QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
/X/ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 |
/ / | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
Commission file number 1-8432
MESA OFFSHORE TRUST
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Texas | 76-6004065 |
(State of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, Trustee Institutional Trust Services 700 Lavaca Austin, Texas | 78701 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
1-512-479-2562
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x/ No / /
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes / / No /x/
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of August 14, 2003—71,980,216 Units of Beneficial Interest in Mesa Offshore Trust.
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MESA OFFSHORE TRUST
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended June 30,
| | Six Months Ended June 30,
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Royalty income | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Interest income | | | 2,727 | | | 5,512 | | | 5,825 | | | 12,825 | |
General and administrative expense | | | (2,727 | ) | | (5,512 | ) | | (5,825 | ) | | (12,825 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Distributable income | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Distributable income per unit | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS
| | June 30, 2003
| | December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | (Unaudited)
| |
| |
---|
| | | | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | |
Cash and short-term investments | | $ | 1,201,210 | | $ | 1,482,810 | |
Interest receivable | | | 2,727 | | | 3,946 | |
Net overriding royalty interest in oil and gas properties | | | 380,905,000 | | | 380,905,000 | |
Accumulated amortization | | | (380,893,873 | ) | | (380,893,873 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | | Total assets | | $ | 1,215,064 | | $ | 1,497,883 | |
| |
| |
| |
LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS | | | | | | | |
Reserve for Trust expenses | | $ | 1,203,937 | | $ | 1,486,756 | |
Distributions payable | | | — | | | — | |
Trust corpus (71,980,216 units of beneficial interest authorized and outstanding) | | | 11,127 | | | 11,127 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Total liabilities and trust corpus | | $ | 1,215,064 | | $ | 1,497,883 | |
| |
| |
| |
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.)
1
MESA OFFSHORE TRUST
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended June 30,
| | Six Months Ended June 30,
|
---|
| | 2003
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2002
|
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trust corpus, beginning of period | | $ | 11,127 | | $ | 11,127 | | $ | 11,127 | | $ | 11,127 |
| Distributable income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| Distributions to unitholders | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| Amortization of net overriding royalty interest | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Trust corpus, end of period | | $ | 11,127 | | $ | 11,127 | | $ | 11,127 | | $ | 11,127 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.)
2
MESA OFFSHORE TRUST
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1—Trust Organization
The Mesa Offshore Trust (the "Trust") was created effective December 1, 1982. On that date, Mesa Petroleum Co., predecessor to Mesa Limited Partnership, which was the predecessor to MESA Inc., transferred to the Trust a 99.99% interest in the Mesa Offshore Royalty Partnership (the "Partnership"). The Partnership was created to receive and hold a net overriding royalty interest (the "Royalty") in ten producing and nonproducing oil and gas properties located in federal waters offshore Louisiana and Texas (the "Royalty Properties"). Mesa Inc. created the Royalty out of its working interest in the Royalty Properties and transferred it to the Partnership. Until August 7, 1997, MESA Inc. owned and operated its assets through Mesa Operating Co. ("Mesa"), the operator and the managing general partner of the Royalty Properties. On August 7, 1997, MESA Inc. merged with and into Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"), formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of MESA, Inc., and Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company merged with and into Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (successor to Mesa) a wholly owned subsidiary of Pioneer ("PNR") (collectively, the mergers are referred to herein as the "Merger"). Subsequent to the Merger, Pioneer owns and operates its assets through PNR and is also the managing general partner of the Partnership. As used in this report, the term PNR generally refers to the operator of the Royalty Properties, unless otherwise indicated.
Status of the Trust
The Trust Indenture provides that the Trust will terminate if the total amount of cash per year received by the Trust falls below certain levels for each of three successive years (the "Termination Threshold").
As a result of the Trust properties nearing the end of their estimated productive lives, Royalty income received by the Trust in 2002 fell below the Termination Threshold prescribed by the Trust Indenture. In addition, there is an accumulated deficit due PNR as of June 30, 2003 of $803,992 that will be deducted from any future gross proceeds on the Royalty Properties, which deduction will reduce future Royalty income.
The December 31, 2002 reserve report prepared for the Partnership (see the Trust's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K) indicates that Royalty income expected to be received by the Trust in 2003 and thereafter will be below the Termination Threshold. The reserve report estimates that future Royalty income to the Trust will be approximately $1.7 million (net of the recoupment of the Trust deficit) while the Termination Threshold for 2002 was approximately $1.1 million. Future Royalty income in the reserve report was calculated using oil and natural gas spot prices in effect at December 31, 2002 of $31.17 per barrel and $4.75 per Mcf, respectively. Based on the current estimates of future Royalty income, the Trustee expects that Royalty income received by the Trust will fall below the Termination Threshold in 2003 and 2004. Accordingly, the Trustee anticipates that the Trust will be required to terminate under the provisions of the Trust Indenture effective December 31, 2004. PNR has advised the Trust that it has farmed out the Trust's interest in Brazos A-7 and A-39 so that the exploratory prospects can be drilled during 2003 with the Trust retaining an overriding royalty interest. The first prospect was drilled during the second quarter with results expected in late August 2003 and with plans to drill the second prospect
3
immediately following. However, there can be no assurance that the second of the prospects will be drilled or that either prospect will be successful. Even if the exploratory prospects are successful, it is currently expected that any Royalty income generated from these prospects will not be received in time to eliminate the deficit balance and to increase Royalty income above the Threshold Amount before the Indenture requires the termination of the Trust. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating and projecting the quantity and value of proved reserves for the Trust properties, as many of the Trust properties are nearing the end of their productive lives and are therefore subject to unforeseen changes in production rates. As such, the foregoing statements reflect only current reasonable expectations.
Note 2—Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited financial information has been prepared by JPMorgan Chase Bank (the "Trustee") in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. JPMorgan Chase Bank was formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank and is the successor by mergers to the original name of the Trustee, Texas Commerce Bank National Association. The Trustee believes such information includes all the disclosures necessary to make the information presented not misleading. The information furnished reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Trustee, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Trust's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The financial statements of the Trust are prepared on the following basis:
(a) Royalty income recorded for a month is the Trust's interest in the amount computed and paid by the working interest owner to the Partnership for such month rather than either the value of a portion of the oil and gas produced by the working interest owner for such month or the amount subsequently determined to be 90% of the net proceeds for such month;
(b) Interest income, interest receivable and distributions payable to unitholders include interest to be earned on short-term investments from the financial statement date through the next date of distribution;
(c) Trust general and administrative expenses, net of reimbursements, are recorded in the month they accrue;
(d) Amortization of the net overriding royalty interest, which is calculated on the basis of current royalty income in relation to estimated future royalty income, is charged directly to trust corpus since such amount does not affect distributable income; and
(e) Distributions payable are determined on a monthly basis and are payable to unitholders of record as of the last business day of each month or such other day as the Trustee determines is required to comply with legal or stock exchange requirements. However, cash distributions are made quarterly in January, April, July and October, and include interest earned from the monthly record dates to the date of distribution.
4
This basis for reporting Royalty income is considered to be the most meaningful because distributions to the unitholders for a month are based on net cash receipts for such month. However, it will differ from the basis used for financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America because under such accounting principles, Royalty income for a month would be based on net proceeds from production for such month without regard to when calculated or received and interest income for a month would be calculated only through the end of such month.
The instruments conveying the Royalty provide that the working interest owner will calculate and pay the Partnership each month an amount equal to 90% of the net proceeds for the preceding month.
Generally, net proceeds means the excess of the amounts received by the working interest owner from sales of oil and gas from the Royalty Properties plus other cash receipts over operating and capital costs incurred. For the three and six months ending June 30, 2003, operating and capital costs incurred fell below proceeds from oil and gas sales; however, no Royalty income was reported as the net proceeds were used to reduce the accumulated deficit. There remains an accumulated deficit balance due PNR as of June 30, 2003 of $803,992 that will be deducted from any future gross proceeds on the Royalty Properties, which deduction will reduce future Royalty income. In addition, no Royalty income will be distributed to unitholders until the Trustee recoups Trust expenses being paid from the reserve that the Trustee has established for anticipated future expenses. As of June 30, 2003, $796,063 will be recouped by the Trustee from future Royalty income before Trust distributions will resume.
Since the inception of the Trust, PNR has withheld from royalty income amounts for the future abandonment of the Royalty properties. The unexpended amount withheld by PNR for future abandonment costs at June 30, 2003 was $4,111,044.
5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following review of the Trust's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto.
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Form 10-Q, including without limitation the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 1 to the financial statements of the Trust regarding the future net revenues of the Trust, are forward-looking statements. Although Pioneer has advised the Trust that it believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations ("Cautionary Statements") are disclosed in this Form 10-Q, and in the Trust's Form 10-K, including under the section "Business—Principal Trust Risk Factors." All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Trust or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements.
Financial Review
During the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, the Trust had no distributable income.
Production volumes for natural gas decreased to 49,227 Mcf in the second quarter of 2003 from 66,028, Mcf in the second quarter of 2002 primarily due to natural production decline on all properties as described under "Operational Review." The average price received for natural gas was $5.07 per Mcf in the second quarter of 2003, as compared to $2.17 per Mcf in the second quarter of 2002.
Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids production increased to 2,105 barrels in the second quarter of 2003 from 1,337 barrels in the second quarter of 2002. The average price received for crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids was $23.86 per barrel in the second quarter of 2003 as compared to $19.32 per barrel in the second quarter of 2002.
For the six months ended June 30, 2003, natural gas production volumes decreased to 76,805 Mcf from 203,994 Mcf for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The average price received for natural gas was $4.70 per Mcf for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $2.19 per Mcf for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquid volumes decreased to 2,783 barrels in the first six months of 2003 as compared to 4,689 barrels in the first six months of 2002. The average price received for crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids was $24.95 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $21.10 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
See "Operational Review" for a discussion of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids production.
There is a deficit balance due PNR as of June 30, 2003 of $803,992 that will be deducted from any future gross proceeds on the Royalty Properties, which deduction will reduce future Royalty income. In addition, there will be no income distributed to unitholders until the Trustee recoups Trust expenses being paid from the reserve that the Trustee established. As of June 30, 2003, $796,063 will be recouped by the Trustee from future Royalty income before Trust distributions to unitholders will resume.
6
Since the inception of the Trust, PNR has withheld from royalty income amounts for the future abandonment of the Royalty properties. The unexpended amount withheld by PNR for future abandonment costs at June 30, 2003 was $4,111,044.
Operational Review
PNR has advised the Trust that during the first quarter of 2003 its offshore gas production was marketed under short-term contracts at spot market prices primarily to H&N, Limited and that it expects to continue to market its production under short-term contracts for the foreseeable future. In April 2003, PNR began marketing the natural gas production of the Trust to Occidental Petroleum Corp. and TotalFinaElf SA. Spot market prices for natural gas in the second quarter of 2003 were generally higher than spot market prices in the second quarter of 2002.
The amount of cash distributed by the Trust is dependent on, among other things, the sales prices and quantities of gas, crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids produced from the Royalty Properties and the quantities sold. Substantial uncertainties exist with regard to future gas and oil prices, which are subject to fluctuations due to the regional supply and demand for natural gas and oil, production levels and other activities of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and other oil and gas producers, weather, storage levels, industrial growth, conservation measures, competition and other variables.
The Brazos A-7 and A-39 blocks in the second quarter of 2003 continued to experience a decrease in natural gas production due to natural production decline. At June 30, 2003, these two blocks had two wells producing, the Brazos A-7 No. B-1 well and the Brazos A-39 No. A-3 well. Production from the Brazos A-39 No. A-3 well is sporadic. The Brazos A-7 No. B-1 well, operated by Newfield Exploration Company, is currently the only remaining consistently producing well on these blocks. However, PNR has farmed out the Trust's interest in both of these blocks so that two exploration prospects can be drilled during 2003 where the Trust will retain an overriding royalty interest. The first prospect was drilled during the second quarter of 2003 with results expected in late August 2003 and with plans to drill the second prospect immediately following. However, there can be no assurance that the second of these two prospects will ever be drilled or that either prospect will be successful.
Throughout 2002, the West Delta 61 and 62 blocks experienced a decrease in oil and natural gas production due to normal production decline. The PNR operated wells ceased production in the second quarter of 2002 and the wells were plugged and abandoned by year-end. In 2002, on West Delta 62, the Trust received royalty income from one producing well pursuant to a farm out agreement with Walter Oil and Gas Corporation ("Walter"). Production ceased in the first quarter of 2002 and Walter initiated and completed plugging and abandonment procedures and relinquished the lease before year-end 2002. The only remaining wells on this block are in West Delta 61. PNR farmed out a portion of West Delta 61 to Stone Energy Corporation ("Stone") retaining a 12.5% (11.25% net to the Trust) overriding royalty interest. Stone drilled a development well during 2002 that is now on production along with the other two producing wells.
The Matagorda Island 624 block, operated by PNR, ceased production in the second quarter of 2002. PNR attempted a workover in the third quarter of 2002, but was unsuccessful. In the first quarter of 2003, PNR plugged and abandoned the property, and in July 2003, the platform was removed.
The South Marsh Island 155 and 156 blocks ceased production during the first quarter 2000. The lease was relinquished and abandonment procedures were completed during 2002.
7
The following tables provide a summary of the calculations of the net proceeds attributable to the Partnership's royalty interest (unaudited):
| | Brazos A-7 and A-39
| | West Delta 61 and 62
| | Matagorda Island 624
| | South Marsh Island 155 and 156
| | Total
| |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ninety percent of gross proceeds | | $ | 100,754 | | $ | 199,129 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 299,883 | |
| Less ninety percent of— | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating expenditures | | | (100,754 | ) | | (199,129 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (299,883 | ) |
| | Capital costs recovered | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Net proceeds | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Trust share of net proceeds (99.99%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Trust Deficit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (803,992 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Production Volumes and Average Prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (Bbls) | | | 48 | | | 2,057 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,105 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Bbl | | $ | 29.15 | | $ | 23.74 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 23.86 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Natural gas (Mcf) | | | 27,243 | | | 21,984 | | | — | | | — | | | 49,227 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Mcf | | $ | 3.65 | | $ | 6.83 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 5.07 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Producing wells | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | |
| | Brazos A-7 and A-39
| | West Delta 61 and 62
| | Matagorda Island 624
| | South Marsh Island 155 and 156
| | Total
| |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ninety percent of gross proceeds | | $ | 135,025 | | $ | 33,426 | | $ | 984 | | $ | — | | $ | 169,435 | |
| Less ninety percent of— | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating expenditures | | | (90,864 | ) | | (45,901 | ) | | (15,224 | ) | | (15,535 | ) | | (167,524 | ) |
| | Capital costs recovered | | | — | | | — | | | (1,911 | ) | | — | | | (1,911 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Net proceeds | | $ | 44,161 | | $ | (12,475 | ) | $ | (16,151 | ) | $ | (15,535 | ) | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Trust share of net proceeds (99.99%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Trust Deficit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (258,579 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Production Volumes and Average Prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (Bbls) | | | 129 | | | 1,205 | | | 3 | | | — | | | 1,337 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Bbl | | $ | 19.51 | | $ | 19.31 | | $ | 18.50 | | $ | — | | $ | 19.32 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Natural gas (Mcf) | | | 62,035 | | | 3,668 | | | 325 | | | — | | | 66,028 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Mcf | | $ | 2.14 | | $ | 2.77 | | $ | 2.88 | | $ | — | | $ | 2.17 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Producing wells | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | |
- •
- The amounts shown are for Mesa Offshore Royalty Partnership.
- •
- Producing wells indicate the number of wells capable of production as of the end of the period.
- •
- The amounts for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 represent actual production for the periods February 2003 through April 2003 and February 2002 through April 2002, respectively.
- •
- Capital costs recovered represents capital costs incurred during the current or prior periods to the extent that such costs have been recovered by PNR from current period Gross Proceeds.
- •
- The unexpended amount withheld by PNR for future abandonment costs at June 30, 2003 was $4,111,044.
- •
- The Trust deficit balance of $803,992 as of June 30, 2003 will be deducted from any future gross proceeds on the Royalty properties, which deduction will reduce future Royalty income.
8
| | Brazos A-7 and A-39
| | West Delta 61 and 62
| | Matagorda Island 624
| | South Marsh Island 155 and 156
| | Total
| |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ninety percent of gross proceeds | | $ | 206,602 | | $ | 223,526 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 430,128 | |
| Less ninety percent of— | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating expenditures | | | (206,602 | ) | | (223,526 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (430,128 | ) |
| | Capital costs recovered | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Net proceeds | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Trust share of net proceeds (99.99%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Trust Deficit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (803,992 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Production Volumes and Average Prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (Bbls) | | | 123 | | | 2,660 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,783 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Bbl | | $ | 26.83 | | $ | 24.86 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 24.95 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Natural gas (Mcf) | | | 53,084 | | | 23,721 | | | — | | | — | | | 76,805 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Mcf | | $ | 3.83 | | $ | 6.63 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 4.70 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Producing wells | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | 5 | |
| | Brazos A-7 and A-39
| | West Delta 61 and 62
| | Matagorda Island 624
| | South Marsh Island 155 and 156
| | Total
| |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ninety percent of gross proceeds | | $ | 249,154 | | $ | 145,528 | | $ | 151,068 | | $ | — | | $ | 545,750 | |
| Release of MMS royalty reserve | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less ninety percent of— | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating expenditures | | | (322,307 | ) | | (117,835 | ) | | (55,993 | ) | | (47,597 | ) | | (543,732 | ) |
| | Capital costs recovered | | | — | | | — | | | (2,018 | ) | | — | | | (2,018 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Net proceeds | | $ | (73,153 | ) | $ | 27,693 | | $ | 93,057 | | $ | (47,597 | ) | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Trust share of net proceeds (99.99%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Trust Deficit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (258,579 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Production Volumes and Average Prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (Bbls) | | | 330 | | | 3,532 | | | 827 | | | — | | | 4,689 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Bbl | | $ | 19.02 | | $ | 21.48 | | $ | 20.30 | | $ | — | | $ | 21.10 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Natural gas (Mcf) | | | 117,959 | | | 24,832 | | | 61,203 | | | — | | | 203,994 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average sales price per Mcf | | $ | 2.06 | | $ | 2.81 | | $ | 2.19 | | $ | — | | $ | 2.19 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Producing wells | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | |
- •
- The amounts shown are for Mesa Offshore Royalty Partnership.
- •
- Producing wells indicate the number of wells capable of production as of the end of the period.
- •
- The amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 represent actual production for the periods November 2002 through April 2003, and November 2001 through April 2002 respectively.
- •
- Capital costs recovered represents capital costs incurred during the current or prior periods to the extent that such costs have been recovered by PNR from current period Gross Proceeds.
- •
- The unexpended amount withheld by PNR for future abandonment costs at June 30, 2003 was $4,111,044.
- •
- The Trust deficit balance of $803,992 as of June 30, 2003 will be deducted from any future gross proceeds on the Royalty properties, which deduction will reduce future Royalty income.
9
Termination of the Trust
The terms of the Mesa Offshore Trust Indenture provide, among other things, that the Trust will terminate upon the first to occur of the following events: (1) the total amount of cash received per year by the Trust for each of three successive years commencing after December 31, 1987 is less than ten times one-third of the total amount payable to the Trustee as compensation for such three-year period (the "Termination Threshold") or (2) a vote by holders of a majority of the outstanding units in favor of termination. Because the Trust will terminate in the event the total amount of cash received per year by the Trust falls below certain levels, it would be possible for the Trust to terminate even though some of the Royalty Properties continued to have remaining productive lives. For information regarding the estimated remaining life of each of the Royalty Properties and the estimated future net revenues of the Trust based on information provided by PNR, see the Trust's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Upon termination of the Trust, the Trustee will sell for cash all the assets held in the Trust estate and make a final distribution to unitholders of any funds remaining after all Trust liabilities have been satisfied. The discussion set forth above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Trust Indenture itself, which is an exhibit to the Trust's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is available upon request from the Trustee.
The December 31, 2002 reserve report prepared for the Partnership (see the Trust's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K) indicates that Royalty income expected to be received by the Trust in 2003 and thereafter will be below the Termination Threshold. The reserve report estimates that future Royalty income to the Trust will be approximately $1.7 million (net of the recoupment of the Trust deficit) while the Termination Threshold from 2002 was approximately $1.1 million. Future Royalty income in the reserve report was calculated using oil and natural gas spot prices in effect at December 31, 2002 of $31.17 per barrel and $4.75 per Mcf, respectively. Based on the current estimates of future Royalty income, the Trustee expects that Royalty income received by the Trust will fall below the Termination Threshold in 2003 and 2004. Accordingly, the Trustee anticipates that the Trust will be required to terminate under the provisions of the Trust Indenture effective December 31, 2004. PNR has farmed out the Trust's interest in Brazos A-7 and A-39 so that two exploration prospects can be drilled during 2003 where the Trust will retain an overriding royalty interest. The first prospect was spud during the second quarter with results expected in late August 2003 with plans to drill the second prospect immediately following. However, there can be no assurance that the second of these two prospects will be drilled or that either prospect will be successful. Even if the exploratory prospects are successful, it is currently expected that any Royalty income generated from these prospects will not be received in time to eliminate the deficit balance and to increase Royalty income above the Threshold Amount before the Indenture requires the termination of the Trust. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating and projecting the quantity and value of proved reserves for the Trust properties, as many of the Trust properties are nearing the end of their productive lives and are therefore subject to unforeseen changes in production rates. As such, the foregoing reflect only current reasonable expectations.
The terms of the First Amended and Restated Articles of General Partnership of the Partnership provide that the Partnership shall dissolve upon the occurrence of any of the following: (a) December 31, 2030; (b) the election of the Trustee to dissolve the Partnership; (c) the termination of the Trust; (d) the bankruptcy of the Managing General Partner; or (e) the dissolution of the Managing General Partner or its election to dissolve the Partnership; provided that the Managing General Partner shall not elect to dissolve the Partnership so long as the Trustee remains the only other partner of the Partnership. In the event of a dissolution of the Partnership and a subsequent winding up and termination thereof, the assets of the Partnership (i.e., the Royalty interest) could either (i) be distributed in kind ratably to the Managing General Partner and the Trustee or (ii) be sold and the proceeds thereof distributed ratably to the
10
Managing General Partner and the Trustee. In the event of a sale of the Royalty and a distribution of the cash proceeds to the Trustee, the Trustee would make a final distribution to unitholders of such cash proceeds plus any other cash held by the Trust after the payment of or provision for all liabilities of the Trust, and the Trust would be terminated.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Trust does not utilize market risk sensitive instruments. However, see the discussion of marketing by PNR above.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Trustee maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and regulations. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust is accumulated and communicated by Pioneer, as the managing general partner of the Partnership, and the working interest owners to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee of the Trust, and its employees who participate in the preparation of the Trust's periodic reports as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the date of this report, the Trustee carried out an evaluation of the Trustee's disclosure controls and procedures. Mike Ulrich, as Trust Officer of the Trustee, has concluded that the controls and procedures are effective, while noting certain limitations on disclosure controls and procedures as set forth below.
Due to the contractual arrangements of (i) the Trust Indenture, and (ii) the Partnership Agreement and (iii) the rights of the Partnership under the Conveyance regarding information furnished by the working interest owners, there are certain weaknesses that are not subject to change or modification by the Trustee. The contractual limitations creating potential weaknesses in disclosure controls and procedures may be deemed to include:
- •
- The working interest owners alone control (i) historical operating data, including production volumes, marketing of products, operating and capital expenditures, environmental and other liabilities, the effects of regulatory changes and the number of producing wells and acreage, (ii) plans for future operating and capital expenditures, (iii) geological data relating to reserves, as well as the reserve report that contains projected production, operating expenses and capital expenses, and (iv) information relating to projected production. The Trustee does not control this information and relies entirely on the working interest owners to provide accurate and timely information when requested for use in the Trust's periodic reports.
- •
- The Trustee relies on information provided by the managing general partner of the Partnership that is collected by the managing general partner from the working interest owners. While the Trustee may request information through the managing general partner, the Conveyance together with the Partnership Agreement gives only the managing general partner of the Partnership, as the Royalty Owner, the actual authority and discretion to request and receive financial information regarding the Royalty Properties from the working interest owners. While the Trustee requests material information for use in periodic reports as part of its disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustee generally does not have any direct contact with working interest owners, other than employees of
11
The Trustee does not intend to expand its responsibilities beyond those permitted or required by the Trust Indenture and those required under applicable law.
Changes in Internal Controls. To the knowledge of the Trustee, there have been no significant changes in the Trustee's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Trustee's internal controls subsequent to the date the Trustee completed its evaluation. The Trustee notes for purposes of clarification that it has no authority over, and makes no statement concerning, the internal controls of the working interest owners or the managing general partner of the Partnership.
PART II
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
- (a)
- Exhibits
(Asterisk indicates exhibit previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference. JPMorgan Chase Bank was formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank and
12
is the successor by mergers to the original name of the Trustee, Texas Commerce Bank National Association.)
| |
|
| | SEC File or Registration Number
| | Exhibit Number
| |
---|
| | | | | | | | |
4(a) | | * | Mesa Offshore Trust Indenture between Mesa Petroleum Co. and Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as Trustee, dated December 15, 1982 | | 2-79673 | | 10 | (gg) |
4(b) | | * | Overriding Royalty Conveyance between Mesa Petroleum Co. and Mesa Offshore Royalty Partnership, dated December 15, 1982 | | 2-79673 | | 10 | (hh) |
4(c) | | * | Partnership Agreement between Mesa Offshore Management Co. and Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as Trustee, dated December 15, 1982 | | 2-79673 | | 10 | (ii) |
4(d) | | * | Amendment to Partnership Agreement between Mesa Offshore Management Co., Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Mesa Operating Limited Partnership, dated December 27, 1985 (Exhibit 4(d) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1992 of Mesa Offshore Trust) | | 1-8432 | | 4 | (d) |
4(e) | | * | Amendment to Partnership Agreement between Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as Trustee and Mesa Operating dated as of January 5, 1994 (Exhibit 4(e) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1993 of Mesa Offshore Trust) | | 1-8432 | | 4 | (e) |
31 | | | Certification furnished pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | |
32 | | | Certification furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | |
- (b)
- Reports on Form 8-K
Current reports on Form 8-K were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 2003, June 24, 2003 and July 21, 2003.
13
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | MESA OFFSHORE TRUST |
| | By: | /S/ JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, TRUSTEE |
| | By: | /s/ MIKE ULRICH Mike Ulrich Vice President & Trust Officer |
Date: August 14, 2003
The Registrant, Mesa Offshore Trust, has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, board of directors or persons performing similar functions. Accordingly, no additional signatures are available and none have been provided.
14
QuickLinks
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATIONMESA OFFSHORE TRUST STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME (Unaudited)STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUSMESA OFFSHORE TRUST STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS (Unaudited)MESA OFFSHORE TRUST NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)PART IISIGNATURES