The Company | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
The Company [Abstract] | ' |
The Company | ' |
Note 1 | | | | | | | | | |
The Company: |
|
Background |
PhotoMedex, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) (the “Company”) is a Global Health products and services company providing integrated disease management and aesthetic solutions to dermatologists, professional aestheticians, ophthalmologists, optometrists, consumers and patients. The Company provides proprietary products and services that address skin diseases and conditions including psoriasis, vitiligo, acne, actinic keratosis photo damage, unwanted hair as well as fixed-site laser vision correction services at our LasikPlus® vision centers. |
|
On May 12, 2014, PhotoMedex, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an $85 million senior secured credit facilities (“the Facilities”) with the lenders that are parties thereto (collectively, the “Lenders”) and JP Morgan Chase (“Chase”) as Administrative Agent for the Lenders. The Facilities included a $10 million revolving credit facility and a $75 million four-year term loan. The Facilities were utilized to refinance the existing term debt with Chase, fund the acquisition of LCA-Vision, Inc. and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. |
|
Interest is determined at Eurodollar plus a margin between 3.25% and 4.50%. The margin is updated quarterly based on the then-current leverage ratio. The Facilities are secured by a first priority security interest in and lien on all assets of the Company. All current and future subsidiaries are guarantors on the Facilities. |
|
There are financial covenants including a maximum leverage covenant and a minimum fixed charge covenant, which the Company must maintain. These covenants will be determined quarterly based on a rolling past four quarters of financial data. As of June 30, 2014, the Company failed to meet both financial covenants and is in default of the Facilities. On August 4, 2014, the Company received a notice of default and a reservation of rights from Chase and is engaging a third-party independent advisor to assist the Company in negotiating a longer term solution to the current default. As a result of the default, the Lenders may accelerate the $85 million outstanding under the Facilities. The Lenders also may increase the applicable interest on loans under the Facilities by 2%. As of the date of this report, the Lenders have neither accelerated the outstanding amount nor increased the applicable interest but may do so in the future. |
|
On December 13, 2011, the Company closed the reverse merger with Radiancy, Inc. Immediately following the reverse merger, the pre-reverse merger shareholders of PhotoMedex, Inc. (“Pre-merged PhotoMedex”) collectively owned approximately 20% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, and the former Radiancy, Inc. stockholders owned approximately 80% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. |
|
The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition with Radiancy treated for accounting purposes as the acquirer. As such, the financial statements of Radiancy, Inc. were treated as the historical financial statements of the Company, with the results of Pre-merged PhotoMedex, Inc. being included from December 14, 2011 and thereafter. |
|
The Company has a business plan focused on four key components – skilled direct sales force to target Physician and Professional Segments; expertise in global consumer marketing; a full product life cycle model representing the ability to develop and commercialize innovative products from concept through regulatory, physician acceptance, and ultimately marketed directly to the consumer as dictated by normal product-life-cycle evolution and establishing XTRAC centers of excellence in key markets by acquiring a fully paid infrastructure of existing clinics with established high customer service standards and culture. The Company reorganized its business into four operating segments to better align its organization based upon the Company’s management structure, products and services offered, markets served and types of customers. |
|
On March 3, 2014, PhotoMedex’ wholly-owned subsidiary, Radiancy, Inc., formed a wholly-owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, Radiancy (HK) Limited, through which the Company has started to directly market certain products and services to patients and consumers in selected markets in that region. |
|
On March 5, 2014, PhotoMedex formed a wholly-owned subsidiary in India, PhotoMedex India Private Limited, through which the Company plans to directly market certain products and services to patients and consumers in selected markets in that country. |
|
On May 12, 2014, PhotoMedex completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of LCA-Vision Inc. (“LCA-Vision” or “LCA”), a publicly–traded Delaware corporation. LCA is a provider of fixed-site laser vision corrections services at its LasikPlus® vision centers. Through this acquisition, the Company added an additional operating segment to its organization. The Company plans to begin to directly market certain of its existing products from these centers. The results of operations of LCA-Vision have been included from May 13, 2014 through June 30, 2014 in the PhotoMedex consolidated financial statements. (See Note 2, Acquisition). |
|
Basis of Presentation: |
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (“fiscal 2013”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) related to interim financial statements. As permitted under those rules, certain information and footnote disclosures normally required or included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The financial information contained herein is unaudited; however, management believes all adjustments have been made that are considered necessary to present fairly the results of the Company’s financial position and operating results for the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. |
|
The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014 or for any other interim period or for any future period. |
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The LCA-Vision results have been included in the financial statements from May 13, 2014, the day following the closing date of the acquisition. |
|
Reclassification |
Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not have material impact on the Company’s equity, net assets, results of operations or cash flows. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
The Company recognizes revenues from product sales when the following four criteria have been met: (i) the product has been delivered or the services have been performed and the Company has no significant remaining obligations; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (iii) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from product sales are recorded net of provisions for estimated chargebacks, rebates, expected returns and cash discounts. |
|
The Company ships most of its products FOB shipping point, although from time to time certain customers, for example governmental customers, will insist upon FOB destination. Among the factors the Company takes into account when determining the proper time at which to recognize revenue are (i) when title to the goods transfers and (ii) when the risk of loss transfers. Shipments to distributors or physicians that do not fully satisfy the collection criteria are recognized when invoiced amounts are fully paid or fully assured. |
|
For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables within a single, contractually binding arrangement (usually sales of products with separately priced extended warranty), each element of the contract is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting when it provides the customer value on a stand-alone basis and there is objective evidence of the fair value of the related unit. |
|
With respect to sales arrangements under which the buyer has a right to return the related product, revenue is recognized only if all the following conditions are met: the price is fixed or determinable at the date of sale; the buyer has paid, or is obligated to pay and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product; the buyer's obligation would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product; the buyer has economic substance; the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer; and the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. |
|
The Company provides a provision for product returns based on the experience with historical sales returns, in accordance with ASC Topic 605-15 with respect to sales of product when a right of return exists. Reported revenues are shown net of the returns provision. Such allowance for sales returns is included in Other Accrued Liabilities. (See Note 8). |
|
Deferred revenue includes amounts received with respect to extended warranty maintenance, repairs and other billable services and amounts not yet recognized as revenues. Revenues with respect to such activities are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the warranty period, the service period or when service is provided, as applicable to each service. |
|
The Company has two distribution channels for its phototherapy treatment equipment. The Company either (i) sells its lasers through a distributor or directly to a physician or (ii) places its lasers in a physician’s office (at no charge to the physician) and generally charges the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments. In some cases, the Company and the customer stipulate to a quarterly or other periodic target of procedures to be performed, and accordingly revenue is recognized ratably over the period. |
|
When the Company places a laser in a physician’s office, it generally recognizes service revenue based on the number of patient treatments performed, or purchased under a periodic commitment, by the physician. Amounts collected with respect to treatments to be performed through laser-access codes that are sold to physicians free of a periodic commitment, but not yet used, are deferred and recognized as a liability until the physician performs the treatment. Unused treatments remain an obligation of the Company because the treatments can only be performed on Company-owned equipment. Once the treatments are performed, this obligation has been satisfied. |
|
The Company defers substantially all revenue from sales of laser-access treatment codes ordered by its customers within the last two weeks of the period in determining the amount of procedures performed by its physician-customers. Management believes this approach closely approximates the actual amount of unused treatments that existed at the end of a period. |
|
Patient Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The Company, through its subsidiary LCA-Vision, provides financing to some of its patients, including those who could not otherwise obtain third-party financing. The terms of the financing usually require the patient to pay an up-front fee which is intended to cover some or all of the variable costs, and then generally the remainder of the payments are automatically deducted from the patient’s bank account over a period of 12 to 36 months. The Company has recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts as a best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses from the patient financing program. Each month, management reviews and adjusts the allowance based upon past experience with patient financing. The Company charges-off receivables against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable that a receivable will not be recovered. The Company’s policy is to reserve for all patient receivables that remain open past their financial maturity date and to provide reserves for patient collectability rates, recent default activity and the current credit environment. Bad debt expense, on patient receivables, was $111 or less than 1% of the clinics revenues for the period of May 13, 2014 through June 30, 2014. |
|
For patients that the Company internally finance, the Company charges interest at market rates. Finance and interest charges on patient receivables were $113 for the periods ended June 30, 2014. |
|
Insurance Reserves |
The Company, through its subsidiary LCA-Vision, maintains a captive insurance company to provide professional liability insurance coverage for claims brought against the Company and its optometrists. In addition, the captive insurance company’s charter allows it to provide professional liability insurance for the Company’s ophthalmologists, none of whom are currently insured by the captive. The Company uses the captive insurance company for both primary insurance and excess liability coverage. A number of claims are now pending with the captive insurance company. Since the captive insurance company is wholly-owned enterprise so it is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As of June 30, 2014, the insurance reserves were $6,111, which represented an actuarially determined estimate of future costs associated with claims filed as well as claims incurred but not yet reported. The actuaries determine loss reserves by comparing the Company’s historical claim experience to comparable insurance industry experience. |
|
Functional Currency |
The currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of the Company, its U.S. subsidiaries and Radiancy Ltd., its subsidiary in Israel, are conducted is the US dollar ("$" or "dollars"). Thus, the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries (other than the foreign subsidiaries mentioned below) is the dollar (which is also the reporting currency of the Group). The other foreign subsidiaries are each conducted in the local currency of the subsidiary. These currencies include: Great Britain Pounds (GBP), Brazilian Real (BRL), Hong Kong Dollar (HKD), Columbian Peso (COP) and Indian Rupee (INR). Substantially all of the Group's revenues are derived in dollars or in other currencies linked to the dollar. Purchases of most materials and components are carried out in, or linked to the dollar. |
|
Balances denominated in, or linked to, foreign currencies are stated on the basis of the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. For foreign currency transactions included in the statement of comprehensive income, the exchange rates applicable to the relevant transaction dates are used. Transaction gains or losses arising from changes in the exchange rates used in the translation of such balances are carried to financing income or expenses. |
|
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currency is their local currency, are translated from their respective functional currency to U.S. dollars at the balance sheet date exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Deferred taxes are not provided on translation adjustments as the earnings of the subsidiaries are considered to be permanently reinvested. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
The Company measures and discloses fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: |
|
| • | Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date. | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| • | Level 2 – pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| • | Level 3 – pricing inputs are unobservable for the non-financial asset or liability and only used when there is little, if any, market activity for the non-financial asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair value is determined using comparable market transactions and other valuation methodologies, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors | | | | | | | |
|
|
This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. |
|
|
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents and short term bank deposits are based on its demand value, which is equal to its carrying value. The estimated fair values of notes payable which are based on borrowing rates that are available to the Company for loans with similar terms, collateral and maturity approximate the carrying values. Additionally, the carrying value of all other monetary assets (including long term receivables which bear interest) and liabilities is estimated to be equal to their fair value due to the short-term nature or commercial terms of these instruments. |
|
Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value, on a recurring basis. The fair value of derivatives generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Group would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting dates, based on the prevailing currency prices and the relevant interest rates. Such measurement is classified within Level 2. |
|
In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, there are also assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include certain long-lived assets including goodwill. As such, we have determined that each of these fair value measurements reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
Derivatives |
The group applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. In accordance with ASC Topic 815, all the derivative financial instruments are recognized as either financial assets or financial liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative financial instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. |
|
From time to time the Company carries out transactions involving foreign exchange derivative financial instruments (mainly forward exchange contracts) which are designed to hedge the cash flows expected to be paid with respect to forecasted expenses of the Israeli subsidiary (Radiancy) denominated in Israeli local currency (NIS) which is different than its functional currency. |
|
Such derivatives were not designated as hedging instruments, and accordingly they were recognized in the balance sheet at their fair value, with changes in the fair value carried to the Statement of Comprehensive Income and included in financing income (expenses), net. |
|
At June 30, 2014, the balance of such derivative instruments amounted to approximately $118 in assets and approximately $93 and $183 were recognized as financing income in the Statement of Comprehensive Income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. |
|
The nominal amounts of foreign currency derivatives as of June 30, 2014 consist of forward transactions for the exchange of $5,200 into NIS as of June 30, 2014. |
|
Accrued Enhancement Expense |
The Company, through its subsidiary LCA-Vision, includes participation in its LasikPlus Advantage Plan® (acuity program) in the base surgical price for substantially all of its patients. Under the acuity program, if determined to be medically appropriate, the Company provides post-surgical enhancements free of charge should the patient not achieve the desired visual correction during the initial procedure. Under this pricing structure, the Company accounts for the acuity program similar to a warranty obligation. Accordingly, the Company accrues the costs expected to be incurred to satisfy the obligation as a liability and cost of revenue at the point of sale given its ability to estimate reasonably such costs based on historical trends and the satisfaction of all other revenue recognition criteria. |
|
This estimate is reviewed throughout the year with consideration to factors such as procedure cost and historical procedure volume when determining the appropriateness of the recorded balance. |
|
Accrued Warranty Costs |
The Company offers a standard warranty on product sales generally for a one to two-year period. In the case of domestic sales of XTRAC lasers, however, the Company has offered longer warranty periods, ranging from three to four years, in order to meet competition or meet customer demands. The Company provides for the estimated cost of the future warranty claims on the date the product is sold. Total accrued warranty is included in Other Accrued Liabilities on the balance sheet. The activity in the warranty accrual during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is summarized as follows: |
|
| | June 30, | | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | |
| | (unaudited) | | | (unaudited) | | |
Accrual at beginning of year | | $ | 1,151 | | | $ | 1,440 | | |
Additions charged to warranty expense | | | 398 | | | | 691 | | |
Expiring warranties | | | (116 | ) | | | (281 | ) | |
Claims satisfied | | | (497 | ) | | | (655 | ) | |
Total | | | 936 | | | | 1,195 | | |
Less: current portion | | | (864 | ) | | | (1,117 | ) | |
Accrued extended warranty | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 78 | | |
|
For extended warranty on the consumer products, see Revenue Recognition above. |
|
Earnings Per Share |
Basic and diluted earnings per common share were calculated using the following weighted-average shares outstanding: |
|
| | For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended |
June 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
Basic number of common shares outstanding | | 18,723,484 | | 20,573,048 | | 18,721,463 | | 20,624,588 |
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants | | - | | 460,301 | | - | | 460,301 |
Diluted number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding | | 18,723,484 | | 21,033,349 | | 18,721,463 | | 21,084,889 |
|
Diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, exclude the impact of common stock options and warrants, totaling 2,550,516 shares, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, excluded the impact of common stock options and warrants, totaling 2,200,350 shares, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. |
|
Adoption of New Accounting Standards |
Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) ("ASU 2013-11"). |
|
The amendments in ASU 2013-11 state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows: To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be presented net of deferred tax assets. |
|
ASU 2013-11 applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. For public companies the amendments in this ASU became effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments were applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that existed at the effective date. |
|
The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. |
|
Effective January 1, 2014, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update 2013-5, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity ("ASU 2013-5"). |
|
ASU 2013-5 clarifies that, when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business (other than a sale of in-substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. ASU 2013-5 also clarifies that if the business combination achieved in stages relates to a previously held equity method investment (step-acquisition) that is a foreign entity, the amount of accumulated other comprehensive income that is reclassified and included in the calculation of gain or loss shall include any foreign currency translation adjustment related to that previously held investment. |
|
For public companies, the amendments in this Update became effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. In accordance with the transition requirements, the amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted. |
|
The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. |