Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended April 26, 2003 | |
OR | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ |
Commission file number 0-5423
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Florida | 59-1277135 | |
(State of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
4440 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida | 33410 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (561) 627-7171
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes x No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class Common Stock, par value $0.33 1/3 per share | Outstanding as of May 30, 2003 47,873,320 |
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||
PART I | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - April 26, 2003 and July 27, 2002 | 3 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002 | 4 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months Ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002 | 5 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002 | 6-7 | |||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 8-18 | |||||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 19-28 | ||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 29 | ||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 29 | ||||
PART II | OTHER INFORMATION | |||||
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 30 | ||||
SIGNATURES | 31 | |||||
CERTIFICATIONS | 32-35 |
2
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
April 26, | July 27, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||||
Cash and equivalents | $ | 118,031,804 | $ | 116,052,139 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net | 105,289,340 | 86,443,183 | |||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings | 30,985,814 | 33,349,021 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets, net | 7,907,353 | 8,680,848 | |||||||
Inventories | 2,766,329 | 5,643,275 | |||||||
Income tax receivable | 7,297,181 | 460,093 | |||||||
Other current assets | 7,599,337 | 6,107,688 | |||||||
Total current assets | 279,877,158 | 256,736,247 | |||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net | 91,753,595 | 110,451,873 | |||||||
OTHER ASSETS: | |||||||||
Goodwill, net | 106,615,836 | 106,615,836 | |||||||
Intangible assets, net | 797,391 | 1,126,555 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 21,531,559 | 21,587,727 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets, net non-current | 6,692,784 | 13,042,372 | |||||||
Other | 9,036,125 | 4,992,743 | |||||||
Total other assets | 144,673,695 | 147,365,233 | |||||||
TOTAL | $ | 516,304,448 | $ | 514,553,353 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 25,706,240 | $ | 26,611,259 | |||||
Notes payable | 14,535 | 78,672 | |||||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings | 1,107,871 | 354,061 | |||||||
Accrued self-insured claims | 9,560,637 | 8,462,759 | |||||||
Customer advances | 84,829 | 5,013,028 | |||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 28,802,800 | 30,031,673 | |||||||
Total current liabilities | 65,276,912 | 70,551,452 | |||||||
NOTES PAYABLE | 23,263 | 29,698 | |||||||
ACCRUED SELF-INSURED CLAIMS | 12,033,837 | 10,813,956 | |||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES | 1,617,574 | 1,861,383 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 78,951,586 | 83,256,489 | |||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, Note 9 | |||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share: | |||||||||
1,000,000 shares authorized: no shares issued and outstanding | — | — | |||||||
Common stock, par value $0.33 1/3 per share: | |||||||||
150,000,000 shares authorized: 47,871,525 and 47,846,403 issued and outstanding, respectively | 15,957,169 | 15,948,790 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 334,807,238 | 334,547,396 | |||||||
Retained earnings | 86,588,455 | 80,800,678 | |||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 437,352,862 | 431,296,864 | |||||||
TOTAL | $ | 516,304,448 | $ | 514,553,353 | |||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements—unaudited.
3
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||
Contract revenues earned | $ | 139,665,894 | $ | 169,751,754 | ||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Costs of earned revenues, excluding depreciation | 109,265,873 | 127,018,704 | ||||||
General and administrative | 17,771,918 | 20,018,899 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,885,456 | 10,207,899 | ||||||
Total | 135,923,247 | 157,245,502 | ||||||
Interest income, net | 345,808 | 505,394 | ||||||
Other income, net | 645,824 | 578,216 | ||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 4,734,279 | 13,589,862 | ||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES: | ||||||||
Current | (7,114,149 | ) | 5,419,867 | |||||
Deferred | 9,064,269 | 457,703 | ||||||
Total | 1,950,120 | 5,877,570 | ||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 2,784,159 | $ | 7,712,292 | ||||
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.17 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.17 | ||||
SHARES USED IN COMPUTING EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE | ||||||||
Basic | 47,871,508 | 46,472,492 | ||||||
Diluted | 47,873,053 | 46,601,092 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements—unaudited.
4
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||
Contract revenues earned | $ | 435,300,405 | $ | 475,848,662 | ||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Costs of earned revenues, excluding depreciation | 344,203,995 | 363,963,332 | ||||||
General and administrative | 53,495,604 | 51,361,823 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 30,175,506 | 27,929,732 | ||||||
Total | 427,875,105 | 443,254,887 | ||||||
Interest income, net | 990,863 | 2,111,011 | ||||||
Other income, net | 2,349,093 | 1,373,051 | ||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 10,765,256 | 36,077,837 | ||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES: | ||||||||
Current | (2,145,610 | ) | 15,139,828 | |||||
Deferred | 7,123,090 | 192,055 | ||||||
Total | 4,977,480 | 15,331,883 | ||||||
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE | 5,787,776 | 20,745,954 | ||||||
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE, NET OF $12,116,700 INCOME TAX BENEFIT | — | (86,929,342 | ) | |||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 5,787,776 | $ | (66,183,388 | ) | |||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — | (1.97 | ) | |||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | (1.50 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — | (1.97 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | (1.50 | ) | |||
SHARES USED IN COMPUTING EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE | ||||||||
Basic | 47,868,094 | 44,115,148 | ||||||
Diluted | 47,871,173 | 44,236,812 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements-unaudited.
5
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents from: | |||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 5,787,776 | $ | (66,183,388 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net | — | 86,929,342 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 30,175,506 | 27,929,732 | |||||||
Provision for bad debts | 655,102 | 954,663 | |||||||
Gain on disposal of assets | (1,600,789 | ) | (750,913 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 7,123,090 | 192,055 | |||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures: | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in operating assets: | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | (19,445,091 | ) | 36,808,880 | ||||||
Unbilled revenues, net | 3,117,017 | 6,230,771 | |||||||
Income tax receivable | (6,808,641 | ) | — | ||||||
Other current assets | 1,385,298 | 2,606,934 | |||||||
Other assets | (4,043,382 | ) | (804,784 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: | |||||||||
Accounts payable | (905,019 | ) | (9,169,258 | ) | |||||
Customer advances | (4,928,199 | ) | (2,225,275 | ) | |||||
Accrued self-insured claims and other liabilities | 845,077 | (9,921,956 | ) | ||||||
Accrued income taxes | — | (2,144,512 | ) | ||||||
Net cash inflow from operating activities | 11,357,745 | 70,452,291 | |||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||
Capital expenditures | (14,297,449 | ) | (9,718,929 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 4,750,167 | 3,829,034 | |||||||
Acquisition expenditures, net of cash acquired | — | 1,968,453 | |||||||
Net cash outflow from investing activities | (9,547,282 | ) | (3,921,442 | ) | |||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||
Principal payments on notes payable and bank lines-of-credit | (70,572 | ) | (61,401,624 | ) | |||||
Exercise of stock options | 185,348 | 889,714 | |||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock | — | (1,150,407 | ) | ||||||
Other | 54,426 | — | |||||||
Net cash inflow (outflow) from financing activities | 169,202 | (61,662,317 | ) | ||||||
NET CASH INFLOW FROM ALL ACTIVITIES | 1,979,665 | 4,868,532 | |||||||
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | 116,052,139 | 130,483,671 | |||||||
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | $ | 118,031,804 | $ | 135,352,203 | |||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements—unaudited.
6
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW AND NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | |||||||||
Interest | $ | 203,963 | $ | 368,350 | |||||
Income taxes | $ | 5,482,438 | $ | 17,437,697 | |||||
Property and equipment acquired and financed with: | |||||||||
Notes payable | $ | — | $ | 147,459 | |||||
Income tax benefit from stock options exercised | $ | 28,447 | $ | 161,852 |
7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of Dycom Industries, Inc. (“Dycom” or the “Company”) as of April 26, 2003 and July 27, 2002, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002 reflect all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such statements. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended April 26, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION — The condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. These statements include Dycom Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned.
In February 2002, the Company acquired Arguss Communications, Inc. (“Arguss”). This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting; hence, the Company’s results include the results of this entity from its acquisition date.
The Company’s operations consist primarily of providing specialty-contracting services to the telecommunications and electrical utility industries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
Estimates are used in the Company’s revenue recognition of work-in-process and in the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts, self-insured claims liability, and asset lives used in computing depreciation and amortization, including intangibles.
RECLASSIFICATIONS — Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current year presentation.
REVENUE RECOGNITION — The majority of the Company’s contracts are unit based. Revenue on unit based contracts is recognized as the unit is completed. Revenue on non-unit based contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method based primarily on the ratio of contract costs incurred to date to total estimated contract costs. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is accrued.
“Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” primarily relates to revenues for completed but unbilled units under unit based contracts, as well as unbilled revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method for non-unit based contracts. For those contracts in which billings exceed contract revenues recognized to date, such excesses are included in the caption “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings.”
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS — Cash and equivalents include cash balances on deposit in banks, overnight repurchase agreements, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and various other financial instruments having an original maturity of three months or less. For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers these amounts to be cash equivalents.
INVENTORIES — Inventories consist primarily of materials and supplies used in the Company’s business and are carried at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value). No obsolescence reserve has been recorded in the periods presented.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT — Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Useful lives range from: buildings—20-31 years; leasehold improvements—the term of the respective lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter; new vehicles—3-7 years; used vehicles—1-7 years; new equipment and machinery—2-10 years; used equipment and machinery—1-10 years; and furniture and fixtures—3-10 years. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and major improvements are capitalized. When assets are sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in income.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS — In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assets,” which supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 establishes new standards for goodwill acquired in a business combination, eliminates amortization of goodwill, and instead sets forth methods to periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 in the first quarter of 2002. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company will conduct on at least an annual basis a review of its reporting units to determine whether their carrying value exceeds their fair market value. Should this be the case, a detailed analysis of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities is performed to
8
Table of Contents
determine whether the goodwill is impaired. The Company performed a review of its reporting units as of July 29, 2001 and identified the following reporting units in which an impairment loss was recognized: Apex Digital, Inc.; Globe Communications, Inc.; Locating, Inc.; Point to Point Communications, Inc.; Tesinc, Inc.; Nichols Construction, Inc.; C-2 Utility Contractors, Inc.; and Lamberts’ Cable Splicing Co. The valuations performed as part of the analysis employed a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value corroborated by comparisons to estimated market multiples. Third party specialists were engaged to assist in the valuations. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $99.0 million ($86.9 million after tax) as of the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The impairment charge was recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles in our consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2002. The subsidiaries with respect to which the Company recorded the impairment charge referred to above contributed 24.7% of the Company’s contract revenues during fiscal 2002 and 23.0% during the nine months ended April 26, 2003. During 2002 and continuing into 2003 the Company has aligned costs at these subsidiaries to better match the level of activity being experienced in the current economy. There can be no assurance that such measures taken will prevent additional write-downs of goodwill from being recorded based on the results of the Company’s annual test for impairment as required by SFAS No. 142. Impairment losses subsequent to adoption are required to be reflected in operating income or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.
SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to conduct a valuation when an event occurs that would indicate that the goodwill of a reporting unit might be impaired. Because Adelphia Communications Corporation filed for bankruptcy protection in fiscal 2002 and was a significant customer of several reporting units, the Company conducted a review for goodwill impairment at those units. As a consequence, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $45.1 million during the fourth quarter 2002.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the annual valuation required by SFAS No. 142 resulted in an impairment charge at the Company’s Point to Point Communications, Inc. (“PTP”) reporting unit of $2.5 million. This impairment was primarily the result of PTP’s loss of business associated with WorldCom Inc. (“WorldCom”).
The Company also recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million in the fourth quarter 2002 related to the write-down of backlog included with other intangible assets.
Information regarding the Company’s other intangible assets is as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||
Average Life | ||||||||||||
In Years | April 26, 2003 | July 27, 2002 | ||||||||||
Carrying amount: | ||||||||||||
Licenses | 5 | $ | 51,030 | $ | 51,030 | |||||||
Covenants not to compete | 7 | 450,843 | 450,843 | |||||||||
Backlog * | 4 | 1,236,154 | 1,236,154 | |||||||||
1,738,027 | 1,738,027 | |||||||||||
Accumulated amortization: | ||||||||||||
Licenses | 33,050 | 25,441 | ||||||||||
Covenants not to compete | 314,427 | 267,630 | ||||||||||
Backlog | 593,159 | 318,401 | ||||||||||
940,636 | 611,472 | |||||||||||
Net | $ | 797,391 | $ | 1,126,555 | ||||||||
* | Resulting from Arguss acquisition |
9
Table of Contents
Amortization expense was $67,769 and $304,083 for the three months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002, respectively, and $329,162 and $340,549 for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for fiscal 2003 and each of the four succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
Fiscal year ending July: | Amount: | |||
2003 | $ | 396,679 | ||
2004 | $ | 258,320 | ||
2005 | $ | 305,460 | ||
2006 | $ | 166,097 | ||
2007 | $ | — |
SELF-INSURED CLAIMS LIABILITY — The Company retains the risk, up to certain limits, for automobile and general liability, workers’ compensation, and employee group health claims. A liability for unpaid claims and the associated claim expenses, including incurred but not reported losses, is actuarially determined and reflected in the consolidated financial statements as an accrued liability. The self-insured claims liability includes incurred but not reported losses of $12,075,442 and $10,624,755 at April 26, 2003 and July 27, 2002, respectively. The determination of such claims and expenses and the appropriateness of the related liability is periodically reviewed and updated. Because the Company retains these risks, up to certain limits, a change in experience or actuarial assumptions could nonetheless affect results of operations in a particular period.
CUSTOMER ADVANCES — Under the terms of certain contracts, the Company receives advances from customers that may be offset against the Company’s future billings. The Company has recorded these advances as liabilities and has not recognized any revenue for these advances.
INCOME TAXES — The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of its assets and liabilities.
PER SHARE DATA — Earnings per common share-basic is computed using the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Earnings per common share-diluted is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents except in cases where the effect would be anti-dilutive, using the treasury stock method. See Note 2.
10
Table of Contents
STOCK OPTION PLANS – Under SFAS No. 123 and No. 148, companies are permitted to continue to apply APB No. 25, which recognizes compensation cost based on the intrinsic value of the equity instrument awarded. The Company continues to apply APB No. 25 to its stock based compensation awards. The pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 are reflected below. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
April 26, 2003 | April 27, 2002 | April 26, 2003 | April 27, 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss), as reported | $ | 2,784,159 | $ | 7,712,292 | $ | 5,787,776 | $ | (66,183,388 | ) | ||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects * | (1,018,861 | ) | (1,616,925 | ) | (3,517,784 | ) | (5,200,989 | ) | |||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) | $ | 1,765,298 | $ | 6,095,367 | $ | 2,269,992 | $ | (71,384,377 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic — as reported | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.12 | $ | (1.50 | ) | ||||||||
Basic — pro forma | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.62 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted — as reported | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.12 | $ | (1.50 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted — pro forma | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.61 | ) | ||||||||
* | All awards refers to awards granted, modified, or settled in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 1994— that is, awards for which the fair value was required to be measured under Statement 123. |
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS — In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This statement requires certain financial instruments that could previously be accounted for by issuers as equity be classified as liabilities or, in some cases, assets. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Based on our current analysis, management does not believe SFAS No. 150 will have an impact on the financial results of the Company.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” was issued. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. SFAS No. 148 does not amend SFAS No. 123 to require companies to account for their employee stock-based awards using the fair value method. However, the disclosure provisions are required for all companies with stock-based employee compensation, regardless of whether they utilize the fair value method of accounting described in SFAS No. 123 or the intrinsic value method described in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 148’s transition provisions are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and management is in the process of evaluating their impact. The Company has adopted the interim disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148.
In June 2002, SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” was issued. This statement requires the recording of costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values only once a liability exists. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued when management committed to an exit plan, which may have been before an actual liability arose. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002, with early adoption encouraged. The Company has not had any exit or disposal activities that were initiated after December 31, 2002.
11
Table of Contents
In August 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions.” SFAS No. 144 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In November 2002, FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” was issued. This interpretation requires elaborating on the disclosures that must be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about obligations under certain guarantees or warranties that it has issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The disclosure requirements of this FIN are effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2002 and its recognition requirements are applicable for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. There have been no new guarantees by the Company subsequent to December 15, 2002 and the Company does not have any material warranties.
In January 2003, FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” was issued with the objective of improving financial reporting by companies involved with variable interest entities. A variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights, or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. Historically, entities generally were not consolidated unless the entity was controlled through voting interests. FIN 46 requires that a variable interest entity be consolidated by a company if that company is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity. Primary beneficiary means the company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. FIN 46 also sets forth disclosure requirements for those variable interest entities to which the company is not the primary beneficiary and therefore would not be consolidated. Dycom does not have any variable interest entities.
12
Table of Contents
2. COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computation as required by SFAS No. 128.
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders (numerator) | $ | 2,784,159 | $ | 7,712,292 | ||||
Weighted-average number of common shares (denominator) | 47,871,508 | 46,472,492 | ||||||
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.17 | ||||
Weighted-average number of common shares | 47,871,508 | 46,472,492 | ||||||
Potential common stock arising from stock options | 1,545 | 128,600 | ||||||
Total shares — diluted (denominator) | 47,873,053 | 46,601,092 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.17 | ||||
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle available to common stockholders (numerator) | $ | 5,787,776 | $ | 20,745,954 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of $12,116,700 income tax benefit | — | (86,929,342 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 5,787,776 | $ | (66,183,388 | ) | |||
Weighted-average number of common shares (denominator) | 47,868,094 | 44,115,148 | ||||||
Basic earnings per common share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — | (1.97 | ) | |||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.12 | $ | (1.50 | ) | |||
Weighted-average number of common shares | 47,868,094 | 44,115,148 | ||||||
Potential common stock arising from stock options | 3,079 | 121,664 | ||||||
Total shares — diluted (denominator) | 47,871,173 | 44,236,812 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — | (1.97 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.12 | $ | (1.50 | ) | |||
3. ACQUISITIONS
In February 2002, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Arguss for 4,853,031 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $85.4 million before various transaction costs. Arguss provides infrastructure services to cable and telecommunication companies. This acquisition primarily expands the Company’s geographical presence within its existing customer base.
13
Table of Contents
The Company recorded the acquisition of Arguss using the purchase method of accounting. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill will be reviewed annually for impairment. The operating results of Arguss are included in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements from its date of purchase.
The following unaudited pro forma summaries present the Company’s consolidated results of operations as if the foregoing acquisition had occurred on July 29, 2001:
For the Three | For the Nine | |||||||
Months Ended | Months Ended | |||||||
April 27, 2002 | April 27, 2002 | |||||||
Total revenues | $ | 176,761,695 | $ | 570,852,934 | ||||
Income before income taxes | 9,405,964 | 33,678,227 | ||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 5,201,954 | 19,306,188 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — | (86,929,342 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) | 5,201,954 | (67,623,154 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.11 | $ | (1.42 | ) | |||
Diluted | $ | 0.11 | $ | (1.41 | ) |
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
April 26, | July 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Contract billings | $ | 98,452,596 | $ | 78,504,554 | ||||
Retainage | 10,556,309 | 11,719,587 | ||||||
Other receivables | 690,331 | 1,045,166 | ||||||
Total | 109,699,236 | 91,269,307 | ||||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | 4,409,896 | 4,826,124 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 105,289,340 | $ | 86,443,183 | ||||
14
Table of Contents
For the periods indicated, the allowance for doubtful accounts changed as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts at 01/25/2003 and 01/26/2002, respectively | $ | 4,486,148 | $ | 2,403,778 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful account balances from acquisitions | — | 2,814,763 | ||||||
Additions charged to bad debt expense | 338,932 | 1,247,854 | ||||||
Amounts reclassed to non-current accounts receivable | (320,287 | ) | — | |||||
Amounts charged against the allowance, net of recoveries | (94,897 | ) | (803,407 | ) | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 4,409,896 | $ | 5,662,988 | ||||
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts at 7/27/2002 and 7/28/2001, respectively | $ | 4,826,124 | $ | 2,885,745 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful account balances from acquisitions | — | 2,814,763 | ||||||
Additions charged to bad debt expense | 655,102 | 954,663 | ||||||
Amounts reclassed to non-current accounts receivable | (320,287 | ) | — | |||||
Amounts charged against the allowance, net of recoveries | (751,043 | ) | (992,183 | ) | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 4,409,896 | $ | 5,662,988 | ||||
As of April 26, 2003, the Company expected to collect all of its retainage balances within twelve months.
Accounts receivable, net classified as non-current, consist of pre-petition trade receivables due from Adelphia Communications Corporation (“Adelphia”) of $21,531,559. Amounts reclassified to non-current trade receivables represent pre-petition Adelphia receivables. Adelphia filed for bankruptcy protection in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.
5. COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON CONTRACTS IN PROGRESS
The accompanying consolidated balance sheets include costs and estimated earnings on contracts in progress, net of progress billings as follows:
April 26, | July 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Costs incurred on contracts in progress | $ | 28,277,010 | $ | 32,761,756 | ||||
Estimated to date earnings | 6,491,964 | 9,466,019 | ||||||
Total costs and estimated earnings | 34,768,974 | 42,227,775 | ||||||
Less billings to date | 4,891,031 | 9,232,815 | ||||||
$ | 29,877,943 | $ | 32,994,960 | |||||
Included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the captions: | ||||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings | $ | 30,985,814 | $ | 33,349,021 | ||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings | 1,107,871 | 354,061 | ||||||
$ | 29,877,943 | $ | 32,994,960 | |||||
As stated in Note 1, the Company performs services under unit based and non-unit based contracts. The amounts presented above aggregate the effects of these types of contracts.
15
Table of Contents
6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the following property and equipment:
April 26, | July 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Land | $ | 5,267,572 | $ | 5,267,572 | ||||
Buildings | 10,746,464 | 10,688,246 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,477,673 | 1,496,466 | ||||||
Vehicles | 120,955,764 | 127,645,455 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 17,176,621 | 16,070,328 | ||||||
Equipment and machinery | 87,956,197 | 86,415,801 | ||||||
Total | 243,580,291 | 247,583,868 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 151,826,696 | 137,131,995 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 91,753,595 | $ | 110,451,873 | ||||
Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment amounted to $2,420,403 and $2,498,064 for the three months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002, respectively. Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment amounted to $7,580,452 and $6,729,997 for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002, respectively.
7. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
April 26, | July 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Accrued payroll and related taxes | $ | 9,894,095 | $ | 9,737,919 | ||||
Accrued employee bonus and benefit costs | 4,767,543 | 8,198,014 | ||||||
Accrued construction costs | 4,017,487 | 2,701,924 | ||||||
Other | 10,123,675 | 9,393,816 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | $ | 28,802,800 | $ | 30,031,673 | ||||
8. NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable are summarized as follows:
April 26, | July 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Equipment loans | $ | 37,798 | $ | 108,370 | ||||
Less current portion | 14,535 | 78,672 | ||||||
Notes payable — non-current | $ | 23,263 | $ | 29,698 | ||||
During fiscal 2002, the Company entered into a new three-year $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks that replaced the Company’s prior credit agreement. The Credit Agreement provides the Company with a commitment of $200 million for a three-year period and includes a $40 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit.
16
Table of Contents
Under the most restrictive covenants of the Credit Agreement, as of April 26, 2003, based on a multiple of EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement), the available borrowing capacity is approximately $84.3 million. As of April 26, 2003, the Company had $24.3 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement. The outstanding letters of credit are all issued to insurance companies as part of the Company’s self-insurance program.
The Credit Agreement requires that the Company maintain certain financial covenants and conditions, including restricting its ability to encumber its assets or incur certain types of indebtedness and maintaining a leverage ratio of not greater than 2.25:1.00, as measured at the end of each fiscal quarter. At April 26, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants and conditions under the Credit Agreement.
Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at the bank’s prime interest rate or LIBOR plus a spread of 1.25%, 1.50%, or 2.00% based upon the Company’s current leverage ratio. Based upon the Company’s current leverage ratio, borrowings would be eligible for the 1.25% spread. The Company deferred approximately $1.1 million of fees related to the Credit Agreement, which are being amortized over its three year term. The Company is required to pay an annual non-utilization fee equal to 0.50% of the unused portion of the facilities. In addition, the Company pays an annual agent fee of $50,000.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company and its subsidiaries have operating leases covering office facilities, vehicles, and equipment that have noncancelable terms in excess of one year. Certain of these leases contain renewal provisions and generally require the Company to pay insurance, maintenance, and other operating expenses. The future minimum obligations under these leases during each fiscal year through fiscal 2007 and thereafter are:
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
$1,701,388 | $ | 5,694,904 | $ | 2,495,064 | $ | 1,265,616 | $ | 571,127 | $ | 248,379 | $ | 11,976,478 |
The Company leases administrative offices from entities related to officers of certain of its subsidiaries. The future minimum lease commitments under these arrangements during each fiscal year through fiscal 2007 and thereafter are:
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
$437,286 | $ | 1,035,568 | $ | 360,126 | $ | 219,095 | $ | 87,405 | $ | 78,400 | $ | 2,217,880 |
On September 10, 2001, as amended on November 9, 2001 and June 7, 2002, Williams Communications LLC (“Williams”) filed suit against one of the Company’s subsidiaries, Niels Fugal Sons Company (“NFS”), in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Oklahoma for claims that include breach of contract with respect to fiber-optic cable installation projects that NFS had constructed for Williams. On May 19, 2003, NFS entered into a Settlement Agreement with Williams and certain other parties pursuant to which this lawsuit was dismissed and all related claims were released. The terms of the settlement of this lawsuit had no material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In the normal course of business, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have pending claims and legal proceedings. It is the opinion of the Company’s management, based on information available at this time, that none of the current claims or proceedings will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into employment agreements with certain members of its executive management. It is the opinion of the Company’s management, based on information available at this time, that these agreements will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
17
Table of Contents
10. CAPITAL STOCK
On February 24, 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25 million worth of the Company’s common stock over an eighteen-month period. Any such repurchases will be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. This plan does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the plan may be suspended at any time. Pursuant to Florida law, any shares repurchased will be added to the Company’s authorized, unissued shares and are available for future issue. No shares have been repurchased under this program as of June 3, 2003.
On November 26, 2002, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2002 Directors Restricted Stock Plan wherein non-employee directors must elect to receive a minimum percentage of their annual fees in restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company has reserved 100,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under the plan. The number of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to be granted is based on the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date such fees are payable. As of April 26, 2003, 2,271 shares had been issued under this plan at an average market price of $13.36 per share.
On February 21, 2002, the Company issued 4,853,031 shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition of Arguss. These shares were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with the consummation of the merger of Arguss, 1,017,165 options to purchase the Company’s common stock were issued to former Arguss employees in exchange for their existing Arguss stock options.
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in one reportable segment as a specialty contractor. The Company provides engineering, placement and maintenance of aerial, underground, and buried fiber-optic, coaxial and copper cable systems owned by local and long distance communications carriers, and cable television multiple system operators. Additionally, the Company provides similar services related to the installation of integrated voice, data, and video local and wide area networks within office buildings and similar structures and also provides underground locating services to various utilities and provides construction and maintenance services to electrical utilities and others. Each of these services is provided by the Company’s various subsidiaries, which provide management with monthly financial statements. All of the Company’s subsidiaries have been aggregated into one reporting segment due to their similar customer bases, products and production methods, and distribution methods. The following table presents information regarding annual contract revenues by type of customer:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Telecommunications | $ | 123,208,004 | $ | 152,593,824 | ||||
Utility line locating | 12,455,431 | 14,145,894 | ||||||
Electrical utilities and others | 4,002,459 | 3,012,036 | ||||||
Total contract revenues | $ | 139,665,894 | $ | 169,751,754 | ||||
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Telecommunications | $ | 384,123,973 | $ | 426,897,720 | ||||
Utility line locating | 39,290,855 | 39,386,742 | ||||||
Electrical utilities and others | 11,885,577 | 9,564,200 | ||||||
Total contract revenues | $ | 435,300,405 | $ | 475,848,662 | ||||
18
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a leading provider of specialty contracting services, including engineering, construction, installation and maintenance services, to telecommunications providers throughout the United States. We also provide underground locating services to various utilities and maintenance and construction services to electrical utilities and others. For the nine months ended April 26, 2003, specialty contracting services related to the telecommunications industry, underground utility locating and construction and maintenance to electrical utilities and others contributed approximately 88.3%, 9.0% and 2.7%, respectively, to our total contract revenues.
In February 2002, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Arguss Communications, Inc. (“Arguss”) for approximately 4.9 million shares of our common stock. The aggregate purchase price, which was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, was approximately $85.4 million before various transaction costs. The results of operations of Arguss are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
We provide a significant portion of our services pursuant to multi-year master service agreements. Under master service agreements, we generally agree to provide for a period of one or more years, generally on an exclusive basis, a customer’s specified service requirements within a given geographical area. Master service agreements generally provide that we will furnish a specified unit of service for a specified unit price (e.g., fiber optic cable will be installed underground for a specified rate of dollars per foot). A customer may generally terminate these agreements for convenience with at least 90 days prior written notice. Master service agreements are usually awarded on a competitive bid basis but in some cases are extended by negotiation rather than re-bid. We are currently a party to approximately 57 master service agreements.
The remainder of our services are provided pursuant to contracts for particular jobs. Long-term contracts relate to specific projects with terms in excess of one year from the contract date. Short-term contracts are generally from three to four months in duration, depending upon the size of the project. A portion of our contracts include retainage provisions under which 5% to 10% of the contract invoicing is withheld subject to project completion and acceptance by the customer.
Contract revenues from multi-year master service agreements represented 42.1% and 46.8% of total contract revenues for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 and April 27, 2002, respectively, and contract revenues from long-term contracts, including multi-year master service agreements, represented 78.9% and 84.1% of total contract revenues, respectively.
We recognize revenue on unit based contracts as the unit is completed. Revenue on non-unit based contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method based primarily on the ratio of contract costs incurred to date to total estimated contract costs. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is accrued.
We derive a significant amount of our revenue from telecommunications companies. Beginning in the latter part of calendar year 2000 and continuing throughout fiscal 2002 and into fiscal 2003, certain segments of the telecommunications industry suffered a severe downturn that has resulted in a number of our customers experiencing financial difficulties. Several of our customers have filed for bankruptcy protection, including Adelphia Communications Corporation (“Adelphia”) and WorldCom, Inc. (“WorldCom”). At April 26, 2003, we had pre-petition outstanding receivables from Adelphia of approximately $21.5 million.
The downturn in the telecommunications industry has adversely affected capital expenditures for infrastructure projects even among customers that are not experiencing financial difficulties. Generally, capital expenditures by telecommunications customers during the remainder of fiscal 2003, with the exception of one of the Company’s significant customers that is engaged in a major upgrade project, are expected to remain at low levels in comparison with prior years, and there can be no assurance that additional customers will not file for bankruptcy protection or otherwise experience severe financial difficulties in fiscal 2003. Additional bankruptcies of companies in the telecommunications sector or further decreases in our customer’s capital expenditures could reduce our cash flows and adversely impact our liquidity.
A significant portion of our revenue comes from several large customers. The following table reflects the percentage of total contract revenue received from customers contributing at least 5% of our total contract revenue for the three month period and the nine month period ending either April 26, 2003 or April 27, 2002:
19
Table of Contents
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Comcast Corporation * | 40.6 | % | 15.5 | % | ||||
BellSouth | 13.8 | % | 16.7 | % | ||||
Sprint | 6.4 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||
Qwest | 6.0 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||
Adelphia | 4.8 | % | 18.5 | % | ||||
DIRECTV | 2.9 | % | 6.9 | % | ||||
Charter | 1.5 | % | 6.7 | % |
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
April 26, | April 27, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Comcast Corporation * | 30.8 | % | 18.6 | % | ||||
BellSouth | 12.7 | % | 16.5 | % | ||||
DIRECTV | 6.9 | % | 5.9 | % | ||||
Sprint | 6.0 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||
Qwest | 5.6 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||
Adelphia | 4.4 | % | 13.4 | % | ||||
Charter | 3.8 | % | 5.3 | % |
* | Revenues have been combined to reflect the acquisition of AT&T Broadband by Comcast. |
In August 2002, in accordance with our contractual rights, DIRECTV was notified that we would cease to perform services for them as of March 1, 2003. We have since reached an agreement with DIRECTV to continue providing service primarily in one of their major markets. We anticipate our continuing revenues from DIRECTV will be reduced by up to 75% as a consequence of this change.
Cost of earned revenues includes all direct costs of providing services under our contracts, including all costs of construction personnel, subcontractor costs, all costs associated with operation of equipment (excluding depreciation), insurance and materials not supplied by the customer. Generally the customer provides the materials that are to be used for its job. Because we retain the risk for automobile and general liability, worker’s compensation, and employee group health claims subject to certain limits, a change in experience or actuarial assumptions could materially affect results of operations in a particular period.
General and administrative costs include all our costs at the parent company level, as well as subsidiary management personnel and administrative overhead. Our management personnel, including subsidiary management, perform substantially all sales and marketing functions as part of their management responsibilities and, accordingly, we have not incurred material selling expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, self-insured claims liability, income taxes, intangible assets, investments, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on current information, historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recognition of revenue that are not readily apparent from other sources. We cannot assure you that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to the accounting for our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact of these policies on our operations is discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. Our key accounting estimates and policies are reviewed with our Audit Committee. For a further discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
20
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition. The majority of our contracts are unit based. Revenue on unit based contracts is recognized as the unit is completed. Revenue on non-unit based contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method based primarily on the ratio of contract costs incurred to date to total estimated contract costs. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is accrued.
“Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” primarily relates to revenues for completed but unbilled units under unit based contracts, as well as unbilled revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method for non-unit based contracts. For those contracts in which billings exceed contract revenues recognized to date, such excesses are included in the caption “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings.”
Estimation of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We record an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the receivable has been impaired at the date of the financial statements and the loss can be reasonably estimated. Any increase in the allowance account has a corresponding negative effect on our results of operations. Estimates of uncollectible amounts are reviewed each period, and changes are recorded in the period they become known. Management analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends and considers changes in customer payment terms and other factors when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Should any of these factors change, the estimate made by management may also change, which could affect the level of our future provision for doubtful accounts.
Self-Insured Claims Liability. We retain the risk of loss, up to certain limits, for automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation claims. A liability for unpaid claims and the associated claim expenses, including incurred but unreported losses, is actuarially determined and reflected in the consolidated financial statements as an accrued liability. Factors affecting the determination of amounts to be accrued for automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation claims include, but are not limited to, cost, frequency, or payment patterns resulting from new types of claims, the hazard level of our operations, tort reform or other legislative changes, unfavorable jury decisions, court interpretations, changes in the medical conditions of claimants and economic factors such as inflation.
In addition, we retain the risk, up to certain limits, under a self-insured employee health plan. We periodically review the paid claims history of our employee health plan and analyze our accrued liability for claims, including claims incurred but not yet paid. Factors affecting the determination of amounts to be accrued under the employee health plan include, but are not limited to, frequency of use, changes in medical costs, unfavorable jury decisions, legislative changes, changes in the medical conditions of claimants, court interpretations and economic factors such as inflation.
For losses occurring during fiscal years 2002 and 2003, we retain the risk on a per occurrence basis for automobile liability to $500,000, for general liability to $250,000, and for worker’s compensation, in states where we are allowed to retain risk, to $500,000. For fiscal 2002 and 2003, we had aggregate stop loss coverage for the above exposures at the stated retentions of approximately $20 million and $17.4 million, respectively. In addition, we have umbrella liability coverage to a policy limit for each year of $75 million. Within the umbrella coverage, we have retained the risk of loss between $2.0 and $5.0 million, on a per occurrence basis, with an aggregate stop loss for this layer of $10.0 million for each of fiscal 2002 and 2003.
The method of calculating the estimated accrued liability for automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation and employee group health claims is subject to inherent uncertainty. If actual results are less favorable than what we use to calculate the accrued liability, we would have to record expenses in excess of what we have already accrued.
Valuation of Intangible Assets and Investments. We have adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” In accordance with that statement, we conduct, on at least an annual basis, a review of our reporting units to determine whether their carrying value exceeds their fair market value. Should this be the case, the value of our goodwill may be impaired and written down. The valuations employ a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value corroborated by comparisons to estimated market multiples. When necessary, we engage third party specialists to assist us with our valuations. Impairment losses are reflected in operating income or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.
Accounting for Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. This approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Developing our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment and expertise in federal and state income tax laws, regulations and strategies, including the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and, if necessary, any valuation allowances that may be required for deferred tax assets. We have not recorded any valuation allowances as of April 26, 2003 because management believes that future taxable income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefits of those assets as the temporary differences in basis reverse over time. Our judgments and tax strategies are subject to audit by various taxing authorities. While the Company believes it has provided adequately for its income tax liabilities in its consolidated financial statements, adverse determinations by taxing authorities could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Contingencies and Litigation. On September 10, 2001, as amended on November 9, 2001 and June 7, 2002, Williams Communications LLC (“Williams”) filed suit against one of the Company’s subsidiaries, Niels Fugal Sons Company (“NFS”), in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Oklahoma for claims that included breach of contract with respect to fiber-optic-cable installation projects that NFS has constructed for Williams. On May 19, 2003, NFS entered into a Settlement Agreement with Williams and certain other parties pursuant to which this lawsuit was dismissed and all related claims were released. The terms of the settlement of this lawsuit had no material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
We are currently involved in certain other legal proceedings. We estimate the range of liability related to pending litigation where the amount and range of loss can be estimated. Where there is a range of loss, we record the minimum estimated liability related to those claims. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and revise our estimates. Revisions of our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operations. If the final outcome of such litigation and contingencies differs adversely from that currently expected, it would result in a charge to earnings when determined.
21
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of contract revenues earned, certain items in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:
For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
April 26, 2003 | April 27, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
Contract revenues earned | $ | 139.7 | 100.0 | % | $ | 169.8 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of earned revenues, excluding depreciation | 109.3 | 78.2 | 127.0 | 74.8 | |||||||||||||
General and administrative | 17.7 | 12.7 | 20.0 | 11.8 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8.9 | 6.4 | 10.2 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||
Total expenses | 135.9 | 97.3 | 157.2 | 92.6 | |||||||||||||
Interest income, net | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||
Other income, net | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 4.7 | 3.4 | 13.6 | 8.0 | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 1.9 | 1.4 | 5.9 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2.8 | 2.0 | % | $ | 7.7 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
April 26, 2003 | April 27, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
Contract revenues earned | $ | 435.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | 475.8 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of earned revenues, excluding depreciation | 344.2 | 79.1 | 364.0 | 76.5 | |||||||||||||
General and administrative | 53.5 | 12.3 | 51.4 | 10.8 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 30.2 | 6.9 | 27.9 | 5.9 | |||||||||||||
Total expenses | 427.9 | 98.3 | 443.3 | 93.2 | |||||||||||||
Interest income, net | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||
Other income, net | 2.4 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 10.8 | 2.4 | 36.0 | 7.5 | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 5.0 | 1.1 | 15.3 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 5.8 | 1.3 | 20.7 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of $12.1 income tax benefit | — | — | (86.9 | ) | (18.3 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 5.8 | 1.3 | % | $ | (66.2 | ) | (14.0 | )% | ||||||||
22
Table of Contents
Revenues.Contract revenues decreased $30.1 million, or 17.7%, to $139.7 million in the quarter ending April 26, 2003 from $169.8 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Of this decrease, $29.4 million was attributable to a decline in demand for specialty contracting services provided to telecommunications companies, and $1.7 million was attributable to a decline in underground utility locating services provided to various utilities. These decreases were offset in part by an increase of $1.0 million attributable to construction and maintenance services provided to electrical utilities and others. Arguss, acquired in February 2002, contributed $27.9 million of contract revenues during the quarter ended April 26, 2003, and $26.5 million during the quarter ended April 27, 2002, primarily in contract revenues from telecommunications services. Excluding revenues attributable to Arguss in both periods, our total contract revenues for the current quarter would have been $111.8 million compared to $143.3 million for the same period last year, a decline of 22.0% from the quarter ended April 27, 2002.
During the quarter ended April 26, 2003, we recognized $123.2 million of contract revenues, or 88.2% of our total contract revenues from telecommunications services as compared to $152.6 million, or 89.9% of total contract revenues, for the quarter ended April 27, 2002. The decrease in our telecommunications service revenues is attributable to lower revenues, primarily from telecommunication and cable customers, due in part to the continued decrease in capital spending by our customers, bankruptcies of certain customers, and the overall continued downturn in the economy. Arguss contributed $26.4 million of contract revenues from telecommunications services during the quarter ended April 26, 2003 and $26.5 million for the same period last year. Excluding Arguss in both periods, contract revenues from telecommunications services for the current quarter would have been $96.8 million compared to $126.1 million for the same period last year.
We recognized contract revenues of $12.5 million, or 8.9% of our total contract revenues, from underground utility locating services in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 as compared to $14.1 million, or 8.3%, in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Arguss had no underground utility locating services revenues in either period. We recognized contract revenues of $4.0 million, or 2.9% of our total contract revenues, from construction and maintenance services provided to electrical utilities and others in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 as compared to $3.0 million, or 1.8%, in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Arguss contributed $1.5 million of contract revenues from construction and maintenance services during the quarter ended April 26, 2003 and had no such revenues for the same period last year. Excluding Arguss, contract revenues from construction and maintenance services for the current quarter would have been $2.5 million.
Contract revenues from multi-year master service agreements and other long-term agreements represented 82.4% of total contract revenues in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 as compared to 82.7% in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Contract revenues from multi-year master service agreements represented 40.7% of total contract revenues in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 as compared to 43.4% in the quarter ended April 27, 2002.
Contract revenues decreased $40.5 million, or 8.5% to $435.3 million in the nine months ending April 26, 2003 from $475.8 million in the nine months ended April 27, 2002. Of this decrease, $42.8 million was attributable to a decline in demand for specialty contracting services provided to telecommunications companies offset by an increase of $2.3 million attributable to construction and maintenance services provided to electrical utilities and others. Underground utility locating services revenues for the nine months ended April 27, 2003 remained relatively flat. Arguss contributed $93.0 million of contract revenues during the nine months ending April 26, 2003 and $26.5 million for the same period last year (Arguss was acquired in February 2002), primarily in contract revenues from telecommunications services. Excluding revenues attributable to Arguss in both periods, our total contract revenues for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 would have been $342.3 million compared to $449.3 million for the same period last year, a decline of 23.8% from the nine months ending April 27, 2002.
During the nine months ended April 26, 2003, the Company recognized $384.1 million of contract revenues from telecommunications services as compared to $426.9 million for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. The decrease in our telecommunications service revenues is attributable to those factors mentioned above with respect to the quarterly period ended April 26, 2003. Arguss contributed $89.7 million of contract revenues from telecommunications services during the nine months ended April 26, 2003 and $26.5 million for the same period last year. Excluding Arguss in both periods, contract revenues from telecommunications services for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 would have been $294.4 million compared to $400.4 million for the same period last year.
We recognized contract revenues of $39.3 million, or 9.0% of our total contract revenues, from underground utility locating services for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to $39.4 million, or 8.3%, for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. Arguss had no underground utility locating services revenues in either period. We recognized contract revenues of $11.9 million, or 2.7% of our total contract revenues, from construction and maintenance services provided to electrical utilities and others for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to $9.5 million, or 2.0%, for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. Arguss contributed $3.3 million of contract revenues from construction and maintenance services during the nine months April 26, 2003 and had no such revenues for the same period last year. Excluding Arguss, contract revenues from construction and maintenance services for the nine months ended would have been $8.6 million.
23
Table of Contents
Contract revenues from multi-year master service agreements and other long-term agreements represented 78.9% of total contract revenues in the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to 84.1% in the nine months ended April 27, 2002. Contract revenues from multi-year master service agreements represented 42.1% of total contract revenues in the nine months ending April 26, 2003 as compared to 46.8% in the nine months ending April 27, 2002.
Costs of Earned Revenues.Costs of earned revenues decreased $17.7 million to $109.3 million in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 from $127.0 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002 and increased as a percentage of contract revenues 3.4% to 78.2% from 74.8%. The primary components of this percentage increase were subcontractor costs of 1.8%, insurance costs of 1.1%, payroll taxes of 1.1% and equipment costs of 0.7%, partially offset by a decrease in direct and other labor costs of 0.9%. Subcontractor costs rose on a percentage basis as the mix of business shifted toward operating units that utilize more subcontract labor. In the quarter ended April 27, 2002, the Company reached a settlement agreement with the IRS with respect to a federal employment tax audit. As a result of the settlement, the Company’s reserve for payroll taxes was adjusted downward resulting in a reduction of payroll tax expense for the quarter ended April 27, 2002 in the amount of approximately $1.5 million. This adjustment had the effect of reducing costs of earned revenues from 75.7% to 74.8% in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Insurance costs have trended up as a consequence of higher premiums and losses associated with our casualty and health insurance programs. Equipment costs have increased primarily due to increases in fuel costs.
Costs of earned revenues decreased $19.8 million to $344.2 million in the nine months ended April 26, 2003 from $364.0 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002 and increased as a percentage of contract revenues 2.6% to 79.1% from 76.5%. The primary components of this percentage increase were direct material costs of 1.8%, insurance costs of 0.9%, and equipment costs of 0.6%, partially offset by a decrease in subcontractor costs of 0.6%. The percentage increase in direct material costs was associated with a bulk sale of inventory to a customer. Insurance costs have trended up as a consequence of higher premiums and losses associated with our casualty and health insurance programs. Equipment costs have increased primarily due to increases in fuel costs.
General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses decreased $2.3 million, or 11.2%, to $17.7 million in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 from $20.0 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended April 26, 2003, as compared to the quarter ended April 27, 2002, was primarily attributable to a decrease in salaries and bonuses of $1.7 million, a decrease in bad debt expense of $0.9 million and a decrease in franchise taxes of $0.9 million, partially offset by an increase in professional fees of $1.5 million related to a review and reorganization of our corporate structure and increased legal expenses. As a result of the review of our corporate structure, we completed a reorganization of our subsidiaries during the quarter ended April 26, 2003. This restructuring was designed to make our corporate structure more efficient from an organizational and income tax standpoint. General and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of contract revenues to 12.7% in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 from 11.8% in the quarter ended April 27, 2002.
General and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million to $53.5 million in the nine months ended April 26, 2003 from $51.4 million in the nine months ended April 27, 2002. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to the nine months ended April 27, 2002, was primarily attributable to increased overhead related to the Arguss acquisition and increases in professional fees of $3.3 million due to the reasons referred to in the preceding paragraph, partially offset by a decrease in bonuses of $2.3 million. General and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of contract revenues to 12.3% in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 from 10.8% in the quarter ended April 27, 2002.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased $1.3 million to $8.9 million in the quarter ending April 26, 2003 as compared to $10.2 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002, but increased as a percentage of contract revenues to 6.4% from 6.0%. The decrease for the three months ended April 26, 2003 reflects the effects of reduced levels of capital expenditures for the past two years and of disposals of fixed assets. Depreciation and amortization increased $2.3 million to $30.2 million in the nine months ended April 26, 2003, as compared to $27.9 million in the nine months ended April 27, 2002, and increased as a percentage of contract revenues to 6.9% from 5.9%. The increase in the nine months ended April 26, 2003 was a result of increased depreciation and amortization associated with assets acquired in the Arguss acquisition, partially offset by the same effects mentioned above.
Interest Income, Net.Interest income, net decreased to $0.3 million in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 from $0.5 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Interest income, net decreased $1.1 million to $1.0 million in the nine months ended April 26, 2003 from $2.1 million in the nine months ended April 27, 2002. This decrease in both the quarter and the nine months ended April 26, 2003 was due primarily to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents as a result of the repayment of Arguss’ $58.0 million indebtedness subsequent to its acquisition as well as to lower interest rates during fiscal 2003.
Other Income, Net.Other income, net increased to $0.6 million in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 from $0.5 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002. Other income, net increased $1.0 million to $2.4 million in the nine months ended April 26, 2003 from $1.4 million in the nine months ended April 27, 2002. The increase in both the quarter and nine moths ended April 26, 2003 is primarily due to gains from the sale of idle assets.
24
Table of Contents
Income Taxes.The provision for income taxes was $1.9 million for the three months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to $5.9 million in the same period last year. Our effective tax rate was 41.2% for the three months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to 43.3% for the same period last year.
The provision for income taxes was $5.0 million for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to $15.3 million in the same period last year. Our effective tax rate was 46.2% for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to 42.5% for the same period last year. The impact of lower pretax income combined with permanent nondeductible expense items for tax purposes resulted in a higher effective tax rate for the nine months ended April 27, 2002.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle for SFAS No. 142.The adoption of SFAS No. 142 was a required change in accounting principal, and in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we conducted a review of our reporting units to determine whether their carrying value exceeded their fair market value. We engaged a third party specialist to assist in the valuation process and as a result of that valuation identified the following reporting units in which an impairment loss was recognized: Apex Digital, Inc.; Globe Communications, Inc.; Locating, Inc.; Point-to-Point Communications, Inc.; Tesinc, Inc.; Nichols Constructions, Inc.; C-2 Utility Contractors, Inc. and Lamberts’ Cable Splicing Co. As a result of the valuations, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $99.0 million ($86.9 million after tax) as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The impairment loss has been recorded as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principles in our accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. The subsidiaries with respect to which we recorded the impairment charge referred to above contributed 24.7% of our contract revenues during fiscal 2002 and 23.0% during the nine months ended April 26, 2003. During fiscal 2002 and continuing into fiscal 2003 we have aligned costs at these subsidiaries to better match the level of activity being experienced in the current economy. There can be no assurance that such measures taken will prevent additional write-downs of goodwill from being recorded based on the results of our annual test for impairment as required by SFAS No. 142.
Net Income (Loss).Net income was $2.8 million in the quarter ended April 26, 2003 as compared to a net income of $7.7 million in the quarter ended April 27, 2002.
Net income was $5.8 million for the nine months ended April 26, 2003 as compared to a net loss of $66.2 million for the nine months ended April 27, 2002.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital requirements. Our primary capital needs are for equipment to support our contractual commitments to customers and for sufficient working capital for general corporate purposes. We have typically financed capital expenditures by operating and capital leases, bank borrowings and internal cash flows. Our cash sources have historically been operating activities, equity offerings, bank borrowings, and proceeds from the sale of idle and surplus equipment and real property. To the extent we seek to grow by acquisitions that involve consideration other than our stock, our capital requirements may increase.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $118.0 million at April 26, 2003 compared to $116.1 million at July 27, 2002.
Nine Months Ended (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
April 26, 2003 | April 27, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash flows: | |||||||||||||||||
Provided by operations | $ | 11.4 | $ | 70.5 | |||||||||||||
Used in investment activites | $ | (9.5 | ) | $ | (3.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 0.02 | $ | (61.7 | ) |
Cash from operating activities. For the nine months ended April 26, 2003, net cash provided from operating activities was $11.4 million compared to cash provided of $70.5 million for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. Net income, adjusted for non-cash items primarily consisting of depreciation, amortization, and provision for bad debts, was our main source of operating cash flow and was offset in part by changes in working capital items that used $19.5 million of operating cash flow during the nine months ended April 26, 2003. Primarily driving this working capital use is an increase in accounts receivable of $19.4 million. An increase in income tax receivable of $6.8 million due to our tax deduction related to the write-off of Adelphia and WorldCom long-term accounts receivables was offset by a decrease in non-current deferred tax assets of $7.1 million.
The changes in working capital included an increase in accounts receivable of $19.4 million, partially offset by a $3.1 million decrease in unbilled revenues, net. Additionally, other assets increased by $4.0 million, primarily as a result of a prepaid discount made to a customer related to a long-term contract and a decrease in customer advances of $4.9 million primarily due to the application of a customer advance to outstanding receivables.
25
Table of Contents
Based on quarterly revenues, days sales outstanding was 68.6 days for the current quarter ended April 26, 2003 compared to 57.2 days for the quarter ended July 27, 2002, for current accounts receivable, net. The increase in accounts receivable days sales outstanding can primarily be attributed to an increase in the mix of customers with longer payment terms.
During the fourth quarter 2002, two of our major customers, Adelphia and WorldCom, filed for bankruptcy protection. At April 26, 2003, we had long-term accounts receivables of $21.5 million from Adelphia, representing the remaining balance of pre-petition receivables of $40.7 million less $19.2 million that was written off against a previously established allowance for doubtful accounts. WorldCom’s long-term accounts receivables were written-off entirely. Should any additional customers file for bankruptcy or experience financial difficulties, or if our efforts to recover outstanding receivables fail, we could experience reduced cash flows and losses in excess of current allowances provided. In addition, material changes in our customer’s revenues or cash flows could affect our ability to collect amounts due from them.
Cash from investing activities. For the nine months ended April 26, 2003, net cash used in investing activities was $9.5 million as compared to $3.9 million for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. During the nine months ended April 26, 2003, cash used in investing activities was primarily for capital expenditures of $14.3 million compared to $9.7 million during the comparable period in the prior year, offset by proceeds from the sale of assets of $4.8 million and $3.8 million during the fiscal 2003 and 2002 periods, respectively.
Cash from financing activities. For the nine months ended April 26, 2003, net cash provided by financing activities was $0.2 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $61.7 million for the nine months ended April 27, 2002. During the nine months ended April 27, 2002 we used $61.4 million to repay notes payable, with $58.0 million related to the repayment of indebtedness of Arguss subsequent to its acquisition and $1.2 million to repurchase common stock.
On June 3, 2002, we entered into a new $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement provides us with a commitment of $200 million for a three-year period and includes a sublimit of $40 million for the issuance of letters of credit. Under the most restrictive covenants of our Credit Agreement, as of April 26, 2003, the available borrowing capacity is approximately $84.3 million. As of April 26, 2003 we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement and $24.3 million of outstanding letters of credit. The outstanding letters of credit are all issued to our insurance companies as part of our self-insurance program.
Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at the bank’s prime interest rate or LIBOR plus a spread of 1.25%, 1.50% or 2.00% based upon our current leverage ratio. Based on our current leverage ratio, borrowings would be eligible for the 1.25% spread. We are required to pay an annual non-utilization fee equal to 0.50% of the unused portion of the facilities. In addition, we pay an annual agent fee of $50,000.
The Credit Agreement requires that we maintain certain financial covenants and conditions, and restricts our ability to encumber our assets or incur certain types of indebtedness. We must maintain a leverage ratio of not greater than 2.25:1.00, as measured at the end of each fiscal quarter. At April 26, 2003, this leverage ratio, defined as consolidated funded debt including any outstanding letters of credit divided by consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement), was 0.65%. At April 26, 2003, we were in compliance with all financial covenants and conditions under the Credit Agreement.
Certain subsidiaries have outstanding obligations under real estate leases and equipment and vehicle financing arrangements. The obligations are payable in monthly installments, expiring at various dates through November 2023.
Interest costs incurred on notes payable during the nine months ended April 26, 2003, all of which were expensed were $15,225.
26
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth our contractual commitments for each of our fiscal years through 2007 and thereafter, including related party leases, as of April 26, 2003:
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 14,535 | $ | 23,263 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 37,798 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 2,138,674 | 6,730,472 | 2,855,190 | 1,484,711 | 658,532 | 326,779 | 14,194,358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,153,209 | $ | 6,753,735 | $ | 2,855,190 | $ | 1,484,711 | $ | 658,532 | $ | 326,779 | $ | 14,232,156 | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial Commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Agreement | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 17,000,000 | 7,325,000 | — | — | — | — | 24,325,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 17,000,000 | $ | 7,325,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 24,325,000 | |||||||||||||||
Related party transactions.We lease administrative offices from entities related to officers of certain of our subsidiaries.
Stock Repurchase Program. On February 24, 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25 million worth of the Company’s common stock over an eighteen-month period. Any such repurchases will be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. This plan does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the plan may be suspended at any time. Pursuant to Florida law, any shares repurchased will be added to the Company’s authorized, unissued shares and are available for future issue. No shares have been repurchased under this program as of June 3, 2003.
We believe that our capital resources, together with existing cash balances, are sufficient to meet our financial obligations, operating lease commitments, and to support our normal replacement of equipment at our current level of business for at least the next twelve months. Our future operating results and cash flows may be affected by a number of factors including our success in bidding on future contracts and our continued ability to manage controllable costs effectively.
Backlog.Our backlog is comprised of the uncompleted portion of services to be performed under job-specific contracts and the estimated value of future services that we expect to provide under long-term requirements contracts. Our backlog at April 26, 2003 and July 27, 2002 was $996.4 million and $795.1 million, respectively. We expect to complete approximately 47.6% of our current backlog during the next twelve months. In many instances our customers are not contractually committed to specific volumes of services under a contract. However, the customer is obligated to obtain these services from us if they are not performed by the customer’s employees. Additionally, we are committed to perform these services if requested by the customer. Many of these contracts are multi-year agreements, and we include in our backlog the amount of services projected to be performed over the terms of the contracts based on our historical relationships with customers and our experience in procurements of this nature. There can be no assurance, however, as to a customer’s requirements during a particular period or that such estimates at any point in time are accurate.
Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “project,” and similar expressions identify forward looking statements. Such statements may include, but may not be limited to, the anticipated outcome of contingent events, including litigation, projections of revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, plans for future operations, growth and acquisitions, financial needs or plans and the availability of financing, and plans relating to our services including backlog, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections. Forward–looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results in the future to differ materially from the results projected or implied in any forward looking statements contained in this report. Such risks and uncertainties include: business and economic conditions in the telecommunications industry affecting our customers, continued deterioration in our customers’ financial condition, the adequacy of our reserves and allowances for doubtful accounts, whether the carrying value of our assets may be impaired, the anticipated outcome of contingent events, including litigation, liquidity needs and the availability of financing. Such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
27
Table of Contents
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This statement requires certain financial instruments that could previously be accounted for by issuers as equity be classified as liabilities or, in some cases, assets. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Based on our current analysis, management does not believe SFAS No. 150 will have an impact on the financial results of the Company.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” was issued. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. SFAS No. 148 does not amend SFAS No. 123 to require companies to account for their employee stock-based awards using the fair value method. However, the disclosure provisions are required for all companies with stock-based employee compensation, regardless of whether they utilize the fair value method of accounting described in SFAS No. 123 or the intrinsic value method described in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 148’s transition provisions are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and management is in the process of evaluating their impact. The Company has adopted the interim disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148.
In June 2002, SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” was issued. This statement requires the recording of costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values only once a liability exists. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued when management committed to an exit plan, which may have been before an actual liability arose. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002, with early adoption encouraged. The Company has not had any exit or disposal activities that were initiated after December 31, 2002.
In August 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions.” SFAS No. 144 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In November 2002, FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” was issued. This interpretation requires elaborating on the disclosures that must be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about obligations under certain guarantees or warranties that it has issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The disclosure requirements of this FIN are effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2002 and its recognition requirements are applicable for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. There have been no new guarantees by the Company subsequent to December 15, 2002 and the Company does not have any material warranties.
In January 2003, FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” was issued with the objective of improving financial reporting by companies involved with variable interest entities. A variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights, or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. Historically, entities generally were not consolidated unless the entity was controlled through voting interests. FIN 46 requires that a variable interest entity be consolidated by a company if that company is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity. Primary beneficiary means the company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. FIN 46 also sets forth disclosure requirements for those variable interest entities to which the company is not the primary beneficiary and therefore would not be consolidated. Dycom does not have any variable interest entities.
28
Table of Contents
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We considered the provision of Financial Reporting Release No. 48, “Disclosure of Accounting Policies for Derivative Financial Instruments and Derivative Commodity Instruments, and Disclosure of Quantitative and Qualitative Information about Market Risk Inherent in Derivative Financial Instruments, Other Financial Instruments and Derivative Commodity Instruments” in determining our market risk. We had no significant holdings of derivative financial or commodity instruments at April 26, 2003. A review of our other financial instruments and risk exposures at that date revealed we had exposure to interest rate risk. At April 26, 2003, we performed sensitivity analyses to assess the potential effect of this risk and concluded that reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates should not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14((c) and 15d-1(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the date of their evaluation, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC reports. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls, or in factors that could significantly affect these internal controls, subsequent to the date the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer completed their evaluation.
29
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibits furnished pursuant to the requirements of Form 10-Q:
Number | Description | |
(11) | Statement re computation of per share earnings; All information required by Exhibit 11 is presented within Note 2 of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128. | |
(99.1) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
(99.2) | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The following reports on Form 8-K were filed on behalf of the Registrant during the quarter ended April 26, 2003:
(i) Press release announcing earnings for the second quarter of 2003 and guidance for the remainder of fiscal 2003.
Item Reported: 9 |
Date Filed: February 25, 2003 |
(ii) Press release announcing stock repurchase program.
Item Reported: 9 |
Date Filed: February 25, 2003 |
(iii) Press release with respect to second quarter expectations and scheduled conference call for February 13, 2003.
Item Reported: 9 |
Date Filed: February 13, 2003 |
30
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||
Registrant | ||
Date: June 3, 2003 | /s/ Steven E. Nielsen | |
Name: Steven E. Nielsen Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: June 3, 2003 | /s/ Richard L. Dunn | |
Name: Richard L. Dunn Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
31
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven E. Nielsen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dycom Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and |
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
32
Table of Contents
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and |
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: June 3, 2003 | ||
/s/ Steven E. Nielsen Steven E. Nielsen President and Chief Executive Officer |
33
Table of Contents
DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Richard L. Dunn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dycom Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and |
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
34
Table of Contents
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and |
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: June 3, 2003 | ||
/s/ Richard L. Dunn Richard L. Dunn Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |
35