The following is a comparison of Third Quarter and First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 to Third Quarter and First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013 results of operations for Sensors, separately identifying the estimated impact of currency translation (in millions):
Selling and marketing expense in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was $14.7 million, an increase of $1.8 million, or 14.0%, compared to $12.9 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. This increase was primarily due to higher compensation and benefits driven by increased headcount to support future sales growth. Selling and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was 18.7%, compared to 18.6% for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013.
Table of Contents
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense in the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014 was $2.7 million, flat compared to the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2013. General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014 was 9.9% on higher volume, compared to 10.9% for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2013.
General and administrative expense in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was $8.8 million, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 4.3%, compared to $9.2 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. This decrease was primarily driven by expenses recognized in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013 related to a senior management transition. General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was 11.2%, compared to 13.3% for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense in the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014 was $1.8 million, an increase of $0.3 million, or 20.0%, compared to $1.5 million for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2013. Research and development expense in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was $5.0 million, an increase of $0.9 million, or 22.0%, compared to $4.1 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. Both increases were primarily driven by higher compensation and benefits resulting from increased headcount. Research and development expense as a percentage of revenue for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014 was 6.6%, compared to 6.1% for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2013. Research and development expense as a percentage of revenue for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was 6.4%, compared to 5.9% for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014 was $5.6 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 1.80%, compared to income from operations of $5.5 million for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2013, as the leverage from higher volume was largely offset by unfavorable product mix. Operating income as a percentage of revenue for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014 was 20.5% on higher volume compared to 22.3% for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2013
Income from operations in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was $14.6 million, an increase of $1.8 million, or 14.1%, compared to income from operations of $12.8 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. The increase was driven by higher gross profit, partially offset by increased operating expenses. Operating income as a percentage of revenue for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was 18.6% on higher volume, compared to 18.5% for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
We had cash and cash equivalents of $56.6 million at the end of the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014. Of this amount, $12.1 million was located in North America, $25.0 million in Europe, and $19.5 million in Asia. Of the $47.5 million of cash located outside of the U.S., approximately $31.0 million is not available for use in the U.S. without the incurrence of U.S. federal and state income tax.
The North American balance was primarily invested in bank deposits. In Europe and Asia, the balances were primarily invested in money market funds and bank deposits. In accordance with our investment policy, we place cash equivalent investments with issuers who have high-quality investment credit ratings. In addition, we limit the amount of investment exposure we have with any particular issuer. Our investment objectives are to preserve principal, maintain liquidity, and achieve the best available return consistent with our primary objectives of safety and liquidity. At the end of the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014, we held no short-term investments.
Total cash and cash equivalents increased $8.3 million in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014, primarily due to earnings and proceeds received from short-term borrowings, partially offset by the acquisition of REI, purchases of our common stock, investment in property and equipment, dividend payments, and increased working capital requirements. Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $26.3 million in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013, primarily due to increased working capital requirements, investment in property and equipment, and dividend payments, partially offset by earnings.
Cash flows from operating activities provided cash totaling $49.0 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014, compared to cash provided of $1.9 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. Cash provided for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was primarily due to earnings and $5.1 million increased advance payments received from customers driven by the mix of orders in the quarter, partially offset by $5.1 million decreased accounts payable resulting from general timing of purchases and payments, $2.7 million increased inventories to support future revenue, and $0.7 million increased accounts and unbilled receivables resulting from general timing of billing and collections.
32
Table of Contents
Cash provided for the First Nine Fiscal Months of Fiscal 2013 was primarily from earnings, substantially offset by $19.0 million increased accounts and unbilled receivables resulting from general timing of billings and collections, $11.7 million increased inventories to support future revenue, $5.5 million decreased accounts payable resulting from general timing of purchases and payments, and $11.9 million decreased advance payments received from customers driven by the mix and timing of orders.
Cash flows from investing activities required the use of cash totaling $30.7 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014, compared to the use of cash totaling $23.2 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. The cash usage for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was due to $14.7 million in payments associated with the acquisition of REI, and $16.0 million investment in property and equipment. The cash usage in the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013 reflects investment in property and equipment. The decreased investment in property and equipment was driven by a lower level of investment in various growth and productivity initiatives.
Cash flows from financing activities used cash totaling $10.3 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014, compared to the cash used totaling $2.3 million for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013. The cash used for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014 was primarily due to the use of $30.8 million to purchase approximately 450,000 shares of our common stock, as well as dividend payments of $13.7 million partially offset by $30.0 million proceeds from short-term borrowings, and $3.6 million received in connection with stock option exercises. The cash used for the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2013 was primarily due to cash dividend payments totaling $14.4 million as well as the use of $2.6 million to purchase approximately 45,500 shares of the Company’s common stock, partially offset by $9.7 million net proceeds received from short-term borrowings and $4.3 million received in connection with stock option exercises.
Under the terms of our borrowing agreements, we have agreed to certain financial covenants. At the end of the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2014, we were in compliance with the financial terms and conditions of those agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 28, 2014, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as such term is defined in rules promulgated by the SEC, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, and GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported. In preparing these financial statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts, giving due consideration to materiality. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are particularly important to the portrayal of the Company’s results of operations and financial position, may require the application of a higher level of judgment by us, and as a result, are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. For further information see “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” under Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year 2013.
Revenue Recognition: We are required to comply with a variety of technical accounting requirements in order to achieve consistent and accurate revenue recognition. The most significant area of judgment and estimation is percentage of completion contract accounting. We develop cost estimates that include materials, component parts, labor and overhead costs. Detailed cost plans are developed for all aspects of the contracts during the bidding phase of the contract. Cost estimates are largely based on actual historical performance of similar projects combined with current knowledge of the projects in progress. Significant factors that impact the cost estimates include technical risk, inflationary cost of materials and labor, changes in scope and schedule, and internal and subcontractor performance. Actual costs incurred during the project phase are monitored and compared to the estimates on a monthly basis. Cost estimates are revised based on changes in circumstances. Anticipated losses on long-term contracts are recognized when such losses become evident.
33
Table of Contents
Inventories: We maintain a material amount of inventory to support our engineering and manufacturing operations. This inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. On a regular basis, we review our inventory and identify that which is excess, slow moving, and obsolete by considering factors such as inventory levels, expected product life, and forecasted sales demand. Any identified excess, slow moving, and obsolete inventory is written down to its market value through a charge to income from operations.
It is possible that additional inventory write-down charges may be required in the future if there is a significant decline in demand for our products and we do not adjust our manufacturing production accordingly.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: We review the carrying value of long-lived assets or asset groups, such as property and equipment and intangibles subject to amortization, when events or changes in circumstances such as asset utilization, physical change, legal factors, or other matters indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When this review indicates the carrying value of an asset or asset group exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group, we recognize an asset impairment charge against operations. The amount of the impairment loss recorded is the amount by which the carrying value of the impaired asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Goodwill: We test goodwill at least annually for impairment. Goodwill is also tested for impairment as changes in circumstances occur indicating that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill impairment testing first requires a comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to the carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds fair value, goodwill is considered impaired.
We have three reporting units, two of which are assigned goodwill. At June 28, 2014, one reporting unit was assigned $31.7 million of goodwill while another was assigned $1.6 million. The fair value of a reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow model that requires input of certain estimates and assumptions requiring our judgment, including projections of economic conditions and customer demand, revenue and margins, changes in competition, operating costs, and new product introductions. At September 28, 2013, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit assigned $1.6 million of goodwill was substantially in excess of its carrying value, while the estimated fair value of the reporting unit assigned $14.9 million of goodwill exceeded its carrying value by approximately 25%. While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in determining the fair value of our reporting units are reasonable, significant changes in estimates of future cash flows, such as those caused by unforeseen events or changes in market conditions, could materially impact the fair value of a reporting unit that could result in the recognition of a goodwill impairment charge.
Software Development Costs: We incur costs associated with the development of software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. Software development costs are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at which time future costs incurred are capitalized until the product is available for general release to the public. A certain amount of judgment and estimation is required to assess when technological feasibility is established, as well as the ongoing assessment of the recoverability of capitalized costs. In evaluating the recoverability of capitalized software costs, we compare expected product performance, utilizing forecasted revenue amounts, to the total costs incurred to date and estimates of additional costs to be incurred. If revised forecasted product revenue is less than, and/or revised forecasted costs are greater than, the previously forecasted amounts, the net realizable value may be lower than previously estimated, which could result in the recognition of an impairment charge in the period in which such a determination is made.
Warranty Obligations: We are subject to warranty obligations on sales of our products. We record general warranty provisions based on an estimated warranty expense percentage applied to current period revenue. The percentage applied reflects historical warranty claims experience over the preceding twelve months. Both the experience percentage and the warranty liability are evaluated on an ongoing basis for adequacy. In addition, warranty provisions are also recognized for certain nonrecurring product claims that are individually significant. A certain amount of judgment is required in determining appropriate reserve levels for anticipated warranty claims. While these reserve levels are based on historical warranty experience, they may not reflect the actual claims that will occur over the upcoming warranty period, and additional warranty reserves may be required.
Income Taxes: We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized. We believe it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining net realizable value of our deferred tax assets. In the event that all or part of the net deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with management’s expectations could have a material impact on our financial condition and operating results.
34
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with customers (Topic 606)”. This update clarifies the principles for revenue recognition in transactions involving contracts with customers. The new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance will be effective for the Company’s interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which is the Company’s Fiscal year 2018. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company has not yet evaluated what impact, if any, the adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or disclosures.
Other Matters
Our dividend policy is to maintain a payout ratio that allows dividends to increase with the long-term growth of earnings per share, while sustaining dividends through economic cycles. Our dividend practice is to target over time a payout ratio of approximately 25% of net earnings per share.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” regarding financial projections made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results and those presently anticipated or projected. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “targets,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those factors described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2013 Form 10-K. Such important factors include:
| | |
| • | We may not achieve our growth plans for the expansion of our business because our long-term success depends on our ability to expand our business through new product development, mergers and acquisitions, geographic expansion, and service offerings, all of which are subject to inherent risks including, but not limited to: market demand; market acceptance of products; and the Company’s ability to advance its technology |
| • | The changes we are making in our Test segment processes and operating systems may not deliver the results we require for growth of the business |
| • | Our business operations may be affected by government contracting risks |
| • | Our business is significantly international in scope, which poses multiple risks including, but not limited to: currency value fluctuations; difficulty enforcing agreements and collecting receivables; trade protection measures and import and export matters; tax rates in certain foreign countries that exceed those in the U.S. and the imposition of withholding requirements on foreign earnings; higher danger of terrorist activity; imposition of tariffs, exchange controls and other restrictions; difficulty in staffing and managing global operations; and compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations; changes in general economic and political conditions where we operate, particularly in emerging markets |
| • | We may be required to recognize impairment charges for long-lived assets |
| • | Volatility in the global economy could adversely affect results |
| • | Our business is subject to strong competition |
| • | We are subject to risks because we design and manufacture first-of-kind products |
| • | We may experience difficulties obtaining the services of skilled employees |
| • | We may fail to protect our intellectual property effectively, or may infringe upon the intellectual property of others |
| • | Our business could be adversely affected by product liability claims and commercial litigation |
| • | We may experience difficulty obtaining materials or components for our products, or the cost of materials or components may increase |
35
Table of Contents
| | |
| • | Government regulation imposes significant costs and other constraints |
| • | The backlog, sales, delivery and acceptance cycle for many of our products is irregular and may not develop as anticipated |
| • | Our customers are in cyclical industries and a downturn in those industries could adversely affect results |
| • | We will need to begin disclosing our use of “conflict minerals,” which will impose costs on us and could raise reputational and other risks that could adversely affect results |
| • | Interest rate fluctuations could adversely affect results |
The performance of our business and our securities may be adversely affected by these factors and by other factors common to other businesses and investments, or to the general economy. Forward-looking statements are qualified by some or all of these risk factors. Therefore, you should consider these risks with caution and form your own critical and independent conclusions about the likely effect of these risks on our future performance. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. Readers should carefully review the disclosures and the risk factors described in this and other documents we file from time to time with the SEC, including our reports on Forms 10-Q and Forms 8-K to be filed by the Company in Fiscal 2014.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our investment portfolio at June 28, 2014 included $56.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. The cash equivalent portion of our investment portfolio is invested in money market funds and bank deposits. A hypothetical 1.0 percentage point increase or decrease in market interest rates would have caused interest income to increase or decrease by $0.4 million for the nine fiscal months ended June 28, 2014.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We manage exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through our regular operating and financing activities and through the use of foreign currency exchange contracts. These contracts are used to manage our overall exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, as the gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset gains and losses on our assets, liabilities, and cash flows.
A hypothetical 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, assuming all other variables were held constant, would have resulted in an estimated increase or decrease of $19.0 million in revenue for the nine fiscal months ended June 28, 2014.
At June 28, 2014, our short-term borrowings outstanding consisted of $65.0 million utilization of the revolving credit facility. This utilization of the credit facility involves interest payments calculated at a floating rate and, therefore, is impacted by the effect of increases or decreases in market interest rates. Because we anticipate the borrowing to be outstanding for only a short period of time, we have elected not to mitigate this risk. A hypothetical 1.0 percentage point increase or decrease in interest rates, assuming all other variables were held constant, would have resulted in an estimated increase or decrease of $0.2 million in interest expense for the nine fiscal months ended June 28, 2014.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 28, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 28, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
36
Table of Contents
PART II ------ OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Investigative Matters
As previously reported by us with disclosures starting in March 2012, we investigated certain gift, travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred in connection with some of our operations in the Asia Pacific region. This investigation focused on possible violations of our policy, corresponding internal control issues and possible violations of applicable law, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Substantial investigative work was completed on this matter and we took remedial actions, including changes to internal control procedures and removing certain persons formerly employed in our Korea office. We voluntarily disclosed this matter to the Department of Justice and the SEC (the “Agencies”). We presented the results of our investigation and our corrective actions to representatives of the Agencies on January 16, 2013. We are now investigating certain business practices in China. This ongoing investigation has a similar focus to the prior investigation as described above. The investigation is still in process; however, we have taken certain initial remedial actions, including changes to internal control procedures and removing certain persons formerly employed in our China business. We are in regular communication with the Agencies regarding this investigation. We cannot predict the outcome of the matters described in this paragraph at this time or whether these matters will have a material adverse impact on our business prospects, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.
Litigation
We are subject to various claims, legal actions, and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe the final resolution of legal matters outstanding as of June 28, 2014 will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We expense legal costs as incurred.
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Purchases of Company Equity Securities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
March 30, 2014 - May 3, 2014 | | | 69,127 | | $ | 66.70 | | | 69,127 | | | 1,172,456 | |
May 4 2014 - May 31, 2014 | | | 41,294 | | $ | 66.40 | | | 41,294 | | | 1,131,162 | |
June 1, 2014 - June 28, 2014 | | | | | | | | | — | | | 1,131,162 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 110,421 | | $ | 66.59 | | | 110,421 | | | | |
We purchase our common stock to mitigate dilution related to new shares created by employee equity compensation such as stock option, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and employee stock purchase plan awards, as well as to return excess capital to shareholders.
During the First Nine Fiscal Months of 2014, our share purchases were executed under a 2.0 million share purchase authorization approved by our Board of Directors and announced on February 11, 2011. Authority over pricing and timing under the authorization has been delegated to management. The share purchase authorization has no expiration date.
37
Table of Contents
Item 6.Exhibits
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) (furnished herewith). |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) (furnished herewith). |
| | |
101.INS ** | | | XBRL Instance Document (furnished herewith). |
| | | |
101.SCH ** | | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (furnished herewith). |
| | | |
101.CAL ** | | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith). |
| | | |
101.DEF ** | | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (furnished herewith). |
| | | |
101.LAB ** | | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (furnished herewith). |
| | | |
101.PRE ** | | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith). |
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
38
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION |
| | |
Dated: August 4, 2014 | | /s/ SUSAN E. KNIGHT |
| | Susan E. Knight |
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer * |
* Executing as both the principal financial officer and a duly authorized officer of the Company.
39