OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number: 3235-0570
Expires: January 31, 2014
Estimated average burden hours per response...20.6
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-3615
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
550 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Pamela M. Krill
Madison/Mosaic Legal and Compliance Department
550 Science Drive
Madison, WI 53711
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 608-274-0300
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2010
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. s 3507.
Item 1. Report to Shareholders.
ANNUAL REPORT
December 31, 2010
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Investors Fund
Mid-Cap Fund
Small/Mid-Cap Fund
Disciplined Equity Fund
Balanced Fund
(Mosaic logo)
CONTENTS
Special Message from Your Portfolio Managers: On Risk Management | 1 |
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | 2 |
Economic Review | 2 |
Outlook | 3 |
Interview with Jay Sekelsky | 3 |
Investors Fund | 3 |
Mid-Cap Fund | 6 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund | 8 |
Disciplined Equity Fund | 9 |
Balanced Fund | 10 |
Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | 12 |
Portfolio of Investments | |
Investors Fund | 13 |
Mid-Cap Fund | 14 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund | 15 |
Disciplined Equity Fund | 16 |
Balanced Fund | 17 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 19 |
Statements of Operations | 20 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 21 |
Financial Highlights | 23 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 26 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 32 |
Other Information | 33 |
Trustees and Officers | 37 |
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Special Message from Your Portfolio Managers: On Risk Management
Given that one can put a similar amount of check marks in the positive and negative columns regarding the top-down investment landscape, it’s worth reviewing how we invest when faced with uncertainty. For us, it’s important to have an informed view of the macroeconomic world. However, we also recognize that forecasts are almost always wrong. Rather than become attached to any one view, we accept this uncertainty, perhaps hearing some truth in a quotation attributed to Mark Twain that reads, "It’s not what we don’t know that hurts us; it’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so." For us, the critical element is not having precise forecasts of the economy and financial markets or sectors, but in having a strong risk management strategy should unpleasant surprises occur.
One thing that cannot be inferred from just looking at returns is how much risk was taken to achieve them. We feel that we take lower than average risk, and we believe it’s important that our fellow investors understand how we approach risk and uncertainty.
There are many different definitions of risk. Beginning in the 1960’s the academic world has defined risk, according to the capital market pricing model, or "CAPM," as the relative volatility of stock price movements. In other words, the more a stock price moves around in relation to other stocks, the riskier it is purported to be. However, to practitioners, this definition is unsatisfactory. As Warren Buffett asked in his 1993 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, does an investment become riskier if the market offers it to you at a lower price? If we feel we have made a reasonably good estimate for the value of the business, we see a lower stock price as an opportunity rather than a risk.
In contrast with the academic definition of risk we subscribe to a more practical one that will likely feel more pertinent to you. By our definition, investment risk is the likelihood that the underlying value of an investment becomes impaired, thus leading to the unpleasant condition of having to eventually "sell low" after having "bought high."
Our thinking on the dynamics of risk includes the progression noted in the steps below. In our daily work and market observations, this feels like a very recognizable dynamic that affords us opportunities to buy great businesses at very reasonable or sometimes even cheap prices.
A course of events can take many pathways, and people can’t know ahead of time which path will be followed.
Because the future will hold surprises securities will react to the new information by adjusting in price. Investment markets are usually fairly efficient at quickly pricing in new information, but not always to an appropriate degree.
Price adjustments in financial markets often overshoot to the upside and to the downside due to psychological idiosyncrasies that prohibit people from being perfectly rational decision makers.
Since we believe stock market prices and the underlying values of businesses sometimes diverge, we aim to take advantage of these occasional discrepancies by looking to buy a stock for less than its fair value. We expect these discrepancies will be corrected or closed over time.
By thinking about markets and risk in this way, we end up inverting the academic definition of risk. We’re delighted when overreactions in stock prices create buying opportunities. We believe we’re reducing risk if we buy good values offered to us by the market at low or reasonable prices. According to our thinking, the most important risks we take involve our judgments and assessments of the underlying values of the stocks we analyze. The cheaper a stock price in relation to its value, the better the protection we have against both macroeconomic uncertainty and imperfections inherent in our own estimates and analyses.
The final piece to our risk management strategy is to invest in high-quality businesses with what we believe are astute, ethical, and proven management teams. High quality, to us, most often means that our targeted businesses have what we deem are sustainable competitive advantages that enable them to achieve market share gains and exercise pricing power. It also means that management teams have demonstrated the ability to allocate capital well, toward the end of building more profitable businesses over time. These characteristics have lead to our owning stocks with earning profiles that are relatively steady over economic cycles. This steadiness allows us to feel more comfortable in our
Annual Report - 1
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Special Message From Your Portfolio Managers | concluded
estimates of the values of the businesses since the earnings (our valuation inputs) don’t swing wildly.
We believe protection of investor capital in periods of stress and participation in the subsequent upside opportunities, can lead to outperformance over the course of a full business cycle. However, there’s a flipside to this approach, too. That is, when risk is hidden and animal spirits abound, our approach might trail that of those who invest in more speculative stocks. At these times, risks may lie silent for long periods, and no one appears any worse off for venturing up the risk curve. Nonetheless the risks persist, and often are exposed at the most inopportune times.
We’re confident the market will have overreactions that will offer us opportunities to choose from high-quality stocks at low prices in 2011 and beyond. In the meantime, we expect our portfolios of high-quality stocks will benefit from increasing demand commensurate with economic recovery.
Regarding stocks as an asset class, we also feel strongly about the proposition offered by stock ownership today. Leading businesses with competitive advantages offer pricing power as a hedge against future inflation, and earnings that continue to grow from productivity gains. Shareholders, as owners of these businesses, share in the prosperity afforded by innovation and advances in productivity, and benefit from the collective ingenuity of our business, science, and working professionals. We think the case for owning stocks remains strong over the next decade.
As always, we appreciate that you’ve entrusted us with your money, we take our fiduciary responsibility seriously, and we remain invested in the Mosaic Funds with you. We look forward to the prospect of growing our investments together through 2011 and beyond.
Respectfully,
The Madison Mosaic Funds Equity Management Team
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance
ECONOMIC REVIEW
With returns of all the major U.S. stock indices up strongly, 2010 will be remembered as a good year for stock investors. The S&P 500 finished with a total return of 15.1% and mid-cap and small-cap indices outpaced the broader indices, with returns well above 20%. But these returns were mostly a late-year phenomenon and it is easy to forget how rocky returns were for much of the period. After a rally in March and April, investors began to get nervous. The spreading sovereign debt crisis in Europe helped generate widespread fears of a double-dip recession. Throughout much of the summer the S&P 500, widely regarded as the best proxy for the U.S. stock market in general, was showing negative returns for the year.
Just as economic indicators were suggesting that we were more likely to see a muted recovery than a double-dip recession the markets received a significant catalyst from the Federal Reserve, in both words and action. In an Op-Ed piece in the Washington Post published on November 4, Chairman Ben Bernanke explained the Fed’s rationale for introducing a second round of quantitative easing, dubbed QE2, where the Fed committed to purchase another $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by mid-2011. Bernanke essentially linked the Fed’s considerable monetary easing to an anticipated (or at least hoped for) rise in stock prices, which would in turn boost consumer confidence and ultimately spending. It seemed to work in the latter part of 2010, with the S&P 500 advancing 10.8% during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Madison Mosaic’s Equity Trust Funds all produced solid positive returns for the year, ranging from the 8.02% return of Madison Mosaic Balanced to the 21.15% return of Mosaic Mosaic Mid-Cap. However, after showing good relative performance during the market’s mid-year retreat, in the end we could not match the sharp rallies which drove the overall positive returns for the period. This result is consistent with Madison Mosaic’s historic performance and investment discipline, which favors high-quality companies with consistent and predictable earnings. For the year, smaller, lower-quality companies were in favor while more defensive sectors such as Health Care and Consumer Staples were laggards compared with the more traditionally
Annual Report - 2
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | continued
cyclical sectors of Materials, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials.
OUTLOOK
Looking forward, we are encouraged by recent economic data. It would appear that moderate economic growth is in the cards for at least the first half of 2011. Generally, this would be considered a good backdrop for investors. Nonetheless, significant and cautionary macroeconomic issues persist. Housing market data continues to disappoint. European sovereign debt issues remain while domestically, state and local governments struggle to meet their financial obligations. As with past economic recoveries, the economic data will likely be volatile and capital markets will respond similarly. Ironically, one of our current concerns is the level of investor complacency that has rather suddenly returned to the stock market. Current sentiment is strongly bullish, while volatility has declined to near three-year lows; from our perspective, this is cause for some short-term caution.
In light of these lingering macro issues, the question we are constantly asking ourselves is, "where are we being appropriately compensated for the still very real risks that are out there?" In our opinion, the one clear answer to this question is quality. In this economic environment, we’d prefer to own companies with strong free cash flows, high earnings predictability and low volatility. Ideally, we would also be able to purchase these same "best of breed" companies at a discount to the market. As we conclude a volatile 2010 we are encouraged that we do not have to pay up for these "world class" companies; in fact they sport some of the lowest relative valuations in the stock market. From our perspective, this is a terrific opportunity, one we look to capitalize on going forward.
INTERVIEW WITH JAY SEKELSKY
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12100.jpg)
After the deep losses of 2008 and early 2009, investors must have been heartened to see the strong rally that began in March of 2009 continue into 2010. However, as long-time shareholders know, a rapidly rising rally that rewards more cyclical and speculative companies is not the best environment for our investment discipline. As a result, we were not displeased when the market rally paused at several points during the year. We showed good resilience in general when the market took these breathers and when investors seemed to show renewed interest in stock fundamentals. But by the fourth quarter we were back into a steep market rally that seemed to be quite indifferent to company-specific metrics. So in the end 2010 became for us a story of good absolute returns, but trailing relative results. That said, when you look at our funds over the past three years, which is really a full market cycle including the crash of 2008, we feel very good about how well shareholders in Equity Trust funds have weathered what was the worst storm to have hit the market in our lifetimes.
MADISON MOSAIC INVESTORS FUND (MINVX)
FUND-AT-A-GLANCE |
Objective: Madison Mosaic Investors seeks long-term capital appreciation through investments in large growth companies. |
Net Assets: $42.9 million |
Date of Inception: November 1, 1978 |
Ticker: MINVX |
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
Madison Mosaic Investors Fund invests primarily in the common stocks of large-sized U.S. corporations. The fund typically owns 25-40 securities which are selected using our long-held investment discipline of seeking the highest-quality, proven companies and purchasing them when valuations appear advantageous. We follow a rigorous three-step process when evaluating companies. We consider the business model, the management team and the valuation of each potential investment. We strive to purchase securities trading at a discount to their intrinsic value as determined by discounted cash flows. We corroborate this valuation work with additional valuation
Annual Report - 3
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Investors Fund | continued
methodologies. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for the purchase no longer apply, the price exceeds its perceived value or other stocks appear more attractively priced relative to its prospects.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION WITH LEAD EQUITY MANAGER
JAY SEKELSKY
How did the fund perform in 2010?
The Investors Fund ended the year with a gain of 10.44%, trailing our S&P 500 benchmark’s 15.06%. We faced a number of headwinds over this one-year period. While we always favor fundamentally sound, well-managed companies, the market can go through periods where there is less discrimination among stocks and even a preference for highly leveraged, more speculative enterprises. Such was the case for much of the trailing period. While we tend to own companies at the upper end of Standard & Poor’s quality rankings, in 2010 companies rated A+ and A by S&P trailed every other S&P quality category and returned half of the lowest category, C&D. Our stock selection discipline which includes a strong valuation screen, looks at companies one at a time. This process led us to above-benchmark weightings in Health Care, Consumer Staples and Information Technology, sectors which all trailed the benchmark in 2010. While it is harder to make generalizations of the sources of return of the fund’s peer group, it was a period where managers hewing closer to the standard large-cap benchmarks would have outperformed our results, while it was also possible to be rewarded for owning a higher percentage of more speculative or smaller companies. We found many of the best investment opportunities among very large domestic companies during a period when the top 20 largest companies in the S&P 500 underperformed as a group. Four of our top ten holdings were among these large companies (Microsoft, Google, IBM and Johnson & Johnson) and all underperformed the market.
Have you made any significant changes to the portfolio since December 31, 2009?
As bottom-up stock pickers we’re less thematic and more opportunistic. Because we seek companies with significant competitive advantages which we expect to be long term, and because we aren’t shifting the portfolio to reflect macro trends, we tend to make changes more gradually than some other managers. In 2010 we had turnover of 41%, close to our historic norm. This level of turnover implies that while we didn’t make drastic changes, there were shifts of note. For instance, Technology became the largest weight in our portfolio. It started the year at about 17% and by year-end we were up to about 23%. Again, not because we decided that the Technology Sector was the most promising as a general theme, but because we found the most attractive companies and valuations there. Meanwhile, Health Care was a fairly high weighting at the start of the year, at about 20%. It ended the period closer to 16.8% of the portfolio. We had found some compelling valuations in this sector as the market reacted to the impact of health care reform. We felt that those concerns did not apply globally to the sector, which produced some good buying opportunities. Many of those stocks rebounded over the course of the year and we sold into that rally. We started with a low weight in the consumer discretionary area and it continued to go down as the year unfolded, since it was difficult to find valuations there that met our criteria.
We added two strong-conviction names to our top-ten holdings over the period and both were additive to performance in 2010. We consider Chevron the best positioned of the integrated oil producers, with strong production coming online and good prospects for additional production. The company also benefited from the rise in oil prices over the course of the period. The second addition to our largest holdings is U.S. Bancorp, a well managed, profitable bank which avoided the excesses of the credit crisis which crippled many other large banking operations. U.S Bancorp has a diversified and attractive business mix that provides a less cyclical earnings stream and requires less capital intensity than many competitors. Their positive brand, business model, business investments, and underwriting discipline should allow them to gain market share and succeed despite a difficult economic environment.
What factors were the strongest contributors to fund performance?
Although 2010 was a strong year for stocks, there was wide disparity in results by sector, with the strongest S&P 500 sector, Consumer Discretionary, outperforming the worst, Health Care, by some 25%. As a result, sector allocation proved to be an important factor in relative returns. We had strong returns from our three consumer discretionary
Annual Report - 4
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Investors Fund | continued
holdings, Target, Walt Disney and Yum! Brands. Despite having a slightly lower-than-index weighting in financial stocks, our holdings produced returns greater than their S&P sector.
On an individual stock basis, the greatest contribution to our positive returns came from Technology holding Qualcomm, Consumer Discretionary’s Yum!Brands, and Financial Sector’s Berkshire Hathaway. We also were rewarded for owning Energy Sector stocks Schlumberger and Chevron, and retailers Costco and Target.
What factors were the largest constraints on performance?
Four S&P 500 sectors outperformed the overall index, and we were underweighted in three of them: Materials, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. The fourth best performing sector was Energy, and although we had a slight overweighting, our emphasis on drilling and natural gas companies produced returns below the sector average. At the same time, we had a significant overweighting to Health Care, a sector which as a whole was barely positive for the year. Even though our stock selection was relatively strong, it was not enough to overcome the market’s general disdain for the entire sector over health care reform concerns. In an up market, holding cash is always a performance dampener when compared to a cash-free index, and this was the case in 2010.
On an individual security level the laggards were Health Care holding Quest Diagnostics which we sold in the later part of the period, Technology’s EMC Corporation, which we also sold during the period, Health Care holding Covance, tech giant Microsoft and Energy Sector holding Noble Corporation.
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/10 | |
Consumer Discretionary | 4.6% |
Consumer Staples | 14.8% |
Energy | 12.8% |
Financials | 15.8% |
Health Care | 16.8% |
Industrials | 7.9% |
Information Technology | 23.0% |
Cash & Other | 4.3% |
TOP TEN STOCK HOLDINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
% of net assets | |
Microsoft Corp. | 4.04% |
Cisco Systems Inc. | 3.73% |
Google Inc., Class A | 3.64% |
International Business Machines Corp. | 3.57% |
Johnson & Johnson | 3.47% |
PepsiCo Inc./NC | 3.38% |
Chevron Corp. | 3.36% |
US Bancorp | 3.26% |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 3.14% |
3M Co. | 3.10% |
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT1.2
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12101.jpg)
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
Annual Report - 5
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Mid-Cap Fund | continued
MADISON MOSAIC MID-CAP FUND (GTSGX)
FUND-AT-A-GLANCE |
Objective: Madison Mosaic Mid-Cap seeks long-term capital appreciation through the investment in mid-sized growth companies. |
Net Assets: $159.4 million |
Date of Inception: July 21, 1983 |
Ticker: GTSGX |
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
Madison Mosaic Mid-Cap Fund invests primarily in the common stocks of mid-sized U.S. corporations. The fund typically owns 25-40 securities which are selected using our long-held investment discipline of seeking the highest-quality, proven companies and purchasing them when valuations appear advantageous. We follow a rigorous three-step process when evaluating companies. We consider the business model, the management team and the valuation of each potential investment. We strive to purchase securities trading at a discount to their intrinsic value as determined by discounted cash flows. We corroborate this valuation work with additional valuation methodologies. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for the purchase no longer apply, the price exceeds its perceived value or other stocks appear more attractively priced relative to its prospects.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION WITH RICH EISINGER, CO-MANAGER OF MADISON MOSAIC MID-CAP
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12102.jpg)
Given the amount of risk incurred, we were content with our strong absolute returns in 2010. While we are never pleased to trail our benchmark, given the market environment and our style of investment, a 21.15% was a strong absolute number and a reasonable relative one. Our benchmark, the Russell Midcap¨ Index, returned 25.48% while the broader market, as measured by the S&P 500, was up 15.06%. Overall, this was a period in which smaller market-cap stocks in the Mid-Cap Index beat larger market stocks, the stocks of cyclical companies beat more predictable companies and lower-quality stocks outperformed higher-quality companies. Our discipline and holdings put us on the wrong side of each of these trends as we favor more predictable, high-quality businesses. However, when we did enter periods where we saw more investor concerns, as during the mid-year downturn, our stocks did decidedly better. In the end, we look back at 2010 as a year during which our investment style was out of favor. However, we believe we are in the late innings of a lower quality, speculative rally. As in previous recoveries, the market should eventually favor the higher-quality, solid businesses we prefer for the long run.
Did you make any significant changes to the portfolio since December 31, 2009?
While the market ended the year well ahead of its starting point, it wasn’t a smooth ride. When we reported at mid-year the fund and Russell Midcap¨ Index were negative for the first six months of the year. A volatile market often produces opportunities.
Our sector exposure showed some significant shifts over the year as we decreased our Consumer Discretionary exposure from 17.7% to 14.1%, saw our stake in financial firms grow from 17.3% to 24.3%, and our Technology Sector increased from 2.2% to 12.2%. As always, these shifts were not the result of top-down sector calls, but a result of company-by-company analysis as we seek the strongest possible holdings at reasonable valuations. That said, bottom-up stock selection often reveals macro trends, and it was no coincidence that we pared our Consumer Discretionary exposure; the sector that led the market in 2010. Meanwhile, the Technology Sector had below-market performance for the year and we were able to find some compelling valuations in this area of the economy.
We also had significant continuity across the year as seven of our 10 top holdings, which represented over one-third of our assets at year end, were stocks we held a year ago. The three new holdings in our top 10 are FLIR Systems, a company which specializes in thermal visioning technology and a firm we have held in the past, Brown & Brown, a leading insurance broker, and Arch Capital Group, a worldwide insurance and reinsurance company.
Annual Report - 6
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Mid-Cap Fund | continued
What factors were the strongest contributors to fund performance?
In terms of absolute return, our strongest performing stocks tended to line up with the leading sectors of Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Relative to our Index, we had excellent returns in the Financial, Consumer Staples, and Technology Sectors. Our top performing individual securities included Brookfield Asset Management, whose stock was up over 53% for the year, and two stocks which we sold during the period, Expeditors International of Washington which reached our price target, and technology firm Teradata. Two of our stronger relative contributors came from the Consumer Discretionary Sector, Interactive Data Corporation which supplies financial data to investment firms, and international cable provider Liberty Global.
What factors were the largest constraints on performance?
As a manager whose discipline leads us to reliable, steady companies, a year where cyclical sectors and stocks were favored is almost always a challenging one. We were particularly week in our Energy Sector holdings, as our holdings suffered from the indirect effects of the Gulf oil spill and from lower natural gas pricing. Our preference for steadier companies among our industrial holdings was a detriment and as always during a stock rally, our cash position was a constraint.
In terms of individual holdings, off-shore driller Noble Corporation was negatively impacted by the Gulf oil spill and its consequences, and its stock had a negative return in a period in which the Energy Sector as a whole was positive. Another similar result was seen from Southwestern Energy Company whose fortunes were tied to the sliding prices of natural gas. A slow recovery in the dental markets hurt Health Care holding Dentsply, while long-time holding Markel had below-market returns on weak insurance pricing and low investment yields in its investment portfolio.
What do you see for Mid-Cap looking ahead to 2011?
The mid-cap asset class has had tremendous relative performance over the last decade, a trend which suggests moderating future returns. As the period progressed we found better values toward the higher end of the mid-cap market-cap spectrum. This suggests that at some point the smaller cap stocks should take a pause. We believe there is good value towards the higher end of the spectrum in our universe.
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/10 | |
Consumer Discretionary | 14.1% |
Consumer Staples | 3.9% |
Energy | 7.2% |
Financials | 24.3% |
Health Care | 15.3% |
Industrials | 15.7% |
Information Technology | 12.2% |
Materials | 2.5% |
Cash & Other | 4.8% |
TOP TEN STOCK HOLDINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
% of net assets | |
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 5.09% |
Copart Inc. | 3.99% |
Techne Corp. | 3.90% |
Markel Corp. | 3.86% |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings | 3.40% |
DENTSPLY International Inc. | 3.34% |
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. | 3.08% |
FLIR Systems Inc. | 3.00% |
Brown & Brown Inc. | 2.99% |
Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 2.94% |
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT1.2
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12103.jpg)
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
Annual Report - 7
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Small/Mid-Cap Fund | continued
MADISON MOSAIC SMALL/MID-CAP FUND (MADMX)
FUND-AT-A-GLANCE |
Objective: Madison Mosaic Small/Mid-Cap seeks long-term capital appreciation through the investment in small and mid-sized growth companies. |
Net Assets: $1.8 million |
Date of Inception: December 31, 2008 |
Ticker: MADMX |
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
Madison Mosaic Small/Mid-Cap Fund invests primarily in the common stocks of small-to-mid-sized U.S. corporations. The fund typically owns 40-80 securities which are selected using our long-held investment discipline of seeking the highest-quality, proven companies and purchasing them when valuations appear advantageous. We follow a rigorous three-step process when evaluating companies. We consider the business model, the management team and the valuation of each potential investment. We strive to purchase securities trading at a discount to their intrinsic value as determined by discounted cash flows. We corroborate this valuation work with additional valuation methodologies. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for the purchase no longer apply, the price exceeds its perceived value or other stocks appear more attractively priced relative to its prospects.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
Madison Mosaic Small/Mid-Cap Fund returned 18.42% for the year, a solid absolute number, although it trailed the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 2500¨ Index, which was up 26.71% for the year. As was true of Madison Mosaic Mid-Cap, the fund had a hard time overcoming the fundamental trends of the market rally that began in 2009 and continued, with a couple notable pauses, in 2010. This rally was led by highly leveraged, cyclical and lower-quality companies, while our discipline is designed to emphasize just the opposite.
The fund kept up with the hot Consumer Discretionary Sector, thanks to strong returns form AutoZone, Yum!Brands, Lamar Advertising, and Lumber Liquidators. Our overall picks were able to overcome disappointing returns from Sears Holdings and ITT Educational Services. While we added value with our financial holdings, we lagged in the more cyclical sectors of Energy, Industrials and Materials, where we tend to lean towards the steadier companies rather than the volatile ones which led the market. Brookfield Asset Management led our Financial Sector returns, while three Industrial Sector holdings, Fastenal, Wabtec and Expeditors International had great years.
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/10 | |
Consumer Discretionary | 13.0% |
Consumer Staples | 3.1% |
Energy | 8.0% |
Financials | 19.8% |
Health Care | 12.0% |
Industrials | 12.3% |
Information Technology | 11.2% |
Materials | 3.1% |
Telecommunication Services | 1.9% |
Cash & Other | 15.6% |
TOP TEN STOCK HOLDINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
% of net assets | |
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 2.68% |
Copart Inc. | 2.57% |
DENTSPLY International Inc. | 2.47% |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings | 2.25% |
iShares Gold Trust | 2.12% |
FLIR Systems Inc. | 2.11% |
Techne Corp. | 2.07% |
Markel Corp. | 2.02% |
Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 1.97% |
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. | 1.97% |
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT1.2
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12104.jpg)
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
Annual Report - 8
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Disciplined Equity Fund | continued
MADISON MOSAIC DISCIPLINED EQUITY (MADEX)
FUND-AT-A-GLANCE |
Objective: Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity seeks long-term growth with diversification among all equity market sectors. |
Net Assets: $99.0 million |
Date of Inception: December 31, 1997 |
Ticker: MADEX |
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund invests primarily in the common stocks of large-sized U.S. corporations. The fund seeks to maintain an overall sector weighting in line with the broader market, with quarterly rebalancing. The fund typically owns 50-70 securities which are selected using our long-held investment discipline of seeking the highest-quality, proven companies and purchasing them when valuations appear advantageous. We follow a rigorous three-step process when evaluating companies. We consider the business model, the management team and the valuation of each potential investment. We strive to purchase securities trading at a discount to their intrinsic value as determined by discounted cash flows. We corroborate this valuation work with additional valuation methodologies. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for the purchase no longer apply, the price exceeds its perceived value or other stocks appear more attractively priced relative to its prospects.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION WITH JAY SEKELSKY
How would you characterize the performance of the Disciplined Equity Fund for the period?
Against the fund’s benchmark S&P 500’s return of 15.06%, Disciplined Equity showed a modest return of 9.58%. While we continue to believe that our discipline will lead to excellent performance over time, it was not rewarded this year, when lower-quality, smaller and more speculative stocks led the market.
Have you made any significant changes to the portfolio since December 31, 2009?
As in the past, our equity positions are concentrated in large-cap companies which retain a leadership position in their industries and have shown the ability to produce predictable earnings over time.
Although the management team’s objective is to maintain relative sector neutrality against the S&P 500, we are dedicated to actively managing a select group of stocks within each of these sectors. At the beginning of the period the fund had 57 holdings and at the end of the period it held 55. Our goal is to own the highest quality companies we can in each sector of the market, a judgment made on an array of business metrics that boil down to a combination of attractive valuation and the ability to produce consistent, predictable earnings going forward. In many cases, this means selling a stock and replacing it with another we feel has greater potential. This is what we did, for example, in the Consumer Discretionary Sector as we sold AutoZone as it reached what we considered full valuation and ITT Educational Services when our projections for the company’s growth no longer seemed valid. We added advertising agency Omnicom Group as an industry leader poised to benefit from an improving economy and increased ad spending and retailer Staples, which we consider a high-quality company which was available at an attractive valuation.
What factors had the largest impact on this period’s performance?
All S&P 500 sectors were positive for the year, but there was quite a bit of disparity in return, with Consumer Discretionary leading Health Care by some 25%. This phenomenon was also true within sectors and performance varied widely depending on your holdings. We had excellent returns from our Financial Sector holdings as quality remained on investors’ minds as we still felt echoes of the 2008 credit crisis. While we maintained market-like exposure to the cyclical sectors, our high-quality bias was not additive during this period. In fact, most of our underperformance was in the cyclical sectors, notably Industrials and Energy where the more volatile cyclicals had the performance edge over our steadier choices. We also had individual security disappoints in our energy stocks, as driller Noble Corporation underperformed due to the Gulf oil spill and its consequences and Southwestern Energy Company underperformed due to the weakness of natural gas pricing. As is always the case in an up market, our cash position was a detriment when compared to the cash-free benchmark.
Annual Report - 9
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Disciplined Equity Fund | continued
In terms of individual stocks, among the fund’s best relative performers were technology holding Qualcomm, ConocoPhillips, and Berkshire Hathaway.
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/10 | |
Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% |
Consumer Staples | 10.4% |
Energy | 11.3% |
Financials | 15.5% |
Health Care | 11.2% |
Industrials | 10.2% |
Information Technology | 18.4% |
Materials | 2.9% |
Telecommunication Services | 2.2% |
Utilities | 3.1% |
Cash & Other | 4.6% |
TOP TEN STOCK HOLDINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
% of net assets | |
Microsoft Corp. | 3.36% |
Chevron Corp. | 2.91% |
Google Inc., Class A | 2.88% |
International Business Machines Corp. | 2.75% |
3M Co. | 2.61% |
Cisco Systems Inc. | 2.36% |
US Bancorp | 2.28% |
PepsiCo Inc./NC | 2.19% |
AT&T Inc. | 2.16% |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 2.10% |
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT1.2
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12105.jpg)
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
MADISON MOSAIC BALANCED (BHBFX)
FUND-AT-A-GLANCE |
Objective: Madison Mosaic Balanced seeks to provide substantial current dividend income while providing opportunity for capital appreciation by investing in a combination of mid-to-large companies and government agency and investment grade corporate bonds. |
Net Assets: $12.3 million |
Date of Inception: December 18, 1986 |
Ticker: BHBFX |
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
Madison Mosaic Balanced Fund invests primarily in the common stocks of large-sized U.S. corporations along with an actively managed portfolio of investment-grade intermediate-term bonds. The bond exposure is targeted to be at least 30% of the fund’s total assets. The fund typically owns 25-40 securities on the stock side which are selected using our long-held investment discipline of seeking the highest-quality, proven companies and purchasing them when valuations appear advantageous. Bonds are managed to seek the best risk-adjusted return through active management of sectors (corporate, Treasury and Agency), duration, and yield-curve positioning.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION WITH JAY SEKELSKY
AND PAUL LEFURGEY.
How did the Balanced Fund perform for the year?
The Balanced Fund rose 8.02% for the year, a return which reflects the fund’s risk management. The S&P 500 rose 15.06% during the period while the Barclays Capital Intermediate Government Credit Index was up 5.89%. This one-year period was one in which riskier assets in both stocks and bonds led the market, and the peer group has shown historical performance which indicates a higher risk
Annual Report - 10
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Balanced Fund | continued
profile than Mosaic’s. Madison Mosaic Balanced is managed with the belief that shareholders in the fund are primarily interested in participating in up markets while receiving protection in down markets. As a result we avoided the more speculative edges of both the stock and bond markets in a year in which smaller, lower-quality stocks outperformed, as did riskier bond assets. Mosaic Balanced held the stocks of larger, established companies and a bond portfolio heavily favoring high-quality issuance and duration that was shorter, and thus more conservative, than the widely used benchmark, Barclays Capital Government/Credit Bond Index.
Have you made any significant changes to the portfolio since December 31, 2009?
The stock holdings of Balanced mirror the holdings of Mosaic Investors, as discussed above. These holdings continue to focus on solid, well-established domestic companies that have proven their earning ability through difficult times. One of the factors in our management of Balanced is the mix of stocks and bonds, with 70% being the highest allowable percentage of stocks. We began the period holding a 64.4% allocation to stocks and ended the period with a similar 65.4% exposure, a sign that we consider the potential returns of stocks to show greater prospects than those of bonds over the upcoming months.
On the bond side, we kept our relatively high exposure to corporate bonds, 16.9% at the end of period compared to 17.8% at the beginning. We continue to favor the higher yield of high-quality corporate bonds over similar maturity government issuance. However, in both corporate and government issuance we are favoring shorter durations, a stance which would be beneficial if intermediate-term interest rates were to rise, a scenario we consider likely over the next annual period.
How did the stock holdings in Balanced contribute to overall performance?
The stock holdings in Balanced were solidly positive for the year, but the fund’s holdings could not keep up with the benchmark S&P 500. The holdings mirror the stocks held in Mosaic Investors, discussed at some length above.
How did the bond holdings in Balanced contribute to overall performance?
Bond management produced widely divergent results in 2010, with exceptional returns for the riskiest corporate bonds. Our bonds produced positive returns for the portfolio, but did not match the broader market. We benefited from avoiding higher-risk securities when uncertainty and fear took center stage mid-year, but as the risk trade resumed, our bond holdings could not keep pace with the rapid upswing of lower quality bonds or portfolios with significant exposure to these bonds.
COMMON STOCK ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
Consumer Discretionary | 3.1% |
Consumer Staples | 10.3% |
Energy | 8.8% |
Financials | 10.7% |
Health Care | 11.5% |
Industrials | 5.3% |
Information Technology | 15.7% |
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT BLEND AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
Common Stocks | 65.4% |
Corporate Bonds | 16.9% |
Government Bonds | 15.2% |
Cash & Other | 2.5% |
TOP FIVE STOCK AND FIXED INCOME HOLDINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
% of net assets | |
Top Five Stock Holdings (65.4% of net assets in stocks) | |
Microsoft Corp. | 2.88% |
Cisco Systems Inc. | 2.47% |
Google Inc., Class A | 2.47% |
International Business Machines Corp. | 2.45% |
PepsiCo Inc./NC | 2.40% |
% of net assets | |
Top Five Fixed Income Holdings (32.1% of net assets in fixed income) | |
U.S. Treasury Note, 1%, 7/31/11 | 3.28% |
U.S. Treasury Note, 3.125%, 10/31/16 | 2.55% |
U.S.Treasury Note, 3.75%, 11/15/18 | 1.61% |
Federal Home Loan Bank, 5.5%, 8/13/14 | 1.40% |
Freddie Mac, 4.875%, 11/15/13 | 1.36% |
Annual Report - 11
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance • Balanced Fund | concluded
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT1.2
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12106.jpg)
The primary benchmark is changing from the Value Line Geometric Index to the Barclays Capital Intermediate Government Credit Index and S&P 500 Index. See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
NOTES TO MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
1This chart compares a $10,000 investment made in the fund to a $10,000 investment made in the index. |
2Past performance is not predictive of future performance. The above graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or redemption of fund shares and assumes all dividends have been reinvested. |
BENCHMARK DESCRIPTIONS
The Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond Index measures the performance of United States dollar-denominated United States Treasuries, government-related and investment-grade United States corporate securities that have a remaining maturity of greater than or equal to one year and less than 10 years.
The Russell Midcap Index measures the performance of the mid-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell Midcap Index is a subset of the Russell 1000¨ Index. It includes approximately 800 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The S&P 500 Index is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of 500 of the largest companies in the United States as measured by market capitalization. Neither index reflects any investment management fees or transaction expenses, nor the effects of taxes, fees or other charges.
The Russell 2500¨ Index measures the performance of the small to mid-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe, commonly referred to as "smid" cap. The Russell 2500¨ Index is a subset of the Russell 3000¨ Index. It includes approximately 2500 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Index does not reflect any investment management fees or transaction expenses, nor the effect of taxes, fees or other charges.
The S&P 500 Index is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of 500 of the largest companies in the United States as measured by market capitalization. Neither index reflects any investment management fees or transaction expenses, nor the effects of taxes, fees or other charges.
The Value Line Geometric Index is an equally weighted and geometrically averaged index based on the price changes of the 1,650 stocks in the Index. The Index does not reflect any investment management fees or transaction expenses, nor the effect of taxes, fees or other charges.
Annual Report - 12
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Investors Fund • Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
COMMON STOCK - 95.7% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 4.6% | ||
Target Corp. | 21,080 | $ 1,267,540 |
Walt Disney Co./The | 19,005 | 712,878 |
1,980,418 | ||
Consumer Staples - 14.8% | ||
Coca-Cola Co./The | 12,713 | 836,134 |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 13,355 | 964,365 |
Diageo PLC-Sponsored ADR | 13,677 | 1,016,611 |
Kraft Foods Inc., Class A | 31,255 | 984,845 |
PepsiCo Inc./NC | 22,192 | 1,449,803 |
Walgreen Co. | 27,835 | 1,084,452 |
6,336,210 | ||
Energy - 12.8% | ||
Apache Corp. | 8,565 | 1,021,204 |
Chevron Corp. | 15,800 | 1,441,750 |
Noble Corp.* | 21,530 | 770,128 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 15,451 | 1,290,159 |
Southwestern Energy Co.* | 25,823 | 966,555 |
5,489,796 | ||
Financials - 15.8% | ||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 44,593 | 1,346,708 |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class B* | 8,860 | 709,775 |
Franklin Resources Inc. | 10,932 | 1,215,748 |
Markel Corp.* | 2,911 | 1,100,736 |
US Bancorp | 51,790 | 1,396,776 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 33,033 | 1,023,693 |
6,793,436 | ||
Health Care - 16.8% | ||
Johnson & Johnson | 24,089 | 1,489,906 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 12,719 | 1,118,254 |
Merck & Co. Inc. | 34,980 | 1,260,679 |
Novartis AG-ADR | 20,533 | 1,210,420 |
St. Jude Medical Inc.* | 25,975 | 1,110,431 |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 28,499 | 1,029,099 |
7,218,789 | ||
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
Industrials - 7.9% | ||
3M Co. | 15,401 | $ 1,329,106 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.* | 17,515 | 803,063 |
Waste Management Inc. | 33,495 | 1,234,961 |
3,367,130 | ||
Information Technology - 23.0% | ||
Cisco Systems Inc.* | 79,079 | 1,599,768 |
Google Inc., Class A* | 2,630 | 1,562,141 |
Intel Corp. | 59,905 | 1,259,802 |
International Business Machines Corp. | 10,438 | 1,531,881 |
Microsoft Corp. | 62,089 | 1,733,525 |
QUALCOMM Inc. | 21,510 | 1,064,530 |
Visa Inc., Class A | 15,700 | 1,104,966 |
9,856,613 | ||
Total Common Stock (Cost $35,774,822) | 41,042,392 | |
Repurchase Agreement - 4.3% | ||
With U.S. Bank National Association issued 12/31/10 at 0.01%, due 1/3/11, collateralized by $1,890,491 in Freddie Mac MBS Pool #E01424 due 8/1/18. Proceeds at maturity are $1,853,423 (Cost $1,853,422) | 1,853,422 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.0% (Cost $37,628,244) | 42,895,814 | |
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - | (14,135) | |
TOTAL ASSETS - 100.0% | $ 42,881,679 |
* | Non-income producing |
ADR | American Depository Receipt |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 13
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Mid-Cap Fund • Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
COMMON STOCK - 95.2% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 14.1% | ||
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.* | 99,815 | $ 4,905,908 |
CarMax Inc.* | 91,284 | 2,910,134 |
Liberty Global Inc., Class C* | 92,169 | 3,123,607 |
Omnicom Group Inc. | 100,790 | 4,616,182 |
TJX Cos. Inc. | 91,855 | 4,077,443 |
Yum! Brands Inc. | 57,030 | 2,797,322 |
22,430,596 | ||
Consumer Staples - 3.9% | ||
Brown-Forman Corp., Class B | 43,869 | 3,054,160 |
McCormick & Co. | 68,140 | 3,170,554 |
6,224,714 | ||
Energy - 7.2% | ||
EOG Resources Inc. | 36,845 | 3,368,001 |
Noble Corp.* | 128,770 | 4,606,103 |
Southwestern Energy Co.* | 93,720 | 3,507,940 |
11,482,044 | ||
Financials - 24.3% | ||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.* | 53,175 | 4,682,059 |
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 243,751 | 8,114,471 |
Brown & Brown Inc. | 199,400 | 4,773,636 |
Leucadia National Corp. | 157,805 | 4,604,750 |
Markel Corp.* | 16,260 | 6,148,394 |
SEI Investments Co. | 164,779 | 3,920,092 |
T Rowe Price Group Inc. | 49,682 | 3,206,476 |
WR Berkley Corp. | 122,201 | 3,345,863 |
38,795,741 | ||
Health Care - 15.3% | ||
Covance Inc.* | 78,587 | 4,040,158 |
CR Bard Inc. | 37,355 | 3,428,068 |
DENTSPLY International Inc. | 155,984 | 5,329,973 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 61,642 | 5,419,565 |
Techne Corp. | 94,711 | 6,219,671 |
24,437,435 | ||
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
Industrials - 15.7% | ||
Copart Inc.* | 170,323 | $ 6,361,565 |
IDEX Corp. | 104,764 | 4,098,368 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.* | 77,435 | 3,550,395 |
Ritchie Bros Auctioneers Inc. | 130,408 | 3,005,904 |
Wabtec Corp./DE | 63,214 | 3,343,388 |
Waste Management Inc. | 123,975 | 4,570,958 |
24,930,578 | ||
Information Technology - 12.2% | ||
Amphenol Corp., Class A | 61,151 | 3,227,551 |
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. | 187,324 | 4,108,015 |
Factset Research Systems Inc. | 34,216 | 3,208,092 |
FLIR Systems Inc.* | 161,000 | 4,789,750 |
Western Union Co./The | 220,090 | 4,087,071 |
19,420,479 | ||
Materials - 2.5% | ||
Ecolab Inc. | 78,000 | 3,932,760 |
Total Common Stock (Cost $122,291,780) | 151,654,346 | |
Repurchase Agreement - 3.5% | ||
With U.S. Bank National Association issued 12/31/10 at 0.01%, due 1/3/11, collateralized by $5,745,041 in Freddie Mac MBS Pool #E01424 due 8/1/18. Proceeds at maturity are $5,632,395 (Cost $5,632,390) | 5,632,390 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 98.7% (Cost $127,924,170) | 157,286,736 | |
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 1.3% | 2,126,657 | |
TOTAL ASSETS - 100.0% | $159,413,393 |
*Non-income producing
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 14
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Small/Mid-Cap Fund • Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
COMMON STOCK - 84.4% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 13.0% | ||
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.* | 690 | $ 33,913 |
CarMax Inc.* | 954 | 30,414 |
Lamar Advertising Co., Class A* | 760 | 30,278 |
Lumber Liquidators Holdings Inc.* | 845 | 21,049 |
Omnicom Group Inc. | 710 | 32,518 |
Sears Holdings Corp.* | 302 | 22,273 |
TJX Cos. Inc. | 755 | 33,514 |
Yum! Brands Inc. | 535 | 26,242 |
230,201 | ||
Consumer Staples - 3.1% | ||
Brown-Forman Corp., Class B | 354 | 24,645 |
McCormick & Co. | 630 | 29,314 |
53,959 | ||
Energy - 8.0% | ||
Contango Oil & Gas Co.* | 455 | 26,358 |
Ensco PLC ADR | 635 | 33,896 |
EOG Resources Inc. | 320 | 29,251 |
Noble Corp.* | 775 | 27,722 |
Southwestern Energy Co.* | 630 | 23,581 |
140,808 | ||
Financials - 19.8% | ||
Arch Capital Group Ltd.* | 395 | 34,780 |
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 1,420 | 47,271 |
Brookfield Properties Corp. | 1,832 | 32,115 |
Brown & Brown Inc. | 1,285 | 30,763 |
IntercontinentalExchange Inc.* | 251 | 29,907 |
Leucadia National Corp. | 1,155 | 33,703 |
Markel Corp.* | 94 | 35,544 |
RLI Corp. | 475 | 24,971 |
SEI Investments Co. | 1,130 | 26,883 |
T Rowe Price Group Inc. | 407 | 26,268 |
WR Berkley Corp. | 959 | 26,257 |
348,462 | ||
Health Care - 12.0% | ||
Covance Inc.* | 589 | 30,280 |
CR Bard Inc. | 325 | 29,825 |
DENTSPLY International Inc. | 1,275 | 43,567 |
IDEXX Laboratories Inc.* | 455 | 31,495 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 452 | 39,740 |
Techne Corp. | 555 | 36,447 |
211,354 | ||
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
Industrials - 12.3% | ||
Copart Inc.* | 1,213 | $ 45,305 |
IDEX Corp. | 880 | 34,426 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.* | 595 | 27,281 |
Knight Transportation Inc. | 1,350 | 25,650 |
Ritchie Bros Auctioneers Inc. | 1,285 | 29,619 |
Wabtec Corp./DE | 510 | 26,974 |
Waste Management Inc. | 775 | 28,574 |
217,829 | ||
Information Technology - 11.2% | ||
Adobe Systems Inc.* | 750 | 23,085 |
Amphenol Corp., Class A | 528 | 27,868 |
Blackboard Inc.* | 390 | 16,107 |
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. | 1,583 | 34,715 |
Factset Research Systems Inc. | 280 | 26,253 |
FLIR Systems Inc.* | 1,248 | 37,128 |
Western Union Co./The | 1,720 | 31,940 |
197,096 | ||
Materials - 3.1% | ||
Ecolab Inc. | 600 | 30,252 |
Valspar Corp. | 740 | 25,515 |
55,767 | ||
Telecommunication Services - 1.9% | ||
Crown Castle International Corp.* | 750 | 32,873 |
Total Common Stock (Cost $1,217,550) | 1,488,350 | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 2.1% | ||
iShares Gold Trust* | 2,690 | 37,391 |
Total Investment Companies (Cost $25,638) | 37,391 | |
Repurchase Agreement - 13.5% | ||
With U.S. Bank National Association issued 12/31/10 at 0.01%, due 1/3/11, collateralized by $242,229 in Freddie Mac MBS Pool #E01424 due 8/1/18. Proceeds at maturity are $237,480 (Cost $237,479) | 237,479 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.0% (Cost $1,480,667) | 1,763,220 | |
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.0% | 86 | |
TOTAL ASSETS - 100.0% | $ 1,763,306 |
*Non-income producing
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 15
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Disciplined Equity Fund • Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
COMMON STOCK - 95.4% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 10.2% | ||
NIKE Inc. , Class B | 19,670 | $ 1,680,211 |
Omnicom Group Inc. | 41,557 | 1,903,311 |
Staples Inc. | 42,325 | 963,740 |
Target Corp. | 30,135 | 1,812,018 |
TJX Cos. Inc. | 38,285 | 1,699,471 |
Walt Disney Co./The | 30,375 | 1,139,366 |
Yum! Brands Inc. | 18,810 | 922,631 |
10,120,748 | ||
Consumer Staples - 10.4% | ||
Coca-Cola Co./The | 22,585 | 1,485,415 |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 24,255 | 1,751,454 |
Diageo PLC-Sponsored ADR | 24,830 | 1,845,614 |
Kraft Foods Inc., Class A | 35,975 | 1,133,572 |
PepsiCo Inc./NC | 33,185 | 2,167,976 |
Walgreen Co. | 47,120 | 1,835,795 |
10,219,826 | ||
Energy - 11.3% | ||
Apache Corp. | 17,275 | 2,059,698 |
Chevron Corp. | 31,605 | 2,883,956 |
ConocoPhillips | 23,530 | 1,602,393 |
Noble Corp.* | 36,690 | 1,312,401 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 24,870 | 2,076,645 |
Southwestern Energy Co.* | 32,927 | 1,232,458 |
11,167,551 | ||
Financials - 15.5% | ||
American Express Co. | 48,380 | 2,076,470 |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 62,355 | 1,883,121 |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class B* | 10,160 | 813,918 |
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 40,350 | 1,343,252 |
Franklin Resources Inc. | 16,959 | 1,886,010 |
Markel Corp.* | 4,762 | 1,800,655 |
Morgan Stanley | 51,070 | 1,389,615 |
US Bancorp | 83,525 | 2,252,669 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 61,410 | 1,903,095 |
15,348,805 | ||
Health Care - 11.2% | ||
Allergan Inc. | 14,575 | 1,000,865 |
Johnson & Johnson | 33,015 | 2,041,978 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 18,342 | 1,612,629 |
Merck & Co. Inc. | 54,175 | 1,952,467 |
Novartis AG ADR | 31,420 | 1,852,209 |
St. Jude Medical Inc.* | 32,445 | 1,387,024 |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 34,430 | 1,243,267 |
11,090,439 | ||
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
Industrials - 10.2% | ||
3M Co. | 29,885 | $ 2,579,075 |
Aecom Technology Corp.* | 58,295 | 1,630,511 |
Copart Inc.* | 28,625 | 1,069,144 |
Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 31,035 | 1,657,269 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.* | 25,385 | 1,163,902 |
Waste Management Inc. | 55,025 | 2,028,772 |
10,128,673 | ||
Information Technology - 18.4% | ||
Cisco Systems Inc.* | 115,355 | 2,333,632 |
FLIR Systems Inc.* | 46,975 | 1,397,506 |
Google Inc., Class A* | 4,795 | 2,848,086 |
Intel Corp. | 71,805 | 1,510,059 |
International Business Machines Corp. | 18,518 | 2,717,702 |
Microsoft Corp. | 119,100 | 3,325,272 |
QUALCOMM Inc. | 36,955 | 1,828,903 |
Visa Inc., Class A | 18,485 | 1,300,974 |
Western Union Co./The | 52,800 | 980,496 |
18,242,630 | ||
Materials - 2.9% | ||
Ecolab Inc. | 34,990 | 1,764,196 |
Praxair Inc. | 11,850 | 1,131,320 |
2,895,515 | ||
Telecommunication Services - 2.2% | ||
AT&T Inc. | 72,735 | 2,136,954 |
Utilities - 3.1% | ||
Entergy Corp. | 18,185 | 1,288,044 |
NextEra Energy Inc. | 34,420 | 1,789,496 |
3,077,539 | ||
Total Common Stock (Cost $84,667,238) | 94,428,682 | |
Repurchase Agreement - 6.4% | ||
With U.S. Bank National Association issued 12/31/10 at 0.01%, due 1/3/11, collateralized by $6,476,551 in Freddie Mac MBS Pool #E01424 due 8/1/18. Proceeds at maturity are $6,349,561 (Cost $6,349,555) | 6,349,555 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 101.8% (Cost $91,016,793) | 100,778,237 | |
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (1.8%) | (1,796,897) | |
TOTAL ASSETS - 100.0% | $ 98,981,340 |
* | Non-income producing |
ADR | American Depository Receipt |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 16
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Balanced Fund • Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
COMMON STOCK - 65.4% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 3.1% | ||
Target Corp. | 3,940 | $ 236,912 |
Walt Disney Co./The | 3,820 | 143,288 |
380,200 | ||
Consumer Staples - 10.3% | ||
Coca-Cola Co./The | 2,485 | 163,438 |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 2,670 | 192,801 |
Diageo PLC-Sponsored ADR | 2,735 | 203,293 |
Kraft Foods Inc., Class A | 6,240 | 196,622 |
PepsiCo Inc./NC | 4,502 | 294,116 |
Walgreen Co. | 5,500 | 214,280 |
1,264,550 | ||
Energy - 8.8% | ||
Apache Corp. | 1,690 | 201,498 |
Chevron Corp. | 3,210 | 292,913 |
Noble Corp.* | 4,075 | 145,763 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 2,930 | 244,655 |
Southwestern Energy Co.* | 5,302 | 198,454 |
1,083,283 | ||
Financials - 10.7% | ||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 8,357 | 252,382 |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class B* | 1,710 | 136,988 |
Franklin Resources Inc. | 2,148 | 238,879 |
Markel Corp.* | 577 | 218,181 |
US Bancorp | 10,055 | 271,183 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 6,155 | 190,743 |
1,308,356 | ||
Health Care - 11.5% | ||
Johnson & Johnson | 4,580 | 283,273 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 2,465 | 216,723 |
Merck & Co. Inc. | 6,705 | 241,648 |
Novartis AG-ADR | 3,960 | 233,442 |
St. Jude Medical Inc.* | 5,080 | 217,170 |
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 5,810 | 209,799 |
1,402,055 | ||
Industrials - 5.3% | ||
3M Co. | 3,075 | 265,373 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.* | 3,365 | 154,285 |
Waste Management Inc. | 6,325 | 233,203 |
652,861 | ||
Information Technology - 15.7% | ||
Cisco Systems Inc.* | 14,969 | 302,822 |
Google Inc., Class A* | 509 | 302,331 |
Intel Corp. | 11,665 | 245,315 |
International Business Machines Corp. | 2,047 | 300,418 |
Microsoft Corp. | 12,650 | 353,188 |
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
QUALCOMM Inc. | 4,295 | $ 212,560 |
Visa Inc., Class A | 3,010 | 211,844 |
1,928,478 | ||
Total Common Stock (Cost $6,771,676) | 8,019,783 | |
Par Value | ||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS - 16.9% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 0.5% | ||
Comcast Cable Communications Holdings Inc., 8.375%, 3/15/13 | $ 55,000 | 62,616 |
Consumer Staples - 1.9% | ||
Costco Wholesale Corp., 5.3%, 3/15/12 | 100,000 | 105,235 |
Kraft Foods Inc., 5.625%, 11/1/11 | 13,000 | 13,508 |
Sysco Corp., 5.25%, 2/12/18 | 100,000 | 110,361 |
229,104 | ||
Energy - 3.6% | ||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 3.875%, 3/10/15 | 52,000 | 53,689 |
Devon Energy Corp., 6.3%, 1/15/19 | 100,000 | 117,871 |
Marathon Oil Corp., 6%, 10/1/17 | 100,000 | 113,736 |
Valero Energy Corp., 6.875%, 4/15/12 | 150,000 | 159,677 |
444,973 | ||
Financials - 4.0% | ||
Allstate Corp./The, 6.2%, 5/16/14 | 100,000 | 113,178 |
American Express Co., 4.875%, 7/15/13 | 150,000 | 160,446 |
Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corp., 4.85%, 1/15/15 | 100,000 | 109,460 |
General Electric Capital Corp., 4.8%, 5/1/13 | 100,000 | 106,968 |
490,052 | ||
Health Care - 1.2% | ||
Abbott Laboratories, 5.6%, 11/30/17 | 125,000 | 143,121 |
Industrials - 0.9% | ||
United Parcel Service Inc., 5.5%, 1/15/18 | 100,000 | 113,771 |
Information Technology - 3.5% | ||
Cisco Systems Inc., 5.25%, 2/22/11 | 100,000 | 99,220 |
Hewlett-Packard Co., 4.5%, 3/1/13 | 100,000 | 107,091 |
Oracle Corp., 4.95%, 4/15/13 | 100,000 | 109,000 |
Western Union Co./The, 5.93%, 10/1/16 | 100,000 | 112,091 |
427,402 | ||
Telecommunication Services - 1.3% | ||
Verizon New England Inc., 6.5%, 9/15/11 | 150,000 | 155,861 |
Total Corporate Notes and Bonds (Cost $1,963,544) | 2,066,900 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 17
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Balanced Fund • Portfolio of Investments | December 31, 2010 | concluded
Par Value | Value (Note 1) | |
U.S. GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY OBLIGATIONS - 15.2% | ||
Fannie Mae - 2.1% | ||
4.875%, 5/18/2012 | $150,000 | $ 159,002 |
2.375%, 7/28/2015 | 100,000 | 101,523 |
260,525 | ||
Federal Home Loan Bank - 1.4% | ||
5.5%, 8/13/2014 | 150,000 | 171,733 |
Freddie Mac - 1.3% | ||
4.875%, 11/15/2013 | 150,000 | 166,380 |
U.S. Treasury Bond - 1.0% | ||
2.625%, 11/15/2020 | 125,000 | 117,930 |
U.S. Treasury Notes - 9.4% | ||
5.125%, 6/30/2011 | 50,000 | 51,222 |
1%, 7/31/2011 | 400,000 | 401,844 |
0.5%, 11/15/2013 | 75,000 | 74,045 |
4.25%, 8/15/2014 | 100,000 | 110,328 |
3.125%, 10/31/2016 | 300,000 | 312,984 |
3.75%, 11/15/2018 | 185,000 | 196,807 |
1,147,230 | ||
Total U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (Cost $1,801,427) | 1,863,797 | |
Par Value | Value (Note 1) | |
Repurchase Agreement - 2.7% | ||
With U.S. Bank National Association issued 12/31/10 at 0.01%, due 1/3/11, collateralized by $341,743 in Freddie Mac MBS Pool #E01424 due 8/1/18. Proceeds at maturity are $335,043 (Cost $335,042) | $ 335,042 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.2% (Cost $10,871,689) | 12,285,522 | |
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (0.2%) | (29,303) | |
TOTAL ASSETS - 100.0% | $ 12,256,219 |
* | Non-income producing |
ADR | American Depository Receipt |
PLC | Public Limited Company |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 18
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
Investors Fund | Mid-Cap Fund | Small/ Mid-Cap Fund | Disciplined Equity Fund | Balanced Fund | |
ASSETS | |||||
Investments, at value (Notes 1 and 2) | |||||
Investment securities | $41,042,392 | $151,654,346 | $1,525,741 | $94,428,682 | $11,950,480 |
Repurchase agreements | 1,853,422 | 5,632,390 | 237,479 | 6,349,555 | 335,042 |
Total investments* | 42,895,814 | 157,286,736 | 1,763,220 | 100,778,237 | 12,285,522 |
Cash | – | 7,901 | 257 | – | – |
Receivables | |||||
Investment securities sold | – | 2,295,596 | – | – | – |
Dividends and interest | 42,320 | 91,092 | 866 | 111,326 | 52,082 |
Capital shares sold | 16,914 | 98,121 | – | 6,160 | 1,658 |
Total assets | 42,955,048 | 159,779,446 | 1,764,343 | 100,895,723 | 12,339,262 |
LIABILITIES | |||||
Payables | |||||
Investment securities purchased | – | – | – | 1,409,942 | 74,020 |
Dividends | 27,652 | – | – | 496,840 | 1,880 |
Capital shares redeemed | 31,842 | 347,178 | 37 | 1,726 | 768 |
Auditor fees | 10,000 | 15,000 | 1,000 | 5,500 | 5,500 |
Independent trustee fees | 3,875 | 3,875 | – | 375 | 875 |
Total liabilities | 73,369 | 366,053 | 1,037 | 1,914,383 | 83,043 |
NET ASSETS | $42,881,679 | $159,413,393 | $1,763,306 | $98,981,340 | $12,256,219 |
Net assets consists of: | |||||
Paid in capital | 43,410,649 | 137,513,183 | 1,461,781 | 88,953,071 | 11,220,600 |
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | – | – | – | – | – |
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) | (5,796,540) | (7,462,356) | 18,972 | 266,825 | (378,214) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 5,267,570 | 29,362,566 | 282,553 | 9,761,444 | 1,413,833 |
Net assets | $42,881,679 | $159,413,393 | $1,763,306 | $98,981,340 | $12,256,219 |
CAPITAL SHARES OUTSTANDING | |||||
An unlimited number of capital shares, without par value, are authorized. (Note 7) | 2,591,260 | 13,778,546 | 132,532 | 7,803,815 | 700,413 |
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE | $16.55 | $11.57 | $13.30 | $12.68 | $17.50 |
*INVESTMENT SECURITIES, AT COST | $37,628,244 | $127,924,170 | $1,480,667 | $91,016,793 | $10,871,689 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 19
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Statements of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2010
Investors Fund | Mid-Cap Fund | Small/ Mid-Cap Fund | Disciplined Equity Fund | Balanced Fund | |
INVESTMENT INCOME (Note 1) | |||||
Interest income | $ 159 | $ 859 | $ 12 | $ 631 | $160,726 |
Dividend income | 633,492 | 1,490,814 | 17,259 | 1,202,738 | 127,939 |
Total investment income | 633,651 | 1,491,673 | 17,271 | 1,203,369 | 288,665 |
EXPENSES (Notes 3 and 5) | |||||
Investment advisory fees | 298,315 | 1,125,493 | 10,200 | 509,388 | 90,302 |
Other expenses: | |||||
Service agreement fees | 66,461 | 718,913 | 5,800 | 230,714 | 49,539 |
Auditor fees | 13,500 | 22,000 | 1,000 | 5,500 | 5,500 |
Independent trustee fees | 15,500 | 15,500 | – | 1,500 | 3,500 |
Line of credit interest and fees | 250 | 250 | – | 250 | 250 |
Other expenses waived | – | – | – | (74,710) | – |
Total other expenses | 95,711 | 756,663 | 6,800 | 163,254 | 58,789 |
Total expenses | 394,026 | 1,882,156 | 17,000 | 672,642 | 149,091 |
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS) | 239,625 | (390,483) | 271 | 530,727 | 139,574 |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS | |||||
Net realized gain on investments | 1,011,557 | 11,120,939 | 100,114 | 933,085 | 379,920 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation of investments | 2,606,593 | 18,528,051 | 146,941 | 8,509,840 | 392,114 |
NET GAIN ON INVESTMENTS | 3,618,150 | 29,648,990 | 247,055 | 9,442,925 | 772,034 |
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | $3,857,775 | $29,258,507 | $247,326 | $9,973,652 | $911,608 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 20
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the period indicated
Investors Fund | Mid-Cap Fund | |||
Year Ended Dec. 31, | Year Ended Dec. 31, | |||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | ||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 239,625 | $ 128,323 | $ (390,483) | $ (409,288) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 1,011,557 | (2,987,073) | 11,120,939 | (1,427,953) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 2,606,593 | 12,637,531 | 18,528,051 | 30,861,589 |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 3,857,775 | 9,778,781 | 29,258,507 | 29,024,348 |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM NET INVESTMENT INCOME | (239,625) | (144,107) | – | – |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (Note 7) | (420,547) | 2,019,018 | (10,392,681) | 22,559,315 |
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS | 3,197,603 | 11,653,692 | 18,865,826 | 51,583,663 |
NET ASSETS | ||||
Beginning of period | $39,684,076 | $28,030,384 | $140,547,567 | $ 88,963,904 |
End of period | $42,881,679 | $39,684,076 | $159,413,393 | $140,547,567 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund | Disciplined Equity Fund | |||
Year Ended Dec. 31,* | Year Ended Dec. 31, | |||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | ||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 271 | $ (2,595) | $ 530,727 | $ 47,510 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 100,114 | 109,107 | 933,085 | (104,959) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 146,941 | 135,612 | 8,509,840 | 2,142,872 |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 247,326 | 242,124 | 9,973,652 | 2,085,423 |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS | ||||
From net investment income | (271) | – | (530,727) | (47,510) |
From net capital gains | (101,704) | (85,950) | (221,732) | – |
Total distributions | (101,975) | (85,950) | (752,459) | (47,510) |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (Note 7) | 561,942 | 899,839 | 48,310,018 | 36,340,532 |
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS | 707,293 | 1,056,013 | 57,531,211 | 38,378,445 |
NET ASSETS | ||||
Beginning of period | $1,056,013 | $ – | $41,450,129 | $ 3,071,684 |
End of period | $1,763,306 | $1,056,013 | $98,981,340 | $41,450,129 |
* Inception of Fund was December 31, 2008 with effective date of January 1, 2009.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 21
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
For the period indicated
Balanced Fund | ||
Year Ended Dec. 31, | ||
2010 | 2009 | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | ||
Net investment income | $ 139,574 | $ 126,787 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 379,920 | (382,279) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 392,114 | 2,662,360 |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 911,608 | 2,406,868 |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM NET INVESTMENT INCOME | (139,574) | (126,787) |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (Note 7) | (634,826) | (299,992) |
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS | 137,208 | 1,980,089 |
NET ASSETS | ||
Beginning of period | $12,119,011 | $10,138,922 |
End of period | $12,256,219 | $12,119,011 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 22
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Financial Highlights
Selected data for a share outstanding for the periods indicated.
INVESTORS FUND
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $15.07 | $11.31 | $18.44 | $20.57 | $18.81 |
Investment operations: | |||||
Net investment income | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.09 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.48 | 3.76 | (6.28) | (0.21) | 3.02 |
Total from investment operations | 1.57 | 3.81 | (6.20) | (0.01) | 3.11 |
Less distributions: | |||||
From net investment income | (0.09) | (0.05) | (0.08) | (0.20) | (0.09) |
From net capital gains | – | – | (0.85) | (1.92) | (1.26) |
Total distributions | (0.09) | (0.05) | (0.93) | (2.12) | (1.35) |
Net asset value, end of period | $16.55 | $15.07 | $11.31 | $18.44 | $20.57 |
Total return (%) | 10.44 | 33.73 | (33.40) | (0.18) | 16.55 |
Ratios and supplemental data | |||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $42,882 | $39,684 | $28,030 | $55,991 | $176,861 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.78 | 0.55 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 41 | 74 | 47 | 51 | 52 |
MID-CAP FUND
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $9.55 | $7.67 | $12.87 | $13.04 | $11.99 |
Investment operations: | |||||
Net investment loss | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.02) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.05 | 1.91 | (4.71) | 1.15 | 1.98 |
Total from investment operations | 2.02 | 1.88 | (4.74) | 1.13 | 1.96 |
Less distributions from capital gains | – | – | (0.46) | (1.30) | (0.91) |
Net asset value, end of period | $11.57 | $9.55 | $7.67 | $12.87 | $13.04 |
Total return (%) | 21.15 | 24.51 | (36.61) | 8.62 | 16.32 |
Ratios and supplemental data | |||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $159,413 | $140,548 | $88,964 | $146,378 | $147,122 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.25 |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | (0.26) | (0.36) | (0.33) | (0.18) | (0.18) |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 57 | 63 | 76 | 43 | 47 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 23
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Financial Highlight | continued
Selected data for a share outstanding for the periods indicated.
SMALL/MID-CAP FUND
Year Ended December 31, | ||
2010 | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of year | $11.92 | $10.00* |
Investment operations: | ||
Net investment income (loss) | 0.001 | (0.03) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.20 | 3.01 |
Total from investment operations | 2.20 | 2.98 |
Less distribution: | ||
From net investment income | 0.001 | – |
From net capital gains | (0.82) | (1.06) |
Total distributions | (0.82) | (1.06) |
Net asset value, end of year | $13.30 | $11.92 |
Total return (%) | 18.42 | 29.66 |
Ratios and supplemental data | ||
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) | $1,763 | $1,056 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.25 | 1.24 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets (%) | 0.02 | (0.31) |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 61 | 74 |
DISCIPLINED EQUITY FUND
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $11.66 | $8.81 | $13.78 | $14.07 | $12.61 |
Investment operations: | |||||
Net investment income | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.05 | 2.85 | (4.80) | 1.21 | 2.05 |
Total from investment operations | 1.12 | 2.86 | (4.71) | 1.27 | 2.12 |
Less distributions: | |||||
From net investment income | (0.07) | (0.01) | (0.09) | (0.06) | (0.07) |
From net capital gains | (0.03) | – | (0.17) | (1.50) | (0.59) |
Total distributions | (0.10) | (0.01) | (0.26) | (1.56) | (0.66) |
Net asset value, end of period | $12.68 | $11.66 | $8.81 | $13.78 | $14.07 |
Total return (%) | 9.58 | 32.50 | (34.20) | 9.05 | 16.83 |
Ratios and supplemental data | |||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $98,981 | $41,450 | $3,072 | $4,499 | $4,081 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets before fee waiver (%) | 1.09 | 1.06 | 1.14 | 1.26 | 1.27 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after fee waiver (%) | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.06 | N/A | N/A |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets before fee waiver (%) | 0.68 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.41 | 0.54 |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets after fee waiver (%) | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.80 | N/A | N/A |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 40 | 62 | 63 | 70 | 54 |
1Greater than zero but less than a penny.
* Inception of Fund was December 31, 2008 with effective date of January 1, 2009.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 24
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Financial Highlight | concluded
Selected data for a share outstanding for the periods indicated.
BALANCED FUND
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $16.39 | $13.29 | $17.62 | $18.39 | $17.40 |
Investment operations: | |||||
Net investment income | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.23 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.11 | 3.10 | (3.72) | 0.13 | 1.84 |
Total from investment operations | 1.30 | 3.27 | (3.47) | 0.41 | 2.07 |
Less distributions: | |||||
From net investment income | (0.19) | (0.17) | (0.25) | (0.28) | (0.23) |
From net capital gains | – | – | (0.61) | (0.90) | (0.85) |
Total distributions | (0.19) | (0.17) | (0.86) | (1.18) | (1.08) |
Net asset value, end of period | $17.50 | $16.39 | $13.29 | $17.62 | $18.39 |
Total return (%) | 8.02 | 24.82 | (19.92) | 2.24 | 11.96 |
Ratios and supplemental data | |||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $12,256 | $12,119 | $10,139 | $13,800 | $16,267 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 1.22 | 1.22 |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.24 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 39 | 57 | 50 | 42 | 35 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Annual Report - 25
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | December 31, 2010
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Madison Mosaic Equity Trust (the "Trust") is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified investment management company. This report contains information about five separate funds included within the Trust (the "Funds"): the Investors Fund, Mid-Cap Fund, Small/Mid-Cap Fund, Disciplined Equity Fund and Balanced Fund, each of whose objectives and strategies are described in the Funds’ prospectus. A sixth Trust portfolio, available to certain institutional investors (as defined in the portfolio’s prospectus), presents its financial information in a separate report.
Portfolio Valuation: Securities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at their closing sale price except for securities traded on NASDAQ which are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price ("NOCP"). Repurchase agreements and other securities having maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Securities having longer maturities, for which quotations are readily available, are valued at the mean between their closing bid and ask prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
Each fund has adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") applicable guidance on fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that each fund would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data "inputs" and minimize the use of unobservable "inputs" and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk (for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value including such a pricing model and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique). Inputs may be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 –quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rate volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risk, benchmark yields, transactions, bids, offers, new issues, spreads and other relationships observed in the markets among comparable securities, underlying equity of the issuer; and proprietary pricing models such as yield measures calculated using factors such as cash flows, financial or collateral performance and other reference data, etc.) |
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The valuation techniques used by the funds to measure fair value for the period ended December 31, 2010 maximized the use of observable inputs and minimized the use of unobservable inputs. As of December 31, 2010, none of the funds held securities deemed as a Level 3.
Annual Report - 26
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Notes to Financal Statements | continued
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2010 in valuing the funds’ investments carried at fair value:
Fund | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Value at 12/31/10 |
Investors | ||||
Common Stocks | $ 41,042,392 | $ – | $ – | $ 41,042,392 |
Repurchase Agreement | – | 1,853,422 | – | 1,853,422 |
Total | $ 41,042,392 | $1,853,422 | $ – | $ 42,895,814 |
Mid-Cap | ||||
Common Stocks | $151,654,346 | $ – | $ – | $151,654,346 |
Repurchase Agreement | – | 5,632,390 | – | 5,632,390 |
Total | $151,654,346 | $5,632,390 | $ – | $157,286,736 |
Small/Mid-Cap | ||||
Common Stocks | $ 1,488,350 | $ – | $ – | $ 1,488,350 |
Investment Companies | 37,391 | – | – | 37,391 |
Repurchase Agreement | – | 237,479 | – | 237,479 |
Total | $ 1,525,741 | $ 237,479 | $ – | $ 1,763,220 |
Disciplined Equity | ||||
Common Stocks | $ 94,428,682 | $ – | $ – | $ 94,428,682 |
Repurchase Agreement | – | 6,349,555 | – | 6,349,555 |
Total | $ 94,428,682 | $6,349,555 | $ – | $100,778,237 |
Balanced | ||||
Common Stocks | $ 8,019,783 | $ – | $ – | $ 8,019,783 |
Corporate Obligations | – | 2,066,900 | – | 2,066,900 |
U.S. Treasury & Agency Obligations | – | 1,863,797 | – | 1,863,797 |
Repurchase Agreement | – | 335,042 | – | 335,042 |
Total | $ 8,019,783 | $4,265,739 | $ – | $ 12,285,522 |
Please see the Portfolio of Investments for each respective Fund for a listing of all securities within each caption. |
The Funds have adopted the Accounting Standard Update, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures; Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements which provides guidance on how investment assets and liabilities are to be valued and disclosed. Specifically, the amendment requires reporting entities to disclose i) the input and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements, for Level 2 or Level 3 positions, ii) transfers between all levels (including Level 1 and Level 2) will be required to be disclosed on a gross basis (i.e. transfers out must be disclosed separately from transfers in) as well as the reason(s) for the transfer and iii) purchases, sales, issuances and settlements must be shown on a gross basis in the Level 3 rollforward rather than as one net number. The effective date of the amendment is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, however, the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity for purchases, sales, issuance and settlements on a gross basis will be effective for interim and annual period beginning after December 15, 2010. There were no transfers between classification levels during the period ended December 31, 2010.
The Funds adopted guidance regarding enhanced disclosures about funds’ derivitive and hedging activities. Management has determined that there is no impact on the financial statements of the Funds held in the Trust as they did not hold derivative financial instruments during the year.
Investment Transactions: Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. The cost of investments sold is determined on the identified cost basis for financial statement and federal income tax purposes.
Annual Report - 27
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Notes to Financal Statements | continued
Investment Income: Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Bond premium is amortized and original issue discount and market discount are accreted over the expected life of each applicable security using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Other income is accrued as earned.
Distribution of Income and Gains: Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Net investment income, determined as gross investment income less total expenses, is declared as a regular dividend and distributed to shareholders at year-end for the Investors, Mid-Cap, Small/Mid-Cap and Disciplined Equity Funds. The Trust intends to declare and pay regular dividends quarterly on the Balanced Fund. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually at year-end.
The tax character of distributions paid during 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
2010 | 2009 | |
Investors Fund: | ||
Distributions paid from ordinary income | $ 239,625 | $ 144,107 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund: | ||
Distributions paid from: | ||
Ordinary income | $ 52,639 | $ 85,950 |
Long-term capital gains | $ 49,336 | – |
Disciplined Equity Fund: | ||
Distributions paid from: | ||
Ordinary income | $ 598,830 | $ 47,510 |
Long-term capital gains | 153,629 | – |
Balanced Fund: | ||
Distributions paid from ordinary income | $ 139,574 | $ 126,787 |
The Investors Fund, Small/Mid-Cap Fund, Disciplined Equity Fund and Balanced Fund designate 100%, 22.22%, 100% and 91.66%, respectively, of dividends declared from net investment income and short-term capital gains during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as qualified income under the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003.
As of December 31, 2010, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Investors Fund: | |
Accumulated net realized losses | $ (5,708,149) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 5,179,179 |
$ (528,970) | |
Mid-Cap Fund: | |
Accumulated net realized losses | $(6,383,760) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 28,283,970 |
$21,900,210 | |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund: | |
Accumulated net realized gains | $ 18,972 |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 282,553 |
$301,525 | |
Disciplined Equity Fund: | |
Accumulated net realized gains | $ 311,667 |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 9,716,602 |
$10,028,269 | |
Balanced Fund: | |
Accumulated net realized losses | $ (348,574) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 1,384,193 |
$1,035,619 |
Net realized gains or losses may differ for financial and tax reporting purposes as a result of loss deferrals related to wash sales and post-October transactions.
Income Tax: No provision is made for federal income taxes since it is the intention of the Trust to comply with the provisions of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code available to investment companies and to make the requisite distribution to shareholders of taxable income which will be sufficient to relieve it from all or substantially all federal income taxes.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Funds did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The Funds recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the Funds did not incur any interest or penalties.
The Regulated Investment Company ("RIC") Modernization Act of 2010 (the "Modernization Act") modernizes several of the federal income and excise tax provisions related to RICs. The Modernization Act contains simplification provisions effective for taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010, which are aimed at preventing disqualification of a RIC for "inadvertent" failures of the asset diversification and/or qualifying income tests. Additionally, the Modernization Act allows capital losses to be carried forward indefinitely, and retain the character of the original loss, exempts RICs from the preferential dividend rule, and repealed the 60-day designation requirement for certain types of pay-through income and gains.
Annual Report - 28
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Notes to Financal Statements | continued
As of December 31, 2010, capital loss carryovers available to offset future capital gains for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Expiration Date | Investors Fund | Mid-Cap Fund | Balanced Fund |
December 31, 2016 | $1,512,847 | – | – |
December 31, 2017 | 4,195,302 | $6,383,760 | $348,574 |
Due to inherent differences in the recognition of income, expenses, and realized gains/losses under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and federal income tax purposes, permanent differences between book and tax basis reporting for the 2010 fiscal year have been identified and appropriately reclassified on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. In the Mid-Cap Fund, a permanent book and tax difference relating to net investment losses in the amount of $390,483 was reclassified from accumulated undistributed net investment income to paid in capital.
Tax years open to examination by tax authorities under the statute of limitations include 2007 through 2010.
Cash Concentration: At times, the Funds maintain cash balances at financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. The Funds monitor this credit risk and have not experienced any losses related to this risk.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions. Such estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. Investments in Repurchase Agreements. When the Funds purchase securities under agree-ments to resell, the securities are held for safekeeping by the custodian bank as collateral. Should the market value of the securities purchased under such an agreement decrease below the principal amount to be received at the termination of the agreement plus accrued interest, the counterparty is required to place an equivalent amount of additional securities in safekeeping with the Trust’s custodian bank. Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Trust, along with other registered investment companies having Advisory and Services Agreements with the same investment adviser, transfers uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. The aggregate balance in this joint trading account is invested in one or more consolidated repurchase agreements whose underlying securities are U.S. Treasury or federal agency obligations. As of December 31, 2010, the Investors Fund had approximately a 11.2% interest, the Mid-Cap Fund approximately a 34.2% interest, the Small/Mid-Cap Fund approximately a 1.4% interest, the Disciplined Equity Fund approximately a 38.5% interest and the Balanced Fund approximately a 2.0% interest in the consolidated repurchase agreement of $16,483,850 collateralized by $16,813,538 in Freddie Mac Mortgage Backed Security Notes. Proceeds at maturity were $16,483,864.
3. Investment Advisory Fees. The investment adviser to the Trust, Madison Investment Advisors, LLC, (the "Adviser"), earned an advisory fee equal to 0.75% per annum of the average net assets of the Mid-Cap, Small/Mid-Cap, Disciplined Equity and Balanced Funds and the first $100 million in the Investors Fund. The advisory fee paid by the Investors Fund is reduced to 0.60% per annum on assets over $100 million. The fees are accrued daily and are paid monthly. Prior to November 30, 2010, the investment adviser to the Trust was Madison Mosaic, LLC and its parent, Madison Investment Advisors, Inc. On November 30, 2010, Madison Mosaic, LLC changed its name to Madison Investment Advisors, LLC and became the sole Adviser.
4. Investment Transactions. Purchases and sales of securities (excluding short-term securities) for the year ended December 31, 2010 were as follows :
Purchases | Sales | |
Investors Fund: | ||
U. S. Gov’t Securities | – | – |
Other | $15,650,175 | $15,865,527 |
Mid-Cap Fund: | ||
U. S. Gov’t Securities | – | – |
Other | $79,731,025 | $86,613,793 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund: | ||
U. S. Gov’t Securities | – | – |
Other | $1,062,001 | $748,543 |
Disciplined Equity Fund: | ||
U. S. Gov’t Securities | – | – |
Other | $70,414,384 | $25,033,698 |
Annual Report - 29
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Notes to Financal Statements | continued
Purchases | Sales | |
Balanced Fund: | ||
U. S. Gov’t Securities | $1,082,683 | $911,580 |
Other | $3,419,100 | $4,245,165 |
5. Other Expenses. Under a separate Services Agreement, the Adviser will provide or arrange for each Fund to have all other necessary operational and support services for a fee based on a percentage of average net assets. These fees, presented below for the year ended December 31, 2010, are accrued daily and paid monthly. This percentage was 0.35% for the Investors Fund but may be limited due to a total expense cap (including the management fee) of 0.99% for the Fund, 0.50% for the Small/Mid-Cap Fund and 0.35% for the Disciplined Equity Fund. Additionally, for the Disciplined Equity Fund, the Adviser agreed to waive 0.11% of this fee. This waiver may end at any time. The direct expenses paid by the Investors Fund, Small/Mid-Cap Fund and Disciplined Equity Fund (described below) come out of this fee.
Prior to November 30, 2010, the percentage for the Balanced Fund was 0.41% plus 0.09% for payment of direct expenses described below and for the Mid-Cap Fund, this fee was 0.48% on the first $150 million and 0.45% on all assets greater than $150 million plus 0.03% for payment of direct expenses described below. Effective November 30, 2010, this percentage for the Balanced Fund was increased to 0.50% and for the Mid-Cap Fund, this fee was increased to 0.50% on the first $150 million and 0.47% on all assets greater than $150 million with direct expenses now being paid from this fee.
The Funds pay the expenses of the Funds’ Independent Trustees directly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, these fees were $15,500, $15,500, $0, $1,500 and $3,500, for the Investors, Mid-Cap, Small/Mid-Cap, Disciplined Equity and Balanced Funds, respectively.
The Funds also pay the expenses of the Funds’ independent registered public accountants directly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the amounts expensed for these fees were $13,500, $22,000, $1,000, $5,500 and $5,500 for the Investors, Mid-Cap, Small/Mid-Cap, Disciplined Equity and Balanced Funds, respectively.
6. Aggregate Cost and Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation). The aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes and the net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) are as follows as of December 31, 2010:
Investors Fund | Mid-Cap Fund | |
Aggregate Cost | $37,716,635 | $129,002,766 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | 5,850,512 | 29,683,644 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (671,333) | (1,399,674) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 5,179,179 | $ 28,283,970 |
Small/ Mid-Cap Fund | Disciplined Equity Fund | |
Aggregate Cost | $1,480,667 | $91,061,635 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | 293,729 | 10,421,088 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (11,176) | (704,486) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $ 282,553 | $ 9,716,602 |
Balanced Fund | |
Aggregate Cost | $10,901,329 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | 1,511,281 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (127,088) |
Net unrealized appreciation | $1,384,193 |
7. Capital Share Transactions. An unlimited number of capital shares, without par value, are authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||
Investors Fund | 2010 | 2009 |
In Dollars | ||
Shares sold | $7,889,489 | $6,615,204 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 211,972 | 134,890 |
Total shares issued | 8,101,461 | 6,750,094 |
Shares redeemed | (8,522,008) | (4,731,076) |
Net increase (decrease) | $ (420,547) | $2,019,018 |
In Shares | ||
Shares sold | 512,651 | 528,650 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 12,808 | 8,951 |
Total shares issued | 525,459 | 537,601 |
Shares redeemed | (567,461) | (381,744) |
Net increase (decrease) | (42,002) | 155,857 |
Annual Report - 30
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Notes to Financal Statements | concluded
Year Ended December 31, | ||
Mid-Cap Fund | 2010 | 2009 |
In Dollars | ||
Shares sold | $35,464,120 | $46,974,339 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | – | – |
Total shares issued | 35,464,120 | 46,974,339 |
Shares redeemed | (45,856,801) | (24,415,024) |
Net increase (decrease) | $(10,392,681) | $22,559,315 |
In Shares | ||
Shares sold | 3,554,316 | 6,112,573 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | – | – |
Total shares issued | 3,554,316 | 6,112,573 |
Shares redeemed | (4,491,882) | (2,997,580) |
Net increase (decrease) | (937,566) | 3,114,993 |
Year Ended December 31, | ||
Small/Mid-Cap Fund | 2010 | 2009 |
In Dollars | ||
Shares sold | $504,262 | $967,188 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 101,974 | 85,951 |
Total shares issued | 606,236 | 1,053,139 |
Shares redeemed | (44,294) | (153,300) |
Net increase | $561,942 | $899,839 |
In Shares | ||
Shares sold | 39,869 | 96,421 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 7,644 | 7,139 |
Total shares issued | 47,513 | 103,560 |
Shares redeemed | (3,541) | (15,000) |
Net increase | 43,972 | 88,560 |
Year Ended December 31, | ||
Disciplined Equity Fund | 2010 | 2009 |
In Dollars | ||
Shares sold | $49,934,288 | $36,598,913 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 48,040 | 47,426 |
Total shares issued | 49,982,328 | 36,646,339 |
Shares redeemed | (1,672,310) | (305,807) |
Net increase | $48,310,018 | $36,340,532 |
Year Ended December 31, | ||
Disciplined Equity Fund (cont.) | 2010 | 2009 |
In Shares | ||
Shares sold | 4,385,449 | 3,232,595 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 3,783 | 4,068 |
Total shares issued | 4,389,232 | 3,236,663 |
Shares redeemed | (139,064) | (31,636) |
Net increase | 4,250,168 | 3,205,027 |
Year Ended December 31, | ||
Balanced Fund | 2010 | 2009 |
In Dollars | ||
Shares sold | $815,118 | $ 596,811 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 130,183 | 115,728 |
Total shares issued | 945,301 | 712,539 |
Shares redeemed | (1,580,127) | (1,012,531) |
Net decrease | $(634,826) | $(299,992) |
In Shares | ||
Shares sold | 49,220 | 40,612 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | 7,854 | 8,145 |
Total shares issued | 57,074 | 48,757 |
Shares redeemed | (95,941) | (72,138) |
Net decrease | (38,867) | (23,381) |
8. Line of Credit. The Investors Fund, Balanced Fund, Disciplined Equity Fund and Mid-Cap Fund have lines of credit with U.S. Bank N.A. of $3.5 million, $1.5 million, $6.5 million and $14 million, respectively. Each line is a revolving credit facility with a bank to be used for temporary emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The interest rate on the outstanding principal amount is equal to the prime rate less 1/2%. Each Fund paid $250 for the year to maintain its line of credit. During the year ended December 31, 2010, none of the Funds borrowed on their respective lines of credit.
9. Subsequent Events. Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Funds’ financial statements. No events have taken place that meet the definition of a subsequent event that requires adjustment to, or disclosure in the financial statements.
Annual Report - 31
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments of the Madison Mosaic Equity Trust (the "Trust"), including the Investors Fund, Balanced Fund, Mid-Cap Fund, Small/Mid-Cap Fund and Disciplined Equity Fund (collectively, the "Funds"), as of December 31, 2010 and the related statements of operations for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended and for each of the two years in the period then ended for the Small/Mid-Cap Fund. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2010 by correspondence with the Funds’ custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds constituting the Trust as of December 31, 2010, and the results of their operations for the year then ended and the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended and for each of the two years in the period then ended for the Small/Mid-Cap Fund, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12107.jpg)
Chicago, Illinois
February 22, 2011
Annual Report - 32
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Other Information
Fund Expenses
Example: As a shareholder of one of the Funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including investment advisory fees and other expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in any Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. See Notes 3 and 5 above for an explanation of the types of costs charged by the Funds. This Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on July 1, 2010 and held for the six-months ended December 31, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table below titled "Based on Actual Total Return" provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,500 ending account valued divided by $1,000 = 8.5), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During the Period."
Based on Actual Total Return1 | ||||
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Annualized Expense Ratio | Expenses Paid During the Period2 | |
Investors Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,209.51 | 0.99% | $5.48 |
Mid-Cap Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,253.52 | 1.25% | $7.04 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,221.04 | 1.25% | $6.89 |
Disciplined Equity Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,190.72 | 0.99%* | $5.43 |
Balanced Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,134.78 | 1.24% | $6.66 |
*After fee waiver. See Note 5. 1For the six-months ended December 31, 2010. 2Expenses are equal to each Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365. |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below titled "Based on Hypothetical Total Return" provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not any Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in a fund offered by the Trust and other funds. To do so, compare the 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the applicable Fund with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Based on Hypothetical Total Return1 | ||||
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Annualized Expense Ratio | Expenses Paid During the Period2 | |
Investors Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,025.47 | 0.99% | $5.06 |
Mid-Cap Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,025.47 | 1.25% | $6.40 |
Small/Mid-Cap Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,025.47 | 1.25% | $6.37 |
Disciplined Equity Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,025.47 | 0.99%* | $5.04 |
Balanced Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,025.47 | 1.24% | $6.32 |
*After fee waiver. See Note 5. 1For the six-months ended December 31, 2010. 2Expenses are equal to each Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365. |
Annual Report - 33
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Other Information | continued
Forward-Looking Statement Disclosure. One of our most important responsibilities as investment company managers is to communicate with shareholders in an open and direct manner. Some of our comments in our letters to shareholders are based on current management expectations and are considered "forward-looking statements." Actual future results, however, may prove to be different from our expectations. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as "estimate," "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "plan" and other similar terms. We cannot promise future returns. Our opinions are a reflection of our best judgment at the time this report is compiled, and we disclaim any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Proxy Voting Information. The Trust only invests in non-voting securities. Nevertheless, the Trust adopted policies that provide guidance and set forth parameters for the voting of proxies relating to securities held in the Trust’s portfolios. These policies are available to you upon request and free of charge by writing to Madison Mosaic Funds, 550 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711 or by calling toll-free at 1-800-368-3195. The Trust’s proxy voting policies may also be obtained by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") web site at www.sec.gov. The Trust will respond to shareholder requests for copies of our policies within two business days of request by first-class mail or other means designed to ensure prompt delivery.
N-Q Disclosure. The Trust files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Trust’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website. The Trust’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information about the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Form N-Q and other information about the Trust are available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of this information may also be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, DC 20549-0102. Finally, you may call Madison Mosaic at 800-368-3195 if you would like a copy of Form N-Q and we will mail one to you at no charge.
Discussion of Contract Renewal. The Trustees considered a number of factors when the Board most recently approved the advisory contract between the Adviser and the Trust in July 2010. Rather than providing you with a list of factors or conclusory statements that explained the Board’s decisionmaking process, the following discussion is designed to describe what you would have seen and heard if you had been at the Trust’s Board meeting when it most recently approved the advisory contract:
With regard to the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by the Adviser, the Board reviewed the biographies and tenure of the personnel involved in Trust management and the experience of the Adviser and its affiliates as investment manager to other investment companies with similar investment strategies. They recognized the wide array of investment professionals employed by the firm. Representatives of the Adviser discussed the firm’s ongoing investment philosophies and strategies intended to provide superior performance consistent with each Trust portfolio’s investment objectives under various market scenarios. The Trustees also noted their familiarity with the Adviser and its affiliates due to the Advisers’ history of providing advisory services to the Madison Mosaic organization as well as the MEMBERS Mutual Funds, Ultra Series Fund and the Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund.
The Board also discussed the quality of services provided to the Trust by its transfer agent and custodian as well as the various administrative services provided directly by the Adviser.
With regard to the investment performance of the Trust and the investment adviser, the Board reviewed current performance information provided in the written Board materials. It discussed the reasons for both outperformance and underperformance compared with peer groups and applicable indices and benchmarks.
A comprehensive discussion of fund performance and market conditions followed. Representatives of the Adviser
Annual Report - 34
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Other Information | continued
discussed with the Board the methodology for arriving at peer groups and indices used for performance comparisons.
With regard to the costs of the services to be provided and the profits to be realized by the investment adviser and its affiliates from their relationships with the Trust, the Board reviewed the expense ratios for a variety of other funds in each Trust portfolio’s peer group with similar investment objectives.
The Board noted that the Adviser or its affiliates provided investment management services to other investment company and non-investment company clients and considered the fees charged by the Adviser to such funds and clients for purposes of determining whether the given advisory fee was disproportionately large under the so-called "Gartenberg" standard traditionally used by investment company boards in connection with contract renewal considerations. The Board took those fees into account and considered the differences in services and time required by the various types of funds and clients to which the Adviser provided services. The Board recognized that significant differences may exist between the services provided to one type of fund or client and those provided to others, such as those resulting from a greater frequency of shareholder redemptions in a mutual fund and the higher turnover of mutual fund assets. The Board gave such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the various funds require and were wary of "inapt comparisons." They considered that, if the services rendered by the Adviser to one type of fund or client differ significantly from others, then the comparison should not be used. In the case of non-investment company clients for which the Adviser may act as either investment adviser or subadviser, the Board noted that the fee is lower than the fee charged to the Trusts. The Board noted too the various administrative, operational, compliance, legal and corporate communication services required to be handled by the Adviser which are performed for investment company clients but are not performed for other institutional clients.
The Trustees reviewed each fund’s fee structure based on total fund expense ratio as well as by comparing advisory fees to other advisory fees. The Board noted the simple expense structure maintained by the Trusts (i.e. an advisory fee and a capped administrative "services" expense). The Board paid particular attention to the total expense ratios paid by other funds with similar investment objectives, recognizing that such a comparison, while not completely dispositive, was nevertheless an important consideration.
The Trustees sought to ensure that fees paid by the Trust were appropriate. The Board reviewed materials demonstrating that although the Adviser is compensated for a variety of the administrative services it provides or arranges to provide to the Trust pursuant to its Services Agreement with the Trust, such compensation generally does not cover all costs due to the cap on administrative expenses. Administrative, operational, regulatory and compliance fees and costs in excess of the Services Agreement fees are paid by the Adviser from investment advisory fees earned. In this regard, the Trustees noted that examination of each Trust portfolio’s total expense ratio compared to those of other investment companies was more meaningful than a simple comparison of basic "investment management only" fee schedules.
In reviewing costs and profits, the Board noted the salaries of all portfolio management personnel, trading desk personnel, corporate accounting personnel and employees of the Adviser who serve as Trust officers, as well as facility costs (rent), could not be supported by fees received from the Trust alone. However, the Board recognized that the Trust is profitable to the Adviser because such salaries and fixed costs are already paid in whole or in part from revenue generated by management of the remaining assets managed by the Adviser. The Trustees noted that total assets managed by the Adviser and its affiliates approximated $15 billion at the time of the meeting. As a result, although the fees paid by each Trust portfolio at its present size might not be sufficient to profitably support a stand-alone fund, the Trust is reasonably profitable to the Adviser as part of its larger, diversified organization. In sum, the Trustees recognized that each Trust is important to the Adviser, is managed with the attention given to other firm clients and is not treated as "loss leader."
With regard to the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as each Trust portfolio grows, the Trustees recognized that at their current sizes, it was premature to discuss any economies of scale not already factored into existing advisory and services agreements.
Annual Report - 35
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Other Information | concluded
Counsel to the Trust’s non-interested Trustees (the "Independent Trustees") confirmed that the Independent Trustees met previously and reviewed the written contract renewal materials provided by the Adviser. The Independent Trustees’ counsel noted that the Independent Trustees had considered such materials in light of the aforementioned Gartenberg standards as well as criteria either set forth or discussed in the recent Supreme Court decision in Jones v. Harris regarding the investment company contract renewal process under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Independent Trustees made a variety of additional inquiries regarding such written materials to the Adviser and representatives of the Adviser discussed each matter raised.
After further discussion and analysis and reviewing the totality of the information presented, including the information set forth above and the other information considered by the Board of Trustees, the Trustees concluded that the Trust’s advisory fees are fair and reasonable for each respective portfolio and that renewal of their respective Advisory and Services Agreements with the Madison Investment Advisors organization are in the best interests of each respective fund and its shareholders.
After further discussion and analysis and reviewing the totality of the information presented, including the information set forth above and the other information considered by the Board of Trustees, the Trustees concluded that the respective Trusts’ advisory fees are fair and reasonable for each respective portfolio and that renewal of their respective Advisory and Services Agreements with the Madison Investment Advisors organization are in the best interests of each respective fund and its shareholders.
Annual Report - 36
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Trustees and Officers
The address of each trustee and officer of the funds is 550 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711, except that Mr. Mason’s address is 8777 N. Gainey Center Drive, #220, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258. The Statement of Additional Information, which includes additional information about the trustees and officers, is available at no cost on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov or by calling Madison Mosaic Funds at 1-800-368-3195.
Interested Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Katherine L. Frank1 1960 | President, 1996 - Present, and Trustee, 2001 - Present | Madison Investment Holdings, Inc. ("MIH") (affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and Vice President, 1986 - 2010; Madison Asset Management, LLC ("MAM") (affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; Vice President, 2004 - 2010; Madison Investment Advisors, LLC ("Madison"), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; President, 1996 - 2010; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (closed end fund), President, 2005 - Present; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund (closed end fund), Vice President, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17) (mutual funds), President, 2009 - Present | Madison Mosaic Funds (all but Equity Trust), 2001 - Present; Madison; Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
Frank E. Burgess1 1942 | Trustee and Vice President, 1996 - Present | MIH, Founder, Executive Director and President, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and President, 1973 - 2010; MAM, Executive Director and President, 2010 - Present; President, 2004 - 2010; Madison, Executive Director and President, 2010 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Vice President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Vice President, 2009 - Present | Madison Mosaic Funds (13), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund and Madison/Claymore Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; Capitol Bank of Madison, WI, 1995 - Present; American Riviera Bank of Santa Barbara, CA, 2006 - Present |
1 "Interested person" as defined in the 1940 Act. Considered an interested Trustee because of the position held with the investment adviser of the Funds.
Annual Report - 37
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Trustees and Officers | continued
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Jay R. Sekelsky 1959 | Vice President, 1996 - Present | MIH, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and Vice President, 1990 - 2010; MAM, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Madison, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Vice President, 1996 - 2010; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Vice President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund and Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Paul Lefurgey 1964 | Vice President, 2009 - Present | MIH, Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income Investments, 2005 - Present; MAM and Madison, Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income Investments, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Capital Advisors, Inc. ("MCA") (investment advisory firm), Madison, WI, Vice President 2003 - 2005; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Greg D. Hoppe 1969 | Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 1999 - 2009 | MIH and Madison, Vice President, 1999 - Present; MAM, Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 1999 - 2009; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Treasurer, 2005 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 2005 - 2009; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2008 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Treasurer, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Annual Report - 38
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Trustees and Officers | continued
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Holly S. Baggot 1960 | Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present | MIH and Madison, Vice President, 2010 - Present; MAM, Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Secretary, 1999 - Present; Treasurer, 2008 - 2009; Assistant Treasurer, 1997 - 2007; MCA, Director-Mutual Funds, 2008 - 2009; Director-Mutual Fund Operations, 2006 - 2008; Operations Officer-Mutual Funds, 2005 - 2006; Senior Manager-Product & Fund Operations, 2001 - 2005 | N/A |
W. Richard Mason 1960 | Chief Compliance Officer, 1992 - Present; Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; General Counsel and Secretary, 1992 - 2009 | MIH, MAM, Madison, and Madison Scottsdale, LC (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, 2009 - Present; General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 1996 - 2009; Mosaic Funds Distributor, LLC (an affiliated brokerage firm of Madison), Principal, 1998 - Present; Concord Asset Management, LLC ("Concord") (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), General Counsel, 1996 - 2009; NorthRoad Capital Management LLC ("NorthRoad") (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, 2011 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel, and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Secretary, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, 1992 - 2009; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 2005 - 2009; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Annual Report - 39
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Trustees and Officers | continued
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Pamela M. Krill 1966 | General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | MIH, MAM, Madison, Madison Scottsdale, LC, Mosaic Funds Distributor, and Concord, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer, 2009 - Present NorthRoad, General Counsel & Chief Legal Officer, 2011 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; CUNA Mutual Insurance Society (insurance company with affiliated investment advisory, brokerage and mutual fund operations), Madison, WI, Managing Associate General Counsel-Securities & Investments, 2007 - 2009; Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. (law firm), Madison and Milwaukee, WI, Shareholder, Securities Practice Group, 1994-2007 | N/A |
Independent Trustees
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Philip E. Blake 1944 | Trustee, 2001 - Present | Retired investor; Lee Enterprises, Inc (news and advertising publisher), Madison, WI, Vice President, 1998 - 2001; Madison Newspapers, Inc., Madison, WI, President and Chief Executive Officer, 1993 - 2000 | 44 | Madison Newspapers, Inc., 1993 - Present; Meriter Hospital & Health Services, 2000 - Present; Edgewood College, 2003 - Present; Chairman of the Board, 2010 - Present; Nerites Corporation (technology company), 2004 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), 2001 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
Annual Report - 40
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Trustees and Officers | concluded
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
James R Imhoff, Jr. 1944 | Trustee, 1996 - Present | First Weber Group (real estate brokers), Madison, WI, Chief Executive Officer, 1996 - Present | 44 | Park Bank, 1978 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
Lorence D. Wheeler 1938 | Trustee, 1996 - Present | Retired investor; Credit Union Benefits Services, Inc. (a provider of retirement plans and related services for credit union employees nationwide), Madison, WI, President, 1986 - 1997 | 44 | Grand Mountain Bank FSB and Grand Mountain Bancshares, Inc. 2003 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund. 2005 - Present; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
1 Independent Trustees serve in such capacity until the Trustee reaches the age of 76, unless retirement is waived by unanimous vote of the remaining Trustees on an annual basis.
2 As of the date of this report, the fund complex consists of the Trust with 6 portfolios, the MEMBERS Mutual Funds with 13 portfolios, the Ultra Series Fund with 17 portfolios, the Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (a closed-end fund) and the Madison Mosaic Income, Tax-Free and Government Money Market Trusts, which together have 7 portfolios, for a grand total of 44 separate portfolios in the fund complex. Not every Trustee is a member of the Board of Trustees of every fund in the fund complex, as noted above.
The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Trustees and is available upon request. To request a free copy, call Madison Mosaic Funds at 1-800-368-3195.
Annual Report - 41
The Madison Mosaic Family of Mutual Funds
Equity Trust
Investors Fund
Mid-Cap Fund
Small/Mid-Cap Fund
Disciplined Equity Fund
Balanced Fund
Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Income Trust
Government Fund
Core Bond Fund
Institutional Bond Fund
Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund
Tax-Free Trust
Virginia Tax-Free Fund
Tax-Free National Fund
Government Money Market
For more complete information on any Madison Mosaic fund, including charges and expenses, request a prospectus by calling 1-800-368-3195. Read it carefully before you invest or send money. This document does not constitute an offering by the distributor in any jurisdiction in which such offering may not be lawfully made. Mosaic Funds Distributor, LLC.
TRANSFER AGENT
Madison Mosaic¨ Funds
c/o US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
P.O. Box 701
Milwaukee, WI 53201-0701
TELEPHONE NUMBERS
Shareholder Service
Toll-free nationwide: 888-670-3600
550 Science Drive
Madison, Wisconsin 53711
SEC File Number 811-3615
ANNUAL REPORT
December 31, 2010
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund (MADOX)
Active Equity Management combined with a Covered Call Option Strategy
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | 1 |
Portfolio of Investments | 4 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 6 |
Statement of Operations | 7 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 8 |
Financial Highlights | 9 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 10 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 15 |
Other Information | 16 |
Trustees and Officers | 18 |
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance
What happened in the market during 2010?
After bottoming in July, risk-based assets continued their relentless climb through year-end 2010. Mid-year fears of a spreading sovereign debt crisis in Europe were at least temporarily pushed aside as investors were emboldened by soothing words and actions from the Federal Reserve. This monetary stimulus, along with a splash of fiscal stimulus in the form of lower social security payroll taxes, signaled to investors that authorities were willing to take whatever measures necessary to support economic growth. The stock market responded positively to this environment as increased investor confidence led to a move toward higher risk assets. This was clearly evident in the S&P 500’s 23% advance in the second half of the year. The fourth quarter’s 10.8% gain was a virtually unabated upward surge. The incredibly strong second half of the year offset a tumultuous first half in which the market moved higher through late April, continuing the strong rally from the March 2009 lows and then corrected sharply in May and June as economic news suggested sluggishness and the European sovereign debt crisis threatened to impact global markets. Despite this correction, the trend for the market was broadly positive for 2010 with the S&P 500 posting a healthy 15.1% return.
As sentiment toward economic stability and growth improved through the year, investors increasingly gravitated to the most economically sensitive areas of the market leading to strong leadership from cyclical sectors such as Consumer Discretionary and Industrials as well as commodity sensitive sectors such as Energy and Materials. Apart from the market correction during the second quarter of the year, traditionally defensive sectors such as Health Care, Consumer Staples and Utilities lagged. In addition, investors were more fixated on macroeconomic issues in 2010 and less on company fundamental issues. This resulted in a high level of correlation among individual stocks and a lack of distinction between higher quality, fundamentally strong companies and lower quality, higher risk companies.
As the stock market began its long recovery from the March 2009 lows, volatility began to retreat from historic highs and trended lower through the rest of 2009. That trend continued in early 2010 as the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) began the year at 21.7 and fell below 16 by mid April. The ensuing correction in the stock market raised fear levels significantly and the VIX Index surged above the 45 level. As the market returned to an upward bias in the second half of the year, volatility, again, retreated steadily and ended the year below 18. Over the past 5 years, this level has seemingly been a low point for volatility and a high point of investor comfort or complacency.
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS AS OF 12/31/10 | |
Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% |
Energy | 14.4% |
Financials | 22.9% |
Health Care | 22.1% |
Information Technology | 17.2% |
Cash & Other | 10.9% |
How did the fund perform given the marketplace conditions during 2010?
During the course of the previous annual period, 2009, MADOX outperformed both the S&P 500 and the CBOE S&P BuyWrite Index (BXM) by allowing underlying stock positions to recover with the overall market. Acknowledging the strong stock performance, the strategy of the fund in 2010 was to become more fully covered as the market returned to a more normalized return pattern. This was accomplished opportunistically throughout the year and particularly during the fourth quarter following the strong upswing in stock prices. As such, with a larger percentage of portfolio stock positions covered by call options, MADOX lagged the S&P 500 as would be expected during sharp market run-ups. For the year ending December 31, 2010, the fund returned 4.95% compared to the 15.1% return on the S&P 500. The fund’s performance was in line with the CBOE S&P BuyWrite Index (BXM) return of 5.9%. The BXM Index represents the passive version of a covered call strategy on the S&P 500.
Overall stock performance during the year was muted by the high level of correlation in the market and the fund’s sector exposure. The fund had little exposure to hot sectors such as Industrials and Materials as these areas typically provide fewer companies meeting our consistent growth criterion and, in the case of Industrials, offer very low option premiums. Also, an over-weighted positioning in Health Care
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 1
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | continued
related stocks weighed on performance as this defensive sector lagged throughout the year. Stock performance in Technology, Financial, Energy and Consumer Discretionary holdings provided a positive offset. The surge in the market during the second half of the year proved to be a headwind to the fund as more option positions moved In-The-Money resulting in some stock positions being called away and a corresponding increase in cash which was reinvested in an opportunistic fashion. A higher level of cash during a surging market was a hindrance to short term performance, however, it was our preference to tread cautiously following such a sharp upward market move. This was particularly evident during the fourth quarter as the market moved sharply higher providing few opportunities to become more fully invested. Our defensive posture was echoed in the option strategy whereby at year end 88% of the equity positions were covered by call options, many written close-to-the-money in order to obtain maximum protection in the form of higher premiums.
Describe the fund’s portfolio equity and option structure.
As of December 31, 2010, the fund held 33 equity securities and unexpired covered call options had been written against 88% of the fund’s stock holdings. During 2010, the fund generated premiums of $538,835 from its covered call writing activities. Some of these premiums were realized and helped offset large losses realized during the year on long held equity positions. It is the strategy of the fund to write "out-of-the-money" call options. As of December 31, 55% of the fund’s call options (17 of 31 different options) remained "out-of-the-money". (Out-of-the-money means the stock price is below the strike price at which the shares could be called away by the option holder.) The number of "out-of-the-money" options has declined from the beginning of the year as the strength of the market rally has moved many share prices above their corresponding option strike prices. The fund’s managers have also begun writing options "closer-to-the-money" in order to capture higher premium income and provide the fund added protection from a reversal in the market’s upward surge.
Which sectors are prevalent in the fund?
From a sector perspective, MADOX’s largest exposure as of December 31, 2010 was to the Financial Sector, followed by Health Care, Technology (and technology related), Energy and Consumer Discretionary. The fund was not invested in the Consumer Staples, Telecommunication Services and Utilities Sectors as of year-end.
Discuss the fund’s security and option selection process.
The fund is managed by two teams of investment professionals. We like to think of these teams as a "right hand" and "left hand" meaning they work together to make common stock and option decisions. We use fundamental analysis to select solid companies with good growth prospects and attractive valuations. We then seek attractive call options to write on those stocks. It is our belief that this partnership of active management between the equity and option teams provides investors with an innovative, risk-moderated approach to equity investing. The fund’s portfolio managers seek to invest in a portfolio of common stocks that have favorable "PEG" ratios (Price-Earnings ratio to Growth rate) as well as financial strength and industry leadership. As bottom-up investors, we focus on the fundamental businesses of our companies. Our stock selection philosophy strays away from the "beat the street" mentality, as we seek companies that have sustainable competitive advantages, predictable cash flows, solid balance sheets and high-quality management teams. By concentrating on long-term prospects and circumventing the "instant gratification" school of thought, we believe we bring elements of consistency, stability and predictability to our shareholders.
Once we have selected attractive and solid names for the fund, we employ our call writing strategy. This procedure entails selling calls that are primarily out-of the-money, meaning that the strike price is higher than the common stock price, so that the fund can participate in some stock appreciation. By receiving option premiums, the fund receives a high level of investment income and adds an element of downside protection. Call options may be written over a number of time periods and at differing strike prices in an effort to maximize the protective value to the strategy and spread income evenly throughout the year.
What is management’s outlook for the market and fund in 2011?
The U.S. economy looks better than it did at this time last year, and we’ve upgraded our view going forward. The
2 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | concluded
holiday retail season proved a pleasant surprise with retail sales growth exceeding initially gloomy estimates. The manufacturing sector has a firmer tone, and state claims for unemployment insurance have resumed their downward trend after a choppy period this summer. Despite the more buoyant economic mood and our upgraded assessment of future prospects, we still consider the outlook for 2011 to be somewhat below where the economy should be at this stage of the recovery for several reasons. The housing market remains an issue and has exhibited renewed softness with the expiration of tax incentives for home purchase. Mortgage rates have recently edged higher as overall market interest rates have increased, and the inventory of unsold homes is still near record highs. Housing starts are still near the lows recorded in the spring of 2009. Despite some recent improvement, the labor market remains extremely challenging. Gains in productivity are allowing businesses and workers to do more with less, and it is unlikely that payroll growth will advance in earnest until productivity growth levels off. The plus side of strong productivity growth has been low inflation and sustained earnings improvement in corporate America, leading to a firmer stock market. Corporate balance sheets are, by and large, in excellent shape, and creditworthiness is strong.
Looking forward, we are encouraged by recent economic data. It would appear that moderate economic growth is in the cards for at least the first half of 2011. Generally, this would be considered a good backdrop for investors. Nonetheless, significant and cautionary macroeconomic issues persist. As with past economic recoveries, the economic data will likely be volatile and capital markets will respond similarly. Ironically, one of our current concerns is the level of investor complacency that has rather suddenly returned to the stock market. Current sentiment is strongly bullish, while volatility has declined to near three-year lows; from our perspective, this is cause for some short-term caution. Over the near term, we expect the stock market to consolidate its recent gains with increasing risk relating to the possibility that expectations of economic growth are proven to be overly optimistic. While we wait for economic and corporate reality to catch up with expectations, we remain relatively defensively postured.
TOP TEN STOCK HOLDINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 | |
% of net assets | |
Biogen Idec Inc. | 5.99% |
Mylan Inc./PA | 4.53% |
State Street Corp. | 4.14% |
Weatherford International Ltd. | 4.08% |
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 3.86% |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 3.78% |
Cisco Systems Inc. | 3.62% |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc./The | 3.61% |
Gilead Sciences Inc. | 3.24% |
Powershares QQQ Nasdaq 100 | 3.21% |
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN THE VALUE OF A $1,000,000 INVESTMENT
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12108.jpg)
Past performance is not predictive of future performance. The above graphs and tables do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or redemption of fund shares and assumes all dividends have been reinvested.
*Commencement of operations was March 31, 2006.
The CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index (BXM) is a benchmark index designed to track the performance of a hypothetical buy-write strategy on the S&P 500 Index. The BXM is a passive total return index based on (1) buying an S&P 500 stock index portfolio, and (2) "writing" the near-term S&P 500 Index "covered" call option, generally on the third Friday of each month. The S&P 500 Index is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of 500 of the largest companies in the United States as measured by market capitalization. Neither index reflects any investment management fees or transaction expenses, nor the effects of taxes, fees or other charges.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 3
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | December 31, 2010
Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
COMMON STOCK - 89.1% | ||
Consumer Discretionary - 12.5% | ||
American Eagle Outfitters Inc. | 10,000 | $ 146,300 |
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.* | 1,800 | 88,470 |
Best Buy Co. Inc. | 4,000 | 137,160 |
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 8,600 | 215,688 |
TJX Cos. Inc. | 2,500 | 110,975 |
698,593 | ||
Energy - 14.4% | ||
EOG Resources Inc. | 1,300 | 118,833 |
Noble Corp.* | 4,000 | 143,080 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 2,000 | 167,000 |
Southwestern Energy Co.* | 4,000 | 149,720 |
Weatherford International Ltd.* | 10,000 | 228,000 |
806,633 | ||
Financials - 22.9% | ||
American Express Co. | 4,000 | 171,680 |
Bank of America Corp. | 11,000 | 146,740 |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 7,000 | 211,400 |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc./The | 1,200 | 201,792 |
Morgan Stanley | 6,000 | 163,260 |
State Street Corp. | 5,000 | 231,700 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 5,000 | 154,950 |
1,281,522 | ||
Health Care - 22.1% | ||
Biogen Idec Inc.* | 5,000 | 335,250 |
Celgene Corp.* | 3,000 | 177,420 |
Genzyme Corp.* | 2,000 | 142,400 |
Gilead Sciences Inc.* | 5,000 | 181,200 |
Mylan Inc./PA* | 12,000 | 253,560 |
Pfizer Inc. | 8,500 | 148,835 |
1,238,665 | ||
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |
Information Technology - 17.2% | ||
Adobe Systems Inc.* | 3,800 | $ 116,964 |
Brocade Communications Systems Inc.* | 20,000 | 105,800 |
Cisco Systems Inc.* | 10,000 | 202,300 |
eBay Inc.* | 4,200 | 116,886 |
Google Inc., Class A* | 300 | 178,191 |
QUALCOMM Inc. | 300 | 14,847 |
Symantec Corp.* | 6,000 | 100,440 |
Visa Inc., Class A | 1,800 | 126,684 |
962,112 | ||
Total Common Stock (Cost $5,059,650) | 4,987,525 | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 5.7% | ||
iPATH S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN* | 3,600 | 135,324 |
Powershares QQQ Nasdaq 100 | 3,300 | 179,751 |
Total Investment Companies (Cost $311,000) | 315,075 | |
Repurchase Agreement - 17.7% | ||
With U.S. Bank National Association issued 12/31/10 at 0.01%, due 1/3/11, collateralized by $1,010,787 in Freddie Mac MBS Pool #E01424 due 8/1/18. Proceeds at maturity are $990,968 (Cost $990,967) | 990,967 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 112.5% (Cost $6,361,617) | 6,293,567 | |
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (5.3%) | (300,012) | |
Total Call Options Written - (7.2%) | (401,102) | |
TOTAL ASSETS - 100.0% | $5,592,453 |
* | Non-income producing |
ETN | Exchange Traded Note |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
4 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Portfolio of Investments | December 31, 2010 | concluded
Call Options Written | Contracts | Expiration | Strike Price | Market Value |
Adobe Systems Inc. | 38 | April 2011 | 35.00 | $ 3,040 |
American Eagle Outfitters Inc. | 100 | August 2011 | 16.00 | 11,000 |
American Express Co. | 40 | April 2011 | 46.00 | 5,300 |
Bank of America Corp. | 110 | April 2011 | 14.00 | 8,360 |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 35 | June 2011 | 30.00 | 8,120 |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 35 | January 2011 | 27.00 | 11,550 |
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. | 18 | May 2011 | 47.00 | 8,280 |
Best Buy Co. Inc. | 40 | March 2011 | 44.00 | 180 |
Biogen Idec Inc. | 50 | April 2011 | 62.50 | 33,250 |
Celgene Corp. | 9 | April 2011 | 60.00 | 2,857 |
Celgene Corp. | 21 | January 2011 | 55.00 | 9,555 |
eBay Inc. | 42 | April 2011 | 30.00 | 4,073 |
EOG Resources Inc. | 13 | April 2011 | 95.00 | 5,623 |
Genzyme Corp. | 20 | April 2011 | 70.00 | 7,950 |
Gilead Sciences Inc. | 50 | May 2011 | 39.00 | 7,550 |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc./The | 12 | January 2011 | 145.00 | 28,200 |
iPATH S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN | 36 | February 2011 | 40.00 | 8,820 |
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 86 | April 2011 | 23.00 | 23,478 |
Morgan Stanley | 60 | July 2011 | 28.00 | 12,330 |
Mylan Inc./PA | 120 | April 2011 | 21.00 | 16,260 |
Noble Corp. | 40 | March 2011 | 37.00 | 5,640 |
Powershares QQQ Nasdaq 100 | 33 | February 2011 | 54.00 | 5,858 |
QUALCOMM Inc. | 3 | January 2011 | 35.00 | 4,358 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 20 | January 2011 | 65.00 | 37,150 |
Southwestern Energy Co. | 40 | March 2011 | 39.00 | 6,200 |
State Street Corp. | 50 | January 2011 | 40.00 | 32,750 |
Symantec Corp. | 60 | January 2011 | 17.50 | 990 |
TJX Cos. Inc. | 25 | July 2011 | 46.00 | 5,688 |
Visa Inc. | 18 | January 2011 | 75.00 | 567 |
Weatherford International Ltd. | 100 | January 2011 | 16.00 | 68,000 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 50 | January 2011 | 27.50 | 18,125 |
TOTAL CALL OPTIONS WRITTEN (Premiums received $272,036) | $401,102 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 5
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | December 31, 2010
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
ASSETS | |
Investments, at value (Note 1 and 2) | |
Investment securities | $5,302,600 |
Repurchase agreements | 990,967 |
Total investments (cost $6,361,617) | 6,293,567 |
Cash | 10,900 |
Receivables | |
Investment securities sold | 10,584 |
Dividends and interest | 1,070 |
Total assets | 6,316,121 |
LIABILITIES | |
Options written, at value (premiums received of $272,036) | 401,102 |
Payables | |
Investment securities purchased | 317,816 |
Auditor fees | 4,000 |
Independent trustee fees | 750 |
Total liabilities | 723,668 |
NET ASSETS | $5,592,453 |
Net assets consists of: | |
Paid in capital | 9,103,711 |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and options transactions | (3,314,142) |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and options transactions | (197,116) |
Net assets | $5,592,453 |
CAPITAL SHARES ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING | |
An unlimited number of capital shares authorized, $.01 par value per share (Note 7) | 361,384 |
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE | $15.48 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
6 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Statements of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2010
INVESTMENT INCOME (Note 1) | |
Interest income | $ 125 |
Dividend income | 44,675 |
Total investment income | 44,800 |
EXPENSES (Notes 3 and 5) | |
Investment advisory fees | 43,714 |
Performance fulcrum fee | (9,457) |
Other expenses: | |
Service agreement fees | 3,357 |
Auditor fees | 5,300 |
Independent trustee fees | 3,000 |
Total other expenses | 11,657 |
Total expenses | 45,914 |
NET INVESTMENT LOSS | (1,114) |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investments | (2,275,728) |
Options | 145,373 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 2,415,258 |
Options | (33,952) |
NET GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND OPTIONS TRANSACTIONS | 250,951 |
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | $249,837 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 7
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the period indicated
Year Ended December 31, | ||
2010 | 2009 | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (1,114) | $ 3,540 |
Net realized loss on investments and options transactions | (2,130,355) | (867,555) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and options transactions | 2,381,306 | 2,212,483 |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 249,837 | 1,348,468 |
DISTRIBUTION TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM NET INVESTMENT INCOME | – | (5,373) |
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (Note 7) | (694,311) | 51,981 |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | $ (444,474) | $1,395,076 |
NET ASSETS | ||
Beginning of period | $6,036,927 | $4,641,851 |
End of period | $5,592,453 | $6,036,927 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
8 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | December 31, 2010
Financial Highlights
Per Share Operating Performance for One Share Outstanding Throughout the Period
Year Ended December 31, | For the period March 31, 2006* through | ||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $14.75 | $11.44 | $18.13 | $21.18 | $20.00 |
Investment Operations | |||||
Net investment income (loss) | (0.00)1 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.10 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and options transactions | 0.73 | 3.31 | (5.40) | (0.84) | 1.44 |
Total from investment operations | 0.73 | 3.32 | (5.25) | (0.71) | 1.54 |
Less distributions from: | |||||
Net investment income | – | (0.01) | (0.15) | (0.13) | (0.10) |
Capital gains | – | – | (1.29) | (2.21) | (0.26) |
Total distributions | – | (0.01) | (1.44) | (2.34) | (0.36) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $15.48 | $14.75 | $11.44 | $18.13 | $21.18 |
Total Investment Return (%) | 4.95 | 29.05 | (29.91) | (3.98) | 7.74 |
Ratios and Supplemental Data | |||||
Net assets, end of period (thousands) | $5,592 | $6,037 | $4,642 | $13,153 | $11,511 |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 0.94** |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | (0.02) | 0.07 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.83** |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 81 | 46 | 40 | 103 | 41 |
* Commencement of operations. ** Annualized. 1 The fund had a net investment loss but it was less than a penny. Net asset value figures are based on average daily shares outstanding during the year. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 9
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | December 31, 2010
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Madison Mosaic Equity Trust (the "Trust") is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified investment management company. The Trust currently offers six portfolios, each of which is a diversified mutual fund. This report contains information about one of these portfolios, the Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund (the "Fund"), which commenced operations March 31, 2006. Its objectives and strategies are detailed in its prospectus. The remaining five Trust portfolios present their financial information in a separate report.
Portfolio Valuation: Securities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at their closing sale price except for securities traded on NASDAQ which are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price ("NOCP") and options which are valued at the mean between the best bid and best ask prices across all option exchanges. Repurchase agreements and other securities having maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Securities having longer maturities, for which quotations are readily available, are valued at the mean between their closing bid and ask prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
The Fund has adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") applicable guidance on fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that each fund would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data "inputs" and minimize the use of unobservable "inputs" and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk (for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value including such a pricing model and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique). Inputs may be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 –quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rate volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risk, benchmark yields, transactions, bids, offers, new issues, spreads and other relationships observed in the markets among comparable securities, underlying equity of the issuer; and proprietary pricing models such as yield measures calculated using factors such as cash flows, financial or collateral performance and other reference data, etc.) |
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The valuation techniques used by the Fund to measure fair value for the period ended December 31, 2010 maximized the use of observable inputs and minimized the use of unobservable inputs. As of December 31, 2010, the Fund held no securities deemed as a Level 3.
10 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Notes to Financial Statements | continued
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2010 in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at fair value:
Fund | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Value at 12/31/10 |
Madison Institutional Equity Option | ||||
Assets: | ||||
Common Stocks | $4,987,525 | $ – | $ – | $4,987,525 |
Investment Companies | 315,075 | $ – | $ – | 315,075 |
Repurchase Agreement | – | 990,967 | – | 990,967 |
Total | $5,302,600 | $ 990,967 | $ – | $6,293,567 |
Liabilities: | ||||
Written options | $ 401,102 | $ – | $ – | $ 401,102 |
Total | $ 401,102 | $ – | $ – | $ 401,102 |
Please see Portfolio of Investments for common stock sector breakdown and listing of all securities within each caption. |
The Funds has adopted the Accounting Standard Update, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures; Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements which provides guidance on how investment assets and liabilities are to be valued and disclosed. Specifically, the amendment requires reporting entities to disclose i) the input and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements, for Level 2 or Level 3 positions, ii) transfers between all levels (including Level 1 and Level 2) will be required to be disclosed on a gross basis (i.e. transfers out must be disclosed separately from transfers in) as well as the reason(s) for the transfer and iii) purchases, sales, issuances and settlements must be shown on a gross basis in the Level 3 rollforward rather than as one net number. The effective date of the amendment is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, however, the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity for purchases, sales, issuance and settlements on a gross basis will be effective for interim and annual period beginning after December 15, 2010. There were no transfers between classification levels during the period ended December 31, 2010.
In March 2008, FASB issued guidance on enhanced disclosures about a fund’s derivitive and hedging activities in order to enable investors to understand: a) how and why a fund uses derivative investments, b) how derivative instruments and related hedge fund items are accounted for, and c) how derivative instruments and related hedge fund items affect a fund’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The following table presents the types of derivatives in the Fund and their effect:
Statement of Asset & Liability Presentation of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments | ||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||
Derivatives not accounted for as hedging instruments | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Fair Value | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Fair Value |
Equity contracts | -- | Options written | $401,102 |
The following table presents the effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010:
Realized Gain on Derivatives: | Change in Unrealized Depreciation on Derivatives | |
Derivatives not accounted for as hedging instruments | ||
Equity contracts | $145,373 | $(33,952) |
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 11
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Notes to Financial Statements | continued
Investment Transactions: Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. The cost of investments sold is determined on the identified cost basis for financial statement and federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income: Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Other income is accrued as earned.
Distribution of Income and Gains: Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Net investment income, determined as gross investment income less total expenses, is declared as a regular dividend and distributed to shareholders at year-end for the Fund. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually at year-end.
There were no distributions in 2010. The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders was $5,373 of ordinary income in 2009.
As of December 31, 2010, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows :
Net realized losses on investments | $(3,270,359) |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | (240,899) |
$(3,511,258) |
Net realized gains or losses may differ for financial and tax reporting purposes as a result of loss deferrals related to wash sales and post-October transactions.
Income Tax: No provision is made for federal income taxes since it is the intention of the Trust to comply with the provisions of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code available to investment companies and to make the requisite distribution to shareholders of taxable income which will be sufficient to relieve it from all or substantially all federal income taxes.
The Regulated Investment Company ("RIC") Modernization Act of 2010 (the "Modernization Act") modernizes several of the federal income and excise tax provisions related to RICs. The Modernization Act contains simplification provisions effective for taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010, which are aimed at preventing disqualification of a RIC for "inadvertent" failures of the asset diversification and/or qualifying income tests. Additionally, the Modernization Act allows capital losses to be carried forward indefinitely, and retain the character of the original loss, exempts RICs from the preferential dividend rule, and repealed the 60-day designation requirement for certain types of pay-through income and gains.
As of and during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Fund did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The Fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the Fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
As of December 31, 2010, the Fund had available for federal income tax purposes capital loss carryovers which will expire as follows:
Expiration Date | |
December 31, 2017 | $1,125,781 |
December 31, 2018 | 2,144,578 |
Due to inherent differences in the recognition of income, expenses, and realized gains/losses under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and federal income tax purposes, permanent differences between book and tax basis reporting for the 2010 fiscal year have been identified and appropriately reclassified on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. A permanent book and tax difference relating to net investment losses in the amount of $1,114 was reclassified from accumulated undistributed net investment income to paid in capital.
Information on the tax components of investments, excluding option contracts, as of December 31, 2010 is as follows:
Aggregate Cost | $ 6,405,399 |
Gross unrealized appreciation | 298,906 |
Gross unrealized depreciation | (410,738) |
Net unrealized depreciation | $ (111,832) |
Tax years open to examination by tax authorities under the statute of limitations include 2007 through 2010.
Clarification of Investment Strategy: When options are exercised and stocks are called away, the Fund will see its cash level materially increase. Although the Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its assets in securities under normal circumstances, there may be times when the Fund’s cash and cash equivalents represent more than 20% of the Fund’s assets for indeterminate periods until it is opportune to re-invest these amounts in securities pursuant to the
12 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Notes to Financial Statements | continued
Fund’s equity and option strategies. The Fund monitors this credit risk and has not experienced any losses related to this risk.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions. Such estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. Investments in Repurchase Agreements. When the Fund purchases securities under agree-ments to resell, the securities are held for safekeeping by the custodian bank as collateral. Should the market value of the securities purchased under such an agreement decrease below the principal amount to be received at the termination of the agreement plus accrued interest, the counterparty is required to place an equivalent amount of additional securities in safekeeping with the Trust’s custodian bank. The Fund, along with other registered investment companies having Advisory and Services Agreements with the same investment adviser, transfers uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. The aggregate balance in this joint trading account is invested in one or more consolidated repurchase agreements whose underlying securities are U.S. Treasury or federal agency obligations. As of December 31, 2010, the Fund had approximately an 6.0% interest in the consolidated repurchase agreement of $16,483,850 collateralized by $16,813,538 in Freddie Mac Mortgage Backed Security Notes. Proceeds at maturity were $16,483,864.
3. Investment Advisory Fees. The investment adviser to the Fund, Madison Investment Advisors, LLC (the "Adviser"), earns an advisory fee equal to 0.75% per annum of the average net assets of the Fund. As of April 1, 2007, a fulcrum fee was applied to the advisory fee which can increase, decrease or have no effect on the advisory fee based on certain performance criteria described in the Fund’s prospectus. The fee is accrued daily and is paid monthly. Prior to November 30, 2010, the investment adviser to the Trust was Madison Mosaic, LLC and its parent, Madison Investment Advisors, Inc. On November 30, 2010, Madison Mosaic, LLC changed its name to Madison Investment Advisors, LLC and became the sole Adviser.
4. Investment Transactions. Purchases and sales of securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $4,063,584 and $4,187,497, respectively. No U.S. Government securities were purchased or sold during the period.
5. Other Expenses. Under a separate Services Agreement, the Adviser will provide or arrange for the Fund to have all other necessary operational and support services for a fee based on a percentage of average net assets. These fees are accrued daily and paid monthly. The Fund also pays the expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees and auditors directly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, these fees amounted to $3,000 and $5,300, respectively. The combined Services Agreement fees paid to the Adviser and Independent Trustees and auditor fees may not exceed 0.20% of average net assets.
6. Covered Call Options. The Fund will pursue its primary objective by employing an option strategy of writing (selling) covered call options on common stocks. The number of call options the Fund can write (sell) is limited by the amount of equity securities the Fund holds in its portfolio. The Fund will not write (sell) "naked" or uncovered call options. The Fund seeks to produce a high level of current income and gains generated from option writing premiums and, to a lesser extent, from dividends.
When an option is written, the premium received is recorded as an asset with an equal liability and is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current market value of the option written. These liabilities are reflected as options written in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire unexercised are recorded on the expiration date as a realized gain. The difference between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchase transitions, as a realized loss. If a call option is exercised; the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether there has been a realized gain or loss.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 13
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Notes to Financial Statements | concluded
Transactions in option contracts during the year ended December 31, 2010 were as follows:
Number of Contracts | Premiums Received | |
Options outstanding, beginning of period | 1,434 | $311,756 |
Options written | 3,107 | 538,835 |
Options expired | (935) | (181,628) |
Options closed | (1,328) | (199,171) |
Options assigned | (904) | (197,756) |
Options outstanding at end of period | 1,374 | $272,036 |
7. Capital Share Transactions.
An unlimited number of capital shares, without par value, are authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||
2010 | 2009 | |
In Dollars | ||
Shares sold | $10,000 | $92,646 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | – | 5,206 |
Total shares issued | 10,000 | 97,852 |
Shares redeemed | (704,311) | (45,871) |
Net increase (decrease) | $(694,311) | $51,981 |
In Shares | ||
Shares sold | 645 | 6,877 |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | – | 353 |
Total shares issued | 645 | 7,230 |
Shares redeemed | (48,637) | (3,453) |
Net increase (decrease) | (47,992) | 3,777 |
8. Subsequent Events. Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Funds’ financial statements. No events have taken place that meet the definition of a subsequent event that requires adjustment to, or disclosure in the financial statements.
14 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments of the Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund (the "Fund"), as of December 31, 2010 and the related statement of operations for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and financial highlights for each of the four years in the period then ended and for the period from March 31, 2006 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2006. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2010 by correspondence with the Fund’s custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of December 31, 2010, and the results of its operations for the year then ended and the changes of its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and financial highlights for each of the four years in the period then ended and for the period from March 31, 2006 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000310407-11-000055/eqncsr12109.jpg)
Chicago, Illinois
February 22, 2011
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 15
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | December 31, 2010
Other Information
Fund Expenses
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including Investment advisory fees and other fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. See Notes 3 and 5 above for an explanation of the types of costs charged by the Fund. This Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on January 1, 2010 and held for the six-months ended December 31, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table below titled "Based on Actual Total Return" provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,500 ending account valued divided by $1,000 = 8.5), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During the Period."
Based on Actual Total Return1 | ||||
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Annualized Expense Ratio | Expenses Paid During the Period2 | |
Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,147.52 | 0.79% | $4.31 |
1For the six-months ended December 31, 2010. 2Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365. |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below titled "Based on Hypothetical Total Return" provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare the 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the Fund with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Based on Hypothetical Total Return1 | ||||
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Annualized Expense Ratio | Expenses Paid During the Period2 | |
Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | $1,000.00 | $1,025.47 | 0.79% | $4.02 |
1For the six-months ended December 31, 2010. 2Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365. |
16 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Other Information | concluded
Forward-Looking Statement Disclosure.
One of our most important responsibilities as investment company managers is to communicate with shareholders in an open and direct manner. Some of our comments in our letters to shareholders are based on current management expectations and are considered "forward-looking statements." Actual future results, however, may prove to be different from our expectations. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as "estimate," "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "plan" and other similar terms. We cannot promise future returns. Our opinions are a reflection of our best judgment at the time this report is compiled, and we disclaim any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Proxy Voting Information.
The Fund adopted policies that provide guidance and set forth parameters for the voting of proxies relating to securities held in the Fund. Additionally, information regarding how the Fund voted proxies related to portfolio securities, if applicable, during the period ended December 31, 2009 is available to you upon request and free of charge, by writing to Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund, 550 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711 or by calling toll-free at 1-800-368-3195. The Fund’s proxy voting policies and voting information may also be obtained by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") web site at www.sec.gov. The Fund will respond to shareholder requests for copies of our policies and voting information within two business days of request by first-class mail or other means designed to ensure prompt delivery.
N-Q Disclosure.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information about the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Form N-Q and other information about the Fund are available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of this information may also be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, DC 20549-0102. Finally, you may call the Fund at 800-368-3195 if you would like a copy of Form N-Q and we will mail one to you at no charge.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 17
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | December 31, 2010
Trustees and Officers
The address of each trustee and officer of the funds is 550 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711, except that Mr. Mason’s address is 8777 N. Gainey Center Drive, #220, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258. The Statement of Additional Information, which includes additional information about the trustees and officers, is available at no cost on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by calling Madison Mosaic Funds at 1-800-368-3195.
Interested Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Katherine L. Frank1 1960 | President, 1996 - Present, and Trustee, 2001 - Present | Madison Investment Holdings, Inc. ("MIH") (affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and Vice President, 1986 - 2010; Madison Asset Management, LLC ("MAM") (affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; Vice President, 2004 - 2010; Madison Investment Advisors, LLC ("Madison"), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; President, 1996 - 2010; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (closed end fund), President, 2005 - Present; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund (closed end fund), Vice President, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17) (mutual funds), President, 2009 - Present | Madison Mosaic Funds (all but Equity Trust), 2001 - Present; Madison; Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
Frank E. Burgess1 1942 | Trustee and Vice President, 1996 - Present | MIH, Founder, Executive Director and President, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and President, 1973 - 2010; MAM, Executive Director and President, 2010 - Present; President, 2004 - 2010; Madison, Executive Director and President, 2010 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Vice President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Vice President, 2009 - Present | Madison Mosaic Funds (13), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund and Madison/Claymore Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; Capitol Bank of Madison, WI, 1995 - Present; American Riviera Bank of Santa Barbara, CA, 2006 - Present |
1 "Interested person" as defined in the 1940 Act. Considered an interested Trustee because of the position held with the investment adviser of the Funds.
18 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Trustees and Officers | continued
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Jay R. Sekelsky 1959 | Vice President, 1996 - Present | MIH, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and Vice President, 1990 - 2010; MAM, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Madison, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Vice President, 1996 - 2010; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Vice President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund and Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Paul Lefurgey 1964 | Vice President, 2009 - Present | MIH, Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income Investments, 2005 - Present; MAM and Madison, Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income Investments, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Capital Advisors, Inc. ("MCA") (investment advisory firm), Madison, WI, Vice President 2003 - 2005; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Greg D. Hoppe 1969 | Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 1999 - 2009 | MIH and Madison, Vice President, 1999 - Present; MAM, Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 1999 - 2009; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Treasurer, 2005 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 2005 - 2009; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2008 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Treasurer, 2009 - Present | N/A |
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 19
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Trustees and Officers | continued
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Holly S. Baggot 1960 | Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present | MIH and Madison, Vice President, 2010 - Present; MAM, Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Secretary, 1999 - Present; Treasurer, 2008 - 2009; Assistant Treasurer, 1997 - 2007; MCA, Director-Mutual Funds, 2008 - 2009; Director-Mutual Fund Operations, 2006 - 2008; Operations Officer-Mutual Funds, 2005 - 2006; Senior Manager-Product & Fund Operations, 2001 - 2005 | N/A |
W. Richard Mason 1960 | Chief Compliance Officer, 1992 - Present; Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; General Counsel and Secretary, 1992 - 2009 | MIH, MAM, Madison, and Madison Scottsdale, LC (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, 2009 - Present; General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 1996 - 2009; Mosaic Funds Distributor, LLC (an affiliated brokerage firm of Madison), Principal, 1998 - Present; Concord Asset Management, LLC ("Concord") (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), General Counsel, 1996 - 2009; NorthRoad Capital Management LLC ("NorthRoad") (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, 2011 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel, and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Secretary, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, 1992 - 2009; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 2005 - 2009; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | N/A |
20 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Trustees and Officers | continued
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Pamela M. Krill 1966 | General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | MIH, MAM, Madison, Madison Scottsdale, LC, Mosaic Funds Distributor, and Concord, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer, 2009 - Present; NorthRoad, General Counsel & Chief Legal Officer, 2011 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2010 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; CUNA Mutual Insurance Society (insurance company with affiliated investment advisory, brokerage and mutual fund operations), Madison, WI, Managing Associate General Counsel-Securities & Investments, 2007 - 2009; Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. (law firm), Madison and Milwaukee, WI, Shareholder, Securities Practice Group, 1994-2007 | N/A |
Independent Trustees
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
Philip E. Blake 1944 | Trustee, 2001 - Present | Retired investor; Lee Enterprises, Inc (news and advertising publisher), Madison, WI, Vice President, 1998 - 2001; Madison Newspapers, Inc., Madison, WI, President and Chief Executive Officer, 1993 - 2000 | 44 | Madison Newspapers, Inc., 1993 - Present; Meriter Hospital & Health Services, 2000 - Present; Edgewood College, 2003 - Present; Chairman of the Board, 2010 - Present; Nerites Corporation (technology company), 2004 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), 2001 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010 | 21
MADOX | Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund | Trustees and Officers | concluded
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships |
James R Imhoff, Jr. 1944 | Trustee, 1996 - Present | First Weber Group (real estate brokers), Madison, WI, Chief Executive Officer, 1996 - Present | 44 | Park Bank, 1978 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
Lorence D. Wheeler 1938 | Trustee, 1996 - Present | Retired investor; Credit Union Benefits Services, Inc. (a provider of retirement plans and related services for credit union employees nationwide), Madison, WI, President, 1986 - 1997 | 44 | Grand Mountain Bank FSB and Grand Mountain Bancshares, Inc. 2003 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (13 funds, including the Funds), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund. 2005 - Present; Madison/Claymore Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; MEMBERS Mutual Funds (13) and Ultra Series Fund (17), 2009 - Present |
1 Independent Trustees serve in such capacity until the Trustee reaches the age of 76, unless retirement is waived by unanimous vote of the remaining Trustees on an annual basis.
2 As of the date of this report, the fund complex consists of the Trust with 6 portfolios, the MEMBERS Mutual Funds with 13 portfolios, the Ultra Series Fund with 17 portfolios, the Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (a closed-end fund) and the Madison Mosaic Income, Tax-Free and Government Money Market Trusts, which together have 7 portfolios, for a grand total of 44 separate portfolios in the fund complex. Not every Trustee is a member of the Board of Trustees of every fund in the fund complex, as noted above.
The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Trustees and is available upon request. To request a free copy, call Madison Mosaic Funds at 1-800-368-3195.
22 | Madison Mosaic Equity Trust | Annual Report | December 31, 2010
This page was intentionally left blank.
This page was intentionally left blank.
The Madison Mosaic Family of Mutual Funds
Equity Trust
Investors Fund
Mid-Cap Fund
Small/Mid-Cap Fund
Disciplined Equity Fund
Balanced Fund
Madison Institutional Equity Option Fund
Income Trust
Government Fund
Core Bond Fund
Institutional Bond Fund
Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund
Tax-Free Trust
Virginia Tax-Free Fund
Tax-Free National Fund
Government Money Market
For more complete information on any Madison Mosaic fund, including charges and expenses, request a prospectus by calling 1-800-368-3195. Read it carefully before you invest or send money. This document does not constitute an offering by the distributor in any jurisdiction in which such offering may not be lawfully made. Mosaic Funds Distributor, LLC.
TRANSFER AGENT
Madison Mosaic¨ Funds
c/o US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
P.O. Box 701
Milwaukee, WI 53201-0701
TELEPHONE NUMBERS
Shareholder Service
Toll-free nationwide: 888-670-3600
550 Science Drive
Madison, Wisconsin 53711
SEC File Number 811-3615
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) The Trust has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Trust’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the Trust or a third party. The code was first adopted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.
(c) The code has not been materially amended since it was initially adopted.
(d) The Trust granted no waivers from the code during the period covered by this report.
(f) Any person may obtain a complete copy of the code without charge by calling Madison Mosaic Funds at 800-368-3195 and requesting a copy of the Madison Mosaic Funds Sarbanes Oxley Code of Ethics.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
In July 2010, Philip E. Blake, an “independent” Trustee and a member of the Trust’s audit committee, was elected to serve as the Trust’s audit committee financial expert among the three Madison Mosaic independent Trustees who so qualify to serve in that capacity. He succeeded James R. Imhoff, Jr. who served in that capacity from August 2009 through July 2010.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) Audit Fees. Total audit fees paid (or to be paid) to the registrant's principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, out of the Services Agreement fees collected from or paid on behalf of all Madison Mosaic Funds were $85,300 ($105,300 including the Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, an affiliated closed-end fund ("MSP")) and $85,300 ($108,000 including MSP). Of these amounts, approximately $52,800 and $50,500, respectively, was or will be attributable to Madison Mosaic Equity Trust and the remainder was or will be attributable to audit services provided to other Madison Mosaic Funds registrants.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. None.
(c) Tax-Fees. None.
(d) All Other Fees. None.
(e) (1) Before any accountant is engaged by the registrant to render audit or non-audit services, the engagement must be approved by the audit committee as contemplated by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(A) of Rule 2-01of Regulation S-X.
(2) Not applicable.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) Not applicable.
(h) Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Schedule included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No changes. The Trust does not normally hold shareholder meetings.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Trust’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer determined that the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Act")) are effective, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 90 days of the date of this report. There were no significant changes in the Trust’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. The officers identified no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.
(b) There were no changes in the Trust's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Code of ethics referred to in Item 2 (no change from the previously filed Code).
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Madison Mosaic Equity Trust
By: (signature)
W. Richard Mason, Chief Compliance Officer
Date: February 22, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: (signature)
Katherine L. Frank, Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 22, 2011
By: (signature)
Greg Hoppe, Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 22, 2011