Loans and Commitments | NOTE 3—LOANS AND COMMITMENTS The table below presents the outstanding principal balance of loans to members, including deferred loan origination costs, and unadvanced loan commitments, by loan type and member class, as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Loans Outstanding Unadvanced Commitments (1) Loans Outstanding Unadvanced Commitments (1) Loan type: (2) Long-term fixed-rate loans $ 21,127,042 $ — $ 19,543,274 $ — Long-term variable-rate loans 718,193 4,402,860 698,495 4,835,623 Loans guaranteed by RUS 174,990 — 179,241 — Line of credit loans 1,113,990 8,909,560 1,038,210 9,294,127 Total loans outstanding (3) 23,134,215 13,312,420 21,459,220 14,129,750 Deferred loan origination costs 9,884 — 9,797 — Loans to members $ 23,144,099 $ 13,312,420 $ 21,469,017 $ 14,129,750 Member class: (2) CFC: Distribution $ 17,700,859 $ 9,045,185 $ 16,095,043 $ 9,474,568 Power supply 4,322,069 3,219,631 4,181,481 3,273,501 Statewide and associate 56,084 135,624 65,466 127,473 CFC total 22,079,012 12,400,440 20,341,990 12,875,542 RTFC 357,967 258,690 385,709 288,810 NCSC 697,236 653,290 731,521 965,398 Total loans outstanding (3) $ 23,134,215 $ 13,312,420 $ 21,459,220 $ 14,129,750 ____________________________ (1) The interest rate on unadvanced commitments is not set until drawn; therefore, the long-term unadvanced loan commitments have been classified in this table as variable-rate unadvanced commitments. However, at the time of the advance, the borrower may select a fixed or a variable rate on the new loan. (2) Includes nonperforming and restructured loans. (3) Represents the unpaid principal balance excluding deferred loan origination costs. Unadvanced Loan Commitments Unadvanced loan commitments totaled $2,457 million and $2,765 million as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 , respectively, related to committed lines of credit loans that are not subject to a material adverse change clause at the time of each loan advance. As such, we are required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility. The following table summarizes the available balance under unconditional committed lines of credit, and the related maturities by fiscal year and thereafter, as of February 29, 2016 . Available Balance Notional Maturities of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit (Dollars in thousands) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Committed lines of credit $2,457,435 $ 11,000 $125,377 $683,351 $673,109 $591,526 $373,072 The remaining unadvanced commitments totaling $10,855 million and $11,365 million as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 , respectively, were generally subject to material adverse change clauses. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. In some cases, the borrower’s access to the full amount of the facility is further constrained by the designated purpose, imposition of borrower-specific restrictions or by additional conditions that must be met prior to advancing funds. The following table summarizes the available balance under unadvanced commitments as of February 29, 2016 and the related maturities by fiscal year and thereafter by loan type: Available Balance Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Commitments (Dollars in thousands) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Line of credit loans $ 8,909,560 $ 280,881 $ 5,200,892 $ 1,120,869 $ 909,795 $ 742,503 $ 654,620 Long-term loans 4,402,860 126,400 1,029,474 700,609 1,078,147 882,742 585,488 Total $ 13,312,420 $ 407,281 $ 6,230,366 $ 1,821,478 $ 1,987,942 $ 1,625,245 $ 1,240,108 Unadvanced commitments related to line of credit loans are typically for periods not to exceed five years and are generally revolving facilities used for working capital and backup liquidity purposes. Historically, we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, whether or not there is a material adverse change clause. Since we generally do not charge a fee on the unadvanced portion of the majority of our loan facilities, our borrowers will typically request long-term facilities to fund construction work plans and other capital expenditures for periods of up to five years and draw down on the facility over that time. In addition, borrowers will typically request an amount in excess of their immediate estimated loan requirements to avoid the expense related to seeking additional loan funding for unexpected items. These factors contribute to our expectation that the majority of the unadvanced commitments will expire without being fully drawn upon and that the total unadvanced amount does not necessarily represent future cash funding requirements. Loan Sales We transfer some of our loans to third parties, generally at par value, under our direct loan sale program. Our loan transfers meet the applicable accounting criteria for sale accounting. Accordingly, we remove the loans from our condensed consolidated balance sheets when control has been surrendered and recognize a gain or loss. Because the loans are sold at par, we record immaterial losses on the sale of these loans for unamortized deferred loan origination costs.We retain the servicing performance obligations on these loans and recognize related servicing fees on an accrual basis over the period for which servicing activity is provided, as we believe the servicing fee represents adequate compensation. We do not hold any continuing interest in the loans sold to date other than servicing performance obligations. We have no obligation to repurchase loans from the purchaser, except in the case of breaches of representations and warranties. We sold CFC loans with outstanding balances totaling $84 million and $25 million , at par for cash, during the nine months ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 , respectively. Credit Quality We closely monitor loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our credit risk exposure. Our goal is to provide a balance between the credit needs of our members while also ensuring sound credit quality of our loan portfolio. Payment status and internal risk rating trends are indicators, among others, of the level of credit risk within our loan portfolios. As part of our strategy to reduce our credit risk exposure, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac on August 31, 2015. Under this agreement, we may designate certain loans, as approved by Farmer Mac, and in the event any such loan later goes into material default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. We have designated, and Farmer Mac has approved an initial tranche of loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $520 million as of August 31, 2015, which were reduced by subsequent loan principal payments to $511 million as of February 29, 2016 . We are paying Farmer Mac a monthly fee based on the unpaid principal balance of the loans in the tranche(s) for the commitment to purchase loans under the agreement. Payment Status of Loans The tables below present the payment status of loans outstanding by member class as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . February 29, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due (1) Total Past Due Total Financing Receivables Nonaccrual Loans CFC: Distribution $ 17,700,859 $ — $ — $ — $ 17,700,859 $ — Power supply 4,322,069 — — — 4,322,069 — Statewide and associate 56,084 — — — 56,084 — CFC total 22,079,012 — — — 22,079,012 — RTFC 354,461 — 3,506 3,506 357,967 5,864 NCSC 697,236 — — — 697,236 — Total loans outstanding $ 23,130,709 $ — $ 3,506 $ 3,506 $ 23,134,215 $ 5,864 As a % of total loans 99.98 % — % 0.02 % 0.02 % 100.00 % 0.03 % May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due (1) Total Total Financing Nonaccrual Loans CFC: Distribution $ 16,095,043 $ — $ — $ — $ 16,095,043 $ 7,221 Power supply 4,181,481 — — — 4,181,481 — Statewide and associate 65,466 — — — 65,466 — CFC total 20,341,990 — — — 20,341,990 7,221 RTFC 385,709 — — — 385,709 4,221 NCSC 731,521 — — — 731,521 294 Total loans outstanding $ 21,459,220 $ — $ — $ — $ 21,459,220 $ 11,736 As a % of total loans 100.00 % — % — % — % 100.00 % 0.05 % ____________________________ (1) All loans 90 days or more past due are on nonaccrual status. Internal Risk Ratings of Loans We evaluate the credit quality of our loans using an internal risk rating system that employs similar criteria for all member classes. Our internal risk rating system is based on a determination of a borrower’s risk of default utilizing both quantitative and qualitative measurements. We have grouped our risk ratings into the categories of pass and criticized based on the criteria below. (i) Pass: Borrowers that are not experiencing difficulty and/or not showing a potential or well-defined credit weakness. (ii) Criticized: Includes borrowers categorized as special mention, substandard and doubtful as described below: • Special mention: Borrowers that may be characterized by a potential credit weakness or deteriorating financial condition that is not sufficiently serious to warrant a classification of substandard or doubtful. • Substandard: Borrowers that display a well-defined credit weakness that may jeopardize the full collection of principal and interest. • Doubtful: Borrowers that have a well-defined weakness and the full collection of principal and interest is questionable or improbable. Borrowers included in the pass, special mention, and substandard categories are generally reflected in the general portfolio of loans. Borrowers included in the doubtful category are reflected in the impaired portfolio of loans. Each risk rating is reassessed annually based on the receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim downgrades and upgrades may take place at any time as significant events or trends occur. The following table presents our loan portfolio by risk rating category and member class based on available data as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Pass Criticized Total Pass Criticized Total CFC: Distribution $ 17,667,879 $ 32,980 $ 17,700,859 $ 16,062,516 $ 32,527 $ 16,095,043 Power supply 4,322,069 — 4,322,069 4,181,481 — 4,181,481 Statewide and associate 55,827 257 56,084 65,200 266 65,466 CFC total 22,045,775 33,237 22,079,012 20,309,197 32,793 20,341,990 RTFC 344,886 13,081 357,967 373,087 12,622 385,709 NCSC 694,268 2,968 697,236 727,159 4,362 731,521 Total loans outstanding $ 23,084,929 $ 49,286 $ 23,134,215 $ 21,409,443 $ 49,777 $ 21,459,220 Allowance for Loan Losses We maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level estimated by management to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. The tables below summarize changes, by company, in the allowance for loan losses as of and for the nine months ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 . Three Months Ended February 29, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) CFC RTFC NCSC Total Balance as of November 30, 2015 $ 27,700 $ 5,918 $ 5,982 $ 39,600 Provision for loan losses (2,136 ) 798 (397 ) (1,735 ) Recoveries 53 — — 53 Balance as of February 29, 2016 $ 25,617 $ 6,716 $ 5,585 $ 37,918 Three Months Ended February 28, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) CFC RTFC NCSC Total Balance as of November 30, 2014 $ 41,185 $ 5,027 $ 4,545 $ 50,757 Provision for loan losses 2,366 (193 ) 131 2,304 Recoveries 53 — — 53 Balance as of February 28, 2015 $ 43,604 $ 4,834 $ 4,676 $ 53,114 Nine Months Ended February 29, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) CFC RTFC NCSC Total Balance as of May 31, 2015 $ 23,716 $ 4,533 $ 5,441 $ 33,690 Provision for loan losses 1,740 2,183 144 4,067 Recoveries 161 — — 161 Balance as of February 29, 2016 $ 25,617 $ 6,716 $ 5,585 $ 37,918 Nine Months Ended February 28, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) CFC RTFC NCSC Total Balance as of May 31, 2014 $ 45,600 $ 4,282 $ 6,547 $ 56,429 Provision for loan losses (2,156 ) 552 (1,871 ) (3,475 ) Recoveries 160 — — 160 Balance as of February 28, 2015 $ 43,604 $ 4,834 $ 4,676 $ 53,114 Our allowance for loan losses consists of a specific allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment and a collective allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment. The tables below present, by company, the components of our allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment of the related loans as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . February 29, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) CFC RTFC NCSC Total Ending balance of the allowance: Collectively evaluated $ 25,617 $ 2,162 $ 5,585 $ 33,364 Individually evaluated — 4,554 — 4,554 Total ending balance of the allowance $ 25,617 $ 6,716 $ 5,585 $ 37,918 Recorded investment in loans: Collectively evaluated $ 22,072,296 $ 344,886 $ 697,236 $ 23,114,418 Individually evaluated 6,716 13,081 — 19,797 Total recorded investment in loans $ 22,079,012 $ 357,967 $ 697,236 $ 23,134,215 Loans to members, net (1) $ 22,053,395 $ 351,251 $ 691,651 $ 23,096,297 May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) CFC RTFC NCSC Total Ending balance of the allowance: Collectively evaluated $ 23,716 $ 4,138 $ 5,441 $ 33,295 Individually evaluated — 395 — 395 Total ending balance of the allowance $ 23,716 $ 4,533 $ 5,441 $ 33,690 Recorded investment in loans: Collectively evaluated $ 20,334,769 $ 381,488 $ 731,227 $ 21,447,484 Individually evaluated 7,221 4,221 294 11,736 Total recorded investment in loans $ 20,341,990 $ 385,709 $ 731,521 $ 21,459,220 Loans to members, net (1) $ 20,318,274 $ 381,176 $ 726,080 $ 21,425,530 ____________________________ (1) Excludes deferred origination costs of $10 million as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . Impaired Loans Our recorded investment in individually-impaired loans, which consists of the unpaid principal balance, and the related specific valuation allowance, by member class, as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 are summarized below. February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Recorded Investment Related Allowance Recorded Investment Related Allowance With no specific allowance recorded: CFC/Distribution $ 6,716 $ — $ 7,221 $ — NCSC — — 294 — Total 6,716 — 7,515 — With a specific allowance recorded: RTFC 13,081 4,554 4,221 395 Total 13,081 4,554 4,221 395 Total impaired loans $ 19,797 $ 4,554 $ 11,736 $ 395 The tables below represent the average recorded investment in impaired loans and the interest income recognized, by member class, for the three and nine months ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 . Three Months Ended February 29, 2016 February 28, 2015 February 29, 2016 February 28, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized CFC/Distribution $ 6,716 $ 7,221 $ 130 $ — NCSC — 312 — — RTFC 13,362 1,580 113 — Total impaired loans $ 20,078 $ 9,113 $ 243 $ — Nine Months Ended February 29, 2016 February 28, 2015 February 29, 2016 February 28, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized CFC/Distribution $ 6,884 $ 7,342 $ 260 $ — NCSC — 334 — 10 RTFC 9,092 1,656 142 — Total impaired loans $ 15,976 $ 9,332 $ 402 $ 10 Troubled Debt Restructured (“TDR”) and Nonperforming Loans TDR Loans The table below summarizes modified loans accounted for and reported as TDRs, the performance status of the loan, and the related unadvanced commitments, by member class, as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Loans Outstanding % of Total Loans Unadvanced Commitments (1) Loans Outstanding % of Total Loans Unadvanced Commitments (1) TDR loans: Nonperforming TDR loans: RTFC $ 3,506 $ — $ — $ — Total nonperforming TDR loans 3,506 0.02 % — — — % — Performing TDR loans: CFC/Distribution (2) 6,716 — 7,221 — NCSC — — 294 — RTFC 7,217 — 4,221 — Total performing TDR loans 13,933 0.06 — 11,736 0.05 — Total TDR loans $ 17,439 0.08 % $ — $ 11,736 0.05 % $ — ____________________________ (1) The interest rate on unadvanced commitments is not set until drawn; therefore, the long-term unadvanced loan commitments have been classified in this table as variable-rate unadvanced commitments. However, at the time of the advance, the borrower may select a fixed or a variable rate on the new loan. (2) A borrower in this category also had a line of credit loan outstanding that was classified as performing as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . Unadvanced commitments related to this line of credit loan totaled $3 million and $2 million as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 , respectively. All loans classified as performing TDR loans were performing in accordance with the terms of the restructured loan agreement as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . The TDR loans classified as performing as of May 31, 2015 were on nonaccrual status as of that date. These loans were returned to accrual status during the nine months ended February 29, 2016 . Nonperforming Loans The table below summarizes nonperforming loans and the related unadvanced commitments, by member class, as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Loans Outstanding % of Total Loans Unadvanced Commitments (1) Loans Outstanding % of Total Loans Unadvanced Commitments (1) Nonperforming loans: RTFC $ 2,358 $ — $ — $ — Total nonperforming loans $ 2,358 0.01 % $ — $ — — % $ — ____________________________ (1) The interest rate on unadvanced commitments is not set until drawn; therefore, the long-term unadvanced loan commitments have been classified in this table as variable-rate unadvanced commitments. However, at the time of the advance, the borrower may select a fixed or a variable rate on the new loan. The following table shows foregone interest income as a result of holding loans on nonaccrual status for the three and nine months ended February 29, 2016 and February 28, 2015 . Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended (Dollars in thousands) February 29, 2016 February 28, 2015 February 29, 2016 February 28, 2015 Nonperforming loans $ 2 $ 23 $ 14 $ 74 Performing TDR loans — 132 166 396 Nonperforming TDR loans 31 — 77 — Total $ 33 $ 155 $ 257 $ 470 Pledging of Loans and Loans on Deposit We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes in an amount at least equal to the outstanding balance of our secured debt. The following table summarizes our loans outstanding as collateral pledged to secure our collateral trust bonds, Clean Renewable Energy Bonds and notes payable to Farmer Mac and the amount of the corresponding debt outstanding as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 , See “Note 5—Short-Term Debt and Credit Arrangements” and “Note 6—Long-Term Debt”) for information on our borrowings. (Dollars in thousands) February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 Collateral trust bonds: 2007 indenture: Distribution system mortgage notes $ 7,335,292 $ 6,551,836 RUS guaranteed loans qualifying as permitted investments 152,966 156,665 Total pledged collateral $ 7,488,258 $ 6,708,501 Collateral trust bonds outstanding 6,747,711 6,197,711 1994 indenture: Distribution system mortgage notes $ 852,944 $ 905,656 Collateral trust bonds outstanding 800,000 855,000 Farmer Mac: Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $ 2,736,592 $ 2,160,805 Notes payable outstanding 2,312,616 1,910,688 Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A: Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $ 17,656 $ 19,260 Cash — 485 Total pledged collateral $ 17,656 $ 19,745 Notes payable outstanding 14,871 16,529 We are required to maintain collateral on deposit in an amount at least equal to the balance of debt outstanding to the Federal Financing Bank (“FFB”) of the United States Treasury issued under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program of the USDA (the “Guaranteed Underwriter Program”). See “Note 5—Short-Term Debt and Credit Arrangements” and “Note 6—Long-Term Debt.” The following table shows the collateral on deposit and the amount of the corresponding debt outstanding as of February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2015 . (Dollars in thousands) February 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 FFB: Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes on deposit $ 5,404,553 $ 4,943,746 Notes payable outstanding 4,786,627 4,406,785 On March 29, 2016, we entered into a second amended restated and consolidated pledge agreement with RUS and U.S. Bank National Association to pledge all mortgage notes previously held on deposit pursuant to the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and, in connection with any advance, pledge collateral satisfactory to RUS pursuant to the terms of the facility. The agreement replaces the previous pledge agreement, dated December 13, 2012, and will govern all collateral under the Guaranteed Underwriting Program. |