UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[x] | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015
or
[ ] | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission File Number 000-19364
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 62-1117144 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
701 Cool Springs Boulevard, Franklin, TN 37067 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) |
615-614-4929 |
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☒ | No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☒ | No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☒ | |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ | No ☒ |
As of August 3, 2015, there were outstanding 35,832,147 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.001 per share ("common stock").
1
Healthways, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
Page | |||
2
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,265 | $ | 1,765 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 113,914 | 126,559 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 10,728 | 10,680 | ||||||
Other current assets | 6,684 | 7,662 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | 2,265 | 2,917 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | 7,035 | 13,118 | ||||||
Total current assets | 145,891 | 162,701 | ||||||
Property and equipment: | ||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 38,825 | 39,285 | ||||||
Computer equipment and related software | 349,351 | 316,808 | ||||||
Furniture and office equipment | 23,095 | 23,257 | ||||||
Capital projects in process | 24,478 | 38,389 | ||||||
435,749 | 417,739 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (272,134 | ) | (252,043 | ) | ||||
163,615 | 165,696 | |||||||
Other assets | 42,846 | 75,550 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 66,227 | 69,161 | ||||||
Goodwill, net | 338,800 | 338,800 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 757,379 | $ | 811,908 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 40,289 | $ | 37,204 | ||||
Accrued salaries and benefits | 20,570 | 24,198 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 47,688 | 62,674 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 9,476 | 8,282 | ||||||
Contract billings in excess of earned revenue | 15,292 | 15,232 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 23,808 | 20,613 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term liabilities | 3,187 | 2,127 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 160,310 | 170,330 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 229,456 | 231,112 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liability | 24,811 | 32,883 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 38,343 | 72,993 | ||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock | ||||||||
$.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares | ||||||||
authorized, none outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock | ||||||||
$.001 par value, 120,000,000 shares authorized, | ||||||||
35,818,495 and 35,511,221 shares outstanding, respectively | 36 | 35 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 297,138 | 292,346 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 38,113 | 42,439 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,254,953 shares in treasury | (28,182 | ) | (28,182 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (3,309 | ) | (2,048 | ) | ||||
Total Healthways, Inc. stockholders' equity | 303,796 | 304,590 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest | 663 | — | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 304,459 | 304,590 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 757,379 | $ | 811,908 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except earnings (loss) per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 198,073 | $ | 180,613 | $ | 387,935 | $ | 357,391 | ||||||||
Cost of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization of $9,814, $9,604, $19,341, and $18,976, respectively, included below) | 159,483 | 146,476 | 320,935 | 294,624 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses | 21,195 | 16,899 | 37,177 | 33,331 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 12,217 | 13,536 | 24,861 | 26,872 | ||||||||||||
Legal settlement charges | — | — | — | 9,363 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 5,178 | 3,702 | 4,962 | (6,799 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,561 | 4,516 | 9,052 | 8,899 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 617 | (814 | ) | (4,090 | ) | (15,698 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 500 | (297 | ) | (1,294 | ) | (5,585 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 117 | $ | (517 | ) | $ | (2,796 | ) | $ | (10,113 | ) | |||||
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | (303 | ) | — | (303 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Healthways, Inc. | $ | 420 | $ | (517 | ) | $ | (2,493 | ) | $ | (10,113 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Healthways, Inc.: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | |||||
Diluted (1) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 538 | $ | (449 | ) | $ | (4,052 | ) | $ | (9,702 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest | (298 | ) | — | (298 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Healthways, Inc. | $ | 836 | $ | (449 | ) | $ | (3,754 | ) | $ | (9,702 | ) | |||||
Weighted average common shares | ||||||||||||||||
and equivalents: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 35,734 | 35,285 | 35,664 | 35,219 | ||||||||||||
Diluted (1) | 36,881 | 35,285 | 35,664 | 35,219 | ||||||||||||
(1)The impact of potentially dilutive securities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was not considered because the effect would be anti-dilutive in each of those periods. |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Non-Controlling Interest | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | — | $ | 35 | $ | 292,346 | $ | 42,439 | $ | (28,182 | ) | $ | (2,048 | ) | $ | — | $ | 304,590 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to Healthways, Inc. | — | — | — | (2,493 | ) | — | — | — | (2,493 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | — | — | — | — | — | — | (303 | ) | (303 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of income tax benefit of $45 | — | — | — | — | — | (16 | ) | — | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | — | (1,245 | ) | 5 | (1,240 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss: | — | — | — | — | — | (1,261 | ) | 5 | (1,256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (2,493 | ) | — | (1,261 | ) | (298 | ) | (4,052 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | — | 1 | 1,291 | — | — | — | — | 1,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | — | — | — | (1,833 | ) | — | — | — | (1,833 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect of stock options and restricted stock units | — | — | (3,519 | ) | — | — | — | — | (3,519 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based employee compensation expense | — | — | 5,797 | — | — | — | — | 5,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of CareFirst Warrants | — | — | 807 | — | — | — | — | 807 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from non-controlling interest | — | — | 416 | — | — | — | 961 | 1,377 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2015 | $ | — | $ | 36 | $ | 297,138 | $ | 38,113 | $ | (28,182 | ) | $ | (3,309 | ) | $ | 663 | $ | 304,459 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (2,796 | ) | $ | (10,113 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by | ||||||||
operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 24,861 | 26,872 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs | 986 | 925 | ||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 3,495 | 3,303 | ||||||
Share-based employee compensation expense | 5,797 | 3,558 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (2,393 | ) | (3,332 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | (310 | ) | |||||
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable, net | 12,427 | (19,373 | ) | |||||
Increase in other current assets | (709 | ) | (940 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | 3,795 | (3,251 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accrued salaries and benefits | (5,362 | ) | (3,489 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) increase in other current liabilities | (12,454 | ) | 17,913 | |||||
Other | 1,340 | 7,548 | ||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | 28,987 | 19,311 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment | (17,332 | ) | (20,976 | ) | ||||
Investment in joint ventures | (4,450 | ) | (3,250 | ) | ||||
Other | (550 | ) | (579 | ) | ||||
Net cash flows used in investing activities | (22,332 | ) | (24,805 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 303,956 | 224,900 | ||||||
Payments of long-term debt | (307,667 | ) | (233,554 | ) | ||||
Deferred loan costs | — | (88 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | 310 | ||||||
Exercise of stock options | 1,292 | 1,265 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (1,833 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from non-controlling interest | 1,377 | — | ||||||
Change in cash overdraft and other | 619 | 12,114 | ||||||
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities | (2,256 | ) | 4,947 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (899 | ) | 390 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 3,500 | (157 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 1,765 | 2,584 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 5,265 | $ | 2,427 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7
HEALTHWAYS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) | Basis of Presentation |
Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Healthways, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, "Healthways," the "Company," or such terms as "we," "us," or "our") reflect all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring accruals necessary for a fair statement. We have reclassified certain items in prior periods to conform to current classifications.
We have omitted certain financial information that is normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP but that is not required for interim reporting purposes. You should read the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
On March 11, 2015, we formed a joint venture with SulAmérica, the largest independent insurer in Brazil, to sell total population health services to the Brazilian market. With its contribution, SulAmérica acquired a 49% interest in the joint venture, Healthways Brasil Servicos De Consultoria LTDA ("Healthways Brazil"). We have determined that our interest in Healthways Brazil represents a controlling financial interest and, therefore, have consolidated the financial statements of Healthways Brazil and have presented a noncontrolling interest for the portion owned by SulAmérica.
(2) | Recent Accounting Standards |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-9, which creates FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASC Topic 606") and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The provisions of ASC Topic 606 provide for a single comprehensive principles-based standard for the recognition of revenue across all industries and expanded disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue, as well as certain additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASC Topic 606.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period" ("ASU 2014-12"). ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those annual periods, with earlier adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU 2015-03"), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those years, and should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have an impact on our results of operations or cash flows but will result in debt issuance costs being presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset.
8
(3) | Share-Based Compensation |
We currently have four types of share-based awards outstanding to our employees and directors: stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and performance-based stock units. Performance-based stock units have a multi-year performance period and vest four years from the grant date. We believe that our share-based awards align the interests of our employees and directors with those of our stockholders.
We estimate share-based compensation expense based on the number of awards expected to vest, after consideration of expected forfeitures and estimated vesting of performance-based stock units. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recognized share-based compensation costs of $3.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively, which each included the acceleration of vesting of all unexercisable stock options and unvested time-based restricted stock units held by our former chief executive officer and president at the time of his termination of employment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized share-based compensation costs of $1.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
A summary of our stock options as of June 30, 2015 and changes during the six months then ended is presented below:
Shares (000s) | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000s) | |||||||||||||
Options | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | 3,564 | $ | 13.01 | |||||||||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Exercised | (550 | ) | 10.53 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited | (74 | ) | 11.35 | |||||||||||||
Expired | (62 | ) | 40.01 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 | 2,878 | 12.95 | 5.99 | $ | 3,122 | |||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2015 | 2,193 | $ | 13.13 | 5.57 | $ | 2,459 |
There were no stock options granted during the three or six months ended June 30, 2015.
The following table shows a summary of our restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based stock units ("nonvested shares") as of June 30, 2015, as well as activity during the six months then ended:
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units | Performance-Based Stock Units | |||||||||||||||
Nonvested Shares | Shares (000s) | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares (000s) | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2015 | 1,047 | $ | 13.15 | 341 | $ | 14.77 | ||||||||||
Granted | 116 | 16.21 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Vested | (284 | ) | 12.57 | — | — | |||||||||||
Forfeited | (49 | ) | 12.03 | — | — | |||||||||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2015 | 830 | $ | 13.87 | 341 | $ | 14.77 |
At the end of each reporting period, we estimate the number of performance-based stock units expected to vest based on the probability that the related performance objectives will be met. As of June 30, 2015, none of the outstanding performance-based stock units are expected to vest.
9
(4) | Income Taxes |
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we had an effective income tax rate of 81.0%, compared to an effective tax benefit rate of 36.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had an effective tax benefit rate of 31.6%, compared to an effective tax benefit rate of 35.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The change in the effective rates was primarily due to the smaller base of pretax income/(loss) for the 2015 periods in relation to certain items for which we currently are not able to recognize a tax benefit.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax years remaining subject to examination in these major jurisdictions include 2011 to present.
(5) | Long-Term Debt |
The Company's long-term debt consists of the following at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
(In $000s) | June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Cash Convertible Notes, net of unamortized discount | $ | 126,642 | $ | 123,148 | ||||
CareFirst Convertible Note | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Fifth Amended Credit Agreement: | ||||||||
Term Loan | 90,000 | 97,500 | ||||||
Revolver | 9,850 | 4,950 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations and other | 6,772 | 6,127 | ||||||
253,264 | 251,725 | |||||||
Less: current portion | (23,808 | ) | (20,613 | ) | ||||
$ | 229,456 | $ | 231,112 |
1.50% Cash Convertible Senior Notes Due 2018
On July 16, 2013, we completed the issuance of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of cash convertible senior notes due 2018 (the "Cash Convertible Notes"), which bear interest at a rate of 1.50% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on January 1 and July 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2014. The Cash Convertible Notes will mature on July 1, 2018, unless earlier repurchased or converted into cash in accordance with their terms prior to such date. At the option of the holders, the Cash Convertible Notes are convertible into cash based on the conversion rate set forth below only upon occurrence of certain triggering events as defined in the Indenture dated as of July 8, 2013 by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, none of which had occurred as of June 30, 2015. Accordingly, we have classified the Cash Convertible Notes as long-term debt at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014. The Cash Convertible Notes are not convertible into our common stock or any other securities under any circumstances. The initial cash conversion rate is approximately 51.38 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Cash Convertible Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $19.46 per share of common stock). The Cash Convertible Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to any of our indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Cash Convertible Notes. As a result of this transaction, we recognized deferred loan costs of approximately $3.9 million, which are being amortized over the term of the Cash Convertible Notes using the effective interest method.
The cash conversion feature of the Cash Convertible Notes (the "Cash Conversion Derivative") requires bifurcation from the Cash Convertible Notes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and is recorded in other long-term liabilities as a derivative liability and carried at fair value. The fair value of the Cash Conversion Derivative at the time of issuance of the Cash Convertible Notes was $36.8 million, which was recorded as a debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Cash Convertible Notes. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the Cash Convertible Notes using the effective interest method. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded $3.5 million of interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount based upon an effective interest rate of 5.7%. The net carrying amount of the Cash Convertible Notes at June 30, 2015 was $126.6 million, net of the unamortized discount of $23.4 million.
In connection with the issuance of the Cash Convertible Notes, we entered into privately negotiated convertible note hedge transactions (the "Cash Convertible Notes Hedges"), which are cash-settled and are intended to reduce our exposure to potential cash payments that we would be required to make if holders elect to convert the Cash Convertible Notes at a time when our stock price exceeds the conversion price. The initial cost of the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges was $36.8 million. The Cash Convertible Notes Hedges are recorded in other assets as a derivative asset under FASB ASC Topic 815 and are carried at fair value. See Note 7 for additional information regarding the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and the Cash Conversion Derivative and their fair values as of June 30, 2015.
10
In July 2013, we also sold separate privately negotiated warrants (the "Warrants") initially relating, in the aggregate, to a notional number of shares of our common stock underlying the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges. The Warrants have an initial strike price of approximately $25.95 per share, which effectively increases the conversion price of the Cash Convertible Notes to a 60% premium to our stock price on July 1, 2013. The Warrants will be net share settled by issuing a number of shares of our common stock per Warrant corresponding to the excess of the market price per share of our common stock (as measured on each warrant exercise date under the terms of the Warrants) over the applicable strike price of the Warrants. The Warrants meet the definition of derivatives under the guidance in ASC Topic 815; however, because these instruments have been determined to be indexed to our own stock and meet the criteria for equity classification under ASC Topic 815-40, the Warrants have been accounted for as an adjustment to our additional paid-in-capital.
If the market value per share of our common stock exceeds the strike price of the Warrants, the Warrants will have a dilutive effect on net income per share, and the "treasury stock" method will be used in calculating the dilutive effect on earnings per share.
CareFirst Convertible Note
On October 1, 2013, we entered into an Investment Agreement (the "Investment Agreement") with CareFirst Holdings, LLC ("CareFirst"), which is in addition to certain existing commercial agreements between us and CareFirst relating to, among other things, disease management and care coordination services (the "Commercial Agreements"). Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, we issued to CareFirst a convertible subordinated promissory note in the aggregate original principal amount of $20 million (the "CareFirst Convertible Note") for a purchase price of $20 million. The CareFirst Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of 4.75% per year, payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each calendar year, beginning on December 31, 2013. The CareFirst Convertible Note may be prepaid only under limited circumstances and upon the terms and conditions specified therein. If the CareFirst Convertible Note has not been fully converted or redeemed in accordance with its terms, it will mature on October 1, 2019. The CareFirst Convertible Note is subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of (a) all of our indebtedness under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement (as defined below), and (b) any other of our senior debt, which currently includes only the Cash Convertible Notes.
The CareFirst Convertible Note is convertible into shares of our common stock at the conversion rate determined by dividing (a) the sum of the portion of the principal to be converted and accrued and unpaid interest with respect to such principal by (b) the conversion price equal to $22.41 per share of our common stock. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, reorganizations, reclassifications and similar events.
CareFirst has an opportunity to earn warrants to purchase shares of our common stock ("CareFirst Warrants") based on achievement of certain quarterly thresholds (the "Revenue Thresholds") for revenue derived from both the Commercial Agreements and from new business to us from third parties as a result of an introduction or referral to us by CareFirst (collectively, the "Quarterly Revenue"). If the Quarterly Revenue is greater than or equal to the applicable Revenue Threshold for any quarter ending on or prior to September 30, 2017, then we will issue to CareFirst a certain number of warrants exercisable for the number of shares of our common stock ("CareFirst Warrant Shares") determined in accordance with the terms of the Investment Agreement unless (i) CareFirst elects to receive a cash payment in accordance with the terms of the Investment Agreement or (ii) there is a change of control. The aggregate number of CareFirst Warrant Shares in any single 12-month period beginning on October 1, 2013 cannot exceed 400,000, and the aggregate number of CareFirst Warrant Shares issuable pursuant to the Investment Agreement cannot exceed 1,600,000. As of June 30, 2015, we had issued CareFirst Warrant Shares totaling 305,121 at a weighted average exercise price of $18.98. These CareFirst Warrants may have a dilutive effect on net income per share, and the "treasury stock" method is used in calculating the dilutive effect on earnings per share.
Also on October 1, 2013, in connection with the execution of the Investment Agreement, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with CareFirst, pursuant to which we agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause any registration statement covering an underwritten offering of our common stock for our own account or for the account of any holder of our common stock (other than a registration statement on Form S-4 or Form S-8 or any successor thereto) to include those registrable common shares that any holder of such registrable common shares has requested to be registered.
The term of the Investment Agreement expires on the earlier of (a) December 31, 2017 and (b) the first date on which no Commercial Agreement is in effect.
11
Credit Facility
On June 8, 2012, we entered into the Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (as amended, the "Fifth Amended Credit Agreement"). The Fifth Amended Credit Agreement provides us with a $200.0 million revolving credit facility that expires on June 8, 2017 and includes a swingline sub facility of $20.0 million and a $75.0 million sub facility for letters of credit. The Fifth Amended Credit Agreement also provides a $200.0 million term loan facility that matures on June 8, 2017, $90.0 million of which remained outstanding at June 30, 2015, and an uncommitted incremental accordion facility of $100.0 million.
On July 1, 2013, we entered into an amendment to the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement, which provided for, among other things, the amendment of certain negative covenants to permit the issuance of and payments related to the Cash Convertible Notes described above as well as increases in the maximum required levels of total funded debt to EBITDA beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2013. On April 14, 2014 and December 29, 2014, we entered into additional amendments to the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement, which, among other things, (1) amended the calculation of consolidated EBITDA to exclude the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota ("BCBSMN") legal settlement and, for any period that includes a fiscal quarter ending on or before December 31, 2015, up to $5 million in the aggregate of accounting charges attributable to the settlement or other satisfaction of litigation liabilities and the incurrence of related expenses, (2) reduced the amount of the accordion facility from $200 million to $100 million, (3) provided that the net cash proceeds of an asset sale or recovery event be deposited with the administrative agent pending reinvestment or application to the payment of loans, and (4) limited the aggregate consideration payable in respect of acquisitions consummated after December 29, 2014 to $150 million. As of June 30, 2015, availability under the revolving credit facility totaled $109.9 million as calculated under the most restrictive covenant.
We are required to repay outstanding revolving loans under the revolving credit facility in full on June 8, 2017. We are required to repay term loans in quarterly principal installments aggregating (1) 1.875% of the original aggregate principal amount of the term loans during each of the four quarters beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 2014, and (2) 2.500% of the original aggregate principal amount of the term loans during each of the remaining quarters prior to maturity on June 8, 2017, at which time the entire unpaid principal balance of the term loans is due and payable.
The Fifth Amended Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require us to maintain, as defined, specified ratios or levels of (1) total funded debt to EBITDA and (2) fixed charge coverage.
The Fifth Amended Credit Agreement contains various other affirmative and negative covenants that are typical for financings of this type. Among other things, the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement limits repurchases of our common stock and the amount of dividends that we can pay to holders of our common stock.
(6) | Derivative Investments and Hedging Activities |
We use derivative instruments to manage risks related to interest, foreign currencies, and the Cash Convertible Notes. We account for derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, which establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that certain derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value. Additionally, changes in the derivative's fair value will be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. As permitted under our master netting arrangements, the fair value amounts of our interest rate swaps and foreign currency options and/or forward contracts are presented on a net basis by counterparty in the consolidated balance sheets.
12
Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedging Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
Derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded at estimated fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, with the effective portion of the gains and losses being reported in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss ("accumulated OCI"). Cash flow hedges for all periods presented consist solely of interest rate swap agreements, which effectively modify our exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of our floating rate debt to fixed rate obligations, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. Under these agreements, we receive a variable rate of interest based on LIBOR (as defined in Note 5), and we pay a fixed rate of interest with interest rates ranging from 0.690% to 1.480% plus a spread (see Note 5). We maintain interest rate swap agreements with current notional amounts of $125.0 million and termination dates ranging from November 2015 to December 2016. Of this amount, $75.0 million was effective at June 30, 2015, and $50.0 million will become effective in December 2015, as older interest rate swap agreements expire. Gains and losses on these interest rate swap agreements are reclassified to interest expense in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings or the period in which all or a portion of the hedge becomes ineffective. As of June 30, 2015, we expect to reclassify $0.4 million of net losses on interest rate swap agreements from accumulated OCI to interest expense within the next 12 months due to the scheduled payment of interest associated with our debt.
The following table shows the effect of our cash flow hedges on the consolidated balance sheets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
(In $000s) | For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Loss related to effective portion of derivatives recognized in accumulated OCI, gross of tax effect | $ | 54 | $ | 216 | $ | 255 | $ | 281 | ||||||||
Loss related to effective portion of derivatives reclassified from accumulated OCI to interest expense, gross of tax effect | $ | 96 | $ | 130 | $ | 194 | $ | 256 |
Gains and losses representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no gains or losses on cash flow hedges recognized in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) resulting from hedge ineffectiveness.
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Our Cash Conversion Derivative, Cash Convertible Notes Hedges, and foreign currency options and/or forward contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP and are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). These derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments did not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.
Cash Conversion Derivative and Cash Convertible Notes Hedges
The Cash Conversion Derivative is accounted for as a derivative liability and carried at fair value. In order to offset the risk associated with the Cash Conversion Derivative, we entered into Cash Convertible Notes Hedges which are cash-settled and are intended to reduce our exposure to potential cash payments that we would be required to make if holders elect to convert the Cash Convertible Notes at a time when our stock price exceeds the conversion price. The Cash Convertible Notes Hedges are accounted for as a derivative asset and carried at fair value.
13
The gains and losses resulting from a change in fair values of the Cash Conversion Derivative and the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges are reported in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as follows:
(In $000s) | Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Classification | |||||||
Cash Convertible Notes Hedges: | ||||||||||
Net unrealized loss | $ | (32,473 | ) | $ | (32,897 | ) | Selling, general and administrative expenses | |||
Cash Conversion Derivative: | ||||||||||
Net unrealized gain | $ | 32,473 | $ | 32,897 | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts
We also enter into foreign currency options and/or forward contracts in order to minimize our earnings exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our foreign currency exchange contracts require current period mark-to-market accounting, with any change in fair value being recorded each period in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) in selling, general and administrative expenses. At June 30, 2015, we had forward contracts with notional amounts of $28.7 million to exchange foreign currencies, primarily the Australian dollar and Euro, that were entered into to hedge forecasted foreign net income (loss) and certain intercompany transactions. We routinely monitor our foreign currency exposures to maximize the overall effectiveness of our foreign currency hedge positions. We do not execute transactions or hold derivative financial instruments for trading or other purposes.
The estimated gross fair values of derivative instruments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, excluding the impact of netting derivative assets and liabilities when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists, were as follows:
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In $000s) | Foreign currency exchange contracts | Interest rate swap agreements | Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and Cash Conversion Derivative | Foreign currency exchange contracts | Interest rate swap agreements | Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and Cash Conversion Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other current assets | $ | 163 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 477 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Other assets | — | — | 15,128 | — | — | 48,025 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 163 | $ | — | $ | 15,128 | $ | 477 | $ | — | $ | 48,025 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities | $ | 119 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 111 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | — | — | 15,128 | — | — | 48,025 | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities | — | 145 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | — | 362 | — | — | 395 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 119 | $ | 507 | $ | 15,128 | $ | 111 | $ | 395 | $ | 48,025 |
See also Note 7.
(7) | Fair Value Measurements |
We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, assuming the transaction occurs in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability.
14
Fair Value Hierarchy
The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. We categorize each of our fair value measurements in one of these three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-based valuation techniques in which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and typically reflect management's estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
(In $000s) June 30, 2015 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross Fair Value | Netting(1) | Net Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | $ | 163 | $ | — | $ | 163 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 64 | |||||||||
Cash Convertible Notes Hedges | — | 15,128 | 15,128 | — | 15,128 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | $ | 119 | $ | — | $ | 119 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 20 | |||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | 507 | — | 507 | — | 507 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Conversion Derivative | — | 15,128 | 15,128 | — | 15,128 |
(In $000s) December 31, 2014 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross Fair Value | Netting(1) | Net Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | $ | 477 | $ | — | $ | 477 | $ | (111 | ) | $ | 366 | |||||||||
Cash Convertible Notes Hedges | — | 48,025 | 48,025 | — | 48,025 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | $ | 111 | $ | — | $ | 111 | $ | (111 | ) | $ | — | |||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | 395 | — | 395 | — | 395 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Conversion Derivative | — | 48,025 | 48,025 | — | 48,025 |
(1) This column reflects the impact of netting derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.
15
The fair values of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued using broker quotations of similar assets or liabilities in active markets. The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are primarily determined based on the present value of future cash flows using internal models and third-party pricing services with observable inputs, including interest rates, yield curves and applicable credit spreads. The fair values of the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and the Cash Conversion Derivative are measured using Level 3 inputs. These instruments are not actively traded and are valued using an option pricing model that uses observable and unobservable market data for inputs, such as expected time to maturity of the derivative instruments, the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility of our common stock and other factors. The Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and the Cash Conversion Derivative were designed such that changes in their fair values would offset one another, with minimal impact to the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Therefore, the sensitivity of changes in the unobservable inputs to the option pricing model for such instruments is mitigated.
The following table presents our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3):
(In $000s) | Balance at December 31, 2014 | Purchases of Level 3 Instruments | Issuances of Level 3 Instruments | Gains/(Losses) Included in Earnings | Balance at June 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Convertible Notes Hedges | $ | 48,025 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (32,897 | ) | $ | 15,128 | |||||||||
Cash Conversion Derivative | (48,025 | ) | — | — | 32,897 | (15,128 | ) |
The gains and losses included in earnings noted above represent the change in the fair value of these financial instruments and are recorded each period in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as selling, general and administrative expenses.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
In addition to foreign currency exchange contracts, interest rate swap agreements, the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges, and the Cash Conversion Derivative, the estimated fair values of which are disclosed above, the estimated fair value of each class of financial instruments at June 30, 2015 was as follows:
• | Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amount of $5.3 million approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments (less than three months). |
• | Long-term debt – The estimated fair value of outstanding borrowings under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement, which includes a revolving credit facility and a term loan facility (see Note 5), and the Cash Convertible Notes are determined based on the fair value hierarchy as discussed above. The revolving credit facility and the term loan facility are not actively traded and therefore are classified as Level 2 valuations based on the market for similar instruments. The estimated fair value is based on the average of the prices set by the issuing bank given current market conditions and is not necessarily indicative of the amount we could realize in a current market exchange. The estimated fair value and carrying amount of outstanding borrowings under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement at June 30, 2015 are $99.4 million and $99.9 million, respectively. |
The Cash Convertible Notes are actively traded and therefore are classified as Level 1 valuations. The estimated fair value at June 30, 2015 was $140.8 million, which is based on the last traded price of the Cash Convertible Notes on June 30, 2015, and the par value was $150.0 million. The carrying amount of the Cash Convertible Notes at June 30, 2015 was $126.6 million, which is net of the debt discount discussed in Note 5.
The CareFirst Convertible Note was issued at its fair value of $20.0 million on October 1, 2013. It is not actively traded and is not based upon either an observable market, other than the market for our common stock, or on an observable index and is therefore classified as a Level 3 valuation. At June 30, 2015, the carrying amount of the CareFirst Convertible Note of $20.0 million approximates fair value.
16
Commitments and Contingencies |
Junk Fax Prevention Act Lawsuits
On September 16, 2014, Healthways and its wholly owned subsidiary, Healthways WholeHealth Networks, Inc. ("HWHN"), were named in a putative class action lawsuit filed by Edward Simon, DC in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seeking damages and other relief relating to alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), as amended by the Junk Fax Prevention Act ("JFPA"), in connection with faxes allegedly transmitted to members of HWHN's network of complementary and alternative care practitioners. The JFPA prohibits sending an "unsolicited advertisement" to a fax machine and requires the sender to provide a notice to allow a recipient to "opt out" of future fax transmissions (including, pursuant to rules promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), those sent with the prior express invitation or permission of the recipient). The complaint seeks damages in excess of $5 million. The case has been removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division ("California Matter").
On December 22, 2014, HWHN was also named in a putative class action lawsuit filed by Affiliated Health Care Associates, P.C. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division ("Illinois Matter"), seeking damages and other relief relating to alleged violations of the TCPA, the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, and Illinois common law in connection with faxes allegedly sent to members of HWHN's network of complementary and alternative care practitioners. The complaint seeks damages in an unstated amount. We deny the claims and intend to vigorously defend these actions. On May 29, 2015, the plaintiff in the Illinois Matter voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit without prejudice; that plaintiff has been joined as a party in the California Matter.
In connection with these actions, on March 2, 2015, Healthways and HWHN filed with the FCC a Petition for Retroactive Waiver ("Waiver Petition") of the FCC's regulation that requires advertising faxes sent with the prior express invitation or permission of the recipient to include an "opt-out" notice. The FCC has previously granted retroactive waivers of that regulation to several petitioners who were facing lawsuits alleging that the petitioners failed to include the "opt-out" language in fax advertisements sent with the prior express invitation or permission of the recipients. We cannot predict whether the FCC will grant our Waiver Petition or, if granted, the impact on the California Matter.
Performance Award Lawsuit
On September 4, 2012, Milton Pfeiffer ("Plaintiff"), claiming to be a stockholder of the Company, filed a putative derivative action against the Company and the Board of Directors (the "Board") in Delaware Chancery Court (the "Court") alleging that the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Board breached their fiduciary duties and violated the Company's 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") by granting Ben R. Leedle, Jr., then chief executive officer and president of the Company, discretionary performance awards under the Plan in the form of options to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, which consisted of a performance award in November 2011 granting Mr. Leedle the right to purchase 365,000 shares and a performance award in February 2012 granting Mr. Leedle the right to purchase 135,000 shares (the "Performance Awards"). Plaintiff alleges that the Performance Awards exceeded what is authorized by the Plan and that the Company's 2012 proxy statement, in which the Performance Awards are disclosed, is false and misleading. Plaintiff also alleges that Mr. Leedle breached his fiduciary duties and was unjustly enriched by receiving the Performance Awards. Plaintiff is seeking, among other things, the rescission or disgorgement of all alleged "excess" awards granted to Mr. Leedle under the Performance Awards, to recover any incidental damages to the Company, and an award of attorneys' fees and expenses. On November 2, 2012, the Company and the Board filed a Motion to Dismiss because Plaintiff failed to make a demand upon the Board as required by Delaware law. On November 8, 2013, the Court denied the Company's Motion to Dismiss. On February 21, 2014, the Company filed its answer. On May 15, 2015, in connection with the termination of Mr. Leedle's employment, the Board ratified the awards to Mr. Leedle pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporate Law and subsequently sent notice of the ratification to shareholders. The Company intends to vigorously defend the allegations in this case.
17
Outlook
We are also subject to other contractual disputes, claims and legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While we are unable to estimate a range of potential losses, we do not believe that any of the legal proceedings pending against us as of the date of this report, some of which are expected to be covered by insurance policies, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. As these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties, our view of these matters may change in the future.
Contractual Commitments
In January 2008, we entered into a 25-year strategic relationship agreement with Gallup and a global joint venture agreement with Gallup in October 2012, that requires us to make payments over a 5-year period beginning January 2013. We have minimum remaining contractual cash obligations of $30.8 million related to these agreements.
In May 2011, we entered into a ten-year applications and technology services outsourcing agreement with HP Enterprise Services, LLC that contains minimum fee requirements. Total payments over the remaining term, including an estimate for future contractual cost of living adjustments, must equal or exceed a minimum level of approximately $109.2 million; however, based on initial required service and equipment level assumptions, we estimate that the remaining payments will be approximately $226.3 million. The agreement allows us to terminate all or a portion of the services after the first two years provided we pay certain termination fees, which could be material to the Company.
(9) | Earnings Per Share |
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
(In 000s, except per share data) | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Healthways, Inc. - numerator for basic income (loss) per share | $ | 420 | $ | (517 | ) | $ | (2,493 | ) | $ | (10,113 | ) | |||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||||||
Shares used for basic income (loss) per share | 35,734 | 35,285 | 35,664 | 35,219 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Non-qualified stock options (1) | 770 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock units (1) | 372 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
CareFirst Warrants (1) | 5 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Shares used for diluted income per share | 36,881 | 35,285 | 35,664 | 35,219 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | |||||
Diluted (1) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | |||||
Dilutive securities outstanding not included in the computation of income (loss) per share because their effect is antidilutive: | ||||||||||||||||
Non-qualified stock options | 560 | 2,237 | 1,307 | 2,164 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock units | 277 | 300 | 408 | 298 | ||||||||||||
Warrants related to Cash Convertible Notes | 7,707 | 7,707 | 7,707 | 7,707 | ||||||||||||
CareFirst Convertible Note | 892 | 892 | 892 | 892 | ||||||||||||
CareFirst Warrants | 198 | 36 | 133 | 34 |
(1) The impact of potentially dilutive securities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was not considered because the effect would be anti-dilutive in each of those periods.
Performance-based stock units outstanding are considered contingently issuable shares and were excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share for all periods presented as the performance criteria had not been met as of the end of the reporting periods.
18
(10) | Accumulated OCI |
The following tables summarize the changes in accumulated OCI, net of tax, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
(In $000s) | Net Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swaps | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | Total | |||||||||
Accumulated OCI, net of tax, as of January 1, 2015 | $ | (342 | ) | $ | (1,706 | ) | $ | (2,048 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of tax | (133 | ) | (1,245 | ) | (1,378 | ) | ||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI, net of tax | 117 | — | 117 | |||||||||
Net decrease in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (16 | ) | (1,245 | ) | (1,261 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated OCI, net of tax, as of June 30, 2015 | $ | (358 | ) | $ | (2,951 | ) | $ | (3,309 | ) |
(In $000s) | Net Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swaps | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | Total | |||||||||
Accumulated OCI, net of tax, as of January 1, 2014 | $ | (513 | ) | $ | 106 | $ | (407 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax | (150 | ) | 407 | 257 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI, net of tax | 154 | — | 154 | |||||||||
Net increase in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 4 | 407 | 411 | |||||||||
Accumulated OCI, net of tax, as of June 30, 2014 | $ | (509 | ) | $ | 513 | $ | 4 |
The following table provides details about reclassifications out of accumulated OCI for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
Six Months Ended June 30, | Statement of Comprehensive | ||||||||
(In $000s) | 2015 | 2014 | Loss Classification | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | $ | 194 | $ | 256 | Interest expense | ||||
(77 | ) | (102 | ) | Income tax benefit | |||||
$ | 117 | $ | 154 | Net of tax |
See Note 6 for further discussion of our interest rate swaps.
(11) | Share Repurchases |
In accordance with the terms of a Separation and Release Agreement entered into with our former president and chief executive officer, Ben R. Leedle, Jr., whose employment was terminated on May 15, 2015 (the "Separation Date"), Mr. Leedle elected to net exercise (net of the applicable exercise price and tax withholding) on the Separation Date certain performance awards granted to Mr. Leedle in the form of options to purchase 434,436 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $9.96 per share. The Company repurchased from Mr. Leedle 106,408 shares of common stock resulting from this net exercise at $17.23 per share, which was the per share purchase price equal to the closing price of the common stock on the Separation Date as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
19
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
Founded and incorporated in Delaware in 1981, Healthways, Inc. provides comprehensive total population health management solutions that are uniquely designed to help people improve their well-being, thereby improving their health and productivity and reducing their health-related costs. Total population health management involves a proactive approach to reducing avoidable disease incidence – a considerable improvement from the more traditional and more costly method of waiting for people to get a disease before acting.
As used throughout this report, unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms "we," "us," "our," "Healthways," or the "Company" refer collectively to Healthways, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
As a global leader in total population health, Healthways has established a proven value proposition: by taking a systematic approach to keeping healthy people healthy, eliminating or reducing lifestyle risks and optimizing care for persistent or chronic conditions, we help our customers reduce health-related costs and increase productivity and performance across whole populations, including workforces, health plan memberships, and communities. We are pioneers of this systematic approach, and we believe we are unique in having the capability to provide a full spectrum of proven total population health management solutions.
Healthways' comprehensive well-being improvement programs provide personalized solutions for any individual, irrespective of their health status, age or paying sponsor. Our total population health technology platform uses our proprietary analytics and predictive models to enable us to stratify the population, develop individualized well-being improvement plans and deliver action-based solutions to improve individual and organizational performance. Our technology-driven infrastructure is compatible with, and integrated into, our customers' systems. Through this data-driven process, we identify the needs of each individual in a population and determine the right level of support. This allows us to efficiently deploy successful strategies to sustain engagement, to use the best science to drive behavior change and ultimately deliver meaningful, measurable outcomes. We know that each individual in a given population often simultaneously seeks a variety of support services in his or her pursuit of improved well-being. We provide a full spectrum of services that can be delivered at scale, and in a manner that meets the needs of individuals over time.
Our value proposition, described above, has been proven and outcome studies have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Our systematic approach and comprehensive well-being improvement solutions are designed to focus on improving a population's essential well-being elements: physical, financial, social, community and sense of purpose.
For example, to keep healthy people healthy, our wellness and prevention programs focus on education, physical fitness, nutrition, health coaching and tools that support behavior change by:
· | fostering well-being improvement and disease prevention through biometric screening and proprietary well-being assessments; |
· | engaging people in our well-being improvement programs, such as fitness, weight management, stress management, and financial and lifestyle management; and |
· | providing access to our fitness center, physical and occupational therapy, chiropractic, and complementary and alternative medicine provider networks. |
20
To eliminate or reduce lifestyle risks, our programs help to motivate people to make positive lifestyle changes and accomplish individual goals, such as increasing physical activity for seniors, overcoming nicotine addiction or generating sustainable weight loss, by:
· | promoting personal change and improvement in the lifestyle behaviors that lead to poor health or chronic conditions; and |
· | providing personal interactions with highly trained healthcare professionals and educational materials to create and sustain healthier behaviors for those individuals at risk or in the early stages of chronic conditions. |
To help people optimize care for persistent or chronic conditions we:
· | incorporate the latest, evidence-based clinical guidelines into interventions to optimize patient health outcomes; |
· | develop care support plans and motivate members to set attainable goals for themselves; |
· | provide local market resources to address acute episodic interventions; |
· | coordinate members' care as an extension of their healthcare providers; |
· | provide software technology solutions and management consulting in support of well-being improvement services; and |
· | provide high-risk care management for members at risk for hospitalization due to complex conditions. |
In North America, we operate in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Our customers include health plans, both commercial and Medicare Advantage, large self-insured employers including state and municipal government entities, and providers of healthcare, including integrated healthcare systems, hospitals and physician groups. We also provide services to commercial healthcare businesses and/or government entities in Australia, Brazil, and France.
Our services are delivered using a range of methods, including venue-based face-to-face interactions; print; phone; mobile and remote devices with unique applications; on-line, including social networks; and any combination of these methods to motivate and sustain healthy behaviors. Many of our programs for lifestyle support, management and education are delivered through web-based portals and mobile applications and may also offer a social networking opportunity.
We have a scalable platform that we believe will enable us to gain substantial operating leverage as we grow – our proprietary technology infrastructure and delivery capabilities are currently accessible to approximately 68 million people across four continents. Our scalable model is also flexible, and therefore the degree of our engagement and model of support can evolve with our customers' needs and preferences. In many cases, our intervention services are delivered from our domestic and international well-being improvement call centers staffed with a range of professionals including, but not limited to, nurses, dieticians, pharmacists, health coaches, exercise specialists and nutritional counselors. Our fitness center network encompasses approximately 16,000 U.S. locations. We also maintain an extensive network of over 88,000 complementary, alternative and physical medicine practitioners, which offers convenient access to the significant number of individuals who seek health services outside of the traditional healthcare system.
21
Forward-Looking Statements
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements, which are based upon current knowledge, assumptions, beliefs, estimates and expectations, involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and are subject to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical statements of fact and those regarding the intent, belief, or expectations of the Company, including, without limitation, all statements regarding the Company's future earnings and results of operations, and can be identified by the use of words like "may," "believe," "will," "expect," "project," "estimate," "anticipate," "plan," or "continue" and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to:
· | the effectiveness of management's strategies and decisions; |
· | our ability to sign and implement new contracts for our solutions; |
· | our ability to accurately forecast the costs required to successfully implement new contracts; |
· | our ability to renew and/or maintain contracts with our customers under existing terms or restructure these contracts on terms that would not have a material negative impact on our results of operations; |
· | our ability to effectively compete against other entities, whose financial, research, staff, and marketing resources may exceed our resources; |
· | our ability to accurately forecast our revenues, margins, earnings and net income, as well as any potential charges that we may incur as a result of changes in our business and leadership; |
· | our ability to accurately forecast performance and the timing of revenue recognition under the terms of our customer contracts ahead of data collection and reconciliation; |
· | the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, "PPACA"), on our operations and/or the demand for our services; |
· | our ability to anticipate change and respond to emerging trends in the domestic and international markets for healthcare and the impact of the same on demand for our services; |
· | the risks associated with deriving a significant concentration of our revenues from a limited number of customers; |
· | the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and our ability to hedge against such fluctuations; |
· | our ability to achieve and reach mutual agreement with customers with respect to the contractually required performance metrics, cost savings and clinical outcomes improvements, or to achieve such metrics, savings and improvements within the timeframes contemplated by us; |
22
· | our ability to achieve estimated annualized revenue in backlog in the manner and within the timeframe we expect, which is based on certain estimates regarding the implementation of our services; |
· | our ability and/or the ability of our customers to enroll participants and to accurately forecast their level of enrollment and participation in our programs in a manner and within the timeframe anticipated by us; |
· | the ability of our customers to provide timely and accurate data that is essential to the operation and measurement of our performance under the terms of our contracts; |
· | our ability to favorably resolve contract billing and interpretation issues with our customers; |
· | our ability to service our debt, make principal and interest payments as those payments become due, and remain in compliance with our debt covenants; |
· | the risks associated with changes in macroeconomic conditions, which may reduce the demand and/or the timing of purchases for our services from customers or potential customers, reduce the number of covered lives of our existing customers, or restrict our ability to obtain additional financing; |
· | counterparty risk associated with the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges, interest rate swap agreements, and foreign currency exchange contracts; |
· | the risks associated with valuation of the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and the Cash Conversion Derivative, which may result in volatility to our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) if these transactions do not completely offset one another; |
· | our ability to integrate new or acquired businesses, services (including outsourced services), or technologies into our business and to accurately forecast the related costs; |
· | our ability to anticipate and respond to strategic changes, opportunities, and emerging trends in our industry and/or business and to accurately forecast the related impact on our revenues and earnings; |
· | the impact of any impairment of our goodwill, intangible assets, or other long-term assets; |
· | our ability to develop new products and deliver and report outcomes on those products; |
· | our ability to implement our integrated data and technology solutions platform within the required timeframe and expected cost estimates and to develop and enhance this platform and/or other technologies to meet evolving customer and market needs; |
· | our ability to obtain adequate financing to provide the capital that may be necessary to support our operations and to support or guarantee our performance under new contracts; |
· | unusual and unforeseen patterns of healthcare utilization by individuals with diseases or conditions for which we provide services; |
23
· | the ability of our customers to maintain the number of covered lives enrolled in the plans during the terms of our agreements; |
· | the risks associated with data privacy or security breaches, computer hacking, network penetration and other illegal intrusions of our information systems or those of third-party vendors or other service providers, which may result in unauthorized access by third parties to customer, employee or our information or patient health information and lead to enforcement actions, fines and other litigation against us; |
· | the impact of any new or proposed legislation, regulations and interpretations relating to Medicare or Medicare Advantage; |
· | the impact of future state, federal, and international legislation and regulations applicable to our business, including PPACA, on our ability to deliver our services and on the financial health of our customers and their willingness to purchase our services; |
· | current geopolitical turmoil, the continuing threat of domestic or international terrorism, and the potential emergence of a health pandemic or infectious disease outbreak; |
· | the impact of legal proceedings involving us and/or our subsidiaries; and |
· | other risks detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. |
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements.
Customer Contracts
Our fees are generally billed on a per member per month ("PMPM") basis or upon member participation, such as the number of visits to a Healthways® SilverSneakers® fitness location. For PMPM fees, we generally determine our contract fees by multiplying the contractually negotiated PMPM rate by the number of members covered by our services during the month. We typically set PMPM rates during contract negotiations with customers based on the value we expect our programs to create and a sharing of that value between the customer and the Company.
Our contracts with health plans and integrated healthcare systems generally range from three to five years with certain comprehensive strategic agreements extending up to ten years in length. Contracts with self-insured employers typically have two to four-year terms. Some of our contracts allow the customer to terminate early.
Some of our contracts place a portion of our fees at risk based on achieving certain performance metrics, cost savings, and/or clinical outcomes improvements or obtaining customer agreement ("performance-based"). Approximately 6% of revenues recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were performance-based, and 2% of revenues were subject to final reconciliation as of June 30, 2015.
Business Strategy
Our business strategy and value proposition reflect our fundamental belief that people with higher well-being have lower overall health-related costs, improved workforce engagement and improved productivity, which yields better performance for individuals, families, health plans, governments, employers, integrated healthcare systems and communities.
We believe the entire healthcare market is shifting to payment for outcomes, not simply volume of services or time, and that total population health management is the most effective model within this pay-for-value reimbursement market. Unlike historical business models that generate revenue based on the cost of a unit of service delivered, the total population health management business model only creates recurring revenue if a positive outcome – lower medical cost and/or improved productivity – is achieved. We believe this model is better aligned with macro healthcare trends and their impact on payors, providers and consumers.
24
Strategic Transformation
In 2006, we recognized that an evolving healthcare landscape and difficult economic headwinds were challenging our conventional stand-alone disease management model. We therefore undertook a major strategic transformation, which is now largely complete, to become a leader in the rapidly growing total population health management industry. Over the past eight years, we designed, built, and implemented a business model that utilizes the Company's core strengths and that provides a diverse set of total population health management services to a broader set of end customer markets. The transformation involved:
• | Investing in technology and innovative capabilities to form our scalable platform to deliver our comprehensive well-being improvement solution; |
• | Expanding the scope and extending the term of our relationships with a number of our largest customers; and |
• | Establishing significant new customer relationships by providing value aligned with their needs. |
Scalable Model
Our scalable model is flexible, and therefore the degree of our engagement and model of support can evolve with our customers' needs and preferences. The behavior change techniques and predictive modeling incorporated in our technology identify an individual's readiness to change and provide personalized support through appropriate interactions using a range of methods desired by an individual, including venue-based face-to-face; print; phone; mobile and remote devices with unique applications; on-line, including social networks; and any combination thereof to motivate and sustain healthy behaviors. We can take a simple approach to scaling the business by providing the support each individual needs using the most cost-effective modality.
In order to do this across millions of lives, we have built a delivery infrastructure that can accommodate the balance between cost of delivery and required intensity of intervention while still solving for the preference sensitivities of each individual so that they stay engaged. A large percentage of the population is supported through self-directed modalities of mobile, web and integrated devices. A small percentage of the population has more intensive needs and receives person-to-person services. In the end, the modalities used and intensity of service must deliver the expected result – healthier people who perform better and cost less.
We continue to invest in technology and are continually refining our proprietary clinical, data management, and reporting systems to continue to meet the information management requirements of our services.
Strategic Partnerships
Strategic partnerships with leading health and well-being solutions providers are an important part of our business strategy.
Through our exclusive, 25-year relationship with Gallup which began in 2008, we have created a definitive measure and empiric database of changes in the well-being of the U.S. population based on over two million completed surveys to date, known as the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index®. This database supports our understanding of the causes and effects of well-being for a population. In 2012, we created a global joint venture with Gallup that has developed the next generation of Gallup-Healthways individual well-being assessment tools, known as the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being 5TM, to provide employers, health providers, insurers and other interested parties with a validated capability to assess, measure and report on changes in the well-being of their employees, patients, members and customers.
25
Additionally, we have a series of exclusive and proprietary relationships to deliver specific solutions to our customer markets. We collaborate with Blue Zones, LLC to deliver a scaled well-being improvement solution to support our customers' initiatives to improve the well-being of entire community populations. We also have an exclusive partnership with Dr. Dean Ornish that is scaling access to the Dr. Ornish's Program for Reversing Heart Disease™ for a number of health plans, health systems and hospitals. In another exclusive arrangement, Healthways Financial Well-Being™, powered by Dave Ramsey, empowers individuals to take control of their personal finances by blending the proven approach of New York Times best-selling author and national radio show host Dave Ramsey with Healthways' intuitive technology, science-based methodology and well-being expertise.
Customer Growth Strategy
The customer markets for our well-being improvement solutions include health plans (both commercial and Medicare Advantage), self-insured employers, integrated health systems/hospitals/physician groups and international entities. Our strategy to grow the business has three components. 1) We are growing the market opportunity by adding new customers in our geographic footprint in the U.S. and abroad and adding countries in our international business. 2) We are growing the eligible lives for services within our existing customers, both as our customers grow their eligible populations or offer our solutions more broadly within their membership. 3) We are expanding our scope of services with existing customers who initially purchased something less than our comprehensive solution.
Health Plans: A number of contracts signed and expanded since 2011 have increased both the level of integration and breadth of services provided to major regional commercial health plans, as they develop and implement a number of patient-centered medical home models. Our services extend beyond chronic care and wellness programs to include a full range of care management functions, as well as a variety of health promotion and prevention and quality improvement solutions. Examples include: Blue Zones systematic, environmental approach to community well-being, MeYou Health web and mobile device based social networking well-being improvement tools and the hospital-based Dr. Ornish's Program for Reversing Heart DiseaseTM. We expect additional opportunities to grow in this market, based upon the competitive advantage that our total population management approach provides to health plans and their customers in addition to the external market forces orienting this market toward outcome-driven solutions.
We also provide a variety of services to most of the major Medicare Advantage health plans. We expect this market to grow as the Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplemental health plan memberships grow with an aging population. Our SilverSneakers® senior fitness program is the largest single program within our current services to this market. We are leveraging the fitness center national network to expand our product offering in the traditional commercial health plan and large employer markets – an increasingly important part of our overall well-being improvement solution. In addition, more of the senior population is becoming interested in web-based services and mobile applications, and some of our Medicare Advantage health plan customers are therefore adding these services for personal support and social networking.
Self-Insured Employers: Large self-insured employers, including state and municipal government entities, continue to demand services that focus across the entire population of employees and their dependent family members. These employers typically seek to utilize a broad array of our intervention capabilities. Our comprehensive well-being improvement solution targets a much larger improvement in employer performance and profitability by reducing the impact of productivity lost for health-related reasons, in addition to improving individuals' health and reducing direct healthcare costs. With the success of our total population health management work, we expect to enhance our competitive advantage by responding to and meeting employers' needs for a healthier, higher-performing, and less costly workforce.
Integrated Health Systems / Hospitals / Physician Groups: Significant changes in healthcare payment structures, from fee for service to outcomes–based payments, have expanded our opportunities to provide services to integrated healthcare systems, hospitals, and physicians. In 2011, we acquired Navvis & Company, a well-established provider of strategic consulting and change management services that enable its healthcare system clients to become future-ready clinical enterprises within the healthcare industry's rapidly emerging value-based reimbursement system. Our strategy includes providing integrated healthcare systems, hospitals and physician enterprises with both consultative strategic planning services and an array of solutions that enable and support the delivery of Physician-Directed Population Health solutions. We expect to continue to grow the number and size of our health systems relationships through the deployment of services such as consulting, our acute to post-acute Care Transitions SolutionTM, the Dr. Ornish's Program for Reversing Heart DiseaseTM, and the aggregation of risk lives within health systems for our total population management services.
26
International Entities: Our international business continues to develop within our existing geographic footprint of Australia, France and Brazil. Additionally, we have a pipeline of opportunities and expect our international business will continue to expand. Our international strategy is to pursue opportunities in countries with a relatively developed healthcare infrastructure, including the existence of one or more payors with a large volume of at risk lives. This approach allows us to partner either directly with government payors or with the private insurers and service providers that operate in those countries.
We expect to increase our competitive advantage and strong market position by leveraging the scope of our well-being improvement services and capabilities, including our medical information content, behavior change processes and techniques, strategic relationships, health provider networks and fitness center relationships. We also expect to continue to scale the delivery of our solutions by employing a blend of our state-of-the-art well-being improvement call centers and proprietary technologies, modalities, and techniques. While our core total population health infrastructure and technology investments are complete and our scalable platform is in place, we may add new capabilities and technologies through internal development, strategic alliances with other entities and/or selective acquisitions or investments.
Critical Accounting Policies
We describe our accounting policies in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. We prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical in understanding the estimates and judgments that are involved in preparing our financial statements and the uncertainties that could impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue as services are performed when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collectability is reasonably assured, and amounts are fixed or determinable.
Our fees are generally billed on a per member per month ("PMPM") basis or upon member participation, such as the number of visits to a Healthways® SilverSneakers® fitness location. For PMPM fees, we generally determine our contract fees by multiplying the contractually negotiated PMPM rate by the number of members covered by our services during the month. We typically set PMPM rates during contract negotiations with customers based on the value we expect our programs to create and a sharing of that value between the customer and the Company. Some of our contracts are performance-based. Approximately 6% of revenues recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were performance-based, and 2% of revenues were subject to final reconciliation as of June 30, 2015.
We generally bill our customers each month for the entire amount of the fees contractually due for the prior month's enrollment, which typically includes the amount, if any, that is performance-based and may be subject to refund should we not meet performance targets. Fees for participation are typically billed in the month after the services are provided. Deferred revenues arise from contracts that permit upfront billing and collection of fees covering the entire contractual service period, generally 12 months. A limited number of our contracts provide for certain performance-based fees that cannot be billed until after they are reconciled with the customer.
We recognize revenue as follows: (1) we recognize the fixed portion of PMPM fees and fees for service as revenue during the period we perform our services; and (2) we recognize performance-based revenue based on the most recent assessment of our performance, which represents the amount that the customer would legally be obligated to pay if the contract were terminated as of the latest balance sheet date.
We generally assess our level of performance for our contracts based on medical claims and other data that the customer is contractually required to supply, interim assessments of achievement against performance targets, or metrics available from our operating platforms. A minimum of four to nine months' data is typically required for us to measure performance. In assessing our performance, we may include estimates such as medical claims incurred but not reported. In addition, we may also provide reserves for contractual allowances (such as data reconciliation differences) as appropriate.
27
If data is insufficient or incomplete to measure performance, or interim performance measures indicate that we are not meeting performance targets, we do not recognize performance-based fees subject to refund as revenues but instead record them in a current liability account entitled "contract billings in excess of earned revenue." Only in the event we do not meet performance levels by the end of the measurement period, typically one year, are we contractually obligated to refund some or all of the performance-based fees. We would only reverse revenues that we had already recognized if performance to date in the measurement period, previously above targeted levels, subsequently dropped below targeted levels.
During the settlement process under a contract, which generally occurs six to eight months after the end of a contract year, we settle any performance-based fees and reconcile healthcare claims and clinical data. As of June 30, 2015, cumulative performance-based revenues that have not yet been settled with our customers but that have been recognized in the current and prior years totaled approximately $20.7 million, all of which were based on actual data. Data reconciliation differences, for which we provide contractual allowances until we reach agreement with respect to identified issues, can arise between the customer and us due to customer data deficiencies, omissions, and/or data discrepancies.
Performance-related adjustments (including any amounts recorded as revenue that were ultimately refunded), changes in estimates, or data reconciliation differences may cause us to recognize or reverse revenue in a current fiscal year that pertains to services provided during a prior fiscal year. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized a net increase in revenue of $4.0 million and $2.7 million that related to services provided prior to each respective year.
We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", will have on our revenue recognition policies and procedures, financial position, result of operations, cash flows, financial disclosures and control framework.
Impairment of Intangible Assets and Goodwill
We review goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If we conclude during the qualitative assessment that this is the case or if we elect not to perform a qualitative assessment, we perform a quantitative review as described below.
During a quantitative review of goodwill, we estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow model and a market-based approach, and we reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our consolidated market capitalization. Estimating fair value requires significant judgments, including management's estimate of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term growth rate for our business, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based approach. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the estimate of fair value and potential goodwill impairment for each reporting unit.
If we determine that the carrying value of goodwill is impaired based upon an impairment review, we calculate any impairment using a fair value-based goodwill impairment test as required by U.S. GAAP. The fair value of a reporting unit is the price that would be received upon a sale of the unit as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Except for a trade name that has an indefinite life and is not subject to amortization, we amortize identifiable intangible assets, such as acquired technologies and customer contracts, over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. We assess the potential impairment of intangible assets subject to amortization whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. If we determine that the carrying value of other identifiable intangible assets may not be recoverable, we calculate any impairment using an estimate of the asset's fair value based on the estimated price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants.
We review intangible assets not subject to amortization, which consist of a trade name, on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events or circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. We estimate the fair value of the trade name using a present value technique, which requires management's estimate of future revenues attributable to this trade name, estimation of the long-term growth rate for these revenues, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the estimate of fair value for the trade name.
28
Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill and/or other intangible assets are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Income Taxes
The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity's financial statements or tax returns. Accounting for income taxes requires significant judgment in evaluating tax positions and in determining income tax provisions, including determination of deferred tax assets, deferred tax liabilities, and any valuation allowances that might be required against deferred tax assets.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. U.S. GAAP also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and income tax disclosures. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Variations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards over the required vesting period based on estimated fair values at the date of grant. Determining the estimated fair value of stock options at the grant date requires judgment in developing assumptions, which involve a number of variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and expected stock option exercise behavior. In addition, we also use judgment in estimating the number of share-based awards that are expected to vest, after consideration of expected forfeitures and estimated vesting of performance-based stock units.
Results of Operations
Income Tax Expense
The following table shows the components of the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 expressed as a percentage of revenues.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Revenues | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization included below) | 80.5 | % | 81.1 | % | 82.7 | % | 82.4 | % | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 10.7 | % | 9.4 | % | 9.6 | % | 9.3 | % | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6.2 | % | 7.5 | % | 6.4 | % | 7.5 | % | ||||
Legal settlement charges | — | % | — | % | — | % | 2.6 | % | ||||
Operating income (loss) (1) | 2.6 | % | 2.0 | % | 1.3 | % | (1.9 | )% | ||||
Interest expense | 2.3 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.3 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes (1) | 0.3 | % | (0.5 | )% | (1.1 | )% | (4.4 | )% | ||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 0.3 | % | (0.2 | )% | (0.3 | )% | (1.6 | )% | ||||
Net income (loss) (1) | 0.1 | % | (0.3 | )% | (0.7 | )% | (2.8 | )% | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | (0.2 | )% | — | % | (0.1 | )% | — | % | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Healthways, Inc. (1) | 0.2 | % | (0.3 | )% | (0.6 | )% | (2.8 | )% |
(1) Figures may not add due to rounding.
29
Revenues
Revenues increased $17.5 million, or 9.7%, and $30.5 million, or 8.5%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014, primarily due to the following:
· | an increase in average participation per member in our fitness solutions, primarily due to our initiatives to drive higher participation; |
· | an increase in the number of members eligible to participate in our fitness solutions, primarily due to increased enrollment in Medicare Advantage, our customers' ability to acquire new populations, and expansion into new service areas; |
· | an increase in performance-based revenues, primarily due to the positive impact of our ability to recognize certain such revenues during the second quarter of 2015 that were previously expected to be recognized in the second half of 2015; and |
· | the commencement of contracts with new customers and ramping revenues under existing contracts. |
These increases were somewhat offset by contract terminations in 2014, including four health plan contracts for our disease management solution (the "four terminated contracts"), and the completion of short-term consulting engagements with certain customers during 2014.
Cost of Services
Cost of services (excluding depreciation and amortization) as a percentage of revenues remained relatively consistent at 80.5% and 82.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 81.1% and 82.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, although there were offsetting increases and decreases within the periods.
Increases in cost of services as a percentage of revenues were primarily due to the following:
· | the impact of the four terminated contracts and the completion of certain short-term consulting engagements that were in effect during 2014 and carried a lower than average cost of services as a percentage of revenues; and |
· | three customer contract renewals that changed certain contract terms and structure, resulting in lower contract margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, but that provide us an opportunity to grow revenue and expand margins over the term of the contracts. |
Decreases in cost of services as a percentage of revenues were primarily due to the following:
· | an increase in the recognition of performance-based revenues, while the related costs remained relatively consistent; |
· | improved operating leverage and efficiency gains; |
· | a decrease in support costs related to our technology platform, partially offset by recoupment of fees in 2014 related to certain supplier service level agreements; and |
· | a decrease in the level of long-term incentive compensation expense based on the Company's actual and projected financial performance against established targets. |
30
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 10.7% and 9.6%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 9.4% and 9.3%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily due to expenses associated with the termination in May 2015 of our former president and chief executive officer, partially offset by a decrease in expenses related to proxy contest defense costs, which were incurred in 2014 and did not recur in 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $1.3 million, or 9.7%, and $2.0 million, or 7.5%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014, primarily due to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized during 2014.
Legal Settlement Charges
On April 17, 2014, we entered into an agreement with BCBSMN to resolve a contractual dispute. As a result of this settlement, we incurred charges of approximately $9.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Interest Expense
Interest expense remained relatively consistent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we had an effective income tax rate of 81.0%, compared to an effective tax benefit rate of 36.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had an effective tax benefit rate of 31.6%, compared to an effective tax benefit rate of 35.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The change in the effective rates was primarily due to the smaller base of pretax income/(loss) for the 2015 periods in relation to certain items for which we currently are not able to recognize a tax benefit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 provided cash of $29.0 million, compared to $19.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily due to the following:
• | a decrease in days sales outstanding in accounts receivable from 55 days at June 30, 2014 to 52 days at June 30, 2015; and | |
• | the timing of several significant vendor payments. |
Investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015 used $22.3 million in cash which primarily consisted of capital expenditures, most of which were associated with our Embrace platform.
Financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015 used $2.3 million in cash primarily due to net payments under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement.
Credit Facility
For a detailed description of the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. The Fifth Amended Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios or levels at June 30, 2015 of (1) a maximum total funded debt to EBITDA of 4.25 and (2) a minimum total fixed charge coverage of 1.50. We were in compliance with all of the financial covenant requirements of the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2015.
31
Cash Convertible Senior Notes
For a detailed description of the Cash Convertible Notes, Cash Convertible Notes Hedges, Cash Conversion Derivative, and Warrants entered into in July 2013, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. Aside from the initial premium paid, we will not be required to make any cash payments under the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges and could be entitled to receive an amount of cash from the option counterparties generally equal to the amount by which the market price per share of common stock exceeds the strike price of the Cash Convertible Note Hedges during the relevant valuation period. The strike price under the Cash Convertible Notes Hedges is initially equal to the conversion price of the Cash Convertible Notes. Additionally, if the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the strike price of the Warrants on any warrant exercise date, we will be obligated to issue to the option counterparties a number of shares based on the amount by which the then-current market price per share of our common stock exceeds the then-effective strike price of each Warrant. We will not receive any additional proceeds if the Warrants are exercised.
CareFirst Convertible Note
For a description of the CareFirst Convertible Note and CareFirst Warrants, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
We believe that cash flows from operating activities, our available cash, and our anticipated available credit under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement will continue to enable us to meet our contractual obligations and fund our current operations for at least the next 12 months. We cannot assure you that we would always be able to secure additional financing if needed and, if such funds were available, whether the terms or conditions would be acceptable to us.
If contract development accelerates or acquisition opportunities arise, we may need to issue additional debt or equity securities to provide the funding for these increased growth opportunities. We may also issue debt or equity securities in connection with future acquisitions or strategic alliances. We cannot assure you that we would be able to issue additional debt or equity securities on terms that would be acceptable to us.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-9 which creates FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The provisions of ASC Topic 606 provide for a single comprehensive principles-based standard for the recognition of revenue across all industries and expanded disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue, as well as certain additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASC Topic 606.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period". ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those annual periods, with earlier adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
32
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU 2015-03"), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those years, and should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have an impact on our results of operations or cash flows but will result in debt issuance costs being presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset.
We are subject to market risk related to interest rate changes, primarily as a result of the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement generally bear interest at variable rates based on a margin or spread in excess of either (1) one-month, two-month, three-month or six-month (or with the approval of affected lenders, nine-month or twelve-month) LIBOR or (2) the greatest of (a) the SunTrust Bank prime lending rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, and (c) the Base Rate, as selected by the Company. The LIBOR margin varies between 1.75% and 3.00%, and the Base Rate margin varies between 0.75% and 2.00%, depending on our leverage ratio.
In order to reduce our interest rate exposure under the Fifth Amended Credit Agreement, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements effectively converting a portion of our floating rate debt to fixed obligations with interest rates ranging from 0.690% to 1.480% plus a spread.
We estimate that a one-point interest rate change would have resulted in a change in interest expense of approximately $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
As a result of our investment in international initiatives, we are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks. Because a significant portion of these risks is economically hedged with currency options and forwards contracts and because our international initiatives are not yet material to our consolidated results of operations, a 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates would not have had a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015. We do not execute transactions or hold derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief financial officer and interim president and chief executive officer, has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2015. Based on that evaluation, our chief financial officer and interim president and chief executive officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2015. They are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief financial officer and interim president and chief executive officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
33
Junk Fax Prevention Act Lawsuits
On September 16, 2014, Healthways and its wholly owned subsidiary, HWHN, were named in a putative class action lawsuit filed by Edward Simon, DC in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seeking damages and other relief relating to alleged violations of the TCPA, as amended by the JFPA, in connection with faxes allegedly transmitted to members of HWHN's network of complementary and alternative care practitioners. The JFPA prohibits sending an "unsolicited advertisement" to a fax machine and requires the sender to provide a notice to allow a recipient to "opt out" of future fax transmissions (including, pursuant to rules promulgated by the FCC, those sent with the prior express invitation or permission of the recipient). The complaint seeks damages in excess of $5 million. The case has been removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division.
On December 22, 2014, HWHN was also named in a putative class action lawsuit filed by Affiliated Health Care Associates, P.C. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, seeking damages and other relief relating to alleged violations of the TCPA, the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, and Illinois common law in connection with faxes allegedly sent to members of HWHN's network of complementary and alternative care practitioners. The complaint seeks damages in an unstated amount. We deny the claims and intend to vigorously defend these actions. On May 29, 2015, the plaintiff in the Illinois Matter voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit without prejudice; that plaintiff has been joined as a party in the California Matter.
In connection with these actions, on March 2, 2015, Healthways and HWHN filed with the FCC a Petition for Retroactive Waiver of the FCC's regulation that requires advertising faxes sent with the prior express invitation or permission of the recipient to include an "opt-out" notice. The FCC has previously granted retroactive waivers of that regulation to several petitioners who were facing lawsuits alleging that the petitioners failed to include the "opt-out" language in fax advertisements sent with the prior express invitation or permission of the recipients. We cannot predict whether the FCC will grant our Waiver Petition or, if granted, the impact on the California Matter.
Performance Award Lawsuit
On September 4, 2012, Milton Pfeiffer, claiming to be a stockholder of the Company, filed a putative derivative action against the Company and the Board in Delaware Chancery Court alleging that the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Board breached their fiduciary duties and violated the Company's 2007 Stock Incentive Plan by granting Ben R. Leedle, Jr., then chief executive officer and president of the Company, discretionary performance awards under the Plan in the form of options to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, which consisted of a performance award in November 2011 granting Mr. Leedle the right to purchase 365,000 shares and a performance award in February 2012 granting Mr. Leedle the right to purchase 135,000 shares. Plaintiff alleges that the Performance Awards exceeded what is authorized by the Plan and that the Company's 2012 proxy statement, in which the Performance Awards are disclosed, is false and misleading. Plaintiff also alleges that Mr. Leedle breached his fiduciary duties and was unjustly enriched by receiving the Performance Awards. Plaintiff is seeking, among other things, the rescission or disgorgement of all alleged "excess" awards granted to Mr. Leedle under the Performance Awards, to recover any incidental damages to the Company, and an award of attorneys' fees and expenses. On November 2, 2012, the Company and the Board filed a Motion to Dismiss because Plaintiff failed to make a demand upon the Board as required by Delaware law. On November 8, 2013, the Court denied the Company's Motion to Dismiss. On February 21, 2014, the Company filed its answer. On May 15, 2015, in connection with the termination of Mr. Leedle's employment, the Board ratified the awards to Mr. Leedle pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporate Law and subsequently sent notice of the ratification to shareholders. The Company intends to vigorously defend the allegations in this case.
34
Outlook
We are also subject to other contractual disputes, claims and legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While we are unable to estimate a range of potential losses, we do not believe that any of the legal proceedings pending against us as of the date of this report will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity or financial condition. As these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties, our view of these matters may change in the future.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties previously reported under the caption "Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, the occurrence of which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. The risks previously reported and described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and in this report are not the only risks facing our business. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business operations.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Pursuant to the Investment Agreement with CareFirst (as described under "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – CareFirst Convertible Note"), CareFirst has an opportunity to earn warrants based on achievement of Revenue Thresholds for Quarterly Revenue. On April 15, 2015 and June 15, 2015, we issued to CareFirst warrants to purchase 60,872 shares and 53,566 shares, respectively, of our common stock at an exercise price of $23.49 and $21.20 per share, respectively, in accordance with the terms of the Investment Agreement. The issuance of the CareFirst Warrants was exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because it was a transaction not involving a public offering.
In accordance with the terms of a Separation and Release Agreement entered into with our former president and chief executive officer, Ben R. Leedle, Jr., whose employment was terminated on May 15, 2015 (the "Separation Date"), Mr. Leedle elected to net exercise (net of the applicable exercise price and tax withholding) on the Separation Date certain performance awards granted to Mr. Leedle in the form of options to purchase 434,436 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $9.96 per share. The Company repurchased from Mr. Leedle 106,408 shares of common stock resulting from this net exercise at $17.23 per share, which was the per share purchase price equal to the closing price of the common stock on the Separation Date as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
The following table contains information about repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2015.
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
April 1 through 30 | - | $ | - | - | - | |||||||||||
May 1 through 31 | 106,408 | 17.23 | - | - | ||||||||||||
June 1 through 30 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total | 106,408 | $ | 17.23 | - | - |
(1) The shares repurchased from Mr. Leedle in May 2015 were not part of a publicly announced plan or program in which additional shares would be purchased.
35
Not Applicable.
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
(a) | Exhibits |
10.1 | Sixth Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement | |
10.2 | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for Directors) under the Company's Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan | |
10.3 | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for Executive Officers) 1-Year Cliff Vesting under the Company's Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan | |
10.4 | Separation and Release Agreement, dated May 15, 2015, between Healthways, Inc. and Ben R. Leedle, Jr. [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2015, File No. 000-19364] | |
10.5 | Healthways, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated May 19, 2015, Registration No. 333-204313] | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | |
32 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Healthways, Inc. | ||||
(Registrant) | ||||
Date | August 7, 2015 | By | /s/ Alfred Lumsdaine | |
Alfred Lumsdaine | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
37