SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
|
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, Dynamic Energy Development Corporation and Transformation Consulting, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
Preparation of the Company's unaudited condensed financial statements in conformity with United States GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications were made to change the balance sheet liability presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net income or assets and liabilities. |
|
Development Costs |
|
Development costs are expensed in the period they are incurred unless they meet specific criteria related to technical, market and financial feasibility, as determined by management, including but not limited to the establishment of a clearly defined future market for the product, and the availability of adequate resources to complete the project. If all criteria are met, the costs are deferred and amortized over the expected useful life, or written off if a product is abandoned. For the period ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, total development costs amounted to $65,200 and $0, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014,the Company had no deferred product development costs. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted the accounting standards codified in ASC 740, Income Taxes as of its inception. Pursuant to those standards, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. Potential benefit of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not that it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years. |
|
ASC 740-10-25 prescribes recognition thresholds that must be met before a tax position is recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. An entity may only recognize or continue to recognize tax positions that meet a "more likely than not" threshold. Based on its evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements. |
|
The Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014 that, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective income tax rate. The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax issues as components of income tax expense. The Company did not recognize or have any accrual for interest and penalties relating to income taxes as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, if any, include all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. At the period ended March 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("Topic 820"). Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. |
|
The three levels are defined as follows: |
|
Level 1 | inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
Level 2 | inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
Level 3 | inpuinputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement. |
|
The fair value of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accrued liabilities and accounts payable approximate carrying value because of the short-term nature of these items. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the FASB ASC Section 605-10-S99, Revenue Recognition, Overall, SEC Materials ("Section 605-10-S99"). Section 605-10-S99 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share |
|
Basic income (loss) per common share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The Company currently has no dilutive securities and as such, basic and diluted income (loss) per share is the same for all periods presented. |
|
Share Purchase Warrants |
|
The Company accounts for common share purchase warrants at fair value in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Black-Scholes option pricing valuation method is used to determine fair value of these warrants. Use of this method requires that the Company make assumptions regarding stock volatility, dividend yields, expected term of the warrants and risk-free interest rates. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
Recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC during the current reporting period did not, or are not, believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements. |