Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-2464
MFS SERIES TRUST IX
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
111 Huntington Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02199
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: April 30
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2012*
* | This Form N-CSR pertains to the following series of the Registrant: MFS Bond Fund, MFS Limited Maturity Fund, MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund, and MFS Research Bond Fund. The remaining series of the Registrant, MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund, has a fiscal year end of October 31. |
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
Table of Contents
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
October 31, 2012
MFS® BOND FUND
MFB-SEM
Table of Contents
MFS® BOND FUND
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
Table of Contents
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
As 2012 winds down, economic uncertainty continues to dominate world financial markets. In the United States, all eyes are riveted to the ongoing budget deal
negotiations and the specter of a “fiscal cliff.” Overseas, we see growth slowing in China and Japan, and the eurozone has entered its second recession in four years against a backdrop of double-digit unemployment and the continuing sovereign debt crisis.
Amidst the instability, there are silver linings — especially in the U.S. where the labor and housing markets have picked up, consumer confidence has risen and industrial output has increased. Additionally, a U.S. budgetary compromise could propel markets, unleashing pent-up spending and investments, which would help to revive both the U.S. and global economies.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, an emphasis on global research and our disciplined risk management approach anchor our uniquely collaborative investment process. Our global team of more than 200 investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines, and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results — for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges we face locally, nationally and globally. It is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view, employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification, and work closely with investment advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 14, 2012
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 65.0% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 20.1% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 6.3% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 1.1% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 0.4% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities (o) | 0.0% | |||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (o) | 0.0% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 0.4% | |||
AA | 0.7% | |||
A | 15.4% | |||
BBB | 55.0% | |||
BB | 18.0% | |||
B | 3.3% | |||
CCC | 0.1% | |||
C (o) | 0.0% | |||
Not Rated (o) | 0.0% | |||
Cash & Other | 7.1% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 5.5 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 8.2 yrs. |
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(o) | Less than 0.1%. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/12.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/12 | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,055.91 | $4.15 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.17 | $4.08 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,052.84 | $8.02 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.39 | $7.88 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,052.13 | $8.02 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.39 | $7.88 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,057.22 | $2.85 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.43 | $2.80 | ||||||||||||||
R1 | Actual | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,052.10 | $8.02 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.39 | $7.88 | ||||||||||||||
R2 | Actual | 1.05% | $1,000.00 | $1,054.61 | $5.44 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.05% | $1,000.00 | $1,019.91 | $5.35 | ||||||||||||||
R3 | Actual | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,055.91 | $4.15 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.17 | $4.08 | ||||||||||||||
R4 | Actual | 0.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,057.20 | $2.85 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.43 | $2.80 | ||||||||||||||
R5 | Actual | 0.48% | $1,000.00 | $1,056.40 | $2.07 | (i) | ||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.48% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.79 | $2.45 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(i) | For the period of class inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
Table of Contents
10/31/12 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 91.7% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Aerospace - 0.1% | ||||||||
BE Aerospace, Inc., 5.25%, 2022 | $ | 3,792,000 | $ | 3,953,160 | ||||
Airlines - 0.6% | ||||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., 7.25%, 2019 | $ | 1,943,261 | $ | 2,244,467 | ||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., FRN, 0.768%, 2013 | 15,842,581 | 15,525,729 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 17,770,196 | |||||||
Apparel Manufacturers - 0.7% | ||||||||
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | $ | 18,298,000 | $ | 20,493,760 | ||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 1.6% | ||||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.571%, 2019 (z) | $ | 2,145,842 | $ | 2,092,196 | ||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.811%, 2040 (z) | 1,931,582 | 1,252,374 | ||||||
BlackRock Capital Finance LP, 7.75%, 2026 (n) | 458,557 | 56,746 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (n) | 4,985,050 | 5,078,769 | ||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.366%, 2049 | 2,920,000 | 3,037,769 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 (z) | 916,162 | 926,468 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 5.905%, 2025 (i)(z) | 3,664,339 | 575,301 | ||||||
G-Force LLC, CDO, “A2”, 4.83%, 2036 (z) | 2,503,712 | 2,519,360 | ||||||
GMAC LLC, FRN, 6.02%, 2033 (z) | 1,532,947 | 1,569,535 | ||||||
GMAC LLC, FRN, 7.936%, 2034 (d)(n)(q) | 3,212,000 | 2,350,471 | ||||||
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp., FRN, 6.063%, 2038 | 2,125,000 | 2,366,347 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A3”, FRN, 5.971%, 2051 | 9,792,112 | 10,441,574 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A4”, FRN, 5.813%, 2049 | 1,467,768 | 1,718,664 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.436%, 2042 (n) | 4,734,928 | 799,914 | ||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “C”, FRN, 1.76%, 2021 (n) | 3,651,630 | 3,176,918 | ||||||
LB Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.067%, 2030 (i) | 5,513,799 | 82,828 | ||||||
LB Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.856%, 2030 (i) | 6,414,367 | 229,006 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.728%, 2050 | 3,070,000 | 3,509,876 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 0.978%, 2030 (i)(n) | 12,432,834 | 276,481 | ||||||
Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corp., FRN, 7.166%, 2013 (z) | 3,468,000 | 3,461,373 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
Spirit Master Funding LLC, 5.05%, 2023 (z) | $ | 1,927,777 | $ | 1,820,843 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 47,342,813 | |||||||
Automotive - 5.0% | ||||||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 2.125%, 2017 (n) | $ | 13,328,000 | $ | 13,705,889 | ||||
Daimler Finance North America LLC, 1.65%, 2015 (n) | 5,000,000 | 5,070,590 | ||||||
Delphi Corp., 6.125%, 2021 | 10,729,000 | 11,855,545 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8%, 2014 | 5,635,000 | 6,149,938 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 4.207%, 2016 | 3,610,000 | 3,844,704 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 3.984%, 2016 | 4,112,000 | 4,358,268 | ||||||
Harley Davidson Financial Services, 1.15%, 2015 (n) | 9,393,000 | 9,437,927 | ||||||
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, 3.875%, 2016 (n) | 12,070,000 | 13,041,116 | ||||||
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, 2.7%, 2017 (n) | 3,815,000 | 3,947,995 | ||||||
Hyundai Capital America, 4%, 2017 (n) | 10,225,000 | 11,053,327 | ||||||
Hyundai Capital America, 2.125%, 2017 (n) | 11,618,000 | 11,677,345 | ||||||
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | 12,266,000 | 13,630,593 | ||||||
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 1.95%, 2017 (n) | 15,896,000 | 16,136,014 | ||||||
TRW Automotive, Inc., 7.25%, 2017 (n) | 13,320,000 | 15,168,150 | ||||||
Volkswagen International Finance N.V., 2.375%, 2017 (n) | 11,500,000 | 11,901,925 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 150,979,326 | |||||||
Biotechnology - 0.6% | ||||||||
Life Technologies Corp., 6%, 2020 | $ | 15,483,000 | $ | 18,531,123 | ||||
Broadcasting - 1.1% | ||||||||
CBS Corp., 8.875%, 2019 | $ | 4,240,000 | $ | 5,835,245 | ||||
CBS Corp., 5.75%, 2020 | 1,010,000 | 1,221,320 | ||||||
CBS Corp., 3.375%, 2022 | 2,755,000 | 2,895,577 | ||||||
News America, Inc., 8.5%, 2025 | 4,931,000 | 6,814,499 | ||||||
News America, Inc., 6.15%, 2041 | 3,000,000 | 3,882,873 | ||||||
WPP Finance, 8%, 2014 | 2,744,000 | 3,063,863 | ||||||
WPP Finance, 4.75%, 2021 | 3,500,000 | 3,840,607 | ||||||
WPP Finance, 3.625%, 2022 | 4,361,000 | 4,469,510 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 32,023,494 | |||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 1.0% | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc., 3.375%, 2022 | $ | 1,633,000 | $ | 1,745,904 | ||||
Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. LLC, 4.75%, 2023 (n) | 2,631,000 | 2,821,969 | ||||||
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 12.5%, 2017 | 14,711,000 | 16,660,208 | ||||||
Franklin Resources, Inc., 1.375%, 2017 | 3,705,000 | 3,727,641 | ||||||
TD Ameritrade Holding Co., 4.15%, 2014 | 5,138,000 | 5,493,760 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 30,449,482 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Building - 1.6% | ||||||||
Mohawk Industries, Inc., 6.375%, 2016 | $ | 21,082,000 | $ | 23,822,660 | ||||
Owens Corning, Inc., 6.5%, 2016 | 14,893,000 | 16,764,157 | ||||||
Owens Corning, Inc., 4.2%, 2022 | 6,520,000 | 6,590,025 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 47,176,842 | |||||||
Business Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
Tencent Holdings Ltd., 3.375%, 2018 (n) | $ | 12,299,000 | $ | 12,545,730 | ||||
Cable TV - 4.0% | ||||||||
CCH II LLC, 13.5%, 2016 | $ | 6,736,686 | $ | 7,241,937 | ||||
CCO Holdings LLC, 5.25%, 2022 | 18,106,000 | 18,196,530 | ||||||
Comcast Corp., 4.65%, 2042 | 6,372,000 | 6,907,962 | ||||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 6.25%, 2018 (n) | 1,735,000 | 2,120,418 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 5.875%, 2019 | 3,310,000 | 3,959,657 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 6.375%, 2041 | 4,310,000 | 5,191,761 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 5.15%, 2042 | 9,250,000 | 9,675,537 | ||||||
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | 18,201,000 | 20,612,633 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | 6,150,000 | 8,315,077 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5%, 2020 | 1,480,000 | 1,742,210 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 4.5%, 2042 | 13,352,000 | 13,719,727 | ||||||
Time Warner Entertainment Co. LP, 8.375%, 2033 | 1,734,000 | 2,576,044 | ||||||
Videotron Ltee, 5%, 2022 | 13,220,000 | 13,682,700 | ||||||
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 5.25%, 2022 | 2,915,000 | 3,046,175 | ||||||
Virgin Media Secured Finance PLC, 5.25%, 2021 | 2,990,000 | 3,483,434 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 120,471,802 | |||||||
Chemicals - 2.2% | ||||||||
Ashland, Inc., 4.75%, 2022 (n) | $ | 6,302,000 | $ | 6,428,040 | ||||
CF Industries Holdings, Inc., 7.125%, 2020 | 16,654,000 | 21,108,312 | ||||||
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | 10,554,000 | 14,312,353 | ||||||
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 5%, 2019 | 13,386,000 | 14,490,345 | ||||||
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 6%, 2021 | 9,720,000 | 11,238,750 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 67,577,800 | |||||||
Computer Software - 0.1% | ||||||||
Seagate Technology HDD Holdings, 6.8%, 2016 | $ | 2,800,000 | $ | 3,094,000 | ||||
Conglomerates - 0.2% | ||||||||
ABB Treasury Center USA, Inc., 4%, 2021 (n) | $ | 4,687,000 | $ | 5,228,349 | ||||
Construction - 0.5% | ||||||||
D.R. Horton, Inc., 4.75%, 2017 | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,325,000 | ||||
D.R. Horton, Inc., 4.375%, 2022 | 9,472,000 | 9,495,680 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 14,820,680 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Consumer Products - 0.5% | ||||||||
Mattel, Inc., 5.45%, 2041 | $ | 4,568,000 | $ | 5,397,489 | ||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 4,425,000 | 4,512,549 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 2020 | 5,052,000 | 5,630,272 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,540,310 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 1.4% | ||||||||
eBay, Inc., 4%, 2042 | $ | 10,840,000 | $ | 10,869,344 | ||||
Experian Finance PLC, 2.375%, 2017 (n) | 18,068,000 | 18,497,368 | ||||||
Service Corp. International, 7.375%, 2014 | 5,360,000 | 5,869,200 | ||||||
Service Corp. International, 7%, 2019 | 5,550,000 | 6,077,250 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 41,313,162 | |||||||
Containers - 1.3% | ||||||||
Ball Corp., 5%, 2022 | $ | 5,537,000 | $ | 5,841,535 | ||||
Crown Americas LLC, 7.625%, 2017 | 24,644,000 | 26,184,250 | ||||||
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 5,864,000 | 6,465,060 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 38,490,845 | |||||||
Defense Electronics - 0.4% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.375%, 2019 (n) | $ | 10,202,000 | $ | 12,284,902 | ||||
Electronics - 0.6% | ||||||||
Jabil Circuit, Inc., 4.7%, 2022 | $ | 3,601,000 | $ | 3,601,000 | ||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 6.55%, 2017 | 2,450,000 | 2,934,757 | ||||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 3.5%, 2022 | 11,088,000 | 11,545,081 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 18,080,838 | |||||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.6% | ||||||||
CNOOC Finance (2012) Ltd., 5%, 2042 (n) | $ | 663,000 | $ | 769,080 | ||||
CNPC General Capital Ltd., 2.75%, 2017 (z) | 13,441,000 | 13,894,768 | ||||||
Gaz Capital S.A., 8.125%, 2014 (n) | 2,914,000 | 3,195,026 | ||||||
Pemex Finance Ltd., 10.61%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 1,871,465 | ||||||
Petrobras International Finance Co., 3.875%, 2016 | 6,547,000 | 6,955,107 | ||||||
Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 2021 | 11,160,000 | 12,656,065 | ||||||
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 2022 | 1,699,000 | 1,902,880 | ||||||
Petroleos Mexicanos, 6.5%, 2041 | 6,950,000 | 8,626,688 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 49,871,079 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 2.8% | ||||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.375%, 2017 | $ | 4,953,000 | $ | 6,004,339 | ||||
EQT Corp., 4.875%, 2021 | 4,449,000 | 4,816,519 | ||||||
Hess Corp., 8.125%, 2019 | 1,452,000 | 1,935,082 | ||||||
LINN Energy LLC, 7.75%, 2021 | 9,400,000 | 10,034,500 | ||||||
Noble Energy, Inc., 4.15%, 2021 | 13,080,000 | 14,418,398 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Energy - Independent - continued | ||||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 6.65%, 2017 | $ | 6,900,000 | $ | 8,212,697 | ||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 7.5%, 2020 | 9,237,000 | 11,835,183 | ||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 3.95%, 2022 | 5,000,000 | 5,351,490 | ||||||
QEP Resources, Inc., 5.375%, 2022 | 7,241,000 | 7,603,050 | ||||||
QEP Resources, Inc., 5.25%, 2023 | 1,860,000 | 1,939,050 | ||||||
Southwestern Energy Co., 7.5%, 2018 | 10,149,000 | 12,532,949 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 84,683,257 | |||||||
Energy - Integrated - 0.4% | ||||||||
BG Energy Capital PLC, 4%, 2021 (n) | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,612,220 | ||||
BG Energy Capital PLC, 5.125%, 2041 (n) | 4,094,000 | 4,956,172 | ||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.5%, 2020 | 1,753,000 | 2,058,516 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 12,626,908 | |||||||
Entertainment - 0.1% | ||||||||
Viacom, Inc., 3.5%, 2017 | $ | 4,200,000 | $ | 4,567,072 | ||||
Financial Institutions - 4.2% | ||||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 5%, 2017 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,634,500 | ||||
CIT Group, Inc., 4.25%, 2017 | 9,647,000 | 9,895,960 | ||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2018 | 2,885,000 | 3,065,313 | ||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 6.625%, 2018 (n) | 7,448,000 | 8,304,520 | ||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2019 (n) | 5,815,000 | 6,200,244 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.75%, 2014 | 2,587,000 | 2,737,569 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 2.15%, 2015 | 10,000,000 | 10,275,480 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.5%, 2020 | 8,500,000 | 10,112,238 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.15%, 2022 | 14,000,000 | 14,242,046 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 5.875%, 2022 | 15,000,000 | 15,582,000 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | 3,221,000 | 3,784,675 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 6.25%, 2019 | 3,853,000 | 4,152,575 | ||||||
NYSE Euronext, 2%, 2017 | 11,833,000 | 12,047,426 | ||||||
SLM Corp., 6.25%, 2016 | 4,180,000 | 4,514,609 | ||||||
SLM Corp., 6%, 2017 | 15,703,000 | 17,037,755 | ||||||
SLM Corp., 8%, 2020 | 2,532,000 | 2,932,360 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 127,519,270 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 6.4% | ||||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.75%, 2019 | $ | 12,630,000 | $ | 17,134,224 | ||||
Campbell Soup Co., 2.5%, 2022 | 2,137,000 | 2,167,339 | ||||||
Conagra Foods, Inc., 1.35%, 2015 | 4,693,000 | 4,731,056 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc., 7.25%, 2016 | 18,881,000 | 21,807,555 | ||||||
Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.625%, 2023 | 901,000 | 917,894 | ||||||
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V., 4.5%, 2022 (n) | 12,661,000 | 13,927,682 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Food & Beverages - continued | ||||||||
Heineken N.V., 1.4%, 2017 (n) | $ | 9,086,000 | $ | 9,126,869 | ||||
Ingredion, Inc., 1.8%, 2017 | 5,634,000 | 5,622,152 | ||||||
J.M. Smucker Co., 3.5%, 2021 | 12,140,000 | 12,940,864 | ||||||
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 2.25%, 2017 (n) | 10,744,000 | 11,160,137 | ||||||
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2040 (n) | 3,950,000 | 5,534,930 | ||||||
Miller Brewing Co., 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 7,185,000 | 7,468,772 | ||||||
Molson Coors Brewing Co., 3.5%, 2022 | 8,982,000 | 9,629,737 | ||||||
Pernod Ricard S.A., 5.75%, 2021 (n) | 4,451,000 | 5,390,562 | ||||||
Pernod Ricard S.A., 5.5%, 2042 (n) | 3,700,000 | 4,466,366 | ||||||
SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 2022 (n) | 11,234,000 | 12,355,603 | ||||||
Smithfield Foods, Inc., 7.75%, 2017 | 8,630,000 | 9,751,900 | ||||||
Smithfield Foods, Inc., 6.625%, 2022 | 4,652,000 | 4,872,970 | ||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., 6.6%, 2016 | 12,881,000 | 14,847,027 | ||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., 4.5%, 2022 | 8,026,000 | 8,507,560 | ||||||
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 3.05%, 2013 (n) | 9,894,000 | 10,048,040 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 192,409,239 | |||||||
Food & Drug Stores - 0.9% | ||||||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 3.25%, 2015 | $ | 1,743,000 | $ | 1,853,168 | ||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 5.75%, 2017 | 2,008,000 | 2,417,750 | ||||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 5.75%, 2041 | 9,305,000 | 12,052,971 | ||||||
Walgreen Co., 1.8%, 2017 | 9,384,000 | 9,508,807 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 25,832,696 | |||||||
Forest & Paper Products - 1.4% | ||||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 (n) | $ | 13,758,000 | $ | 16,328,696 | ||||
International Paper Co., 6%, 2041 | 6,640,000 | 8,128,037 | ||||||
Packaging Corp. of America, 3.9%, 2022 | 16,288,000 | 16,822,751 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 41,279,484 | |||||||
Gaming & Lodging - 1.2% | ||||||||
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., REIT, 6.75%, 2016 | $ | 7,230,000 | $ | 7,424,306 | ||||
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., REIT, 4.75%, 2023 | 2,843,000 | 3,013,580 | ||||||
Sheraton Holding Corp., 7.375%, 2015 | 3,655,000 | 4,237,545 | ||||||
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | 850,000 | 1,027,851 | ||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | 87,000 | 97,411 | ||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 4.25%, 2022 | 18,435,000 | 19,230,433 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 35,031,126 | |||||||
Insurance - 1.9% | ||||||||
American International Group, Inc., 4.875%, 2016 | $ | 3,388,000 | $ | 3,788,072 | ||||
American International Group, Inc., 3.8%, 2017 | 7,167,000 | 7,731,953 | ||||||
American International Group, Inc., 6.4%, 2020 | 8,987,000 | 11,036,917 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Insurance - continued | ||||||||
Metlife, Inc., 1.756%, 2017 | $ | 3,956,000 | $ | 4,020,435 | ||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 2,700,000 | 2,890,088 | ||||||
Principal Financial Group, Inc., 7.875%, 2014 | 200,000 | 221,167 | ||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 4.75%, 2015 | 4,369,000 | 4,826,884 | ||||||
Unum Group, 7.125%, 2016 | 11,200,000 | 13,194,339 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 8,751,000 | 9,818,934 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 57,528,789 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 1.3% | ||||||||
CIGNA Corp., 2.75%, 2016 | $ | 9,534,000 | $ | 10,049,761 | ||||
CIGNA Corp., 5.375%, 2042 | 4,300,000 | 5,071,416 | ||||||
Humana, Inc., 7.2%, 2018 | 10,075,000 | 12,470,875 | ||||||
Wellpoint Inc., 4.65%, 2043 | 3,000,000 | 3,221,283 | ||||||
Wellpoint, Inc., 1.875%, 2018 | 9,382,000 | 9,507,278 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 40,320,613 | |||||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 1.8% | ||||||||
Aon Corp., 6.25%, 2040 | $ | 1,832,000 | $ | 2,415,007 | ||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | 10,742,000 | 11,536,210 | ||||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.875%, 2020 | 1,810,000 | 2,046,679 | ||||||
Chubb Corp., 6.375% to 2017, FRN to 2067 | 1,838,000 | 1,994,230 | ||||||
CNA Financial Corp., 7.35%, 2019 | 1,220,000 | 1,528,866 | ||||||
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 2020 | 6,010,000 | 7,069,960 | ||||||
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., 4.8%, 2021 | 8,500,000 | 9,629,744 | ||||||
XL Group PLC, 5.75%, 2021 | 6,890,000 | 8,162,108 | ||||||
XL Group PLC, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | 2,655,000 | 2,462,513 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust II, 6.45% to 2016, FRN to 2065 (n) | 1,048,000 | 1,126,600 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2067 (n) | 4,913,000 | 5,244,625 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 53,216,542 | |||||||
Machinery & Tools - 0.5% | ||||||||
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 | $ | 13,046,000 | $ | 15,329,050 | ||||
Major Banks - 5.1% | ||||||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 (n) | $ | 8,100,000 | $ | 8,151,597 | ||||
Bank of America Corp., 1.5%, 2015 | 18,180,000 | 18,200,707 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 2018 | 4,060,000 | 4,726,843 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 7.625%, 2019 | 1,290,000 | 1,635,862 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.625%, 2020 | 360,000 | 420,015 | ||||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 5%, 2019 (n) | 1,530,000 | 1,774,402 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.625%, 2017 | 7,771,000 | 8,615,879 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 1.1%, 2015 | 20,000,000 | 19,976,880 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 2%, 2017 | 13,489,000 | 13,633,508 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Major Banks - continued | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 4.25%, 2020 | $ | 6,107,000 | $ | 6,735,575 | ||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 4.5%, 2022 | 9,500,000 | 10,733,053 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 3.25%, 2022 | 3,915,000 | 4,012,945 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.15%, 2013 | 3,390,000 | 3,474,204 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.05%, 2016 | 3,281,000 | 3,620,203 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.75%, 2016 | 5,924,000 | 6,595,835 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | 7,355,000 | 8,545,348 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, 2.55%, 2015 | 10,358,000 | 10,618,110 | ||||||
Wachovia Corp., 6.605%, 2025 | 7,936,000 | 9,816,824 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 2.625%, 2016 | 13,081,000 | 13,818,363 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 155,106,153 | |||||||
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 3.0% | ||||||||
Aristotle Holding, Inc., 2.65%, 2017 (n) | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,219,335 | ||||
Aristotle Holding, Inc., 3.9%, 2022 (n) | 11,171,000 | 12,210,573 | ||||||
Davita, Inc., 6.625%, 2020 | 15,982,000 | 17,060,785 | ||||||
Davita, Inc., 5.75%, 2022 | 4,648,000 | 4,857,160 | ||||||
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, 9%, 2015 (n) | 10,225,000 | 11,733,188 | ||||||
Fresenius Medical Care US Finance II, Inc., 6.5%, 2018 (n) | 7,266,000 | 8,137,920 | ||||||
HCA, Inc., 4.75%, 2023 | 13,591,000 | 13,591,000 | ||||||
Hospira, Inc., 6.05%, 2017 | 5,884,000 | 6,906,480 | ||||||
McKesson Corp., 5.7%, 2017 | 5,010,000 | 5,953,248 | ||||||
McKesson Corp., 7.5%, 2019 | 920,000 | 1,195,869 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., 3.15%, 2023 | 3,081,000 | 3,207,725 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 90,073,283 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 1.7% | ||||||||
BHP Billiton Finance Ltd., 5.5%, 2014 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 106,928 | ||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 3.55%, 2022 | 10,832,000 | 11,029,121 | ||||||
Southern Copper Corp., 6.75%, 2040 | 18,301,000 | 21,714,887 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 | 2,919,000 | 3,514,896 | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd., 5.625%, 2019 | 14,499,000 | 16,537,733 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 52,903,565 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Distribution - 1.0% | ||||||||
AmeriGas Finance LLC, 7%, 2022 | $ | 16,552,000 | $ | 17,979,610 | ||||
ONEOK, Inc., 4.25%, 2022 | 10,000,000 | 11,056,150 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 29,035,760 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 4.4% | ||||||||
El Paso Pipeline Partners LP, 6.5%, 2020 | $ | 9,145,000 | $ | 11,197,513 | ||||
El Paso Pipeline Partners LP, 5%, 2021 | 9,019,000 | 10,211,745 | ||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 8.5%, 2014 | 5,773,000 | 6,346,900 | ||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 9.7%, 2019 | 1,560,000 | 2,100,184 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - continued | ||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 5.2%, 2022 | $ | 2,477,000 | $ | 2,843,373 | ||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 6.5%, 2042 | 2,418,000 | 3,039,927 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 5.2%, 2020 | 2,000,000 | 2,415,214 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 5.65%, 2013 | 2,434,000 | 2,481,022 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 1.25%, 2015 | 7,242,000 | 7,319,185 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 6.3%, 2017 | 3,590,000 | 4,401,484 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 4.45%, 2043 | 4,527,000 | 4,614,090 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 8.375% to 2016, FRN to 2066 | 2,791,000 | 3,181,740 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 7.034% to 2018, FRN to 2068 | 1,472,000 | 1,681,760 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, 6.5%, 2039 | 1,000,000 | 1,275,631 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5.125%, 2014 | 2,559,000 | 2,776,571 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 6.85%, 2020 | 4,303,000 | 5,496,446 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5.3%, 2020 | 5,745,000 | 6,807,130 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 7.4%, 2031 | 3,627,000 | 4,879,875 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5%, 2042 | 4,530,000 | 4,908,658 | ||||||
NiSource Finance Corp., 3.85%, 2023 | 10,894,000 | 11,529,229 | ||||||
Oneok Partners LP, 2%, 2017 | 7,668,000 | 7,824,818 | ||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, LP, 3.95%, 2015 | 5,710,000 | 6,200,775 | ||||||
Southern Natural Gas Co., 4.4%, 2021 | 2,500,000 | 2,789,248 | ||||||
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 2019 | 5,750,000 | 7,685,439 | ||||||
Spectra Energy Partners LP, 4.6%, 2021 | 2,500,000 | 2,726,925 | ||||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd., 0.875%, 2015 | 5,000,000 | 5,054,320 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 131,789,202 | |||||||
Network & Telecom - 1.7% | ||||||||
AT&T, Inc., 5.35%, 2040 | $ | 1,600,000 | $ | 1,962,346 | ||||
AT&T, Inc., 5.55%, 2041 | 5,474,000 | 6,967,105 | ||||||
British Telecommunications PLC, 2%, 2015 | 5,000,000 | 5,128,500 | ||||||
CenturyLink, Inc., 7.6%, 2039 | 18,088,000 | 18,539,169 | ||||||
Verizon Communications, Inc., 1.95%, 2014 | 12,500,000 | 12,763,488 | ||||||
Verizon Communications, Inc., 6%, 2041 | 4,310,000 | 5,888,999 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 51,249,607 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.5% | ||||||||
Schlumberger Investment S.A., 2.4%, 2022 (n) | $ | 5,368,000 | $ | 5,360,490 | ||||
Transocean, Inc., 2.5%, 2017 | 8,676,000 | 8,786,879 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 14,147,369 | |||||||
Oils - 0.7% | ||||||||
Phillips 66, 5.875%, 2042 (n) | $ | 6,745,000 | $ | 8,426,502 | ||||
Tesoro Corp., 5.375%, 2022 | 12,172,000 | 12,689,310 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 21,115,812 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 3.7% | ||||||||
American Express Centurion Bank, 5.5%, 2013 | $ | 3,943,000 | $ | 4,034,438 | ||||
American Express Co., 8.125%, 2019 | 1,435,000 | 1,941,406 | ||||||
American Express Credit Corp., 2.8%, 2016 | 8,000,000 | 8,518,832 | ||||||
American Express Credit Corp., 2.375%, 2017 | 6,255,000 | 6,577,670 | ||||||
BB&T Corp., 3.95%, 2016 | 2,500,000 | 2,755,268 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 2.15%, 2015 | 14,300,000 | 14,699,957 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 8.8%, 2019 | 7,000,000 | 9,316,909 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 10.25%, 2039 | 3,490,000 | 3,594,700 | ||||||
Discover Bank, 7%, 2020 | 13,145,000 | 16,111,787 | ||||||
Fifth Third Bancorp, 3.5%, 2022 | 5,404,000 | 5,731,115 | ||||||
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | 3,146,000 | 3,596,444 | ||||||
Santander UK PLC, 3.875%, 2014 (n) | 2,587,000 | 2,665,386 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, 2.875%, 2017 | 8,191,000 | 8,654,611 | ||||||
Swedbank AB, 2.125%, 2017 (n) | 12,318,000 | 12,438,347 | ||||||
U.S. Bancorp, 3%, 2022 | 2,601,000 | 2,757,679 | ||||||
U.S. Bancorp, 2.95%, 2022 | 8,970,000 | 9,253,927 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 112,648,476 | |||||||
Personal Computers & Peripherals - 0.1% | ||||||||
Motorola Solutions, Inc., 3.75%, 2022 | $ | 3,801,000 | $ | 3,953,724 | ||||
Pharmaceuticals - 2.0% | ||||||||
Amgen, Inc., 2.3%, 2016 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 3,127,635 | ||||
Celgene Corp., 2.45%, 2015 | 3,438,000 | 3,584,318 | ||||||
Celgene Corp., 1.9%, 2017 | 19,032,000 | 19,324,198 | ||||||
Mylan Laboratories, Inc., 7.625%, 2017 (n) | 17,523,000 | 19,538,145 | ||||||
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance IV LLC, 3.65%, 2021 | 3,780,000 | 4,114,216 | ||||||
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1.875%, 2017 | 3,180,000 | 3,223,343 | ||||||
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 3.25%, 2022 | 4,118,000 | 4,243,554 | ||||||
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 4.625%, 2042 | 4,240,000 | 4,554,506 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 61,709,915 | |||||||
Pollution Control - 0.2% | ||||||||
Republic Services, Inc., 5.25%, 2021 | $ | 6,200,000 | $ | 7,411,920 | ||||
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.1% | ||||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 3%, 2019 | $ | 1,878,000 | $ | 1,910,608 | ||||
Printing & Publishing - 1.1% | ||||||||
Moody’s Corp., 4.5%, 2022 | $ | 14,469,000 | $ | 15,556,447 | ||||
Pearson Funding Four PLC, 3.75%, 2022 (n) | 6,576,000 | 6,916,795 | ||||||
Pearson PLC, 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 1,930,000 | 1,971,395 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Printing & Publishing - continued | ||||||||
Pearson PLC, 4%, 2016 (n) | $ | 9,720,000 | $ | 10,431,203 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 34,875,840 | |||||||
Railroad & Shipping - 1.3% | ||||||||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC, 3.05%, 2022 | $ | 3,500,000 | $ | 3,645,530 | ||||
Canadian Pacific Railway Co., 7.25%, 2019 | 11,151,000 | 13,952,009 | ||||||
Canadian Pacific Railway Co., 4.5%, 2022 | 6,058,000 | 6,754,343 | ||||||
CSX Corp., 7.375%, 2019 | 5,360,000 | 6,854,786 | ||||||
CSX Corp., 4.4%, 2043 | 4,000,000 | 4,252,424 | ||||||
Kansas City Southern, 8%, 2018 | 4,243,000 | 4,709,730 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 40,168,822 | |||||||
Real Estate - 3.9% | ||||||||
Boston Properties LP, REIT, 3.7%, 2018 | $ | 5,912,000 | $ | 6,442,744 | ||||
Boston Properties LP, REIT, 3.85%, 2023 | 9,626,000 | 10,382,844 | ||||||
DDR Corp., REIT, 4.625%, 2022 | 3,149,000 | 3,488,890 | ||||||
ERP Operating LP, REIT, 5.375%, 2016 | 2,950,000 | 3,371,579 | ||||||
ERP Operating LP, REIT, 4.625%, 2021 | 14,520,000 | 16,628,493 | ||||||
HCP, Inc., REIT, 3.75%, 2019 | 5,000,000 | 5,306,985 | ||||||
HCP, Inc., REIT, 5.375%, 2021 | 12,036,000 | 13,931,357 | ||||||
HRPT Properties Trust, REIT, 6.25%, 2016 | 6,245,000 | 6,819,634 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 5.75%, 2015 | 2,560,000 | 2,883,379 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 10.35%, 2019 | 5,828,000 | 8,397,513 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 4.375%, 2021 | 7,340,000 | 8,288,005 | ||||||
Ventas Realty LP, REIT, 4%, 2019 | 6,657,000 | 7,188,109 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC, REIT, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | 13,693,000 | 16,948,744 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC/WT Finance Australia, 3.375%, 2022 (n) | 7,118,000 | 7,213,260 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 117,291,536 | |||||||
Restaurants - 0.3% | ||||||||
Darden Restaurants, Inc., 3.35%, 2022 | $ | 9,086,000 | $ | 9,096,340 | ||||
Retailers - 3.5% | ||||||||
AutoZone, Inc., 3.7%, 2022 | $ | 8,867,000 | $ | 9,446,352 | ||||
Dollar General Corp., 4.125%, 2017 | 23,009,000 | 24,044,405 | ||||||
Gap, Inc., 5.95%, 2021 | 24,047,000 | 27,327,901 | ||||||
Kohl’s Corp., 4%, 2021 | 6,914,000 | 7,516,486 | ||||||
Kohl’s Corp., 3.25%, 2023 | 11,293,000 | 11,306,721 | ||||||
Limited Brands, Inc., 7%, 2020 | 11,059,000 | 12,621,084 | ||||||
Limited Brands, Inc., 5.625%, 2022 | 7,521,000 | 8,113,279 | ||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | 4,170,000 | 4,282,527 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 104,658,755 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Specialty Chemicals - 1.0% | ||||||||
Ecolab, Inc., 3%, 2016 | $ | 8,728,000 | $ | 9,366,069 | ||||
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 4.875%, 2022 (n) | 273,000 | 288,698 | ||||||
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 6.75%, 2042 (z) | 18,646,000 | 20,137,680 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 29,792,447 | |||||||
Specialty Stores - 0.4% | ||||||||
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 5.75%, 2020 | $ | 5,476,000 | $ | 6,353,458 | ||||
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 4.5%, 2022 | 4,668,000 | 5,040,175 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 11,393,633 | |||||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 1.8% | ||||||||
America Movil S.A.B. de C.V., 3.125%, 2022 | $ | 3,344,000 | $ | 3,448,289 | ||||
American Tower Corp., REIT, 4.625%, 2015 | 10,110,000 | 10,858,565 | ||||||
American Tower Corp., REIT, 4.5%, 2018 | 5,760,000 | 6,378,417 | ||||||
American Tower Corp., REIT, 4.7%, 2022 | 7,973,000 | 8,807,191 | ||||||
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.75%, 2017 (n) | 11,040,000 | 11,757,600 | ||||||
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 2023 (z) | 4,570,000 | 4,729,950 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 2020 (n) | 1,615,000 | 1,964,919 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.883%, 2020 (n) | 1,400,000 | 1,599,812 | ||||||
Rogers Cable, Inc., 5.5%, 2014 | 2,229,000 | 2,375,713 | ||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 5.625%, 2017 | 1,452,000 | 1,724,838 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 53,645,294 | |||||||
Telephone Services - 0.0% | ||||||||
Oi S.A., 5.75%, 2022 (n) | $ | 1,148,000 | $ | 1,239,840 | ||||
Tobacco - 2.3% | ||||||||
B.A.T. International Finance PLC, 2.125%, 2017 (n) | $ | 8,948,000 | $ | 9,144,409 | ||||
B.A.T. International Finance PLC, 9.5%, 2018 (n) | 6,976,000 | 9,732,992 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 2.3%, 2017 | 9,055,000 | 9,159,812 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 2019 | 15,092,000 | 19,412,070 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 6.875%, 2020 | 5,000,000 | 6,145,425 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 7%, 2041 | 2,698,000 | 3,354,825 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 7,310,000 | 8,833,813 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 4.75%, 2042 | 5,190,000 | 5,287,001 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 71,070,347 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.3% | ||||||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | $ | 1,400,000 | $ | 1,707,994 | ||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 7%, 2037 (n) | 4,707,000 | 6,134,125 | ||||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 5.625%, 2042 (n) | 2,420,000 | 2,760,010 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 10,602,129 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 3.2% | ||||||||
Calpine Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (n) | $ | 14,009,000 | $ | 15,339,855 | ||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 5.95%, 2017 | 4,600,000 | 5,372,519 | ||||||
CMS Energy Corp., 2.75%, 2014 | 4,220,000 | 4,287,495 | ||||||
CMS Energy Corp., 6.25%, 2020 | 6,891,000 | 8,221,404 | ||||||
CMS Energy Corp., 5.05%, 2022 | 5,159,000 | 5,762,853 | ||||||
Dominion Resources, Inc., 4.9%, 2041 | 4,300,000 | 5,093,915 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 1.625%, 2017 | 6,837,000 | 6,887,252 | ||||||
Enersis S.A., 7.375%, 2014 | 4,189,000 | 4,454,038 | ||||||
Exelon Corp., 4.9%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,198,880 | ||||||
FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., 6.05%, 2021 | 11,869,000 | 13,715,223 | ||||||
NextEra Energy Capital Co., 1.2%, 2015 | 1,330,000 | 1,337,077 | ||||||
Oncor Electric Delivery Co., 4.1%, 2022 | 3,410,000 | 3,653,685 | ||||||
PPL Corp., 4.2%, 2022 | 6,378,000 | 6,854,915 | ||||||
PPL WEM Holdings PLC, 5.375%, 2021 (n) | 5,693,000 | 6,410,506 | ||||||
PSEG Power LLC, 5.32%, 2016 | 1,727,000 | 1,972,509 | ||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 (z) | 1,072,338 | 1,087,780 | ||||||
Waterford 3 Funding Corp., 8.09%, 2017 | 3,520,270 | 3,596,446 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 96,246,352 | |||||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $2,594,294,077) | $ | 2,771,520,468 | ||||||
Money Market Funds - 6.4% | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.16%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | 192,669,265 | $ | 192,669,265 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $2,786,963,342) | $ | 2,964,189,733 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 1.9% | 58,531,469 | |||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 3,022,721,202 |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $566,225,840 representing 18.8% of net assets. |
(q) | Interest received was less than stated coupon rate. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Value | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.571%, 2019 | 1/15/10 | $1,652,515 | $2,092,196 | |||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.811%, 2040 | 3/01/06 | 1,931,582 | 1,252,374 | |||||||
CNPC General Capital Ltd., 2.75%, 2017 | 4/12/12 | 13,439,912 | 13,894,768 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 | 3/02/10 | 775,678 | 926,468 | |||||||
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 2023 | 10/03/12 | 4,570,000 | 4,729,950 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 5.905%, 2025 | 1/29/03 | 256,685 | 575,301 | |||||||
G-Force LLC, CDO, “A2”, 4.83%, 2036 | 1/20/11 | 2,431,269 | 2,519,360 | |||||||
GMAC LLC, FRN, 6.02%, 2033 | 3/20/02 | 1,532,947 | 1,569,535 | |||||||
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 6.75%, 2042 | 9/12/12-10/11/12 | 19,441,641 | 20,137,680 | |||||||
Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corp., FRN, 7.166%, 2013 | 12/06/04 | 3,496,688 | 3,461,373 | |||||||
Spirit Master Funding LLC, 5.05%, 2023 | 10/04/05 | 1,910,244 | 1,820,843 | |||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 | 4/16/04 | 1,072,338 | 1,087,780 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $54,067,628 | |||||||||
% of Net assets | 1.8% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Derivative Contracts at 10/31/12
Swap Agreements at 10/31/12
Expiration | Notional Amount | Counterparty | Cash Flows to Receive | Cash Flows to Pay | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||
Credit Default Swaps | ||||||||||||||||||
12/20/12 | USD | 6,090,000 | Merrill Lynch International | 1.00% (fixed rate) | (1) | $(199,860 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
(1) | Fund, as protection seller, to pay notional amount upon a defined credit event by MBIA, Inc., 7%, 12/15/25, a B rated bond. The fund entered into the contract to gain issuer exposure. |
The credit ratings presented here are an indicator of the current payment/performance risk of the related swap, the reference obligation for which may be either a single security or, in the case of a credit default index, a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers. Ratings are
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
assigned to each reference security, including each individual security within a reference basket of securities, utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). The ratings for a credit default index are calculated by MFS as a weighted average of the external credit ratings of the individual securities that compose the index’s reference basket of securities.
At October 31, 2012, the fund had cash collateral of $430,000 to cover any commitments for certain derivative contracts. Cash collateral is comprised of “Restricted cash” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $2,594,294,077) | $2,771,520,468 | |||
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | 192,669,265 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $2,786,963,342) | $2,964,189,733 | |||
Cash | 13,138,934 | |||
Restricted cash | 430,000 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 1,636,748 | |||
Fund shares sold | 19,710,252 | |||
Interest and dividends | 32,094,178 | |||
Total assets | $3,031,199,845 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $1,559,129 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 5,682,184 | |||
Swaps, at value | 199,860 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 97,815 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 687,586 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 79,554 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 49,587 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 122,928 | |||
Total liabilities | $8,478,643 | |||
Net assets | $3,022,721,202 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $2,866,220,140 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 177,026,531 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (11,000,312 | ) | ||
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | (9,525,157 | ) | ||
Net assets | $3,022,721,202 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 211,028,220 |
21
Table of Contents
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) – continued
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $1,673,949,720 | 116,794,869 | $14.33 | |||||||||
Class B | 114,141,020 | 7,983,881 | 14.30 | |||||||||
Class C | 382,597,599 | 26,792,983 | 14.28 | |||||||||
Class I | 566,962,048 | 39,566,741 | 14.33 | |||||||||
Class R1 | 10,020,431 | 701,080 | 14.29 | |||||||||
Class R2 | 67,704,230 | 4,724,156 | 14.33 | |||||||||
Class R3 | 71,145,770 | 4,964,127 | 14.33 | |||||||||
Class R4 | 136,090,772 | 9,492,734 | 14.34 | |||||||||
Class R5 | 109,612 | 7,649 | 14.33 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $15.04 [100 / 95.25 × $14.33]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $57,227,955 | |||
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | 136,206 | |||
Foreign taxes withheld | (28 | ) | ||
Total investment income | $57,364,133 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $5,109,647 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 4,371,504 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 1,563,988 | |||
Administrative services fee | 191,334 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 24,657 | |||
Custodian fee | 112,464 | |||
Shareholder communications | 134,205 | |||
Audit and tax fees | 31,706 | |||
Legal fees | 12,270 | |||
Miscellaneous | 181,407 | |||
Total expenses | $11,733,182 | |||
Fees paid indirectly | (648 | ) | ||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser | (4,612 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $11,727,922 | |||
Net investment income | $45,636,211 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||
Investments | $19,949,184 | |||
Swap agreements | 31,127 | |||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | $19,980,311 | |||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
Investments | $79,971,020 | |||
Swap agreements | 434,769 | |||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $80,405,789 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $100,386,100 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $146,022,311 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited) | Year ended 4/30/12 | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $45,636,211 | $74,812,660 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 19,980,311 | 27,955,504 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 80,405,789 | 23,468,780 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $146,022,311 | $126,236,944 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(54,639,074 | ) | $(86,518,599 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $580,106,585 | $898,655,500 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $671,489,822 | $938,373,845 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 2,351,231,380 | 1,412,857,535 | ||||||
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $9,525,157 and $522,294, respectively) | $3,022,721,202 | $2,351,231,380 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.86 | $13.64 | $13.17 | $10.95 | $12.18 | $12.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.25 | $0.59 | $0.68 | $0.71 | $0.64 | $0.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 2.23 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.77 | $0.91 | $1.21 | $2.94 | $(0.58 | ) | $0.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.74 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | $(0.65 | ) | $(0.68 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.33 | $13.86 | $13.64 | $13.17 | $10.95 | $12.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 5.59 | (n) | 6.92 | 9.46 | 27.35 | (4.61 | ) | 1.41 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.80 | (a) | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 0.98 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.80 | (a) | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.89 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.52 | (a) | 4.38 | 5.09 | 5.72 | 5.76 | 5.21 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,673,950 | $1,350,525 | $884,807 | $781,496 | $618,093 | $769,599 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.82 | $13.60 | $13.14 | $10.91 | $12.14 | $12.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.20 | $0.49 | $0.58 | $0.62 | $0.56 | $0.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 2.23 | (1.22 | ) | (0.48 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.72 | $0.81 | $1.10 | $2.85 | $(0.66 | ) | $0.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | $(0.64 | ) | $(0.62 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.30 | $13.82 | $13.60 | $13.14 | $10.91 | $12.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 5.28 | (n) | 6.13 | 8.58 | 26.60 | (5.32 | ) | 0.69 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.68 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.59 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.77 | (a) | 3.64 | 4.35 | 5.00 | 5.06 | 4.52 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $114,141 | $89,789 | $63,614 | $62,341 | $67,149 | $98,671 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.81 | $13.58 | $13.12 | $10.90 | $12.13 | $12.63 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.19 | $0.49 | $0.58 | $0.62 | $0.56 | $0.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 2.22 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.71 | $0.82 | $1.10 | $2.84 | $(0.66 | ) | $0.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | $(0.64 | ) | $(0.62 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.28 | $13.81 | $13.58 | $13.12 | $10.90 | $12.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 5.21 | (n) | 6.21 | 8.59 | 26.52 | (5.33 | ) | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.68 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.59 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.76 | (a) | 3.62 | 4.35 | 4.97 | 5.09 | 4.52 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $382,598 | $280,260 | $152,326 | $117,744 | $74,651 | $75,666 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.86 | $13.64 | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.18 | $12.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.26 | $0.62 | $0.71 | $0.74 | $0.67 | $0.68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.53 | 2.24 | (1.21 | ) | (0.48 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.78 | $0.95 | $1.24 | $2.98 | $(0.54 | ) | $0.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.73 | ) | $(0.78 | ) | $(0.75 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.33 | $13.86 | $13.64 | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 5.72 | (n) | 7.18 | 9.65 | 27.76 | (4.32 | ) | 1.64 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.55 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.55 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.73 | (a) | 4.58 | 5.31 | 5.98 | 6.06 | 5.50 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $566,962 | $361,290 | $114,736 | $43,990 | $53,906 | $56,574 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.82 | $13.59 | $13.13 | $10.91 | $12.14 | $12.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.20 | $0.50 | $0.58 | $0.62 | $0.56 | $0.55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 2.22 | (1.22 | ) | (0.48 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.71 | $0.82 | $1.10 | $2.84 | $(0.66 | ) | $0.07 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.59 | ) | $(0.64 | ) | $(0.62 | ) | $(0.57 | ) | $(0.58 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.29 | $13.82 | $13.59 | $13.13 | $10.91 | $12.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 5.21 | (n) | 6.21 | 8.59 | 26.50 | (5.32 | ) | 0.61 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.61 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.75 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.61 | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.66 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.82 | (a) | 3.67 | 4.38 | 4.99 | 5.09 | 4.42 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $10,020 | $10,894 | $9,492 | $10,941 | $7,912 | $8,351 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.86 | $13.63 | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.17 | $12.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.23 | $0.56 | $0.65 | $0.68 | $0.62 | $0.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 2.24 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.75 | $0.89 | $1.17 | $2.92 | $(0.60 | ) | $0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.66 | ) | $(0.71 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.63 | ) | $(0.64 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.33 | $13.86 | $13.63 | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 5.46 | (n) | 6.73 | 9.11 | 27.16 | (4.82 | ) | 1.03 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.05 | (a) | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.26 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.05 | (a) | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.30 | (a) | 4.15 | 4.85 | 5.47 | 5.53 | 4.91 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $67,704 | $112,858 | $66,050 | $65,141 | $55,413 | $81,433 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R3 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.86 | $13.63 | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.18 | $12.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.25 | $0.60 | $0.68 | $0.71 | $0.65 | $0.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 2.24 | (1.23 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.77 | $0.92 | $1.20 | $2.95 | $(0.58 | ) | $0.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.74 | ) | $(0.72 | ) | $(0.66 | ) | $(0.68 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.33 | $13.86 | $13.63 | $13.17 | $10.94 | $12.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 5.59 | (n) | 6.99 | 9.38 | 27.47 | (4.65 | ) | 1.36 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.80 | (a) | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.80 | (a) | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.93 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.53 | (a) | 4.40 | 5.11 | 5.73 | 5.80 | 5.16 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $71,146 | $63,099 | $50,351 | $49,555 | $46,014 | $59,233 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.87 | $13.64 | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.19 | $12.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.26 | $0.63 | $0.72 | $0.74 | $0.67 | $0.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 2.24 | (1.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.78 | $0.96 | $1.24 | $2.98 | $(0.55 | ) | $0.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.73 | ) | $(0.78 | ) | $(0.75 | ) | $(0.69 | ) | $(0.71 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.34 | $13.87 | $13.64 | $13.18 | $10.95 | $12.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 5.72 | (n) | 7.26 | 9.65 | 27.76 | (4.40 | ) | 1.65 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.55 | (a) | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.55 | (a) | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.71 | (a) | 4.65 | 5.34 | 5.97 | 6.01 | 5.44 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | 47 | 58 | 91 | 44 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $136,091 | $82,516 | $71,481 | $61,604 | $46,014 | $86,097 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Class R5 | Period ended (unaudited) (i) | |||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $13.82 | |||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.22 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 0.55 | |||
Total from investment operations | $0.77 | |||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||
From net investment income | $(0.26 | ) | ||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $14.33 | |||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 5.64 | (n) | ||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.48 | (a) | ||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.48 | (a) | ||
Net investment income | 3.71 | (a) | ||
Portfolio turnover | 27 | (n) | ||
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | $110 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(i) | For the period from the class inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Bond Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 seeks to improve the comparability of fair value measurements as presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by providing common requirements for fair value measurement and disclosure.
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods, ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosure requirements on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2011-11 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Swap agreements are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets
34
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining
35
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as swap agreements. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2012 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | $— | $49,871,079 | $— | $49,871,079 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 2,209,421,452 | — | 2,209,421,452 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 56,746 | — | 56,746 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 32,239,982 | — | 32,239,982 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 15,046,085 | — | 15,046,085 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 464,885,124 | — | 464,885,124 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 192,669,265 | — | — | 192,669,265 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $192,669,265 | $2,771,520,468 | $— | $2,964,189,733 | ||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Swap Agreements | $— | $(199,860 | ) | $— | $(199,860 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were swap agreements. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
36
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Fair Value | ||||||
Risk | Derivative Contracts | Liability Derivatives | ||||
Credit | Credit Default Swaps | $(199,860) |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Swap Transactions | |||
Credit | $31,127 |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Swap Transactions | |||
Credit | $434,769 |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures contracts and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, swap agreements and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to
37
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as “Restricted cash”. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Swap Agreements – The fund entered into swap agreements. A swap agreement is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap agreement, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap agreement are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap agreements are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
The fund entered into credit default swap agreements in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap agreement, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the agreement notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although agreement-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant agreement. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
swap agreement’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Credit default swap agreements are considered to have credit-risk-related contingent features since they trigger payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event. The aggregate fair value of credit default swap agreements in a net liability position as of October 31, 2012 is disclosed in the footnotes to the Portfolio of Investments. As discussed earlier in this note, collateral requirements for these swap agreements are based generally on the market value of the swap agreement netted against collateral requirements for other types of over-the-counter derivatives traded under each counterparty’s ISDA Master Agreement. The maximum amount of future, undiscounted payments that the fund, as protection seller, could be required to make is equal to the swap agreement’s notional amount. The protection seller’s payment obligation would be offset to the extent of the value of the agreement’s deliverable obligation. If a defined credit event had occurred as of October 31, 2012, the swap agreement’s credit-risk-related contingent features would have been triggered and, for those swap agreements in a net liability position for which the fund is the protection seller, the fund in order to settle these swap agreements would have been required to either (1) pay the swap agreement’s notional value of $6,090,000 less the value of the agreements’ related deliverable obligations as decided through an ISDA auction or (2) pay the notional value of the swap agreements in return for physical receipt of the deliverable obligations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the agreement. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2012, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Foreign taxes have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/12 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $86,518,599 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/2012 | ||||
Cost of investments | $2,799,960,392 | |||
Gross appreciation | 175,160,824 | |||
Gross depreciation | (10,931,483 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $164,229,341 | |||
As of 4/30/12 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 7,641,295 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (19,707,315 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (8,805,323 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 85,989,168 |
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized after April 30, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of April 30, 2012, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
Pre-enactment losses: | ||||
4/30/17 | $(19,707,315 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||
Class A | $31,617,595 | $54,371,677 | ||||||
Class B | 1,794,174 | 3,134,621 | ||||||
Class C | 5,698,779 | 8,391,212 | ||||||
Class I | 10,154,102 | 10,038,847 | ||||||
Class R1 | 181,561 | 413,657 | ||||||
Class R2 | 1,367,694 | 3,367,194 | ||||||
Class R3 | 1,388,257 | 2,822,323 | ||||||
Class R4 | 2,434,955 | 3,979,068 | ||||||
Class R5 | 1,957 | — | ||||||
Total | $54,639,074 | $86,518,599 |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at the following annual rates:
First $1.1 billion of average daily net assets | 0.39 | % | ||
Average daily net assets in excess of $1.1 billion | 0.38 | % |
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The management fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.38% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $1,230,740 for the six months ended October 31, 2012, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | $1,886,099 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 520,960 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1,657,108 | |||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 52,193 | |||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 172,572 | |||||||||||||||
Class R3 | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 82,572 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $4,371,504 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2012 based on each class’ average daily net assets. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $6,853 | |||
Class B | 77,624 | |||
Class C | 35,594 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
six months ended October 31, 2012, the fee was $361,612, which equated to 0.0271% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. Class R5 shares do not incur sub-accounting fees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $1,202,376.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0143% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $721 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $2,137. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended October 31, 2012. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under both plans amounted to $54,643 at October 31, 2012, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $10,281 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $4,612, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
On May 31, 2012, MFS purchased 7,236 shares of Class R5 for an aggregate amount of $100,000. At October 31, 2012, MFS held 96% of the outstanding shares of Class R5.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities and short-term obligations, aggregated $1,118,240,561 and $663,467,447, respectively.
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 27,508,204 | $386,632,886 | 46,548,843 | $632,764,000 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 2,044,731 | 28,539,115 | 3,218,560 | 43,605,699 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 7,960,415 | 111,377,054 | 11,286,088 | 153,071,063 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 16,655,059 | 234,221,493 | 21,642,526 | 294,509,142 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 126,950 | 1,775,782 | 308,337 | 4,185,106 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 861,108 | 12,051,855 | 4,691,774 | 64,436,917 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 831,961 | 11,683,982 | 1,597,690 | 21,717,190 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 5,780,010 | 80,860,377 | 1,634,763 | 22,262,156 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 | 7,511 | 103,855 | — | — | ||||||||||||
61,775,949 | $867,246,399 | 90,928,581 | $1,236,551,273 |
44
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,998,333 | $28,158,459 | 3,400,547 | $46,258,788 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 114,393 | 1,607,964 | 192,049 | 2,605,580 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 278,785 | 3,915,264 | 393,678 | 5,337,083 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 438,879 | 6,192,314 | 438,311 | 5,967,759 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 12,943 | 181,561 | 30,482 | 413,186 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 91,307 | 1,285,454 | 233,036 | 3,170,843 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 98,562 | 1,388,251 | 207,213 | 2,817,374 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 172,470 | 2,434,955 | 292,292 | 3,976,000 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 | 138 | 1,957 | — | — | ||||||||||||
3,205,810 | $45,166,179 | 5,187,608 | $70,546,613 | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (10,158,485 | ) | $(142,998,079 | ) | (17,389,741 | ) | $(236,785,029 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (670,228 | ) | (9,384,008 | ) | (1,593,006 | ) | (21,571,871 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (1,742,966 | ) | (24,418,179 | ) | (2,596,231 | ) | (35,152,881 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (3,600,427 | ) | (50,568,229 | ) | (4,421,645 | ) | (60,095,515 | ) | ||||||||
Class R1 | (227,100 | ) | (3,178,837 | ) | (248,774 | ) | (3,379,755 | ) | ||||||||
Class R2 | (4,371,822 | ) | (60,772,996 | ) | (1,626,090 | ) | (22,065,576 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | (519,624 | ) | (7,263,957 | ) | (944,694 | ) | (12,866,632 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | (2,411,003 | ) | (33,721,708 | ) | (1,215,969 | ) | (16,525,127 | ) | ||||||||
(23,701,655 | ) | $(332,305,993 | ) | (30,036,150 | ) | $(408,442,386 | ) | |||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 19,348,052 | $271,793,266 | 32,559,649 | $442,237,759 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 1,488,896 | 20,763,071 | 1,817,603 | 24,639,408 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 6,496,234 | 90,874,139 | 9,083,535 | 123,255,265 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 13,493,511 | 189,845,578 | 17,659,192 | 240,381,386 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | (87,207 | ) | (1,221,494 | ) | 90,045 | 1,218,537 | ||||||||||
Class R2 | (3,419,407 | ) | (47,435,687 | ) | 3,298,720 | 45,542,184 | ||||||||||
Class R3 | 410,899 | 5,808,276 | 860,209 | 11,667,932 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 3,541,477 | 49,573,624 | 711,086 | 9,713,029 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 | 7,649 | 105,812 | — | — | ||||||||||||
41,280,104 | $580,106,585 | 66,080,039 | $898,655,500 |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, June 1, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating
45
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $7,598 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 79,095,062 | 646,911,568 | (533,337,365 | ) | 192,669,265 | |||||||||||
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $136,206 | $192,669,265 |
46
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2012 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2011 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to
47
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile for each of the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2011 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.
48
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts, if any. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is subject to a contractual breakpoint that reduces the Fund’s advisory fee rate on average daily net assets over $1.1 billion. The Trustees concluded that the existing breakpoint was sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economics of scale as its assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other
49
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2012.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
50
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
51
Table of Contents
Save paper with eDelivery.
MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Table of Contents
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
October 31, 2012
MFS® LIMITED MATURITY FUND
MQL-SEM
Table of Contents
MFS® LIMITED MATURITY FUND
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
Table of Contents
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
As 2012 winds down, economic uncertainty continues to dominate world financial markets. In the United States, all eyes are riveted to the ongoing budget deal
negotiations and the specter of a “fiscal cliff.” Overseas, we see growth slowing in China and Japan, and the eurozone has entered its second recession in four years against a backdrop of double-digit unemployment and the continuing sovereign debt crisis.
Amidst the instability, there are silver linings — especially in the U.S. where the labor and housing markets have picked up, consumer confidence has risen and industrial output has increased. Additionally, a U.S. budgetary compromise could propel markets, unleashing pent-up spending and investments, which would help to revive both the U.S. and global economies.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, an emphasis on global research and our disciplined risk management approach anchor our uniquely collaborative investment process. Our global team of more than 200 investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines, and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results — for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges we face locally, nationally and globally. It is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view, employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification, and work closely with investment advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 14, 2012
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 73.7% | |||
Non-U.S. Government Bonds | 10.0% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | 6.0% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 3.7% | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 3.4% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 0.9% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 0.6% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 0.3% | |||
U.S. Government Agencies | 0.2% | |||
U.S. Treasury Securities | (3.4)% | |||
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 13.9% | |||
AA | 10.3% | |||
A | 35.1% | |||
BBB | 33.4% | |||
BB | 1.7% | |||
B (o) | 0.0% | |||
CCC | 0.2% | |||
CC | 0.2% | |||
C | 0.1% | |||
D | 0.1% | |||
Federal Agencies | 3.6% | |||
Not Rated | (3.2)% | |||
Cash & Other | 4.6% |
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 1.6 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 2.0 yrs. | |||
Issuer country weightings (i)(x) | ||||
United States | 55.0% | |||
United Kingdom | 7.6% | |||
France | 4.8% | |||
Netherlands | 4.1% | |||
Australia | 3.5% | |||
Canada | 3.4% | |||
Germany | 2.3% | |||
Sweden | 2.3% | |||
Japan | 2.2% | |||
Other Countries | 14.8% |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Federal Agencies includes rated and unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities, U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(o) | Less than 0.1%. |
(x) | Represents the portfolio’s exposure to issuer countries as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/12.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012.
The expenses include the payment of a portion of the transfer-agent-related expenses of MFS funds that invest in the fund. For further information, please see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/12 | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During 5/01/12-10/31/12 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.27 | $3.81 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.75% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.42 | $3.82 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.50% | $1,000.00 | $1,012.50 | $7.61 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.50% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.64 | $7.63 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,011.97 | $8.11 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,015.38 | $3.05 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.18 | $3.06 | ||||||||||||||
R1 | Actual | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,011.98 | $8.11 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.14 | $8.13 | ||||||||||||||
R2 | Actual | 1.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,015.01 | $5.08 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.16 | $5.09 | ||||||||||||||
R3 | Actual | 0.85% | $1,000.00 | $1,015.77 | $4.32 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.85% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.92 | $4.33 | ||||||||||||||
R4 | Actual | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.03 | $3.05 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.60% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.18 | $3.06 | ||||||||||||||
R5 | Actual | 0.53% | $1,000.00 | $1,005.85 | $0.84 | (i) | ||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.53% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.53 | $2.70 | ||||||||||||||
529A | Actual | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.01 | $4.07 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.80% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.17 | $4.08 | ||||||||||||||
529B | Actual | 1.56% | $1,000.00 | $1,012.19 | $7.91 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.56% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.34 | $7.93 | ||||||||||||||
529C | Actual | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,011.73 | $8.37 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.89 | $8.39 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(i) | For the period from the class inception, September 4, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
Table of Contents
10/31/12 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 98.1% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Airlines - 0.3% | ||||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., FRN, 0.768%, 2013 | $ | 3,861,036 | $ | 3,783,815 | ||||
Apparel Manufacturers - 0.2% | ||||||||
VF Corp., FRN, 1.184%, 2013 | $ | 2,235,000 | $ | 2,248,169 | ||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 7.2% | ||||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.571%, 2019 (z) | $ | 345,255 | $ | 336,624 | ||||
ARI Fleet Lease Trust, “A”, FRN, 0.764%, 2020 (n) | 3,464,070 | 3,474,476 | ||||||
ARI Fleet Lease Trust, “A”, FRN, 0.513%, 2021 (n) | 7,490,000 | 7,492,120 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.521%, 2035 (z) | 1,126,664 | 822,614 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.481%, 2036 (z) | 952,049 | 724,455 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.175%, 2036 (i)(z) | 4,933,458 | 75,335 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.638%, 2036 | 2,370,000 | 2,292,790 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2041 | 974,742 | 974,714 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.811%, 2040 (z) | 924,916 | 599,685 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (n) | 2,424,957 | 2,470,546 | ||||||
Chesapeake Funding LLC, “A”, FRN, 1.964%, 2021 (z) | 1,534,066 | 1,547,277 | ||||||
Chesapeake Funding LLC, “A”, FRN, 0.969%, 2023 (z) | 5,970,000 | 5,984,394 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.648%, 2032 (i)(z) | 12,478,905 | 78,180 | ||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 2.06%, 2018 (z) | 1,405,000 | 1,405,340 | ||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 2.2%, 2019 (z) | 1,215,000 | 1,222,630 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, 5.303%, 2035 | 764,307 | 705,870 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.007%, 2037 (d)(q) | 2,700,560 | 1,179,070 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 4.894%, 2037 (d)(q) | 3,875,730 | 1,839,960 | ||||||
Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust, “A2”, 0.74%, 2013 | 528,865 | 529,320 | ||||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust, “A2”, 0.68%, 2014 | 54,112 | 54,124 | ||||||
Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner, “A”, FRN, 0.564%, 2016 | 5,090,000 | 5,090,000 | ||||||
GE Equipment Transportation LLC, “A2”, 0.77%, 2014 | 2,834,523 | 2,839,877 | ||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.635%, 2035 (z) | 1,167,037 | 1,085,345 | ||||||
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., 4.26%, 2014 (n) | 2,491,667 | 2,513,314 | ||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 (n) | 2,010,000 | 2,053,577 | ||||||
Home Loan Servicing Solutions Ltd., 1.34%, 2043 (z) | 2,020,000 | 2,025,208 | ||||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust, “A3”, 1.16%, 2015 | 2,337,186 | 2,347,647 | ||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 0.951%, 2034 | 351,342 | 322,473 | ||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 1.131%, 2034 | 369,834 | 309,138 | ||||||
IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., FRN, 0.561%, 2036 | 1,013,386 | 1,001,467 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
Interstar Millennium Trust, FRN, 0.794%, 2036 | $ | 383,819 | $ | 364,579 | ||||
John Deere Owner Trust, “A2”, 0.64%, 2014 | 163,299 | 163,319 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.298%, 2047 | 4,009,993 | 4,042,646 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.29%, 2037 | 1,421,668 | 1,464,303 | ||||||
LB Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.415%, 2035 (i) | 4,069,604 | 162,780 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., 5.45%, 2037 (d)(q) | 2,032,023 | 465,185 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.878%, 2046 | 1,168,174 | 1,179,397 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.095%, 2031 (i)(z) | 1,577,250 | 5,293 | ||||||
Nationslink Funding Corp., FRN, 1.371%, 2030 (i) | 2,785,861 | 22,192 | ||||||
Option One Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 5.611%, 2037 | 1,990,000 | 1,268,569 | ||||||
Ownit Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.29%, 2036 (d)(q) | 2,186,527 | 1,115,131 | ||||||
Porsche Innovative Lease Owner Trust, 0.92%, 2014 (n) | 2,391,195 | 2,393,378 | ||||||
Porsche Innovative Lease Owner Trust, 0.44%, 2015 (n) | 3,020,000 | 3,020,646 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivable Trust, “A2”, 0.91%, 2015 | 2,417,283 | 2,424,259 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivable Trust, “A2”, 0.57%, 2015 | 7,690,000 | 7,696,490 | ||||||
Smart Trust, “A2B”, FRN, 0.764%, 2014 (n) | 3,304,000 | 3,309,017 | ||||||
Smart Trust, “A2B”, FRN, 0.764%, 2015 (z) | 5,550,000 | 5,552,237 | ||||||
Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust, FRN, 0.891%, 2043 | 1,391,274 | 1,378,886 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.275%, 2048 | 184,002 | 184,989 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, “A3”, FRN, 5.923%, 2051 | 1,250,000 | 1,316,612 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 90,927,478 | |||||||
Automotive - 4.0% | ||||||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 2.375%, 2013 (n) | $ | 4,050,000 | $ | 4,078,719 | ||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 1.625%, 2013 (n) | 1,800,000 | 1,816,713 | ||||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 1.85%, 2014 (n) | 1,700,000 | 1,730,070 | ||||||
American Honda Finance Corp., 1%, 2015 (n) | 3,060,000 | 3,064,165 | ||||||
Daimler Finance North America LLC, FRN, 1.677%, 2013 (n) | 2,590,000 | 2,608,534 | ||||||
Daimler Finance North America LLC, FRN, 1.599%, 2013 (n) | 4,020,000 | 4,047,525 | ||||||
Daimler Finance North America LLC, FRN, 0.972%, 2014 (z) | 3,960,000 | 3,975,242 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 4.207%, 2016 | 3,170,000 | 3,376,098 | ||||||
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, 3.875%, 2016 (n) | 4,620,000 | 4,991,711 | ||||||
Hyundai Capital America, 1.625%, 2015 (n) | 4,490,000 | 4,517,887 | ||||||
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 3.25%, 2013 (n) | 3,130,000 | 3,149,249 | ||||||
RCI Banque S.A., FRN, 2.217%, 2014 (n) | 4,820,000 | 4,810,996 | ||||||
Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 1.25%, 2014 | 2,660,000 | 2,699,496 | ||||||
Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 3.2%, 2015 | 1,270,000 | 1,352,174 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Automotive - continued | ||||||||
Volkswagen International Finance N.V., FRN, 1.126%, 2014 (n) | $ | 4,520,000 | $ | 4,542,623 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 50,761,202 | |||||||
Banks & Diversified Financials (Covered Bonds) - 2.0% | ||||||||
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, FRN, 1.018%, 2015 (n) | $ | 1,940,000 | $ | 1,945,449 | ||||
Bank of Nova Scotia, 1.45%, 2013 (n) | 5,540,000 | 5,584,320 | ||||||
BNP Paribas Home Loan, 2.2%, 2015 (n) | 4,260,000 | 4,393,338 | ||||||
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2%, 2013 (n) | 1,496,000 | 1,502,283 | ||||||
Compagnie de Financement Foncier, 2.125%, 2013 (n) | 3,500,000 | 3,524,850 | ||||||
Norddeutsche Landesbank, 0.875%, 2015 (n) | 2,400,000 | 2,400,720 | ||||||
SpareBank 1 Boligkreditt A.S., 2.625%, 2016 (n) | 2,260,000 | 2,392,888 | ||||||
Stadshypotek AB, FRN, 0.912%, 2013 (n) | 4,200,000 | 4,208,169 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 25,952,017 | |||||||
Broadcasting - 0.8% | ||||||||
NBCUniversal Media LLC, 2.1%, 2014 | $ | 2,100,000 | $ | 2,141,490 | ||||
Vivendi S.A., 2.4%, 2015 (n) | 2,580,000 | 2,612,023 | ||||||
WPP Finance, 8%, 2014 | 4,550,000 | 5,080,384 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 9,833,897 | |||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.7% | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc., 3.5%, 2014 | $ | 3,700,000 | $ | 3,926,873 | ||||
BlackRock, Inc., 1.375%, 2015 | 1,740,000 | 1,772,573 | ||||||
Franklin Resources, Inc., 1.375%, 2017 | 1,222,000 | 1,229,468 | ||||||
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., 2.95%, 2012 | 2,548,000 | 2,552,885 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 9,481,799 | |||||||
Building - 0.1% | ||||||||
CRH America, Inc., 5.3%, 2013 | $ | 1,400,000 | $ | 1,452,115 | ||||
Cable TV - 0.7% | ||||||||
Comcast Corp., 5.3%, 2014 | $ | 2,250,000 | $ | 2,377,463 | ||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 4.75%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,221,556 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 2.4%, 2017 | 3,360,000 | 3,462,003 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 9,061,022 | |||||||
Chemicals - 1.2% | ||||||||
Dow Chemical Co., 7.6%, 2014 | $ | 6,030,000 | $ | 6,647,960 | ||||
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 | 3,210,000 | 3,436,273 | ||||||
PPG Industries, Inc., 5.75%, 2013 | 5,201,000 | 5,297,655 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,381,888 | |||||||
Computer Software - 0.3% | ||||||||
Adobe Systems, Inc., 3.25%, 2015 | $ | 4,085,000 | $ | 4,313,160 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Conglomerates - 1.2% | ||||||||
ABB Finance (USA), Inc., 1.625%, 2017 | $ | 1,539,000 | $ | 1,570,005 | ||||
ABB Treasury Center USA, Inc., 2.5%, 2016 (n) | 3,907,000 | 4,071,485 | ||||||
General Electric Co., 0.85%, 2015 | 1,260,000 | 1,262,546 | ||||||
Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Co. Ltd., 6%, 2013 | 4,425,000 | 4,610,624 | ||||||
Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Co. Ltd., 9.5%, 2014 | 1,025,000 | 1,147,798 | ||||||
United Technologies Corp., FRN, 0.921%, 2015 | 2,560,000 | 2,591,752 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,254,210 | |||||||
Consumer Products - 1.7% | ||||||||
Clorox Co., 5%, 2013 | $ | 5,850,000 | $ | 5,937,206 | ||||
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A., 1.625%, 2017 (n) | 3,150,000 | 3,184,650 | ||||||
Mattel, Inc., 5.625%, 2013 | 3,330,000 | 3,388,701 | ||||||
Mattel, Inc., 2.5%, 2016 | 2,030,000 | 2,115,130 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 4,360,000 | 4,446,263 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 2%, 2015 | 2,337,000 | 2,362,595 | ||||||
Phillips Electronics N.V., 7.25%, 2013 | 400,000 | 419,935 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 21,854,480 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 0.8% | ||||||||
eBay, Inc., 1.35%, 2017 | $ | 3,482,000 | $ | 3,535,330 | ||||
Experian Finance PLC, 2.375%, 2017 (n) | 2,439,000 | 2,496,960 | ||||||
Western Union Co., FRN, 0.99%, 2013 | 4,190,000 | 4,199,067 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 10,231,357 | |||||||
Defense Electronics - 0.2% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 4.95%, 2014 (n) | $ | 2,640,000 | $ | 2,785,844 | ||||
Electronics - 0.5% | ||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc., 2.65%, 2016 | $ | 1,670,000 | $ | 1,766,564 | ||||
Broadcom Corp., 1.5%, 2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,413,668 | ||||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 1.6%, 2015 | 3,160,000 | 3,208,673 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 6,388,905 | |||||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 2.0% | ||||||||
Banco do Nordeste do Brasil (BNB), 3.625%, 2015 (n) | $ | 979,000 | $ | 1,013,265 | ||||
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, 4.75%, 2014 (n) | 5,420,000 | 5,768,669 | ||||||
Gaz Capital S.A., 4.95%, 2016 (n) | 1,398,000 | 1,491,163 | ||||||
Korea Expressway Corp., 4.5%, 2015 (n) | 2,479,000 | 2,653,348 | ||||||
Korea Gas Corp., 2.25%, 2017 (n) | 2,750,000 | 2,770,265 | ||||||
Mubadala Development Co., 5.75%, 2014 (n) | 3,197,000 | 3,392,017 | ||||||
National Agricultural Co., 5%, 2014 (n) | 2,541,000 | 2,715,363 | ||||||
Petrobras International Finance Co., 3.875%, 2016 | 4,654,000 | 4,944,107 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 24,748,197 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Emerging Market Sovereign - 0.8% | ||||||||
Russian Federation, 3.25%, 2017 (n) | $ | 5,400,000 | $ | 5,730,426 | ||||
State of Qatar, 5.15%, 2014 (n) | 1,588,000 | 1,687,250 | ||||||
State of Qatar, 5.15%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,187,500 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 10,605,176 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 1.1% | ||||||||
ConocoPhillips, 5.5%, 2013 | $ | 1,700,000 | $ | 1,737,412 | ||||
Encana Corp., 5.9%, 2017 | 3,360,000 | 4,007,805 | ||||||
Encana Holdings Finance Corp., 5.8%, 2014 | 3,545,000 | 3,797,213 | ||||||
Hess Corp., 7%, 2014 | 3,740,000 | 4,036,892 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,579,322 | |||||||
Energy - Integrated - 2.1% | ||||||||
BG Energy Capital PLC, 2.875%, 2016 (n) | $ | 3,830,000 | $ | 4,078,701 | ||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 3.125%, 2015 | 5,300,000 | 5,664,253 | ||||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc., 4.5%, 2014 | 2,170,000 | 2,324,074 | ||||||
Husky Energy, Inc., 5.9%, 2014 | 2,965,000 | 3,201,313 | ||||||
Petro-Canada Financial Partnership, 5%, 2014 | 2,950,000 | 3,200,272 | ||||||
Shell International Finance B.V., 1.125%, 2017 | 3,430,000 | 3,466,931 | ||||||
Total Capital International S.A., 1.5%, 2017 | 1,670,000 | 1,699,058 | ||||||
TOTAL S.A., 3%, 2015 | 2,810,000 | 2,986,327 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 26,620,929 | |||||||
Entertainment - 0.2% | ||||||||
Viacom, Inc., 1.25%, 2015 | $ | 2,100,000 | $ | 2,120,383 | ||||
Financial Institutions - 1.7% | ||||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.45%, 2013 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 605,947 | ||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 4.8%, 2013 | 1,820,000 | 1,857,610 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 1.875%, 2013 | 3,030,000 | 3,069,741 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 2.15%, 2015 | 2,180,000 | 2,240,055 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN, 0.575%, 2012 | 1,570,000 | 1,570,000 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., FRN, 1.201%, 2014 | 6,000,000 | 6,046,830 | ||||||
LeasePlan Corp. N.V., 3%, 2017 (z) | 3,370,000 | 3,408,848 | ||||||
NYSE Euronext, 2%, 2017 | 3,266,000 | 3,325,183 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 22,124,214 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 5.7% | ||||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 3.625%, 2015 | $ | 1,350,000 | $ | 1,447,921 | ||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 1.375%, 2017 | 5,370,000 | 5,450,953 | ||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., FRN, 1.097%, 2013 | 2,000,000 | 2,006,374 | ||||||
Campbell Soup Co., FRN, 0.743%, 2014 | 4,570,000 | 4,589,797 | ||||||
Coca Cola Co., 0.75%, 2013 | 1,570,000 | 1,575,919 | ||||||
Conagra Foods, Inc., 5.875%, 2014 | 4,000,000 | 4,288,828 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Food & Beverages - continued | ||||||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 7.375%, 2014 | $ | 3,520,000 | $ | 3,801,815 | ||||
Diageo Capital PLC, 1.5%, 2017 | 2,750,000 | 2,803,837 | ||||||
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 2.35%, 2012 | 2,240,000 | 2,245,622 | ||||||
General Mills, Inc., 5.25%, 2013 | 2,100,000 | 2,177,404 | ||||||
General Mills, Inc., 5.2%, 2015 | 1,990,000 | 2,200,801 | ||||||
H.J. Heinz Co., 5.35%, 2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,550,766 | ||||||
Heineken N.V., 0.8%, 2015 (n) | 2,810,000 | 2,815,642 | ||||||
Ingredion, Inc., 3.2%, 2015 | 1,025,000 | 1,080,982 | ||||||
Ingredion, Inc., 1.8%, 2017 | 2,092,000 | 2,087,601 | ||||||
Kellogg Co., 4.45%, 2016 | 1,209,000 | 1,359,651 | ||||||
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 1.625%, 2015 (n) | 5,170,000 | 5,274,708 | ||||||
Miller Brewing Co., 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 6,225,000 | 6,470,856 | ||||||
Molson Coors Brewing Co., 2%, 2017 | 3,330,000 | 3,439,427 | ||||||
Mondelez International, Inc., 6.75%, 2014 | 1,100,000 | 1,185,895 | ||||||
PepsiAmericas, Inc., 4.5%, 2013 | 3,000,000 | 3,043,980 | ||||||
PepsiCo, Inc., 2.5%, 2016 | 3,400,000 | 3,598,057 | ||||||
Pernod-Ricard S.A., 2.95%, 2017 (n) | 5,000,000 | 5,273,500 | ||||||
SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 1.85%, 2015 (n) | 2,630,000 | 2,695,450 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 72,465,786 | |||||||
Food & Drug Stores - 0.5% | ||||||||
CVS Caremark Corp., 3.25%, 2015 | $ | 2,372,000 | $ | 2,521,925 | ||||
Walgreen Co., 1%, 2015 | 4,120,000 | 4,136,295 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 6,658,220 | |||||||
Gaming & Lodging - 0.4% | ||||||||
Marriott International, Inc., 5.625%, 2013 | $ | 2,370,000 | $ | 2,400,113 | ||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 2.95%, 2017 | 2,783,000 | 2,794,561 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 5,194,674 | |||||||
Industrial - 0.3% | ||||||||
Cornell University, 4.35%, 2014 | $ | 3,070,000 | $ | 3,216,654 | ||||
Insurance - 3.3% | ||||||||
Aflac, Inc., 3.45%, 2015 | $ | 3,840,000 | $ | 4,104,714 | ||||
American International Group, Inc., 3.65%, 2014 | 2,670,000 | 2,749,411 | ||||||
American International Group, Inc., 3%, 2015 | 3,360,000 | 3,496,342 | ||||||
Lincoln National Corp., 4.3%, 2015 | 2,060,000 | 2,219,232 | ||||||
MassMutual Global Funding, FRN, 0.72%, 2014 (n) | 2,870,000 | 2,878,687 | ||||||
Metlife, Inc., 1.756%, 2017 | 1,199,000 | 1,218,529 | ||||||
MetLife, Inc., FRN, 1.692%, 2013 | 5,570,000 | 5,620,637 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 5.125%, 2013 (n) | 2,250,000 | 2,295,117 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 1,450,000 | 1,552,084 | ||||||
New York Life Global Funding, 4.65%, 2013 (n) | 4,262,000 | 4,356,459 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Insurance - continued | ||||||||
New York Life Global Funding, 1.3%, 2015 (n) | $ | 4,590,000 | $ | 4,658,161 | ||||
Principal Financial Group, Inc., 7.875%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,317,508 | ||||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 2,590,000 | 2,906,073 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 41,372,954 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 0.6% | ||||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 4.875%, 2013 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 4,553,203 | ||||
WellPoint, Inc., 5%, 2014 | 120,000 | 130,304 | ||||||
Wellpoint, Inc., 1.25%, 2015 | 2,400,000 | 2,423,554 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 7,107,061 | |||||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 1.2% | ||||||||
ACE Ltd., 2.6%, 2015 | $ | 2,890,000 | $ | 3,028,552 | ||||
Allstate Corp., 6.2%, 2014 | 1,490,000 | 1,614,896 | ||||||
Aon Corp., 3.5%, 2015 | 3,200,000 | 3,378,288 | ||||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | 3,480,000 | 3,737,294 | ||||||
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., FRN, 1.135%, 2014 | 3,210,000 | 3,247,085 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,006,115 | |||||||
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 7.0% | ||||||||
Achmea Hypotheekbank N.V., FRN, 0.792%, 2014 (n) | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,487,660 | ||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 2.9%, 2014 (n) | 2,000,000 | 2,089,480 | ||||||
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 3%, 2014 | 5,000,000 | 4,962,500 | ||||||
Electricite de France PLC, 5.5%, 2014 (n) | 5,310,000 | 5,614,566 | ||||||
Finance for Danish Industry A.S., FRN, 0.642%, 2012 (n) | 2,590,000 | 2,590,479 | ||||||
Finance for Danish Industry A.S., FRN, 0.769%, 2013 (n) | 3,500,000 | 3,482,490 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 3.9%, 2014 (n) | 3,700,000 | 3,864,173 | ||||||
Irish Life & Permanent PLC, 3.6%, 2013 (e)(n) | 5,300,000 | 5,300,000 | ||||||
KfW Bankengruppe, 1.375%, 2013 | 6,900,000 | 6,952,440 | ||||||
KfW Bankengruppe, 3.5%, 2014 | 3,066,000 | 3,195,722 | ||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, 1%, 2014 (n) | 2,080,000 | 2,098,741 | ||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, 1%, 2015 (n) | 3,000,000 | 3,032,100 | ||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, 1.75%, 2015 (n) | 1,000,000 | 1,032,500 | ||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, FRN, 0.443%, 2016 (z) | 4,360,000 | 4,356,507 | ||||||
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, 4.125%, 2013 | 4,040,000 | 4,145,969 | ||||||
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, 3.125%, 2016 (n) | 1,700,000 | 1,833,280 | ||||||
Nederlandse Waterschapsbank N.V., 1.375%, 2014 (n) | 1,550,000 | 1,569,251 | ||||||
Societe Financement de l’ Economie Francaise, 3.375%, 2014 (n) | 7,550,000 | 7,872,974 | ||||||
Statoil A.S.A., 2.9%, 2014 | 4,380,000 | 4,580,166 | ||||||
Statoil A.S.A., 1.8%, 2016 | 2,350,000 | 2,430,990 | ||||||
Swedish Export Credit Corp., FRN, 1.187%, 2014 | 8,640,000 | 8,708,861 | ||||||
Vestjysk Bank A/S, FRN, 0.939%, 2013 (n) | 2,940,000 | 2,946,568 | ||||||
Westpac Banking Corp., 3.45%, 2014 (n) | 3,370,000 | 3,541,129 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 88,688,546 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
International Market Sovereign - 1.0% | ||||||||
Kingdom of Belgium, 2.875%, 2014 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,594,450 | ||||
Kingdom of Spain, 3.625%, 2013 | 6,790,000 | 6,787,963 | ||||||
Republic of Iceland, 4.875%, 2016 (n) | 3,494,000 | 3,673,067 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,055,480 | |||||||
Local Authorities - 0.7% | ||||||||
Louisiana Gas & Fuels Tax Rev. (Build America Bonds), FRN, 3%, 2043 | $ | 3,730,000 | $ | 3,745,554 | ||||
Province of Ontario, 2.3%, 2016 | 4,700,000 | 4,955,210 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 8,700,764 | |||||||
Machinery & Tools - 0.1% | ||||||||
Caterpillar Financial Services Corp., 1.1%, 2015 | $ | 1,260,000 | $ | 1,275,376 | ||||
Major Banks - 13.4% | ||||||||
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., 3%, 2014 (n) | $ | 400,000 | $ | 407,142 | ||||
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., FRN, 2.083%, 2014 (n) | 4,850,000 | 4,904,679 | ||||||
ANZ National (International) Ltd., 2.375%, 2012 (n) | 2,300,000 | 2,306,067 | ||||||
ANZ National (International) Ltd., FRN, 1.379%, 2013 (n) | 3,630,000 | 3,661,214 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 7.375%, 2014 | 1,075,000 | 1,174,585 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 4.5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,099 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 1.5%, 2015 | 3,060,000 | 3,063,485 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.5%, 2016 | 2,625,000 | 3,053,043 | ||||||
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, 2.6%, 2013 (n) | 4,070,000 | 4,084,306 | ||||||
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, 1.6%, 2013 (n) | 1,960,000 | 1,972,750 | ||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 2.5%, 2013 | 2,100,000 | 2,109,517 | ||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 5.2%, 2014 | 3,660,000 | 3,913,261 | ||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, FRN, 1.38%, 2014 | 2,360,000 | 2,371,559 | ||||||
BNP Paribas, 2.125%, 2012 | 3,250,000 | 3,254,469 | ||||||
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 3.75%, 2014 (n) | 4,574,000 | 4,825,113 | ||||||
Credit Suisse New York, 5.5%, 2014 | 4,630,000 | 4,936,788 | ||||||
Credit Suisse New York, FRN, 1.3%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,023,307 | ||||||
DBS Bank Ltd., 2.35%, 2017 (n) | 4,010,000 | 4,132,393 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 6%, 2014 | 3,930,000 | 4,213,903 | ||||||
HSBC Bank PLC, 3.1%, 2016 (n) | 2,520,000 | 2,666,611 | ||||||
HSBC USA, Inc., 2.375%, 2015 | 1,650,000 | 1,706,498 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 2.65%, 2013 (n) | 1,850,000 | 1,855,365 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 3.75%, 2017 (n) | 2,644,000 | 2,799,708 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., FRN, 1.439%, 2013 (n) | 2,140,000 | 2,145,776 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., FRN, 1.645%, 2013 (n) | 4,750,000 | 4,781,554 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., FRN, 2.009%, 2015 (n) | 3,680,000 | 3,699,938 | ||||||
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., FRN, 2.831%, 2014 (n) | 2,490,000 | 2,455,337 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 2%, 2017 | 2,087,000 | 2,109,358 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Major Banks - continued | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., FRN, 1.077%, 2013 | $ | 4,000,000 | $ | 4,009,212 | ||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., FRN, 1.116%, 2014 | 2,110,000 | 2,123,289 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., FRN, 1.139%, 2014 | 4,620,000 | 4,647,406 | ||||||
KeyCorp, 3.75%, 2015 | 3,850,000 | 4,144,213 | ||||||
Kookmin Bank, 7.25%, 2014 (n) | 2,200,000 | 2,394,031 | ||||||
Macquarie Bank Ltd., 5%, 2017 (n) | 6,790,000 | 7,374,823 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.15%, 2013 | 3,710,000 | 3,802,153 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6%, 2014 | 2,060,000 | 2,188,528 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6%, 2015 | 3,290,000 | 3,583,521 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, FRN, 1.916%, 2014 | 3,290,000 | 3,311,665 | ||||||
National Australia Bank Ltd., 2%, 2015 | 4,810,000 | 4,960,255 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 3.625%, 2015 | 2,300,000 | 2,454,206 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Canada, 0.8%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,009,735 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, 2.55%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,025,112 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, 4.375%, 2016 | 4,880,000 | 5,310,811 | ||||||
Santander International Debt S.A., 2.991%, 2013 (n) | 3,100,000 | 3,107,558 | ||||||
Standard Chartered PLC, 3.85%, 2015 (n) | 3,730,000 | 3,944,281 | ||||||
Standard Chartered PLC, FRN, 1.388%, 2014 (n) | 2,700,000 | 2,700,081 | ||||||
State Street Corp., 4.3%, 2014 | 3,750,000 | 3,970,354 | ||||||
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., 1.35%, 2015 | 3,770,000 | 3,824,303 | ||||||
Wachovia Corp., 5.5%, 2013 | 2,250,000 | 2,305,458 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 4.375%, 2013 | 4,530,000 | 4,573,878 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 3.75%, 2014 | 1,350,000 | 1,432,702 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 1.25%, 2015 | 5,320,000 | 5,381,611 | ||||||
Westpac Banking Corp., 2%, 2017 | 1,780,000 | 1,824,577 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 170,102,588 | |||||||
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 2.1% | ||||||||
Aristotle Holding, Inc., 2.1%, 2015 (n) | $ | 4,225,000 | $ | 4,321,326 | ||||
Baxter International, Inc., 1.85%, 2017 | 2,610,000 | 2,699,257 | ||||||
Becton, Dickinson & Co., 1.75%, 2016 | 2,030,000 | 2,094,940 | ||||||
Catholic Health Initiatives, 1.6%, 2017 | 2,480,000 | 2,489,498 | ||||||
Covidien International Finance S.A., 1.875%, 2013 | 2,670,000 | 2,693,878 | ||||||
Covidien International Finance S.A., 1.35%, 2015 | 2,440,000 | 2,478,393 | ||||||
McKesson Corp., 3.25%, 2016 | 4,190,000 | 4,506,534 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., 2.15%, 2012 | 2,900,000 | 2,907,734 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., 2.25%, 2016 | 2,960,000 | 3,081,686 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 27,273,246 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 1.0% | ||||||||
Anglo American Capital, 2.15%, 2013 (n) | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,014,600 | ||||
ArcelorMittal, 6.5%, 2014 | 2,710,000 | 2,826,007 | ||||||
BHP Billiton Finance Ltd., 5.5%, 2014 | 2,250,000 | 2,405,878 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 2.15%, 2017 | 3,680,000 | 3,737,132 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Metals & Mining - continued | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Ltd., 2.5%, 2016 | $ | 2,210,000 | $ | 2,303,483 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,287,100 | |||||||
Mortgage-Backed - 3.4% | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 2014 - 2019 | $ | 2,186,188 | $ | 2,343,749 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 7%, 2015 - 2016 | 435,394 | 464,226 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.152%, 2016 | 844,079 | 944,398 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.725%, 2016 | 2,075,464 | 2,360,478 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2016 - 2017 | 1,025,536 | 1,112,208 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 1.114%, 2017 | 4,070,000 | 4,109,385 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2017 | 1,065,881 | 1,147,872 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.5%, 2018 - 2023 | 2,958,865 | 3,191,444 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2018 - 2023 | 2,685,545 | 2,921,645 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2020 (f) | 2,558,624 | 2,789,894 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, FRN, 2.653%, 2033 | 786,883 | 829,168 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, FRN, 2.73%, 2033 | 160,587 | 162,829 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, FRN, 2.835%, 2033 | 122,662 | 130,933 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, TBA, 2.5%, 2027 | 12,005,000 | 12,563,983 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 7.5%, 2015 | 122,284 | 122,629 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 1.655%, 2016 | 281,484 | 290,074 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 6%, 2016 - 2017 | 763,133 | 820,217 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5.5%, 2017 - 2025 | 3,050,324 | 3,329,573 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5%, 2018 - 2020 | 2,737,355 | 2,969,675 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, FRN, 1.75%, 2032 | 171,130 | 176,468 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 42,780,848 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.4% | ||||||||
GDF Suez, 1.625%, 2017 (n) | $ | 4,630,000 | $ | 4,661,484 | ||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 0.9% | ||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 8.5%, 2014 | $ | 2,005,000 | $ | 2,204,319 | ||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 3.7%, 2015 | 4,320,000 | 4,612,028 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 3.2%, 2016 | 740,000 | 791,383 | ||||||
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd., 3.4%, 2015 | 4,100,000 | 4,367,595 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 11,975,325 | |||||||
Network & Telecom - 1.5% | ||||||||
AT&T, Inc., 2.4%, 2016 | $ | 2,750,000 | $ | 2,906,541 | ||||
BellSouth Corp., 5.2%, 2014 | 1,277,000 | 1,383,928 | ||||||
British Telecommunications PLC, 5.15%, 2013 | 799,000 | 806,271 | ||||||
France Telecom, 4.375%, 2014 | 2,390,000 | 2,530,413 | ||||||
France Telecom, 2.125%, 2015 | 1,900,000 | 1,961,281 | ||||||
Telecom Italia Capital, 5.25%, 2013 | 1,900,000 | 1,957,000 | ||||||
Telefonica Emisiones S.A.U., 2.582%, 2013 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Network & Telecom - continued | ||||||||
Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.25%, 2013 | $ | 2,770,000 | $ | 2,829,489 | ||||
Verizon Communications, Inc., 2%, 2016 | 2,610,000 | 2,727,998 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,602,921 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.7% | ||||||||
Noble Corp., 5.875%, 2013 | $ | 3,800,000 | $ | 3,908,539 | ||||
Noble Corp., 3.45%, 2015 | 2,270,000 | 2,405,285 | ||||||
Transocean, Inc., 2.5%, 2017 | 1,970,000 | 1,995,177 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 8,309,001 | |||||||
Oils - 0.2% | ||||||||
Phillips 66, 1.95%, 2015 (n) | $ | 2,680,000 | $ | 2,746,073 | ||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 6.3% | ||||||||
American Express Centurion Bank, 5.5%, 2013 | $ | 4,110,000 | $ | 4,205,311 | ||||
American Express Credit Corp., FRN, 1.504%, 2015 | 2,400,000 | 2,446,790 | ||||||
Banco Santander Chile, 2.875%, 2012 (n) | 3,418,000 | 3,418,410 | ||||||
BB&T Corp., 2.05%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,040,716 | ||||||
BBVA Senior Finance S.A. Unipersonal, FRN, 2.562%, 2014 | 3,500,000 | 3,455,729 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 2.15%, 2015 | 1,752,000 | 1,801,002 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., FRN, 1.49%, 2014 | 4,550,000 | 4,586,072 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 4,770,000 | 4,870,518 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.375%, 2014 | 2,380,000 | 2,593,403 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.01%, 2015 | 1,880,000 | 2,069,658 | ||||||
Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, 4.375%, 2015 (n) | 5,110,000 | 5,440,080 | ||||||
National Bank of Canada, 1.5%, 2015 | 2,970,000 | 3,033,647 | ||||||
Nordea Bank AB, 1.75%, 2013 (n) | 4,800,000 | 4,857,456 | ||||||
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 4.2%, 2014 (n) | 3,770,000 | 3,964,155 | ||||||
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 3.375%, 2017 | 3,967,000 | 4,266,473 | ||||||
Santander UK PLC, 3.875%, 2014 (n) | 4,525,000 | 4,662,108 | ||||||
SunTrust Banks, Inc., 3.5%, 2017 | 4,907,000 | 5,277,631 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, 4.875%, 2014 (n) | 3,330,000 | 3,513,150 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, 2.875%, 2017 | 3,548,000 | 3,748,817 | ||||||
Swedbank AB, 2.125%, 2017 (n) | 3,925,000 | 3,963,347 | ||||||
UBS AG, 2.25%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,051,952 | ||||||
Union Bank, 3%, 2016 | 1,910,000 | 2,024,432 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 80,290,857 | |||||||
Personal Computers & Peripherals - 0.3% | ||||||||
Hewlett-Packard Co., 2.625%, 2014 | $ | 4,120,000 | $ | 4,196,772 | ||||
Pharmaceuticals - 2.5% | ||||||||
Amgen, Inc., 2.3%, 2016 | $ | 3,570,000 | $ | 3,721,886 | ||||
Celgene Corp., 2.45%, 2015 | 5,312,000 | 5,538,073 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals - continued | ||||||||
Roche Holding, Inc., 5%, 2014 (n) | $ | 5,213,000 | $ | 5,504,964 | ||||
Sanofi, 1.2%, 2014 | 650,000 | 658,885 | ||||||
Sanofi, FRN, 0.672%, 2014 | 5,000,000 | 5,024,975 | ||||||
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance III, 1.7%, 2014 | 1,410,000 | 1,429,599 | ||||||
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance III, FRN, 1.339%, 2013 | 3,680,000 | 3,708,560 | ||||||
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1.875%, 2017 | 2,240,000 | 2,270,531 | ||||||
Wyeth, 5.5%, 2014 | 3,400,000 | 3,612,959 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 31,470,432 | |||||||
Printing & Publishing - 0.5% | ||||||||
Pearson Dollar Finance PLC, 5.7%, 2014 (n) | $ | 4,900,000 | $ | 5,227,648 | ||||
Pearson PLC, 5.5%, 2013 (n) | 780,000 | 796,729 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 6,024,377 | |||||||
Real Estate - 0.5% | ||||||||
ERP Operating, REIT, 5.125%, 2016 | $ | 2,738,000 | $ | 3,077,920 | ||||
HCP, Inc., REIT, 2.7%, 2014 | 2,750,000 | 2,802,770 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 4.2%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,066,339 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 6,947,029 | |||||||
Retailers - 1.5% | ||||||||
AutoZone, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | $ | 5,803,000 | $ | 6,174,787 | ||||
Home Depot, Inc., 5.25%, 2013 | 3,470,000 | 3,658,244 | ||||||
Staples, Inc., 9.75%, 2014 | 3,350,000 | 3,679,844 | ||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | 2,894,000 | 2,972,095 | ||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 2.983%, 2016 (n) | 2,900,000 | 3,030,715 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,515,685 | |||||||
Specialty Chemicals - 1.0% | ||||||||
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., 4.15%, 2013 | $ | 1,150,000 | $ | 1,160,526 | ||||
Airgas, Inc., 4.5%, 2014 | 5,480,000 | 5,813,343 | ||||||
Ecolab, Inc., 2.375%, 2014 | 2,570,000 | 2,663,309 | ||||||
Ecolab, Inc., 1%, 2015 | 2,520,000 | 2,531,663 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 12,168,841 | |||||||
Specialty Stores - 0.3% | ||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc., 6.75%, 2013 | $ | 4,074,000 | $ | 4,165,665 | ||||
Supermarkets - 1.0% | ||||||||
Delhaize Group, 5.875%, 2014 | $ | 2,270,000 | $ | 2,376,025 | ||||
Kroger Co., 5%, 2013 | 2,453,000 | 2,501,991 | ||||||
Safeway, Inc., 6.25%, 2014 | 2,450,000 | 2,607,016 | ||||||
Tesco PLC, 2%, 2014 (n) | 3,510,000 | 3,581,811 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Supermarkets - continued | ||||||||
Woolworths Ltd., 2.55%, 2015 (n) | $ | 1,900,000 | $ | 1,968,014 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,034,857 | |||||||
Supranational - 1.5% | ||||||||
Central American Bank for Economic Integration, 5.375%, 2014 (n) | $ | 4,240,000 | $ | 4,545,581 | ||||
European Investment Bank, 1.25%, 2013 | 6,470,000 | 6,521,501 | ||||||
European Investment Bank, 3%, 2014 | 3,730,000 | 3,866,630 | ||||||
Inter-American Development Bank, 3%, 2014 | 3,980,000 | 4,132,856 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,066,568 | |||||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 1.1% | ||||||||
America Movil S.A.B. de C.V., 2.375%, 2016 | $ | 1,564,000 | $ | 1,634,885 | ||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.523%, 2015 (n) | 2,660,000 | 2,816,913 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 3.214%, 2015 (n) | 2,730,000 | 2,843,576 | ||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 4.15%, 2014 | 2,750,000 | 2,905,166 | ||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 5.375%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,315,555 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,516,095 | |||||||
Tobacco - 1.3% | ||||||||
Altria Group, Inc., 8.5%, 2013 | $ | 3,670,000 | $ | 3,955,368 | ||||
B.A.T. International Finance PLC, 8.125%, 2013 (n) | 3,415,000 | 3,657,462 | ||||||
B.A.T. International Finance PLC, 1.4%, 2015 (n) | 2,820,000 | 2,850,135 | ||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 3.5%, 2016 | 2,590,000 | 2,752,199 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 1.05%, 2015 | 2,650,000 | 2,657,783 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,872,947 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.7% | ||||||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 2.75%, 2013 (n) | $ | 4,455,000 | $ | 4,517,909 | ||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 2.25%, 2014 (n) | 1,900,000 | 1,921,622 | ||||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 2.75%, 2017 (n) | 2,408,000 | 2,517,436 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 8,956,967 | |||||||
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 0.2% | ||||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.1%, 2016 | $ | 668,375 | $ | 697,409 | ||||
Small Business Administration, 5.46%, 2016 | 563,363 | 591,591 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.68%, 2016 | 601,529 | 631,825 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.94%, 2016 | 319,387 | 341,957 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.37%, 2016 | 354,955 | 374,506 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 2,637,288 | |||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 5.2% | ||||||||
DTE Energy Co., FRN, 1.118%, 2013 | $ | 1,880,000 | $ | 1,884,503 | ||||
Duke Energy Corp., 5.65%, 2013 | 4,010,000 | 4,138,148 |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - continued | ||||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 6.3%, 2014 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,139,570 | ||||
Duke Energy Corp., 3.35%, 2015 | 960,000 | 1,020,101 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 1.625%, 2017 | 1,410,000 | 1,420,364 | ||||||
EDP Finance B.V., 5.375%, 2012 (n) | 3,950,000 | 3,950,000 | ||||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 5.7%, 2013 (n) | 3,010,000 | 3,033,045 | ||||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 3.875%, 2014 (n) | 3,300,000 | 3,404,775 | ||||||
Exelon Generation Co. LLC, 5.35%, 2014 | 2,500,000 | 2,627,688 | ||||||
Georgia Power Co., 6%, 2013 | 1,120,000 | 1,180,459 | ||||||
Iberdrola Finance Ireland Ltd., 3.8%, 2014 (n) | 5,150,000 | 5,304,346 | ||||||
NextEra Energy Capital Co., 1.2%, 2015 | 3,610,000 | 3,629,209 | ||||||
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc., 1.611%, 2014 | 2,600,000 | 2,629,401 | ||||||
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 3.553%, 2014 (n) | 3,280,000 | 3,441,786 | ||||||
Northeast Utilities, FRN, 1.129%, 2013 | 3,500,000 | 3,518,760 | ||||||
PG&E Corp., 5.75%, 2014 | 3,100,000 | 3,312,437 | ||||||
PPL WEM Holdings PLC, 3.9%, 2016 (n) | 4,710,000 | 4,958,825 | ||||||
Progress Energy, Inc., 6.05%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,138,010 | ||||||
PSEG Power LLC, 2.75%, 2016 | 2,570,000 | 2,693,506 | ||||||
Southern Co., 4.15%, 2014 | 2,260,000 | 2,382,361 | ||||||
Southern Co., 2.375%, 2015 | 6,530,000 | 6,824,098 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 65,631,392 | |||||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,221,770,066) | $ | 1,246,485,567 | ||||||
Money Market Funds - 2.2% | ||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.16%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | 27,922,003 | $ | 27,922,003 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,249,692,069) | $ | 1,274,407,570 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (0.3)% | (3,376,367 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 1,271,031,203 |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(e) | Guaranteed by Minister for Finance of Ireland. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $415,320,210, representing 32.7% of net assets. |
(q) | Interest received was less than stated coupon rate. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Value | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.571%, 2019 | 5/11/11 | $320,710 | $336,624 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.521%, 2035 | 6/09/05 | 1,126,664 | 822,614 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.481%, 2036 | 2/23/06 | 952,049 | 724,455 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.175%, 2036 | 5/16/06 | 376,352 | 75,335 | |||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.811%, 2040 | 3/01/06 | 924,916 | 599,685 | |||||||
Chesapeake Funding LLC, “A”, FRN, 1.964%, 2021 | 8/09/12 | 1,549,776 | 1,547,277 | |||||||
Chesapeake Funding LLC, “A”, FRN, 0.969%, 2023 | 5/10/12 | 5,970,000 | 5,984,394 | |||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.648%, 2032 | 8/25/03 | 96,027 | 78,180 | |||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 2.06%, 2018 | 11/23/11 | 1,396,373 | 1,405,340 | |||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 2.2%, 2019 | 3/22/12 | 1,214,871 | 1,222,630 | |||||||
Daimler Finance North America LLC, FRN, 0.972%, 2014 | 10/19/12 | 3,971,269 | 3,975,242 | |||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.635%, 2035 | 6/21/05-1/18/07 | 1,167,084 | 1,085,345 | |||||||
Home Loan Servicing Solutions Ltd., 1.34%, 2043 | 10/10/12 | 2,019,876 | 2,025,208 | |||||||
Kommunalbanken AS, FRN, 0.443%, 2016 | 10/23/12 | 4,360,000 | 4,356,507 | |||||||
LeasePlan Corp. N.V., 3%, 2017 | 10/15/12 | 3,367,820 | 3,408,848 | |||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.095%, 2031 | 6/10/03 | 23,798 | 5,293 | |||||||
Smart Trust, “A2B”, FRN, 0.764%, 2015 | 10/04/12 | 5,550,000 | 5,552,237 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $33,205,214 | |||||||||
% of Net assets | 2.6% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
TBA | To Be Announced |
20
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Derivative Contracts at 10/31/12
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 10/31/12
Description | Currency | Contracts | Value | Expiration Date | Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Futures | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note 5 yr (Short) | USD | 351 | $43,611,750 | December - 2012 | $37,164 | |||||||||||||
|
|
At October 31, 2012, the fund had liquid securities with an aggregate value of $212,454 to cover any commitments for certain derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,221,770,066) | $1,246,485,567 | |||
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | 27,922,003 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,249,692,069) | $1,274,407,570 | |||
Cash | 241,275 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 275 | |||
Fund shares sold | 4,318,162 | |||
Interest | 9,082,941 | |||
Total assets | $1,288,050,223 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $322,793 | |||
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts | 87,748 | |||
TBA purchase commitments | 12,415,796 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 3,356,657 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 43,089 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 587,285 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 30,428 | |||
Program manager fees | 221 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 3,310 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 171,693 | |||
Total liabilities | $17,019,020 | |||
Net assets | $1,271,031,203 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $1,358,180,981 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 24,752,665 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (106,513,218 | ) | ||
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | (5,389,225 | ) | ||
Net assets | $1,271,031,203 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 207,022,872 |
22
Table of Contents
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) – continued
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $595,004,056 | 96,805,778 | $6.15 | |||||||||
Class B | 8,819,286 | 1,439,117 | 6.13 | |||||||||
Class C | 216,532,647 | 35,262,165 | 6.14 | |||||||||
Class I | 110,827,018 | 18,111,256 | 6.12 | |||||||||
Class R1 | 679,787 | 110,935 | 6.13 | |||||||||
Class R2 | 4,607,121 | 749,779 | 6.14 | |||||||||
Class R3 | 8,449,752 | 1,376,321 | 6.14 | |||||||||
Class R4 | 872,853 | 141,986 | 6.15 | |||||||||
Class R5 | 271,208,215 | 44,232,322 | 6.13 | |||||||||
Class 529A | 31,898,678 | 5,190,295 | 6.15 | |||||||||
Class 529B | 1,936,841 | 316,336 | 6.12 | |||||||||
Class 529C | 20,194,949 | 3,286,582 | 6.14 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $6.31 [100 / 97.5 × $6.15] and $6.31 [100 / 97.5 × $6.15], respectively. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering prices of Class A and Class 529A shares are reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, Class C, Class 529B, and Class 529C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and 529A. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $17,367,613 | |||
Dividends from affiliated underlying funds | 49,148 | |||
Foreign taxes withheld | (2,307 | ) | ||
Total investment income | $17,414,454 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $2,501,069 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 2,094,308 | |||
Program manager fees | 25,411 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 784,558 | |||
Administrative services fee | 92,816 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 14,843 | |||
Custodian fee | 87,479 | |||
Shareholder communications | 113,733 | |||
Audit and tax fees | 27,917 | |||
Legal fees | 8,903 | |||
Miscellaneous | 109,821 | |||
Total expenses | $5,860,858 | |||
Fees paid indirectly | (45 | ) | ||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | (346,097 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $5,514,716 | |||
Net investment income | $11,899,738 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | ||||
Investments | $191,996 | |||
Futures contracts | (563,729 | ) | ||
Swap agreements | 69,795 | |||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | $(301,938 | ) | ||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
Investments | $7,697,500 | |||
Futures contracts | 191,366 | |||
Swap agreements | (68,808 | ) | ||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $7,820,058 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $7,518,120 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $19,417,858 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited) | Year ended 4/30/12 | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $11,899,738 | $26,795,191 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (301,938 | ) | 20,517 | |||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 7,820,058 | (6,637,519 | ) | |||||
Change in net assets from operations | $19,417,858 | $20,178,189 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(15,228,733 | ) | $(33,864,160 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $25,803,560 | $33,503,944 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $29,992,685 | $19,817,973 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 1,241,038,518 | 1,221,220,545 | ||||||
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $5,389,225 and $2,060,230, respectively) | $1,271,031,203 | $1,241,038,518 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months ended (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.13 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.14 | $0.17 | $0.21 | $0.25 | $0.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | (0.02 | ) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.36 | (0.34 | ) | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.10 | $0.12 | $0.17 | $0.57 | $(0.09 | ) | $0.16 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.18 | ) | $(0.21 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.15 | $6.13 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.63 | (n) | 1.96 | 2.72 | 9.87 | (1.41 | ) | 2.61 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.75 | (a) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.03 | (a) | 2.34 | 2.75 | 3.39 | 4.26 | 4.34 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $595,004 | $632,661 | $702,266 | $705,470 | $531,374 | $373,587 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.11 | $6.18 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.04 | $0.10 | $0.13 | $0.17 | $0.21 | $0.23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | (0.04 | )(g) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.36 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.08 | $0.06 | $0.13 | $0.53 | $(0.14 | ) | $0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.06 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.26 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.13 | $6.11 | $6.18 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.25 | (n) | 1.02 | 2.12 | 9.06 | (2.17 | ) | 1.94 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.59 | 1.58 | 1.57 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.50 | (a) | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.44 | 1.42 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.29 | (a) | 1.61 | 2.06 | 2.71 | 3.57 | 3.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $8,819 | $10,056 | $16,641 | $35,642 | $50,394 | $76,246 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.04 | $0.09 | $0.12 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.03 | (g) | (0.03 | )(g) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.07 | $0.06 | $0.12 | $0.52 | $(0.15 | ) | $0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.05 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.15 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.26 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.14 | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.20 | (n) | 0.93 | 2.02 | 8.95 | (2.42 | ) | 1.90 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.18 | (a) | 1.49 | 1.90 | 2.51 | 3.39 | 3.50 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $216,533 | $224,122 | $234,829 | $234,584 | $121,612 | $69,420 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.11 | $6.17 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.07 | $0.15 | $0.18 | $0.22 | $0.27 | $0.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.02 | (g) | (0.02 | ) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.36 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.09 | $0.13 | $0.18 | $0.58 | $(0.08 | ) | $0.18 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.32 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.12 | $6.11 | $6.17 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 1.54 | (n) | 2.11 | 2.87 | 10.05 | (1.29 | ) | 2.91 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.22 | (a) | 2.48 | 2.88 | 3.52 | 4.50 | 4.50 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $110,827 | $310,572 | $212,086 | $147,616 | $76,526 | $163,725 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.11 | $6.17 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | $6.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.04 | $0.09 | $0.12 | $0.16 | $0.21 | $0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.03 | (g) | (0.02 | ) | (0.01 | )(g) | 0.36 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.07 | $0.07 | $0.11 | $0.52 | $(0.14 | ) | $0.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.05 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.15 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.13 | $6.11 | $6.17 | $6.21 | $5.88 | $6.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 1.20 | (n) | 1.09 | 1.85 | 8.96 | (2.27 | ) | 1.80 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.72 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.60 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.57 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.19 | (a) | 1.51 | 1.93 | 2.57 | 3.45 | 3.41 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $680 | $675 | $963 | $1,164 | $1,046 | $909 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.13 | $0.16 | $0.19 | $0.24 | $0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.03 | (g) | (0.04 | )(g) | (0.01 | )(g) | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.09 | $0.09 | $0.15 | $0.56 | $(0.11 | ) | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.07 | ) | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.27 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.14 | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 1.50 | (n) | 1.54 | 2.46 | 9.59 | (1.66 | ) | 2.41 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.10 | (a) | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.22 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.00 | (a) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.97 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.78 | (a) | 2.10 | 2.51 | 3.16 | 4.05 | 3.98 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $4,607 | $4,869 | $6,134 | $5,999 | $4,983 | $5,768 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R3 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.14 | $0.16 | $0.19 | $0.25 | $0.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | (0.04 | )(g) | 0.01 | 0.38 | (0.36 | ) | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.10 | $0.10 | $0.17 | $0.57 | $(0.11 | ) | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.17 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.14 | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.22 | $5.89 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 1.58 | (n) | 1.69 | 2.78 | 9.77 | (1.68 | ) | 2.40 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.98 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.85 | (a) | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.83 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.93 | (a) | 2.23 | 2.64 | 3.14 | 4.20 | 4.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $8,450 | $8,109 | $6,714 | $5,757 | $577 | $941 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.13 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.07 | $0.15 | $0.18 | $0.21 | $0.27 | $0.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.03 | (g) | (0.02 | ) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.10 | $0.13 | $0.18 | $0.58 | $(0.08 | ) | $0.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.32 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.15 | $6.13 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 1.70 | (n) | 2.11 | 2.87 | 10.03 | (1.26 | ) | 2.69 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.60 | (a) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.18 | (a) | 2.49 | 2.88 | 3.37 | 4.44 | 4.42 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $873 | $839 | $855 | $691 | $55 | $56 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Class R5 | Six months (unaudited) | |||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $6.12 | |||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.02 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 0.02 | (g) | ||
Total from investment operations | $0.04 | |||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||
From net investment income | $(0.03 | ) | ||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.13 | |||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 0.58 | (n) | ||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.53 | (a) | ||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.53 | (a) | ||
Net investment income | 2.04 | (a) | ||
Portfolio Turnover | 16 | (n) | ||
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | $271,208 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529A | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.13 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | $6.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.14 | $0.16 | $0.20 | $0.25 | $0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | (0.02 | ) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.37 | (0.35 | ) | (0.10 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.10 | $0.12 | $0.16 | $0.57 | $(0.10 | ) | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.18 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | $(0.29 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.15 | $6.13 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.90 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.60 | (n) | 1.90 | 2.62 | 9.76 | (1.60 | ) | 2.42 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.95 | (a) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.11 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.80 | (a) | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.98 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.97 | (a) | 2.27 | 2.64 | 3.28 | 4.10 | 4.00 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $31,899 | $28,311 | $22,743 | $16,907 | $8,852 | $6,373 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.10 | $6.17 | $6.20 | $5.87 | $6.25 | $6.39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.04 | $0.09 | $0.12 | $0.16 | $0.21 | $0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.03 | (g) | (0.03 | )(g) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.36 | (0.36 | ) | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.07 | $0.06 | $0.12 | $0.52 | $(0.15 | ) | $0.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.05 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.15 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.12 | $6.10 | $6.17 | $6.20 | $5.87 | $6.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.22 | (n) | 0.96 | 2.00 | 8.96 | (2.29 | ) | 1.76 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.70 | (a) | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.79 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.56 | (a) | 1.57 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.55 | 1.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.23 | (a) | 1.53 | 1.93 | 2.56 | 3.46 | 3.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,937 | $1,915 | $1,735 | $2,008 | $1,355 | $989 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.89 | $6.28 | $6.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.03 | $0.09 | $0.11 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | (0.04 | )(g) | 0.00 | (w) | 0.38 | (0.36 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.07 | $0.05 | $0.11 | $0.53 | $(0.16 | ) | $0.10 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.05 | ) | $(0.12 | ) | $(0.15 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.23 | ) | $(0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $6.14 | $6.12 | $6.19 | $6.23 | $5.89 | $6.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.17 | (n) | 0.87 | 1.75 | 9.02 | (2.52 | ) | 1.66 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.70 | (a) | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.72 | 1.78 | 1.88 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.66 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.64 | 1.73 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.13 | (a) | 1.43 | 1.79 | 2.43 | 3.34 | 3.25 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 16 | (n) | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $20,195 | $18,909 | $16,254 | $12,364 | $6,256 | $4,861 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(g) | The per share amount varies from the net realized and unrealized gain/loss for the period because of the timing of sales of fund shares and the per share amount of realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(i) | For the period from the class inception, September 4, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
37
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Limited Maturity Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 seeks to improve the comparability of fair value measurements as presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by providing common requirements for fair value measurement and disclosure.
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods, ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosure requirements on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2011-11 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Swap agreements are generally valued at
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures contracts. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2012 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents | $— | $2,637,288 | $— | $2,637,288 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | — | 156,163,967 | — | 156,163,967 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 552,169,795 | — | 552,169,795 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 54,632,634 | — | 54,632,634 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 11,080,263 | — | 11,080,263 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 67,995,429 | — | 67,995,429 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 401,806,191 | — | 401,806,191 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 27,922,003 | — | — | 27,922,003 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $27,922,003 | $1,246,485,567 | $— | $1,274,407,570 | ||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | $37,164 | $— | $— | $37,164 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts and swap agreements. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Fair Value (a) | ||||||
Risk | Derivative Contracts | Asset Derivatives | ||||
Interest Rate | Interest Rate Futures | $37,164 |
(a) | The value of futures contracts outstanding includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Futures Contracts | Swap Agreements | ||||||
Interest Rate | $(563,729 | ) | $— | |||||
Credit | — | 69,795 | ||||||
Total | $(563,729 | ) | $69,795 |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Futures Contracts | Swap Agreements | ||||||
Interest Rate | $191,366 | $— | ||||||
Credit | — | (68,808 | ) | |||||
Total | $191,366 | $(68,808 | ) |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures contracts and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, swap agreements and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, currency exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Swap Agreements – The fund entered into swap agreements. A swap agreement is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap agreement, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap agreement are reflected as premiums paid or received on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap agreements are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. The risk is further mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund entered into credit default swap agreements in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap agreement, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the agreement notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although agreement-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant agreement. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap agreement’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the agreement. This risk is mitigated by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
The fund purchased or sold debt securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, or in a “To Be Announced” (TBA) or “forward commitment” transaction with delivery or payment to occur at a later date beyond the normal settlement period. TBA securities resulting from these transactions are included in the Portfolio of Investments. At the time a fund enters into a commitment to purchase or sell a security, the transaction is recorded and the value of the security acquired is reflected in the fund’s net asset value. The price of such security and the date that the security will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The value of the security may vary with market fluctuations. TBA purchase commitments are held at carrying amount, which approximates fair value and are categorized as Level 2 within the disclosure hierarchy. No interest accrues to the fund until payment takes place. At the time that a fund enters into this type of transaction, the fund is required to have sufficient cash and/or liquid securities to cover its commitments. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract’s terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic or other factors. Additionally, losses may arise due to declines in the value of the securities prior to settlement date.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2012, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Foreign taxes have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net
44
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to expiration of capital loss carryforwards and amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end.
The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/12 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $33,864,160 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/12 | ||||
Cost of investments | $1,260,188,135 | |||
Gross appreciation | 29,728,657 | |||
Gross depreciation | (15,509,222 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $14,219,435 | |||
As of 4/30/12 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 732,223 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (94,970,995 | ) | ||
Post-October capital loss deferral | (1,100,773 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (2,729,078 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 6,729,720 |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized after April 30, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of April 30, 2012, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
Pre-enactment losses: | ||||
4/30/13 | $(18,655,874 | ) | ||
4/30/14 | (16,764,678 | ) | ||
4/30/15 | (11,871,035 | ) | ||
4/30/16 | (12,189,538 | ) | ||
4/30/17 | (11,740,197 | ) | ||
4/30/18 | (9,393,942 | ) | ||
4/30/19 | (9,431,348 | ) | ||
Total | $(90,046,612 | ) |
45
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Post-enactment losses: | ||||
Short-Term | $(662,414 | ) | ||
Long-Term | (4,261,969 | ) | ||
Total | $(4,924,383 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution, service, and program manager fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B and Class 529B shares will convert to Class A and Class 529A shares, respectively, approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||
Class A | $7,925,883 | $19,613,119 | ||||||
Class B | 84,313 | 290,431 | ||||||
Class C | 1,909,246 | 4,705,336 | ||||||
Class I | 3,593,620 | 7,776,640 | ||||||
Class R1 | 5,698 | 18,982 | ||||||
Class R2 | 55,271 | 144,693 | ||||||
Class R3 | 103,275 | 209,978 | ||||||
Class R4 | 11,377 | 26,175 | ||||||
Class R5 | 989,932 | — | ||||||
Class 529A | 372,990 | 699,912 | ||||||
Class 529B | 16,507 | 36,375 | ||||||
Class 529C | 160,621 | 342,519 | ||||||
Total | $15,228,733 | $33,864,160 |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, September 4, 2012, through the stated period end. |
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.40% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $70,354 and $2,348 for the six months ended October 31, 2012, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A and Class 529A shares of the fund, respectively.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
46
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | $771,130 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.90% | 46,159 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1,108,595 | |||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 3,313 | |||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.40% | 11,918 | |||||||||||||||
Class R3 | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 10,472 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | 37,135 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.91% | 9,390 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 96,196 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $2,094,308 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2012 based on each class’ average daily net assets. 0.10% of the Class A and Class 529A service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver arrangement. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $323,302 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. For one year from the date of sale of Class B and Class 529B shares, assets attributable to such Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B and Class 529B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B and Class 529B shares, 0.15% of the Class B and Class 529B service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class B and Class 529B service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $5,436 for Class B and Class 529B shares, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. 0.10% of the Class R2 distribution fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $2,384 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. These written waiver agreements will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreements will continue at least until August 31, 2013. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C and Class 529C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B and
47
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Class 529B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $5,642 | |||
Class B | 5,760 | |||
Class C | 16,343 | |||
Class 529B | — | |||
Class 529C | 38 |
The fund has entered into and may from time to time enter into contracts with program managers and other parties which administer the tuition programs through which an investment in the fund’s 529 share classes is made. The fund has entered into an agreement with MFD pursuant to which MFD receives an annual fee of up to 0.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. MFD has agreed to waive a portion of this fee in an amount equal to 0.05% of the average daily net assets for each 529 share class. This waiver agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees but such agreement will continue at least until August 31, 2013, after which MFD may eliminate this waiver without a vote of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $12,706 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The program manager fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. The services provided by MFD, or a third party with which MFD contracts, include recordkeeping and tax reporting and account services, as well as services designed to maintain the program’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulatory requirements. Program manager fees and waivers for the six months ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
Fee | Waiver | |||||||
Class 529A | $14,854 | $7,427 | ||||||
Class 529B | 938 | 469 | ||||||
Class 529C | 9,619 | 4,810 | ||||||
Total Program Manager Fees and Waivers | $25,411 | $12,706 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fee was $210,076, which equated to 0.0335% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. Class R5 shares do not incur sub-accounting fees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $472,513.
Under a Special Servicing Agreement among MFS, each MFS fund which invests in other MFS funds (“MFS fund-of-funds”) and certain underlying funds in which a MFS
48
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
fund-of-funds invests (“underlying funds”), each underlying fund may pay a portion of each MFS fund-of-fund’s transfer agent-related expenses, including sub-accounting fees payable to financial intermediaries, to the extent such payments do not exceed the benefits realized or expected to be realized by the underlying fund from the investment in the underlying fund by the MFS fund-of-fund. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, these costs for the fund amounted to $101,969 and are reflected in the “Shareholder servicing costs” on the Statement of Operations.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0148% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $98 and is included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended October 31, 2012. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the DB plan amounted to $6,758 at October 31, 2012, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $5,339 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $2,269, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
49
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
On August 31, 2012, MFS purchased 16,340 shares of Class R5 for an aggregate amount of $100,000.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||
U.S. Government securities | $49,440,503 | $43,432,179 | ||||||
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | $208,813,529 | $143,131,067 |
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 11,095,986 | $67,947,272 | 32,961,103 | $202,404,824 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 227,329 | 1,388,473 | 691,496 | 4,240,483 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 3,532,745 | 21,616,674 | 9,453,271 | 57,983,131 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 13,328,005 | 81,329,014 | 25,042,639 | 153,281,279 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 17,750 | 108,352 | 23,136 | 142,063 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 208,553 | 1,276,685 | 255,486 | 1,569,482 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 158,660 | 971,014 | 366,228 | 2,246,502 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 12,266 | 75,254 | 37,436 | 229,691 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 | 44,141,578 | 270,168,878 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 1,330,805 | 8,147,236 | 2,140,072 | 13,101,957 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 108,007 | 659,259 | 261,622 | 1,595,443 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 758,842 | 4,647,413 | 1,381,768 | 8,459,878 | ||||||||||||
74,920,526 | $458,335,524 | 72,614,257 | $445,254,733 |
50
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,055,405 | $6,465,263 | 2,540,299 | $15,586,220 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 11,971 | 73,123 | 38,453 | 235,209 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 239,415 | 1,465,407 | 549,744 | 3,368,144 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 498,267 | 3,040,604 | 1,132,792 | 6,925,450 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 933 | 5,698 | 3,076 | 18,817 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 8,182 | 50,092 | 21,921 | 134,498 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 16,870 | 103,241 | 34,264 | 209,836 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 1,608 | 9,852 | 3,763 | 23,089 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 | 161,501 | 989,932 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 60,509 | 370,715 | 113,521 | 696,338 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 2,673 | 16,305 | 5,870 | 35,846 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 26,076 | 159,653 | 55,618 | 341,019 | ||||||||||||
2,083,410 | $12,749,885 | 4,499,321 | $27,574,466 | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (18,623,857 | ) | $(114,054,739 | ) | (45,600,964 | ) | $(279,793,420 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (446,668 | ) | (2,725,361 | ) | (1,778,414 | ) | (10,897,200 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (5,129,960 | ) | (31,393,640 | ) | (11,331,065 | ) | (69,499,188 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (46,566,881 | ) | (284,858,247 | ) | (9,670,036 | ) | (59,142,630 | ) | ||||||||
Class R1 | (18,350 | ) | (111,888 | ) | (71,540 | ) | (436,528 | ) | ||||||||
Class R2 | (262,051 | ) | (1,603,937 | ) | (472,862 | ) | (2,904,997 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | (124,364 | ) | (761,636 | ) | (160,529 | ) | (982,109 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | (8,789 | ) | (53,686 | ) | (42,389 | ) | (260,671 | ) | ||||||||
Class R5 | (70,757 | ) | (433,742 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Class 529A | (822,947 | ) | (5,039,208 | ) | (1,303,614 | ) | (7,996,914 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529B | (108,224 | ) | (660,263 | ) | (234,927 | ) | (1,434,835 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529C | (585,795 | ) | (3,585,502 | ) | (974,985 | ) | (5,976,763 | ) | ||||||||
(72,768,643 | ) | $(445,281,849 | ) | (71,641,325 | ) | $(439,325,255 | ) |
51
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/12 (i) | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (6,472,466 | ) | $(39,642,204 | ) | (10,099,562 | ) | $(61,802,376 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (207,368 | ) | (1,263,765 | ) | (1,048,465 | ) | (6,421,508 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (1,357,800 | ) | (8,311,559 | ) | (1,328,050 | ) | (8,147,913 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (32,740,609 | ) | (200,488,629 | ) | 16,505,395 | 101,064,099 | ||||||||||
Class R1 | 333 | 2,162 | (45,328 | ) | (275,648 | ) | ||||||||||
Class R2 | (45,316 | ) | (277,160 | ) | (195,455 | ) | (1,201,017 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | 51,166 | 312,619 | 239,963 | 1,474,229 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 5,085 | 31,420 | (1,190 | ) | (7,891 | ) | ||||||||||
Class R5 | 44,232,322 | 270,725,068 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 568,367 | 3,478,743 | 949,979 | 5,801,381 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 2,456 | 15,301 | 32,565 | 196,454 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 199,123 | 1,221,564 | 462,401 | 2,824,134 | ||||||||||||
4,235,293 | $25,803,560 | 5,472,253 | $33,503,944 |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, September 4, 2012, through the stated period end. |
Effective May 1, 2006, the sale of Class B shares of the fund have been suspended except in certain circumstances. Please see the fund’s prospectus for details.
The fund is one of several mutual funds in which the MFS funds-of-funds may invest. The MFS funds-of-funds do not invest in the underlying MFS funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Conservative Allocation Fund, the MFS Lifetime Retirement Fund, and the MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund were the owners of record of approximately 16%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund. In addition, the MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund was the owner of record of less than 1% of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $3,986 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations.
52
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 66,878,364 | 160,318,026 | (199,274,387 | ) | 27,922,003 | |||||||||||
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $49,148 | $27,922,003 |
53
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2012 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2011 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense
54
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for each of the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2011 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (“MFD”), an affiliate of MFS, currently observes a Class A 12b-1 fee waiver, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
55
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts, if any. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. The Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFD. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research, and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
56
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2012.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
57
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
58
Table of Contents
Save paper with eDelivery.
MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Table of Contents
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
October 31, 2012
MFS® MUNICIPAL LIMITED MATURITY FUND
MTL-SEM
Table of Contents
MFS® MUNICIPAL LIMITED MATURITY FUND
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
Table of Contents
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
As 2012 winds down, economic uncertainty continues to dominate world financial markets. In the United States, all eyes are riveted to the ongoing budget deal
negotiations and the specter of a “fiscal cliff.” Overseas, we see growth slowing in China and Japan, and the eurozone has entered its second recession in four years against a backdrop of double-digit unemployment and the continuing sovereign debt crisis.
Amidst the instability, there are silver linings — especially in the U.S. where the labor and housing markets have picked up, consumer confidence has risen and industrial output has increased. Additionally, a U.S. budgetary compromise could propel markets, unleashing pent-up spending and investments, which would help to revive both the U.S. and global economies.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, an emphasis on global research and our disciplined risk management approach anchor our uniquely collaborative investment process. Our global team of more than 200 investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines, and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results — for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges we face locally, nationally and globally. It is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view, employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification, and work closely with investment advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 14, 2012
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Top five industries (i) | ||||
Universities-Colleges | 12.8% | |||
Healthcare Revenue-Hospitals | 11.5% | |||
General Obligations-General Purpose | 8.7% | |||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue | 7.7% | |||
Utilities-Investor Owned | 7.0% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 13.9% | |||
AA | 34.0% | |||
A | 28.2% | |||
BBB | 20.3% | |||
BB | 0.4% | |||
B | 0.5% | |||
Not Rated | 0.2% | |||
Cash & Other | 2.5% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 3.5 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 4.6 yrs. |
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/12.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads).Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Expense Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/12 | Ending Account Value 10/31/12 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/12-10/31/12 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.69% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.25 | $3.51 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.69% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.73 | $3.52 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.45% | $1,000.00 | $1,012.46 | $7.36 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.45% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.90 | $7.38 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.54% | $1,000.00 | $1,010.68 | $7.80 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.54% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.44 | $7.83 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.54% | $1,000.00 | $1,015.78 | $2.74 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.54% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.48 | $2.75 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
5
Table of Contents
10/31/12 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Municipal Bonds - 96.4% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Airport Revenue - 4.7% | ||||||||
Atlanta, GA, Airport Passenger Facility Charge Rev., “B”, 5%, 2018 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,383,222 | ||||
Atlanta, GA, Airport Rev., “A”, AGM, 5.375%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,070,610 | ||||||
Atlanta, GA, Airport Rev., “B”, 5%, 2018 | 700,000 | 834,134 | ||||||
Atlanta, GA, Airport Rev., “B”, 5%, 2020 | 400,000 | 484,672 | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Airport System Rev., “Q-1”, 3%, 2015 | 550,000 | 583,699 | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Airport System Rev., “Q-1”, 5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,126,230 | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Airport System Rev., “Q-1”, 4%, 2016 | 150,000 | 167,438 | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Airport System Rev., “Q-1”, 5%, 2016 | 850,000 | 984,861 | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Airport System Rev., “Q-1”, 4%, 2017 | 250,000 | 283,633 | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Airport System Rev., “Q-1”, 5%, 2017 | 700,000 | 831,124 | ||||||
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., “A-2”, AGM, 5.25%, 2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,511,610 | ||||||
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., “B”, 4%, 2015 | 11,850,000 | 12,540,737 | ||||||
Chicago, IL, O’Hare International Airport Rev., “B”, 4%, 2016 | 7,460,000 | 7,996,747 | ||||||
Cleveland, OH, Airport System Rev., “A”, AMBAC, 5.25%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,133,650 | ||||||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Rev., “F”, 5%, 2014 | 600,000 | 651,366 | ||||||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Rev., “F”, 4%, 2015 | 300,000 | 326,715 | ||||||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Rev., “F”, 4%, 2018 | 5,415,000 | 6,111,423 | ||||||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport, “A”, AMBAC, 6%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,054,390 | ||||||
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Systems Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,151,530 | ||||||
Denver, CO, City & County Airport Systems Rev., “A”, 4%, 2017 | 1,250,000 | 1,406,600 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., “B”, 5%, 2020 | 1,000,000 | 1,218,280 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Airport System Rev., Subordinate Lien, “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,020,000 | 1,149,224 | ||||||
Metropolitan Nashville, TN, Airport Authority Rev., “A”, ASSD GTY, 4.5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,586,475 | ||||||
Metropolitan Nashville, TN, Airport Authority Rev., “B”, AGM, 4%, 2015 | 1,500,000 | 1,603,320 | ||||||
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency (Terminal One Group Assn.), 5.5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,052,630 | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Airport Rev., “B”, AGM, 5%, 2016 | 1,265,000 | 1,421,949 | ||||||
San Francisco, CA, City & County Airports Commission, International Airport Rev., “D”, 5%, 2025 | 1,000,000 | 1,186,780 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 51,853,049 | |||||||
General Obligations - General Purpose - 8.6% | ||||||||
California Economic Recovery, “B”, 5%, 2023 (b) | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,604,190 | ||||
Chandler, AZ, 5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,174,840 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
General Obligations - General Purpose - continued | ||||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consolidated Loan, “A”, 5%, 2016 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,105,970 | ||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consolidated Loan, “A”, 5%, 2015 (c) | 2,500,000 | 2,766,150 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consolidated Loan, “C”, 5%, 2015 (c) | 5,000,000 | 5,644,800 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, “A”, FRN, 0.59%, 2013 | 3,000,000 | 3,000,930 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, AGM, 5%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,167,620 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, “A”, NATL, 5.5%, 2020 | 2,820,000 | 3,102,282 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, “A”, 4.75%, 2018 | 1,870,000 | 1,994,841 | ||||||
Corpus Christi, TX, General Improvement, ASSD GTY, 4%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,260,420 | ||||||
Detroit, MI, District Aid, 5%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,207,420 | ||||||
Fulton County, GA, “A”, 3%, 2017 | 2,515,000 | 2,770,977 | ||||||
Henry County, GA, 5%, 2014 | 1,080,000 | 1,163,948 | ||||||
Mecklenburg County, NC, “A”, 5%, 2013 | 1,115,000 | 1,154,583 | ||||||
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, General Obligation, “A”, 4%, 2017 | 4,000,000 | 4,583,760 | ||||||
New York, NY, “F”, 5%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,139,840 | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Redevelopment Authority Rev. (Transformation Initiative), 3%, 2014 | 950,000 | 977,455 | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Redevelopment Authority Rev. (Transformation Initiative), 5%, 2014 | 705,000 | 745,545 | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Redevelopment Authority Rev. (Transformation Initiative), 3%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,041,500 | ||||||
Philadelphia, PA, Redevelopment Authority Rev. (Transformation Initiative), 5%, 2015 | 730,000 | 795,328 | ||||||
Shelby County, TN, Public Improvement & School, “B”, 5%, 2018 | 1,100,000 | 1,336,775 | ||||||
State of California, 5%, 2017 | 7,000,000 | 8,180,690 | ||||||
State of Hawaii, “EA”, 5%, 2022 | 2,500,000 | 3,152,500 | ||||||
State of Illinois, AGM, 5%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,169,260 | ||||||
State of Illinois, AGM, 5%, 2016 | 2,750,000 | 3,062,620 | ||||||
State of Maryland, “A”, 5.25%, 2013 | 1,450,000 | 1,473,766 | ||||||
State of Maryland, “C”, 4%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,105,590 | ||||||
State of Minnesota, “H”, 5%, 2016 | 3,000,000 | 3,524,700 | ||||||
State of Minnesota, “H”, 5%, 2017 | 2,600,000 | 3,145,766 | ||||||
State of Utah, “C”, 5%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,362,460 | ||||||
State of Washington, “A”, AGM, 5%, 2019 | 9,025,000 | 10,107,729 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, 5%, 2018 | 2,770,000 | 3,383,500 | ||||||
Will County, IL, Forest Preservation District, 5%, 2019 | 1,250,000 | 1,546,875 | ||||||
Yakima County, WA, “A”, AGM, 4%, 2017 | 2,300,000 | 2,630,602 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 93,585,232 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
General Obligations - Improvement - 2.7% | ||||||||
Bergen County, NJ, “A”, 3.25%, 2013 | $ | 2,475,000 | $ | 2,548,037 | ||||
Durham County, NC, 5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,248,990 | ||||||
Honolulu, HI, City & County Department of Finance, “B”, AGM, 5.5%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,139,080 | ||||||
Montgomery County, MD, “A”, 5%, 2013 | 4,000,000 | 4,189,160 | ||||||
New Orleans, LA, 5%, 2019 | 4,000,000 | 4,735,520 | ||||||
Pittsburgh, PA, “A-1”, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,035,600 | ||||||
Pittsburgh, PA, “N”, AGM, 5.25%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,112,920 | ||||||
Seattle, WA, 5%, 2016 | 3,780,000 | 4,342,086 | ||||||
State of North Carolina, “A”, 5%, 2017 | 3,500,000 | 4,154,430 | ||||||
Washington, MD, Suburban Sanitation District, 5%, 2013 | 2,450,000 | 2,517,498 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 30,023,321 | |||||||
General Obligations - Schools - 3.5% | ||||||||
Bastrop, TX, Independent School District, Capital Appreciation, “N”, PSF, 0%, 2020 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 787,130 | ||||
Beaufort County, SC, School District, “B”, 5%, 2017 | 2,500,000 | 2,954,525 | ||||||
Clark County, NV, School District, 5%, 2017 | 2,845,000 | 3,345,293 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 4%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,157,860 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2015 | 2,500,000 | 2,753,850 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5.25%, 2018 | 795,000 | 974,233 | ||||||
Ennis, TX, Independent School District, Capital Appreciation, “N”, PSF, 0%, 2021 | 2,865,000 | 2,083,972 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Independent School District, AGM, 5%, 2015 | 1,120,000 | 1,248,632 | ||||||
Klein, TX, Independent School District, “A”, PSF, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,186,300 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Community College District, “E”, AGM, 5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,149,600 | ||||||
Mt. San Antonio, CA, Community College District, Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2015 | 3,170,000 | 3,105,332 | ||||||
Pflugerville, TX, Independent School District, PSF, 5%, 2024 | 1,000,000 | 1,137,790 | ||||||
Plano, TX, Independent School District, “A”, 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,178,580 | ||||||
Reading, PA, School District, “A”, 5%, 2019 | 6,230,000 | 7,186,305 | ||||||
Richland County, SC, School District No. 1, 4%, 2019 | 1,270,000 | 1,469,936 | ||||||
Salt Lake City, UT, School District, “B”, 5%, 2013 | 1,040,000 | 1,056,141 | ||||||
San Marcos, TX, Consolidated Independent School District, PSF, 5.25%, 2014 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,086,150 | ||||||
Shelby County, TN, Public Improvement & Schools, “A”, AGM, 5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,593,375 | ||||||
Twin Rivers, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation, 0%, 2014 | 750,000 | 735,023 | ||||||
Washington County, OR, School District, AGM, 5.25%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,219,730 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 38,409,757 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 11.3% | ||||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 4%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,059,840 | ||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), “A-1”, FRN, 0.93%, 2021 | 2,500,000 | 2,455,400 | ||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), “F”, FRN, 1.26%, 2038 | 2,500,000 | 2,504,650 | ||||||
Berks County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Reading Hospital & Medical Center), “A-3”, 5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,114,670 | ||||||
Birmingham, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Rev. (Baptist Health Systems, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,135,540 | ||||||
Burleigh County, ND, Health Care Rev. (Alexius Medical Center Project), “A”, 3%, 2017 | 1,335,000 | 1,400,722 | ||||||
Burleigh County, ND, Health Care Rev. (Alexius Medical Center Project), “A”, 3%, 2018 | 1,180,000 | 1,238,268 | ||||||
Butler County, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Butler Health System), 5.375%, 2017 | 1,465,000 | 1,662,072 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Catholic Healthcare West), “I”, 4.95%, 2026 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,200,100 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Memorial Health Services), “A”, 4%, 2016 | 570,000 | 631,634 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Memorial Health Services), “A”, 4%, 2017 | 1,100,000 | 1,235,674 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Kaiser Permanente), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,590,270 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Kaiser Permanente), “C”, 5%, 2029 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,738,395 | ||||||
Clackamas County, OR, Hospital Facility Authority Rev. (Legacy Health System), “C”, 5%, 2037 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,061,970 | ||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (National Jewish Health Project), 3%, 2013 | 300,000 | 300,762 | ||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (National Jewish Health Project), 4%, 2014 | 350,000 | 359,818 | ||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (National Jewish Health Project), 4%, 2015 | 500,000 | 523,145 | ||||||
Dauphin County, PA, General Authority Health System Rev. (Pinnacle Health System), “A”, 5.25%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 1,681,290 | ||||||
East Alabama Healthcare Authority Rev., Health Care Facilities, “B”, 4.75%, 2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,440,292 | ||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (Methodist Hospital System), “B-2”, 5%, 2041 (b) | 2,500,000 | 2,561,425 | ||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Medical Facilities Rev. (Baylor College Medicine), “D”, 5%, 2016 | 750,000 | 854,430 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Medical Facilities Rev. (Baylor College Medicine), “D”, 5%, 2018 | $ | 470,000 | $ | 554,370 | ||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Medical Facilities Rev. (Baylor College Medicine), “D”, 5%, 2019 | 600,000 | 698,772 | ||||||
Illinois Development Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health), “A”, NATL, 5.75%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,505,175 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Carle Foundation), “A”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 2013 | 1,250,000 | 1,262,400 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Central DuPage Health), 5%, 2014 | 1,820,000 | 1,965,636 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (OSF Healthcare System), “A”, 4%, 2014 | 600,000 | 626,568 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (OSF Healthcare System), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 500,000 | 547,150 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (OSF Healthcare System), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 500,000 | 547,150 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Resurrection Health), 5.25%, 2015 | 2,195,000 | 2,407,037 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 6.75%, 2021 | 1,590,000 | 1,964,127 | ||||||
Iowa Finance Authority, Health Care Facilities Rev. (Genesis Health System), 5%, 2017 | 3,000,000 | 3,429,690 | ||||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), “A”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,162,300 | ||||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 2,000,000 | 2,238,120 | ||||||
Knox County, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), “A”, 4%, 2018 | 515,000 | 558,435 | ||||||
Knox County, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), “A”, 3%, 2019 | 525,000 | 536,377 | ||||||
Knox County, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Good Samaritan Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2020 | 1,690,000 | 1,923,744 | ||||||
Knox County, TN, Health, Educational, Hospital & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Fort Sanders), NATL, 5.75%, 2014 | 4,800,000 | 5,098,608 | ||||||
Lubbock, TX, Health Facilities Development Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), “A”, 1.125%, 2030 (b) | 6,000,000 | 5,985,000 | ||||||
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Health Systems Rev. (Memorial Health Systems of East Texas), 5.5%, 2019 | 320,000 | 360,381 | ||||||
Lycoming County, PA, Authority Health System Rev. (Susquehanna Health System), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 3,195,000 | 3,557,473 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Partners Healthcare), “K-4”, 3%, 2035 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,131,180 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Baystate Medical Center), “K”, 5%, 2039 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,080,160 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||||
Miami Beach, FL, Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Mount Sinai Medical Center), 6.75%, 2021 | $ | 5,745,000 | $ | 6,358,566 | ||||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Ascension Health Subordinate Credit Group), “A-4”, 1.625%, 2027 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,002,970 | ||||||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (Henry Ford Health System), 4%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,097,440 | ||||||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (McLaren Health Care Corp.), 5%, 2013 | 500,000 | 512,385 | ||||||
Monroe County, PA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Pocono Medical Center), “A”, 5%, 2023 | 1,225,000 | 1,371,902 | ||||||
Montgomery County, OH, Rev. (Catholic Healthcare Initiatives), 5.25%, 2038 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,047,610 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Local Economic Assistance Corp. Rev. (Winthrop-University Hospital Association Project), 3%, 2013 | 1,540,000 | 1,560,066 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Local Economic Assistance Corp. Rev. (Winthrop-University Hospital Association Project), 4%, 2015 | 500,000 | 534,575 | ||||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Concord Hospital), 5%, 2013 | 750,000 | 763,958 | ||||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Covenant Health), 5%, 2014 | 295,000 | 298,980 | ||||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (Holy Name Medical Center), 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,096,330 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), 6.25%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,070,200 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Mount Sinai Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,176,610 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (North Shore Long Island Jewish Health Care, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,193,580 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (North Shore Long Island Jewish Health Care, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,126,900 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (North Shore Long Island Jewish Health Care, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 1,728,495 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., State Supported Debt (Mental Health Services Facilities), “A”, 3.5%, 2013 | 3,365,000 | 3,445,659 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., State Supported Debt (Mental Health Services Facilities), “A”, ETM, 3.5%, 2013 (c) | 10,000 | 10,252 | ||||||
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Rev. (University Hospital), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 620,000 | 681,671 | ||||||
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Rev. (University Hospital), “A”, 5.2%, 2017 | 620,000 | 684,375 | ||||||
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Health System Rev. (Integris Baptist Medical Center), 5%, 2013 | 500,000 | 516,880 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||||
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.375%, 2022 | $ | 870,000 | $ | 931,509 | ||||
South Miami, FL, Health Facilities Baptist Authority Hospital Rev. (Baptist Health South Florida Group), 5%, 2021 | 290,000 | 336,040 | ||||||
Sullivan County, TN, Health Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Wellmont Health System), RADIAN, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,027,390 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Hospital Rev. (Scott & White Hospital), 5%, 2018 | 500,000 | 577,610 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Rev. (Texas Health Resources), 5%, 2019 | 500,000 | 564,920 | ||||||
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (Mother Frances Hospital), 5%, 2021 | 2,500,000 | 2,870,350 | ||||||
Washington County, VA, Hospital Facilities Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), “C”, 7.25%, 2019 | 1,335,000 | 1,545,436 | ||||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Central Washington Health), 6%, 2015 | 1,900,000 | 2,127,544 | ||||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Providence Health & Services), “B”, 5%, 2042 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,186,180 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Healthcare, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2022 | 6,000,000 | 6,872,580 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Fort Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 2013 | 645,000 | 659,622 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5%, 2014 | 1,100,000 | 1,179,552 | ||||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.25%, 2018 | 1,500,000 | 1,674,165 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 123,722,522 | |||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - 0.4% | ||||||||
Colorado Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society), “B”, 5%, 2039 (b) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,076,250 | ||||
Pell City, AL, Special Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (Noland Health Services, Inc.), 4%, 2016 | 1,810,000 | 1,967,144 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckner Retirement), 5%, 2016 | 500,000 | 554,900 | ||||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp., Retirement Facility (Air Force Village Foundation, Inc.), 5.75%, 2019 | 850,000 | 940,338 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 4,538,632 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Human Services - 0.3% | ||||||||
Delaware County, PA, Authority Rev. (Elwyn Inc.), 4%, 2018 | $ | 1,795,000 | $ | 1,869,564 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (NYSARC, Inc.), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 1,500,000 | 1,605,705 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 3,475,269 | |||||||
Industrial Revenue - Chemicals - 0.1% | ||||||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Dow Chemical Co.), 6.25%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,085,630 | ||||
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - 1.3% | ||||||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), “B”, 5.25%, 2023 (b) | $ | 135,000 | $ | 155,357 | ||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), “C”, 5.25%, 2023 (b) | 3,045,000 | 3,504,156 | ||||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), “A-1”, 1.875%, 2025 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,036,220 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Solid Waste Facilities Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), “A”, 4.95%, 2012 | 1,750,000 | 1,754,620 | ||||||
Director of the State of Nevada Department of Business & Industry Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), 5.625%, 2026 (b) | 1,950,000 | 2,279,453 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), “B”, 3.4%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,002,210 | ||||||
Michigan Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 4.5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,041,290 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), “A”, 5.3%, 2015 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,066,740 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), 2.75%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,017,350 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,857,396 | |||||||
Industrial Revenue - Other - 0.9% | ||||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Exempt Facilities Rev. (Amtrak Project), “A”, 3%, 2018 | $ | 265,000 | $ | 277,291 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Exempt Facilities Rev. (Amtrak Project), “A”, 5%, 2019 | 1,325,000 | 1,545,440 | ||||||
St. Charles Parish, LA, Gulf Zone Opportunity Zone Rev. (Valero Energy Corp.), 4%, 2040 (b) | 3,280,000 | 3,591,108 | ||||||
Valdez, AK, Marine Terminal Rev. (BP Pipelines Project), “B”, 5%, 2021 | 4,000,000 | 4,851,840 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 10,265,679 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Industrial Revenue - Paper - 0.2% | ||||||||
Bucksport, ME, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (International Paper), “A”, 4%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,038,090 | ||||
Courtland, AL, Industrial Development Board Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 750,000 | 780,585 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 1,818,675 | |||||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - 0.1% | ||||||||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 5.75%, 2015 | $ | 1,075,000 | $ | 1,177,523 | ||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - 2.6% | ||||||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), “A”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2019 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,092,570 | ||||
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev. (J. Paul Getty Trust), “A-1”, 2.5%, 2047 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,513,980 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., FL, “A-1”, 5%, 2019 | 4,000,000 | 4,644,600 | ||||||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., FL, “A-1”, 5%, 2020 | 1,435,000 | 1,668,173 | ||||||
Dayton Montgomery County, OH, Port Dayton, “A”, 4.75%, 2015 | 790,000 | 787,899 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp., Facilities Lease Rev. (LAXFUEL Corp.), 5%, 2015 | 1,105,000 | 1,197,035 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp., Facilities Lease Rev. (LAXFUEL Corp.), 5%, 2017 | 350,000 | 395,091 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp., Facilities Lease Rev. (LAXFUEL Corp.), ASSD GTY, 5%, 2018 | 2,450,000 | 2,624,122 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp., Facilities Lease Rev. (LAXFUEL Corp.), 5%, 2018 | 310,000 | 354,845 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp., Facilities Lease Rev. (LAXFUEL Corp.), ASSD GTY, 5%, 2019 | 2,575,000 | 2,751,774 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Regional Airports Improvement Corp., Facilities Lease Rev. (LAXFUEL Corp.), ASSD GTY, 5%, 2020 | 2,705,000 | 2,879,445 | ||||||
New York City, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Rev. (Museum of Modern Art), “1A”, 5%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,389,440 | ||||||
Oklahoma Industries Authority Rev. (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation), 4.75%, 2014 | 1,060,000 | 1,112,353 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Economic Development), 5%, 2016 | 2,000,000 | 2,255,660 | ||||||
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, Airport Facilities Rev. (Transportation Infrastructure Properties LLC), “B”, 5%, 2022 | 3,000,000 | 3,218,280 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 28,885,267 | |||||||
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - 0.8% | ||||||||
Boston, MA, Housing Authority Capital Program Rev., AGM, 5%, 2015 | $ | 1,750,000 | $ | 1,867,985 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - continued | ||||||||
Boston, MA, Housing Authority Capital Program Rev., AGM, 5%, 2017 | $ | 1,770,000 | $ | 1,969,107 | ||||
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Rental Housing Rev., “A”, AGM, 5.05%, 2018 | 2,000,000 | 2,055,040 | ||||||
New York, NY, Housing Development Corp., Multi-Family Housing Rev., “L-2”, 2%, 2045 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,007,410 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 8,899,542 | |||||||
Port Revenue - 0.6% | ||||||||
Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority Deepwater Port Rev. (LOOP LLC Project), 1.375%, 2037 (b) | $ | 2,115,000 | $ | 2,122,614 | ||||
Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority Deepwater Port Rev. (LOOP LLC Project), “B-1”, 1.875%, 2040 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,019,720 | ||||||
Port of Seattle, WA, Rev., “B”, 3%, 2015 | 2,285,000 | 2,399,890 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 6,542,224 | |||||||
Sales & Excise Tax Revenue - 1.8% | ||||||||
Illinois Sales Tax Rev., “B”, 3%, 2014 | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,205,250 | ||||
Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax Rev., “B”, 5%, 2017 | 3,500,000 | 4,184,040 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Transit Sales Surtax Rev., AGM, 5%, 2017 | 1,500,000 | 1,762,530 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Interim Finance Authority Sales Tax, “A”, 4%, 2017 | 4,350,000 | 5,039,301 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Interim Finance Authority Sales Tax, “A”, 4%, 2018 | 2,275,000 | 2,682,020 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Interim Finance Authority Sales Tax, “A”, 4%, 2019 | 600,000 | 711,564 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,584,705 | |||||||
Single Family Housing - State - 1.8% | ||||||||
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “E”, FGIC, 5%, 2014 | $ | 1,435,000 | $ | 1,443,050 | ||||
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “G”, 4.95%, 2023 | 2,300,000 | 2,357,845 | ||||||
California Housing Finance Agency Rev. (Home Mortgage), “K”, 4.55%, 2021 | 2,515,000 | 2,536,704 | ||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev., Single Family Program, “I”, 3.1%, 2013 | 2,835,000 | 2,860,373 | ||||||
Maryland Department of Housing & Community Development, “A”, 3.875%, 2016 | 1,575,000 | 1,674,020 | ||||||
Missouri Housing Development Commission, Single Family Mortgage Rev. (Home Loan Program), “B”, GNMA, 6.05%, 2037 | 190,000 | 205,700 | ||||||
South Dakota Housing Development Authority, “B”, 2.7%, 2014 | 3,000,000 | 3,057,720 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Single Family Housing - State - continued | ||||||||
Virginia Housing Development Authority, Commonwealth Mortgage, “A-5”, 4.4%, 2015 | $ | 230,000 | $ | 236,470 | ||||
Virginia Housing Development Authority, Commonwealth Mortgage, “A-5”, 4.4%, 2015 | 295,000 | 304,998 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 1.6%, 2014 | 2,000,000 | 2,010,960 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 2%, 2015 | 1,085,000 | 1,096,610 | ||||||
West Virginia Housing Development Fund, “B”, 2.1%, 2015 | 1,750,000 | 1,772,365 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,556,815 | |||||||
Solid Waste Revenue - 0.1% | ||||||||
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Synagro-Baltimore), “A”, 5.25%, 2012 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 501,160 | ||||
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Synagro-Baltimore), “A”, 5.25%, 2013 | 750,000 | 772,073 | ||||||
Niagara County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (American Ref-fuel), “C”, 5.625%, 2024 (b) | 300,000 | 300,498 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 1,573,731 | |||||||
State & Agency - Other - 1.0% | ||||||||
Kentucky Property & Buildings Commission Rev. (Project Number 100), “A”, 5%, 2020 | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 6,175,300 | ||||
Puerto Rico Government Development Bank, “B”, 5%, 2014 | 2,500,000 | 2,637,875 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Rev., “C”, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2015 | 1,665,000 | 1,793,405 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 10,606,580 | |||||||
State & Local Agencies - 6.8% | ||||||||
Alabama Building Renovation Finance Authority Rev., 4%, 2017 | $ | 1,815,000 | $ | 2,044,216 | ||||
Alabama Building Renovation Finance Authority Rev., 4%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,138,270 | ||||||
Alabama Building Renovation Finance Authority Rev., 4%, 2019 | 1,615,000 | 1,853,277 | ||||||
Alabama Public School & College Authority, “A”, 5%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,221,800 | ||||||
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,061,630 | ||||||
California Public Works Board Lease Rev. (Various Capital Projects), “G”, 4%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,091,220 | ||||||
California Public Works Board Lease Rev. (Various Capital Projects), “G”, 4%, 2016 | 3,840,000 | 4,263,898 | ||||||
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (State Prison - Lassen County, Susanville), “I”, 5%, 2016 | 5,000,000 | 5,669,900 | ||||||
California Public Works Board Lease Rev., Department of Public Health (Richmond Laboratory), “J”, 4%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,091,220 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Proposition 1A Receivables Program), 5%, 2013 | 2,000,000 | 2,057,460 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
State & Local Agencies - continued | ||||||||
Chattanooga, TN, Industrial Development Board, Lease Rental Rev. (Southside Redevelopment Corp.), 5%, 2018 | $ | 5,120,000 | $ | 6,033,920 | ||||
Florida Department Management Services Rev. “A”, AGM, 5.25%, 2015 | 1,875,000 | 2,091,169 | ||||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “A”, AMBAC, 5%, 2020 | 2,200,000 | 2,203,916 | ||||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, “B”, 5.5%, 2013 (c) | 1,000,000 | 1,030,290 | ||||||
Greenville County, SC, School District Installment Purchase Rev., 5%, 2020 | 4,475,000 | 5,546,360 | ||||||
Hamilton Heights School Building Corp., First Mortgage, “N”, AGM, 5%, 2014 | 1,875,000 | 2,010,544 | ||||||
Hampton, VA, Museum Rev., 5%, 2014 | 760,000 | 788,827 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., AGM, 5%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,072,220 | ||||||
New York Municipal Bond Bank Agency, Special School Purpose Rev., 5%, 2016 | 5,500,000 | 6,416,465 | ||||||
New York Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “B”, 5%, 2018 | 2,000,000 | 2,397,700 | ||||||
New York Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “B-1C”, 5.5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,030,590 | ||||||
New York Urban Development Corp. Rev., “A”, 5.125%, 2015 | 675,000 | 726,638 | ||||||
Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority, State Facilities Rev. (Higher Education Projects), “A”, 2.25%, 2017 | 2,500,000 | 2,641,800 | ||||||
Orange County, NC, Public Facilities Co., Limited Obligation, 5%, 2020 | 500,000 | 618,650 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority Rev. (Ports Authority Project), “C”, 3%, 2026 (b) | 4,000,000 | 4,046,240 | ||||||
South Jersey, NJ, Port Corp. Rev. (Marine Terminal), “P-2”, 4%, 2015 | 2,420,000 | 2,535,168 | ||||||
Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Rev., “A”, 5%, 2013 | 2,500,000 | 2,588,350 | ||||||
Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,250,000 | 1,448,000 | ||||||
Virginia Public School Authority, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,021,450 | ||||||
Virginia Public School Authority, “C”, 5%, 2018 | 1,000,000 | 1,221,910 | ||||||
Virginia, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority, Healthcare Facility Lease Rev., 5.25%, 2013 | 215,000 | 219,984 | ||||||
Wake County, NC, Annual Appropriation Ltd., Obligation Bonds, 5%, 2013 | 2,185,000 | 2,245,066 | ||||||
Wake County, NC, Annual Appropriation Ltd., Obligation Bonds, 5%, 2014 | 1,890,000 | 2,029,539 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 74,457,687 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Student Loan Revenue - 2.1% | ||||||||
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. Rev., “A-1”, 4.875%, 2020 | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,602,850 | ||||
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2017 | 2,800,000 | 3,202,080 | ||||||
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority Rev., “J”, 5%, 2020 | 4,400,000 | 4,908,508 | ||||||
New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority Student Loan Rev., “1A”, 4%, 2012 | 2,000,000 | 2,005,200 | ||||||
New Mexico Educational Assistance Foundation, “A-1”, 5%, 2019 | 2,000,000 | 2,353,420 | ||||||
New Mexico Educational Assistance Foundation, “A-1”, 4%, 2020 | 1,500,000 | 1,683,345 | ||||||
New Mexico Educational Assistance Foundation, “B”, 4%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,227,160 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 22,982,563 | |||||||
Tax - Other - 2.4% | ||||||||
Denver, CO, City & County Excise Tax Rev., “A”, ASSD GTY, 6%, 2021 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,885,170 | ||||
Guam Government Ltd. Obligation Rev., “A”, 5%, 2013 | 825,000 | 852,811 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., 5%, 2018 | 4,000,000 | 4,636,160 | ||||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev., Cigarette Tax, 5.375%, 2015 | 2,730,000 | 3,082,416 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax Rev., “A”, 1.75%, 2018 | 10,000,000 | 10,407,200 | ||||||
New York, NY, City Transitional Finance Authority Rev., Future Tax Secured, “A”, 5%, 2014 | 945,000 | 1,032,611 | ||||||
New York, NY, City Transitional Finance Authority Rev., Future Tax Secured, “A”, ETM, 5%, 2014 (c) | 55,000 | 60,064 | ||||||
New York, NY, City Transitional Finance Authority Rev., Future Tax Secured, “C”, 5%, 2016 | 4,000,000 | 4,685,760 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 26,642,192 | |||||||
Tax Assessment - 2.1% | ||||||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority Rev. (Colorado Employment Compensation), “A”, 5%, 2014 | $ | 4,000,000 | $ | 4,281,880 | ||||
Illinois Department of Employment Security, Unemployment Insurance and Fund Building Receipts Rev., “C”, 1.5%, 2021 | 2,500,000 | 2,516,150 | ||||||
Irvine, CA, Improvement Bond Act 1915, 2%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,012,000 | ||||||
Irvine, CA, Improvement Bond Act 1915, 3%, 2014 | 500,000 | 517,480 | ||||||
Michigan Finance Authority Rev. (Unemployment Obligation Assessment), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 4,600,000 | 5,230,154 | ||||||
Michigan Finance Authority Rev. (Unemployment Obligation Assessment), “B”, 5%, 2022 | 5,000,000 | 5,716,100 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Unemployment Compensation Rev., “B”, 5%, 2023 | 1,770,000 | 1,997,622 |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Tax Assessment - continued | ||||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Unemployment Compensation Rev., “B”, 5%, 2023 | $ | 1,060,000 | $ | 1,179,409 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 22,450,795 | |||||||
Tobacco - 2.4% | ||||||||
Alabama 21st Century Authority, Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A”, 4%, 2015 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,084,510 | ||||
Alabama 21st Century Authority, Tobacco Settlement Rev., “A”, 5%, 2018 | 2,335,000 | 2,781,312 | ||||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, “A-2”, 5.125%, 2024 | 1,775,000 | 1,534,221 | ||||||
Illinois Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, 6.25%, 2024 | 7,190,000 | 8,006,784 | ||||||
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 6.75%, 2013 (c) | 1,460,000 | 1,514,838 | ||||||
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., “1A”, 4.5%, 2023 | 3,835,000 | 3,743,459 | ||||||
Tobacco Securitization Authority, Minnesota Tobacco Settlement Rev., “B”, 5%, 2022 | 6,000,000 | 7,033,200 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 25,698,324 | |||||||
Toll Roads - 1.1% | ||||||||
Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Highway System Rev., “B”, 5%, 2017 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,148,310 | ||||
San Francisco, CA, Bay Area Toll Authority, Bridge Rev., “C”, 1.45%, 2045 (b) | 2,500,000 | 2,536,125 | ||||||
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Rev., NY, “A-1”, 4%, 2038 (b) | 2,895,000 | 2,897,953 | ||||||
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Rev., NY, “B”, 5.25%, 2016 | 5,000,000 | 5,007,050 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 11,589,438 | |||||||
Transportation - Special Tax - 2.1% | ||||||||
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Capital Grant Receipts Rev., AMBAC, 5%, 2014 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,128,040 | ||||
Commonwealth of Virginia, Transportation Board Rev., Capital Projects, 5%, 2020 | 2,175,000 | 2,716,727 | ||||||
Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Economic Development Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 4,000,000 | 4,614,960 | ||||||
Missouri Highways & Transit Commission State Road Rev. (Federal Reimbursement), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 3,000,000 | 3,336,660 | ||||||
Nevada Highway Improvement Rev. (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax), NATL, 5.5%, 2013 | 2,395,000 | 2,519,420 | ||||||
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, “D”, 5%, 2018 | 2,500,000 | 3,026,975 | ||||||
New Mexico Finance Authority State Transportation Rev., 5%, 2018 | 2,000,000 | 2,441,560 | ||||||
New York Thruway Authority, Second General Highway & Bridge Trust Fund, “A-1”, 5%, 2019 | 1,350,000 | 1,648,607 |
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Transportation - Special Tax - continued | ||||||||
San Francisco, CA, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Sales Tax Rev., “A”, 3%, 2015 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 426,564 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 22,859,513 | |||||||
Universities - Colleges - 12.7% | ||||||||
Alabama Private Colleges (Tuskegee University), “N”, ASSD GTY, 5%, 2015 | $ | 625,000 | $ | 692,175 | ||||
Allegheny County, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Chatham University), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 475,000 | 531,074 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Chapman University), 5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,184,130 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Chapman University), 5%, 2020 | 1,250,000 | 1,486,075 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Loyola Marymount), “B”, FRN, 1.01%, 2015 | 1,725,000 | 1,732,745 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Pitzer College), 5%, 2016 | 1,395,000 | 1,537,904 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of San Francisco), 5%, 2021 | 500,000 | 591,785 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (Biola University), 5%, 2018 | 650,000 | 740,136 | ||||||
Central Michigan University Rev., 5%, 2017 | 1,760,000 | 2,040,315 | ||||||
Connecticut Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Yale University), “A-3”, 2%, 2049 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,014,250 | ||||||
Delaware County, PA, Authority University Rev. (Villanova University), 4%, 2016 | 250,000 | 277,453 | ||||||
Delaware County, PA, Authority University Rev. (Villanova University), 5%, 2017 | 425,000 | 500,034 | ||||||
Delaware County, PA, Authority University Rev. (Villanova University), 5%, 2018 | 305,000 | 364,966 | ||||||
Delaware County, PA, Authority University Rev. (Villanova University), 5%, 2019 | 250,000 | 301,430 | ||||||
District of Columbia University Rev. (Georgetown University), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 1,400,000 | 1,424,738 | ||||||
El Paso County, CO, Rev. (Colorado College), 2%, 2013 | 1,030,000 | 1,033,677 | ||||||
El Paso County, CO, Rev. (Colorado College), 5%, 2014 | 1,090,000 | 1,146,168 | ||||||
Erie, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Mercyhurst College), 4.35%, 2014 | 640,000 | 667,130 | ||||||
Erie, PA, Higher Education Building Authority Rev. (Mercyhurst College), 5%, 2018 | 1,075,000 | 1,215,363 | ||||||
Florida Higher Educational Facilities, Financial Authority Rev. (University of Tampa Project), “A”, 5%, 2021 | 1,300,000 | 1,490,827 |
20
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Florida Higher Educational Facilities, Financial Authority Rev. (University of Tampa Project), “A”, 5%, 2022 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 686,580 | ||||
Fulton County, GA, Development Authority Rev. (Georgia Tech Athletic Association), “A”, 5%, 2019 | 5,000,000 | 6,020,100 | ||||||
Hempstead, NY, Local Development Corp. Rev. (Adelphi University Project), 5%, 2022 | 1,140,000 | 1,313,052 | ||||||
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Art Institute Chicago), “A”, 4.3%, 2030 (b) | 500,000 | 540,295 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Depaul University), “B”, 5%, 2020 | 3,335,000 | 3,990,428 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,053,320 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), “A”, 5%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,064,940 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,078,430 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 5.25%, 2019 | 570,000 | 648,489 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (The Art Institute of Chicago), “A”, 4%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,045,650 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (The Art Institute of Chicago), “A”, 5%, 2015 | 900,000 | 988,326 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (University of Chicago), “B”, 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,181,000 | ||||||
Indiana Finance Authority Rev. (Butler University), “A”, 5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,162,050 | ||||||
Indiana University Rev., “A”, 5%, 2020 | 1,000,000 | 1,252,890 | ||||||
Indiana University Rev., “A”, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,262,190 | ||||||
Indiana University Rev., “A”, 5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,269,130 | ||||||
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority Rev., Private College Facilities (Upper Iowa University), 5%, 2015 | 550,000 | 604,109 | ||||||
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority Rev., Private College Facilities (Upper Iowa University), 5%, 2016 | 845,000 | 944,093 | ||||||
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority Rev., Private College Facilities (Upper Iowa University), 5%, 2017 | 730,000 | 825,871 | ||||||
Jackson State University, MS, Educational Building Corp. Rev. “A-1”, 5%, 2015 | 1,490,000 | 1,617,827 | ||||||
Lone Star College System, TX, “A”, 5%, 2018 | 4,250,000 | 5,185,978 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Boston University), “V-2”, 2.875%, 2014 | 2,250,000 | 2,338,988 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Brandeis University), “O-2”, 3%, 2013 | 2,680,000 | 2,742,926 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Brandeis University), “O-2”, 3%, 2014 | 2,675,000 | 2,770,043 |
21
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Hampshire College), 5.15%, 2014 | $ | 65,000 | $ | 67,414 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), “H”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2018 | 1,485,000 | 1,722,021 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), “H”, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2019 | 1,605,000 | 1,873,340 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Tufts University), “P”, 3%, 2036 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,216,300 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Wheelock), “C”, 5%, 2017 | 1,755,000 | 1,990,152 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Springfield College), 5%, 2014 | 1,010,000 | 1,085,972 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Springfield College), 5%, 2016 | 1,115,000 | 1,246,648 | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Massachusetts), “A”, 2.2%, 2030 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,015,640 | ||||||
Medical Center, Educational Building Corp. Rev. (University of Mississippi), 4%, 2014 | 1,240,000 | 1,301,864 | ||||||
Medical Center, Educational Building Corp. Rev. (University of Mississippi), 4%, 2015 | 2,330,000 | 2,508,292 | ||||||
Michigan University Rev. (Wayne State University), “A”, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,044,590 | ||||||
Nassau County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (New York Institute of Technology), “A”, 5.25%, 2017 | 430,000 | 490,836 | ||||||
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), “B”, 6%, 2017 | 1,710,000 | 2,071,426 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (Fordham University), 2%, 2014 | 1,170,000 | 1,200,666 | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (Fordham University), 4%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,088,600 | ||||||
New York, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Rev. (Juilliard School), 2.1%, 2036 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,077,300 | ||||||
New York, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Rev. (Juilliard School), “B”, 1.35%, 2036 (b) | 5,000,000 | 5,039,050 | ||||||
Niagara, NY, Area Development Corp. Rev. (Niagara University), “A”, 5%, 2017 | 200,000 | 228,036 | ||||||
Niagara, NY, Area Development Corp. Rev. (Niagara University), “A”, 5%, 2018 | 250,000 | 288,945 | ||||||
Ohio State University, “A”, 5%, 2012 | 1,415,000 | 1,419,938 | ||||||
Ohio State University, “A”, ETM, 5%, 2012 (c) | 85,000 | 85,297 | ||||||
Oregon Health & Science University Rev., “A”, 5%, 2018 | 785,000 | 926,889 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Unemployment Compensation Rev., ”B”, 5.25%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,173,290 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Drexel University), 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,165,100 |
22
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Drexel University), 5%, 2018 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 594,200 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University), 3%, 2015 | 500,000 | 527,750 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University), 4%, 2016 | 350,000 | 386,929 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University), 4%, 2017 | 500,000 | 563,105 | ||||||
Pinellas County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Barry University), 4%, 2015 | 400,000 | 425,968 | ||||||
Pinellas County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Barry University), 4%, 2016 | 390,000 | 419,921 | ||||||
Pinellas County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Barry University), 4%, 2017 | 870,000 | 942,428 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical, & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (Ana G. Mendez University System Project), 4%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,026,730 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical, & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher Education Rev. (International American University of Puerto Rico Project), 4%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,045,620 | ||||||
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 2%, 2013 | 250,000 | 251,660 | ||||||
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 3%, 2015 | 410,000 | 424,809 | ||||||
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 3%, 2016 | 400,000 | 416,176 | ||||||
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 3%, 2018 | 620,000 | 634,514 | ||||||
Quad Cities, IL, Regional Economic Development Authority Rev. (Augustana College), 4%, 2020 | 500,000 | 527,375 | ||||||
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5%, 2019 | 1,250,000 | 1,391,638 | ||||||
South Carolina Educational Facilities Authority, Private Nonprofit Institutions (Furman University), 3%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,019,350 | ||||||
St. Lawrence County, NY, Industrial Development Agency (St. Lawrence University), 5%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,133,090 | ||||||
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (New York Institute of Technology), 5.25%, 2017 | 500,000 | 538,690 | ||||||
Texas Tech University Rev., Refunding & Improvement, “A”, 4.25%, 2021 | 2,000,000 | 2,381,860 |
23
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||||
Texas Tech University Rev., Refunding & Improvement, “A”, 4.25%, 2022 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,348,260 | ||||
Tompkins County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Ithaca College), 5%, 2016 | 3,000,000 | 3,298,680 | ||||||
Tulsa, OK, Industrial Authority Rev. (University of Tulsa), 5.5%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,151,490 | ||||||
University of Delaware Rev., “B”, 4%, 2013 | 1,500,000 | 1,555,980 | ||||||
University of Southern Indiana Rev., “J”, ASSD GTY, 4%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,104,090 | ||||||
University of Texas, Permanent University Fund, “B”, 5%, 2014 (c) | 2,000,000 | 2,155,800 | ||||||
University of Texas, Permanent University Fund, “C”, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,135,880 | ||||||
Utah Board of Regents Auxiliary & Campus Facilities System Rev., “A”, NATL, 5%, 2018 | 1,090,000 | 1,192,275 | ||||||
Utah Board of Regents Student Loan Rev., “EE-2”, 5%, 2017 | 5,000,000 | 5,949,450 | ||||||
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Gonzaga University), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 3,315,000 | 3,480,021 | ||||||
Western Michigan University Rev., ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,088,900 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 138,999,325 | |||||||
Universities - Dormitories - 0.3% | ||||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Student Housing (University of California-Irvine), 5%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,060,490 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5%, 2017 | 825,000 | 922,787 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5%, 2018 | 1,005,000 | 1,135,580 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 3,118,857 | |||||||
Universities - Secondary Schools - 0.2% | ||||||||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Montessori Charter School Project), 2%, 2013 | $ | 110,000 | $ | 110,682 | ||||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Montessori Charter School Project), 2.25%, 2017 | 175,000 | 176,244 | ||||||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Montessori Charter School Project), 3.25%, 2022 | 1,460,000 | 1,444,378 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 1,731,304 | |||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - 7.0% | ||||||||
Beaver County, PA, Industrial Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Duquesne Light Co.), “C”, 4.75%, 2033 (b) | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,233,820 | ||||
Brazos River, TX, Authority Rev. (Centerpoint Energy), “B”, FGIC, 4.25%, 2017 | 1,260,000 | 1,306,431 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Poll (Southern California Edison Co.), “A”, SYNCORA, 4.1%, 2028 (b) | 500,000 | 507,160 |
24
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | ||||||||
Chesapeake, VA., Economic Development Authority Pollution Control (Virginia Electric Power Co.) Rev., 3.6%, 2032 (b) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,007,900 | ||||
Chula Vista, CA, Industrial Development Rev. (San Diego Gas & Electric Co.), “A”, 1.65%, 2018 | 3,500,000 | 3,554,005 | ||||||
Connecticut Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Connecticut Light & Power Co.), “A”, 1.55%, 2031 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,009,420 | ||||||
De Soto Parish, LA, Pollution Control Rev. (Southwestern Electric Power Co.), 3.25%, 2019 (b) | 2,500,000 | 2,594,700 | ||||||
Escambia County, FL, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Gulf Power Co.), 1.35%, 2039 (b) | 2,500,000 | 2,508,200 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (El Paso Electric Company Four Corners Project), “A”, 1.875%, 2032 (b) | 2,500,000 | 2,511,600 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service Co. of New Mexico), “B”, 4.75%, 2040 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,186,920 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service of Arizona), “C”, 2.875%, 2024 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,014,890 | ||||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Southern California Edison Co.), “A”, 2.875%, 2029 (b) | 2,400,000 | 2,504,928 | ||||||
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance Special Purpose Rev. (Hawaiian Electric Co. & Subsidiary), “B”, SYNCORA, 5%, 2022 | 5,000,000 | 5,039,800 | ||||||
Hillsborough County, FL, Industrial Development Authority (Tampa Electric), 5.15%, 2025 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,036,490 | ||||||
Illinois Finance Authority Gas Supply Rev. (Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.), 2.125%, 2030 (b) | 1,900,000 | 1,934,998 | ||||||
Indiana Finance Authority Environmental Facilities Rev. (Indianapolis Power & Light Co.), “B”, 4.9%, 2016 | 1,000,000 | 1,101,130 | ||||||
Iowa Finance Authority Pollution Control Facilities Rev. (Interstate Power & Light), FGIC, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,060,050 | ||||||
Louisa, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (VEPCO), “C”, 1.5%, 2035 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,034,940 | ||||||
Louisa, VA, Industrial Development Authority, Solid Waste & Sewer Disposal (VEPCO), “A”, 2.5%, 2031 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,004,450 | ||||||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Rev. (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana LLC), “B”, 2.875%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 2,065,840 | ||||||
Maryland Economic Development Corp., Pollution Control Rev. (Potomac Electric Power Co.), 6.2%, 2022 | 1,045,000 | 1,285,559 | ||||||
Mason County, WV, Pollution Control Rev. (Appalachian Power Co.), “L”, 2%, 2022 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,059,340 | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 2042 (b) | 220,000 | 270,422 | ||||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison Co.), 5.625%, 2020 | 1,000,000 | 1,238,480 |
25
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | ||||||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison Co.), 3.05%, 2024 (b) | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,001,080 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison Co.), 5.25%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,085,230 | ||||||
Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Rev. (Mississippi Power Co. Project), 2.25%, 2040 (b) | 2,000,000 | 2,006,280 | ||||||
Missouri Environmental Improvement & Energy Resources Authority (Kansas Power & Light Co.), SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2017 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,012,750 | ||||||
Mobile, AL, Industrial Development Board, Pollution Control Rev. (Alabama Power Co.), 1.65%, 2034 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,015,260 | ||||||
Mobile, AL, Industrial Development Board, Pollution Control Rev. (Alabama Power Co.), 0.58%, 2034 (b) | 5,000,000 | 5,000,400 | ||||||
Navajo County, AZ, Pollution Control Corp. Rev. (Arizona Public Service Co.), “C”, 5.5%, 2034 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,070,180 | ||||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (United Illuminating Co.), 4.5%, 2027 (b) | 1,960,000 | 2,104,511 | ||||||
New York Energy Research & Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (New York Electric & Gas Corp.), “A”, 2.125%, 2015 | 2,500,000 | 2,561,900 | ||||||
New York Energy Research & Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.), “A”, NATL, 4.75%, 2032 (b) | 1,130,000 | 1,265,284 | ||||||
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority Rev. (FirstEnergy Generation Corp.), “A”, 2.25%, 2023 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,508,955 | ||||||
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority Rev. (FirstEnergy Generation Project), 2.25%, 2029 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,504,950 | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (PPL Energy Supply LLC), 3%, 2038 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,130,650 | ||||||
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Pollution Control Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.), “A”, 4.95%, 2020 | 2,360,000 | 2,703,144 | ||||||
State of Indiana Finance Authority, Environmental Rev. (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.), “A-2”, 3.375%, 2019 | 3,000,000 | 3,216,090 | ||||||
York County, VA, Economic Development Authority Pollution Control Rev. (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), “A”, 4.05%, 2033 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,040,420 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 76,298,557 | |||||||
Utilities - Municipal Owned - 5.4% | ||||||||
American Municipal Power, Inc. Rev. (AMP Fremont Energy Center Project), “B”, 5%, 2017 | $ | 1,260,000 | $ | 1,449,945 | ||||
California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Rev., “L”, 5%, 2018 | 3,510,000 | 4,270,617 | ||||||
California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Rev., “M”, 4%, 2019 | 3,000,000 | 3,526,980 |
26
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Municipal Owned - continued | ||||||||
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank Rev., “A”, 4%, 2015 | $ | 1,260,000 | $ | 1,341,446 | ||||
Energy Northwest, WA, Wind Project Rev., NATL, 5%, 2013 | 280,000 | 287,840 | ||||||
Florida Municipal Power Agency Rev. (St. Lucie Project), “A”, 5%, 2019 | 2,365,000 | 2,828,871 | ||||||
Florida Municipal Power Agency Rev. (St. Lucie Project), “A”, 5%, 2020 | 1,330,000 | 1,596,705 | ||||||
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority Power Rev., “GG”, 5%, 2020 | 500,000 | 609,210 | ||||||
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority Power Rev., “GG”, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,226,380 | ||||||
Georgia Municipal Gas Authority Rev. (Gas Portfolio III Project), “Q”, 5%, 2021 | 1,750,000 | 2,122,208 | ||||||
Guam Power Authority Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2021 | 1,500,000 | 1,731,630 | ||||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Thermal Utilities Rev. (Teco Project), “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,078,620 | ||||||
Indianapolis, IN, Gas Utility Rev., ASSD GTY, 5%, 2030 (b) | 1,500,000 | 1,552,440 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Department of Water & Power Rev., “A”, 5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,236,590 | ||||||
Louisville & Jefferson County, KY, Metropolitan Government Pollution Control Rev. (Louisville Gas & Electric Co.), “A”, 1.65%, 2033 (b) | 2,700,000 | 2,715,309 | ||||||
Memphis, TN, Electric System Rev., 5%, 2014 | 1,500,000 | 1,639,635 | ||||||
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Electric System Rev., “B”, 5%, 2021 | 7,500,000 | 9,491,025 | ||||||
Nebraska Public Power District Rev., “C”, 5%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,186,100 | ||||||
New York Energy Research & Development Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (New York Electric & Gas Corp.), “C”, 3%, 2029 (b) | 1,000,000 | 1,011,430 | ||||||
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, “A”, 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,051,300 | ||||||
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Catawba Electric Rev., “A”, 5.5%, 2013 | 340,000 | 342,723 | ||||||
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Catawba Electric Rev., “A”, ETM, 5.5%, 2013 (c) | 160,000 | 161,302 | ||||||
Northern California Power Agency Rev., “A”, 4%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,022,810 | ||||||
Orlando, FL, Utilities Commission Utility System Rev., “C”, 5%, 2013 | 1,335,000 | 1,390,950 | ||||||
Piedmont, SC, Municipal Power Agency Electric Rev., “A-2”, 5%, 2018 | 750,000 | 869,648 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority Power Rev., “B”, 5%, 2016 | 5,000,000 | 5,483,500 | ||||||
Sacramento, CA, Municipal Utility District, “X”, 5%, 2020 | 1,750,000 | 2,160,410 | ||||||
Sam Rayburn, TX, Municipal Power Agency, Power Supply System Rev., 5%, 2014 | 1,000,000 | 1,074,520 | ||||||
Seattle, WA, Municipal Light & Power Rev., “B”, 5%, 2018 | 4,000,000 | 4,823,680 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 59,283,824 |
27
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Utilities - Other - 1.4% | ||||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 2015 | $ | 190,000 | $ | 206,291 | ||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 2016 | 1,175,000 | 1,307,246 | ||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5.125%, 2016 | 1,045,000 | 1,158,748 | ||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., “A”, 5%, 2022 | 2,455,000 | 2,848,708 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,189,170 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2016 | 270,000 | 309,417 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5%, 2017 | 1,350,000 | 1,556,240 | ||||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2018 | 355,000 | 421,108 | ||||||
Long Beach, CA, Bond Finance Authority, Natural Gas Purchase Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2020 | 930,000 | 1,091,327 | ||||||
Nebraska Central Plains Energy Project, Gas Project Rev., 5%, 2020 | 1,710,000 | 1,951,931 | ||||||
Nebraska Central Plains Energy Project, Gas Project Rev., 5%, 2021 | 2,000,000 | 2,274,720 | ||||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., “A”, 5.25%, 2019 | 1,000,000 | 1,140,480 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,455,386 | |||||||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - 7.6% | ||||||||
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., “A”, FGIC, 5.5%, 2014 | $ | 1,185,000 | $ | 1,297,148 | ||||
Birmingham, AL, Waterworks Board Water Rev., 3%, 2015 | 3,730,000 | 3,863,236 | ||||||
Clairton, PA, Municipal Authority, “B”, 2%, 2013 | 425,000 | 428,885 | ||||||
Clairton, PA, Municipal Authority, “B”, 2%, 2014 | 435,000 | 438,619 | ||||||
Clairton, PA, Municipal Authority, “B”, 4%, 2015 | 375,000 | 398,505 | ||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., “A”, 5%, 2017 | 2,000,000 | 2,138,400 | ||||||
Dallas, TX, Waterworks & Sewer Systems Rev., 3%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,106,130 | ||||||
DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, 5%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,238,990 | ||||||
Detroit, MI, Water & Sewerage Department, Sewage Disposal System Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2016 | 2,500,000 | 2,821,500 | ||||||
Fort Worth, TX, Water & Sewer Rev., Refunding & Improvement, 5%, 2020 | 2,940,000 | 3,649,157 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Utilities Systems Rev., NATL, 5.25%, 2014 | 1,485,000 | 1,596,004 | ||||||
Houston, TX, Utilities Systems Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2012 | 1,500,000 | 1,501,995 | ||||||
Los Angeles County, CA, Public Works Financing Authority Lease Rev. (Multiple Capital Project II), 5%, 2018 | 500,000 | 594,360 | ||||||
Los Angeles County, CA, Sanitation Districts Financing Authority Rev. (Capital Projects), “A”, 5%, 2020 | 5,000,000 | 6,304,200 | ||||||
Los Angeles, CA, Wastewater System Rev., “A”, NATL, 5.25%, 2019 | 3,185,000 | 3,272,078 |
28
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - continued | ||||||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Water & Sewer Rev., 4%, 2014 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,067,480 | ||||
Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, Revolving Fund Rev., “C”, 5%, 2019 | 9,215,000 | 11,410,289 | ||||||
Mississippi Development Bank Special Obligation (Hattiesburg Water & Sewer), “N”, AMBAC, 5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,074,830 | ||||||
Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Metropolitan Government Water & Sewer Rev., “A”, AGM, 5%, 2017 | 1,000,000 | 1,175,350 | ||||||
New York Environmental Facilities Corp. Rev., “C”, 5%, 2020 | 3,395,000 | 4,293,011 | ||||||
New York Environmental Facilities Corp. Rev., “C”, 5%, 2020 | 2,825,000 | 3,599,587 | ||||||
New York Environmental Facilities Corp. Rev., “I”, 5%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,029,420 | ||||||
North Hudson, NJ, Sewerage Authority, Gross Rev. Lease Certificates, “A”, 4%, 2017 | 775,000 | 865,760 | ||||||
North Hudson, NJ, Sewerage Authority, Gross Rev. Lease Certificates, “A”, 4%, 2018 | 2,250,000 | 2,552,175 | ||||||
North Hudson, NJ, Sewerage Authority, Gross Rev. Lease Certificates, “A”, 5%, 2019 | 3,580,000 | 4,306,704 | ||||||
Nueces River Authority, Texas Water Supply Rev. (Corpus Christi Project), AGM, 5%, 2013 | 540,000 | 555,935 | ||||||
Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Rev., 5.25%, 2020 | 2,000,000 | 2,549,720 | ||||||
Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Rev. (Water Quality), “A”, 3.25%, 2013 | 1,470,000 | 1,495,799 | ||||||
Phoenix, AZ, Civic Improvement Corp., Water System Rev., FGIC, 5.5%, 2021 | 1,260,000 | 1,634,422 | ||||||
Portland, OR, Sewer System Rev. , “A”, 5%, 2018 | 5,000,000 | 6,042,700 | ||||||
Sebring, FL, Water & Wastewater, ETM, FGIC, 5.25%, 2013 (c) | 690,000 | 695,348 | ||||||
Southern California Metropolitan Water District Rev., “E-3”, 3.5%, 2037 (b) | 4,000,000 | 4,444,920 | ||||||
Virginia Resources Authority, Clean Water Rev., 5%, 2019 | 1,980,000 | 2,368,694 | ||||||
Wisconsin Clean Water Rev., “1”, 3%, 2013 | 1,000,000 | 1,016,060 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 82,827,411 | |||||||
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $1,009,909,125) | $ | 1,053,856,725 | ||||||
Floating Rate Demand Notes - 0.7% | ||||||||
Lincoln County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), “A”, 0.16%, due 11/01/12 | $ | 2,900,000 | $ | 2,900,000 | ||||
Lincoln County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), “B”, 0.16%, due 11/01/12 | 3,200,000 | 3,200,000 | ||||||
Lincoln County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Exxon Mobil Corp.), “C”, 0.16%, due 11/01/12 | 1,600,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||
Total Floating Rate Demand Notes, at Cost and Value | $ | 7,700,000 |
29
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Money Market Funds - 2.4% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.16%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | 25,864,178 | $ | 25,864,178 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $1,043,473,303) | $ | 1,087,420,903 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 0.5% | 5,221,499 | |||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 1,092,642,402 |
(b) | Mandatory tender date is earlier than stated maturity date. |
(c) | Refunded bond. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
ETM | Escrowed to Maturity |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
Insurers | ||
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal | |
AMBAC | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. | |
ASSD GTY | Assured Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
GNMA | Government National Mortgage Assn. | |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | |
PSF | Permanent School Fund | |
RADIAN | Radian Asset Assurance, Inc. | |
SYNCORA | Syncora Guarantee Inc. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $1,017,609,125) | $1,061,556,725 | |||
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | 25,864,178 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $1,043,473,303) | $1,087,420,903 | |||
Cash | 184,365 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 875,000 | |||
Fund shares sold | 8,371,852 | |||
Interest | 11,714,040 | |||
Other assets | 1 | |||
Total assets | $1,108,566,161 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $266,374 | |||
Investments purchased | 12,943,788 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 2,328,271 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 36,958 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 270,329 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 22,302 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 1,451 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 54,286 | |||
Total liabilities | $15,923,759 | |||
Net assets | $1,092,642,402 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $1,048,055,467 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 43,947,600 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | 343,833 | |||
Undistributed net investment income | 295,502 | |||
Net assets | $1,092,642,402 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 132,003,736 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||
Class A | $625,353,111 | 75,536,923 | $8.28 | |||||||||
Class B | 1,631,205 | 197,247 | 8.27 | |||||||||
Class C | 174,378,134 | 21,051,812 | 8.28 | |||||||||
Class I | 291,279,952 | 35,217,754 | 8.27 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $8.49 [100 / 97.50 x $8.28]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $13,792,559 | |||
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | 32,582 | |||
Total investment income | $13,825,141 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $1,997,736 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 1,559,622 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 397,691 | |||
Administrative services fee | 75,171 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 10,012 | |||
Custodian fee | 61,575 | |||
Shareholder communications | 21,710 | |||
Audit and tax fees | 23,662 | |||
Legal fees | 5,800 | |||
Miscellaneous | 110,288 | |||
Total expenses | $4,263,267 | |||
Fees paid indirectly | (2 | ) | ||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | (297,453 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $3,965,812 | |||
Net investment income | $9,859,329 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) on investments (identified cost basis) | $479,294 | |||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | $4,510,527 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $4,989,821 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $14,849,150 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited) | Year ended | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $9,859,329 | $17,581,801 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 479,294 | 2,658,429 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 4,510,527 | 26,372,287 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $14,849,150 | $46,612,517 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(9,449,277 | ) | $(17,359,066 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $167,077,956 | $162,182,970 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $172,477,829 | $191,436,421 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 920,164,573 | 728,728,152 | ||||||
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $295,502 and accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $114,550, respectively) | $1,092,642,402 | $920,164,573 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $8.23 | $7.93 | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.09 | $0.19 | $0.19 | $0.22 | $0.25 | $0.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | 0.30 | (0.00 | )(w) | 0.22 | 0.05 | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.13 | $0.49 | $0.19 | $0.44 | $0.30 | $0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.08 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | $(0.26 | ) | $(0.28 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $8.28 | $8.23 | $7.93 | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.63 | (n) | 6.20 | 2.41 | 5.80 | 3.99 | 3.25 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.79 | (a) | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.78 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.69 | (a) | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.63 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.08 | (a) | 2.33 | 2.41 | 2.84 | 3.33 | 3.53 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 5 | (n) | 17 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $625,353 | $563,330 | $589,476 | $482,962 | $214,796 | $124,161 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $8.22 | $7.92 | $7.92 | $7.70 | $7.66 | $7.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.06 | $0.13 | $0.13 | $0.17 | $0.20 | $0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | 0.30 | (0.00 | )(w) | 0.21 | 0.04 | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.10 | $0.43 | $0.13 | $0.38 | $0.24 | $0.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.05 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $8.27 | $8.22 | $7.92 | $7.92 | $7.70 | $7.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.25 | (n) | 5.42 | 1.65 | 5.03 | 3.22 | 2.46 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.54 | (a) | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.54 | 1.52 | 1.53 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.45 | (a) | 1.45 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.37 | 1.38 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.34 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.68 | 2.19 | 2.63 | 2.79 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 5 | (n) | 17 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,631 | $1,856 | $3,312 | $6,231 | $10,486 | $10,454 |
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $8.24 | $7.94 | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | $7.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.05 | $0.12 | $0.12 | $0.16 | $0.19 | $0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.01 | (g) | 0.21 | 0.04 | (0.04 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.09 | $0.42 | $0.13 | $0.37 | $0.23 | $0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.05 | ) | $(0.12 | ) | $(0.12 | ) | $(0.15 | ) | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.21 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $8.28 | $8.24 | $7.94 | $7.93 | $7.71 | $7.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 1.07 | (n) | 5.29 | 1.67 | 4.90 | 3.11 | 2.24 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 1.54 | (a) | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.62 | 1.63 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 1.54 | (a) | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.48 | 1.48 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.23 | (a) | 1.47 | 1.56 | 1.98 | 2.46 | 2.68 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 5 | (n) | 17 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $174,378 | $150,584 | $121,803 | $111,259 | $44,185 | $21,959 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||
Class I | 2012 | 2011 (i) | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $8.23 | $7.93 | $8.09 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.09 | $0.20 | $0.13 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.04 | (g) | 0.30 | (0.16 | )(g) | |||||||
Total from investment operations | $0.13 | $0.50 | $(0.03 | ) | ||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.09 | ) | $(0.20 | ) | $(0.13 | ) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period (x) | $8.27 | $8.23 | $7.93 | |||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 1.58 | (n) | 6.35 | (0.32 | )(n) | |||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | 0.54 | (a) | 0.54 | 0.56 | (a) | |||||||
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | 0.54 | (a) | 0.54 | 0.53 | (a) | |||||||
Net investment income | 2.22 | (a) | 2.40 | 2.55 | (a) | |||||||
Portfolio turnover | 5 | (n) | 17 | 9 | ||||||||
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | $291,280 | $204,394 | $14,138 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(g) | The per share amount varies from the net realized and unrealized gain/loss for the period because of the timing of sales of fund shares and the per share amount of realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(i) | For the period from the class I inception, August 30, 2010, through the stated period end. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net asset values which include adjustments made in accordance with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests primarily in municipal instruments. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuer’s future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, the security could decline in value, interest from the security could become taxable and the funds may be required to issue Forms 1099-DIV.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 seeks to improve the comparability of fair value measurements as presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by providing common requirements for fair value measurement and disclosure.
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods, ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosure requirements on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2011-11 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
37
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar
38
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2012 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $— | $1,053,856,725 | $— | $1,053,856,725 | ||||||||||||
Short Term Securities | — | 7,700,000 | — | 7,700,000 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 25,864,178 | — | — | 25,864,178 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $25,864,178 | $1,061,556,725 | $— | $1,087,420,903 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the six months ended October 31, 2012, is shown as a reduction of total expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order
39
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/12 | ||||
Tax-exempt income | $17,359,066 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/12 | ||||
Cost of investments | $1,042,180,077 | |||
Gross appreciation | 46,059,877 | |||
Gross depreciation | (819,051 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $45,240,826 | |||
As of 4/30/12 | ||||
Undistributed tax-exempt income | 1,409,957 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (1,010,481 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (1,524,507 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 40,312,093 |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized after April 30, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of April 30, 2012, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
Pre-enactment losses: | ||||
4/30/16 | $(159,517 | ) | ||
4/30/17 | (616,758 | ) | ||
4/30/18 | (234,206 | ) | ||
Total | $(1,010,481 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and
40
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B will convert to Class A shares, respectively, approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/12 | Year ended 4/30/12 (i) | |||||||
Class A | $5,894,245 | $13,927,762 | ||||||
Class B | 11,030 | 39,523 | ||||||
Class C | 931,486 | 1,904,360 | ||||||
Class I | 2,612,516 | 1,487,421 | ||||||
Total | $9,449,277 | $17,359,066 |
(i) | For Class I, the period is from inception, August 30, 2010, through the stated period end. |
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.40% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s operating expenses, exclusive of management fee, distribution and service fees, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses, such that operating expenses do not exceed 0.15% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until August 31, 2013. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fund’s actual operating expenses did not exceed the limit and therefore, the investment adviser did not pay any portion of the fund’s expenses related to this agreement.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $120,436 for the six months ended October 31, 2012, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | $737,176 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.91% | 8,743 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 813,703 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $1,559,622 |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2012 based on each class’ average daily net assets. 0.10% of the Class A service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $294,866 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. For one year from date of purchase of Class B shares, assets attributable to such Class B shares are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B shares, 0.15% of the Class B service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class B service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $832 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. These written waiver agreements will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreements will continue at least until August 31, 2013. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $82,172 | |||
Class B | 3,059 | |||
Class C | 19,027 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fee was $67,211, which equated to 0.0134% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $330,480.
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0150% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. The DB plan resulted in a net decrease pension expense of $13 and is included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the six months ended October 31, 2012. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under the DB plan amounted to $3,776 at October 31, 2012, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $3,995 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $1,755, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities and short-term obligations, aggregated $227,726,618 and $49,053,545, respectively.
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/12 | Year ended 4/30/12 (i) | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 16,135,446 | $133,299,766 | 35,564,094 | $288,496,210 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 14,099 | 116,324 | 75,960 | 613,979 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 4,412,482 | 36,473,633 | 6,150,308 | 50,032,037 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 13,978,498 | 115,389,337 | 26,342,546 | 215,361,960 | ||||||||||||
34,540,525 | $285,279,060 | 68,132,908 | $554,504,186 | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 609,522 | $5,037,714 | 1,339,652 | $10,874,871 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 957 | 7,897 | 3,329 | 26,959 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 81,994 | 678,065 | 154,917 | 1,258,125 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 234,724 | 1,938,189 | 114,089 | 931,266 | ||||||||||||
927,197 | $7,661,865 | 1,611,987 | $13,091,221 | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (9,631,018 | ) | $(79,537,374 | ) | (42,779,854 | ) | $(348,193,636 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (43,497 | ) | (358,869 | ) | (271,524 | ) | (2,198,366 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (1,722,483 | ) | (14,240,012 | ) | (3,369,790 | ) | (27,302,987 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (3,844,155 | ) | (31,726,714 | ) | (3,391,308 | ) | (27,717,448 | ) | ||||||||
(15,241,153 | ) | $(125,862,969 | ) | (49,812,476 | ) | $(405,412,437 | ) | |||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 7,113,950 | $58,800,106 | (5,876,108 | ) | $(48,822,555 | ) | ||||||||||
Class B | (28,441 | ) | (234,648 | ) | (192,235 | ) | (1,557,428 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | 2,771,993 | 22,911,686 | 2,935,435 | 23,987,175 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 10,369,067 | 85,600,812 | 23,065,327 | 188,575,778 | ||||||||||||
20,226,569 | $167,077,956 | 19,932,419 | $162,182,970 |
(i) | For Class I, the period is from inception, August 30, 2010, through the stated period end. |
Effective May 1, 2006, the sale of Class B shares of the fund have been suspended except in certain circumstances. Please see the fund’s prospectus for details.
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings,
44
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $3,011 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 44,131,623 | 174,101,166 | (192,368,611 | ) | 25,864,178 | |||||||||||
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $32,582 | $25,864,178 |
45
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2012 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2011 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to
46
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 1st quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 2nd quintile for each of the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2011 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, and that MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (“MFD”), an affiliate of MFS, currently observes a Class A 12b-1 fee waiver, each of which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that
47
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts, if any. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account the expense limitation noted above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFD. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
48
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2012.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
49
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
50
Table of Contents
Save paper with eDelivery.
MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Table of Contents
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
October 31, 2012
MFS® RESEARCH BOND FUND
RBF-SEM
Table of Contents
MFS® RESEARCH BOND FUND
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
Table of Contents
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
As 2012 winds down, economic uncertainty continues to dominate world financial markets. In the United States, all eyes are riveted to the ongoing budget deal
negotiations and the specter of a “fiscal cliff.” Overseas, we see growth slowing in China and Japan, and the eurozone has entered its second recession in four years against a backdrop of double-digit unemployment and the continuing sovereign debt crisis.
Amidst the instability, there are silver linings — especially in the U.S. where the labor and housing markets have picked up, consumer confidence has risen and industrial output has increased. Additionally, a U.S. budgetary compromise could propel markets, unleashing pent-up spending and investments, which would help to revive both the U.S. and global economies.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, an emphasis on global research and our disciplined risk management approach anchor our uniquely collaborative investment process. Our global team of more than 200 investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines, and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results — for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges we face locally, nationally and globally. It is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view, employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification, and work closely with investment advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 14, 2012
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
Table of Contents
Portfolio structure (i)
Fixed income sectors (i) | ||||
High Grade Corporates | 37.5% | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 24.8% | |||
U.S. Treasury Securities | 12.2% | |||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 7.0% | |||
High Yield Corporates | 3.8% | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | 3.6% | |||
Emerging Markets Bonds | 2.6% | |||
U.S. Government Agencies | 2.3% | |||
Collateralized Debt Obligations | 1.7% | |||
Non-U.S. Government Bonds | 0.8% | |||
Municipal Bonds | 0.2% |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | ||||
AAA | 5.9% | |||
AA | 2.6% | |||
A | 13.7% | |||
BBB | 29.8% | |||
BB | 3.6% | |||
B | 0.7% | |||
CCC | 0.4% | |||
CC | 0.2% | |||
C | 0.1% | |||
D | 0.1% | |||
U.S. Government | 15.1% | |||
Federal Agencies | 27.1% | |||
Not Rated | (2.8)% | |||
Cash & Other | 3.5% | |||
Portfolio facts (i) | ||||
Average Duration (d) | 4.5 | |||
Average Effective Maturity (m) | 6.6 yrs. |
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Government includes securities issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Agencies includes rated and unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities, U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
2
Table of Contents
Portfolio Composition – continued
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/12.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
Table of Contents
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period,
May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012.
The expenses include the payment of a portion of the transfer agent-related expenses of MFS funds that invest in the fund. For further information, please see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
4
Table of Contents
Expense Table – continued
Share Class | Annualized Ratio | Beginning Account Value 5/01/12 | Ending Account Value 10/31/12 | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/12-10/31/12 | ||||||||||||||
A | Actual | 0.81% | $1,000.00 | $1,044.87 | $4.17 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.81% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.12 | $4.13 | ||||||||||||||
B | Actual | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,040.93 | $7.97 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.55% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.39 | $7.88 | ||||||||||||||
C | Actual | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,040.43 | $8.49 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.89 | $8.39 | ||||||||||||||
I | Actual | 0.66% | $1,000.00 | $1,045.62 | $3.40 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.66% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.88 | $3.36 | ||||||||||||||
R1 | Actual | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,040.43 | $8.49 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.65% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.89 | $8.39 | ||||||||||||||
R2 | Actual | 1.16% | $1,000.00 | $1,043.07 | $5.97 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.16% | $1,000.00 | $1,019.36 | $5.90 | ||||||||||||||
R3 | Actual | 0.91% | $1,000.00 | $1,044.35 | $4.69 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.91% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.62 | $4.63 | ||||||||||||||
R4 | Actual | 0.66% | $1,000.00 | $1,045.65 | $3.40 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.66% | $1,000.00 | $1,021.88 | $3.36 | ||||||||||||||
R5 (formerly W) | Actual | 0.57% | $1,000.00 | $1,045.90 | $2.94 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.57% | $1,000.00 | $1,022.33 | $2.91 | ||||||||||||||
529A | Actual | 0.86% | $1,000.00 | $1,044.66 | $4.43 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 0.86% | $1,000.00 | $1,020.87 | $4.38 | ||||||||||||||
529B | Actual | 1.70% | $1,000.00 | $1,040.17 | $8.74 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.70% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.64 | $8.64 | ||||||||||||||
529C | Actual | 1.70% | $1,000.00 | $1,041.13 | $8.75 | |||||||||||||
Hypothetical (h) | 1.70% | $1,000.00 | $1,016.64 | $8.64 |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’ annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
Expense Changes Impacting the Table
As further discussed in Note 5 in the Notes to Financial Statements, the Class W shares were redesignated Class R5 on May 30, 2012 which resulted in changes to the fund’s fee agreements. Class R5 shares are generally available only to certain eligible retirement plans and to the funds distributed by MFD. Class R5 shares do not pay a 12b-1 distribution fee or sub-accounting costs.
5
Table of Contents
10/31/12 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Bonds - 98.7% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Aerospace - 0.4% | ||||||||
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 2020 (n) | $ | 7,300,000 | $ | 8,531,875 | ||||
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 6.875%, 2018 | 5,390,000 | 5,821,185 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 14,353,060 | |||||||
Airlines - 0.3% | ||||||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., FRN, 0.768%, 2013 | $ | 9,127,034 | $ | 8,944,494 | ||||
Apparel Manufacturers - 0.2% | ||||||||
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | $ | 5,950,000 | $ | 6,664,000 | ||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 12.3% | ||||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.571%, 2019 (z) | $ | 6,968,552 | $ | 6,794,338 | ||||
Anthracite Ltd., “BFL”, CDO, FRN, 1.211%, 2037 (z) | 1,846,356 | 1,841,740 | ||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “CFL”, CDO, FRN, 1.461%, 2037 (z) | 1,122,780 | 1,004,888 | ||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO III, 6.077%, 2039 (a)(p)(z) | 5,531,537 | 276,577 | ||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, FRN, 1.061%, 2037 (z) | 9,178,646 | 8,788,554 | ||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “F”, FRN, 5.992%, 2045 (a)(d)(z) | 1,852,256 | 185 | ||||||
ARI Fleet Lease Trust, “A”, FRN, 0.764%, 2020 (n) | 6,596,541 | 6,616,357 | ||||||
ARI Fleet Lease Trust, “A”, FRN, 0.51%, 2021 (n) | 8,421,000 | 8,423,383 | ||||||
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., 5.338%, 2043 (z) | 9,482,898 | 10,124,463 | ||||||
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.625%, 2049 (z) | 2,193,253 | 2,462,738 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.521%, 2035 (z) | 576,385 | 420,838 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.481%, 2036 (z) | 450,427 | 342,749 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.816%, 2036 (i)(z) | 13,826,473 | 120,241 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.175%, 2036 (i)(z) | 13,858,449 | 211,621 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.904%, 2036 (i)(z) | 23,423,838 | 695,250 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.825%, 2036 (i)(z) | 11,444,745 | 467,836 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 4.049%, 2037 (i)(z) | 25,457,219 | 1,128,445 | ||||||
Bayview Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Trust, FRN, 2.93%, 2036 (i)(z) | 9,654,663 | 107,664 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.638%, 2036 | 1,500,000 | 1,451,133 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2041 | 1,666,913 | 1,666,865 | ||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.811%, 2040 (z) | 3,286,140 | 2,130,624 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (n) | 5,639,878 | 5,745,908 | ||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.267%, 2035 (z) | 7,074,200 | 7,136,453 | ||||||
Chesapeake Funding LLC, “A”, FRN, 0.969%, 2023 (z) | 8,280,000 | 8,299,963 |
6
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, 5.322%, 2049 | $ | 28,251,642 | $ | 32,467,804 | ||||
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.219%, 2044 | 400,000 | 442,064 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.648%, 2032 (i)(z) | 10,935,293 | 68,510 | ||||||
Countrywide Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.372%, 2036 | 789,686 | 652,037 | ||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 2.2%, 2019 (z) | 3,714,000 | 3,737,324 | ||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 1.52%, 2020 (n) | 5,595,000 | 5,595,509 | ||||||
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificate, 5.311%, 2039 | 7,531,000 | 8,589,535 | ||||||
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificate, FRN, 5.694%, 2040 | 1,275,594 | 1,344,064 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, 5.303%, 2035 | 1,127,982 | 1,041,739 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 5.007%, 2037 (d)(q) | 1,832,182 | 799,934 | ||||||
Credit-Based Asset Servicing & Securitization LLC, FRN, 4.894%, 2037 (d)(q) | 2,228,545 | 1,057,977 | ||||||
Crest G-Star, CDO, 6.95%, 2032 (z) | 4,645,997 | 4,680,842 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A1” CDO, FRN, 0.842%, 2018 (z) | 2,796,881 | 2,740,944 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 (z) | 858,576 | 868,235 | ||||||
Crest Ltd., “B”, CDO, FRN, 1.663%, 2035 (z) | 678,524 | 675,131 | ||||||
CWCapital Cobalt Ltd., “A4”, FRN, 5.804%, 2046 | 7,960,070 | 9,325,938 | ||||||
CWCapital LLC, 5.223%, 2048 | 6,335,000 | 7,106,077 | ||||||
DLJ Commercial Mortgage Corp., FRN, 7.95%, 2033 | 431,005 | 430,387 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 5.51%, 2023 (i)(z) | 137,558 | 13,068 | ||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 5.905%, 2025 (i)(z) | 2,458,460 | 385,978 | ||||||
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage, FRN, 1.573%, 2043 (i)(z) | 1,648,216 | 2,148 | ||||||
First Union-Lehman Brothers Bank of America, FRN, 0.452%, 2035 (i) | 4,653,341 | 79,484 | ||||||
Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner, “A”, FRN, 0.564%, 2016 | 14,401,000 | 14,401,000 | ||||||
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corp., “A”, 5.543%, 2049 | 3,400,691 | 3,893,676 | ||||||
GE Equipment Transportation LLC, “A2”, 0.77%, 2013 | 370,539 | 370,612 | ||||||
GE Equipment Transportation LLC, “A2”, 0.77%, 2014 | 6,794,787 | 6,807,622 | ||||||
GMAC Mortgage Corp. Loan Trust, FRN, 5.805%, 2036 | 1,943,307 | 1,657,423 | ||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.635%, 2035 (z) | 629,156 | 585,115 | ||||||
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp., 5.736%, 2049 | 13,530,667 | 15,916,502 | ||||||
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 (n) | 5,998,000 | 6,128,037 | ||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 0.951%, 2034 | 184,917 | 169,723 | ||||||
IMPAC CMB Trust, FRN, 1.131%, 2034 | 92,458 | 77,285 | ||||||
IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., FRN, 0.561%, 2036 | 692,068 | 683,929 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 4.865%, 2046 | 2,195,695 | 2,254,169 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A3”, FRN, 5.813%, 2049 | 15,661,513 | 16,880,245 |
7
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A3”, FRN, 5.971%, 2051 | $ | 21,360,633 | $ | 22,777,377 | ||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A4”, FRN, 5.813%, 2049 | 20,920,833 | 24,496,977 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.436%, 2042 (n) | 4,180,000 | 706,165 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.728%, 2049 | 2,662,741 | 3,138,602 | ||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “A1”, FRN, 0.584%, 2017 (z) | 1,722,532 | 1,698,765 | ||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “C”, FRN, 1.76%, 2021 (n) | 7,811,290 | 6,795,822 | ||||||
LB Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.415%, 2035 (i) | 2,087,815 | 83,511 | ||||||
Mach One Trust Commercial Mortgage, CDO, “B”, 5.43%, 2040 (z) | 5,198,000 | 5,191,503 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., 5.45%, 2037 (d)(q) | 2,404,560 | 550,469 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, “A3”, FRN, 5.847%, 2050 | 8,250,000 | 8,840,717 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.728%, 2050 | 22,016,127 | 25,170,642 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.095%, 2031 (i)(z) | 1,089,035 | 3,655 | ||||||
Nationslink Funding Corp., FRN, 1.371%, 2030 (i) | 722,125 | 5,752 | ||||||
Option One Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 5.611%, 2037 | 1,280,000 | 815,964 | ||||||
Ownit Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.29%, 2036 (d)(q) | 1,110,535 | 566,374 | ||||||
Preferred Term Securities XIX Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.739%, 2035 (z) | 7,625,014 | 5,185,010 | ||||||
Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., FRN, 4.971%, 2034 | 953,842 | 956,526 | ||||||
Residential Funding Mortgage Securities, Inc., FRN, 5.32%, 2035 | 8,795,000 | 5,275,162 | ||||||
Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities, Inc., FRN, 7.158%, 2032 (z) | 2,537,767 | 2,571,669 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivable Trust, “A2”, 0.91%, 2015 | 5,795,841 | 5,812,568 | ||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivable Trust, “A2”, 0.57%, 2015 | 11,681,000 | 11,690,859 | ||||||
Smart Trust, “A2B”, FRN, 0.759%, 2014 (n) | 10,638,000 | 10,654,155 | ||||||
Smart Trust, “A2B”, FRN, 0.764%, 2015 (z) | 17,816,000 | 17,823,180 | ||||||
Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust, FRN, 0.891%, 2043 | 28,084 | 27,834 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, “A3”, FRN, 5.923%, 2051 | 2,118,681 | 2,231,586 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, “A4”, FRN, 5.923%, 2051 | 10,682,873 | 12,680,602 | ||||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.75%, 2049 | 19,188,501 | 22,051,138 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 425,991,464 | |||||||
Automotive - 1.1% | ||||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 3.984%, 2016 | $ | 3,677,000 | $ | 3,897,216 | ||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 8%, 2016 | 3,365,000 | 4,075,116 | ||||||
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 5%, 2018 | 3,303,000 | 3,643,354 |
8
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Automotive - continued | ||||||||
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, 3.875%, 2016 (n) | $ | 9,522,000 | $ | 10,288,112 | ||||
Hyundai Capital America, 3.75%, 2016 (n) | 1,449,000 | 1,533,412 | ||||||
Hyundai Capital America, 2.125%, 2017 (n) | 4,734,000 | 4,758,181 | ||||||
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 2020 | 5,346,000 | 5,940,743 | ||||||
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 1.95%, 2017 (n) | 4,144,000 | 4,206,570 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 38,342,704 | |||||||
Banks & Diversified Financials (Covered Bonds) - 0.2% | ||||||||
Compagnie de Financement Foncier, 2.125%, 2013 (n) | $ | 5,800,000 | $ | 5,841,180 | ||||
Biotechnology - 0.3% | ||||||||
Life Technologies Corp., 5%, 2021 | $ | 10,129,000 | $ | 11,562,183 | ||||
Broadcasting - 0.8% | ||||||||
Discovery Communications, Inc., 4.95%, 2042 | $ | 5,225,000 | $ | 5,890,263 | ||||
NBCUniversal Media LLC, 5.95%, 2041 | 7,613,000 | 9,480,949 | ||||||
News America, Inc., 8.5%, 2025 | 120,000 | 165,837 | ||||||
Vivendi S.A., 4.75%, 2022 (n) | 6,166,000 | 6,422,506 | ||||||
WPP Finance, 3.625%, 2022 | 5,113,000 | 5,240,222 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 27,199,777 | |||||||
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.5% | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc., 3.375%, 2022 | $ | 2,539,000 | $ | 2,714,544 | ||||
Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. LLC, 4.75%, 2023 (n) | 845,000 | 906,333 | ||||||
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 12.5%, 2017 | 7,051,000 | 7,985,258 | ||||||
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., 5.6%, 2019 | 5,512,000 | 6,458,840 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 18,064,975 | |||||||
Building - 0.3% | ||||||||
Owens Corning, Inc., 6.5%, 2016 | $ | 8,981,000 | $ | 10,109,373 | ||||
Owens Corning, Inc., 4.2%, 2022 | 1,978,000 | 1,999,244 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 12,108,617 | |||||||
Business Services - 0.2% | ||||||||
Tencent Holdings Ltd., 3.375%, 2018 (n) | $ | 6,299,000 | $ | 6,425,364 | ||||
Cable TV - 1.6% | ||||||||
CCO Holdings LLC, 7.875%, 2018 | $ | 7,420,000 | $ | 8,013,600 | ||||
Cox Communications, Inc., 4.625%, 2013 | 600,000 | 614,810 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 5.2%, 2020 | 6,220,000 | 7,163,705 | ||||||
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 3.8%, 2022 | 10,588,000 | 11,031,849 | ||||||
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | 2,886,000 | 3,268,395 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 4.125%, 2021 | 3,072,000 | 3,427,028 | ||||||
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 4%, 2021 | 2,720,000 | 3,021,575 |
9
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Cable TV - continued | ||||||||
Time Warner Entertainment Co. LP, 8.375%, 2033 | $ | 5,117,000 | $ | 7,601,856 | ||||
Videotron Ltee, 5%, 2022 | 4,940,000 | 5,112,900 | ||||||
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 5.25%, 2022 | 7,115,000 | 7,435,175 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 56,690,893 | |||||||
Chemicals - 0.6% | ||||||||
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | $ | 7,900,000 | $ | 10,713,245 | ||||
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 6%, 2021 | 290,000 | 335,313 | ||||||
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 5.75%, 2024 | 6,990,000 | 8,090,925 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,139,483 | |||||||
Conglomerates - 0.2% | ||||||||
General Electric Co., 4.125%, 2042 | $ | 5,234,000 | $ | 5,484,494 | ||||
Consumer Products - 0.5% | ||||||||
Clorox Co., 3.05%, 2022 | $ | 3,121,000 | $ | 3,230,066 | ||||
Mattel, Inc., 5.45%, 2041 | 3,828,000 | 4,523,115 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 5.5%, 2013 | 5,547,000 | 5,656,747 | ||||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 2020 | 3,887,000 | 4,331,922 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 17,741,850 | |||||||
Consumer Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
eBay, Inc., 2.6%, 2022 | $ | 7,232,000 | $ | 7,386,801 | ||||
Experian Finance PLC, 2.375%, 2017 (n) | 5,923,000 | 6,063,754 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 13,450,555 | |||||||
Containers - 0.2% | ||||||||
Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | $ | 5,615,000 | $ | 6,443,213 | ||||
Defense Electronics - 0.1% | ||||||||
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.375%, 2019 (n) | $ | 2,705,000 | $ | 3,257,269 | ||||
Electrical Equipment - 0.2% | ||||||||
Ericsson, Inc., 4.125%, 2022 | $ | 6,066,000 | $ | 6,367,850 | ||||
Electronics - 0.1% | ||||||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 6.55%, 2017 | $ | 3,194,000 | $ | 3,825,965 | ||||
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 3.5%, 2022 | 1,340,000 | 1,395,239 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 5,221,204 | |||||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.3% | ||||||||
Banco do Brasil S.A., 5.875%, 2022 | $ | 3,130,000 | $ | 3,396,050 | ||||
Banco do Brasil S.A., 3.875%, 2022 | 200,000 | 199,400 | ||||||
Caixa Economica Federal, 3.5%, 2022 (z) | 154,000 | 154,020 |
10
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - continued | ||||||||
CEZ A.S., 4.25%, 2022 (n) | $ | 4,813,000 | $ | 5,154,723 | ||||
CNPC (HK) Overseas Capital Ltd., 4.5%, 2021 (n) | 6,736,000 | 7,548,631 | ||||||
Gaz Capital S.A., 4.95%, 2022 (n) | 241,000 | 255,608 | ||||||
Gazprom, 4.375%, 2022 (n) | 1,606,000 | 1,610,015 | ||||||
Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 2021 | 5,927,000 | 6,721,550 | ||||||
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 2022 | 2,900,000 | 3,248,000 | ||||||
Petroleos Mexicanos, 6.5%, 2041 | 5,234,000 | 6,496,703 | ||||||
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 2044 (z) | 83,000 | 90,470 | ||||||
PTT PLC, 3.375%, 2022 (z) | 6,964,000 | 6,870,411 | ||||||
PTT PLC, 4.5%, 2042 (z) | 2,369,000 | 2,355,838 | ||||||
Turkiye Vakiflar Bankasi, 6%, 2022 (z) | 351,000 | 351,585 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 44,453,004 | |||||||
Energy - Independent - 1.5% | ||||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.375%, 2017 | $ | 1,604,000 | $ | 1,944,470 | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., 6.95%, 2019 | 4,110,000 | 5,236,399 | ||||||
EOG Resources, Inc., 2.625%, 2023 | 4,541,000 | 4,648,426 | ||||||
EQT Corp., 4.875%, 2021 | 2,296,000 | 2,485,666 | ||||||
Nexen, Inc., 7.5%, 2039 | 2,990,000 | 4,289,636 | ||||||
Noble Energy, Inc., 4.15%, 2021 | 9,910,000 | 10,924,031 | ||||||
Pioneer Natural Resources Co., 6.65%, 2017 | 7,190,000 | 8,557,869 | ||||||
Southwestern Energy Co., 7.5%, 2018 | 6,187,000 | 7,640,295 | ||||||
Southwestern Energy Co., 4.1%, 2022 (n) | 4,484,000 | 4,851,087 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 50,577,879 | |||||||
Energy - Integrated - 0.8% | ||||||||
BG Energy Capital PLC, 2.875%, 2016 (n) | $ | 6,908,000 | $ | 7,356,571 | ||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc., 4.45%, 2042 | 6,971,000 | 7,521,897 | ||||||
Total Capital International S.A., 1.55%, 2017 | 8,593,000 | 8,775,343 | ||||||
Total Capital International S.A., 2.7%, 2023 | 4,187,000 | 4,336,685 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 27,990,496 | |||||||
Financial Institutions - 1.6% | ||||||||
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 2018 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 318,750 | ||||
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2019 (n) | 7,342,000 | 7,828,408 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 4.65%, 2021 | 6,757,000 | 7,645,593 | ||||||
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.15%, 2022 | 8,589,000 | 8,737,495 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 5.75%, 2016 | 5,264,000 | 5,558,194 | ||||||
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 2018 (n) | 5,888,000 | 6,918,400 | ||||||
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 9.625%, 2019 (n) | 3,030,000 | 3,348,150 | ||||||
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 9.625%, 2019 (n) | 695,000 | 764,500 | ||||||
NYSE Euronext, 2%, 2017 | 4,518,000 | 4,599,871 | ||||||
SLM Corp., 6.25%, 2016 | 3,318,000 | 3,583,606 | ||||||
SLM Corp., 6%, 2017 | 2,065,000 | 2,240,525 |
11
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Financial Institutions - continued | ||||||||
SLM Corp., 4.625%, 2017 | $ | 4,772,000 | $ | 4,896,029 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 56,439,521 | |||||||
Food & Beverages - 1.9% | ||||||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.75%, 2019 | $ | 9,724,000 | $ | 13,191,860 | ||||
Campbell Soup Co., 3.8%, 2042 | 4,096,000 | 4,151,513 | ||||||
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V., 4.5%, 2022 (n) | 4,886,000 | 5,374,825 | ||||||
Heineken N.V., 2.75%, 2023 (n) | 6,478,000 | 6,544,782 | ||||||
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 (n) | 1,212,000 | 1,486,686 | ||||||
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 5%, 2042 (z) | 5,648,000 | 6,596,135 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | 2,538,000 | 3,129,379 | ||||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 1,104,000 | 1,355,046 | ||||||
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., “A”, 4.9%, 2019 | 3,146,000 | 3,641,382 | ||||||
Molson Coors Brewing Co., 5%, 2042 | 5,422,000 | 6,238,266 | ||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., 6.6%, 2016 | 8,949,000 | 10,314,886 | ||||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., 4.5%, 2022 | 4,645,000 | 4,923,700 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 66,948,460 | |||||||
Food & Drug Stores - 0.2% | ||||||||
Walgreen Co., 3.1%, 2022 | $ | 5,862,000 | $ | 5,968,853 | ||||
Forest & Paper Products - 0.5% | ||||||||
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 5.4%, 2020 (n) | $ | 7,582,000 | $ | 8,998,704 | ||||
Smurfit Kappa Group PLC, 4.875%, 2018 (n) | 6,695,000 | 6,695,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,693,704 | |||||||
Gaming & Lodging - 0.3% | ||||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 6%, 2016 | $ | 93,000 | $ | 104,129 | ||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | 3,010,000 | 3,609,736 | ||||||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 4.25%, 2022 | 5,675,000 | 5,919,865 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 9,633,730 | |||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 0.2% | ||||||||
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 3.5%, 2022 | $ | 7,059,000 | $ | 7,443,447 | ||||
Insurance - 1.5% | ||||||||
American International Group, Inc., 4.875%, 2016 | $ | 4,739,000 | $ | 5,298,605 | ||||
American International Group, Inc., 3.8%, 2017 | 6,986,000 | 7,536,685 | ||||||
American International Group, Inc., 6.4%, 2020 | 8,214,000 | 10,087,597 | ||||||
MetLife, Inc., 5.375%, 2012 | 300,000 | 301,642 | ||||||
Metlife, Inc., 1.756%, 2017 | 1,279,000 | 1,299,832 | ||||||
Metlife, Inc., 4.125%, 2042 | 4,069,000 | 4,118,479 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 5.125%, 2013 (n) | 6,580,000 | 6,711,942 | ||||||
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | 2,570,000 | 2,750,936 |
12
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Insurance - continued | ||||||||
Unum Group, 7.125%, 2016 | $ | 2,220,000 | $ | 2,615,307 | ||||
UnumProvident Corp., 6.85%, 2015 (n) | 11,413,000 | 12,805,797 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 53,526,822 | |||||||
Insurance - Health - 0.4% | ||||||||
Humana, Inc., 7.2%, 2018 | $ | 9,203,000 | $ | 11,391,510 | ||||
Wellpoint Inc., 4.65%, 2043 | 3,697,000 | 3,969,694 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 15,361,204 | |||||||
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 1.8% | ||||||||
Allied World Assurance, 5.5%, 2020 | $ | 3,670,000 | $ | 4,085,800 | ||||
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | 5,360,000 | 5,756,292 | ||||||
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 2020 | 6,990,000 | 8,222,798 | ||||||
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2042 (z) | 4,114,000 | 4,688,508 | ||||||
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., 4.8%, 2021 | 10,943,000 | 12,397,445 | ||||||
PartnerRe Ltd., 5.5%, 2020 | 4,882,000 | 5,394,454 | ||||||
QBE Capital Funding III Ltd., FRN, 7.25%, 2041 (n) | 7,155,000 | 7,476,975 | ||||||
XL Group PLC, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2049 | 7,039,000 | 6,528,673 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust II, 6.45% to 2016, FRN to 2065 (n) | 2,405,000 | 2,585,375 | ||||||
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2067 (n) | 6,524,000 | 6,964,370 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 64,100,690 | |||||||
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 0.8% | ||||||||
Achmea Hypotheekbank N.V., 3.2%, 2014 (n) | $ | 2,875,000 | $ | 3,009,924 | ||||
FIH Erhvervsbank A.S., 1.75%, 2012 (z) | 3,821,000 | 3,825,585 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 3.9%, 2014 (n) | 6,800,000 | 7,101,723 | ||||||
NIBC Bank N.V., 2.8%, 2014 (z) | 4,940,000 | 5,141,226 | ||||||
Societe Financement de l’ Economie Francaise, 3.375%, 2014 (n) | 7,905,000 | 8,243,160 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 27,321,618 | |||||||
Local Authorities - 0.7% | ||||||||
State of California (Build America Bonds), 7.625%, 2040 | $ | 1,360,000 | $ | 1,901,742 | ||||
State of California (Build America Bonds), 7.6%, 2040 | 10,440,000 | 14,739,088 | ||||||
State of Illinois (Build America Bonds), 6.63%, 2035 | 6,805,000 | 7,758,789 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 24,399,619 | |||||||
Machinery & Tools - 0.3% | ||||||||
Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 2017 | $ | 8,995,000 | $ | 10,569,125 | ||||
Major Banks - 5.7% | ||||||||
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., 4.25%, 2017 (n) | $ | 7,822,000 | $ | 8,478,813 | ||||
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 2015 (n) | 7,100,000 | 7,145,227 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.5%, 2016 | 1,460,000 | 1,698,073 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 2018 | 19,525,000 | 22,731,923 |
13
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Major Banks - continued | ||||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.625%, 2020 | $ | 2,505,000 | $ | 2,922,601 | ||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.875%, 2021 | 4,930,000 | 5,779,656 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5%, 2021 | 4,805,000 | 5,420,420 | ||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.875%, 2042 | 5,303,000 | 6,518,098 | ||||||
DBS Bank Ltd., 3.625% to 2017, FRN to 2022 (n) | 5,702,000 | 5,878,973 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.625%, 2017 | 4,693,000 | 5,203,232 | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.5%, 2019 | 5,607,000 | 7,002,027 | ||||||
HSBC Holdings PLC, 4%, 2022 | 7,694,000 | 8,428,462 | ||||||
HSBC USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | 5,500,000 | 6,057,183 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 2%, 2015 (n) | 6,554,000 | 6,607,304 | ||||||
ING Bank N.V., 3.75%, 2017 (n) | 2,945,000 | 3,118,434 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 2%, 2017 | 3,141,000 | 3,174,650 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 4.25%, 2020 | 5,000,000 | 5,514,635 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 4.5%, 2022 | 6,850,000 | 7,739,096 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 3.25%, 2022 | 4,744,000 | 4,862,685 | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., 5.875%, 2016 | 4,250,000 | 4,830,363 | ||||||
Macquarie Bank Ltd., 5%, 2017 (n) | 7,564,000 | 8,215,487 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.15%, 2013 | 3,960,000 | 4,058,362 | ||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.05%, 2016 | 6,749,000 | 7,446,739 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.75%, 2016 | 7,752,000 | 8,631,147 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.5%, 2020 | 4,790,000 | 5,287,600 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.5%, 2021 | 4,884,000 | 5,428,200 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley, 4.875%, 2022 | 6,531,000 | 6,602,390 | ||||||
PNC Funding Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | 8,496,000 | 9,871,010 | ||||||
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, 2.55%, 2015 | 4,259,000 | 4,365,952 | ||||||
Wachovia Corp., 6.605%, 2025 | 2,393,000 | 2,960,139 | ||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 3.5%, 2022 | 4,468,000 | 4,770,417 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 196,749,298 | |||||||
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 1.2% | ||||||||
Aristotle Holding, Inc., 2.65%, 2017 (n) | $ | 6,827,000 | $ | 7,126,480 | ||||
Aristotle Holding, Inc., 3.9%, 2022 (n) | 10,049,000 | 10,984,160 | ||||||
Catholic Health Initiatives, 2.95%, 2022 | 4,580,000 | 4,647,509 | ||||||
HCA, Inc., 7.875%, 2020 | 7,855,000 | 8,777,963 | ||||||
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., 3.15%, 2023 | 9,211,000 | 9,589,858 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 41,125,970 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 0.6% | ||||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 3.55%, 2022 | $ | 10,030,000 | $ | 10,212,526 | ||||
Southern Copper Corp., 6.75%, 2040 | 5,181,000 | 6,147,469 | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 | 2,595,000 | 3,124,754 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 19,484,749 |
14
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Mortgage-Backed - 24.8% | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.517%, 2013 | $ | 1,219,189 | $ | 1,218,819 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 4.518%, 2013 | 624,805 | 624,617 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.37%, 2013 | 574,988 | 574,815 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.607%, 2014 | 1,326,281 | 1,372,834 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.62%, 2014 - 2015 | 4,147,900 | 4,401,030 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.77%, 2014 | 1,684,642 | 1,766,413 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.825%, 2014 | 3,626,682 | 3,807,316 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.86%, 2014 | 1,536,972 | 1,636,365 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.05%, 2014 | 1,163,818 | 1,238,233 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.412%, 2014 | 2,419,629 | 2,574,780 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.53%, 2015 | 1,132,777 | 1,221,720 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.56%, 2015 | 21,928 | 23,635 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.6%, 2015 | 1,812,824 | 1,956,416 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.665%, 2015 | 1,146,055 | 1,226,172 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.7%, 2015 | 27,434 | 29,770 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.78%, 2015 | 2,494,509 | 2,696,734 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.815%, 2015 | 1,800,763 | 1,939,073 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.85%, 2015 | 1,382,939 | 1,479,516 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.87%, 2015 | 1,163,803 | 1,254,028 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.89%, 2015 | 363,021 | 394,616 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.907%, 2015 | 2,154,943 | 2,342,582 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.94%, 2015 | 2,641,000 | 2,863,407 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.09%, 2016 | 2,726,614 | 2,993,653 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.152%, 2016 | 605,205 | 677,133 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.35%, 2016 | 2,670,147 | 2,987,257 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.395%, 2016 | 2,342,844 | 2,621,189 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.423%, 2016 | 5,016,365 | 5,653,650 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 2016 - 2038 | 99,561,477 | 109,482,953 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.725%, 2016 | 2,102,654 | 2,391,401 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.93%, 2016 | 1,214,161 | 1,361,121 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 2.71%, 2017 | 1,521,657 | 1,630,562 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.991%, 2017 | 4,304,460 | 4,614,016 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.28%, 2017 | 2,619,311 | 2,941,708 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.478%, 2017 | 1,094,878 | 1,278,129 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.54%, 2017 | 1,454,571 | 1,638,834 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 2.578%, 2018 | 11,000,000 | 11,782,364 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 3.84%, 2018 | 1,424,202 | 1,592,025 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 3.849%, 2018 | 3,745,128 | 4,208,477 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 3.99%, 2018 | 2,450,000 | 2,765,111 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5%, 2018 - 2040 | 50,877,452 | 55,724,244 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 2.43%, 2019 | 1,984,000 | 2,105,071 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.18%, 2019 | 530,227 | 610,535 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.88%, 2020 | 668,083 | 750,179 |
15
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Mortgage-Backed - continued | ||||||||
Fannie Mae, 5.19%, 2020 | $ | 2,838,890 | $ | 3,275,506 | ||||
Fannie Mae, 4.5%, 2025 | 2,384,376 | 2,576,145 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 3%, 2027 | 5,996,527 | 6,336,258 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2031 - 2033 | 424,872 | 489,227 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 4.5%, 2034 - 2040 | 13,527,001 | 14,734,813 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2034 - 2038 | 30,663,598 | 34,375,932 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, 3.5%, 2041 - 2042 | 30,842,094 | 32,988,820 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, TBA, 2.5%, 2027 | 25,690,000 | 26,886,191 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, TBA, 3%, 2042 | 7,200,000 | 7,549,875 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, TBA, 3.5%, 2042 | 62,640,000 | 66,721,384 | ||||||
Fannie Mae, TBA, 4%, 2042 | 24,400,000 | 26,127,061 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 1.655%, 2016 | 6,270,432 | 6,461,793 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 3.882%, 2017 | 8,787,000 | 9,930,681 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5.5%, 2017 - 2038 | 17,954,871 | 19,696,423 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 2.303%, 2018 | 2,159,711 | 2,286,549 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 2.323%, 2018 | 5,437,000 | 5,758,055 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 2.412%, 2018 (n) | 4,630,000 | 4,923,204 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 3.154%, 2018 | 3,479,000 | 3,823,741 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 5%, 2018 - 2040 | 17,549,391 | 19,161,688 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 2.13%, 2019 | 14,841,000 | 15,528,569 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 3.32%, 2020 | 2,851,487 | 3,105,466 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.251%, 2020 | 4,741,000 | 5,494,236 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4%, 2025 - 2040 | 36,780,291 | 39,224,874 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 4.5%, 2025 - 2041 | 4,513,224 | 4,856,100 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 3.5%, 2026 - 2042 | 19,346,436 | 20,619,714 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, 6%, 2033 - 2038 | 7,348,472 | 8,192,483 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, TBA, 3%, 2042 | 12,300,000 | 12,846,774 | ||||||
Freddie Mac, TBA, 3.5%, 2042 | 7,920,000 | 8,418,713 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 6%, 2034 - 2038 | 7,700,158 | 8,758,413 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 5.5%, 2038 - 2042 | 14,371,841 | 15,882,564 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 4.5%, 2039 - 2041 | 73,887,585 | 81,148,067 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 3.5%, 2040 - 2042 | 25,734,435 | 28,125,250 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, 4%, 2040 | 17,225,342 | 18,847,312 | ||||||
Ginnie Mae, TBA, 3%, 2042 | 36,380,000 | 38,719,121 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 860,323,505 | |||||||
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.2% | ||||||||
GDF Suez, 2.875%, 2022 (n) | $ | 5,954,000 | $ | 5,978,769 | ||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 1.4% | ||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 4.65%, 2021 | $ | 8,511,000 | $ | 9,452,555 | ||||
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 5.2%, 2022 | 1,660,000 | 1,905,531 | ||||||
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 4.85%, 2042 | 3,627,000 | 3,906,315 |
16
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Natural Gas - Pipeline - continued | ||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 5.65%, 2013 | $ | 1,802,000 | $ | 1,836,813 | ||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 6.95%, 2038 | 2,580,000 | 3,462,621 | ||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 6.375%, 2041 | 7,490,000 | 9,748,467 | ||||||
Oneok Partners LP, 3.375%, 2022 | 6,603,000 | 6,879,210 | ||||||
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 2019 | 8,284,000 | 11,072,378 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 48,263,890 | |||||||
Network & Telecom - 0.7% | ||||||||
AT&T, Inc., 5.35%, 2040 | $ | 7,380,000 | $ | 9,051,319 | ||||
AT&T, Inc., 5.55%, 2041 | 2,259,000 | 2,875,172 | ||||||
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 2042 | 11,824,000 | 12,096,993 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 24,023,484 | |||||||
Oil Services - 0.8% | ||||||||
Schlumberger Norge A.S., 1.25%, 2017 (n) | $ | 11,361,000 | $ | 11,379,200 | ||||
Transocean, Inc., 6%, 2018 | 2,610,000 | 3,074,906 | ||||||
Transocean, Inc., 6.5%, 2020 | 6,453,000 | 7,839,917 | ||||||
Transocean, Inc., 3.8%, 2022 | 4,341,000 | 4,439,745 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 26,733,768 | |||||||
Oils - 0.1% | ||||||||
Phillips 66, 4.3%, 2022 (n) | $ | 4,533,000 | $ | 5,097,322 | ||||
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 2.7% | ||||||||
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.75%, 2022 (n) | $ | 4,540,000 | $ | 5,141,550 | ||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 6.15%, 2016 | 6,690,000 | 7,662,672 | ||||||
Capital One Financial Corp., 8.8%, 2019 | 3,520,000 | 4,685,074 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 4.45%, 2017 | 4,631,000 | 5,116,088 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | 3,435,000 | 4,104,468 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | 7,251,000 | 9,668,672 | ||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 4.5%, 2022 | 8,584,000 | 9,476,290 | ||||||
Discover Bank, 7%, 2020 | 9,837,000 | 12,057,181 | ||||||
Fifth Third Bancorp, 3.5%, 2022 | 4,075,000 | 4,321,668 | ||||||
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | 7,444,000 | 8,509,832 | ||||||
Santander Holdings USA, Inc., 4.625%, 2016 | 3,739,000 | 3,908,728 | ||||||
Santander UK PLC, 8.963% to 2030, FRN to 2049 | 6,715,000 | 7,403,288 | ||||||
SunTrust Banks, Inc., 3.5%, 2017 | 3,701,000 | 3,980,540 | ||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB, 2.875%, 2017 | 3,371,000 | 3,561,799 | ||||||
U.S. Bancorp, 2.95%, 2022 | 3,150,000 | 3,249,707 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 92,847,557 | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 0.7% | ||||||||
Celgene Corp., 2.45%, 2015 | $ | 7,103,000 | $ | 7,405,297 | ||||
Celgene Corp., 1.9%, 2017 | 7,253,000 | 7,364,355 |
17
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals - continued | ||||||||
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance IV LLC, 3.65%, 2021 | $ | 10,300,000 | $ | 11,210,695 | ||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 25,980,347 | |||||||
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.0% | ||||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 3%, 2019 | $ | 704,000 | $ | 716,224 | ||||
Printing & Publishing - 0.2% | ||||||||
Moody’s Corp., 4.5%, 2022 | $ | 2,558,000 | $ | 2,750,252 | ||||
Pearson Funding Four PLC, 3.75%, 2022 (n) | 4,882,000 | 5,135,005 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 7,885,257 | |||||||
Railroad & Shipping - 0.0% | ||||||||
Canadian Pacific Railway Co., 4.45%, 2023 | $ | 1,366,000 | $ | 1,517,305 | ||||
Real Estate - 2.0% | ||||||||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., REIT, 4.6%, 2022 | $ | 4,863,000 | $ | 5,264,723 | ||||
Boston Properties LP, REIT, 3.7%, 2018 | 5,442,000 | 5,930,550 | ||||||
Boston Properties LP, REIT, 3.85%, 2023 | 1,725,000 | 1,860,628 | ||||||
DDR Corp., REIT, 4.625%, 2022 | 1,016,000 | 1,125,663 | ||||||
HCP, Inc., REIT, 3.75%, 2019 | 4,862,000 | 5,160,512 | ||||||
HCP, Inc., REIT, 5.375%, 2021 | 4,940,000 | 5,717,922 | ||||||
HRPT Properties Trust, REIT, 6.25%, 2016 | 9,514,000 | 10,389,431 | ||||||
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 6%, 2012 | 2,846,000 | 2,856,260 | ||||||
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 5.783%, 2016 | 7,684,000 | 8,673,745 | ||||||
Liberty Property LP, REIT, 5.5%, 2016 | 4,563,000 | 5,187,287 | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 10.35%, 2019 | 4,593,000 | 6,618,012 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC, REIT, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | 6,948,000 | 8,600,005 | ||||||
WEA Finance LLC/WT Finance Australia, 3.375%, 2022 (n) | 3,508,000 | 3,554,948 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 70,939,686 | |||||||
Retailers - 1.1% | ||||||||
Gap, Inc., 5.95%, 2021 | $ | 10,350,000 | $ | 11,762,123 | ||||
Home Depot, Inc., 5.95%, 2041 | 3,217,000 | 4,486,936 | ||||||
Kohl’s Corp., 3.25%, 2023 | 7,173,000 | 7,181,715 | ||||||
Target Corp., 4%, 2042 | 4,523,000 | 4,779,364 | ||||||
Wesfarmers Ltd., 6.998%, 2013 (n) | 9,110,000 | 9,355,833 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 37,565,971 | |||||||
Specialty Chemicals - 0.3% | ||||||||
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 6.75%, 2042 (z) | $ | 8,576,000 | $ | 9,262,080 | ||||
Specialty Stores - 0.2% | ||||||||
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 5.75%, 2020 | $ | 6,047,000 | $ | 7,015,953 |
18
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
Telecommunications - Wireless - 0.8% | ||||||||
American Tower Corp., REIT, 4.5%, 2018 | $ | 12,073,000 | $ | 13,369,206 | ||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 2020 (n) | 7,264,000 | 8,837,876 | ||||||
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 4.883%, 2020 (n) | 3,480,000 | 3,976,676 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 26,183,758 | |||||||
Telephone Services - 0.0% | ||||||||
Oi S.A., 5.75%, 2022 (n) | $ | 1,596,000 | $ | 1,723,680 | ||||
Tobacco - 0.8% | ||||||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 2019 | $ | 10,633,000 | $ | 13,676,686 | ||||
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 7%, 2041 | 1,356,000 | 1,686,117 | ||||||
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | 10,032,000 | 12,123,231 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 27,486,034 | |||||||
Transportation - Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 2.75%, 2017 (n) | $ | 3,043,000 | $ | 3,181,295 | ||||
ERAC USA Finance Co., 7%, 2037 (n) | 9,010,000 | 11,741,760 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 14,923,055 | |||||||
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 2.2% | ||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., FRN, 0.617%, 2012 (m) | $ | 30,444,000 | $ | 30,469,390 | ||||
National Credit Union Administration Guaranteed Note, 2.9%, 2020 | 5,600,000 | 5,968,375 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.94%, 2016 | 136,437 | 146,079 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.37%, 2016 | 272,796 | 287,822 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.35%, 2021 | 11,928 | 13,366 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.34%, 2021 | 16,568 | 18,365 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.44%, 2021 | 19,293 | 21,564 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.34%, 2021 | 118,753 | 130,991 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 6.07%, 2022 | 66,714 | 74,541 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.35%, 2023 | 750,655 | 823,606 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.98%, 2023 | 1,168,986 | 1,298,365 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.89%, 2023 | 1,031,837 | 1,145,263 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.93%, 2024 | 1,307,484 | 1,445,697 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.34%, 2024 | 1,184,063 | 1,303,062 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.18%, 2024 | 1,193,937 | 1,334,026 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.52%, 2024 | 1,443,318 | 1,632,065 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.19%, 2024 | 1,605,901 | 1,810,954 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.86%, 2024 | 976,391 | 1,096,478 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.57%, 2025 | 1,803,456 | 2,009,324 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 4.76%, 2025 | 5,139,133 | 5,744,228 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.39%, 2025 | 560,948 | 641,854 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 5.35%, 2026 | 3,057,453 | 3,492,863 | ||||||
Small Business Administration, 3.25%, 2030 | 4,503,293 | 4,809,345 |
19
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
Bonds - continued | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - continued | ||||||||
Small Business Administration, 2.85%, 2031 | $ | 6,702,343 | $ | 7,084,023 | ||||
Small Business Administration, 2.37%, 2032 | 5,245,000 | 5,323,617 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 78,125,263 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations - 15.0% | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6%, 2026 | $ | 840,000 | $ | 1,224,169 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2036 | 1,967,000 | 2,617,033 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 5%, 2037 | 9,893,000 | 14,128,441 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2039 | 64,984,100 | 87,149,787 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.375%, 2013 | 6,578,000 | 6,607,548 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.875%, 2014 | 41,365,000 | 42,260,180 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.875%, 2014 | 145,788,000 | 149,295,951 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.125%, 2015 (f) | 170,345,000 | 178,077,130 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.125%, 2016 | 6,351,000 | 7,385,019 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.75%, 2019 | 8,725,900 | 9,670,749 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 2%, 2014 | 5,433,598 | 5,636,510 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 1.625%, 2015 | 5,733,383 | 6,103,364 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, TIPS, 2%, 2016 | 10,156,388 | 11,297,397 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 521,453,278 | |||||||
Utilities - Electric Power - 2.5% | ||||||||
APT Pipelines Ltd., 3.875%, 2022 (z) | $ | 12,507,000 | $ | 12,464,864 | ||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., 5.95%, 2017 | 3,300,000 | 3,854,199 | ||||||
Constellation Energy Group, Inc., 5.15%, 2020 | 3,366,000 | 3,956,218 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 5.05%, 2019 | 6,505,000 | 7,731,459 | ||||||
Duke Energy Corp., 3.05%, 2022 | 8,111,000 | 8,328,002 | ||||||
Enel Finance International S.A., 6%, 2039 (n) | 5,000,000 | 4,843,390 | ||||||
Exelon Corp., 4.9%, 2015 | 8,028,000 | 8,826,304 | ||||||
Oncor Electric Delivery Co., 4.1%, 2022 | 6,820,000 | 7,307,371 | ||||||
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 4.45%, 2042 | 2,420,000 | 2,690,827 | ||||||
PPL Corp., 3.5%, 2022 | 3,600,000 | 3,696,538 | ||||||
PPL WEM Holdings PLC, 5.375%, 2021 (n) | 9,014,000 | 10,150,061 | ||||||
Progress Energy, Inc., 3.15%, 2022 | 3,682,000 | 3,792,162 | ||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 (z) | 259,953 | 263,697 | ||||||
TECO Energy, Inc., 5.15%, 2020 | 7,160,000 | 8,383,136 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
$ | 86,288,228 | |||||||
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $3,251,192,833) | $ | 3,427,417,232 |
20
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Money Market Funds - 5.8% | ||||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.16%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | 203,407,956 | $ | 203,407,956 | |||||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $3,454,600,789) | $ | 3,630,825,188 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (4.5)% | (157,628,032 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets - 100.0% | $ | 3,473,197,156 |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(d) | In default. Interest and/or scheduled principal payment(s) have been missed. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(m) | The debt is guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The expiration date of the FDIC’s guarantee is the earlier of the maturity date of the debt or December 31, 2012. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $414,239,863, representing 11.9% of net assets. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(q) | Interest received was less than stated coupon rate. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Value | |||||||
APT Pipelines Ltd., 3.875%, 2022 | 10/03/12 | $12,391,980 | $12,464,864 | |||||||
ARCap REIT, Inc., CDO, “F”, FRN, 5.992%, 2045 | 12/07/06 | 1,889,879 | 185 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.571%, 2019 | 1/15/10-3/25/11 | 5,420,065 | 6,794,338 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “BFL”, CDO, FRN, 1.211%, 2037 | 12/09/10 | 1,689,493 | 1,841,740 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., “CFL”, CDO, FRN, 1.461%, 2037 | 3/03/11 | 1,060,791 | 1,004,888 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO III, 6.077%, 2039 | 10/25/06-10/01/12 | 5,152,226 | 276,577 | |||||||
Anthracite Ltd., CDO, FRN, 1.061%, 2037 | 2/24/10-3/03/11 | 8,292,731 | 8,788,554 | |||||||
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., 5.338%, 2043 | 10/26/12 | 10,352,995 | 10,124,463 |
21
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Restricted Securities - continued | Acquisition Date | Cost | Value | |||||||
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.625%, 2049 | 10/03/12 | $2,418,955 | $2,462,738 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.521%, 2035 | 6/09/05 | 576,385 | 420,838 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 2.816%, 2036 | 2/28/06 | 1,256,109 | 120,241 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 0.481%, 2036 | 2/23/06 | 450,427 | 342,749 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.175%, 2036 | 5/16/06-5/29/09 | 1,061,664 | 211,621 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.904%, 2036 | 9/11/06 | 2,629,793 | 695,250 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 3.825%, 2036 | 10/25/06 | 1,339,020 | 467,836 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust, FRN, 4.049%, 2037 | 1/26/07-5/29/09 | 1,417,337 | 1,128,445 | |||||||
Bayview Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Trust, FRN, 2.93%, 2036 | 3/29/06 | 833,216 | 107,664 | |||||||
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.811%, 2040 | 3/01/06 | 3,286,140 | 2,130,624 | |||||||
Caixa Economica Federal, 3.5%, 2022 | 10/26/12 | 153,304 | 154,020 | |||||||
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.267%, 2035 | 9/14/10 | 6,480,059 | 7,136,453 | |||||||
Chesapeake Funding LLC, “A”, FRN, 0.969%, 2023 | 5/10/12 | 8,280,000 | 8,299,963 | |||||||
Commercial Mortgage Asset Trust, FRN, 0.648%, 2032 | 8/25/03-4/09/12 | 77,898 | 68,510 | |||||||
Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, “A”, 2.2%, 2019 | 3/22/12 | 3,713,605 | 3,737,324 | |||||||
Crest G-Star, CDO, 6.95%, 2032 | 9/13/05 | 4,927,107 | 4,680,842 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A1” CDO, FRN, 0.842%, 2018 | 1/21/10-3/04/10 | 2,269,213 | 2,740,944 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “A2”, CDO, 4.669%, 2018 | 3/02/10 | 726,922 | 868,235 | |||||||
Crest Ltd., “B”, CDO, FRN, 1.663%, 2035 | 1/12/10 | 574,065 | 675,131 | |||||||
FIH Erhvervsbank A.S., 1.75%, 2012 | 12/02/09 | 3,820,669 | 3,825,585 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 5.51%, 2023 | 1/18/02-3/23/11 | 5,743 | 13,068 | |||||||
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 5.905%, 2025 | 1/29/03-3/23/11 | 172,191 | 385,978 | |||||||
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage, FRN, 1.573%, 2043 | 12/11/03-4/09/12 | 995 | 2,148 | |||||||
Gramercy Real Estate Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.635%, 2035 | 6/21/05 | 629,173 | 585,115 | |||||||
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “A1”, FRN, 0.584%, 2017 | 4/11/11 | 1,664,329 | 1,698,765 | |||||||
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 5%, 2042 | 5/30/12 | 5,628,630 | 6,596,135 | |||||||
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 6.5%, 2042 | 5/01/12 | 4,104,385 | 4,688,508 | |||||||
Mach One Trust Commercial Mortgage, CDO, “B”, 5.43%, 2040 | 3/10/10-3/25/11 | 4,903,614 | 5,191,503 |
22
Table of Contents
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) – continued
Restricted Securities - continued | Acquisition Date | Cost | Value | |||||||
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 6.75%, 2042 | 9/12/12-10/11/12 | $8,963,714 | $9,262,080 | |||||||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.095%, 2031 | 6/10/03 | 16,481 | 3,655 | |||||||
NIBC Bank N.V., 2.8%, 2014 | 11/24/09 | 4,935,324 | 5,141,226 | |||||||
PTT PLC, 3.375%, 2022 | 10/18/12-10/22/12 | 6,888,037 | 6,870,411 | |||||||
PTT PLC, 4.5%, 2042 | 10/18/12 | 2,338,260 | 2,355,838 | |||||||
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 2044 | 10/12/12 | 92,052 | 90,470 | |||||||
Preferred Term Securities XIX Ltd., CDO, FRN, 0.739%, 2035 | 9/08/05-3/28/11 | 7,559,774 | 5,185,010 | |||||||
Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities, Inc., FRN, 7.158%, 2032 | 1/07/05 | 2,853,395 | 2,571,669 | |||||||
Smart Trust, “A2B”, FRN, 0.764%, 2015 | 10/04/12 | 17,816,000 | 17,823,180 | |||||||
System Energy Resources, Inc., 5.129%, 2014 | 4/16/04 | 259,953 | 263,697 | |||||||
Turkiye Vakiflar Bankasi, 6%, 2022 | 10/24/12 | 351,000 | 351,585 | |||||||
Total Restricted Securities | $150,650,663 | |||||||||
% of Net assets | 4.3% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
TBA | To Be Announced |
TIPS | Treasury Inflation Protected Security |
Derivative Contracts at 10/31/12
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 10/31/12
Description | Currency | Contracts | Value | Expiration Date | Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Futures | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Short) | USD | 50 | $7,465,625 | December - 2012 | $(3,300 | ) | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Short) | USD | 700 | 93,121,875 | December - 2012 | (13,845 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
$(17,145 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
At October 31, 2012, the fund had liquid securities with an aggregate value of $968,031 to cover any commitments for certain derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | ||||
Investments- | ||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $3,251,192,833) | $3,427,417,232 | |||
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | 203,407,956 | |||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $3,454,600,789) | $3,630,825,188 | |||
Cash | 6,354,994 | |||
Receivables for | ||||
Investments sold | 11,642,896 | |||
Fund shares sold | 9,218,973 | |||
Interest | 24,844,849 | |||
Total assets | $3,682,886,900 | |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payables for | ||||
Distributions | $2,504,295 | |||
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts | 285,938 | |||
Investments purchased | 15,326,064 | |||
TBA purchase commitments | 185,186,231 | |||
Fund shares reacquired | 5,111,791 | |||
Payable to affiliates | ||||
Investment adviser | 145,587 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 826,752 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 35,087 | |||
Program manager fees | 36 | |||
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | 42 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 267,921 | |||
Total liabilities | $209,689,744 | |||
Net assets | $3,473,197,156 | |||
Net assets consist of | ||||
Paid-in capital | $3,314,844,477 | |||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 176,207,254 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (7,131,038 | ) | ||
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | (10,723,537 | ) | ||
Net assets | $3,473,197,156 | |||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 311,565,357 |
24
Table of Contents
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) – continued
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share (a) | ||||||||||||
Class A | $1,056,630,447 | 94,809,687 | $11.14 | |||||||||||
Class B | 46,676,674 | 4,182,616 | 11.16 | |||||||||||
Class C | 164,769,843 | 14,766,482 | 11.16 | |||||||||||
Class I | 1,024,580,707 | 91,886,977 | 11.15 | |||||||||||
Class R1 | 3,240,960 | 290,341 | 11.16 | |||||||||||
Class R2 | 47,661,334 | 4,279,704 | 11.14 | |||||||||||
Class R3 | 45,762,159 | 4,107,334 | 11.14 | |||||||||||
Class R4 | 72,677,675 | 6,521,457 | 11.14 | |||||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | 1,002,390,675 | 89,930,148 | 11.15 | |||||||||||
Class 529A | 4,380,624 | 393,870 | 11.12 | |||||||||||
Class 529B | 417,239 | 37,387 | 11.16 | |||||||||||
Class 529C | 4,008,819 | 359,354 | 11.16 |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Classes A and 529A, for which the maximum offering prices per share were $11.70 [100 / 95.25 × $11.14] and $11.67 [100 / 95.25 × $11.12], respectively. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering prices of Class A and Class 529A shares are reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, Class C, Class 529B, and Class 529C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and 529A. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
Six months ended 10/31/12 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest | $59,072,562 | |||
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | 117,562 | |||
Foreign taxes withheld | (1,043 | ) | ||
Total investment income | $59,189,081 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Management fee | $8,337,482 | |||
Distribution and service fees | 2,550,057 | |||
Program manager fees | 4,190 | |||
Shareholder servicing costs | 1,528,975 | |||
Administrative services fee | 238,654 | |||
Independent Trustees’ compensation | 27,367 | |||
Custodian fee | 129,565 | |||
Shareholder communications | 199,059 | |||
Audit and tax fees | 33,614 | |||
Legal fees | 20,697 | |||
Miscellaneous | 164,393 | |||
Total expenses | $13,234,053 | |||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | (554,429 | ) | ||
Net expenses | $12,679,624 | |||
Net investment income | $46,509,457 | |||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||
Realized gain (loss) on investments (identified cost basis) | $26,731,921 | |||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
Investments | $73,627,109 | |||
Futures contracts | (17,145 | ) | ||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $73,609,964 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $100,341,885 | |||
Change in net assets from operations | $146,851,342 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Change in net assets | Six months ended (unaudited) | Year ended 4/30/12 | ||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment income | $46,509,457 | $94,817,310 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 26,731,921 | 55,720,688 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 73,609,964 | 32,462,149 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations | $146,851,342 | $183,000,147 | ||||||
Distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||
From net investment income | $(56,079,466 | ) | $(107,567,289 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | $139,910,976 | $502,803,491 | ||||||
Total change in net assets | $230,682,852 | $578,236,349 | ||||||
Net assets | ||||||||
At beginning of period | 3,242,514,304 | 2,664,277,955 | ||||||
At end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $10,723,537 and $1,153,528, respectively) | $3,473,197,156 | $3,242,514,304 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Table of Contents
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.84 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.15 | $0.35 | $0.39 | $0.44 | $0.48 | $0.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 1.35 | (0.74 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.48 | $0.67 | $0.68 | $1.79 | $(0.26 | ) | $0.25 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.18 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | $(0.53 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.14 | $10.84 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 4.49 | (n) | 6.42 | 6.73 | 20.30 | (2.54 | ) | 2.60 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.91 | (a) | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 1.03 | 1.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.81 | (a) | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.62 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.73 | (a) | 3.27 | 3.72 | 4.45 | 5.27 | 4.94 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,056,630 | $1,009,130 | $900,575 | $918,742 | $799,077 | $1,137,796 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.86 | $10.58 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.11 | $0.27 | $0.30 | $0.36 | $0.41 | $0.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.36 | (0.75 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.44 | $0.59 | $0.60 | $1.72 | $(0.34 | ) | $0.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.14 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.33 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.46 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.16 | $10.86 | $10.58 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 4.09 | (n) | 5.70 | 5.88 | 19.34 | (3.41 | ) | 1.75 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.66 | (a) | 1.67 | �� | 1.66 | 1.65 | 1.64 | 1.63 | ||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.55 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.61 | 1.58 | 1.44 | 1.43 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.98 | (a) | 2.48 | 2.91 | 3.66 | 4.47 | 4.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $46,677 | $43,939 | $41,493 | $45,472 | $45,473 | $60,335 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.86 | $10.58 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.26 | $0.30 | $0.35 | $0.40 | $0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 1.36 | (0.75 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.44 | $0.59 | $0.59 | $1.71 | $(0.35 | ) | $0.18 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.14 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.16 | $10.86 | $10.58 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 4.04 | (n) | 5.62 | 5.83 | 19.28 | (3.45 | ) | 1.84 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.69 | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 1.49 | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.88 | (a) | 2.41 | 2.86 | 3.51 | 4.43 | 4.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $164,770 | $153,898 | $135,007 | $141,966 | $83,990 | $83,506 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class I | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.85 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.16 | $0.37 | $0.40 | $0.45 | $0.50 | $0.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.36 | (0.75 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.49 | $0.69 | $0.70 | $1.81 | $(0.25 | ) | $0.27 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.53 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.15 | $10.85 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 4.56 | (n) | 6.68 | 6.89 | 20.47 | (2.39 | ) | 2.75 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.66 | (a) | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.67 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.66 | (a) | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.47 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.91 | (a) | 3.41 | 3.87 | 4.54 | 5.43 | 5.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,024,581 | $1,883,416 | $1,470,218 | $1,291,881 | $825,529 | $1,301,075 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
31
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.86 | $10.59 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.26 | $0.30 | $0.36 | $0.41 | $0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.35 | (0.76 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.44 | $0.58 | $0.60 | $1.71 | $(0.35 | ) | $0.16 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.14 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.32 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.16 | $10.86 | $10.59 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 4.04 | (n) | 5.52 | 5.93 | 19.28 | (3.45 | ) | 1.65 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.67 | 1.69 | 1.75 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.65 | (a) | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 1.49 | 1.56 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.88 | (a) | 2.42 | 2.86 | 3.61 | 4.44 | 3.99 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $3,241 | $3,117 | $2,969 | $2,985 | $2,998 | $2,891 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.84 | $10.56 | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | $10.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.13 | $0.31 | $0.35 | $0.40 | $0.45 | $0.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 1.36 | (0.74 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.46 | $0.64 | $0.65 | $1.76 | $(0.29 | ) | $0.21 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.36 | ) | $(0.38 | ) | $(0.45 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.14 | $10.84 | $10.56 | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 4.31 | (n) | 6.15 | 6.36 | 19.90 | (2.88 | ) | 2.14 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.16 | (a) | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.27 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.16 | (a) | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.14 | 0.99 | 1.07 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.39 | (a) | 2.93 | 3.37 | 4.08 | 4.94 | 4.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $47,661 | $45,433 | $41,076 | $41,092 | $33,055 | $42,613 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
33
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R3 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.84 | $10.57 | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | $10.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.15 | $0.34 | $0.38 | $0.43 | $0.47 | $0.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.35 | (0.74 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.48 | $0.66 | $0.68 | $1.78 | $(0.27 | ) | $0.23 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.18 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.14 | $10.84 | $10.57 | $10.29 | $8.98 | $9.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 4.44 | (n) | 6.32 | 6.73 | 20.20 | (2.64 | ) | 2.39 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.91 | (a) | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.01 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.91 | (a) | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 0.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.63 | (a) | 3.16 | 3.62 | 4.35 | 5.18 | 4.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $45,762 | $41,177 | $29,493 | $31,165 | $26,213 | $38,851 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
34
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.84 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.98 | $9.78 | $10.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.16 | $0.36 | $0.40 | $0.45 | $0.50 | $0.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.37 | (0.76 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.49 | $0.68 | $0.70 | $1.82 | $(0.26 | ) | $0.26 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.19 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | $(0.43 | ) | $(0.50 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.14 | $10.84 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.98 | $9.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 4.56 | (n) | 6.58 | 6.89 | 20.61 | (2.50 | ) | 2.68 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.66 | (a) | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.73 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.66 | (a) | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.54 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.87 | (a) | 3.40 | 3.87 | 4.53 | 5.44 | 5.02 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $72,678 | $46,209 | $32,336 | $26,315 | $17,583 | $14,182 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
35
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) (y) | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.85 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | $10.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.16 | $0.35 | $0.40 | $0.45 | $0.49 | $0.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 1.35 | (0.74 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.46 | $0.68 | $0.69 | $1.80 | $(0.25 | ) | $0.27 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.16 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $(0.49 | ) | $(0.54 | ) | $(0.52 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.15 | $10.85 | $10.57 | $10.30 | $8.99 | $9.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | 4.59 | (n) | 6.57 | 6.78 | 20.36 | (2.49 | ) | 2.75 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 0.57 | (a) | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.77 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.57 | (a) | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.57 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.92 | (a) | 3.30 | 3.78 | 4.56 | 5.34 | 4.92 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $1,002,391 | $8,217 | $5,643 | $9,582 | $16,151 | $14,321 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
36
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529A | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.82 | $10.55 | $10.27 | $8.96 | $9.75 | $10.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.15 | $0.34 | $0.38 | $0.43 | $0.47 | $0.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.35 | (0.75 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.48 | $0.66 | $0.68 | $1.78 | $(0.28 | ) | $0.22 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.18 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.40 | ) | $(0.47 | ) | $(0.51 | ) | $(0.48 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.12 | $10.82 | $10.55 | $10.27 | $8.96 | $9.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 4.47 | (n) | 6.37 | 6.73 | 20.23 | (2.74 | ) | 2.24 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.01 | (a) | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.13 | 1.26 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 0.86 | (a) | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 2.69 | (a) | 3.21 | 3.63 | 4.31 | 5.14 | 4.61 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $4,381 | $3,934 | $2,593 | $2,066 | $1,289 | $1,170 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
37
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.86 | $10.59 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | $10.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.26 | $0.29 | $0.34 | $0.40 | $0.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 1.36 | (0.76 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.43 | $0.57 | $0.59 | $1.70 | $(0.36 | ) | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.16 | $10.86 | $10.59 | $10.31 | $9.00 | $9.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 4.02 | (n) | 5.46 | 5.82 | 19.17 | (3.55 | ) | 1.50 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.75 | (a) | 1.77 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.91 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.70 | (a) | 1.73 | 1.76 | 1.74 | 1.59 | 1.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.84 | (a) | 2.39 | 2.76 | 3.47 | 4.34 | 3.84 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $417 | $428 | $590 | $700 | $478 | $397 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
38
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
Six months (unaudited) | Years ended 4/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning | $10.85 | $10.58 | $10.31 | $8.99 | $9.79 | $10.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) | $0.10 | $0.25 | $0.29 | $0.34 | $0.40 | $0.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 1.37 | (0.76 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total from investment | $0.44 | $0.57 | $0.58 | $1.71 | $(0.36 | ) | $0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Less distributions declared to shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | $(0.13 | ) | $(0.30 | ) | $(0.31 | ) | $(0.39 | ) | $(0.44 | ) | $(0.41 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end | $11.16 | $10.85 | $10.58 | $10.31 | $8.99 | $9.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | 4.11 | (n) | 5.47 | 5.72 | 19.30 | (3.56 | ) | 1.49 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense | 1.75 | (a) | 1.77 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.91 | |||||||||||||||||
Expenses after expense | 1.70 | (a) | 1.73 | 1.76 | 1.74 | 1.59 | 1.71 | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1.83 | (a) | 2.34 | 2.77 | 3.46 | 4.34 | 3.82 | |||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover | 43 | (n) | 59 | 67 | 90 | 75 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period | $4,009 | $3,617 | $2,284 | $1,550 | $1,215 | $1,208 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
39
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights – continued
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
(y) | As further discussed in Note 5 in the Notes to Financial Statements, on May 10, 2012, sales of Class W shares (including exchanges) were suspended. On May 11, 2012, certain Class W shares were automatically converted to Class I shares. Shareholders of certain Class W shares became shareholders of Class I and received Class I shares with a total net asset value equal to their Class W shares at the time of the conversion. On May 30, 2012, remaining Class W shares, which represented MFS seed money, were redesignated as Class R5. Class R5 shares are generally available only to certain eligible retirement plans and to funds distributed by MFD. Class R5 shares do not pay a 12b-1 distribution fee or sub-accounting costs. On June 1, 2012, Class R5 shares were offered for sale to the public. For further information about the fund’s fee arrangements and changes to those fee arrangements, please see Note 3 in the Notes to Financial Statements. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
40
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Research Bond Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust IX (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests a significant portion of its assets in asset-backed and/or mortgage-backed securities. The value of these securities may depend, in part, on the issuer’s or borrower’s credit quality or ability to pay principal and interest when due and may fall if an issuer or borrower defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest or if the instrument’s credit rating is downgraded by a credit rating agency. U.S. Government securities not supported as to the payment of principal or interest by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks, are subject to greater credit risk than are U.S. Government securities supported by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Ginnie Mae. The fund invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In this reporting period the fund adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 seeks to improve the comparability of fair value measurements as presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by providing common requirements for fair value measurement and disclosure.
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods, ASU 2011-11 is intended to enhance disclosure requirements on the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2011-11 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term
41
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases,
42
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures contracts. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2012 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents | $— | $599,578,541 | $— | $599,578,541 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | — | 71,774,621 | — | 71,774,621 | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 7,443,447 | — | 7,443,447 | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 1,158,600,872 | — | 1,158,600,872 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 877,089,952 | — | 877,089,952 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 240,723,815 | — | 240,723,815 | ||||||||||||
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | — | 168,501,201 | — | 168,501,201 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 303,704,783 | — | 303,704,783 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 203,407,956 | — | — | 203,407,956 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $203,407,956 | $3,427,417,232 | $— | $3,630,825,188 | ||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | $(17,145 | ) | $— | $— | $(17,145 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Inflation-Adjusted Debt Securities – The fund invests in inflation-adjusted debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. The fund may also invest in inflation-adjusted debt securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and instrumentalities other than the U.S. Treasury and by other entities such as U.S. and foreign corporations and foreign governments. The principal value of these debt securities is adjusted through income according to changes in the Consumer Price Index or another general price or wage index. These debt securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest, but this fixed rate is applied to the inflation-adjusted principal amount. The principal paid at maturity of the debt security is typically equal to the inflation-adjusted principal amount, or the security’s original par value, whichever is greater. Other types of inflation-adjusted securities may use other methods to adjust for other measures of inflation.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct
43
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Fair Value (a) | ||||||||||
Risk | Derivative Contracts | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||
Interest Rate | Interest Rate Futures | $— | $(17,145 | ) |
(a) | The value of futures contracts outstanding includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
There is no realized gain (loss) from derivative transactions during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended October 31, 2012 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Risk | Futures Contracts | |||
Interest Rate | $(17,145 | ) |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
44
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures contracts and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, swap agreements and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose, if any, is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, currency exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed-income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted upward or downward to the rate of inflation. Interest is accrued based on the principal value, which is adjusted for inflation. Any increase or decrease in the principal amount of an inflation-indexed bond
45
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
is generally recorded as an increase or decrease in interest income, respectively, even though the adjusted principal is not received until maturity. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
The fund purchased or sold debt securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, or in a “To Be Announced” (TBA) or “forward commitment” transaction with delivery or payment to occur at a later date beyond the normal settlement period. TBA securities resulting from these transactions are included in the Portfolio of Investments. At the time a fund enters into a commitment to purchase or sell a security, the transaction is recorded and the value of the security acquired is reflected in the fund’s net asset value. The price of such security and the date that the security will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The value of the security may vary with market fluctuations. TBA purchase commitments are held at carrying amount, which approximates fair value and are categorized as Level 2 within the disclosure hierarchy. No interest accrues to the fund until payment takes place. At the time that a fund enters into this type of transaction, the fund is required to have sufficient cash and/or liquid securities to cover its commitments. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract’s terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic or other factors. Additionally, losses may arise due to declines in the value of the securities prior to settlement date.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, custody fees were not reduced.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Foreign taxes have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order
46
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
4/30/12 | ||||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $107,567,289 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 10/31/12 | ||||
Cost of investments | $3,466,776,364 | |||
Gross appreciation | 199,659,385 | |||
Gross depreciation | (35,610,561 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $164,048,824 | |||
As of 4/30/12 | ||||
Undistributed ordinary income | 8,491,453 | |||
Capital loss carryforwards | (22,048,970 | ) | ||
Other temporary differences | (10,209,979 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 91,348,299 |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized after April 30, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of April 30, 2012, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
Pre-enactment losses: | ||||
4/30/17 | $(19,087,062 | ) | ||
4/30/18 | (2,961,908 | ) | ||
Total | $(22,048,970 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution, service, and program manager
47
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B and Class 529B shares will convert to Class A and Class 529A shares, respectively, approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
From net investment income | ||||||||
Six months ended 10/31/12 | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||
Class A | $17,256,728 | $35,151,181 | ||||||
Class B | 592,712 | 1,220,736 | ||||||
Class C | 1,974,101 | 4,053,197 | ||||||
Class I | 20,875,282 | 62,426,486 | ||||||
Class R1 | 39,481 | 84,454 | ||||||
Class R2 | 705,417 | 1,453,300 | ||||||
Class R3 | 733,830 | 1,197,900 | ||||||
Class R4 | 915,335 | 1,513,844 | ||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | 12,867,785 | 254,845 | ||||||
Class 529A | 66,993 | 116,119 | ||||||
Class 529B | 5,082 | 14,185 | ||||||
Class 529C | 46,720 | 81,042 | ||||||
Total | $56,079,466 | $107,567,289 |
On May 30, 2012, Class W shares were redesignated Class R5. See Note 5 for additional information.
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.50% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $590,480 and $1,661 for the six months ended October 31, 2012, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A and Class 529A shares of the fund, respectively.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
48
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
Distribution Fee Rate (d) | Service Fee Rate (d) | Total Distribution Plan (d) | Annual Effective Rate (e) | Distribution and Service Fee | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | $1,302,002 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.90% | 231,031 | |||||||||||||||
Class C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 798,527 | |||||||||||||||
Class R1 | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 15,955 | |||||||||||||||
Class R2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 118,752 | |||||||||||||||
Class R3 | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 57,044 | |||||||||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | — | — | — | 0.00% | (a) | 232 | ||||||||||||||
Class 529A | — | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.15% | 5,130 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529B | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 2,096 | |||||||||||||||
Class 529C | 0.75% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 19,288 | |||||||||||||||
Total Distribution and Service Fees | $2,550,057 |
(a) | Amount is less than 0.01%. |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’ average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the six months ended October 31, 2012 based on each class’ average daily net assets. 0.10% of the Class A and Class 529A service fee is currently being waived under a written waiver arrangement. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $522,846 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Assets attributable to Class B shares purchased prior to May 1, 2006 are subject to the 0.25% annual Class B service fee. On assets attributable to all other Class B shares, 0.15% of the Class B service fee is being paid by the fund and 0.10% of the Class B service fee is being waived under a written waiver agreement. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $23,482 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. These written waiver agreements will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreements will continue at least until August 31, 2013. Effective May 30, 2012, Class W shares were redesignated Class R5 shares. Effective May 31, 2012, the 0.10% Class W distribution fee was eliminated. See Note 5 for additional information. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C and Class 529C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B and Class 529B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the six months ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
Amount | ||||
Class A | $13,807 | |||
Class B | 34,164 | |||
Class C | 7,988 | |||
Class 529B | 10 |
49
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
The fund has entered into and may from time to time enter into contracts with program managers and other parties which administer the tuition programs through which an investment in the fund’s 529 share classes is made. The fund has entered into an agreement with MFD pursuant to which MFD receives an annual fee of up to 0.10% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. MFD has agreed to waive a portion of this fee in an amount equal to 0.05% of the average daily net assets for each 529 share class. This waiver agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees but such agreement will continue at least until August 31, 2013, after which MFD may eliminate this waiver without a vote of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, this waiver amounted to $2,095 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The program manager fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.05% of the average daily net assets attributable to each 529 share class. The services provided by MFD, or a third party with which MFD contracts, include recordkeeping and tax reporting and account services, as well as services designed to maintain the program’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other regulatory requirements. Program manager fees and waivers for the six months ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
Fee | Waiver | |||||||
Class 529A | $2,052 | $1,026 | ||||||
Class 529B | 210 | 105 | ||||||
Class 529C | 1,928 | 964 | ||||||
Total Program Manager Fees and Waivers | $4,190 | $2,095 |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fee was $207,131, which equated to 0.0124% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $1,221,945. Effective with the redesignation of Class W to Class R5 on May 30, 2012 (as discussed in Note 5), Class R5 shares do not incur sub-accounting fees.
Under a Special Servicing Agreement among MFS, each MFS fund which invests in other MFS funds (“MFS fund-of-funds”) and certain underlying funds in which a MFS fund-of-funds invests (“underlying funds”), each underlying fund may pay a portion of each MFS fund-of-fund’s transfer agent-related expenses, including sub-accounting fees payable to financial intermediaries, to the extent such payments do not exceed the benefits realized or expected to be realized by the underlying fund from the investment in the underlying fund by the MFS fund-of-fund. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, these costs for the fund amounted to $99,899 and are reflected in the “Shareholder servicing costs” on the Statement of Operations. Effective June 1, 2012, the fund no longer pays any expenses under this agreement.
50
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended October 31, 2012 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0143% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $13,946 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $6,006, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
On May 9, 2012, MFS purchased 9,200 shares of Class W for an aggregate amount of $100,000. On May 31, 2012, MFS purchased 9,191 shares of Class R5 for an aggregate amount of $100,000.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||
U.S. Government securities | $1,005,695,019 | $859,703,515 | ||||||
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | $650,797,294 | $534,585,642 |
51
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 10/31/12 | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares sold | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 14,867,802 | $163,298,022 | 29,805,685 | $318,801,031 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 549,992 | 6,025,634 | 1,351,241 | 14,468,582 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 1,681,463 | 18,490,143 | 4,239,241 | 45,422,586 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 15,193,681 | 166,868,648 | 57,005,973 | 610,152,244 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 28,715 | 314,819 | 93,689 | 1,005,989 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 466,270 | 5,104,089 | 1,080,992 | 11,560,836 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 1,047,160 | 11,463,670 | 1,492,259 | 15,995,493 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2,725,590 | 30,088,048 | 1,949,761 | 20,814,101 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | 91,930,767 | 999,052,040 | 753,591 | 8,090,292 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 57,706 | 633,637 | 139,420 | 1,489,889 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 6,091 | 66,671 | 5,522 | 59,291 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 48,472 | 532,411 | 156,778 | 1,680,692 | ||||||||||||
128,603,709 | $1,401,937,832 | 98,074,152 | $1,049,541,026 | |||||||||||||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,289,609 | $14,202,776 | 2,635,512 | $28,209,626 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 43,089 | 475,434 | 85,589 | 917,321 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 103,146 | 1,137,487 | 204,808 | 2,195,172 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 646,316 | 7,100,346 | 3,076,192 | 32,949,318 | ||||||||||||
Class R1 | 3,573 | 39,421 | 7,862 | 84,272 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 61,733 | 679,324 | 131,151 | 1,402,810 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 66,607 | 733,830 | 111,900 | 1,197,603 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 82,856 | 913,168 | 141,188 | 1,512,041 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | 1,163,109 | 12,860,182 | 22,222 | 238,079 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 6,056 | 66,583 | 10,836 | 115,798 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | 454 | 5,014 | 1,304 | 13,964 | ||||||||||||
Class 529C | 4,232 | 46,665 | 7,546 | 80,897 | ||||||||||||
3,470,780 | $38,260,230 | 6,436,110 | $68,916,901 |
52
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
Six months ended 10/31/12 | Year ended 4/30/12 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
Shares reacquired | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | (14,407,141 | ) | $(158,206,692 | ) | (24,595,046 | ) | $(262,864,145 | ) | ||||||||
Class B | (457,176 | ) | (5,028,976 | ) | (1,310,422 | ) | (14,017,504 | ) | ||||||||
Class C | (1,191,951 | ) | (13,105,436 | ) | (3,027,051 | ) | (32,398,531 | ) | ||||||||
Class I | (97,583,077 | ) | (1,060,358,051 | ) | (25,519,695 | ) | (272,759,954 | ) | ||||||||
Class R1 | (28,948 | ) | (317,776 | ) | (94,953 | ) | (1,016,426 | ) | ||||||||
Class R2 | (441,044 | ) | (4,848,387 | ) | (908,846 | ) | (9,711,580 | ) | ||||||||
Class R3 | (804,781 | ) | (8,884,506 | ) | (596,706 | ) | (6,380,403 | ) | ||||||||
Class R4 | (548,472 | ) | (6,023,281 | ) | (889,377 | ) | (9,517,399 | ) | ||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | (3,921,116 | ) | (42,761,339 | ) | (552,181 | ) | (5,890,270 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529A | (33,391 | ) | (365,605 | ) | (32,588 | ) | (347,903 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529B | (8,602 | ) | (94,311 | ) | (23,137 | ) | (247,116 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529C | (26,573 | ) | (292,726 | ) | (47,043 | ) | (503,205 | ) | ||||||||
(119,452,272 | ) | $(1,300,287,086 | ) | (57,597,045 | ) | $(615,654,436 | ) | |||||||||
Net change | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 1,750,270 | $19,294,106 | 7,846,151 | $84,146,512 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 135,905 | 1,472,092 | 126,408 | 1,368,399 | ||||||||||||
Class C | 592,658 | 6,522,194 | 1,416,998 | 15,219,227 | ||||||||||||
Class I | (81,743,080 | ) | (886,389,057 | ) | 34,562,470 | 370,341,608 | ||||||||||
Class R1 | 3,340 | 36,464 | 6,598 | 73,835 | ||||||||||||
Class R2 | 86,959 | 935,026 | 303,297 | 3,252,066 | ||||||||||||
Class R3 | 308,986 | 3,312,994 | 1,007,453 | 10,812,693 | ||||||||||||
Class R4 | 2,259,974 | 24,977,935 | 1,201,572 | 12,808,743 | ||||||||||||
Class R5 (formerly Class W) | 89,172,760 | 969,150,883 | 223,632 | 2,438,101 | ||||||||||||
Class 529A | 30,371 | 334,615 | 117,668 | 1,257,784 | ||||||||||||
Class 529B | (2,057 | ) | (22,626 | ) | (16,311 | ) | (173,861 | ) | ||||||||
Class 529C | 26,131 | 286,350 | 117,281 | 1,258,384 | ||||||||||||
12,622,217 | $139,910,976 | 46,913,217 | $502,803,491 |
The fund is one of several mutual funds in which the MFS funds-of-funds may invest. The MFS funds-of-funds do not invest in the underlying MFS funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. At the end of the period, the MFS Moderate Allocation Fund, the MFS Conservative Allocation Fund, the MFS Growth Allocation Fund, the MFS Lifetime Retirement Income Fund, and the MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund were the owners of record of approximately 13%, 10%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively, of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund. In addition, the MFS Lifetime 2010 Fund, the MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund, the MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund, the MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund and the MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund were each the owners of record of less than 1% of the value of outstanding voting shares of the fund.
Redesignation of Class W to Class R5 – On May 10, 2012, sales of Class W shares (including exchanges) were suspended. On May 11, 2012, certain Class W shares were automatically converted to Class I shares. Shareholders of certain Class W shares became shareholders of Class I and received Class I shares with a total net asset value
53
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) – continued
equal to their Class W shares at the time of the conversion. On May 30, 2012, remaining Class W shares, which represented MFS seed money, were redesignated as Class R5. Class R5 shares are generally available only to certain eligible retirement plans and to funds distributed by MFD. Class R5 shares do not pay a 12b-1 distribution fee or sub-accounting costs. On June 1, 2012, Class R5 shares were offered for sale to the public.
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended October 31, 2012, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $10,515 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense on the Statement of Operations.
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | Ending Shares/Par Amount | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | 169,298,396 | 853,855,079 | (819,745,519 | ) | 203,407,956 | |||||||||||
Underlying Affiliated Fund | Realized Gain (Loss) | Capital Gain Distributions | Dividend Income | Ending Value | ||||||||||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | $— | $— | $117,562 | $203,407,956 |
54
Table of Contents
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2012 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2011 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management
55
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 1st quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for the one-year period and the 2nd quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2011 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (“MFD”), an affiliate of MFS, currently observes a Class A 12b-1 fee waiver, which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations
56
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to institutional accounts, if any. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund is likely to benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account that the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate was approximately at the Lipper expense group median described above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFD. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
57
Table of Contents
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2012.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
58
Table of Contents
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products and Performance” section of mfs.com.
PROVISION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS AND SUMMARY PROSPECTUSES
The fund produces financial reports every six months and updates its summary prospectus and prospectus annually. To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, only one copy of the fund’s annual and semiannual report and summary prospectus may be mailed to shareholders having the same last name and residential address on the fund’s records. However, any shareholder may contact MFSC (please see back cover for address and telephone number) to request that copies of these reports and summary prospectuses be sent personally to that shareholder.
59
Table of Contents
Save paper with eDelivery.
MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
During the period covered by this report, the Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to any element of the Code’s definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 6. | INVESTMENTS |
A schedule of investments of each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
Table of Contents
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
(1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
(2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Table of Contents
Notice
A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) MFS SERIES TRUST IX
By (Signature and Title)* | JOHN M. CORCORAN | |
John M. Corcoran, President |
Date: December 19, 2012
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* | JOHN M. CORCORAN | |
John M. Corcoran, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: December 19, 2012
By (Signature and Title)* | DAVID L. DILORENZO | |
David L. DiLorenzo, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: December 19, 2012
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |