The second paragraph under the heading entitled “Item 4. The Solicitation or Recommendation—Opinion of the Company’s Financial Advisor—Financial Analyses—Other Financial Reviews and Analyses Solely for Informational Reference Purposes” on page 43 of the Schedule 14D-9 is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
LBO Analysis. Guggenheim Securities performed an illustrative analysis of the implied price per share of the Company’s common stock that could theoretically be paid by a financial sponsor that required a 5-year internal rate of return ranging from 17.5% to 22.5%, before any estimated incentive equity compensation paid to senior management following completion of the transaction, which range was selected by Guggenheim Securities based upon its experience and expertise in mergers and acquisitions transactions involving financial sponsors. Guggenheim Securities performed the illustrative LBO analysis assuming that the Transaction was completed with approximately $145 million of total debt (or approximately 6.4x the Company’s CY2021A Adjusted EBITDA (Post-SBC) or 6.1x net of cash) at prevailing market rates, a minimum cash balance of $5 million, annual net public company cost savings of $2 million and a long term tax rate of 21%. Assuming the Company-Provided Financial Projections were achieved and assuming an exit EBITDA multiple range of 7.0x—8.0x the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA (post-SBC) in the terminal year of 2026, which range of exit EBITDA multiples was selected by Guggenheim Securities based upon its experience and expertise in mergers and acquisitions transactions involving financial sponsors, the LBO analysis resulted in a reference range of $8.05 – 9.52 per share.
Item 8. Additional Information.
The subsection of Item 8 of the Schedule 14D-9 having the heading “Item 8. Additional Information—Legal Proceedings” is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
“Legal Proceedings.
On May 31, 2022, a purported Company stockholder filed a complaint against the Company and each member of the Company Board in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Shiva Stein v. Trecora Resources, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-4474 (the “Stein Complaint”). On June 2, 2022, the Company received a demand from a purported Company stockholder (the “Wilson Demand”). Also on June 2, 2022, a purported Company stockholder filed a complaint against the Company and each member of the Company Board in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned William Johnson v. Trecora Resources, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-04585 (the “Johnson Complaint”). On June 3, 2022, a purported Company stockholder filed a complaint against the Company and each member of the Company Board in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, captioned Denise Redfield v. Trecora Resources et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-03301 (the “Redfield Complaint,” together with the Stein Complaint and the Johnson Complaint, the “Complaints”). Also on June 3, 2022, the Company received two additional demands from two purported Company stockholders (the “Dixon Demand” and the “Kaufmann Demand,” together with the Wilson Demand, the “Demands”). On June 6, 2022, a purported Company stockholder filed a complaint against the Company and each member of the Company Board in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, captioned Justice v. Trecora Resources et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-03339 (the “Justice Complaint”, together with the Stein Complaint, the Johnson Complaint, and the Redfield Complaint, the “Complaints”).
The Complaints and Demands allege violations of Sections 14(d) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 14d-9 thereunder against all defendants and violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the individual defendants. Each of the Complaints seek injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Transactions, rescissory damages or rescission to the extent the Transactions are consummated, an award of plaintiff’s expenses including attorneys’ fees and expenses, and such other relief the court may deem just and proper. The Stein Complaint also seeks an accounting of damages.
The Company believes the claims asserted in each of the Complaints and Demands are without merit.
Additional lawsuits may be filed against the Company and/or the Company Board in connection with the Transactions, the Schedule TO and the Schedule 14D-9. Additional demands may also be made of the Company and/or the Company Board. If additional similar complaints are filed or demands are made, absent new or different allegations that are material, the Company will not necessarily announce such additional complaints or demands.”
5