The Company has four reportable segments: U.S. consumer finance, Canadian consumer finance, automobile finance, and leasing. The Company’s operating segments are determined by product type and geography. U.S. consumer finance operations make loans to individuals and purchase sales finance contracts through 785 consumer finance branches in 47 states, Guam, Saipan, and Puerto Rico. The U.S. consumer finance segment also issues credit cards through two banking subsidiaries. Canadian consumer finance operations make loans to individuals and purchase sales finance contracts through 162 consumer finance branches in the 10 provinces. Automobile finance operations specialize in purchasing sales finance contracts directly from automobile dealers and making loans secured by automobiles through 187 branches in 34 states and Puerto Rico. Leasing operations specialize in financing commercial equipment such as office copiers, telephone systems, health care equipment, small computers, and light industrial equipment. Lease finance receivables are generated primarily from equipment distributors ranging from small independently-owned vendors to large equipment manufacturers. Results from insurance operations are included in the appropriate segment.
8. Recent Accounting Standards.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (FAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In July 1999, the FASB issued FAS 137, Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, which deferred the effective date for implementation of FAS 133 to no later than January 1, 2001 for the Company’s financial statements. In June 2000, the FASB issued FAS 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an amendment to FAS 133. The Company implemented the statements on January 1, 2001 and there was no material impact on the Company’s financial statements as a result of the implementation.
In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement No. 140 (FAS 140), Accounting for the Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, which replaces FAS 125 (of the same title). FAS 140 revises certain standards in the accounting for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and collateral, and requires certain disclosures relating to securitization transactions and collateral, but it carries over most of FAS 125’s provisions. The collateral and disclosure provisions of FAS 140 were effective for year-end 2000 financial statements. The other provisions of this Statement were effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001; the Company implemented the revised provisions when effective and there was no material impact on the financial statements.
In July 2001, FASB issued Statement No. 141 (FAS 141), Business Combinations, and Statement No. 142 (FAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
FAS 141, effective June 30, 2001, requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting; the use of the pooling-of-interests method of accounting is eliminated. FAS 141 also establishes how the purchase method is to be applied for business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. This guidance is similar to previous GAAP, however, FAS 141 establishes additional disclosure requirements for transactions occurring after the effective date.
FAS 142, effective on July 1, 2001, eliminates amortization of goodwill associated with business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. During a transition period goodwill associated with business combinations completed prior to July 1, 2001, will continue to be amortized through the income statement. All goodwill amortization expense will cease effective January 1, 2002. However, goodwill will be assessed (at least annually) for impairment at the reporting unit level by applying a fair-value-based test. FAS 142 also provides additional guidance on acquired intangibles that should be separately recognized and amortized, which could result in the recognition of additional intangible assets, as compared with previous GAAP.
Under FAS 142, the Company’s goodwill amortization expense (included in noninterest expense) will be approximately $9 million quarterly for the remainder of 2001. The elimination of goodwill amortization effective January 1, 2002 is expected to reduce noninterest expense by approximately $38 million (pretax) and increase net income by approximately $26 million (after tax), for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared with 2001.
The initial goodwill impairment assessment is expected to be completed in early 2002; the Company cannot determine if a transition impairment charge will be recognized in 2002.
9. Business Combinations.
Effective January 31, 2001, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Conseco Finance Vendor Services Corporation, a leasing company based in Paramus, New Jersey. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at fair value, and the Company’s financial statements contain only the results of operations since the acquisition date. Conseco Finance Vendor Services Corporation had lease receivables outstanding of $825 million and had another $135 million of lease receivables under management at the time of acquisition.
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Statements made in Management’s Discussion and Analysis may be forward-looking and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements address management’s present expectations about future performance and involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control) could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Those factors include the economic environment, competition, products and pricing in the geographic and business areas in which the Company conducts its operations, prevailing interest rates, changes in government regulations and policies affecting financial services companies, credit quality and credit risk management, acquisitions, and integration of acquired businesses.
Wells Fargo Financial’s performance for the second quarter of 2001 closely paralleled performance for the first six months of 2001. The discussion and analysis that follows, therefore, is limited to a discussion of the first six months as a whole and does not include a separate discussion of the second quarter unless otherwise noted.
Wells Fargo Financial’s net income for the first six months of 2001 was $129.6 million compared with $111.3 million for the first six months of 2000. Net income in the first quarter of 2000 included a $7.1 million loss incurred by subsidiaries engaged in multiple peril crop insurance business. On June 1, 2000 these subsidiaries were transferred to another affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company. Excluding these operations, net income increased to $129.6 million for the first six months of 2001 compared with $118.4 million in the first six months of 2000.
Well’s Fargo Financial’s total income (revenue) increased 22% for the first six months ($1,282.9 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $1,052.2 million in the first six months of 2000).
Income from finance charges and interest increased 21% for the first six months ($1,091.4 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $901.7 million in the first six months of 2000). Changes in income from finance charges and interest result predominantly from (1) changes in the amount of finance receivables outstanding and (2) changes in the rate of charge on those receivables. In total, average finance receivables outstanding in the first six months of 2001 increased 30% from the first six months of 2000; average U.S. consumer finance receivables outstanding increased 19%, average Canadian consumer finance receivables outstanding increased 1%, average automobile finance receivables outstanding increased 43%, average leasing finance receivables outstanding increased 192%, and average other finance receivables outstanding increased 23%.
Rate of charge on finance receivables: | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| |
| U.S. consumer finance | 18.87 | % | 19.05 | % |
| Canadian consumer finance | 23.84 | | 24.38 | |
| Automobile finance | 16.62 | | 18.60 | |
| Leasing | 12.20 | | 13.18 | |
| Other | 14.38 | | 17.54 | |
| Total | 17.92 | | 19.22 | |
| | | | | | |
The increases in income from finance charges and interest were due predominantly to growth in average receivables outstanding. Growth in average receivables for U.S. consumer finance was due to the purchase of $400 million in credit card receivables on June 30, 2000 and due to regular business activity. Growth in average receivables for automobile finance was due primarily to the purchase of Flagship Credit Corporation on December 20, 2000. The average receivable growth in leasing receivables was due primarily to the purchase of Conseco Finance Vendor Service Corporation on January 31, 2001. The majority of the increase in other average receivables was due to significant receivable growth of the rediscounting operations. Changes in the earned rates of charge were due to changes in prevailing market rates combined with a change in the portfolio mix. The decline in the earned rate of charge for automobile finance was predominantly due to the change in portfolio mix as a result of the Flagship purchase. The decline in the earned rate of charge for other finance receivables occurred due to the change in portfolio mix occurring due to the growth of rediscounting operations.
Other income increased 33% ($131.2 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $98.3 million in the first six months of 2000). The increase in other income was due predominantly to additional fee income originating from the companies acquired in the past year.
Operating expenses increased 13% ($457.1 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $405.3 million in the first six months of 2000). The increase was due primarily to increases in employee compensation and benefits and other costs relating to business expansion and acquisitions.
Interest and debt expense increased 25% ($368.7 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $295.8 million in the first six months of 2000). Changes in interest and debt expense result predominantly from (1) changes in the amount of borrowings outstanding and (2) changes in the cost of those borrowings. Average total outstanding borrowings in the first six months of 2001 increased 28% from the first six months of 2000.
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
| |
Costs of funds: | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| |
| Short-term | 5.60 | % | 6.27 | % |
| Long-term | 6.54 | | 6.56 | |
| Total | 6.26 | | 6.47 | |
Changes in average debt outstanding generally correspond to changes in average finance receivables outstanding combined with the change in notes receivable - affiliates. Average finance receivables and notes receivable - - affiliates increased 29% from the first six months of 2000.
Provision for credit losses increased 53% ($229.0 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $149.9 million in the first six months of 2000). Net write-offs increased 62% in the first six months of 2001. The increase was due primarily to higher write-offs in the Company’s U.S. consumer finance and leasing portfolios (see following table). This increase was partially offset by improvements in the automobile finance business and the Company’s private label credit card business in Canada.
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
| |
Net write-offs, not annualized, as a percentage of average net receivables outstanding: | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| |
| U.S. consumer finance | 2.17 | % | 1.25 | % |
| Canadian consumer finance | 2.04 | | 2.74 | |
| Automobile finance | 1.35 | | 1.56 | |
| Leasing | 1.11 | | .46 | |
| Other | 1.30 | | 1.49 | |
| Total | 1.82 | | 1.46 | |
| | | | | | |
Through June 30, 2001, the provision for credit losses exceeded net write-offs by $7.7 million. At June 30, 2001, the Company had an allowance for credit losses of $509.9 million (4.05% of receivables) compared with $462.6 million (4.05% of receivables) at December 31, 2000. There were no material changes in estimation methods and assumptions during 2001 and 2000. Non-accrual finance receivables were $74.6 million at June 30, 2001 compared with $58.0 million at December 31, 2000. In addition, finance receivables outstanding which were more than three payments contractually delinquent and which were still accruing interest were $172.4 million at June 30, 2001 compared with $159.9 million at December 31, 2000. Management believes the allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2001, is adequate to absorb probable losses on existing receivables in the finance receivables portfolio.
Income taxes increased 19% ($77.4 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $65.2 million in the first six months of 2000). Income before income taxes increased 17% ($207.0 million in the first six months of 2001 compared with $176.4 million in the first six months of 2000.) The effective tax rate was 37.4% for the first six months of 2001 and 36.9% for the first six months of 2000.
The Company maintains bank lines of credit and revolving credit agreements to provide an alternative source of liquidity to support the Company’s commercial paper borrowings. At June 30, 2001, lines of credit and revolving credit agreements totaling $2,364 million were being maintained at 19 domestic and international banks; the entire amount was available on that date. Additionally, the Company’s bank subsidiaries, Wells Fargo Financial Bank and Wells Fargo Financial National Bank, have access to federal funds borrowings. At June 30, 2001, federal funds availability at the two banks was $869 million.
The Company and a Canadian subsidiary obtain long-term debt capital primarily from the issuance of debt securities to the public through underwriters on a firm-commitment basis and the issuance of debt securities to institutional investors. The Company and a Canadian subsidiary also obtain long-term debt from the issuance of medium-term notes (which have maturities ranging from nine months to 30 years) through underwriters (acting as agent or principal).
The Company anticipates the continued availability of borrowed funds, at prevailing interest rates, to provide for Wells Fargo Financial’s growth in the foreseeable future. Funds are also generated internally from payments of principal and interest on Wells Fargo Financial’s finance receivables.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC.
Item 5. Other Information.
RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The following table sets forth the ratios of earnings to fixed charges of Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods indicated:
| Years Ended December 31, | |
|
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 | 2000 | | 1999 | | 1998 | | 1997 | | 1996 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
1.55 | 1.58 | | 1.78 | | 1.72 | | 2.00 | | 2.11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The ratios of earnings to fixed charges have been computed by dividing net earnings plus fixed charges and income taxes by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest and debt expense plus one-third of rentals (which is deemed representative of the interest factor).
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits:
Exhibit (12) | Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 2001. |
(b) Reports on 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter for which this report is filed.
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC. |
| |
Date: August 10, 2001 | | |
| | |
| By | /s/ Eric Torkelson |
|
|
| | Eric Torkelson |
| | Senior Vice President and Controller |
| | (Principal Accounting Officer) |