[ ]
[ ]
BACKGROUND OF THE SOLICITATION
Mr. Razin, the founder of the Company and a long tenured, 47-year director, presided as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for 25 years and as Chairman of the Board for an additional 16 years, during which he oversaw a deteriorating business with unproductive R&D investments and a disenfranchised customer base, instilled a capital allocation plan that prioritized $400 million in dividends that thwarted sustainable high growth and largely benefited him personally, and eventually stepped down as Chairman at the request of the other members of the Board in November 2015.
Mr. Razin was conferred the ceremonial title of Chairman Emeritus in connection with his resignation, and nevertheless continued to serve as a member of the Board, a position he was able to perpetually guarantee for himself because of his historic ownership of a significant stake in the Company and the ability to use cumulative voting in the election of the Company’s directors as provided by California law and the Company’s organizational documents.
Mr. Rosenzweig has been a director of the Company for nine years, beginning in 2012.
In their capacities as members of the Board, and in Mr. Razin’s capacity as a significant shareholder of the Company, Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig have consistently acted in a manner that demonstrated conflicts with their personal interests. Mr. Razin has sought to have the Board approve dividend declarations to shareholders, and to have the Board appoint Mr. Rosenzweig as Chief Executive Officer of the Company despite lacking the relevant knowledge and expertise for the role.
In addition, Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig do not have a good relationship with the other members of the Board and the Company’s management. Mr. Razin’s relationship with Mr. Frantz, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, was terse, with Mr. Frantz often frustrated with Mr. Razin’s behavior. Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig have also been vocal of their disapproval of the compensation of management and employees (including equity incentives), notwithstanding the fact that such compensation is generally in line with that of our peer group companies, approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board and vetted by an independent compensation consultant, and they have, on occasion, overstepped their roles as directors by attempting to interfere with day-to-day operations and management matters at the Company.
Beginning in 2018, as part of its regular review of the corporate governance of the Company, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee discussed a potential reincorporation of the Company in Delaware with its outside legal counsel. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee considered it beneficial to the Company’s shareholders to reincorporate in Delaware for a range of reasons, including the predictability and efficiency of an established body of corporate case law in Delaware, the fast and efficient corporate filing system, as well as the elimination of cumulative voting and adoption of a “one share, one vote” framework in the election of directors to ensure that a minority shareholder would be unable to accumulate shares and override the will of the majority with respect to the election of directors. The Board and Nominating and Governance Committee did not consider that changes in corporate governance a result of a reincorporation of the Company in Delaware, including the elimination of cumulative voting, would entrench existing directors; on the contrary, it would reduce the ability of significant stockholders to entrench themselves or their nominees on the Board.
In May 2019, Mr. Rosenzweig discussed with Mr. Margolis his potential transition off the Board following the conclusion of his term at the 2020 annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders (the “2020 Annual Meeting”). At the request of Mr. Razin, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee agreed to continue to include Mr. Rosenzweig as part of its slate of director nominees for the 2020 Annual Meeting, with the understanding that he would transition off the Board following the conclusion of his term at the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Beginning in early 2020, the Board started seriously evaluating director refreshment in connection with efforts across the Company to improve diversity, and to reflect legislative and policy directions in California. Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig were part of these refreshment efforts and participated in the director candidate search and evaluation process. In February 2021, as part of such efforts, the Nominating and Governance Committee retained Spencer Stuart, a director and executive search and leadership consulting firm, to aid the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Governance Committee in its search for new director candidates to supplement the candidates previously identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee.
In the first half of 2021, Mr. Margolis and Mr. Barbarosh had a series of discussions with Mr. Razin regarding a potential transition plan for himself and Mr. Rosenzweig which would allow them both to remain on the Board’s slate of nominees for additional terms if Mr. Razin agreed to vote his shares in favor of the Board’s slate. Messrs. Margolis and Barbarosh also proposed several alternatives for Mr. Razin in an effort by the Board to avoid a potential costly and distracting proxy fight. Mr. Razin rejected all of these settlement proposals made by Mr. Margolis and Mr. Barbarosh.
Between April and June 2021, members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board, including Mr. Razin, interviewed potential director candidates identified by Spencer Stuart to determine their suitability as Board members. Mr. Razin exhibited insensitive and unprofessional behavior during his interviews of two highly qualified candidates, including by, among other things, referring to them as “diversity candidates,” in violation of the Company’s Code of Business and Ethics and its Corporate Social Responsibility Statement.
Meanwhile, between May and June 2021, Messrs. Razin, Margolis and Panner engaged in a series of email correspondences and meetings where Mr. Razin made numerous demands for confidential information and accused other Board members of meeting in secret without inviting him. Messrs. Margolis and Panner cooperated to the best of their abilities with Mr. Razin’s demands, and tried to negotiate a conciliatory path forward for him to remain on the Board while focusing on the best interests of the Company and all of its stakeholders, including its shareholders. Mr. Razin also requested that Messrs. Margolis and Panner meet with himself and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, outside counsel that he had engaged to represent him, and suggested that Messrs. Margolis and Panner include their outside counsel.
On June 3, 2021, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP sent a letter on behalf of Mr. Razin to Mr. Linton, the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary, to be transmitted to the other members of the Board, claiming that Mr. Razin’s requests to determine the agenda of Board meetings, for information relating to withheld votes for directors at previous years’ annual meetings and for information that would enable him to audit meetings of the Nomination and Governance Committee of the Board, were not fulfilled by the Board or the Company.
On June 16, 2021, Mr. Margolis, with the approval of the Board members other than Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig, sent a censure letter to Mr. Razin detailing Mr. Razin’s inappropriate behavior and comments regarding racial diversity during his interviews of potential director candidates, which Mr. Razin had self-reported to the other members of the Board, and advising him to participate in Board-mandated sensitivity training which all other members of the Board completed.
On June 18, 2021, the Company announced that the Company and Mr. Frantz agreed to a mutual separation and that Mr. Frantz would no longer serve as President, Chief Executive Officer or a member of the Board. The Company also announced the establishment of an Executive Leadership Committee, consisting of Mr. Arnold, the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Metcalfe, the Chief Technology Officer, Ms. Greene, the Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Mr. Velamoor, the Chief Growth & Strategy Officer of the Company, as members, to lead the Company on an interim basis, reporting to and working with a Board Oversight Committee consisting of Mr. Margolis and Mr. Barbarosh. The Board believed the Executive Leadership Committee, collectively, had the breadth of expertise to lead the Company and continue supporting the business seamlessly during the transition.
Between June and July 2021, Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig continued to correspond with the other members of the Board, expressing their dissatisfaction with what they viewed as deliberate attempts to block their ability to exert control over the Board and management, including by not appointing them to the Board Oversight Committee. All of the other members of the Board disagreed with the perspective of Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig. This correspondence included:
| • | | On June 30, 2021, a letter from Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig to the rest of the Board making certain allegations against the other Board members. |
| • | | On July 8, 2021, a letter from the rest of the Board to Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig refuting the allegations made in their June 30, 2021 letter concerning, among other things, Mr. Frantz’s separation, the creation of the Board Oversight Committee and Executive Leadership Committee, Mr. Razin’s censure by the Board and the potential Delaware reincorporation proposal. |
| • | | On July 19, 2021, a letter from Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig to the rest of the Board responding to several claims that the Board made in its July 8, 2021 letter; and |
| • | | On July 26, 2021, a letter from the rest of the Board to Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig noting that the Board had made considerable efforts to engage constructively with each of Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig to no avail, and that the views expressed by them in their June 30, 2021 and previous correspondence were not held by any of the other directors. The Board again reiterated its willingness to reach a mutually agreeable resolution, so long as its terms benefited all shareholders’ interests. |
On August 17, 2021, as a result of the Board’s ongoing refreshment efforts beginning in 2020 and more focused refreshment initiatives that began with Spencer Stuart in February 2021, the Board announced the appointment of Dr. McGinty as an independent member of the Board effective August 11, 2021, the nomination of Dr. Puryear for election as an independent member of the Board at the 2021 Annual Meeting, and the retirement of Mr. Malone as a member of the Board effective as of the conclusion of his term at the 2021 Annual Meeting. In addition, the Board announced its full slate of director nominees for the 2021 Annual Meeting, including each of Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig.
On August 19, 2021, Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig submitted a notice of nomination (the “Nomination Notice”) of six nominees—each of themselves and Ruby Sharma, Kenneth H. Fearn, Jr., Julie Schoenfeld and Ramon Gregory (the nominees nominated by Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig, collectively, the “Dissident Nominees”)—for election to the Board at the annual meeting, and issued a press release announcing such nomination.
On August 22, 2021, in light of the receipt of the Nomination Notice, the Board, at the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, voted to (i) remove Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig from the Board’s slate of nominees for the 2021 Annual Meeting, (ii) establish a Proxy Committee of the Board consisting of all members of the Board other than Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig with the authority to approve all matters related to the 2021 Annual Meeting, and (iii) approve the reincorporation of the Company in Delaware and submission of the reincorporation to a vote of the Company’s shareholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting. At no point prior to the submission of the notice of nomination did Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig indicate that they intended to submit a dissident nominee slate for the 2021 Annual Meeting or seek control of the Board, and given that they were included in the Board’s slate for the 2021 Annual Meeting, there was no reason for the Company to believe they would do so.
On August 23, 2021, the Company filed its preliminary proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting and issued a press release in connection with such filing.
Following receipt of the Nomination Notice, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board determined to consider and interview each of the Dissident Nominees consistent with its policies and procedures for considering proposed shareholder nominees, including by conducting interviews of each nominee. In connection with such process, on August 24, 2021, Mr. Panner contacted each of the Dissident Nominees to arrange interviews with the Nominating and Governance Committee and Spencer Stuart, to aid the Board in making its recommendation with respect to the Dissident Nominees. Mr. Rosenzweig, writing on behalf of himself and Mr. Razin, refused to grant the Nominating and Governance Committee access to any of the Dissident Nominees.
On August 25, 2021, Mr. Razin, Mr. Rosenzweig and the Dissident Nominees delinquently filed a beneficial ownership report on Schedule 13D, reporting beneficial ownership by Mr. Razin and Mr. Rosenzweig of 15.2% and less than 1% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, respectively, and the submission of the Nomination of Notice.
Also, on August 25, 2021, the Company received a demand from Mr. Razin to inspect its stockholder list materials pursuant to Section 1600(a) of the California General Corporation Law (“CGCL”) and the Company’s bylaws.
On August 26, 2021, Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig filed their preliminary proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting and issued a press release in connection with such filing.
Also on August 26, 2021, the Company issued a press release noting that Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig had refused to allow the Dissident Nominees to be interviewed by the Nomination and Governance Committee or Spencer Stuart.
Each of the Company and Messrs. Razin and Rosenzweig have since continued to file press releases and soliciting materials in connection with their respective campaigns.
81