QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this documentSCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant /x/
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / / |
Check the appropriate box: |
/ / | | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
/ / | | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). |
/x/ | | Definitive Proxy Statement |
/ / | | Definitive Additional Materials |
/ / | | Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 |
ADAPTEC, INC.
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) |
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/x/ | | No fee required. |
/ / | | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| | (1) | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
| | (2) | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
| | (3) | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
| | (4) | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
| | (5) | | Total fee paid:
|
/ / | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
/ / | | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
| | (1) | | Amount Previously Paid:
|
| | (2) | | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
| | (3) | | Filing Party:
|
| | (4) | | Date Filed:
|
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/DEF 14A/0000912057-01-524246/g808046.jpg)
July 27, 2001
To our stockholders:
You are cordially invited to attend our 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be held at our principal executive offices located at 691 S. Milpitas Blvd., Milpitas, California 95035 on Thursday, August 23, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., local time.
The matters to be acted upon at the meeting are described in detail in the accompanying Notice of Annual Stockholders Meeting and Proxy Statement.
Please use this opportunity to take part in our business by voting on the matters to come before this meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope before the meeting so that your shares will be represented at the meeting. Returning the proxy card does not deprive you of your right to attend the meeting and to vote your shares in person.
We hope to see you at the meeting.
Adaptec, Inc.
691 S. Milpitas Blvd.
Milpitas, California 95035
NOTICE OF ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING
To our stockholders:
Our 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting will be held at our principal executive offices located at 691 S. Milpitas Blvd., Milpitas, California 95035 on Thursday, August 23, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., local time.
At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:
1. The election of seven directors to our Board of Directors, each to serve until our 2002 Annual Stockholders Meeting and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation, death or removal. Our Board of Directors intends to present the following nominees for election as directors:
Carl J. Conti | | Lucie J. Fjeldstad | | Robert N. Stephens |
Victoria L. Cotten | | Ilene H. Lang | | |
John C. East | | Robert J. Loarie | | |
2. A ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent accountants for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2002.
3. To transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Stockholders Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
These items of business are more fully described in the attached Proxy Statement. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on July 9, 2001 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
Milpitas, California
July 27, 2001
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope before the meeting so that your shares will be represented at the meeting.
Adaptec, Inc.
691 S. Milpitas Blvd.
Milpitas, California 95035
PROXY STATEMENT
July 27, 2001
The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Adaptec, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for use at the 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be held at our principal executive offices located at 691 S. Milpitas Blvd., Milpitas, California 95035 on Thursday, August 23, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., local time. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy were first mailed to stockholders on or about July 27, 2001. Our Annual Report for fiscal year 2001 is enclosed with this Proxy Statement.
Record Date; Quorum
Only holders of record of common stock at the close of business on July 9, 2001 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on the record date, we had 99,101,771 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
A majority of the shares outstanding on the record date, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes, which are the votes of shares held of record by brokers as to which the underlying beneficial owners have given no voting instructions, will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting.
Voting Rights; Required Vote
Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held as of the record date. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. Negative votes will not affect the outcome of the election of directors. Approval of proposal No. 2 ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent accountants for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2002 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote that are present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and are voted for or against the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on either of the proposals. The inspector of elections appointed for the meeting will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes for each proposal.
Voting of Proxies
Please complete, date and sign the proxy card and promptly return it in the enclosed envelope or at the Annual Stockholders Meeting. All signed, returned proxy cards that are not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions in the proxy. Returned signed proxy cards that give no instructions as to how they should be voted on a particular proposal will be counted as votes "for" that proposal and as to any other matter that may be properly brought before the meeting. In the case of
1
the election of directors, proxy cards that give no instructions as to how they should be voted will be counted as voted "for" election to the board of each of the nominees presented by the board.
Adjournment of Meeting
If we do not receive sufficient votes in favor of the proposals by the date of the meeting, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments of the meeting to permit solicitation of proxies. Any adjournment would require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting.
Revocability of Proxies
A stockholder may revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted. A proxy may be revoked by signing and returning a proxy with a later date, by delivering a written notice of revocation to Adaptec, Inc., Midtown Station, Post Office Box 886, New York, NY 10138-0707 stating that the proxy is revoked or by attending the meeting and voting in person. The mere presence at the Annual Stockholders Meeting of a stockholder who has appointed a proxy will not revoke the prior appointment. Please note, however, that if a stockholder's shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and that stockholder wishes to vote at the meeting, the stockholder must bring to the meeting a letter from the broker, bank or other nominee confirming the stockholder's beneficial ownership of the shares and that the broker, bank or other nominee is not voting the shares at the meeting.
2
PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
A board of seven directors is to be elected at the Annual Stockholders Meeting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the seven nominees named below, five of whom are presently our directors. B.J. Moore and W. Ferrell Sanders, each of whom are currently members of our Board of Directors, will not stand for reelection. Victoria L. Cotten and Lucie J. Fjeldstad will stand for election to fill the two seats currently held by Messrs. Moore and Sanders.
Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. If any nominee for any reason is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominee as the proxy holder may determine. We are not aware of any nominee who will be unable to or for good cause will not serve as a director. If additional persons are nominated for election as directors, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them in such manner as will assure the election of as many of the nominees listed below as possible. In this event, the specific nominees to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders. The term of office of each person elected as a director will continue until the next Annual Stockholders Meeting or until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.
Directors/Nominees
The names of the nominees, their ages as of the date of this proxy statement and certain information about them are set forth below:
Name of Director
| | Age
| | Principal Occupation
| | Director Since
|
---|
Carl J. Conti | | 63 | | Independent management consultant | | 1995 |
Victoria L. Cotten | | 47 | | Retired | | — |
John C. East | | 56 | | President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Actel Corporation, a manufacturer of field programmable gate arrays | | 1995 |
Lucie J. Fjeldstad | | 57 | | President and Chief Executive Officer of DataChannel, Inc., a software development company | | — |
Ilene H. Lang | | 57 | | Corporate advisor | | 1997 |
Robert J. Loarie | | 58 | | Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., a diversified investment firm | | 1981 |
Robert N. Stephens | | 55 | | President and Chief Executive Officer of Adaptec, Inc. | | 1998 |
Mr. Conti is an independent management consultant. From 1959 to 1991, Mr. Conti held a variety of technical and managerial positions with International Business Machines Corporation, a manufacturer of computer hardware and software, concluding with four years as a Senior Vice President.
Ms. Cotten has been retired since July 2000. From January 1997 to July 2000, Ms. Cotten served as Senior Vice President of the Product Management Division of Ingram Micro, a wholesale distributor of computer hardware, network working equipment and software products. From August 1984 to January 1997, Ms. Cotten held various managerial positions with Ingram Micro.
Mr. East has, since December 1988, served as President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Actel Corporation, a manufacturer of field programmable gate arrays.
3
Ms. Fjeldstad has served as Chief Executive Officer of DataChannel, Inc., a software development company, since September 1999, and as President since October 1998. From July 1997 to October 1998, Ms. Fjeldstad was Chief Executive Officer of her own consulting firm, Fjeldstad International. From March 1995 to July 1997, Ms. Fjeldstad served as President of the Video Division of Tektronics, Inc., a manufacturer of testing equipment, printers and video equipment.
Ms. Lang is a corporate advisor. From May 1999 to May 2000, Ms. Lang served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Individual.com, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Office.com, Inc., a provider of news to corporations. From August 1998 to March 1999, Ms. Lang served as Chief Executive Officer of Essential.com, Inc., an eCommerce company that sells communication and energy services over the Internet. From July 1996 to August 1997, Ms. Lang served as President and Chief Executive Officer of AltaVista Internet Software Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Digital Equipment Corporation, a manufacturer of computer systems. From November 1995 to June 1996, Ms. Lang served as Vice President of the Internet Software Business Unit of Digital Equipment Corporation. From January 1993 to September 1995, Ms. Lang served first as Vice President of International Product Development and, more recently, as Senior Vice President of the Desktop Business Group at Lotus Development Corporation, a software manufacturer.
Mr. Loarie has served as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., a diversified investment firm, since December 1997, and served as a Principal of that company from August 1992 until December 1997. Mr. Loarie also has served as a general partner or a managing member of several venture capital investment partnerships affiliated with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. since August 1992. Prior to that time, Mr. Loarie was a general partner of Weiss, Peck & Greer, an investment management firm, and of several venture capital partnerships affiliated with Weiss Peck & Greer. Mr. Loarie is also a Director of Evolving Systems, Inc. and Websense, Inc.
Mr. Stephens became our Chief Executive Officer in April 1999. Mr. Stephens has served as our President since October 1998, and from November 1995 to March 1999, he was our Chief Operating Officer. From November 1993 until November 1995, Mr. Stephens founded and was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Power I/O, Inc. Mr. Stephens is a director of Roxio, Inc., formally a wholly owned subsidiary of Adaptec.
Board of Directors Meetings and Committees
During fiscal 2001, the Board of Directors met 11 times, including telephone conference meetings. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board on which the director served during the time he or she served.
Standing committees of the Board of Directors include an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee.
Audit Committee. The current members of the Audit Committee are Carl J. Conti, Ilene H. Lang and B.J. Moore. In August 2000, the Board elected Ms. Lang and Mr. Moore to the Audit Committee to replace John G. Adler and Robert J. Loarie. Mr. Adler resigned from the Board of Directors in August 2000. Messrs. Conti, Moore and Ms. Lang are each independent directors as defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Subsequent to the Annual Stockholders Meeting, the Board of Directors will replace Mr. Moore on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met seven times during fiscal 2001. The Audit Committee reviews and monitors our financial statements and accounting practices, makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the selection of independent accountants and reviews the results and scope of the audit and other services provided by our independent accountants.
4
Compensation Committee. The current members of the Compensation Committee are John C. East, Robert J. Loarie and W. Ferrell Sanders. In August 2000, the Board elected Mr. Loarie to the Compensation Committee to replace Ms. Lang. Subsequent to the Annual Stockholders Meeting, the Board of Directors will replace Mr. Sanders on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met four times during fiscal 2001. The Compensation Committee establishes our executive compensation policy, determines the salary and bonuses of our executive officers and recommends to the Board of Directors stock option grants for our executive officers.
Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors elected Robert J. Loarie and John C. East to the Nominating Committee in May 2001 to replace B.J. Moore and W. Ferrell Sanders. The Nominating Committee is responsible for reviewing the qualifications of potential candidates for membership on our Board of Directors and recommending such candidates to the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by management and stockholders. Such recommendations may be delivered in writing to the attention of the Nominating Committee in care of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary at our principal executive offices. The Nominating Committee held no meetings during fiscal year 2001.
Director Compensation
Cash Compensation. Non-employee directors receive $3,000 per fiscal quarter and $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended other than telephonic meetings and are reimbursed for their expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors. The chairmen of the Compensation and Audit Committees receive an additional $5,000 per year as compensation for their services as chairmen. Directors do not receive compensation for committee or telephonic meetings. Employee directors do not receive additional compensation for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors.
Deferred Compensation Program. Non-employee directors may choose to (i) receive their quarterly payment in cash, (ii) defer the payment by investing it in the Adaptec, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan or (iii) elect a combination of (i) and (ii).
1999 Stock Option Plan. In November 2000, Messrs. Conti, East, Loarie, Moore and Sanders and Ms. Lang were each granted options to purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $11.94 per share. These options become vested and exercisable for 25% of the shares subject to the options every six months after the date of grant so long as each such person remains a director.
2000 Director Option Plan. Pursuant to our 2000 Director Option Plan, Messrs. Conti, East, Loarie, Moore and Sanders and Ms. Lang were each granted options to purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock on March 31, 2001 at an exercise price of $8.67 per share. These options become vested and exercisable for 25% of the shares subject to the options for each full quarter after the date of grant so long as each such person remains a director.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF EACH NOMINATED DIRECTOR.
5
PROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We have selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent accountants to perform the audit of our financial statements for our fiscal year ending March 31, 2002, and our stockholders are being asked to ratify our selection. We have engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent accountants since 1995. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the meeting, have the opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit Fees
We estimate that the audit fees owed to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for our fiscal year 2001 audit were approximately $463,000, of which $208,000 had been billed through March 31, 2001.
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
We did not incur any financial information systems design and implementation fees in fiscal 2001.
Software Segment Spin Off Fees
During fiscal 2001, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP significantly contributed to our ability to effectively spin off our Software segment (Roxio, Inc.). We completed the spin off of Roxio on May 11, 2001. We estimate that the fees associated with the spin off owed to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for our fiscal year 2001 were approximately $6,958,000, of which $6,302,000 had been billed through March 31, 2001.
All Other Fees
We estimate that all other fees, primarily for tax and other consulting services, owed to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for fiscal 2001 were approximately $1,451,000, of which $1,419,000 had been billed through March 31, 2001.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP.
6
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table presents information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of July 9, 2001 by:
- •
- each person or entity known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;
- •
- each of our current directors who will continue as our directors after the Annual Stockholders Meeting;
- •
- each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below; and
- •
- all directors and executive officers as a group.
The percentage of beneficial ownership for the table is based on approximately 99,101,771 shares of our common stock outstanding as of July 9, 2001. To our knowledge, except under community property laws or as otherwise noted, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power over their shares of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, each entity or person listed below maintains a mailing address of c/o Adaptec, Inc., 691 S. Milpitas Blvd., Milpitas, California 95035.
The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the stockholder has sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes shares of common stock that the stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days after July 9, 2001 through the exercise of any option or warrant. The percentage ownership of the common stock, however, is based on the assumption, required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported has converted options or warrants into shares of our common stock.
| | Adaptec Shares Beneficially Owned
| |
---|
Name of Beneficial Owner
| | Number of Shares
| | Percent of Shares
| |
---|
Directors and Executive Officers: | | | | | |
| Carl J. Conti(1) | | 74,330 | | * | |
| John C. East(2) | | 62,500 | | * | |
| Ilene H. Lang(3) | | 87,000 | | * | |
| Robert J. Loarie(4) | | 105,104 | | * | |
| Robert N. Stephens(5)(12) | | 148,131 | | * | |
| Robert L. Schultz, Jr.(6)(12) | | 10,566 | | * | |
| David A. Young(7) | | 4,850 | | * | |
| Kenneth B. Arola(8)(12) | | 59,676 | | * | |
| Kok Yong (K.Y.) Lim(9)(12) | | 208,555 | | * | |
| Directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)(10) | | 760,712 | | * | |
5% Stockholders | | | | | |
| AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle, AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle, AXA Conseil Vie Assurance Mutuelle, AXA Courtage Assurance Mutuelle, AXA, AXA Financial, Inc.(11) | | 5,109,451 | | 5.2 | % |
- *
- Less than 1% ownership.
7
- (1)
- Includes options to purchase 57,500 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (2)
- Includes options to purchase 57,500 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (3)
- Includes options to purchase 85,000 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (4)
- Includes options to purchase 57,500 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (5)
- Includes options to purchase 91,250 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (6)
- Includes options to purchase 3,750 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (7)
- Includes options to purchase 3,750 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (8)
- Includes options to purchase 58,750 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (9)
- Includes options to purchase 201,812 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (10)
- Includes options to purchase 616,812 shares of our common stock that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 9, 2001.
- (11)
- Includes 5,108,351 shares held by Alliance Capital Management L.P. ("Alliance"), which were acquired solely for investment purposes on behalf of client discretionary investment advisory accounts, and 1,100 shares held by The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States ("Equitable"). Alliance and Equitable are subsidiaries of AXA Financial, Inc. AXA beneficially holds a majority interest in AXA Financial, Inc. AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle, AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle, AXA Conseil Vie Assurance Mutuelle and AXA Courtage Assurance Mutuelle as a group control AXA. Alliance claims to have sole voting power with respect to 2,072,952 shares, shared voting power with respect to 124,117 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,108,351 shares. Equitable claims to have sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,100 shares. The addresses of AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle, AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle and AXA Conseil Vie Assurance Mutuelle are 370 rue Saint Honore 75001, Paris, France. The address of AXA Courtage Assurance Mutuelle is 26 rue Louis le Grand 75002, Paris, France. The address of AXA is 25 avenue Matignon 75008, Paris, France. The address of AXA Financial, Inc. is 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104. All information regarding these entities is based solely upon the Schedule 13G filed by such entities on February 12, 2001.
- (12)
- Excludes shares of common stock subject to options which were cancelled on June 21, 2001 in connection with our New Grant Program. The New Grant Program allowed our employees, including executive officers and employee directors, to cancel certain options in exchange for the right to receive new options to be granted no sooner than December 22, 2001.
8
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation
The following table presents information about the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to (i) our Chief Executive Officer and (ii) our four other most highly compensated executive officers as of March 31, 2001 whose salary and bonus for fiscal 2001 were more than $100,000. We do not grant stock appreciation rights and have no long-term compensation benefits other than stock options.
Summary Compensation Table
| |
| |
| |
| | Long-Term Compensation Awards(4)
| |
|
---|
| |
| | Annual Compensation
| |
|
---|
Name and Principal Position
| | Fiscal Year
| | Restricted Stock Award(s)
| | Securities Underlying Options
| | All Other Compensation(1)
|
---|
| Salary
| | Bonus
|
---|
Robert N. Stephens, President and Chief Executive Officer | | 2001 2000 1999 | | $
| 647,116 569,288 425,000 | | $
| — 1,200,000 250,000 | | — — — | | 340,000 505,000 330,000 | | $
| 14,945 1,750 1,682 |
Robert L. Schultz, Jr., Chief Operating Officer | | 2001 2000 1999 | | | 398,077 215,384 — | (2)
| | — 350,000 — | | — — — | | 315,000 200,000 — | | | 9,497 378 — |
David A. Young, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary | | 2001 2000 1999 | | | 131,538 — — | (3)
| | 485,118 — — | | — — | | 215,000 — — | | | 6,744 — — |
Kenneth B. Arola, Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer | | 2001 2000 1999 | | | 190,927 172,882 147,228 | | | — 90,000 70,000 | | — — — | | 56,000 10,000 37,000 | | | 9,501 9,021 8,725 |
Kok Yong (K.Y.) Lim, Vice President, Manufacturing | | 2001 2000 1999 | | | 185,958 175,708 163,378 | | | — 198,267 67,133 | | — — — | | 90,000 25,000 28,500 | | | 400 382 347 |
- (1)
- Represents life insurance premiums.
- (2)
- Mr. Schultz's 2000 compensation represents what he earned from his hire date through March 31, 2000.
- (3)
- Mr. Young's 2001 compensation represents what he earned from his hire date through March 31, 2001.
- (4)
- Some of these stock options were cancelled on June 21, 2001 in connection with our New Grant Program. The New Grant Program allowed our employees, including executive officers and employee directors, to cancel certain options in exchange for the right to receive new options to be granted no sooner than December 22, 2001.
Option Grants in Fiscal 2001
The following table sets forth grants of stock options made during fiscal 2001 to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.
Potential realizable values are calculated by:
- •
- Multiplying the number of shares of common stock subject to a given option by the exercise price per share of our common stock on the date of grant;
- •
- Assuming that the aggregate option exercise price derived from that calculation compounds at the annual 5% or 10% rates shown in the table for the entire ten-year term of the option; and
9
- •
- Subtracting from that result the aggregate option exercise price.
The 5% and 10% assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation are required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not reflect our estimate or projections of future stock price growth.
The percentage of total options granted to employees in the last fiscal year is based on options to purchase an aggregate of 13,041,956 shares of common stock granted to employees during fiscal 2001. The options shown in the table were granted under our 1999 Stock Plan. These options were granted at fair market value, are primarily incentive stock options (to the extent permitted under the Internal Revenue Code), are not transferable by the optionee (other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution) and will expire ten years from the date of grant. The options become exercisable at the rate of 12.5% of the shares subject to the option six months after the date of grant and at the rate of 6.25% of the shares subject to the option at the end of each of the next 14 quarters. To the extent exercisable at the time of employment termination, options may be exercised for an additional three months unless termination is the result of total and permanent disability, in which case the options may be exercised within six months following termination, or unless termination is the result of death, in which case all unvested options become vested and all of the individual's outstanding options may be exercisable by the individual's estate or other successor. Options are subject to earlier termination upon termination of the option holder's employment.
Option Grants in Fiscal 2001
| | Individual Grants
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term
|
---|
| | Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted(1)
| | Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal 2001
| |
| |
|
---|
Name
| | Exercise Price Per Share
| | Expiration Date
|
---|
| 5%
| | 10%
|
---|
Robert N. Stephens | | 325,000 15,000 | | 2.49 0.12 | % % | $ $ | 19.06 11.94 | | 5/12/2010 11/22/2010 | | $
| 3,895,688 112,635 | | $
| 9,872,438 285,439 |
Robert L. Schultz, Jr. | | 300,000 15,000 | | 2.30 0.12 | % % | $ $ | 19.06 11.94 | | 5/12/2010 11/22/2010 | | | 3,596,019 112,635 | | | 9,113,019 285,439 |
David A. Young | | 200,000 15,000 | | 1.53 0.12 | % % | $ $ | 14.75 11.94 | | 10/20/2010 11/22/2010 | | | 1,855,239 112,635 | | | 4,701,540 285,439 |
Kenneth B. Arola | | 7,000 14,000 20,000 15,000 | | 0.05 0.11 0.15 0.12 | % % % % | $ $ $ $ | 29.25 20.00 18.06 11.94 | | 4/17/2010 5/9/2010 10/6/2010 11/22/2010 | | | 128,766 176,091 227,157 112,635 | | | 326,319 446,248 575,660 285,439 |
Kok Yong (K.Y.) Lim | | 75,000 15,000 | | 0.58 0.12 | % % | $ $ | 19.06 11.94 | | 5/12/2010 11/22/2010 | | | 899,005 112,635 | | | 2,278,255 285,439 |
- (1)
- Some of these stock options were cancelled on June 21, 2001 in connection with our New Grant Program. The New Grant Program allowed our employees, including executive officers and employee directors, to cancel certain options in exchange for the right to receive new options to be granted no sooner than December 22, 2001.
Option Exercises
The following table presents the number of shares acquired and the value realized upon exercise of stock options during fiscal 2001 by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The table includes the number of shares covered by both exercisable and unexercisable stock options as of March 31, 2001. Also reported are values of "in-the-money" options that represent the
10
positive difference between the exercise price of the outstanding stock option and the fair market value of the shares subject to the option at fiscal year end. The fair market value is based on $8.67 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on March 30, 2001, the last day of trading for fiscal 2001. These values, unlike the amounts in the column entitled "Value Realized," have not been, and may never be, realized.
Aggregate Option Exercises in Fiscal 2001 and Fiscal Year-End Values
| |
| |
| | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Year-End(1)
| |
| |
|
---|
| |
| |
| | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Year-End
|
---|
Name
| | Shares Acquired on Exercise
| | Value Realized
|
---|
| Exercisable
| | Unexercisable
| | Exercisable
| | Unexercisable
|
---|
Robert N. Stephens | | — | | $ | — | | 581,916 | | 761,563 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Robert L. Schultz, Jr. | | — | | $ | — | | 131,250 | | 383,750 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
David A. Young | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 215,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Kenneth B. Arola | | 2,000 | | $ | 26,500 | | 69,937 | | 76,563 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Kok Yong (K.Y.) Lim | | 4,000 | | $ | 6,250 | | 195,124 | | 101,376 | | $ | 9,531 | | $ | — |
- (1)
- Some of these stock options were cancelled on June 21, 2001 in connection with our New Grant Program. The New Grant Program allowed our employees, including executive officers and employee directors, to cancel certain options in exchange for the right to receive new options to be granted no sooner than December 22, 2001.
Change in Control Arrangements
Under our 1990 Stock Plan, 1999 Stock Plan and 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, in the event of a Change in Control, any Options or Rights (as such terms are defined in these plans) outstanding upon the date of such Change in Control shall have their vesting accelerated as to an additional 25% of the shares subject to such Options or Rights as of the date of such Change in Control. In the event an optionee is Involuntarily Terminated Without Cause (as defined in these plans) within 12 months following a Change in Control, any Options or Rights outstanding upon such Change in Control that are not yet exercisable and vested on such date shall become 100% exercisable and vested. Such vesting acceleration may cause part or all of the consideration involved to be treated as a "parachute payment" under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which may subject the recipient thereof to a 20% excise tax and which may not be deductible by the participant's employer.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee currently consists of John C. East, Robert J. Loarie and W. Ferrell Sanders, none of whom has any interlocking relationships as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview and Philosophy
This report on executive compensation is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating this Proxy Statement by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference. Also, it shall not otherwise be deemed soliciting material or filed under these Acts.
11
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors regularly reviews and approves all executive officer pay plans. These include the following compensation elements: base salaries, annual incentives, stock options and various benefit plans.
The Compensation Committee is composed of three independent, non-employee directors. It is the Compensation Committee's objective that executive compensation be directly related to our achievement of our business goals. Specifically, our executive compensation program is designed to reward exceptional executive contribution and performance that result in enhanced corporate, economic and stockholder values over the short and long-term.
The Compensation Committee retains independent compensation consultants to provide objective and expert advice in the review of all executive compensation plans. Published industry pay survey data is also reviewed and relied upon in the Compensation Committee's assessment of appropriate total compensation levels, including the Radford Executive Compensation Report for High Technology Industries and data from a comparable group of companies supplied by the committee's compensation consultant, J. Richard & Co.
The Compensation Committee recognizes that the industry sector and geographical areas in which we operate are both intensely competitive and are continuing to undergo rapid globalization with the result that there is heightened demand for qualified, experienced executive personnel. The Compensation Committee considers it crucial that we be assured of retaining and rewarding our top-caliber executives who are essential to the attainment of our ambitious, long-term, strategic goals.
For these reasons, the Compensation Committee believes our executive compensation arrangements must remain competitive with those offered by other higher performing companies of similar size, scope, performance levels and complexity of operations, including some, but not all, of the companies comprising the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
Annual Cash Compensation (Base Salary, Plus Performance Incentives)
The Compensation Committee believes that annual cash compensation should be paid commensurate with attained performance to plan. For these reasons, our executive cash compensation consists of base compensation (salary) and variable incentive compensation (annual bonus).
Base salaries for executive officers are established considering a number of factors, including our continued, planned, profitable growth; the executive's individual performance and measurable contribution to our success; and pay levels of similar positions with comparable companies in the industry. The Compensation Committee supports our compensation philosophy of moderation for elements such as base salary and benefits. Base salary decisions are made as part of our formal annual review process. Generally, base salaries are maintained at approximately the level of the median salaries of similar, high-technology companies.
Under the Executive Incentive Plan, an executive's incentive performance award generally depends on three performance factors: our overall financial performance; the performance of the business unit or corporate unit/functions the executive is accountable for; and the executive's individual performance. Our performance objectives and those of the business unit or corporate function derive from the board-approved annual business plan that includes specific financial performance targets relating to revenue and profit growth for the fiscal year. The Executive Incentive Plan provides no payment until threshold earnings and revenue targets are met. Long-term strategic goals may also be incorporated for certain executives. Individual executive performance is measured against an annual incentive target that represents a percentage of base salary that the executive can earn as bonus compensation if performance warrants. This target percentage ranges from 85% to 110% of an executive's base salary. The incentive target is set at a higher percentage for more senior officers, with the result that the more senior executive officers have a higher percentage of their potential total cash compensation at risk. If business plans are exceeded, executives can earn additional amounts above the established target levels.
12
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves specific targets, maximums, and performance criteria for each executive officer.
Long-term Incentive: Stock Options
The Compensation Committee approves executive stock options under the 1999 Stock Plan to foster executive officer ownership, to stimulate a long-term orientation in decisions and to provide direct linkage with stockholder interests. The Compensation Committee considers the total compensation package, options previously granted, dilution effects, industry practices and trends, the executive's accountability level, and future potential stock values when granting stock options. The Compensation Committee recommends option grant amounts to provide retention considering projected earnings to be derived from option gains based upon relatively aggressive assumptions related to our growth in revenue and earnings. In this manner, executive option gains closely parallel those of other stockholders. Therefore, the stock option program serves as an effective, cost-efficient and competitive long-term incentive and retention tool for our executives, as well as other employees. The exercise prices of stock options granted to executive officers are equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee believes that our stock option plan has been administered in a manner comparable to our peer group and other high performing companies in the high technology sector. The Compensation Committee also regularly reviews our executive stock purchase/ownership policy to assess progress toward desired ownership levels.
Benefits
We provide benefits to the named executive officers that are generally available to all of our employees. The amount of executive level benefits and perquisites, as determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to executive compensation, did not exceed 10% of total salary for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001 for any executive officer.
Chief Executive Officer Performance and Compensation
In setting Mr. Stephens' base salary for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, the Compensation Committee considered our overall business performance for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000, as well as our market capitalization improvement. Mr. Stephens did not receive a cash bonus for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. Additionally, Mr. Stephens, as well all other executive officers, elected not to accept an increase in base compensation for the year ended March 31, 2002.
The Compensation Committee determines the number of shares of common stock underlying stock options granted to Mr. Stephens after analyzing stock option grants made to chief executive officers of comparable companies, retention effectiveness and the number of stock options previously granted to Mr. Stephens.
Compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
Certain types of compensation are taxable for us under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 only if performance criteria are specified in detail, and payments are contingent on stockholder approval of the compensation arrangement. The 1999 Stock Option Plan complies with the requirements of Section 162(m). In addition, because we did not pay cash compensation in excess of $1,000,000 to any of our executive officers during fiscal 2001, such cash compensation will be tax-deductible under Section 162(m). However, since corporate objectives may not always be consistent with the requirements for full deductibility, it is conceivable that we may enter into compensation arrangements in the future under which payments are not deductible under Section 162(m).
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
John C. East
Robert J. Loarie
W. Ferrell Sanders
13
COMPANY STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE
The stock price performance graph below is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference. Also, it shall not otherwise be deemed soliciting material or filed under these Acts.
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return of our common stock with the cumulative total return on the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.) Index and the Nasdaq Computer and Data Processing Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested in our common stock, the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.) Index and the Nasdaq Computer and Data Processing Index on March 31, 1996 and calculates the annual return through March 31, 2001. The stock price performance shown in the graph below is based on historical data and does not necessarily indicate future stock price performance.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG ADAPTEC, INC., THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S.) INDEX
AND THE NASDAQ COMPUTER & DATA PROCESSING INDEX
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/DEF 14A/0000912057-01-524246/g735293.jpg)
14
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Other than the relationship described below, since April 1, 2000, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $60,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of his or her immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Mr. Loarie is a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and we entered into an engagement letter pursuant to which Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. agreed to provide financial advisory services to us in connection with the spin off of our Software segment (Roxio, Inc.). During fiscal 2001, we estimate that the fees owed by us to Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. were approximately $7,593,000, of which $1,513,000 had been paid through March 31, 2001.
STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS
Our Bylaws provide that only persons nominated by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or by a stockholder who has given timely written notice to our Secretary or Assistant Secretary of Adaptec prior to the meeting will be eligible for election as directors. In all cases, to be timely, notice must be received by us not less than twenty (20) days prior to the meeting; provided, however, if fewer than thirty (30) days notice or prior public disclosure of the meeting date is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the tenth day following the day on which such notice was mailed or such public disclosure was made. In the notice, the stockholder must provide (a) as to each person, whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director: (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of the corporation which are beneficially owned by such person, (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required by law to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors; and (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice: (i) the name and address, as they appear on our books, of such stockholder, (ii) the class and number of shares of our capital stock which are beneficially owned by such stockholder and (iii) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) relating to the nomination.
Our Bylaws also provide that all business which can be conducted at the meeting must be properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual meeting, business must be: (a) as specified in the notice of meeting, or any supplement thereto, given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, (b) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a stockholder. Business to be brought before the meeting by a stockholder shall not be considered properly brought if the stockholder has not given timely notice thereof in writing to our Secretary or Assistant Secretary of Adaptec. To be timely, a stockholder's notice must be delivered to our principal executive offices not less than forty five (45) days prior to the date on which we first mailed proxy materials for the prior year's annual meeting; provided, however, that if our Annual Stockholders Meeting occurs on a date more than thirty (30) days earlier or later than our prior year's annual meeting, then our Board of Directors shall determine a date a reasonable period prior to our Annual Stockholders Meeting by which date the stockholders notice must be delivered and publicize such date in a filing pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or via press release. Such publication shall occur at least ten (10) days prior to the date set by the Board of Directors. A stockholder's notice to the Secretary or Assistant Secretary shall set forth as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting: (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and address of the stockholder
15
proposing such business, (iii) the class and number of shares of our capital stock which are beneficially owned by the stockholder, (iv) any material interest of the stockholder in such business, and (v) any other information that is required by law to be provided by the stockholder in his capacity as proponent of a stockholder proposal.
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
FOR 2002 ANNUAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING
Stockholders are entitled to present proposals for consideration at forthcoming stockholder meetings provided that they comply with the proxy rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and our Bylaws. Stockholders wishing to present a proposal at our 2002 Annual Stockholders Meeting must submit such proposal to us by March 22, 2002 if they wish for it to be eligible for inclusion in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. In addition, under our Bylaws, a stockholder wishing to make a proposal at the 2002 Annual Stockholders Meeting must submit such a proposal to us prior to June 12, 2002.
COMPLIANCE UNDER SECTION 16(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations also require these persons to furnish us with a copy of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of the forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met during fiscal 2001.
OTHER BUSINESS
We know of no other matters to be submitted to the 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the shares they represent as the Board of Directors may recommend.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, date, sign and promptly return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope so that your shares will be represented at the meeting.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The following is the Report of the Audit Committee with respect to our audited financial statements for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The material in this report is not "soliciting material," is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date of this Proxy Statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.
The Audit Committee's purpose is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of our financial accounting, reporting and controls. The Board of Directors, in its business judgment, has determined that all members of the committee are "independent" as required by the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market. The committee operates under a charter, which was formally adopted by the Board of Directors in June 2000 and most recently updated in May 2001. A copy of the current charter is in the Appendix to this Proxy Statement.
16
Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, and internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Our independent accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. The Audit Committee discussed with our independent accountants the overall scope and plans for the audit. The Audit Committee met with the internal and independent accountants, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of Adaptec's financial reporting.
In performing its oversight role, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent accountants. The committee also discussed with the independent accountants the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61,Communication with Audit Committees. The committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,Independence Discussions with Audit Committees. The committee also considered whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent accountants is compatible with maintaining the accountants' independence and has discussed with the accountants the accountants' independence. Based on the review and discussions described in this report, and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the committee referred to below and in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended that the audited financial statements to be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors also recommended, subject to stockholder approval, the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent accountants.
The members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting and are not experts in the fields of accounting or auditing, including in respect of auditor independence. Members of the committee rely without independent verification on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and the independent accountants. Accordingly, the Audit Committee's oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee's considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of our financial statements has been carried out in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is in fact "independent" as required by the Nasdaq National Market.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Carl J. Conti
Ilene H. Lang
B. J. Moore
17
Appendix
CHARTER FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
ADAPTEC, INC.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Adaptec, Inc. (the "Company") shall be:
- •
- to provide oversight and monitoring of Company management and the independent auditors and their activities with respect to the Company's financial reporting process;
- •
- to provide the Company's Board of Directors with the results of its monitoring and recommendations derived therefrom;
- •
- to nominate to the Board of Directors independent auditors to audit the Company's financial statements and oversee the activities and independence of the auditors;
- •
- to provide to the Board of Directors such additional information and materials as it may deem necessary to make the Board of Directors aware of significant financial matters that require the attention of the Board of Directors; and
- •
- to annually review the charter and gain approval of the Board of Directors.
The Audit Committee will undertake those specific duties and responsibilities listed below and such other duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe.
COMPOSITION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
- •
- The Audit Committee members will be appointed by, and will serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.
- •
- The Audit Committee will consists of at least three members of the Board of Directors;
- •
- Each member will be an independent director, in accordance with the Nasdaq National Market Audit Committee requirements;
- •
- Each member will be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, in accordance with the Nasdaq National Market Audit Committee requirements or must be able to do so within a reasonable period of time after his or her appointment to the Audit Committee; and
- •
- At least one member will have past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background, including a current or past position as chief executive or financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities.
RESPONSIBLILITIES:
The responsibilities of the Audit Committee shall include:
- •
- Reviewing the Audit Committee's own structure, process and membership requirements; and
- •
- Reviewing the performance of the independent auditors, who shall be accountable to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee, and providing oversight and monitoring of Company management and the independent auditors and their activities with respect to the Company's financial reporting process;
- •
- Recommending the selection and, where appropriate, replacement of the independent auditors to the Board of Directors;
- •
- Reviewing the independent auditor's proposed audit scope, approach, fee arrangement, and independence;
- •
- Upon completion of annual examination: review with the independent auditors the company's financial statements, the independent auditors report thereon, any other matters related to the conduct of the audit, which are to be communicated to the committee under generally accepted accounting standards, any significant changes required in the audit plan, and any serious difficulties or disputes with management encountered during the audit, and any other matters required to be discussed by Statement on Accounting Standard No. 61;
- •
- Requesting from the independent auditors of a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the auditor, and the Company, consistent with Independent Standards Board Standard No. 1, and engaging in a dialogue with the auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the auditors;
- •
- Review interim financial statements and quarterly earnings press releases with the independent auditors and management prior to public releases and direct the Company's independent auditors to review before filing with the SEC the Company's interim financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, using professional standards and procedures for conduction such reviews;
- •
- Review with management, before release, the audited financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K;
PROXY STATEMENT DISCLOSURES
- •
- A copy of the charter is to be included as an appendix to the Company's proxy statement at least once ever three years;
- •
- Provide an Audit Committee Report in the Company's proxy statement in accordance with the requirements of Item 306 of SEC Regulation S-K and Item 7(e) (3) of Schedule 14A of the SEC's proxy rules;
MEETINGS, MINUTES, AND REPORTS TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
The Audit Committee will meet at least three times per year in addition to the quarterly telephonic review of the financial statements prior to public releases. Meetings may be held telephonically or in person. The Audit Committee may establish its own schedule, which it will provide to the Board of Directors in advance.
The Audit Committee will meet separately with the independent auditors as well as members of the Company's management, as it deems appropriate in order to review the financial controls of the Company.
The Audit Committee will maintain written minutes of its meetings.
Apart from the report prepared pursuant to Item 3067 of Regulation S-K and Item 7(e) (3) of Schedule 14A, the Audit Committee will summarize its examinations and recommendations to the Board from time to time as may be appropriate, consistent with the Committee's charter.
THE PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ADAPTEC, INC.
Adaptec, Inc.
Proxy for 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting
August 23, 2001
The undersigned stockholder(s) of Adaptec, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Stockholders Meeting and Proxy Statement, each dated July 27, 2001, and hereby appoints Robert N. Stephens and David A. Young, and each of them, Proxies and Attorneys-in-Fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the Company's 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be held on August 23, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Company's principal executive offices located at 691 South Milpitas Boulevard, Milpitas, California, 95035 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present on any of the following matters and with discretionary authority as to any and all other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, AND FOR SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AS THE PROXY HOLDERS DEEM ADVISABLE.
^ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ^
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
Please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the Board of Director nominees and FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. | | Please mark your votes as indicated in this example | | /x/ |
| | FOR all nominees listed below (except as indicated). | | WITHHOLD authority to vote for all nominees listed below. |
1. Election of Directors to serve one-year terms. | | / / | | / / |
If you wish to withhold authority for any individual nominee, strike a line through that nominee's name in the list below: |
01 Carl J. Conti | | 02 Victoria L. Cotten | | 03 John C. East |
04 Lucie J. Fjeldstad | | 05 Ilene H. Lang | | 06 Robert J. Loarie |
07 Robert N. Stephens | | | | |
2. To ratify and approve the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2002. | | FOR / / | | AGAINST / / | | ABSTAIN / / |
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. |
(This proxy should be marked, dated and signed by each stockholder exactly as such stockholder's name appears hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. A corporation is requested to sign its name by its President or other authorized officer, with the office held designated. If shares are held by joint tenants or as community property, both holders should sign.)
TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING, PLEASE MARK, SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE.
Signature(s) | | | | Dated | | , 2001 |
| |
| | | |
|
^ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ^
QuickLinks
PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORSPROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTSPRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERSEXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONREPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPANY STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCERELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSSTOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALSDEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2002 ANNUAL STOCKHOLDER MEETINGCOMPLIANCE UNDER SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934OTHER BUSINESSREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEECHARTER FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ADAPTEC, INC.