Met Pro 10Q/A 2009 Q0 Quarterly report (amended)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

S QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended: July 31, 2007

£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-07763

MET-PRO CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	23-1683282
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

160 Cassell Road, P.O. Box 144
Harleysville, Pennsylvania	19438
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 723-6751

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes S No £

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer £ Accelerated filer S Non-accelerated filer £

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No S

As of July 31, 2007 the Registrant had 11,258,045 Common Shares, par value of $.10 per share, issued and outstanding.

MET-PRO CORPORATION

EXPLANATORY NOTE

On January 22, 2008, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Met-Pro Corporation (the “Company”), after discussion with management and the Company’s independent registered public accountants, Margolis & Company P.C., concluded that the Company’s previously issued audited financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 inclusive of the fourth fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2007, and interim period unaudited financial statements as of and for the periods ended April 30, 2007, July 31, 2007 and October 31, 2007, should no longer be relied upon because of errors in such financial statements that would require restatement of the financial statements for all indicated periods. Subsequent investigation has indicated that, for similar reasons, restatement of the unaudited financial statements as of and for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2006 is also required.

The financial statements for the affected periods prematurely recognized net sales and net income that should have been recognized in subsequent fiscal periods, or which are expected to be able to be recognized in future fiscal periods. These revenue recognition errors resulted in or contributed to adjustments in earnings per share, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, retained earnings and backlog. The financial statement errors were the result of unauthorized actions by one non-officer level sales employee, in violation of the Company’s policies including its revenue recognition policy. Additional information with respect to the action by the employee, who fabricated documents and involved vendors who made false statements to the Company, is disclosed in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2008.

The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Met-Pro Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 is to correct the net sales, net income, earnings per share, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, retained earnings and backlog amounts that were improperly stated as a result of these actions. The errors affect the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Operations, Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition to these changes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, this Amendment makes corresponding changes in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The only changes in this Amendment on Form 10-Q/A to the original Form 10-Q filed on September 7, 2007 are those affected by the restatement. This Form 10-Q/A continues to speak as of the date of our original Form 10-Q and we have not updated the disclosures to speak as of a later date or to reflect subsequent results, events or developments. Information in the original Form 10-Q not affected by the foregoing is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the filing of the original Form 10-Q. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our SEC filings made subsequent to the September 7, 2007 filing of the original Form 10-Q, including any amendments to those filings. The following items have been amended as a result of the restatement and are included in this Form 10-Q/A:

Part I – Item 1 – Financial Statements

Part I – Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Part I – Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

Part II – Item 6 – Exhibits

Pursuant to the applicable rules, Item 6 of Part II has been amended to contain the currently dated certifications from our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are attached to this Form 10-Q/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.

MET-PRO CORPORATION

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheet (Restated) as of July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007		3
	Consolidated Statement of Operations (Restated) for the six-month and three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006		4
	Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Restated) for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006		5
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Restated) for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006		6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		17

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated)		18

Item 3.		Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk	25

Item 4.		Controls and Procedures (Restated)	25


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	26

Item 1A.		Risk Factors	27

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	27

Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	27

Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	28

Item 5.		Other Information	28

Item 6.		Exhibits	28


SIGNATURES			29

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (RESTATED)

(unaudited)

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

	July 31,			January 31,
ASSETS	2007			2007
Current assets	(Restated)			(Restated)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,426,816		$	17,322,194
Marketable securities		24,043			24,090
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $150,000 and $133,000, respectively		16,703,558			19,988,097
Inventories		24,414,471			19,720,842
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets		2,254,041			1,748,130
Total current assets		67,822,929			58,803,353

Property, plant and equipment, net		16,217,855			16,832,988
Costs in excess of net assets of businesses acquired, net		20,798,913			20,798,913
Other assets		294,610			306,403
Total assets	$	105,134,307		$	96,741,657

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	1,981,082		$	1,955,202
Accounts payable		8,554,790			6,419,951
Accrued salaries, wages and expenses		3,753,556			4,005,300
Dividend payable		757,389			757,029
Customers' advances		2,333,909			981,680
Deferred income taxes		242,457			245,231
Total current liabilities		17,623,183			14,364,393

Long-term debt		4,517,363			5,417,990
Other non-current liabilities		3,305,321			3,276,551
Deferred income taxes		2,335,529			1,369,591
Total liabilities		27,781,396			24,428,525

Shareholders' equity
Common shares, $.10 par value; 18,000,000 shares authorized, 12,846,608 shares issued, of which 1,588,563 and 1,631,364 shares were reacquired and held in treasury at the respective dates		1,284,661			1,284,661
Additional paid-in capital		8,254,499			7,910,708
Retained earnings		78,666,767			74,657,888
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		351,891			( 33,471	)
Treasury shares, at cost		(11,204,907	)		(11,506,654	)
Total shareholders' equity		77,352,911			72,313,132
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	105,134,307		$	96,741,657
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (RESTATED)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Restated)						(Restated)
Net sales	$	45,964,544		$	43,557,923		$	25,148,431		$	23,778,882
Cost of goods sold		31,147,427			30,968,074			17,015,515			17,044,392
Gross profit		14,817,117			12,589,849			8,132,916			6,734,490

Operating expenses (income)
Selling		4,589,778			3,972,366			2,519,901			2,076,187
General and administrative		5,407,261			4,539,931			2,923,408			2,181,418
Gain on sale of building		(3,513,940	)		-			-			-
		6,483,099			8,512,297			5,443,309			4,257,605
Income from operations		8,334,018			4,077,552			2,689,607			2,476,885

Interest expense		(170,698	)		(147,314	)		(90,546	)		(87,509	)
Other income, net		516,393			505,251			299,087			270,453
Income before taxes		8,679,713			4,435,489			2,898,148			2,659,829

Provision for taxes		3,030,694			1,419,356			970,880			851,144
Net income	$	5,649,019		$	3,016,133		$	1,927,268		$	1,808,685

Earnings per share, basic (1)	$	.50		$	.27		$	.17		$	.16

Earnings per share, diluted (2)	$	.49		$	.27		$	.17		$	.16

Cash dividend per share – declared (3)	$	.1350		$	.1250		$	.0675		$	.0625

Cash dividend per share – paid (3)	$	.1350		$	.1250		$	.0675		$	.0625

(1)

Basic earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 11,226,822 and 11,202,088 for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 11,222,658 and 11,201,507 for the three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(2)

Diluted earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 11,473,431 and 11,379,867 for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 11,470,742 and 11,383,659 for the three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(3)

The Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $.0675 per share payable on March 14, 2007, June 12, 2007, and September 10, 2007 to shareholders of record as of February 28, 2007, May 29, 2007, and August 27, 2007, respectively. Quarterly dividends of $.0625 per share were paid on March 9, 2006, June 7, 2006, and September 6, 2006 to shareholders of record as of February 24, 2006, May 26, 2006, and August 24, 2006, respectively.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (RESTATED)

(unaudited)


								Accumulated
			Additional					Other
	Common		Paid-in		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Shares		Capital		Earnings			Income/(Loss)			Shares			Total
Balances,
January 31, 2007(Restated)	$	1,284,661	$	7,910,708	$	74,657,888		$	(33,471	)	$	(11,506,654	)	$	72,313,132

Comprehensive income:
Net income (Restated)		-		-		5,649,019			-			-
Adoption of FIN No. 48		-		-		(125,000	)		-			-
Foreign currency translation adjustment									280,143
Interest rate swap, net of tax of ($61,813)		-		-		-			105,249			-
Securities available for sale, net of tax of $17		-		-		-			(30	)		-
Total comprehensive income															5,909,381

Dividends paid, $.0675 per share		-		-		(757,751	)		-			-			(757,751	)
Dividends declared, $.0675 per share		-		-		(757,389	)		-			-			(757,389	)
Stock-based compensation		-		255,054		-			-			-			255,054
Stock option transactions		-		88,737		-			-			301,747			390,484
Balances,
July 31, 2007(Restated)	$	1,284,661	$	8,254,499	$	78,666,767		$	351,891		$	(11,204,907	)	$	77,352,911

								Accumulated
			Additional					Other
	Common		Paid-in		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Shares		Capital		Earnings			Income/(Loss)			Shares			Total
Balances, January 31, 2006	$	1,284,661	$	7,564,180	$	70,645,717		$	(321,821	)	$	(11,634,499	)	$	67,538,238

Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-		3,016,133			-			-
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-		-		-			201,298			-
Interest rate swap, net of tax of $43,599		-		-		-			90,864			-
Total comprehensive income															3,308,295

Dividends paid, $.0625 per share		-		-		(700,287	)		-			-			(700,287	)
Dividends declared, $.0625 per share		-		-		(700,286	)		-			-			(700,286	)
Stock-based compensation		-		163,601		-			-			-			163,601
Stock option transactions		-		2,589		-			-			52,642			55,231
Balances, July 31, 2006	$	1,284,661	$	7,730,370	$	72,261,277		$	(29,659	)	$	(11,581,857	)	$	69,664,792
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (RESTATED)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	July 31,
	2007			2006
	(Restated)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	5,649,019		$	3,016,133
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		843,274			768,427
Deferred income taxes		899,167			(1,106	)
(Gain) on sale of property and equipment, net		(3,516,683	)		(11,589	)
Stock-based compensation		255,054			163,601
Allowance for doubtful accounts		17,211			(79,629	)
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Accounts receivable		3,409,747			1,607,822
Inventories		(4,562,546	)		(1,405,805	)
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets		(481,406	)		247,600
Other assets		(4,841	)		(4,644	)
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,651,487			(276,556	)
Customers’ advances		1,351,575			(532,636	)
Other non-current liabilities		28,770			1,098
Net cash provided by operating activities		5,539,828			3,492,716

Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		4,345,282			12,810
Acquisitions of property and equipment		(864,953	)		(3,275,209	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		3,480,329			(3,262,399	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from new borrowings		-			4,140,315
Reduction of debt		(758,148	)		(713,113	)
Exercise of stock options		390,484			55,232
Payment of dividends		(1,514,780	)		(1,400,107	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,882,444	)		2,082,327
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(33,091	)		23,357

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		7,104,622			2,336,001

Cash and cash equivalents at February 1		17,322,194			17,683,305
Cash and cash equivalents at July 31	$	24,426,816		$	20,019,306
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (RESTATED)

Restatement:

As noted in the Explanatory Note at the outset of this Amendment, the filing of this amended Form 10-Q/A arises out of unauthorized actions by one non-officer level sales employee, in violation of the Company’s policies including its revenue recognition policy. The financial statements for the affected periods prematurely recognized net sales and net income that should have been recognized in subsequent fiscal periods, or which are expected to be able to be recognized in future fiscal periods. These revenue recognition errors resulted in or contrubted to adjustments in earnings per share, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, retained earnings and backlog. The financial statement errors were the result of unauthorized actions by one non-officer level sales employee, in violation of the Company’s policies including its revenue recognition policy. Additional information with respect to the action by the employee, who fabricated documents and involved vendors who made false statements to the Company, is disclosed in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2008.

This restatement affects the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Operations, Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, the Company changed its previously reported net sales, net income, earnings per share, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, retained earnings and backlog.

The impact of these actions on reported results are as follows:

	Six Months Ended July 31, 2007				Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
	As Restated		As Previously Reported		As Restated		As Previously Reported
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Net sales	$	45,964,544	$	49,512,698	$	25,148,431	$	27,596,089
Net income		5,649,019		6,405,944		1,927,268		2,527,701
Earnings per share, basic	$	.50	$	.57	$	.17	$	.23
Earnings per share, diluted	$	.49	$	.56	$	.17	$	.22

	Period Ended July 31, 2007
	As Restated		As Previously Reported
Consolidated Balance Sheet:
Accounts receivable	$	16,703,558	$	21,573,525
Inventory		24,414,471		22,082,136
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets		2,254,041		1,751,891
Accounts payable		8,554,790		9,057,973
Accrued salaries, wages and expenses		3,753,556		4,264,905
Retained earnings		78,666,767		79,687,717

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, which replaces Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements”. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for accounting and reporting a change in accounting principle, and applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles, as well as changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance it does not include specific transition provisions. Specifically,

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine the period specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is impracticable to determine the effects of the change, the new accounting principle must be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable and a corresponding adjustment must be made to the opening balance of retained earnings for that period rather than being reported in the statement of operations. When it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of the change, the new principle must be applied as if it were adopted prospectively from the earliest date practicable. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing pronouncements. SFAS No. 154 has not had a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of SFAS No. 109”. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN No. 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN No. 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity) for that fiscal year. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted FIN 48 effective February 1, 2007. See Note 8 on page 11 for further information.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 108, to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that the Company quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of our financial statements and related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company has adopted SAB 108 effective as of January 31, 2007. The adoption of this bulletin did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of the fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)”. SFAS No. 158 requires that we recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of our pension plans (the Plans) as an asset or liability in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet, with changes in the funded status recognized through other comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. SFAS No. 158 also requires us to measure the funded status of the Plans as of the year end consolidated balance sheet date not later than December 31, 2008. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 resulted in an increase in the pension liabilities and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of approximately $0.3 million, prior to any deferred tax adjustment, in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115”. SFAS No. 159 permits an entity to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with few exceptions. SFAS No. 159 amends previous guidance to extend the use of the fair value option to available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities. The statement also established presentation and disclosure requirements to help financial statement users understand the effect of the election. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 159 on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

NOTE 2 – PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Met-Pro Corporation (“Met-Pro” or the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Mefiag B.V., Flex-Kleen Canada Inc., Strobic Air Corporation, MPC Inc., Pristine Water Solutions Inc., Mefiag (Guangzhou) Filter Systems Ltd. and Met-Pro (Hong Kong) Limited Company. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

NOTE 3 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of July 31, 2007 and the results of operations for the six-month and three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, and changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the six-month periods then ended. The results of operations for the six-month and three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2007.

NOTE 4 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Options:

On December 15, 2006, the Company granted 179,000 stock options to employees and directors, with one-third exercisable one year from the grant date and the remaining two-thirds vesting two and three years from the grant date, respectively. Previous options granted by the Company became exercisable with one-third exercisable as of the date of grant and the remaining two-thirds vesting over a two year period. In the event of a “change of control”, any unvested portion of the option shall become immediately exercisable. The Company’s present practice is that the duration of options is for up to ten years from the date of grant, subject to earlier termination under various conditions. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis over its respective vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of options was estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The per share weighted-average fair value at the date of grant for stock options granted during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 was $4.03 per option. The application of this valuation model relies on the following assumptions that are judgmental and sensitive in the determination of the compensation expense:

	Six Months Ended
	July 31,
	2007			2006
Expected term (years)		5.0			5.0
Risk-free interest rate		4.50% - 4.58	%		3.63% - 4.58	%
Expected volatility		29% - 30	%		30% - 32	%
Dividend yield		1.86% - 3.39	%		2.26% - 3.39	%

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Historical information was the principal basis for the selection of the expected term and dividend yield. The expected volatility is based on a weighted-average combination of historical and implied volatilities over a time period that approximates the expected term of the option. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon the U.S. Treasury Bill rates in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.

The following table summarizes stock option transactions for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007:

					Weighted
			Weighted		Average
			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Shares		Exercise Price		Life (years)		Intrinsic Value
Options:
Outstanding at February 1, 2007		956,941	$	10.6892		7.49
Granted		-		-
Forfeited		12,667		-
Expired		-		-
Exercised		42,801		9.1232
Outstanding at July 31, 2007		901,473	$	10.7169		6.99	$	4,447,056

Exercisable at July 31, 2007		678,801	$	9.6621		6.99	$	4,064,593

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 was $279,725 and $43,332, respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options is the amount by which the market price of the stock on a given date, such as at the end of the period or on the day of exercise, exceeded the market price of the stock on the date of grant.

The following table summarizes information about the options outstanding and options exercisable as of July 31, 2007:

		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
				Weighted Average
				Remaining		Weighted Average				Weighted Average
		Shares		Life (years)		Exercise Price		Shares		Exercise Price
Range of prices:
$	5.48 – 5.99		32,980		2.45	$	5.5533		32,980	$	5.5533
$	6.00 – 6.99		59,382		3.63		6.8063		59,382		6.8063
$	7.00 – 8.99		187,097		5.27		7.3740		187,097		7.3740
$	9.00 – 11.99		153,340		7.68		9.8813		153,340		9.8813
$	12.00 – 12.99		299,674		7.69		12.4243		246,002		12.5059
$	13.00 – 14.99		169,000		9.51		14.5300		-		-
			901,473		6.99	$	10.7169		678,801	$	9.6621

As of July 31, 2007, there was $695,981 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

At July 31, 2007 the Company's marketable securities had a fair market value of $24,043, which includes an unrealized loss of ($449). The marketable securities are composed of 555 shares of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (“AWI”) distributed to Met-Pro as part of a Chapter 11 reorganization settlement in October of 2006.

NOTE 6 – INVENTORIES (RESTATED)

Inventories consisted of the following:

	July 31, 2007		January 31, 2007
Raw materials	$	15,049,792	$	13,596,386
Work in progress		6,561,219		2,790,052
Finished goods		2,803,460		3,334,404
	$	24,414,471	$	19,720,842

NOTE 7 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Net cash flows from operating activities reflect cash payments for interest and income taxes as follows:

	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007		2006
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	173,826	$	155,138
Income taxes		2,722,978		1,964,283

NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 on February 1, 2007. Previously, the Company accounted for tax contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”. As required by FIN No. 48, which clarifies SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, the Company applied FIN No. 48 to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, the Company recognized an increase of $125,000 in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as a reduction to the February 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of February 1, 2007, prior to the FIN No. 48 adjustment, amounted to $38,000. The total unrecognized tax benefit amounted to $163,000 which, if ultimately realized, will reduce the Company’s annual effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense for all periods presented. The Company had accrued approximately $65,000 for the payment of interest and penalties through February 1, 2007, which is included in the $163,000 unrecognized tax benefit amount.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company plans to enter into Voluntary Disclosure programs in several taxing jurisdictions. The Company anticipates that the resolution of these unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next twelve months.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2003.

NOTE 9 – DEBT

The Company and its subsidiaries have domestic and foreign unsecured lines of credit totaling $5,000,000 which can be used for working capital. As of July 31, 2007, the Company’s Mefiag B.V. subsidiary had borrowed $410,430 (300,000 Euro) from its available line of credit, which is included in the table below.

Short-term and long-term debt consisted of the following:

	July 31, 2007			January 31, 2007

Bond payable, bank, payable in quarterly installments of $58,460, plus interest at a rate of 16 basis points below the ninety day LIBOR rate (effective interest rate of 5.19% at July 31, 2007), maturing April, 2021, collateralized by the Telford, PA building	$	3,215,325		$	3,332,246

Note payable, bank, payable in quarterly installments of $300,000, plus interest at a rate of 75 basis points over the ninety day LIBOR rate (effective interest rate of 6.10% at July 31, 2007), maturing October, 2008		1,800,000			2,400,000

Note payable, bank, payable in quarterly installments of $34,202 (25,000 Euro), plus interest at a fixed rate of 3.82%, maturing January, 2016		1,162,886			1,173,061

Line of credit, $410,430 (300,000 Euro), payable upon demand, plus interest at a rate of 70 basis points over the thirty day EURIBOR rate (effective interest rate of 4.81% at July 31, 2007)		410,430			391,020

		6,588,641			7,296,327
Less current portion		1,981,082			1,955,202
		4,607,559			5,341,125
Fair market value of interest rateswap liability		(90,196	)		76,865
Long-term portion	$	4,517,363		$	5,417,990

The notes payable and bond payable are subject to certain covenants, including maintenance of prescribed amounts of leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has two separate interest rate swap agreements to hedge against the potential impact on earnings from increases in market interest rates. Effective October 29, 1998, the Company entered into a ten-year interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount equal to the balance on the note payable maturing October 2008. The Company swapped the ninety day LIBOR for a fixed rate of 5.23%. As a result, the effective fixed interest rate is 5.98%. Effective April 3, 2006, the Company entered into a fifteen-year interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount equal to the balance on the bond payable maturing April 2021. The Company swapped the ninety day LIBOR for a fixed rate of 4.87%. As a result, the effective fixed interest rate is 4.71%. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges that qualify for treatment under the short-cut method of measuring effectiveness in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended by SFAS 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 133”. There was no hedge ineffectiveness as of July 31, 2007. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements resulted in an increase in equity of $56,824 (net of tax) for the six-months ended July 31, 2007 and a decrease in equity of $48,425 (net of tax) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007. These results are recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive loss section of shareholders’ equity.

Maturities of short-term and long-term debt are as follows:

Year Ending
January 31,
2008	$	1,981,082
2009		1,570,648
2010		370,648
2011		370,648
2012		370,648
Thereafter		1,924,967
	$	6,588,641

NOTE 10 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

	July 31,			January 31,
	2007			2007
Interest rate swap, net of tax	$	56,824		$	(48,425	)
Unrealized gain on securities available-for sale, net of tax		1,400			1,430
Foreign currency translation adjustment		971,873			691,730
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax		(678,206	)		(678,206	)
	$	351,891		$	(33,471	)

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11 – OTHER INCOME, NET

Other income, net was comprised of the following:

	Six Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	July 31,					July 31,
	2007			2006		2007			2006
Interest income	$	529,028		$	493,984	$	306,669		$	248,893
Other miscellaneous income		(12,635	)		11,267		(7,582	)		21,560
	$	516,393		$	505,251	$	299,087		$	270,453

NOTE 12 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has several defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the United States. In the third quarter ended October 31, 2006, the Company amended its defined benefit pension plans to freeze the accrual of future benefits for all its salaried and non-union hourly employees effective on December 31, 2006. The net periodic pension cost is based on estimated values provided by independent actuaries. The following table provides the components of net periodic pension costs:

	Pension Benefits
	Six Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended July 31,
		2007		2006			2007			2006
Service cost	$	74,128		$	354,124		$	37,064		$	177,062
Interest cost		520,082			535,814			260,041			267,907
Expected return on plan assets		(629,750	)		(584,930	)		(314,875	)		(292,465	)
Amortization of transition asset		(742	)		(8,058	)		(371	)		(4,029	)
Amortization of prior service cost		17,390			49,406			8,695			24,703
Recognized net actuarial loss		20,368			51,678			10,184			25,839
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,476		$	398,034		$	738		$	199,017

The Company contributed $50,700 to the pension plans during the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 and expects an additional contribution of $52,622 during the six-month period ended January 31, 2008.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 – BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA (RESTATED)

During the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2006, management reviewed operating segment aggregation in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” and based upon changes beginning in February 2006 in the manner in which management manages the Company, as well as the current economic characteristics of its operating segments, management determined that a revision of the aggregation of operating segments was appropriate. Therefore, the segment discussion outlined below represents the adjusted segment structure as determined by management in accordance with SFAS No. 131. All prior year amounts related to these reporting segments have been restated to conform to the new reporting segment structure.

The Company has identified six operating segments and has aggregated those segments into two reportable segments, Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies and Fluid Handling Technologies and one other segment, Filtration/Purification Technologies. The Filtration/Purification Technologies segment is comprised of four operating segments that do not presently meet the criteria for aggregation outlined in SFAS No. 131. However, the Company’s analysis is that SFAS No. 131 permits the aggregation of operating segments if, individually, each operating segment does not meet any of the following quantitative thresholds: (i) reported revenue is 10 percent or more of combined revenue of all reported operating segments, (ii) the absolute amount of reported profit or loss is 10 percent or more of the greater, in absolute amounts, of either the combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss or the combined reported loss of all operating segments that did report a loss, and (iii) its assets are 10 percent or more of the combined assets of all operating segments. Since none of the operating segments included in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment meet these criteria, and at least 75 percent of total consolidated revenue is included in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies and Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segments, the Company has determined the aggregation of these operating segments into this other segment is appropriate under SFAS No. 131.

The following is a description of each segment:

Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies: This reportable segment consists of one operating segment that manufactures products for the purification of air or liquids. Many of these products are custom designed and engineered to solve a customer’s pollution control or product recovery issues. The products are sold worldwide through Company sales personnel and a network of manufacturer’s representatives. This reporting segment is comprised of the Duall, Systems, Flex-Kleen and Strobic Air business units.

Fluid Handling Technologies: This reportable segment consists of one operating segment that manufactures high quality centrifugal pumps that are suitable for difficult applications including the pumping of acids, brines, caustics, bleaches, seawater, high temperature liquids and a wide variety of waste liquids. A variety of pump configurations make these products adaptable to almost any pumping application. These products are sold worldwide through an extensive network of distributors. This reporting segment is comprised of the Dean Pump, Fybroc and Sethco business units.

Filtration/Purification Technologies: This other segment consists of four operating segments that produce the following products: proprietary chemicals for the treatment of municipal drinking water systems and boiler and cooling tower systems; cartridges and filter housings; filtration products for difficult industrial air and liquid applications; and filter systems using horizontal disc technology. This other segment is comprised of the Keystone Filter, Pristine Water Solutions, Mefiag and Mefiag B.V. operating segments.

The accounting policies of the reporting segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates the performance of these segments based on many factors including sales, sales trends, margins and operating performance.

No significant inter-company revenue is realized in these reporting segments. Interest income and expense are not included in the measure of segment profit reviewed by management. Income taxes are also not included in the measure of segment operating profit reviewed by management.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial information for the two reporting segments and one other segment is shown below:

	Six Months Ended July 31,				Three Months Ended July 31,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net sales	(Restated)				(Restated)
Product recovery/pollution control technologies	$	21,551,576	$	22,091,252	$	12,105,186	$	12,792,903
Fluid handling technologies		13,411,570		12,023,633		7,357,498		6,106,139
Filtration/purification technologies		11,001,398		9,443,038		5,685,747		4,879,840
	$	45,964,544	$	43,557,923	$	25,148,431	$	23,778,882

Income from operations
Product recovery/pollution control technologies	$	1,456,152	$	1,406,072	$	778,418	$	839,358
Fluid handling technologies		2,732,614		1,733,748		1,569,300		1,038,204
Filtration/purification technologies		631,312		937,732		341,889		599,323
		4,820,078		4,077,552		2,689,607		2,476,885
Gain on sale of building		3,513,940		-		-		-
	$	8,334,018	$	4,077,552	$	2,689,607	$	2,476,885

	July 31,		January 31,
	2007		2007
Identifiable assets	(Restated)		(Restated)
Product recovery/pollution control technologies	$	33,990,621	$	34,907,323
Fluid handling technologies		21,421,043		21,667,719
Filtration/purification technologies		20,343,643		20,514,339
		75,755,307		77,089,381
Corporate		29,379,000		19,652,276
	$	105,134,307	$	96,741,657

NOTE 14 – ACCOUNTANTS’ 10-Q/A REVIEW

Margolis & Company P.C., the Company’s independent registered public accountants, has performed a limited review of the financial information included herein. Their report on such review accompanies this filing.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Met-Pro Corporation

Harleysville, Pennsylvania

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Met-Pro Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of July 31, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations for the six-month and three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, and shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Met-Pro Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of January 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 23, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.

	/s/ Margolis & Company P.C.
	Certified Public Accountants

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania

August 17, 2007, except for Notes 1, 6 and 13 as to which the date is February 4, 2008

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated)

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A. This item contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2007.

The financial statements for the affected periods prematurely recognized net sales and net income that should have been recognized in subsequent fiscal periods or which are expected to be recognized in future fiscal periods. These revenue recognition errors resulted in or contributed to adjustments in accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, retained earnings and backlog. The financial statement errors were the result of unauthorized actions by one non-officer level sales employee, in violation of the Company’s policies including its revenue recognition policy. Additional information with respect to the action by the employee, who fabricated documents and involved vendors who made false statements to the Company, is disclosed in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2008.

In total, the errors require adjustments in net sales, net income, earnings per share, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, retained earnings and backlog. The errors affect the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Operations, Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The impact of these actions on reported results are as follows:

	Six Months Ended July 31, 2007				Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
	As Restated		As Previously Reported		As Restated		As Previously Reported
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Net sales	$	45,964,544	$	49,512,698	$	25,148,431	$	27,596,089
Net income		5,649,019		6,405,944		1,927,268		2,527,701
Earnings per share, basic	$	.50	$	.57	$	.17	$	.23
Earnings per share, diluted	$	.49	$	.56	$	.17	$	.22

	Period Ended July 31, 2007
	As Restated		As Previously Reported
Consolidated Balance Sheet:
Accounts receivable	$	16,703,558	$	21,573,525
Inventory		24,414,471		22,082,136
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets		2,254,041		1,751,891
Accounts payable		8,554,790		9,057,973
Accrued salaries, wages and expenses		3,753,556		4,264,905
Retained earnings		78,666,767		79,687,717

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations gives effect to the restatement as it pertains to the fiscal period covered by this Report.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated) continued…

Results of Operations (Restated):

The following table sets forth, for the six-month and three-month periods indicated, certain financial information derived from the Company’s consolidated statement of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.

	Six Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Restated)						(Restated)
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of goods sold		67.8	%		71.1	%		67.7	%		71.7	%
Gross profit		32.2	%		28.9	%		32.3	%		28.3	%

Selling expenses		10.0	%		9.1	%		10.0	%		8.7	%
General and administrative expenses		11.7	%		10.4	%		11.6	%		9.2	%
Gain on sale of building		(7.6	% )		-			-			-
Income from operations		18.1	%		9.4	%		10.7	%		10.4	%

Interest expense		(.3	% )		(.3	% )		(.4	% )		(.4	% )
Other income, net		1.1	%		1.1	%		1.2	%		1.2	%
Income before taxes		18.9	%		10.2	%		11.5	%		11.2	%

Provision for taxes		6.6	%		3.3	%		3.8	%		3.6	%
Net income		12.3	%		6.9	%		7.7	%		7.6	%

Six Months Ended July 31, 2007 vs. Six Months Ended July 31, 2006 (Restated)

Net sales for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 were $45,964,544 compared with $43,557,923 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $2,406,621 or 5.5%. Sales in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment were $21,551,576 or $539,676 lower than the $22,091,252 of sales for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, a decrease of 2.4%. The sales decrease in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was due primarily to timing of shipping our particulate collection, fume and odor control equipment. Sales in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment totaled $13,411,570, or $1,387,937 higher than the $12,023,633 of sales for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of 11.5%. The sales increase in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment was due primarily to increased demand for our centrifugal pumps that handle a broad range of industrial applications. Sales in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment were $11,001,398, or $1,558,360 higher than the $9,443,038 of sales for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of 16.5%. This increase was due primarily to increased demand for our horizontal disc filter systems which are utilized in the metal finishing and plating industry.

The Company’s backlog of orders totaled $30,290,983 and $23,966,831 as of July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Backlog for the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was $23,415,799 or 42.5% higher than the $16,430,154 backlog for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006. The increase in backlog in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was due primarily to increased demand for our air pollution control systems for the removal of volatile organic compounds and other atmospheric pollutants, as well as increased demand for our particulate collection equipment. Backlog for the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment was $4,688,780 or 18.1% lower than the $5,722,781 backlog for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006. The decrease in backlog in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment was due primarily to the timing of large projects for our fiberglass reinforced plastic centrifugal pumps. Backlog for the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment was $2,186,404 or 20.5% higher than the $1,813,896 backlog for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006. The increase in backlog in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment was due primarily to increased demand for our horizontal disc filter systems as well as our filter, cartridge and filter housing products. The Company expects that the majority of the backlog existing as of July 31, 2007 will be shipped during the current fiscal year.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated) continued…

Income from operations for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 was $8,334,018 compared with $4,077,552 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $4,256,466, of which $3,513,940 was due to the sale during the first quarter ended April 30, 2007 of the Company’s property in Hauppauge, Long Island, New York, consisting of a 30,000 square foot building situated on 4 acres. Excluding the gain on the sale of this New York property, income from operations for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 was $4,820,078, or 18.2% higher than the $4,077,552 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006. For comparative purposes, the following income from operations analysis by segment does not contain the gain on the sale of the New York property.

Income from operations in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was $1,456,152, or $50,080 higher than the $1,406,072 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of 3.6%. The increase in income from operations in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was primarily related to increased sales and higher gross margins for our fume and odor control equipment and higher gross margins for our air pollution control systems for the removal of volatile organic compounds and other atmospheric pollutants.

Income from operations in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment totaled $2,732,614, or $998,866 higher than the $1,733,748 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of 57.6%. The increase in income from operations in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment was principally related to higher net sales and gross margins for our centrifugal pumps that handle a broad range of industrial applications.

Income from operations in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment was $631,312 or $306,420 lower than the $937,732 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, a decrease of 32.7%. This decrease was principally related to the increase in expenses relating to the expansion of the sales organization, partially offset by increased sales for our horizontal disc filter systems.

Net income for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 was $5,649,019 compared with $3,016,133 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $2,632,886. This increase in net income was related to (i) a gain during the first quarter ended April 30, 2007 on the sale of the New York property, which increased net income by $2,213,782, (ii) higher sales volume in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment and the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment and (iii) higher gross margins in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control and Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segments, which was offset by (iv) an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the two reporting segments and the other segment amounting to $1,484,742.

The gross margin for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 was 32.2% versus 28.9% for the same period in the prior year. This increase in gross margin was due to higher gross margins in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies and Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segments as a result of the implementation of certain strategic measures, including among other measures, selected sales price increases and improved purchasing practices.

Selling expense increased $617,412 during the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to higher payroll and fringes relating to the expansion of the sales organization for the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment, combined with higher freight expenses in this same segment. Selling expense as a percentage of net sales was 10.0% for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with 9.1% for the same period last year.

General and administrative expense was $5,407,261 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with $4,539,931 for the same period last year, an increase of $867,330. This increase was primarily related to higher executive and office payroll, healthcare expenses, management incentive accruals, stock option expenses, legal expenses and personnel acquisition expenses. General and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales was 11.7% for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007, compared with 10.4% for the same period last year.

Interest expense was $170,698 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007, compared with $147,314 for the same period in the prior year, an increase of $23,384. This increase was due principally to an increase in long-term debt related to plant expansions of the Netherlands and Telford, Pennsylvania facilities.

Other income, net, was $516,393 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with $505,251 for the same period in the prior year, an increase of $11,142. This increase in other income, net, consisted primarily of interest income, which was affected by fluctuations in the amount of cash on hand during the six-month period ended July 31, 2007.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated) continued…

The effective tax rates for the six-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 were 34.9% and 32.0%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate to 34.9% was due to the additional tax expense related to the gain on the sale of the New York property, which increased the effective tax rate by 1.4%, combined with the reduction in the tax benefit provided by the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion (“EIE”).

On August 2, 2007, the Company expended $3,157,113 to purchase a 45,000 sq. ft. facility in suburban Chicago, Illinois to consolidate the operations of its Flex-Kleen business unit, which currently leases office space in the Chicago area and warehouse facilities in North Carolina. The purchase was structured as part of an IRS Section 1031 tax-free exchange, in connection with the sale of the New York property. As a result, the Company has recorded a deferred income tax liability in the first quarter ended April 30, 2007, to record the income tax on the gain related to $3,157,113 of the $4,326,696 net sales price of the New York property. The income tax on the $1,169,583 balance of the gain is reflected in the current liability section of the consolidated balance sheet.

Three Months Ended July 31, 2007 vs. Three Months Ended July 31, 2006 (Restated)

Net sales for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 were $25,148,431 compared with $23,778,882 for the three month-period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $1,369,549 or 5.8%. Sales in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies segment were $12,105,186 compared with $12,792,903 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, a decrease of $687,717 or 5.4%. The sales decrease in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies segment was due primarily to timing of shipments for our particulate collection as well as our fume and odor control equipment. Sales in the Fluid Handling Technologies segment were $7,357,498, compared with $6,106,139 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $1,251,359 or 20.5%. The sales increase in the Fluid Handling Technologies segment was due primarily to increased demand for our centrifugal pumps that handle a broad range of applications. Sales in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment were $5,685,747 compared with $4,879,840 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $805,907 or 16.5%. The sales increase in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment was due primarily to increased demand for our horizontal disc filter systems which are utilized in the metal finishing and plating industry.

Income from operations for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 was $2,689,607 compared with $2,476,885 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $212,722 or 8.6%.

Income from operations in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was $778,418, or $60,940 lower than the $839,358 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, a decrease of 7.3%. The decrease in income from operations in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment was primarily related to decreased sales for our particulate collection equipment, off-set by increased sales and higher gross margins for our fume and odor control equipment, and our air pollution control systems for the removal of volatile organic compounds and other atmospheric pollutants.

Income from operations in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment totaled $1,569,300, or $531,096 higher than the $1,038,204 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of 51.2%. The increase in income from operations in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment was principally related to higher net sales and gross margins for our centrifugal pumps that handle a broad range of industrial applications.

Income from operations in the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment was $341,889 or $257,434 lower than the $599,323 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, a decrease of 43.0%. This decrease was principally related to the increase in expenses relating to the expansion of the sales organization, partially offset by increased sales for our horizontal disc filter systems.

Net income for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 was $1,927,268 compared with $1,808,685 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $118,583 or 6.6%. The increase in net income was related to (i) higher sales volume in the Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segment and the one other segment and (ii) higher gross margins in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control and Fluid Handling Technologies reporting segments, which was offset by (iii) an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the two reporting segments and the other segment amounting to $1,185,704.

The gross margin for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 was 32.3% compared with 28.3% for the same period in the prior year. This increase in gross margin was due to higher gross margins in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated) continued…

Technologies and Fluid Handling Technologies segments as a result of certain strategic measures implemented, which included selected sales price increases and improved purchasing practices.

Selling expenses increased $443,714 during the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to higher payroll and fringes relating to the expansion of the sales organization for the Filtration/Purification Technologies segment, combined with higher freight expenses in this same segment. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses were 10.0% for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared to 8.7% for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006.

General and administrative expense was $2,923,408 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with $2,181,418 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $741,990. This increase was primarily related to higher executive and office payroll, healthcare expenses, management incentive accruals, stock option expenses, legal expenses and personnel acquisition expenses. General and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales was 11.6% for the six-month period ended July 31, 2007, compared with 9.2% of net sales for the same period last year.

Interest expense was $90,546 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with $87,509 for the same period in the prior year, an increase of $3,037. This increase was due principally to an increase of long-term debt related to plant expansions.

Other income, net, was $299,087 for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 compared with $270,453 for the same period in the prior year. This change is related to higher interest income earned on cash on hand.

The effective tax rates for the three-month periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 were 33.5% and 32%, respectively.

Liquidity (Restated):

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $24,426,816 on July 31, 2007 compared with $17,322,194 on January 31, 2007, an increase of $7,104,622. This increase is the net result of the positive cash flows provided by operating activities of $5,539,828, the proceeds from the sale of property and equipment, principally the sale of the New York property, amounting to $4,345,282 and the exercise of stock options amounting to $390,484, offset by payment of the quarterly cash dividends amounting to $1,514,780, payments on long-term debt totaling $758,148 and investment in property and equipment amounting to $864,953. The Company’s cash flows from operating activities are influenced, in part, by the timing of shipments and negotiated standard payment terms, including retention associated with major projects, as well as other factors including changes in inventories and accounts receivable balances.

Accounts receivable (net) totaled $16,703,558 on July 31, 2007 compared with $19,988,097 on January 31, 2007, which represents a decrease of $3,284,539. In addition to changes in sales volume, the timing and size of shipments and retainage on contracts, especially in the Product Recovery/Pollution Control Technologies reporting segment, will, among other factors, influence accounts receivable balances at any given point in time.

Inventories were $24,414,471 on July 31, 2007 compared with $19,720,842 on January 31, 2007, an increase of $4,693,629. This increase is primarily attributable to inventory purchased in the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 for projects which are expected to ship in the next six-month period. Inventory balances fluctuate depending on market demand and the timing and size of shipments, especially when major systems and contracts are involved.

Current liabilities amounted to $17,623,183 on July 31, 2007, compared with $14,364,393 on January 31, 2007, an increase of $3,258,790. This increase is due to an increase in customer advance payments, accounts payable, and accrued salaries, wages and expenses.

The Company has consistently maintained a high current ratio and it and its subsidiaries maintain domestic and foreign lines of credit totaling $5,000,000, all of which are available for working capital purposes, except for $410,430 outstanding as of July 31, 2007 borrowed by the Company’s Mefiag B.V. subsidiary to partially finance an expansion and renovation of its facility located in The Netherlands. Cash flows, in general, have exceeded the current needs of the Company. The Company presently foresees no change in this situation in the immediate future. As of July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007, working capital was $50,199,746 and $44,438,960, respectively, and the current ratio was 3.8 and 4.1, respectively.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(Restated) continued…

Capital Resources and Requirements:

Cash flows provided by operating activities during the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 amounted to $5,539,828 compared with $3,492,716 in the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $2,047,112. This increase in cash flows from operating activities was due principally to increases in net income, accounts receivable, accrued customer advances, deferred taxes and accounts payable and accrued expenses, offset by an increase in inventories and the non-cash net gain on sales of property and equipment.

Cash flows provided by investing activities during the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 amounted to $3,480,329 compared with cash flows used in investing activities of $3,262,399 for the six-month period ended July 31, 2006, an increase of $6,742,728. The increase in cash from investing activities is principally due to the sale of the New York property amounting to $4,326,696 and a reduction in the acquisition of property and equipment in the two reporting segments and one other segment amounting to $2,410,256. As previously discussed, on August 2, 2007, the Company expended $3,157,113 of cash to purchase a property in suburban Chicago, Illinois to be occupied by its Flex-Kleen business unit, as part of a Section 1031 tax free exchange in connection with the sale of the New York property.

Consistent with past practices, the Company intends to continue to invest in new product development programs and to make capital expenditures required to support the ongoing operations during the coming fiscal year. The Company expects to finance all routine capital expenditure requirements through cash flows generated from operations.

Financing activities during the six-month period ended July 31, 2007 utilized $1,882,444 of available resources, compared with $2,082,327 provided during the six-month period ended July 31, 2006. The 2007 activity is the result of the payments of the quarterly cash dividends amounting to $1,514,780 and the reduction of long-term debt totaling $758,148, offset by the exercise of stock options amounting to $390,484.

The Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $.0675 payable on March 14, 2007, June 12, 2007 and September 10, 2007 to shareholders of record as of February 28, 2007, May 29, 2007 and August 27, 2007, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Results of Operations is based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The significant accounting policies which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:

The Company recognizes revenues from product sales or services provided when the following revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”, provides guidance on the application of generally accepted accounting principles to selected revenue recognition issues. The Company has concluded that its revenue recognition policy is appropriate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and SAB No. 104.

Property, plant and equipment, intangible and certain other long-lived assets are depreciated and amortized over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on management’s estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets”, effective February 1, 2002, the Company’s unamortized goodwill balance is being assessed, at least annually, for impairment. The Company performs its

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(Restated) continued…

annual impairment test for each reporting unit using a fair value approach. The test for goodwill impairment involves significant judgment in estimating projections of fair value generated through future performance of each of the reporting units, which comprise our operating segments. In calculating the fair value of the reporting units using the present value of estimated future cash flows method, we rely on a number of assumptions including sales and related gross margin projections, operating margins, anticipated working capital requirements and market rate of returns used in discounting projected cash flows. These assumptions were based upon market and industries outlooks, our business plans and historical data. Inherent uncertainties exist in determining and applying such factors. The discount rate used in the projection of fair value represents a weighted average cost of capital applicable to the Company.

The determination of our obligation and expense for pension benefits is dependent on our selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. These assumptions include, among others, the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore generally affect our recognized expense and recorded obligation in such future periods. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our pension obligations and our future expense.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements:

Our prospects are subject to certain uncertainties and risk. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A also contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words describing our belief or expectation, such as where we say that we “believe”, “expect” or “anticipate”, or where we characterize something in a manner in which there is an express or implicit reference to the future, such as “non-recurring” or “unusual,” or where we express that our view is based upon the “current status” of a given matter, or upon facts as we know them as of the date of the statement. The content and/or context of other statements that we make may indicate that the statement is “forward-looking”. We claim the “safe harbor” provided by The Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 for all forward-looking statements.

Results may differ materially from our current results and actual results could differ materially from those suggested in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risk factors, including but not limited to those set forth below, other one time events, other important factors disclosed previously and from time to time in Met-Pro’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The following important factors, along with those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, could affect our future financial condition and results of operations, and could cause our future financial condition and results of operations to differ materially from those expressed in our SEC filings and in our forward-looking statements:

the write-down of costs in excess of net assets of businesses acquired (goodwill), as a result of the determination that the acquired business is impaired. Our Flex-Kleen business unit, which initially performed well after being acquired by Met-Pro, thereafter had several years of declining performance which we attributed primarily to a general weakness in its served markets, followed by improved performance in the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, we performed an impairment analysis of the $11.1 million of goodwill that the Company carries for Flex-Kleen and concluded that no impairment had occurred. For the six-month period ended July 31, 2007, the annualized projection for net sales and operating profit for our Flex-Kleen business unit currently exceeds the projections used in our annual impairment model for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008;

·	materially adverse changes in economic conditions in the markets served by us or in significant customers of ours;

·	material changes in available technology;

adverse developments in the asbestos cases that have been filed against the Company, including without limitation the exhaustion of insurance coverage, the insolvency of our insurance carriers, the imposition of punitive damages or other adverse developments in the availability of insurance coverage;

·	changes in accounting rules promulgated by regulatory agencies, including the SEC, which could result in an impact on earnings;

·	the cost of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley and other applicable legal and listing requirements, and the unanticipated possibility that Met-Pro may not meet these requirements;

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(Restated) continued…

·	unexpected results in our product development activities;

·	loss of key customers;

·	changes in product mix and the cost of materials, with effect on margins;

·	changes in our existing management;

·	exchange rate fluctuations;

·	changes in federal laws, state laws and regulations;

·	lower than anticipated return on investments in the Company’s defined benefit plans, which could affect the amount of the Company’s pension liabilities;

·	the assertion of litigation claims that the Company’s products, including products produced by companies acquired by the Company, infringe third party patents or have caused injury, loss or damage;

·	the effect of acquisitions and other strategic ventures;

·	failure to properly quote and/or execute customer orders, including misspecifications, design, engineering or production errors;

·	the cancellation or delay of purchase orders or shipments;

·	losses related to international sales; and/or

·	failure in execution of acquisition strategy.

Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to certain market risks, primarily changes in interest rates. There have been no significant changes in our exposure to market risks since January 31, 2007. Refer to “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 for additional information.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Restated)

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the original filing of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the participation of our management, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” as of July 31, 2007, as such term is defined in Rule 13a−15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

As a result of the errors in the financial statements and the related restatement discussed in several places in this amended Form 10-Q/A including in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the participation of our management, has re-evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 in connection with the filing this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.

Based upon that re-evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have again concluded that as of July 31, 2007, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and adequate. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer reached this conclusion notwithstanding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting that is discussed below in “Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; Remediation Plan”. The Company notes that the interrelationship between disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting is not yet fully defined by law, rule, or interpretation. If an internal control over financial reporting were determined by appropriate authority to be part of disclosure controls and procedures, then our chief executive officer and principal financial officer might conclude that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective for the same reasons described below under “Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; Remediation Plan.” Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that the material weakness that is described below is confined to revenue recognition as described below and that our current disclosure controls and procedures are otherwise adequate to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Restated) continued…

(b) Material Weakness In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; Remediation Plan

As noted in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with respect to an event dated January 22, 2008, management has identified a material weakness as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in its internal control over financial reporting that existed as of July 31, 2007, as follows: we did not maintain effective policies and procedures with respect to revenue recognition. Specifically, the combination of the lack of effective policies and procedures surrounding the review of terms and conditions of customer purchase orders and the status of the completion of those orders contributed (together with false statements by vendors, documents fabricated by an employee, and other unauthorized actions by the employee444 explicitly intended to circumvent our revenue recognition policies and procedures, as well as other policies and procedures) to the reporting of incorrect net sales and net income, as well as related errors, in our financial statements for our fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007. These deficiencies resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected.

Based upon our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2007, management has committed to the following remediation plan:

1. We shall continue to enhance our contract review process including the implementation of various additional controls and procedures intended to better assure us that the terms and conditions of customer purchase orders are accurately entered and that orders are on terms acceptable to management and otherwise consistent with our policies.

2. We shall continue to enhance our production processes including the implementation of various additional controls and procedures intended to better assure us that the information with respect to the status of projects and orders is accurate and that projects and orders are deemed complete in accordance with our revenue recognition policies.

Except with respect to the changes in our policies and procedures surrounding our revenue recognition policy as described in (b) above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a−15(f) and 15d−15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10−Q/A that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Certain of the statements made in this Item 1 (and elsewhere in this Report) are “forward-looking” statements which are subject to the considerations set forth in “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” located in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Report, and we refer you to these considerations.

Beginning in 2002, the Company and/or one of its divisions began to be named as one of many defendants in asbestos-related lawsuits filed predominantly in Mississippi on a mass basis by large numbers of plaintiffs against a large number of industrial companies including in particular those in the pump and fluid handling industries. More recently, the Company and/or this division have been named as one of many pump and fluid handling defendants in asbestos-related lawsuits filed in New York and Maryland by individual plaintiffs, sometimes husband and wife. To a lesser extent, the Company and/or this division have also been named together with many other pump and fluid handling defendants in these type of cases in other states as well. The complaints filed against the Company and/or this division have been vague, general and speculative, alleging that the Company, and/or the division, along with the numerous other defendants, sold unidentified asbestos-containing products and engaged in other related actions which caused injuries and loss to the plaintiffs. The Company believes that it and/or the division have meritorious defenses to the cases which have been filed and that none of its and/or the division’s products were a cause of any injury or loss to any of the plaintiffs. The Company’s insurers have hired attorneys who together with the Company are vigorously defending these cases. The Company and/or the division have been dismissed from or settled a number of these cases. The sum total of all payments through July 31, 2007 to settle these cases was $340,000, all of which has been paid by the Company’s insurers, with an average cost per settled claim of approximately $24,000. As of July 31, 2007, there were a total of 36 cases pending against the Company, as compared with 37 cases that were pending as of January 31,

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings continued…

2007. For the six-month period ended July 31, 2007, ten new cases were filed against the Company, the Company was dismissed from seven cases and settled four cases. Most of the pending cases have not advanced beyond the early stages of discovery, although several cases are on schedules leading to trial. The Company presently believes that none of the pending cases will have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

The Company is also party to a small number of other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based upon the present information including the Company’s assessment of the facts of each particular claim as well as accruals, the Company believes that no pending proceeding will have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, financial results or future performance. Additionally, we refer you to “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” of this report which we incorporate herein by reference.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)	During the second quarter ended July 31, 2007, we did not sell any of our equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

(b)	Not applicable.

(c)	The following table summarizes Met-Pro’s purchases of its Common Shares for the quarter ended July 31, 2007:

Issuer Purchases of

Equity Securities

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs		(1	)

May 1-31, 2007		0	$	-		0		270,918
June 1-30, 2007		0		-		0		270,918
July 1-31, 2007		0		-		0		270,918
Total		0	$	-		0		270,918

(1)	On December 15, 2000, our Board of Directors authorized a Common Share repurchase program that was publicly announced on December 19, 2000, for up to 533,333 (adjusted for stock split) shares. The program has no fixed expiration date.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Index

MET-PRO CORPORATION

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

An Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders was held on June 6, 2007. At that meeting, two proposals were submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders. Proposal 1 was a proposal to elect two Directors (with Raymond J. De Hont and Nicholas DeBenedictis being the nominees) to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Proposal 2 was to ratify the election of Margolis & Company P.C. as independent registered public accountants for the Company’s fiscal year ending January 31, 2008.

At the close of business on the record date for the meeting (which was April 13, 2007), there were 11,220,577 Common Shares outstanding and entitled to be voted at the meeting. Holders of 10,106,474 Common Shares (representing a like number of votes) were present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy.

The following table sets forth the results of the voting on each of the proposals:

		Number of Votes
Proposals		For		Against		Abstain/ Broker Non Vote
Proposal 1 -	Election of Directors
	Raymond J. De Hont		9,774,929		331,545		-
	Nicholas DeBenedictis		8,691,161		1,415,313		-
Proposal 2 -	Selection of Margolis & Company P.C. as Independent Registered Public Accountants		9,946,454		117,863		42,157

Consequently, both proposals were adopted by the shareholders.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)	Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

	Exhibit No.	Description

	(31.1)	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
		Pursuant to Section 302 of the
		Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

	(31.2)	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
		Pursuant to Section 302 of the
		Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

	(32.1)	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
		Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
		Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

	(32.2)	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
		Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
		Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

* Filed herewith.

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Met-Pro Corporation
	(Registrant)


February 12, 2008	/s/ Raymond J. De Hont
	Raymond J. De Hont
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive
	Officer


February 12, 2008	/s/ Gary J. Morgan
	Gary J. Morgan
	Senior Vice President of Finance,
	Secretary and Treasurer, Chief
	Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
	Officer and Director

Met Pro (MPR) Inactive 10-Q/A2009 Q0 Quarterly report (amended)