Exhibit 99.1
Nash Finch Reports Third Quarter 2010 Results
Company Announces Purchase of Three Military Distribution Centers for Strategic Growth
MINNEAPOLIS (November 16, 2010) — Nash Finch Company (NASDAQ: NAFC), one of the leading food distribution companies in the United States, today announced financial results for the sixteen weeks (third quarter) ended October 9, 2010.
Financial Results
Total Company sales for the third quarter 2010 were $1.51 billion compared to $1.63 billion in the prior-year quarter, a decrease of 7.5%. Excluding the previously announced transition of a portion of a food distribution customer buying group to another supplier during the second quarter 2010, total Company sales declined 4.9% during the third quarter 2010. Total Company sales for the first forty weeks of 2010 were $3.85 billion compared to $3.99 billion in the prior-year period, a decrease of 3.6%. Excluding the additional sales of $59.4 million attributable to acquired military locations during the first quarter 2010, offset by the previously announced transition of a portion of a food distribution customer buying group to another supplier during the second quarter 2010, total Company sales declined 3.7% during year-to-date 2010.
Consolidated EBITDA1 for the third quarter 2010 was $43.8 million, or 2.9% of sales, as compared to $46.0 million, or 2.8% of sales, for the prior-year-quarter. For the forty weeks of 2010, Consolidated EBITDA was $104.2 million, or 2.7% of sales, compared to $108.9 million, or 2.7% of sales, in the prior-year period. Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial results in the attached financial statements.
Net earnings for the third quarter 2010 were $15.3 million, or $1.18 per diluted share, as compared to net earnings of $21.9 million, or $1.64 per diluted share, in the prior year quarter. Net earnings for the first forty weeks of 2010 were $34.0 million, or $2.57 per diluted share, as compared to net earnings of $45.9 million, or $3.44 per diluted share, in the same prior-year period.
Net earnings for both years were impacted by several significant items which are presented in the table below. Net earnings for the third quarter 2010 benefited by significant items totaling $1.2 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, as compared to the third quarter 2009 that benefited by significant items totaling $6.3 million, or $0.47 per diluted share, primarily due to a non-cash gain realized on a litigation settlement. Net earnings for the year-to-date 2010 benefited by significant items totaling $0.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share as compared to the year-to-date 2009 that benefited by significant items totaling $11.8 million, or $0.88 per diluted share, primarily due to non-cash gains realized on the acquisition of a business and a litigation settlement.
1
The following table identifies the significant net credits (charges) affecting our Consolidated EBITDA, net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the third quarter and year-to-date 2010 and prior year results:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 3rd Quarter | | | 3rd Qtr. YTD | |
(dollars in millions except per share amounts) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Significant credits (charges) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution center closing costs | | $ | (0.5 | ) | | | — | | | | (1.7 | ) | | | — | |
Retail stores opening & closing costs | | | (0.2 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.7 | ) |
Gain on sale of intangible asset | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | 0.3 | | | | — | |
Start up and conversion cost | | | (1.1 | ) | | | (0.9 | ) | | | (1.7 | ) | | | (2.3 | ) |
Consulting fees | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Significant charges impacting Consolidated EBITDA | | | (1.5 | ) | | | (0.9 | ) | | | (3.3 | ) | | | (3.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on acquisition of a business | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6.7 | |
Gain on litigation settlement | | | — | | | | 7.6 | | | | — | | | | 7.6 | |
Settlement of gain contingency | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | 0.3 | | | | — | |
Net increase in lease reserves | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (1.7 | ) |
Asset impairments and lease costs on closed retail stores | | | — | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | — | | | | (1.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total significant net credits (charges) impacting earnings before tax | | | (1.6 | ) | | | 5.5 | | | | (3.4 | ) | | | 7.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax on significant net credits (charges) | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 1.3 | | | | 0.1 | |
Income tax effect on gain on acquisition of a business | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.7 | |
Reversal of previously recorded income tax reserves and refunds | | | 2.2 | | | | — | | | | 2.2 | | | | 1.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total significant net credits impacting net earnings | | $ | 1.2 | | | | 6.3 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 11.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share impact | | $ | 0.10 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.01 | | | | 0.88 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
“Although we continued to experience significant headwinds that impacted our top line sales during the third quarter, we were able to increase year-over-year EBITDA as a percentage of sales,” said Alec Covington, President and CEO of Nash Finch. “This was achieved by placing a sharp focus on executing initiatives to improve productivity, reduce overall expenses and maintain profitability during this challenging economic environment.”
“The Company completed the closing of the Bridgeport, Michigan distribution center, which will allow us to more efficiently serve our customers and will improve productivity in our Lima, Ohio facility,” said Covington. “We have also taken advantage of the depressed real estate market during the third quarter by purchasing three distribution facilities that will expand our military footprint at a very low cost. We anticipate this will provide significant transportation savings and offer long-term strategic growth in the Midwest, Southeast and Southwestern United States.”
2
Military Distribution Results
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 3rd Quarter | | | % | | | 3rd Qtr. YTD | | | % | |
(dollars in millions) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
Sales | | $ | 620.8 | | | | 637.1 | | | | (2.5 | %) | | | 1,555.4 | | | | 1,508.3 | | | | 3.1 | % |
Segment EBITDA1 | | $ | 15.9 | | | | 15.7 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 42.8 | | | | 38.9 | | | | 10.1 | % |
Percentage of Sales | | | 2.6 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | | | | | 2.8 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | | |
Military segment sales were down 2.5% during the third quarter 2010 as compared to the prior year, primarily due to timing differences between the quarters relating to export shipments and to a lesser extent from a reduction in domestic sales promotions. Year-to-date military sales increased 3.1% in comparison to the prior year. However, excluding the additional sales attributable to the acquired locations during the first quarter 2010 of $59.4 million, year-to-date comparable military segment sales decreased by 0.8% in comparison to the prior year.
The military segment EBITDA increased by 0.8% and 10.1% in the third quarter and year-to-date 2010, respectively, compared to the prior year. Military segment EBITDA increased as a percentage of sales to 2.6% in the third quarter 2010 as compared to 2.5% in the prior year quarter. Year-to-date military segment EBITDA increased as a percentage of sales to 2.8% in 2010 as compared to 2.6% in the prior year period.
“I am pleased to announce that our new Columbus, Georgia distribution center began shipping product at the end of the third quarter and the start-up has gone very smoothly,” said Covington. “We expect to realize significant transportation cost savings by opening this facility which will also provide for significant strategic growth opportunities. In addition, during the third quarter we announced the purchase of a 303,000 square foot facility in Bloomington, Indiana and two facilities totaling 538,000 square feet in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma to support the expansion of our military distribution segment.”
3
Food Distribution & Retail Results
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 3rd Quarter | | | % | | | 3rd Qtr. YTD | | % | |
(dollars in millions) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | Change | |
Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Food Distribution | | $ | 731.5 | | | | 818.2 | | | | (10.6 | %) | | | 1,889.5 | | | | 2,040.0 | | | | (7.4 | %) |
Retail | | | 158.6 | | | | 178.0 | | | | (10.9 | %) | | | 400.3 | | | | 441.9 | | | | (9.4 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 890.1 | | | | 996.2 | | | | (10.7 | %) | | | 2,289.8 | | | | 2,481.9 | | | | (7.7 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment EBITDA1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Food Distribution | | $ | 20.2 | | | | 22.5 | | | | (10.2 | %) | | | 45.1 | | | | 52.7 | | | | (14.3 | %) |
Retail | | | 7.7 | | | | 7.8 | | | | (1.2 | %) | | | 16.3 | | | | 17.3 | | | | (5.6 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 27.9 | | | | 30.3 | | | | (7.9 | %) | | | 61.4 | | | | 70.0 | | | | (12.2 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Percentage of Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Food Distribution | | | 2.8 | % | | | 2.8 | % | | | | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | | |
Retail | | | 4.9 | % | | | 4.4 | % | | | | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | | | | | 2.7 | % | | | 2.8 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The combined food distribution and retail segment sales decrease in the third quarter and year-to-date periods compared to the 2009 periods was 10.7% and 7.7%, respectively. The decrease in sales was negatively impacted by the previously announced transition of a portion of a customer buying group to another supplier during the second quarter 2010. However, after adjusting to exclude this sales impact of $44.6 million in the quarter and $60.8 million year-to-date, combined food distribution and retail segment sales declined 6.5% for the third quarter and 5.4% year-to-date, primarily due to soft comparable sales to existing customers in both businesses, continued deflation in certain product categories, and the closure of four retail stores since the beginning of the fourth quarter 2009. The retail same store sales declined 6.3% for the third quarter and 4.9% in the year-to-date.
During the third quarter the Bridgeport, Michigan distribution center closed and substantially all of the customer sales volume was successfully transferred to our Lima, Ohio distribution center. In addition, we closed one retail store in the third quarter.
The combined food distribution and retail segment EBITDA decreased by 7.9% and 12.2% in the third quarter and year-to-date 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Food distribution and retail segment EBITDA as a percentage of sales increased to 3.1% in the third quarter 2010 as compared to 3.0% in the prior year quarter, and for the year-to-date periods, EBITDA was 2.7% in 2010 as compared to 2.8% in the prior year.
4
Financial Target Progress
Improvements on our key financial targets have been achieved since the targets were announced as part of the Company’s strategic plan in November 2006. In particular, Consolidated EBITDA margin has improved from 2.2% to 2.7% of sales and the debt leverage ratio has improved from 3.11x to 2.38x from Fiscal 2006 to the third quarter 2010. The ratio of free cash flow to net assets (exclusive of strategic projects) has increased from 8.7% in Fiscal 2006 to 11.6% in the third quarter 2010. Finally, the organic revenue growth metric has been negatively impacted by the loss of a portion of a food distribution customer buying group and due to the downturn in the economy.
The following table charts the Company’s progress towards its long-term financial targets that are anticipated to be attained through successful execution of the strategic plan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Long-term | | | 3rd Qtr. YTD | | | Fiscal | | | Fiscal | | | Fiscal | | | Fiscal | |
Financial Targets | | Target | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Organic Revenue Growth2 | | | 2.0 | % | | | (5.1 | %) | | | (0.6 | %) | | | 3.1 | % | | | (2.6 | %) | | | (3.1 | %) |
Consolidated EBITDA Margin3 | | | 4.0 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | | 3.1 | % | | | 2.8 | % | | | 2.2 | % |
Trailing Four Quarter Free Cash Flow4/ Net Assets | | | | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 10.6 | % | | | 12.0 | % | | | 9.2 | % | | | 8.7 | % |
Trailing Four Quarter Free Cash Flow5/ Net Assets excluding impact of strategic projects | | | 10.0 | % | | | 11.6 | % | | | 10.6 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 9.7 | % | | | 8.7 | % |
Total Leverage Ratio6 | | | 2.5 - 3.0 x | | | | 2.38x | | | | 2.02x | | | | 1.75x | | | | 2.20x | | | | 3.11x | |
Liquidity
Total debt at the end of the third quarter of 2010 was $321.9 million, a reduction of $11.5 million as compared to $333.4 million at the end of the third quarter of 2009. The Company continues to focus on effectively managing its balance sheet and is currently in compliance with all of its debt covenants. The debt leverage ratio as of the end of the third quarter 2010 was 2.38x. Availability on the Company’s revolving credit facility at the end of the quarter was $157.6 million.
Share Repurchase Program
As previously announced, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to spend up to $25.0 million to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The program took effect on November 16, 2009 and will continue until December 31, 2010. During the third quarter 2010, we repurchased a total of 141,023 shares for $5.0 million, at an average price per share of $35.11. Since the program’s inception, we have repurchased a total of 613,455 shares for $21.3 million, at an average price per share of $34.70.
5
| | |
1 | | Consolidated EBITDA, and segment EBITDA is calculated as earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude extraordinary gains or losses, gains or losses from sales of assets other than inventory in the ordinary course of business, and non-cash charges (such as LIFO, asset impairments, closed store lease costs and share-based compensation), less cash payments made during the current period on non-cash charges recorded in prior periods. Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered an alternative measure of our net income, operating performance, cash flows or liquidity. Consolidated EBITDA is provided as additional information as a key metric used to determine payout pursuant to our Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive Plans. |
|
2 | | Organic Revenue Growth is the percentage change in revenues for a fiscal period(s) compared to the similar prior year fiscal period(s), excluding incremental revenue obtained through acquisitions. |
|
3 | | Consolidated EBITDA Margin is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBITDA by sales. |
|
4 | | Trailing Four Quarter Free Cash Flow to Net Assets ratio is defined as cash provided from operations less capital expenditures for property, plant & equipment during the trailing four quarters divided by the average net assets for the current period and prior year comparable period (total assets less current liabilities plus current portion of long-term debt and capital leases). |
|
5 | | Trailing Four Quarter Free Cash Flow to Net Assets excluding impact of strategic projects ratio is defined as cash provided from operations (excluding the impact of cash generated from strategic projects) less capital expenditures for property, plant & equipment (excluding capital expenditures for strategic projects) during the trailing four quarters divided by the average net assets (excluding average net assets generated from strategic projects) for the current period and prior year comparable period (total assets less current liabilities plus current portion of long-term debt and capital leases). |
|
6 | | Total Leverage Ratio is defined as total debt (current portion of long-term debt and capital leases, long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations) divided by the trailing four quarters Consolidated EBITDA. |
*********************************************************
A conference call to review the third quarter 2010 results is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. CST (11:00 a.m. EST) on November 16, 2010. Interested participants can listen to the conference call over the Internet by logging onto the “Investor Relations” portion of Nash Finch’s website at http://www.nashfinch.com. A replay of the webcast will be available and the transcript of the call will be archived on the “Investor Relations” portion of Nash Finch’s website under the heading “Audio Archives.” A copy of this press release and the other financial and statistical information about the periods to be discussed in the conference call will be available at the time of the call on the “Investor Relations” portion of the Nash Finch website under the caption “Press Releases.”
Nash Finch Company is a Fortune 500 company and one of the leading food distribution companies in the United States. Nash Finch’s core business, food distribution, serves independent retailers and military commissaries in 36 states, the District of Columbia, Europe, Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Azores and Egypt. The Company also owns and operates a base of retail stores, primarily supermarkets under the Econofoods®, Family Thrift Center®, AVANZA®, Family Fresh Market ® and Sun Mart® trade names. Further information is available on the Company’s website atwww.nashfinch.com.
This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements relate to trends and events that may affect our future financial position and operating results. Any statement contained in this release that is not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. For example, words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend, “ “potential” or “plan,” or comparable terminology, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based upon current expectations, estimates and assumptions, and entail various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Important factors known to us that could cause or contribute to material differences include, but are not limited to, the following:
6
• | | the effect of competition on our food distribution, military and retail businesses; |
|
• | | general sensitivity to economic conditions, including the uncertainty related to the current state of the economy in the U.S. and worldwide economic slowdown; continued disruptions to the credit and financial markets in the U.S. and worldwide; changes in market interest rates; continued volatility in energy prices and food commodities; |
|
• | | macroeconomic and geopolitical events affecting commerce generally; |
|
• | | changes in consumer buying and spending patterns; |
|
• | | our ability to identify and execute plans to expand our food distribution, military and retail operations; |
|
• | | possible changes in the military commissary system, including those stemming from the redeployment of forces, congressional action and funding levels; |
|
• | | our ability to identify and execute plans to improve the competitive position of our retail operations; |
|
• | | the success or failure of strategic plans, new business ventures or initiatives; |
|
• | | our ability to successfully integrate and manage current or future businesses we acquire, including the ability to manage credit risks and retain the customers of those operations; |
|
• | | changes in credit risk from financial accommodations extended to new or existing customers; |
|
• | | significant changes in the nature of vendor promotional programs and the allocation of funds among the programs; |
|
• | | limitations on financial and operating flexibility due to debt levels and debt instrument covenants; |
|
• | | legal, governmental, legislative or administrative proceedings, disputes, or actions that result in adverse outcomes; |
|
• | | failure of our internal control over financial reporting; |
|
• | | changes in accounting standards; |
|
• | | technology failures that may have a material adverse effect on our business; |
|
• | | severe weather and natural disasters that may impact our supply chain; |
|
• | | unionization of a significant portion of our workforce; |
|
• | | costs related to multi-employer pension plan which has liabilities in excess of plan assets; |
|
• | | changes in health care, pension and wage costs and labor relations issues; |
|
• | | product liability claims, including claims concerning food and prepared food products; |
|
• | | threats or potential threats to security; and |
|
• | | unanticipated problems with product procurement. |
A more detailed discussion of many of these factors, as well as other factors that could affect the Company’s results, is contained in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the SEC. You should carefully consider each of these factors and all of the other information in this release. We believe that all forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions when made. However, we caution that it is impossible to predict actual results or outcomes and that accordingly you should not place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when made and we undertake no obligation to revise or update these statements in light of subsequent events or developments. Actual results and outcomes may differ materially from anticipated results or outcomes discussed in forward-looking statements. You are advised, however, to consult any future disclosures we make on related subjects in future reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Contact:Bob Dimond, Executive Vice President & CFO, 952-844-1060
7
NASH FINCH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Sixteen | | | Forty | |
| | Weeks Ended | | | Weeks Ended | |
| | October 9 | | | October 10 | | | October 9 | | | October 10 | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 1,510,881 | | | | 1,633,304 | | | | 3,845,191 | | | | 3,990,218 | |
Cost of sales | | | 1,388,926 | | | | 1,504,350 | | | | 3,537,079 | | | | 3,667,116 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 121,955 | | | | 128,954 | | | | 308,112 | | | | 323,102 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 81,119 | | | | 84,716 | | | | 208,601 | | | | 222,055 | |
Gain on acquisition of a business | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,682 | ) |
Gain on litigation settlement | | | — | | | | (7,630 | ) | | | — | | | | (7,630 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 10,883 | | | | 12,592 | | | | 27,638 | | | | 31,299 | |
Interest expense | | | 7,123 | | | | 7,621 | | | | 17,747 | | | | 18,765 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other costs and expenses | | | 99,125 | | | | 97,299 | | | | 253,986 | | | | 257,807 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings before income taxes | | | 22,830 | | | | 31,655 | | | | 54,126 | | | | 65,295 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | 7,484 | | | | 9,728 | | | | 20,125 | | | | 19,410 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | | $ | 15,346 | | | | 21,927 | | | | 34,001 | | | | 45,885 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 1.21 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 2.64 | | | | 3.53 | |
Diluted | | $ | 1.18 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 2.57 | | | | 3.44 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Declared dividends per common share | | $ | 0.18 | | | | 0.18 | | | | 0.54 | | | | 0.54 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common equivalent shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 12,656 | | | | 13,021 | | | | 12,870 | | | | 12,998 | |
Diluted | | | 13,038 | | | | 13,377 | | | | 13,223 | | | | 13,344 | |
8
NASH FINCH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 10/09/2010 | | | 01/02/2010 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 785 | | | | 830 | |
Accounts and notes receivable, net | | | 271,489 | | | | 250,767 | |
Inventories | | | 341,405 | | | | 285,443 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 13,188 | | | | 11,410 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 5,592 | | | | 9,366 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 632,459 | | | | 557,816 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Notes receivable, net | | | 21,498 | | | | 23,343 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment: | | | 653,901 | | | | 637,167 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (415,159 | ) | | | (422,529 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net property, plant and equipment | | | 238,742 | | | | 214,638 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 166,545 | | | | 166,545 | |
Customer contracts and relationships, net | | | 18,803 | | | | 21,062 | |
Investment in direct financing leases | | | 3,003 | | | | 3,185 | |
Other assets | | | 11,090 | | | | 12,947 | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,092,140 | | | | 999,536 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations | | $ | 3,170 | | | | 4,438 | |
Accounts and other payables | | | 281,570 | | | | 240,483 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 58,995 | | | | 60,524 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 1,424 | | | | 3,064 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 345,159 | | | | 308,509 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 299,363 | | | | 257,590 | |
Capitalized lease obligations | | | 19,408 | | | | 21,442 | |
Deferred tax liability, net | | | 23,057 | | | | 19,323 | |
Other liabilities | | | 41,470 | | | | 42,113 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock — no par value. Authorized 500 shares; none issued | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock of $1.66 2/3 par value Authorized 50,000 shares, issued 13,676 and 13,675 shares respectively | | | 22,793 | | | | 22,792 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 113,089 | | | | 106,705 | |
Common stock held in trust | | | (1,203 | ) | | | (2,342 | ) |
Deferred compensation obligations | | | 1,203 | | | | 2,342 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | (10,415 | ) | | | (10,756 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 288,893 | | | | 261,821 | |
Treasury stock at cost, 1,508 and 863 shares, respectively | | | (50,677 | ) | | | (30,003 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 363,683 | | | | 350,559 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,092,140 | | | | 999,536 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
9
NASH FINCH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Forty | |
| | Weeks Ended | |
| | October 9 | | | October 10 | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings | | $ | 34,001 | | | | 45,885 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Gain on acquisition of a business | | | — | | | | (6,682 | ) |
Gain on litigaiton settlement | | | — | | | | (7,630 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 27,638 | | | | 31,299 | |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 1,411 | | | | 1,357 | |
Non-cash convertible debt interest | | | 4,058 | | | | 3,753 | |
Amortization of rebateable loans | | | 3,074 | | | | 3,133 | |
Provision for bad debts | | | 216 | | | | 1,070 | |
Provision for lease reserves | | | 291 | | | | 1,492 | |
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) | | | 7,510 | | | | (1,237 | ) |
Gain on sale of property, plant & equipment | | | (423 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
LIFO credit | | | (76 | ) | | | (732 | ) |
Asset impairments | | | 926 | | | | 1,738 | |
Share-based compensation | | | 6,179 | | | | 7,421 | |
Deferred compensation | | | 838 | | | | 990 | |
Other | | | (730 | ) | | | (129 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts and notes receivable | | | (22,593 | ) | | | (38,921 | ) |
Inventories | | | (55,886 | ) | | | (32,838 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | | | 1,887 | | | | 824 | |
Accounts and other payables | | | 14,407 | | | | 23,294 | |
Accrued expenses | | | (912 | ) | | | (14,529 | ) |
Income taxes payable | | | (5,305 | ) | | | 946 | |
Other assets and liabilities | | | (200 | ) | | | 1,795 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 16,311 | | | | 22,298 | |
| | | | | | |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Disposal of property, plant and equipment | | | 575 | | | | 507 | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | (39,853 | ) | | | (12,563 | ) |
Business acquired, net of cash | | | — | | | | (78,056 | ) |
Loans to customers | | | (1,095 | ) | | | (2,225 | ) |
Payments from customers on loans | | | 1,703 | | | | 3,411 | |
Other | | | (400 | ) | | | (154 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (39,070 | ) | | | (89,080 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds of revolving debt | | | 38,000 | | | | 80,500 | |
Dividends paid | | | (6,739 | ) | | | (6,929 | ) |
Purchase of Common Stock | | | (20,267 | ) | | | — | |
Payments of long-term debt | | | (264 | ) | | | (248 | ) |
Payments of capitalized lease obligations | | | (3,009 | ) | | | (2,649 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in bank overdraft | | | 14,993 | | | | (1,346 | ) |
Payments of deferred financing costs | | | — | | | | (2,706 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | | 196 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 22,714 | | | | 66,818 | |
| | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (45 | ) | | | 36 | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of year | | | 830 | | | | 824 | |
| | | | | | |
End of period | | $ | 785 | | | | 860 | |
| | | | | | |
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures funded by other payables | | $ | 8,500 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
10
NASH FINCH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Supplemental Data (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | October 9 | | | October 10 | |
Other Data (In thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total debt | | $ | 321,941 | | | | 333,413 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | $ | 363,683 | | | | 395,678 | |
Capitalization | | $ | 685,624 | | | | 729,091 | |
Debt to total capitalization | | | 47.0 | % | | | 45.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-GAAP Data | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated EBITDA — rolling 4 quarters (a) | | $ | 135,503 | | | | 144,372 | |
Leverage ratio — rolling 4 quarters. (debt to consolidated EBITDA) (b) | | | 2.38 | | | | 2.31 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Comparable GAAP Data | | | | | | | | |
Debt to earnings before income taxes (b) | | | 25.59 | | | | 4.39 | |
| | |
(a) | | Consolidated EBITDA is calculated as earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude extraordinary gains or losses, gains or losses from sales of assets other than inventory in the ordinary course of business, and non-cash charges (such as LIFO, asset impairments, closed store lease costs and share-based compensation), less cash payments made during the current period on non-cash charges recorded in prior periods. Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered an alternative measure of our net income, operating performance, cash flows or liquidity. Consolidated EBITDA is provided as additional information as a key metric used to determine payout pursuant to our Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive Plans. |
|
(b) | | Leverage ratio is defined as the Company’s total debt at October 9, 2010 and October 10, 2009, divided by Consolidated EBITDA for the respective rolling four quarters. The most comparable GAAP ratio is debt at the same date divided by earnings from continuing operations before income taxes for the respective four quarters. |
11
Derivation of Consolidated EBITDA; Segment Consolidated EBITDA; and Segment Profit (in thousands)
FY 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | Rolling | |
| | Qtr 4 | | | Qtr 1 | | | Qtr 2 | | | Qtr 3 | | | 4 Qtrs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | (41,545 | ) | | | 13,330 | | | | 17,966 | | | | 22,830 | | | | 12,581 | |
Add/(deduct) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIFO | | | (2,301 | ) | | | (40 | ) | | | (321 | ) | | | 285 | | | | (2,377 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,304 | | | | 8,585 | | | | 8,170 | | | | 10,883 | | | | 36,942 | |
Interest expense | | | 5,607 | | | | 5,258 | | | | 5,366 | | | | 7,123 | | | | 23,354 | |
Special charge | | | 6,020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,020 | |
Goodwill impairment | | | 50,927 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50,927 | |
Settlement of acquisiton contingency | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (310 | ) | | | (310 | ) |
Closed store lease costs | | | 1,644 | | | | — | | | | (434 | ) | | | 725 | | | | 1,935 | |
Asset impairment | | | 722 | | | | 517 | | | | 301 | | | | 108 | | | | 1,648 | |
Stock compensation | | | 1,663 | | | | 1,605 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 2,717 | | | | 7,842 | |
Subsequent cash payments on non-cash charges | | | (772 | ) | | | (740 | ) | | | (969 | ) | | | (578 | ) | | | (3,059 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated EBITDA | | $ | 31,269 | | | | 28,515 | | | | 31,936 | | | | 43,783 | | | | 135,503 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | Rolling | |
| | Qtr 4 | | | Qtr 1 | | | Qtr 2 | | | Qtr 3 | | | 4 Qtrs | |
Segment Consolidated EBITDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Military | | $ | 12,031 | | | | 13,615 | | | | 13,364 | | | | 15,858 | | | | 54,868 | |
Food Distribution | | | 15,455 | | | | 11,227 | | | | 13,634 | | | | 20,212 | | | | 60,528 | |
Retail | | | 3,783 | | | | 3,673 | | | | 4,938 | | | | 7,713 | | | | 20,107 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 31,269 | | | | 28,515 | | | | 31,936 | | | | 43,783 | | | | 135,503 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | Rolling | |
| | Qtr 4 | | | Qtr 1 | | | Qtr 2 | | | Qtr 3 | | | 4 Qtrs | |
Segment profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Military | | $ | 10,146 | | | | 11,816 | | | | 11,519 | | | | 12,822 | | | | 46,303 | |
Food Distribution | | | 11,495 | | | | 5,799 | | | | 8,581 | | | | 12,848 | | | | 38,723 | |
Retail | | | (1,449 | ) | | | 227 | | | | 2,389 | | | | 2,824 | | | | 3,991 | |
Unallocated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | | (4,790 | ) | | | (4,512 | ) | | | (4,523 | ) | | | (5,664 | ) | | | (19,489 | ) |
Special charge | | | (6,020 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,020 | ) |
Goodwill impairment | | | (50,927 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (50,927 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | (41,545 | ) | | | 13,330 | | | | 17,966 | | | | 22,830 | | | | 12,581 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12
FY 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | Rolling | |
| | Qtr 4 | | | Qtr 1 | | | Qtr 2 | | | Qtr 3 | | | 4 Qtrs | |
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | 10,643 | | | | 17,526 | | | | 16,114 | | | | 31,655 | | | | 75,938 | |
Add/(deduct) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIFO | | | 7,849 | | | | — | | | | (287 | ) | | | (445 | ) | | | 7,117 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,051 | | | | 9,335 | | | | 9,372 | | | | 12,592 | | | | 40,350 | |
Interest expense | | | 6,034 | | | | 5,304 | | | | 5,840 | | | | 7,621 | | | | 24,799 | |
Gain on acquisition of a business | | | — | | | | (6,682 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,682 | ) |
Gain on litigation settlement | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7,630 | ) | | | (7,630 | ) |
Closed store lease costs | | | (317 | ) | | | 1,066 | | | | — | | | | 425 | | | | 1,174 | |
Asset impairment | | | 1,065 | | | | — | | | | 898 | | | | 840 | | | | 2,803 | |
Stock compensation | | | 1,814 | | | | 3,307 | | | | 2,408 | | | | 1,707 | | | | 9,236 | |
Gains on sale of real estate | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (54 | ) | | | (54 | ) |
Subsequent cash payments on non-cash charges | | | (635 | ) | | | (617 | ) | | | (714 | ) | | | (713 | ) | | | (2,679 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated EBITDA | | $ | 35,504 | | | | 29,239 | | | | 33,631 | | | | 45,998 | | | | 144,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | Rolling | |
| | Qtr 4 | | | Qtr 1 | | | Qtr 2 | | | Qtr 3 | | | 4 Qtrs | |
Segment Consolidated EBITDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Military | | $ | 11,484 | | | | 11,948 | | | | 11,239 | | | | 15,731 | | | | 50,402 | |
Food Distribution | | | 17,412 | | | | 13,257 | | | | 16,946 | | | | 22,461 | | | | 70,076 | |
Retail | | | 6,608 | | | | 4,034 | | | | 5,446 | | | | 7,806 | | | | 23,894 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 35,504 | | | | 29,239 | | | | 33,631 | | | | 45,998 | | | | 144,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | Rolling | |
| | Qtr 4 | | | Qtr 1 | | | Qtr 2 | | | Qtr 3 | | | 4 Qtrs | |
Segment profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Military | | $ | 9,242 | | | | 9,905 | | | | 9,421 | | | | 13,448 | | | | 42,016 | |
Food Distribution | | | 5,155 | | | | 5,982 | | | | 10,508 | | | | 15,181 | | | | 36,826 | |
Retail | | | 1,450 | | | | (470 | ) | | | 1,209 | | | | 1,937 | | | | 4,126 | |
Unallocated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | | (5,204 | ) | | | (4,573 | ) | | | (5,024 | ) | | | (6,541 | ) | | | (21,342 | ) |
Gain on acquisition | | | — | | | | 6,682 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,682 | |
Gain on litigation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,630 | | | | 7,630 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,643 | | | | 17,526 | | | | 16,114 | | | | 31,655 | | | | 75,938 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
13