- MTSC Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
-
ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
DEF 14A Filing
MTS Systems (MTSC) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy
Filed: 25 Apr 17, 12:00am
Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrantý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto | ||
Check the appropriate box: | ||
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
ý | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
MTS Systems Corporation | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý | No fee required. | |||
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: | |||
(4) | Date Filed: |
![]() | MTS Systems Corporation 14000 Technology Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2290 Telephone 952-937-4000 Fax: 952-937-4515 Info@mts.com www.mts.com |
April 25, 2017 | ||
Dear MTS Shareholder: | ||
MTS is holding a virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders this year on Tuesday, June 6, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. Central Standard Time. You may attend the Annual Meeting, vote and submit a question during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017. You will need to provide your 16-digit control number that is on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card if you receive materials by mail. | ||
Your vote is important to us. Last year, approximately 96% of the Company's shares were voted at the Annual Meeting and we thank our shareholders for their response. We urge you to cast your vote, as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, over the Internet or by telephone as promptly as possible. You may also request a paper proxy card to submit your vote by mail, if you prefer. And, as indicated above, you may vote during the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017. | ||
I encourage you to attend our virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 6, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., Central Standard Time by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017. | ||
Very truly yours, | ||
![]() | ||
David J. Anderson Chairman of the Board |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
DATE AND TIME
June 6, 2017; 9:00 a.m. (Central time)
VIRTUAL MEETING
The annual meeting of shareholders of MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company") will be held on Tuesday, June 6, 2017, as a virtual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017.
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement made available over the internet and, upon request, in paper copy.
April 25, 2017
On behalf of the Board of Directors,
David J. Anderson
Chairman of the Board
MTS Systems Corporation
14000 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2290
The Board of Directors has set the close of business on April 17, 2017, as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at, the meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
HOW TO VOTE
All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017. Whether or not you expect to attend, please vote:
By Internet: www.proxyvote.com
By Phone: Call 1.800.690.6903
By Mail: You may request a paper proxy
card, which you may complete, sign
and return by mail.
The proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors and may be revoked or withdrawn by you at any time before it is exercised.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
14000 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished to the shareholders of MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company," "we," "us," or "our") in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") to be voted at the virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, June 6, 2017 (the "Annual Meeting"), at 9:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, or any adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy statement and the form of proxy, along with the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016 ("fiscal 2016"), is being first sent or given to shareholders on or about April 25, 2017.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Eight directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting. Upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated for election the eight persons named below. Each has consented to being named a nominee and will, if elected, serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until a successor is elected. Other than Maximiliane C. Straub, each nominee listed below is currently a director of the Company and each was elected by the shareholders. Ms. Straub was elected to serve as a director by our Board on January 1, 2017 and identified as a board candidate by a third-party search firm retained for this purpose by our Governance and Nominating Committee and is standing for election by our shareholders as a director of the Company for the first time at the Annual Meeting. In addition to the nominees listed below, Emily M. Liggett and Barb J. Samardzich served as a member of our Board during fiscal 2016. Ms. Liggett did not stand for re-election at last year's annual meeting of shareholders and Ms. Samardzich is not standing for re-election at this year's Annual Meeting. Proxies solicited by the Board will, unless otherwise directed, be voted to elect the eight nominees named below to constitute the entire Board.
The names of the nominees, their principal occupations for at least the past five years and other information are set forth below:
1
David J. Anderson – Age 69 Director since 2009 Chair since 2011 | Director of Modine Manufacturing Company since 2010 and a member of its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Audit Committee, and Technology Committee; Director of Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (a steel manufacturing and scrap metal recycling company) since 2009 and a member of its Audit Committee and Compensation Committee; Co-Vice Chairman of Sauer-Danfoss, Inc. (developer and manufacturer of fluid power and electronic components and systems for mobile equipment applications) from 2008 until June 2009; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. from 2002 until he retired in 2009; various senior management positions with Sauer-Danfoss Inc. from 1984 to 2008; and prior to 1984, various positions in sales, marketing and applications engineering within several manufacturing and distribution businesses. Mr. Anderson's qualifications to serve on our Board and to serve as the Chair of the Board include his more than 40 years of international, industrial business experience and his chief executive officer and operations experience. He also has technology and engineering experience, the ability to formulate and execute strategy and financial expertise. | |
Jeffrey A. Graves – Age 55 Director since 2012 | President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 2012; President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of C&D Technologies, Inc. (a manufacturer, marketer and distributer of electrical power storage systems for the standby power storage market) from July 2005 until May 2012; various executive positions at Kemet Electronics Corporation from 2001 to 2005, including Chief Executive Officer; various leadership positions with General Electric Company's Power Systems Division and Corporate Research & Development Center from 1995 to 2001; prior to 1995, various positions of increasing responsibility at Rockwell International Corporation and Howmet Corporation. Dr. Graves has served as a director of Teleflex Incorporated and Hexcel Corporation since 2007. As the only member of management serving on our Board, Dr. Graves contributes an in-depth understanding of the opportunities and challenges facing our Company. His experience in both executive and board positions at various technology companies gives him insight into strategic, financial and personnel matters, as well as the considerations particular to public companies. | |
David D. Johnson – Age 61 Director since 2013 | Retired; Director of Nuvectra Corporation since 2016 and a member of its Audit Committee; Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Molex LLC (manufacturer of electronic connectors) from 2005 to 2016; Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Sypris Solutions, Inc., from 1996 to 2005; served as Regional Controller for Molex's Far East Region; Financial Director for New Ventures and Acquisitions; and Financial Director for the Far East South Region from 1984 to 1996. From 1978 to 1984, Mr. Johnson worked for the public accounting firm KPMG LLP. Mr. Johnson's qualifications to serve on our Board include his chief financial officer experience for a global industrial company. Mr. Johnson has had executive-level responsibility for financial and accounting matters in a number of settings, including international contexts. |
2
Randy J. Martinez – Age 62 Director since 2014 | Corporate Vice President of Strategy and Business Development for AAR CORP. (a provider of aviation services to the worldwide commercial aerospace and governmental/defense industries) since August 2015. Prior to his current role, Mr. Martinez held other leadership roles within AAR, including Group Vice President, Aviation Services and President and Chief Executive Officer, AAR Airlift Group (March 2012 to August 2015) and Group Vice President, Government and Defense Services and Senior Vice President, Government and Defense Programs (2009 to 2012). Before joining AAR in 2009, Mr. Martinez was the Chief Executive Officer at World Air Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ). As a graduate of the United States Air Force Academy, Mr. Martinez served with distinction in the U.S. Air Force for over 21 years, holding a wide variety of leadership roles, including both line command and senior staff positions. Mr. Martinez currently serves on the Board of the National Defense Transportation Association (NDTA), serving as Chair for the Aviation Sector. Mr. Martinez's qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as a chief executive officer at a public company and his particular knowledge of the aviation and defense industries. His diverse industry experience assists in helping to understand our customers who are also diverse by industry and geography. | |
Michael V. Schrock – Age 64 Director since 2014 | Advisor for Oak Hill Capital Partners (a private equity investment firm) since March 2014; President and Chief Operating Officer of Pentair LLC (a global water, fluid, thermal management and equipment protection company) from 2006 through 2013. Prior to that role, Mr. Schrock held several leadership positions at Pentair over his 16-year career, including President of Water Technologies Americas, President of the Pump and Pool Group and President/COO of Pentair Technical Products. Before joining Pentair, Mr. Schrock held numerous senior leadership roles in both the US and Europe at Honeywell International Inc. Mr. Schrock has served on the Board of Directors of Plexus Corporation since 2016. Mr. Schrock's experience includes more than 35 years in senior roles at major industrial companies. His deep management and operating experience both domestically and internationally and strong track record leading and integrating strategic acquisitions give our Board valuable insight into global business and acquisition matters. |
3
Gail P. Steinel – Age 60 Director since 2009 | Owner of Executive Advisors (provider of leadership development services and strategic/profit improvement consulting) since 2007; Executive Vice President, Consumer, Industrial & Technology business unit at BearingPoint (a global technology and management consulting company) from 2002 to 2007; and progressive management positions at Arthur Andersen (provider of audit, tax and consulting services), where her final position was Global Managing Partner of the Business Consulting Division, from 1979 to 2002. Ms. Steinel serves on several boards, including the Board of Trustees of Federal Realty Investment Trust and is Chairperson of its Audit Committee. Ms. Steinel's qualifications to serve on our Board include her global managing partner experience running a large global business, more than 35 years of business management consulting providing global strategy, policy development, complex problem solving and operations consulting services, as well as her financial expertise and experience as a certified public accountant. | |
Maximiliane C. Straub – Age 52 Director since 2017 | Chief Financial Officer of Bosch LLC (the U.S. subsidiary of Bosch Group, a global engineering and electronics manufacturer) and Executive VP Finance, Controlling and Administration of Bosch North America from 2010 to present; President Full Brake Systems North America of Robert Bosch LLC from 2006 to 2010; and other roles of increasing responsibility with various Bosch affiliates from 1993 to 2006. Ms. Straub's qualifications to serve on our Board include her chief financial officer experience for a global industrial company. She has developed significant responsibility for finance and accounting matters, as well as profit and loss responsibility, strategic planning experience and mergers and acquisitions experience, all in an international context. | |
Chun Hung (Kenneth) Yu – Age 67 Director since 2013 | Retired; Vice President, Global Channel Services, International Operations for 3M Company (diversified manufacturer of consumer, industrial and health products) from May 2013 to December 2013; President, China Region and 3M China from 2000 to May 2013; President, 3M Taiwan from 1999 to 2000; served in several Director and leadership roles within the 3M organization from 1969 to 1999, located in St. Paul, Minnesota and the Asian-Pacific region. Mr. Yu's qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive operations experience in the Asian-Pacific region, a market we have identified as a growth opportunity for our Company's products and services. Mr. Yu also contributes significant leadership, planning and management skills developed during his long tenure with a successful and growing global manufacturing company. |
Voting Information and Board Voting Recommendation
In accordance with Minnesota law, directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast. The eight nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. If any nominee is unable to serve as a director, the Board may act to reduce the number of directors or the persons named in the proxies may vote for the election of such substitute nominee as the Board may propose. It is intended that proxies will be voted for such nominees in the latter circumstance. The proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than eight.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" EACH NOMINEE LISTED.
4
Other Information Regarding the Board
Meetings and Independence. The Board met ten times during fiscal 2016. All of the directors attended at least 75% of the number of Board meetings and meetings of Board committees on which he or she served that were held during fiscal 2016. It is our policy that all directors should attend the Annual Meeting and all of the directors who were serving at the time of last year's annual meeting of shareholders did so.
Independence determinations concerning the Board are made by the Governance and Nominating Committee and, with regard to related party transactions, by the Audit Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board has determined that Messrs. Anderson, Johnson, Martinez, Schrock and Yu and Mses. Liggett, Steinel and Samardzich are independent, as defined by the applicable rules for companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board has determined that Ms. Straub is not independent as defined by the applicable rules for companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market because her sibling is a partner of KPMG Germany, an affiliate of our independent registered public accounting firm. Dr. Graves is not independent due to his service as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In making the independence determination with respect to related party transactions during fiscal 2016, the Audit Committee considered with regard to: Ms. Samardzich that the Company sold approximately $22.7 million in vehicle testing goods and services to Ford Motor Company; Mr. Anderson that the Company sold less than $200,000 in goods and services to Modine Manufacturing Company; and Mr. Johnson that the Company sold less than $10,000 in goods and services to Molex Incorporated. The Audit Committee determined that the aggregate dollar amount of the transactions are below the threshold for the NASDAQ Stock Market independence rules and/or that the transactions do not present a real, potential or perceived conflict between the Company's interests and the direct or indirect interests of Ms. Samardzich, Mr. Anderson, and Mr. Johnson as applicable.
Board Committees. Each of our three standing committees operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. These charters are available to shareholders on our website at www.mts.com (select "Investor Relations" and click on "Corporate Governance").
The Audit Committee of the Board, composed of Mr. Johnson (Chair), Ms. Steinel and Messrs. Anderson, and Martinez, held sixteen meetings during fiscal 2016. All members of the Audit Committee during fiscal 2016 satisfied the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards for Audit Committee membership. The Board determined that Ms. Steinel and Messrs. Anderson, Johnson and Martinez are each an "audit committee financial expert" under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Among other duties, the Audit Committee:
5
A report of the Audit Committee is contained in this proxy statement.
The Compensation and Leadership Development Committee (the "Compensation Committee") of the Board, composed of Mr. Schrock (Chair), Ms. Samardzich and Messrs. Johnson and Martinez, held six meetings during fiscal 2016. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors as defined by the rules applicable to companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, are "non-employee directors" as that term is defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are "outside directors" as that term is used in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Among other duties, the Compensation Committee:
A report of the Compensation Committee is contained in this proxy statement.
The Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board, composed of Ms. Steinel (chair) and Messrs. Schrock and Yu, held five meetings in fiscal 2016. All members are independent directors
6
as defined by the rules applicable to companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market. Among other duties, the Governance and Nominating Committee:
Director Nomination Process. In identifying prospective director candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee (for purposes of thisDirector Nomination Process sub-section, the "Committee") considers recommendations from shareholders and recommendations from business and professional sources, including executive search firms.
In evaluating director candidates, the Committee believes that all members of the Board should have personal and professional integrity, an absence of conflicts of interest and an ability to understand and respect the advisory and proactive oversight responsibility of the Board. In addition, all non-employee members of the Board should meet independence requirements, comply with director orientation and education guidelines, commit sufficient time to attend Board and committee meetings and fully perform the duties of a director.
In addition to these threshold criteria, the Committee also considers the contributions a candidate is expected to make to the collective functioning of the Board. The Committee seeks directors who will contribute to the Board in areas such as strategy and policy development, technology and engineering, human capital development, financial expertise, international business development and best practices, industrial business value creation, acquisition expertise and public company chief executive officer perspective.
Candidates are expected to effectively perform the role of a director by demonstrating broad perspectives and an inquiring mind, being well prepared for and actively participating in Board and committee meetings, contributing expertise to the Board and committees, listening well, expressing views candidly, applying experience and expertise, being respectful of others and appropriately representing the shareholders.
While it does not have a specific written policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, the Committee believes the Board should reflect a variety of opinions, perspectives, personal and professional experiences and backgrounds. The goal is to have a balanced and diverse Board, with members whose skills, backgrounds and experiences will enhance the quality of the Board's deliberations and decisions and cover the spectrum of areas that impact the Company's business. Each member of the Board should contribute to the overall Board composition, with the goal of creating a diverse Board that works collaboratively to guide the success of the Company and represent shareholder interests.
7
The Committee's policy is to consider qualified candidates for positions on the Board who are recommended in writing by shareholders. Shareholders wishing to recommend candidates for Board membership rather than directly nominating an individual should submit the written recommendations to our Secretary at least 90 days prior to the date corresponding to the date of the previous year's annual meeting of shareholders, with the submitting shareholder's name, address and pertinent information about the proposed nominee. See "Other Information – Shareholder Proposals" for additional information regarding the submission of candidates for Board membership in the event of a change in the annual meeting date from the previous year, which we anticipate will be the case for next year's annual meeting of shareholders to be held in early calendar 2018.
A shareholder intending to nominate an individual as a director at an annual meeting of shareholders, rather than recommend the individual to the Committee for consideration as a nominee, must comply with the advance notice requirements set forth in our Bylaws. Our Bylaws provide that any shareholder entitled to vote generally in the election of directors may nominate one or more persons for election as directors provided that such shareholder has provided written notice of such intention to our Secretary. Such notice must be given not fewer than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the date corresponding to the date of the previous year's annual meeting of shareholders, except in certain circumstances and must contain certain required information about the nominee.
Shareholders wishing to recommend for nomination or nominate a director should contact the Company's Secretary for a copy of the relevant procedure and the criteria considered by the Committee when evaluating potential new directors or the continued service of existing directors.
Board Leadership Structure. Our Board leadership structure currently includes a non-executive Chairman of the Board and a separate Chief Executive Officer. The Board has not adopted a policy of separateness and will periodically re-evaluate its leadership structure.
The primary role of our Chief Executive Officer is to manage the business affairs of the Company and the primary role of our Chairman is to preside over all Board activities and ensure the effectiveness of the Board in all aspects of its areas of responsibility. This role includes working with the Chief Executive Officer to set the Board agenda; ensuring that clear, accurate and timely information is provided to the Board; managing Board meetings to allow time for discussion of complex or difficult issues; and promoting active participation by all Board members. The Chairman may also assist the Chief Executive Officer in managing the Company's relationships with investors and other external stakeholders.
The Board has determined that the separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles is appropriate for the Company at this time because it enables the Chief Executive Officer to focus more closely on the day-to-day operations of the Company. The Board also values the involvement of Mr. Anderson as a leader and, through his service as Chairman, benefits more directly from his extensive industry and executive experience than it would if he did not hold such position.
Board Role in Risk Management Oversight.Management is responsible for designing and implementing the Company's day-to-day risk management processes, controls and oversight. The Board, as a whole and through its committees, has broad responsibility for the oversight of risk management. The Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that risk management processes and controls are adequate and functioning as designed and that Company business is conducted in compliance with proper governance procedures and applicable laws and regulations. The Board views risk in the context of major strategic and operational decisions relative to the anticipated benefits. The Board recognizes that it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk because
8
purposeful and appropriate risk taking is essential for the Company to be competitive and to achieve its performance goals.
The Board believes the Company has good internal processes, controls and resources to identify, manage and mitigate risk, including a robust code of conduct and the compliance oversight role held by the Chief Risk Officer. As a critical part of its risk management oversight role, the Board encourages full, open and ongoing communication with management. The Board regularly engages in discussions with management on strategic, operational and governance matters to ensure that processes and controls are in place so risks are identified, managed and mitigated in a timely fashion.
The Board implements its risk management oversight function both as a whole and through committees. Much of the work is delegated to various committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board. All committees have significant roles in carrying out the risk management oversight function. The chair of each committee provides a committee report at each Board meeting that enables the Board to fulfill its risk management oversight responsibilities. Since risk management oversight is an ongoing process and inherent in the Company's strategic and operational decisions, the Board also discusses risk in relation to specific proposed actions.
Each committee is comprised entirely of independent directors and is responsible for overseeing risks associated with its respective area of responsibility.
The Audit Committee:
The Compensation Committee:
9
The Governance and Nominating Committee:
A separate discussion regarding the risk considerations in our compensation programs, including the processes that have been put in place by the Compensation Committee and management to identify, manage and mitigate potential risks in compensation, can be found on pages 31 to 32 of this proxy statement.
Communications with the Board. The Board provides a process for shareholders to communicate with its members. The manner in which shareholders may send communications to the Board is set forth on our website at www.mts.com (select "Investor Relations" and click on "Corporate Governance").
Board Evaluation.The Governance and Nominating Committee leads the Board in an annual evaluation of its performance as a board of directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board annually evaluate its performance to determine whether the Board, its committees and its individual members are functioning effectively.
Code of Conduct.We adhere to a code of ethics, known as the "MTS Code of Conduct." It applies to our directors, officers, employees and contractors. The MTS Code of Conduct sets forth guidelines for ensuring that all personnel act in accordance with the highest standards of integrity. The MTS Code of Conduct, as well as any waivers from and amendments to it, are posted on our website at www.mts.com (select "Investor Relations" and click on "Corporate Governance").
Non-Employee Director Compensation
During fiscal 2016, the Board reviewed the market competitive pay of our compensation peer companies, as prepared by Willis Towers Watson. Based on the information presented, the Board determined that cash and equity compensation for fiscal 2017 will be adjusted to align the fees and restricted stock units that our non-employee directors receive with market as compared to our peer companies.
10
The table below reflects the cash compensation for annual service during fiscal 2016 to our non-employee directors along with the approved adjustments for fiscal 2017:
Role | Fiscal 2016 Annual Cash Retainer | Fiscal 2017 Annual Cash Retainer | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Chairman of the Board | $110,000 | $120,000 | |||||
All other non-employee directors | $45,000 | $55,000 | |||||
Audit Committee | |||||||
Chair | $19,000 | $20,000 | |||||
All other committee members | $9,000 | $10,000 | |||||
Compensation Committee | |||||||
Chair | $12,500 | $15,000 | |||||
All other committee members | $5,000 | $7,500 | |||||
Governance and Nominating Committee | |||||||
Chair | $11,000 | $11,000 | |||||
All other committee members | $5,000 | $5,000 |
Upon election or re-election to the Board at each of our annual meetings of shareholders, the directors receive an annual grant of restricted stock units under our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan with the number of shares equal to the amounts set forth in the table below. The annual restricted stock unit award to be granted in June 2017 will be under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan that is the subject of shareholder approval at this Annual Meeting, and will vest on the one year anniversary of the date of grant.
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fiscal 2016 Award Amount | | Fiscal 2017 Award Amount | | Calculation | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David Anderson (Chairman of the Board) | $134,000 | $154,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David Johnson | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Randy Martinez | FMV ÷ Grant Date Stock | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Barb Samardzich(1) | Price rounded down to the | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Schrock | $95,000 | $115,000 | next whole number | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gail Steinel | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kenneth Yu | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maximiliane Straub(2) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
If a non-employee director is appointed to the Board prior to the annual meeting of shareholders, the non-employee director may receive a pro-rated restricted stock unit award depending upon, among other factors, the length of time until the next annual meeting of shareholders. If a non-employee director resigns, retires or otherwise terminates his or her service as a director, a pro-rata portion of
11
any restricted stock units held by such director shall vest prior to the date that the restrictions would otherwise vest.
Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for travel expenses to Board meetings.
Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and may elect to defer up to 100% of the director's fees we pay in cash and to defer the settlement of up to 100% of the restricted stock unit awards that they are eligible to receive. At the time of the deferral election, participants must select a distribution date and form of distribution. The plan provides for the crediting of dividend equivalents on such deferred settlement restricted stock units and for the crediting of interest on cash amounts (deferred director fees and dividend equivalents amounts) that are credited to a participant's deferred account. The interest rate utilized is approved by the Compensation Committee in November of each year for the following calendar year. Historically, the ten-year government treasury note rate as of the first business day of the calendar year has been used. The interest rate for calendar 2016 was 2.24%. For fiscal 2016, Mr. Johnson elected to defer 100% of his director's fees and settlement of 100% of his restricted stock unit grant and associated dividend equivalents paid on that grant and Mr. Anderson and Ms. Steinel elected to defer settlement of 100% of their restricted stock unit grant and associated dividend equivalents paid on that grant. Earnings on the deferred compensation accounts (dividend equivalents and interest credits) do not represent above-market or preferential earnings.
The table below shows cash compensation earned by non-employee directors for fiscal 2016 and either paid in cash or deferred at the election of the director as described above. The table also shows the dollar amounts recognized by us for financial statement reporting purposes during fiscal 2016 for restricted stock unit awards granted for service during fiscal 2016.
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2016
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2)(3) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David Anderson | 119,000 | 134,006 | 4,634 | 257,640 | |||||||||
David Johnson | 69,833 | 95,004 | 4,874 | 169,711 | |||||||||
Emily Liggett(5) | 12,500 | — | 403 | 12,903 | |||||||||
Randy Martinez | 59,417 | 95,004 | 2,078 | 156,499 | |||||||||
Barb Samardzich | 50,000 | 95,004 | 2,078 | 147,082 | |||||||||
Michael Schrock | 63,125 | 95,004 | 2,078 | 160,207 | |||||||||
Gail Steinel | 65,917 | 95,004 | 4,080 | 165,001 | |||||||||
Kenneth Yu | 50,000 | 95,004 | 2,078 | 147,082 |
12
restricted stock units and each of Mr. Johnson, Mr. Martinez, Ms. Samardzich, Mr. Schrock, Ms. Steinel and Mr. Yu were awarded 1,861 restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $51.05 per share.
13
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
THIS SECTION SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE "AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT" BELOW.
KPMG LLP ("KPMG"), an independent registered public accounting firm, has been our independent registered public accounting firm since May 31, 2002. The Audit Committee has selected KPMG to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm and to serve as auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017. Shareholder ratification of the appointment is requested. Consistent with our Audit Committee Charter and the requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market, the ratification of the appointment of independent auditors by the shareholders will in no manner impinge upon or detract from the authority and power of the Audit Committee to appoint, retain, oversee and, if necessary, disengage the independent auditors. In the event the appointment of KPMG is not ratified by the shareholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.
Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The following table presents aggregate fees for professional services rendered by KPMG in fiscal 2016 and fiscal year 2015 for the audit of our annual financial statements and for other services.
| Fiscal Year ($000's) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 4,253 | $ | 1,779 | |||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 1,830 | 16 | |||||
Tax Fees(3) | 177 | 97 | |||||
All Other Fees(4) | - | - | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total fees | $ | 6,260 | $ | 1,892 |
The amounts in the table include out-of-pocket expenses incurred by KPMG. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services described in the table. The Audit Committee has determined
14
that the provision of the services identified in the table is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.
The Audit Committee's current practice on pre-approval of services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm is to require pre-approval of all audit services and permissible non-audit services. The Audit Committee reviews each non-audit service to be provided and assesses the impact of the service on the firm's independence. In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to grant certain pre-approvals to the Audit Committee Chair. Pre-approvals granted by the Audit Committee Chair are reported to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP.
15
The Audit Committee is currently composed of four directors who are independent, as defined by the applicable rules for companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which is available to shareholders on our website at www.mts.com (select "Investor Relations" and click on "Corporate Governance").
Management is responsible for preparing the financial statements, establishing and maintaining the system of internal controls over the financial reporting processes, and assessing the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal controls in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and for issuing reports on such audit. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
Management has represented to the Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the Audit Committee has reviewed and extensively discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and KPMG, our independent registered public accounting firm.
In reviewing our fiscal 2016 audited consolidated financial statements, the Audit Committee discussed with KPMG matters required to be discussed by the applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Standards. In addition, the Audit Committee received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures required by the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with them their independence from us and our management. The Audit Committee determined that the tax services provided to our Company by our independent registered public accounting firm are compatible with the independent registered public accounting firm's independence.
Based upon the Audit Committee's discussions with management and KPMG and the Audit Committee's review of the representations of management and the reports of KPMG, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016.
SUBMITTED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David D. Johnson (Chair)
David J. Anderson
Randy J. Martinez
Gail P. Steinel
16
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This CD&A describes our executive compensation program for the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers of the Company. The Compensation and Leadership Development Committee (for purposes of this Executive Compensation Section, the "Committee") administers and makes decisions regarding our executive compensation and benefit programs. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and footnote disclosure setting forth the compensation of our fiscal 2016 named executive officers:
Mr. Oldenkamp provided a resignation notice to the Company on April 20, 2017 and his employment with the Company will end effective May 12, 2017.
Mr. Bachrach retired from the Company on January 13, 2017.
Mr. Emholz is one of our named executive officers for whom disclosure would have been provided because he was one of our three other most highly paid executive officers, but for the fact that he was not serving as an executive officer at the end of fiscal 2016. Mr. Emholz transitioned from the role of Senior Vice President, Sensors, effective as of July 6, 2016. In connection with such transition, we entered into a transition bonus agreement with Mr. Emholz and he remained employed by the Company as Senior Vice President, Sensors, including the corresponding compensation and benefits, until September 6, 2016, at which time Mr. Emholz's employment with the Company was terminated. He continues to be eligible to receive compensation pursuant to the Company's Executive Severance Plan.
Ms. Powell and the Company entered into a mutual separation agreement on April 18, 2017 pursuant to which the parties mutually agreed that Ms. Powell's employment with the Company will end effective May 5, 2017.
The objectives of the Committee are to provide a market competitive compensation program that:
17
A discussion of recent Company performance and the corresponding executive pay outcomes, demonstrates that our compensation program is functioning according to our established goals in most respects.
| | | | | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | |
Performance Highlights | Compensation Outcomes | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2016 Results Related to Target Levels for Incentive Plans • Total Adjusted Revenue, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $605.6 million(1), up from the previous year's GAAP revenue of $563.9 million. • Adjusted ROIC, a non-GAAP financial measure, of 16.3%(2), compared to 15.5%(3) in fiscal year 2015. • Adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS), a non-GAAP financial measure, of $3.01(2), compared to the previous year's GAAP diluted EPS of $3.00. • Adjusted Working Capital Rate to Revenue ("WCRR"), a non-GAAP financial measure, was 24.0%(4), compared to WCRR of 30.4%(5) in fiscal year 2015. | Annual Incentives • Based on achieving 92% of the adjusted EPS goal, 100% of the adjusted revenue goal and 121% of the adjusted WCRR goal, the fiscal year 2016 annual incentive payout for our CEO was 100% of target. • The payout was capped at target, as our incentive compensation plan restricts over-ranging in the event that the adjusted EPS goal is not achieved. Without the cap, payouts for the CEO would have been 123% of target during fiscal year 2016. Long-Term Incentives • Three of the four outstanding stock option grants for our CEO were underwater as of October 1, 2016. • The performance-based restricted stock units granted in fiscal years 2016 and 2015 were tracking below target payout levels. o Adjusted ROIC performance was below target levels in both fiscal years 2016 and 2015. o Share prices were below the grant levels. The overall result is compensation below the targeted opportunity. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
(1) For purposes of our incentive compensation plans, we use adjusted revenue, which is not a measure of performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted revenue is calculated by excluding PCB revenue for the three months ended October 1, 2016 of approximately $44,503,000 from our total fiscal year 2016 revenue of approximately $650,147,000. We use adjusted revenue as an incentive compensation measure as defined in the plan documents. This measure should not be construed as an alternative to revenue determined in accordance with GAAP.
(2) For purposes of our incentive compensation plans, we have calculated adjusted ROIC and adjusted diluted EPS for fiscal year 2016, which are not financial measures of performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted ROIC is calculated by dividing adjusted net income by average adjusted invested capital. Adjusted diluted EPS is calculated by
18
dividing adjusted net income by adjusted diluted weighted average common shares outstanding. Adjusted net income is calculated by excluding the following from reported net income: PCB net income, acquisition-related expense, net of tax; acquisition integration expenses, net of tax; acquisition inventory step-up, net of tax; restructuring expense, net of tax; acquisition interest expense, net of tax; and after-tax interest expense. Adjusted diluted weighted average common shares outstanding is calculated by excluding the impact of our common stock offering and the issuance of 8.75% tangible equity units, or TEUs. Average invested capital is defined as the aggregate of average adjusted interest-bearing debt and average adjusted shareholders' equity and is calculated as the sum of current and prior year ending amounts divided by two. Because the calculations are not prescribed or authorized by GAAP, the adjusted ROIC percentage and adjusted diluted EPS amount are non-GAAP financial measures. We use adjusted ROIC and adjusted diluted EPS as incentive compensation measures as defined in the plan documents. These measures should not be construed as an alternative to return on equity, diluted EPS or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures, see page 58 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016.
(3) For the calculation of fiscal year 2015 ROIC, see page 20 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016.
(4) For purposes of our incentive compensation plans, we use adjusted WCRR for fiscal year 2016, which is not a measure of performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted WCRR is calculated by dividing the adjusted 12 month average net working capital by adjusted revenue. The adjusted 12 month average net working capital is calculated by excluding PCB accounts receivable, net, unbilled accounts receivable, inventories, net, accounts payable and advance payments from customers and averaging the quarterly adjusted net working capital for fiscal year 2016. Adjusted revenue is calculated by excluding PCB revenue for the three months ended October 1, 2016 of approximately $44,503,000 from fiscal year 2016 revenue of approximately $650,147,000. Because the ratio is not prescribed or authorized by GAAP, the adjusted WCRR is a non-GAAP financial measure. We use adjusted WCRR as an incentive compensation measure as defined in the plan documents. For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP measures for fiscal year 2016, see page 59 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016.
(5) WCRR is calculated by dividing the 12 month average net working capital by full fiscal year revenue. The 12 month average net working capital is calculated by averaging the quarterly adjusted net working capital for fiscal year 2015. Because the ratio is not prescribed or authorized by GAAP, WCRR is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP measures for fiscal year 2015, see page 60 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016.
While we believe our executive compensation program is meeting our stated objectives, we do accept shareholder feedback on the design and performance-orientation of our programs. Specifically, we received approximately 98% support of our executive compensation programs at our last annual meeting of shareholders held in fiscal 2016 related to the compensation of our named executive officers. We continue to solicit shareholder feedback regarding our compensation programs, and take this input into consideration as we design future incentive compensation.
Fiscal 2016 Executive Compensation Highlights
Detailed below are some of the key actions and decisions with respect to our executive compensation programs for fiscal 2016 as approved by the Committee, with counsel from its independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson:
19
Employment Agreement has a two-year term and provides for potential payments in the event of a termination of Mr. Hore's employment. Therefore, during the term of the Hore Employment Agreement, Mr. Hore will not participate in our Executive Severance Plan or the Executive Change in Control Severance Plan. In addition, as one of our new executive officers, Mr. Hore received a restricted stock unit award on August 15, 2016 with a fair market value of $270,000 in accordance with our typical policy for newly hired executive officers. We believe that executive hire equity grants are important to align our officers' interests with our shareholders' interests.
20
Information Used in the Compensation Process
Independent Compensation Consultant
Under the Committee's charter, the Committee has the authority to select, retain and compensate executive compensation consultants and other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its responsibilities. For assistance with fiscal 2016 compensation decisions, the Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson to provide it with information regarding compensation of executive officers, non-executive officers and directors. Specifically, Willis Towers Watson was asked by the Committee to:
Determining Competitive Compensation
The Committee annually assesses "competitive market" compensation for each component of compensation using a number of sources.
The Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as its independent compensation consultant to review compensation levels for executive positions. For fiscal 2016, as in past years, a base salary benchmark tool was updated for the Committee based upon executive salary survey data that was adjusted for comparability by business, revenue, executive position and age of data. In setting salaries for fiscal 2016, executive salary survey data for executives was obtained from the 2015 Towers Watson Compensation DataBank Survey and the 2015 Towers Watson Compensation Survey Report for companies with less than $1 billion in revenue. The results of the benchmark tool
21
were then referenced against proxy compensation data from our compensation peer group described below, which is used as a supplemental data source.
For each position, the base salary benchmark tool produces a median and a competitive salary range, with the minimum and maximum end of the range at approximately 80% and 120% of the median, respectively. The Committee used the benchmark tool to assess the median and range of competitive salaries for fiscal 2016 and compared these to the base salaries for the named executive officers to determine the need for adjustments.
Our direct competitors are either privately-owned companies or business units within much larger public companies and, as a result, a broad and reliable base of compensation data from these companies is not readily available. Accordingly, the compensation peer group we use to confirm the base salary data from our benchmark tool consists of durable goods manufacturing companies, most of which do not compete with us directly but several of which compete with us for management talent. Our compensation peer group is reviewed on an annual basis by the Committee with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant. Our compensation peer group used when determining fiscal 2016 compensation consisted of the following companies:
Badger Meter Inc. | GSI Group Inc. | |
Checkpoint Systems Inc. | John Bean Technologies Corporation | |
Cognex Corporation | Kimball Electronics, Inc. | |
Coherent Inc. | Methode Electronics, Inc. | |
CTS Corporation | National Instruments Corporation | |
Daktronics Inc. | Newport Corp. | |
ESCO Technologies Inc. | OSI Systems, Inc. | |
Fabrinet | RBC Bearings Inc. | |
FARO Technologies Inc. | Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. | |
FEI Company | Standex International Corporation |
In May 2016, the Committee evaluated its peer group in light of the acquisition of PCB and determined that its peer group should be revised to add the following companies: HEICO Corporation and MKS Instruments, Inc.
For short-term cash incentive compensation, which was delivered to the named executive officers through the EVC Plan, the Committee also reviewed market data and executive salary survey information that had been compiled and adjusted by Willis Towers Watson. For each of the named executive officers, the Committee compared the target amounts under the EVC Plan for fiscal 2016 to the survey information relating to the median amount of non-salary cash compensation paid to executive officers as a percentage of base salary.
Additionally, Willis Towers Watson prepares for the Committee an annual analysis of long-term equity incentive compensation. The analysis includes a market review of our equity grant structure, comparing the value of our long-term incentive award guidelines to market data. Comparative information was obtained from the Willis Towers Watson's Executive Compensation Database for long-term incentive tables for companies with revenues of less than $1 billion. The Committee used
22
this data to establish competitive guideline ranges and median values for equity awards made in December 2015 to the named executive officers.
Role of Management
In determining compensation for executive officers, other than the CEO, the Committee solicits input from the CEO regarding the duties and responsibilities of the other executive officers and the results of performance evaluations. The CEO also recommends to the Committee the base salary for all executive officers (other than his own) and, in developing his recommendations, may request input from the Chief Human Resources Officer from time to time relating to the compensation of those executive officers. The CEO, Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Human Resources Officer develop recommendations for the Committee regarding the financial performance goals under the EVC Plan and the minimum, target and maximum levels of achievement of the performance goals. The CEO, Chief Human Resources Officer and General Counsel are invited to attend meetings of the Committee from time to time. No executive officer attends any independent director executive session of the Committee or is present during deliberations or determination of his or her compensation.
The Committee establishes the compensation for the executive officers, other than the CEO. With respect to the CEO, the Committee makes recommendations to the independent directors of the Board of Directors.
Compensation of our Named Executive Officers
During fiscal 2016, the components of our executive compensation program consisted of base salary, short-term cash incentive, long-term equity incentive awards, broad-based benefits and other perquisites. The named executive officers were eligible to participate in the same benefit programs as were available to our other salaried employees working in the same countries. The chart below reflects the relative weighting associated with each of these components paid or granted to the CEO for fiscal 2016.
23
For the named executive officers, other than the CEO, the average relative weighting associated with these components paid or granted for fiscal 2016 was base salary 38%; long-term equity incentive 38%; short-term cash incentive 20%; benefits 3% and perquisites 1%. Mr. Hore and Mr. Emholz were not included in the calculation of the pay mix for the named executive officers due to Mr. Hore's Employment Agreement and Mr. Emholz's transition bonus.
Determining Mix of Compensation
The Committee does not have a set policy or formula for weighting the elements of compensation for each named executive officer. Instead, the Committee considers market factors relevant to that executive and his or her tenure, role within the Company and contributions to the Company's performance. In general, as named executive officers assume greater responsibility, a larger portion of their total cash compensation is payable as short-term cash incentive, which is variable based on performance, as opposed to base salary and a larger portion of their total direct compensation (that is, compensation other than benefits and perquisites) comes in the form of long-term equity incentive.
The Committee determines base salaries for named executive officers, other than the CEO, and makes recommendations to the independent directors of the Board regarding the base salary of the CEO. These recommendations are based upon a number of factors, including competitive salaries and individual performance. Annual recommendations for executive officers are made in November of each year and any resulting adjustments to base salaries take effect that same month.
The Committee reviewed base salary datasets developed by Willis Towers Watson as the Committee considered adjustments to base salaries for fiscal year 2016. These datasets provided the Committee with information regarding a median level of base salary for each named executive officer position and a range of competitive base salaries.
Additionally, we have a systematic approach for evaluating the performance of our executive officers, with base salary adjustments affected primarily by the performance evaluation for the prior fiscal year. The process begins by establishing specific, individualized performance goals at the beginning of the fiscal year for each executive officer, as well as identifying or reaffirming the core competencies of the position and evaluating performance against the values that guide how we conduct ourselves and our business. The CEO proposes individual performance goals for himself that are reviewed by the Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board. The CEO works with each of the other named executive officers to establish appropriate performance goals for that individual. These individual performance goals relate to our customers and our market, organizational improvements and financial measures.
The CEO regularly provides reports and updates throughout the year regarding his progress toward achievement of these individual performance goals. The performance of the executive officer is assessed by the independent directors of the Board, in the case of the CEO, or by the CEO, in the case of the other executive officers. As part of this performance review, the independent directors of the Board or the CEO, as the case may be, consider the executive officer's demonstration of competencies of that executive's role, the behaviors that reinforce our values and achievement of the individual performance goals established for that fiscal year.
24
The following table shows the annualized base salaries for the named executive officers for fiscal year 2016 (other than Mr. Hore, who received the same base salary as provided in the employment agreement that he had in place with PCB prior to the acquisition), as well as the proximity of the fiscal year 2016 base salary to the median of the market data for the same or similar position.
Named Executive Officer | Fiscal Year 2016 Annualized Base Salary | Fiscal Year 2016 Annualized Base Salary as a Percent of Median of Base Salary Comparable | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | $ | 650,000 | 99.2% | ||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | $ | 345,000 | 95.8% | ||
William Bachrach | $ | 360,000 | 100.0% | ||
John Emholz | $ | 320,000 | 103.2% | ||
Catherine Powell | $ | 300,000 | 96.8% |
Mr. Hore receives compensation under the terms of the Hore Employment Agreement, which provides for an annualized base salary of $500,000.
Design of EVC Plan and Review of Fiscal 2016 Performance
Under the EVC Plan, all of the named executive officers employed by the Company at the end of fiscal 2016, other than Mr. Hore, were eligible for cash bonuses as determined based upon our financial performance as compared to set performance goals. Mr. Hore does not participate under the EVC Plan because the Hore Employment Agreement provides that payment of any bonus is at the sole discretion of the Board.
The table below shows the target bonus amounts as a percentage of their respective base salaries that would be earned by the named executive officers, other than Mr. Hore, under the EVC Plan upon our achievement of target performance goals.
Named Executive Officer | % of Fiscal Year 2016 Base Salary at Target Achievement | |
---|---|---|
| | |
Jeffrey Graves | 100% | |
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 55% | |
William Bachrach | 55% | |
John Emholz | 45% | |
Catherine Powell | 45% |
The differences among the named executive officers of the cash incentive opportunity at the target level is primarily a function of their position within our Company and the corresponding grade level assigned to that position. Named executive officers with the same grade level were assigned the same cash incentive opportunity at the target level. The Committee usually sets the cash incentive opportunity at the target level at the same percentage for the same positions. However, the Committee reviews, primarily for trend information, data from our compensation survey analysis and our group of compensation peer companies relating to short-term compensation earned by executive officers in comparable positions. After this review, the Committee makes adjustments to the percentage of base salary that will be earned by our executive officers at target achievement as appropriate.
25
The Committee determined the performance goals under the EVC Plan as part of our annual planning process, selecting performance goals deemed critical to our success in fiscal 2016. The Committee believes the combination of performance goals are appropriately balanced between earnings-related and growth goals, while also focusing on shareholder value. The following is a summary of the performance goals and their relative weighting for the named executive officers, other than Mr. Hore.
Weighting for
Named Executive Officers
for Fiscal Year 2016
![]() |
For Dr. Graves, Mr. Oldenkamp and Ms. Powell, all performance goals were based on total Company performance. For Messrs. Bachrach and Emholz, the adjusted diluted EPS performance goal was a total Company measure, but the remaining measures were determined based upon achievement of targets by the Test or Sensors segment, as applicable. The Committee established performance goals based on segment (rather than total Company) performance for these executives to reflect their accountability for the performance of that segment. The Committee believes that the leader of the segment has a meaningful opportunity to directly impact the achievement of the performance goals through his individual performance as the leader of that segment.
The Committee established minimum, target and maximum levels of achievement for each of the performance metrics, as shown in the following table:
Corporate Goal (1) | Weight | Threshold(2) | Target | Maximum | Result | Percent of Target Performance Achieved | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Diluted EPS(3) | 35% | $ 2.61 | $ 3.27 | $ 3.92 | $ 3.01 | 92% | ||||||
Adjusted Revenue (000s)(4) | 35% | $ 484,320 | $ 605,400 | $ 726,480 | $ 605,644 | 100% | ||||||
Adjusted WCRR(5) | 30% | 31.9% | 29.0% | 26.1% | 24.0% | 121% | ||||||
Payout as % of Target Bonus | 50% | 100% | 200% |
26
WCRR, minimum is equal to a 10% decrease in the expected results under the applicable segment's annual plan, target is equal to expected results and maximum is equal to a 10% increase in expected results.
In addition, since the Committee believes the adjusted diluted EPS performance goal provides a strong link between the incentive program and shareholder value, if the target level of adjusted diluted EPS achievement is not met, EVC Plan participants are limited to target payout under the plan regardless of the results of other performance goals. Within this provision of the EVC Plan, if the adjusted diluted EPS target is not met, an executive may receive a payout in excess of 100% for an individual performance goal so long as the executive's payout under the EVC Plan is not in excess of 100% of target, in the aggregate.
Based on the results for fiscal year 2016, the payouts to each named executive officer, other than Messrs. Emholz and Hore, under the EVC Plan by performance goal were calculated as follows based upon their respective fiscal year 2016 base salaries:
Performance Goal | Percent of Target Payout Achieved | Jeffrey Graves | Jeffrey Oldenkamp | William Bachrach(1) | Catherine Powell | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted diluted EPS | 80% | $ | 181,980 | $ | 52,290 | $ | 55,351 | $ | 35,569 | |||||||
Adjusted revenue | 100% | $ | 227,078 | $ | 65,249 | $ | 80,952 | $ | 44,496 | |||||||
Adjusted WCRR | 200% | $ | 388,500 | $ | 111,632 | $ | 118,167 | $ | 76,125 | |||||||
Total without cap | $ | 797,558 | $ | 229,171 | $ | 254,470 | $ | 156,190 | ||||||||
Total with cap(2) | $ | 647,500 | $ | 186,053 | $ | 196,945 | $ | 126,876 | ||||||||
Total as % of Target | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Mr. Emholz did not qualify for a payout under the EVC Plan since he was no longer an employee of the Company as of the last day of fiscal 2016. Mr. Hore does not participate in the EVC Plan, so he also did not qualify for a payout. Pursuant to the terms of the Hore Employment Agreement, the Committee decided not to provide a discretionary bonus to Mr. Hore based on the short period of time that he was employed by the Company during fiscal 2016.
27
The awards for fiscal 2016 were weighted 50% of the value in stock options and 50% of the value in PRSUs restricted over a three-year period. In determining the number of stock options to grant, the Committee reviewed the stock options based on an average of the Black Scholes values over the last 90 days prior to the end of the fiscal year. This methodology was to better represent the value of our equity over the most current period prior to the date of the award. A more stable option grant size (in terms of the number of options) also sends a signal that pay realized from stock option grants will be more sensitive to future stock price appreciation and less sensitive to past stock price volatility. This approach, however, causes the accounting value of the stock options that are shown in the Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards tables to differ from the value of PRSUs, which would otherwise be unexpected with an equal-weighted mix of options and PRSUs. In determining the number of PRSUs to grant, half of the aggregate value of the grant is divided by the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.
The options are all non-qualified stock options that vest in incremental installments of one-third per year commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire seven years after the date of grant.
In fiscal 2016, the Committee continued to grant PRSUs using adjusted ROIC as a performance measure. The Committee believes that measuring adjusted ROIC over a three-year period is an appropriate measure for such PRSUs given its emphasis on profitability with a longer-term view. The performance measure of adjusted ROIC is expressed as annual targets for the applicable three-year period and the annual performance is averaged over the performance period. The performance range has threshold, target and maximum performance expectations each cycle, with a 75% guaranteed threshold of target and up to a 125% maximum opportunity of target.
The following table shows for each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Hore who did not receive an award because he was not an officer of the Company at the time) the number of shares underlying the equity awards and the aggregate value of the awards granted in December 2015 for fiscal 2016.
Named Executive Officer | Number of Shares Underlying Stock Options | Number of Performance Restricted Stock Units | Aggregate Value of Awards | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jeffrey Graves | 61,455 | 10,123 | $ | 1,250,000 | |||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 17,207 | 2,834 | $ | 350,000 | |||
William Bachrach | 14,749 | 2,430 | $ | 300,000 | |||
John Emholz | 9,833 | 1,620 | $ | 200,000 | |||
Catherine Powell | 8,850 | 1,458 | $ | 180,000 |
The table below sets forth for fiscal 2016 the threshold, target and maximum levels for the adjusted ROIC performance goal as well as the actual achievement of that performance goal for fiscal 2016 and the percentage of the target level of that achievement.
Performance Goal | | | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | Result | | Percent of Target Performance Achieved | | Percent of Target Payout Achieved |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted ROIC | | | 10.6% | | 17.6% | | 22.6% | | 15.9% | | 90.3% | | 93.9% |
28
Based on the results for fiscal 2016, the payouts to each named executive officer (other than Mr. Emholz and Ms. Powell, who were not officers of the Company at the time of the date of grant) for the PRSUs with a date of grant of December 3, 2014, were calculated as follows based upon the respective PRSUs attributable to fiscal year 2015 and 2016 performance.
| Target PRSUs | Actual PSRUs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Named Executive Officer(1) | Shares | Value(2) | Shares | Value(3) | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | 2,670 | $178,837 | 2,508 | $134,805 | ||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 672 | $45,011 | 631 | $33,916 | ||||
William Bachrach | 684 | $45,814 | 642 | $34,508 | ||||
John Emholz | — | — | — | — | ||||
Catherine Powell | — | — | — | — |
Equity Incentive Grant Policy. The Committee recognizes the importance of adhering to specific practices and procedures in the granting of equity incentives. Accordingly, the Committee has developed a formal policy relating to the grant of equity incentives. Our policy is that grants of equity incentives, other than new hire or promotional grants, will be made by the Committee once per year as described above. Equity incentive awards to our CEO are approved by the independent directors of the Board following a recommendation by the Committee. Our policy is that the annual grant date for awards made by the Committee for the annual grant is on the later of (i) market close as of the first Wednesday in December in the first fiscal quarter, or (ii) market close as of the fifth business day after the fourth quarter earnings release is issued. Our policy also states that the grant date for awards made by the Committee to new hires will be the 15th day of the month following the month of hire or, if the market is closed that day, the first business day prior thereto in which the market is open.
Under our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, the Committee may delegate authority to make awards to a subcommittee consisting only of independent directors or to one or more executive officers. We also included a similar provision to the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan that is the subject of shareholder approval at this Annual Meeting. The Committee has delegated authority to the CEO to make awards of stock options, restricted stock units or a combination of stock options and restricted stock units, other than to our executive officers. This delegation is subject to a maximum number of shares and other restrictions.
Executive Compensation Clawback Policy. We added a recoupment or "clawback" provision to our EVC Plan that was approved by shareholders at the fiscal year 2009 annual meeting of shareholders. Our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan contains a similar provision. We also included a similar provision to the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan that is the subject of shareholder approval at this Annual Meeting, with the addition of recoupment in the event of a violation of the MTS Code of Conduct. These clawback provisions require an executive officer to forfeit and allow us to recoup from the
29
executive officer any payments or benefits received by the executive officer under the EVC Plan or our equity plans under certain circumstances, such as certain restatements of our financial statements, termination of employment for cause, violation of the MTS Code of Conduct and breach of an agreement between us and the executive officer.
Stock Ownership Guidelines. To align our executive officers' interests with our shareholders' interests, the Committee expects our executive officers to acquire significant equity ownership in the Company. Accordingly, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines requiring each executive officer to achieve an equity ownership level equal to a specified multiple of his or her base salary within five years of being appointed as an executive officer or within five years of change in executive officer status resulting in an increased required level of ownership. The Committee revised the stock ownership guidelines in September 2014 and the current minimum equity ownership levels as a multiple of base pay are as follows: five times for the CEO; four times for the Chief Financial Officer; and a multiple equal to their executive salary grade level for any other Senior Vice President (ranging from two times to four times) and one time for a Vice President. As part of the revisions in September 2014, the policy now provides that failure by a participant to meet the required ownership level within the time period established will result in a requirement that participants must retain 100% of the net shares acquired (net of taxes) through the Company's equity compensation programs until the ownership levels are met. It also requires that our executive officers hold equity acquired through our equity compensation plans in a minimum amount of 75% of the net proceeds (net of taxes) until ownership levels are met.
Our independent directors have also imposed upon themselves a guideline for achieving significant equity ownership. Our independent directors are expected to achieve an ownership of our Common Stock equal to a minimum of five times their annual cash retainer.
The Committee reviews the progress of our executive officers toward the ownership guidelines on a regular basis and determined that all of the executive officers are on track for meeting the ownership guidelines within the established timeframes.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits our ability to deduct compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the CEO or any of the three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer), unless the compensation qualifies as "performance-based compensation." Among other things, in order to be deemed performance-based compensation, the compensation must be based on the achievement of pre-established, objective performance criteria and must be pursuant to a plan that has been approved by our shareholders. The Committee intends to continue its practice of paying competitive compensation in order to attract and retain the senior executives necessary to manage our business in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Under some circumstances, this practice may require us to pay compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m). Although we intend to maximize the deductibility of compensation paid to executive officers, we also intend to maintain the flexibility to take actions considered to be in our best interests including, where appropriate, entering into compensation arrangements under which payments are not deductible.
Compensation and Leadership Development Committee Report
The Compensation and Leadership Development Committee has discussed and reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
30
SUBMITTED BY THE COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Michael V. Schrock (Chair)
Barb J. Samardzich
David D. Johnson
Randy J. Martinez
Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs
In fiscal 2016, management and the Compensation Committee continued to focus on responsible pay practices designed to produce positive results for the Company and its shareholders without encouraging excessive or inappropriate risk-taking. The Compensation Committee's analysis identified the following components of our compensation programs that it believes effectively reduce risk without reducing incentives:
Based on the Company's use of these programmatic safeguards and on the Committee's continued review of the Company's incentive compensation policies and practices for all of the Company's worldwide locations, the Committee concluded in fiscal 2016 that any risks arising from the
31
Company's compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Our Compensation Committee has considered the relationships that its independent compensation consultants have had with the Company, the members of the Compensation Committee and our executive officers, as well as the policies that the consultants have in place to maintain their independence and objectivity and has determined that the work performed by its compensation consultants has raised no conflicts of interest.
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation with respect to each named executive officer during the prior three fiscal years.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus(1) ($) | Stock Awards(2) ($) | Option Awards(2) ($) | Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3) ($) | All Other Compensation(4) ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | 2016 | 647,500 | — | 624,994 | 722,274 | 647,500 | 20,667 | 2,662,935 | ||||||||
President and Chief | 2015 | 637,000 | — | 536,510 | 398,355 | 133,163 | 16,326 | 1,721,354 | ||||||||
Executive Officer | 2014 | 631,887 | — | 678,984 | 953,320 | 185,396 | 17,161 | 2,466,748 | ||||||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 2016 | 338,278 | — | 174,971 | 202,229 | 186,053 | 20,972 | 922,503 | ||||||||
Senior Vice President, | 2015 | 291,253 | — | 135,032 | 100,237 | 37,516 | 14,907 | 578,945 | ||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||
William Bachrach | 2016 | 358,082 | — | 150,028 | 173,341 | 196,945 | 97,801 | 976,197 | ||||||||
Former President, Test | 2015 | 329,663 | — | 167,520 | 102,093 | 49,647 | 78,614 | 727,537 | ||||||||
2014 | 306,580 | — | 122,531 | 171,997 | 117,972 | 16,176 | 735,256 | |||||||||
John Emholz | 2016 | 307,007 | 150,000 | 173,341 | — | — | 66,534 | 846,910 | ||||||||
Former Senior Vice | 2015 | 220,579 | 50,000 | 107,495 | 65,132 | 21,667 | 77,034 | 541,907 | ||||||||
President, Sensors | ||||||||||||||||
David Hore | 2016 | 125,000 | — | 269,994 | — | — | 14,955 | 409,949 | ||||||||
Catherine Powell | 2016 | 289,245 | — | 165,040 | 104,013 | 126,876 | 19,997 | 705,171 |
32
Supplemental Table to the "All Other Compensation" Column
| Retirement Plan | | | Life Insurance Premiums, Executive Physical and Health Saving Account Contributions ($) | | | | | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Match ($) | Fiscal Year Contribution(1) ($) | Car ($) | Club Membership ($) | Relocation/ Living Expenses(2) ($) | Tax Payment(3) ($) | Severance Related Payments(4) ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | 11,925 | — | 8,040 | — | 702 | — | — | — | 20,667 | |||||||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 11,925 | — | 8,040 | — | 1,007 | — | — | — | 20,972 | |||||||||
William Bachrach | 11,925 | — | 8,040 | — | 1,002 | 39,834 | 37,000 | — | 97,801 | |||||||||
John Emholz | 11,925 | — | 8,040 | — | 1,419 | 18,022 | — | 27,128 | 66,534 | |||||||||
David Hore | — | 5,300 | 5,975 | 1,337 | 2,343 | — | — | — | 14,955 | |||||||||
Catherine Powell | 11,925 | — | 7,370 | — | 702 | — | — | — | 19,997 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2016
As reflected in the table below, the named executive officers received three types of plan-based awards for their service in fiscal 2016: a cash award under our EVC Plan, payable in the first quarter of fiscal 2017; stock options granted on December 2, 2015 under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan; and PRSUs granted on December 2, 2015 under the same plan. Mr. Hore received an inducement equity award as a new hire.
Under our EVC Plan, the named executive officers may receive cash payouts after the completion of each fiscal year if specified performance goals established at the beginning of the fiscal year are attained. For each named executive officer, a cash incentive amount, expressed as a percentage of his or her base salary, is established for performance at each of the target and maximum levels. The EVC Plan awards for fiscal 2016 were structured so that the cash incentive paid to each named executive officer would be 0% to 200% of the payout level established for performance at the target level for each goal. Mr. Hore did not participate in the EVC Plan during fiscal 2016 and, as a result, did not receive any cash payouts under the EVC Plan. The Committee also decided that, based on his limited tenure with the Company since the completion of the acquisition of PCB on July 5, 2016, no discretionary bonus would be paid to Mr. Hore during fiscal 2016.
33
Information about the potential payout levels established for each named executive officer, other than Mr. Hore, and the nature and weighting of the goals selected for Fiscal 2016 can be found under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis." The actual amounts paid pursuant to our EVC Plan for fiscal 2016 performance are listed in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column to the Summary Compensation Table.
Unless an option holder is terminated for cause, vested stock options are exercisable for 90 days after the termination of the option holder's employment, or 180 days upon death, disability or retirement. If an option holder's employment is terminated for "cause," as such term is defined in our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, all unexercised options will immediately terminate. The Compensation Committee may, at any time after the award is granted, accelerate the vesting of some or all of the unvested options as it deems appropriate. We also included similar provisions to the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan that is the subject of shareholder approval at this Annual Meeting.
These stock options would become fully exercisable upon the occurrence of a "change in control," as such term is defined in our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, unless the acquiring entity assumed or provided a substitute for the award. The Compensation Committee may require options be exercised prior to the change in control and may pay cash or other securities to cancel awards in connection with the change in control.
If a unit holder's employment is terminated, the unvested units will be forfeited. The Compensation Committee may, at any time after the award is granted, accelerate the vesting of some or all of the unvested units as it deems appropriate.
These restricted stock units would become fully exercisable upon the occurrence of a "change in control," as such term is defined in our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, unless the acquiring entity assumed or provided a substitute for the award. The Compensation Committee may pay cash or other securities to cancel awards in connection with the change in control.
34
Grants to named executive officers of plan-based awards in fiscal 2016 are set forth in the table below.
| | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date | Approval Date | Award Type (1) | Threshold(3) ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold(4) ($) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | All Other Options Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(5) (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Options Awards(5) ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (6) ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | Cash | 95,550 | 637,000 | 1,274,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/17/2015 | Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 61,455 | 61.74 | 722,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/17/2015 | PRSUs | — | — | — | 7,592 | 10,123 | 12,654 | — | — | — | 624,994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | Cash | 25,575 | 170,500 | 341,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,207 | 61.74 | 202,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | PRSUs | — | — | — | 2,126 | 2,834 | 3,543 | — | — | — | 174,971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William Bachrach | Cash | 28,875 | 192,500 | 385,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,749 | 61.74 | 173,341 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | PRSUs | — | — | — | 1,823 | 2,430 | 3,038 | — | — | — | 150,028 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Emholz | Cash | 20,925 | 139,500 | 279,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,833 | 61.74 | 115,563 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | PRSUs | — | — | — | 1,215 | 1,620 | 2,025 | — | — | — | 100,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Hore | 8/15/2016 | 4/4/2016 | RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,583 | — | — | 269,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine Powell | Cash | 17,314 | 115,426 | 230,852 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,850 | 61.74 | 104,013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/9/2015 | 11/16/2015 | PRSUs | — | — | — | 1,094 | 1,458 | 1,823 | — | — | — | 90,017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/15/2015 | 10/01/2015 | RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 | — | — | 75,023 |
35
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (1) | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Exercisable (#) | Un- Exercisable (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Unites of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Unites of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Unites or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | | 28,790 | | — | | 39.38 | | 7/2/2017 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
45,494 | 22,747 | 64.90 | 12/4/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,952 | 21,902 | 66.98 | 12/3/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 61,455 | 61.74 | 12/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,487 | 160,507 | 15,463 | 711,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 2,814 | 1,407 | 72.64 | 2/15/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,756 | 5,511 | 66.98 | 12/3/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 17,207 | 61.74 | 12/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
192 | 8,838 | 4,178 | 192,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
William Bachrach | | 6,750 | | — | | 54.77 | | 4/15/2018 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
8,208 | 4,104 | 64.90 | 12/4/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,807 | 5,613 | 66.98 | 12/3/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 14,749 | 61.74 | 12/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
929 | 42,762 | 3,798 | 174,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
John Emholz | 1,684 | — | 72.29 | 2/15/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
David Hore | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 5,583 | | 256,985 | | — | | — | |||||||||
Catherine Powell | 833 | — | 51.88 | 3/15/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,500 | — | 39.38 | 7/2/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,103 | 1,101 | 64.90 | 12/4/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
511 | 1,020 | 66.98 | 12/3/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 8,850 | 61.74 | 12/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,622 | 74,661 | 1,458 | 67,112 |
36
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2016
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vest(1) (#) | Value Realized on Vest(2) ($) | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | — | — | 4,011 | 240,112 | ||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | — | — | 543 | 31,303 | ||||
William Bachrach | — | — | 1,469 | 85,397 | ||||
John Emholz | — | — | 305 | 15,982 | ||||
David Hore | — | — | — | — | ||||
Catherine Powell | — | — | 195 | 11,673 |
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is a non-qualified plan that provides a select group of employees, including all of the named executive officers, with the option to defer up to 90% of base salary or short-term cash incentive. Independent directors are also eligible to participate in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and may elect to defer up to 100% of the director's fees we pay.
Participants' deferred compensation accounts earn a monthly rate of return based on an established interest rate. The interest rate is approved by the Committee in November of each year for the following calendar year. Historically, the ten-year government treasury note rate as of the first business day of the calendar year has been used. As such, the interest rate for calendar year 2016 was 2.24%.
At the time of the deferral election, participants must also select a distribution date and form of distribution. Participants may elect to receive distribution in a single payment, installments, or combination thereof. Distribution elections cannot change unless the election is to postpone payment until the fifth anniversary of separation from service or, if later, age 60 and the election
37
must be made at least 12 months before separation from service. In no case can an earlier distribution election be allowed.
Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(1) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | |
William Bachrach | 25,351 | — | 1,528 | — | 26,879 |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Payments and benefits receivable by the named executive officers upon termination of employment or a change in control of our Company are governed by the arrangements described below.
Executive Change in Control Severance Plan
We adopted the Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (the "Change in Control Severance Plan") on September 30, 2013, which became effective January 1, 2014, so that the treatment of all eligible named executive officers would be consistent if such individual's employment with the Company or an affiliate were terminated without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control, each such capitalized term as defined in the Change in Control Severance Plan. Under the Change in Control Severance Plan, the Company will pay and provide to the eligible participants benefits in a sum equal to 200% of the following: annualized basic cash remuneration in effect during the then current year; average annual Executive Variable Compensation paid for the preceding three years (or the actual number of years of receipt of such bonus if less than three years); and any other form of compensation paid to the participant and included in such individual's gross income during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of termination. The cash severance benefit will be paid in a lump sum following termination. The executive will also receive certain life, disability, accident, and health insurance coverage for a period of up to 18 months following termination and officers' liability insurance for not less than six years from the date of a Change in Control. As a condition to the receipt of such benefits, the executive may not render services to any entity offering any competing product for a period of two years following the date of termination unless the change in control was not approved by the Board of Directors. Pursuant to an amendment to the Change in Control Severance Plan, Mr. Hore is not eligible to participate in the plan. The change in control severance benefits available to Mr. Hore under the Hore Employment Agreement, assuming that a termination of employment and/or a change in control occurred on October 1, 2016, are as set forth under the heading "Estimated Payments for Named Executive Officers" below.
We adopted the Executive Severance Plan on September 30, 2013 (the "Severance Plan"), so that the treatment of all eligible named executive officers would be consistent if such individual's employment with the Company or an affiliate were terminated without Cause or for Good Reason,
38
each as defined in the Severance Plan. In the event of such termination, the Severance Plan provides that the eligible participant would receive as benefits a sum equal to 100% of his or her annualized basic cash remuneration in effect during the then current year and certain life, accident and health insurance coverage. The cash severance benefit would be paid in equal installments on each payroll pay date during the 12 month period beginning no later than 60 days following the date of termination. As a condition of the receipt of these benefits, the executive may not render services to any entity offering any competing product for a period of one year following the date of termination. In addition, payments to be paid under the Severance Plan can be forfeited, and certain payments already made can be recaptured, if the executive engaged or engages in conduct detrimental to the Company while employed by the Company or violates the Severance Plan's non-compete provisions. Pursuant to an amendment to the Severance Plan, Mr. Hore is not eligible to participate in the plan. The severance benefits available to Mr. Hore under the Hore Employment Agreement, assuming that a termination of employment and/or a change in control occurred on October 1, 2016, are as set forth under the heading "Estimated Payments for Named Executive Officers" below. Under the Emholz Transition Agreement, on September 6, 2016, which is 60 days after the completion of the Company's acquisition of PCB, Mr. Emholz became eligible for severance of $320,000, payable in 25 biweekly installments of $12,307.69, and a final installment of $12,307.75.
Our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan provides that, if any awards have not been assumed or substituted by an acquiring entity, any stock incentives accelerate upon a change in control. We also included a similar provision to the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan that is the subject of shareholder approval at this Annual Meeting. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless the Committee determines otherwise at or prior to the change in control, no stock incentive that is subject to any performance criteria for which the performance period has not expired shall accelerate at the time of a change in control.
Under the terms of the awards made pursuant to the EVC Plan, if a named executive officer's employment with the Company is terminated for any reason other than death before the end of the fiscal year on which the performance goals are based, the officer will not receive any payout under the EVC Plan. If a named executive officer dies during the fiscal year on which the performance goals are based, a prorated payout based on actual achievement of the performance goals at the end of the fiscal year will be made to the officer's estate. Such a payout will be proportionately reduced based upon the time the officer was employed during the fiscal year.
Estimated Payments for Named Executive Officers
Assuming that a termination of employment and/or change in control occurred on October 1, 2016, the total compensation payable to the following named executive officers in accordance with the
39
Executive Change in Control Severance and Executive Severance Plans that were in place at that time is as set forth in the table below.
Termination of Employment in Conjunction with a Change in Control | Change in Control (without Termination of Employment) | Termination (without Change in Control) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Cash Payment ($)(1) | Accelerated Vesting ($)(2) | Benefits ($)(3) | Total Value ($) | Accelerated Vesting ($)(2) | Cash Payment ($)(4) | Benefits ($)(5) | Total Value ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeffrey Graves | 1,960,119 | 872,269 | 25,965 | 2,858,353 | 872,269 | 650,000 | 16,596 | 666,596 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Oldenkamp | 929,649 | 201,151 | 16,397 | 1,147,197 | 201,151 | 345,000 | 10,217 | 355,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||
William Bachrach | 1,132,791 | 217,584 | 21,337 | 1,371,712 | 217,584 | 360,000 | 13,510 | 373,510 | |||||||||||||||||||||
David Hore | 1,014,622 | 256,985 | 26,440 | 1,298,047 | 256,985 | 500,000 | 17,187 | 517,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine Powell | 868,492 | 141,772 | 25,965 | 1,036,229 | 141,772 | 300,000 | 16,596 | 316,596 |
40
PROPOSAL 3
NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION
OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), shareholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of MTS Systems Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure, set forth in the Company's proxy statement.
The compensation of our named executive officers is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related disclosures contained on pages 17 to 40 of this proxy statement. As discussed in those disclosures, we believe that our compensation policies and decisions are focused on pay-for-performance principles and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Compensation of our named executive officers is designed to enable us to attract and retain talented and experienced senior executives to lead the Company successfully in a competitive environment.
Your vote on Proposal 3 is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee, or the Board. The vote will not be construed to create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the Company or the Board, or to create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for the Company or the Board. However, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our shareholders' concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
The Board believes that the Company should hold an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers (the "Say-on-Pay Vote") annually, and plans to hold a similar Say-on-Pay Vote next year pending the results of Proposal 4 contained herein relating to the non-binding, advisory shareholder vote on when the next Say-on-Pay Vote should be held.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DESCRIBED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION, THE COMPENSATION TABLES AND THE ACCOMPANYING NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE, SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
41
PROPOSAL 4
NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE REGARDING THE FREQUENCY
OF THE VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company is also providing shareholders an advisory vote on the frequency with which the Company's shareholders shall have the advisory vote on executive compensation as provided for in Proposal 3 above.
The Company is presenting this Proposal 4, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to inform the Company as to how often you wish to include a proposal, similar to Proposal 3 above, in our proxy statement. In particular, we are asking whether the advisory vote should occur every year, every two years, or every three years. The Company asks that you support a frequency period of every year (an annual vote) for future non-binding, advisory shareholder votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of MTS Systems Corporation recommend, on an advisory basis, that the frequency with which the shareholders of the Company shall have an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers set forth in the Company's proxy statement is:
Choice 1 – every year;
Choice 2 – every two years;
Choice 3 – every three years; or
Choice 4 – abstain from voting.
Setting a one-year period for holding this shareholder vote will enhance shareholder communication by providing a clear, simple means for the Company to obtain information on investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy. We believe an advisory vote on an annual basis will be the most effective timeframe to engage with shareholders to understand and respond to the vote results.
As with your vote on Proposal 3 above, your vote on this Proposal 4 is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee, or our Board. The vote will not be construed to create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the Company or the Board, or to create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for the Company or the Board. However, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote in favor of one frequency over the other options, we will consider our shareholders' concerns and the Board will evaluate any appropriate next steps.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR A FREQUENCY OF "ONE YEAR" FOR FUTURE NON-BINDING, ADVISORY SHAREHOLDER VOTES ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
42
APPROVAL OF THE
MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION 2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
On November 15, 2016, our Board of Directors adopted the MTS Systems Corporation 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan") effective as of June 6, 2017, subject to shareholder approval. A copy of the 2017 Plan is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A. The 2017 Plan provides stock incentive awards in the form of options (incentive and non-qualified), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, and other awards in stock and/or cash. The 2017 Plan permits the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock in any of the above stock awards.
Immediately prior to the Board's approval of the 2017 Plan on November 15, 2016, our only equity compensation plan was our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2011 Plan"). No further grants under the 2011 Plan will be permitted if the 2017 Plan is approved by shareholders. Upon approval of the new plan, if any shares granted under the 2011 Plan should be forfeited, such shares will become available for grant under the 2017 Plan.
The purpose of the 2017 Plan is to attract and retain talented and experienced people, closely link employee compensation with performance realized by shareholders, and reward long-term results with long-term compensation. If approved, the 2017 Plan will permit us to grant stock incentive awards to current and new employees, including officers, service providers and members of the Board.
The proposed 2017 Plan is similar to the 2011 Plan but includes the following changes:
43
Below is a summary of the key terms of the 2017 Plan, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2017 Plan attached to this statement as Annex A.
Key Plan Features | Description | |
---|---|---|
Effective Date | • June 6, 2017, provided the 2017 Plan is approved by shareholders | |
Term of Plan | • The earlier of June 6, 2027 or the date on which all shares reserved under the 2017 Plan have been issued or are no longer available for use under the 2017 Plan | |
Eligible Participants | • Our employees or employees of any of our subsidiaries | |
• Non-employee members of the Board | ||
• Key service providers to us or any of our subsidiaries | ||
Total Shares Authorized and Share Counting | • 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock for all types of stock incentive awards | |
• Shares available under the 2017 Plan are reduced by one share for each share underlying an award, including stock options, restricted stock or units and performance stock or units. | ||
• Shares available under the 2017 Plan are reduced by the aggregate number of shares exercised pursuant to a stock settled appreciation right and not the net number of shares issued upon exercise | ||
• Shares withheld by us for taxes, shares tendered to us to pay the exercise price of an option, and shares reacquired by us with amounts received from exercise of an option will not be added back to the 2017 Plan | ||
Award Limits | • Up to the total of 1,500,000 shares plus forfeited or cancelled shares may be issued as incentive stock options | |
• Up to 200,000 shares per person per year under all stock awards, plus up to an additional 100,000 shares for stock incentives to a newly hired employee • Up to $5,000,000 in awards payable in cash per person per year |
44
Key Plan Features | Description | |
---|---|---|
Type of Stock Incentive Awards | • Incentive and nonqualified stock options and stock appreciation rights with an exercise period no longer than seven years | |
• Restricted stock and restricted stock units | ||
• Performance stock and performance units | ||
• Other awards in stock or cash | ||
• Restricted stock awards as Board and Committee compensation on the annual election or re-election of non-employee directors | ||
Vesting and Exercise | • Determined by Compensation Committee based on service (time vesting) or upon achievement of performance targets (performance vesting) or both, except as provided below | |
• Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights will vest no earlier than one (1) year after the grant date or immediately upon death or disability or a change in control of the Company with respect to non-assumed awards, except that the Compensation Committee may grant or accelerate Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights up to 5% of the shares authorized under the 2017 Plan without regard to such minimum vesting period | ||
• All non-performance awards that are not assumed or substituted will vest upon a change in control | ||
• Objective performance criteria in the 2017 Plan described below, if approved by shareholders, will permit deductibility of executive officer awards as performance based compensation under Code Section 162(m). | ||
Permissible Features | • We may specify that stock awards are subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment under certain circumstance, including misrepresentations in our financial statements, violation of Code of Conduct and violations of restrictive covenants on competing with us or soliciting our customers. | |
• Options may be exercised with previously acquired shares or by reducing the net number of shares awarded on exercise. |
45
Key Plan Features | Description | |
---|---|---|
Features Not Permitted | • Increase the number of shares reserved or any of the limits stated in the 2017 Plan without shareholder approval, except to equalize shares and awards as a result of a stock split or stock dividend. | |
• Extend the term of the 2017 Plan without shareholder approval | ||
• Re-price stock options or stock appreciation rights or exchange stock options or stock appreciation rights for cash | ||
• Re-grant shares tendered for stock option exercise or payment of taxes |
Who is Eligible for Stock Incentive Awards
Our employees who hold key management and technical positions with us or any subsidiary, the non-employee members of our Board and key service providers to us or our subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Plan. The Compensation Committee will determine which employees and other eligible persons will be awarded stock incentives under the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan also provides for an annual grant of restricted stock to each non-employee Board member upon election or re-election and shall be determined by the Board in its sole discretion prior to such annual meeting of shareholders, but also permits stock incentives be made to non-employee Board members by the Board in its discretion in addition to the annual grant of restricted stock. Currently, the Company has seven non-employee Board members, approximately 500 employees, and zero key service providers who are eligible to be designated by the Compensation Committee for incentive awards.
Types of Stock Incentives to be Awarded
Subject to the limits under the 2017 Plan, the Compensation Committee has the discretionary authority to determine the size of the award, the type of award, and if it will be tied to meeting performance-based requirements or will vest over time. For executive officers, the performance-based requirements for vesting in an award may be designed to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to permit us to deduct the value of the award for income tax purposes. Except as provided in the preceding sentences, the Compensation Committee may accelerate unvested awards.
For directors who are not employees, the 2017 Plan provides for an automatic grant of a discretionary number of shares of restricted stock units on each director's election and re-election at the annual shareholders meeting, which will vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant if the recipient remains a director on such date. Please see "New Plan Benefits" below for a description of the award to non-employee directors that will be made in connection with this Annual Meeting if this Proposal 5: Approval of the MTS Systems Corporation 2017 Stock Incentive Plan is approved by shareholders. The Board will determine the number of restricted stock units to be granted to directors under the 2017 Plan each year thereafter. In addition, the Board may from time to time grant additional awards to some or all of the Board as it deems appropriate within the limits set forth in the Plan.
46
The types of awards that may be made under the 2017 Plan are similar to those under the 2011 Plan and are as follows:
The Compensation Committee may establish sub plans and grant awards that result in the payment of cash or the issuance of stock upon the achievement of one or more of the performance based criteria set forth in the 2017 Plan. The performance awards may provide for vesting or payment or the calculation of the amount of the award to be based on the performance criteria in the 2017 Plan. The performance award will typically set a goal payout amount and may provide for variable payout
47
amounts based on performance above or below the performance goal. The Committee may make such performance based awards to executive officers that are intended to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to permit us to deduct the full value of the award for income tax purposes. Payments under any such awards are subject to the Award Limits described above.
The Committee will generally establish the performance goals within a reasonable period of time after the beginning of the performance period, the length of the performance period and the amount payable at various performance levels. The performance goals are set at the sole discretion of the Committee and may be based upon criteria including one or more of the following:
Earnings per share | Earnings before or after taxes, depreciation and/or amortization | |
Total shareholder return | Share price | |
Return on assets or equity | Cash flow returns | |
Net income | Operating income | |
Revenue or sales | Corporate performance indicators | |
Cash generation | Working capital | |
Ratios, such as debt | External indices |
The specific performance goals may be absolute in their terms, on a per share basis, as a growth rate or change from preceding periods, or as a comparison to the performance of specified companies or other external measures, and may relate to one or any combination of corporate, group, unit, division, subsidiary or individual performance. At any time prior to payment, the Committee can adjust awards for the effect of unforeseen events that have a substantial effect on the performance goals and would otherwise make application of the performance goals unfair. However, the Committee may not increase the amount that would otherwise be payable under an award intended to constitute performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Adjustments to Stock Incentives for Corporate Transactions
In the event of a stock dividend, recapitalization, stock split, reorganization, merger, spin-off, repurchase or exchange of our Common Stock or similar event effecting our stock, the Compensation Committee may in its discretion adjust the number and kind of shares granted under the 2017 Plan, including the number and exercise price of shares subject to outstanding options or stock appreciation rights, and to adjust restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock and performance share units and other awards.
Effect on Termination of Employment on Stock Incentives
Subject to certain exceptions requiring earlier termination, stock options and stock appreciation rights will expire and cannot be exercised 90 days after the termination of a participant's employment, 180 days after termination of employment as a result of death, disability or retirement, and will expire immediately if the termination is for cause as defined in the 2017 Plan or other agreement. Prior to
48
that time, only options that have become exercisable under their terms, based on either service based or performance based vesting, may be exercised. Restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock and performance stock units will be forfeited if not vested when the participant terminates employment, including upon death, disability or retirement, unless otherwise determined by the Committee.
Effect of a Change in Control on Stock Incentives
If the acquiring entity does not assume or provide substitute awards, stock options and stock appreciation rights become fully exercisable and restricted stock and restricted stock units automatically become fully vested upon the occurrence of a change in control as defined in the 2017 Plan. The Compensation Committee may elect to accelerate such awards at or prior to the change in control. Awards based on performance criteria where the performance period has not yet closed at the time of a change in control, however, will not automatically accelerate, except that the Board may, in its discretion, determine the achievement of the performance goals as of the change in control and award all or a pro rata portion of the shares based upon the level of performance. The Compensation Committee may require that options or stock appreciation rights be exercised prior to the change in control, may pay cash or other securities to cancel awards in connection with the change in control, or may provide for the successor to substitute its stock for outstanding awards.
Transferability of Stock Incentives
Stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, and performance units, as well as other awards under the 2017 Plan that are vested at the time of the death of the participant, are transferable only by the participant's last will and testament or applicable state laws on descent and distribution. Restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock and performance units may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until the applicable restrictions lapse or the performance targets have been achieved.
The Compensation Committee will administer the 2017 Plan. The Compensation Committee will select employees who shall receive awards, determine the number of shares covered by each award, and establish the other terms and conditions consistent with the limitations contained in the 2017 Plan. The Compensation Committee may also interpret the 2017 Plan, may establish and amend terms of existing stock incentive awards, except that if the participant is adversely affected by the amendment, the participant must also consent. The Board may also exercise any of the authorities granted to the Compensation Committee. To the extent required by law or desired for tax purposes, awards to executive officers will be made only by persons who qualify as outside directors under securities and tax laws and stock exchange rules. The Compensation Committee may delegate to an executive officer all or part of its responsibilities to make awards, other than the authority to make awards to other executive officers, directors or other insiders.
The Compensation Committee may amend or suspend the 2017 Plan at any time except that any amendment will not be permitted without the approval of the shareholders if the amendment either increases the number of shares, provides for re-pricing of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights or for an exchange for cash, or increases the maximum number of shares that may be granted as awards to any participant.
49
Tax Consequences of Stock Incentives to Participants and the Company
Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock option grants under the 2017 Plan may either be granted as incentive stock options, which are governed by Internal Revenue Code Section 422, as amended, or as non-qualified stock options, which are governed by Internal Revenue Code Section 83, as amended. Generally, no federal income tax is payable by the participant upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option and no deduction is taken by us. If the participant holds the stock acquired upon exercise of the option for a certain period, all appreciation in the value of the shares will be taxed at favorable capital gains tax rates. If the required holding period is not met, then any appreciation in the stock up to the date of exercise will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates. If after exercise, the participant disposes of the shares within a certain time period, we will be entitled to deduct the appreciation on the shares at the time of exercise. Under current tax laws, if a participant exercises a non-qualified stock option, the participant will be taxed on the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date and the exercise price and we will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction. Similar rules apply to stock appreciation rights awards.
Restricted and Performance Stock and Units. Awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance stock and performance units under the 2017 Plan generally are not subject to federal income tax when awarded, unless the participant properly elects to accelerate the tax recognition. Restricted stock is generally subject to ordinary income tax at the time the restrictions lapse and performance stock is taxed at the time the performance targets are met. Restricted stock units and performance units are generally subject to ordinary tax at the time of payment, even if vested earlier. We are entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes taxable income on the restricted or performance stock or units.
Other than as described below, no benefits or amounts have been granted, awarded or received under the 2017 Plan. Because the number or size of the awards that a participant may receive under the 2017 Plan is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received by participants if the 2017 Plan were to be approved by the shareholders. Please see the above description regarding the 2017 Plan's limitations on the size of awards that may be granted to individual participants.
On November 14, 2016 the Compensation Committee and the Board determined that under the 2017 Plan each non-employee director elected or re-elected at this Annual Meeting will receive a restricted stock unit with the number of shares (rounded to the next whole share) equal to $115,000 divided by the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of this Annual Meeting. The Chair of the Board will receive a restricted stock unit with the number of shares (rounded to the next whole share) equal to $154,000 divided by the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of this Annual Meeting. The restricted stock award vests as to all the shares on the first anniversary of the date of this Annual Meeting. Accordingly, if shareholder approval is received with respect to this Proposal 5 and if elected or re-elected at this Annual Meeting, non-employee directors David J. Anderson, David D. Johnson, Randy J. Martinez, Maximiliane Straub, Michael V. Shrock, Gail P. Steinel, and Chun Hung (Kenneth) Yu will receive the award of restricted stock described above.
If shareholder approval is not received with respect to this Proposal 5, restricted stock units described in the previous paragraph will be issued to non-employee directors at this Annual Meeting under the 2011 Plan.
50
Registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission
If the 2017 Plan is approved by our shareholders, we intend to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, covering the 1,500,000 shares issuable under the 2017 Plan.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Common Stock present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary for the approval of Proposal 5: Approval of MTS Systems Corporation 2017 Stock Incentive Plan. Proxies will be voted in favor of Proposal 5 unless otherwise indicated.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.
51
OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table sets forth information regarding our equity compensation plans as of October 1, 2016.
(shares in thousands) | Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | |
Plan category | Number of shares of Common Stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(1) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(2) | Number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans(3) | |||
| | | | | | |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | 785 | $60.35 | 2,073 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders | - | - | - | |||
| | | | | | |
Total | 785 | $60.35 | 2,073 | |||
| | | | | | |
Under our 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, there is a two-year mandatory holding period for stock acquired upon exercise of options granted thereunder. In contrast, there is no mandatory holding period for stock acquired upon exercise of options granted under our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. However, the federal income tax consequences to an employee for immediate disposition of stock acquired upon exercise of incentive stock options may make it more advantageous to the employee to hold such shares for at least one year from the date of exercise and two years from the date of grant. In addition, our executive officers and directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines that may encourage our executive officers and directors to hold shares acquired upon exercise of options. See the section of this proxy statement entitled "Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Policies – Stock Ownership Guidelines" for more information.
52
Security Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Management
The following table sets forth, as of the close of business on April 17, 2017, the number and percentage of outstanding shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by each person who is known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of our Common Stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares | Note | Percent | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | |
| ||||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 2,045,739 | (1) | 12.2% | |||
Ariel Investments, LLC | 1,791,564 | (2) | 10.7% | |||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 1,442,477 | (3) | 8.6% | |||
Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. | 1,318,690 | (4) | 7.9% | |||
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC | 1,242,619 | (5) | 7.4% | |||
Clearbridge Investments, LLC | 1,087,385 | (6) | 6.5% |
53
1,242,619 shares over which Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC has sole dispositive power.
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company's common stock as of April 17, 2017 by:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Number of Shares of Common Stock | Options Exercisable within 60 days of April 17, 2017 | RSUs vesting within 60 days of April 17, 2017 | Total | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David J. Anderson | 15,242 | - | 2,625 | (1) | 17,867 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David D. Johnson | 13,484 | - | 1,861 | (1) | 15,345 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Randy J. Martinez | 2,628 | - | 1,861 | (1) | 4,489 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Barb J. Samardzich | 27,444 | - | 1,861 | (1) | 29,305 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michael V. Schrock | 2,628 | - | 1,861 | (1) | 4,489 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gail P. Steinel | 10,732 | - | 1,861 | (1) | 12,593 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Maximiliane C. Straub | - | - | - | - | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Chun Hung (Kenneth) Yu | 9,484 | - | 1,861 | (1) | 11,345 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Jeffrey A. Graves | 23,150 | 139,419 | - | 162,569 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Jeffrey P. Oldenkamp(2) | 1,849 | 15,469 | - | 17,318 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| William E. Bachrach(3) | 4,458 | 22,843 | - | 27,301 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David T. Hore | - | - | - | - | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| William C. Becker | - | - | - | - | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Steven B. Harrison | - | - | - | - | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Catherine S. Powell(4) | 1,185 | 7,675 | - | 8,860 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| John V. Emholz(5) | 305 | - | - | 305 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (14 persons) | 112,589 | 185,406 | 13,791 | 311,786 | 1.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
54
The Audit Committee is responsible for the review and approval of all related party transactions between the Company and any of our executive officers, directors or director nominees, or any immediate family member of any such person. Pursuant to a related party transactions approval procedure adopted by the Audit Committee, all related party transactions that involve amounts in excess of $120,000 and in which a related party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. If the proposed transaction involves a member of the Audit Committee, such member will not participate in the deliberations or vote on the proposed transaction. Related party transactions may be approved if the Audit Committee in good faith determines them to be (i) fair and reasonable to us, (ii) on terms no less favorable than could be obtained by us if the transaction did not involve a related party and (iii) in our best interests.
There were no related party transactions during fiscal 2016.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The rules of the SEC require us to disclose the identity of directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our Common Stock who did not file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based solely on a review of copies of such reports and written representations from reporting persons, we believe that all directors and executive officers complied with all filing requirements applicable to them during fiscal 2016.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of our Compensation Committee has been an officer or employee of our Company or any of our subsidiaries and affiliates or has had any relationship with our Company requiring disclosure in our proxy statement other than service as a director. None of our executive officers has served on the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity, any officer of which served either on our Board of Directors or on our Compensation Committee.
Proposals Included in the Proxy Statement
Proposals of our shareholders that are intended to be presented by such shareholders at our fiscal 2017 annual meeting that we anticipate will be held in early calendar 2018 as has been our typical practice and that shareholders desire to have included in our proxy materials related to such meeting must be received by us at our principal executive offices a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials. We will inform shareholders of this date after the date of the fiscal 2017 annual meeting has been set via a public announcement. Upon timely receipt of any such proposal we will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the proxy statement and proxy in accordance with applicable regulations governing the solicitation of proxies.
55
Proposals Not Included in the Proxy Statement
If a shareholder wishes to present a proposal at our fiscal 2017 annual meeting to be held in early calendar 2018 or to nominate one or more directors and the proposal is not intended to be included in our proxy statement relating to that meeting, the shareholder must give advance notice to us prior to the deadline for such meeting determined in accordance with our Bylaws. In general, our Bylaws provide that such notice should be addressed to the Secretary and be no less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting, except as set forth in the next sentence. In the event that the fiscal 2017 annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, which we anticipate will be the case for the fiscal 2017 annual meeting that will likely be held in early calendar 2018, notice by a shareholder is timely only if received not less than 90 days before the fiscal 2017 annual meeting or, if later, within ten days following the date of the public announcement of the date of such annual meeting. We will inform shareholders of the date of the fiscal 2017 annual meeting after it has been set through a public announcement. These time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the SEC relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority. Our Bylaws set out specific requirements that such shareholders and written notices must satisfy. Copies of those requirements will be forwarded to any shareholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company.
Our management knows of no matters other than the foregoing to be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, this proxy gives discretionary authority in the event that additional matters should be presented.
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2016, which includes audited financial statements, will be furnished without charge to any shareholder who requests it in writing from Treasurer, MTS Systems Corporation, 14000 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 and are also available from the SEC's Internet site at www.sec.gov or via our Internet site at www.mts.com.
Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
56
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY MATERIALS
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote upon (1) the election of eight directors, (2) the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017, (3) a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, (4) a non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency of the vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, (5) the approval of the Company's 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and (6) such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. In addition, our management will report on the performance of the Company and respond to questions from shareholders.
Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice of Internet Availability") to our shareholders of record and beneficial owners. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability or request a printed set of the proxy materials at no cost to the shareholder. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice of Internet Availability.
If you do not affirmatively elect to receive printed copies of the proxy materials, you will only be able to view our proxy materials electronically on the Internet. Providing our proxy materials to shareholders on the Internet rather than printing and mailing hard copies saves us these costs. We encourage you to view our proxy materials on the Internet. Shareholders who have affirmatively elected to receive a printed set of our proxy materials may change their election and elect to view all future proxy materials on the Internet instead of receiving them by mail.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2017 (the "Record Date") will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Each outstanding share of the Company's common stock, $0.25 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), entitles its holder to cast one vote on each matter to be voted upon.
Shareholders have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. If any shareholder gives proper written notice to any officer of the Company before the Annual Meeting, or to the presiding officer at the Annual Meeting, that shareholder may cumulate their votes for the election of directors by multiplying the number of votes to which the shareholder is entitled by the number of directors to be elected and casting all such votes for one nominee or distributing them among any two or more nominees. If such notice is given by any shareholder, votes for directors by such shareholder will be cumulated. For instance, if a shareholder only votes for one nominee, such vote will be automatically cumulated and cast for that nominee. If a shareholder has voted for more than one nominee, the total number of votes that the shareholder is entitled to cast will be divided equally among the nominees for whom the shareholder has voted.
57
Who can attend the Annual Meeting?
All shareholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017. If you hold your shares in street name, you must request a legal proxy from your broker or nominee to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting.
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of our Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum. A quorum is required for business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 16,740,852 shares of our Common Stock were outstanding, so holders of at least 8,370,427 shares of our Common Stock must be present, attending the virtual Annual Meeting or by proxy, to have a quorum. If you vote your proxy electronically through the Internet or by telephone, or submit a properly executed paper proxy card, your shares will be considered part of the quorum even if you abstain from voting.
You may vote in one of the following ways:
Shares represented by proxies submitted through the Internet or by telephone, or those paper proxy cards properly signed, dated and returned, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions set forth therein. If a proxy is properly submitted, whether through the Internet, by telephone, or by mail using a paper proxy card, but contains no instructions, the shares represented thereby will be voted:
58
The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to verify shareholders' identities, allow them to give voting instructions and confirm that their instructions have been recorded properly. Shareholders voting through the Internet should be aware that they may incur costs to access the Internet and that these costs will be at the expense of the shareholder.
If you wish to vote by Internet or telephone, you must do so before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on June 5, 2017 using www.proxyvote.com or calling 1-800-690-6903, as applicable. If you want to vote after June 5, 2017 or revoke an earlier proxy, you must submit a signed proxy card or vote during the virtual Annual Meeting atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017.
Can I change my vote after I vote electronically or return my proxy card?
Yes. Even after you have voted electronically through the Internet or by telephone or submitted your proxy card, you may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised at the Annual Meeting. You may change your vote by:
Shareholders who hold shares through a broker or other intermediary should consult that party as to the procedures to be used for revoking a vote.
What does the Board recommend?
The Board's recommendations are set forth after the description of the proposals in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a vote:
59
If you return a properly executed proxy card without specific voting instructions, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, at their own discretion.
What vote is required to approve each proposal?
For Proposal 1, the election of directors, the eight nominees receiving the highest number of"FOR" votes will be elected.
For Proposals 2, 3 and 5, each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required for approval.
For Proposal 4, the non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency of the vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, each shareholder will be entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held and the frequency (every one, two or three years) that receives the highest number of votes will be deemed to be the choice of the shareholders.
With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required for approval.
A"WITHHELD" vote will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, but will not be considered to have been voted in favor of the director nominee with respect to whom authority has been withheld.
A properly executed proxy marked"ABSTAIN" with respect to Proposals 2, 3, 4 or 5 and any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, will not be voted, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. In Proposals 2, 3 and 5, abstentions will have the same effect as a negative vote.
If your shares are held in the "street name" of a broker or other nominee, your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to the proposal to be acted upon. If you do not give your broker instructions as to how to vote your shares, your broker has authority under New York Stock Exchange rules to vote those shares for or against "routine" matters, such as the ratification of accounting firms. Brokers cannot vote on their customers' behalf on "non-routine" proposals such as the election of directors, the non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, the non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency of the vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers and the approval of the Company's 2017 Stock Incentive Plan. These rules apply notwithstanding the fact that shares of our Common Stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
60
If your brokerage firm votes your shares only on "routine" matters because you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum to conduct business at the Annual Meeting and in determining the number of shares voted for or against the routine matter. If your brokerage firm lacks discretionary voting power with respect to an item that is not a routine matter and you do not provide voting instructions (a "broker non-vote"), your shares will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum to conduct business at the Annual Meeting, but will not be counted in determining the number of shares voted for or against non-routine matters.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will act as inspector of elections to determine whether or not a quorum is present and tabulate votes cast by proxy or at the Annual Meeting.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability?
If your shares are held in more than one account, you will receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability. To ensure that all your shares are voted, vote electronically through the Internet or by telephone, or sign, date and return a paper proxy card for each Notice of Internet Availability you receive. We encourage you to have all accounts registered in the same name and address (whenever possible). You can accomplish this by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. by telephone at 800-542-1061 or in writing at Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.
How will voting on any other business be conducted?
We do not know of any business to be considered at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement. However, if any other business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives authority to each of David Anderson and Jeffrey Graves to vote on such matters at their discretion.
In addition to use of the Internet and mail, proxies may be solicited by our officers, directors and other employees by telephone, through electronic transmission, facsimile transmission, or personal solicitation. No additional compensation will be paid to such individuals for such activity.
We may send a single Notice of Internet Availability, as well as other shareholder communications, to any household at which two or more shareholders reside unless we receive other instruction from you. This practice, known as "householding," is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and printing and postage costs and conserve natural resources. If your Notice of Internet Availability is being householded and you wish to receive multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive a single copy, or if you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings, you may contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., by telephone at 800-542-1061 or in writing at Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.
61
Who pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
We will bear the entire cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability, the proxy statement and any additional information furnished to shareholders. We will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and certain fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in mailing proxy materials to their principals.
62
MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Plan Term: June 6, 2017 through June 6, 2027
Adopted by the Board of Directors on November 15, 2016
Approved by the Shareholders of the Company on June 6, 2017
A-1
SECTION | PAGE | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PURPOSE | A-5 | ||||
2 | DEFINITIONS | A-5 | ||||
2.1 | BOARD | A-5 | ||||
2.2 | CAUSE | A-5 | ||||
2.3 | CODE | A-5 | ||||
2.4 | COMMITTEE | A-5 | ||||
2.5 | COMPANY | A-5 | ||||
2.6 | DEFERRED COMPENSATION | A-5 | ||||
2.7 | DISABILITY | A-6 | ||||
2.8 | EXCHANGE ACT | A-6 | ||||
2.9 | EXERCISE PRICE | A-6 | ||||
2.10 | FAIR MARKET VALUE | A-6 | ||||
2.11 | INSIDER | A-6 | ||||
2.12 | ISO | A-6 | ||||
2.13 | KEY EMPLOYEE | A-6 | ||||
2.14 | KEY PERSON | A-6 | ||||
2.15 | NQSO | A-7 | ||||
2.16 | OPTION | A-7 | ||||
2.17 | OUTSIDE DIRECTOR | A-7 | ||||
2.18 | PARTICIPANT | A-7 | ||||
2.19 | PERFORMANCE-BASED EXCEPTION | A-7 | ||||
2.20 | PERFORMANCE GOAL | A-7 | ||||
2.21 | PERFORMANCE PERIOD | A-8 | ||||
2.22 | PERFORMANCE STOCK | A-8 | ||||
2.23 | PERFORMANCE UNITS | A-8 | ||||
2.24 | PLAN | A-8 | ||||
2.25 | QUALIFYING EVENT | A-8 | ||||
2.26 | RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD | A-8 | ||||
2.27 | RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT | A-8 | ||||
2.28 | RETIREMENT | A-8 | ||||
2.29 | SERVICE | A-8 | ||||
2.30 | SHARE | A-8 | ||||
2.31 | SPECIFIED EMPLOYEE | A-8 | ||||
2.32 | STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT | A-9 | ||||
2.33 | STOCK INCENTIVE | A-9 | ||||
2.34 | STOCK INCENTIVE AGREEMENT | A-9 | ||||
2.35 | SUBSIDIARY | A-9 | ||||
2.36 | TEN PERCENT SHAREHOLDER | A-9 |
A-2
3 | SHARES SUBJECT TO STOCK INCENTIVES | A-9 | ||||
3.1 | AGGREGATE SHARES AUTHORIZED | A-9 | ||||
3.2 | SHARE COUNTING | A-10 | ||||
3.3 | LIMITATIONS ON STOCK INCENTIVES | A-10 | ||||
3.4 | SHARE ADJUSTMENT | A-11 | ||||
4 | EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF PLAN | A-11 | ||||
5 | ADMINISTRATION | A-12 | ||||
5.1 | GENERAL ADMINISTRATION | A-12 | ||||
5.2 | AUTHORITY OF THE COMMITTEE | A-12 | ||||
5.3 | DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY | A-12 | ||||
5.4 | DECISIONS BINDING | A-13 | ||||
6 | ELIGIBILITY | A-13 | ||||
7 | TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK INCENTIVES | A-13 | ||||
7.1 | ALL STOCK INCENTIVES | A-13 | ||||
7.2 | OPTIONS | A-16 | ||||
7.3 | RESTRICTED STOCK | A-18 | ||||
7.4 | RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS | A-18 | ||||
7.5 | STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS | A-19 | ||||
7.6 | PERFORMANCE STOCK AND PERFORMANCE UNITS | A-20 | ||||
7.7 | OTHER AWARDS | A-21 | ||||
7.8 | NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK AND OTHER AWARDS | A-22 | ||||
8 | SECURITIES REGULATION | A-22 | ||||
8.1 | LEGALITY OF ISSUANCE | A-22 | ||||
8.2 | RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER; REPRESENTATIONS; LEGENDS | A-22 | ||||
8.3 | REGISTRATION OF SHARES | A-23 | ||||
9 | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE | A-23 | ||||
9.1 | DISCRETION IN FORMULATION OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA | A-23 | ||||
9.2 | PERFORMANCE PERIODS | A-23 | ||||
9.3 | MODIFICATIONS TO PERFORMANCE GOAL CRITERIA | A-23 | ||||
9.4 | LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OR EXERCISE | A-23 | ||||
9.5 | DELAY IN PAYMENT OR EXERCISE FOR SPECIFIED EMPLOYEES | A-24 | ||||
9.6 | WITHHOLDING | A-24 | ||||
9.7 | NOTIFICATION OF DISQUALIFYING DISPOSITIONS OF AN ISO | A-25 | ||||
10 | STOCK INCENTIVES TO PARTICIPANTS OUTSIDE THE US | A-25 | ||||
11 | CHANGE IN CONTROL OF THE COMPANY | A-25 | ||||
11.1 | CHANGE IN CONTROL | A-25 | ||||
11.2 | VESTING UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL | A-26 | ||||
11.3 | DISPOSITION OF STOCK INCENTIVES | A-27 | ||||
11.4 | GENERAL RULE FOR OTHER STOCK INCENTIVES | A-28 |
A-3
12 | AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION | A-28 | ||||
12.1 | AMENDMENT OF PLAN | A-28 | ||||
12.2 | TERMINATION OF PLAN | A-29 | ||||
12.3 | AMENDMENT OF STOCK INCENTIVES | A-29 | ||||
13 | MISCELLANEOUS | A-30 | ||||
13.1 | SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS | A-30 | ||||
13.2 | NO GUARANTEE OF CONTINUED RELATIONSHIP | A-30 | ||||
13.3 | TRANSFERS & RESTRUCTURINGS | A-30 | ||||
13.4 | LEAVES OF ABSENCE | A-30 | ||||
13.5 | GOVERNING LAW/CONSENT TO JURISDICTION | A-30 | ||||
13.6 | ESCROW OF SHARES | A-30 | ||||
13.7 | NO FRACTIONAL SHARES | A-30 | ||||
13.8 | FORFEITURE AND RECOUPMENT | A-31 | ||||
13.9 | SEVERABILITY | A-31 | ||||
13.10 | NO TRUST OR FUND CREATED | A-32 |
A-4
MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
The purpose of the Plan is to enable MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company") and its Subsidiaries to attract and retain employees, directors and service providers of the Company by aligning financial interests of these individuals with the other stockholders of the Company.
The Plan provides for the grant of Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Stock, Performance Units, and other awards to aid the Company in obtaining these goals, subject to the approval by the shareholders.
A-5
A-6
amended, as in effect on the date hereof or any registration form(s) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, subsequently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A-7
accounting standards or tax laws, non-recurring unusual events specified by the Committee, including write-offs or write-downs, capital gains or losses, acquisitions or divestitures, restructurings, and litigation judgments and settlements.
A-8
the United States. If a Participant is a key employee at any time during the 12 months ending on each September 30, the Participant is a Specified Employee for the 12 month period commencing on the next January 1. Any such identification of a Specified Employee under this Plan shall apply to all nonqualified deferred compensation plans in which the Specified Employee participates. In the case of certain corporate transactions (a merger, acquisition or spin-off), or in the case of nonresident alien employees, the Company will determine Specified Employees in accordance with Treas. Reg. §1.409A-1(i).
SECTION 3
SHARES SUBJECT TO STOCK INCENTIVES
A-9
to adjustment as provided in Section 3.4. Such Shares shall be reserved, to the extent that the Company deems appropriate, from authorized but unissued Shares, and from Shares which have been reacquired by the Company.
A-10
additional One Hundred Thousand (100,000) Shares, which shall not count against the limit set forth in the preceding sentence.
SECTION 4
EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF PLAN
The effective date of this Plan shall be June 6, 2017, provided, however, that if the Plan is not approved by the shareholders of the Company within 12 months of the approval by the Board, the Plan will be terminated and all Stock Incentives granted under the Plan will be terminated and deemed null and void and further provided that no Stock Incentive shall vest and no Shares may be issued under the Plan prior to approval of the Plan by the shareholders of the Company. No Stock Incentive shall be granted under this Plan on or after the earlier of:
This Plan shall continue in effect until all outstanding Stock Incentives have been exercised in full or are no longer exercisable, all Restricted Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units have vested or been forfeited and all Performance Shares or Units have be awarded or lapsed at the end of the Performance Periods.
A-11
A-12
Participants selected by the Committee shall be eligible for the grant of Stock Incentives under this Plan, but no Participant shall have the right to be granted a Stock Incentive under this Plan merely as a result of his or her status as a Key Person or Key Employee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an ISO may only be granted to a Key Employee.
SECTION 7
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK INCENTIVES
A-13
have sole discretion to modify the terms and provisions of any Stock Incentive in accordance with Section 12.3.
A-14
conditions to which the dividend equivalents are subject. Under a dividend equivalent, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payments equivalent to the amount of dividends paid by the Company to holders of Shares with respect to the number of dividend equivalents held by the Participant, which may be paid concurrently with the payment of dividends or deferred and paid at a later date. The dividend equivalent may provide for payment in Shares or in cash, or a fixed combination of Shares or cash, or the Committee may reserve the right to determine the manner of payment at the time the dividend equivalent is payable. Any such dividend equivalent that is intended to exempt from Section 409A of the Code with respect to a Stock Incentive that constitutes Deferred Compensation shall be stated in a separate arrangement.
A-15
A-16
terminated for Cause, all unexercised Options granted to such Participant shall immediately terminate.
A-17
A-18
A-19
such Stock Appreciation Right is granted in connection with the grant of an ISO to a Ten Percent Shareholder. Stock Appreciation Rights issued under the Plan may become exercisable based on the service of a Participant, or based upon the attainment (as determined by the Committee) of performance criteria, including but not limited to Performance Goals.
A-20
award will specify the number of Performance Stock or Performance Units to which it pertains, which number may be subject to adjustment to reflect changes in compensation or other factors; provided, however, that no such adjustment will be made in the case of a grant that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, other than as provided in Sections 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3. Subject to the limitation set forth in Section 3.4, any grant of Performance Stock or Performance Units may specify that the amount payable with respect thereto may not exceed a maximum specified by the Committee at the date of grant.
A-21
The Board, in its discretion, may, in addition to the Restricted Stock grants provided above, grant any additional Stock Incentive to all non-employee Directors or to any individual non-employee Director, provided that such grant shall be solely for substantial services performed or to be performed by the non-employee Directors or non-employee Director as determined in good faith by the Board.
SECTION 8
SECURITIES REGULATION
A-22
the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 apply but an exemption is available which requires an investment representation or other representation, the Participant shall be required, as a condition to acquiring such Shares, to represent that such Shares are being acquired for investment, and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof, except in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, and to make such other representations as are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Company and its counsel. All Stock Incentive Agreements shall contain a provision stating that any restrictions under any applicable securities laws will apply.
SECTION 9
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE
A-23
(d) a Change in Control as defined in Section 11.1. Any election permitted under any Stock Incentive that constitutes Deferred Compensation shall comply with the requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.409A-2 and shall be irrevocable as of the date of grant of the Stock Incentive. In addition, with respect to any Stock Incentive that constitutes Deferred Compensation, except to the extent acceleration or deferral is permitted by or complies with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, neither the Committee nor a Participant may accelerate or defer the time or schedule of any payment or exercise of, or the amount scheduled to be reported as income as a result.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Participant who is an Insider, a withholding or tender of Shares shall be a subsequent transaction approved as part of the Stock Incentive for purposes of the exemption under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.
A-24
SECTION 10
STOCK INCENTIVES TO PARTICIPANTS OUTSIDE THE US
The Committee shall have the authority to require that any Stock Incentive Agreement relating to a Stock Incentive in a jurisdiction outside of the United States contain such terms as are required by local law in order to constitute a valid grant under the laws of such jurisdiction. Such authority shall be notwithstanding the fact that the requirements of the local jurisdiction may be different from or more or less restrictive than the terms set forth in this Plan. No purchase or delivery of Shares pursuant to a Stock Incentive to a Participant outside the United States shall occur until applicable restrictions imposed pursuant to this Plan (as modified as provided in this Section 10) or the applicable Stock Incentive have terminated.
SECTION 11
CHANGE IN CONTROL OF THE COMPANY
A-25
"Incumbent Directors" shall mean those individuals who are members of the Board of Directors on the effective date of this Plan and any individual who subsequently becomes a member of the Board (other than a director designated by a person who has entered into agreement with the Company to effect a transaction contemplated by Section 11.1(c)) whose election or nomination for election by the Company's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the then Incumbent Directors; or
A-26
Change in Control, with respect to a Stock Incentive that is subject a Performance Goal for which the Performance Period has not expired, including a Stock Incentive subject to the Performance-Based Exception, the Participant shall be entitled to receive a number of Shares that is determined by measuring the applicalbe Performance Goal based upon actual results at or immediately prior to the Change in Control and/or based upon Performance Goals pro rated based on the time elapsed in the Performance Period as of the Change in Control date.
A-27
vesting) less the value of any consideration payable on exercise.
SECTION 12
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION
A-28
A-29
A-30
whether cash shall be paid in lieu of any fractional Share or whether such Shares shall be cancelled or otherwise eliminated.
A-31
to such Stock Incentive, and the remainder of the Plan or any such Stock Incentive shall remain in full force and effect.
A-32
VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 5, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTSC2017 You may attend the Meeting via the Internet and vote during the Meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 5, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION 14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E28509-P93964 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1.To elect eight directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected. Nominees: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. For Withhold For All AllAllExcept 01) 02) 03) 04) David J. Anderson Jeffrey A. Graves David D. Johnson Randy J. Martinez 05) 06) 07) 08) Michael V. Schrock Gail P. Steinel Maximiliane C. Straub Chun Hung (Kenneth) Yu The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 5 and 1 YEAR on proposal 4: 2.To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017. For Against Abstain 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain 4. To approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the frequency of the vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. For Against Abstain 3.To approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. 5. To approve the Company's 2017 Stock Incentive Plan. NOTE: THIS PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1, 2, 3 AND 5 AND 1 YEAR ON ITEM 4. DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY IS HEREBY CONFERRED AS TO ALL OTHER MATTERS WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF. For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. This proxy should be marked, dated and signed by the shareholder(s) exactly as his, her or their name(s) appear(s) hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. Jointly owned shares will be voted as directed unless another owner instructs to the contrary, in which case, the shares will not be voted. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date V.1.1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com. E28510-P93964 PROXY MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION Proxy for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders June 6, 2017 SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned shareholder of MTS Systems Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement and hereby appoints David J. Anderson and Jeffrey A. Graves, each with the power to appoint a substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote all the shares of Common Stock of the Company, held of record by the undersigned on April 17, 2017, at the ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS to be held on June 6, 2017, and any adjournments or postponements thereof. (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Card to be signed on the reverse side V.1.1 Address Changes/Comments: