Loans and Commitments | NOTE 4—LOANS AND COMMITMENTS Loans, which are classified as held for investment, are carried at the outstanding unpaid principal balance net of unamortized loan origination costs. The following table presents loans outstanding, by loan type and by member class, as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . February 28, 2018 May 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Loans Outstanding Unadvanced Commitments (1) Loans Outstanding Unadvanced Commitments (1) Loan type: Long-term loans: Fixed rate $ 22,737,089 $ — $ 22,136,690 $ — Variable rate 985,714 4,715,976 847,419 4,802,319 Total long-term loans 23,722,803 4,715,976 22,984,109 4,802,319 Lines of credit 1,609,032 7,435,288 1,372,221 7,772,655 Total loans outstanding 25,331,835 12,151,264 24,356,330 12,574,974 Deferred loan origination costs 11,087 — 10,714 — Loans to members $ 25,342,922 $ 12,151,264 $ 24,367,044 $ 12,574,974 Member class: CFC: Distribution $ 19,687,812 $ 7,750,226 $ 18,825,366 $ 8,295,146 Power supply 4,422,600 3,394,064 4,504,791 3,276,113 Statewide and associate 57,144 126,467 57,830 144,406 Total CFC 24,167,556 11,270,757 23,387,987 11,715,665 NCSC 800,814 581,125 613,924 584,944 RTFC 363,465 299,382 354,419 274,365 Total loans outstanding 25,331,835 12,151,264 24,356,330 12,574,974 Deferred loan origination costs 11,087 — 10,714 — Loans to members $ 25,342,922 $ 12,151,264 $ 24,367,044 $ 12,574,974 ____________________________ (1) The interest rate on unadvanced loan commitments is not set until an advance is made; therefore, all long-term unadvanced loan commitments are reported as variable-rate. However, the borrower may select either a fixed or a variable rate when an advance on a commitment is made. Unadvanced Loan Commitments Unadvanced loan commitments represent approved and executed loan contracts for which funds have not been advanced to borrowers. The following table summarizes the available balance under unadvanced loan commitments as of February 28, 2018 and the related maturities by fiscal year and thereafter by loan type: Available Balance Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Loan Commitments (Dollars in thousands) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Line of credit loans $ 7,435,288 $ 226,587 $ 4,057,079 $ 782,079 $ 995,502 $ 707,497 $ 666,544 Long-term loans 4,715,976 71,913 924,921 585,953 637,024 1,742,934 753,231 Total $ 12,151,264 $ 298,500 $ 4,982,000 $ 1,368,032 $ 1,632,526 $ 2,450,431 $ 1,419,775 Unadvanced line of credit commitments accounted for 61% of total unadvanced loan commitments as of February 28, 2018 , while unadvanced long-term loan commitments accounted for 39% of total unadvanced loan commitments. Unadvanced line of credit commitments are typically revolving facilities for periods not to exceed five years. Unadvanced line of credit commitments generally serve as supplemental back-up liquidity to our borrowers. Historically, borrowers have not drawn the full commitment amount for line of credit facilities, and we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities regardless of whether or not we are obligated to fund the facility where a material adverse change exists. Our unadvanced long-term loan commitments have a five-year draw period under which a borrower may advance funds prior to the expiration of the commitment. We expect that the majority of the long-term unadvanced loan commitments of $4,716 million will be advanced prior to the expiration of the commitment. Because we historically have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, which account for the majority of our total unadvanced loan commitments, we believe the unadvanced loan commitment total of $12,151 million as of February 28, 2018 is not necessarily representative of our future funding cash requirements. Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Conditional The substantial majority of our line of credit commitments and all of our unadvanced long-term loan commitments include material adverse change clauses. Unadvanced loan commitments subject to material adverse change clauses totaled $9,374 million and $9,973 million as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 , respectively. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. In some cases, the borrower’s access to the full amount of the facility is further constrained by the designated purpose, imposition of borrower-specific restrictions or by additional conditions that must be met prior to advancing funds. Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Unconditional Unadvanced loan commitments not subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of each advance consisted of unadvanced committed lines of credit totaling $2,777 million and $2,602 million as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 , respectively. As such, we are required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility. The following table summarizes the available balance under unconditional committed lines of credit, and the related maturities by fiscal year and thereafter, as of February 28, 2018 . Available Balance Notional Maturities of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit (Dollars in thousands) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Committed lines of credit $2,776,918 $130,000 $306,122 $515,691 $645,083 $487,908 $692,114 Loan Sales We transfer, from time to time, loans to third parties under our direct loan sale program. We sold CFC loans with outstanding balances totaling $118 million and $33 million , at par for cash, during the nine months ended February 28, 2018 and 2017 , respectively. We recorded immaterial losses upon the sale of these loans, attributable to the unamortized deferred loan origination costs associated with the transferred loans. Pledging of Loans We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes in an amount at least equal to the outstanding balance of our secured debt. The following table summarizes our loans outstanding as collateral pledged to secure our collateral trust bonds, Clean Renewable Energy Bonds, notes payable to Farmer Mac and notes payable to the Federal Financing Bank and guaranteed by RUS under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program of the USDA (“Guaranteed Underwriter Program”) and the amount of the corresponding debt outstanding as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . See “Note 5—Short-Term Borrowings” and “Note 6—Long-Term Debt” for information on our borrowings. (Dollars in thousands) February 28, 2018 May 31, 2017 Collateral trust bonds: 2007 indenture: Distribution system mortgage notes $ 8,453,575 $ 8,740,572 RUS-guaranteed loans qualifying as permitted investments 142,133 146,373 Total pledged collateral $ 8,595,708 $ 8,886,945 Collateral trust bonds outstanding 7,697,711 7,697,711 1994 indenture: Distribution system mortgage notes $ 249,384 $ 263,007 Collateral trust bonds outstanding 220,000 225,000 Farmer Mac: Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $ 3,375,180 $ 2,942,456 Notes payable outstanding 2,805,376 2,513,389 Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A: Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $ 13,339 $ 14,943 Cash — 481 Total pledged collateral $ 13,339 $ 15,424 Notes payable outstanding 11,556 13,214 Federal Financing Bank: Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $ 5,827,497 $ 5,833,515 Notes payable outstanding 4,871,771 4,985,748 Credit Concentration As a tax-exempt, member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution, transmission and related facilities. We serve electric and telecommunications members throughout the United States and its territories, including 49 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa and Guam. Our consolidated membership totaled 1,447 members and 217 associates as of February 28, 2018 . Texas had the largest concentration of outstanding loans to borrowers in any one state, with approximately 15% of total loans outstanding as of both February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . Outstanding loans to electric utility organizations represented approximately 99% of the total outstanding loan portfolio as of February 28, 2018 , unchanged from May 31, 2017 . The remaining outstanding loans in our portfolio were to RTFC members, affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry. As a result of lending primarily to our members we have a loan portfolio with single-industry and single-obligor concentration risk. Despite our credit concentration risks, we historically have experienced limited defaults and very low credit losses in our electric loan portfolio. Single-Obligor Concentration The outstanding exposure to our 20 largest borrowers was 23% and 24% as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 , respectively. The 20 largest borrowers consisted of 10 distribution systems, 9 power supply systems and 1 NCSC associate member as of both February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . The largest total outstanding exposure to a single borrower or controlled group represented approximately 2% of total loans and guarantees outstanding as of both February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . Credit Quality We closely monitor loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our credit risk exposure. We seek to provide a balance between meeting the credit needs of our members, while also ensuring the sound credit quality of our loan portfolio. Payment status and internal risk ratings are key indicators, among others, of the level of credit risk in our loan portfolio. As part of our strategy in managing our credit risk exposure, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac. Under this agreement, we may designate certain long-term loans to be covered under the commitment, subject to approval by Farmer Mac, and in the event any such loan later goes into payment default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of designated and Farmer Mac approved loans was $777 million and $843 million as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 , respectively. Under the agreement, we are required to pay Farmer Mac a monthly fee based on the unpaid principal balance of loans covered under the purchase commitment. No loans had been put to Farmer Mac for purchase, pursuant to this agreement, as of February 28, 2018 . Also, we had long-term loans totaling $163 million and $167 million as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 , respectively, that were guaranteed by the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture. Payment Status of Loans The tables below present the payment status of loans outstanding by member class as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . As indicated in the table, we did not have any past due loans as of either February 28, 2018 or May 31, 2017 . February 28, 2018 (Dollars in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due (1) Total Past Due Total Financing Receivables Nonaccrual Loans CFC: Distribution $ 19,687,812 $ — $ — $ — $ 19,687,812 $ — Power supply 4,422,600 — — — 4,422,600 — Statewide and associate 57,144 — — — 57,144 — CFC total 24,167,556 — — — 24,167,556 — NCSC 800,814 — — — 800,814 — RTFC 363,465 — — — 363,465 — Total loans outstanding $ 25,331,835 $ — $ — $ — $ 25,331,835 $ — Percentage of total loans 100.00 % — % — % — % 100.00 % — % May 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due (1) Total Total Financing Nonaccrual Loans CFC: Distribution $ 18,825,366 $ — $ — $ — $ 18,825,366 $ — Power supply 4,504,791 — — — 4,504,791 — Statewide and associate 57,830 — — — 57,830 — CFC total 23,387,987 — — — 23,387,987 — NCSC 613,924 — — — 613,924 — RTFC 354,419 — — — 354,419 — Total loans outstanding $ 24,356,330 $ — $ — $ — $ 24,356,330 $ — Percentage of total loans 100.00 % — % — % — % 100.00 % — % ____________________________ (1) All loans 90 days or more past due are on nonaccrual status. Troubled Debt Restructured (“TDR”) Loans We did not have any loans modified as TDRs during the nine months ended February 28, 2018 . The following table provides a summary of loans modified as TDRs in prior periods, the performance status of these loans and the unadvanced loan commitments related to the TDR loans, by member class, as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . February 28, 2018 May 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Loans Outstanding % of Total Loans Unadvanced Commitments Loans Outstanding % of Total Loans Unadvanced Commitments TDR loans: Performing TDR loans: CFC/Distribution $ 6,507 0.03 % $ — $ 6,581 0.02 % $ — RTFC 6,216 0.02 — 6,592 0.03 — Total performing TDR loans 12,723 0.05 — 13,173 0.05 — Total TDR loans $ 12,723 0.05 % $ — $ 13,173 0.05 % $ — We did not have any TDR loans classified as nonperforming as of February 28, 2018 or May 31, 2017 . TDR loans classified as performing as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 were performing in accordance with the terms of their respective restructured loan agreement and on accrual status as of the respective reported dates. One borrower with a TDR loan also had a line of credit facility, restricted for fuel purchases only, totaling $6 million as of both February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . The outstanding amount under this facility totaled approximately $0.8 million and $0.5 million as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 , respectively, and was classified as performing as of each respective date. Nonperforming Loans In addition to TDR loans that may be classified as nonperforming, we also may have nonperforming loans that have not been modified as a TDR loan. We did not have any loans classified as nonperforming as of February 28, 2018 or May 31, 2017 . We had no foregone interest income for loans on nonaccrual status during the three and nine months ended February 28, 2018. We had foregone interest income for loans on nonaccrual status totaling $31 thousand during the nine months ended February 28, 2017 . Impaired Loans The following table provides information on loans classified as individually impaired loans as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . February 28, 2018 May 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Recorded Investment Related Allowance Recorded Investment Related Allowance With no specific allowance recorded: CFC $ 6,507 $ — $ 6,581 $ — With a specific allowance recorded: RTFC 6,216 1,272 6,592 1,640 Total impaired loans $ 12,723 $ 1,272 $ 13,173 $ 1,640 The following table presents, by company, the average recorded investment for individually impaired loans and the interest income recognized on these loans for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2018 and 2017 . Three Months Ended February 28, 2018 2017 2018 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized CFC $ 6,507 $ 6,582 $ 142 $ 144 RTFC 6,299 6,799 79 84 Total impaired loans $ 12,806 $ 13,381 $ 221 $ 228 Nine Months Ended February 28, 2018 2017 2018 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized CFC $ 6,529 $ 6,624 $ 428 $ 418 RTFC 6,425 8,093 241 259 Total impaired loans $ 12,954 $ 14,717 $ 669 $ 677 Internal Risk Ratings of Loans We evaluate the credit quality of our loans using an internal risk rating system that employs similar criteria for all member classes. Our internal risk rating system is based on a determination of a borrower’s risk of default utilizing both quantitative and qualitative measurements. Each risk rating is reassessed annually following the receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim risk rating downgrades or upgrades may occur as a result of significant developments or trends. Our borrower risk ratings fall into the following four categories based on the criteria identified below. • Pass : Borrowers that are not experiencing difficulty and/or not showing a potential or well-defined credit weakness. • Special Mention : Borrowers that may be characterized by a potential credit weakness or deteriorating financial condition that is not sufficiently serious to warrant a classification of substandard or doubtful. • Substandard : Borrowers that display a well-defined credit weakness that may jeopardize the full collection of principal and interest. • Doubtful : Borrowers that have a well-defined weakness and the full collection of principal and interest is questionable or improbable. Loans to borrowers in the pass, special mention and substandard categories are generally included in the collective loan portfolio for purposes of determining the allowance for loan losses. Loans to borrowers in the doubtful category are considered to be individually impaired and therefore reflected in the impaired loan portfolio. The special mention, substandard, and doubtful categories are intended to comply with the definition of criticized loans by the banking regulatory authorities. The following tables present total loans outstanding, by member class and borrower risk rating category, based on the risk ratings used in the estimation of our allowance for loan losses as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . February 28, 2018 (Dollars in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total CFC: Distribution $ 19,585,802 $ 102,010 $ — $ — $ 19,687,812 Power supply 4,422,600 — — — 4,422,600 Statewide and associate 57,144 — — — 57,144 CFC total 24,065,546 102,010 — — 24,167,556 NCSC 800,814 — — — 800,814 RTFC 357,249 — 6,216 — 363,465 Total loans outstanding $ 25,223,609 $ 102,010 $ 6,216 $ — $ 25,331,835 May 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total CFC: Distribution $ 18,715,810 $ 109,556 $ — $ — $ 18,825,366 Power supply 4,504,791 — — — 4,504,791 Statewide and associate 56,654 1,176 — — 57,830 CFC total 23,277,255 110,732 — — 23,387,987 NCSC 612,592 1,332 — — 613,924 RTFC 346,944 — 7,475 — 354,419 Total loans outstanding $ 24,236,791 $ 112,064 $ 7,475 $ — $ 24,356,330 Allowance for Loan Losses We maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level estimated by management to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. Our allowance for loan losses consists of an amount for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, referred to as our collective allowance, and an amount for loans designated as individually impaired, referred to as our specific allowance. The following tables summarize changes, by company, in the allowance for loan losses as of and for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2018 and 2017 . Three Months Ended February 28, 2018 (Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total Balance as of November 30, 2017 $ 28,799 $ 3,117 $ 4,858 $ 36,774 Provision (benefit) for loan losses 506 731 (132 ) 1,105 Balance as of February 28, 2018 $ 29,305 $ 3,848 $ 4,726 $ 37,879 Three Months Ended February 28, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total Balance as of November 30, 2016 $ 25,857 $ 3,664 $ 4,390 $ 33,911 Provision (benefit) for loan losses 2,448 (215 ) (168 ) 2,065 Recoveries 53 — — 53 Balance as of February 28, 2017 $ 28,358 $ 3,449 $ 4,222 $ 36,029 Nine Months Ended February 28, 2018 (Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total Balance as of May 31, 2017 $ 29,499 $ 2,910 $ 4,967 $ 37,376 Provision (benefit) for loan losses (194 ) 938 (241 ) 503 Balance as of February 28, 2018 $ 29,305 $ 3,848 $ 4,726 $ 37,879 Nine Months Ended February 28, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total Balance as of May 31, 2016 $ 24,559 $ 3,134 $ 5,565 $ 33,258 Provision for loan losses 3,640 315 776 4,731 Charge-offs — — (2,119 ) (2,119 ) Recoveries 159 — — 159 Net recoveries (charge-offs) 159 — (2,119 ) (1,960 ) Balance as of February 28, 2017 $ 28,358 $ 3,449 $ 4,222 $ 36,029 The tables below present, by company, the components of our allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment of the related loans as of February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . February 28, 2018 (Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total Allowance by company: Collective allowance $ 29,305 $ 3,848 $ 3,454 $ 36,607 Specific allowance — — 1,272 1,272 Total allowance for loan losses $ 29,305 $ 3,848 $ 4,726 $ 37,879 Recorded investment in loans: Collectively evaluated loans $ 24,161,049 $ 800,814 $ 357,249 $ 25,319,112 Individually evaluated loans 6,507 — 6,216 12,723 Total recorded investment in loans $ 24,167,556 $ 800,814 $ 363,465 $ 25,331,835 Total recorded investment in loans, net (1) $ 24,138,251 $ 796,966 $ 358,739 $ 25,293,956 May 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total Allowance by company: Collective allowance $ 29,499 $ 2,910 $ 3,327 $ 35,736 Specific allowance — — 1,640 1,640 Total ending balance of the allowance $ 29,499 $ 2,910 $ 4,967 $ 37,376 Recorded investment in loans: Collectively evaluated loans $ 23,381,406 $ 613,924 $ 347,827 $ 24,343,157 Individually evaluated loans 6,581 — 6,592 13,173 Total recorded investment in loans $ 23,387,987 $ 613,924 $ 354,419 $ 24,356,330 Total recorded investment in loans, net (1) $ 23,358,488 $ 611,014 $ 349,452 $ 24,318,954 ____________________________ (1) Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs $11 million as of both February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . Reserve for Unadvanced Commitments We also maintain a reserve for unadvanced loan commitments at a level estimated by management to provide for probable losses under these commitments as of each balance sheet dated. Unadvanced loan commitments are analyzed and segregated by loan type and risk using our internal risk rating scales. We use these risk classifications, in combination with the probability of commitment usage, and any other pertinent information to estimate a reserve for unadvanced loan commitments, which we record as a liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The reserve for these commitments was less than $1 million as of both February 28, 2018 and May 31, 2017 . |