UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 |
OR
o | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 1-13703
SIX FLAGS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | | 13-3995059 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) | | |
| | |
1540 Broadway, 15th Fl., New York, NY 10036
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(212) 652-9403
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer x | | Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: At November 1, 2006, Six Flags, Inc. had 94,384,728 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $0.025 per share.
SIX FLAGS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects” and similar references to future periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding (i) our belief that cash flows from operations, available cash and available amounts under our credit agreement will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for at least the next several years and (ii) our expectation to refinance all or a portion of our existing debt on or prior to maturity.
Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, by their nature, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you therefore that you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements as statements of historical fact or as guarantees or assurances of future performance. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory conditions and include the following:
· factors impacting attendance, such as local conditions, events, disturbances and terrorist activities;
· accidents occurring at our parks;
· adverse weather conditions;
· competition with other theme parks and other recreational alternatives;
· changes in consumer spending patterns; and
· pending, threatened or future legal proceedings.
A more complete discussion of these factors and other risks applicable to our business is contained in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. See “Available Information” below.
Any forward-looking statement made by us in this document speaks only as of the date on which we make it. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
Available Information
Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge through our website (www.sixflags.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
1
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 — Financial Statements
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 58,635,000 | | $ | 81,534,000 | |
Accounts receivable | | 90,424,000 | | 51,308,000 | |
Inventories | | 32,896,000 | | 27,164,000 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 40,653,000 | | 39,797,000 | |
Total current assets | | 222,608,000 | | 199,803,000 | |
| | | | | |
Other assets: | | | | | |
Debt issuance costs | | 40,405,000 | | 43,897,000 | |
Restricted-use investment securities | | 11,001,000 | | — | |
Deposits and other assets | | 21,448,000 | | 36,123,000 | |
Total other assets | | 72,854,000 | �� | 80,020,000 | |
| | | | | |
Property and equipment, at cost | | 2,875,115,000 | | 2,812,258,000 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | 999,220,000 | | 908,944,000 | |
Total property and equipment | | 1,875,895,000 | | 1,903,314,000 | |
| | | | | |
Assets held for sale | | 26,700,000 | | 119,154,000 | |
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization | | 1,189,632,000 | | 1,189,631,000 | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,387,689,000 | | $ | 3,491,922,000 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Item 1 — Financial Statements (Continued)
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 35,144,000 | | $ | 31,101,000 | |
Accrued compensation, payroll taxes and benefits | | 15,003,000 | | 17,101,000 | |
Accrued insurance reserves | | 37,969,000 | | 32,826,000 | |
Accrued interest payable | | 54,548,000 | | 34,022,000 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | 42,832,000 | | 35,433,000 | |
Deferred income | | 23,852,000 | | 7,289,000 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | 53,825,000 | | 113,601,000 | |
Total current liabilities | | 263,173,000 | | 271,373,000 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt | | 2,129,336,000 | | 2,128,756,000 | |
Minority interest | | 74,413,000 | | 56,277,000 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | 44,157,000 | | 43,592,000 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 14,329,000 | | 14,345,000 | |
| | | | | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (redemption value of $287,500,000) | | 284,216,000 | | 283,371,000 | |
| | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value | | — | | — | |
| | | | | |
Common stock, $0.025 par value, 210,000,000 shares authorized and 94,384,728 and 93,201,528 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | 2,360,000 | | 2,330,000 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | 1,765,149,000 | | 1,750,925,000 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (1,174,409,000 | ) | (1,042,042,000 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (15,035,000 | ) | (17,005,000 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 578,065,000 | | 694,208,000 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 3,387,689,000 | | $ | 3,491,922,000 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Item 1 — Financial Statements (Continued)
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Revenue: | | | | | |
Theme park admissions | | $ | 294,648,000 | | $ | 298,106,000 | |
Theme park food, merchandise and other | | 246,069,000 | | 247,989,000 | |
Total revenue | | 540,717,000 | | 546,095,000 | |
| | | | | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | 151,263,000 | | 150,488,000 | |
Selling, general and administrative (including stock-based compensation of $2,277,000 in 2006 and $166,000 in 2005) | | 62,130,000 | | 51,342,000 | |
Costs of products sold | | 44,129,000 | | 45,988,000 | |
Depreciation | | 37,616,000 | | 36,552,000 | |
Amortization | | 220,000 | | 222,000 | |
Loss on fixed assets | | 1,187,000 | | 1,918,000 | |
Total operating costs and expenses | | 296,545,000 | | 286,510,000 | |
Income from operations | | 244,172,000 | | 259,585,000 | |
| | | | | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | |
Interest expense | | (51,467,000 | ) | (45,962,000 | ) |
Interest income | | 1,162,000 | | 1,813,000 | |
Minority interest in earnings | | (30,917,000 | ) | (25,060,000 | ) |
Equity in operations of partnerships | | (144,000 | ) | — | |
Other expense | | (233,000 | ) | (270,000 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | | (81,599,000 | ) | (69,479,000 | ) |
| | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations | | 162,573,000 | | 190,106,000 | |
| | | | | |
Income tax expense | | 1,783,000 | | 1,270,000 | |
| | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before discontinued operations | | 160,790,000 | | 188,836,000 | |
| | | | | |
Discontinued operations | | 3,954,000 | | 6,852,000 | |
Net income | | $ | 164,744,000 | | $ | 195,688,000 | |
Net income applicable to common stock | | $ | 159,252,000 | | $ | 190,195,000 | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic: | | 94,352,000 | | 93,107,000 | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted: | | 155,229,000 | | 154,051,000 | |
Net income per average common share outstanding - basic: | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 1.65 | | $ | 1.97 | |
Discontinued operations | | 0.04 | | .07 | |
Net income | | $ | 1.69 | | $ | 2.04 | |
Net income per average common share outstanding — diluted: | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 1.06 | | $ | 1.25 | |
Discontinued operations | | 0.02 | | 0.04 | |
Net income | | $ | 1.08 | | $ | 1.29 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Item 1 — Financial Statements (Continued)
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Revenue: | | | | | |
Theme park admissions | | $ | 507,082,000 | | $ | 517,284,000 | |
Theme park food, merchandise and other | | 432,413,000 | | 438,914,000 | |
Total revenue | | 939,495,000 | | 956,198,000 | |
| | | | | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | 393,785,000 | | 366,716,000 | |
Selling, general and administrative (including stock-based compensation of $13,052,000 in 2006 and $620,000 in 2005) | | 211,239,000 | | 160,514,000 | |
Costs of products sold | | 79,394,000 | | 82,608,000 | |
Depreciation | | 109,576,000 | | 105,954,000 | |
Amortization | | 659,000 | | 667,000 | |
Loss on fixed assets | | 20,910,000 | | 11,518,000 | |
Total operating costs and expenses | | 815,563,000 | | 727,977,000 | |
Income from operations | | 123,932,000 | | 228,221,000 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | |
Interest expense | | (151,209,000 | ) | (139,668,000 | ) |
Interest income | | 2,528,000 | | 4,963,000 | |
Minority interest in earnings | | (45,402,000 | ) | (44,028,000 | ) |
Equity in operations of partnerships | | (462,000 | ) | — | |
Early repurchase of debt | | — | | (19,303,000 | ) |
Other expense | | (11,538,000 | ) | (1,353,000 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | | (206,083,000 | ) | (199,389,000 | ) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | (82,151,000 | ) | 28,832,000 | |
Income tax expense | | 3,985,000 | | 3,791,000 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | (86,136,000 | ) | 25,041,000 | |
Discontinued operations | | (28,716,000 | ) | 3,029,000 | |
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | (114,852,000 | ) | 28,070,000 | |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (see Note 1) | | (1,038,000 | ) | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (115,890,000 | ) | $ | 28,070,000 | |
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock | | $ | (132,367,000 | ) | $ | 11,592,000 | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted: | | 94,194,000 | | 96,106,000 | |
Net income (loss) per average common share outstanding - basic and diluted: | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (1.10 | ) | $ | 0.09 | |
Discontinued operations | | (0.30 | ) | 0.03 | |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | (0.01 | ) | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | 0.12 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Item 1 — Financial Statements (Continued)
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 164,744,000 | | $ | 195,688,000 | | $ | (115,890,000 | ) | $ | 28,070,000 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | 2,740,000 | | 2,976,000 | | 1,965,000 | | 4,813,000 | |
Net change in fair value of derivative instruments | | — | | 42,000 | | 8,000 | | (1,025,000 | ) |
Reclassifications of amounts taken to operations | | (2,000 | ) | — | | (3,000 | ) | 1,167,000 | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 167,482,000 | | $ | 198,706,000 | | $ | (113,920,000 | ) | $ | 33,025,000 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Item 1 — Financial Statements (Continued)
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Cash flow from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (115,890,000 | ) | $ | 28,070,000 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 110,235,000 | | 106,621,000 | |
Minority interest in earnings | | 45,402,000 | | 44,028,000 | |
Partnership and joint venture distributions | | (27,266,000 | ) | (25,820,000 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | 13,052,000 | | 620,000 | |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | 1,038,000 | | — | |
Interest accretion on notes payable | | 178,000 | | 200,000 | |
Early repurchase of debt | | — | | 19,303,000 | |
Loss on discontinued operations | | 18,773,000 | | 8,298,000 | |
Amortization of debt issuance costs | | 6,452,000 | | 6,159,000 | |
Other including loss on disposal of assets | | 20,899,000 | | 11,728,000 | |
Increase in accounts receivable | | (47,150,000 | ) | (44,586,000 | ) |
Increase in inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets | | (6,752,000 | ) | (5,124,000 | ) |
Decrease in deposits and other assets | | 14,674,000 | | 10,672,000 | |
Increase in accounts payable, deferred income, accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities | | 31,709,000 | | 37,272,000 | |
Increase in accrued interest payable | | 20,526,000 | | 13,880,000 | |
Deferred income tax benefit | | 267,000 | | 41,000 | |
Total adjustments | | 202,037,000 | | 183,292,000 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 86,147,000 | | 211,362,000 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flow from investing activities: | | | | | |
Additions to property and equipment | | (104,141,000 | ) | (136,551,000 | ) |
Additions to intangible assets | | (417,000 | ) | — | |
Capital expenditures of discontinued operations | | (414,000 | ) | (1,690,000 | ) |
Purchase of restricted-use investments | | (11,001,000 | ) | — | |
Maturities of restricted-use investments | | — | | 134,508,000 | |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | | 77,000,000 | | — | |
Property insurance recovery | | 8,071,000 | | — | |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 28,000 | | 103,000 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (30,874,000 | ) | (3,630,000 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flow from financing activities: | | | | | |
Repayment of borrowings | | (336,799,000 | ) | (590,316,000 | ) |
Proceeds from borrowings | | 276,809,000 | | 449,525,000 | |
Net cash proceeds from issuance of common stock | | 163,000 | | — | |
Payment of cash dividends | | (15,633,000 | ) | (15,633,000 | ) |
Payment of debt issuance costs | | (2,960,000 | ) | (4,456,000 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (78,420,000 | ) | (160,880,000 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | 248,000 | | 720,000 | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | (22,899,000 | ) | 47,572,000 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | 81,534,000 | | 68,807,000 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 58,635,000 | | $ | 116,379,000 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Item 1 — Financial Statements (Continued)
SIX FLAGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 124,054,000 | | $ | 119,431,000 | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 3,731,000 | | $ | 4,365,000 | |
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities | | | | | |
2006 | | | | | |
- Acquired approximately $616,000 of assets through a capital lease | | | | | |
2005 | | | | | |
- None | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
SIX FLAGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General — Basis of Presentation
We own and operate regional theme and water parks. As used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “we,” “our” or “Six Flags” refer to Six Flags, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. As used herein, Holdings refers only to Six Flags, Inc., without regard to its subsidiaries.
As of September 30, 2006, we owned or operated 30 parks, including 28 domestic parks, one park in Mexico and one park in Canada.
In October 2005, we permanently closed Six Flags AstroWorld in Houston, Texas and on June 1, 2006, sold the 104 acre site on which the park was located for an aggregate purchase price of $77 million. The sale was approved by our lenders under the Credit Facility (see Note 4(a)) and the proceeds from the sale were used to reduce our indebtedness. We relocated select rides, attractions and other equipment from Six Flags AstroWorld to our remaining parks and have sold certain other equipment. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented reflect select assets of Six Flags AstroWorld as assets held for sale and its results as discontinued operations. See Note 3.
In January 2006, we announced our intention to sell our two Oklahoma City parks following the 2006 season. In addition, during the first quarter of 2006, we agreed to sell substantially all of the assets of our water park in Columbus, Ohio to our lessor, the Columbus Zoo, at the end of the lease term (October 31, 2006) for $2.0 million and exercised our rights to terminate the ground lease at our Sacramento, California water park following the 2006 season. The sale of the Ohio assets was completed on November 1, 2006. We are negotiating with the lessor of the California facility and others to purchase our rides, attractions and personal property at that park. If those negotiations are not successful, we are entitled to remove those assets at the end of the lease term. The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for all periods presented reflect the assets of our Oklahoma City parks and our Columbus and Sacramento water parks as assets held for sale and their results as discontinued operations. See Note 3.
In June 2006, we announced that we will be exploring potential strategic options with respect to the following six properties: Six Flags Darien Lake (outside Buffalo, New York); Six Flags Waterworld (Concord, California); Six Flags Elitch Gardens (Denver, Colorado); Wild Waves and Enchanted Village (outside Seattle, Washington); Six Flags Splashtown (Houston, Texas); and Six Flags Magic Mountain and Hurricane Harbor (near Los Angeles, California). Although we cannot predict when, or if, any specific transaction will occur with respect to these parks, we are initially considering a sale of the parks as going concerns in a single transaction but may also consider a series of transactions, dismantling and re-utilizing certain rides and attractions and selling the underlying land for real estate development purposes, as well as other potential alternatives. The assets and operations of these parks are not shown as assets held for sale or discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Six Flags New Orleans sustained very extensive damage in Hurricane Katrina in late August 2005 and did not reopen during the 2005 or 2006 seasons. See Note 5.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations which follows these notes contains additional information on our results of operations and our financial position. Those comments should be read in conjunction with these notes. Our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 includes additional information about us, our operations and our financial position, and should be referred to in conjunction with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments (which are normal and recurring) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the periods presented.
9
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not indicative of the results expected for the full year. In particular, our theme park operations contribute a significant majority of their annual revenue during the period from Memorial Day to Labor Day each year, while a certain level of expense is incurred year round.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts, our majority and wholly owned subsidiaries, and limited partnerships and limited liability companies in which we beneficially own 100% of the interests.
We also consolidate the partnerships and joint ventures that own Six Flags Over Texas, Six Flags Over Georgia, Six Flags White Water Atlanta and Six Flags Marine World as we have determined that we have the most significant economic interest since we receive a majority of these entities’ expected losses or expected residual returns and have the ability to make decisions that significantly affect the results of the activities of these entities. The equity interests owned by non-affiliated parties in these entities are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as minority interest. The portion of earnings or loss from these parks owned by non-affiliated parties in these entities is reflected as minority interest in (earnings) loss in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. At December 31, 2005, we had recorded a valuation allowance of $196,783,000 due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net operating loss, capital loss, and tax credit carryforwards, before they expire. We generated a net loss in the first nine months of 2006. As a result, and in light of the uncertainties referred to in the preceding sentence, we added $46,602,000 to the valuation allowance at September 30, 2006. The valuation allowance was decreased $6,202,000 at September 30, 2005, in respect of net income before income taxes generated during the first nine months of 2005. Six Flags is no longer permanently reinvesting foreign earnings in 2006; therefore, United States deferred income taxes have been provided on foreign earnings. The impact was an increase to deferred tax liabilities and a reduction to the valuation allowance of approximately $23,980,000. In addition, we added $340,000 to the valuation allowance at September 30, 2006 related to other comprehensive loss.
Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
10
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Derivative Instruments
In February 2000, we entered into three interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted $600,000,000 of the term loan component of the Credit Facility (see Note 4(a)) into a fixed rate obligation. The terms of the agreements, as subsequently extended, each of which had a notional amount of $200,000,000, began in March 2000 and expired from March 2005 to June 2005. Our term loan borrowings bear interest based upon LIBOR plus a fixed margin. Our interest rate swap arrangements were designed to “lock-in” the LIBOR component at rates after March 6, 2003, ranging from 2.065% to 3.50% (with an average of 3.01%) and after March 6, 2005, ranging from 3.47% to 3.50% (with an average of 3.49%). The counterparties to these transactions were major financial institutions, which minimized the credit risk.
FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. It requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge for accounting purposes. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative (that is gains and losses) depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.
Six Flags Over Georgia is also party to an interest rate swap agreement with respect to an aggregate of $1,000,000 and $3,000,000 of indebtedness at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
During the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, we have designated all of the interest rate swap agreements as cash-flow hedges.
We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk-management objective and our strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash-flow hedges to forecasted transactions. We also assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items.
Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), until operations are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. Changes in fair value of a derivative that is not designated as a hedge are recorded in operations on a current basis.
During the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, there were no gains or losses reclassified into operations as a result of the discontinuance of hedge accounting treatment for any of our derivatives.
By using derivative instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, we are exposed to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. To mitigate this risk, the hedging instruments were placed with counterparties that we believe are minimal credit risks.
Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates, commodity prices, or currency exchange rates. The market risk associated with interest
11
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
rate swap agreements is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as hedges are reported on the consolidated balance sheet in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.” These amounts are reclassified to interest expense when the forecasted transaction takes place.
The critical terms, such as the index, settlement dates, and notional amounts, of the derivative instruments were substantially the same as the provisions of our hedged borrowings under the Credit Facility. As a result, no ineffectiveness of the cash-flow hedges was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.
No transactions or events are expected to occur over the next 12 months that will necessitate reclassifying these derivatives’ losses to operations. The maximum term over which we are hedging exposures to the variability of cash flows for interest rate risk is 2 months.
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
The following table reconciles the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding used in the calculations of basic and diluted income per share for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The effect of potential common shares issuable upon the exercise of employee stock options on the weighted average number of shares on a diluted basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 does not include 4,317,000 and 4,267,000 options, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 does not include 2,704,000 and 3,004,000 options, respectively, as the effect of the exercise of these options would be antidilutive. Additionally, the weighted average number of shares of common stock on a diluted basis for the nine-month periods does not include the effect of the potential conversion of our convertible preferred stock or convertible notes as the effect of such conversion and the resulting decrease in preferred stock dividends and interest expense, as the case may be, is antidilutive. Our Preferred Income Equity Redeemable Shares (“PIERS”), which are shown as mandatorily redeemable preferred stock on our consolidated balance sheets, were issued in January 2001 and are convertible into 13,789,000 shares of common stock. Our 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (the “Convertible Notes”) are convertible into 47,087,000 shares of common stock, although we can satisfy conversions by delivering cash in lieu of shares. See Note 4(f).
12
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | Three months ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | Weighted | | | | | | Weighted | | | |
| | | | Average | | Per | | | | Average | | Per | |
| | Net | | Shares | | Share | | Net | | Shares | | Share | |
| | Income | | Outstanding | | Amount | | Income | | Outstanding | | Amount | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 164,744,000 | | | | | | $ | 195,688,000 | | | | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | (5,492,000 | ) | | | | | (5,493,000 | ) | | | | |
| | 159,252,000 | | 94,352,000 | | $ | 1.69 | | 190,195,000 | | 93,107,000 | | $ | 2.04 | |
Effect of potential common shares issuable upon exercise of employee stock options | | — | | 1,000 | | | | — | | 68,000 | | | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock | | 5,492,000 | | 13,789,000 | | | | 5,493,000 | | 13,789,000 | | | |
Convertible notes | | 3,591,000 | | 47,087,000 | | | | 3,591,000 | | 47,087,000 | | | |
| | $ | 168,335,000 | | 155,229,000 | | $ | 1.08 | | $ | 199,279,000 | | 154,051,000 | | $ | 1.29 | |
Reclassifications
Reclassifications have been made to certain amounts reported in 2005 to conform with the 2006 presentation.
Stock Benefit Plans
As described below, we maintain stock-based compensation arrangements under which employees and directors are awarded grants of restricted stock and stock options. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for these awards under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) as permitted under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Accordingly, compensation expense for stock options was not recognized as long as the stock options granted had an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (“SFAS 123 (R)”) using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized beginning January 1, 2006 includes compensation expense for all stock-based payment arrangements granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value and expense attribution methodology determined in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, a cumulative effect for liability based awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, and compensation cost for all stock-based payment arrangements granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value and expense attribution methodology determined in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 (R). Results for periods prior to January 1, 2006 have not been restated. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, stock-based compensation was $2,277,000 and $13,052,000, respectively.
13
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
As a result of adopting SFAS 123 (R), a cumulative effect loss of $1,038,000 was recognized on certain liability based options and our loss from continuing operations before income taxes for the first nine months of 2006 is $6,827,000 higher than if we had continued to account for stock-based payment arrangements under APB 25. Basic and diluted net loss per share for the first nine months of 2006 would have been $1.33 if we had not adopted SFAS 123 (R), compared to reported basic and diluted loss per share of $1.41.
No compensation expense has been recognized for the unconditional stock options in the consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. Had we determined compensation expense based on the fair value at the grant date for all our unconditional stock options under SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” and as provided for under SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” our net income (loss) applicable to common stock would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts below:
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, 2005 | | September 30, 2005 | |
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock: | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 190,195,000 | | $ | 11,592,000 | |
Add: Noncash compensation | | 166,000 | | 620,000 | |
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards | | (609,000 | ) | (1,948,000 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | 189,752,000 | | $ | 10,264,000 | |
Net income (loss) per weighted average common share outstanding — basic: | | | | | |
Basic: | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 2.04 | | $ | 0.12 | |
Pro forma | | $ | 2.04 | | $ | 0.11 | |
| | | | | |
Diluted: | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 1.29 | | $ | 0.12 | |
Pro forma | | $ | 1.29 | | $ | 0.11 | |
Our Stock Option and Incentive Plans
Under our various stock option and incentive plans (“Plans”), our officers and, under certain plans non-employee directors, may be awarded stock options, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) determines, at its discretion, which eligible employees and directors will receive awards, the types of awards to be received, and the terms and conditions thereof. The right of an employee to receive an award may be subject to performance conditions as specified by the Compensation Committee. The Plans contain provisions which, in the event of a change in control of the Company, may accelerate the vesting of the awards. As of September 30, 2006, options to purchase 4,337,000 shares of our common stock and 770,000 shares of restricted stock were outstanding under our Plans and approximately 3,105,000 shares were available for future grant.
14
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Stock Options:
Options granted under the Plans may be designated as either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. The Compensation Committee determines the terms and conditions of the option, including the time or times at which an option may be exercised, the methods by which such exercise price may be paid, and the form of such payment. Options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of our common stock at the date of grant. These option awards generally vest 20% per annum, commencing with the date of grant, and have a contractual term of either 7 or 10 years. In addition, our President and Chief Executive Officer was granted 475,000 options during the first quarter of 2006 that become exercisable only if certain market prices of our common stock are maintained for consecutive 90 day periods. Stock option compensation is recognized over the vesting period using the graded vesting terms of the respective grant. In June 2006, 2,810,000 options that had been issued as liability based options to 16 employees were modified to obtain equity based status. This modification resulted in $4,022,000 of liabilities, related to stock-based compensation, to be reclassified to equity.
The estimated fair value of options granted without a market condition was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model. This model takes into account several factors and assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life assumption at the time of grant. The expected term (estimated period of time outstanding) is estimated using the contractual term of the option and the historical effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. Expected volatility was calculated based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock option’s expected life, calculated on a daily basis in 2006 and monthly basis in 2005. The expected dividend yield is based on expected dividends for the expected term of the stock options.
The estimated fair value of options granted to our President and Chief Executive Officer with a market condition was calculated using the Monte Carlo option pricing valuation model. This model takes into account several factors and assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life assumption at the time of grant. The expected term (estimated period of time outstanding) is estimated using the contractual term of the option and the historical effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. Expected volatility was equal to the expected volatility utilized in the Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model described above. The expected dividend yield is based on expected dividends for the expected term of the stock options. The vesting hurdles were based on the market prices of our common stock that were the terms of the option grants ($12 and $15) and the exercise multiple utilized was 1.75 which assumes that the option holder will exercise once the stock price has appreciated to 1.75 times the grant price.
The weighted-average assumptions used in the option pricing valuation models for options granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
| | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | Employees | | Directors | | Employees | | Directors | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 4.79 | % | 4.55 | % | 3.71 | % | 3.81 | % |
Expected life (in years) | | 5.33 | | 6.25 | | 5.00 | | 5.00 | |
Expected volatility | | 60 | % | 55 | % | 78 | % | 79 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
15
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
A summary of the status of our stock option awards as of September 30, 2006 and changes during the nine months then ended is presented below:
| | Shares | | Weighted Avg. Exercise Price | | Weighted Avg. Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000) | |
Balance at January 1, 2006 | | 3,323,000 | | $ | 16.48 | | 2.94 | | $ | 1,221 | |
Granted | | 3,090,000 | | 8.77 | | 8.88 | | 2 | |
Exercised | | (1,056,000 | ) | 6.96 | | — | | 3,617 | |
Canceled or exchanged | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Forfeited | | (1,020,000 | ) | 18.21 | | — | | — | |
Expired | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Balance at September 30, 2006 | | 4,337,000 | | 13.29 | | 6.60 | | 31 | |
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2006 | | 4,268,000 | | 13.38 | | 6.55 | | 30 | |
Options exercisable at September 30, 2006 | | 1,965,000 | | 18.10 | | 3.34 | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The weighted average grant date fair value of our option awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $4.61 and $3.23, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the same period was $3.6 million and $0 million, respectively. The total fair value of options that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, was $3.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
The number of options and shares of restricted stock granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 represent, in part, the December 2005 management change, the resulting new members of senior management and the issuance and vesting of options and restricted stock to our former chief financial officer under his employment and termination agreements.
As of September 30, 2006, there was $7.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to our option awards. The weighted average period over which that cost is expected to be recognized is 3.06 years.
Restricted Stock:
Restricted shares of our common stock may be awarded under the Plans and are subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, as the Compensation Committee may impose. The Compensation Committee may also determine when and under what circumstances the restrictions may lapse and whether the participant receives the rights of a stockholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote and receive dividends. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, restricted stock that is still subject to restrictions is forfeited upon termination of employment. Of the 820,000 shares of restricted stock granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, (i) 50,000 vested on March 31, 2006 upon the resignation of our former chief financial officer, (ii) 520,000 shares will vest in three equal annual installments, commencing January 2007 and (iii) 250,000 shares will vest in two equal installments in January 2009 and 2010.
16
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
A summary of the status of our restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2006 and changes during the nine months then ended is presented below:
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
Non-vested balance at January 1, 2006 | | 162,500 | | $ | 7.44 | |
Granted | | 820,000 | | 8.54 | |
Vested | | (212,500 | ) | 7.80 | |
Forfeited | | — | | — | |
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2006 | | 770,000 | | $ | 8.52 | |
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of our restricted stock awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $8.54 and $5.62, respectively. The total grant date fair value of our restricted stock distributed during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $7.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $1.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, there was $4.3 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to our restricted stock awards. The weighted average period over which that cost is expected to be recognized is 2.48 years.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 will be effective beginning January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of this interpretation on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”), “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 expresses the SEC Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 addresses the diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. SAB 108 will be effective for the year ending December 31, 2006. The cumulative effect of the initial application of SAB 108 will be reported in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the year, with the offsetting balance to retained earnings. We do not expect the adoption of SAB 108 to have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 (“SFAS 158”), “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS 158 requires recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans as an asset or liability in the balance sheet and recognition of changes in that funded status in comprehensive income in the year in which the changes occur. SFAS 158 also requires measurement of the funded status of a plan as of the date of the balance sheet. SFAS 158 will be effective for recognition of the funded status of the benefit plans for the fourth quarter of 2006, and will be
17
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
effective for the measurement date provisions for the fourth quarter of 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 158 to have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheet.
2. Preferred Stock
In January 2001, we issued 11,500,000 PIERS, for proceeds of $277,834,000, net of the underwriting discount and offering expenses of $9,666,000. We used the net proceeds of the offering to fund our acquisition in that year of a park we subsequently sold, to repay borrowings under the working capital revolving credit portion of our senior credit facility (see Note 4(a)) and for working capital. Each PIERS represents one one-hundredth of a share of our 7¼% mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (an aggregate of 115,000 shares of preferred stock). The PIERS accrue cumulative dividends (payable, at our option, in cash or shares of common stock) at 7¼% per annum (approximately $20,844,000 per annum).
Prior to August 15, 2009, each of the PIERS is convertible at the option of the holder into 1.1990 common shares (equivalent to a conversion price of $20.85 per common share), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances (the “Conversion Price”). In addition, we may cause the PIERS, in whole or in part, to be automatically converted at the then applicable conversion rate if for 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days, including the last day of such period, the closing price of our common stock exceeds 120% of the then prevailing Conversion Price. On August 15, 2009, the PIERS are mandatorily redeemable in cash equal to 100% of the liquidation preference (initially $25.00 per PIERS), plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.
3. Disposition of Theme Parks
In October 2005, we permanently closed Six Flags AstroWorld in Houston, Texas and on June 1, 2006, sold the 104 acre site on which the park was located for an aggregate purchase price of $77 million. The sale was approved by our lenders under the Credit Facility (see Note 4(a)) and the proceeds from the sale were used to reduce our indebtedness. We relocated select rides, attractions and other equipment from Six Flags AstroWorld to our remaining parks and have sold certain other equipment. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented reflect select assets of Six Flags AstroWorld as assets held for sale and its results as discontinued operations.
In January 2006, we announced our intention to sell our two Oklahoma City parks following the 2006 season. In addition, during the first quarter of 2006, we agreed to sell substantially all of the assets of our water park in Columbus, Ohio to our lessor, the Columbus Zoo, at the end of the lease term (October 31, 2006) for $2.0 million and exercised our rights to terminate the ground lease at our Sacramento, California water park following the 2006 season. The sale of the Ohio assets was completed on November 1, 2006. We are negotiating with the lessor of the California facility and others to purchase our rides, attractions and personal property at that park. If those negotiations are not successful, we are entitled to remove those assets at the end of the lease term. The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for all periods presented reflect select assets of our Oklahoma City parks and our Columbus and Sacramento water parks, as assets held for sale and their results as discontinued operations.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” our consolidated financial statements have been reclassified for all periods presented to reflect the operations and select assets of Six Flags AstroWorld, our Oklahoma City parks, Columbus water park and Sacramento water park as discontinued operations. The assets of these facilities have been classified as
18
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
“Assets held for sale” on the September 30, 2006 (excluding the Houston park) and December 31, 2005 consolidated balance sheets and consist of the following:
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 1,694 | | $ | 1,396 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | 12,268 | | 75,347 | |
Goodwill, net. | | 12,738 | | 42,411 | |
Total assets held for sale | | $ | 26,700 | | $ | 119,154 | |
The net loss from discontinued operations was classified on the consolidated statements of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 as “Discontinued operations.” Summarized results of discontinued operations are as follows:
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Operating revenue | | $ | 11,406 | | $ | 27,198 | | $ | 18,979 | | $ | 57,966 | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operation | | — | | — | | 761 | | — | |
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes | | 5,002 | | 6,852 | | 3,386 | | 3,029 | |
Impairment of assets held for sale | | (1,048 | ) | — | | (32,863 | ) | — | |
Net results of discontinued operations | | $ | 3,954 | | $ | 6,852 | | $ | (28,716 | ) | $ | 3,029 | |
Our long-term debt is at the consolidated level and is not reflected at each individual park. Thus, we have not allocated a portion of interest expense to the discontinued operations.
4. Long-Term Indebtedness
(a) On November 5, 1999, Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. (“SFTP”), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Six Flags Operations Inc., our principal direct subsidiary (“Six Flags Operations”), entered into a senior credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which was amended and restated on July 8, 2002 and further amended on November 25, 2003, January 14, 2004, March 26, 2004, November 5, 2004, April 22, 2005, December 23, 2005, April 21, 2006 and July 28, 2006. The Credit Facility includes a $300,000,000 working capital revolving credit facility ($45,000,000 and $0 of which was outstanding at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively), an $82,500,000 multicurrency facility (of which none was outstanding at September 30, 2006 or 2005, excluding letters of credit in the amounts of $32,969,000 and $30,575,000 on those dates) and a term loan ($640,263,000 and $646,813,000 of which were outstanding at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively). The interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Facility can be fixed for periods ranging from one to six months. At our option the interest rate is based upon specified levels in excess of the applicable base rate or LIBOR. At September 30, 2006, the weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the working capital revolver and the term loan was 8.58% and 8.73%, respectively. The working capital revolver and the multicurrency facility permit optional prepayments and reborrowings and terminate on June 30, 2008. The term loan facility requires quarterly repayments of 0.25% of the outstanding amount thereof commencing on September 30, 2004 and 24.0% commencing on September 30, 2008. The term loan matures on June 30, 2009, provided, however, that the maturity of the term loan will be shortened to December 31, 2008, if prior to such date our outstanding preferred stock is not redeemed or converted into common stock. A commitment fee of 0.50% of the unused credit of the working capital revolver and multicurrency facility is due quarterly in arrears. The principal borrower
19
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
under the Credit Facility is SFTP, and borrowings under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by Holdings, Six Flags Operations and all of Six Flags Operations’ domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of Six Flags Operations’ domestic assets and a pledge of Six Flags Operations’ capital stock.
On November 25, 2003, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility pursuant to which we amended the covenants relating to the leverage ratio through 2005 and the fixed charge coverage ratio through June 30, 2007, in order to provide us with additional financial flexibility. In addition, pursuant to the amendment we are permitted to enter into fixed-to-floating rate debt swap agreements so long as our total floating rate debt does not exceed 50% of our total debt as of the swap date. In exchange for our lenders’ consent to the amendment, we agreed to an increase of 0.25% in the interest rates we are charged on our borrowings under the Credit Facility.
On January 14, 2004, we completed a $130,000,000 increase of the term loan portion of the Credit Facility and used all of the proceeds of the additional loan to redeem the remaining balance of our 9 ¾% Senior Notes due 2007, then outstanding. In March 2004, we amended the term loan in order to permit the sales of our Cleveland park and European division. In April 2004, we permanently repaid $75,000,000 of the term loan from a portion of the proceeds of these sales and recognized a gross loss of $1,216,000 for the write off of debt issuance costs.
On November 5, 2004, we entered into an additional amendment to the Credit Facility which further relaxed the leverage ratio through 2006 and the fixed charge coverage ratio through 2007. In exchange for our lenders’ consent to the amendment, we agreed to a further increase of 0.25%, in certain circumstances, in the interest rates we are charged on our borrowings under the Credit Facility. We also agreed to pay a 1% prepayment penalty if we refinance all or any portion of the term loans outstanding under the Credit Facility prior to November 4, 2005.
On April 22, 2005, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility to permit our Canadian subsidiary that owns our Montreal park to incur up to Canadian $35.0 million of secured debt to finance improvements at that park and to increase from $25.0 million to $40.0 million the letter of credit capacity under the Credit Facility. No such secured debt has been incurred to date.
On December 23 2005, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility to permit the sale of the Six Flags AstroWorld site in Houston, Texas. The proceeds were permitted to be used to repay our debt, debt of Six Flags Operations or SFTP, or to make capital expenditures.
On April 21, 2006, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility to (i) reduce by 0.25% the interest rate on the term loan, (ii) to eliminate amortization on the multicurrency facility and the provision of the working capital revolver that required the facility to be repaid in full for 30 consecutive days each year, (iii) permit us to borrow up to an additional $300.0 million in term loans under the Credit Facility and (iv) permit us to make asset dispositions of up to $300.0 million without seeking lender approval, in each case, within eleven months of the receipt of such proceeds. The proceeds of any transaction referred to in clauses (iii) and (iv) above may be used to refinance Holdings’ public debt, redeem its PIERS, make required payments to our partners at Six Flags Over Georgia and Six Flags Over Texas (together, the “Partnership Parks”) and, in the case of asset dispositions, spend up to $100.0 million to acquire, restore or construct assets.
On July 28, 2006, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement to (i) waive Six Flags Operations’ compliance with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement for the period ending
20
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
June 30, 2006, (ii) relax the covenants relating to leverage, interest coverage and debt service coverage though the end of 2007 and eliminated the covenant relating to fixed charge coverage through 2007, (iii) permit the disposition of Six Flags Darien Lake, Six Flags Waterworld (Concord), Six Flags Elitch Gardens, Six Flags Splashtown, Six Flags Magic Mountain and Hurricane Harbor, Wild Waves and Enchanted Village, Frontier City and White Water Bay, provided that we must offer to make mandatory prepayments to our term loan lenders with the net cash proceeds of such dispositions and, in certain cases, make optional prepayments with such proceeds, and (iv) adjust the margin used to calculate the interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Agreement based on our debt rating and leverage ratio.
In addition to the specified financial ratios and tests noted above, the Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of Six Flags Operations and its subsidiaries to dispose of assets; incur additional indebtedness or liens; repurchase stock; make investments; engage in mergers or consolidations; pay dividends (except that (i) dividends of up to $75,000,000 in the aggregate (of which $8,900,000 had been dividended prior to September 30, 2006) may be made from cash from operations in order to enable us to pay amounts in respect of any refinancing or repayment of Holdings’ senior notes and (ii) subject to covenant compliance, dividends will be permitted to allow Holdings to meet cash interest obligations with respect to its Senior Notes, cash dividend payments on our PIERS and our obligations to the limited partners in the Partnership Parks) and engage in certain transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates.
(b) On February 2, 2001, Holdings issued $375,000,000 principal amount of 9 ½% Senior Notes due 2009 (the “2009 Senior Notes”). As of December 31, 2004, we had repurchased $70.3 million of the 2009 Senior Notes from a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the 2004 discontinued operations and a portion of the proceeds of the November 2004 offering of our 4 ½% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (the “Convertible Notes”). See Note 4(f). A gross loss of $3,922,000 due to the repurchase of the 2009 Notes was recognized in 2004. On February 1, 2005 we redeemed $123,500,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes with a portion of the net proceeds of the Convertible Notes. We redeemed the balance of the 2009 Notes on February 7, 2005 with the proceeds of the January 2005 offering of $195,000,000 of additional 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014 (see Note 4(e)). A gross loss of $19,303,000 due to the redemptions of the 2009 Notes was recognized in the first quarter of 2005.
(c) On February 11, 2002, Holdings issued $480,000,000 principal amount of 8 ⅞% Senior Notes due 2010 (the “2010 Senior Notes”). As of December 31, 2004, we had repurchased $179.7 million of the 2010 Senior Notes from a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the 2004 discontinued operations and a portion of the proceeds of the November 2004 offering of our Convertible Notes (see Note 4(f)). A gross loss of $4,599,000 due to the repurchase of the 2010 Notes was recognized in 2004. We have not repurchased or retired any additional 2010 Senior Notes since December 31, 2004. The 2010 Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Holdings, are not guaranteed by subsidiaries and rank equal to the other Senior Notes of Holdings. The 2010 Senior Notes require annual interest payments of approximately $26,652,000 (8 ⅞% per annum) and, except in the event of a change in control of Holdings and certain other circumstances, do not require any principal payments prior to their maturity in 2010. The 2010 Senior Notes are redeemable, at Holding’s option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after February 1, 2006, at varying redemption prices beginning at 104.438% and reducing annually until maturity. The net proceeds of the 2010 Senior Notes were used to fund the redemptions of senior notes of Holdings and Six Flags Operations.
The indenture under which the 2010 Senior Notes were issued limits our ability, among other things, to dispose of assets; incur additional indebtedness or liens; pay dividends; engage in mergers or consolidations; and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.
21
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(d) On April 16, 2003, Holdings issued $430,000,000 principal amount of 9 ¾% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Senior Notes”). As of December 31, 2004 we had repurchased $42,000,000 principal amount of the 2013 Senior Notes. A gross loss of $1,979,000 due to this repurchase was recognized in 2004. We have not repurchased or retired any additional 2013 Senior Notes since December 31, 2004. The 2013 Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Holdings, are not guaranteed by subsidiaries and rank equal to the other Holdings Senior Notes. The 2013 Senior Notes require annual interest payments of approximately $37,830,000 (9 ¾% per annum) and, except in the event of a change in control of the Company and certain other circumstances, do not require any principal payments prior to their maturity in 2013. The 2013 Senior Notes are redeemable, at Holdings’ option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after April 15, 2008, at varying redemption prices beginning at 104.875% and reducing annually until maturity. The indenture under which the 2013 Senior Notes were issued contains covenants substantially similar to those relating to the other Holdings Senior Notes. All of the net proceeds of the 2013 Senior Notes were used to fund the tender offer and redemption of other senior notes of Holdings.
(e) On December 5, 2003, Holdings issued $325,000,000 principal amount of 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014 (the “2014 Senior Notes”). As of December 31, 2004, we had repurchased $16,350,000 principal amount of the 2014 Senior Notes. A gross loss of $837,000 due to this repurchase was recognized in 2004. In January 2005, we issued an additional $195,000,000 of 2014 Senior Notes, the proceeds of which were used to fund the redemption of $181,155,000 principal amount of the 2009 Senior Notes (see Note 4(b)). The 2014 Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Holdings, are not guaranteed by subsidiaries and rank equal to the other Holdings Senior Notes. The 2014 Senior Notes require annual interest payments of approximately $48,476,000 (9 5/8% per annum) and, except in the event of a change in control of the Company and certain other circumstances, do not require any principal payments prior to their maturity in 2014. The 2014 Senior Notes are redeemable, at Holdings’ option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after June 1, 2009, at varying redemption prices beginning at 104.813% and reducing annually until maturity. The indenture under which the 2014 Senior Notes were issued contains covenants substantially similar to those relating to the other Holdings Senior Notes. All of the net proceeds of the original issuance of 2014 Senior Notes were used to redeem other senior notes of Holdings.
(f) On November 19, 2004, Holdings issued $299,000,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Holdings, are not guaranteed by subsidiaries and rank equal to the other Holdings Senior Notes. Except during specified non-convertibility periods, the Convertible Notes are convertible into our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 157.4803 shares of common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to adjustment, representing an initial conversion price of $6.35 per share. Upon conversion of the notes, we have the option to deliver common stock, cash or a combination of cash and common stock. The Convertible Notes require annual interest payments of approximately $13,455,000 (4 ½% per annum) and, except in the event of a change in control of Holdings and certain other circumstances, do not require any principal payments prior to their maturity in 2015. The Convertible Notes are redeemable, at Holdings’ option, in whole or in part, at any time after May 15, 2010 at varying redemption prices beginning at 102.143% and reducing annually until maturity. The net proceeds of the Convertible Notes were used to repurchase and redeem a portion of the 2009 Senior Notes (see Note 4(b)) and repurchase a portion of the 2010 Senior Notes (see Note 4 (c)).
22
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
5. Commitments and Contingencies
Six Flags New Orleans sustained very extensive damage in Hurricane Katrina in late August 2005 and did not reopen during the 2005 or 2006 seasons. We have determined that our carrying value of the assets destroyed is approximately $32.5 million. This amount does not include the property and equipment owned by the lessor, which is also covered by our insurance policies. The park is covered by up to approximately $180 million in property insurance, subject to a deductible in the case of named storms of approximately $5.5 million. The property insurance covers the full replacement value of the assets destroyed and includes business interruption coverage. Although the flood insurance provisions of the policies contain a $27.5 million sublimit, the separate “Named Storm” provision, which explicitly covers flood damage, is not similarly limited. Based on advice from our insurance advisors, we do not believe the flood sublimit to be applicable. We have filed property insurance claims, including business interruption, with our insurers. Since we expect to recover therefrom an amount in excess of our net book value of the impaired assets, we established an insurance receivable in an amount equal to the prior carrying value of those assets, of $32.5 million plus $3.4 million in business interruption coverage for costs incurred while the park has been closed. As of September 30, 2006, we have received payments from our carriers in the amount of $11.5 million bringing the total insurance receivable balance to $24.4 million at September 30, 2006. We cannot estimate at this time when, or if, the park will be back in operation. We are contractually committed to rebuilding the park, but only to the extent of insurance proceeds received, including proceeds from the damage to the lessor’s assets. We cannot be certain that our current estimates of the extent of the damage will be correct.
On April 1, 1998 we acquired all of the capital stock of Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (“SFEC”) for $976,000,000, paid in cash. In addition to our obligations under outstanding indebtedness and other securities issued or assumed in the SFEC acquisition, we also guaranteed in connection therewith certain contractual obligations relating to the partnerships that own the two Partnership Parks. Specifically, we guaranteed the obligations of the general partners of those partnerships to (i) make minimum annual distributions of approximately $56,791,000 (as of 2006 and subject to annual cost of living adjustments thereafter) to the limited partners in the Partnership Parks and (ii) make minimum capital expenditures at each of the Partnership Parks during rolling five-year periods, based generally on 6% of such park’s revenues. Cash flow from operations at the Partnership Parks is used to satisfy these requirements first, before any funds are required from us. We also guaranteed the obligation of our subsidiaries to purchase a maximum number of 5% per year (accumulating to the extent not purchased in any given year) of the total limited partnership units outstanding as of the date of the agreements (the “Partnership Agreements”) that govern the partnerships (to the extent tendered by the unit holders). The agreed price for these purchases is based on a valuation for each respective Partnership Park equal to the greater of (i) a value derived by multiplying such park’s weighted average four year EBITDA (as defined in the Partnership Agreements) by a specified multiple (8.0 in the case of the Georgia park and 8.5 in the case of the Texas park) or (ii) $250.0 million in the case of the Georgia park and $374.8 million in the case of the Texas park. Our obligations with respect to Six Flags Over Georgia and Six Flags Over Texas will continue until 2027 and 2028, respectively.
As we purchase units relating to either Partnership Park, we are entitled to the minimum distribution and other distributions attributable to such units, unless we are then in default under the applicable agreements with our partners at such Partnership Park. On September 30, 2006, we owned approximately 25.3% and 37.7%, respectively, of the limited partnership units in the Georgia and Texas partnerships. No units were tendered in 2005 and approximately 0.52 units in the Texas partnership were tendered in 2006. The maximum unit purchase obligations for 2007 at both parks will aggregate approximately $276.8 million, representing approximately 50.0% of the outstanding units of the Georgia park and 40.9% of the outstanding units of the Texas park. The annual unit purchase obligation (without taking into account accumulation from prior years) aggregates approximately $33.1 million for both parks based on current purchase prices. Under our agreement with Time Warner Inc., which has also guaranteed certain obligations relating to the Partnership Parks, we have deposited into escrow $11.0 million as a source of funds in the event Timer Warner Inc. is required to honor its guarantee.
23
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
We maintain multi-layered general liability policies that provide for excess liability coverage of up to $100,000,000 per occurrence. For incidents arising after November 15, 2003, our self-insured retention is $2,500,000 per occurrence ($2,000,000 per occurrence for the twelve months ended November 15, 2003 and $1,000,000 per occurrence for the twelve months ended on November 15, 2002) for our domestic parks and a nominal amount per occurrence for our international parks. Our self-insured retention after November 15, 2003 is $750,000 for workers compensation claims ($500,000 for the period from November 15, 2001 to November 15, 2003). For most incidents prior to November 15, 2001, our policies did not provide for a self-insured retention. Based upon reported claims and an estimate for incurred, but not reported claims, we accrue a liability for our self-insured retention contingencies.
On November 7, 2005, certain plaintiffs filed a complaint on behalf of a purported class of current and former employees against us in California state court. In the complaint, plaintiffs allege ten causes of action for, inter alia, unpaid wages and related penalties, and violations of California law governing employee meal and rest breaks. On April 5, 2006, we moved for summary judgment with respect to some of the plaintiffs’ purported claims and to dismiss all claims against those parks and individuals who were improperly named in the complaint. Discovery is proceeding with respect to our summary judgment motion and we are investigating the allegations of unpaid wages at several of our California parks. The consolidated financial statements of Six Flags, Inc. do not include any expenses or liabilities related to the above action as a loss has not been deemed probable or estimable.
On May 30, 2006, a civil action against us was commenced in Connecticut state court. The plaintiff seeks damages for injuries to his face and head and loss of his vision in both eyes as a result of an accident that occurred on September 8, 2004 at Six Flags New England. The plaintiff, an employee of an on-site contractor at the time of the accident, alleges that he was injured while participating in efforts to free a jammed drive train on a rollercoaster at the park. We anticipate that the contractor will be joined as an additional party to the litigation. Our self-insurance retention on the action totals $2.5 million.
We are party to various other legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Matters that are probable of unfavorable outcome to us and which can be reasonably estimated are accrued. Such accruals are based on information known about the matters, our estimate of the outcomes of such matters and our experience in contesting, litigating and settling similar matters. None of the legal actions are believed by management to involve amounts that would be material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity after consideration of recorded accruals.
In December 2004, we guaranteed the payment of a $32.1 million construction term loan incurred by HWP Development LLC (a joint venture in which we own a 41% interest) for the purpose of financing the construction and development of a hotel and indoor water park project located adjacent to our Great Escape park near Lake George, New York, which opened in February 2006. At September 30, 2006, $31,943,000 was outstanding under the loan. We have also guaranteed a $1.0 million working capital revolving facility. Our guarantee of the term loan will be released upon full payment and discharge of the loan, which matures on December 17, 2009. The ability of the joint venture to repay the loan will be dependent upon the joint venture’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow, which cannot be assured. The revolving facility terminates in March 2007. As security for the guarantee, we have provided an $8.0 million letter of credit. We also entered into a management agreement to manage and operate the project.
Red Zone LLC (“Red Zone”) requested that we reimburse certain of the expenses it incurred in connection with its 2005 consent solicitation. By virtue of the consent solicitation, three individuals designated by Red Zone, including Daniel M. Snyder, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, and Mark Shapiro, our President and Chief Executive Officer, became directors and three previously existing directors were removed from the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors authorized us to reimburse
24
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Red Zone for the reasonable expenses Red Zone incurred in connection with its consent solicitation subject to approval by our shareholders. Red Zone requested reimbursement for expenses that include financial advisory fees, legal fees, travel, compensation and signing bonuses paid by Red Zone to Mr. Shapiro and additional individuals who became our employees and other out of the pocket expenses. The Audit Committee, with the advice of an independent counsel, determined that the reimbursement of approximately $10.4 million of Red Zone’s expenses would be reasonable. Shareholders approved this reimbursement at the 2006 Annual Meeting on May 25, 2006. We recognized the reimbursement expense in the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
6. Minority Interest, Partnerships and Joint Ventures
Minority interest represents the third parties’ share of the assets of the four parks that are less than wholly owned by us, Six Flags Over Texas, Six Flags Over Georgia (including Six Flags White Water Atlanta which is owned by the partnership that owns Six Flags Over Georgia) and Six Flags Marine World.
On April 1, 1997, we became manager of Marine World (subsequently renamed Six Flags Marine World), then a marine and exotic wildlife park located in Vallejo, California, pursuant to a contract with an agency of the City of Vallejo under which we are entitled to receive an annual base management fee of $250,000 and up to $250,000 annually in additional management fees based on park revenues. In November 1997, we exercised our option to lease approximately 40 acres of land within the site for nominal rent and an initial term of 55 years (plus four ten-year and one four-year renewal options). We have added theme park rides and attractions on the leased land, which is located within the existing park, in order to create one fully integrated regional theme park at the site. We are entitled to receive, in addition to the management fee, 80% of the cash flow generated by the combined operations at the park, after combined operating expenses and debt service on outstanding third party debt obligations relating to the park. We also have an option through February 2010 to purchase the entire site at a purchase price equal to the greater of the then principal amount of the debt obligations of the seller (expected to aggregate $52,000,000) or the then fair market value of the seller’s interest in the park (based on a formula relating to the seller’s 20% share of cash flow).
We have accounted for our interest in the HWP Development LLC joint venture under the equity method and have included our investment of $2,311,000 and $2,791,000 as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, in deposits and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 5 for a description of the partnership arrangements applicable to Partnership Parks.
7. Business Segments
We manage our operations on an individual park location basis. Discrete financial information is maintained for each park and provided to our management for review and as a basis for decision making. The primary performance measure used to allocate resources is earnings before interest, tax expense, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). All of our parks provide similar products and services through a similar process to the same class of customer through a consistent method. As such, we have only one reportable segment - - operation of theme parks. The following tables present segment financial information and a reconciliation of the primary segment performance measure to loss from continuing operations before income taxes. Park level expenses exclude all non-cash operating expenses, principally depreciation, amortization and stock-based non-cash compensation, and all corporate and non-operating expenses.
25
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Theme park revenue | | $ | 540,717 | | $ | 546,095 | | $ | 939,495 | | $ | 956,198 | |
Theme park cash expenses | | (242,411 | ) | (241,623 | ) | (617,387 | ) | (586,988 | ) |
Aggregate park EBITDA | | 298,306 | | 304,472 | | 322,108 | | 369,210 | |
Minority interest in earnings - EBITDA | | (32,137 | ) | (26,280 | ) | (49,062 | ) | (47,688 | ) |
Equity in Operations of Affiliates - EBITDA | | 438 | | — | | 658 | | — | |
Corporate expenses | | (12,834 | ) | (6,029 | ) | (53,979 | ) | (22,230 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | (2,277 | ) | (166 | ) | (13,052 | ) | (620 | ) |
Other income (expenses) | | (233 | ) | (270 | ) | (11,538 | ) | (1,353 | ) |
Equity in Operations of Affiliates | | (582 | ) | — | | (1,120 | ) | — | |
Minority interest in earnings — depreciation and other expense | | 1,220 | | 1,220 | | 3,660 | | 3,660 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | (37,836 | ) | (36,774 | ) | (110,235 | ) | (106,621 | ) |
Loss on fixed assets | | (1,187 | ) | (1,918 | ) | (20,910 | ) | (11,518 | ) |
Early repurchase of debt | | — | | — | | — | | (19,303 | ) |
Interest expense | | (51,467 | ) | (45,962 | ) | (151,209 | ) | (139,668 | ) |
Interest income | | 1,162 | | 1,813 | | 2,528 | | 4,963 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | 162,573 | | $ | 190,106 | | $ | (82,151 | ) | $ | 28,832 | |
All of our parks are located in the United States except one park located in Mexico City, Mexico and one located in Montreal, Canada. The following information reflects our long-lived assets and revenue by domestic and foreign categories as of and for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005.
| | (in thousands) | |
2006 | | Domestic | | Foreign | | Total | |
Long-lived assets | | $ | 2,920,022 | | $ | 145,505 | | $ | 3,065,527 | |
Revenue | | 863,848 | | 75,647 | | 939,495 | |
2005 | | | | | | | |
Long-lived assets | | $ | 2,962,196 | | $ | 138,599 | | $ | 3,100,795 | |
Revenue | | 888,350 | | 67,848 | | 956,198 | |
Long-lived assets include property and equipment and intangible assets.
8. Pension Benefits
As part of the acquisition of SFEC, we assumed the obligations related to the SFTP Defined Benefit Plan (the “SFTP Plan”). The SFTP Plan covered substantially all of SFTP’s employees. During 1999 the SFTP Plan was amended to cover substantially all of our domestic full-time employees. During 2004, the SFTP Plan was further amended to cover certain seasonal workers, retroactive to January 1, 2003. The SFTP Plan permits normal retirement at age 65, with early retirement at ages 55 through 64 upon attainment
26
SIX FLAGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
of ten years of credited service. The early retirement benefit is reduced for benefits commencing before age 62. The SFTP Plan benefits are calculated according to a benefit formula based on age, average compensation over the highest consecutive five-year period during the employee’s last ten years of employment and years of service. The SFTP Plan assets are invested primarily in common stock and mutual funds. The SFTP Plan does not have significant liabilities other than benefit obligations. Under our funding policy, contributions to the SFTP Plan are determined using the projected unit credit cost method. This funding policy meets the requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
In February 2006, we announced we were “freezing” our pension plan effective April 1, 2006, pursuant to which participants will no longer continue to earn future pension benefits. However, by virtue of provisions of collective bargaining agreements relating to 239 employees at three of our parks, those employees will continue to earn future benefits under the Plan through periods ranging from December 15, 2007 through January 15, 2009. The freeze resulted in a curtailment loss of $3,125,000 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Service cost | | $ | 166,000 | | $ | 1,524,000 | | $ | 2,072,000 | | $ | 4,578,000 | |
Interest cost | | 2,206,000 | | 2,315,000 | | 6,756,000 | | 6,912,000 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (2,362,000 | ) | (2,199,000 | ) | (7,084,000 | ) | (6,609,000 | ) |
Amortization of prior service cost | | 9,000 | | 140,000 | | 69,000 | | 420,000 | |
Recognized net actuarial loss | | 85,000 | | 1,143,000 | | 585,000 | | 2,516,000 | |
Curtailment loss | | — | | — | | 3,125,000 | | — | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 104,000 | | $ | 2,923,000 | | $ | 5,523,000 | | $ | 7,817,000 | |
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used To Determine Net Cost
Discount rate | | 5.750 | % | 5.875 | % | 5.750 | % | 5.875 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | | 4.000 | % | 3.750 | % | 4.000 | % | 3.750 | % |
Expected Return on plan assets | | 8.000 | % | 8.500 | % | 8.000 | % | 8.500 | % |
Employer Contributions
We expect to contribute approximately $6,617,000 to the SFTP Plan during fiscal year 2006. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we made pension contributions of approximately $5,073,000.
27
Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
Results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not indicative of the results expected for the full year. In particular, our theme park operations contribute a significant majority of their annual revenue during the period from Memorial Day to Labor Day each year while a certain level of expense is incurred throughout the year.
As of September 30, 2006, we owned or operated 30 parks, including 28 domestic parks, one park in Mexico City, Mexico and one park in Montreal, Canada.
In June 2006, we announced that we will be exploring potential strategic options with respect to the following six properties: Six Flags Darien Lake (outside Buffalo, New York); Six Flags Waterworld (Concord, California); Six Flags Elitch Gardens (Denver, Colorado); Wild Waves and Enchanted Village (outside Seattle, Washington); Six Flags Splashtown (Houston, Texas); and Six Flags Magic Mountain and Hurricane Harbor (near Los Angeles, California). Although we cannot predict when, or if, any specific transaction will occur with respect to these parks, we are initially considering a sale of the parks as going concerns in a single transaction but may also consider a series of transactions, dismantling and re-utilizing certain rides and attractions and selling the underlying land for real estate development purposes, as well as other potential alternatives. The assets and operations of these parks are not shown as assets held for sale or discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2005, we permanently closed Six Flags AstroWorld in Houston, Texas and on June 1, 2006, sold the 104 acre site on which the park was located for an aggregate purchase price of $77 million. The sale was approved by our lenders under the Credit Facility (see Note 4(a) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and the proceeds from the sale were used to reduce our indebtedness. We relocated select rides, attractions and other equipment from Six Flags AstroWorld to our remaining parks and have sold certain other equipment. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented reflect select assets of Six Flags AstroWorld as assets held for sale and its results as discontinued operations. See Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2006, we announced our intention to sell our two Oklahoma City parks following the 2006 season. In addition, during the first quarter of 2006, we agreed to sell substantially all of the assets of our water park in Columbus, Ohio to our lessor, the Columbus Zoo, at the end of the lease term (October 31, 2006) for $2.0 million and exercised our rights to terminate the ground lease at our Sacramento, California water park following the 2006 season. The sale of the Ohio assets was completed on November 1, 2006. We are negotiating with the lessor of the California facility and others to purchase our rides, attractions and personal property at that park. If those negotiations are not successful, we are entitled to remove those assets at the end of the lease term. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for all periods presented reflect the assets of our Oklahoma City parks and our Columbus and Sacramento water parks, as assets held for sale and their results as discontinued operations. See Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Six Flags New Orleans sustained extensive damage in Hurricane Katrina in late August 2005 and did not reopen during the 2005 or 2006 seasons. We have determined that our carrying value of the assets destroyed is approximately $32.5 million. This amount does not include the property and equipment owned by the lessor, which is also covered by our insurance policies. The park is covered by up to approximately $180 million in property insurance, subject to a deductible in the case of named
28
storms of approximately $5.5 million. The property insurance covers the full replacement value of the assets destroyed and includes business interruption coverage. Although the flood insurance provisions of the policies contain a $27.5 million sublimit, the separate “Named Storm” provision, which explicitly covers flood damage, is not similarly limited. Based on advice from our insurance advisors, we do not believe the flood sublimit to be applicable. We have filed property insurance claims, including business interruption, with our insurers. Since we expect to recover therefrom an amount in excess of our net book value of the impaired assets, we established an insurance receivable in an amount equal to the carrying value of those assets, of $32.5 million plus $3.4 million in business interruption coverage to compensate for costs incurred while the park has been closed. As of September 30, 2006, we have received payments from our carriers in the amount of $11.5 million bringing the total insurance receivable balance to $24.4 million at September 30, 2006. We cannot estimate at this time when, or if, the park will be back in operation. We are contractually committed to rebuilding the park, but only to the extent of insurance proceeds received, including proceeds from the damage to the lessor’s assets. We cannot be certain that our current estimates of the extent of the damage will be correct. See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our revenue is primarily derived from the sale of tickets for entrance to our parks (approximately 54% of revenues in the first nine months of 2006) and the sale of food, merchandise, parking, games and attractions inside our parks as well as sponsorship revenue. Revenues in the first nine months of 2006 decreased 2% over the comparable period of 2005, due largely to a 14% reduction in attendance, offset in large part by a 14% increase in per capita total revenue. Per capita total revenue is defined as total revenue divided by attendance. Per capita total revenue includes admissions revenue per capita as well as food, merchandise and other revenue per capita.
Our principal costs of operations include salaries and wages, employee benefits, advertising, outside services, maintenance, utilities and insurance. A large portion of our expenses is relatively fixed. Costs for full-time employees, maintenance, utilities, advertising and insurance do not vary significantly with attendance.
Following a successful consent solicitation by Red Zone LLC, an entity controlled by Daniel M. Snyder, in December 2005, Mr. Snyder became Chairman of our Board of Directors and two designees of Red Zone became directors, including Mark Shapiro, who was elected President and Chief Executive Officer at that time. In 2006, our Board of Directors has approved substantial changes to senior management, including several park general managers and new management has begun to effectuate a series of long-term operating initiatives including (i) expanding the family entertainment offering of the parks by adding additional shows, parades, fireworks and character events utilizing the Warner Bros. licensed property, (ii) enhancing the guest experience by improving the overall appearance and cleanliness of the parks, (iii) reviewing our asset base to determine whether any non-core assets, including underutilized land, should be sold, (iv) redesigning our advertising campaigns and increasing the use of direct marketing and (v) increasing future sponsorship and promotional revenues as well as driving increased value from admissions and in-park revenues.
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “2005 Form 10-K”) discussed our most critical accounting policies. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we increased our valuation allowance in respect of income taxes by $22,962,000 as described in Note 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Except for the foregoing, there have been no material developments with respect to any critical accounting policies discussed in the 2005 Form 10-K since December 31, 2005.
29
However, as described in Note 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted SFAS 123 (R), relating to stock-based compensation beginning January 1, 2006 and certain new accounting pronouncements have been issued that may affect future financial reporting.
Summary of Operations
Summary data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were as follows (in thousands, except per capita total revenue):
| | Three months ended | | | | Nine months ended | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | September 30, | | | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | Percentage Change (%) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | Percentage Change (%) | |
Total revenue | | $ | 540,717 | | $ | 546,095 | | (1.0 | ) | $ | 939,495 | | $ | 956,198 | | (1.7 | ) |
Operating expenses | | 151,263 | | 150,488 | | 0.5 | | 393,785 | | 366,716 | | 7.4 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 62,130 | | 51,342 | | 21.0 | | 211,239 | | 160,514 | | 31.6 | |
Costs of products sold | | 44,129 | | 45,988 | | (4.0 | ) | 79,394 | | 82,608 | | (3.9 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | 37,836 | | 36,774 | | 2.9 | | 110,235 | | 106,621 | | 3.4 | |
Loss on fixed assets | | 1,187 | | 1,918 | | (38.1 | ) | 20,910 | | 11,518 | | 81.5 | |
Income from operations | | 244,172 | | 259,585 | | (5.9 | ) | 123,932 | | 228,221 | | (45.7 | ) |
Interest expense, net | | (50,305 | ) | (44,149 | ) | 13.9 | | (148,681 | ) | (134,705 | ) | 10.4 | |
Minority interest in earnings | | (30,917 | ) | (25,060 | ) | 23.4 | | (45,402 | ) | (44,028 | ) | 3.1 | |
Equity in operations of partnerships | | (144 | ) | — | | n/a | | (462 | ) | — | | n/a | |
Early repurchase of debt | | — | | — | | n/a | | — | | (19,303 | ) | n/a | |
Other expense | | (233 | ) | (270 | ) | (13.7 | ) | (11,538 | ) | (1,353 | ) | 752.8 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | 162,573 | | 190,106 | | (14.5 | ) | (82,151 | ) | 28,832 | | (384.9 | ) |
Income tax expense | | 1,783 | | 1,270 | | 40.4 | | 3,985 | | 3,791 | | 5.1 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 160,790 | | $ | 188,836 | | (14.9 | ) | $ | (86,136 | ) | $ | 25,041 | | (444.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Attendance | | 14,269 | | 16,269 | | (12.3 | ) | 25,057 | | 28,985 | | (13.6 | ) |
Per capita total revenue | | $ | 37.89 | | $ | 33.57 | | 12.9 | | $ | 37.49 | | $ | 32.99 | | 13.7 | |
Three months ended September 30, 2006 vs. three months ended September 30, 2005
Revenue in the third quarter of 2006 totaled $540.7 million compared to $546.1 million for the third quarter of 2005, representing a 1.0% decrease. The decrease arose out of a reduction of 2.0 million (12.3%) in attendance compared to the prior year period. Per capita total revenue (representing total revenue divided by total attendance) increased by $4.32 (12.9%) in the 2006 quarter. The attendance decrease was caused largely by reduced season pass (0.4 million) and group (0.4 million) attendance, the closing of Six Flags New Orleans (0.2 million) and adverse weather conditions, especially on weekend days at our Six Flags branded parks. Per capita total revenue includes admissions revenue per capita as well as food, merchandise and other revenue per capita. Admissions revenue per capita increased 12.7% in the third quarter of 2006, compared to prior year, and is driven primarily by price and ticket mix (i.e. season tickets, main gate, group sales and other discounted tickets). Food and beverage, merchandise and other revenue per capita increased 13.1% in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 driven by price, attendance mix and additional product and service offerings.
30
Operating expenses for the third quarter of 2006 increased $0.8 million (0.5%) compared to expenses for the third quarter of 2005. The increase includes anticipated increases in outside services and contract shows ($2.3 million), salaries and wages ($1.2 million) and rent ($0.8 million), partially offset by ($2.6 million) in reduced labor benefit costs and the timing of repairs, maintenance and operating supplies.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2006 increased $10.8 million (21.0%) compared to the third quarter of 2005. The increase primarily reflects an anticipated increase in costs associated with additional staffing and services, as well as higher insurance and advertising costs in the current year quarter.
Costs of products sold in the 2006 period decreased $1.9 million compared to costs for the third quarter of 2005, reflecting primarily the decrease in attendance and in-park revenues. As a percentage of our in-park spending, cost of sales decreased slightly in the 2006 period.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the third quarter of 2006 increased $1.1 million compared to the third quarter of 2005. The increase was attributable to our on-going capital program.
Loss on fixed assets decreased by $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the prior year period primarily due to the demolition of rides in 2005 for preparation for new capital in 2006.
Interest expense, net increased $6.2 million (13.9%) compared to the third quarter of 2005, reflecting higher net debt levels and higher interest rates in the 2006 quarter.
Minority interest in earnings, which reflects the third party share of the operations of the parks that are not wholly owned by us, Six Flags Over Georgia (including White Water Atlanta), Six Flags Over Texas and Six Flags Marine World, increased by $5.9 million compared to the third quarter of 2005.
Other expense decreased by $0.1 million to $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2006 primarily related to the decrease of certain proxy-related expenses.
Income tax expense was $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2006 compared to $1.3 million for the third quarter of 2005. The tax expense for the third quarter of 2006 was impacted primarily by the reduction of $58.9 million to the valuation allowance described in Note 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Nine months ended September 30, 2006 vs. nine months ended September 30, 2005
Revenue in the first nine months of 2006 totaled $939.5 million compared to $956.2 million for the first nine months of 2005, representing a 1.7% decrease. The decrease in the 2006 period results primarily from a 13.6% decrease in attendance, offset in large part by a 13.7% increase in per capita total revenue (representing total revenue divided by total attendance). The attendance decrease was largely the result of reduced season pass (1.1 million) and group (0.9 million) attendance. In addition, the attendance decline reflected the closing of Six Flags New Orleans in August 2005 (0.5 million), reduced and delayed advertising expenditures as well as unfavorable weather comparisons to the prior year. Per capita total revenue includes admissions revenue per capita as well as food, merchandise and other revenue per capita. Admissions revenue per capita increased 13.4% in the first nine months of 2006, compared to prior year, and is driven primarily by price and ticket mix (i.e., season tickets, main gate, group sales and other discounted tickets). Food and beverage, merchandise and other revenue per capita increased 14.0% in the first nine months of 2006 driven by price, attendance mix and additional product and service offerings.
Operating expenses for the first nine months of 2006 increased $27.1 million (7.4%) compared to expenses for the first nine months of 2005. The increase primarily reflects anticipated increases in
31
salaries, wages and benefits ($15.7 million) and an increase in repair, maintenance and operating supplies ($4.8 million) due to our guest enhancement program.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first nine months of 2006 increased $50.7 million (31.6%) compared to the first nine months of 2005. The increase primarily relates to an increase in salaries, wages and benefits ($25.3 million) driven by an increase in stock-based compensation expense ($12.4 million) related to the adoption of SFAS 123 (R), severance costs associated with the December 2005 management charge ($8.4 million) as well as anticipated increases in salaries, wages and benefits ($4.5 million) primarily due to additional staffing and services. Increased insurance costs ($7.4 million) and an increase in consulting and legal services ($6.3 million), including $1.0 million from the December 2005 management change, also contributed to the increased expense. Excluding the non-cash stock-based compensation expense from adoption of SFAS 123 (R) and the cost of the December 2005 management change, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 18.0% over the first nine months of 2006 compared with the prior year period.
Costs of products sold for the first nine months of 2006 decreased $3.2 million compared to costs for the first nine months of 2005, reflecting the decrease in attendance and in-park revenues. As a percentage of our in-park spending, cost of sales decreased slightly in the 2006 period.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the first nine months of 2006 increased $3.6 million compared to the first nine months of 2005. The increase compared to the 2005 level was attributable to our on-going capital program.
Loss on fixed assets for the first nine months of 2006 increased by $9.4 million compared to the loss for the first nine months of 2005 primarily related to new management’s decision to write-off and dispose of several old rides that were not in operation and were being held in storage.
Interest expense, net increased $14.0 million for the first nine months of 2006 compared to the first nine months of 2005, reflecting higher net debt levels and higher interest rates in the 2006 period.
Minority interest in earnings, which reflects the third party share of the operations of the parks that are not wholly owned by us, Six Flags Over Georgia (including White Water Atlanta), Six Flags Over Texas and Six Flags Marine World, increased by $1.4 million compared to the first nine months of 2005.
Other expense in the first nine months of 2006 increased $10.2 million compared to the prior-year period, primarily related to the reimbursement of certain proxy-related expenses incurred by Red Zone LLC, an entity controlled by Daniel M. Snyder, the Chairman of our Board of Directors ($10.4 million). See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income tax expense was $4.0 million for the first nine months of 2006 compared to $3.8 million for the first nine months of 2005. The tax expense for the 2006 period was primarily impacted by the $46.6 million valuation allowance established and discussed in Note 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Results of Discontinued Operations
In October 2005, we permanently closed Six Flags AstroWorld in Houston, Texas and on June 1, 2006, sold the 104 acre site on which the park was located for an aggregate purchase price of $77 million. The sale was approved by our lenders under the Credit Facility (see Note 4(a) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and the proceeds from the sale were used to reduce our indebtedness. We relocated select rides, attractions and other equipment from Six Flags AstroWorld to our remaining parks and have sold certain other equipment. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented reflect select assets of Six Flags AstroWorld as assets held for sale and its results as discontinued operations. See Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2006, we announced our intention to sell our two Oklahoma City parks following the 2006 season. In addition, during the first quarter of 2006, we agreed to sell substantially all of the assets of our water park in Columbus, Ohio to our lessor, the Columbus Zoo, at the end of the lease term
32
(October 31, 2006) for $2.0 million and exercised our rights to terminate the ground lease at our Sacramento, California water park following the 2006 season. The sale of the Ohio assets was completed on November 1, 2006. We are negotiating with the lessor of the California facility and others to purchase our rides, attractions and personal property at that park. If those negotiations are not successful, we are entitled to remove those assets at the end of the lease term. The consolidated financial statements as of and for all periods presented reflect the assets of our Oklahoma City parks and our Columbus and Sacramento water parks, as assets held for sale and their results as discontinued operations. See Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” our consolidated financial statements have been reclassified for all periods presented to reflect the operations and select assets of Six Flags AstroWorld, our Oklahoma City parks, Columbus water park and Sacramento water park as discontinued operations. The assets of these facilities have been classified as “Assets held for sale” on the September 30, 2006 (excluding the Houston facility) and December 31, 2005 consolidated balance sheets and consist of the following:
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 1,694 | | $ | 1,396 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | 12,268 | | 75,347 | |
Goodwill, net | | 12,738 | | 42,411 | |
Total assets held for sale. | | $ | 26,700 | | $ | 119,154 | |
The net loss from discontinued operations was classified on the consolidated statements of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 as “Discontinued operations.” Summarized results of discontinued operations are as follows:
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Operating revenue | | $ | 11,406 | | $ | 27,198 | | $ | 18,979 | | $ | 57,966 | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operation | | — | | — | | 761 | | — | |
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes | | 5,002 | | 6,852 | | 3,386 | | 3,029 | |
Impairment of assets held for sale | | (1,048 | ) | — | | (32,863 | ) | — | |
Net results of discontinued operations | | $ | 3,954 | | $ | 6,852 | | $ | (28,716 | ) | $ | 3,029 | |
Our long-term debt is at the consolidated level and is not reflected at each individual park. Thus, we have not allocated a portion of interest expense to the discontinued operations.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL COMMITMENTS AND RESOURCES
General
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations, funds from borrowings and existing cash on hand. Our principal uses of cash include the funding of working capital obligations, debt service, investments in parks (including capital projects), preferred stock dividends and payments to our partners in the Partnership Parks. We did not pay a dividend on our common stock during 2005, nor do we expect to pay such dividends in 2006. We believe that, based on historical and anticipated operating results, cash flows from operations, available cash and available amounts under our Credit Facility will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs, including anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, scheduled debt and preferred stock requirements and obligations under arrangements
33
relating to the Partnership Parks, for at least the next twelve months. Our current and future liquidity is, however, greatly dependent upon our operating results, which are driven largely by overall economic conditions as well as the price and perceived quality of the entertainment experience at our parks. Our liquidity could also be adversely affected by unfavorable weather, accidents or the occurrence of an event or condition, including terrorist acts or threats, negative publicity or significant local competitive events, that significantly reduces paid attendance and, therefore, revenue at any of our theme parks. See Item 1A contained in the 2005 Form 10-K. In that case, we might be unable to borrow under our Credit Facility and/or need to seek additional financing. In addition, we expect to refinance all or a portion of our existing debt on or prior to maturity and potentially to seek additional financing. The degree to which we are leveraged could adversely affect our ability to obtain any new financing or to effect any such refinancing. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
At September 30, 2006, our total debt aggregated $2.2 billion, of which approximately $53.8 million is scheduled to mature prior to September 30, 2007. Of the current portion of long-term debt, $45.0 million represents borrowings under the working capital revolver of our Credit Facility, which can be reborrowed. Based on interest rates at September 30, 2006 for floating rate debt and after giving effect to the interest rate swaps described herein, annual cash interest payments for 2006 on non-revolving credit debt outstanding at September 30, 2006 and anticipated levels of working capital revolving borrowings for the year will aggregate approximately $200.0 million. In addition, annual dividend payments on our outstanding preferred stock total $20.8 million, payable at our option in cash or shares of common stock. We plan on spending approximately $130.0 million on capital expenditures for the 2006 calendar year. At September 30, 2006, we had approximately $58.6 million of cash and $304.5 million available under our Credit Facility.
Due to the seasonal nature of our business, we are largely dependent upon our $300.0 million working capital revolver credit portion of our Credit Facility in order to fund off-season expenses. Our ability to borrow under the working capital revolver is dependent upon compliance with certain conditions, including financial ratios and the absence of any material adverse change. Our compliance with the financial covenants at the end of the second quarter of 2006 was waived by our lenders and the financial covenants have been relaxed through 2007. However, if we were to become unable to borrow under the working capital revolver, we would likely be unable to pay in full our off-season obligations. The working capital revolver expires in June 2008. The terms and availability of our Credit Facility and other indebtedness would not be affected by a change in the ratings issued by rating agencies in respect of our indebtedness except that the interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Facility will be adjusted in the event of certain rating changes.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net cash provided by operating activities was $86.1 million. Net cash used in investing activities in the first nine months of 2006 was $30.9 million, consisting primarily of capital expenditures offset by the proceeds from the sale of the 104 acre site where Six Flags AstroWorld was located. Net cash used in financing activities in the first nine months of 2006 was $78.4 million, representing primarily the repayment of borrowings under the working capital revolver of our Credit Facility and the payment of preferred stock dividends.
Our net operating cash flows are largely driven by attendance and per capita spending levels because our cash-based expenses are relatively fixed and do not vary significantly with either attendance or levels of per capita spending. These cash-based operating expenses include salaries and wages, employee benefits, advertising, outside services, repairs and maintenance, utilities and insurance.
Long-Term Debt and Preferred Stock
Our debt at September 30, 2006 included $1.5 billion of fixed-rate senior notes, with staggered maturities ranging from 2010 to 2015, $685.3 million under our Credit Facility and $8.2 million of other
34
indebtedness, including $5.8 million of indebtedness at Six Flags Over Texas and $1.0 million of indebtedness at Six Flags Over Georgia. Except in certain circumstances, the public debt instruments do not require principal payments prior to maturity. Our Credit Facility includes a $655.0 million term loan ($640.3 million of which was outstanding at September 30, 2006); an $82.5 million multicurrency facility (none of which was outstanding at September 30, 2006 other than $33.0 million of letters of credit); and a $300.0 million working capital revolver ($45.0 million of which was outstanding at that date). The working capital and multicurrency facilities terminate on June 30, 2008. The term loan facility requires quarterly repayments of 0.25% of the outstanding amount thereof commencing on September 30, 2004 and 24.0% commencing on September 30, 2008. The term loan matures on June 30, 2009. Under the Credit Facility, the maturity of the term loan will be shortened to December 31, 2008, if prior to such date our outstanding preferred stock is not converted into common stock or redeemed. All of our outstanding preferred stock ($287.5 million liquidation preference) must be redeemed on August 15, 2009 (to the extent not previously converted into common stock). See Notes 2 and 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our indebtedness and preferred stock.
Partnership Park Obligations
In connection with our 1998 acquisition of the former Six Flags, we guaranteed certain obligations relating to Six Flags Over Georgia and Six Flags Over Texas. These obligations continue until 2027, in the case of the Georgia park and 2028, in the case of the Texas park. Among such obligations are (i) minimum annual distributions (including rent) of approximately $56.8 million in 2006 (subject to cost of living adjustments in subsequent years) to partners in these two Partnerships Parks (of which we will be entitled to receive in 2006 approximately $18.5 million based on our ownership of approximately 25% of the Georgia partnership and approximately 38% of the Texas partnership at September 30, 2006), (ii) minimum capital expenditures at each park during rolling five-year periods based generally on 6% of park revenues, and (iii) an annual offer to purchase a maximum number of 5% per year (accumulating to the extent not purchased in any given year) of limited partnership units at specified prices.
We have incurred approximately $30.0 million of capital expenditures at these parks for the 2006 season, an amount in excess of the minimum required expenditure. We were not required to purchase any units in the 2005 offer to purchase and we purchased approximately 0.52 units in the 2006 offer. Because we have not been required since 1998 to purchase a material amount of units, our maximum unit purchase obligation for both parks in 2007 will be an aggregate of approximately $276.8 million, representing approximately 50.0% of the outstanding units of the Georgia park and 40.9% of the outstanding units of the Texas park. The annual unit purchase obligation (without taking into account accumulation from prior years) aggregates approximately $31.1 million for both parks based on current purchase prices. As we purchase additional units, we are entitled to a proportionate increase in our share of the minimum annual distributions. Under our agreement with Time Warner Inc., which has also guaranteed certain obligations relating to the Partnership Parks, we have deposited into escrow $11.0 million as a source of funds in the event Time Warner Inc. is required to honor its guarantee.
Cash flows from operations at these Partnership Parks will be used to satisfy the annual distribution and capital expenditure requirements, before any funds are required from us. The two partnerships generated approximately $45.9 million of aggregate net cash provided by operating activities during 2005 (net of advances from the general partners). At September 30, 2006, we had total loans outstanding of $157.7 million to the partnerships that own these parks, primarily to fund the acquisition of Six Flags White Water Atlanta and to make capital improvements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In December 2004, we guaranteed the payment of a $32.1 million construction term loan incurred by HWP Development LLC (a joint venture in which we own a 41% interest) for the purpose of financing the construction and development of a hotel and indoor water park project located adjacent to
35
our Great Escape park near Lake George, New York, which opened in February 2006. We have also guaranteed a $1.0 million working capital revolving facility. We have not yet received any revenues from the joint venture but had advanced the joint venture approximately $2.2 million at September 30, 2006. We acquired our interest in the joint venture through a contribution of land and a restaurant, valued at $5.0 million.
The guarantee of the term loan will be released upon full payment and discharge of the loan, which matures on December 17, 2009. The ability of the joint venture to repay the loan will be dependent upon the joint venture’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow, which cannot be assured. The revolving credit facility terminates in March 2007. As security for the guarantee, we have provided an $8.0 million letter of credit. At September 30, 2006, approximately $31.9 million was outstanding under the construction term loan. In the event we are required to fund amounts under the guarantee, our joint venture partners must reimburse us for their respective pro rata share, assuming they have the resources to do so, or their interests in the joint venture will be diluted or, in certain cases, forfeited. We also entered into a management agreement to manage and operate the project. As of September 30, 2006, we were not involved in any other off-balance sheet arrangements.
Other Obligations
In addition to the debt, preferred stock, lease obligations applicable to several of our parks and our commitments to the partnerships that own Six Flags Over Texas and Six Flags Over Georgia discussed above, our contractual commitments include commitments for license fees to Warner Bros. and commitments relating to capital expenditures. License fees to Warner Bros. for our domestic parks aggregate $4.0 million for 2006 based upon the number of domestic parks utilizing the licensed property. In addition to the licensee fee, we also pay a royalty fee on merchandise sold using the licensed property, generally equal to 12% of the cost of the merchandise.
In February 2006, we announced we were “freezing” our pension plan, pursuant to which participants will no longer continue to earn future pension benefits. Including the effects of this freeze, we expect to make contributions of approximately $6.6 million in 2006 with respect to our pension plans and $2.5 million in 2006 to our 401(k) plan. Our estimated expense for employee health insurance for 2006 is $16.0 million.
Although we are contractually committed to make approximately $17.5 million of capital and other expenditures at one park, the vast majority of our capital expenditures in 2006 and beyond will be made on a discretionary basis. We plan on spending approximately $130 million on capital expenditures for the 2006 calendar year.
During the first quarter of 2006 we entered into a five-year sponsorship, marketing and purchasing agreement with Papa John’s pursuant to which we agreed to purchase ingredients for a minimum number of whole pizzas as well as certain printing, embroidery and promotional services, in each case, subject to Papa John’s meeting certain pricing and specification requirements.
We have entered into two long-term agreements with The Home Depot. Under the terms of the supply agreement, we agreed to purchase certain commercial home products, building material, construction, maintenance and repair products exclusively from The Home Depot, subject to The Home Depot meeting certain pricing and specification requirements. Under the terms of the marketing agreement, each party agreed to provide the other specified marketing and promotional support.
During the three years ended December 31, 2003, insurance premiums and self-insurance retention levels increased substantially. However, as compared to the policies that expired in 2004 and 2005, the current policies, which expire in December 2006, cover substantially the same risks (neither property insurance policy covered terrorist activities), do not require higher aggregate premiums and do not have substantially larger self-insurance retentions (liability insurance retentions increased from $2.0 million to $2.5 million per occurrence and workers’ compensation retentions increased from $500,000 to
36
$750,000). We cannot predict the level of the premiums that we may be required to pay for subsequent insurance coverage, the level of any self-insurance retention applicable thereto, the level of aggregate coverage available or the availability of coverage for specific risks, such as terrorism.
We are party to various other legal actions arising in the normal course of business. See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on certain significant litigation.
Red Zone requested that we reimburse certain of the expenses it incurred in connection with its 2005 consent solicitation. By virtue of consent solicitation, three individuals designated by Red Zone, including Daniel M. Snyder, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, and Mark Shapiro, our President and Chief Executive Officer, became directors and three previously existing directors were removed from the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors authorized us to reimburse Red Zone for the reasonable expenses incurred in connection with its consent solicitation subject to approval by our shareholders. Red Zone requested reimbursement for expenses that include financial advisory fees, legal fees, travel, compensation and signing bonuses paid by Red Zone to Mr. Shapiro and additional individuals who have become our employees and other out of the pocket expenses. The Audit Committee, with the advice of an independent counsel, determined that the reimbursement of approximately $10.4 million of Red Zone’s expenses would be reasonable. Shareholders approved this reimbursement at the 2006 Annual Meeting on May 25, 2006. We recognized the reimbursement expense in the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
We may from time to time seek to retire our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on the prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of September 30, 2006, there have been no material changes in our market risk exposure from that disclosed in the 2005 Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of September 30, 2006. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective (i) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
37
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
During the three months ended September 30, 2006, there were no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. For a discussion of our risk factors, see Item 1A of such Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed (or furnished) herewith or were heretofore filed and are hereby incorporated by reference:
Exhibit 10.1 | | Consulting Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2006, by and between Six Flags, Inc. and Brian Jenkins (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 12, 2006) |
| | |
Exhibit 10.2 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2006, by and between Mark Shapiro and Six Flags, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | |
Exhibit 10.3 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of Restricted Stock to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | |
Exhibit 10.4 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of $12 Share Price Stock Option to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | |
Exhibit 10.5 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of $15 Share Price Stock Option to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | |
Exhibit 10.6 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of Noncontingent Stock Option to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | |
Exhibit 31.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
Exhibit 31.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
Exhibit 32.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
Exhibit 32.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* Filed/furnished herewith
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| SIX FLAGS, INC. (Registrant) | |
| | |
| /s/ Mark Shapiro | |
| Mark Shapiro | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | |
| /s/ Jeffrey R. Speed | |
| Jeffrey R. Speed | |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) | |
Date: November 9, 2006
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | | | |
10.1 | | Consulting Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2006, by and between Six Flags, Inc. and Brian Jenkins (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 12, 2006) |
| | | | |
10.2 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2006, by and between Mark Shapiro and Six Flags, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | | | |
10.3 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of Restricted Stock to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | | | |
10.4 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of $12 Share Price Stock Option to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | | | |
10.5 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of $15 Share Price Stock Option to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | | | |
10.6 | | Award Agreement for the Grant of Noncontingent Stock Option to Mark Shapiro (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Six Flags Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2006) |
| | | | |
31.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | |
31.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | |
32.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | |
32.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* Filed/furnished herewith
40