014 (n) | $ | 3,220,000 | $ | 3,774,700 | ||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.75%, 2019 (n) | 4,630,000 | 5,987,312 | ||||||
Del Monte Foods Co., 7.5%, 2019 | 5,940,000 | 6,519,150 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | 8,190,000 | 9,680,408 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.5%, 2040 | 1,052,000 | 1,205,760 | ||||||
Miller Brewing Co., 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 7,185,000 | 7,913,839 | ||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., 7.35%, 2016 | 10,310,000 | 11,469,875 | ||||||
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 3.05%, 2013 (n) | 9,894,000 | 10,202,643 | ||||||
$ | 56,753,687 | |||||||
Food & Drug Stores - 0.3% | ||||||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 3.25%, 2015 | $ | 1,743,000 | $ | 1,833,254 | ||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 5.75%, 2017 | 2,008,000 | 2,316,385 | ||||||
$ | 4,149,639 | |||||||
Forest & Paper Products - 0.6% | ||||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 7.125%, 2017 (n) | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | 6,450,000 | ||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 (z) | 2,164,000 | 2,185,640 | ||||||
$ | 8,635,640 | |||||||
Gaming & Lodging - 1.4% | ||||||||
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 6.75%, 2016 | $ | 8,900,000 | $ | 9,244,875 | ||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | 9,520,000 | 10,166,218 | ||||||
$ | 19,411,093 | |||||||
Insurance - 2.7% | ||||||||
Aflac, Inc., 6.45%, 2040 | $ | 6,236,000 | $ | 6,356,904 | ||||
ING Groep N.V., 5.775% to 2015, FRN to 2049 | 4,906,000 | 4,525,785 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 2,700,000 | 3,010,230 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Insurance - continued | ||||||||
Principal Financial Group, Inc., 7.875%, 2014 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 236,400 | ||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 4.75%, 2015 | 4,369,000 | 4,764,137 | ||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 2,540,000 | 2,761,999 | ||||||
Unum Group, 7.125%, 2016 | 4,500,000 | 5,194,350 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 8,751,000 | 9,898,134 | ||||||
$ | 36,747,939 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 0.5% | ||||||||
Humana, Inc., 7.2%, 2018 | $ | 5,489,000 | $ | 6,378,986 | ||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 2.0% | ||||||||
Aon Corp., 6.25%, 2040 | $ | 3,051,000 | $ | 3,071,814 | ||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | 5,545,000 | 5,927,672 | ||||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.875%, 2020 | 1,810,000 | 1,852,481 | ||||||
Chubb Corp., 6.375% to 2017, FRN to 2067 | 1,838,000 | 1,886,248 | ||||||
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 2020 | 6,010,000 | 6,148,110 | ||||||
XL Group PLC, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | 2,655,000 | 2,376,225 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust II, 6.45% to 2016, FRN to 2065 (n) | 1,048,000 | 1,006,080 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2067 (n) | 4,913,000 | 4,698,056 | ||||||
$ | 26,966,686 | |||||||
Machinery & Tools - 0.9% | ||||||||
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 (n) | $ | 11,046,000 | $ | 12,343,905 | ||||
Major Banks - 10.0% | ||||||||
BAC Capital Trust XIV, 5.63% to 2012, FRN to 2049 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 1,415,000 | ||||
Bank of America Corp., 3.7%, 2015 | 4,000,000 | 4,031,772 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 2018 | 4,060,000 | 4,273,085 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.49%, 2019 | 2,815,000 | 2,862,458 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 7.625%, 2019 | 2,800,000 | 3,277,845 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 8% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | 3,200,000 | 3,229,344 | ||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 5.125%, 2020 | 2,000,000 | 2,166,602 | ||||||
BB&T Corp., 3.95%, 2016 | 2,500,000 | 2,670,263 | ||||||
BNP Paribas, 7.195% to 2037, FRN to 2049 (n) | 4,300,000 | 4,332,250 | ||||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 5%, 2019 (n) | 1,530,000 | 1,660,426 | ||||||
Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., 6%, 2018 | 1,320,000 | 1,483,123 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.625%, 2017 | 7,771,000 | 8,324,894 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.5%, 2019 | 8,443,000 | 10,163,295 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 4,000,000 | 4,232,296 | ||||||
HSBC USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | 7,140,000 | 7,418,317 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 2017 | 5,750,000 | 6,543,845 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXII, 6.45%, 2037 | 4,770,000 | 4,596,320 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Major Banks - continued | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXVII, 7%, 2039 | $ | 1,239,000 | $ | 1,253,345 | ||||
Macquarie Group Ltd., 6%, 2020 (n) | 6,000,000 | 6,251,520 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.15%, 2013 | 3,390,000 | 3,674,346 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.05%, 2016 | 3,281,000 | 3,470,570 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.75%, 2016 | 5,924,000 | 6,471,253 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 2018 | 5,114,000 | 5,744,203 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 7.3%, 2019 | 3,930,000 | 4,532,693 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | 7,355,000 | 8,061,021 | ||||||
Santander UK PLC, 3.875%, 2014 (n) | 2,587,000 | 2,668,930 | ||||||
UFJ Finance Aruba AEC, 6.75%, 2013 | 6,193,000 | 7,045,522 | ||||||
UniCredito Luxembourg Finance S.A., 6%, 2017 (n) | 3,160,000 | 3,268,439 | ||||||
Wachovia Corp., 6.605%, 2025 | 7,936,000 | 8,572,348 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.98% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | 2,157,000 | 2,264,850 | ||||||
$ | 135,960,175 | |||||||
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 1.0% | ||||||||
Hospira, Inc., 6.05%, 2017 | $ | 5,884,000 | $ | 6,809,300 | ||||
McKesson Corp., 5.7%, 2017 | 5,010,000 | 5,738,028 | ||||||
McKesson Corp., 7.5%, 2019 | 920,000 | 1,151,703 | ||||||
$ | 13,699,031 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 5.6% | ||||||||
ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 2018 | $ | 1,138,000 | $ | 1,244,579 | ||||
ArcelorMittal, 5.25%, 2020 | 2,170,000 | 2,195,593 | ||||||
BHP Billiton Finance Ltd., 5.5%, 2014 | 100,000 | 113,244 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.25%, 2015 | 4,629,000 | 4,958,816 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 2017 | 9,936,000 | 11,240,100 | ||||||
Gold Fields Orogen Holdings Ltd., 4.875%, 2020 (z) | 5,180,000 | 5,084,356 | ||||||
International Steel Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | 6,119,000 | 6,805,772 | ||||||
Peabody Energy Corp., 5.875%, 2016 | 3,500,000 | 3,548,125 | ||||||
Peabody Energy Corp., 7.375%, 2016 | 8,530,000 | 9,660,225 | ||||||
Southern Copper Corp., 6.75%, 2040 | 8,946,000 | 9,611,627 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.25%, 2016 | 8,367,000 | 10,333,245 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 | 3,892,000 | 4,972,030 | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd., 6.875%, 2039 | 5,595,000 | 6,419,798 | ||||||
$ | 76,187,510 | |||||||
Mortgage-Backed - 0.1% | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 7.5%, 2030 - 2031 | $ | 481,014 | $ | 554,149 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2032 | 979,974 | 1,106,386 | ||||||
$ | 1,660,535 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 5.2% | ||||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 7.875%, 2013 | $ | 8,438,000 | $ | 9,717,192 | ||||
El Paso Pipeline Partners LP, 6.5%, 2020 | 5,580,000 | 6,086,385 | ||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 8.5%, 2014 | 7,200,000 | 8,567,366 | ||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 9.7%, 2019 | 3,520,000 | 4,647,900 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 5.65%, 2013 | 2,434,000 | 2,657,210 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 5.2%, 2020 | 2,000,000 | 2,196,750 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 6.3%, 2017 | 3,590,000 | 4,189,587 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, FRN, 8.375%, 2066 | 2,791,000 | 2,944,505 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, FRN, 7.034%, 2068 | 1,472,000 | 1,519,840 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, 6.85%, 2020 | 1,303,000 | 1,562,749 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, 6.5%, 2039 | 1,000,000 | 1,060,928 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5.125%, 2014 | 2,559,000 | 2,851,596 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 7.4%, 2031 | 3,627,000 | 4,149,114 | ||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, LP, 3.95%, 2015 | 5,710,000 | 6,046,696 | ||||||
Rockies Express Pipeline, 5.625%, 2020 (n) | 5,303,000 | 5,366,753 | ||||||
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 2019 | 5,750,000 | 7,268,782 | ||||||
$ | 70,833,353 | |||||||
Network & Telecom - 2.3% | ||||||||
CenturyLink, Inc., 7.6%, 2039 | $ | 8,240,000 | $ | 8,241,739 | ||||
Qwest Corp., 7.875%, 2011 | 6,990,000 | 7,365,713 | ||||||
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 5.5%, 2020 (z) | 1,451,000 | 1,460,069 | ||||||
Verizon New York, Inc., 6.875%, 2012 | 3,370,000 | 3,634,872 | ||||||
Windstream Corp., 8.625%, 2016 | 10,000,000 | 10,625,000 | ||||||
$ | 31,327,393 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.7% | ||||||||
Pride International, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 | $ | 8,220,000 | $ | 9,309,150 | ||||
Oils - 0.2% | ||||||||
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 6.125%, 2020 (z) | $ | 3,363,000 | $ | 3,332,094 | ||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 5.2% | ||||||||
American Express Centurion Bank, 5.55%, 2012 | $ | 3,943,000 | $ | 4,241,406 | ||||
American Express Co., 8.125%, 2019 | 1,435,000 | 1,843,355 | ||||||
Banco Bradesco S.A., 6.75%, 2019 (n) | 4,713,000 | 5,131,279 | ||||||
Banco Santander Chile, 2.875%, 2012 (n) | 3,000,000 | 3,021,621 | ||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 (z) | 8,500,000 | 8,548,867 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 8.8%, 2019 | 7,000,000 | 8,878,849 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 10.25%, 2039 | 3,490,000 | 3,786,650 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | 5,765,000 | 6,428,667 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 4,200,000 | 4,420,370 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - continued | ||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 8.125%, 2039 | $ | 2,480,000 | $ | 3,120,108 | ||||
Discover Bank, 7%, 2020 | 8,164,000 | 9,010,525 | ||||||
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | 3,146,000 | 3,600,031 | ||||||
Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 7.25%, 2020 (n) | 1,318,000 | 1,465,464 | ||||||
Nordea Bank AB, 5.424% to 2015, FRN to 2049 (n) | 2,450,000 | 2,384,044 | ||||||
UBS AG, 4.875%, 2020 | 1,830,000 | 1,962,022 | ||||||
UBS Preferred Funding Trust V, 6.243% to 2016, FRN to 2049 | 3,471,000 | 3,432,125 | ||||||
$ | 71,275,383 | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 0.8% | ||||||||
Celgene Corp., 2.45%, 2015 | $ | 3,438,000 | $ | 3,455,537 | ||||
Mylan Laboratories, Inc., 7.625%, 2017 (n) | 6,784,000 | 7,462,400 | ||||||
$ | 10,917,937 | |||||||
Pollution Control - 0.8% | ||||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., 6.875%, 2017 | $ | 7,890,000 | $ | 8,688,863 | ||||
Republic Services, Inc., 5.25%, 2021 | 1,500,000 | 1,663,941 | ||||||
$ | 10,352,804 | |||||||
Printing & Publishing - 0.3% | ||||||||
Pearson PLC, 5.5%, 2013 (n) | $ | 1,930,000 | $ | 2,106,705 | ||||
Pearson PLC, 4%, 2016 (n) | 2,500,000 | 2,652,645 | ||||||
$ | 4,759,350 | |||||||
Railroad & Shipping - 0.2% | ||||||||
CSX Corp., 7.375%, 2019 | $ | 560,000 | $ | 704,589 | ||||
Kansas City Southern, 7.375%, 2014 | 2,170,000 | 2,267,650 | ||||||
$ | 2,972,239 | |||||||
Real Estate - 2.3% | ||||||||
HRPT Properties Trust, REIT, 6.25%, 2016 | $ | 6,245,000 | $ | 6,628,274 | ||||
Liberty Property LP, REIT, 5.5%, 2016 | 4,340,000 | 4,849,993 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 5.75%, 2015 | 2,560,000 | 2,923,668 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 10.35%, 2019 | 5,828,000 | 8,238,408 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC, REIT, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | 7,693,000 | 9,062,662 | ||||||
$ | 31,703,005 | |||||||
Retailers - 1.7% | ||||||||
Limited Brands, Inc., 7%, 2020 | $ | 5,120,000 | $ | 5,632,000 | ||||
Macy’s, Inc., 6.625%, 2011 | 6,801,000 | 6,945,521 | ||||||
Staples, Inc., 7.75%, 2011 | 2,750,000 | 2,825,889 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Retailers - continued | ||||||||
Staples, Inc., 9.75%, 2014 | $ | 2,400,000 | $ | 2,972,796 | ||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | 4,170,000 | 4,668,048 | ||||||
$ | 23,044,254 | |||||||
Specialty Stores - 0.4% | ||||||||
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 5.75%, 2020 | $ | 5,476,000 | $ | 6,017,921 | ||||
Supermarkets - 0.2% | ||||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.7%, 2040 (z) | $ | 3,416,000 | $ | 3,343,905 | ||||
Supranational - 0.1% | ||||||||
Eurasian Development Bank, 7.375%, 2014 (n) | $ | 836,000 | $ | 923,780 | ||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 2.1% | ||||||||
American Tower Corp., 4.625%, 2015 | $ | 10,110,000 | $ | 10,892,170 | ||||
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.75%, 2017 (n) | 6,040,000 | 6,779,900 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 2020 (n) | 1,615,000 | 1,796,201 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.883%, 2020 (n) | 1,400,000 | 1,426,265 | ||||||
Indosat Palapa Co. B.V., 7.375%, 2020 (n) | 147,000 | 166,294 | ||||||
Rogers Cable, Inc., 5.5%, 2014 | 2,229,000 | 2,511,053 | ||||||
Rogers Wireless, Inc., 7.25%, 2012 | 3,315,000 | 3,737,493 | ||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 5.625%, 2017 | 1,452,000 | 1,677,544 | ||||||
$ | 28,986,920 | |||||||
Telephone Services - 0.3% | ||||||||
Embarq Corp., 7.082%, 2016 | $ | 3,710,000 | $ | 4,236,215 | ||||
Tobacco - 2.9% | ||||||||
Altria Group, Inc., 9.95%, 2038 | $ | 6,980,000 | $ | 10,055,416 | ||||
BAT International Finance PLC, 9.5%, 2018 (n) | 4,400,000 | 5,953,094 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 2019 | 11,036,000 | 12,750,917 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 7.25%, 2012 | 2,612,000 | 2,818,238 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 7,310,000 | 8,286,470 | ||||||
$ | 39,864,135 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.9% | ||||||||
Erac USA Finance Co., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | $ | 1,400,000 | $ | 1,637,531 | ||||
Erac USA Finance Co., 7%, 2037 (n) | 10,118,000 | 11,200,768 | ||||||
$ | 12,838,299 | |||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 5.0% | ||||||||
Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC, 8.25%, 2012 (n) | $ | 4,390,000 | $ | 4,743,369 | ||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 5.95%, 2017 | 4,600,000 | 5,141,080 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
��
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | ||||||||
CMS Energy Corp., 6.25%, 2020 | $ | 6,005,000 | $ | 6,388,203 | ||||
DPL, Inc., 6.875%, 2011 | 3,644,000 | 3,825,034 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 5.65%, 2013 | 6,240,000 | 6,961,169 | ||||||
EDP Finance B.V., 6%, 2018 (n) | 12,973,000 | 13,461,797 | ||||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 5.125%, 2019 (n) | 2,500,000 | 2,708,555 | ||||||
Enersis S.A., 7.375%, 2014 | 4,189,000 | 4,742,312 | ||||||
Entergy Corp., 5.125%, 2020 | 8,970,000 | 9,081,040 | ||||||
Oncor Electric Delivery Co., 6.8%, 2018 | 1,868,000 | 2,279,052 | ||||||
PSEG Power LLC, 5.32%, 2016 | 1,727,000 | 1,940,804 | ||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 (z) | 1,710,668 | 1,778,667 | ||||||
Waterford 3 Funding Corp., 8.09%, 2017 | 4,913,000 | 5,008,558 | ||||||
$ | 68,059,640 | |||||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,231,158,185) | $ | 1,320,039,712 | ||||||
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 0.4% | ||||||||
Automotive - 0.4% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan B, 3.03%, 2013 (Identified Cost, $4,559,781) | $ | 4,867,957 | $ | 4,817,223 | ||||
Money Market Funds (v) - 3.7% | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | 50,870,653 | $ | 50,870,653 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,286,588,619) | $ | 1,375,727,588 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (0.9)% | (12,248,994 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 1,363,478,594 |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $256,201,747, representing 18.8% of net assets. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Market Value | |||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “G”, 6.076%, 2045 | 9/21/04 | $2,034,826 | $225,750 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.616%, 2019 | 1/15/10 | 2,318,412 | 2,444,185 | |||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 | 9/30/10 | 8,486,738 | 8,548,867 | |||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.855%, 2040 | 3/15/10 | 2,218,632 | 991,728 | |||||||
Brazilian Merchant Voucher Receivables Ltd., 5.911%, 2011 | 7/02/03-3/08/07 | 1,070,198 | 1,085,990 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 | 9/14/10-9/16/10 | 8,478,047 | 8,469,596 | |||||||
Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 6.6%, 2029 | 6/07/00 | 1,046,981 | 1,106,883 | |||||||
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, 3.75%, 2020 | 10/28/10 | 1,822,333 | 1,838,416 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 | 3/02/10 | 2,042,412 | 2,393,463 | |||||||
DLJ Commercial Mortgage Corp., 6.04%, 2031 | 7/23/04 | 2,453,017 | 2,574,585 | |||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.7%, 2040 | 8/02/07-8/08/07 | 2,727,281 | 3,343,905 | |||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 6.375%, 2016 | 10/14/10-10/15/10 | 5,771,100 | 5,725,471 | |||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 7.375%, 2020 | 10/14/10 | 1,655,000 | 1,627,648 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, 6.5%, 2014 | 7/15/05-10/15/10 | 1,252,364 | 1,127,046 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.272%, 2025 | 1/29/03 | 1,125,049 | 948,299 | |||||||
GMAC LLC, FRN, 6.02%, 2033 | 3/20/02 | 4,140,000 | 4,275,581 | |||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 | 10/27/10 | 2,151,297 | 2,185,640 | |||||||
Gold Fields Orogen Holdings Ltd., 4.875%, 2020 | 9/30/10 | 5,143,779 | 5,084,356 | |||||||
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 6.125%, 2020 | 10/29/10 | 3,332,094 | 3,332,094 | |||||||
PNC Mortgage Acceptance Corp., 7.1%, 2032 | 3/25/08 | 2,468,718 | 2,468,705 | |||||||
Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corp., FRN, 7.285%, 2013 | 12/06/04 | 3,595,886 | 3,506,605 | |||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 3.375%, 2016 | 10/06/10 | 225,294 | 226,185 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Restricted Securities - continued | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Market Value | |||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 4.75%, 2021 | 10/06/10-10/07/10 | $1,995,232 | $1,971,074 | |||||||
Spirit Master Funding LLC, 5.05%, 2023 | 10/04/05 | 2,279,669 | 2,069,606 | |||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 | 4/16/04 | 1,710,668 | 1,778,667 | |||||||
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 5.5%, 2020 | 4/23/09-4/24/09 | 1,182,999 | 1,460,069 | |||||||
VTB Capital S.A., 6.551%, 2020 | 10/06/10 | 4,490,000 | 4,535,798 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $75,346,212 | |||||||||
% of Net Assets | 5.5% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Derivative Contracts at 10/31/10
Swap Agreements at 10/31/10
Expiration | Notional Amount | Counterparty | Cash Flows to Receive | Cash Flows to Pay | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Default Swaps | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12/20/12 | USD | 6,090,000 | Merrill Lynch International | 1.00% (fixed rate) | (1) | $(2,003,816 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Fund, as protection seller, to pay notional amount upon a defined credit event by MBIA, Inc., 9.375%, 2/15/11, a Ba3 rated bond. The fund entered into the contract to gain issuer exposure. |
The credit ratings presented here are an indicator of the current payment/performance risk of the related swap, the reference obligation for which may be either a single security or, in case of a credit default index, a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers. Each reference security, including each individual security within a reference basket of securities, is assigned a rating from Moody’s Investor Service. If not rated by Moody’s, the rating will be that assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Likewise, if not assigned by Standard & Poor’s, it will be based on the rating assigned by Fitch, Inc. The ratings for a credit default index are calculated by MFS as a weighted average of the external credit ratings of the individual securities that compose the index’s reference basket of securities.
At October 31, 2010, the fund had sufficient cash and/or other liquid securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
18
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,235,717,966) | $1,324,856,935 | |||
Underlying funds, at cost and value | 50,870,653 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,286,588,619) | $1,375,727,588 | |||
Cash | 3,755,612 | |||
Restricted cash | 2,030,000 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 22,137,746 | |||
Fund shares sold | 4,203,600 | |||
Interest and dividends | 19,774,333 | |||
Total assets | $1,427,628,879 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $1,151,639 | |||
Investments purchased | 56,131,636 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 4,255,119 | |||
Swaps, at value | 2,003,816 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 57,860 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 364,522 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 54,073 | |||
Administrative services fee | 1,958 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 67,473 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 62,189 | |||
Total liabilities | $64,150,285 | |||
Net assets | $1,363,478,594 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $1,335,772,458 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 87,135,153 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (61,935,053 | ) | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 2,506,036 | |||
Net assets | $1,363,478,594 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 99,861,373 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $903,651,602 | 66,146,311 | $13.66 | |||||||||
Class B | 67,753,006 | 4,972,937 | 13.62 | |||||||||
Class C | 142,868,778 | 10,498,836 | 13.61 | |||||||||
Class I | 49,062,072 | 3,590,527 | 13.66 | |||||||||
Class R1 | 10,885,076 | 799,277 | 13.62 | |||||||||
Class R2 | 70,093,578 | 5,132,104 | 13.66 | |||||||||
Class R3 | 48,735,517 | 3,567,826 | 13.66 | |||||||||
Class R4 | 70,428,965 | 5,153,555 | 13.67 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $14.34 [100 / 95.25 x $13.66]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, and R4. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
19
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses.
It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $38,075,192 | |||
Dividends | 13,954 | |||
Dividends from underlying funds | 51,130 | |||
Foreign taxes withheld | (18,182 | ) | ||
Total investment income | $38,122,094 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $2,463,077 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 2,293,919 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 968,873 | |||
Administrative services fee | 90,977 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 22,521 | |||
Custodian fee | 87,748 | |||
Shareholder communications | 35,838 | |||
Auditing fees | 29,872 | |||
Legal fees | 8,332 | |||
Miscellaneous | 95,947 | |||
Total expenses | $6,097,104 | |||
Fees paid indirectly | (3,156 | ) | ||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | (3,372 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $6,090,576 | |||
Net investment income | $32,031,518 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||
Investment transactions | $14,224,995 | |||
Swap transactions | 30,788 | |||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | $14,255,783 | |||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
Investments | $34,963,507 | |||
Swap transactions | 185,306 | |||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $35,148,813 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $49,404,596 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $81,436,114 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Year ended | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $32,031,518 | $62,847,751 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 14,255,783 | 43,796,906 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 35,148,813 | 157,354,633 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $81,436,114 | $263,999,290 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(34,475,673 | ) | $(63,421,130 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $123,706,593 | $23,081,433 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $170,667,034 | $223,659,593 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 1,192,811,560 | 969,151,967 | ||||||
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $2,506,036 and $4,950,191, respectively) | $1,363,478,594 | $1,192,811,560 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Class A | Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.17 | $10.95 | $12.18 | $12.69 | $12.38 | $12.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.35 | $0.71 | $0.64 | $0.64 | $0.66 | $0.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.51 | 2.23 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | 0.32 | (0.49 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.86 | $2.94 | $(0.58 | ) | $0.17 | $0.98 | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.37 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | $(0.65 | ) | $(0.68 | ) | $(0.67 | ) | $(0.68 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.66 | $13.17 | $10.95 | $12.18 | $12.69 | $12.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 6.65 | (n) | 27.35 | (4.61 | ) | 1.41 | 8.13 | 1.11 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.87 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.97 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.88 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 5.16 | (a) | 5.72 | 5.76 | 5.21 | 5.29 | 4.99 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $903,652 | $781,496 | $618,093 | $769,599 | $832,752 | $896,891 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Class B | Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.14 | $10.91 | $12.14 | $12.65 | $12.34 | $12.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.30 | $0.62 | $0.56 | $0.56 | $0.57 | $0.55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.50 | 2.23 | (1.22 | ) | (0.48 | ) | 0.32 | (0.48 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.80 | $2.85 | $(0.66 | ) | $0.08 | $0.89 | $0.07 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.62 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | $(0.58 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.62 | $13.14 | $10.91 | $12.14 | $12.65 | $12.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 6.19 | (n) | 26.60 | (5.32 | ) | 0.69 | 7.39 | 0.47 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.63 | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.54 | 1.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.43 | (a) | 5.00 | 5.06 | 4.52 | 4.60 | 4.28 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $67,753 | $62,341 | $67,149 | $98,671 | $164,852 | $230,360 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Class C | Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.12 | $10.90 | $12.13 | $12.63 | $12.33 | $12.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.30 | $0.62 | $0.56 | $0.56 | $0.57 | $0.54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.51 | 2.22 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | 0.31 | (0.48 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.81 | $2.84 | $(0.66 | ) | $0.09 | $0.88 | $0.06 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.62 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | $(0.58 | ) | $(0.58 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.61 | $13.12 | $10.90 | $12.13 | $12.63 | $12.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 6.27 | (n) | 26.52 | (5.33 | ) | 0.77 | 7.31 | 0.47 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.63 | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.54 | 1.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.43 | (a) | 4.97 | 5.09 | 4.52 | 4.59 | 4.29 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $142,869 | $117,744 | $74,651 | $75,666 | $79,473 | $79,921 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.18 | $12.70 | $12.39 | $12.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.36 | $0.74 | $0.67 | $0.68 | $0.70 | $0.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.51 | 2.24 | (1.21 | ) | (0.48 | ) | 0.32 | (0.47 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.87 | $2.98 | $(0.54 | ) | $0.20 | $1.02 | $0.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.75 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | $(0.71 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.66 | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.18 | $12.70 | $12.39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 6.70 | (n) | 27.76 | (4.32 | ) | 1.64 | 8.45 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 5.42 | (a) | 5.98 | 6.06 | 5.50 | 5.59 | 5.29 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $49,062 | $43,990 | $53,906 | $56,574 | $49,251 | $41,976 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.13 | $10.91 | $12.14 | $12.65 | $12.34 | $12.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.30 | $0.62 | $0.56 | $0.55 | $0.56 | $0.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.51 | 2.22 | (1.22 | ) | (0.48 | ) | 0.32 | (0.48 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.81 | $2.84 | $(0.66 | ) | $0.07 | $0.88 | $0.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.62 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.58 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.62 | $13.13 | $10.91 | $12.14 | $12.65 | $12.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 6.27 | (n) | 26.50 | (5.32 | ) | 0.61 | 7.29 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.75 | 1.81 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 1.70 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.46 | (a) | 4.99 | 5.09 | 4.42 | 4.49 | 4.28 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $10,885 | $10,941 | $7,912 | $8,351 | $3,612 | $1,900 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.17 | $12.69 | $12.38 | $12.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.33 | $0.68 | $0.62 | $0.59 | $0.62 | $0.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.52 | 2.24 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | 0.32 | (0.47 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.85 | $2.92 | $(0.60 | ) | $0.12 | $0.94 | $0.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.36 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.63 | ) | $(0.64 | ) | $(0.63 | ) | $(0.63 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.66 | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.17 | $12.69 | $12.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 6.52 | (n) | 27.16 | (4.82 | ) | 1.03 | 7.76 | 0.80 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.10 | (a) | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 1.42 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.10 | (a) | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.26 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 4.92 | (a) | 5.47 | 5.53 | 4.91 | 4.94 | 4.65 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $70,094 | $65,141 | $55,413 | $81,433 | $27,069 | $9,992 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R3 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.18 | $12.69 | $12.38 | $12.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.35 | $0.71 | $0.65 | $0.64 | $0.65 | $0.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.51 | 2.24 | (1.23 | ) | (0.47 | ) | 0.32 | (0.43 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.86 | $2.95 | $(0.58 | ) | $0.17 | $0.97 | $0.13 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.37 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | $(0.66 | ) | $(0.68 | ) | $(0.66 | ) | $(0.66 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.66 | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.18 | $12.69 | $12.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 6.65 | (n) | 27.47 | (4.65 | ) | 1.36 | 8.03 | 1.01 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 5.19 | (a) | 5.73 | 5.80 | 5.16 | 5.19 | 5.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $48,736 | $49,555 | $46,014 | $59,233 | $38,827 | $4,170 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Class R4 | Six months 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.19 | $12.70 | $12.38 | $12.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.36 | $0.74 | $0.67 | $0.67 | $0.68 | $0.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.52 | 2.24 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | 0.34 | (0.49 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.88 | $2.98 | $(0.55 | ) | $0.20 | $1.02 | $0.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.75 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.71 | ) | $(0.70 | ) | $(0.70 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $13.67 | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.19 | $12.70 | $12.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 6.78 | (n) | 27.76 | (4.40 | ) | 1.65 | 8.43 | 1.32 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.68 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 5.42 | (a) | 5.97 | 6.01 | 5.44 | 5.84 | 5.19 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 29 | 91 | 44 | 56 | 45 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $70,429 | $61,604 | $46,014 | $86,097 | $69,694 | $51 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Bond Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund can invest in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
30
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own
31
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2010 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | $— | $44,698,320 | $— | $44,698,320 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 973,525,973 | — | 973,525,973 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 1,724,881 | — | 1,724,881 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 64,679,204 | — | 64,679,204 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 18,495,501 | — | 18,495,501 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 216,915,833 | — | 216,915,833 | ||||||||||||
Floating Rate Loans | — | 4,817,223 | — | 4,817,223 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 50,870,653 | — | — | 50,870,653 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $50,870,653 | $1,324,856,935 | $— | $1,375,727,588 | ||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Swaps | $— | $(2,003,816 | ) | $— | $(2,003,816 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and
32
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
Derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract Tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Fair Value | ||||||
Risk | Derivative | Liability Derivatives | ||||
Credit Contracts | Credit Default Swaps | $(2,003,816) |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Swap Transactions | |||
Credit Contracts | $30,788 |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Swap Transactions | |||
Credit Contracts | $185,306 |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement
33
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Swap Agreements – The fund entered into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
34
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund entered into credit default swaps in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the contract notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although contract-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant contract. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Credit default swaps are considered to have credit-risk-related contingent features since they trigger payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event. The aggregate fair value of credit default swaps in a net liability position as of October 31, 2010 is disclosed in the footnotes to the Portfolio of Investments. As discussed earlier in this note, collateral requirements for these swaps are based generally on the market value of the swap netted against collateral requirements for other types of over-the-counter derivatives traded under each counterparty’s ISDA Master Agreement. The maximum amount of future, undiscounted payments that the fund, as protection seller, could be required to make is equal to the swap’s notional amount. The protection seller’s payment obligation would be offset to the extent of the value of the contract’s deliverable obligation. If a defined credit event had occurred as of October 31, 2010, the swaps’ credit-risk-related contingent features would have been triggered and, for those swaps in a net liability position for which the fund is the protection seller, the fund in order to settle these swaps would have been required to either (1) pay the swap’s notional value of $6,090,000 less the value of the contracts’ related deliverable
35
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
obligations as decided through an ISDA auction or (2) pay the notional value of the swaps in return for physical receipt of the deliverable obligations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
36
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2010, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities, and derivative transactions.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/10 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $63,421,130 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/10 | ||||
Cost of investments | $1,292,773,732 | |||
Gross appreciation | 97,114,663 | |||
Gross depreciation | (14,160,807 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $82,953,856 |
37
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
As of 4/30/10 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 8,269,362 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (65,947,324 | ) | ||
Post-October capital loss deferral | (4,702,648 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (5,515,398 | ) |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
As of April 30, 2010, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
4/30/11 | $(16,773,836 | ) | ||
4/30/15 | (9,364,882 | ) | ||
4/30/16 | (7,302,655 | ) | ||
4/30/17 | (32,505,951 | ) | ||
$(65,947,324 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||
Class A | $23,164,948 | $41,752,300 | ||||||
Class B | 1,559,225 | 3,335,362 | ||||||
Class C | 3,088,581 | 4,985,721 | ||||||
Class I | 1,330,268 | 3,236,336 | ||||||
Class R1 | 256,244 | 463,500 | ||||||
Class R2 | 1,802,274 | 3,534,665 | ||||||
Class R3 | 1,363,523 | 2,786,761 | ||||||
Class R4 | 1,910,610 | 3,326,485 | ||||||
Total | $34,475,673 | $63,421,130 |
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund.
The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at the following annual rates:
First $1.1 billion of average daily net assets | 0.39 | % | ||
Average daily net assets in excess of $1.1 billion | 0.38 | % |
The management fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.39% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $306,705 for the six months ended October 31, 2010, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | $1,043,320 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 324,001 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 642,495 | |||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 53,157 | |||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 169,695 | |||||||||||||||
Class R3 | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 61,251 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $2,293,919 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2010 based on each class’ average daily net assets. Assets attributable to Class A sold prior to March 1, 1991 are subject to a service fee of 0.15% annually. The agreement terminates on January 1, 2011. |
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $1,310 | |||
Class B | 54,637 | |||
Class C | 7,576 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fee was $339,710, which equated to 0.0536% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $629,163.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0144% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB Plan covers only certain of those
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB Plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB Plan resulted in a pension expense of $2,828 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $2,811. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended October 31, 2010. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under both Plans amounted to $67,373 at October 31, 2010, and is included in payable for independent Trustees’ compensation on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $4,648 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $3,372, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||
U.S. Government securities | $— | $4,406,994 | ||||||
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | $474,857,052 | $348,360,116 |
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 12,556,830 | $167,258,394 | 19,416,010 | $239,954,455 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 1,096,712 | 14,512,423 | 1,292,138 | 16,060,295 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 2,242,091 | 29,753,647 | 3,629,462 | 44,733,288 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 716,611 | 9,575,994 | 3,725,234 | 45,539,585 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 94,308 | 1,248,743 | 259,616 | 3,274,471 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 839,288 | 11,136,707 | 1,806,604 | 22,381,873 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 747,772 | 9,977,743 | 1,089,969 | 13,630,802 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 1,055,948 | 14,036,072 | 1,623,464 | 20,274,193 | ||||||||||||
19,349,560 | $257,499,723 | 32,842,497 | $405,848,962 | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,378,333 | $18,384,850 | 2,763,417 | $34,566,825 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 92,540 | 1,230,661 | 208,010 | 2,583,012 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 144,164 | 1,915,340 | 249,428 | 3,113,930 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 77,571 | 1,034,715 | 199,753 | 2,458,851 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 19,142 | 254,187 | 37,022 | 461,542 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 124,984 | 1,666,347 | 260,363 | 3,252,497 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 101,309 | 1,349,797 | 221,035 | 2,758,788 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 143,187 | 1,910,502 | 265,233 | 3,320,112 | ||||||||||||
2,081,230 | $27,746,399 | 4,204,261 | $52,515,557 | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (7,106,808 | ) | $(94,458,119 | ) | (19,332,511 | ) | $(239,931,445 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (961,209 | ) | (12,706,525 | ) | (2,907,792 | ) | (35,816,926 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (860,029 | ) | (11,380,477 | ) | (1,754,429 | ) | (21,756,626 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (541,786 | ) | (7,227,971 | ) | (5,510,672 | ) | (68,794,336 | ) | ||||||||
Class R1 | (147,278 | ) | (1,932,818 | ) | (188,800 | ) | (2,334,584 | ) | ||||||||
Class R2 | (777,841 | ) | (10,362,400 | ) | (2,185,333 | ) | (27,303,465 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | (1,042,979 | ) | (13,892,392 | ) | (1,753,887 | ) | (21,667,473 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | (719,974 | ) | (9,578,827 | ) | (1,417,165 | ) | (17,678,231 | ) | ||||||||
(12,157,904 | ) | $(161,539,529 | ) | (35,050,589 | ) | $(435,283,086 | ) |
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 6,828,355 | $91,185,125 | 2,846,916 | $34,589,835 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 228,043 | 3,036,559 | (1,407,644 | ) | (17,173,619 | ) | ||||||||||
Class C | 1,526,226 | 20,288,510 | 2,124,461 | 26,090,592 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 252,396 | 3,382,738 | (1,585,685 | ) | (20,795,900 | ) | ||||||||||
Class R1 | (33,828 | ) | (429,888 | ) | 107,838 | 1,401,429 | ||||||||||
Class R2 | 186,431 | 2,440,654 | (118,366 | ) | (1,669,095 | ) | ||||||||||
Class R3 | (193,898 | ) | (2,564,852 | ) | (442,883 | ) | (5,277,883 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | 479,161 | 6,367,747 | 471,532 | 5,916,074 | ||||||||||||
9,272,886 | $123,706,593 | 1,996,169 | $23,081,433 |
Class W shares were not available for sale during the period. Please see the fund’s prospectus for details.
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $6,416 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 9,937,864 | 335,354,586 | (294,421,797 | ) | 50,870,653 | |||||||||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $51,130 | $50,870,653 |
44
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2010 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2009 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers,
45
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile for each of the one and five-year periods ended December 31, 2009 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results are likely to differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
46
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was lower than the Lipper expense group median, and the Fund’s total expense ratio was approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is subject to a contractual breakpoint that reduces the Fund’s advisory fee rate on average daily net assets over $1.1 billion. The Trustees concluded that the existing breakpoint was sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economics of scale as its assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the
47
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2010.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
48
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
49
Table of Contents
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
10/31/10
MQL-SEM
Table of Contents
Dear Shareholders:
After an extended rebound in the financial markets, uncertainty returned in early 2010 as investors began to question the durability of the recovery for global economies and markets. That uncertainty led to increased risk aversion, especially as investors saw the eurozone struggle with the debt woes of many of its members. In September, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s promises to further loosen monetary policy helped assuage market fears and drive asset prices off their recent lows. A combination of solid earnings and improving economic data gave an additional boost to investor sentiment. As we near the end of 2010, we are cautiously optimistic that economic growth will continue to improve and that the global economies will recover from the shocks of the past few years. We expect the pace of recovery worldwide will be uneven and volatile.
As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is in times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with their advisors to research and identify investment opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 66.1% | |||
Non-U.S. Government Bonds | 13.6% | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 4.5% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | 3.5% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 3.0% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 2.3% | |||
U.S. Government Agencies | 2.0% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 1.2% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 0.7% | |||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | 0.3% | |||
U.S. Treasury Securities | (6.3)% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 17.5% | |||
AA | 17.1% | |||
A | 21.8% | |||
BBB | 33.4% | |||
BB | 1.0% | |||
B | 0.3% | |||
CCC | 0.4% | |||
CC | 0.2% | |||
C | 0.1% | |||
U.S. Agency (NR) | 4.9% | |||
Other Fixed Income (NR) | (5.8)% | |||
Cash & Other | 9.1% |
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 1.7 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 2.5 yrs. |
Issuer country weightings (i) | ||||
United States | 61.0% | |||
United Kingdom | 7.1% | |||
France | 4.2% | |||
Canada | 3.6% | |||
Netherlands | 2.9% | |||
Sweden | 2.3% | |||
Japan | 2.3% | |||
Australia | 2.2% | |||
Supranational | 1.8% | |||
Other Countries | 12.6% |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
(a) | The rating categories include debt securities, fixed-income structured products, and securities underlying credit default swaps where these have long-term public ratings. The credit default swap itself is not rated. All ratings are assigned in accordance with the following hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moody’s, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moody’s, then a Standard & Poor’s rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Ratings from Moody’s are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Agency (NR) includes unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Other Fixed Income (NR) includes unrated long-term fixed income securities, interest rate swaps and fixed income futures. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/10.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010.
The expenses include the payment of a portion of the transfer-agent-related expenses of MFS funds that invest in the fund. For further information, please see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Share Class | Annualized Expense Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/10 | Ending Account Value 10/31/10 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/10-10/31/10 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.74% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.53 | $3.77 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.74% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.48 | $3.77 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.52% | $1,000.00 | $1,018.66 | $7.73 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.52% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.54 | $7.73 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,018.23 | $8.09 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.19 | $8.08 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,023.31 | $3.01 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.23 | $3.01 | ||||||||||||||
R1 | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,018.23 | $8.14 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
R2 | Actual | 0.99% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.26 | $5.04 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.99% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.21 | $5.04 | ||||||||||||||
R3 | Actual | 0.84% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.03 | $4.28 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.84% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.97 | $4.28 | ||||||||||||||
R4 | Actual | 0.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,023.29 | $3.01 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.23 | $3.01 | ||||||||||||||
529A | Actual | 0.84% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.03 | $4.28 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.84% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.97 | $4.28 | ||||||||||||||
529B | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,018.24 | $8.14 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
529C | Actual | 1.69% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.70 | $8.59 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.69% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.69 | $8.59 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
Table of Contents
10/31/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 95.9% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 8.3% | ||||||||
Bank of Nova Scotia, 1.45%, 2013 (n) | $ | 5,540,000 | $ | 5,621,532 | ||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.566%, 2035 (z) | 1,492,243 | 1,077,955 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.526%, 2036 (z) | 1,259,496 | 981,305 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.415%, 2036 (i)(z) | 6,906,047 | 393,349 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.638%, 2036 | 2,370,000 | 2,041,027 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2041 | 1,910,434 | 1,907,715 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.855%, 2040 (z) | 1,062,366 | 474,878 | ||||||
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust, 0.58%, 2012 | 3,700,000 | 3,702,395 | ||||||
BNP Paribas Home Loan, 2.2%, 2015 (z) | 4,260,000 | 4,283,741 | ||||||
Brascan Real Estate, CDO, FRN, 1.889%, 2040 (z) | 1,526,000 | 534,100 | ||||||
Brazilian Merchant Voucher Receivables Ltd., 5.911%, 2011 (z) | 571,602 | 580,176 | ||||||
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2%, 2013 (n) | 1,496,000 | 1,535,384 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (z) | 4,120,000 | 4,120,000 | ||||||
Chrysler Financial Auto Securitization Trust, 0.69%, 2013 | 3,500,000 | 3,501,611 | ||||||
Chrysler Financial Auto Securitization Trust, “A2”, 1.15%, 2011 | 3,229,271 | 3,235,004 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.841%, 2032 (i)(z) | 18,330,644 | 378,251 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, FRN, 0.446%, 2017 (n) | 3,400,000 | 3,181,779 | ||||||
Compagnie de Financement Foncier, 2.125%, 2013 (n) | 3,500,000 | 3,573,980 | ||||||
Compagnie de Financement Foncier, FRN, 1.038%, 2012 (n) | 4,700,000 | 4,694,125 | ||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., FRN, 0.826%, 2011 | 252,536 | 246,854 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, 5.476%, 2037 | 2,830,000 | 1,339,464 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.303%, 2035 | 1,169,331 | 1,151,717 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.419%, 2037 | 4,000,000 | 2,249,264 | ||||||
Crest G-Star, 2001-1A, “A”, CDO, 0.769%, 2016 (z) | 3,614,911 | 3,434,166 | ||||||
E*TRADE RV & Marine Trust, 3.62%, 2018 | 338,928 | 339,667 | ||||||
Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust, “A2”, 0.75%, 2012 (z) | 4,800,000 | 4,778,446 | ||||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust, “A2”, 1.21%, 2012 | 843,997 | 844,586 | ||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.608%, 2035 (z) | 2,141,767 | 1,606,325 | ||||||
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., 4.26%, 2014 (n) | 2,990,000 | 3,139,994 | ||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 (z) | 1,570,000 | 1,604,390 | ||||||
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, “A2”, 1.5%, 2011 | 241,131 | 241,289 | ||||||
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, “A2”, 2.22%, 2011 | 16,401 | 16,414 | ||||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust, “A2”, 1.11%, 2012 | 1,385,653 | 1,387,470 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 0.996%, 2034 | $ | 443,418 | $ | 396,744 | ||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 1.176%, 2034 | 466,755 | 305,842 | ||||||
IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., FRN, 0.606%, 2036 | 1,524,722 | 1,286,333 | ||||||
Interstar Millennium Trust, FRN, 0.692%, 2036 | 589,565 | 574,404 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.298%, 2047 | 5,000,000 | 5,108,585 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.318%, 2037 | 5,000,000 | 5,095,441 | ||||||
JPMorgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., FRN, 5.532%, 2036 | 3,700,000 | 3,388,331 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.36%, 2035 (i) | 4,843,968 | 267,955 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., 5.45%, 2037 | 2,126,214 | 652,010 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.878%, 2046 | 4,970,000 | 5,021,087 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.217%, 2031 (i)(z) | 1,869,238 | 44,559 | ||||||
Nationslink Funding Corp., FRN, 1.204%, 2030 (i) | 3,495,181 | 97,059 | ||||||
Nissan Auto Lease Trust, “A2”, 1.22%, 2011 | 1,309,325 | 1,310,640 | ||||||
Option One Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 5.611%, 2037 | 1,990,000 | 819,464 | ||||||
Ownit Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.29%, 2036 | 2,710,177 | 1,702,108 | ||||||
Popular ABS Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 4.62%, 2035 | 335,508 | 335,823 | ||||||
Stadshypotek AB, 0.839%, 2013 (z) | 4,200,000 | 4,200,018 | ||||||
Structured Asset Securities Corp., FRN, 4.67%, 2035 | 243,668 | 241,905 | ||||||
Structured Asset Securities Corp., FRN, 0.496%, 2035 | 104,053 | 100,685 | ||||||
Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust, FRN, 0.936%, 2043 | 1,957,036 | 1,822,204 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.275%, 2048 | 6,000,000 | 6,145,606 | ||||||
$ | 107,115,156 | |||||||
Automotive - 1.7% | ||||||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 2.375%, 2013 (n) | $ | 4,050,000 | $ | 4,153,016 | ||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 1.625%, 2013 (z) | 1,800,000 | 1,819,699 | ||||||
BMW US Capital LLC, 4.25%, 2011 | 1,900,000 | 1,959,626 | ||||||
Johnson Controls, Inc., 5.25%, 2011 | 4,440,000 | 4,481,328 | ||||||
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 5.625%, 2011 (n) | 3,289,000 | 3,347,817 | ||||||
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 3.25%, 2013 (n) | 1,500,000 | 1,548,453 | ||||||
Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 5.125%, 2011 | 3,246,000 | 3,366,852 | ||||||
Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 3.2%, 2015 | 1,270,000 | 1,359,541 | ||||||
$ | 22,036,332 | |||||||
Broadcasting - 0.4% | ||||||||
CBS Corp., 6.625%, 2011 | $ | 2,650,000 | $ | 2,730,883 | ||||
NBC Universal, Inc., 2.1%, 2014 (z) | 2,100,000 | 2,125,261 | ||||||
$ | 4,856,144 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.8% | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc., 3.5%, 2014 | $ | 3,700,000 | $ | 3,934,469 | ||||
Franklin Resources, Inc., 2%, 2013 | 3,290,000 | 3,370,332 | ||||||
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corp., 2.95%, 2012 | 2,548,000 | 2,619,382 | ||||||
$ | 9,924,183 | |||||||
Building - 0.7% | ||||||||
CRH America, Inc., 6.95%, 2012 | $ | 2,700,000 | $ | 2,872,001 | ||||
CRH America, Inc., 5.3%, 2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,506,964 | ||||||
Lafarge S.A., 6.15%, 2011 | 4,410,000 | 4,561,647 | ||||||
$ | 8,940,612 | |||||||
Cable TV - 1.3% | ||||||||
Comcast Corp., 5.45%, 2010 | $ | 5,100,000 | $ | 5,108,481 | ||||
Comcast Corp., 5.3%, 2014 | 2,250,000 | 2,514,463 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 4.75%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,293,169 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5.4%, 2012 | 5,409,000 | 5,785,953 | ||||||
$ | 16,702,066 | |||||||
Chemicals - 1.6% | ||||||||
Dow Chemical Co., 7.6%, 2014 | $ | 6,030,000 | $ | 7,094,627 | ||||
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc., 7.75%, 2011 | 4,032,000 | 4,195,377 | ||||||
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 | 3,210,000 | 3,548,889 | ||||||
PPG Industries, Inc., 5.75%, 2013 | 5,201,000 | 5,696,692 | ||||||
$ | 20,535,585 | |||||||
Computer Software - 0.7% | ||||||||
Adobe Systems, Inc., 3.25%, 2015 | $ | 3,785,000 | $ | 3,976,536 | ||||
Oracle Corp., 3.75%, 2014 | 4,430,000 | 4,827,650 | ||||||
$ | 8,804,186 | |||||||
Conglomerates - 0.6% | ||||||||
Eaton Corp., 4.9%, 2013 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,185,738 | ||||
Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Co. Ltd., 6%, 2013 | 2,575,000 | 2,889,724 | ||||||
Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Co. Ltd., 9.5%, 2014 | 1,025,000 | 1,270,196 | ||||||
Textron Financial Corp., 5.125%, 2010 | 1,810,000 | 1,810,000 | ||||||
$ | 8,155,658 | |||||||
Consumer Products - 2.0% | ||||||||
Clorox Co., 5%, 2013 | $ | 5,850,000 | $ | 6,359,161 | ||||
Fortune Brands, Inc., 5.125%, 2011 | 4,692,000 | 4,728,752 | ||||||
Mattel, Inc., 6.125%, 2011 | 2,250,000 | 2,315,770 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 4,360,000 | 4,744,997 | ||||||
Phillips Electronics N.V., 7.25%, 2013 | 400,000 | 466,003 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Consumer Products - continued | ||||||||
Royal Philips Electronics N.V., 4.625%, 2013 | $ | 3,980,000 | $ | 4,314,710 | ||||
Whirlpool Corp., 8%, 2012 | 2,971,000 | 3,241,961 | ||||||
$ | 26,171,354 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 0.7% | ||||||||
Ebay Inc., 0.875%, 2013 | $ | 3,050,000 | $ | 3,054,996 | ||||
Western Union Co., 5.4%, 2011 | 5,500,000 | 5,758,286 | ||||||
$ | 8,813,282 | |||||||
Defense Electronics - 0.5% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.4%, 2011 (n) | $ | 3,495,000 | $ | 3,667,684 | ||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 4.95%, 2014 (n) | 2,240,000 | 2,479,496 | ||||||
$ | 6,147,180 | |||||||
Electronics - 0.5% | ||||||||
Broadcom Corp., 1.5%, 2013 (z) | $ | 1,400,000 | $ | 1,406,436 | ||||
Tyco Electronics Ltd., 6%, 2012 | 4,751,000 | 5,144,905 | ||||||
$ | 6,551,341 | |||||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.1% | ||||||||
Korea Expressway Corp., 4.5%, 2015 (n) | $ | 2,479,000 | $ | 2,643,184 | ||||
Mubadala Development Co., 5.75%, 2014 (n) | 3,197,000 | 3,525,469 | ||||||
National Agricultural Co., 5%, 2014 (n) | 2,541,000 | 2,724,902 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 6.5%, 2014 (n) | 2,365,000 | 2,654,873 | ||||||
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 8.294%, 2014 (n) | 2,499,000 | 2,770,766 | ||||||
$ | 14,319,194 | |||||||
Emerging Market Sovereign - 0.4% | ||||||||
State of Qatar, 5.15%, 2014 (n) | $ | 1,588,000 | $ | 1,734,890 | ||||
State of Qatar, 5.15%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,277,500 | ||||||
$ | 5,012,390 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 0.4% | ||||||||
Encana Corp., 6.3%, 2011 | $ | 3,200,000 | $ | 3,367,798 | ||||
EnCana Holdings Finance Corp., 5.8%, 2014 | 1,535,000 | 1,749,209 | ||||||
$ | 5,117,007 | |||||||
Energy - Integrated - 3.0% | ||||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 3.125%, 2015 | $ | 5,300,000 | $ | 5,439,406 | ||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc., 4.5%, 2014 | 2,170,000 | 2,397,099 | ||||||
ConocoPhillips, 5.5%, 2013 | 1,700,000 | 1,884,278 | ||||||
ConocoPhillips, 4.75%, 2014 | 1,740,000 | 1,937,746 | ||||||
Hess Corp., 7%, 2014 | 3,740,000 | 4,379,993 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Energy - Integrated - continued | ||||||||
Husky Energy, Inc., 5.9%, 2014 | $ | 2,965,000 | $ | 3,316,670 | ||||
Petro-Canada, 5%, 2014 | 2,950,000 | 3,266,868 | ||||||
Royal Dutch Shell PLC, 3.1%, 2015 | 5,780,000 | 6,129,257 | ||||||
Statoil A.S.A., 2.9%, 2014 | 4,380,000 | 4,632,980 | ||||||
TNK-BP Finance S.A., 6.875%, 2011 (n) | 2,060,000 | 2,124,375 | ||||||
TOTAL S.A., 3%, 2015 | 2,810,000 | 2,957,935 | ||||||
$ | 38,466,607 | |||||||
Financial Institutions - 1.7% | ||||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.45%, 2013 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 653,233 | ||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 4.8%, 2013 | 1,820,000 | 1,969,180 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 1.875%, 2013 | 3,030,000 | 3,066,121 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN, 0.338%, 2011 | 2,630,000 | 2,630,395 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN, 0.373%, 2011 | 2,230,000 | 2,231,111 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN, 0.596%, 2012 | 1,570,000 | 1,555,120 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 5.35%, 2012 | 3,340,000 | 3,398,450 | ||||||
NYSE Euronext, Inc., 4.8%, 2013 | 3,230,000 | 3,532,399 | ||||||
ORIX Corp., 5.48%, 2011 | 3,240,000 | 3,364,170 | ||||||
$ | 22,400,179 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 5.4% | ||||||||
Anheuser Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., FRN, 1.019%, 2013 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,017,152 | ||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 3%, 2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,078,832 | ||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.2%, 2014 (n) | 3,760,000 | 4,407,724 | ||||||
Brown-Forman Corp., 5.2%, 2012 | 3,780,000 | 4,001,054 | ||||||
Cargill, Inc, 6.375%, 2012 (n) | 350,000 | 377,746 | ||||||
Cargill, Inc., 5.2%, 2013 (n) | 3,400,000 | 3,684,050 | ||||||
Conagra Foods, Inc., 5.875%, 2014 | 4,000,000 | 4,558,180 | ||||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 5.125%, 2012 | 7,130,000 | 7,520,959 | ||||||
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 1.7%, 2011 | 3,160,000 | 3,181,693 | ||||||
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 2.35%, 2012 | 2,240,000 | 2,301,118 | ||||||
General Mills, Inc., 5.25%, 2013 | 2,100,000 | 2,346,872 | ||||||
H.J. Heinz Co., 6.625%, 2011 | 1,670,000 | 1,737,977 | ||||||
H.J. Heinz Co., 5.35%, 2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,658,859 | ||||||
Kellogg Co., 6.6%, 2011 | 3,850,000 | 3,949,353 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.25%, 2012 | 2,820,000 | 3,056,609 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 2.625%, 2013 | 2,000,000 | 2,078,206 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.75%, 2014 | 1,100,000 | 1,285,299 | ||||||
Miller Brewing Co., 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 6,225,000 | 6,856,458 | ||||||
PepsiAmericas Inc., 4.5%, 2013 | 3,000,000 | 3,246,753 | ||||||
Pepsico Inc., 0.875%, 2013 | 1,800,000 | 1,804,406 | ||||||
SABMiller PLC, 6.2%, 2011 (n) | 1,050,000 | 1,086,135 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Food & Beverages - continued | ||||||||
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 2.45%, 2012 (n) | $ | 6,163,000 | $ | 6,225,240 | ||||
$ | 69,460,675 | |||||||
Food & Drug Stores - 0.4% | ||||||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 5.75%, 2011 | $ | 2,240,000 | $ | 2,326,988 | ||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 3.25%, 2015 | 2,372,000 | 2,494,825 | ||||||
$ | 4,821,813 | |||||||
Gaming & Lodging - 0.2% | ||||||||
Marriott International, Inc., 5.625%, 2013 | $ | 2,370,000 | $ | 2,567,724 | ||||
Industrial - 0.8% | ||||||||
Cornell University, 4.35%, 2014 | $ | 3,070,000 | $ | 3,385,043 | ||||
Duke University Taxable Bonds, “A”, 4.2%, 2014 | 1,560,000 | 1,724,221 | ||||||
President & Fellows Harvard College, 5%, 2014 (n) | 2,300,000 | 2,581,244 | ||||||
Steelcase, Inc., 6.5%, 2011 | 2,114,000 | 2,171,797 | ||||||
$ | 9,862,305 | |||||||
Insurance - 2.9% | ||||||||
Aflac Inc., 3.45%, 2015 | $ | 3,840,000 | $ | 4,013,729 | ||||
ING Bank N.V., FRN, 0.919%, 2012 (n) | 2,250,000 | 2,248,243 | ||||||
Lincoln National Corp., 4.3%, 2015 | 2,060,000 | 2,192,992 | ||||||
Metlife, Inc., FRN, 1.674%, 2013 | 5,570,000 | 5,647,228 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 2.875%, 2012 (n) | 2,120,000 | 2,186,182 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2013 (n) | 2,250,000 | 2,450,736 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 1,450,000 | 1,616,605 | ||||||
New York Life Global Funding, 4.65%, 2013 (n) | 4,262,000 | 4,622,442 | ||||||
Pricoa Global Funding, 4.625%, 2012 (n) | 740,000 | 782,119 | ||||||
Pricoa Global Funding, FRN, 0.388%, 2012 (n) | 2,970,000 | 2,949,857 | ||||||
Principal Financial Group, Inc., 7.875%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,545,994 | ||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 3.625%, 2012 | 1,770,000 | 1,840,163 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 2,569,000 | 2,905,760 | ||||||
$ | 37,002,050 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 1.2% | ||||||||
Aetna, Inc., 7.875%, 2011 | $ | 3,915,000 | $ | 4,008,291 | ||||
Aetna, Inc., 5.75%, 2011 | 2,350,000 | 2,423,224 | ||||||
Unitedhealth Group, Inc., 4.875%, 2013 | 4,500,000 | 4,837,874 | ||||||
WellPoint, Inc., 6.8%, 2012 | 3,580,000 | 3,930,543 | ||||||
$ | 15,199,932 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.7% | ||||||||
Allstate Corp., 6.2%, 2014 | $ | 1,490,000 | $ | 1,736,708 | ||||
Aon Corp., 3.5%, 2015 | 3,200,000 | 3,302,528 | ||||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | 3,480,000 | 3,720,162 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust IV, 5.875% to 2012, FRN to 2062 (n) | 648,000 | 617,771 | ||||||
$ | 9,377,169 | |||||||
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 10.7% | ||||||||
Achmea Hypotheekbank N.V., FRN, 0.804%, 2014 (n) | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,493,105 | ||||
ANZ National Bank Ltd. Group, 3.25%, 2012 (n) | 4,290,000 | 4,445,963 | ||||||
Bank of England, 2.375%, 2012 (n) | 2,400,000 | 2,458,277 | ||||||
Bank of Ireland, 2.75%, 2012 (n) | 2,190,000 | 2,115,321 | ||||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 2.4%, 2012 (n) | 1,950,000 | 1,990,950 | ||||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 2.9%, 2014 (n) | 2,000,000 | 2,117,954 | ||||||
Danske Bank A/S, FRN, 0.679%, 2012 (n) | 5,170,000 | 5,158,321 | ||||||
Dexia Credit Local, FRN, 0.94%, 2011 (n) | 7,370,000 | 7,394,151 | ||||||
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.125%, 2011 | 3,780,000 | 3,953,464 | ||||||
Electricite de France PLC, 5.5%, 2014 (n) | 3,910,000 | 4,414,273 | ||||||
Finance for Danish Industry A.S., FRN, 0.619%, 2012 (n) | 3,790,000 | 3,813,911 | ||||||
Finance for Danish Industry A.S., FRN, 0.523%, 2012 (n) | 2,590,000 | 2,589,386 | ||||||
Finance for Danish Industry A.S., FRN, 0.663%, 2013 (z) | 3,500,000 | 3,495,566 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 2.625%, 2012 (n) | 4,770,000 | 4,868,238 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 3.9%, 2014 (n) | 3,700,000 | 4,049,817 | ||||||
Irish Life & Permanent PLC, 3.6%, 2013 (e)(n) | 5,300,000 | 4,965,665 | ||||||
Japan Finance Corp., 2%, 2011 | 3,680,000 | 3,715,762 | ||||||
KfW Bankengruppe, 1.875%, 2011 | 2,870,000 | 2,886,411 | ||||||
KfW Bankengruppe, 1.375%, 2013 | 6,900,000 | 7,033,094 | ||||||
KfW Bankengruppe, 3.5%, 2014 | 3,066,000 | 3,333,662 | ||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, 1.75%, 2015 (z) | 1,000,000 | 1,006,027 | ||||||
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, 4.125%, 2013 | 4,040,000 | 4,396,578 | ||||||
LeasePlan Corp. N.V., 3%, 2012 (n) | 1,600,000 | 1,653,059 | ||||||
Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, FRN, 1.29%, 2012 (n) | 4,330,000 | 4,375,738 | ||||||
Macquarie Bank, 2.6%, 2012 (n) | 2,680,000 | 2,744,784 | ||||||
National Australia Bank Ltd., 2.55%, 2012 (n) | 1,950,000 | 1,995,698 | ||||||
Nationwide Building Society, FRN, 0.549%, 2012 (n) | 7,000,000 | 6,987,526 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, FRN, 1.098%, 2012 (n) | 5,406,000 | 5,434,868 | ||||||
Societe Financement de l’ Economie Francaise, 3.375%, 2014 (n) | 7,550,000 | 8,159,942 | ||||||
Swedbank AB, 2.8%, 2012 (n) | 780,000 | 802,388 | ||||||
Swedish Export Credit Corp., FRN, 1.126%, 2014 | 8,640,000 | 8,788,928 | ||||||
Swedish Housing Finance Corp., 3.125%, 2012 (n) | 4,740,000 | 4,906,075 | ||||||
Vestjysk Bank A/S, FRN, 0.842%, 2013 (z) | 2,940,000 | 2,965,399 | ||||||
Westpac Banking Corp., 3.25%, 2011 (n) | 1,800,000 | 1,850,274 | ||||||
Westpac Banking Corp., 3.45%, 2014 (n) | 3,370,000 | 3,588,602 | ||||||
$ | 136,949,177 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
International Market Sovereign - 1.0% | ||||||||
Kingdom of Belgium, 2.875%, 2014 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,607,495 | ||||
Kingdom of Spain, 2%, 2012 (n) | 2,700,000 | 2,704,963 | ||||||
Kingdom of Spain, 3.625%, 2013 | 6,790,000 | 6,986,007 | ||||||
$ | 12,298,465 | |||||||
Local Authorities - 0.8% | ||||||||
Louisiana Gas & Fuels Tax Rev. (Build America Bonds), FRN, 2.756%, 2043 | $ | 3,730,000 | $ | 3,768,494 | ||||
Province of Ontario, 5%, 2011 | 5,000,000 | 5,223,225 | ||||||
Province of Ontario, 2.625%, 2012 | 1,050,000 | 1,078,544 | ||||||
$ | 10,070,263 | |||||||
Major Banks - 9.0% | ||||||||
ANZ National (International) Ltd., 2.375%, 2012 (n) | $ | 2,300,000 | $ | 2,348,762 | ||||
BAC Capital Trust XIV, 5.63% to 2012, FRN to 2049 | 3,700,000 | 2,617,750 | ||||||
Banco Santander Chile, 1.29%, 2011 (z) | 1,350,000 | 1,349,411 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 7.375%, 2014 | 1,075,000 | 1,218,674 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 4.5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,041,365 | ||||||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp., 4.3%, 2014 | 2,010,000 | 2,203,366 | ||||||
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, 2.6%, 2013 (n) | 4,070,000 | 4,200,464 | ||||||
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, 1.6%, 2013 (z) | 1,960,000 | 1,979,561 | ||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 2.5%, 2013 | 2,100,000 | 2,160,482 | ||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 5.2%, 2014 | 3,660,000 | 4,078,279 | ||||||
BB&T Corp., 3.85%, 2012 | 5,080,000 | 5,330,500 | ||||||
BNP Paribas, 2.125%, 2012 | 3,250,000 | 3,327,106 | ||||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 3.75%, 2014 (n) | 4,574,000 | 4,885,146 | ||||||
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 4%, 2011 | 3,000,000 | 3,038,721 | ||||||
Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., 6.125%, 2011 | 5,039,000 | 5,318,589 | ||||||
Credit Suisse New York, 5.5%, 2014 | 2,270,000 | 2,554,515 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 6%, 2014 | 3,930,000 | 4,414,946 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 2.65%, 2013 (n) | 1,850,000 | 1,881,576 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 1.609%, 2013 (z) | 4,750,000 | 4,743,184 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 5.375%, 2012 | 1,500,000 | 1,622,864 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., FRN, 0.957%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,014,316 | ||||||
KeyCorp, 3.75%, 2015 | 3,850,000 | 3,963,756 | ||||||
Kookmin Bank, 7.25%, 2014 (n) | 2,200,000 | 2,544,390 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.15%, 2013 | 3,710,000 | 4,021,187 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.75%, 2011 | 3,920,000 | 4,026,781 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6%, 2014 | 2,060,000 | 2,266,325 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6%, 2015 | 3,290,000 | 3,656,950 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 3.625%, 2015 | 2,300,000 | 2,434,299 | ||||||
Santander UK PLC, 3.875%, 2014 (n) | 4,525,000 | 4,668,307 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Major Banks - continued | ||||||||
Societe Generale North America, Inc., 0.635%, 2012 | $ | 6,180,000 | $ | 6,178,461 | ||||
Standard Chartered PLC, 3.85%, 2015 (n) | 3,730,000 | 3,941,976 | ||||||
State Street Corp., 4.3%, 2014 | 3,750,000 | 4,142,794 | ||||||
Wachovia Corp., 5.5%, 2013 | 2,250,000 | 2,475,191 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 4.375%, 2013 | 4,530,000 | 4,840,672 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 3.75%, 2014 | 1,350,000 | 1,444,087 | ||||||
$ | 114,934,753 | |||||||
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.5% | ||||||||
CareFusion Corp., 4.125%, 2012 | $ | 1,490,000 | $ | 1,562,712 | ||||
Covidien International Finance SA, 5.45%, 2012 | 1,896,000 | 2,063,997 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., 2.15%, 2012 | 2,900,000 | 2,959,105 | ||||||
$ | 6,585,814 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 0.8% | ||||||||
Anglo American Capital, 2.15%, 2013 (z) | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,033,716 | ||||
ArcelorMittal, 3.75%, 2015 | 2,250,000 | 2,316,940 | ||||||
BHP Billiton Finance Ltd., 5.5%, 2014 | 2,250,000 | 2,547,992 | ||||||
International Steel Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | 2,710,000 | 3,014,160 | ||||||
Vale Inco Ltd., 7.75%, 2012 | 420,000 | 457,112 | ||||||
$ | 10,369,920 | |||||||
Mortgage-Backed - 4.5% | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.022%, 2010 | $ | 4,685,489 | $ | 4,685,485 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 5.899%, 2011 | 1,517,717 | 1,548,060 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.13%, 2011 | 1,107,709 | 1,138,578 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 2014-2026 | 5,567,447 | 6,005,981 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 7%, 2015-2016 | 921,572 | 1,005,699 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4%, 2016 | 344,697 | 347,426 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.5%, 2016-2023 | 6,413,807 | 6,787,147 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.725%, 2016 | 2,137,138 | 2,372,440 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2016-2017 | 2,021,504 | 2,224,297 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2017 | 2,369,212 | 2,578,152 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2018-2025 | 2,469,540 | 2,654,385 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2023 (f) | 4,543,224 | 4,844,813 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, FRN, 2.5%, 2033 | 1,249,579 | 1,303,454 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, FRN, 2.58%, 2033 | 246,963 | 258,376 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, FRN, 2.71%, 2033 | 143,767 | 150,056 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 7.5%, 2015 | 313,306 | 340,319 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 6%, 2016-2017 | 1,730,450 | 1,884,242 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5.5%, 2017-2025 | 6,359,987 | 6,889,703 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5%, 2018-2028 | 8,722,041 | 9,208,237 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.5%, 2026 | 331,407 | 333,339 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Mortgage-Backed - continued | ||||||||
Freddie Mac, FRN, 0.706%, 2031 | $ | 404,295 | $ | 404,392 | ||||
Ginnie Mae, 7.5%, 2011 | 8,834 | 8,870 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, FRN, 3.625%, 2032 | 208,972 | 216,062 | ||||||
$ | 57,189,513 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 2.0% | ||||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 7.75%, 2011 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 4,591,040 | ||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 5.65%, 2012 | 2,750,000 | 2,922,312 | ||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 8.5%, 2014 | 2,500,000 | 2,974,780 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 3.7%, 2015 | 4,320,000 | 4,581,295 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, 5.85%, 2012 | 3,000,000 | 3,244,872 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Finance Corp., 5.35%, 2011 | 3,264,000 | 3,288,480 | ||||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd., 3.4%, 2015 | 4,100,000 | 4,403,437 | ||||||
$ | 26,006,216 | |||||||
Network & Telecom - 2.7% | ||||||||
AT&T, Inc., 6.7%, 2013 | $ | 1,390,000 | $ | 1,612,399 | ||||
British Telecommunications PLC, 9.375%, 2010 | 1,872,000 | 1,891,349 | ||||||
British Telecommunications PLC, 5.15%, 2013 | 799,000 | 861,809 | ||||||
CenturyLink, Inc., 7.875%, 2012 | 3,420,000 | 3,736,080 | ||||||
Deutsche Telekom International Finance B.V., 5.375%, 2011 | 4,500,000 | 4,584,524 | ||||||
France Telecom, 4.375%, 2014 | 2,390,000 | 2,639,449 | ||||||
France Telecom, 2.125%, 2015 | 1,900,000 | 1,925,804 | ||||||
Telecom Italia Capital, 5.25%, 2013 | 1,900,000 | 2,066,037 | ||||||
Telefonica Emisiones S.A.U., 5.984%, 2011 | 3,300,000 | 3,407,603 | ||||||
TELUS Corp., 8%, 2011 | 2,458,000 | 2,558,965 | ||||||
Verizon Communications, Inc, 5.25%, 2013 | 2,770,000 | 3,061,105 | ||||||
Verizon New England, Inc., 6.5%, 2011 | 2,020,000 | 2,116,722 | ||||||
Verizon Wireless Capital LLC, FRN, 2.945%, 2011 | 3,750,000 | 3,802,504 | ||||||
$ | 34,264,350 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.2% | ||||||||
Noble Corp., 3.45%, 2015 | $ | 2,270,000 | $ | 2,405,326 | ||||
Oils - 0.3% | ||||||||
Premcor Refing Group, Inc., 6.125%, 2011 | $ | 3,514,000 | $ | 3,596,382 | ||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 3.9% | ||||||||
American Express Centurion Bank, 5.55%, 2012 | $ | 2,870,000 | $ | 3,087,202 | ||||
American Express Centurion Bank, 5.5%, 2013 | 1,240,000 | 1,352,314 | ||||||
Banco Santander Chile, 2.875%, 2012 (n) | 3,418,000 | 3,442,634 | ||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 2.991%, 2013 (z) | 3,100,000 | 3,116,232 | ||||||
Bosphorus Financial Services Ltd., FRN, 2.176%, 2012 (z) | 637,500 | 626,902 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - continued | ||||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 5.7%, 2011 | $ | 3,130,000 | $ | 3,252,893 | ||||
Citigroup, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 4,770,000 | 5,164,336 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.375%, 2014 | 2,380,000 | 2,671,319 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.01%, 2015 | 1,880,000 | 2,083,474 | ||||||
Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, 4.375%, 2015 (n) | 4,660,000 | 4,885,698 | ||||||
Nordea Bank AB, 1.75%, 2013 (z) | 4,800,000 | 4,824,130 | ||||||
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 4.2%, 2014 (n) | 3,770,000 | 4,105,847 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, 2.875%, 2012 (n) | 2,000,000 | 2,060,872 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, 4.875%, 2014 (n) | 3,330,000 | 3,666,983 | ||||||
UBS AG, 2.25%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,086,756 | ||||||
Woori Bank, FRN, 0.652%, 2011 | 2,000,000 | 1,965,288 | ||||||
$ | 50,392,880 | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 2.9% | ||||||||
AstraZeneca PLC, 5.4%, 2012 | $ | 1,210,000 | $ | 1,317,689 | ||||
Celgene Corp., 2.45%, 2015 | 3,092,000 | 3,107,772 | ||||||
Eli Lilly & Co., 3.55%, 2012 | 1,480,000 | 1,535,704 | ||||||
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, 4.85%, 2013 | 532,000 | 585,661 | ||||||
Novartis AG, 1.9%, 2013 | 2,000,000 | 2,058,636 | ||||||
Novartis AG, 4.125%, 2014 | 2,500,000 | 2,736,930 | ||||||
Pfizer, Inc., 4.45%, 2012 | 3,740,000 | 3,935,116 | ||||||
Roche Holding, Inc., 5%, 2014 (n) | 8,209,000 | 9,206,919 | ||||||
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., 1.5%, 2012 | 5,660,000 | 5,737,417 | ||||||
Wyeth, 6.95%, 2011 | 3,260,000 | 3,339,120 | ||||||
Wyeth, 5.5%, 2014 | 3,400,000 | 3,867,344 | ||||||
$ | 37,428,308 | |||||||
Pollution Control - 0.2% | ||||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., 6.5%, 2010 | $ | 2,810,000 | $ | 2,815,617 | ||||
Printing & Publishing - 0.8% | ||||||||
Pearson Dollar Finance PLC, 5.7%, 2014 (n) | $ | 4,900,000 | $ | 5,486,324 | ||||
Pearson PLC, 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 780,000 | 851,414 | ||||||
Reed Elsevier Capital, 6.75%, 2011 | 3,250,000 | 3,394,606 | ||||||
$ | 9,732,344 | |||||||
Railroad & Shipping - 0.2% | ||||||||
Canadian Pacific Railroad Co., 5.75%, 2013 | $ | 2,230,000 | $ | 2,461,603 | ||||
Real Estate - 0.9% | ||||||||
PPF Funding, Inc., REIT, 5.35%, 2012 (n) | $ | 3,660,000 | $ | 3,752,862 | ||||
ProLogis, REIT, 5.5%, 2012 | 3,440,000 | 3,548,996 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 4.2%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,081,862 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Real Estate - continued | ||||||||
WEA Finance LLC, REIT, 5.4%, 2012 (n) | $ | 3,500,000 | $ | 3,733,009 | ||||
$ | 12,116,729 | |||||||
Restaurants - 0.2% | ||||||||
YUM! Brands, Inc., 8.875%, 2011 | $ | 2,910,000 | $ | 3,014,015 | ||||
Retailers - 1.8% | ||||||||
AutoZone, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | $ | 5,803,000 | $ | 6,598,661 | ||||
Home Depot, Inc., 5.2%, 2011 | 2,240,000 | 2,274,476 | ||||||
Home Depot, Inc., 5.25%, 2013 | 3,470,000 | 3,864,442 | ||||||
Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., 5.35%, 2012 | 1,510,000 | 1,579,838 | ||||||
Staples, Inc., 7.75%, 2011 | 1,240,000 | 1,274,219 | ||||||
Staples, Inc., 9.75%, 2014 | 3,350,000 | 4,149,528 | ||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | 2,894,000 | 3,239,648 | ||||||
$ | 22,980,812 | |||||||
Specialty Chemicals - 0.5% | ||||||||
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., 4.15%, 2013 | $ | 1,150,000 | $ | 1,217,116 | ||||
Airgas, Inc., 4.5%, 2014 | 5,480,000 | 5,885,197 | ||||||
$ | 7,102,313 | |||||||
Specialty Stores - 0.4% | ||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2013 | $ | 4,074,000 | $ | 4,561,360 | ||||
Supermarkets - 1.2% | ||||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.875%, 2014 | $ | 2,270,000 | $ | 2,567,592 | ||||
Kroger Co., 6.8%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,024,976 | ||||||
Kroger Co., 5%, 2013 | 2,453,000 | 2,674,305 | ||||||
Safeway, Inc., 6.5%, 2011 | 3,685,000 | 3,750,059 | ||||||
Safeway, Inc., 5.8%, 2012 | 3,644,000 | 3,933,308 | ||||||
Woolworths Ltd., 2.55%, 2015 (z) | 1,900,000 | 1,933,985 | ||||||
$ | 15,884,225 | |||||||
Supranational - 1.8% | ||||||||
Central American Bank for Economic Integration, 5.375%, 2014 (n) | $ | 4,240,000 | $ | 4,625,391 | ||||
Corporacion Andina de Fomento, 6.875%, 2012 | 3,000,000 | 3,210,123 | ||||||
Eurasian Development Bank, 7.375%, 2014 (n) | 813,000 | 898,365 | ||||||
European Investment Bank, 1.25%, 2013 | 6,470,000 | 6,577,861 | ||||||
European Investment Bank, 3%, 2014 | 3,730,000 | 3,996,236 | ||||||
Inter-American Development Bank, 3%, 2014 | 3,980,000 | 4,276,255 | ||||||
$ | 23,584,231 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 1.4% | ||||||||
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., 7.875%, 2011 | $ | 3,560,000 | $ | 3,647,373 | ||||
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., 8.125%, 2012 | 1,000,000 | 1,107,995 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 3.214%, 2015 (n) | 2,730,000 | 2,792,651 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.523%, 2035 (n) | 2,660,000 | 2,846,644 | ||||||
Sprint Nextel Corp., 7.625%, 2011 | 1,850,000 | 1,873,125 | ||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 4.15%, 2014 | 2,750,000 | 2,976,223 | ||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 5.375%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,409,434 | ||||||
$ | 18,653,445 | |||||||
Tobacco - 1.0% | ||||||||
Altria Group, Inc., 8.5%, 2013 | $ | 3,670,000 | $ | 4,424,302 | ||||
B.A.T. International Finance PLC, 8.125%, 2013 (n) | 3,415,000 | 4,049,483 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., FRN, 0.992%, 2011 | 3,980,000 | 3,989,078 | ||||||
$ | 12,462,863 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 8%, 2011 (n) | $ | 1,230,000 | $ | 1,246,888 | ||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 2.75%, 2013 (n) | 3,200,000 | 3,291,859 | ||||||
$ | 4,538,747 | |||||||
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 2.0% | ||||||||
American Express Co., 3.15%, 2011 (m) | $ | 2,200,000 | $ | 2,267,797 | ||||
Citigroup, Inc., 2.875%, 2011 (m) | 2,010,000 | 2,065,878 | ||||||
Farmer Mac, 5.5%, 2011 (n) | 2,600,000 | 2,693,597 | ||||||
FDIC Structured Sale Guarantee Note, 0%, 2012 (n) | 1,250,000 | 1,218,613 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 2.2%, 2012 (m) | 1,690,000 | 1,738,234 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 3.25%, 2012 (m) | 1,430,000 | 1,495,889 | ||||||
Pooled Funding Trust I, 2.74%, 2012 (m)(n) | 2,500,000 | 2,559,898 | ||||||
Pooled Funding Trust II, 2.625%, 2012 (m)(n) | 3,430,000 | 3,503,357 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.1%, 2016 | 1,453,382 | 1,542,900 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.46%, 2016 | 1,154,478 | 1,234,750 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.68%, 2016 | 1,128,863 | 1,209,363 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.94%, 2016 | 1,040,861 | 1,122,560 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.37%, 2016 | 565,288 | 606,953 | ||||||
U.S. Central Federal Credit Union, 1.9%, 2012 | 2,590,000 | 2,658,293 | ||||||
$ | 25,918,082 | |||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 5.5% | ||||||||
Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC, 8.25%, 2012 (n) | $ | 2,770,000 | $ | 2,992,968 | ||||
Duke Energy Corp., 5.65%, 2013 | 4,010,000 | 4,473,444 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 6.3%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,292,424 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 3.35%, 2015 | 960,000 | 1,022,733 | ||||||
Duquesne Light Co., 6.7%, 2012 | 1,400,000 | 1,505,323 |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | ||||||||
EDP Finance B.V., 5.375%, 2012 (n) | $ | 3,950,000 | $ | 4,123,670 | ||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 5.7%, 2013 (n) | 3,010,000 | 3,261,805 | ||||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 3.875%, 2014 (n) | 3,300,000 | 3,486,193 | ||||||
Entergy Corp., 3.625%, 2015 | 5,350,000 | 5,463,201 | ||||||
FirstEnergy Corp., 6.45%, 2011 | 57,000 | 59,558 | ||||||
Georgia Power Co., 6%, 2013 | 1,120,000 | 1,279,331 | ||||||
HQI Transelec Chile S.A., 7.875%, 2011 | 1,001,000 | 1,032,378 | ||||||
Iberdrola Finance Ireland Ltd., 3.8%, 2014 (n) | 5,150,000 | 5,357,514 | ||||||
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 3.553%, 2014 (n) | 3,280,000 | 3,483,144 | ||||||
NiSource Finance Corp., 7.875%, 2010 | 4,299,000 | 4,307,667 | ||||||
Oncor Electric Delivery Co., 5.95%, 2013 | 6,720,000 | 7,564,079 | ||||||
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 4.2%, 2011 | 3,460,000 | 3,502,164 | ||||||
Progress Energy, Inc., 6.05%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,278,380 | ||||||
PSEG Power LLC, 7.75%, 2011 | 3,960,000 | 4,085,520 | ||||||
Southern Co., 4.15%, 2014 | 2,260,000 | 2,450,547 | ||||||
Southern Co., 2.375%, 2015 | 6,530,000 | 6,642,336 | ||||||
$ | 70,664,379 | |||||||
Utilities - Gas - 0.3% | ||||||||
Keyspan Corp., 7.625%, 2010 | $ | 3,491,000 | $ | 3,497,563 | ||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,195,209,556) | $ | 1,230,839,819 | ||||||
Money Market Funds (v) - 3.7% | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | 46,583,306 | $ | 46,583,306 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,241,792,862) | $ | 1,277,423,125 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 0.4% | 5,728,234 | |||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 1,283,151,359 |
(e) | Guaranteed by Minister for Finance of Ireland. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(m) | The debt is guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The expiration date of the FDIC’s guarantee is the earlier of the maturity date of the debt or June 30, 2012. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $320,134,151, representing 25.0% of net assets. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Value | |||||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 1.625%, 2013 | 9/14/10 | $1,799,341 | $1,819,699 | |||||||
Anglo American Capital, 2.15%, 2013 | 9/20/10 | 1,998,372 | 2,033,716 | |||||||
BNP Paribas Home Loan, 2.2%, 2015 | 10/26/10 | 4,258,381 | 4,283,741 | |||||||
Banco Santander Chile, 1.29%, 2011 | 9/15/10 | 1,350,000 | 1,349,411 | |||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 2.991%, 2013 | 9/27/10 | 3,100,000 | 3,116,232 | |||||||
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, 1.6%, 2013 | 9/08/10 | 1,959,887 | 1,979,561 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.566%, 2035 | 6/09/05 | 1,492,243 | 1,077,955 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.526%, 2036 | 2/23/06 | 1,259,496 | 981,305 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.415%, 2036 | 5/16/06 | 525,289 | 393,349 | |||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.855%, 2040 | 3/01/06 | 1,062,366 | 474,878 | |||||||
Bosphorus Financial Services Ltd., FRN, 2.176%, 2012 | 3/08/05 | 637,500 | 626,902 | |||||||
Brascan Real Estate, CDO, FRN, 1.889%, 2040 | 9/14/04 | 1,526,000 | 534,100 | |||||||
Brazilian Merchant Voucher Receivables Ltd., 5.911%, 2011 | 7/02/03-3/08/07 | 571,797 | 580,176 | |||||||
Broadcom Corp., 1.5%, 2013 | 10/27/10 | 1,395,716 | 1,406,436 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 | 9/16/10 | 4,125,139 | 4,120,000 | |||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.841%, 2032 | 8/25/03 | 402,667 | 378,251 | |||||||
Crest G-Star, 2001-1A, “A”, CDO, 0.769%, 2016 | 10/27/10 | 3,562,947 | 3,434,166 | |||||||
Finance for Danish Industry A.S., FRN, 0.663%, 2013 | 6/03/10 | 3,500,000 | 3,495,566 | |||||||
Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust, “A2”, 0.75%, 2012 | 10/21/10 | 4,799,905 | 4,778,446 | |||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.608%, 2035 | 6/21/05-1/18/07 | 2,141,828 | 1,606,325 | |||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 | 7/16/10 | 1,569,579 | 1,604,390 | |||||||
ING Bank N.V., 1.609%, 2013 | 10/13/10 | 4,750,000 | 4,743,184 | |||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, 1.75%, 2015 | 9/27/10 | 999,103 | 1,006,027 | |||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.217%, 2031 | 6/10/03 | 60,382 | 44,559 |
20
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Restricted Securities - continued | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Value | |||||||
NBC Universal, Inc., 2.1%, 2014 | 9/27/10 | $2,099,733 | $2,125,261 | |||||||
Nordea Bank AB, 1.75%, 2013 | 9/27/10 | 4,794,431 | 4,824,130 | |||||||
Stadshypotek AB, 0.839%, 2013 | 9/23/10 | 4,200,000 | 4,200,018 | |||||||
Vestjysk Bank A/S, FRN, 0.842%, 2013 | 6/10/10 | 2,940,000 | 2,965,399 | |||||||
Woolworths Ltd., 2.55%, 2015 | 9/14/10 | 1,897,823 | 1,933,985 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $61,917,168 | |||||||||
% of Net Assets | 4.8% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Derivative Contracts at 10/31/10
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 10/31/10
Description | Currency | Contracts | Value | Expiration Date | Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Futures | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note 5 yr (Short) | USD | 661 | $80,363,141 | December-2010 | $(1,344,970 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Swap Agreements at 10/31/10
Expiration | Notional Amount | Counterparty | Cash Flows to Receive | Cash Flows to Pay | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Default Swaps | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9/20/14 | USD | 4,770,000 (a | ) | Goldman Sachs International | 1.00% (fixed rate) | (1) | $86,126 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Fund, as protection seller, to pay notional amount upon a defined credit event by Cargill, Inc., 7.375%, 10/1/25, an A2 rated bond. The fund entered into the contract to gain issuer exposure. |
(a) | Net unamortized premiums received by the fund amounted to $8,528. |
The credit ratings presented here are an indicator of the current payment/performance risk of the related swap, the reference obligation for which may be either a single security or, in case of a credit default index, a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers. Each reference security, including each individual security within a reference basket of securities, is assigned a rating from Moody’s Investor Service. If not rated by Moody’s, the rating will be that assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Likewise, if not assigned by Standard & Poor’s, it will be based on the rating assigned by Fitch, Inc. The ratings for a credit default index are calculated by MFS as a weighted average of the external credit ratings of the individual securities that compose the index’s reference basket of securities.
At October 31, 2010, the fund had sufficient cash and/or other liquid securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,195,209,556) | $1,230,839,819 | |||
Underlying funds, at cost and value | 46,583,306 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,241,792,862) | $1,277,423,125 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 5,893,592 | |||
Fund shares sold | 3,616,602 | |||
Interest and dividends | 11,691,227 | |||
Swaps, at value (net unamortized premiums received, $8,528) | 86,126 | |||
Total assets | $1,298,710,672 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $860,620 | |||
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts | 180,742 | |||
Investments purchased | 11,291,765 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 2,778,724 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 56,192 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 220,973 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 53,586 | |||
Administrative services fee | 1,852 | |||
Program manager fees | 400 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 10,006 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 104,453 | |||
Total liabilities | $15,559,313 | |||
Net assets | $1,283,151,359 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $1,382,112,040 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 34,379,947 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (127,983,028 | ) | ||
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | (5,357,600 | ) | ||
Net assets | $1,283,151,359 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 205,164,764 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $772,525,782 | 123,431,458 | $6.26 | |||||||||
Class B | 27,385,394 | 4,390,032 | 6.24 | |||||||||
Class C | 258,526,782 | 41,347,705 | 6.25 | |||||||||
Class I | 173,527,712 | 27,812,560 | 6.24 | |||||||||
Class R1 | 1,081,951 | 173,434 | 6.24 | |||||||||
Class R2 | 6,027,059 | 963,288 | 6.26 | |||||||||
Class R3 | 6,901,986 | 1,104,148 | 6.25 | |||||||||
Class R4 | 669,824 | 106,998 | 6.26 | |||||||||
Class 529A | 20,161,369 | 3,221,630 | 6.26 | |||||||||
Class 529B | 1,850,724 | 297,033 | 6.23 | |||||||||
Class 529C | 14,492,776 | 2,316,478 | 6.26 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $6.42 [100 / 97.5 x $6.26] and $6.42 [100 / 97.5 x $6.26], respectively. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering prices of Class A and Class 529A shares are reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, Class C, Class 529B, and Class 529C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, and 529A. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $22,515,398 | |||
Dividends from underlying funds | 42,902 | |||
Total investment income | $22,558,300 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $2,478,068 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 2,487,694 | |||
Program manager fees | 16,647 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 729,195 | |||
Administrative services fee | 89,120 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 17,371 | |||
Custodian fee | 94,602 | |||
Shareholder communications | 136,916 | |||
Auditing fees | 26,279 | |||
Legal fees | 7,615 | |||
Miscellaneous | 102,288 | |||
Total expenses | $6,185,795 | |||
Fees paid indirectly | (133 | ) | ||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | (403,537 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $5,782,125 | |||
Net investment income | $16,776,175 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||
Investment transactions | $3,208,025 | |||
Futures contracts | (4,506,909 | ) | ||
Swap transactions | 25,190 | |||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | $(1,273,694 | ) | ||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
Investments | $11,782,706 | |||
Futures contracts | (685,009 | ) | ||
Swap transactions | (18,940 | ) | ||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $11,078,757 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $9,805,063 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $26,581,238 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Year ended 4/30/10 | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $16,776,175 | $32,661,480 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (1,273,694 | ) | (2,635,748 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 11,078,757 | 59,653,468 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $26,581,238 | $89,679,200 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(20,329,052 | ) | $(38,447,410 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $108,698,685 | $313,939,025 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $114,950,871 | $365,170,815 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 1,168,200,488 | 803,029,673 | ||||||
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in | $1,283,151,359 | $1,168,200,488 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.43 | $6.38 | $6.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.09 | $0.21 | $0.25 | $0.28 | $0.28 | $0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.36 | (0.34 | ) | (0.12 | ) | 0.07 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.14 | $0.57 | $(0.09 | ) | $0.16 | $0.35 | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.11 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.27 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.26 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.43 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 2.25 | (n) | 9.87 | (1.41 | ) | 2.61 | 5.65 | 2.32 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.84 | (a) | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.74 | (a) | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.89 | (a) | 3.39 | 4.26 | 4.34 | 4.38 | 3.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $772,526 | $705,470 | $531,374 | $373,587 | $388,086 | $345,689 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | $6.36 | $6.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.07 | $0.17 | $0.21 | $0.23 | $0.23 | $0.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | 0.36 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 0.06 | (0.08 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.11 | $0.53 | $(0.14 | ) | $0.12 | $0.29 | $0.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.26 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.24 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | $6.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 1.87 | (n) | 9.06 | (2.17 | ) | 1.94 | 4.70 | 1.69 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.60 | (a) | 1.59 | 1.58 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.59 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.52 | (a) | 1.51 | 1.44 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.44 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.16 | (a) | 2.71 | 3.57 | 3.58 | 3.62 | 2.97 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $27,385 | $35,642 | $50,394 | $76,246 | $119,976 | $103,406 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | �� | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | $6.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $0.22 | $0.22 | $0.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.10 | ) | 0.07 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.11 | $0.52 | $(0.15 | ) | $0.12 | $0.29 | $0.10 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.26 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.21 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.25 | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 1.82 | (n) | 8.95 | (2.42 | ) | 1.90 | 4.60 | 1.61 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.59 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.66 | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.59 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.52 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.05 | (a) | 2.51 | 3.39 | 3.50 | 3.53 | 2.89 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $258,527 | $234,584 | $121,612 | $69,420 | $81,986 | $81,144 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | $6.36 | $6.48 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.22 | $0.27 | $0.29 | $0.29 | $0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | 0.36 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 0.06 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.14 | $0.58 | $(0.08 | ) | $0.18 | $0.35 | $0.16 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.11 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.24 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | $6.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 2.33 | (n) | 10.05 | (1.29 | ) | 2.91 | 5.65 | 2.46 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.60 | (a) | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.59 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.52 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.05 | (a) | 3.52 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.51 | 3.90 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $173,528 | $147,616 | $76,526 | $163,725 | $151,568 | $127,926 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | $6.35 | $6.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.16 | $0.21 | $0.22 | $0.22 | $0.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.36 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 0.07 | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.11 | $0.52 | $(0.14 | ) | $0.11 | $0.29 | $0.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.24 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | $6.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 1.82 | (n) | 8.96 | (2.27 | ) | 1.80 | 4.66 | 1.30 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.60 | (a) | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.72 | 1.84 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.60 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.57 | 1.60 | 1.66 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.07 | (a) | 2.57 | 3.45 | 3.41 | 3.42 | 2.79 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,082 | $1,164 | $1,046 | $909 | $267 | $123 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | $6.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.08 | $0.19 | $0.24 | $0.24 | $0.25 | $0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.09 | ) | 0.07 | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.13 | $0.56 | $(0.11 | ) | $0.15 | $0.32 | $0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.10 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.27 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.26 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 2.13 | (n) | 9.59 | (1.66 | ) | 2.41 | 5.07 | 1.87 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.10 | (a) | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 1.38 | 1.41 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.99 | (a) | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 1.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.65 | (a) | 3.16 | 4.05 | 3.98 | 3.98 | 3.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $6,027 | $5,999 | $4,983 | $5,768 | $1,154 | $269 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R3 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.43 | $6.38 | $6.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.09 | $0.19 | $0.25 | $0.26 | $0.27 | $0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.38 | (0.36 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 0.07 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.14 | $0.57 | $(0.11 | ) | $0.15 | $0.34 | $0.13 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.11 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.25 | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.43 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 2.20 | (n) | 9.77 | (1.68 | ) | 2.40 | 5.39 | 2.06 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.84 | (a) | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 1.07 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.84 | (a) | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.92 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.80 | (a) | 3.14 | 4.20 | 4.15 | 4.13 | 3.60 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $6,902 | $5,757 | $577 | $941 | $494 | $260 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.43 | $6.38 | $6.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.21 | $0.27 | $0.28 | $0.28 | $0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 0.08 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.14 | $0.58 | $(0.08 | ) | $0.17 | $0.36 | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.11 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.27 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.26 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.43 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 2.33 | (n) | 10.03 | (1.26 | ) | 2.69 | 5.71 | 2.37 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.60 | (a) | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.77 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.59 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.62 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.06 | (a) | 3.37 | 4.44 | 4.42 | 4.41 | 3.80 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $670 | $691 | $55 | $56 | $54 | $51 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529A | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | $6.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.09 | $0.20 | $0.25 | $0.25 | $0.25 | $0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.10 | ) | 0.07 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.14 | $0.57 | $(0.10 | ) | $0.15 | $0.32 | $0.13 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.11 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.26 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 2.20 | (n) | 9.76 | (1.60 | ) | 2.42 | 5.12 | 1.96 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.94 | (a) | 0.97 | 1.11 | 1.23 | 1.26 | 1.27 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.84 | (a) | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.80 | (a) | 3.28 | 4.10 | 4.00 | 4.02 | 3.41 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $20,161 | $16,907 | $8,852 | $6,373 | $4,467 | $2,868 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.20 | $5.87 | $6.25 | $6.39 | $6.35 | $6.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.16 | $0.21 | $0.21 | $0.21 | $0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.36 | (0.36 | ) | (0.10 | ) | 0.07 | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.11 | $0.52 | $(0.15 | ) | $0.11 | $0.28 | $0.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.23 | $6.20 | $5.87 | $6.25 | $6.39 | $6.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 1.82 | (n) | 8.96 | (2.29 | ) | 1.76 | 4.47 | 1.26 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.70 | (a) | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.86 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.60 | (a) | 1.61 | 1.55 | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.08 | (a) | 2.56 | 3.46 | 3.36 | 3.39 | 2.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,851 | $2,008 | $1,355 | $989 | $1,046 | $682 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.23 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | $6.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $0.21 | $0.21 | $0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.05 | 0.38 | (0.36 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 0.06 | (0.08 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.11 | $0.53 | $(0.16 | ) | $0.10 | $0.27 | $0.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $6.26 | $6.23 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.42 | $6.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 1.77 (n | ) | 9.02 | (2.52 | ) | 1.66 | 4.34 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.70 | (a) | 1.72 | 1.78 | 1.88 | 1.90 | 1.92 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.69 | (a) | 1.70 | 1.64 | 1.73 | 1.75 | 1.77 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.95 | (a) | 2.43 | 3.34 | 3.25 | 3.27 | 2.66 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 13 | 28 | 27 | 21 | 33 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $14,493 | $12,364 | $6,256 | $4,861 | $3,719 | $2,157 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Limited Maturity Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in asset-backed and/or mortgage-backed securities. The value of these securities may depend, in part, on the issuer’s or borrower’s credit quality or ability to pay principal and interest when due and may fall if an issuer or borrower defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest or if the instrument’s credit rating is downgraded by a credit rating agency. U.S. Government securities not supported as to the payment of principal or interest by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks, are subject to greater credit risk than are U.S. Government securities supported by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Ginnie Mae. The fund can invest in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are
36
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value
37
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2010 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents | $— | $25,918,082 | $— | $25,918,082 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | — | 192,163,457 | — | 192,163,457 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 569,792,446 | — | 569,792,446 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 79,843,837 | — | 79,843,837 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 29,079,263 | — | 29,079,263 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 35,672,809 | — | 35,672,809 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 298,369,925 | — | 298,369,925 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 46,583,306 | — | — | 46,583,306 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $46,583,306 | $1,230,839,819 | $— | $1,277,423,125 | ||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures | $(1,344,970 | ) | $— | $— | $(1,344,970 | ) | ||||||||||
Swaps | — | 86,126 | — | 86,126 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
Derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract Tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Fair Value (a) | ||||||||||
Risk | Derivative | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | Interest Rate Futures | $— | $(1,344,970 | ) | ||||||
Credit Contracts | Credit Default Swaps | 86,126 | — | |||||||
Total | $86,126 | $(1,344,970 | ) |
(a) | The value of futures contracts outstanding includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin or futures contracts is separately reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Futures Contracts | Swap Transactions | ||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | $(4,506,909 | ) | $— | |||||
Credit Contracts | — | 25,190 | ||||||
Total | $(4,506,909 | ) | $25,190 |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Futures Contracts | Swap Transactions | ||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | $(685,009 | ) | $— | |||||
Credit Contracts | — | (18,940 | ) | |||||
Total | $(685,009 | ) | $(18,940 | ) |
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to gain or to hedge against broad market, interest rate or currency exposure. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Swap Agreements – The fund entered into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
The fund entered into credit default swaps in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the contract notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although contract-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant contract. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Credit default swaps are considered to have credit-risk-related contingent features since they trigger payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event. The aggregate fair value of credit default swaps in a net liability position as of October 31, 2010 is disclosed in the footnotes to the Portfolio of Investments. As discussed earlier in this note, any collateral requirements for these swaps are based generally on the market value of the swap netted against collateral requirements for other types of over-the-counter derivatives traded under each counterparty’s ISDA Master Agreement. The maximum amount of future, undiscounted payments that the fund, as protection seller, could be required to make is equal to the swap’s notional amount. The protection seller’s payment obligation would be offset to the extent of the value of the contract’s deliverable obligation. At October 31, 2010, the fund did not hold any credit default swaps at an unrealized loss where it is the protection seller.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2010, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/10 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $38,447,410 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/10 | ||||
Cost of investments | $1,250,451,942 | |||
Gross appreciation | 44,535,035 | |||
Gross depreciation | (17,563,852 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $26,971,183 | |||
As of 4/30/10 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 1,671,463 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (115,137,686 | ) | ||
Post-October capital loss deferral | (5,439,160 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (3,368,025 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 17,060,541 |
As of April 30, 2010, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
4/30/11 | $(18,880,791 | ) | ||
4/30/12 | (15,641,631 | ) | ||
4/30/13 | (18,655,874 | ) | ||
4/30/14 | (16,764,678 | ) | ||
4/30/15 | (11,871,035 | ) | ||
4/30/16 | (12,189,538 | ) | ||
4/30/17 | (11,740,197 | ) | ||
4/30/18 | (9,393,942 | ) | ||
$(115,137,686 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution, service, and program manager fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each
44
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B and Class 529B shares will convert to Class A and Class 529A shares, respectively, approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||
Class A | $13,008,042 | $25,514,574 | ||||||
Class B | 441,304 | 1,430,520 | ||||||
Class C | 3,310,279 | 5,838,491 | ||||||
Class I | 2,839,556 | 4,622,469 | ||||||
Class R1 | 15,144 | 36,000 | ||||||
Class R2 | 99,521 | 205,001 | ||||||
Class R3 | 106,675 | 74,540 | ||||||
Class R4 | 11,745 | 11,801 | ||||||
Class 529A | 300,170 | 423,128 | ||||||
Class 529B | 26,193 | 49,041 | ||||||
Class 529C | 170,423 | 241,845 | ||||||
Total | $20,329,052 | $38,447,410 |
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.40% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser had agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s operating expenses, exclusive of management fee, distribution and service fees, program manager fees, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs, and investment-related expenses, such that operating expenses do not exceed 0.20% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. Effective September 1, 2010, this written agreement was terminated. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s actual operating expenses did not exceed the limit and therefore, the investment adviser did not pay any portion of the fund’s expenses related to this agreement.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $83,082 and $1,530 for the six months ended October 31, 2010, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A and Class 529A shares of the fund, respectively.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
45
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | $937,524 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.92% | 161,997 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1,259,445 | |||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 5,743 | |||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.40% | 15,418 | |||||||||||||||
Class R3 | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 7,909 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | 22,271 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.90% | 9,954 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 67,433 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $2,487,694 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2010 based on each class’ average daily net assets. 0.15% of the Class A and Class 529A service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class A and Class 529A service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $375,007 and $8,908, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. For one year from the date of sale of Class B and Class 529B shares, assets attributable to such Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B and Class 529B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B and Class 529B shares, 0.15% of the Class B and Class 529B service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class B and Class 529B service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $12,207 and $1,007 for Class B and Class 529B shares, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. 0.10% of the Class R2 distribution fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $3,084 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. These written waiver agreements will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreements will continue at least until August 31, 2011. |
46
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C and Class 529C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $47,825 | |||
Class B | 8,006 | |||
Class C | 37,762 | |||
Class 529B | 210 | |||
Class 529C | 2 |
The fund has entered into and may from time to time enter into contracts with program managers and other parties which administer the tuition programs through which an investment in the fund’s 529 share classes is made. The fund has entered into an agreement with MFD pursuant to which MFD receives an annual fee of up to 0.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. The services provided by MFD, or a third party with which MFD contracts, include recordkeeping and tax reporting and account services, as well as services designed to maintain the program’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulatory requirements. Program manager fees for the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class 529A | $8,909 | |||
Class 529B | 995 | |||
Class 529C | 6,743 | |||
Total Program Manager Fees | $16,647 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fee was $278,514, which equated to 0.0450% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $394,193.
Under a Special Servicing Agreement among MFS, each MFS fund which invests in other MFS funds (“MFS fund-of-funds”) and certain underlying funds in which a MFS fund-of-funds invests (“underlying funds”), each
47
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
underlying fund may pay a portion of each MFS fund-of-fund’s transfer agent-related expenses, including sub-accounting fees payable to financial intermediaries, to the extent such payments do not exceed the benefits realized or expected to be realized by the underlying fund from the investment in the underlying fund by the MFS fund-of-fund. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, these costs for the fund amounted to $56,488 and are reflected in the shareholder servicing costs on the Statement of Operations.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0144% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB Plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. The DB Plan resulted in a pension expense of $574 and is included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended October 31, 2010. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the DB plan amounted to $9,960 at October 31, 2010, and is included in payable for independent Trustees’ compensation on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the
48
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $4,557 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $3,324, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||
U.S. Government securities | $2,359,977 | $8,180,618 | ||||||
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | $229,161,430 | $141,103,129 |
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 28,749,077 | $178,913,237 | 62,971,093 | $385,360,827 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 538,088 | 3,337,341 | 1,121,324 | 6,870,333 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 8,373,432 | 52,056,989 | 23,249,229 | 142,154,032 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 5,750,530 | 35,734,606 | 11,859,560 | 72,565,661 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 12,069 | 74,783 | 85,758 | 525,820 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 288,437 | 1,796,678 | 434,751 | 2,671,025 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 199,969 | 1,244,495 | 883,629 | 5,455,358 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 7,133 | 44,531 | 110,909 | 684,784 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 939,507 | 5,855,239 | 1,760,592 | 10,869,177 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 47,512 | 294,290 | 128,540 | 788,498 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 654,202 | 4,070,264 | 1,374,380 | 8,486,827 | ||||||||||||
45,559,956 | $283,422,453 | 103,979,765 | $636,432,342 |
49
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,514,775 | $9,437,457 | 3,250,466 | $19,983,837 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 56,065 | 347,913 | 184,492 | 1,127,757 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 360,021 | 2,240,494 | 643,123 | 3,954,616 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 397,254 | 2,467,252 | 674,627 | 4,137,528 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2,423 | 15,036 | 5,839 | 35,754 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 14,027 | 87,367 | 29,523 | 181,413 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 17,139 | 106,645 | 11,941 | 73,933 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 1,591 | 9,914 | 1,721 | 10,661 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 47,895 | 298,328 | 68,520 | 421,526 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 4,176 | 25,896 | 7,978 | 48,817 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 27,228 | 169,597 | 39,227 | 241,271 | ||||||||||||
2,442,594 | $15,205,899 | 4,917,457 | $30,217,113 | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (20,085,654 | ) | $(125,108,044 | ) | (43,056,462 | ) | $(264,248,687 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (1,944,893 | ) | (12,071,278 | ) | (4,139,492 | ) | (25,313,058 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (5,081,682 | ) | (31,626,957 | ) | (6,833,937 | ) | (42,020,895 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (2,108,476 | ) | (13,084,402 | ) | (1,778,233 | ) | (10,956,973 | ) | ||||||||
Class R1 | (28,486 | ) | (176,338 | ) | (82,064 | ) | (505,315 | ) | ||||||||
Class R2 | (302,515 | ) | (1,886,408 | ) | (346,058 | ) | (2,123,043 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | (38,272 | ) | (237,405 | ) | (68,127 | ) | (415,551 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | (12,645 | ) | (78,559 | ) | (11,079 | ) | (68,848 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529A | (480,388 | ) | (2,990,140 | ) | (615,724 | ) | (3,782,196 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529B | (78,445 | ) | (487,011 | ) | (43,592 | ) | (265,629 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529C | (350,641 | ) | (2,183,125 | ) | (489,302 | ) | (3,010,235 | ) | ||||||||
(30,512,097 | ) | $(189,929,667 | ) | (57,464,070 | ) | $(352,710,430 | ) | |||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 10,178,198 | $63,242,650 | 23,165,097 | $141,095,977 | ||||||||||||
Class B | (1,350,740 | ) | (8,386,024 | ) | (2,833,676 | ) | (17,314,968 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | 3,651,771 | 22,670,526 | 17,058,415 | 104,087,753 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 4,039,308 | 25,117,456 | 10,755,954 | 65,746,216 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | (13,994 | ) | (86,519 | ) | 9,533 | 56,259 | ||||||||||
Class R2 | (51 | ) | (2,363 | ) | 118,216 | 729,395 | ||||||||||
Class R3 | 178,836 | 1,113,735 | 827,443 | 5,113,740 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | (3,921 | ) | (24,114 | ) | 101,551 | 626,597 | ||||||||||
Class 529A | 507,014 | 3,163,427 | 1,213,388 | 7,508,507 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | (26,757 | ) | (166,825 | ) | 92,926 | 571,686 | ||||||||||
Class 529C | 330,789 | 2,056,736 | 924,305 | 5,717,863 | ||||||||||||
17,490,453 | $108,698,685 | 51,433,152 | $313,939,025 |
50
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Effective May 1, 2006, the sale of Class B shares of the fund have been suspended except in certain circumstances. Please see the fund’s prospectus for details.
The fund is one of several mutual funds in which the MFS funds-of-funds may invest. The MFS funds-of-funds do not invest in the underlying MFS funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Conservative Allocation Fund and MFS Lifetime Retirement Income Fund were the owners of record of approximately 9% and 1%, respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund. In addition, the MFS Lifetime 2010 Fund and the MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund were each the owners of record of less than 1% of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $6,272 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 15,150,231 | 204,218,116 | (172,785,041 | ) | 46,583,306 | |||||||||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $42,902 | $46,583,306 |
51
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2010 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2009 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers,
52
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for each of the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2009 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results are likely to differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
53
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (“MFD”), an affiliate of MFS, currently observes a Class A 12b-1 fee waiver, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account that the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was below the Lipper expense group median described above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the
54
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFD. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research, and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2010.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
55
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
56
Table of Contents
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
MFS® Municipal Limited Maturity Fund
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
10/31/10
MTL-SEM
Table of Contents
Dear Shareholders:
After an extended rebound in the financial markets, uncertainty returned in early 2010 as investors began to question the durability of the recovery for global economies and markets. That uncertainty led to increased risk aversion, especially as investors saw the eurozone struggle with the debt woes of many of its members. In September, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s promises to further loosen monetary policy helped assuage market fears and drive asset prices off their recent lows. A combination of solid earnings and improving economic data gave an additional boost to investor sentiment. As we near the end of 2010, we are cautiously optimistic that economic growth will continue to improve and that the global economies will recover from the shocks of the past few years. We expect the pace of recovery worldwide will be uneven and volatile.
As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is in times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with their advisors to research and identify investment opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Top five industries (i) | ||||
Universities – Colleges | 14.1% | |||
Healthcare Revenue – Hospitals | 12.6% | |||
General Obligations – General Purpose | 10.2% | |||
Utilities – Investor Owned | 6.7% | |||
State & Local Agencies | 6.7% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 16.5% | |||
AA | 40.0% | |||
A | 20.4% | |||
BBB | 17.1% | |||
BB | 0.3% | |||
Other Fixed Income (NR) | 2.0% | |||
Cash & Other | 3.7% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 3.8 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 4.6 yrs. |
(a) | The rating categories include debt securities and fixed-income structured products where these have long-term public ratings. All ratings are assigned in accordance with the following hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moody’s, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moody’s, then a Standard & Poor’s rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Ratings from Moody’s are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). All ratings are subject to change. Other Fixed Income (NR) includes unrated long-term fixed income securities, interest rate swaps and fixed income futures. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/10.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
2
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
3
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Expense Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/10 | Ending Account Value 10/31/10 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/10-10/31/10 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.68% | $1,000.00 | $1,027.39 | $3.47 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.68% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.78 | $3.47 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.46% | $1,000.00 | $1,023.42 | $7.45 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.46% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.85 | $7.43 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.53% | $1,000.00 | $1,024.26 | $7.81 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.53% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.49 | $7.78 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual (i) | 0.54% | $1,000.00 | $999.30 | $0.93 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.54% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.48 | $2.75 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(i) | For the period of the class inception, August 30, 2010 through the stated period end. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
4
Table of Contents
10/31/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Municipal Bonds - 95.2% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Airport & Port Revenue - 2.1% | ||||||||
Atlanta, GA, Airport Rev., “A”, AGM, 5.375%, 2015 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,103,257 | ||||
Charlotte, NC, Airport Rev., “A”, 4%, 2012 | 2,180,000 | 2,278,601 | ||||||
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., “A-2”, AGM, 5.25%, 2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,610,160 | ||||||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport, “A”, AMBAC, 6%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,107,390 | ||||||
Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority Deepwater Port Rev. (LOOP LLC Project), 1.6%, 2037 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,370 | ||||||
Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority Deepwater Port Rev. (LOOP LLC Project), “B-1”, 1.875%, 2040 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,004,780 | ||||||
Metropolitan Nashville, TN, Airport Authority Rev., “A”, ASSD GTY, 4.5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,655,745 | ||||||
Metropolitan Nashville, TN, Airport Authority Rev., “B”, AGM, 4%, 2015 | 1,500,000 | 1,647,585 | ||||||
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Terminal One Group Assn.), 5.5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,075,130 | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Airport Rev., “B”, AGM, 5%, 2016 | 1,265,000 | 1,396,218 | ||||||
Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., Airport Rev., “A”, FGIC, 5%, 2012 | 750,000 | 775,830 | ||||||
$ | 15,655,066 | |||||||
General Obligations - General Purpose - 10.1% | ||||||||
Boston, MA, “A”, 5%, 2011 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,007,630 | ||||
California Economic Recovery, “B”, 5%, 2023 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,670,985 | ||||||
Cambridge, MA, “C”, 5%, 2011 | 1,070,000 | 1,107,525 | ||||||
Chandler, AZ, 5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,127,190 | ||||||
Cobb County, GA, Park & Recreation, 5%, 2013 | 500,000 | 547,615 | ||||||
Columbus, OH, 5.25%, 2011 | 705,000 | 710,640 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consolidated Loan, “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,140,250 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consolidated Loan, “A”, 5%, 2022 (c) | 2,500,000 | 2,922,475 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consolidated Loan, “C”, 5%, 2015 (c) | 5,000,000 | 5,906,600 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, “A”, FRN, 0.65%, 2013 | 3,000,000 | 3,005,160 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, AGM, 5%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,297,240 | ||||||
Corpus Christi, TX, General Improvement, ASSD GTY, 4%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,205,300 | ||||||
Detroit, MI, District Aid, 5%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,324,390 |
5
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
General Obligations - General Purpose - continued | ||||||||
Fulton County, GA, “A”, 3%, 2017 | $ | 2,515,000 | $ | 2,659,789 | ||||
Henry County, GA, 5%, 2014 | 1,080,000 | 1,232,388 | ||||||
Maryland, State & Local Facilities Loan, “C”, 4%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,133,260 | ||||||
Mecklenburg County, NC, “A”, 5%, 2013 | 1,115,000 | 1,246,704 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Double Barreled Aviation, 5%, 2014 | 500,000 | 560,015 | ||||||
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government, “A”, 4%, 2017 | 4,000,000 | 4,501,840 | ||||||
New York, NY, “A”, 5.25%, 2012 | 265,000 | 280,685 | ||||||
New York, NY, “F”, 5%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,443,520 | ||||||
Shelby County, TN, Public Improvement & School, “B”, 5%, 2018 | 1,100,000 | 1,318,691 | ||||||
State of California, 5%, 2011 | 2,250,000 | 2,274,075 | ||||||
State of Georgia, “D”, 5.25%, 2011 | 1,500,000 | 1,578,825 | ||||||
State of Illinois, AGM, 5%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,194,700 | ||||||
State of Illinois, AGM, 5%, 2016 | 2,750,000 | 3,027,640 | ||||||
State of Maryland, “A”, 5.5%, 2011 | 1,500,000 | 1,558,185 | ||||||
State of Maryland, “A”, 5.25%, 2013 | 1,450,000 | 1,605,977 | ||||||
State of Minnesota, “H”, 5%, 2016 | 3,000,000 | 3,586,500 | ||||||
State of Minnesota, “H”, 5%, 2017 | 2,600,000 | 3,129,334 | ||||||
State of Utah, “C”, 5%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,513,750 | ||||||
State of Wisconsin, 5.125%, 2011 | 400,000 | 418,656 | ||||||
State of Wisconsin, “1”, NATL, 5%, 2017 | 500,000 | 556,650 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, 4%, 2017 | 1,215,000 | 1,364,202 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, 5%, 2018 | 2,770,000 | 3,299,236 | ||||||
Yakima County, WA, “A”, AGM, 4%, 2017 | 2,300,000 | 2,594,055 | ||||||
$ | 75,051,677 | |||||||
General Obligations - Improvement - 3.9% | ||||||||
Arlington County, VA, “A”, 5%, 2016 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,196,850 | ||||
Bergen County, NJ, “A”, 3.25%, 2013 | 2,475,000 | 2,654,066 | ||||||
Durham County, NC, 5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,202,850 | ||||||
Honolulu, HI, City & County Department of Finance, “B”, AGM, 5.5%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,483,840 | ||||||
Montgomery County, MD, “A”, 5%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,511,360 | ||||||
New Orleans, LA, Certificate of Indebtedness, AGM, 5.5%, 2010 | 500,000 | 501,985 | ||||||
Oak Ridge, TN, AMBAC, 5%, 2012 | 300,000 | 305,373 | ||||||
Pittsburgh, PA, “A-1”, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,082,340 | ||||||
Pittsburgh, PA, “N”, AGM, 5.25%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,129,640 | ||||||
Seattle, WA, 5%, 2016 | 3,780,000 | 4,455,599 | ||||||
State of North Carolina, “A”, 5%, 2017 | 3,500,000 | 4,192,370 | ||||||
State of South Carolina, “A”, 5%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,007,630 | ||||||
Washington, MD, Suburban Sanitation District, 5%, 2013 | 2,450,000 | 2,721,313 | ||||||
$ | 29,445,216 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
General Obligations - Schools - 6.6% | ||||||||
Arizona School Facilities, Board Rev., 5.5%, 2011 (c) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,034,930 | ||||
Bastrop, TX, Independent School District, Capital Appreciation, “N”, PSF, 0%, 2020 | 1,000,000 | 681,150 | ||||||
Beaufort County, SC, School District, “B”, 5%, 2017 | 2,500,000 | 2,969,800 | ||||||
Byron Center, MI, Public Schools, MSQLF, 5%, 2011 | 600,000 | 612,018 | ||||||
Carrollton, TX, Farmers Branch, Independent School District, PSF, 5.5%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,014,740 | ||||||
Clark County, NV, School District, 5%, 2017 | 2,845,000 | 3,293,116 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 4%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,235,760 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2015 | 2,500,000 | 2,898,850 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2016 | 3,235,000 | 3,811,574 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5.25%, 2018 | 795,000 | 964,486 | ||||||
Ennis, TX, Independent School District, Capital Appreciation, “N”, PSF, 0%, 2021 | 2,865,000 | 1,818,358 | ||||||
Fayette County, GA, School District, AGM, 4.15%, 2014 | 710,000 | 776,172 | ||||||
Fayette County, GA, School District, AGM, 4.35%, 2016 | 355,000 | 398,864 | ||||||
Ferndale, MI, School District, MSQLF, 5.5%, 2013 | 1,115,000 | 1,164,294 | ||||||
Florida Board of Education, “C”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,066,240 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Independent School District, AGM, 5%, 2015 | 1,120,000 | 1,307,768 | ||||||
Kansas City, MO, School District Building Corp., “A”, FGIC, 5%, 2012 | 855,000 | 881,847 | ||||||
Kansas City, MO, School District Building Corp., “A”, ETM, FGIC, 5%, 2012 (c) | 170,000 | 179,608 | ||||||
Kansas City, MO, School District Building Corp., “A”, ETM, FGIC, 5%, 2012 (c) | 425,000 | 449,021 | ||||||
Killeen, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2016 | 2,000,000 | 2,356,460 | ||||||
Klein, TX, Independent School District, “A”, PSF, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,149,170 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Community College District, “E”, AGM, 5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,093,170 | ||||||
Mt. San Antonio, CA, Community College District, Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2015 | 3,170,000 | 2,870,562 | ||||||
Northside, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5.5%, 2016 | 850,000 | 860,634 | ||||||
Pflugerville, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2024 | 1,000,000 | 1,099,280 | ||||||
Plano, TX, Independent School District, “A”, 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,184,060 | ||||||
Richland County, SC, School District No. 1, 4%, 2019 | 1,270,000 | 1,424,559 | ||||||
Round Rock, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5.375%, 2012 | 570,000 | 618,404 | ||||||
Salt Lake City, UT, School District, “B”, 5%, 2013 | 1,040,000 | 1,145,102 | ||||||
San Marcos, TX, Consolidated Independent School District, PSF, 5.25%, 2014 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,159,400 | ||||||
Shelby County, TN, Public Improvement & Schools, “A”, AGM, 5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,688,520 | ||||||
Tulsa County, OK, Independent School District No. 9 (Union Board of Education), 0.25%, 2012 | 2,500,000 | 2,482,475 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
General Obligations - Schools - continued | ||||||||
Twin Rivers, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2014 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 680,985 | ||||
Washington County, OR, School District, AGM, 5.25%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,192,680 | ||||||
Westerville, OH, City School District, NATL, 5.5%, 2012 (c) | 300,000 | 308,979 | ||||||
$ | 48,873,036 | |||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 12.5% | ||||||||
Alabama Healthcare Authority Rev. (Baptist Health), “A”, 6%, 2036 (b) | $ | 1,800,000 | $ | 1,882,512 | ||||
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Rev. (Greater Fairbanks), “A”, AGM, 5%, 2012 | 1,000,000 | 1,033,860 | ||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 4%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,092,760 | ||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), “F”, FRN, 1.33%, 2038 | 2,500,000 | 2,504,625 | ||||||
Berks County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Reading Hospital & Medical Center), “A-3”, 5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,100,410 | ||||||
Birmingham, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Rev. (Baptist Health Systems, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,116,540 | ||||||
Butler County, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Butler Health System), 5.375%, 2017 | 1,465,000 | 1,576,369 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Catholic Healthcare West), “I”, 4.95%, 2026 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,293,040 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority, Certificates of Participation (Community Hospitals of Central California), 5%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,071,400 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Daughters of Charity), 5.25%, 2011 | 1,600,000 | 1,632,448 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,653,375 | ||||||
Clackamas County, OR, Hospital Facility Authority Rev. (Legacy Health System), “C”, 5%, 2037 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,095,950 | ||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Parkview Medical Center), 5%, 2011 | 575,000 | 586,063 | ||||||
Dauphin County, PA, General Authority Health System Rev. (Pinnacle Health System), “A”, 5.25%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 1,609,245 | ||||||
East Alabama Healthcare Authority Rev., Health Care Facilities, “B”, 4.75%, 2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,471,722 | ||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (Methodist Hospital Systems), “B-2”, 5%, 2041 (b) | 2,500,000 | 2,752,500 | ||||||
Illinois Development Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health) “A”, NATL, 5.75%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,502,730 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Advocate Healthcare), “A”, 3.875%, 2030 (b) | $ | 500,000 | $ | 519,295 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Carle Foundation), “A”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 2013 | 1,250,000 | 1,333,838 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Central DuPage Health), 5%, 2014 | 1,820,000 | 2,051,741 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (OSF Healthcare System), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 500,000 | 548,880 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (OSF Healthcare System), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 500,000 | 541,475 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Resurrection Health), 5.25%, 2015 | 2,195,000 | 2,345,226 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 6.75%, 2021 | 1,590,000 | 1,871,064 | ||||||
Indiana Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (King’s Daughters Hospital), 5%, 2020 | 3,325,000 | 3,402,273 | ||||||
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Genesis Health System), 5%, 2017 | 3,000,000 | 3,281,970 | ||||||
Jackson, TN, Hospital Rev. (Jackson-Madison County General Hospital), 5%, 2012 | 345,000 | 361,991 | ||||||
Joplin, MO, Industrial Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Freeman Health Systems), 5.5%, 2013 | 700,000 | 731,836 | ||||||
Kent, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Spectrum Health), “A”, 5%, 2047 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,049,800 | ||||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), “A”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,126,040 | ||||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Rev. (Catholic Health), 3.5%, 2034 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,500,900 | ||||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 2,000,000 | 2,144,480 | ||||||
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Fort Sanders), NATL, 5.75%, 2014 | 4,800,000 | 5,242,080 | ||||||
Lycoming County, PA, Authority Health System Rev. (Susquehanna Health System), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 3,195,000 | 3,454,370 | ||||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Johns Hopkins Health System), 5%, 2042 (b) | 500,000 | 523,375 | ||||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Lifebridge Health), 5%, 2012 | 500,000 | 531,830 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Baystate Medical Center), “K”, 5%, 2039 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,117,250 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Miami Children’s Hospital), NATL, 4.125%, 2046 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,019,640 | ||||||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 4%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,108,120 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (McLaren Health Care Corp.), 5%, 2013 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 543,990 | ||||
Mississippi Hospital Equipment & Facilities Authority Rev. (Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center), 5%, 2014 | 500,000 | 506,700 | ||||||
Montgomery County, OH, Rev. (Catholic Healthcare Initiatives), 5.25%, 2038 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,113,320 | ||||||
Montgomery County, OH, Rev. (Catholic Healthcare Initiatives), 4.1%, 2041 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,554,525 | ||||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Concord Hospital), 5%, 2013 | 750,000 | 792,645 | ||||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Health), 5%, 2014 | 565,000 | 586,029 | ||||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (Holy Name Medical Center), 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,080 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), 6.25%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,152,670 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non State Supported Debt (Mount Sinai Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,117,080 | ||||||
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Rev. (University Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 620,000 | 667,802 | ||||||
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Rev. (University Hospital), “A”, 5.2%, 2017 | 620,000 | 663,555 | ||||||
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Health System Rev. (Integris Baptist Medical Center), 5%, 2013 | 500,000 | 553,300 | ||||||
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Hospital Rev. (Unity Health Center), 5%, 2013 | 875,000 | 924,919 | ||||||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Nemours Foundation), “A”, 4%, 2017 | 500,000 | 541,080 | ||||||
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.375%, 2022 | 870,000 | 889,914 | ||||||
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Palmetto Health), 3.5%, 2013 | 500,000 | 514,375 | ||||||
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Palmetto Health), 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,082,460 | ||||||
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority Hospital Rev. (Palmetto Health), 5%, 2015 | 800,000 | 869,864 | ||||||
South Miami, FL, Health Facilities Baptist Authority Hospital Rev. (Baptist Health South Florida Group), 5%, 2021 | 790,000 | 859,473 | ||||||
Sullivan County, TN, Health Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Wellmont Health System), RADIAN, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,043,290 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Hospital Rev. (Scott & White Hospital),, 5%, 2018 | 500,000 | 548,900 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (Texas Health Resources), 5%, 2019 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 537,570 | ||||
Washington County, VA, Hospital Facilities Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), “C”, 7.25%, 2019 | 1,500,000 | 1,727,010 | ||||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Central Washington Health), 6%, 2015 | 1,900,000 | 2,066,744 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), “B”, 5.125%, 2027 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,105,860 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Fort Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 2012 | 610,000 | 629,008 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Fort Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 2013 | 645,000 | 674,090 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5%, 2014 | 1,100,000 | 1,174,833 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.25%, 2018 | 1,500,000 | 1,586,340 | ||||||
$ | 92,881,449 | |||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - 0.4% | ||||||||
ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corps., CA, Rev. (Casa de las Campanas), 3%, 2012 | $ | 780,000 | $ | 792,792 | ||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society), “B”, 5%, 2039 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,091,050 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp., Retirement Facilities (Air Force Village Foundation, Inc.), 5.75%, 2019 | 500,000 | 528,840 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckner Retirement), 5%, 2016 | 500,000 | 538,215 | ||||||
$ | 2,950,897 | |||||||
Human Services - 0.5% | ||||||||
Delaware County, PA, Authority Rev. (Elwyn Inc.), 4%, 2018 | $ | 1,795,000 | $ | 1,812,555 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (NYSARC, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 1,500,000 | 1,652,865 | ||||||
$ | 3,465,420 | |||||||
Industrial Revenue - Chemicals - 0.4% | ||||||||
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, (Dow Chemical Co.), “B-1”, 5.5%, 2033 (b) | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,564,980 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Dow Chemical Co.), 6.25%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,131,590 | ||||||
$ | 2,696,570 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - 1.0% | ||||||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), “B”, 5.25%, 2023 (b) | $ | 135,000 | $ | 145,136 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Solid Waste Facilities Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), “A”, 4.95%, 2012 | 1,750,000 | 1,833,353 | ||||||
Director of the State of Nevada Department of Business & Industry Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), 5.625%, 2026 (b) | 400,000 | 436,112 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), “B”, 3.4%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,021,160 | ||||||
Michigan Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 4.5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,063,460 | ||||||
Mission, TX, Economic Development Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Allied Waste N.A., Inc.), “A”, 5.2%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,008,200 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), “A”, 5.3%, 2015 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,093,440 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 2.75%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,024,670 | ||||||
$ | 7,625,531 | |||||||
Industrial Revenue - Other - 0.4% | ||||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Marathon Oil Corp.), 4.75%, 2032 (b) | $ | 1,425,000 | $ | 1,481,174 | ||||
Cartersville, GA, Development Authority Rev. (Anheuser-Busch), 5.1%, 2012 | 375,000 | 384,949 | ||||||
Port Corpus Christi, TX, Nueces County General Rev. (Union Pacific Corp.), 5.35%, 2010 | 610,000 | 610,000 | ||||||
Utah County, UT, Environmental Improvement Rev. (Marathon Oil), 5.05%, 2017 (b) | 300,000 | 308,544 | ||||||
$ | 2,784,667 | |||||||
Industrial Revenue - Paper - 0.5% | ||||||||
Bucksport, ME, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (International Paper), “A”, 4%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,054,790 | ||||
Courtland, AL, Industrial Development Board Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 750,000 | 808,725 | ||||||
Delta County, MI, Economic Development Corp., Environmental Improvement Rev. (Mead Westvaco Escanaba), “B”, 6.45%, 2012 (c) | 1,500,000 | 1,619,880 | ||||||
$ | 3,483,395 | |||||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - 0.3% | ||||||||
Brooklyn, NY Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 5.75%, 2015 | $ | 1,075,000 | $ | 1,157,668 | ||||
George L. Smith II, GA, World Congress Center Authority Rev. (Domed Stadium), NATL, 6%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,012,650 | ||||||
$ | 2,170,318 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - 1.9% | ||||||||
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Drivers License Rev. (Arkansas State Police - Wireless Information Network Project), AGM, 4%, 2014 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 501,130 | ||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 988,180 | ||||||
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev. (J. Paul Getty Trust), “A-1”, 2.5%, 2047 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,556,745 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., FL, “A-1”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 2012 | 1,500,000 | 1,575,765 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., FL, High Risk, “A-3”, FRN, 2.03%, 2013 | 5,000,000 | 4,954,000 | ||||||
Dayton Montgomery County, OH, Port Dayton, “A”, 4.75%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,023,020 | ||||||
New York City, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Rev. (Museum of Modern Art), “1A”, 5%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,394,020 | ||||||
Oklahoma Industries Authority Rev. (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation), 4.75%, 2014 | 1,060,000 | 1,146,390 | ||||||
$ | 14,139,250 | |||||||
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - 1.7% | ||||||||
Boston, MA, Housing Authority Capital Program Rev., AGM, 5%, 2015 | $ | 1,750,000 | $ | 1,910,948 | ||||
Boston, MA, Housing Authority Capital Program Rev., AGM, 5%, 2017 | 1,770,000 | 1,941,478 | ||||||
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Rental Housing Rev., “A”, AGM, 5.05%, 2018 | 2,000,000 | 2,031,380 | ||||||
Missouri Housing Development Community Multi-Family Housing Rev. (Courthouse Apartments), FHA, 3%, 2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,047,320 | ||||||
New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, Multi-Family Rev., “C”, 2.55%, 2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,340 | ||||||
New York, NY, Housing Development Corp., Multi-Family Housing Rev., “L-2”, 2%, 2045 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,022,560 | ||||||
$ | 12,954,026 | |||||||
Sales & Excise Tax Revenue - 1.2% | ||||||||
California Economic Recovery, “B”, 5%, 2023 (b) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,015,720 | ||||
Illinois Sales Tax Rev., “B”, 3%, 2014 | 5,000,000 | 5,225,200 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Transit Sales Surtax Rev., AGM, 5%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 1,725,765 | ||||||
Spokane, WA, Public Facilities District Hotel, “A”, NATL, 5.75%, 2012 | 425,000 | 442,319 | ||||||
Wyandotte County-Kansas City, KS, Sales Tax Second Lien Area B, 4.75%, 2016 | 220,000 | 222,354 | ||||||
$ | 8,631,358 | |||||||
Single Family Housing - State - 3.1% | ||||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “A”, 1.5%, 2014 | $ | 485,000 | $ | 484,234 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Single Family Housing - State - continued | ||||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “A”, 1.8%, 2015 | $ | 490,000 | $ | 489,569 | ||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “A”, 1.9%, 2015 | 660,000 | 659,360 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “A”, 2.15%, 2016 | 595,000 | 592,822 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “A”, 2.25%, 2016 | 435,000 | 433,277 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “B”, 1.4%, 2014 | 185,000 | 184,743 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “B”, 1.5%, 2014 | 185,000 | 184,708 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “B”, 1.8%, 2015 | 390,000 | 389,657 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “B”, 1.9%, 2015 | 395,000 | 394,617 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “B”, 2.15%, 2016 | 395,000 | 393,554 | ||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. Mortgage Rev., “B”, 2.25%, 2016 | 300,000 | 298,812 | ||||||
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “E”, FGIC, 5%, 2014 | 2,985,000 | 3,040,014 | ||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., Single Family Program, “A-3”, 6.3%, 2012 | 10,000 | 10,039 | ||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., Single Family Program, “B-3”, 6.7%, 2016 | 10,000 | 10,255 | ||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., Single Family Program, “C-2”, 8.4%, 2021 | 15,000 | 15,734 | ||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., Single Family Program, “I”, 3.1%, 2013 | 3,310,000 | 3,379,444 | ||||||
Maryland Department of Housing & Community Development, “A”, 3.875%, 2016 | 1,575,000 | 1,613,351 | ||||||
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), “B”, GNMA, 6.05%, 2037 | 310,000 | 333,650 | ||||||
South Dakota Housing Development Authority, “B”, 2.7%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,039,780 | ||||||
Tennessee Housing Development Agency (Homeownership Program), “2”, 2.15%, 2013 | 730,000 | 733,066 | ||||||
Tennessee Housing Development Agency (Homeownership Program), “2”, 2.2%, 2013 | 155,000 | 155,597 | ||||||
Virginia Housing Development Authority, Commonwealth Mortgage, “A-5”, 4.4%, 2015 | 230,000 | 237,312 | ||||||
Virginia Housing Development Authority, Commonwealth Mortgage, “A-5”, 4.4%, 2015 | 295,000 | 302,230 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 1.6%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,003,860 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 2%, 2015 | 1,085,000 | 1,089,188 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 2.1%, 2015 | 1,750,000 | 1,757,455 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 2.45%, 2016 | 720,000 | 720,799 | ||||||
$ | 22,947,127 | |||||||
Solid Waste Revenue - 0.4% | ||||||||
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Synagro-Baltimore), “A”, 5.25%, 2012 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 515,345 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Solid Waste Revenue - continued | ||||||||
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Synagro-Baltimore), “A”, 5.25%, 2013 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 778,193 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Semass Systems), “B”, NATL, 5.625%, 2012 | 400,000 | 413,084 | ||||||
Niagara County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (American Ref-fuel), “C”, 5.625%, 2024 (b) | 300,000 | 307,977 | ||||||
South Bayside, CA, Waste Management Authority, Solid Waste Enterprise Rev. (Shoreway Environmental), “A”, 5%, 2012 | 400,000 | 423,424 | ||||||
South Bayside, CA, Waste Management Authority, Solid Waste Enterprise Rev. (Shoreway Environmental), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 400,000 | 430,988 | ||||||
Tacoma, WA, Solid Waste Utility Rev., AMBAC, 5%, 2010 | 400,000 | 401,284 | ||||||
$ | 3,270,295 | |||||||
State & Agency - Other - 1.2% | ||||||||
Kentucky Property & Buildings Commerce Rev. (Project Number 69), “A”, AGM, 5.5%, 2011 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 518,510 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Lease Rev. (Mental Health Service Facilities), “A”, 3.5%, 2013 | 3,375,000 | 3,602,171 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (City University), NATL, 5.25%, 2011 | 1,270,000 | 1,310,615 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Government Development Bank, “B”, 5%, 2014 | 2,500,000 | 2,725,625 | ||||||
Tulsa County, OK, Industrial Authority Educational Facilities Lease Rev. (Jenks Public School), 5%, 2012 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,690 | ||||||
$ | 9,228,611 | |||||||
State & Local Agencies - 6.7% | ||||||||
Alabama Building Renovation Finance Authority Rev., 4%, 2017 | $ | 1,815,000 | $ | 2,018,589 | ||||
Alabama Building Renovation Finance Authority Rev., 4%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,108,270 | ||||||
Alabama Building Renovation Finance Authority Rev., 4%, 2019 | 1,615,000 | 1,774,885 | ||||||
Alabama Public School & College Authority, “A”, 5%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,312,560 | ||||||
Arizona Certificates of Participation, “A”, 5%, 2012 | 1,000,000 | 1,076,120 | ||||||
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,087,390 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Proposition 1A Receivables Program), 5%, 2013 | 2,000,000 | 2,181,080 | ||||||
Chattanooga, TN, Industrial Development Board, Lease Rental Rev. (Southside Redevelopment Corp.), 5%, 2013 | 5,120,000 | 5,989,427 | ||||||
Florida Department Management Services Rev. “A”, AGM, 5.25%, 2015 | 1,875,000 | 2,135,513 | ||||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, AMBAC, 5%, 2020 | 2,200,000 | 2,201,034 | ||||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “B”, 5.5%, 2013 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,122,950 | ||||||
Hamilton Heights School Building Corp., First Mortgage, “N”, AGM, 5%, 2014 | 1,875,000 | 2,123,325 | ||||||
Hampton, VA, Museum Rev., 5%, 2014 | 760,000 | 831,691 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
State & Local Agencies - continued | ||||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Common School Fund, AMBAC, 5.75%, 2013 | $ | 205,000 | $ | 218,030 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., AGM, 5%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,100,670 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., FGIC, 5.25%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,065,460 | ||||||
New York Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “B-1”, 5.25%, 2013 | 360,000 | 361,058 | ||||||
New York Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “B-1C”, 5.5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,100,760 | ||||||
New York Urban Development Corp. Rev., “A”, 5.125%, 2015 | 675,000 | 756,452 | ||||||
Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority, State Facilities Rev. (Higher Education Projects), “A”, 2%, 2016 | 2,500,000 | 2,529,475 | ||||||
Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority, State Facilities Rev. (Higher Education Projects), “A”, 2.25%, 2017 | 2,500,000 | 2,526,275 | ||||||
South Jersey, NJ, Port Corp. Rev. (Marine Terminal), “P-2”, 4%, 2015 | 2,420,000 | 2,580,325 | ||||||
Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Rev., “A”, 5%, 2013 | 2,500,000 | 2,788,050 | ||||||
Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,250,000 | 1,480,075 | ||||||
Virginia Public School Authority, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,102,980 | ||||||
Virginia Public School Authority, “C”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,198,340 | ||||||
Virginia, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority, Healthcare Facility Lease Rev., 5.25%, 2012 | 85,000 | 88,996 | ||||||
Virginia, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority, Healthcare Facility Lease Rev., 5.25%, 2013 | 215,000 | 228,631 | ||||||
Wake County, NC, Annual Appropriation Ltd., Obligation Bonds, 5%, 2013 | 2,185,000 | 2,415,102 | ||||||
Wake County, NC, Annual Appropriation Ltd., Obligation Bonds, 5%, 2014 | 1,890,000 | 2,149,308 | ||||||
$ | 49,652,821 | |||||||
Student Loan Revenue - 1.7% | ||||||||
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2017 | $ | 2,800,000 | $ | 3,135,804 | ||||
New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority Student Loan Rev., “1A”, 4%, 2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,102,740 | ||||||
New Mexico Educational Assistance Foundation, “A-1”, 5%, 2019 | 2,000,000 | 2,300,320 | ||||||
New Mexico Educational Assistance Foundation, “A-1”, 4%, 2020 | 1,500,000 | 1,595,985 | ||||||
New Mexico Educational Assistance Foundation, “B”, 4%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,273,300 | ||||||
$ | 12,408,149 | |||||||
Tax - Other - 1.1% | ||||||||
Denver, CO, City & County Excise Tax Rev., “A”, ASSD GTY, 6%, 2021 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,790,130 | ||||
Guam Government Ltd. Obligation Rev., “A”, 5%, 2013 | 825,000 | 886,479 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Tax - Other - continued | ||||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., Cigarette Tax, 5.375%, 2015 | $ | 2,730,000 | $ | 2,912,774 | ||||
New York City, NY, Transitional Finance Authority Rev., 5%, 2011 | 625,000 | 653,825 | ||||||
New York City, NY, Transitional Finance Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,149,040 | ||||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., “A”, 6%, 2014 | 400,000 | 448,828 | ||||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Matching Fund Loan Note, “A”, 5%, 2013 | 200,000 | 215,938 | ||||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev., Matching Fund Loan Note, “A”, 5%, 2014 | 250,000 | 272,755 | ||||||
$ | 8,329,769 | |||||||
Tax Assessment - 0.1% | ||||||||
Dyer, IN, Redevelopment Authority, Economic Development Lease Rent, CIFG, 5%, 2011 | $ | 570,000 | $ | 573,848 | ||||
Tobacco - 1.1% | ||||||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.125%, 2024 | $ | 1,775,000 | $ | 1,542,475 | ||||
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 6.75%, 2013 (c) | 1,460,000 | 1,690,140 | ||||||
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1A”, 4.5%, 2023 | 3,980,000 | 3,725,001 | ||||||
South Carolina Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., “B”, 6%, 2022 | 90,000 | 90,609 | ||||||
Southern California Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., “A”, 5.625%, 2012 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,082,090 | ||||||
Virginia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 5.25%, 2019 | 345,000 | 357,630 | ||||||
$ | 8,487,945 | |||||||
Toll Roads - 0.6% | ||||||||
Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Highway System Rev., “B”, 5%, 2017 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,138,840 | ||||
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Rev., “C”, FRN, 0.8%, 2011 | 500,000 | 500,980 | ||||||
Triborough, NY, Bridge & Tunnel Authority Rev., “A-1”, 4%, 2038 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,202,050 | ||||||
$ | 4,841,870 | |||||||
Transportation - Special Tax - 2.8% | ||||||||
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Capital Grant Receipts Rev., AMBAC, 5%, 2014 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,195,240 | ||||
Du Page County, IL, Transportation Rev., AGM, 5.5%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,008,150 | ||||||
Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Economic Development Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 4,000,000 | 4,650,800 | ||||||
Missouri Highways & Transit Commission State Road Rev. (Federal Reimbursement), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,495,900 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Transportation - Special Tax - continued | ||||||||
Nevada Highway Improvement Rev. (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax), NATL, 5.5%, 2013 | $ | 2,395,000 | $ | 2,696,722 | ||||
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, NATL, 5%, 2011 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,052,120 | ||||||
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, “D”, 5%, 2018 | 2,500,000 | 2,886,950 | ||||||
New Mexico Finance Authority State Transportation Rev., 5%, 2018 | 2,000,000 | 2,389,140 | ||||||
Texas Transportation Commission Rev., 5%, 2011 | 725,000 | 739,014 | ||||||
$ | 21,114,036 | |||||||
Universities - Colleges - 13.9% | ||||||||
Alabama Private Colleges (Tuskegee University), “N”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 2015 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,079,420 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Loyola Marymount), “B”, FRN, 1.08%, 2015 | 1,895,000 | 1,899,719 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Pitzer College), 5%, 2016 | 1,395,000 | 1,563,697 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev (Biola University), 5%, 2018 | 550,000 | 592,631 | ||||||
Central Michigan University Rev., 5%, 2017 | �� | 1,760,000 | 1,975,864 | |||||
Connecticut Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Yale University), “A-3”, 2%, 2049 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,090,060 | ||||||
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev., AICUP Financing (Dickinson College), “Q1”, 2.75%, 2039 (b) | 400,000 | 409,072 | ||||||
District of Columbia University Rev. (Georgetown University), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,500,072 | ||||||
El Paso County, CO Rev. (Colorado College), 2%, 2013 | 1,030,000 | 1,057,202 | ||||||
El Paso County, CO Rev. (Colorado College), 5%, 2014 | 1,090,000 | 1,225,106 | ||||||
Erie, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Mercyhurst College), 4.35%, 2014 | 640,000 | 684,186 | ||||||
Erie, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Mercyhurst College), 5%, 2018 | 1,075,000 | 1,186,951 | ||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Baylor College of Medicine), 4%, 2011 | 500,000 | 509,760 | ||||||
Hempstead, NY, Local Development Corp. Rev. (Adelphi University), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 600,000 | 656,454 | ||||||
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Art Institute Chicago), “A”, 4.3%, 2030 (b) | 500,000 | 525,975 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Art Institute of Chicago), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 500,000 | 568,105 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (IIlinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,072,310 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,029,240 |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 5%, 2015 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,085,910 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 5.25%, 2019 | 570,000 | 600,455 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (University of Chicago), “B”, 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,168,530 | ||||||
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority Rev., Private College Facilities (Upper Iowa University), 5%, 2015 | 550,000 | 590,117 | ||||||
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority Rev., Private College Facilities (Upper Iowa University), 5%, 2016 | 845,000 | 900,702 | ||||||
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority Rev., Private College Facilities (Upper Iowa University), 5%, 2017 | 730,000 | 772,304 | ||||||
Jackson State University, MS, Educational Building Corp. Rev. “A-1”, 5%, 2015 | 1,490,000 | 1,681,659 | ||||||
Lone Star College System, TX, “A”, 5%, 2018 | 4,250,000 | 5,060,008 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Boston University), “V-2”, 2.875%, 2014 | 2,250,000 | 2,291,333 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Brandeis University), “O-2”, 3%, 2013 | 2,680,000 | 2,822,308 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Brandeis University), “O-2”, 3%, 2014 | 2,675,000 | 2,825,790 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Hampshire College), 5.15%, 2014 | 120,000 | 132,910 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), “H”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2018 | 1,485,000 | 1,651,261 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), “H”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2019 | 1,605,000 | 1,778,196 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Wheelock), “C”, 5%, 2017 | 1,905,000 | 2,109,826 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Amherst College), “K-2”, 2.75%, 2038 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,023,170 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), “K”, 5.25%, 2012 | 375,000 | 404,948 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Northeastern University), 4.1%, 2037 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,037,420 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Northeastern University), “T-1”, 4.125%, 2037 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,033,290 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Springfield College), 4%, 2013 | 530,000 | 559,436 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Springfield College), 5%, 2014 | 1,010,000 | 1,111,596 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Springfield College), 5%, 2016 | 1,115,000 | 1,229,923 |
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Stonehill College), “H”, 2.5%, 2011 | $ | 760,000 | $ | 765,122 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Stonehill College), “H”, 2.5%, 2012 | 585,000 | 593,108 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Stonehill College), “H”, 3%, 2013 | 855,000 | 880,180 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Stonehill College), “H”, 3%, 2014 | 680,000 | 700,720 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Massachusetts), “A”, 2.2%, 2030 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,033,980 | ||||||
Medical Center Educational Building Corp. Rev. (University of Mississippi), 4%, 2014 | 1,240,000 | 1,332,268 | ||||||
Medical Center Educational Building Corp. Rev. (University of Mississippi), 4%, 2015 | 2,330,000 | 2,521,177 | ||||||
Michigan University Rev. (Wayne State University), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,105,600 | ||||||
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Health & Educational Facilities (Vanderbilt University), “B”, 5%, 2012 | 1,000,000 | 1,083,080 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (New York Institute of Technology), “A”, 5.25%, 2017 | 430,000 | 496,074 | ||||||
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 6%, 2017 | 1,710,000 | 1,993,381 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Manhattan Marymount), 5%, 2015 | 500,000 | 536,425 | ||||||
New York, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Rev. (Juilliard School), 2.1%, 2036 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,043,820 | ||||||
New York, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Rev. (Juilliard School), “B”, 2.75%, 2036 (b) | 1,190,000 | 1,224,617 | ||||||
Ohio State University Rev., “A”, 5%, 2012 | 1,500,000 | 1,635,420 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Thomas Jefferson University), “B”, 5.25%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,150,590 | ||||||
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 4.5%, 2012 | 685,000 | 713,962 | ||||||
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5%, 2019 | 1,250,000 | 1,337,288 | ||||||
South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, Private Nonprofit Institutions (Furman University), 5%, 2012 | 300,000 | 321,354 | ||||||
South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, Private Nonprofit Institutions (Furman University), 3%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,048,700 | ||||||
St. Joseph County, IN, Educational Facilities Rev. (University of Notre Dame Du Lac), 3.875%, 2040 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,034,580 | ||||||
St. Lawrence County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (St. Lawrence University), 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,150,800 |
20
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (New York Institute of Technology), 5.25%, 2017 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 555,400 | ||||
Texas A&M University Rev., “A”, 5%, 2015 | 750,000 | 872,498 | ||||||
Tompkins County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Ithaca College), 5%, 2016 | 3,000,000 | 3,276,810 | ||||||
Tulsa, OK, Industrial Authority Rev. (University of Tulsa), 5.5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,088,790 | ||||||
University of Arkansas Rev. (Fayetteville Campus), “A”, 3%, 2014 | 500,000 | 534,595 | ||||||
University of Delaware Rev., “A”, 2%, 2037 (b) | 1,200,000 | 1,205,088 | ||||||
University of Delaware Rev., “B”, 4%, 2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,634,745 | ||||||
University of Michigan Rev., “A”, 4%, 2014 | 750,000 | 824,738 | ||||||
University of Southern Indiana Rev., “J”, ASSD GTY, 4%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,087,670 | ||||||
University of Texas Rev., “D”, 5%, 2017 (c) | 850,000 | 1,009,222 | ||||||
University of Texas Rev., “D”, 5%, 2018 | 150,000 | 174,708 | ||||||
University of Texas, Permanent University Fund, “B”, 5%, 2014 (c) | 2,000,000 | 2,297,760 | ||||||
University of Texas, Permanent University Fund, “B”, 5%, 2020 | 500,000 | 598,615 | ||||||
University of Texas, Permanent University Fund, “C”, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,127,790 | ||||||
Utah Board of Regents Auxiliary & Campus Facilities System Rev., “A”, NATL, 5%, 2018 | 1,090,000 | 1,205,518 | ||||||
Utah Board of Regents Rev. (University of Utah), “A”, 4%, 2014 | 200,000 | 219,364 | ||||||
Vincennes University, IN, Student Fee Rev., “J”, 3%, 2013 | 400,000 | 417,180 | ||||||
Vincennes University, IN, Student Fee Rev., “J”, 3%, 2014 | 475,000 | 497,525 | ||||||
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Gonzaga University), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 3,315,000 | 3,595,615 | ||||||
Western Michigan University Rev., ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,121,610 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Marquette University), 5%, 2013 | 830,000 | 912,187 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Marquette University), 5%, 2013 | 540,000 | 593,471 | ||||||
$ | 104,050,061 | |||||||
Universities - Dormitories - 0.4% | ||||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Student Housing (University of California-Irvine), 5%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,072,820 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5%, 2017 | 825,000 | 865,400 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5%, 2018 | 1,005,000 | 1,047,120 | ||||||
$ | 2,985,340 | |||||||
Universities - Secondary Schools - 0.0% | ||||||||
District of Columbia Rev. (Gonzaga College High School), AGM, 5%, 2012 | $ | 145,000 | $ | 150,691 |
21
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - 6.7% | ||||||||
Brazos River, TX, Authority Rev. (Centerpoint Energy), “B”, FGIC, 4.25%, 2017 | $ | 1,260,000 | $ | 1,282,995 | ||||
Burke County, GA, Development Authority Pollution Control Rev. (Georgia Power Co.), 4.95%, 2048 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,016,430 | ||||||
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev. (Pacific Gas & Electric Co.), “E”, 2.25%, 2026 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,513,560 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Poll (Southern California Edison Co.), “A”, SYNCORA, 4.1%, 2028 (b) | 500,000 | 535,095 | ||||||
Chesapeake, VA., Economic Development Authority Pollution Control (Virginia Electric Power Co.) Rev., 3.6%, 2032 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,037,610 | ||||||
Connecticut Pollution Control Development Authority Rev. (Connecticut Light & Power Co.), “A”, 1.4%, 2031 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,000,160 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (El Paso Electric Co.), “A”, FGIC, 4%, 2032 (b) | 695,000 | 696,223 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service Co. of New Mexico), “B”, 4.75%, 2040 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,038,400 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service of Arizona), “C”, 2.875%, 2024 (b) | 1,000,000 | 999,290 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Southern California Edison Co.), “A”, 2.875%, 2029 (b) | 2,400,000 | 2,472,816 | ||||||
Hillsborough County, FL, Industrial Development Authority (Tampa Electric), 5.15%, 2025 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,091,060 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Gas Supply Rev. (Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.), 2.125%, 2030 (b) | 1,400,000 | 1,393,868 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Gas Supply Rev. (Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.), “B”, 2.625%, 2033 (b) | 750,000 | 752,970 | ||||||
Indiana Finance Authority Environmental Facilities Rev. (Indianapolis Power & Light Co.), “B”, 4.9%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,085,200 | ||||||
Iowa Finance Authority Pollution Control Facilities Rev. (Interstate Power & Light), FGIC, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,104,630 | ||||||
Louisa, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste & Sewer Disposal (VEPCO), “A”, 2.5%, 2031 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,006,980 | ||||||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Rev. (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana LLC), “B”, 2.875%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,030,300 | ||||||
Madison, WI, Industrial Development Rev. (Madison Gas & Electric Co.), “B”, 4.875%, 2027 (b) | 420,000 | 442,684 | ||||||
Maricopa County, AZ, Pollution Control Corp., Pollution Control Rev. (Arizona Public Service Co.), “D”, 6%, 2029 (b) | 325,000 | 357,913 | ||||||
Maryland Economic Development Corp., Pollution Control Rev. (Potomac Electric Power Co.), 6.2%, 2022 | 1,045,000 | 1,237,290 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 2042 (b) | 220,000 | 239,560 |
22
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | ||||||||
Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1 Pollution Control Rev. (AEP - Texas Central Co.), 5.125%, 2030 (b) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,019,070 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison Co.), 3.05%, 2024 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,019,050 | ||||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison Co.), 5.25%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,096,930 | ||||||
Missouri Environmental Improvement & Energy Resources Authority (Kansas Power & Light Co.), SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2017 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,074,400 | ||||||
Navajo County, AZ, Pollution Control Corp. Rev. (Arizona Public Service Co.), “C”, 5.5%, 2034 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,086,670 | ||||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (United Illuminating Co.), 4.5%, 2027 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,031,760 | ||||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (United Illuminating Co.), 7.125%, 2027 (b) | 1,565,000 | 1,660,230 | ||||||
New York Energy Research & Development Authority (Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.), “A”, NATL, 4.75%, 2032 (b) | 1,130,000 | 1,216,954 | ||||||
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority Rev. (FirstEnergy Generation Corp.), 5.25%, 2023 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,519,635 | ||||||
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority Rev. (FirstEnergy Generation Corp.), “A”, 2.25%, 2023 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,502,235 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Exelon Generation Co. LLC), “A”, 5%, 2042 (b) | 3,200,000 | 3,368,288 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (PPL Energy Supply LLC), 3%, 2038 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,006,630 | ||||||
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Pollution Control Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.), “A”, 4.95%, 2020 | 2,135,000 | 2,272,558 | ||||||
State of Indiana Finance Authority, Environmental Rev. (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.), “A-2”, 3.375%, 2019 | 3,000,000 | 3,018,360 | ||||||
Titus County, TX, Fresh Water Supply District, (Southwestern Electric Power Co.), 4.5%, 2011 | 500,000 | 510,020 | ||||||
York County, VA, Economic Development Authority Pollution Control Rev. (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), “A”, 4.05%, 2033 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,070,960 | ||||||
$ | 49,808,784 | |||||||
Utilities - Municipal Owned - 5.3% | ||||||||
California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., “L”, 5%, 2018 | $ | 3,510,000 | $ | 4,114,176 | ||||
California Department of Water Resources Power Supply Rev., “M”, 4%, 2019 | 3,000,000 | 3,263,370 | ||||||
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., “A”, 4%, 2015 | 1,260,000 | 1,354,046 | ||||||
Dalton, GA, Utilities Rev., AGM, 6%, 2012 | 500,000 | 531,975 |
23
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Municipal Owned - continued | ||||||||
De Soto Parish, LA, Pollution Control Rev. (Southwestern Electric Power Co.), 3.25%, 2019 (b) | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,575,650 | ||||
Energy Northwest, WA, Electric Rev., “A”, 5%, 2014 | 845,000 | 963,249 | ||||||
Energy Northwest, WA, Wind Project Rev., NATL, 5%, 2013 | 280,000 | 305,082 | ||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Financial Corp., Thermal Utilities Rev. (Teco Project), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,133,960 | ||||||
Indianapolis, IN, Gas Utility Rev., ASSD GTY, 5%, 2030 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,625,865 | ||||||
Kissimmee, FL, Utility Authority Electric, AMBAC, 5%, 2011 | 500,000 | 519,490 | ||||||
Lakeland, FL, Energy System Rev., FRN, 1.03%, 2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,001,860 | ||||||
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX, Rev., “A”, ETM, NATL, 5%, 2011 (c) | 30,000 | 30,748 | ||||||
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX, Rev., “N”, NATL, 5%, 2011 | 470,000 | 481,304 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Devens Electrical Systems), 5.125%, 2011 | 60,000 | 61,618 | ||||||
Memphis, TN, Electric System Rev., 5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,727,460 | ||||||
Municipal Electric Authority, GA, Vogtle Units 3&4, “J-B”, 5%, 2017 | 2,500,000 | 2,856,925 | ||||||
New York Energy Research & Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (New York Electric & Gas Corp.), “C”, 3%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,008,920 | ||||||
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,108,620 | ||||||
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Catawba Electric Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2013 | 340,000 | 374,398 | ||||||
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Catawba Electric Rev., “A”, ETM, 5.5%, 2013 (c) | 160,000 | 176,734 | ||||||
Northern California Power Agency Capital Facilities Rev., “A”, 2%, 2012 | 1,000,000 | 1,018,470 | ||||||
Northern California Power Agency Rev., “A”, 4%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,470 | ||||||
Orlando, FL, Utilities Commission Utility System Rev., “C”, 5%, 2012 | 650,000 | 704,652 | ||||||
Orlando, FL, Utilities Commission Utility System Rev., “C”, 5%, 2013 | 1,335,000 | 1,492,316 | ||||||
Salt River, AZ, Agricultural Improvement (Salt River), “A”, 5%, 2011 | 500,000 | 503,820 | ||||||
Seattle, WA, Municipal Light & Power Rev., “B”, 5%, 2018 | 4,000,000 | 4,740,240 | ||||||
Southern California Public Power Authority (San Juan), “A”, AGM, 5.375%, 2012 | 595,000 | 627,606 | ||||||
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Power Supply System Rev., “A”, 5%, 2015 | 375,000 | 426,934 | ||||||
Tacoma, WA, Electric Systems Rev., “A”, AGM, 5.5%, 2011 | 500,000 | 504,150 | ||||||
Vermont Public Power Supply Authority Rev. (Swanton Peaking), “A”, ASSD GTY, 3%, 2013 | 875,000 | 904,925 | ||||||
Wyoming Municipal Power Agency Power Supply System Rev. “A”, 3.25%, 2014 | 200,000 | 206,684 | ||||||
Wyoming Municipal Power Agency Power Supply System Rev. “A”, 3.75%, 2016 | 600,000 | 631,032 |
24
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Municipal Owned - continued | ||||||||
Wyoming Municipal Power Agency Power Supply System Rev. “A”, 3.875%, 2017 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 315,693 | ||||
$ | 39,363,442 | |||||||
Utilities - Other - 1.2% | ||||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 2015 | $ | 190,000 | $ | 207,307 | ||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,175,000 | 1,277,883 | ||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5.125%, 2016 | 365,000 | 389,017 | ||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 2022 | 2,455,000 | 2,634,387 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2016 | 270,000 | 302,095 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5%, 2017 | 1,350,000 | 1,488,834 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2018 | 355,000 | 391,821 | ||||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,057,060 | ||||||
Texas SA Energy Acquisition Public Facilities Corp., Gas Supply Rev., 5%, 2012 | 1,500,000 | 1,556,775 | ||||||
$ | 9,305,179 | |||||||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - 5.4% | ||||||||
Allentown, PA, Water Rev., Guaranteed, AMBAC, 5%, 2011 | $ | 925,000 | $ | 948,680 | ||||
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., “A”, FGIC, 5.5%, 2014 | 1,185,000 | 1,342,487 | ||||||
Birmingham, AL, Waterworks Board Water Rev., 3%, 2015 | 3,730,000 | 3,788,449 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Waterworks & Sewer Systems Rev., 3%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,065,570 | ||||||
Gulf Breeze, FL, Local Government Rev., “J”, 2%, 2020 (b) | 250,000 | 251,063 | ||||||
Gulf Breeze, FL, Local Government Rev., “J”, 2.6%, 2020 (b) | 430,000 | 433,298 | ||||||
Harrison County, MS, Wastewater Treatment Facilities, “A”, ETM, FGIC, 5.5%, 2011 (c) | 400,000 | 405,008 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Utilities Systems Rev., NATL, 5.25%, 2014 | 1,485,000 | 1,698,543 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Utilities Systems Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2012 | 1,500,000 | 1,630,950 | ||||||
King County, WA, Sewer Rev., FGIC, 5.25%, 2012 | 750,000 | 791,190 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Water & Sewer Rev., 4%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,100,620 | ||||||
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Clean Water Rev., 5.25%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,045,000 | ||||||
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Clean Water Rev., 5.375%, 2014 | 1,920,000 | 2,087,021 | ||||||
Mississippi Development Bank Special Obligation (Hattiesburg Water & Sewer), “N”, AMBAC, 5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,106,910 | ||||||
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,168,640 | ||||||
New York Environmental Facilities Corp., 5%, 2012 | 2,085,000 | 2,237,622 | ||||||
New York Environmental Facilities Corp., “I”, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,110,740 |
25
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - continued | ||||||||
Nueces River Authority, Texas Water Supply Rev. (Corpus Christi Project), AGM, 5%, 2013 | $ | 540,000 | $ | 590,868 | ||||
Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Rev., 5.25%, 2020 | 2,000,000 | 2,442,960 | ||||||
Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Rev. (Water Quality), “A”, 3.25%, 2013 | 1,470,000 | 1,564,036 | ||||||
Phoenix, AZ, Civic Improvement Corp., Water System Rev., FGIC, 5.5%, 2021 | 1,260,000 | 1,537,817 | ||||||
Portland, OR, Sewer System Rev. , “A”, 5%, 2018 | 5,000,000 | 5,950,000 | ||||||
Sebring, FL, Water & Wastewater, FGIC, 5.25%, 2013 | 690,000 | 736,423 | ||||||
St. Mary’s, PA, Area Water Authority Rev., 2.75%, 2014 | 210,000 | 214,589 | ||||||
St. Mary’s, PA, Area Water Authority Rev., 3.125%, 2015 | 150,000 | 154,361 | ||||||
St. Mary’s, PA, Area Water Authority Rev., 3.625%, 2016 | 130,000 | 134,871 | ||||||
Truckee Meadows, NV, Water Authority, “A”, AGM, 5.5%, 2011 | 1,000,000 | 1,032,340 | ||||||
Utah Water Finance Agency Rev., “A”, AMBAC, 5%, 2012 | 500,000 | 532,450 | ||||||
Virginia Resources Authority, Clean Water Rev., 5%, 2019 | 1,980,000 | 2,307,373 | ||||||
Wisconsin Clean Water Rev., “1”, 3%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,055,230 | ||||||
$ | 40,465,109 | |||||||
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $685,200,439) | $ | 709,790,953 | ||||||
Floating Rate Demand Notes - 1.0% | ||||||||
Lincoln County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), “A”, 0.18%, due 11/01/10 | $ | 2,900,000 | $ | 2,900,000 | ||||
Lincoln County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), “B”, 0.18%, due 11/01/10 | 3,200,000 | 3,200,000 | ||||||
Lincoln County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), “C”, 0.18%, due 11/01/10 | 1,600,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||
Total Floating Rate Demand Notes, at Cost and Value | $ | 7,700,000 | ||||||
Money Market Funds (v) - 2.5% | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | 18,843,383 | $ | 18,843,383 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $711,743,822) | $ | 736,334,336 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 1.3% | 9,561,084 | |||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 745,895,420 |
(b) | Mandatory tender date is earlier than stated maturity date. |
(c) | Refunded bond. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
26
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
ETM | Escrowed to Maturity |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
Insurers | ||||||
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal | |||||
AMBAC | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. | |||||
ASSD GTY | Assured Guaranty Insurance Co. | |||||
CIFG | CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty | |||||
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | |||||
FHA | Federal Housing Administration | |||||
GNMA | Government National Mortgage Assn. | |||||
MSQLF | Michigan Student Qualified Loan Fund | |||||
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | |||||
PSF | Permanent School Fund | |||||
RADIAN | Radian Asset Assurance, Inc. | |||||
SYNCORA | Syncora Guarantee Inc. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $692,900,439) | $717,490,953 | |||
Underlying funds, at cost and value | 18,843,383 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $711,743,822) | $736,334,336 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 100,000 | |||
Fund shares sold | 8,941,972 | |||
Interest | 8,315,585 | |||
Total assets | $753,691,893 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $394,501 | |||
Investments purchased | 4,060,333 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 3,203,667 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 32,652 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 46,708 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 26,562 | |||
Administrative services fee | 1,129 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 5,558 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 25,363 | |||
Total liabilities | $7,796,473 | |||
Net assets | $745,895,420 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $724,503,811 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 24,590,514 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (3,338,539 | ) | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 139,634 | |||
Net assets | $745,895,420 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 92,631,189 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $605,690,319 | 75,225,890 | $8.05 | |||||||||
Class B | 4,783,247 | 594,765 | 8.04 | |||||||||
Class C | 135,321,940 | 16,798,120 | 8.06 | |||||||||
Class I | 99,914 | 12,414 | 8.05 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $8.26 [100 / 97.5 x $8.05]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $10,474,220 | |||
Dividends from underlying funds | 28,884 | |||
Total investment income | $10,503,104 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $1,352,602 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 1,343,186 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 197,639 | |||
Administrative services fee | 51,075 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 7,211 | |||
Custodian fee | 54,105 | |||
Shareholder communications | 16,238 | |||
Auditing fees | 22,251 | |||
Legal fees | 3,376 | |||
Miscellaneous | 87,248 | |||
Total expenses | $3,134,931 | |||
Fees paid indirectly | (21 | ) | ||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | (275,612 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $2,859,298 | |||
Net investment income | $7,643,806 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||
Investment transactions | $77,622 | |||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
Investments | $9,801,867 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $9,879,489 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $17,523,295 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Year ended 4/30/10 | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $7,643,806 | $11,520,608 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 77,622 | 16,525 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 9,801,867 | 10,129,610 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $17,523,295 | $21,666,743 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(7,472,127 | ) | $(11,234,300 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $135,392,153 | $320,553,789 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $145,443,321 | $330,986,232 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 600,452,099 | 269,465,867 | ||||||
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $139,634 and accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $32,045, respectively) | $745,895,420 | $600,452,099 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.70 | $7.66 | $7.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.22 | $0.25 | $0.27 | $0.27 | (z) | $0.24 | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.05 | (0.02 | ) | 0.02 | (z) | (0.13 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.22 | $0.44 | $0.30 | $0.25 | $0.29 | $0.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.10 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.26 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $8.05 | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.70 | $7.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 2.74 | (n) | 5.80 | 3.99 | 3.25 | 3.83 | 1.40 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.78 | (a) | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.86 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.68 | (a) | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.43 | (a) | 2.84 | 3.33 | 3.53 | 3.55 | (z) | 3.11 | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 4 | 8 | 15 | 30 | 9 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $605,690 | $482,962 | $214,796 | $124,161 | $116,562 | $149,936 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $7.92 | $7.70 | $7.66 | $7.69 | $7.65 | $7.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.07 | $0.17 | $0.20 | $0.21 | $0.21 | (z) | $0.18 | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.04 | (0.02 | ) | 0.02 | (z) | (0.13 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.19 | $0.38 | $0.24 | $0.19 | $0.23 | $0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.07 | ) | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.18 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $8.04 | $7.92 | $7.70 | $7.66 | $7.69 | $7.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 2.34 | (n) | 5.03 | 3.22 | 2.46 | 3.06 | 0.66 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.53 | (a) | 1.54 | 1.52 | 1.53 | 1.61 | 1.61 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.46 | (a) | 1.46 | 1.37 | 1.38 | 1.46 | 1.46 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.68 | (a) | 2.19 | 2.63 | 2.79 | 2.79 | (z) | 2.36 | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 4 | 8 | 15 | 30 | 9 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $4,783 | $6,231 | $10,486 | $10,454 | $15,393 | $23,575 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.16 | $0.19 | $0.21 | $0.21 | (z) | $0.18 | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.04 | (0.04 | ) | 0.01 | (z) | (0.14 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.19 | $0.37 | $0.23 | $0.17 | $0.22 | $0.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.06 | ) | $(0.15 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.21 | ) | $(0.18 | ) | $(0.17 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $8.06 | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.71 | $7.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 2.43 | (n) | 4.90 | 3.11 | 2.24 | 2.96 | 0.54 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.53 | (a) | 1.57 | 1.62 | 1.63 | 1.70 | 1.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.53 | (a) | 1.55 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.55 | 1.56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.58 | (a) | 1.98 | 2.46 | 2.68 | 2.70 | (z) | 2.26 | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 4 | 8 | 15 | 30 | 9 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $135,322 | $111,259 | $44,185 | $21,959 | $24,634 | $35,569 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | ||||
Class I | ||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $8.09 | |||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.04 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (0.05 | )(g) | ||
Total from investment operations | $(0.01 | ) | ||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||
From net investment income | $(0.03 | ) | ||
Net asset value, end of period | $8.05 | |||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | (0.07 | )(n) | ||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.54 | (a) | ||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.54 | (a) | ||
Net investment income | 2.61 | (a) | ||
Portfolio turnover | 4 | |||
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | $100 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(g) | The per share amount varies from the net realized and unrealized gain/loss for the period because of the timing of sales of fund shares and the per share amount of realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, August 30, 2010 (Class I) through the stated period end. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(z) | The fund applied a change in estimate for amortization of premium on certain debt securities in the current year that resulted in an increase of $0.01 per share to net investment income, a decrease of less than $0.01 per share to net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, and an increase of 0.06% to the net investment income ratio for the year ended April 30, 2007. The change in estimate had no impact on net assets, net asset value per share or total return of each class. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuer’s future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, the security could decline in value, interest from the security could become taxable and the funds may be required to issue Forms 1099-DIV.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both
35
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2
36
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2010 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $— | $709,790,953 | $— | $709,790,953 | ||||||||||||
Short Term Securities | — | 7,700,000 | — | 7,700,000 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 18,843,383 | — | — | 18,843,383 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $18,843,383 | $717,490,953 | $— | $736,334,336 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2010, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including
37
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/10 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $6,639 | |||
Tax-exempt income | 11,227,661 | |||
Total distributions | $11,234,300 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/10 | ||||
Cost of investments | $711,138,391 | |||
Gross appreciation | 25,691,365 | |||
Gross depreciation | (495,420) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $25,195,945 | |||
As of 4/30/10 | ||||
Undistributed tax-exempt income | 1,108,447 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (3,882,268) | |||
Other temporary differences | (1,140,492) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 15,254,754 |
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
As of April 30, 2010, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
4/30/11 | $(159,222) | |||
4/30/12 | (277,860) | |||
4/30/13 | (789,744) | |||
4/30/14 | (625,131) | |||
4/30/15 | (746,953) | |||
4/30/16 | (432,394 | |||
4/30/17 | (616,758) | |||
4/30/18 | (234,206) | |||
$(3,882,268) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||
Class A | $6,454,953 | $9,595,469 | ||||||
Class B | 46,326 | 167,189 | ||||||
Class C | 970,423 | 1,471,642 | ||||||
Class I (i) | 425 | — | ||||||
Total | $7,472,127 | $11,234,300 |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, August 30, 2010 (Class I) through the stated period end. |
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.40% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s operating expenses, exclusive of management fee, distribution and service fees, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses, such that operating expenses do not exceed 0.15% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. This written agreement
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until August 31, 2011. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s actual operating expenses did not exceed the limit and therefore, the investment adviser did not pay any portion of the fund’s expenses related to this agreement.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $62,265 for the six months ended October 31, 2010, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | $679,381 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.93% | 28,379 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 635,426 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $1,343,186 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2010 based on each class’ average daily net assets. 0.15% of the Class A service fee is being paid by the fund, and 0.10% of the Class A service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $271,750 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. For one year from the date of sale of Class B shares, assets attributable to such Class B shares are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B shares, 0.15% of the Class B service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class B service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $2,090 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. These written waiver agreements will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreements will continue at least until August 31, 2011. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $7,600 | |||
Class B | 549 | |||
Class C | 20,566 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fee was $83,100, which equated to 0.0246% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $114,539.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0151% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB Plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. The DB Plan resulted in a pension expense of $169 and is included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended October 31, 2010. The
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the DB plan amounted to $5,509 at October 31, 2010, and is included in payable for independent Trustees’ compensation on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $2,455 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $1,772, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities, purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $156,674,245 and $23,247,822, respectively.
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 23,427,301 | $187,853,394 | 49,461,026 | $388,693,778 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 18,022 | 144,011 | 77,594 | 609,407 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 4,163,464 | 33,330,581 | 9,820,551 | 77,185,019 | ||||||||||||
Class I (i) | 12,361 | 100,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||
27,621,148 | $221,427,986 | 59,359,171 | $466,488,204 | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 574,498 | $4,608,132 | 904,064 | $7,108,310 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 3,136 | 25,118 | 11,574 | 90,655 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 74,318 | 596,628 | 112,349 | 883,955 | ||||||||||||
Class I (i) | 53 | 425 | — | — | ||||||||||||
652,005 | $5,230,303 | 1,027,987 | $8,082,920 | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (9,712,640 | ) | $(77,748,236 | ) | (17,297,759 | ) | $(135,996,097 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (213,493 | ) | (1,710,652 | ) | (664,012 | ) | (5,180,504 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (1,470,054 | ) | (11,807,248 | ) | (1,632,438 | ) | (12,840,734 | ) | ||||||||
(11,396,187 | ) | $(91,266,136 | ) | (19,594,209 | ) | $(154,017,335 | ) | |||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 14,289,159 | $114,713,290 | 33,067,331 | $259,805,991 | ||||||||||||
Class B | (192,335 | ) | (1,541,523 | ) | (574,844 | ) | (4,480,442 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | 2,767,728 | 22,119,961 | 8,300,462 | 65,228,240 | ||||||||||||
Class I (i) | 12,414 | 100,425 | — | — | ||||||||||||
16,876,966 | $135,392,153 | 40,792,949 | $320,553,789 |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, August 30, 2010, (Class I) through the stated period end. |
Effective May 1, 2006, the sale of Class B shares of the fund has been suspended except in certain circumstances. Please see the fund’s prospectus for details.
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $3,013 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 16,569,665 | 125,325,108 | (123,051,390 | ) | 18,843,383 | |||||||||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $28,884 | $18,843,383 |
44
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2010 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2009 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund,
45
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
(v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile for each of the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2009 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results are likely to differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
46
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
In addition to considering the performance information provided in connection with the contract review meetings, the Trustees noted that, in light of the Fund’s substandard relative performance at the time of their contract review meetings in 2009, they had met at each of their regular meetings since then with MFS’ senior investment management personnel to discuss the Fund’s performance and MFS’ efforts to improve the Fund’s performance. The Trustees further noted that the Fund’s relative performance for the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 had improved in comparison to the prior year. Taking this information into account, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, and that MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (“MFD”), an affiliate of MFS, currently observes a Class A 12b-1 waiver, each of which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was approximately at the Lipper expense group median, and the Fund’s total expense ratio was lower than the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account the expense limitation noted above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group,
47
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFD. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2010.
48
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
49
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
50
Table of Contents
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ
NO BANK GUARANTEE
10/31/10
RBF-SEM
Table of Contents
Dear Shareholders:
After an extended rebound in the financial markets, uncertainty returned in early 2010 as investors began to question the durability of the recovery for global economies and markets. That uncertainty led to increased risk aversion, especially as investors saw the eurozone struggle with the debt woes of many of its members. In September, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s promises to further loosen monetary policy helped assuage market fears and drive asset prices off their recent lows. A combination of solid earnings and improving economic data gave an additional boost to investor sentiment. As we near the end of 2010, we are cautiously optimistic that economic growth will continue to improve and that the global economies will recover from the shocks of the past few years. We expect the pace of recovery worldwide will be uneven and volatile.
As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is in times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with their advisors to research and identify investment opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 31.4% | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 22.7% | |||
U.S. Treasury Securities | 13.4% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 7.2% | |||
U.S. Government Agencies | 7.1% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 5.8% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 2.8% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 2.6% | |||
Municipal Bonds | 1.9% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | 1.9% | |||
Non-U.S. Government Bonds | 1.5% | |||
Floating Rate Loans | 0.2% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 29.1% | |||
AA | 4.9% | |||
A | 8.3% | |||
BBB | 24.2% | |||
BB | 7.4% | |||
B | 0.3% | |||
CCC | 0.5% | |||
CC | 0.1% | |||
C (o) | 0.0% | |||
U.S. Agency (NR) | 23.4% | |||
Other Fixed Income (NR) | 0.3% | |||
Cash & Other | 1.5% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 4.3 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 6.5 yrs. |
(a) | The rating categories include debt securities and fixed-income structured products where these have long-term public ratings. All ratings are assigned in accordance with the following hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moody’s, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moody’s, then a Standard & Poor’s rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Ratings from Moody’s are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Agency (NR) includes unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Other Fixed Income (NR) includes unrated long-term fixed income securities, interest rate swaps and fixed income futures. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(o) | Less than 0.1%. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/10.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010.
The expenses include the payment of a portion of the transfer-agent-related expenses of MFS funds that invest in the fund. For further information, please see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Expense Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/10 | Ending Account Value 10/31/10 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/10-10/31/10 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,052.71 | $4.14 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.17 | $4.08 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,049.53 | $8.21 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.59% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.19 | $8.08 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,048.26 | $8.52 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.89 | $8.39 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,053.49 | $3.36 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.93 | $3.31 | ||||||||||||||
W | Actual | 0.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,052.96 | $3.88 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.42 | $3.82 | ||||||||||||||
R1 | Actual | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,049.24 | $8.52 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.89 | $8.39 | ||||||||||||||
R2 | Actual | 1.15% | $1,000.00 | $1,050.91 | $5.94 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.15% | $1,000.00 | $1,019.41 | $5.85 | ||||||||||||||
R3 | Actual | 0.90% | $1,000.00 | $1,053.21 | $4.66 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.90% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.67 | $4.58 | ||||||||||||||
R4 | Actual | 0.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,053.49 | $3.36 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.93 | $3.31 | ||||||||||||||
529A | Actual | 0.90% | $1,000.00 | $1,053.27 | $4.66 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.90% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.67 | $4.58 | ||||||||||||||
529B | Actual | 1.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,048.72 | $9.04 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.38 | $8.89 | ||||||||||||||
529C | Actual | 1.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,047.74 | $9.03 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.38 | $8.89 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
Table of Contents
10/31/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 97.4% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Aerospace - 0.3% | ||||||||
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | 6,660,000 | ||||
Airlines - 0.1% | ||||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., 7.25%, 2019 | $ | 1,650,000 | $ | 1,831,500 | ||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 10.4% | ||||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.616%, 2019 (z) | $ | 10,335,462 | $ | 7,751,597 | ||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO III, 6.077%, 2039 (z) | 5,000,000 | 500,000 | ||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, FRN, 1.106%, 2037 (z) | 2,405,000 | 1,875,900 | ||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, 6.076%, 2045 (z) | 4,149,000 | 518,625 | ||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “G”, 6.076%, 2045 (z) | 2,354,000 | 247,170 | ||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “H”, 6.075%, 2045 (z) | 1,218,795 | 76,175 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.566%, 2035 (z) | 763,411 | 551,466 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.87%, 2035 (i)(z) | 25,629,578 | 1,127,627 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 (i)(z) | 18,668,423 | 931,782 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.526%, 2036 (z) | 595,884 | 464,268 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.415%, 2036 (i)(z) | 19,399,598 | 1,104,947 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.213%, 2036 (i)(z) | 32,648,881 | 2,534,213 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.331%, 2036 (i)(z) | 16,066,968 | 1,227,229 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.454%, 2037 (i)(z) | 36,028,908 | 3,101,091 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 (i)(z) | 12,867,197 | 652,973 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.402%, 2035 | 611,784 | 614,342 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.638%, 2036 | 1,500,000 | 1,291,790 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2041 | 3,267,048 | 3,262,399 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.855%, 2040 (z) | 3,774,489 | 1,687,197 | ||||||
Brascan Real Estate, CDO, FRN, 1.889%, 2040 (z) | 418,000 | 146,300 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (z) | 8,552,149 | 8,552,149 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.267%, 2035 (z) | 7,074,200 | 6,455,208 | ||||||
Carey Commercial Mortgage Trust, 2002-1, “A”, 5.97%, 2019 (z) | 2,883,384 | 2,932,920 | ||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.322%, 2049 | 13,737,015 | 14,329,127 | ||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.222%, 2044 | 400,000 | 409,893 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.841%, 2032 (i)(z) | 2,968,525 | 61,255 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, FRN, 0.446%, 2017 (n) | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,403,726 | ||||
Compagnie de Financement Foncier, 2.125%, 2013 (n) | 5,800,000 | 5,922,595 | ||||||
Countrywide Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.43%, 2036 | 1,031,686 | 778,903 | ||||||
Countrywide Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.689%, 2046 | 3,720,000 | 2,810,586 | ||||||
Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C5, 5.694%, 2040 | 412,609 | 438,568 | ||||||
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificate, 5.311%, 2039 | 7,531,000 | 7,928,826 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, 5.476%, 2037 | 1,920,000 | 908,753 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.303%, 2035 | 1,641,433 | 1,616,708 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.419%, 2037 | 2,300,000 | 1,293,327 | ||||||
Crest G-Star, 2001-1A, “A”, CDO, 0.769%, 2016 (z) | 4,626,591 | 4,395,262 | ||||||
Crest G-Star, CDO, 6.95%, 2032 (z) | 6,526,000 | 5,351,320 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A1” CDO, FRN, 0.769%, 2018 (z) | 7,691,395 | 6,306,944 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 (z) | 2,361,075 | 2,243,022 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “B”, CDO, FRN, 1.638%, 2035 (z) | 6,377,000 | 5,962,495 | ||||||
CWCapital LLC, 5.223%, 2048 | 6,335,000 | 6,616,002 | ||||||
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corp., FRN, 7.5%, 2031 | 1,028,249 | 1,036,053 | ||||||
DLJ Commercial Mortgage Corp., 7.95%, 2033 | 1,000,000 | 999,783 | ||||||
E*TRADE RV & Marine Trust, 3.62%, 2018 | 190,877 | 191,293 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.363%, 2023 (i)(z) | 284,963 | 12,766 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.256%, 2025 (i)(z) | 6,531,140 | 517,919 | ||||||
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 0.83%, 2043 (i)(n) | 17,626,365 | 59,424 | ||||||
First Union-Lehman Brothers Bank of America, FRN, 0.428%, 2035 (i) | 6,640,083 | 119,154 | ||||||
Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust, 1.04%, 2013 (n) | 11,710,312 | 11,728,617 | ||||||
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corp., 6.269%, 2035 | 1,990,803 | 2,097,192 | ||||||
GMAC Mortgage Corp. Loan Trust, FRN, 5.805%, 2036 | 2,933,571 | 1,630,106 | ||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.608%, 2035 (z) | 1,154,637 | 865,978 | ||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 (z) | 5,998,000 | 6,129,381 | ||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 0.996%, 2034 | 233,378 | 208,813 | ||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 1.176%, 2034 | 116,689 | 76,461 | ||||||
IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., FRN, 0.606%, 2036 | 1,041,273 | 878,471 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 4.865%, 2046 | 2,195,695 | 2,337,446 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.42%, 2049 | 20,397,722 | �� | 21,355,387 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.38%, 2042 (n) | 4,180,000 | 1,700,894 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.817%, 2049 | 15,661,513 | 16,717,361 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.99%, 2051 | $ | 16,745,745 | $ | 17,853,161 | ||||
JPMorgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., FRN, 5.532%, 2036 | 2,100,000 | 1,923,107 | ||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “C”, FRN, 1.826%, 2021 (n) | 7,023,814 | 5,548,813 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.36%, 2035 (i) | 2,485,084 | 137,468 | ||||||
Mach One Trust Commercial Mortgage, “B”, 5.43%, 2040 (z) | 5,024,000 | 4,961,200 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., 5.45%, 2037 | 2,516,020 | 771,545 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, “A3”, 5.826%, 2050 | 8,250,000 | 8,838,999 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, “B”, 5.826%, 2050 | 8,120,000 | 2,630,393 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.81%, 2050 | 6,810,000 | 7,078,806 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.217%, 2031 (i)(z) | 1,290,642 | 30,766 | ||||||
Nationslink Funding Corp., FRN, 1.204%, 2030 (i) | 905,988 | 25,159 | ||||||
Option One Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 5.611%, 2037 | 1,280,000 | 527,092 | ||||||
Ownit Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.29%, 2036 | 1,376,496 | 864,499 | ||||||
Popular ABS Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 4.62%, 2035 | 351,494 | 351,824 | ||||||
Preferred Term Securities XIX Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.642%, 2035 (z) | 7,668,612 | 4,371,109 | ||||||
Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corp., FRN, 6.885%, 2013 (z) | 1,905,000 | 2,079,249 | ||||||
Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., FRN, 4.971%, 2034 | 4,852,000 | 5,004,780 | ||||||
Residential Funding Mortgage Securities, Inc., 5.32%, 2035 | 8,795,000 | 3,242,734 | ||||||
Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities, Inc., FRN, 6.724%, 2032 (z) | 3,262,500 | 3,462,675 | ||||||
Structured Asset Securities Corp., FRN, 4.67%, 2035 | 799,284 | 793,499 | ||||||
Structured Asset Securities Corp., FRN, 0.496%, 2035 | 232,570 | 225,042 | ||||||
Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust, FRN, 0.936%, 2043 | 39,504 | 36,783 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.275%, 2048 | 1,900,000 | 1,946,108 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.903%, 2051 | 12,941,938 | 13,588,905 | ||||||
$ | 271,340,895 | |||||||
Automotive - 0.1% | ||||||||
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 5.625%, 2011 (n) | $ | 1,925,000 | $ | 1,959,425 | ||||
Broadcasting - 0.8% | ||||||||
CBS Corp., 5.75%, 2020 | $ | 8,330,000 | $ | 9,232,372 | ||||
Inmarsat Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | 5,705,000 | 6,104,350 | ||||||
NBC Universal, Inc., 5.95%, 2041 (n) | 4,715,000 | 4,815,274 | ||||||
News America, Inc., 8.5%, 2025 | 120,000 | 149,957 | ||||||
$ | 20,301,953 | |||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.4% | ||||||||
INVESCO PLC, 5.625%, 2012 | $ | 4,255,000 | $ | 4,482,115 | ||||
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corp., 5.6%, 2019 | 5,512,000 | 6,026,821 | ||||||
$ | 10,508,936 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Building - 0.1% | ||||||||
CRH America, Inc., 6.95%, 2012 | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,329,630 | ||||
Cable TV - 2.4% | ||||||||
Comcast Cable Communications LLC, 6.75%, 2011 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,060 | ||||
Comcast Corp., 5.45%, 2010 | 300,000 | 300,499 | ||||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 4.625%, 2013 | 600,000 | 648,214 | ||||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 9.375%, 2019 (z) | 10,194,000 | 13,820,556 | ||||||
CSC Holdings LLC, 8.5%, 2014 | 5,500,000 | 6,132,500 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | 7,919,000 | 8,869,280 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 5.2%, 2020 | 6,220,000 | 6,755,486 | ||||||
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | 7,171,000 | 7,540,307 | ||||||
TCI Communications, Inc., 9.8%, 2012 | 1,703,000 | 1,881,144 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5%, 2020 | 10,340,000 | 11,220,110 | ||||||
Time Warner Entertainment Co. LP, 8.375%, 2033 | 5,117,000 | 6,464,613 | ||||||
$ | 63,636,769 | |||||||
Chemicals - 0.9% | ||||||||
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 2017 | $ | 4,820,000 | $ | 5,555,050 | ||||
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | 9,150,000 | 11,751,684 | ||||||
Nalco Co., 8.25%, 2017 | 5,500,000 | 6,125,625 | ||||||
$ | 23,432,359 | |||||||
Conglomerates - 0.0% | ||||||||
Kennametal, Inc., 7.2%, 2012 | $ | 525,000 | $ | 545,265 | ||||
Consumer Products - 0.6% | ||||||||
Hasbro, Inc., 6.35%, 2040 | $ | 5,690,000 | $ | 5,727,309 | ||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 5,547,000 | 6,036,811 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 2020 | 4,915,000 | 5,109,432 | ||||||
$ | 16,873,552 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
Western Union Co., 5.4%, 2011 | $ | 9,060,000 | $ | 9,485,467 | ||||
Containers - 0.5% | ||||||||
Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | $ | 5,615,000 | $ | 6,120,350 | ||||
Owens-Illinois, Inc., 7.375%, 2016 | 5,710,000 | 6,223,900 | ||||||
$ | 12,344,250 | |||||||
Defense Electronics - 0.4% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.4%, 2011 (n) | $ | 7,306,000 | $ | 7,666,982 | ||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.375%, 2019 (n) | 2,705,000 | 3,154,671 | ||||||
$ | 10,821,653 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Electronics - 0.2% | ||||||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 6.55%, 2017 | $ | 5,330,000 | $ | 6,222,503 | ||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.3% | ||||||||
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, 3.75%, 2020 (z) | $ | 2,811,000 | $ | 2,785,870 | ||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 6.375%, 2016 (z) | 4,055,000 | 4,016,745 | ||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 7.375%, 2020 (z) | 2,796,000 | 2,749,791 | ||||||
Qatari Diar Finance Q.S.C., 5%, 2020 (n) | 6,384,000 | 6,681,731 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 3.375%, 2016 (z) | 276,000 | 275,009 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 7.875%, 2019 | 3,259,000 | 4,003,776 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 7.875%, 2019 (n) | 892,000 | 1,095,848 | ||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 4.75%, 2021 (z) | 4,276,000 | 4,233,206 | ||||||
SCF Capital Ltd., 5.375%, 2017 (z) | 1,692,000 | 1,659,833 | ||||||
VEB Finance Ltd., 6.902%, 2020 (n) | 6,036,000 | 6,452,484 | ||||||
$ | 33,954,293 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 1.3% | ||||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 5.95%, 2016 | $ | 5,730,000 | $ | 6,266,615 | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.375%, 2017 | 1,604,000 | 1,781,903 | ||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.95%, 2019 | 4,110,000 | 4,652,919 | ||||||
Apache Corp., 7.375%, 2047 | 37,000 | 46,356 | ||||||
Newfield Exploration Co., 6.625%, 2016 | 3,900,000 | 4,056,000 | ||||||
Newfield Exploration Co., 7.125%, 2018 | 2,350,000 | 2,514,500 | ||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 6.65%, 2017 | 4,730,000 | 5,106,886 | ||||||
Southwestern Energy Co., 7.5%, 2018 | 7,599,000 | 8,738,850 | ||||||
$ | 33,164,029 | |||||||
Energy - Integrated - 0.4% | ||||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.5%, 2020 | $ | 3,096,000 | $ | 3,206,917 | ||||
Petro-Canada, 6.05%, 2018 | 7,280,000 | 8,582,210 | ||||||
$ | 11,789,127 | |||||||
Financial Institutions - 0.9% | ||||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 10.25%, 2017 | $ | 5,490,000 | $ | 5,661,563 | ||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.5%, 2020 | 9,060,000 | 9,972,378 | ||||||
Household Finance Corp., 7%, 2012 | 170,000 | 183,639 | ||||||
HSBC Finance Corp., 6.75%, 2011 | 20,000 | 20,620 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | 5,888,000 | 6,476,800 | ||||||
Kazakhstan Temir Zholy Finance B.V., 6.375%, 2020 (n) | 273,000 | 285,285 | ||||||
$ | 22,600,285 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 1.4% | ||||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.75%, 2019 (n) | $ | 9,724,000 | $ | 12,574,649 | ||||
Del Monte Foods Co., 7.5%, 2019 | 475,000 | 521,313 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Food & Beverages - continued | ||||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.5%, 2040 | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | 6,876,960 | ||||
Miller Brewing Co., 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 9,295,000 | 10,237,876 | ||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., 7.35%, 2016 | 5,810,000 | 6,463,625 | ||||||
$ | 36,674,423 | |||||||
Forest & Paper Products - 0.3% | ||||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 7.125%, 2017 (n) | $ | 5,825,000 | $ | 6,261,875 | ||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 (z) | 780,000 | 787,800 | ||||||
$ | 7,049,675 | |||||||
Gaming & Lodging - 0.4% | ||||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | $ | 7,828,000 | $ | 8,359,365 | ||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | 3,010,000 | 3,338,337 | ||||||
$ | 11,697,702 | |||||||
Insurance - 1.7% | ||||||||
Aflac, Inc., 6.45%, 2040 | $ | 7,967,000 | $ | 8,121,464 | ||||
ING Groep N.V., 5.775% to 2015, FRN to 2049 | 6,333,000 | 5,842,193 | ||||||
MetLife, Inc., 5.375%, 2012 | 300,000 | 324,698 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2013 (n) | 6,580,000 | 7,167,041 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 2,570,000 | 2,865,293 | ||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 2,950,000 | 3,207,833 | ||||||
Unum Group, 7.125%, 2016 | 2,220,000 | 2,562,546 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 11,413,000 | 12,909,085 | ||||||
$ | 43,000,153 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 0.6% | ||||||||
Humana, Inc., 7.2%, 2018 | $ | 6,010,000 | $ | 6,984,461 | ||||
Unitedhealth Group, Inc., 4.875%, 2013 | 9,117,000 | 9,801,532 | ||||||
$ | 16,785,993 | |||||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 1.9% | ||||||||
Aon Corp., 5%, 2020 | $ | 7,490,000 | $ | 7,711,756 | ||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | 8,925,000 | 9,540,932 | ||||||
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 2020 | 6,990,000 | 7,150,630 | ||||||
PartnerRe Ltd., 5.5%, 2020 | 8,258,000 | 8,617,405 | ||||||
XL Group PLC, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | 7,039,000 | 6,299,905 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust II, 6.45% to 2016, FRN to 2065 (n) | 2,405,000 | 2,308,800 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust IV, 5.875% to 2012, FRN to 2062 (n) | 432,000 | 411,847 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2067 (n) | 6,524,000 | 6,238,575 | ||||||
$ | 48,279,850 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.5% | ||||||||
Achmea Hypotheekbank N.V., 3.2%, 2014 (n) | $ | 4,730,000 | $ | 5,069,240 | ||||
FIH Erhvervsbank A.S., 1.75%, 2012 (z) | 3,821,000 | 3,895,494 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 3.9%, 2014 (n) | 6,800,000 | 7,442,906 | ||||||
NIBC Bank N.V., 2.8%, 2014 (z) | 4,940,000 | 5,239,606 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 2.625%, 2012 (n) | 8,520,000 | 8,697,642 | ||||||
Societe Financement de l’ Economie Francaise, 3.375%, 2014 (n) | 7,905,000 | 8,543,621 | ||||||
$ | 38,888,509 | |||||||
Machinery & Tools - 0.3% | ||||||||
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 (n) | $ | 6,095,000 | $ | 6,811,163 | ||||
Major Banks - 5.3% | ||||||||
BAC Capital Trust XIV, 5.63% to 2012, FRN to 2049 | $ | 2,060,000 | $ | 1,457,450 | ||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 2018 | 16,095,000 | 16,939,730 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 8% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | 3,357,000 | 3,387,784 | ||||||
BNP Paribas, 7.195% to 2037, FRN to 2049 (n) | 6,500,000 | 6,548,750 | ||||||
Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., 6%, 2018 | 9,110,000 | 10,235,796 | ||||||
DBS Group Holdings Ltd., 7.657% to 2011, FRN to 2049 (n) | 2,833,000 | 2,871,954 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.625%, 2017 | 4,693,000 | 5,027,503 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.5%, 2019 | 5,607,000 | 6,749,449 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 5,588,000 | 5,912,518 | ||||||
HSBC USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | 5,500,000 | 5,714,390 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 2017 | 5,000,000 | 5,690,300 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., 5.875%, 2016 | 4,250,000 | 4,815,939 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXII, 6.45%, 2087 | 4,668,000 | 4,498,033 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXVII, 7%, 2039 | 1,211,000 | 1,225,021 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.15%, 2013 | 3,960,000 | 4,292,157 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.05%, 2016 | 6,749,000 | 7,138,944 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.75%, 2016 | 7,752,000 | 8,468,122 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 2018 | 10,150,000 | 11,400,795 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.5%, 2020 | 4,790,000 | 4,984,943 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | 12,270,000 | 13,447,822 | ||||||
UFJ Finance Aruba AEC, 6.75%, 2013 | 980,000 | 1,114,906 | ||||||
Wachovia Corp., 6.605%, 2025 | 2,393,000 | 2,584,883 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.98% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | 4,170,000 | 4,378,500 | ||||||
Wells Fargo Bank NA, 6.45%, 2011 | 200,000 | 202,858 | ||||||
$ | 139,088,547 | |||||||
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
HCA, Inc., 7.875%, 2020 | $ | 6,430,000 | $ | 7,121,225 | ||||
Hospira, Inc., 6.05%, 2017 | 3,920,000 | 4,536,447 | ||||||
$ | 11,657,672 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Metals & Mining - 2.4% | ||||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.25%, 2015 | $ | 3,792,000 | $ | 4,062,180 | ||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 2017 | 8,138,000 | 9,206,113 | ||||||
Gold Fields Orogen Holdings Ltd., 4.875%, 2020 (z) | 9,940,000 | 9,756,468 | ||||||
International Steel Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | 8,404,000 | 9,347,231 | ||||||
Peabody Energy Corp., 5.875%, 2016 | 5,520,000 | 5,595,900 | ||||||
Southern Copper Corp., 6.75%, 2040 | 6,277,000 | 6,744,040 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.25%, 2016 | 7,436,000 | 9,183,460 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 | 3,461,000 | 4,421,428 | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd., 6.875%, 2039 | 4,670,000 | 5,358,437 | ||||||
$ | 63,675,257 | |||||||
Mortgage-Backed - 22.7% | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.022%, 2010 | $ | 9,400,000 | $ | 9,399,992 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 4.506%, 2011 | 1,415,279 | 1,426,128 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.55%, 2011 | 2,247,487 | 2,277,753 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.86%, 2012-2014 | 3,534,973 | 3,786,964 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.12%, 2012 | 1,844,096 | 1,927,363 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.518%, 2013 | 1,056,876 | 1,119,894 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.542%, 2013 | 2,265,374 | 2,411,937 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.845%, 2013 | 2,539,613 | 2,730,362 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.37%, 2013 | 1,106,603 | 1,168,437 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.609%, 2014 | 1,459,759 | 1,587,777 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.62%, 2014-2015 | 4,326,903 | 4,782,061 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.77%, 2014 | 1,763,286 | 1,937,586 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.841%, 2014 | 3,994,846 | 4,371,460 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.05%, 2014 | 1,207,486 | 1,339,105 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.412%, 2014 | 2,523,542 | 2,788,872 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.53%, 2015 | 1,180,031 | 1,296,361 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.56%, 2015 | 22,866 | 25,124 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.6%, 2015 | 1,888,825 | 2,081,379 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.665%, 2015 | 1,194,238 | 1,317,288 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.7%, 2015 | 28,565 | 31,614 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.78%, 2015 | 2,599,090 | 2,886,520 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.815%, 2015 | 1,854,578 | 2,060,535 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.85%, 2015 | 1,438,384 | 1,595,401 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.87%, 2015 | 1,211,284 | 1,345,572 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.89%, 2015 | 376,732 | 420,942 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.921%, 2015 | 4,677,297 | 5,208,661 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.94%, 2015 | 2,616,000 | 2,849,099 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2016-2040 | 58,936,648 | 62,894,502 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.09%, 2016 | 2,826,240 | 3,186,101 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.395%, 2016 | 2,424,188 | 2,745,016 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.424%, 2016 | 5,309,987 | 6,011,364 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Mortgage-Backed - continued | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 2016-2039 | $ | 87,240,418 | $ | 94,008,614 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 5.725%, 2016 | 2,165,135 | 2,403,520 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.93%, 2016 | 1,274,342 | 1,450,024 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.989%, 2017 | 4,518,653 | 4,999,902 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.28%, 2017 | 2,688,600 | 3,040,614 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.54%, 2017 | 1,493,619 | 1,693,898 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.88%, 2020 | 807,768 | 902,765 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.19%, 2020 | 2,854,504 | 3,148,461 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.35%, 2023 | 2,015,347 | 2,230,218 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4%, 2024 | 14,800,001 | 15,513,208 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.5%, 2025 | 4,229,307 | 4,479,966 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2029-2038 | 45,058,912 | 49,110,119 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2031-2033 | 715,719 | 808,786 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2037 | 1,284,896 | 1,397,238 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5%, 2017-2040 | 36,128,609 | 38,432,639 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5.5%, 2017-2038 | 38,574,935 | 41,674,136 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.251%, 2020 | 4,741,000 | 5,085,765 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4%, 2025-2040 | 39,684,894 | 41,628,298 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.5%, 2025-2028 | 10,649,087 | 11,192,172 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 6%, 2033-2038 | 14,218,598 | 15,602,866 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 4%, 2032-2040 | 22,067,659 | 22,965,721 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 6%, 2034-2038 | 13,019,563 | 14,387,100 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 5.5%, 2038-2039 | 19,430,994 | 21,067,240 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 4.5%, 2039-2040 | 49,532,581 | 52,910,365 | ||||||
$ | 589,144,805 | |||||||
Municipals - 1.9% | ||||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Stanford University), “T-1”, 5%, 2039 | $ | 17,995,000 | $ | 20,996,206 | ||||
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., 5%, 2031 | 7,970,000 | 9,156,255 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), “K”, 5.5%, 2032 | 15,335,000 | 19,263,827 | ||||||
$ | 49,416,288 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 1.1% | ||||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 7.875%, 2013 | $ | 11,585,000 | $ | 13,341,274 | ||||
El Paso Pipeline Partners LP, 6.5%, 2020 | 2,700,000 | 2,945,025 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 5.65%, 2013 | 1,802,000 | 1,967,252 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 6.75%, 2011 | 110,000 | 112,324 | ||||||
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 2019 | 8,284,000 | 10,472,103 | ||||||
$ | 28,837,978 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Network & Telecom - 2.0% | ||||||||
CenturyLink, Inc., 7.6%, 2039 | $ | 7,550,000 | $ | 7,551,593 | ||||
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.5%, 2020 | 3,655,000 | 4,221,525 | ||||||
Telecom Italia Capital, 7.175%, 2019 | 8,691,000 | 10,479,364 | ||||||
Telefonica Emisiones S.A.U., 2.582%, 2013 | 4,828,000 | 4,954,368 | ||||||
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 5.5%, 2020 (z) | 2,892,000 | 2,910,075 | ||||||
Verizon New York, Inc., 6.875%, 2012 | 14,320,000 | 15,445,509 | ||||||
Windstream Corp., 8.625%, 2016 | 6,080,000 | 6,460,000 | ||||||
$ | 52,022,434 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.7% | ||||||||
Nabor Industries, Inc., 5%, 2020 (n) | $ | 10,440,000 | $ | 10,651,326 | ||||
Pride International, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 | 7,680,000 | 8,697,600 | ||||||
$ | 19,348,926 | |||||||
Oils - 0.2% | ||||||||
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 6.125%, 2020 (z) | $ | 4,519,000 | $ | 4,477,470 | ||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 2.5% | ||||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 (z) | $ | 7,100,000 | $ | 7,140,818 | ||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 6.15%, 2016 | 6,690,000 | 7,422,134 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 8.8%, 2019 | 4,260,000 | 5,403,414 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | 11,130,000 | 12,411,286 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | 8,594,000 | 10,791,288 | ||||||
Discover Bank, 7%, 2020 | 4,210,000 | 4,646,535 | ||||||
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | 5,404,000 | 6,183,905 | ||||||
Nordea Bank AB, 5.424% to 2015, FRN to 2049 (n) | 1,161,000 | 1,129,745 | ||||||
UBS AG, 4.875%, 2020 | 2,220,000 | 2,380,157 | ||||||
UBS Preferred Funding Trust V, 6.243% to 2016, FRN to 2049 | 6,530,000 | 6,456,864 | ||||||
$ | 63,966,146 | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 0.1% | ||||||||
Celgene Corp., 2.45%, 2015 | $ | 3,688,000 | $ | 3,706,812 | ||||
Pollution Control - 0.4% | ||||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., 6.875%, 2017 | $ | 9,660,000 | $ | 10,638,075 | ||||
Printing & Publishing - 0.1% | ||||||||
Pearson PLC, 5.5%, 2013 (n) | $ | 3,090,000 | $ | 3,372,911 | ||||
Real Estate - 1.9% | ||||||||
HRPT Properties Trust, REIT, 6.25%, 2016 | $ | 9,514,000 | $ | 10,097,903 | ||||
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 6%, 2012 | 2,846,000 | 3,082,113 | ||||||
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 5.783%, 2016 | 7,684,000 | 8,511,229 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Real Estate - continued | ||||||||
Liberty Property LP, REIT, 5.5%, 2016 | $ | 8,890,000 | $ | 9,934,664 | ||||
PPF Funding, Inc., REIT, 5.35%, 2012 (n) | 2,080,000 | 2,132,774 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 10.35%, 2019 | 4,593,000 | 6,492,623 | ||||||
Vornado Realty Trust, REIT, 4.75%, 2010 | 798,000 | 799,741 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC, REIT, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | 6,948,000 | 8,185,022 | ||||||
$ | 49,236,069 | |||||||
Restaurants - 0.3% | ||||||||
YUM! Brands, Inc., 8.875%, 2011 | $ | 7,093,000 | $ | 7,346,532 | ||||
Retailers - 0.4% | ||||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | $ | 9,110,000 | $ | 10,198,062 | ||||
Specialty Stores - 0.7% | ||||||||
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 5.75%, 2020 | $ | 9,047,000 | $ | 9,942,318 | ||||
Best Buy Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2013 | 6,570,000 | 7,355,949 | ||||||
$ | 17,298,267 | |||||||
Supermarkets - 0.3% | ||||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.7%, 2040 (z) | $ | 7,368,000 | $ | 7,212,498 | ||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 0.4% | ||||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 2020 (n) | $ | 7,264,000 | $ | 8,079,014 | ||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.883%, 2020 (n) | 3,480,000 | 3,545,288 | ||||||
Indosat Palapa Co. B.V., 7.375%, 2020 (n) | 136,000 | 153,850 | ||||||
$ | 11,778,152 | |||||||
Tobacco - 1.3% | ||||||||
Altria Group, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | $ | 2,660,000 | $ | 3,652,111 | ||||
Altria Group, Inc., 9.95%, 2038 | 4,610,000 | 6,641,184 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 2019 | 6,250,000 | 7,221,206 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 6.875%, 2020 | 4,760,000 | 5,107,994 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 7.25%, 2012 | 125,000 | 134,870 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 10,032,000 | 11,372,075 | ||||||
$ | 34,129,440 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.6% | ||||||||
Erac USA Finance Co., 5.25%, 2020 (n) | $ | 8,800,000 | $ | 9,404,613 | ||||
Erac USA Finance Co., 7%, 2037 (n) | 5,370,000 | 5,944,665 | ||||||
$ | 15,349,278 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 7.1% | ||||||||
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 0.67%, 2012 (m) | $ | 11,928,000 | $ | 12,007,870 | ||||
Citigroup, Inc., FRN, 0.618%, 2012 (m) | 30,444,000 | 30,616,222 | ||||||
FDIC Structured Sale Guarantee Note, 0%, 2012 (n) | 2,332,000 | 2,273,443 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN, 0.235%, 2012 (m) | 15,378,000 | 15,376,047 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., FRN, 0.492%, 2012 (m) | 5,866,000 | 5,886,068 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., FRN, 0.539%, 2012 (m) | 30,444,000 | 30,639,390 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, FRN, 0.641%, 2012 (m) | 31,178,000 | 31,385,178 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., FRN, 0.49%, 2012 (m) | 15,003,000 | 15,043,118 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.94%, 2016 | 444,640 | 479,540 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.37%, 2016 | 434,445 | 466,466 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.35%, 2021 | 21,394 | 23,516 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.34%, 2021 | 34,765 | 38,101 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.44%, 2021 | 33,810 | 37,151 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.34%, 2021 | 185,889 | 201,280 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.07%, 2022 | 127,310 | 142,765 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.35%, 2023 | 1,043,092 | 1,119,792 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.98%, 2023 | 1,604,546 | 1,729,694 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.89%, 2023 | 1,438,136 | 1,572,685 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.93%, 2024 | 1,820,622 | 1,976,786 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.34%, 2024 | 1,632,288 | 1,747,888 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.18%, 2024 | 1,640,114 | 1,786,693 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.52%, 2024 | 2,139,436 | 2,341,016 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.19%, 2024 | 2,167,953 | 2,373,657 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.86%, 2024 | 1,389,367 | 1,510,758 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.57%, 2025 | 2,302,555 | 2,491,881 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.76%, 2025 | 6,858,729 | 7,467,642 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.39%, 2025 | 752,265 | 832,631 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.35%, 2026 | 4,124,182 | 4,574,158 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., FRN, 0.512%, 2012 (m) | 7,795,000 | 7,823,990 | ||||||
$ | 183,965,426 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations - 13.3% | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6.25%, 2023 | $ | 4,506,000 | $ | 6,023,959 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6%, 2026 | 840,000 | 1,108,538 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 5.25%, 2029 | 6,210,000 | 7,605,312 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2036 | 2,640,000 | 2,890,800 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 5%, 2037 | 9,893,000 | 11,678,380 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2039 | 44,008,500 | 47,859,244 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.25%, 2010 | 5,957,000 | 5,961,885 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.125%, 2011 | 67,754,000 | 69,958,647 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.375%, 2012 | 90,555,700 | 91,857,438 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 2013 | 56,625,000 | 60,955,907 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations - continued | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.875%, 2014 | $ | 542,000 | $ | 564,400 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.125%, 2016 | 6,351,000 | 7,625,665 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 3.75%, 2018 | 7,256,000 | 8,092,704 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 2%, 2014 | 5,149,021 | 5,571,400 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 1.625%, 2015 | 5,433,057 | 5,883,832 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 2%, 2016 | 9,624,388 | 10,717,660 | ||||||
$ | 344,355,771 | |||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 1.7% | ||||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 5.95%, 2017 | $ | 3,300,000 | $ | 3,688,166 | ||||
Duke Energy Corp., 5.65%, 2013 | 7,610,000 | 8,489,503 | ||||||
EDP Finance B.V., 6%, 2018 (n) | 6,760,000 | 7,014,703 | ||||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 6%, 2039 (n) | 5,168,000 | 5,314,053 | ||||||
Entergy Corp., 5.125%, 2020 | 7,150,000 | 7,238,510 | ||||||
NiSource Finance Corp., 7.875%, 2010 | 6,503,000 | 6,516,110 | ||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 (z) | 414,695 | 431,180 | ||||||
TECO Energy, Inc., 5.15%, 2020 | 3,960,000 | 4,298,481 | ||||||
$ | 42,990,706 | |||||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $2,441,281,550) | $ | 2,531,202,881 | ||||||
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 0.2% | ||||||||
Automotive - 0.2% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan B, 3.03%, 2013 (Identified Cost, $3,869,411) | $ | 4,137,314 | $ | 4,094,195 | ||||
Money Market Funds (v) - 2.3% | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | 59,873,775 | $ | 59,873,775 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $2,505,024,736) | $ | 2,595,170,851 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 0.1% | 2,822,847 | |||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 2,597,993,698 |
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(m) | The debt is guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The expiration date of the FDIC’s guarantee is the earlier of the maturity date of the debt or June 30, 2012. |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $275,800,917, representing 10.62% of net assets. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Market Value | |||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, 6.076%, 2045 | 12/07/06 | $4,235,570 | $518,625 | |||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “G”, 6.076%, 2045 | 9/21/04 | 2,227,898 | 247,170 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.616%, 2019 | 1/15/10-3/04/10 | 7,407,187 | 7,751,597 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO III, 6.077%, 2039 | 10/25/06 | 4,998,346 | 500,000 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, FRN, 1.106%, 2037 | 2/24/10 | 1,869,313 | 1,875,900 | |||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “H”, 6.075%, 2045 | 3/11/05-12/30/08 | 1,094,237 | 76,175 | |||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 | 9/27/10 | 7,100,000 | 7,140,818 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.566%, 2035 | 6/09/05 | 763,411 | 551,466 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.87%, 2035 | 10/06/05 | 2,015,724 | 1,127,627 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 | 2/28/06 | 1,679,603 | 931,782 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.526%, 2036 | 2/23/06 | 595,884 | 464,268 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.415%, 2036 | 5/16/06-5/29/09 | 1,479,367 | 1,104,947 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.213%, 2036 | 9/11/06 | 4,364,068 | 2,534,213 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.331%, 2036 | 10/25/06 | 2,162,209 | 1,227,229 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.454%, 2037 | 1/26/07-5/29/09 | 3,897,824 | 3,101,091 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 | 3/29/06 | 1,277,279 | 652,973 | |||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.855%, 2040 | 3/01/06 | 3,774,489 | 1,687,197 |
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Restricted Securities - continued | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Market Value | |||||||
Brascan Real Estate, CDO, FRN, 1.889%, 2040 | 9/14/04 | $418,000 | $146,300 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 | 4/07/06-3/04/10 | 8,257,546 | 8,552,149 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.267%, 2035 | 9/14/10 | 6,456,556 | 6,455,208 | |||||||
Carey Commercial Mortgage Trust, 2002-1, “A”, 5.97%, 2019 | 7/22/10 | 2,911,584 | 2,932,920 | |||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.841%, 2032 | 8/25/03 | 65,209 | 61,255 | |||||||
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, 3.75%, 2020 | 10/28/10 | 2,761,498 | 2,785,870 | |||||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 9.375%, 2019 | 1/07/10-1/15/10 | 12,950,025 | 13,820,556 | |||||||
Crest G-Star, 2001-1A, “A”, CDO, 0.769%, 2016 | 7/21/10 | 4,504,471 | 4,395,262 | |||||||
Crest G-Star, CDO, 6.95%, 2032 | 9/13/05 | 6,940,405 | 5,351,320 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A1” CDO, FRN, 0.769%, 2018 | 1/21/10-3/04/10 | 5,841,033 | 6,306,944 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 | 3/02/10 | 1,914,035 | 2,243,022 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “B”, CDO, FRN, 1.638%, 2035 | 1/12/10-3/01/10 | 5,307,036 | 5,962,495 | |||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.7%, 2040 | 8/02/07-5/29/09 | 5,880,419 | 7,212,498 | |||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 6.375%, 2016 | 10/14/10-10/15/10 | 4,048,851 | 4,016,745 | |||||||
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, 7.375%, 2020 | 10/14/10 | 2,796,000 | 2,749,791 | |||||||
FIH Erhvervsbank A.S., 1.75%, 2012 | 12/02/09 | 3,813,876 | 3,895,494 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.363%, 2023 | 1/18/02 | 12,763 | 12,766 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.256%, 2025 | 1/29/03 | 614,463 | 517,919 | |||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 | 10/27/10 | 775,421 | 787,800 | |||||||
Gold Fields Orogen Holdings Ltd., 4.875%, 2020 | 9/30/10 | 9,870,494 | 9,756,468 | |||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.608%, 2035 | 6/21/05-1/18/07 | 1,154,659 | 865,978 | |||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 | 7/16/10 | 5,996,392 | 6,129,381 | |||||||
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 6.125%, 2020 | 10/29/10 | 4,477,470 | 4,477,470 | |||||||
Mach One Trust Commercial Mortgage, “B”, 5.43%, 2040 | 3/10/10 | 4,724,905 | 4,961,200 | |||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.217%, 2031 | 6/10/03 | 41,789 | 30,766 | |||||||
NIBC Bank N.V., 2.8%, 2014 | 11/24/09 | 4,931,090 | 5,239,606 |
20
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Restricted Securities - continued | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Market Value | |||||||
Preferred Term Securities XIX Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.642%, 2035 | 9/08/05-5/29/09 | $7,601,320 | $4,371,109 | |||||||
Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corp., FRN, 6.885%, 2013 | 12/06/04-5/29/09 | 1,974,595 | 2,079,249 | |||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 3.375%, 2016 | 10/06/10 | 273,926 | 275,009 | |||||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 4.75%, 2021 | 10/06/10-10/07/10 | 4,294,803 | 4,233,206 | |||||||
SCF Capital Ltd., 5.375%, 2017 | 10/20/10 | 1,692,000 | 1,659,833 | |||||||
Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities, Inc., FRN, 6.724%, 2032 | 1/07/05 | 3,688,410 | 3,462,675 | |||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 | 4/16/04 | 414,695 | 431,180 | |||||||
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 5.5%, 2020 | 4/23/09-4/24/09 | 2,358,131 | 2,910,075 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $160,582,597 | |||||||||
% of Net Assets | 6.2% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
TIPS | Treasury Inflation Protected Security |
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $2,445,150,961) | $2,535,297,076 | |||
Underlying funds, at cost and value | 59,873,775 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $2,505,024,736) | $2,595,170,851 | |||
Cash | 2,533,807 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 41,526,542 | |||
Fund shares sold | 7,283,172 | |||
Interest and dividends | 23,622,051 | |||
Total assets | $2,670,136,423 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $3,108,303 | |||
Investments purchased | 65,521,946 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 2,576,702 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 142,052 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 711,979 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 48,637 | |||
Administrative services fee | 3,619 | |||
Program manager fees | 61 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 358 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 29,068 | |||
Total liabilities | $72,142,725 | |||
Net assets | $2,597,993,698 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $2,592,328,336 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 90,146,115 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (78,541,000 | ) | ||
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | (5,939,753 | ) | ||
Net assets | $2,597,993,698 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 244,352,877 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $972,191,070 | 91,466,235 | $10.63 | |||||||||
Class B | 47,106,356 | 4,425,208 | 10.65 | |||||||||
Class C | 156,660,667 | 14,718,611 | 10.64 | |||||||||
Class I | 1,289,160,692 | 121,238,075 | 10.63 | |||||||||
Class W | 13,807,446 | 1,298,555 | 10.63 | |||||||||
Class R1 | 3,443,260 | 323,446 | 10.65 | |||||||||
Class R2 | 45,209,125 | 4,256,514 | 10.62 | |||||||||
Class R3 | 33,082,464 | 3,113,428 | 10.63 | |||||||||
Class R4 | 31,762,324 | 2,988,525 | 10.63 | |||||||||
Class 529A | 2,588,828 | 244,094 | 10.61 | |||||||||
Class 529B | 793,799 | 74,562 | 10.65 | |||||||||
Class 529C | 2,187,667 | 205,624 | 10.64 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $11.16 [100 / 95.25 x $10.63] and $11.14 [100 / 95.25 x $10.61], respectively. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering prices of Class A and Class 529A shares are reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, Class C, Class 529B, and Class 529C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, W, R1, R2, R3, R4, and 529A. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Interest income | $55,988,999 | |||
Dividends from underlying funds | 82,641 | |||
Total investment income | $56,071,640 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $6,286,971 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 2,376,505 | |||
Program manager fees | 2,464 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 1,311,658 | |||
Administrative services fee | 175,243 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 29,655 | |||
Custodian fee | 130,922 | |||
Shareholder communications | 85,821 | |||
Auditing fees | 31,481 | |||
Legal fees | 16,395 | |||
Miscellaneous | 132,645 | |||
Total expenses | $10,579,760 | |||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | (499,315 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $10,080,445 | |||
Net investment income | $45,991,195 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||
Investment transactions | $47,859,676 | |||
Swap transactions | (431,042 | ) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | $47,428,634 | |||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | ||||
investments | $34,159,908 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $81,588,542 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $127,579,737 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||
Change in net assets | (unaudited) | |||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $45,991,195 | $96,838,593 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 47,428,634 | 52,654,178 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 34,159,908 | 240,423,670 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $127,579,737 | $389,916,441 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(49,729,057 | ) | $(107,085,274 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $6,626,226 | $377,634,378 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $84,476,906 | $660,465,545 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 2,513,516,792 | 1,853,051,247 | ||||||
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $5,939,753 and $2,201,891, respectively) | $2,597,993,698 | $2,513,516,792 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.04 | $9.86 | $10.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.19 | $0.44 | $0.48 | $0.49 | $0.47 | $0.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.35 | (0.74 | ) | (0.24 | ) | 0.21 | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.54 | $1.79 | $(0.26 | ) | $0.25 | $0.68 | $0.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.21 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.53 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.21 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.53 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.55 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.63 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.04 | $9.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 5.27 | (n) | 20.30 | (2.54 | ) | 2.60 | 7.08 | 0.70 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.90 | (a) | 0.92 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 1.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.80 | (a) | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.70 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.65 | (a) | 4.45 | 5.27 | 4.94 | 4.75 | 4.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $972,191 | $918,742 | $799,077 | $1,137,796 | $1,059,522 | $922,617 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | $9.88 | $10.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.15 | $0.36 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $0.39 | $0.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.36 | 1.36 | (0.75 | ) | (0.24 | ) | 0.21 | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.51 | $1.72 | $(0.34 | ) | $0.17 | $0.60 | $— | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.17 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.17 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.65 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | $9.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 4.95 | (n) | 19.34 | (3.41 | ) | 1.75 | 6.17 | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.65 | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.71 | 1.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.59 | (a) | 1.58 | 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.55 | 1.55 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.85 | (a) | 3.66 | 4.47 | 4.11 | 3.92 | 3.21 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $47,106 | $45,472 | $45,473 | $60,335 | $67,970 | $77,518 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.05 | $9.88 | $10.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.15 | $0.35 | $0.40 | $0.40 | $0.39 | $0.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.34 | 1.36 | (0.75 | ) | (0.22 | ) | 0.20 | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.49 | $1.71 | $(0.35 | ) | $0.18 | $0.59 | $— | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.64 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.05 | $9.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 4.83 | (n) | 19.28 | (3.45 | ) | 1.84 | 6.07 | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.66 | 1.69 | 1.67 | 1.71 | 1.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.64 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.55 | 1.55 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.79 | (a) | 3.51 | 4.43 | 4.08 | 3.90 | 3.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $156,661 | $141,966 | $83,990 | $83,506 | $67,112 | $59,342 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.04 | $9.87 | $10.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.20 | $0.45 | $0.50 | $0.50 | $0.48 | $0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.36 | (0.75 | ) | (0.23 | ) | 0.21 | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.55 | $1.81 | $(0.25 | ) | $0.27 | $0.69 | $0.10 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.53 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.55 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.53 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.56 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.63 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.04 | $9.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 5.35 | (n) | 20.47 | (2.39 | ) | 2.75 | 7.13 | 0.96 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.65 | (a) | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.65 | (a) | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.55 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.81 | (a) | 4.54 | 5.43 | 5.09 | 4.89 | 4.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,289,161 | $1,291,881 | $825,529 | $1,301,075 | $958,287 | $614,643 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||
Class W | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.03 | $9.86 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.19 | $0.45 | $0.49 | $0.49 | $0.39 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on | 0.35 | 1.35 | (0.74 | ) | (0.22 | ) | 0.29 | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.54 | $1.80 | $(0.25 | ) | $0.27 | $0.68 | ||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.21 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | ||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.63 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.03 | |||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 5.30 | (n) | 20.36 | (2.49 | ) | 2.75 | 7.02 | |||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.75 | (a) | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.82 | ||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.75 | (a) | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.68 | (a) | 4.56 | 5.34 | 4.92 | 4.55 | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | |||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | $13,807 | $9,582 | $16,151 | $14,321 | $861 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | $9.88 | $10.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.15 | $0.36 | $0.41 | $0.40 | $0.38 | $0.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.35 | (0.76 | ) | (0.24 | ) | 0.21 | (0.34 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.50 | $1.71 | $(0.35 | ) | $0.16 | $0.59 | $(0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.65 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | $9.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 4.92 | (n) | 19.28 | (3.45 | ) | 1.65 | 6.07 | (0.28 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.67 | 1.69 | 1.75 | 1.90 | 1.94 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.64 | 1.49 | 1.56 | 1.65 | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.80 | (a) | 3.61 | 4.44 | 3.99 | 3.79 | 3.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $3,443 | $2,985 | $2,998 | $2,891 | $1,655 | $488 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | $10.03 | $9.85 | $10.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.17 | $0.40 | $0.45 | $0.44 | $0.42 | $0.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.36 | (0.74 | ) | (0.23 | ) | 0.21 | (0.34 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.52 | $1.76 | $(0.29 | ) | $0.21 | $0.63 | $0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.62 | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | $10.03 | $9.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 5.09 | (n) | 19.90 | (2.88 | ) | 2.14 | 6.55 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.15 | (a) | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.45 | 1.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.15 | (a) | 1.14 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 1.20 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.31 | (a) | 4.08 | 4.94 | 4.49 | 4.25 | 3.54 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $45,209 | $41,092 | $33,055 | $42,613 | $26,212 | $14,923 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R3 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | $10.03 | $9.86 | $10.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.19 | $0.43 | $0.47 | $0.47 | $0.45 | $0.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.35 | (0.74 | ) | (0.24 | ) | 0.20 | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.54 | $1.78 | $(0.27 | ) | $0.23 | $0.65 | $0.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.63 | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | $10.03 | $9.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 5.32 | (n) | 20.20 | (2.64 | ) | 2.39 | 6.71 | 0.45 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.90 | (a) | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 1.12 | 1.14 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.90 | (a) | 0.89 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.95 | 0.95 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.55 | (a) | 4.35 | 5.18 | 4.74 | 4.50 | 3.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $33,082 | $31,165 | $26,213 | $38,851 | $28,761 | $10,835 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.30 | $8.98 | $9.78 | $10.04 | $9.86 | $10.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.20 | $0.45 | $0.50 | $0.49 | $0.47 | $0.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.37 | (0.76 | ) | (0.23 | ) | 0.22 | (0.28 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.55 | $1.82 | $(0.26 | ) | $0.26 | $0.69 | $0.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.55 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.63 | $10.30 | $8.98 | $9.78 | $10.04 | $9.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s) | 5.35 | (n) | 20.61 | (2.50 | ) | 2.68 | 7.13 | 0.76 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.65 | (a) | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.84 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.65 | (a) | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.80 | (a) | 4.53 | 5.44 | 5.02 | 4.75 | 4.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $31,762 | $26,315 | $17,583 | $14,182 | $11,129 | $358 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529A | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.27 | $8.96 | $9.75 | $10.01 | $9.84 | $10.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.19 | $0.43 | $0.47 | $0.45 | $0.42 | $0.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.35 | (0.75 | ) | (0.23 | ) | 0.22 | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.54 | $1.78 | $(0.28 | ) | $0.22 | $0.64 | $0.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.61 | $10.27 | $8.96 | $9.75 | $10.01 | $9.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 5.33 | (n) | 20.23 | (2.74 | ) | 2.24 | 6.60 | 0.44 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.00 | (a) | 1.02 | 1.13 | 1.26 | 1.32 | 1.34 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.90 | (a) | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.56 | (a) | 4.31 | 5.14 | 4.61 | 4.41 | 3.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $2,589 | $2,066 | $1,289 | $1,170 | �� | $1,213 | $637 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | $9.88 | $10.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.14 | $0.34 | $0.40 | $0.38 | $0.35 | $0.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.36 | 1.36 | (0.76 | ) | (0.23 | ) | 0.22 | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.50 | $1.70 | $(0.36 | ) | $0.15 | $0.57 | $(0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.65 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | $9.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 4.87 | (n) | 19.17 | (3.55 | ) | 1.50 | 5.91 | (0.39 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.75 | (a) | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.91 | 1.97 | 1.99 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.75 | (a) | 1.74 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.80 | 1.80 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.70 | (a) | 3.47 | 4.34 | 3.84 | 3.66 | 2.96 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $794 | $700 | $478 | $397 | $355 | $153 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of | $10.31 | $8.99 | $9.79 | $10.05 | $9.87 | $10.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.14 | $0.34 | $0.40 | $0.37 | $0.35 | $0.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.35 | 1.37 | (0.76 | ) | (0.22 | ) | 0.22 | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.49 | $1.71 | $(0.36 | ) | $0.15 | $0.57 | $(0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | ||||||||||||
From net realized gain on | — | — | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions declared to | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.64 | $10.31 | $8.99 | $9.79 | $10.05 | $9.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 4.77 | (n) | 19.30 | (3.56 | ) | 1.49 | 5.91 | (0.39 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.75 | (a) | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.91 | 1.97 | 1.99 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.75 | (a) | 1.74 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.80 | 1.80 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.70 | (a) | 3.46 | 4.34 | 3.82 | 3.65 | 3.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 37 | 90 | 75 | 96 | 56 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $2,188 | $1,550 | $1,215 | $1,208 | $628 | $283 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Research Bond Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in asset-backed and/or mortgage-backed securities. The value of these securities may depend, in part, on the issuer’s or borrower’s credit quality or ability to pay principal and interest when due and may fall if an issuer or borrower defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest or if the instrument’s credit rating is downgraded by a credit rating agency. U.S. Government securities not supported as to the payment of principal or interest by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks, are subject to greater credit risk than are U.S. Government securities supported by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Ginnie Mae. The fund can invest in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing
37
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases,
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2010 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents | $— | $528,321,197 | $— | $528,321,197 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | — | 72,842,802 | — | 72,842,802 | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 49,416,288 | — | 49,416,288 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 818,934,745 | — | 818,934,745 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 617,377,887 | — | 617,377,887 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 151,319,476 | — | 151,319,476 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 85,865,752 | — | 85,865,752 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 207,124,734 | — | 207,124,734 | ||||||||||||
Floating Rate Loans | — | 4,094,195 | — | 4,094,195 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 59,873,775 | — | — | 59,873,775 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $59,873,775 | $2,535,297,076 | $— | $2,595,170,851 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Inflation-Adjusted Debt Securities – The fund invests in inflation-adjusted debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. The fund may also invest in inflation-adjusted debt securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and instrumentalities other than the U.S. Treasury and by other entities such as U.S. and foreign corporations and foreign governments. The principal value of these debt securities is adjusted through income according to changes in the Consumer Price Index or another general price or wage index. These debt securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest, but this fixed rate is applied to the inflation-adjusted principal amount. The principal paid at maturity of the debt security is typically equal to the inflation-adjusted principal amount, or the security’s original par value, whichever is greater. Other types of inflation-adjusted securities may use other methods to adjust for other measures of inflation.
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
Derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. At October 31, 2010, the fund did not have any outstanding derivative instruments.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Swap Transactions | |||
Credit Contracts | (431,042 | ) |
There is no unrealized gain (loss) from derivative transactions at period end.
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Swap Agreements – The fund entered into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
The fund entered into credit default swaps in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the contract notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although contract-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant contract. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. Loan
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed-income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted upward or downward to the rate of inflation. Interest is accrued based on the principal value, which is adjusted for inflation. Any increase or decrease in the principal amount of an inflation-indexed bond is generally recorded as an increase or decrease in interest income, respectively, even though the adjusted principal is not received until maturity. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
The fund entered into “TBA” (to be announced) purchase commitments to purchase securities for a fixed unit price at a future date. Although the unit price has been established, the principal value has not been finalized. However, the principal amount of the commitments will not fluctuate more than 0.01%. The fund holds, and maintains until settlement date, cash or high-grade debt obligations in an amount sufficient to meet the purchase price, or the fund may enter into offsetting contracts for the forward sale of other securities it owns. Income on the securities will not be earned until settlement date. TBA
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
purchase commitments may be considered securities in themselves, and involve a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines prior to settlement date, which is in addition to the risk of decline in the value of the fund’s other assets. Unsettled TBA purchase commitments are valued at the current market value of the underlying securities.
The fund entered into “TBA” (to be announced) sale commitments to hedge its portfolio positions or to sell mortgage-backed securities it owns under delayed delivery arrangements. Proceeds of TBA sale commitments are not received until the contractual settlement date. During the time a TBA sale commitment is outstanding, equivalent deliverable securities, or an offsetting TBA purchase commitment deliverable on or before the sale commitment date, are held as “cover” for the transaction.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, custody fees were not reduced.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
44
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/10 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $107,085,274 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/10 | ||||
Cost of investments | $2,519,068,329 | |||
Gross appreciation | 137,675,526 | |||
Gross depreciation | (61,573,004 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $76,102,522 | |||
As of 4/30/10 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 6,248,870 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (109,078,871 | ) | ||
Post-October capital loss deferral | (5,524,465 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (9,015,759 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 45,184,907 |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
As of April 30, 2010, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
4/30/11 | $(108,693 | ) | ||
4/30/12 | (1,464,107 | ) | ||
4/30/13 | (1,670,568 | ) | ||
4/30/14 | (14,142,447 | ) | ||
4/30/15 | (33,880,250 | ) | ||
4/30/16 | (14,742,595 | ) | ||
4/30/17 | (40,108,303 | ) | ||
4/30/18 | (2,961,908 | ) | ||
$(109,078,871 | ) |
The availability of a portion of the capital loss carryforwards, which were acquired on June 22, 2007 in connection with the MFS Intermediate Investment Grade Bond Fund merger, may be limited in a given year.
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution, service, and program manager fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class.
45
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B and Class 529B shares will convert to Class A and Class 529A shares, respectively, approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||
Class A | $18,896,077 | $42,229,374 | ||||||
Class B | 738,179 | 1,915,336 | ||||||
Class C | 2,368,675 | 4,740,675 | ||||||
Class I | 25,350,382 | 52,809,122 | ||||||
Class W | 235,307 | 800,192 | ||||||
Class R1 | 48,709 | 126,840 | ||||||
Class R2 | 780,667 | 1,723,274 | ||||||
Class R3 | 626,761 | 1,444,093 | ||||||
Class R4 | 600,239 | 1,125,112 | ||||||
Class 529A | 45,316 | 83,149 | ||||||
Class 529B | 11,529 | 25,188 | ||||||
Class 529C | 27,216 | 62,919 | ||||||
Total | $49,729,057 | $107,085,274 |
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.50% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $303,013 and $901 for the six months ended October 31, 2010, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A and Class 529A shares of the fund, respectively.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
46
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | $1,195,453 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 233,129 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 761,608 | |||||||||||||||
Class W | 0.10% | — | 0.10% | 0.10% | 5,906 | |||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 15,652 | |||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 108,276 | |||||||||||||||
Class R3 | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 40,662 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | 2,943 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 3,827 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 9,049 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $2,376,505 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2010 based on each class’ average daily net assets. 0.10% of the Class A and 0.10 % of the Class 529A service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver arrangement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $479,354 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Assets attributable to Class B shares sold prior to May 1, 2006 are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B shares, 0.15% of the Class B service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class B service fee is being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this waiver amounted to $13,152 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. These written waiver agreements will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreements will continue at least until August 31, 2011. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 24 months of purchase. Class C and Class 529C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $11,183 | |||
Class B | 27,841 | |||
Class C | 16,436 | |||
Class 529B | 73 |
The fund has entered into and may from time to time enter into contracts with program managers and other parties which administer the tuition programs through which an investment in the fund’s 529 share classes is made. The fund
47
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
has entered into an agreement with MFD pursuant to which MFD receives an annual fee of up to 0.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. The services provided by MFD, or a third party with which MFD contracts, include recordkeeping and tax reporting and account services, as well as services designed to maintain the program’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulatory requirements. Program manager fees for the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class 529A | $1,176 | |||
Class 529B | 383 | |||
Class 529C | 905 | |||
Total Program Manager Fees | $2,464 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fee was $248,815, which equated to 0.0198% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $754,915.
Under a Special Servicing Agreement among MFS, each MFS fund which invests in other MFS funds (“MFS fund-of-funds”) and certain underlying funds in which a MFS fund-of-funds invests (“underlying funds”), each underlying fund may pay a portion of each MFS fund-of-fund’s transfer agent-related expenses, including sub-accounting fees payable to financial intermediaries, to the extent such payments do not exceed the benefits realized or expected to be realized by the underlying fund from the investment in the underlying fund by the MFS fund-of-fund. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, these costs for the fund amounted to $307,928 and are reflected in the shareholder servicing costs on the Statement of Operations.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0139% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
48
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $9,321 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $6,809, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||
U.S. Government securities | $532,358,584 | $452,172,070 | ||||||
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | $404,019,780 | $447,456,104 |
49
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 15,061,647 | $157,079,044 | 36,170,241 | $355,379,664 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 794,338 | 8,302,679 | 1,448,858 | 14,356,692 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 2,718,871 | 28,408,392 | 6,799,737 | 66,944,197 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 16,451,350 | 172,520,039 | 41,269,033 | 410,725,669 | ||||||||||||
Class W | 592,644 | 6,198,692 | 676,001 | 6,701,977 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 83,231 | 874,708 | 123,593 | 1,224,763 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 646,247 | 6,752,144 | 1,728,183 | 17,034,370 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 616,483 | 6,434,079 | 1,300,335 | 12,685,838 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 587,779 | 6,121,009 | 1,272,713 | 12,631,311 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 46,338 | 481,851 | 81,065 | 796,482 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 8,976 | 93,278 | 22,111 | 209,772 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 68,229 | 715,975 | 91,955 | 916,090 | ||||||||||||
37,676,133 | $393,981,890 | 90,983,825 | $899,606,825 | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,308,289 | $13,699,934 | 3,314,767 | $32,870,853 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 50,624 | 530,864 | 144,073 | 1,426,453 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 122,125 | 1,281,142 | 266,154 | 2,645,530 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 1,307,011 | 13,681,959 | 3,280,523 | 32,562,482 | ||||||||||||
Class W | 20,699 | 217,207 | 75,257 | 743,845 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 4,600 | 48,271 | 12,697 | 125,766 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 72,191 | 755,832 | 167,957 | 1,664,188 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 59,658 | 624,687 | 145,230 | 1,438,267 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 56,910 | 596,244 | 111,305 | 1,107,266 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 4,326 | 45,245 | 8,338 | 82,608 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 1,096 | 11,508 | 2,531 | 25,133 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 2,596 | 27,216 | 6,301 | 62,576 | ||||||||||||
3,010,125 | $31,520,109 | 7,535,133 | $74,754,967 |
50
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (14,128,989 | ) | $(147,606,746 | ) | (39,192,164 | ) | $(383,623,003 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (828,856 | ) | (8,659,825 | ) | (2,235,802 | ) | (22,097,014 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (1,889,310 | ) | (19,837,177 | ) | (2,630,415 | ) | (26,152,744 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (21,934,149 | ) | (226,226,450 | ) | (10,971,595 | ) | (109,141,389 | ) | ||||||||
Class W | (244,977 | ) | (2,568,385 | ) | (1,617,917 | ) | (16,257,021 | ) | ||||||||
Class R1 | (53,764 | ) | (560,244 | ) | (180,005 | ) | (1,786,408 | ) | ||||||||
Class R2 | (455,563 | ) | (4,759,415 | ) | (1,584,094 | ) | (15,545,655 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | (590,244 | ) | (6,167,985 | ) | (1,336,501 | ) | (13,140,805 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | (212,029 | ) | (2,211,019 | ) | (785,212 | ) | (7,725,225 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529A | (7,645 | ) | (79,895 | ) | (32,127 | ) | (322,039 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529B | (3,395 | ) | (35,562 | ) | (9,823 | ) | (95,518 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529C | (15,623 | ) | (163,070 | ) | (82,886 | ) | (840,593 | ) | ||||||||
(40,364,544 | ) | $(418,875,773 | ) | (60,658,541 | ) | $(596,727,414 | ) | |||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2,240,947 | $23,172,232 | 292,844 | $4,627,514 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 16,106 | 173,718 | (642,871 | ) | (6,313,869 | ) | ||||||||||
Class C | 951,686 | 9,852,357 | 4,435,476 | 43,436,983 | ||||||||||||
Class I | (4,175,788 | ) | (40,024,452 | ) | 33,577,961 | 334,146,762 | ||||||||||
Class W | 368,366 | 3,847,514 | (866,659 | ) | (8,811,199 | ) | ||||||||||
Class R1 | 34,067 | 362,735 | (43,715 | ) | (435,879 | ) | ||||||||||
Class R2 | 262,875 | 2,748,561 | 312,046 | 3,152,903 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 85,897 | 890,781 | 109,064 | 983,300 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 432,660 | 4,506,234 | 598,806 | 6,013,352 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 43,019 | 447,201 | 57,276 | 557,051 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 6,677 | 69,224 | 14,819 | 139,387 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 55,202 | 580,121 | 15,370 | 138,073 | ||||||||||||
321,714 | $6,626,226 | 37,860,417 | $377,634,378 |
The fund is one of several mutual funds in which the MFS funds-of-funds may invest. The MFS funds-of-funds do not invest in the underlying MFS funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Conservative Allocation Fund, MFS Moderate Allocation Fund, and MFS Growth Allocation Fund were the owners of record of approximately 7%, 10%, and 3%, respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund. In addition, the MFS Lifetime Retirement Income Fund, MFS Lifetime 2010 Fund, MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund, MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund, MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund, and MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund were each the owners of record of less than 1% of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided
51
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $13,221 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 52,816,274 | 761,325,660 | (754,268,159 | ) | 59,873,775 | |||||||||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $82,641 | $59,873,775 |
52
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2010 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2009 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund,
53
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
(v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 1st quintile for the one-year period and the 2nd quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2009 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results are likely to differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
54
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (“MFD”), an affiliate of MFS, currently observes a Class A 12b-1 fee waiver, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year) the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account that the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was lower than the Lipper expense group median described above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
55
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFD. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research, and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2010.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
56
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
57
Table of Contents
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
Table of Contents
MFS® Mutual Funds | 10/31/10 | |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT |
MFS® Research Bond Fund J
RBJ-SEM 10/10
Table of Contents
CONTACT INFORMATION | BACK COVER |
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED • MAY LOSE VALUE • NO BANK GUARANTEE
Table of Contents
Dear Shareholders:
After an extended rebound in the financial markets, uncertainty returned in early 2010 as investors began to question the durability of the recovery for global economies and markets. That uncertainty led to increased risk aversion, especially as investors saw the eurozone struggle with the debt woes of many of its members. In September, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s promises to further loosen monetary policy helped assuage market fears and drive asset prices off their recent lows. A combination of solid earnings and improving economic data gave an additional boost to investor sentiment. As we near the end of 2010, we are cautiously optimistic that economic growth will continue to improve and that the global economies will recover from the shocks of the past few years. We expect the pace of recovery worldwide will be uneven and volatile.
As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is in times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with their advisors to research and identify investment opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 35.5% | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 25.2% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 8.0% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 6.0% | |||
U.S. Treasury Securities | 6.0% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 5.6% | |||
U.S. Government Agencies | 4.7% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | 2.9% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 2.9% | |||
Municipal Bonds | 2.7% | |||
Non-U.S. Government Bonds | 1.1% | |||
Floating Rate Loans | 0.3% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 18.7% | |||
AA | 6.9% | |||
A | 8.1% | |||
BBB | 30.1% | |||
BB | 9.9% | |||
B | 0.3% | |||
CCC | 0.6% | |||
U.S. Agency (NR) | 26.2% | |||
Other Fixed Income (NR) | 0.1% | |||
Cash & Other | (0.9)% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 4.3 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 7.0 yrs. |
(a) | The rating categories include debt securities and fixed-income structured products where these have long-term public ratings. All ratings are assigned in accordance with the following hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moody’s, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moody’s, then a Standard & Poor’s rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Ratings from Moody’s are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Agency (NR) includes unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Other Fixed Income (NR) includes unrated long-term fixed income securities, interest rate swaps and fixed income futures. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
“From time to time “Cash & Other Net Assets” may be negative due to timing of cash receipts and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.”
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/10.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
2
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010.
Actual expenses
The first line of the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The second line of the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Annualized Expense Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/10 | Ending Account Value 10/31/10 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/10-10/31/10 | |||||||||||||
Actual | 1.60 | % | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,053.23 | $ | 8.28 | ||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60 | % | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,017.14 | $ | 8.13 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid is equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. |
3
Table of Contents
10/31/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 99.7% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Aerospace - 0.4% | ||||||||
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | $ | 210,000 | $ | 233,100 | ||||
Airlines - 0.1% | ||||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., 7.25%, 2019 | $ | 65,000 | $ | 72,150 | ||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 14.5% | ||||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.616%, 2019 (z) | $ | 247,754 | $ | 185,815 | ||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “H”, 6.075%, 2045 (z) | 138,945 | 8,684 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.87%, 2035 (i)(z) | 3,750,670 | 165,022 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 (i)(z) | 2,393,813 | 119,480 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.415%, 2036 (i)(z) | 1,837,749 | 104,673 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 (i)(z) | 1,679,205 | 85,215 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.402%, 2035 | 49,234 | 49,440 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2041 | 252,259 | 251,901 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (z) | 134,623 | 134,623 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.267%, 2035 (z) | 160,100 | 146,091 | ||||||
Carey Commercial Mortgage Trust, 2002-1, “A”, 5.97%, 2019 (z) | 69,147 | 70,335 | ||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.322%, 2049 | 336,667 | 351,178 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.303%, 2035 | 113,017 | 111,315 | ||||||
Crest G-Star, CDO, 6.95%, 2032 (z) | 974,000 | 798,680 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A1” CDO, FRN, 0.769%, 2018 (z) | 215,639 | 176,824 | ||||||
CWCapital LLC, 5.223%, 2048 | 350,000 | 365,525 | ||||||
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corp., FRN, 7.5%, 2031 | 260,993 | 262,974 | ||||||
E*TRADE RV & Marine Trust, 3.62%, 2018 | 14,010 | 14,041 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.09%, 2023 (i)(z) | 72,133 | 3,232 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.272%, 2025 (i)(z) | 1,491,912 | 118,309 | ||||||
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 0.83%, 2043 (i)(n) | 3,338,603 | 11,255 | ||||||
First Union-Lehman Brothers Bank of America, FRN, 0.428%, 2035 (i) | 1,683,052 | 30,202 | ||||||
Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust, 1.04%, 2013 (n) | 439,371 | 440,057 | ||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 (z) | 145,000 | 148,176 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.42%, 2049 | 247,640 | 259,267 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.38%, 2042 (n) | 540,000 | 219,733 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.817%, 2049 | 117,670 | 125,603 | ||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “C”, FRN, 1.826%, 2021 (n) | 787,476 | 622,106 | ||||||
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.36%, 2035 (i) | 510,550 | 28,242 | ||||||
Mach One Trust Commercial Mortgage, “B”, 5.43%, 2040 (z) | 174,000 | 171,825 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, “B”, 5.826%, 2050 | 350,000 | 113,379 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.748%, 2050 | 320,000 | 332,631 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.217%, 2031 (i)(z) | 271,210 | 6,465 | ||||||
Nationslink Funding Corp., FRN, 1.204%, 2030 (i) | 229,620 | 6,376 | ||||||
Popular ABS Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 4.62%, 2035 | 27,324 | 27,350 | ||||||
Preferred Term Securities XIX Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.642%, 2035 (z) | 1,353,284 | 771,372 | ||||||
Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., FRN, 4.971%, 2034 | 185,000 | 190,825 | ||||||
Residential Funding Mortgage Securities, Inc., 5.32%, 2035 | 845,000 | 311,553 | ||||||
Structured Asset Securities Corp., FRN, 0.496%, 2035 | 13,637 | 13,196 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.903%, 2051 | 402,255 | 422,364 | ||||||
$ | 7,775,334 | |||||||
Broadcasting - 0.9% | ||||||||
CBS Corp., 5.75%, 2020 | $ | 70,000 | $ | 77,583 | ||||
Inmarsat Finance PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (n) | 235,000 | 251,450 | ||||||
NBC Universal, Inc., 5.95%, 2041 (n) | 112,000 | 114,382 |
4
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Broadcasting - continued | ||||||||
News America, Inc., 8.5%, 2025 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 37,489 | ||||
$ | 480,904 | |||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.8% | ||||||||
INVESCO PLC, 5.625%, 2012 | $ | 179,000 | $ | 188,554 | ||||
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corp., 5.6%, 2019 | 233,000 | 254,762 | ||||||
$ | 443,316 | |||||||
Cable TV - 2.4% | ||||||||
CSC Holdings LLC, 8.5%, 2014 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 223,000 | ||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | 376,000 | 421,120 | ||||||
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | 121,000 | 127,231 | ||||||
TCI Communications, Inc., 9.8%, 2012 | 181,000 | 199,934 | ||||||
Time Warner Entertainment Co. LP, 8.375%, 2033 | 243,000 | 306,996 | ||||||
$ | 1,278,281 | |||||||
Chemicals - 1.0% | ||||||||
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 2017 | $ | 240,000 | $ | 276,600 | ||||
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | 150,000 | 192,651 | ||||||
Dow Chemical Co., 9.4%, 2039 | 55,000 | 77,929 | ||||||
$ | 547,180 | |||||||
Consumer Products - 0.5% | ||||||||
Hasbro, Inc., 6.35%, 2040 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 120,787 | ||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 2020 | 125,000 | 129,945 | ||||||
$ | 250,732 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 1.0% | ||||||||
Western Union Co., 5.4%, 2011 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 523,481 | ||||
Defense Electronics - 1.0% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.4%, 2011 (n) | $ | 372,000 | $ | 390,380 | ||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.375%, 2019 (n) | 105,000 | 122,455 | ||||||
$ | 512,835 | |||||||
Electronics - 0.4% | ||||||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 6.55%, 2017 | $ | 180,000 | $ | 210,141 | ||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.1% | ||||||||
Qatari Diar Finance Q.S.C., 5%, 2020 (n) | $ | 161,000 | $ | 168,509 | ||||
Qtel International Finance Ltd., 7.875%, 2019 | 200,000 | 245,706 | ||||||
VEB Finance Ltd., 6.902%, 2020 (n) | 171,000 | 182,799 | ||||||
$ | 597,014 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 1.5% | ||||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.375%, 2017 | $ | 125,000 | $ | 138,864 | ||||
Apache Corp., 7.375%, 2047 | 10,000 | 12,529 | ||||||
Newfield Exploration Co., 6.625%, 2016 | 120,000 | 124,800 | ||||||
Newfield Exploration Co., 7.125%, 2018 | 80,000 | 85,600 | ||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 6.65%, 2017 | 205,000 | 221,334 | ||||||
Southwestern Energy Co., 7.5%, 2018 | 183,000 | 210,450 | ||||||
$ | 793,577 | |||||||
Energy - Integrated - 0.7% | ||||||||
Petro-Canada, 6.05%, 2018 | $ | 327,000 | $ | 385,492 |
5
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Financial Institutions - 1.1% | ||||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 10.25%, 2017 | $ | 135,000 | $ | 139,219 | ||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.5%, 2020 | 340,000 | 374,239 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | 50,000 | 55,000 | ||||||
$ | 568,458 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 0.7% | ||||||||
Del Monte Foods Co., 7.5%, 2019 | $ | 20,000 | $ | 21,950 | ||||
Miller Brewing Co., 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 341,000 | 375,591 | ||||||
$ | 397,541 | |||||||
Forest & Paper Products - 0.0% | ||||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 (z) | $ | 17,000 | $ | 17,170 | ||||
Gaming & Lodging - 0.8% | ||||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | $ | 410,000 | $ | 437,831 | ||||
Insurance - 2.2% | ||||||||
ING Groep N.V., 5.775% to 2015, FRN to 2049 | $ | 323,000 | $ | 297,967 | ||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2013 (n) | 300,000 | 326,765 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 110,000 | 122,639 | ||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 70,000 | 76,118 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 308,000 | 348,374 | ||||||
$ | 1,171,863 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 0.6% | ||||||||
Humana, Inc., 7.2%, 2018 | $ | 270,000 | $ | 313,778 | ||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 1.1% | ||||||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 213,802 | ||||
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 2020 | 170,000 | 173,907 | ||||||
PartnerRe Ltd., 5.5%, 2020 | 99,000 | 103,309 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2067 (n) | 126,000 | 120,487 | ||||||
$ | 611,505 | |||||||
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.1% | ||||||||
FIH Erhvervsbank A.S., 1.75%, 2012 (z) | $ | 160,000 | $ | 163,119 | ||||
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 2.625%, 2012 (n) | 400,000 | 408,340 | ||||||
$ | 571,459 | |||||||
Machinery & Tools - 0.3% | ||||||||
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 (n) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 167,625 | ||||
Major Banks - 6.6% | ||||||||
BAC Capital Trust XIV, 5.63% to 2012, FRN to 2049 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 84,900 | ||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 2018 | 230,000 | 242,071 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 8% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | 136,000 | 137,247 | ||||||
BNP Paribas, 7.195% to 2037, FRN to 2049 (n) | 200,000 | 201,500 | ||||||
Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., 6%, 2018 | 360,000 | 404,488 | ||||||
DBS Group Holdings Ltd., 7.657% to 2011, FRN to 2049 (n) | 162,000 | 164,228 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.625%, 2017 | 205,000 | 219,612 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.5%, 2019 | 140,000 | 168,526 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 2017 | 250,000 | 284,515 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.05%, 2016 | 280,000 | 296,178 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 2018 | 488,000 | 548,137 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.5%, 2020 | 110,000 | 114,477 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Major Banks - continued | ||||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | $ | 290,000 | $ | 317,838 | ||||
Wachovia Corp., 6.605%, 2025 | 187,000 | 201,994 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.98% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | 170,000 | 178,500 | ||||||
$ | 3,564,211 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 3.1% | ||||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.25%, 2015 | $ | 158,000 | $ | 169,257 | ||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 2017 | 337,000 | 381,231 | ||||||
Gold Fields Orogen Holdings Ltd., 4.875%, 2020 (z) | 220,000 | 215,938 | ||||||
International Steel Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | 197,000 | 219,110 | ||||||
Peabody Energy Corp., 5.875%, 2016 | 240,000 | 243,300 | ||||||
Southern Copper Corp., 6.75%, 2040 | 194,000 | 208,435 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.25%, 2016 | 38,000 | 46,930 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 | 17,000 | 21,717 | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd., 6.875%, 2039 | 127,000 | 145,722 | ||||||
$ | 1,651,640 | |||||||
Mortgage-Backed - 25.2% | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.589%, 2014 | $ | 160,776 | $ | 174,997 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 4.609%, 2014 | 246,292 | 267,891 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.86%, 2014 | 170,659 | 188,955 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.56%, 2015 | 219,365 | 241,025 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.69%, 2015 | 123,355 | 136,104 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.89%, 2015 | 119,429 | 132,759 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.921%, 2015 | 421,864 | 469,790 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.1%, 2015 | 100,000 | 109,529 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.466%, 2015 | 296,231 | 334,095 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2016 - 2040 | 1,175,226 | 1,253,360 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.157%, 2016 | 149,623 | 169,581 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 2018 - 2038 | 1,917,063 | 2,065,433 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4%, 2024 | 270,001 | 283,012 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.5%, 2025 | 101,541 | 107,559 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2029 - 2038 | 844,870 | 921,428 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2033 | 39,860 | 45,002 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2037 | 25,790 | 28,045 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5%, 2017 - 2040 | 1,051,743 | 1,117,757 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.251%, 2020 | 160,000 | 171,635 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5.5%, 2022 - 2039 | 873,387 | 934,843 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4%, 2025 - 2040 | 911,175 | 955,795 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.5%, 2025 - 2028 | 232,123 | 244,538 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 6%, 2034 - 2037 | 464,892 | 510,747 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 4%, 2032 - 2040 | 497,230 | 517,341 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 6%, 2036 - 2038 | 332,298 | 368,174 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 5.5%, 2038 | 528,516 | 572,771 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 4.5%, 2039 - 2040 | 1,148,892 | 1,227,243 | ||||||
$ | 13,549,409 | |||||||
Municipals - 2.7% | ||||||||
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Sales Tax Rev., 5%, 2031 | $ | 415,000 | $ | 476,769 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), “K”, 5.5%, 2032 | 755,000 | 948,431 | ||||||
$ | 1,425,200 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 1.5% | ||||||||
El Paso Pipeline Partners LP, 6.5%, 2020 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 109,075 | ||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 5.65%, 2013 | 181,000 | 197,599 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - continued | ||||||||
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 2019 | $ | 393,000 | $ | 496,805 | ||||
$ | 803,479 | |||||||
Network & Telecom - 1.0% | ||||||||
CenturyLink, Inc., 7.6%, 2039 | $ | 180,000 | $ | 180,038 | ||||
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.5%, 2020 | 90,000 | 103,950 | ||||||
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 5.5%, 2020 (z) | 246,000 | 247,538 | ||||||
$ | 531,526 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.8% | ||||||||
Nabor Industries, Inc., 5%, 2020 (n) | $ | 240,000 | $ | 244,858 | ||||
Pride International, Inc., 6.875%, 2020 | 170,000 | 192,525 | ||||||
$ | 437,383 | |||||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 3.2% | ||||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 (z) | $ | 200,000 | $ | 201,150 | ||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 6.15%, 2016 | 310,000 | 343,925 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | 510,000 | 568,711 | ||||||
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | 236,000 | 270,060 | ||||||
UBS Preferred Funding Trust V, 6.243% to 2016, FRN to 2049 | 350,000 | 346,080 | ||||||
$ | 1,729,926 | |||||||
Pollution Control - 1.0% | ||||||||
Allied Waste North America, Inc., 6.875%, 2017 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 550,625 | ||||
Printing & Publishing - 0.3% | ||||||||
Pearson PLC, 5.5%, 2013 (n) | $ | 140,000 | $ | 152,818 | ||||
Real Estate - 2.3% | ||||||||
HRPT Properties Trust, REIT, 6.25%, 2016 | $ | 216,000 | $ | 229,257 | ||||
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 6%, 2012 | 150,000 | 162,444 | ||||||
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 5.783%, 2016 | 248,000 | 274,699 | ||||||
Liberty Property LP, REIT, 5.5%, 2016 | 230,000 | 257,027 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC, REIT, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | 260,000 | 306,290 | ||||||
$ | 1,229,717 | |||||||
Restaurants - 0.8% | ||||||||
YUM! Brands, Inc., 8.875%, 2011 | $ | 417,000 | $ | 431,905 | ||||
Retailers - 0.9% | ||||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | $ | 420,000 | $ | 470,163 | ||||
Specialty Stores - 0.6% | ||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2013 | $ | 270,000 | $ | 302,299 | ||||
Supermarkets - 0.3% | ||||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.7%, 2040 (z) | $ | 190,000 | $ | 185,990 | ||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 0.7% | ||||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 2020 (n) | $ | 278,000 | $ | 309,191 | ||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.883%, 2020 (n) | 70,000 | 71,313 | ||||||
$ | 380,504 | |||||||
Tobacco - 2.3% | ||||||||
Altria Group, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 288,325 | ||||
Altria Group, Inc., 9.95%, 2038 | 125,000 | 180,075 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Tobacco - continued | ||||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 2019 | $ | 308,000 | $ | 355,861 | ||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 350,000 | 396,753 | ||||||
$ | 1,221,014 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.5% | ||||||||
Erac USA Finance Co., 7%, 2037 (n) | $ | 260,000 | $ | 287,824 | ||||
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 4.7% | ||||||||
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 0.67%, 2012 (m) | $ | 474,000 | $ | 477,174 | ||||
FDIC Structured Sale Guarantee Note, 0%, 2012 (n) | 81,000 | 78,966 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., FRN, 0.492%, 2012 (m) | 234,000 | 234,801 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., FRN, 0.49%, 2012 (m) | 597,000 | 598,596 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.35%, 2021 | 5,348 | 5,879 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.34%, 2021 | 8,691 | 9,525 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.44%, 2021 | 8,453 | 9,288 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.34%, 2021 | 47,249 | 51,161 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.07%, 2022 | 32,226 | 36,138 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.35%, 2023 | 264,405 | 283,847 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.76%, 2025 | 417,740 | 454,826 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., FRN, 0.512%, 2012 (m) | 280,000 | 281,041 | ||||||
$ | 2,521,242 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations - 5.9% | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 8.125%, 2019 | $ | 5,000 | $ | 7,284 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 5.375%, 2031 | 29,000 | 36,033 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2036 | 74,000 | 81,030 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 5%, 2037 | 100,000 | 118,047 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2039 | 779,600 | 847,815 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 2013 | 909,000 | 978,524 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 4.75%, 2014 | 74,000 | 84,591 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 3.75%, 2018 | 419,000 | 467,316 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 2%, 2014 | 267,021 | 288,925 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 1.625%, 2015 | 265,250 | 287,258 | ||||||
$ | 3,196,823 | |||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 1.1% | ||||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 5.95%, 2017 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 279,407 | ||||
Entergy Corp., 5.125%, 2020 | 170,000 | 172,104 | ||||||
TECO Energy, Inc., 5.15%, 2020 | 140,000 | 151,967 | ||||||
$ | 603,478 | |||||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $52,916,766) | $ | 53,587,943 | ||||||
Floating Rate Loans - 0.3% (g)(r) | ||||||||
Automotive - 0.3% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan B, 3.03%, 2013 (Identified Cost, $145,708) | $ | 155,797 | $ | 154,173 | ||||
Money Market Funds - 0.7% (v) | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.21%, at Cost and Net Asset Value | 355,688 | $ | 355,688 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $53,418,162) | $ | 54,097,804 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (0.7)% | (354,663 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 53,743,141 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(g) | The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(m) | The debt is guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The expiration date of the FDIC’s guarantee is the earlier of the maturity date of the debt or June 30, 2012. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $7,365,491, representing 13.7% of net assets. |
(r) | Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Current Market Value | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.616%, 2019 | 1/15/10 | $176,254 | $185,815 | |||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “H”, 6.075%, 2045 | 3/11/05-3/28/05 | 126,457 | 8,684 | |||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 | 9/27/10 | 200,000 | 201,150 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.87%, 2035 | 10/06/05 | 294,984 | 165,022 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 | 2/28/06 | 215,372 | 119,480 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.415%, 2036 | 5/16/05 | 139,783 | 104,673 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, FRN, 2.257%, 2036 | 3/29/06 | 166,688 | 85,215 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 | 3/04/10 | 129,968 | 134,623 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.267%, 2035 | 9/14/10 | 146,122 | 146,091 | |||||||
Carey Commercial Mortgage Trust, 2002-1, “A”, 5.97%, 2019 | 7/22/10 | 69,823 | 70,335 | |||||||
Crest G-Star, CDO, 6.95%, 2032 | 9/13/05 | 1,035,850 | 798,680 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A1” CDO, FRN, 0.769%, 2018 | 1/21/10 | 162,570 | 176,824 | |||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.7%, 2040 | 8/02/10 | 151,902 | 185,990 | |||||||
FIH Erhvervsbank A.S., 1.75%, 2012 | 12/02/09 | 159,702 | 163,119 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.09%, 2023 | 12/19/03 | 4,077 | 3,232 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 3.272%, 2025 | 12/19/03 | 160,656 | 118,309 | |||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 | 10/27/10 | 16,900 | 17,170 | |||||||
Gold Fields Orogen Holdings Ltd., 4.875%, 2020 | 9/30/10 | 218,462 | 215,938 | |||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 | 7/16/10 | 144,961 | 148,176 | |||||||
Mach One Trust Commercial Mortgage, “B”, 5.43%, 2040 | 3/10/10 | 163,641 | 171,825 | |||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.217%, 2031 | 12/19/03 | 8,761 | 6,465 | |||||||
Preferred Term Securities XIX Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.642%, 2035 | 9/08/05 | 1,353,284 | 771,372 | |||||||
Telemar Norte Leste S.A., 5.5%, 2020 | 4/23/09 | 200,567 | 247,538 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $4,245,726 | |||||||||
% of Net Assets | 7.9% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
TIPS | Treasury Inflation Protected Security |
See Notes to Financial Statements
10
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||||||
Investments- | ||||||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $53,062,474) | $53,742,116 | |||||||
Underlying funds, at cost and value | 355,688 | |||||||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $53,418,162) | $54,097,804 | |||||||
Receivables for | ||||||||
Investments sold | 1,304,071 | |||||||
Interest and dividends | 541,891 | |||||||
Total assets | $55,943,766 | |||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Payables for | ||||||||
Distributions | $185,488 | |||||||
Investments purchased | 1,024,024 | |||||||
Fund shares reacquired | 874,022 | |||||||
Payable to affiliates | ||||||||
Investment adviser | 4,932 | |||||||
Shareholder servicing costs | 39 | |||||||
Distribution and service fees | 5,900 | |||||||
Administrative services fee | 197 | |||||||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 65 | |||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 105,958 | |||||||
Total liabilities | $2,200,625 | |||||||
Net assets | $53,743,141 | |||||||
Net assets consist of | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | $65,124,446 | |||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 679,642 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (12,323,438 | ) | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income | 262,491 | |||||||
Net assets | $53,743,141 | |||||||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 5,282,654 | |||||||
Net asset value per share (net assets of $53,743,141 / 5,282,654 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | $10.17 |
A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class B shares.
See Notes to Financial Statements
11
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||||||
Interest income | $1,520,699 | |||||||
Dividends from underlying funds | 1,547 | |||||||
Total investment income | $1,522,246 | |||||||
Expenses | ||||||||
Management fee | $146,727 | |||||||
Distribution and service fees | 293,454 | |||||||
Shareholder servicing costs | 29 | |||||||
Administrative services fee | 9,384 | |||||||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 1,790 | |||||||
Custodian fee | 18,000 | |||||||
Shareholder communications | 10,145 | |||||||
Auditing fees | 27,083 | |||||||
Legal fees | 13,955 | |||||||
Miscellaneous | 7,723 | |||||||
Total expenses | $528,290 | |||||||
Fees paid indirectly | (42 | ) | ||||||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | (58,388 | ) | ||||||
Net expenses | $469,860 | |||||||
Net investment income | $1,052,386 | |||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||||||
Investment transactions | $1,497,805 | |||||||
Swap transactions | (15,964 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | $1,481,841 | |||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | $464,472 | |||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $1,946,313 | |||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $2,998,699 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
12
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/10 (unaudited) | Year ended 4/30/10 | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $1,052,386 | $3,522,665 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 1,481,841 | 3,353,454 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 464,472 | 9,872,826 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $2,998,699 | $16,748,945 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(1,204,085 | ) | $(4,068,597 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $(11,878,162 | ) | $(28,517,111 | ) | ||||
Total change in net assets | $(10,083,548 | ) | $(15,836,763 | ) | ||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 63,826,689 | 79,663,452 | ||||||
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $262,491 and $414,190, respectively) | $53,743,141 | $63,826,689 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
13
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $9.86 | $8.66 | $9.46 | $9.74 | $9.58 | $10.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.18 | $0.36 | $0.38 | $0.40 | $0.37 | $0.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 0.34 | 1.26 | (0.76 | ) | (0.27 | ) | 0.20 | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.52 | $1.62 | $(0.38 | ) | $0.13 | $0.57 | $(0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.21 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $10.17 | $9.86 | $8.66 | $9.46 | $9.74 | $9.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t) | 5.32 | (n) | 19.00 | (3.98 | ) | 1.40 | 6.03 | (0.17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.80 | (a) | 1.76 | 1.83 | 1.67 | 1.75 | 1.73 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.60 | (a) | 1.59 | 1.60 | 1.51 | 1.60 | 1.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.59 | (a) | 3.80 | 4.32 | 4.16 | 3.88 | 3.18 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 39 | 103 | 65 | 87 | 71 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period (000 Omitted) | $53,743 | $63,827 | $79,663 | $123,093 | $168,913 | $201,306 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
14
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Research Bond Fund J (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in asset-backed and/or mortgage-backed securities. The value of these securities may depend, in part, on the issuer’s or borrower’s credit quality or ability to pay principal and interest when due and may fall if an issuer or borrower defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest or if the instrument’s credit rating is downgraded by a credit rating agency. U.S. Government securities not supported as to the payment of principal or interest by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks, are subject to greater credit risk than are U.S. Government securities supported by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Ginnie Mae. The fund can invest in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Swaps are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in
15
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2010 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents | $— | $5,718,065 | $— | $5,718,065 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | — | 1,168,473 | — | 1,168,473 | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 1,425,200 | — | 1,425,200 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 18,728,624 | — | 18,728,624 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 14,504,986 | — | 14,504,986 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 3,201,460 | — | 3,201,460 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 3,618,295 | — | 3,618,295 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 5,222,840 | — | 5,222,840 | ||||||||||||
Floating Rate Loans | — | 154,173 | — | 154,173 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 355,688 | — | — | 355,688 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $355,688 | $53,742,116 | $— | $54,097,804 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Inflation-Adjusted Debt Securities – The fund invests in inflation-adjusted debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. The fund may also invest in inflation-adjusted debt securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and instrumentalities other than the U.S. Treasury and by other entities such as U.S. and foreign corporations and foreign governments. The principal value of these debt securities is adjusted through income according to changes in the Consumer Price Index or another general price or wage index. These debt securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest, but this fixed rate is applied to the inflation-adjusted principal amount. The principal paid at maturity of the debt security is typically equal to the inflation-adjusted principal amount, or the security’s original par value, whichever is greater. Other types of inflation-adjusted securities may use other methods to adjust for other measures of inflation.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the
16
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
Derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. At October 31, 2010, the fund did not have any outstanding derivative instruments.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Swap Transactions | |||
Credit Contracts | $(15,964 | ) |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Swap Agreements – The fund entered into swap agreements. A swap is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap transactions are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between
17
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
The fund entered into credit default swaps in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the contract notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although contract-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant contract. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap transactions in the Statement of Operations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed-income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted upward or downward to the rate of inflation. Interest is accrued based on the principal value, which is adjusted for inflation. Any increase or decrease in the principal amount of an inflation-indexed bond is generally recorded as an increase or decrease in interest income, respectively, even though the adjusted principal is not received until maturity. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed
18
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2010, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities and wash sale loss deferrals.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/10 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $4,068,597 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/10 | ||||
Cost of investments | $53,740,053 | |||
Gross appreciation | 3,265,480 | |||
Gross depreciation | (2,907,729 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $357,751 | |||
As of 4/30/10 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 643,513 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (13,511,211 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (233,357 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (74,864 | ) |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
As of April 30, 2010, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
4/30/13 | $(1,678,843 | ) | ||
4/30/14 | (1,444,482 | ) | ||
4/30/15 | (5,723,242 | ) | ||
4/30/16 | (1,524,378 | ) | ||
4/30/17 | (2,779,139 | ) | ||
4/30/18 | (361,127 | ) | ||
$(13,511,211 | ) |
19
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.50% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee to 0.35% of average daily net assets. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until August 31, 2011. This management fee reduction amounted to $44,018, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.35% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s total annual operating expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs, and investment-related expenses, such that total annual fund operating expenses do not exceed 1.60% annually of the average daily net assets for Class B shares. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until August 31, 2011. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, this reduction amounted to $14,207 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Distributor – The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution | Annual Effective | Distribution and Service | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | $293,454 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2010 based on each class’ average daily net assets. |
Class B shares are subject to a contingent deffered sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within five years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2010, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class B | $500,016 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fee was $29, which equated to 0.0001% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund did not pay any out-of-pocket expenses.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six
20
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
months ended October 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0320% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $221 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $163, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than purchased option transactions and short-term obligations, were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||
U.S. Government securities | $15,801,741 | $15,973,006 | ||||||
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | $6,613,565 | $16,284,797 |
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/10 | Year ended 4/30/10 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | 852,400 | $8,563,278 | 5,496,721 | $49,798,565 | ||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 146 | 1,460 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | (2,040,466 | ) | (20,442,900 | ) | (8,226,770 | ) | (78,315,676 | ) | ||||||||
Net change | (1,187,920 | ) | $(11,878,162 | ) | (2,730,049 | ) | $(28,517,111 | ) |
Class A and Class C shares were not available for sale during the period. Please see the fund’s prospectus for details.
Effective October 16, 2010 sales of Class B shares have been suspended.
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In
21
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $287 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 1,422,611 | 20,663,449 | (21,730,372 | ) | 355,688 | |||||||||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $1,547 | $355,688 |
(8) | Subsequent Event |
The Board of Trustees which oversees the fund has approved the termination of the fund, effective March 30, 2011, or as soon as practicable thereafter.
22
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2010 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2009 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees compared the total return performance of the Fund’s Class B shares to the performance of funds in its
23
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class B shares was in the 4th quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class B shares was in the 2nd quintile for the one-year period and the 4th quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2009 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results are likely to differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
The Trustees expressed concern to MFS about the substandard investment performance of the Fund. In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year, as to MFS’ efforts to improve the Fund’s performance, including assigning a new portfolio manager for the Fund in 2009. In addition, the Trustees requested that they receive a separate update on the Fund’s performance at each of their regular meetings. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that MFS’ responses and efforts and plans to improve investment performance were sufficient to support approval of the continuance of the investment advisory agreement for an additional one-year period, but that they would continue to closely monitor the performance of the Fund.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class B shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its advisory fee, and that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, each of which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was lower than the Lipper expense group median, and total expense ratio was approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account the advisory fee reduction and the expense limitation noted above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered
24
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Funds were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2010.
25
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling
1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com.
26
Table of Contents
CONTACT US
Web site
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
Account service and literature
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Investment professionals
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
Mailing address
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
Overnight mail
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Save paper with eDelivery. MFS® will send you prospectuses, reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter. To sign up: 1. go to mfs.com. 2. log in via MFS® Access. 3. select eDelivery. If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS Access, and eDelivery may not be available to you.
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
The Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to any element of the Code’s definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 6. | INVESTMENTS. |
A schedule of investments of each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
Table of Contents
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
(1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
(2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Table of Contents
Notice
A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) MFS SERIES TRUST IX
By (Signature and Title)* | MARIA F. DIORIODWYER | |
Maria F. DiOrioDwyer, President |
Date: December 16, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* | MARIA F. DIORIODWYER | |
Maria F. DiOrioDwyer, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: December 16, 2010
By (Signature and Title)* | JOHN M. CORCORAN | |
John M. Corcoran, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: December 16, 2010
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |