Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 | |
(in millions of dollars) | | Parent | | | Guarantors | | | Non-Guarantors | | | Consolidated | |
Net cash provided by (used by) operating activities: | | $ | (36.7 | ) | | $ | 41.1 | | | $ | 26.1 | | | $ | 30.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | | (6.6 | ) | | | (5.5 | ) | | | (12.1 | ) |
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.8 | |
Other investing activities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.3 | | | | 1.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used by investing activities | | | — | | | | (6.2 | ) | | | (3.8 | ) | | | (10.0 | ) |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intercompany financing | | | 73.7 | | | | (50.8 | ) | | | (22.9 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments on long-term debt | | | (59.0 | ) | | | — | | | | (20.7 | ) | | | (79.7 | ) |
Repayments on short-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1.9 | ) | | | (1.9 | ) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options | | | 9.1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9.1 | |
Other financing activities | | | (0.1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities | | | 23.7 | | | | (50.8 | ) | | | (45.5 | ) | | | (72.6 | ) |
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.2 | | | | 2.2 | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (13.0 | ) | | | (15.9 | ) | | | (21.0 | ) | | | (49.9 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | | | 17.9 | | | | 24.2 | | | | 49.0 | | | | 91.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | | $ | 4.9 | | | $ | 8.3 | | | $ | 28.0 | | | $ | 41.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 25, 2005 | |
(in millions of dollars) | | Parent | | | Guarantors | | | Non-Guarantors | | | Consolidated | |
Net cash provided by (used by) operating activities: | | $ | (2.7 | ) | | $ | (26.9 | ) | | $ | 28.2 | | | $ | (1.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | | (5.2 | ) | | | (8.1 | ) | | | (13.3 | ) |
Other investing activities | | | (0.4 | ) | | | — | | | | 0.2 | | | | (0.2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used by investing activities | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (5.2 | ) | | | (7.9 | ) | | | (13.5 | ) |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in parent company investment | | | (39.9 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (39.9 | ) |
Intercompany financing | | | (73.8 | ) | | | 38.3 | | | | 35.5 | | | | — | |
Net dividends | | | 117.8 | | | | 0.5 | | | | (118.3 | ) | | | — | |
Proceeds from borrowings of short-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities | | | 4.1 | | | | 38.8 | | | | (81.9 | ) | | | (39.0 | ) |
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3.6 | ) | | | (3.6 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 1.0 | | | | 6.7 | | | | (65.2 | ) | | | (57.5 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | | | — | | | | (13.4 | ) | | | 93.2 | | | | 79.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | (6.7 | ) | | $ | 28.0 | | | $ | 22.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
On August 17, 2005, ACCO Brands Corporation, following its spin-off from Fortune Brands Inc. (“Fortune Brands” or the “Parent”), became the parent company of General Binding Corporation (“GBC”) when GBC merged with a wholly owned subsidiary of ACCO Brands. As a result of the merger, GBC is now a wholly owned subsidiary of ACCO Brands Corporation.
ACCO Brands Corporation is a world leader in select categories of branded office products (excluding furniture, computers, printers and bulk paper) to the office products resale industry. We design, develop, manufacture and market a wide variety of traditional and computer-related office products, supplies, binding and laminating equipment and consumable supplies, personal computer accessory products, paper-based time management products, presentation aids and label products. We have leading market positions and brand names, including Swingline®, GBC®, Kensington®, Quartet®, Rexel®, Day-Timer® and Wilson Jones®, among others.
We also manufacture and market specialized laminating films for book printers, packaging and digital print lamination, as well as high-speed laminating and binding equipment targeted at commercial consumers.
Our customers include commercial contract stationers (such as Office Depot, Staples, Corporate Express and Office Max), retail superstores, wholesalers, distributors, mail order catalogs, mass merchandisers, club stores and dealers. We also supply our products to commercial and industrial end-users and to the educational market.
We enhance shareholder value by building our leading brands to generate sales, earn profits and create cash flow. We do this by targeting the premium end of select categories, which are characterized by high brand equity, high customer loyalty and a reasonably high price gap between branded and private label products. Our participation in private label or value categories is limited to areas where we believe we have an economic advantage or where it is necessary to merchandise a complete category. We have announced the sale of the Perma® storage business during the third quarter, and the discontinuance of the Kensington cleaning product category as of the end of the first quarter, which together represent approximately $40 million of annual net sales. These actions are in addition to our previously stated intention to adjust pricing or discontinue sale of approximately $75 million of low margin SKU’s by the end of 2006. (To date $25 million is now planned to be dropped from the product line in January 2007. The remaining $50 million is still under review.) Through a focus on research, marketing and innovation, we seek to develop new products that meet the needs of our consumers and commercial end-users. In addition, we will provide value-added features or benefits that will enhance product appeal to our customers. This focus, we believe, will increase the premium product positioning of our brands.
Our strategy centers on maximizing profitability and high-return growth. Specifically, we seek to leverage our platform for organic growth through greater consumer understanding, product innovation, marketing and merchandising, disciplined category expansion, including possible strategic transactions, and continued cost realignment.
In the near term, we are focused on realizing synergies from our merger with GBC. We have identified significant potential savings opportunities resulting from the merger. These opportunities include cost reductions attributable to efficiencies and synergies expected to be derived from facility integration, headcount reduction, supply chain optimization and revenue enhancement. Our near-term priorities for the use of cash flow are to fund integration and restructuring-related activities and to pay down acquisition-related debt.
The following discussion of historical results includes the consolidated financial results of operations for the former ACCO World Corporation businesses for the three and six months ended June 25, 2005. In order to provide additional information relating to our operating results, we also present a discussion of our consolidated operating results as if ACCO Brands and GBC had been a combined company (pro forma) in the three and six months ended June 25, 2005. We have included this additional information in order to provide further insight into our operating results, prior period trends and current financial position. This supplemental information is presented in a manner consistent with the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS No. 141), “Business Combinations,” which are described in more detail in Note 4,Acquisition and Merger,in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The discussion of operating results at the consolidated level is followed by a more detailed discussion of operating results by segment on both an historical and an adjusted pro forma basis.
As more fully described in the Company’s 2005 annual report on Form 10-K, the financial statements for the six months ended June 25, 2005 include a restatement of results affecting the previously filed three-month and six-month periods ended June 25, 2005 for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle related to the removal of a one-month lag in reporting by several of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The change was made to better align their reporting periods with the Company’s fiscal calendar.
Our comparative discussion below includes references to the impact of a change in calendar days in comparison to the prior year. During the third quarter of 2005, the Company’s financial reporting calendar for its ACCO North American businesses was changed to a calendar month end from the previous 25th day of the last month of each quarterly reporting period. The Company’s fiscal year end calendar, previously ended December 27th, was also changed to a calendar month end. The change was made to better align the reporting calendars of the Company and the acquired GBC businesses. As a result, the Company’s first six months ended June 30, 2006 includes the results of one additional calendar day in comparison to the prior year. It should be understood, however, that the impact of this change is influenced by a number of factors, including seasonality of the business. In addition, the Company’s business segments have both gained and lost sales revenues on a comparative basis, depending on the impact of seasonality on each business segment. While the impact of this change was not material to the overall business, the impact of the change in calendar is included in the segment discussions below where the impact is believed to be of use in understanding the change in results.
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements of ACCO Brands Corporation and the accompanying notes contained therein.
Overview
ACCO Brands’ results are dependent upon a number of factors affecting sales, pricing and competition. Historically, key drivers of demand in the office products industry have included trends in white collar employment levels, gross domestic product (GDP) and growth in the number of small businesses and home offices together with increasing usage of personal computers. Pricing and demand levels for office products have also reflected a substantial consolidation within the global resellers of office products. This has led to multiple years of industry pricing pressure and a more efficient level of asset utilization by customers, resulting in lower sales volumes for suppliers. We sell products in highly competitive markets, and compete against large international and national companies, regional competitors and against our own customers’ direct and private-label sourcing initiatives. We have substantially completed our integration planning for the Office Products Group, and have made significant progress toward relocating our people, aligning our customer relationships and toward upgrading information technology systems. Since the beginning of 2006 we have announced and moved ahead with plans to close, consolidate, downsize, or relocate 21 manufacturing, distribution and administrative operations. In addition, the Company has successfully integrated key information technology systems in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, creating a common technology platform for its office products businesses, and consolidated its European office products sales force. Collectively, these actions are expected to ultimately account for more than 85% of the previously announced $40 million of targeted annual cost synergies. In addition, we have initiated a more formal review of the commercial businesses we acquired in the merger. This review will be completed in the second half of 2006, and reported in our third quarter conference call.
Cash payments related to the Company’s restructuring and integration activities have amounted to $13.4 million (excluding capital expenditures) since January 1, 2006. It is expected that additional disbursements will be made throughout 2006 and 2007 as the Company continues to implement phases of its strategic and business integration plans. The Company has adequate cash facilities to finance the anticipated requirements.
Three Months Ended June 2006 versus 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 462.6 | | | $ | 275.7 | | | $ | 186.9 | | | | 68 | % |
Operating income (loss) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 22.7 | | | | (22.8 | ) | | | (100 | )% |
Net income (loss) | | | (9.8 | ) | | | 14.2 | | | | (24.0 | ) | | NM |
Net Sales
Sales increased $186.9 million, or 68% to $462.6 million. The increase was principally related to the acquisition of GBC.
Gross Profit Margin
Gross profit increased $46.3 million to $126.0 million. This increase was primarily related to the acquisition of GBC. Gross profit margin decreased to 27.2% from 28.9%. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to increased raw material and freight costs, partially offset by sales price increases. In addition, unfavorable sales mix, including volume growth in lower relative margin products, have also depressed margins.
SG&A (Advertising, selling, general and administrative expenses)
SG&A increased $53.0 million to $109.6 million. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of GBC. SG&A increased as a percentage of sales to 23.7% from 20.5%. The increase in SG&A as a percentage of sales was attributable to higher marketing and selling investments to drive growth, significantly higher costs related to expensing of equity based management incentive programs, as well as infrastructure costs to support our public company status, align our business model globally and develop our European business model.
The Company’s results of operations in 2006 were impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), which requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. Therefore, stock-based compensation expense was recorded during 2006, but the prior year consolidated statement of income was not restated.
In December 2005, the Company issued an inaugural grant of stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance stock units (“PSUs”) following the spin-off and merger. The inaugural grant followed market practice for Initial Public Offerings/spin transactions and was larger than would be expected in a normal year. The Company will therefore have a larger charge related to the expensing of equity awards for the next three years.
The following is a summary of the incremental impact of all stock compensation expense and other long-term compensation recorded in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, which includes expenses related to grants of stock options, RSUs, and PSUs, along with the impact of the pre-tax expense amounts as a percentage of sales.
Stock-Based and Other Long Term Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Historical Results | | Three Months Ended | | | Incremental | |
(in millions of dollars) | | June 30, 2006 | | | June 25, 2005 | | | Expense | |
Expensing required under SFAS No. 123(R)(a) | | $ | 2.8 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2.8 | |
Previously required expensing(b) | | | 2.3 | | | | — | | | | 2.3 | |
Other non-equity based long term compensation | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.2 | | | | (0.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total long term executive compensation | | $ | 4.9 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 4.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Sales | | | 1.0 | % | | | 0.1 | % | | | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | The Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Therefore, restatement of prior periods is not required. |
|
(b) | | Includes expensing of RSUs and PSUs under SFAS No. 123, and unvested stock options/unearned compensation related to GBC. |
Refer to Note 2 for information specific to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Operating Income (Loss)
Operating income decreased $22.8 million, or 100%, and decreased as a percentage of sales to 0.0% from 8.2%. The decrease was driven by $14.9 million of incremental restructuring and restructuring-related costs, as well as lower gross profit margin and higher SG&A margin as discussed above.
Interest, Other Expense (Income) and Income Taxes
Interest expense increased $13.4 million to $15.3 million, as debt levels increased significantly in order to finance the transactions related to the spin-off from Fortune Brands and the merger with GBC. Other income increased $0.8 million to $0.2 million, primarily due to a foreign exchange gain in 2006 compared to a loss in 2005.
Income tax for the second quarter of 2006 was a benefit of $5.4 million, compared to an expense of $6.0 million in the same quarter of 2005. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was 35.5% compared to 29.7% for the quarter ended June 25, 2005. Included in 2006 was a reduction in tax expense on non-US income resulting from the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 signed into law in May 2006. This was partially offset by the lower tax benefit associated with restructuring and restructuring-related charges recorded in the quarter.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) was $(9.8) million compared to $14.2 million in the prior year, and was significantly impacted by lower operating income and increased interest expense. Included in the net loss for 2006 were restructuring and restructuring related after-tax costs of $13.1 million, or $0.25 per share. In the same quarter in 2005 the after-tax cost of restructuring and restructuring-related charges was $2.0 million or $0.06 per share.
Three Months Ended June 2006 versus 2005
Combined Companies — Pro Forma Discussion
The Company has included a “combined companies” discussion below as if GBC had been included in results since the beginning of the 2005 year. Restructuring and restructuring-related costs have been noted where appropriate, as management believes that a comparative review of operating income before restructuring and restructuring-related charges allows for a better understanding of the underlying business performance from year to year.
The presentation of, and supporting calculations related to, the 2005 pro forma information contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis can be found in the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2006, except for $5.4 million of one-time expense related to the step-up in inventory value that was recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet of GBC. The SEC requirements regulating pro forma disclosure (SEC Regulation S-X, Article 11) are different than generally accepted accounting principles.
The following table presents ACCO Brands’ pro forma combined results and the amounts of restructuring and restructuring-related charges for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 25, 2005.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating |
Combined Companies (Reported) | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | Income |
(in millions of dollars) | | Net Sales | | Profit | | SG&A | | (Loss) |
| | |
Reported results | | $ | 462.6 | | | $ | 126.0 | | | $ | 109.6 | | | $ | (0.1 | ) |
Restructuring and restructuring-related charges included in the results: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13.0 | |
Restructuring-related expense | | | — | | | | 2.0 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 4.8 | |
The Company has incurred a net total of $17.8 million in restructuring, restructuring-related and merger and integration related expenses in the 2006 quarter. The charges were principally related to the closure or consolidation of facilities, primarily in the United States and Europe, as well as associated employee termination benefits.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 25, 2005 |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | Operating |
(in millions of dollars) | | Net Sales | | Profit | | SG&A | | Income |
| | |
Pro forma results | | $ | 462.3 | | | $ | 134.1 | | | $ | 100.6 | | | $ | 30.7 | |
Restructuring and restructuring-related charges included in the results: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.2 | |
Restructuring-related expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4.6 | | | | 4.6 | |
Pro Forma Net Sales
Pro forma net sales increased $0.3 million, or 0.1%, to $462.6 million. Growth in Computer Products, Other Commercial and Commercial – Industrial Print Finishing were offset by a decline in Office Products’ European operations. Excluding European Office Products, total company pro forma sales were up 2% and Office Products sales were up 1%.
Pro Forma Gross Profit/Margin
Pro forma gross profit decreased $8.1 million to $126.0 million. Gross profit margin decreased to 27.2% from 29.0%. The decrease in gross profit margin for 2006 is primarily due to increased raw material and freight costs, and a $1.8 million adjustment for slow-moving inventory, partially offset by sales price increases. In addition, unfavorable sales mix, including volume growth in lower relative margin products have also depressed margins.
Pro Forma SG&A (Advertising, selling, general and administrative expenses)
Pro forma SG&A increased $9.0 million, to $109.6 million and as a percentage of sales to 23.7% from 21.8%. The increase in SG&A as a percentage of sales (SG&A margin) was attributable to increased expenditures for marketing and product development and an increase in long-term compensation plan expense following the spin-off and merger. The increases in long-term compensation of $3.8 million includes equity-based compensation expenses attributable, in part, to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). In addition, costs related to the transition in Europe to a pan-European model and incremental corporate costs incurred to operate as an independent public company also negatively impacted SG&A margin. These items were partially offset by synergy savings.
The following is a summary of the incremental impact of all stock compensation expense and other long-term compensation recorded in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, which includes expenses related to grants of both stock options and restricted stock units, along with the impact of the pre-tax expense amounts as a percentage of sales.
Stock-Based and Other Long Term Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | Three Months Ended | | | Incremental | |
(in millions of dollars) | | June 30, 2006 | | | June 25, 2005 | | | Expense | |
Expensing required under SFAS No. 123(R)(a) | | $ | 2.8 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2.8 | |
Previously required expensing (b) | | | 2.3 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 1.4 | |
Other non-equity based long term compensation | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.2 | | | | (0.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total long term executive compensation | | $ | 4.9 | | | $ | 1.1 | | | $ | 3.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Sales | | | 1.0 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | The Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Therefore, restatement of prior periods is not required. |
|
(b) | | Includes expensing of RSUs and PSUs under SFAS 123 and unvested stock options (unearned compensation) related to GBC pre-merger grants under SFAS No. 141“Business Combinations”. |
Pro Forma Operating Income (Loss)
Operating income on a pro forma basis decreased $30.8 million, or 100%, to a loss of $(0.1) million, and operating income margin decreased 6.6%. The decrease was attributable to the change in restructuring and restructuring-related charges which were $17.8 million and $4.8 million in the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 25, 2005, respectively, and the impacts of the lower gross profit margin and the higher SG&A margin.
Pro Forma Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) for the quarter was $(9.8) million, or $(0.18) per share, compared to $8.6 million, or $0.17 per share in the prior year.
Segment Discussion
Office Products Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 308.2 | | | $ | 215.0 | | | $ | 93.2 | | | | 43 | % |
Operating income (loss) | | | (4.7 | ) | | | 13.5 | | | | (18.2 | ) | | NM |
Operating income margin | | | (1.5 | )% | | | 6.3 | % | | | | | | | (7.8 | )% |
Office Products net sales increased $93.2 million, or 43%. The increase was principally due to the acquisition of GBC.
Office Products operating income decreased $18.2 million, to a loss of $(4.7) million. The decrease resulted from higher restructuring and restructuring-related costs, as well as the overall decline in operating margin due to higher raw material and freight costs, a $1.8 million adjustment for slow-moving inventory and a less favorable sales mix.
The following table presents Office Products’ pro forma combined results and the amounts of restructuring and restructuring-related charges for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 25, 2005.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 308.2 | | | $ | 313.0 | | | $ | (4.8 | ) | | | (2 | )% |
Pro forma operating income (loss) | | | (4.7 | ) | | | 18.8 | | | | (23.5 | ) | | NM | |
Restructuring and related charges | | | 15.1 | | | | 2.3 | | | | 12.8 | | | NM | |
Pro forma net sales decreased 2% from $313.0 million to $308.2 million. Growth in the U.S., Australia and Latin America was more than offset by a decline in European operations. Excluding Europe, Office Products sales increased 1%. The decline in Europe primarily resulted from lower demand in retail channels in the United Kingdom and unfavorable pricing throughout Europe.
Office Products pro forma operating income declined $23.5 million to a loss of $(4.7) million, including restructuring and restructuring-related charges. Excluding the adverse impact of restructuring and restructuring-related charges of $12.8 million, the decline in operating profit and margin was principally attributable to a $1.8 million inventory adjustment, as well as adverse results from European operations. Europe’s results were down due to lower volume, unfavorable pricing, higher raw material costs and increased investments in SG&A to transition to a pan-European business model. With the exception of the inventory charge and the transitional items in Europe, the Company believes that Office Products trends in other regional markets are improving. The Company is implementing price increases and introducing new products in key categories.
Computer Products Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 51.2 | | | $ | 49.1 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | | 4 | % |
Operating income | | | 6.5 | | | | 12.1 | | | | (5.6 | ) | | | (46 | )% |
Operating income margin | | | 12.7 | % | | | 24.6 | % | | | | | | | (11.9 | )% |
Restructuring and related charges | | | 1.3 | | | | — | | | | 1.3 | | | | 100 | % |
Computer Products sales were $51.2 million, compared to $49.1 million in the prior-year quarter, an increase of 4%. The sales growth was driven by increased sales of iPod® accessories, mobile power adapters, notebook docking stations and other computer accessory products. This growth rate was lower than in recent quarters because of the Company’s planned exit from the cleaning category and inventory reduction actions by two major customers.
Operating income declined to $6.5 million from $12.1 million. Operating income margins declined to 12.7% from 24.6%. Excluding restructuring and related charges (the group receives an allocation of charges related to shared services restructuring initiatives), the decline in operating profit and margin was due to planned increased investments in selling, marketing and product development activities, a change in product mix, and higher product costs.
No pro forma information is provided for the Computer Products segment as it was not impacted by the GBC acquisition.
Commercial — Industrial and Print Finishing Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 47.9 | | | | — | | | $ | 47.9 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income | | | 4.9 | | | | — | | | | 4.9 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income margin | | | 10.2 | % | | | — | | | | | | | | N/A | |
The Commercial-Industrial and Print Finishing (“IPFG”) business was contributed as part of the merger with GBC and was not merged into an existing ACCO Brands segment; therefore, it is presented on a standalone pro forma basis below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 47.9 | | | $ | 46.7 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | | 3 | % |
Pro forma operating income | | | 4.9 | | | | 4.3 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 14 | % |
IPFG pro forma net sales increased 3%, to $47.9 million. Favorable currency contributed 1% of growth and the balance was a result of increased selling prices to recover raw material cost increases.
Pro forma operating income increased 14%, to $4.9 million, and operating margins expanded to 10.2% from 9.2%. The increase in profit and margin was due to improved mix from new products and higher selling prices, which more than offset the impact of higher raw material costs.
29
Other Commercial
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 55.3 | | | $ | 11.6 | | | $ | 43.7 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 1.8 | | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | | 2.1 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income margin | | | 3.3 | % | | | (2.6 | )% | | | | | | | 5.9 | % |
Other Commercial net sales increased from $11.6 million to $55.3 million. The acquisition of GBC’s Document Finishing business accounted for $44.1 million of the increase. Sales volumes at Day-Timers declined by $0.4 million, principally due to lower sales to reseller customers.
Other Commercial operating income increased $2.1 million to $1.8 million. The acquisition of GBC accounted for substantially all of the increase.
The following table presents Other Commercial’s pro forma combined results for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 25, 2005.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 55.3 | | | $ | 53.5 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | | 3 | % |
Pro forma operating income | | | 1.8 | | | | 3.6 | | | | (1.8 | ) | | | (50 | )% |
On a pro forma basis net sales increased $1.8 million, or 3%. The increase was driven by price increases and volume growth, primarily in sales of document finishing products. This increase was partially offset by a $0.4 million reduction in sales in the Day-Timers business resulting from lower sales in its reseller channels.
Pro forma operating income decreased $1.8 million, or 50%. The decline in profit and margins was driven by various favorable adjustments in the prior year quarter recognized in SG&A expense.
Six Months Ended June 2006 versus 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 931.2 | | | $ | 550.5 | | | $ | 380.7 | | | | 69 | % |
Operating income | | | 13.6 | | | | 48.8 | | | | (35.2 | ) | | | (72 | )% |
Net income (loss) | | | (9.9 | ) | | | 28.8 | | | | (38.7 | ) | | | (134 | )% |
Net Sales
Net sales increased $380.7 million, or 69%, to $931.2 million. The increase was principally related to the acquisition of GBC.
Gross Profit Margin
Gross profit increased $93.8 million to $256.5 million, primarily as a result of the acquisition of GBC. Gross profit margin decreased to 27.5% from 29.6%. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to increased raw material and freight costs, partially offset by sales price increases. In addition, unfavorable sales mix, including volume growth in lower relative margin
products, has also depressed margins.
SG&A (Advertising, selling, general and administrative expenses)
SG&A increased $104.2 million to $217.1 million. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of GBC. SG&A as a percentage of sales increased to 23.3% from 20.5%. The increase in SG&A margin is attributable to higher marketing and selling investments to drive growth, significantly higher cost related to expensing of equity based management incentive programs, as well as infrastructure costs to support our public company status, align our business model globally and develop our European business model.
The Company’s results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), which requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. Therefore, stock-based compensation expense was recorded during the first half of 2006, but the prior year consolidated statement of income was not restated.
In December 2005, the Company issued an inaugural grant of stock options, restricted stock units and performance stock units following the spin-off and merger. The inaugural grant followed market practice for Initial Public Offerings/spin transactions and was larger than would be expected in a normal year. The Company will therefore have a larger charge related to the expensing of equity awards for the next three years.
The following is a summary of the incremental impact of all stock compensation expense and other long-term compensation recorded during the first six months of 2006 and 2005, which includes expenses related to grants of both stock options and restricted stock units, along with the impact of the pre-tax expense amounts as a percentage of sales.
Stock-Based and Other Long Term Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Historical Results | | Six Months Ended | | | Incremental | |
(in millions of dollars) | | June 30, 2006 | | | June 25, 2005 | | | Expense | |
Expensing required under SFAS No. 123(R)(a) | | $ | 5.6 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5.6 | |
Previously required expensing(b) | | | 4.0 | | | | — | | | | 4.0 | |
Other non-equity based long term compensation | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.7 | | | | (0.9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total long term executive compensation | | $ | 9.4 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 8.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Sales | | | 1.0 | % | | | 0.1 | % | | | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | The Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Therefore, restatement of prior periods is not required. |
|
(b) | | Includes expensing of RSUs and PSUs under SFAS No. 123, and unvested stock options/unearned compensation related to GBC. |
Refer to Note 2 for information specific to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Operating Income
Operating income decreased $35.2 million, or 72%, to $13.6 million, and decreased as a percentage of sales to 1.5% from 8.9%. The decrease was driven by lower gross margin and higher SG&A margin as discussed above, and $24.5 million of higher restructuring and restructuring-related costs.
Interest, Other Expense (Income) and Income Taxes
Interest expense increased $26.8 million, to $30.7 million, as debt levels increased significantly in order to finance the transactions related to the spin-off from Fortune Brands and the merger with GBC. Other income increased $3.7 million to $1.7 million, primarily due to a foreign exchange gain in 2006 compared to a loss in 2005 and the inclusion of the Company’s share of earnings in a GBC joint venture investment.
Income tax for the first six months of 2006 was a benefit of $5.6 million, compared to an expense of $17.4 million in the same period of 2005. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 36.4% compared to 40.6% for the six months ended June 25, 2005. Included in the first six months of 2006 was a reduction in tax expense on non-US income resulting from the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 signed into law in May 2006. This benefit was partially offset by the lower tax benefit associated with restructuring and related charges recorded during the first six months. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 25, 2005 was unfavorably impacted by the repatriation expenses of foreign earnings no longer considered permanently reinvested.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) was $(9.9) million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $28.8 million in the six months ended June 25, 2005, and was significantly impacted by lower operating income and increased interest expense. Included in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were restructuring and restructuring related non-recurring after-tax costs of $19.4 million, or $0.36 per share. Similar expenses in the 2005 period were $2.0 million or $0.06 per share.
Six Months Ended June 2006 versus 2005
Combined Companies — Pro Forma Discussion
The Company has included a “combined companies” discussion below as if GBC had been included in results since the beginning of the 2005 year. Restructuring and restructuring-related costs have been noted where appropriate, as management believes that a comparative review of operating income before restructuring and restructuring-related charges allows for a better understanding of the underlying business performance from year to year.
The presentation of, and supporting calculations related to, the 2005 pro forma information contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis can be found in the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2006, except for $5.4 million of one-time expense related to the step-up in inventory value that was recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet of GBC. The SEC requirements regulating pro forma disclosure (SEC Regulation S-X, Article 11) are different than generally accepted accounting principles.
The following table presents ACCO Brands’ pro forma combined results and the amounts of restructuring and restructuring-related charges for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 25, 2005.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
Combined Companies (Reported) | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | Operating |
(in millions of dollars) | | Net Sales | | Profit | | SG&A | | Income |
| | |
Reported results | | $ | 931.2 | | | $ | 256.5 | | | $ | 217.1 | | | $ | 13.6 | |
Restructuring and restructuring-related charges included in the results: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19.8 | |
Restructuring-related expense | | | — | | | | 2.4 | | | | 5.2 | | | | 7.6 | |
The Company has incurred a net total of $27.4 million in pre-tax restructuring, restructuring-related and merger and integration related expenses in the 2006 period. The charges were primarily related to the closure or consolidation of facilities, primarily in the United States and Europe, and associated employee termination benefits.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 25, 2005 |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | Operating |
(in millions of dollars) | | Net Sales | | Profit | | SG&A | | Income |
| | |
Pro forma results | | $ | 917.0 | | | $ | 264.3 | | | $ | 205.2 | | | $ | 52.3 | |
Restructuring and restructuring-related charges included in the results: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.3 | |
Restructuring-related expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7.1 | | | | 7.1 | |
Pro Forma Net Sales
Pro forma net sales increased $14.2 million, or 2%, to $931.2 million. The increase was driven by volume growth across all business segments, led by 10% growth in Computer Products, 4% growth in Commercial-IPFG, and 3% growth in Other Commercial. These increases were offset by a decrease in the Office Products Group. Price increases contributed an additional 1% overall to the Company’s sales. The unfavorable impact of currency translation reduced pro forma sales by 1%.
Pro Forma Gross Profit/Margin
Pro forma gross profit decreased $7.8 million, or 3.0%, to $256.5 million. Gross profit margin decreased to 27.5% from 28.8%. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to increased raw material and freight costs and an adjustment related to slow-moving inventory, partially offset by sales price increases. In addition, unfavorable sales mix, including volume growth in lower relative margin products, contributed to the decrease.
Pro Forma SG&A (Advertising, selling, general and administrative expenses)
Pro forma SG&A increased $11.9 million, or 5.8%, to $217.1 million and increased as a percentage of sales to 23.3% from 22.4%. The increase in relative SG&A was attributable to higher marketing and selling investments to drive growth, significantly higher cost related to expensing of equity based management incentive programs, and infrastructure costs to support our status as an independent public company, align our business model globally and develop our pan-European business model.
The following is a summary of the incremental impact of all stock compensation expense and other long-term compensation recorded during the first six months of 2006 and 2005, which includes expenses related to grants of stock options, RSUs and PSUs, along with the impact of pre-tax expense amounts as a percentage of sales.
Stock-Based and Other Long Term Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | Six Months Ended | | | Incremental | |
(in millions of dollars) | | June 30, 2006 | | | June 25, 2005 | | | Expense | |
Expensing required under SFAS No. 123(R)(a) | | $ | 5.6 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5.6 | |
Previously required expensing(b) | | | 4.0 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 1.5 | |
Other non-equity based long term compensation | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.7 | | | | (0.9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total long term executive compensation | | $ | 9.4 | | | $ | 3.2 | | | $ | 6.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Sales | | | 1.0 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | 0.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | The Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Therefore, restatement of prior periods is not required. |
|
(b) | | Includes expensing of RSUs and PSUs under SFAS 123, and unvested stock options (unearned compensation) related to GBC pre- merger grants under SFAS No. 141“Business Combinations”. |
Pro Forma Operating Income
Operating income on a pro forma basis decreased $38.7 million, or 74%, to $13.6 million, and decreased as a percentage of sales to 1.5% from 5.7%. The decrease is attributable to the $19.0 million increase in restructuring and restructuring-related charges, and the lower gross margin and higher SG&A expenses as discussed above.
Pro Forma Net Income (Loss) Before Change In Accounting Principle
Net income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $(9.9) million, or $(0.18) per share, compared to $5.8 million, or $0.11 per share, before the change in accounting principle in the six months ended June 25, 2005. The decrease was attributable to the lower operating income partially offset by lower effective income tax rate and interest expense.
Segment Discussion
Office Products Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 619.3 | | | $ | 431.3 | | | $ | 188.0 | | | | 44 | % |
Operating income | | | 1.3 | | | | 33.1 | | | | (31.8 | ) | | | (96 | )% |
Operating income margin | | | 0.2 | % | | | 7.7 | % | | | | | | | (7.5 | )% |
Office Products net sales increased $188.0 million, or 44%, to $619.3 million. The increase was principally related to the acquisition of GBC.
Office Products operating income declined $31.8 million, or 96%, to $1.3 million. The decrease resulted from higher restructuring and restructuring related costs, as well as an overall decline in operating margin due to higher raw material and freight cost and unfavorable pricing.
The table below provides ACCO Brands’ pro forma segment results and the amounts of restructuring and restructuring-related charges to be excluded for comparison purposes for the indicated periods.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 619.3 | | | $ | 623.5 | | | $ | (4.2 | ) | | | (1 | )% |
Pro forma operating income | | | 1.3 | | | | 38.0 | | | | (36.7 | ) | | | (97 | )% |
Restructuring and related charges | | | 23.4 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 20.1 | | | NM |
Pro forma net sales decreased $4.2 million, or 1%. Adjusting for the impact of foreign currency translation, pro forma net sales increased 1%. Growth in the U.S., Australia and Latin America was offset by a decline in European operations. Excluding Europe, Office Products sales increased 2%. The decline in Europe was primarily related to sales to retail customers in the United Kingdom and unfavorable pricing.
Office Products pro forma operating income declined $36.7 million, or 97%, to $1.3 million including restructuring and restructuring-related charges. Excluding the adverse impact of restructuring and restructuring-related charges of $20.1 million, the decline in operating profit and margin was attributable to European operations, specifically unfavorable pricing coupled with higher raw material costs, an adjustment related to slow-moving inventory, increased amortization, increased investments in SG&A to transition to a pan-European business model, and lower sales in the United Kingdom, primarily at retail.
Computer Products Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 103.1 | | | $ | 93.4 | | | $ | 9.7 | | | | 10 | % |
Operating income | | | 14.8 | | | | 21.0 | | | | (6.2 | ) | | | (30 | )% |
Operating income margin | | | 14.4 | % | | | 22.5 | % | | | | | | | (8.1 | )% |
Restructuring and related charges | | | 1.3 | | | | — | | | | 1.3 | | | | 100 | % |
Computer Products delivered strong sales growth for 2006, increasing $9.7 million, or 10%, to $103.1 million. The strong sales growth was driven by sales of iPod® accessories, mobile power adapters, notebook docking stations and other computer
accessory products. Sales increases were partially offset by lower than historical rates in the second quarter attributable to the Company’s planned exit from the cleaning category and inventory reduction actions by two major customers.
Computer Products operating income decreased $6.2 million, or 30%, to $14.8 million. Operating margins decreased to 14.4% from 22.5%, principally due a change in product mix, higher product costs, planned increased investments in selling, marketing and product development activities and restructuring and restructuring-related charges of $1.3 million.
No pro forma information is provided for the Computer Products segment as it was not impacted by the GBC acquisition.
Commercial — Industrial and Print Finishing Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 97.5 | | | | — | | | $ | 97.5 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income | | | 9.7 | | | | — | | | | 9.7 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income margin | | | 9.9 | % | | | — | | | | | | | | 9.9 | % |
The Commercial-Industrial and Print Finishing (“IPFG”) business was contributed as part of the merger with GBC and was not merged into an existing ACCO Brands segment; therefore, it is presented on a standalone pro forma basis below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 97.5 | | | $ | 93.0 | | | $ | 4.5 | | | | 5 | % |
Pro forma operating income | | | 9.7 | | | | 6.6 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 47 | % |
IPFG pro forma net sales increased $4.5 million, or 5%, to $97.5 million. Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency, pro forma net sales increased 6%. Growth was driven by improved sales from new product introductions (including some initial stocking), higher volume reflecting normalized volumes after soft demand in the fourth quarter of 2005 and increased selling prices to recover raw material cost increases.
IPFG pro forma operating income increased $3.1million, or 47%, to $9.7 million. Operating income margins also improved to 9.9% from 7.1% in the prior year. The increase was due to improved mix from new products and higher selling prices, which more than offset the impact of higher raw material costs.
Other Commercial
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Historical Results | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Net sales | | $ | 111.3 | | | $ | 25.8 | | | $ | 85.5 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 5.9 | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 6.0 | | | | N/A | |
Operating income margin | | | 5.3 | % | | | (0.4 | )% | | | | | | | 5.7 | % |
Other Commercial net sales increased from $25.8 million to $111.3 million. The acquisition of GBC’s Document Finishing business accounted for $86.3 million of the increase. Sales volumes at Day-Timers declined by $0.8 million with lower sales in its reseller channels, partially due to the change in calendar, offset in part by higher direct-to–end-user catalog sales.
35
Other Commercial operating income increased $6.0 million to $5.9 million. The acquisition of GBC accounted for substantially all of the increase. Operating income within our Day-Timers business was unfavorably impacted by the change in the calendar.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Amount of Change |
Combined Companies (Pro Forma) | | June 30, | | June 25, | | | | |
(in millions of dollars) | | 2006 | | 2005 | | $ | | % |
| | |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 111.3 | | | $ | 107.1 | | | $ | 4.2 | | | | 4 | % |
Pro forma operating income | | | 5.9 | | | | 5.0 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 18 | % |
On a pro forma basis net sales increased $4.2 million, or 4%. Unfavorable currency translation impacted pro forma sales by 1%. The increase was driven by higher sales of custom products and higher pricing and servicing in the Document Finishing business. This growth was partially offset by a 3% reduction in sales, primarily related to the Day-Timers business, which was a result of the change in calendar days for the comparative periods.
Pro forma operating income increased $0.9 million, to $5.9 million. The improvement in operating income and margin was driven by higher sales volume, increased pricing and lower SG&A expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, service indebtedness and support working capital requirements. Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under our credit agreements and long-term notes. We maintain adequate financing arrangements at competitive rates. Our priority for cash flow over the near term, after internal growth, is to fund integration and restructuring-related activities and the reduction of debt that was incurred in connection with the merger with GBC and the spin-off from Fortune Brands.
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $30.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and cash used was $(1.4) million for the six months ended June 25, 2005. Net income (loss) in 2006 was $(9.9) million, or $38.7 million less than 2005. Non-cash adjustments to net income were $39.7 million in 2006, compared to $14.5 million in 2005, on a pre-tax basis.
Principal cash items favorably affecting operating activities included:
| • | | Higher accounts payable as the Company benefited from later timing of inventory purchases compared to the prior year, extended payment terms and other cash management initiatives. |
|
| • | | Substantially lower payments in 2006 of long term incentives and annual bonuses (accrued in 2005 and prior years) as a result of underachieved targets in 2005 compared to significant overachievement in the 2004 year. In addition, the first quarter of 2005 included payments amounting to $22.0 million related to long term incentives tied to the successful repositioning of the former ACCO World businesses. |
Principal cash items unfavorably affecting operating activities included:
| • | | Higher inventory levels resulted from the seasonal back to school build, as well as lower than expected second quarter 2006 sales mainly in Computer Products and in European Office Products. The timing of receipt for inventories sourced by the Company (instead of manufactured), coupled with increased raw material and other product input costs, have also increased inventory values. |
|
| • | | Lower cash collections from accounts receivable resulting principally from the resolution of 2004 customer billing delays which deferred the related cash collection to the first six months of 2005. |
|
| • | | Higher payments for customer programs resulting from enhanced programs (customer consolidation & competitive pricing), including such programs associated with GBC. |
36
| • | | Payments associated with acquisition related interest expense. |
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Cash used by investing activities was $10.0 million in 2006 and $13.5 million in 2005. Gross capital expenditure was $12.1 million and $13.3 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively; both years include substantial investment in enhanced information technology systems. The 2006 period also includes cash distributions received from the Company’s investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries of $1.3 million.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Cash used by financing activities was $72.6 million in 2006. During the 2006 six month period, the Company paid all of the required fiscal 2006 debt service of $24.7 million and paid down an additional $55.0 million of the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facilities. The Company expects to pay down additional debt during the remainder of the year. Cash used by financing activities in 2005 of $39.0 million was principally related to funding provided to the Company’s former parent, Fortune Brands.
Capitalization
The Company’s total debt at June 30, 2006 was $873.1 million. The ratio of debt to stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2006 was 2.2 to 1.
As of June 30, 2006 the amount available for borrowings under the revolving credit facilities was $142.5 million (allowing for $7.5 million of letters of credit outstanding on that date).
On February 13, 2006 the Company entered into an amendment to its senior secured credit facilities waiving any default that may have arisen under those facilities as a result of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements.
As of and for the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all applicable loan covenants.
Adequacy of Liquidity Sources
The Company believes that its internally generated funds, together with revolver availability under its senior secured credit facilities and its access to global credit markets, provide adequate liquidity to meet both its long-term and short-term capital needs with respect to operating activities, capital expenditures and debt service requirements. The Company’s existing credit facilities would not be affected by a change in its credit rating.
Critical Accounting Policies
Stock Based Compensation
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. Refer to Note 2 for further information.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and the cost is recognized as expense ratably over the vesting period. Determining the appropriate fair value model to use requires judgment. Determining the assumptions that enter into the model is highly subjective and also requires judgment, including long-term projections regarding stock price volatility, employee exercise, post-vesting termination, and pre-vesting forfeiture behaviors, interest rates and dividend yields. Management used the guidance outlined in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107) relating to SFAS No. 123(R) in selecting a model and developing assumptions.
The Company has historically used the Black-Scholes model for estimating the fair value of stock options in providing the pro forma fair value method disclosures pursuant to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). After a review of alternatives, the Company decided to continue to use this model for estimating the fair value of stock options as it meets the fair value measurement objective of SFAS No. 123(R).
37
The Company has utilized historical volatility for a pool of peer companies for a period of time that is comparable to the expected life of the option to determine volatility assumptions. The weighted average expected option term reflects the application of the simplified method set out in SAB No. 107. The simplified method defines the life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The forfeiture rate used to calculate compensation expense is primarily based on the Company’s estimate of employee forfeiture patterns based on the experience of Fortune Brands, Inc.
The use of different assumptions would result in different amounts of stock compensation expense. Holding all other variables constant, the indicated change in each of the assumptions below increases or decreases the fair value of an option (and hence, expense), as follows:
| | | | |
Assumption | | Change to Assumption | | Impact on Fair Value of Option |
Expected volatility | | Higher | | Higher |
| | | | |
Expected life | | Higher | | Higher |
| | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | Higher | | Higher |
| | | | |
Dividend yield | | Higher | | Lower |
The pre-vesting forfeitures assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeitures assumption would not impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Different forfeitures assumptions would only impact the timing of expense recognition over the vesting period. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.
The fair value of an option is particularly impacted by the expected volatility and expected life assumptions. In order to understand the impact of changes in these assumptions on the fair value of an option, management performed sensitivity analyses. Holding all other variables constant, if the expected volatility assumption for the fourth quarter 2005 stock option grant were to increase by 5 percentage points, the fair value of a stock option would increase by approximately 10.2%, from $7.84 to $8.64. Alternately, if the expected volatility assumption for the fourth quarter 2005 stock option grant were to decrease by 5 percentage points, the fair value of a stock option would decrease by approximately 10.5%, from $7.84 to $7.02. Holding all other variables constant (including the expected volatility assumption), if the expected term assumption for the fourth quarter 2005 stock option grant were to increase by one year, the fair value of a stock option would increase by approximately 11.1% from $7.84 to $8.71.
Management is not able to estimate the probability of actual results differing from expected results, but believes the Company’s assumptions are appropriate, based upon the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R), the guidance included in SAB No. 107, and the Company’s historical and expected future experience.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 establishes a two-step process consisting of (a) recognition and (b) measurement for evaluating a tax position. The interpretation provides that a position should be recognized if it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Any differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements will generally result in an increase in a liability for income taxes payable or a reduction of an income tax refund receivable; a reduction in a deferred tax asset or an increase in a deferred tax liability; or both. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The provisions of the Interpretation should be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this Interpretation should be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the date of adoption. The implementation of this interpretation is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
38
In June 2006 the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-3How Taxes Collected From Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)(EITF 06-3). The consensuses reached in EITF 06-3 provide that presentation of any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer, which could include sales, use, value added and other excise taxes on either a gross or a net basis is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 22,Disclosure of Accounting Policies. In addition, the Task Force noted that for any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amounts of those taxes in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The consensuses in EITF 06-3 should be applied to financial reports for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier application permitted. The application of the consensuses in this Issue is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report contain, and other periodic reports and press releases of the Company may contain, certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. These forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words “will”, “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “plan,” or similar expressions. The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Because actual results may differ from those predicted by such forward-looking statements, you should not rely on such forward-looking statements when deciding whether to buy, sell or hold the Company’s securities. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the future. Among the factors that could cause plans, actions and results to differ materially from current expectations are: fluctuations in cost and availability of raw materials; competition within the markets in which the Company operates; the effects of both general and extraordinary economic, political and social conditions; the dependence of the Company on certain suppliers of manufactured products; the effect of consolidation in the office products industry; the risk that businesses that have been combined into the Company as a result of the merger with General Binding Corporation will not be integrated successfully; the risk that targeted cost savings and synergies from the aforesaid merger and other previous business combinations may not be fully realized or take longer to realize than expected; disruption from business combinations making it more difficult to maintain relationships with the Company’s customers, employees or suppliers; foreign exchange rate fluctuations; the development, introduction and acceptance of new products; the degree to which higher raw material costs, and freight and distribution costs, can be passed on to customers through selling price increases and the effect on sales volumes as a result thereof; increases in health care, pension and other employee welfare costs; as well as other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings.
ITEM 3. QUANTITIATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Item 7A. of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. There has been no material change to disclosures made therein on Foreign Exchange Risk Management or Interest Rate Risk Management through the period ended June 30, 2006 or through the date of this report.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s management has evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2006.
39
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s six month period ending June 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is, from time to time, involved in routine litigation incidental to our operations. None of the litigation in which it is currently involved, individually or in the aggregate, is material to the consolidated financial condition or results of operations nor is the Company aware of any material pending or contemplated proceedings. It intends to vigorously defend or resolve any such matters by settlement, as appropriate.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A.Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Those risk factors described in that annual report could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in that annual report are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
40
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
A total of 49,595,488 of the Company’s shares of common stock were present or represented by proxy at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 25, 2006 (the “2006 Annual Meeting”). This represented more than 93% of the Company’s shares outstanding. Three management proposals were voted upon at the 2006 Annual Meeting and all were approved.
Proposal 1 Election of Directors.
The terms of office of three current directors, David D. Campbell, G. Thomas Hargrove and Pierre E. Leroy, expired at the 2006 Annual Meeting and all were re-elected to a three-year term. The results of the voting were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | For | | Withheld |
David D. Campbell | | | 49,089,770 | | | | 505,718 | |
G. Thomas Hargrove | | | 49,400,936 | | | | 194,552 | |
Pierre E. Leroy | | | 47,203,412 | | | | 2,392,076 | |
Other directors whose terms continued after the meeting were George V. Bayly, Dr. Patricia O. Ewers, Robert J. Keller, Gordon R. Lohman, Forrest M. Schneider and Norman H. Wesley
Proposal 2 Approve the Amended and Restated ACCO Brands Corporation 2005 Incentive Plan.
| | | | |
For | | Against | | Abstain |
35,058,384 | | 5,464,514 | | 9,072,590 |
Proposal 3 Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2006.
| | | | |
For | | Against | | Abstain |
49,340,419 | | 188,440 | | 66,629 |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
| | |
Number | | Description |
10.1 | | Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2006 (the “Amendment”) among the Company, certain of its subsidiaries, the Lenders listed on the signature pages thereto, and Citicorp North America Inc., as administrative agent filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 4, 2006, is hereby incorporated by reference. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | REGISTRANT: | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | By: | | /s/ David D. Campbell | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | David D. Campbell | | |
| | | | Chairman of the Board and | | |
| | | | Chief Executive Officer | | |
| | | | (principal executive officer) | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | By: | | /s/ Neal V. Fenwick | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Neal V. Fenwick Executive Vice President and Chief
| | |
| | | | Financial Officer | | |
| | | | (principal financial officer) | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | By: | | /s/ Thomas P. O’Neill, Jr. | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Thomas P. O’Neill, Jr.
| | |
| | | | Vice President, Finance and Accounting | | |
| | | | (principal accounting officer) | | |
August 14, 2006