Financial Instruments | Note 9: Financial Instruments Fair Value The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact, and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. A fair value hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The level of an asset or liability in the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: Level 1: Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions. Level 2: Valuations based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or model-derived valuations techniques for which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be corroborated by, observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3: Valuations based on unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities and based on non-binding, broker-provided price quotes and may not have been corroborated by observable market data. The Company’s primary financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted cash and investments, long-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt and capital leases, and foreign currency related derivatives. The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their carrying value due to the short period of time to their maturities. The estimated fair values of capital lease obligations approximate their carrying value as the substantial majority of these obligations have interest rates that adjust to market rates on a periodic basis. Refer to Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the fair value of the Company’s Convertible Notes and Senior Notes. Investments The following table sets forth the Company’s cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted cash and investments, and other assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014: June 28, 2015 (Reported Within) Cost Unrealized Unrealized Fair Value Cash and Short-Term Restricted Investments Other (in thousands) Cash $ 276,663 $ — $ — $ 276,663 $ 271,452 $ — $ 5,211 $ — Level 1: Time Deposit 177,567 — — 177,567 44,738 — 132,829 — Money Market Funds 1,177,875 — — 1,177,875 1,177,875 — — — US Treasury and Agencies 349,009 72 (861 ) 348,220 — 315,291 32,929 — Mutual Funds 30,584 2,926 (47 ) 33,463 — — — 33,463 Level 1 Total $ 1,735,035 $ 2,998 $ (908 ) $ 1,737,125 $ 1,222,613 $ 315,291 $ 165,758 $ 33,463 Level 2: Municipal Notes and Bonds 659,550 429 (335 ) 659,644 7,474 652,170 — — US Treasuries and Agencies 4,007 — (4 ) 4,003 — 4,003 — — Government-Sponsored Enterprises 53,612 2 (249 ) 53,365 — 53,365 — — Foreign Government Bonds 50,336 31 (161 ) 50,206 — 50,206 — — Corporate Notes and Bonds 1,329,587 685 (3,797 ) 1,326,475 — 1,326,475 — — Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential 32,231 72 (292 ) 32,011 — 32,011 — — Mortgage Backed Securities - Commercial 141,988 44 (606 ) 141,426 — 141,426 — — Level 2 Total $ 2,271,311 $ 1,263 $ (5,444 ) $ 2,267,130 $ 7,474 $ 2,259,656 $ — $ — Total $ 4,283,009 $ 4,261 $ (6,352 ) $ 4,280,918 $ 1,501,539 $ 2,574,947 $ 170,969 $ 33,463 June 29, 2014 (Reported Within) Cost Unrealized Unrealized Fair Value Cash and Short-Term Restricted Cash & Investments Other (in thousands) Cash $ 285,031 $ — $ — $ 285,031 $ 279,126 $ — $ 5,905 $ — Level 1: Time Deposit 132,549 — — 132,549 — — 132,549 — Money Market Funds 1,168,261 — — 1,168,261 1,168,261 — — — US Treasury and Agencies 212,436 178 (27 ) 212,587 — 204,549 8,038 — Mutual Funds 18,784 2,974 — 21,758 — — — 21,758 Level 1 Total $ 1,532,030 $ 3,152 $ (27 ) $ 1,535,155 $ 1,168,261 $ 204,549 $ 140,587 $ 21,758 Level 2: Municipal Notes and Bonds 334,329 1,108 (4 ) 335,433 5,290 330,143 — — Government-Sponsored Enterprises 27,666 41 (15 ) 27,692 — 27,692 — — Foreign Government Bonds 35,438 57 (28 ) 35,467 — 35,467 — — Corporate Notes and Bonds 874,540 2,034 (335 ) 876,239 — 876,239 — — Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential 27,067 59 (182 ) 26,944 — 26,944 — — Mortgage Backed Securities - Commercial 112,642 100 (809 ) 111,933 — 111,933 — — Level 2 Total $ 1,411,682 $ 3,399 $ (1,373 ) $ 1,413,708 $ 5,290 $ 1,408,418 $ — $ — Total $ 3,228,743 $ 6,551 $ (1,400 ) $ 3,233,894 $ 1,452,677 $ 1,612,967 $ 146,492 $ 21,758 The Company accounts for its investment portfolio at fair value. Realized gains (losses) for investment sales are specifically identified. Management assesses the fair value of investments in debt securities that are not actively traded through consideration of interest rates and their impact on the present value of the cash flows to be received from the investments. The Company also considers whether changes in the credit ratings of the issuer could impact the assessment of fair value. Net realized gains (losses) on investments included other-than-temporary impairment charges of $3.7 million in fiscal year 2013. There were no other-than-temporary impairment charges in fiscal year 2015 or 2014. Additionally, gross realized gains/(losses) from sales of investments were $2.8 million and $(2.1) million in fiscal year 2015, $1.5 million and $(2.0) million in fiscal year 2014, and $1.6 million and $(1.5) million in fiscal year 2013, respectively. The following is an analysis of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash and investments in unrealized loss positions: June 28, 2015 Unrealized Losses Less Than 12 Months Unrealized Losses 12 Months or Greater Total Fair Value Gross Fair Value Gross Fair Value Gross (in thousands) Municipal Notes and Bonds $ 272,388 $ (335 ) $ — $ — $ 272,388 $ (335 ) US Treasury & Agencies 296,237 (865 ) — — 296,237 (865 ) Retail Funds 3,532 (47 ) — — 3,532 (47 ) Government-Sponsored Enterprises 49,184 (249 ) — — 49,184 (249 ) Foreign Government Bonds 34,882 (161 ) — — 34,882 (161 ) Corporate Notes and Bonds 889,064 (3,750 ) 16,586 (47 ) 905,650 (3,797 ) Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential 20,913 (196 ) 2,190 (96 ) 23,103 (292 ) Mortgage Backed Securities - Commercial 100,388 (431 ) 19,729 (175 ) 120,117 (606 ) $ 1,666,588 $ (6,034 ) $ 38,505 $ (318 ) $ 1,705,093 $ (6,352 ) The amortized cost and fair value of cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash and investments with contractual maturities are as follows: Cost Estimated Fair (in thousands) Due in one year or less $ 1,651,592 $ 1,651,673 Due after one year through five years 1,944,674 1,940,529 Due in more than five years 379,496 378,590 $ 3,975,762 $ 3,970,792 Management has the ability, if necessary, to liquidate any of its cash equivalents and short-term investments in order to meet the Company’s liquidity needs in the next 12 months. Accordingly, those investments with contractual maturities greater than one year from the date of purchase nonetheless are classified as short-term on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative Instruments and Hedging The Company carries derivative financial instruments (“derivatives”) on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts with financial institutions with the primary objective of reducing volatility of earnings and cash flows related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The counterparties to these foreign currency forward contracts are large global financial institutions that the Company believes are creditworthy, and therefore, it does not consider the risk of counterparty nonperformance to be material. Cash Flow Hedges The Company’s financial position is routinely subjected to market risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on non-US dollar transactions or cash flows, primarily from Japanese yen-denominated revenues and euro-denominated and Korean won-denominated expenses. The Company’s policy is to mitigate the foreign exchange risk arising from the fluctuations in the value of these non-U.S. dollar denominated transactions or cash flows through a foreign currency cash flow hedging program, using foreign currency forward contracts that generally expire within twelve months and no later than 24 months. These foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and are carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value with the effective portion of the contracts’ gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently recognized in revenue/expense in the same period the hedged items are recognized. In addition, during the twelve months ended June 28, 2015, the Company entered into and settled a series of forward-starting interest rate swap agreements, with a total notional value of $375 million, to hedge against the variability of cash flows due to changes in the benchmark interest rate of fixed rate debt. These instruments were designated as cash flow hedges at inception and were settled in conjunction with the issuance of debt during the three months ended March 29, 2015. The effective portion of the contracts’ loss is included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) and will amortize into income as the hedged item impacts earnings. At inception and at each quarter end, hedges are tested prospectively and retrospectively for effectiveness using regression analysis. Changes in the fair value of the forward contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness and are recognized in revenue or expense in the current period. The change in time value related to these contracts was not material for all reported periods. To qualify for hedge accounting, the hedge relationship must meet criteria relating both to the derivative instrument and the hedged item. These criteria include identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value or cash flows will be measured. There were no material gains or losses during the twelve months ended June 28, 2015 or June 29, 2014 associated with ineffectiveness or forecasted transactions that failed to occur. To receive hedge accounting treatment, all hedging relationships are formally documented at the inception of the hedge and the hedges must be tested to demonstrate an expectation of providing highly effective offsetting changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions. When derivative instruments are designated and qualify as effective cash flow hedges, the Company recognizes effective changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged exposure is realized. Consequently, with the exception of excluded time value and hedge ineffectiveness recognized, the Company’s results of operations are not subject to fluctuation as a result of changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments. If hedges are not highly effective or if the Company does not believe that the underlying hedged forecasted transactions will occur, the Company may not be able to account for its derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. If this were to occur, future changes in the fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments would be recognized in earnings. Additionally, related amounts previously recorded in other comprehensive income would be reclassified to income immediately. As of June 28, 2015, the Company had losses of $2.9 million accumulated in other comprehensive income, net of tax, including, $0.2 million gains related to foreign exchange which it expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income into earnings over the next 12 months and $3.1 million losses related to interest rate contracts which it expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income into earnings over the next 9.7 years. Balance Sheet Hedges The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge fluctuations associated with foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, primarily third party accounts receivables, accounts payables and intercompany receivables and payables. These foreign currency forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Therefore, the change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded as a component of other income (expense) and offsets the change in fair value of the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, which are also recorded in other income (expense). As of June 28, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding foreign currency forward contracts that were entered into under its cash flow and balance sheet hedge program: Derivatives Designated as Derivatives Not Designated as (in thousands) Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Buy Contracts Sell Contracts Buy Contracts Sell Contracts Japanese yen $ — $ 18,946 $ — $ 49,924 Swiss franc — — — 3,346 Euro 34,377 — 4,049 — Korean won 7,269 — 8,945 — Taiwan dollar — — 33,239 11,162 $ 41,646 $ 18,946 $ 46,233 $ 64,432 The fair value of derivatives instruments in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014 were as follows: June 28, 2015 June 29, 2014 Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (Level 2) Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (Level 2) Asset Derivatives Liability Asset Derivatives Liability Balance Sheet Fair Balance Fair Balance Sheet Location Fair Balance Location Fair (in thousands) Derivatives designated as hedging instrument Foreign exchange forward contracts Prepaid expense $ 3,388 Accrued $ 957 Prepaid expense $ 483 Accrued $ 805 Derivatives not designated as hedging instrument Foreign exchange forward contracts Prepaid expense 8 Accrued 960 Prepaid expense 1,109 Accrued 118 Total derivatives $ 3,396 $ 1,917 $ 1,592 $ 923 Under the master agreements with the respective counterparties to the Company’s foreign exchange contracts, subject to applicable requirements, the Company is allowed to net settle transactions of the same currency with a single net amount payable by one party to the other. However, the Company has elected to present the derivative assets and derivative liabilities on a gross basis in the Company’s balance sheet. As of June 28, 2015, the potential effect of rights of set-off associated with the above foreign exchange contracts would be an offset to both assets and liabilities by $1.9 million, resulting in a net derivative asset of $1.5 million. As of June 29, 2014, the potential effect of rights of set-off associated with the above foreign exchange contracts would be an offset to both assets and liabilities by $0.5 million, resulting in a net derivative asset of $1.1 million. The Company is not required to pledge, nor is the Company entitled to receive, cash collateral related to these derivative transactions. The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, before tax, on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations was as follows: Year Ended June 28, 2015 Year Ended June 29, 2014 Location of Effective Portion Ineffective Effective Portion Ineffective Derivatives Designated as Gain (Loss) Gain (Loss) Gain (Loss) Gain Gain Gain (Loss) (in thousands) (in thousands) Foreign Exchange Contracts Revenue $ 13,678 $ 11,375 $ 258 $ 7,939 $ 9,027 $ 277 Foreign Exchange Contracts Cost of goods sold (6,318 ) (4,349 ) (75 ) 812 2,393 (52 ) Foreign Exchange Contracts Selling, general, and administrative (2,579 ) (2,618 ) (39 ) 318 1,087 (23 ) Interest Rate Contracts Other expense, net (5,071 ) (112 ) (231 ) — — — $ (290 ) $ 4,296 $ (87 ) $ 9,069 $ 12,507 $ 202 The effect of derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations was as follows: Year Ended June 28, 2015 June 29, 2014 Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Location of Gain Recognized Gain Gain (in thousands) Foreign Exchange Contracts Other income $ 1,784 $ 8,205 Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, restricted cash and investments, trade accounts receivable, and derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities. Cash is placed on deposit in large global financial institutions. Such deposits may be in excess of insured limits. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s cash are creditworthy and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these balances. The Company’s over-all portfolio of available-for-sale securities must maintain an average minimum rating of “AA-” or “Aa3” as rated by Standard and Poor’s or Moody’s Investor Services, respectively. To ensure diversification and minimize concentration, the Company’s policy limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution or commercial issuer. The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties on the foreign currency forward contracts that are used to mitigate the effect of exchange rate fluctuations and on contracts related to structured share repurchase agreements. These counterparties are large global financial institutions and, to date, no such counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations to the Company. Credit risk evaluations, including trade references, bank references and Dun & Bradstreet ratings, ae performed on all new customers and the Company monitors its customers’ financial statements and payment performance. In general, the Company does not require collateral on sales. As of June 28, 2015, four customers accounted for approximately 17%, 13%, 12%, and 11% of accounts receivable. As of June 29, 2014, four customers accounted for approximately 15%, 13%, 12%, and 12% of accounts receivable. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable. |