Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 1, 2007
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-10317
LSI CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 94-2712976 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(408) 433-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
LSI Logic Corporation (Former Name)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
LSI Logic Corporation (Former Name)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filerþ Accelerated Filero Non-Accelerated Filero
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso Noþ
As of August 3, 2007, there were 716,061,120 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
LSI CORPORATION
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended July 1, 2007
INDEX
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended July 1, 2007
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
No. | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 4.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 32.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LSI CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands, except | ||||||||
per share amounts) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 725,470 | $ | 327,800 | ||||
Short-term investments | 432,809 | 681,137 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $9,710 and $13,871 | 424,406 | 348,638 | ||||||
Inventories | 285,011 | 209,470 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 252,417 | 68,692 | ||||||
Total current assets | 2,120,113 | 1,635,737 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 246,075 | 86,045 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 1,714,513 | 59,484 | ||||||
Goodwill | 2,517,261 | 932,323 | ||||||
Other assets | 227,148 | 138,555 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 6,825,110 | $ | 2,852,144 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 236,698 | $ | 200,189 | ||||
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits | 135,004 | 82,292 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 302,775 | 155,986 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 24,931 | 88,304 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 699,408 | 526,771 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 719,495 | 350,000 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits | 210,217 | — | ||||||
Income taxes payable — non-current | 172,294 | — | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities | 137,231 | 79,400 | ||||||
Total long-term obligations and other liabilities | 1,239,237 | 429,400 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | ||||||||
Minority interest in subsidiary | 225 | 235 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value: 2,000 shares authorized; none outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value: 1,300,000 shares authorized; 728,069 and 403,680 shares outstanding | 7,281 | 4,037 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 6,446,273 | 3,102,178 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (1,575,924 | ) | (1,220,306 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 8,610 | 9,829 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 4,886,240 | 1,895,738 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 6,825,110 | $ | 2,852,144 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
LSI CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 669,939 | $ | 489,635 | $ | 1,135,354 | $ | 965,519 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues | 517,969 | 291,229 | 788,868 | 573,840 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 151,970 | 198,406 | 346,486 | 391,679 | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 201,933 | 100,362 | 305,780 | 202,636 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 114,803 | 64,636 | 176,413 | 133,514 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring of operations and other items, net | 25,920 | (21,648 | ) | 17,840 | (15,998 | ) | ||||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development | 176,400 | — | 182,900 | — | ||||||||||||
(Loss)/income from operations | (367,086 | ) | 55,056 | (336,447 | ) | 71,527 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (9,049 | ) | (6,428 | ) | (12,939 | ) | (12,758 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income and other, net | 10,790 | 10,319 | 21,321 | 19,846 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)/income before income taxes | (365,345 | ) | 58,947 | (328,065 | ) | 78,615 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 12,500 | 5,100 | 19,956 | 11,600 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income | $ | (377,845 | ) | $ | 53,847 | $ | (348,021 | ) | $ | 67,015 | ||||||
Net (loss)/income per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | 0.17 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | 0.17 | ||||||
Shares used in computing per share amounts: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 751,114 | 397,790 | 577,672 | 396,312 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 751,114 | 405,613 | 577,672 | 404,213 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
LSI CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net (loss)/income | $ | (348,021 | ) | $ | 67,015 | |||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 120,175 | 48,166 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 33,997 | 25,129 | ||||||
Non-cash restructuring and other items | 199 | (2,749 | ) | |||||
Acquired in-process research and development | 182,900 | — | ||||||
Gain on sale of intellectual property | — | (15,000 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of Gresham manufacturing facility and associated intellectual property | — | (12,553 | ) | |||||
Write-off of intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination | — | 3,325 | ||||||
Non-cash foreign exchange (gain)/loss | (3,888 | ) | 469 | |||||
Loss/(gain) on sale/write-down of equity securities | 2,396 | (1,211 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of property and equipment | (9,502 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities | (5,470 | ) | 20 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 150,165 | 12,523 | ||||||
Inventories | 45,242 | 17,306 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 33,864 | (5,977 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable | (131,054 | ) | 8,743 | |||||
Accrued and other liabilities | 14,860 | 3,801 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 85,863 | 149,002 | ||||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchase of debt securities available-for-sale | (122,236 | ) | (382,212 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities and sales of debt securities available-for-sale | 374,132 | 205,913 | ||||||
Purchases of convertible notes/equity securities | (3,000 | ) | (5,150 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of equity securities | — | 3,581 | ||||||
Purchases of property, equipment and software | (40,714 | ) | (28,657 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 13,785 | 40 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of intellectual property | — | 15,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of Fort Collins facility | — | 10,998 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of Colorado Springs facility | — | 7,029 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of Gresham manufacturing facility | — | 81,426 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of intellectual property with the Gresham manufacturing facility | — | 5,100 | ||||||
Cash acquired from acquisition of Agere, net of acquisition costs | 517,712 | — | ||||||
Acquisition of SiliconStor, net of cash acquired and transaction costs | (52,079 | ) | ||||||
Adjustment to goodwill acquired in a prior year for resolution of a pre-acquisition income tax contingency | 2,442 | — | ||||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities | 690,042 | (86,932 | ) | |||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 21,917 | 32,137 | ||||||
Purchase of common stock under repurchase program | (400,355 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities | (378,438 | ) | 32,137 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 203 | 598 | ||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 397,670 | 94,805 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 327,800 | 264,649 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 725,470 | $ | 359,454 | ||||
Non-cash information: | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock in consideration for acquired assets and liabilities of Agere | $ | 3,647,021 | $ | — | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
LSI CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
For financial reporting purposes, LSI Corporation (the “Company” or “LSI”) reports on a 13 or 14-week quarter with a year ending December 31. The most recent quarter ended July 1, 2007. The results of operations for the quarter ended July 1, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The first six months of 2007 ended on July 1, 2007 and the first six months of 2006 ended on July 2, 2006 and consisted of approximately 26 weeks each. The second quarter in each of 2007 and 2006 consisted of 13 weeks.
On April 2, 2007, the Company acquired Agere Systems Inc. (“Agere”) through the merger of Agere and a subsidiary of the Company.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.
In management’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and restructuring and other items, net as discussed in Note 3), necessary to state fairly the financial information included herein. While the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Amortization of intangibles which was previously reported in operating expense in the financial statement captions have been reclassified to cost of revenues for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 to conform to the current period presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FAS 109”).” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with this interpretation is a two-step process. In the first step, recognition, the Company determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The second step addresses measurement of a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not criteria. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements will generally result in (a) an increase in a liability for income taxes payable or a reduction of an income tax refund receivable, (b) a reduction in a deferred tax asset or an increase in a deferred tax liability or (c) both (a) and (b). Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be de-recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. Use of a valuation allowance as described in FAS 109 is not an appropriate substitute for the de-recognition of a tax position. The requirement to assess the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets based on sufficiency of future taxable income is unchanged by this interpretation.
As of January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of adoption as a $3.4 million increase to the opening balance of accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2007. The amount of unrecognized tax benefit as of the date of adoption after the FIN 48 adjustment was $132.9 million. Of the unrecognized tax benefit of $132.9 million, $103.0 million relates to unrecognized tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate of the Company. The Company does not expect any uncertain tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.
6
Table of Contents
The Company files income tax returns at the U.S. federal level and in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001. The Company’s subsidiaries in Hong Kong (1997 to 2001) and Singapore (1999 to 2002) are currently under audit.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued in relation to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. As of the date of adoption, the Company had accrued approximately $32.3 million for the payment of interest and penalties.
Agere adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on April 2, 2007. The amount of unrecognized tax benefit on April 2, 2007 was $64.0 million. Of the unrecognized tax benefit of $64.0 million, $0 relates to unrecognized tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate of the Company. Any adjustments relating to Agere pre-acquisition period unrecognized tax benefits, including related interest and penalties, would be recorded to goodwill. The Company does not expect any uncertain tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.
As of the date of adoption, Agere had accrued approximately $10.7 million for the payment of interest and penalties.
In June 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue No. 06-2 (“EITF 06-02”), “Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43 (“FAS 43”), Accounting for Compensated Absences.” EITF 06-02 addresses the accounting for an employee’s right to a compensated absence under a sabbatical or other similar benefit arrangement that is unrestricted (that is, the employee is not required to perform any services for or on behalf of the entity during the absence) and that requires the completion of a minimum service period and in which the benefit does not increase with additional years of service. For sabbatical arrangements meeting these criteria, EITF 06-02 concludes that the accumulated criteria have been met in paragraph 6(b) of FAS 43 and that if the remaining sections of paragraph 6 are met, the sabbatical arrangement should be accrued over the requisite service period, which for the Company would be 10 years. The Company offers a sabbatical of 20 days to full-time employees upon completion of 10 years of service. The Company adopted EITF 06-02 in the first quarter of 2007, with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $4.2 million.
The impact of the adoption of FIN 48 and EITF 06-02 on the opening balance of accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
Accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2006 | $ | (1,220,306 | ) | |
Impact of adoption of FIN 48 | (3,393 | ) | ||
Impact of adoption of EITF 06-02 | (4,204 | ) | ||
Accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2007 | $ | (1,227,903 | ) | |
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and expands on required disclosures about fair value measurement. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the provisions of FAS 157 will have on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“FAS 158”), which amends FAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” FAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits,” FAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions,” and FAS No. 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosure about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88 and 106.” FAS 158 requires an entity to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status through comprehensive income in the year in which the changes occur. This Statement requires entities to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. As a result of the Agere merger, the Company acquired pension plans and postretirement benefit plans covering many Agere employees in the U.S. See Note 5.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS 159”). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in
7
Table of Contents
earnings. FAS 159 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2008, although earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”) for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 was $22.8 million and $34.0 million, respectively, and for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 was $13.3 million and $25.1 million, respectively, as shown in the table below. Stock-based compensation costs capitalized to inventory and software development for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were not significant.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards, less expected forfeitures, is amortized over the awards’ vesting period (the requisite service period), on a straight-line basis. The table below summarizes stock-based compensation expense, related to employee stock options, the Company’s employee stock purchase plans (“ESPP”) and restricted stock unit awards under SFAS 123R for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 (in thousands).
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense included in: | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 3,148 | $ | 2,458 | $ | 5,092 | $ | 3,983 | ||||||||
Research and development | 8,978 | 4,643 | 13,695 | 9,165 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 10,687 | 6,197 | 15,210 | 11,981 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 22,813 | $ | 13,298 | $ | 33,997 | $ | 25,129 | ||||||||
Stock Options
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a reduced form calibrated binominal lattice model (the “lattice model”). This model requires the use of historical data for employee exercise behavior and the use of assumptions outlined in the following table:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
Employee Stock Options Granted | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average estimated grant date fair value | $ | 3.45 | $ | 3.95 | $ | 3.36 | $ | 3.59 | ||||||||
Weighted average assumptions in calculation: | ||||||||||||||||
Expected life (years) | 4.44 | 4.35 | 4.35 | 4.29 | ||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||
Volatility | 46 | % | 48 | % | 46 | % | 48 | % |
The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is a derived output of the lattice model. The expected life of employee stock options is affected by all of the underlying assumptions and calibration of the Company’s model.
The Company used an equally weighted combination of historical and implied volatilities as of the grant date. The historical volatility is the standard deviation of the daily stock returns for LSI from the date of the Company’s initial public offering in 1983. The Company used implied volatilities of near-the-money exchange traded call options as stock options are call options that are granted at-the-money. The historical and implied volatilities were annualized and equally weighted to determine the volatilities as of the grant date. Management believes that the equally weighted combination of historical and implied volatilities is more representative of future stock price trends than sole use of historical implied volatilities.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates of constant maturity U.S. Treasury securities appropriate for the term of the Company’s employee stock options.
The lattice model assumes that employees’ exercise behavior is a function of the option’s remaining life and the extent to which the option is in-the-money. The lattice model estimates the probability of exercise as a function of these two variables based on the entire history of exercises and cancellations for all option grants made by the Company since its initial public offering in 1983.
Because stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.
8
Table of Contents
A summary of the changes in stock options outstanding under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the six months ended July 1, 2007 is presented below:
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Remaining | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Per | Contractual | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Share | Term (In years) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006 | 56,750 | $ | 11.92 | — | — | |||||||||||
Options assumed in Agere merger | 48,884 | 22.41 | ||||||||||||||
Options granted | 10,198 | 9.38 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Options exercised | (1,614 | ) | (6.27 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Options canceled | (3,174 | ) | (15.95 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Options outstanding at July 1, 2007 | 111,044 | $ | 14.55 | 4.12 | $ | 46,670 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable at July 1, 2007 | 70,769 | $ | 20.93 | 3.15 | $ | 29,024 | ||||||||||
As of July 1, 2007, total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, was approximately $127.0 million and is expected to be recognized over the next 2.8 years calculated on a weighted average basis. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 was $2.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises was $4.5 million and $10.1 million during the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively.
The Company’s determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as a number of highly complex and subjective assumptions. The Company uses third-party consultants to assist in developing the assumptions used in, as well as calibrating, the lattice model. The Company is responsible for determining the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of its share-based payment awards.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
The Company also has two ESPPs, one for U.S. employees and one for employees outside the U.S., under which rights are granted to employees to purchase shares of common stock at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of such shares at the beginning of a 12-month offering period or the end of each six-month purchase period within such an offering period. Compensation expense is calculated using the fair value of the employees’ purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model. A total of 1.7 million shares and 1.9 million shares related to the ESPPs were issued during the three months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006, respectively. For disclosure purposes, the Company has included the assumptions that went into the calculation of fair value for the May 2007 and May 2006 grants as follows:
Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plans Granted | July 2, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | ||||||
Weighted average estimated grant date fair value | $ | 2.37 | $ | 3.05 | ||||
Weighted average assumptions in calculation: | ||||||||
Expected life (years) | 0.8 | 0.8 | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||
Volatility | 38 | % | 39 | % | ||||
Dividend yield | — | — |
Restricted Stock Awards
Under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (“2003 Plan”), the Company may grant restricted stock or restricted stock units. No participant may be granted more than a total of 0.5 million shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units in any year. The vesting requirements for these awards are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Company typically grants restricted stock units, vesting of which is subject to the employee’s continuing service to the Company. The cost of these awards is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.
9
Table of Contents
A summary of the changes in restricted stock unit awards outstanding during the six months ended July 1, 2007 is presented below (in thousands):
Number of | ||||
Shares | ||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2006 | 1,910 | |||
Assumed in Agere merger | 9,141 | |||
Granted | 2,164 | |||
Vested | (951 | ) | ||
Forfeited | (171 | ) | ||
Non-vested shares at July 1, 2007 | 12,093 | |||
As of July 1, 2007, the Company had approximately $72.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock unit awards, which will be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.6 years. The fair value of shares vested in the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 was $4.2 million and $8.8 million, respectively.
NOTE 3 — RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ITEMS
The Company recorded a charge of $25.9 million and $17.8 million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively. A charge of $22.2 million and $14.0 million was recorded in the Semiconductor segment and a charge of $3.7 million and $3.8 million was recorded in the Storage Systems segment for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively. The Company recorded a net credit of $21.6 million and $16.0 million in restructuring of operations and other items during the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively. Of these credits, a credit of $21.9 million and $17.3 million was recorded in the Semiconductor segment and a charge of $0.3 million and $1.3 million was recorded in the Storage Systems segment for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively. For a complete discussion of the 2006 restructuring actions, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Restructuring and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
First quarter of 2007:
The credit of $8.1 million resulted from the following items:
• | $10.4 million net gain was recorded for the sale of land in Colorado, which had a net book value of $2.0 million. Total proceeds from the sale were $12.4 million. The gain was offset in part by a charge of $0.2 million associated with certain other asset write-offs; | ||
• | A credit of $0.5 million was recorded for changes in sublease assumptions for certain previously accrued facility lease exit costs; | ||
• | An expense of $0.7 million was recorded to reflect the change in time value of accruals for facility lease exit costs; and | ||
• | An expense of $1.9 million was recorded for severance and termination benefits for employees. |
Second quarter of 2007:
On June 27, 2007, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to sell the Consumer business to Magnum Semiconductor and a reduction in workforce of approximately 900 positions (inclusive of the Consumer business) or 13 percent of the Company’s non-production workers across all business and functional areas worldwide. In connection with the restructuring actions, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $21.6 million during the quarter ended July 1, 2007, which represents future cash expenditures for termination related benefits expected to be paid primarily by the end of the third quarter of 2007. The sale of the Consumer business closed on July 27, 2007. See Note 12.
On July 25, 2007, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to sell its semiconductor assembly and test operations in Thailand to STATS ChipPAC Ltd. Under the terms of the agreement, the company will also enter into additional agreements, including a multi-year wafer assembly and test agreement and a transition services agreement. The Company also announced that it would transition semiconductor and storage systems assembly and test operations performed at its facilities in Singapore and Kansas to current manufacturing partners. As part of these actions, the Company expects to eliminate approximately 2,100 production positions worldwide (see Note 12). In connection with the restructuring for Kansas, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $2.5 million during the quarter ended July 1, 2007, which represents future cash expenditures for
10
Table of Contents
termination related benefits expected to be paid primarily by the end of the second quarter of 2008. The restructuring costs associated with the Thailand and Singapore assembly and test facilities were recorded as liabilities assumed as part of the merger with Agere on April 2, 2007. See the discussion below under restructuring actions related to Agere.
For the quarter ended July 1, 2007, a charge of $25.9 million resulted from the following items:
• | An expense of $24.1 million was recorded for severance and termination benefits for employees as a result of the actions announced in the second quarter of 2007 — $11.9 million is related to the Consumer business action, $2.5 million is related to the transition of Wichita manufacturing operations to manufacturing partners and $9.7 million is related to the workforce reduction action announced June 27, 2007 as mentioned above. | ||
• | An expense of $0.3 million was recorded for changes in sublease assumptions for certain previously accrued facility lease exit costs; | ||
• | An expense of $0.7 million was recorded to reflect the change in time value of accruals for facility lease exit costs; and | ||
• | An expense of $0.8 million was recorded for certain asset write-offs and merger related costs. |
Assets held for sale of $140.9 million and $20.1 million were included as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets as of July, 1, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The increase in assets held for sale during the six months ended July 1, 2007 is mainly due to the $123.0 million classification as of April 2, 2007 of the acquired Thailand and Singapore assembly and test facilities as assets held for sale. Assets classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and not depreciated. The fair values of impaired equipment and facilities were researched and estimated by management using the assistance of third party appraisers. Given that current market conditions for the sale of older fabrication facilities and related equipment may fluctuate, there can be no assurance that the Company will realize the current net carrying value of the assets held for sale. The Company reassesses the realizability of the carrying value of these assets at the end of each quarter until the assets are sold or otherwise disposed of and additional adjustments may be necessary.
The following table sets forth the Company’s restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2006 and July 1, 2007, which are included in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet, and the activity affecting the reserves during the three months ended July 1, 2007 (in thousands):
Balance at | Restructuring | Utilized | Balance at | Restructuring | Utilized | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Expense | during Q1 | April 1, | Expense | during Q2 | July 1, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | Q1 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | Q2 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Write-down of excess assets (a) | $ | — | $ | (10,143 | ) | $ | 10,143 | $ | — | $ | 785 | $ | (323 | ) | $ | 462 | ||||||||||||
Lease terminations (b) | 23,169 | 189 | (2,952 | ) | 20,406 | 1,027 | (2,082 | ) | 19,351 | |||||||||||||||||||
Payments to employees for severance (c) | 342 | 1,874 | (449 | ) | 1,767 | 24,108 | (1,917 | ) | 23,958 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 23,511 | $ | (8,080 | ) | $ | 6,742 | $ | 22,173 | $ | 25,920 | $ | (4,322 | ) | $ | 43,771 | ||||||||||||
(a) | The credit in Q1 2007 includes the gain from the sale of the land in Colorado, offset in part by a charge of $0.2 million associated with certain asset write-offs. | |
(b) | Amounts utilized represent cash payments. The balance remaining for real estate lease terminations is expected to be paid during the remaining terms of these contracts, which extend through 2011. | |
(c) | Amounts utilized represent cash severance payments to employees. The balance remaining for severance is expected to be paid by the end of 2008. |
Restructuring actions associated with Agere:
In connection with the merger with Agere, the Company’s management approved and initiated plans to restructure the operations of Agere to eliminate certain duplicative activities, reduce cost structure and better align product and operating expenses with existing general economic conditions. All Agere restructuring costs were accounted for as liabilities assumed as part of the purchase business combination as of April 2, 2007 in accordance with EITF 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.”
11
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth restructuring reserves related to Agere as of April 2, 2007 and July 1, 2007, which are included in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet, and the activity affecting the reserves during the three months ended July 1, 2007 (in thousands). The reserves established as of April 2, 2007 include the following:
• | A reserve of $50 million for severance and termination benefits for employees as a result of the actions announced in the second quarter of 2007. | ||
• | A reserve of $14 million for facility lease exit costs primarily in Singapore and Europe; and | ||
• | A reserve of $29 million for stock related compensation for employees terminated. |
Balance at | Utilized | Balance at | ||||||||||
April 2, | during Q2 | July 1, | ||||||||||
(in thousands): | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||
Lease terminations (a) | $ | 14,464 | $ | — | $ | 14,464 | ||||||
Payments to employees for severance (b) | 50,087 | (4,070 | ) | 46,017 | ||||||||
Stock compensation charges in accordance with FAS 123R (c) | 28,841 | — | 28,841 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 93,392 | $ | (4,070 | ) | $ | 89,322 | |||||
(a) | The balance remaining for real estate lease terminations is expected to be paid during the remaining terms of these contracts, which extend through 2013. | |
(b) | Amounts utilized represent cash severance payments to employees. The majority of the balance remaining for severance is expected to be paid by the end of 2008. | |
(c) | Amounts represent stock options and restricted units awarded to employees to be terminated which will accelerate upon their employment terminations. The balance is expected to be utilized by the end of 2009. |
NOTE 4 — BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The Company actively evaluates strategic acquisitions that build upon the Company’s existing library of intellectual property, human capital and engineering talent, and seeks to increase the Company’s leadership position in the markets in which the Company operates.
Merger with Agere
On April 2, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Agere. Agere was a provider of integrated circuit solutions for a variety of computing and communications applications. Some of Agere’s solutions included related software and reference designs. Agere’s solutions were used in products such as hard disk drives, mobile phones, high-speed communications systems and personal computers. Agere also licensed its intellectual property to others. The purpose of the acquisition was to enable the Company to expand its comprehensive set of building block solutions including semiconductors, systems and related software for storage, networking and consumer electronics products that enable businesses and consumers to store, protect and stay connected to their information and digital content and expand its intellectual property portfolio and integrated workforce in the Semiconductor segment.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Agere common stock outstanding at the effective time of the merger was converted into the right to receive 2.16 shares of LSI common stock. As a result, approximately 368 million shares of LSI common stock were issued to former Agere stockholders. The fair value of the common stock issued was determined using a share price of $9.905 per share, which represented the average closing price of LSI common shares for two trading days before and ending two trading days after December 4, 2006, the date by which the merger was agreed to and announced. LSI assumed stock options and restricted stock units covering a total of approximately 58 million shares of LSI common stock. The fair value of options assumed was estimated using a reduced form calibrated binomial lattice model and a share price of $9.905 per share, which represents the average closing price of LSI common shares for two trading days before and ending two trading days after December 4, 2006, the date by which the merger was agreed to and announced. The value of total options and restricted units assumed was reduced by the fair value of unvested options and restricted units assumed, based on the price of a share of LSI common stock on April 2, 2007. LSI also guaranteed Agere’s 6.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due December 15, 2009, the fair value of which was $370 million as of April 2, 2007.
12
Table of Contents
The merger was accounted for as a purchase. Accordingly, the results of operations of Agere and estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the April 2, 2007 acquisition date.
The total purchase price of the acquisition was as follows (in thousands):
Amounts | ||||
Fair value of LSI common shares issued | $ | 3,647,021 | ||
(a) Fair value of stock awards assumed | 218,713 | |||
(b) Fair value of unvested stock awards assumed | (168,555 | ) | ||
(a)-(b) Fair value of the vested options assumed | 50,158 | |||
Direct transaction costs | 22,970 | |||
Total estimated purchase price | $ | 3,720,149 | ||
Purchase price allocation:
The allocation of the purchase price to Agere’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based on their estimated fair values. Further adjustments may be included in the final allocation of the purchase price of Agere, if the adjustments are determined within the purchase price allocation period (up to twelve months from the closing date). The excess of the purchase price over the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been allocated to goodwill. None of the goodwill recorded is expected to be deductible for tax purposes except the tax deductible goodwill LSI inherited from Agere. The purchase price has been allocated as follows (in thousands):
As of | ||||
April 2, | ||||
2007 | ||||
Cash | $ | 540,140 | ||
Accounts receivable | 222,169 | |||
Inventory | 120,848 | |||
Assets held for sale | 122,756 | |||
Property and equipment | 162,047 | |||
Accounts payable | (167,947 | ) | ||
Pension and postretirement liabilities | (214,607 | ) | ||
Convertible Notes | (370,249 | ) | ||
Other liabilities | (183,359 | ) | ||
Net assets acquired | 231,798 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets | 1,727,700 | |||
In-process research and development | 176,400 | |||
Goodwill | 1,584,251 | |||
Total estimated purchase price | $ | 3,720,149 | ||
Note 3 contains information related to the cost of restructuring programs for Agere employees. The costs were included as part of other liabilities assumed as of April 2, 2007.
The following table sets forth the components of the identifiable intangible assets, which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives on both a straight-line and on an accelerated basis (dollars in thousands):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Useful Life | ||||||||
Fair Value | (in Years) | |||||||
Current technology | $ | 844,500 | 8.5 | |||||
Customer base | 513,000 | 10 | ||||||
Patent licensing | 317,200 | 10 | ||||||
Order Backlog | 53,000 | .5 | ||||||
Total acquired identifiable intangible assets | $ | 1,727,700 | ||||||
13
Table of Contents
Acquired in-process research and development:
We recorded a charge of $176.4 million associated with acquired in-process research and development, or IPR&D, associated with the merger with Agere for the three months ended July 1, 2007. The Company’s methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions to IPR&D is determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology industry with the assistance of third party service providers. Each project in-process was analyzed by discounting forecasted cash flows directly related to the products expecting to result from the subject research and development, net of returns on contributory assets including working capital, fixed assets, customer relationships, tradename, and assembled workforce. IPR&D was expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed. The fair value of technology under development is determined using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value. A discount rate is used for the projects to account for the risks associated with the inherent uncertainties surrounding the successful development of the IPR&D, market acceptance of the technology, the useful life of the technology, the profitability level of such technology and the uncertainty of technological advances, which could impact the estimates recorded. The discount rates used in the present value calculations are typically derived from a weighted-average cost of capital analysis. These estimates did not account for any potential synergies realizable as a result of the acquisition and were in line with industry averages and growth estimates. See the details summarized in the table below.
Estimated | Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||
cost to | projections by | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | IPR&D | complete | Discount | projects extend | ||||||||||||||||||||
Company | Date | Projects | $ millions | $ millions | rate | through | ||||||||||||||||||
Agere | April 2007 | Storage – read channel and preamps | $ | 36.2 | $ | 17.8 | 13.8 | % | 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Mobility – HSPDA for 3G | $ | 31.2 | $ | 144.2 | 13.8 | % | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||
Networking–modems, firewire, serdes, media gateway, VoIP, network processors, Ethernet, mappers and framers | $ | 109.0 | $ | 68.0 | 13.8 | % | 2021 |
The actual development timelines and costs were in line with original estimates as of July 1, 2007. However, development of the technology remains a substantial risk to the Company due to factors including the remaining effort to achieve technical feasibility, rapidly changing customer needs and competitive threats from other companies. Failure to bring these products to market in a timely manner could adversely affect sales and profitability of the Company in the future. Additionally, the value of other intangible assets acquired may become impaired.
Pro forma results:
The following pro forma summary is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations for future periods or that actually would have been realized had the Company and Agere been a consolidated entity during the periods presented. The summary combines the results of operations as if Agere had been acquired as of the beginning of the period presented.
The summary includes the impact of certain adjustments such as amortization of intangibles, stock compensation charges and charges in interest expense because of Agere’s notes that the Company guaranteed. Additionally, IPR&D of $176.4 million discussed above has been excluded from the periods presented as it arose from the merger with Agere. The restructuring charges of $25.9 million referred to in Note 3 did not relate to the merger with Agere and accordingly was included.
(dollars in thousands except per share amounts) | Six months ended | |||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,470,498 | $ | 1,683,703 | ||||
Net loss | (195,274 | ) | (115,049 | ) | ||||
Basic income per share | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | ||
Diluted income per share | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | ||
14
Table of Contents
Acquisition of SiliconStor, Inc.
On March 13, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of SiliconStor, Inc. Pro forma statements of earnings information have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material. The table below provides information about this acquisition (dollars in millions).
Fair Value of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity Name; | Tangible Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Included in; | Total | Assets/ | In-Process | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of | Purchase | Type of | (Liabilities) | Amortizable | Research and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired Business | Acquisition Date | Price | Consideration | Acquired | Goodwill | Intangible Assets | Development | |||||||||||||||||||||
SiliconStor, Inc.; Semiconductor segment; silicon solutions for enterprise storage based on SAS and FC-SATA | March 13, 2007 | $ | 56.4 | $56.4 cash | $ | 1.5 | $ | 37.8 | $ | 10.6 | $ | 6.5 |
There were no material acquisitions for the six months ended July 2, 2006.
NOTE 5 — BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
The Company has pension plans covering substantially all former Agere U.S. employees, excluding management employees hired after June 30, 2003. Retirement benefits are offered under a defined benefit plan and are based on either an adjusted career average pay or dollar per month formula or on a cash balance plan. The cash balance plan provides for annual Company contributions based on a participant’s age and compensation and interest on existing balances and covers employees of certain companies acquired by Agere since 1996 and management employees hired after January 1, 1999 and before July 1, 2003. The Company also has postretirement benefit plans that include healthcare benefits and life insurance coverage for former Agere employees. Participants in the cash balance plan and management employees hired after June 30, 2003 are not entitled to Company paid benefits under the postretirement benefit plans. The Company also has pension plans covering certain international employees.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 1, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Postretirement | Postretirement | |||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Benefits | Pension Benefits | Benefits | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1,867 | $ | 41 | $ | 1,867 | $ | 41 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 18,396 | 931 | 18,396 | 931 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (20,859 | ) | (1,194 | ) | (20,859 | ) | (1,194 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | (596 | ) | (222 | ) | (596 | ) | (222 | ) | ||||||||
Curtailment gain | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Settlement charges | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total benefit cost | $ | (596 | ) | $ | (222 | ) | $ | (596 | ) | $ | (222 | ) | ||||
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of the following (in thousands):
July 1, 2007 | ||||||||
Postretirement | ||||||||
Pension Benefits | Benefits | |||||||
Accrued benefit liability | $ | 197,775 | $ | 5,955 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | — | ||||||
Net amount realized | 197,775 | 5,955 |
As of April 2, 2007, the Agere’s pension and postretirement obligations were remeasured and recorded at fair value. For the period from April 2, 2007 through July 1, 2007, the Company accounted for its pension and postretirement obligations under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”.As of July 1, 2007, the total accrued pension benefit liability
15
Table of Contents
was $198 million, of which $2 million was included in other current liabilities and the rest was included as a non-current liability. The net accrued postretirement benefit liability as of July 1, 2007 was $6 million, of which $16 million was reported as a current liability, $14 million was reported as a non-current liability, and $24 million was included in other assets.
The actuarial assumptions for the principal pension and postretirement plans for 2007 are as follows:
Pension | Postretirement | Postretirement | ||||||||||
Benefits | Health Benefits | Life Benefits | ||||||||||
Discount rate to determine net periodic cost | 6.0 % | 6.0 % | 6.0 % | |||||||||
Discount rate to determine the benefit obligation as of April 2, 2007 | 6.0 % | 6.0 % | 6.0 % | |||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 4.0 % | N/A | 4.0 % | |||||||||
Expected average rate of return on plan assets | 8.13 % | N/A | 7.75 % |
The long-term rates of return on assets were based on the asset mix of the portfolios as noted below. The rates used are adjusted for any current or anticipated shifts in the investment mix of the plans. The rates also factor in the historic performance of the plans assets.
Allocation as of April 2, 2007 | ||||||||
Pension | Postretirement | |||||||
Benefits | Benefits | |||||||
Equity Securities | 54 % | 40 % | ||||||
Debt Securities | 46 % | 60 % |
The following table reflects the benefit payments, which include expected future service, that the Company expects to pay in the periods noted (in thousands):
Pension | Postretirement | |||||||
Benefits | Benefits | |||||||
April 2 through December 31, 2007 | $ | 65,774 | $ | 16,335 | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2008 | $ | 89,261 | $ | 17,929 | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2009 | $ | 86,048 | $ | 1,355 | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2010 | $ | 85,954 | $ | 1,472 | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2011 | $ | 85,817 | $ | 1,591 | ||||
Years ended December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2016 | $ | 433,612 | $ | 10,002 |
The Company does not currently plan to make contributions to its pension plans during the year ending December 31, 2007.
16
Table of Contents
NOTE 6 — BALANCE SHEET DETAIL
July 1, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||||
Cash in financial institutions | $ | 100,490 | $ | 50,478 | ||||
Cash equivalents | 624,980 | 277,322 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | $ | 725,470 | $ | 327,800 | ||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | ||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities | $ | 236,815 | $ | 363,723 | ||||
U.S. government and agency securities | 158,206 | 272,287 | ||||||
Corporate and municipal debt securities | 37,788 | 45,127 | ||||||
Total short-term investments | $ | 432,809 | $ | 681,137 | ||||
Long-term investments in equity securities: | ||||||||
Marketable equity securities available-for-sale | $ | 2,335 | $ | 2,827 | ||||
Non-marketable equity securities | 10,580 | 12,973 | ||||||
Total long-term investments in equity securities | $ | 12,915 | $ | 15,800 | ||||
Inventories: | ||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 34,163 | $ | 44,151 | ||||
Work-in-process | 116,082 | 52,497 | ||||||
Finished goods | 134,766 | 112,822 | ||||||
Total inventories | $ | 285,011 | $ | 209,470 | ||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization: | ||||||||
Semiconductor segment | $ | 1,675,952 | $ | 16,701 | ||||
Storage Systems segment | 38,561 | 42,783 | ||||||
Total intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization | $ | 1,714,513 | $ | 59,484 | ||||
Intangible assets by reportable segment are comprised of the following (in thousands):
July 1, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Accumulated | Gross | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Carrying Amount | Amortization | Carrying Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Semiconductor: | ||||||||||||||||
Current technology | $ | 1,090,058 | $ | (267,131 | ) | $ | 240,458 | $ | (232,716 | ) | ||||||
Trademarks | 26,785 | (26,239 | ) | 26,285 | (25,446 | ) | ||||||||||
Customer base | 525,588 | (11,995 | ) | 8,788 | (4,394 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-compete agreements | 1,949 | (849 | ) | 849 | (625 | ) | ||||||||||
Existing purchase orders | 200 | (200 | ) | 200 | (200 | ) | ||||||||||
Supply agreement | 100 | (67 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Patent Licensing | 317,200 | (9,151 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Order Backlog | 53,000 | (26,500 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Workforce | 3,567 | (363 | ) | 3,567 | (65 | ) | ||||||||||
Subtotal | 2,018,447 | (342,495 | ) | 280,147 | (263,446 | ) | ||||||||||
Storage Systems: | ||||||||||||||||
Current technology | 164,339 | (127,489 | ) | 164,339 | (124,618 | ) | ||||||||||
Trademarks | 7,150 | (7,150 | ) | 7,150 | (7,120 | ) | ||||||||||
Customer base | 5,010 | (5,010 | ) | 5,010 | (5,010 | ) | ||||||||||
Supply agreement | 8,147 | (8,147 | ) | 8,147 | (7,472 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-compete agreements | 1,600 | (622 | ) | 1,600 | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Trade Names | 800 | (67 | ) | 800 | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Subtotal | 187,046 | (148,485 | ) | 187,046 | (144,263 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,205,493 | $ | (490,980 | ) | $ | 467,193 | $ | (407,709 | ) | ||||||
On April 2, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Agere and on March 13, 2007, the Company acquired SiliconStor. See more details in Note 4.
17
Table of Contents
Amortization expense and the weighted average lives of intangible assets are shown in the table below:
Weighted | Six months ended | Year ended | ||||||||||||||
Average Lives | July 1, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||
(In Months) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Current technology | 54 | $ | 37,286 | $ | 25,129 | $ | 53,185 | |||||||||
Trademarks | 83 | 822 | 4,119 | 5,001 | ||||||||||||
Customer base | 43 | 7,602 | 2,359 | 2,427 | ||||||||||||
Supply agreement | 32 | 742 | 225 | 1,590 | ||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements | 27 | 813 | 182 | 281 | ||||||||||||
Existing purchase orders | 9 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Workforce | 72 | 298 | 65 | — | ||||||||||||
Patent Licensing | 37 | 9,151 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Order Backlog | 2 | 26,500 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Trade Names | 84 | 57 | 10 | — | ||||||||||||
Total | 48 | $ | 83,271 | $ | 32,089 | $ | 62,484 | |||||||||
The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets as of July 1, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year: | Amount: | |||
2007 (July 2, 2007 through December 31, 2007) | $ | 127,974 | ||
2008 | 297,983 | |||
2009 | 283,345 | |||
2010 | 232,922 | |||
2011 and thereafter | 772,289 | |||
$ | 1,714,513 | |||
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
Semiconductor | Storage Systems | |||||||||||
segment | segment | Total | ||||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2007 | $ | 756,699 | $ | 175,624 | $ | 932,323 | ||||||
Goodwill acquired during the year* | 1,622,041 | — | 1,622,041 | |||||||||
Adjustment to goodwill acquired in a prior year for the resolution of a pre-acquisition income tax contingency | (2,442 | ) | — | (2,442 | ) | |||||||
Adjustment to goodwill related to FIN 48 | (34,661 | ) | — | (34,661 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of July 1, 2007 | $ | 2,341,637 | $ | 175,624 | $ | 2,517,261 | ||||||
* | During the six months ended July 1, 2007, the Company recorded $37.8 million and $1,584.3 million of goodwill in connection with the acquisition of SiliconStor and Agere in the Semiconductor segment, respectively. |
The Company monitors the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions annually, or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment, if any, would be measured by comparing the implied fair value and goodwill against its carrying value of goodwill. See the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for further discussion.
Interest | Conversion | July 1, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
Maturity | Rate | Price | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt: | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 Convertible Subordinated Notes | May 2010 | 4.0 | % | $ | 13.42 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 350,000 | |||||||||||
2002 Convertible Subordinated Notes | December 2009 | 6.5 | % | $ | 15.31 | 361,660 | — | |||||||||||||
Accrued debt premium ** | 8,589 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 720,249 | $ | 350,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of accrued debt premium | (754 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total long-term debt | $ | 719,495 | $ | 350,000 | ||||||||||||||||
** | Upon the completion of merger with Agere, the Company guaranteed Agere’s 2002 Convertible Subordinated Notes. The face value of the Notes were adjusted to the fair value of $370 million as of April 2, 2007, the purchase date. The accrued debt premium will be fully amortized by December 2009. |
18
Table of Contents
NOTE 7 — RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED (LOSS)/INCOME PER SHARE
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted net (loss)/income per share computations are as follows (in thousands except for per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Per-Share | Per-Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss* | Shares+ | Amount | Income* | Shares+ | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders | $ | (377,845 | ) | 751,114 | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 53,847 | 397,790 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||||||
Stock options, employee stock purchase rights and restricted stock unit awards | — | — | — | — | 7,823 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders | $ | (377,845 | ) | 751,114 | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 53,847 | 405,613 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Per-Share | Per-Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss* | Shares+ | Amount | Income* | Shares+ | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders | $ | (348,021 | ) | 577,672 | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | 67,015 | 396,312 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||||||
Stock options, employee stock purchase rights and restricted stock unit awards | — | — | — | — | 7,901 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders | $ | (348,021 | ) | 577,672 | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | 67,015 | 404,213 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||||||
* | Numerator | |
+ | Denominator |
Options to purchase 85,755,990 and 64,446,036 shares outstanding during the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net loss per share. Options to purchase 43,440,695 and 44,523,285 shares outstanding during the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net income per share.
For the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, a weighted average of 49,699,072 potentially dilutive shares associated with the 2003 and 2002 Convertible Notes were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net loss per share. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, a weighted average of 36,401,581 potentially dilutive shares associated with the 2003 and 2001 Convertible Notes were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net income per share.
NOTE 8 — SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates in two reportable segments — the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment — in which the Company offers products and services for a variety of electronic systems applications. LSI’s products are marketed primarily to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) that sell products to the Company’s target markets.
The following is a summary of operations by segment for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Semiconductor | $ | 484,840 | $ | 307,391 | $ | 757,214 | $ | 605,765 | ||||||||
Storage Systems | 185,099 | 182,244 | 378,140 | 359,754 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 669,939 | $ | 489,635 | $ | 1,135,354 | $ | 965,519 | ||||||||
(Loss)/income from operations: | ||||||||||||||||
Semiconductor | $ | (365,811 | ) | $ | 42,372 | $ | (338,652 | ) | $ | 45,901 | ||||||
Storage Systems | (1,275 | ) | 12,684 | 2,205 | 25,626 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | (367,086 | ) | $ | 55,056 | $ | (336,447 | ) | $ | 71,527 | ||||||
Intersegment revenues for the periods presented above were not significant. For the three months ended July 1, 2007, restructuring of operations and other items for the Semiconductor and Storage Systems segments were $22.2 million and $3.7
19
Table of Contents
million, respectively. For six months ended July 1, 2007, restructuring of operations and other items for the Semiconductor and Storage Systems segments were $14.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
For the three months ended July 2, 2006, restructuring of operations and other items, net was a credit of $21.6 million, and was primarily included in the Semiconductor segment. For six months ended July 2, 2006, restructuring of operations and other items for the Semiconductor and Storage Systems segments were a net credit of $17.3 million and a charge of $1.3 million, respectively.
Significant Customers
The following table summarizes the number of our significant customers, each of whom accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues, along with the percentage of revenues they individually represent on a consolidated basis and by segment:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||
Semiconductor segment: | ||||||||
Number of significant customers | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
Percentage of segment revenues | 26 %, 18% | 19% | 24%, 12%, 10% | 19% | ||||
Storage Systems segment: | ||||||||
Number of significant customers | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Percentage of segment revenues | 46 %, 19% | 46%, 16% | 46%, 19% | 45%, 15% | ||||
Consolidated: | ||||||||
Number of significant customers | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Percentage of consolidated revenues | 19%, 13%, 13% | 18%, 12% | 16%, 16% | 18%, 12% |
Revenues from domestic operations were $208.0 million, representing 31.0% of consolidated revenues for the three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to $235.6 million, representing 48.1% of consolidated revenues for the three months ended July 2, 2006.
Revenues from domestic operations were $418.7 million, representing 36.9% of consolidated revenues for the six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to $472.5 million, representing 48.9% of consolidated revenues for the six months ended July 2, 2006.
NOTE 9 — COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)/INCOME
Comprehensive (loss)/income is defined as a change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive (loss)/income, net of taxes for the current reporting period and comparable period in the prior year is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income | $ | ( 377,845 | ) | $ | 53,847 | $ | (348,021 | ) | $ | 67,015 | ||||||
Change in unrealized (loss)/gain on available-for-sale securities | (1,127 | ) | (5,749 | ) | 2,137 | (8,760 | ) | |||||||||
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments | (3,761 | ) | 1,462 | (3,356 | ) | 1,096 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss)/income | $ | (382,733 | ) | $ | 49,560 | $ | (349,240 | ) | $ | 59,351 | ||||||
NOTE 10 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A member of our board of directors is also a member of the board of directors of Seagate Technology. The Company sells semiconductors used in storage product applications to Seagate Technology for prices an unrelated third party would pay for such products. Revenues from sales to Seagate Technology were $123.9 million and $179.5 million for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively. Revenues from sales to Seagate Technology were $59.3 million and $115.7 million for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively. The Company had accounts receivable due from Seagate Technology of $70 million and $45.8 million as of July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
The Company has a joint venture, Silicon Manufacturing Partners Pte Ltd. (“SMP”), with Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. (“Chartered Semiconductor”), a leading manufacturing foundry for integrated circuits. SMP operates an integrated circuit manufacturing facility in Singapore. The Company owns a 51% equity interest in this joint venture, and Chartered Semiconductor owns the remaining 49% equity interest. The Company’s 51% interest in SMP is accounted for under the equity method because LSI is effectively precluded from unilaterally taking any significant action in the management of SMP due to
20
Table of Contents
Chartered Semiconductor’s significant participatory rights under the joint venture agreement. Because of Chartered Semiconductor’s approval rights, the Company can not make any significant decisions regarding SMP without Chartered Semiconductor’s approval, despite the 51% equity interest. In addition, the General Manager, who is responsible for the day-to-day management of SMP, is appointed by Chartered Semiconductor and Chartered Semiconductor provides the day-to-day operational support to SMP.
The Company purchased $18.6 million of inventory from SMP for the three months ended July 1, 2007. At July 1, 2007, the amount of inventory on hand that was purchased from SMP was $9.8 million and amounts payable to SMP were $13.5 million.
NOTE 11 — COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and license agreements or the sale of assets, under which the Company customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of warranties, representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold, validity of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and certain income tax-related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is typically subject to the other party making a claim to and cooperating with the Company pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract. This usually allows the Company to challenge the other party’s claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other party. Further, the Company’s obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of activity (typically to replace or correct the products or terminate agreement with a refund to the other party), duration and/or amounts. In some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties and/or insurance covering payments made by the Company.
On December 6, 2006, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA Inc. filed a lawsuit against Agere in Wake County Superior Court in North Carolina, alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with Agere’s engagement with Sony Ericsson to develop a wireless data card for personal computers. The complaint claims an unspecified amount of damages and seeks damages, treble damages and attorneys’ fees. Based on the information currently available, LSI intends to contest this matter vigorously. No liability has been recorded since any possible loss or range of possible loss cannot be estimated at this time.
The Company has a take or pay agreement with SMP under which it has agreed to purchase 51% of the managed wafer capacity from SMP’s integrated circuit manufacturing facility and Chartered Semiconductor agreed to purchase the remaining 49% of the managed wafer capacity. SMP determines its managed wafer capacity each year based on forecasts provided by the Company and Chartered Semiconductor. If the Company fails to purchase its required commitments, it will be required to pay SMP for the fixed costs associated with the unpurchased wafers. Chartered Semiconductor is similarly obligated with respect to the wafers allotted to it. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon two years written notice. The agreement may also be terminated for material breach, bankruptcy or insolvency.
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to other litigation matters and claims in the normal course of its operations. The Company typically defends legal matters aggressively and does not believe, based on currently available facts and circumstances, that the final outcome of these other matters, taken individually or as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. However, the pending unsettled lawsuits may involve complex questions of fact and law and will likely require the expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of other resources to defend. From time to time the Company may enter into confidential discussions regarding the potential settlement of such lawsuits; however, there can be no assurance that any such discussions will occur or will result in a settlement. Moreover, the settlement of any pending litigation could require the Company to incur substantial costs and, in the case of the settlement of any intellectual property proceeding against the Company, may require the Company to obtain a license under a third party’s intellectual property rights that could require royalty payments in the future and the Company to grant a license to certain of its intellectual property rights to a third party under a cross-license agreement. The results of litigation are inherently uncertain, and material adverse outcomes are possible.
In the second quarter of 2006, the Company completed the sale of our Gresham, Oregon semiconductor manufacturing facility to ON Semiconductor for approximately $105.0 million in cash. Under the terms of the agreement, ON Semiconductor entered into a multi-year wafer supply agreement (WSA) with LSI, whereby LSI agreed to purchase $198.8 million in wafers from ON Semiconductor during the period from the date of sale of the Gresham facility in May 2006 to the end of LSI’s second quarter of 2008. As of July 1, 2007, LSI had yet to purchase $68.9 million in wafers under this arrangement. The Company recorded a charge
21
Table of Contents
of $11 million for the three months ended July 1, 2007 related to required purchases under this arrangement that are in excess of what the Company believes can be sold.
Guarantees
Product warranties
Six months | ||||
ended July 1, | ||||
2007 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Balance at the beginning of the period | $ | 11,325 | ||
Accruals for warranties issued during the period | 7,735 | |||
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) | (168 | ) | ||
Accruals assumed in Agere merger | 1,819 | |||
Settlements made during the period (in cash or in kind) | (6,305 | ) | ||
Balance at the end of the period | $ | 14,406 | ||
Standby letters of credit.At July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit of $10.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively. These instruments are off-balance sheet commitments to extend financial guarantees for leases and certain self-insured risks and generally have one-year terms. The fair value of the letters of credit approximates the contract amount.
NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 25, 2007, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to sell its semiconductor assembly and test operations in Thailand to STATS ChipPAC Ltd. for approximately $100 million with $50 million due upon closing and a $50 million note payable over four years. Under the terms of the agreement, the company will also enter into additional agreements, including a multi-year wafer assembly and test agreement and a transition services agreement. The Company plans to transition semiconductor and storage systems assembly and test operations performed at its facilities in Singapore and Kansas to current manufacturing partners. As part of these actions, the Company expects to eliminate approximately 2,100 production positions worldwide.
On July 27, 2007, the Company completed the sale of its Consumer business to Magnum Semiconductor. In consideration, the Company received approximately $22.6 million in cash on July 27, 2007. In addition, the Company received a promissory note for $18 million due in 2010 and a warrant to purchase preferred shares of Magnum Semiconductor stock.
22
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. In many cases you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “intend” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. We assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, and these statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. For a summary of such risks and uncertainties, please see Item 1ARisk Factors” in Part II.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of silicon-to-system solutions that are used at the core of products that create, store and consume digital information. We offer a broad portfolio of capabilities including custom and standard product integrated circuits, host bus and RAID adapters, storage area network solutions and software applications. Our products enable leading technology companies in the Storage, Networking and Mobility markets to deliver some of the most advanced and well-known electronic systems in the market today.
We operate in two segments — the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment — in which we offer products and services for a variety of electronic systems applications. Our products are marketed primarily to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs that sell products to our target markets.
On April 2, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Agere Systems Inc. through the merger of a subsidiary of ours and Agere. As a result of the merger, each share of Agere common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger was converted into the right to receive 2.16 shares of LSI common stock. Approximately 368 million shares of LSI common stock were issued to former Agere stockholders in connection with the merger.
As a result of the merger, LSI acquired the business and assets of Agere. Agere was a leading provider of integrated circuit solutions for a variety of communications and computing applications. Some of its solutions included related software and reference designs. Agere’s customers included manufacturers of hard disk drives, mobile phones, advanced communications and networking equipment and personal computers. Agere also generated revenue from the licensing of intellectual property. See Note 4 to our financial statements in Item 1.
Revenues for the three months ended July 1, 2007 were $669.9 million, representing a 37% increase from $489.6 million for the three months ended July 2, 2006. Revenues for the six months ended July 1, 2007 were $1,135.4 million, representing an 18% increase from $965.5 million for the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increases are primarily attributable to the Agere acquisition included in our results of operations as of April 2, 2007.
We reported a net loss of $377.8 million or $0.50 per diluted share for the three months ended July 1, 2007, compared to net income of $53.8 million or $0.13 per diluted share for the three months ended July 2, 2006. We reported a net loss of $348.0 million or $0.60 per diluted share for the six months ended July 1, 2007, compared to net income of $67.0 million or $0.17 per diluted share for the six months ended July 2, 2006. We recorded a $176.4 million charge for acquired in-process research and development associated with the merger with Agere, which closed on April 2, 2007 and recorded restructuring of operations and other items, net of $25.9 million associated primarily with a reduction in workforce discussed below.
On June 27, 2007, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement to sell our Consumer business to Magnum Semiconductor and a reduction in our workforce by approximately 900 positions or 13 percent of our non-production workforce. We completed the sale of the Consumer business on July 27, 2007. See Note 3 to our financial statements in Item 1 for information about restructuring charges recorded during the second quarter of 2007.
On July 25, 2007, we announced that we had signed a definitive agreement to sell our semiconductor assembly and test operations in Thailand to STATS ChipPAC Ltd. for approximately $100 million. See Note 12 to our financial statements in Item 1. Under the terms of the agreement, the company will also enter into additional agreements, including a multi-year wafer assembly and test agreement and a transition services agreement. The Company also plans to transition semiconductor and storage systems assembly and test operations performed at its facilities in Singapore and Kansas to current manufacturing partners. As part of these actions, the Company expects to eliminate approximately 2,100 production positions worldwide.
23
Table of Contents
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $1.16 billion as of July 1, 2007 as compared to $1.01 billion as of December 31, 2006. For the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, we generated $29.9 million and $85.9 million, respectively, in cash provided by operations as compared to $49.4 million and $149.0 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2006.
Since April 2007, we have repurchased approximately 60.3 million shares for approximately $500 million in cash.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Where more than one significant factor contributed to changes in results from year to year, we have quantified these factors in the following discussion, where practicable.
Revenues
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | July 2, | July 1, | July 2, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Semiconductor segment | $ | 484.8 | $ | 307.4 | $ | 757.2 | $ | 605.8 | ||||||||
Storage Systems segment | 185.1 | 182.2 | 378.1 | 359.7 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 669.9 | $ | 489.6 | $ | 1,135.3 | $ | 965.5 | ||||||||
There were no significant intersegment revenues during the periods presented.
Three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006:
Total consolidated revenues for the three months ended July 1, 2007 increased $180.3 million or 36.8% as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased $177.4 million or 57.7% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in semiconductor revenues was attributable to:
• | An increase due to the acquisition of Agere; | ||
• | Increased demand for semiconductors used in storage products associated with the ramping of our Serial Attached SCSI, or SAS, products; |
These increases were partially offset by:
• | Decreases in demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications such as digital audio players where our customer’s solution has not been included in the new generation of its customer’s products, DVD products and cable set-top box solutions and | ||
• | Decreases in demand for semiconductors used in communication products such as telecommunications and printing. |
Storage Systems Segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased $2.9 million or 1.6% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 from the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to the ramp of our entry level SAS storage product introduced in the fourth quarter of 2006, increased demand for our premium feature software and partially offset by decreased revenues for our raid storage adapters due to the transition from hardware sales to software sales.
Six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006:
Total consolidated revenues for the six months ended July 1, 2007 increased $169.8 million or 17.6% as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006.
24
Table of Contents
Semiconductor Segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased $151.4 million or 25.0% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in semiconductor revenues was primarily attributable to the Agere acquisition and increased demand for semiconductors used in storage products associated with the ramping of our SAS products, partially offset by a decrease in demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications such as digital audio players where our customer’s solution has not been included in the new generation of its customer’s products, DVD products and cable set-top box solutions and a decrease in demand for semiconductors used in communication products such as telecommunications and printers.
Storage Systems Segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased $18.4 million or 5.1% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 from the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to increased demand for our entry level SAS storage product introduced in the fourth quarter of 2006, increased demand for our mid-range integrated storage modules, partially offset by decreased revenues for our raid storage adapters due to the transition from hardware sales to software sales.
See Note 8 to our financial statements in Item 1 for information about our significant customers.
Revenues by geography:
The following table summarizes our revenues by geography (in millions):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||
North America | $ | 208.0 | $ | 235.6 | $ | 418.7 | $ | 472.5 | ||||||||
Asia, including Japan | 386.9 | 194.6 | 575.8 | 381.0 | ||||||||||||
Europe and Middle East (EMEA) | 75.0 | 59.4 | 140.8 | 112.0 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 669.9 | $ | 489.6 | $ | 1,135.3 | $ | 965.5 | ||||||||
Three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006:
The decrease in revenues in North America in the three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006 was attributable to a decrease in demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications such as digital audio players, custom storage products used in server applications and telecommunication products used in routers and switches. The decrease was offset in part by increased demand for semiconductors used in SAS storage product applications and an increase in revenues due to the Agere acquisition. Revenues in Asia, including Japan, increased for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in revenues in Asia, including Japan, was primarily attributable to the Agere acquisition and increased demand for storage semiconductors used in SAS applications, offset in part by decreased demand for DVD products. The increase in EMEA was primarily attributable to the Agere acquisition. The increase in EMEA was offset in part by decreased demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications such as set-top boxes and DVD’s.
Six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006:
For the six months ended July 1, 2007, revenues decreased in North America compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The decrease in North America was attributable to a decrease in demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications such as digital audio players. The decrease was offset in part by increased demand for semiconductors used in SAS storage product applications and increased revenues due to the Agere acquisition. Revenues in Asia, including Japan, increased for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in revenues in Asia, including Japan, was primarily attributable to the Agere acquisition and increased demand for storage semiconductors used in SAS applications, offset in part by decreased demand for DVD products. The increase in EMEA was primarily attributable to the Agere acquisition and increases in revenues for custom semiconductors used in tape drive applications and storage semiconductors used in SAS applications. The increase in EMEA was offset in part by decreased demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications such as set-top boxes and DVD products.
25
Table of Contents
Gross profit margin, Operating Costs and Expenses
Key elements of the consolidated statements of operations for the respective segments are as follows (dollars in millions):
Gross profit margin:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||
Semiconductor segment | $ | 88.9 | $ | 141.3 | $ | 220.4 | $ | 271.3 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 18.3 | % | 46.0 | % | 29.1 | % | 44.8 | % | ||||||||
Storage Systems segment | $ | 63.1 | $ | 57.1 | $ | 126.1 | $ | 120.4 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 34.1 | % | 31.3 | % | 33.4 | % | 33.5 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 152.0 | $ | 198.4 | $ | 346.5 | $ | 391.7 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 22.7 | % | 40.5 | % | 30.5 | % | 40.6 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangibles which was previously reported in operating expense in the financial statement captions have been reclassified to cost of revenues for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 to conform to the current period presentation.
Three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006:
The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 22.7% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to 40.5% for the three months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased to 18.3% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 from 46.0% for the three months ended July 2, 2006. The decline in gross margin percentage reflects:
• | An increase in the amortization of intangible assets primarily related to the acquisition of Agere; | ||
• | Inventory charges related to fair valuing the inventory in the acquisition of Agere of $47.9 million; and | ||
• | $11.0 million in charges recorded for an unfavorable wafer supply agreement with ON Semiconductor resulting from a decline in demand in the second quarter of 2007. During the three months ended July 2, 2006, we completed the sale of our Gresham, Oregon semiconductor manufacturing facility to ON Semiconductor. Under the terms of the agreement, ON Semiconductor offered employment to substantially all of the Company’s manufacturing employees based at the Gresham site, with the remaining non-manufacturing workforce expected to continue their employment with the Company. ON Semiconductor also entered into additional agreements with the Company, including a multi-year wafer supply and test agreement, intellectual property license agreement, transition services agreement and a facilities use agreement. |
Storage Systems Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased to 34.1% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 from 31.3% for the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in gross profit margins was attributable to changes in product mix, lower product costs and an increase in software revenues.
Six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006:
The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 30.5% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to 40.6% for the six months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased to 29.1% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 from 44.8% for the six months ended July 2, 2006. The decline in gross margin percentage reflects:
• | An increase in the amortization of intangible assets primarily related to the acquisition of Agere; |
26
Table of Contents
• | Inventory charges related to fair valuing the inventory in the acquisition of Agere of $47.9 million; and | ||
• | $11.0 million in charges recorded for an unfavorable wafer supply agreement resulting from a decline in demand in the second quarter of 2007. |
Storage Systems Segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment remained relatively flat at 33.4% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 from 33.5% for the six months ended July 2, 2006.
Research and development:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Semiconductor segment | $ | 170.9 | $ | 77.6 | $ | 244.6 | $ | 159.2 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 35.3 | % | 25.2 | % | 32.3 | % | 26.3 | % | ||||||||
Storage Systems segment | $ | 31.0 | $ | 22.8 | $ | 61.1 | $ | 43.4 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 16.7 | % | 12.5 | % | 16.2 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 201.9 | $ | 100.4 | $ | 305.7 | $ | 202.6 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 30.1 | % | 20.5 | % | 26.9 | % | 21.0 | % |
Three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006:
Consolidated research and development, or R&D, expenses increased $101.5 million or 101.1% during the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
R&D expenses in the Semiconductor segment increased by $93.3 million or 120.2% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment was primarily due to the acquisition of Agere on April 2, 2007.
Storage Systems Segment:
R&D expenses in the Storage Systems segment increased by $8.2 million or 36.0% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment was due to increased compensation expenditures due to an increase in headcount, increased spending for R&D projects associated with new product lines and expenses related to a contract with a significant customer.
Six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006:
Consolidated R&D expenses, increased $103.1 million or 50.9% during the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
R&D expenses in the Semiconductor segment increased by $85.4 million or 53.6% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment was primarily due to the acquisition of Agere on April 2, 2007, partially offset by lower labor, facility and information technology costs as the result of our historical restructuring activities associated with our more focused strategy.
27
Table of Contents
Storage Systems Segment:
R&D expenses in the Storage Systems segment increased by $17.7 million or 40.8% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment was due to increased compensation expenditures due to an increase in headcount, increased spending for R&D projects associated with new product lines and expenses related to a contract with a significant customer.
Selling, general and administrative:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | July 1, 2007 | July 2, 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Semiconductor segment | $ | 85.2 | $ | 43.2 | $ | 117.5 | $ | 83.5 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 17.6 | % | 14.1 | % | 15.5 | % | 13.8 | % | ||||||||
Storage Systems segment | $ | 29.6 | $ | 21.4 | $ | 58.9 | $ | 50.0 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 16.0 | % | 11.7 | % | 15.6 | % | 13.9 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 114.8 | $ | 64.6 | $ | 176.4 | $ | 133.5 | ||||||||
Percentage of revenues | 17.1 | % | 13.2 | % | 15.5 | % | 13.8 | % |
Three months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006:
Consolidated Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses increased $50.2 million or 77.7% during the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased $42.0 million or 97.2% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Agere, and was partially offset by a decrease in labor related expenses as a result of headcount reductions from restructuring activities.
Storage Systems Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased $8.2 million or 38.3% for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase was mainly due an increase in sales commissions due to increased revenues and increased compensation-related expenses based on increased headcount.
Six months ended July 1, 2007 compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006:
Consolidated SG&A expenses increased $42.9 million or 32.1% during the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006.
Semiconductor Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased $34.0 million or 40.7% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Agere, partially offset by a decrease in labor related expenses as a result of reduced headcount from restructuring activities.
Storage Systems Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased $8.9 million or 17.8% for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase was mainly due to an increase in sales commissions due to increased revenues and increased compensation-related expenses based on increased headcount.
Restructuring of operations and other items:
We recorded a charge of $25.9 million and $17.8 million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively. Of these charges, charges of $22.2 million and $14.0 million were recorded in the
28
Table of Contents
Semiconductor segment and charges of $3.7 million and $3.8 million were recorded in the Storage Systems segment for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively.
We recorded a net credit of $21.6 million and $16.0 million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively. Of these credits, $21.9 million and $17.3 million were recorded in the Semiconductor segment and charges of $0.3 million and $1.3 million were recorded in the Storage Systems segment for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively.
As a result of these restructuring actions, we expect to realize savings from salaries and related costs of approximately $42 million in operating expenses in the last half of 2007. In addition, we expect to realize savings from contract labor and salaries and related costs of approximately $12 million in cost of revenues in the last half of 2007; however, we expect these costs of revenue savings to be offset by additional costs from purchasing services through contract manufacturers.
See Note 3 to our financial statements in Item 1 for more information about the restructuring actions we have taken in 2007. For a complete discussion of the 2006 restructuring actions, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Acquired in-process research and development:
We recorded charges of $176.4 million and $182.9 million associated with acquired in-process research and development, or IPR&D, for the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, respectively. Our methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions IPR&D is determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology industry with the assistance of third party service providers. IPR&D was expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed. The fair value of technology under development is determined using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value. A discount rate is used for the projects to account for the risks associated with the inherent uncertainties surrounding the successful development of the technology, market acceptance of the technology, the useful life of the technology, the profitability level of such technology and the uncertainty of technological advances, which could impact the estimates recorded. The discount rates used in the present value calculations are typically derived from a weighted-average cost of capital analysis. These estimates did not account for any potential synergies realizable as a result of the acquisition and were in line with industry averages and growth estimates.
We recorded a charge of $6.5 million for IPR&D in the first quarter of 2007 associated with the acquisition of SiliconStor. In the second quarter of 2007, we recorded a charge of $176.4 million for IPR&D associated with the acquisition of Agere. IPR&D expenses in connection with acquisitions are summarized in the table below.
Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | Discount | projections | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Date | Projects | IPR&D | rate | extend through | |||||||||||||||
SiliconStor | March 2007 | Storage – SATA/SAS multiplexers | $6.5 million | 27 | % | 2017 | ||||||||||||||
Agere | April 2007 | Storage – read channel and preamps Mobility – HSPDA for 3G Networking–modems, firewire, serdes, media gateway, VoIP, network processors, Ethernet, mappers and framers | $176.4 million | 13.8 | % | 2021 |
There was no acquired in-process research and development charge recorded for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006.
Interest expense:
Interest expense increased by $2.6 million to $9.0 million for the three months ended July 1, 2007 from $6.4 million for the three months ended July 2, 2006. Interest expense increased by $0.1 million to $12.9 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007 from $12.8 million for the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase is mainly due to the interest on the Agere convertible notes, offset in part by the repayment at maturity of $271.8 million of Convertible Notes in the fourth quarter of 2006.
29
Table of Contents
Interest income and other, net:
Interest income and other, net, was $10.8 million for the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to $10.3 million for the three months ended July 2, 2006. Interest income increased to $15.6 million for the three months ended July 1, 2007 from $11.9 million for the three months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in interest income was mainly due to higher returns during the three months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2006. Other expenses, net, of $4.8 million for the three months ended July 1, 2007 included a $2.1 million charge for points on foreign currency forward contracts and a pre-tax loss of $2.4 million on the impairment of certain non-marketable available-for-sale equity securities, and other miscellaneous items. Other expenses, net, of $1.6 million for the three months ended July 2, 2006 included a $1.1 million charge for points on foreign currency forward contracts, a pre-tax loss of $0.2 million on the sale of certain marketable available-for-sale equity securities of a company that was acquired, and other miscellaneous items that net to an expense of $0.3 million.
Interest income and other, net, was $21.3 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to $19.8 million for the six months ended July 2, 2006. Interest income increased to $27.9 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007 from $21.1 million for the six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in interest income was mainly due to higher returns during the six months ended July 1, 2007 as compared to the six months ended July 2, 2006. Other expenses, net, of $6.6 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007 included a $3.3 million charge for points on foreign currency forward contracts and a pre-tax loss of $2.4 million on the impairment of certain non-marketable available-for-sale equity securities, a pre-tax loss of $0.6 million on the sale of property and equipment and other miscellaneous items. Other expenses, net, of $1.3 million for the six months ended July 2, 2006 included a $2.2 million charge for points on foreign currency forward contracts, a pre-tax loss of $0.2 million on the sale of certain marketable available-for-sale equity securities of a certain technology company that was acquired by another technology company, and other miscellaneous items, offset in part by a pre-tax gain of $1.4 million on the sale of certain marketable available-for-sale equity securities.
Provision for income taxes:
During the three and six months ended July 1, 2007, we recorded an income tax provision of $12.5 million and $20.0 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.1 million and $11.6 million, respectively.
The provision for income taxes for the six months ended July 1, 2007 included tax benefits of $1.6 million relating to tax refunds in foreign jurisdictions, which were recognized in the first half of 2007. The provision for income taxes for the six months ended July 2, 2006 included tax benefits of $2.6 million relating to settlements of tax audits in foreign jurisdictions, which were treated as discrete items allocable to the second quarter of 2006.
Excluding certain foreign jurisdictions, management believes that the future benefit of deferred tax assets is not more likely than not to be realized.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased to $1.2 billion at July 1, 2007 from $1.01 billion at December 31, 2006. The increase was mainly due to cash and cash equivalents provided by operating and investing activities, partially offset by net cash outflows for financing activities as described below.
Working capital
Working capital increased by $0.3 billion to $1.4 billion at July 1, 2007 from $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2006. The increase in working capital was attributable to the following:
• | Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by $183.7 million primarily due to the merger with Agere, comprised of: $123.0 million in assets held for sale; $12.1 million in prepaid software, rent and other expenses; and $9.2 million in other receivables. In addition, current deferred tax assets increased $47.1 million due to a reallocation of deferred taxes in connection with the merger of Agere. | ||
• | Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased by $149.3 million. | ||
• | Accounts receivable increased $75.8 million due to the Agere balance of $166.9 million offset by a decrease of $91.1 million due to lower revenues and improved collections. |
30
Table of Contents
• | Inventories increased $75.5 million. The increase in inventory reflects the Agere balance of $70.3 million. | ||
• | Income taxes payable decreased by $63.4 million due to the adoption of FIN 48 in the first quarter of 2007, offset in part by an increase in the tax provision. There was no cash impact. |
These increases in working capital were offset, in part, by the following:
• | Other accrued liabilities increased by $146.8 million due to the Agere merger, consisting of: $60.5 million in reserves for restructuring, $5.6 million of deferred revenue, short term pension and post retirement of $17.2 million, and $40.4 million in other tax liabilities and various reserves and payables. In addition, the restructuring reserve increased $20.3 million is mainly from the accrual of termination benefits such as severance payments. | ||
• | Accrued salaries, wages and benefits increased $52.7 million primarily due to the acquisition of Agere, slightly offset by timing differences in payment of salaries, benefits and performance-based compensation. | ||
• | Accounts payable increased $36.5 million due to the Agere balance of $114.8 million offset by a decrease of $78.3 million due to timing of invoice receipts and payments. |
Cash generated from operating activities
During the six months ended July 1, 2007, we generated $85.9 million of cash from operating activities compared to $149.0 million generated in the six months ended July 2, 2006. Cash generated by operating activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007, were the result of the following:
• | Net loss adjusted for non-cash transactions. The non-cash items and other non-operating adjustments are quantified in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in this Form 10-Q; and | ||
• | A net increase in assets and liabilities, including changes in working capital components from December 31, 2006 to July 1, 2007, as discussed above. |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by/(used in) investing activities
Cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities were $690.0 million for the six months ended July 1, 2007, compared to $86.9 million used in investing activities for the six months ended July 2, 2006. The primary investing activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007 were as follows:
• | Proceeds from maturities and sales of debt securities available for sale, net of purchases. | ||
• | Purchases of property, equipment and software. | ||
• | Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment. | ||
• | The merger with Agere. | ||
• | The receipt of an income tax refund for pre-acquisition tax matters associated with a previous year. |
We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $80 million in 2007. In recent years, we have reduced our level of capital expenditures as a result of our focus on establishing strategic supplier alliances with foundry semiconductor manufacturers, which enables us to have access to advanced manufacturing capacity and reduces our capital spending requirements.
Cash and cash equivalents (used in)/provided by financing activities
Cash and cash equivalents used for financing activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007 were $378.4 million as compared to $32.1 million in the same period of 2006. The primary financing activities for the six months ended July 1, 2007 were the purchase of common stock under our repurchase program and the issuance of common stock under our employee stock option plans.
31
Table of Contents
We may seek additional equity or debt financing from time to time. We believe that our existing liquid resources and funds generated from operations, combined with funds from such financing, will be adequate to meet our operating and capital requirements and obligations for the foreseeable future.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of July 1, 2007 (in millions):
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 1 — 3 | 4 — 5 | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | 1 year | years | years | years | Total | |||||||||||||||
Convertible Subordinated Notes | $ | — | $ | 719.5 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 719.5 | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 106.4 | 148.7 | 41.8 | 11.2 | 308.1 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase commitments | 298.8 | 4.5 | — | — | 303.3 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 405.2 | $ | 872.7 | $ | 41.8 | $ | 11.2 | $ | 1,330.9 | ||||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes:
As of July 1, 2007, we had outstanding $350.0 million of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due in May 2010 (“2003 Convertible Notes”). The 2003 Convertible Notes are subordinated to all existing and future senior debt and are convertible at the holder’s option at any time prior to maturity into shares of our common stock. The 2003 Convertible Notes have a conversion price of approximately $13.42 per share. We cannot elect to redeem the 2003 Convertible Notes prior to maturity. Each holder of the 2003 Convertible Notes has the right to cause us to repurchase all of such holder’s convertible notes at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest upon the occurrence of any fundamental change, which includes a transaction or an event such as an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer, consolidation, certain mergers or combination. The merger with Agere did not trigger the 2003 Convertible Note holders’ right to cause us to repurchase the Notes. Interest is payable semiannually.
As part of the merger with Agere, LSI guaranteed Agere’s 6.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due December 15, 2009 with a fair value of approximately $370 million as of April 2, 2007. Interest on these Notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The Notes can be converted into shares of common stock at a current conversion price of $15.3125 per share, subject to adjustment in certain events, at any time prior to maturity, unless previously redeemed or repurchased by the Company. The Company may redeem the Notes in whole or in part at any time. In addition, the Company may be required to repurchase the Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest if its stock is no longer approved for public trading, its stockholders approve a liquidation or if a specified change in control occurs. The Notes are unsecured subordinated obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all the Company’s existing and future senior debt.
Fluctuations in our stock price impact the prices of our outstanding convertible securities and the likelihood of the convertible securities being converted into equity. If we are required to redeem any of the Convertible Notes for cash, it may affect our liquidity position. In the event they are not converted to equity, we believe that our current cash position and expected future operating cash flows will be adequate to meet these obligations as they mature.
Operating lease obligations:
We lease real estate, certain non-manufacturing equipment and software under non-cancelable operating leases.
Purchase commitments:
We maintain certain purchase commitments, primarily for raw materials with suppliers and for some non-production items. Purchase commitments for inventory materials are generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the parties. This forecasted time-horizon varies among different suppliers.
In the second quarter of 2006, we completed the sale of our Gresham, Oregon semiconductor manufacturing facility to ON Semiconductor for approximately $105.0 million in cash. Under the terms of the agreement, ON Semiconductor entered into a multi-year wafer supply agreement (WSA) with LSI, whereby LSI agreed to purchase $198.8 million in wafers from ON
32
Table of Contents
Semiconductor during the period from the date of sale of the Gresham facility in May 2006 to the end of LSI’s second quarter of 2008. As of July 1, 2007, LSI had yet to purchase $68.9 million in wafers under this arrangement. We recorded a charge of $11 million for the three months ended July 1, 2007 related to required purchases under this arrangement that are in excess of what we believe we can currently sell.
LSI has a take or pay agreement with SMP under which it has agreed to purchase 51% of the managed wafer capacity from SMP’s integrated circuit manufacturing facility and Chartered Semiconductor agreed to purchase the remaining 49% of the managed wafer capacity. SMP determines its managed wafer capacity each year based on forecasts provided by LSI and Chartered Semiconductor. If LSI fails to purchase its required commitments, it will be required to pay SMP for the fixed costs associated with the unpurchased wafers. Chartered Semiconductor is similarly obligated with respect to the wafers allotted to it. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon two years written notice. The agreement may also be terminated for material breach, bankruptcy or insolvency.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
For a detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies, please see the Critical Accounting Policies contained in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The following is a description of an accounting policy that has become important following the Agere merger.
Retirement Benefits
Postretirement liabilities are our estimates of benefits that we expect to pay to eligible retirees under Agere’s postretirement plans. We consider various factors in determining our postretirement liability, including the number of employees who we expect to receive benefits, the type and length of benefits they will receive, trends in health care costs and other actuarial assumptions. If the actual postretirement benefits paid differ from our current estimate we may be over- or under-accrued.
We also have pension plans covering substantially all former Agere U.S. employees, excluding management employees hired after June 30, 2003, and pension plans covering certain international employees. We consider various factors in determining our pension liability, including the number of employees who we expect to be paid, their salary levels and years of service, the expected return on plan assets, the discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation, the timing of the payment of benefits, and other actuarial assumptions. If the actual results and events of our pension plan differ from our current assumptions, our benefit obligations may be over- or under-valued.
As a result of the acquisition of Agere, we remeasured the pension and postretirement liabilities, and adopted FAS 158 effective April 2, 2007. The key benefit plan assumptions are the discount rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets. These assumptions are discussed below for our U.S. retirement benefit plans. For our international plans, assumptions were chosen specific to each country.
The discount rate we used is based on a cash flow analysis using the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve and the Citigroup Above Median Pension Discount Curve as of the measurement date. The rate used is within the range of the resultant interest rates. The discount rate used to determine our benefit obligation as of April 2, 2007 was 6.0%. For 2007, we are using 6.0% discount rate for our net periodic benefit cost.
We base our salary increase assumptions on historical experience and future expectations. The expected rate of return for our retirement benefit plans represents the average rate of return expected to be earned on plan assets over the period that the benefit obligations are expected to be paid. In developing the expected rate of return, we consider long-term compound annualized returns based on historical market data, historical and expected returns on the various categories of plan assets, and the target investment portfolio allocation between debt and equity securities. The weighted average investment portfolio allocation for our U.S. management and occupational pension plans as of April 2, 2007 was 54% in equity and 46% in debt investments as compared to the target investment portfolio allocation of 53% equity and 47% debt. The portfolio’s equity weighting is consistent with the long-term
33
Table of Contents
nature of the plans’ benefit obligations. For 2007, we are using an expected rate of return on plan assets of 8.25% and 8.0% for the management and represented pension plans, respectively, consistent with the target investment portfolio allocation. For our U.S. retirement benefit plans, we are using a weighted-average long-term rate of return on assets of 7.75%.
Actuarial assumptions are based on our best estimates and judgment. Material changes may occur in retirement benefit costs in the future if these assumptions differ from actual events or experience. We performed a sensitivity analysis on the discount rate, which is the key assumption in calculating the pension and postretirement benefit obligations. Each change of 25 basis points in the discount rate assumption would have an estimated $0.5 million impact on annual net retirement benefit costs and a $38 million impact on benefit obligations. Each change of 25 basis points in the expected rate of return assumption would have an estimated $2 million annual impact on net retirement benefit costs.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The information contained in Note 1 to our financial statements in Item 1 under the heading “Recent Accounting Pronouncements”, is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 2.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company has merged with Agere and is updating the market risk disclosures during the months ended July 1, 2007 accordingly, as compared to the discussion in Part II, Item 7a of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In 2007, a 10% weighted-average worldwide interest rate movement affecting our fixed and floating rate financial instruments as of July 1, 2007, including investments and debt obligations, would not have had a significant effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows over the next fiscal year, assuming that the debt and investment balances remained consistent.
In 2006, a 10% weighted-average worldwide interest rate movement affecting our fixed and floating rate financial instruments as of December 31, 2006, including investments and debt obligations, would not have had a significant effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows over the next fiscal year, assuming that the debt and investment balances remained consistent.
With the objective of protecting our cash flows and earnings from the impact of fluctuations in interest rates, while minimizing the cost of capital, we may enter into interest rate swaps. As of July 1, 2007, there were no interest rate swaps outstanding.
Foreign currency exchange risk.We have foreign subsidiaries that operate and sell our products in various global markets. As a result, our cash flows and earnings are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We attempt to limit these exposures through operational strategies and financial market instruments. We use various hedge instruments, primarily forward contracts with maturities of twelve months or less and currency option contracts, to manage our exposure associated with net asset and liability positions and cash flows denominated in non-functional currencies. We did not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes during 2007 and 2006.
Based on our overall currency rate exposures at July 1, 2007, including derivative financial instruments and non-functional currency-denominated receivables and payables, a near-term 10% appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar would not have a significant effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows over the next fiscal year. In 2006, a near-term 10% appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar would also not have had a significant effect.
Equity price risk.We have investments in available-for-sale equity securities included in long-term assets. The fair values of these investments are sensitive to equity price changes. Changes in the value of these investments are ordinarily recorded through accumulated comprehensive income. The increase or decrease in the fair value of the investments would affect our results of operations to the extent the investments were sold or that declines in value were concluded by management to be other than temporary.
If prices of the available-for-sale equity securities increase or decrease 10% from their fair values as of July 1, 2007, it would increase or decrease the investment values by $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2006, a 10% increase or decrease in fair values would have increased or decreased the investment values by $1.6 million. We do not use any derivatives to hedge the fair value of our marketable available-for-sale equity securities.
34
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Securities and Exchange Commission defines the term “disclosure controls and procedures” to mean a company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required or necessary disclosures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures by our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for this purpose.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
On April 2, 2007, we acquired Agere. Agere operated under its own set of systems and internal controls and we are currently maintaining those systems and much of that control environment until we are able to incorporate Agere’s processes into our own systems and control environment. We currently expect to complete the incorporation of Agere’s operations into our systems and control environment in the second half of 2008.
In addition, during the quarter ended July 1, 2007, we moved our Storage Systems business from a separate enterprise financial management system onto financial management system that we use for the other parts of our business. This change was made for operational efficiency and was not made in response to any deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). We believe we have taken the necessary steps to monitor and maintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting during this change.
There were no other changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended July 1, 2007, which could have a material effect on our financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
This information is included in Note 11 to our financial statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate, management’s beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “believes,” “seeks,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we do not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
35
Table of Contents
The following factors, many of which are discussed in greater detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 or our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, could affect our future performance and the price of our stock.
• | We may fail to realize the benefits expected from our recent merger with Agere Systems, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock. | ||
• | If we fail to successfully transition our semiconductor assembly and test and storage systems manufacturing operations to third-party contract manufacturers, our customer relationships and results of operations could be adversely affected. |
We have announced that we will sell one of our two semiconductor assembly and test facilities and transition the work performed at our other semiconductor assembly and test facility and at our storage systems manufacturing facility to third-party contract manufacturers. Commencing operations with new manufacturing partners can be a complicated and time-consuming process. If the process takes longer to complete than we anticipate, we may not realize the benefits we were expecting from these actions as quickly as we anticipate or at all. If product quality or shipment delays occur as part of the transition, we could experience customer relationship issues or a negative impact on our results of operations.
• | We must attract and retain key employees in a highly competitive environment; uncertainties associated with the Agere merger may cause a loss of employees and may otherwise materially adversely affect our business. | ||
• | The industries in which we operate are highly cyclical, and our operating results may fluctuate. | ||
• | General economic weakness and geopolitical factors may harm our operating results and financial condition. | ||
• | We are dependent on a limited number of customers. | ||
• | We depend to a large extent on independent foundry subcontractors to manufacture our semiconductor products; accordingly, any failure to secure and maintain sufficient foundry capacity could materially and adversely affect our business. | ||
• | We depend in part, and will depend increasingly, upon third-party subcontractors to assemble, obtain packaging materials for, and test certain products and will depend on third-party subcontractors to assemble our storage systems products. |
We currently have two semiconductor assembly and test facilities, although we have announced that we have agreed to sell one of those facilities and move production from the other facility to contract manufacturers. We also have existing third-party subcontractors located in Asia that assemble, obtain packaging materials for, and test for us. We have also announced that we will move the assembly of our storage systems products that we currently produce in our Wichita, Kansas facility to third-party contract manufacturers.
To the extent that we rely on third-party subcontractors to assemble and test products for us or conduct other services, we will not be able to control directly product delivery schedules and quality assurance. This lack of control may result in product shortages or quality assurance problems that could delay shipments of products or increase manufacturing, assembly, testing or other costs. In addition, if we or these third-party subcontractors are unable to obtain sufficient packaging materials for semiconductor products in a timely manner, we may experience product shortages or delays in product shipments, which could materially and adversely affect customer relationships and results of operations. If we or any of these subcontractors experiences capacity constraints or financial difficulties, suffers any damage to its facilities, experiences power outages or any other disruption of operations, we may not be able to obtain alternative services in a timely manner.
Due to the amount of time that it usually takes to qualify assemblers and testers, we could experience significant delays in product shipments if we are required to find alternative assemblers or testers for such components.
• | We operate in intensely competitive markets. | ||
• | Our target markets are characterized by rapid technological change. |
36
Table of Contents
• | Order or shipment cancellations or deferrals could cause our revenue to decline. | ||
• | We design and develop highly complex products that require significant investments. | ||
• | Our products may contain defects. | ||
• | Our manufacturing facilities have high fixed costs and involve highly complex and precise processes. |
Although we have announced plans to transition the work performed at these facilities to third-party contract manufacturers, we currently have a storage systems manufacturing facility in Wichita, Kansas; and assembly and test facilities in Singapore and Thailand. We also have a 51% equity interest in a joint venture with Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd., which owns a semiconductor manufacturing facility in Singapore. Operations at any of these facilities may be disrupted for reasons beyond our control, including work stoppages, supply shortages, fire, earthquake, tornado, floods or other natural disasters, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position. In addition, if we do not experience adequate utilization of, or adequate yields at, these facilities, our results of operations may be adversely affected. We confront challenges in the manufacturing and assembly and test processes that require us to: maintain a competitive cost structure; exercise stringent quality control measures to obtain high yields; effectively manage subcontractors engaged in the wafer fabrication, test and assembly of products; and update equipment and facilities as required for leading edge production capabilities.
The manufacture of our products involves highly complex and precise processes, requiring production in a clean and tightly controlled environment. In addition, the manufacture of integrated circuits is a highly complex and technologically demanding process. Although we work diligently to minimize the likelihood of reduced manufacturing yields, from time to time, we have experienced lower than anticipated manufacturing yields. This often occurs during the production of new products or the installation and start-up of new process technologies. Poor yields could result in product shortages or delays in product shipments, which could seriously harm relationships with our customers and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
• | Failure to qualify our products or our suppliers’ manufacturing lines may adversely affect our results of operations. | ||
• | A widespread outbreak of an illness or other health issue could negatively affect our manufacturing, assembly and test, design or other operations. | ||
• | We procure parts and raw materials from a limited number of domestic and foreign sources. | ||
• | If our new product development and expansion efforts are not successful, our results of operations may be adversely affected. | ||
• | We may engage in acquisitions and alliances giving rise to financial and technological risks. | ||
• | The semiconductor industry is prone to intellectual property litigation. | ||
• | We may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could harm our competitive position. | ||
• | A decline in the revenue that we derive from the licensing of intellectual property could have a significant impact on net income. | ||
• | We conduct a significant amount of activity outside of the United States, and are exposed to legal, business, political and economic risks associated with our international operations. | ||
• | We may rely on the capital markets and/or bank markets to provide financing. | ||
• | We utilize indirect channels of distribution over which we will have limited control. | ||
• | The price of our securities may be subject to wide fluctuations. |
37
Table of Contents
• | Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices or existing taxation rules or practices may cause adverse unexpected fluctuations and affect reported results of operations. | ||
• | Internal control deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet identified could emerge. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table contains information about our purchases of our common stock during the quarter ended July 1, 2007.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Maximum Number (or | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares (or Units) | Value) of Shares (or | |||||||||||||||
Average Price | Purchased as Part of | Units) that May Yet | ||||||||||||||
Total Number of Shares | Paid per Share | Publicly Announced | Be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Period | (or Units) Purchased | (or Unit) | Plans or Programs | the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
April 2, 2007-May 1, 2007 | 5,048,400 | $ | 8.52 | 5,048,400 | $ | 456,980,776 | ||||||||||
May 2, 2007-June 1, 2007 | 42,382,400 | $ | 8.43 | 42,382,400 | $ | 99,644,612 | ||||||||||
June 2, 2007-July 1, 2007 | 2,250,000 | $ | 7.54 | 2,250,000 | $ | 82,686,812 | ||||||||||
Total | 49,680,800 | $ | 8.40 | 49,680,800 | ||||||||||||
On December 4, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $500 million of our common stock. The repurchases identified in the table were all pursuant to this authorization. Since July 1, 2007, we have purchased additional shares such that we have completed this repurchase program.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our annual meeting of stockholders on May 10, 2007 in Milpitas, California. At the meeting, the stockholders voted on the proposals identified below.
Proposal 1. To elect nine directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected.
Votes For | Votes Withheld | |||||||
Charles A. Haggerty | 327,799,812 | 10,254,795 | ||||||
Richard S. Hill | 326,062,448 | 11,992,159 | ||||||
James H. Keyes | 330,078,064 | 7,976,543 | ||||||
Michael J. Mancuso | 326,476,767 | 11,577,840 | ||||||
John H.F. Miner | 332,387,396 | 5,667,211 | ||||||
Arun Netravali | 326,504,237 | 11,550,369 | ||||||
Matthew J. O’Rourke | 332,187,308 | 5,867,299 | ||||||
Gregorio Reyes | 332,292,296 | 5,762,311 | ||||||
Abhihit Y. Talwalkar | 330,244,912 | 7,809,695 |
Proposal 2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the 2007 fiscal year.
Votes For | Votes Against | Abstain | ||
331,239,616 | 4,357,695 | 2,457,295 |
Proposal 3. Stockholder proposal entitled “Director Election Majority Vote Standard Proposal.”
Votes For | Votes Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Vote | |||
123,100,926 | 91,921,766 | 8,373,215 | 114,658,700 |
38
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
4.1 | Composite Certificate of Incorporation | |
10.1 | 2007 Bonus structure for Abhijit Y. Talwalkar (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 5, 2007) | |
10.2 | Description of Mr. Talwalkar’s relocation benefits (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 15, 2007) | |
10.3 | LSI Employee Commuter Expense Reimbursement Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 15, 2007) | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
39
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LSI CORPORATION (Registrant) | ||||
Date: August 10, 2007 | By | /s/ Bryon Look | ||
Bryon Look | ||||
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | ||||
40
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
4.1 | Composite Certificate of Incorporation | |
10.1 | 2007 Bonus structure for Abhijit Y. Talwalkar (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 5, 2007) | |
10.2 | Description of Mr. Talwalkar’s relocation benefits (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 15, 2007) | |
10.3 | LSI Employee Commuter Expense Reimbursement Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 15, 2007) | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
41