Exhibit 99.1
Trecora Resources Comments on Letter from Ortelius Advisors
SUGAR LAND, Texas, March 23, 2022 – Trecora Resources (“Trecora” or the “Company”) (NYSE: TREC), a leading provider of specialty hydrocarbons and waxes, today issued the following statement regarding Ortelius Advisors’ (“Ortelius”) letter to Trecora stockholders yesterday:
“Trecora’s Board of Directors and management team are focused on delivering value for our shareholders. While we are confident that the Company is positioned for strong, profitable growth, we also remain open to exploring all value-enhancing opportunities.
To that end, we have spoken with the principal of Ortelius on dozens of occasions over the past eighteen months and have considered his input seriously and objectively. In those conversations, Ortelius has made a wide assortment of claims and proposals. At various times, Ortelius has wanted us to:
| | • | | Enter into exclusive negotiations with Ortelius to sell it the Company (even though Ortelius did not indicate a buyout price or demonstrate that it had adequate financing); |
| | • | | Support Ortelius in issuing a mini-tender offer to buy additional shares in the Company; |
| | • | | Allow Ortelius to buy more than 15% of Trecora stock and waive the protections afforded to our other shareholders under Delaware corporate law; |
| | • | | Have the Company conduct a Dutch-tender to buy our own stock while Ortelius also buys stock through a tender or in the open market; |
| | • | | Add three new directors to the Board; |
| | • | | Replace six directors on the Board; and |
| | • | | Add three directors and remove two directors from the Board. |
Ortelius has also suggested several permutations of those ideas at various times.
Despite professing an interest in buying all of Trecora (or a substantial minority interest in Trecora) at different times over the last eighteen months, Ortelius has never submitted an indication of value and has, oddly, refused to even sign a standard non-disclosure agreement so that the Company could provide Ortelius with the information it would seemingly need to make such a proposal.
Ortelius now publicly claims to have a “plan to improve operating and financial performance.” However, if this plan does exist, Ortelius has yet to share it with Trecora’s Board or management team despite having had ample opportunity to do so.
Nevertheless, Trecora’s Board and management team have continued to engage constructively with Ortelius in good faith. In the Fall, for example, the Board interviewed three Ortelius director candidates and offered to appoint one of them to the Board, without even requesting a typical standstill. Ortelius curiously rejected this offer.
Last month, Ortelius surprised us again by indicating its intention to nominate six directors to our seven-person Board. Ortelius appears now to be seeking to do at the ballot box what it has been, so far, unable and unwilling to do with a checkbook: acquire control of the Company without competition from other parties.
Earlier this month, in an effort to avoid a costly and disruptive proxy contest, two of the Company’s independent directors further engaged with the principal of Ortelius in order to find an amicable resolution. During this conversation, Ortelius suggested another new proposal, asking to seat three of its director candidates
