Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all short-term investments readily convertible to cash, without notice or penalty, with an initial maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted Cash Under the terms of three separate operating leases related to our facilities (Note 4), we pledged, as collateral, letters of credit. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2020, an aggregate amount of $0.8 million of restricted cash that was pledged as collateral under two such letters of credit was released back to us. Accordingly, at April 30, 2020 and 2019, restricted cash of $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, was pledged as collateral under letters of credit. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands): As of April 30, 2020 2019 2018 Cash and cash equivalents $ 36,262 $ 32,351 $ 42,265 Restricted cash 350 1,150 1,150 Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 36,612 $ 33,501 $ 43,415 Revenue Recognition On May 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers Under ASC 606, we recognize revenue when we transfer promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for contracts with customers, we perform the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation. Revenue recognized from services provided under our customer contracts are disaggregated into manufacturing and process development revenue streams. Manufacturing revenue Manufacturing revenue generally represents revenue from the manufacturing of customer products recognized over time, utilizing an input method that compares the cost of cumulative work-in-process to date to the most current estimates for the entire cost of the performance obligation. Under a manufacturing contract, a quantity of manufacturing runs is ordered and the product is manufactured according to the customer’s specifications and typically only one performance obligation is included. Each manufacturing run represents a distinct service that is sold separately and has stand-alone value to the customer. The products are manufactured exclusively for a specific customer and have no alternative use. The customer retains control of its product during the entire manufacturing process and can make changes to the process or specifications at its request. Under these agreements, we are entitled to consideration for progress to date that includes an element of profit margin. Process development revenue Process development revenue generally represents revenue from services associated with the custom development of a manufacturing process and analytical methods for a customer’s product. Process development revenue is recognized over time, utilizing an input method that compares the cost of cumulative work-in-process to date to the most current estimates for the entire cost of the performance obligation. Under a process development contract, the customer owns the product details and process, which has no alternative use. These process development projects are customized to each customer to meet its specifications and typically only one performance obligation is included. Each process represents a distinct service that is sold separately and has stand-alone value to the customer. The customer also retains control of its product as the product is being created or enhanced by our services and can make changes to its process or specifications upon request. Under these agreements, we are entitled to consideration for progress to date that includes an element of profit margin. The following table summarizes our manufacturing and process development revenue for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands). Revenue for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2018 has not been adjusted in accordance with our modified retrospective adoption of ASC 606 and continues to be reported under the accounting standards that were in effect prior to our adoption of ASC 606: Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2020 2019 2018 Manufacturing revenues $ 52,046 $ 43,432 $ 47,437 Process development revenues 7,656 10,171 6,184 Total Revenues $ 59,702 $ 53,603 $ 53,621 The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, contract assets (unbilled receivables), and contract liabilities (customer deposits and deferred revenue). Contract assets are recorded when our right to consideration is conditioned on something other than the passage of time. Contract assets are reclassified to accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet when our rights become unconditional. Contract liabilities represent customer deposits and deferred revenue billed and/or received in advance of our fulfillment of performance obligations. Contract liabilities convert to revenue as we perform our obligations under the contract. During the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020 and 2019, we recognized revenue of $13.6 million and $14.3 million, respectively, for which the contract liability was recorded in a prior period. The transaction price for services provided under our customer contracts reflect our best estimates of the amount of consideration to which we are entitled in exchange for providing goods and services to our customers. In determining the transaction price, we considered the different sources of variable consideration including, but not limited to, discounts, credits, refunds, price concessions or other similar items. We have included in the transaction price some or all of an amount of variable consideration, utilizing the most likely method, only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The actual amount of consideration ultimately received may differ. Management may be required to exercise judgement in estimating revenue to be recognized. Judgement is required in identifying performance obligations, estimating the transaction price, estimating the stand-alone selling prices of identified performance obligations, and estimating the progress towards the satisfaction of performance obligations. If actual results in the future vary from our estimates, the estimates will be adjusted, which will affect revenues in the period that such variances become known. We apply the practical expedient available under ASC 606 that permits us not to disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected length of one year or less. As of April 30, 2020, we do not have any unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts greater than one year. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606 on May 1, 2018, revenue was generally recognized when all of the following criteria were met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable generally represent amounts billed for contract manufacturing and process development services provided under our customer contracts and are recorded at the invoiced amount net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary. We apply judgment in assessing the ultimate realization of our receivables and we estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors, such as the aging of our receivables, historical experience, and the financial condition of our customers. Based on our analysis of our accounts receivable balances as of April 30, 2020 and 2019, we determined no allowance for doubtful accounts was necessary. Concentrations of Credit Risk and Customer Base Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a significant concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and contract assets. We maintain our cash balances primarily with one major commercial bank and our deposits held with the bank exceed the amount of government insurance limits provided on our deposits. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the major commercial bank holding our cash balances to the extent of the cash amounts recorded on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets exceed the amount of government insurance limits provided on our deposits. Our accounts receivable from amounts billed for contract manufacturing and process development services are derived from a small customer base. Most contracts require up-front payments and installment payments during the service period. We perform periodic evaluations of the financial condition of our customers and generally do not require collateral, but we can terminate any contract if a material default occurs. At April 30, 2020 and 2019, approximately 98% and 95%, respectively, of our accounts receivable were due from six customers. Our contract assets are reclassified to accounts receivable when our rights to consideration become unconditional. At April 30, 2020 and 2019, approximately 96% and 87% of our contract assets were attributable to six customers and eight customers, respectively. Our revenues are derived from a small customer base. Historically, these customers have not entered into long-term contracts because their need for drug supply depends on a variety of factors, including a product’s stage of development, the timing of regulatory filings and approvals, the product needs of their collaborators, if applicable, their financial resources and the market demand with respect to a commercial product. The table below identifies each of our customers that accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues during any of the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018: Customer Geographc Location 2020 2019 2018 Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. U.S. 28% 30% 55% Gilead Sciences, Inc. U.S. 24 – – Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. U.S. 11 * – IGM Biosciences, Inc. U.S. 11 * – Coherus BioSciences, Inc. U.S. 10 13 22 ADC Therapeutics America Inc. U.S. * 21 * ______________ * Represents a percentage less than 10% of our total revenues. We attribute revenue to the individual countries where the customer is headquartered. Revenues derived from U.S. based customers were 99%, 95% and 99% for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Inventory Inventory consists of raw materials inventory and is valued at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. We periodically review raw materials inventory for potential impairment and adjust inventory to its net realizable value based on the estimate of future use and reduce the carrying value of inventory as deemed necessary. Property and Equipment Property and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related asset, which are generally as follows: Description Estimated Useful Life Leasehold improvements Shorter of estimated useful life or lease term Laboratory and manufacturing equipment 5 – 10 years Computer equipment and software 3 – 5 years Furniture, fixtures and office equipment 5 – 10 years Construction-in-progress, which represents direct costs related to the construction of various equipment and leasehold improvements primarily associated with our manufacturing facilities, is not depreciated until the asset is completed and placed into service. No interest was incurred or capitalized as construction-in-progress as of April 30, 2020 and 2019. All of our property and equipment are located in the U.S. Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands): April 30, 2020 2019 Leasehold improvements $ 21,130 $ 20,574 Laboratory and manufacturing equipment 15,033 12,858 Computer equipment and software 5,334 4,644 Furniture, fixtures and office equipment 685 528 Construction-in-progress 2,564 1,590 Total property and equipment, gross 44,746 40,194 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (17,641 ) (14,569 ) Total property and equipment, net $ 27,105 $ 25,625 Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended April 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $3.1 million, $2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Impairment Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with authoritative guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for events or changes in circumstances that indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell if impairment indicators exist. For the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no indicators of impairment of the value of our long-lived assets and no cumulative impairment losses recognized as of April 30, 2020. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and note payable approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. Fair Value Measurements Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following hierarchy: · Level 1 – Observable inputs, such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. · Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as assets or liabilities whose values are based on quoted market prices in markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets. · Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and significant to the overall fair value measurement of the assets or liabilities; therefore, requiring the company to develop its own valuation techniques and assumptions. As of April 30, 2020 and 2019, we do not have any Level 2 or Level 3 financial assets or liabilities and our cash equivalents, which are primarily invested in money market funds with one major commercial bank, are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices for identical securities (Level 1 inputs). In addition, there were no transfers between any Levels of the fair value hierarchy during the fiscal years ended April 30, 2020 and 2019. Restructuring Charges Restructuring charges consist of one-time termination benefits, including severance and other employee-related costs related to a workforce reduction pursuant to a restructuring plan we implemented and completed during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2018 (Note 10). One-time termination benefits were expensed at the date we notified the employee, unless the employee was required to provide future service, in which case the benefits were expensed ratably over the future service period. Stock-Based Compensation We account for stock options, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards granted under our equity compensation plans in accordance with the authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation. The estimated fair value of stock options granted to employees in exchange for services is measured at the grant date, using a fair value based method, such as a Black-Scholes option valuation model, and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. The fair value of restricted stock units is measured at the grant date based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant, and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the period of vesting. Forfeitures are recognized as a reduction of stock-based compensation expense as they occur. As of April 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no outstanding stock-based awards with market or performance conditions. Income Taxes We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740: Income Taxes The income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended April 30, 2019 resulted from the “Intraperiod Tax Allocation” rules under ASC 740, which requires the allocation of an entity’s total annual income tax provision among continuing operations and, in our case, discontinued operations. Accordingly, a tax benefit was recorded in continuing operations with an offsetting tax expense recorded in discontinued operations (Note 11). Comprehensive Loss Comprehensive loss is the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive loss is equal to our net loss for all periods presented. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02 and its related amendments which introduced Leases Leases (Topic 840) Leases On May 1, 2019, we adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective approach. Accordingly, prior period financial information and disclosures have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historical accounting under the previous lease standard. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients available for existing contracts, which allowed us to carry forward our historical assessments of lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs. As a result of adopting ASC 842, we recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of $23.3 million and $25.5 million, respectively, on May 1, 2019, which are primarily related to our facility operating leases (Note 4). The difference between the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities is primarily attributed to the elimination of deferred rent. There was no adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit as a result of the adoption of ASC 842. We determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. Our operating leases with a term greater than one year are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities, less current portion in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 30, 2020. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date, based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. In determining the net present value of lease payments, we use our incremental borrowing rate which represents an estimated rate of interest that we would have to pay to borrow equivalent funds on a collateralized basis at the lease commencement date. Our operating leases may include options to extend the lease which are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise a renewal option. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. We elected the post-transition practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components for all existing leases. We also elected a policy to not apply the recognition requirements of ASC 842 for short-term leases. Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes |