WHEREAS, Harden alleges that after the merger between Gentiva and Harden closed, and Hanson had resigned from Harden, OLP requested Hanson and CTLTC execute a series of documents related to the Lease;
WHEREAS, Harden alleges that on December 3, 2013, in response to OLP’s request, Hanson provided OLP an executed Guaranty Agreement on behalf of CTLTC with respect to the Lease, dated November 12, 2013, and also executed and provided OLP an Affirmation of Guaranty, dated November 12, 2013 (“Affirmation of Guaranty”), wherein he purported to affirm the Harden Guaranty notwithstanding that he was no longer affiliated with Harden and was managing the affairs of Lessee as the President and CEO of CTLTC;
WHEREAS, Harden alleges that in April 2015, CTLTC sold all of its equity interests to SCC, and CTLTC and Lessee became subsidiaries and/or affiliates of SCC;
WHEREAS, OLP alleges Lessee subsequently defaulted on the Lease in November 2018;
WHEREAS, OLP initiated a lawsuit against, inter alia, Harden, styled OLP Wyoming Springs, LLC, v. Harden Healthcare, LLC, et al., Cause No. 18-1511, in the 368th Judicial District, Williamson County, Texas, wherein OLP alleges it is entitled to recover outstanding amounts owed under the Lease from Harden, as guarantor of the Lease (“Lawsuit”);
WHEREAS, Harden alleges that on December 4, 2018, SCC and certain subsidiaries and/or affiliates, including CTLTC and Lessee, filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, jointly administered in Case No. 18-33967 (“SCC Bankruptcy”);
WHEREAS, Harden alleges it has sought indemnification from the Indemnitors arising out of and related to, inter alia, the Harden Guaranty;
WHEREAS, Harden disputed the allegations in the Lawsuit, and asserted third party claims against Hanson in the Lawsuit for, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and declaratory relief, wherein Harden alleges, inter alia, Hanson breached duties owed to Harden when acting on behalf of CTLTC, including, but not limited to, his purported execution of the Affirmation of Guaranty and failure to disclose to OLP that he was not authorized to act on behalf of Harden, which Harden alleges proximately caused any damages Harden may incur arising from Hanson’s role in connection with the Harden Guaranty and Affirmation of Guaranty (“Harden Claims”);
WHEREAS, Hanson disputed the Harden Claims in the Lawsuit, and has asserted his right to a jury trial; and
WHEREAS, the Parties mediated the dispute with Ross Stoddard, and now desire to enter into this Agreement to avoid the costs and uncertainties of litigation, and resolve all issues and claims that have been and could have been brought against the other in the Lawsuit or related to the Lease, Harden Guaranty, or Affirmation of Guaranty.
NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual promises, agreements, covenants, representations, warranties, and provisions herein contained, and other good and