The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each director and executive officer.
Haim Aviv, Ph.D., is Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientist and a Director of the Company. In 1990, he co-founded Pharmos Corporation, a New York corporation (“Old Pharmos”), which merged into the Company in October 1992 (the “Merger”). Dr. Aviv also served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientist and a Director of Old Pharmos prior to the Merger. Dr. Aviv was the co-founder in 1980 of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a publicly-traded company engaged in the development of products using recombinant DNA, its General Manager and Chief Scientist from 1980 to 1985, and a Director and Senior Scientific Consultant until August 1993. Prior to that time, Dr. Aviv was a professor of molecular biology at the Weizmann Institute of Science. Dr. Aviv is the principal stockholder of Avitek Ltd. Dr. Aviv is also an officer and/or significant stockholder of several privately held Israeli biopharmaceutical and venture capital companies. Dr. Aviv is a member of the Board of Directors of Ben Gurion University at Beer-Sheva, Israel and Yeda Ltd., the commercial arm of the Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel. Dr. Aviv holds a Ph.D. degree from the Weizmann Institute of Science.
Mony Ben Dor, a director of the Company since September 1997, has been the CEO and managing partner of Biocom Management & Investments (2002) Ltd., a V.C Fund in the field of Life Science since April 2000. Prior to that, he was Vice President of the Israel Corporation Ltd. from May 1997, and Chairman of two publicly traded subsidiaries: H.L. Finance and Leasing and Albany Bonded International Trade. He was also a Director of a number of subsidiary companies such as Israel Chemicals Ltd., Zim Shipping Lines, and Tower Semiconductors. From 1992-1997 Mr. Ben Dor was Vice President of Business Development for Clal Industries Limited, which is one of the leading investment groups in Israel. He was actively involved in the acquisition of pharmaceutical companies, including Pharmaceutical Resources Inc., Finetech Ltd. and BioDar Ltd. He served as a director representing Clal Industries in all of the acquired companies as well as other companies of Clal Industries. Prior to his position at Clal Industries, Mr. Ben Dor served as Business Executive at the Eisenberg Group of companies.
David Schlachet, a Director of the Company from December 1994, is CFO of Syneron Medical Ltd, a company that develops, manufactures, and markets aesthetic medical products. Mr. Schlachet was a managing partner of Biocom, a V.C Fund in the field of Life Science, from April 2000 until December 2004. Prior to that, he served as Chairman of Elite Industries Ltd from July 1997 until June 2000. From January 1996 to June 1997, Mr. Schlachet served as the Vice President of the Strauss Group and Chief Executive Officer of Strauss Holdings Ltd, one of Israel’s largest privately owned food manufacturers. He was Vice President of Finance and Administration at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel from 1990 to December 1995, and was responsible for the Institute’s administration and financial activities, including personnel, budget and finance, funding, investments, acquisitions and collaboration with the industrial and business communities. From 1989 to 1990, Mr. Schlachet was President and Chief Executive Officer of YEDA Research and Development Co. Ltd., a marketing and licensing company at the Weizmann Institute of Science. He also serves as a Director of Harel Investment House (Israeli broker, underwriter and asset management firm) and as a Director of Israel Discount Bank Ltd., Hapoalim Capital Markets Ltd, Edgar Ltd. (real estate company), Proseed Ltd., a Venture Capital investment company, Compugen Ltd. and Taya Investment Company Ltd.
Georges Anthony Marcel, M.D., Ph.D., a Director of the Company since September 1998, is founder and chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board of HealthValue SARL, specialized in biotechnology competitive intelligence. Previously, Dr. Marcel was Chairman & CEO of TMC Development, a biopharmaceutical consulting firm based in Paris, France. Prior to founding TMC Development in 1992, Dr. Marcel held a number of senior executive positions in the pharmaceutical industry, including Chief Executive Officer of Amgen’s French subsidiary, Vice President of Marketing for Rhone-Poulenc Sante (now Sanofi/Aventis) and Director of Development for Roussel-Uclaf. Dr. Marcel teaches biotechnology industrial issues and European regulatory affairs at the Faculties of Pharmacy of Paris and Lille as well as at Versailles Law School. Dr. Marcel is also a member of the Gene Therapy Advisory Committee at the French Medicines Agency and sits on the Expert Committee of Genopole.
Elkan R. Gamzu, Ph.D., a Director of the Company since February 2000, is a consultant to the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, a Principal of enERGetics Biopharmaceutical Consultancy, LLC, and a founding partner of the due diligence company BioPharmAnalysis, LLC. He serves as the Interim Head of Clinical Development of Hypnion, Inc. From December 1, 2004 until February 24, 2005, Dr. Gamzu was the interim CEO of XTL Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd.. Prior to becoming a consultant, Dr. Gamzu held a number of senior executive positions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Cambridge Neuroscience, Inc. from 1994 until 1998. Dr. Gamzu also served as President and Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Development for Cambridge Neuroscience, Inc. from 1989 to 1994. Previously, Dr. Gamzu held a variety of senior positions with Warner-Lambert (Vice President, Drug Development) and Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. In 2001 and 2002, Dr. Gamzu was part-time Interim VP, Product Management Leadership for Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Gamzu is a member of the Board of Directors of three other biotechnology companies: the privately held biotechnology companies Neurotech S.A. of Paris, France and Hypnion, Inc., and NeuroHealing Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Lawrence F. Marshall, M.D., a Director of the Company since June 2002, an internationally recognized neurosurgeon and opinion leader in the field, is currently Professor and Chair of the Division of Neurological Surgery at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center. Dr. Marshall’s 30-year career as a scientist and neurosurgeon has been at the forefront in the search for new and better treatment measures to improve patient outcome. He has been a principal investigator or co-investigator in over two dozen preclinical and clinical trials primarily relating to head and spinal cord injury, including projects funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, and several large pharmaceutical companies. Results of research undertaken by Dr. Marshall, which cover a wide range of issues related to TBI and other conditions of the brain, have been published in dozens of scientific journals. Among the numerous board, committee, editorial and other positions Dr. Marshall has held or holds are board and committee memberships with the American Brain Injury Consortium, the National Head Injury Foundation, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Dr. Marshall is the recipient of many distinguished medical prizes and awards.
12
Abraham Sartani, M.D., a Director of the Company since June 2005, is currently Vice-President and Director, Pharmaceutical Research and Development Division of Recordati S.p.A. Dr. Sartani has been involved in pharmaceutical research and development for 25 years, first at Farmitalia Carlo Erba and, since 1985, at Recordati. Since 1988, he has reported directly to the chairman of the company as the Vice President and Director of the Research and Development Division. Since 1999, his responsibilities have included all licensing activities. Dr. Sartani received his medical degree from the Sackler School of Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, Israel in 1974, graduating cum laude. Between 1975 and 1978, he completed his internship and residency at the Jaffa Government Hospital in Tel Aviv. From 1978 to 1980, he was a Specialist in Endocrinology at the University of Pavia and a Ford Foundation Research Fellow at the University of Milan.
Gad Riesenfeld, Ph.D., was named President in February 1997, and has served as Chief Operating Officer since March 1995. He served as Executive Vice President from December 1994 to February 1997, Vice President of Corporate Development and General Manager of Florida Operations from October 1992 to December 1994, and was employed by Pharmos from March 1992 until the Merger. Prior thereto, he was engaged in a variety of pharmaceutical and biotechnology business activities relating to the development and commercialization of intellectual property, primarily in the pharmaceutical and medical fields. From March 1990 through May 1991, Dr. Riesenfeld was a Managing Director of Kamapharm Ltd., a private company specializing in human blood products. Prior thereto, from May 1986, he was Managing Director of Galisar Ltd., a pharmaceutical company involved in extracorporeal blood therapy. Dr. Riesenfeld holds a Ph.D. degree from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and held a scientist position, as a post doctorate, at the Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California.
James A. Meer was elected Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Pharmos in July 2004 and in January of 2005 became Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. From November 2000 until his appointment as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, he was a principal in Meer Healthcare Consulting and GreyPeach Partners serving life science and technology companies. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Meer was Vice President and Treasurer of Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc, (NYSE) a leading specialty pharmaceutical company. In addition, Mr. Meer has held several senior financial positions with public companies in other industries. He holds an MBA in Finance from Pace University and a BA in Economics from Rutgers College.
13
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
During the 2004 fiscal year, the Board of Directors met six times and acted by unanimous written consent three times. Each person who served as a director in 2004 attended in excess of 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during 2004 and (ii) the total number of meetings held during 2004 by each committee of the Board of Directors on which such director served, except for Dr. Marshall, who attended 56% of the meetings.
The Board has a standing Compensation and Stock Option Committee, Governance and Nominating Committee, Audit Committee and Clinical Development and Science Committee.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee is primarily responsible for reviewing the compensation arrangements for the Company’s executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, and for administering the Company’s stock option plans. Members of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee are Messrs. Ben Dor, Gamzu and Marshall. In 2004, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee met three times and acted by unanimous written consent four times.
The Governance and Nominating Committee, created by the Board in February 2004, assists the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become directors, determines the composition of the Board and its committees, monitors the process to assess Board effectiveness and helps develop and implement the Company’s corporate governance guidelines. The members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are Messrs. Ben Dor, Marcel and Schlachet, each of whom is “independent” under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and applicable NASDAQ rules. In 2004, the Governance and Nominating Committee met twice.
The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and evaluating the Company’s accounting policies and its system of internal controls. Consistent with the NASDAQ audit committee structure and membership requirements, the Audit Committee is comprised of three members: Messrs. Gamzu, Marcel and Schlachet, each of whom is “independent” under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and applicable NASDAQ rules.
While more than one member of the Company’s Audit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K, Mr. David Schlachet, the Committee chairperson, is the designated audit committee financial expert. Mr. Schlachet is considered “independent” as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. In 2004, the Audit Committee met seven times and acted by unanimous written consent once.
The Clinical Development and Science Committee was formed in June, 2005 and assists the Board of Directors by reviewing and evaluating the Company’s clinical programs and research and development efforts. Members of the Clinical Development and Science Committee are Messrs. Marcel, Gamzu and Marshall.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee, Governance and Nominating Committee, Audit Committee and Clinical Development and Science Committee operate under written charters adopted by the Board and are available on our website at www.pharmoscorp.com. Click “Investors” and “Corporate Governance.” The charter for the Clinical Development and Science Committee is attached as Appendix A hereto.
14
INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS
The Board has determined that except for Dr. Haim Aviv, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, each of our remaining six (6) directors — Mony Ben Dor, Elkan Gamzu, Georges Anthony Marcel, Lawrence Marshall, David Schlachet and Abraham Sartani — is an “independent director” in that he does not have any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is not in any relationship specified in Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15) that precludes a determination of independence.
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
In accordance with Nasdaq Rule 4250(c)(2), the independent directors of the Board have regularly scheduled meetings in executive session, at which only the independent directors are present (together with counsel, if requested by the independent directors), at least twice a year in conjunction with regularly scheduled Board meetings, and more frequently whenever deemed desirable or appropriate or whenever the full Board has a meeting. In 2004, there were three Executive Sessions.
DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS
The Board has established a Governance and Nominating Committee as described above. The Committee may identify potential board candidates from a variety of sources, including recommendations from current directors or management, recommendations of security holders or any other source the Committee deems appropriate. The Committee may also engage a search firm or consultant to assist it in identifying, screening and evaluating potential candidates. The Committee has been given sole authority to retain and terminate any such search firm or consultant.
In considering candidates for the Board, the Committee evaluates the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. The Committee considers, among other things: (i) business or other relevant experience; (ii) expertise, skills and knowledge; (iii) integrity and reputation; (iv) the extent to which the candidate will enhance the objective of having directors with diverse viewpoints, backgrounds, expertise, skills and experience; (v) willingness and ability to commit sufficient time to Board responsibilities; and (vi) qualification to serve on specialized board committees — such as the Audit Committee or Compensation and Stock Option Committee.
In 2005, the Nominating Committee nominated an independent director, Abraham Sartani, who was appointed to the Board in June 2005.
Our stockholders may recommend potential director candidates by following the procedure described below. The Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate recommendations from stockholders in the same manner that it evaluates recommendations from other sources.
If you wish to recommend a potential director candidate for consideration by the Committee, please send your recommendation to Pharmos Corporation, 99 Wood Avenue South, Suite 311, Iselin, NJ 08830, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Any notice relating to candidates for election at the 2006 annual meeting must be received by January 24, 2006. You should use first class, certified mail in order to ensure the receipt of your recommendation.
15
Any recommendation must include (i) your name and address and a list of the shares of our company that you own; (ii) the name, age, business address and residence address of the proposed candidate; (iii) the principal occupation or employment of the proposed candidate over the preceding ten years and the person’s educational background; (iv) a statement as to why you believe such person should be considered as a potential candidate; (v) a description of any affiliation between you and the person you are recommending; and (vi) the consent of the proposed candidate to your submitting him or her as a potential candidate. You should note that the foregoing process relates only to bringing potential candidates to the attention of the Governance and Nominating Committee. This process will not give you the right to directly propose a nominee at any meeting of stockholders.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Pharmos has adopted a procedure to enable our stockholders to communicate in writing with our Board, with committees of the Board or with any individual director or directors. Stockholders may send communications directly to: Pharmos Corporation, 99 Wood Avenue South, Suite 311, Iselin, New Jersey 08830, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Such communications will be screened for appropriateness before notifying the members of the Board or committee, as the case may be, of receipt of a communication and forwarding it to the appropriate person or persons.
Please note that the foregoing procedure does not apply to (i) stockholder proposals pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 and communications made in connection with such proposals or (ii) service of process or any other notice in a legal proceeding. For information concerning stockholder proposals, see “Stockholders’ Proposals For 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”
POLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT ANNUAL
STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETINGS
The Board has adopted a policy encouraging directors to attend the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, whether or not a Board meeting is scheduled for the same date of the Annual Meeting. To incentivize such attendance, the Company will pay its directors $1,500 for attending an Annual Meeting on a date when no Board meeting is separately scheduled (and if a Board meeting is scheduled for such date, the $1,500 per meeting fee will cover attendance at both the Annual Meeting and the Board meeting).
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT*
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for, among other things, the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Additionally, the Audit Committee must preapprove all audit and non-audit services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are responsible for auditing those financial statements. However, the members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Rather, we rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management and the independent registered public accounting firm.
16
The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
1. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the Company’s management.
2. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended.
3. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP their independence from the Company. When considering PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence, the Audit Committee considered whether their provision of services to the Company beyond those rendered in connection with their audit and review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements was compatible with maintaining their independence. The Audit Committee also has reviewed, among other things, the amount of fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit and non-audit services.
4. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to in paragraphs (1) through (3) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2005.
| Submitted by the Members of the Audit Committee
David Schlachet Elkan Gamzu, Ph.D. Georges Anthony Marcel, M.D., Ph.D. |
| *The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing. |
17
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2004 and the two previous years, as well as all other executive officers of the Company who received compensation in excess of $100,000 for 2004.
Name/ Principal Position
| | Year | | Annual Compensation | | Long Term Compensation | |
Salary | | Bonus | | Other | Restricted Stock
| | Stock Under- lying Options
| | All Other Compensation |
Haim Aviv, Ph.D | | 2004 | | $ | 298,284 | | $ | — | | $ | 17,423 | (1) | $ | 1,200,000 | (2) | 38,000 | | $ | 315,821 | (3) |
Chairman,Chief | | 2003 | | $ | 281,400 | | $ | 140,000 | | $ | 21,928 | (1) | | | | 38,000 | | $ | 14,616 | (4) |
Executive Officer, and | | 2002 | | $ | 289,459 | | $ | 50,000 | | $ | 19,833 | (1) | | | | 37,500 | | $ | 13,503 | (4) |
Chief Scientist | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gad Riesenfeld,Ph.D | | 2004 | | $ | 249,063 | | $ | — | | $ | 69,376 | (5) | $ | 800,000 | (6) | 27,000 | | $ | 215,181 | (7) |
President and Chief | | 2003 | | $ | 324,965 | | $ | 100,000 | | $ | 78,886 | (5) | | | | 27,000 | | $ | 14,025 | (4) |
Operating Officer | | 2002 | | $ | 255,157 | | $ | 40,000 | | $ | 73,379 | (5) | | | | 25,000 | | $ | 12,957 | (4) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
James A. Meer | | 2004 | | $ | 110,320 | (8) | $ | 50,000 | | $ | 5,890 | (1) | | | | 30,000 | | | | |
Senior Vice President, | | 2003 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | |
Chief Financial Officer, | | 2002 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | |
Secretary and Treasurer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Robert W. Cook | | 2004 | | $ | 99,244 | (9) | $ | 5,250 | | $ | 1,942 | (1) | | | | — | | | | |
Executive Vice | | 2003 | | $ | 222,264 | | $ | 100,000 | | $ | 25,211 | (1) | | | | 23,000 | | | | |
President, Chief | | 2002 | | $ | 222,264 | | $ | 37,500 | | $ | 15,338 | (1) | | | | 20,000 | | | | |
Financial Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Consists of contributions to insurance premiums and car allowance. |
(2) | Represents the value at the time of grant of 379,747 restricted stock units (which were converted to 75,950 restricted stock units as a result of the 1:5 stock split that was effective May 31, 2005) awarded to Dr. Aviv pursuant to a Retention Award Agreement dated September 6, 2004. Using the closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2004, the aggregate value of Dr. Aviv’s restricted stock units would be approximately $539,240, and using the closing price on June 30, 2005, the aggregate value would be approximately $186,078. One-half of the restricted stock units are scheduled to vest and become non-forfeitable on December 31, 2005, and the balance on June 30, 2007, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions. The shares of common stock underlying the restricted stock units have the same dividend rights as our unrestricted common stock. |
(3) | Consists of (i) $300,000 awarded to Dr. Aviv pursuant to a Retention Award Agreement dated September 6, 2004 (one-half of the cash award is scheduled to vest and become non-forfeitable on December 31, 2005, and the balance on June 30, 2007, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions) and (ii) $15,821 in deferred payment obligations of the Company equal to the cost of premiums that would otherwise have been payable to maintain a split dollar life insurance policy. |
(4) | Consists of deferred payment obligations of the Company equal to the cost of premiums that would otherwise have been payable to maintain a split dollar life insurance policy. |
(5) | Consists of housing allowance, contributions to insurance premiums, car allowance and car expense. |
(6) | Represents the value at the time of grant of 253,165 shares of restricted stock (which were converted to 50,633 restricted stock units as a result of the 1:5 stock split that was effective May 31, 2005) awarded to Dr. Riesenfeld pursuant to a Retention Award Agreement dated September 6, 2004. Using the closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2004, the aggregate value of Dr. Riesenfeld’s shares of restricted stock would be approximately $359,494, and using the closing price on June 30, 2005, the aggregate value would be approximately $124,051. One-half of the shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest and become non-forfeitable on December 31, 2005, and the balance on June 30, 2007, subject to |
18
| certain accelerated vesting provisions. The shares of restricted stock have the same dividend rights as our unrestricted common stock |
(7) | Consists of (i) $200,000 awarded to Dr. Riesenfeld pursuant to a Retention Award Agreement dated September 6, 2004 (one-half of the cash award is scheduled to vest and become non-forfeitable on December 31, 2005, and the balance on June 30, 2007, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions) and (ii) $15,181 in deferred payment obligations of the Company equal to the cost of premiums that would otherwise have been payable to maintain a split dollar life insurance policy. |
(8) | Mr. Meer joined Pharmos Corporation in July 2004. |
(9) | Mr. Cook resigned from Pharmos Corporation in March 2004. |
The following tables set forth information with respect to the named executive officers concerning the grant and exercise of options during the last fiscal year and unexercised options held as of the end of the fiscal year.
OPTION GRANTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
| Common Stock Underlying Options Granted
| | % of Total Options Granted to Employees
| | Exercise Price per Share
| | Expiration Date
| | 5% | | 10% |
| | | | |
Haim Aviv, Ph.D | 38,000 | | 16 | % | | $ | 21.20 | | 12-Feb-14 | | $ | 506,638 | | $ | 1,283,919 |
Gad Riesenfeld, Ph.D | 27,000 | | 12 | % | | $ | 21.20 | | 12-Feb-14 | | $ | 359,979 | | $ | 912,258 |
James A. Meer** | 30,000 | | 13 | % | | $ | 17.50 | | 12-Jul-14 | | $ | 330,170 | | $ | 836,715 |
Robert W. Cook* | 23,000 | | 10 | % | | $ | 21.20 | | 12-Feb-14 | | $ | 306,649 | | $ | 777,109 |
* | Mr. Cook resigned from Pharmos Corporation in March 2004. |
** | Mr. Meer joined Pharmos Corporation in July 2004. |
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
AND OPTION VALUES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004:
| Number of Shares Acquired On Exercise
| | Value Realized
| | Number of Unexercised Options at December 31, 2004
| | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at December 31, 2004 |
Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable |
Haim Aviv, Ph.D | 39,875 | | $ | 464,690 | | 105,031 | | 73,469 | | $ | 43,862 | | $ | 42,187 |
Gad Riesenfeld, Ph.D | 55,604 | | $ | 490,635 | | 29.250 | | 49,813 | | $ | — | | $ | 28,125 |
James A. Meer** | — | | $ | — | | 3,750 | | 26,250 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Robert W. Cook* | 35,750 | | $ | 305,375 | | 19,000 | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — |
* | Mr. Cook resigned from Pharmos Corporation in March 2004. |
** | Mr. Meer joined Pharmos Corporation in July 2004. |
19
REPORT OF COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE
The following report of the Compensation Committee is provided solely to the stockholders of the Company pursuant to the requirements of Schedule 14A promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of establishing statutory liability. This Report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any document previously or subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that incorporates by reference all or any portion of this Proxy Statement.
General Executive Compensation Policy
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors establishes the general compensation policies of the Company, the compensation plans and specific compensation levels for executive officers, and administers the Company’s 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as well as the 2000, 1997 and 1992 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee is composed of three independent, non-employee Directors who have no interlocking relationships as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission other than as described below (see “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”).
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee, being responsible for overseeing and approving executive compensation and grants of stock options, is in a position to appropriately balance the current cash compensation considerations with the longer-range incentive-oriented growth outlook associated with stock options. The main objectives of the Company’s compensation structure include rewarding individuals for their respective contributions to the Company’s performance, establishing executive officers with a stake in the long-term success of the Company and providing compensation policies that will attract and retain qualified executive personnel.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee uses no set formulas and may accord different weight to different factors for each executive. The Committee looks toward the progress of the Company’s research and development programs and its clinical programs, its ability to gain support for those programs, either internally or externally, its ability to attract, motivate and retain talented employees and its ability to secure capital sufficient for its product development to achieve rapid and effective commercialization as may be practicable.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee believes that the chief executive officer’s (CEO) compensation should be heavily influenced by Company performance. Although Dr. Aviv’s existing agreement with the Company (see “Employment/Consulting Contracts/Directors’ Compensation”) provides for a base level of compensation, the Committee determines the appropriate level of bonuses and increases, if any, based in large part on Company performance. The Committee also considers the salaries of CEOs of comparably-sized companies and their performance. Stock options are granted to the CEO, as to other executives, primarily based on the executive’s ability to influence the Company’s long-term growth.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee has adopted similar policies with respect to compensation of other officers of the Company. The Committee establishes base salaries that are within the range of salaries for persons holding positions of similar responsibility at other companies. In addition, the Committee considers factors such as relative Company performance, the executive’s past performance and future potential in establishing the base salaries of executive officers.
As with the CEO, the number of options granted to the other officers is determined by the subjective evaluation of the executive’s ability to influence the Company’s long-term growth. All options are granted at no less than the current market price. Since the value of an option bears a direct relationship to the Company’s stock price, it is an effective incentive for managers to create value for stockholders. The Committee therefore views stock options as an important component of its long-term, performance-based compensation philosophy.
20
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
In light of the unfavorable results for dexanabinol which was tested as an agent to treat severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), the Compensation and Stock Option Committee determined in February 2005 that there were no salary increases in 2005 based on 2004 performance for senior management and no bonuses, other than those which were contractually obligated, paid in 2005 on 2004 performance.
On September 6, 2004, the Board of Directors approved and Pharmos entered into a Retention Award Agreement with Dr. Aviv. The Company granted a retention award of $300,000 cash and 75,949 restricted stock units to Dr. Aviv (the “Award”). One half of the Award shall vest or is scheduled to vest and become non-forfeitable on December 31, 2005, and the balance shall vest and become non-forfeitable on June 30, 2007, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions.
For 2005, Dr Aviv’s salary remains at the 2004 level of $298,284 and a grant was made to him under the Company’s 2000 Stock Plan for 38,000 Incentive Stock Options (the same as in 2004 and an increase from 37,500 for 2002 and 30,000 for 2001), with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting in twelve equal quarterly installments over the next three years, and exercisable at the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock as of the date of grant.
The Company under Dr. Haim Aviv is continuing its progress as a drug discovery company and approaching the commercialization stages for its neurological and inflammatory products.
| Members of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee
Mony Ben Dor Lawrence F. Marshall, M.D. Elkan Gamzu, Ph.D. |
21
EMPLOYMENT/CONSULTING CONTRACTS/DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION
Haim Aviv, Ph.D. In April 2001, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors recommended, and the Board approved, a one-year employment/consulting agreement for Dr. Aviv, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Dr. Aviv has agreed to devote a majority of his business time to the Company and to Pharmos Ltd. The agreement provides for automatic one year renewals unless either the Company terminates the agreement at least 180 days prior to the scheduled expiration date during the initial one year term (and 90 days for subsequent terms) or Dr. Aviv terminates the agreement at least 60 days prior to the scheduled expiration date. Dr. Aviv’s base compensation for 2004 and for 2005 was and is $298,284, to be allocated between the Company and Pharmos Ltd.. The Company also agreed to make available for Dr. Aviv’s benefit following his death, termination of employment for disability or retirement at the age of at least 62 an amount equal to the cost of insurance premiums the Company would otherwise have incurred to obtain and maintain a “split-dollar” life insurance policy on his life (approximately $10,000 per year, accruing interest at 8% per year). In addition, the Company agreed to pay, in lieu of contributing to other benefits plans on his behalf, an amount equal to an aggregate of approximately 21% of his base compensation paid in Israel toward the “Management Insurance Scheme” managed by the government of Israel for members of management of Israeli companies.
Dr. Aviv’s employment agreement also provides that if his employment is terminated within one year following a “change of control,” he will receive severance pay of 18 months of base salary for the then-current year, accelerated vesting of all unvested stock options and extended exercisability of all stock options until their respective expiration dates. A “change of control” involves an acquisition of at least 50% of the voting power of the Company’s securities, a change in at least 51% of the composition of the current Board of Directors, or approval by the Board of Directors or stockholders of the Company of a transaction where such change of voting control or composition of the Board would occur, where the Company would be liquidated or where all or substantially all of its assets would be sold.
If Dr. Aviv’s employment is terminated by the Company, after notice, other than for a change in control, death, disability or for “cause,” as defined in his employment agreement, or if he terminates his employment within one year of a change in control or otherwise for “good reason,” as defined in his employment agreement, he will receive severance pay of 12 months of base salary for the then-current year, accelerated vesting of all unvested stock options and extended exercisability of all stock options until their respective expiration dates.
The employment agreement also contains customary confidentiality and non-competition undertakings by Dr. Aviv.
Gad Riesenfeld, Ph.D.In April 2001, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors recommended, and the Board approved, a one year employment agreement for Dr. Riesenfeld, as full-time President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Dr. Riesenfeld’s base compensation for 2004 and 2005 was and is $249,063.
The other provisions of Dr. Riesenfeld’s employment agreement relating to benefits, severance arrangements, and automatic renewal, confidentiality and non-competition obligations are substantially similar to those included in Dr. Aviv’s employment agreement, as described above, except that the Company’s contribution to the “Management Insurance Scheme” on Dr. Riesenfeld’s behalf is approximately 16%. In addition, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors in April 2001 also authorized an amendment to Dr. Riesenfeld’s employment agreement to provide that if the Company hires a new Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Riesenfeld will be awarded, at the time of commencement of employment, a one-time stock option grant equal to the highest grant he received during the previous three years, in addition to his annual stock option awards. In addition, any termination by the Company within 12 months after such commencement of employment will require 180 days’ prior written notice to Dr. Riesenfeld and will entitle him to severance pay equal to 12 months of base salary. In such circumstances, any resignation by Dr. Riesenfeld within 12 months thereafter other than for “good reason” (as defined in his employment agreement) will require 90 days’ prior written notice by Dr. Riesenfeld and will entitle him to 12 months of base salary. The amendment to his employment agreement also provides that Dr. Riesenfeld will act as an unpaid consultant to the Company for a
22
one year period following any such termination or resignation. In February, 2005, the Company amended Dr. Riesenfeld’s employment agreement to vest his “split dollar benefit” prior to age 62.
On September 6, 2004, the Board of Directors approved, and Pharmos entered into, Retention Award Agreements with each of Drs. Aviv and Riesenfeld. The Company granted retention awards of $300,000 cash and 379,747 restricted stock units to Dr. Aviv and $200,000 cash and 253,165 shares of restricted stock to Dr. Riesenfeld. One half of the Awards shall vest or are scheduled to vest and become non-forfeitable on December 31, 2005, and the balance shall vest and become non-forfeitable on June 30, 2007, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions. The fair value of the restricted stock awards was based on the fair value of the underlying stock on the issuance date. The aggregate fair value of the restricted stock awards totaled $2 million.
James A. Meer. In July 2004, the Compensation and Stock Option Committees of the Board of Directors recommended, and the Board approved, a one year employment agreement for Mr. Meer as full time Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company. In January 2005, Mr. Meer was promoted to Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Meer’s base compensation for 2004, effective July 12 was $235,000 and is $235,000 for 2005. The other provisions of Mr. Meer’s employment agreement relating to benefits, severance arrangements and automatic renewal and confidentiality obligations are substantially similar to the those included in Dr. Aviv’s employment agreement, as described above, except that Mr. Meer does not participate in the “Management Insurance Scheme” of Pharmos Ltd. As part of Mr. Meer’s employment contract, Mr. Meer is required to have an insurance policy. The Company will reimburse Mr. Meer the premium payments on his life insurance policy up to $8,000.
23
Directors’ Compensation. In March 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a compensation policy with respect to outside members of the Board which was amended in February 2004 and in June 2004.
In February 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the recommendation of the Compensation Committee to increase Board compensation to two payments of $4,000 each per annum (a total of $8,000), to increase compensation for attendance at board, committee or shareholder meetings to $1,500 per meeting (only one payment per day, regardless of the number of meetings attended), to provide for separate additional payments to members of the Audit Committee of $2,000 per meeting, even if other meetings are held on the same day, to increase the initial stock option grants for new independent directors to 7,000 options and to increase the annual option grant to such directors to 5,000. In June 2005, the number of stock options granted to new independent directors was increased to 10,000 options.
In June 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the recommendation of the Compensation Committee to increase the cash compensation for the lead director of the Board of Directors to a payment of $25,000 per annum (to be paid in two installments: $12,500 on January 1 and $12,500 immediately after the Annual Meeting of the Board) in lieu of all other cash payments other directors receive for serving on the Board.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The members of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee are Mony Ben Dor, Lawrence Marshall, and Elkan Gamzu. There were no interlocks on the Compensation and Stock Option Committee in 2004.
24
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the Company’s cumulative stockholder’s return for the five year period ended December 31, 2004 with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Equity Market Index and the NASDAQ Pharmaceuticals Index over the same period.
[THE FOLLOWING TABLE WAS REPRESENTED AS A LINE GRAPH IN THE PRINTED MATERIAL]
| 1999 | | 2000 | | 2001 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
NASDAQ Composite | 100.00 | | 60.31 | | 47.84 | | 33.07 | | 49.45 | | 53.81 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
NASDAQ Pharmaceuticals | 100.00 | | 124.73 | | 106.31 | | 68.69 | | 100.69 | | 107.25 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Pharmos Corporation | 100.00 | | 73.95 | | 114.88 | | 49.77 | | 160.47 | | 66.05 |
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
In June, 2005, the Company’s Pharmos Ltd. subsidiary modified a License Agreement with Herbamed, Ltd., a company controlled by Dr. Haim Aviv, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The License Agreement, originally entered into in May 1997, licenses to Herbamed the Company’s patent rights for the oral delivery of lipophilic substances in the limited field of nutraceuticals, which include food and dietary supplements, food additives, vitamins and herbs. Under the terms of the revised License Agreement, Herbamed will pay to Pharmos Ltd. royalties of 3% on net sales. The Company recognized royalties from Herbamed of a non-material amount during the first half ended June 30, 2005.
Neither the Company nor its Pharmos Ltd. subsidiary is involved in the field of nutraceuticals generally, and specifically in developing improved oral delivery of nutraceuticals. Pharmos Ltd., therefore, licensed its technology in this narrow non-pharmaceutical field of use to Herbamed as a way of seeking to benefit from a potential stream of royalty payments without having to devote any resources to the development of an application it otherwise would not have pursued. In addition, if the technology proves to be successful for the delivery of nutraceuticals, Pharmos hopes that it could be able to interest potential strategic partners in licensing the technology for pharmaceuticals applications.
Dr. Aviv was not involved with either party in negotiating the terms of the License Agreement with Herbamed. Pharmos Ltd. concluded that the royalty rates and other terms of the License Agreement are commercially reasonable to it, and the License Agreement was ratified by the Board of the Company.
SECTION 16 FILINGS
No person who, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock (a “Reporting Person”), failed to file on a timely basis, reports required by Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) during the most recent fiscal year. The foregoing is based solely upon a review by the Company of Forms 3 and 4 during the most recent fiscal year as furnished to the Company under Rule 16a-3(d) under the Act, and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, and any representation received by the Company from any reporting person that no Form 5 is required.
25
ITEM 2 - PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED
SHARES OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK TO 60,000,000 SHARES
The Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, (the “Restated Articles”) currently authorize the issuance of up to 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The Board of Directors of the Company has approved, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Restated Articles to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 60,000,000. The additional authorized shares of Common Stock, if and when issued, would have the same rights and privileges as the shares of Common Stock previously authorized. A copy of the proposed amendment to the Restated Articles is set forth in Appendix B hereto.
As of July 27, 2005, there were 19,027,809 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
The additional shares of Common Stock authorized by the Amendment could be issued at the direction of the Board of Directors from time to time for any proper corporate purpose, including, without limitation, the acquisition of other businesses, the raising of additional capital for use in the Company’s business, a split of or dividend on then outstanding shares or in connection with any employee stock plan or program. The holders of shares of Common Stock do not presently have preemptive rights to subscribe for any of the Company’s securities and holders of Common Stock will not have any such rights to subscribe for the additional Common Stock proposed to be authorized. Any future issuances of authorized shares of Common Stock may be authorized by the Board of Directors without further action by the stockholders.
Although the Board of Directors will issue Common Stock only when required or when the Board considers such issuance to be in the best interests of the Company, the issuance of additional Common Stock may, among other things, have a dilutive effect on the earnings per share (if any) and on the equity and voting rights of stockholders. Furthermore, since Nevada law requires the vote of a majority of shares of each class of stock in order to approve certain mergers and reorganizations, the proposed amendment could permit the Board to issue shares to persons supportive of management’s position. Such persons might then be in a position to vote to prevent a proposed business combination which is deemed unacceptable to the Board, although perceived to be desirable by some stockholders, including, potentially, a majority of stockholders. This could provide management with a means to block any majority vote which might be necessary to effect a business combination in accordance with applicable law, and could enhance the ability of Directors of the Company to retain their positions. Additionally, the presence of such additional authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock could discourage unsolicited business combination transactions which might otherwise be desirable to stockholders.
26
Except for (i) shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s stock option plans (including under the proposed amendment to the 2000 Stock Option Plan) and other non-plan stock options, (ii) shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and (iii) shares of Common Stock which the Company would be required to issue upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, the Board of Directors has no current plans to issue additional shares of Common Stock. However, the Board believes that the benefits of providing it with the flexibility to issue shares without delay for any proper business purpose, including as an alternative to an unsolicited business combination opposed by the Board, outweigh the possible disadvantages of dilution and discouraging unsolicited business combination proposals and that it is prudent and in the best interests of stockholders to provide the advantage of greater flexibility which will result from the Amendment.
Approval of the Amendment to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock to 60,000,000 shares requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE INCREASE OF THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK TO 60,000,000 SHARES (ITEM 2 ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD).
27
ITEM 3 - PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY’S 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Board of Directors has adopted, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment (the “Plan Amendment”) to the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”) authorizing the issuance of an additional 1,500,000 shares under such plan, thereby increasing the aggregate number of shares issuable under such plan from 1,200,000 to 2,700,000.
To date, options to purchase 1,149,308 shares of the Company’s Common Stock have been granted under the 2000 Plan and 241,868 of such options have been exercised or terminated.
The adoption of the Plan Amendment by the Board of Directors reflects a determination by the Board that ensuring the availability of a sufficient number of, and various types of, options and awards available for grant under the 2000 Plan is important to the Company’s ongoing and continuing efforts to attract and retain key senior management personnel and increase the interest of the Company’s executive officers in the Company’s continuing success.
Since the granting of options and awards under the 2000 Plan is discretionary, the Company cannot at present determine the number of options and awards that will be granted in the future to any person or group of persons or the terms of any future grant. Future option and award grants and the terms thereof will be determined by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee in accordance with the terms of the 2000 Plan.
Set forth below is certain information concerning the 2000 Plan. A copy of the 2000 Plan, under which a maximum of 1,200,000 shares are issuable as a result of the 1:5 stock split that was effective May 31, 2005, is attached as Appendix C hereto and a copy of the Plan Amendment is attached as Appendix D hereto.
DESCRIPTION OF 2000 PLAN
The purpose of the 2000 Plan is to allow employees, outside Directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries to increase their proprietary interest in, and to encourage such employees to remain in the employ of, or maintain their relationship with, such entities. It is intended that options granted under the 2000 Plan will qualify either as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code or as non-qualified options. Options granted under the 2000 Plan will only be exercisable for Common Stock.
The 2000 Plan is administered by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors (the Compensation and Stock Option Committee) or by the Board itself. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee will designate the persons to receive awards or options, the number of shares subject to the options and the terms of the awards and options, including the option price and the duration of each option, subject to certain limitations.
The maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the 2000 Plan is currently 1,200,000 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, mergers, consolidations and the like. Common Stock subject to options granted under the 2000 Plan that expire or terminate will again be available for options to be issued under the 2000 Plan.
28
The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased upon exercise of an incentive stock option must be at least 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date the option is granted (or at least 110% of fair market value in the case of a person holding more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (a “10% Stockholder”)).
The aggregate fair market value (determined at the time the option is granted) of Common Stock with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time in any calendar year by an optionee under the 2000 Plan or any other plan of the Company or a subsidiary, shall not exceed $100,000. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee will fix the time or times when, and the extent to which, an option is exercisable, provided that no option will be exercisable earlier than one year or later than ten years after the date of grant (or five years in the case of a 10% Stockholder). The option price is payable in cash or by check. In addition, the Board of Directors may grant a loan to an employee, pursuant to the loan provision of the 2000 Plan, for the purpose of exercising an option or may permit the option price to be paid in shares of Common Stock at the then current fair market value, as defined in the 2000 Plan.
Subject to the terms of the 2000 Plan, the Board of Directors at its sole discretion shall determine when an option shall expire. A stock option agreement may provide for expiration prior to the end of its term in the event of the termination of the optionee’s service to the Company or death or any other circumstances.
The 2000 Plan provides that outstanding options shall vest and become immediately exercisable in the event of a “sale” of the Company, including (i) the sale of more than 75% of the voting power of the Company in a single transaction or a series of transactions, (ii) the sale of substantially all assets of the Company, (iii) approval by the stockholders of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, as a result of which the stockholders of the Company will own less than 50% of the voting power of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company.
The Board of Directors may amend, suspend or discontinue the 2000 Plan, but it must obtain stockholder approval to (i) increase the number of shares subject to the 2000 Plan or (ii) change the designation of the class of persons eligible to receive options.
Under current federal income tax law, the grant of incentive stock options under the 2000 Plan will not result in any taxable income to the optionee or any deduction for the Company at the time the options are granted. The optionee recognizes no gain upon the exercise of an option. However the amount by which the fair market value of Common Stock at the time the option is exercised exceeds the option price is an “item of tax preference” of the optionee, which may cause the optionee to be subject to the alternative minimum tax. If the optionee holds the shares of Common Stock received on exercise of the option at least one year from the date of exercise and two years from the date of grant, he will be taxed at the time of sale at long-term capital gains rates, if any, on the amount by which the proceeds of the sale exceed the option price. If the optionee disposes of the Common Stock before the required holding period is satisfied, ordinary income will generally be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the date of exercise over the option price, or, if the disposition is a taxable sale or exchange, the amount of gain realized on such sale or exchange if that is less. If, as permitted by the 2000 Plan, the Board of Directors permits an optionee to exercise an option by delivering already owned shares of Common Stock valued at fair market value) the optionee will not recognize gain as a result of the payment of the option price with such already owned shares. However, if such shares were acquired pursuant to the previous exercise of an option, and were held less than one year after acquisition or less than two years from the date of grant, the exchange will constitute a disqualifying disposition resulting in immediate taxation of the gain on the already owned shares as ordinary income. It is not clear how the gain will be computed on the disposition of shares acquired by payment with already owned shares.
29
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The table below provides certain information concerning our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004, which has been adjusted to reflect the effect of the 1:5 stock split that was effective May 31, 2005.
|
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
| | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
| | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans(excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
|
Plan Category | (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
|
Equity compensation | 918,576 | | $ 13.95 | | 607,983 |
plans approved by | | | | | |
security holders | | | | | |
|
Equity compensation | N/A | | N/A | | N/A |
plans not approved by | | | | | |
security holders | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
Total | 918,576 | | $ 13.95 | | 607,983 |
|
The Company from time to time engages in discussions with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about potential business and/or product consolidations, joint ventures, acquisitions, mergers or other business combinations. If any such transaction is ever consummated, the existence of these additional outstanding stock options under the 2000 Plan could have the effect of reducing the aggregate consideration received by existing stockholders in such transaction.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting will be required to approve the Plan Amendment.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY’S 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN (ITEM 3 ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD).
30
ITEM 4 - RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PricewaterhouseCoopers”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, and our Board of Directors has directed that management submit the selection of independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Meeting. PricewaterhouseCoopers has audited the financial statements of the Company and its predecessors for more than ten years and has advised the Company that it does not have any material financial interests in, or any connection with (other than as independent registered public accounting firm), the Company.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required by the Bylaws or otherwise. However, the Board is submitting the selection of PriceWaterhouseCoopers to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee or the Board will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee or the Board in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee or the Board determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
PricewaterhouseCoopers is expected to be present at the meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
AUDIT FEES
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with its audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, its reviews of the Company’s unaudited consolidated interim financial statements, and for SEC filings were $629,000 and $353,000, respectively.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES
None.
TAX FEES
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with its income tax compliance and related tax services for the years ended December 31, 2004, and 2003 were $19,000 and $80,000, respectively.
ALL OTHER FEES
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with its executive compensation analysis for the years ended December 31, 2004, and 2003 were $39,000 and $0, respectively
31
POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The charter of the Audit Committee requires that the Committee review and pre-approve all audit, review or attest engagements of, and non-audit services to be provided by, the independent registered public accounting firm (other than with respect to the de minimis exception permitted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC rules promulgated thereunder). The Audit Committee pre-approved all auditing services and permitted non-audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 2004.
The pre-approval duty may be delegated to one or more designated members of the Audit Committee, with any such pre-approval reported to the Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Any such designated member(s) of the Committee shall also have the authority to approve non-audit services already commenced by the independent registered public accounting firm if (i) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent (5%) of the total amount of revenues paid by the Company to the independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year in which the services are provided, (ii) such services were not recognized by the Company at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services, and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by such designated member(s) prior to the completion of the audit.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting will be required to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2005 (ITEM 4 ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD).
STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALS FOR 2006 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
Proposals which stockholders intend to present at the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Company by April 3, 2006, and must meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy material for that meeting. Proposals should be sent to: Pharmos Corporation, 99 Wood Avenue South, Suite 311, Iselin, NJ 08830, Attention: President.
If a stockholder notifies us after June 17, 2006, of an intention to present a proposal at the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders (and for any reason the proposal is voted on at the meeting), our proxy holders will have the right to exercise discretionary voting authority with respect to such proposal.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Upon sending a written request to Pharmos Corporation, 99 Wood Avenue South, Suite 311, Iselin, NJ 08830, Attention: President, stockholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and any amendments thereto, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
32
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the only business which management expects to be considered at the Meeting is the election of directors, the increase of the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock to 60,000,000 shares, the amendment of the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan, and ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s auditors. If any other matters come before the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy are expected to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
HAIM AVIV, PH.D. Chairman of the Board |
Dated: August 5, 2005
33
APPENDIX A
PHARMOS CORPORATION
THE CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE CHARTER
(Adopted by the Board of Directors on June 28, 2005)
The function of the Clinical Development and Scientific Committee (the “Committee”) is to assist the Board of Directors (the “Board”) by reviewing and evaluating the Company’s clinical programs and research and development efforts.
The Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors. At least two members of the Committee shall, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, have relevant scientific expertise. The Committee may engage external consultants.
Unless a Chair is elected by the full Board, the members of the Committee may designate a Chair by majority vote of the full Committee membership.
The Committee may meet at such times during the year as circumstances require. The Committee may ask members of management or others to attend meetings and provide pertinent information as necessary. The presence in person or by telephone of a majority of the Committee’s members shall constitute a quorum for any meeting of the Committee. All actions of the Committee will require the vote of a majority of its members present at a meeting of the Committee at which a quorum is present.
IV. | Responsibilities and Duties |
The Committee shall review, evaluate, and report to the Board regarding plans and goals, as well as the progress and performance, of the Company’s clinical programs and research and development efforts.
The Committee shall identify and discuss significant emerging science and technology issues and trends, including their impact on any Company programs, plans, or policies relating to clinical affairs or research and development.
34
APPENDIX B
Amendment to Article FOURTH of Restated Articles of Incorporation
The first paragraph of Article FOURTH shall be replaced by the following paragraph:
“The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue is sixty-one million two hundred fifty thousand (61,250,000), of which sixty million (60,000,000) shares of the par value of three cents ($0.03) each, amounting in the aggregate to One Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,800,000), shall be Common Stock, and of which one million two hundred fifty thousand (1,250,000) shares of the par value of three cents ($0.03) each, amounting in the aggregate to Thirty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37,500), shall be Preferred Stock.”
35
APPENDIX C
PHARMOS CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN
(December 2004)
SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.
The purpose of the Plan is to offer selected individuals an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the success of the Company, or to increase such interest, through the granting of Options to purchase Shares of the Company’s Stock, restricted Stock Awards and Stock Units. Options granted under the Plan may include Nonstatutory Options as well as ISOs intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Code.
Capitalized terms are defined in Section 12.
SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION.
(a)Committees of the Board of Directors. The Plan may be administered by one or more Committees. Each Committee shall consist of one or more members of the Board of Directors who have been appointed by the Board of Directors. Each Committee shall have such authority and be responsible for such functions as the Board of Directors has assigned to it. If no Committee has been appointed, the entire Board of Directors shall administer the Plan. Any reference to the Board of Directors in the Plan shall be construed as a reference to the Committee (if any) to whom the Board of Directors has assigned a particular function.
(b)Authority of the Board of Directors. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Board of Directors shall have full authority and discretion to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. All decisions, interpretations and other actions of the Board of Directors shall be final and binding on all Awardees and Optionees and all persons deriving their rights from an Awardee or Optionee.
SECTION 3. ELIGIBILITY.
Only Employees, Outside Directors and Consultants shall be eligible for the grant of Options, Awards or the direct award or sale of Shares. Only Employees shall be eligible for the grant of ISOs. In addition to other provisions of the Plan, the provisions of Section 14 of the Plan shall govern Awards to Employees and Directors who are residents of the State of Israel.
SECTION 4. STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN.
(a)Basic Limitation. Shares offered under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares. The aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan (either directly or upon exercise of Options or other rights to acquire Shares) shall not exceed 6,000,000 Shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 8. The number of Shares that are subject to Options or other rights outstanding at any time under the Plan shall not exceed the number of Shares that then remain available for issuance under the Plan. The Company, during the term of the Plan, shall at all times reserve and keep available sufficient Shares to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.
36
(b)Additional Shares. In the event that any outstanding Option or other right for any reason expires or is canceled or otherwise terminated, the Shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option or other right shall again be available for the purposes of the Plan. In the event that Shares issued under the Plan are reacquired by the Company pursuant to any forfeiture provision, right of repurchase or right of first refusal, such Shares shall again be available for the purposes of the Plan, except that the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs shall in no event exceed 6,000,000 Shares (subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 8).
SECTION 5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS.
(a)Stock Option Agreement. Each grant of an Option under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement between the Optionee and the Company. Such Option shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Board of Directors deems appropriate for inclusion in a Stock Option Agreement. The provisions of the various Stock Option Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical.
(b)Number of Shares. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the number of Shares that are subject to the Option. The Stock Option Agreement shall also specify whether the Option is an ISO or a Nonstatutory Option.
(c)Exercise Price. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the Exercise Price. The Exercise Price under any Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion, subject to the following limitations: (i) the Exercise Price of an ISO shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant (110% for an ISO granted to a Greater Than Ten-Percent Stockholder) and (ii) in no event may the Exercise Price of any Option be less than the par value of a Share.
(d)Special Rule for Incentive Options. For those Options not covered by the trust arrangements provided in Section 14 and consistent with Section 422 of the Code and any regulations, notices or other official pronouncements of general applicability, to the extent the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the time the Option is granted) of the Shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by an Optionee during any calendar year (under all plans of his employer corporation and its Parent and Subsidiary corporations) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall not be treated as ISO’s. Nothing in this special rule shall be construed as limiting the exercisability of any Option, unless the Stock Option Agreement expressly provides for such a limitation.
(e)Withholding Taxes. For those Options not covered by the trust provisions of Section 14, as a condition to the exercise of an Option, the Optionee shall make such arrangements as the Board of Directors may require for the satisfaction of any federal, state, local or foreign withholding tax obligations (“Taxes”) that may arise in connection with such exercise. The Optionee shall also make such arrangements as the Board of Directors may require for the satisfaction of any federal, state, local or foreign withholding tax obligations that may arise in connection with the disposition of Shares acquired by exercising an Option.
(f)Exercisability. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the date when all or any installment of the Option is to become exercisable. The exercisability provisions of any Stock Option Agreement shall be determined by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion.
(g)Basic Term. The Stock Option Agreement shall specify the term of the Option. The term shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant (five years, in the case of an ISO granted to a Greater Than Ten-Percent Stockholder). Subject to the preceding sentence, the Board of Directors at its sole discretion shall determine when an Option is to expire. A Stock Option Agreement may provide for expiration prior to the end of its term in the event of the termination of Optionee’s Service or death or any other circumstances.
37
(h)Nontransferability. No Option may be transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of the Optionee may be exercised only by the Optionee or by the Optionee’s guardian or legal representative;provided,however, that an Option that is not an ISO may be otherwise transferred to the extent, if any, permitted by the Board of Directors.
(i)No Rights as a Stockholder. Neither an Optionee nor in the case of an Israeli Option, the Trustee, or in either case a transferee of an Optionee, shall have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares covered by the Optionee’s Option until such Shares are issued pursuant to the terms of such Option.
(j)Modification and Extension of Options. Within the limitations of the Plan, the Board of Directors may modify or extend Options. The foregoing notwithstanding, no modification of an Option shall, without the consent of the Optionee, impair the Optionee’s rights or increase the Optionee’s obligations under such Option.
(k)Substitution of Options. The Board of Directors may grant Options under the Plan in substitution for options held by employees of another corporation who concurrently become employees of the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary as the result of a merger or consolidation of the employing corporation with the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary, or as the result of the acquisition by the Company of property or stock of the employing corporation. The Company may direct that substitute awards be granted on such terms and conditions as the Board of Director considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(l)Restrictions on Transfer of Shares and Minimum Vesting. Any Shares issued upon exercise of an Option shall be subject to such special forfeiture conditions, rights of repurchase, rights of first refusal and other transfer restrictions as the Board of Directors may determine. Such restrictions shall be set forth in the applicable Stock Option Agreement and shall apply in addition to any restrictions that may apply to holders of Shares generally.
SECTION 6. PAYMENT FOR SHARES.
(a)General Rule. The entire Exercise Price of Shares issued under the Plan shall be payable, at the time when such Option is exercised, in cash or cash equivalents payable to the order of the Company, except as otherwise provided in this Section 6.
(b)Surrender of Stock. For Options that are not Israeli Options, unless a Stock Option Agreement otherwise provides, all or any part of the Exercise Price may be paid by surrendering, or attesting to the ownership of, Shares that are already owned by the Optionee. Such Shares shall be surrendered to the Company in good form for transfer and shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when the Option is exercised. The Optionee shall not surrender, or attest to the ownership of, Shares in payment of the Exercise Price if such action would cause the Company to recognize compensation expense (or additional compensation expense) with respect to the Option for financial reporting purposes.
(c)Promissory Note. Unless a Stock Option Agreement otherwise provides, all or a portion of the Exercise Price of Shares issued under the Plan may be paid with a full-recourse promissory note (provided that the Optionee is an Employee of the Company). The Shares shall be pledged as security for payment of the principal amount of the promissory note and interest thereon. The interest rate payable under the terms of the promissory note shall not be less than the minimum rate (if any) required to avoid the imputation of additional interest under the Code. Subject to the foregoing, the Board of Directors (at its sole discretion) shall specify the term, interest rate, amortization requirements (if any) and other provisions of such note.
(d)Exercise/Sale. Unless a Stock Option Agreement otherwise provides (or if otherwise approved by the Board of Directors), and if Stock is publicly traded, payment may be made all or in part by the delivery (on a form prescribed by the Company) of an irrevocable direction to a securities broker approved by the Company to sell Shares and to deliver all or part of the sales proceeds to the Company in payment of all or part of the Exercise Price and any withholding taxes.
38
(e)Exercise/Pledge. Unless a Stock Option Agreement otherwise provides (or if otherwise approved by the Board of Directors), and if Stock is publicly traded, payment may be made all or in part by the delivery (on a form prescribed by the Company) of an irrevocable direction of the Optionee, or in the case of an Israeli Option, of the Trustee, to pledge Shares to a securities broker or lender approved by the Company, as security for a loan, and to deliver all or part of the loan proceeds to the Company in payment of all or part of the Exercise Price and any withholding taxes.
SECTION 7. RESTRICTED STOCK AND STOCK UNITS.
(a)Grants. Subject to the other applicable provisions of the Plan, the Board of Directors may grant Restricted Stock Awards or Stock Units to Awardees in such amounts and for such consideration, including no consideration or such minimum consideration as may be required by law, as it determines. Such Awards shall be made pursuant to a Grant Agreement, and shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Board of Directors deems appropriate for inclusion in the Grant Agreement. The provisions of the various Grant Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical.
(b)Terms and Conditions. A Restricted Stock Award entitles the recipient to acquire shares of Stock and a Stock Unit Award entitles the recipient to be paid the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the exercise date. Stock Units may be settled in Stock, cash or a combination thereof, as determined by the Board of Directors. Restricted Stock Awards and Stock Unit Awards are subject to vesting periods and other restrictions and conditions as the Board of Directors may include in the Grant Agreement.
(c)Restricted Stock Awards.
(i) The Grant Agreement for each Restricted Stock Award shall specify the applicable restrictions on such shares of Stock, the duration of such restrictions, and the times at which such restrictions shall lapse with respect to all or a specified number of shares of Stock that are part of the Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors may reduce or shorten the duration of any restriction applicable to any shares of Stock awarded to any Awardee under the Plan.
(ii) Share certificates with respect to restricted shares of Stock may be issued at the time of grant of the Restricted Stock Award, subject to forfeiture if the restrictions do not lapse, or upon lapse of the restrictions. If share certificates are issued at the time of grant of the Restricted Stock Award, the certificates shall bear an appropriate legend with respect to the restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock Award or, alternatively, the Awardee may be required to deposit the certificates with the Company during the period of any restriction thereon and to execute a blank stock power or other instrument of transfer.
(iii) The extent of the Awardee’s rights as a shareholder with respect to the Restricted Stock shall be specified in the Grant Agreement.
(d)Stock Units.
(i) The grant of Stock Units shall be evidenced by a Grant Agreement that states the number of Stock Units evidenced thereby and the terms and conditions of such Stock Units.
(ii) Stock Units may be exercised in the manner described in the Grant Agreement.
(iii) The extent of the Awardee’s rights as a shareholder with respect to the Stock Units shall be specified in the Grant Agreement.
(e)Transferability. Unvested Restricted Stock Awards or Stock Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of except as specifically provided in the Grant Agreement.
39
SECTION 8. ACQUISITION EVENTS AND OTHER ADJUSTMENT OF SHARES.
(a)Acquisition Events. In the event of a consolidation or merger in which the Company is not the surviving corporation or in the event of any transaction that results in the acquisition of substantially all of the Company’s outstanding Stock by a single person or entity or by a group of persons and/or entities acting in concert, or in the event of the sale or other transfer of substantially all of the Company’s assets (all the foregoing being referred to as “Acquisition Events”), outstanding Options shall be subject to the agreement of merger or consolidation. Such agreement, without the Optionee’s consent, may provide for any of the following:
(i) The continuation of such outstanding Options by the Company (if the Company is not the surviving corporation);
(ii) The assumption of the Plan and such outstanding Options by the surviving corporation or its parent;
(iii) The substitution by the surviving corporation or its parent of options with substantially the same terms for such outstanding Options; or
(iv) The cancellation of such outstanding Options without payment of any consideration.
The provisions of Section 7(b) below shall not apply to any Option that is terminated pursuant to this Section 7(a).
(b)Other Events. In the event that the outstanding Shares of Stock are changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities or property (including cash) of the Company or of another corporation by reason of a stock dividend, stock split or combination of shares, recapitalization or other change in the Company’s capital stock, reorganization, merger, sale or other transfer of substantially all the Company’s assets to another corporation, consolidation, or other transaction described in Section 424(a) of the Code, the Board of Directors shall make appropriate adjustments (in such manner as it deems equitable in its sole discretion) in (i) the number and kind of shares of Stock, other securities or property for the purchase of which Options and Awards may be granted under the Plan, (ii) the number and kind of shares of Stock, other securities or property as to which outstanding Options, or portions thereof then unexercised, shall be exercisable, (iii) the Exercise Price and other terms of outstanding Options and (iv) any other relevant provisions of the Plan. Any adjustment of the Plan or in outstanding Options shall be effective on the effective date of the event giving rise to such adjustment. The Board of Directors may also adjust the number of Shares subject to outstanding Options, the Exercise Price of outstanding Options and the terms of outstanding Options to take into consideration any other event (including, without limitation, accounting changes) if the Board of Directors determines that such adjustment is appropriate to avoid distortion in the operation of the Plan. All determinations and adjustments made by the Board of Directors pursuant to this Section 8(b) shall be binding on all persons.
(c)Reservation of Rights. The grant of an Option or an Award pursuant to the Plan shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure, to merge or consolidate or to dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets.
(d)Sale or Merger. “Sale” means: (i) sale (other than a sale by the Company) of securities entitled to more than 75% of the voting power of the Company in a single transaction or a related series of transactions; or (ii) sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iii) approval by the stockholders of the Company of a reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company, as a result of which the persons who were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not own securities immediately after the reorganization, merger or consolidation entitled to more than 50% of the voting power of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Section 8, immediately prior to a Sale, each Optionee may exercise his or her Option as to all Shares then subject to the Option, regardless of any vesting conditions otherwise expressed in the Option. Voting power, as used in this Section 8(d), shall refer to those securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, and securities of the Company not entitled to vote but which are convertible into, or exercisable for, securities of the
40
Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors shall be counted as if converted or exercised, and each unit of voting securities shall be counted in proportion to the number of votes such unit is entitled to cast.
SECTION 9. SECURITIES LAW REQUIREMENTS.
The Company and, in the case of Israeli Options, the Trustee, shall not be obligated to deliver any Shares of Stock (a) until, in the opinion of the Company’s counsel, all applicable federal and state laws and regulations have been complied with, and (b) if the outstanding Stock is at the time listed on any stock exchange or other stock market, until the Shares to be delivered have been listed or authorized to be listed on such exchange or other stock market upon official notice of issuance, and (c) until all other legal matters in connection with the issuance and delivery of such Shares have been approved by the Company’s counsel. If the sale of Stock has not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Company may require, as a condition to exercise of the Option, such representations or agreements as counsel for the Company may consider appropriate to avoid violation of such Act and may require that the certificates evidencing such Stock bear an appropriate legend restricting transfer.
SECTION 10. NO RETENTION RIGHTS.
(a) Nothing in the Plan or in any right, Award or Option granted under the Plan shall confer upon the Awardee or Optionee any right to continue in Service for any period of specific duration or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing or retaining the Awardee or Optionee) or of the Awardee or Optionee, which rights are hereby expressly reserved by each, to terminate his or her Service at any time and for any reason, with or without cause.
SECTION 11. DURATION AND AMENDMENTS.
(a) Term of the Plan. The Plan, as set forth herein, shall become effective on the date of its adoption by the Board of Directors, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders. In the event that the stockholders fail to approve the Plan within 12 months after its adoption by the Board of Directors, any grants of Awards or Options that have already occurred shall be rescinded, and no additional grants shall be made thereafter under the Plan. The Plan shall terminate automatically 10 years after its adoption by the Board of Directors and may be terminated on any earlier date pursuant to Section 10(b).
(b)Right to Amend or Terminate the Plan. The Board of Directors may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time and for any reason;provided,however, that any amendment of the Plan that increases the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan (except as provided in Section 8), or that otherwise materially changes the class of persons who are eligible for the grant of ISOs, will be subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company. Stockholder approval shall not be required for any other amendment of the Plan.
(c)Effect of Amendment or Termination. No Shares shall be issued or sold under the Plan after the termination thereof, except pursuant to an Award or Option granted prior to such termination. The termination of the Plan, or any amendment thereof, shall not affect any Award or Option previously granted under the Plan.
SECTION 12. DEFINITIONS.
(a)“Award” shall mean a Restricted Stock Award or Stock Unit Award.
(b)“Awardee” shall mean an individual to whom an Award has been granted.
(c)“Board of Directors” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company, as constituted from time to time.
(d)“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
41
(e)“Committee” shall mean a committee of the Board of Directors, as described in Section 2(a).
(f)“Company” shall mean Pharmos Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
(g)“Consultant” shall mean a person who performs bona fide services for the Company, a Parent or a Subsidiary as a consultant or advisor, excluding Employees and Outside Directors.
(h)“Employee” shall mean any individual who is a common-law employee of the Company, a Parent or a Subsidiary.
(i)“Exercise Price” shall mean the amount for which one Share may be purchased upon exercise of an Option, as specified by the Board of Directors in the applicable Stock Option Agreement.
(j)“Fair Market Value” shall be determined by the Committee or the Board of Directors in its discretion;provided, that if the Stock is listed on a stock exchange, the Fair Market Value per Share shall be the closing price on such exchange on the date of grant of the Award or Option as reported in the Wall Street Journal (or, (i) if not so reported, as otherwise reported by the exchange, and (ii) if not reported on the date of grant, then on the last prior date on which a sale of the Stock was reported); or if not listed on an exchange but traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation National Market System (“NASDAQ”), the Fair Market Value per Share shall be the closing price per share of the Stock for the date of grant, as reported in the Wall Street Journal (or, (i) if not so reported, as otherwise reported by NASDAQ, and (ii) if not reported on the date of grant, then on the last prior date on which a sale of the Common Stock was reported); or, if the Stock is otherwise publicly traded, the mean of the closing bid price and asked price for the last known sale.
(k)“Grant Agreement” shall mean the agreement between the Company and an Awardee which contains the terms, conditions and restrictions pertaining to the Awardee’s Award.
(l)“Greater Than Ten-Percent Stockholder” as of any time shall mean any Employee who at such time owns directly, or is deemed to own by reason of the attribution rules set forth in Section 424(d) of the Code, stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company.
(m)“ISO” shall mean an employee incentive stock option described in Section 422(b) of the Code.
(n)“Nonstatutory Option” shall mean a stock option not described in Sections 422(b) or 423(b) of the Code.
(o)“Option” shall mean an ISO or Nonstatutory Option granted under the Plan and entitling the holder to purchase Shares.
(p)“Optionee” shall mean an individual who holds an Option.
(q)“Outside Director” shall mean a member of the Board of Directors who is not an Employee.
(r)“Parent” shall mean any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company, if each of the corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain. A corporation that attains the status of a Parent on a date after the adoption of the Plan shall be considered a Parent commencing as of such date.
(s)“Plan” shall mean this Pharmos Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan.
(t)“Restricted Stock Award” shall mean an award of shares of restricted Stock pursuant to the Plan.
(u)“Service” shall mean service as an Employee, Outside Director or Consultant.
42
(v)“Share” shall mean one share of Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 8 (if applicable).
(w)“Stock” shall mean the Common Stock of the Company, with a par value of $0.03 per Share.
(x)“Stock Option Agreement” shall mean the agreement between the Company and an Optionee which contains the terms, conditions and restrictions pertaining to the Optionee’s Option.
(y)“Stock Unit” shall mean a credit to a bookkeeping reserve account solely for accounting purposes, where the amount of the credit shall equal the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of the Award (unless the Board of Directors provides otherwise in the Grant Agreement) and which shall be subsequently increased or decreased to reflect the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock. Stock Units do not require segregation of any of the Company’s assets.
(z)“Stock Unit Award” shall mean an award of Stock Units pursuant to the Plan.
(aa)“Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company, if each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain. A corporation that attains the status of a Subsidiary on a date after the adoption of the Plan shall be considered a Subsidiary commencing as of such date.
SECTION 13. EXECUTION.
To record the adoption of the Plan by the Board of Directors, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute the same.
SECTION 14. SECTION 102 OF THE ISRAELI TAX ORDINANCE.
The provisions of this Section shall govern all grants of Stock Options, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units under Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [new version] - 1961 (“Section 102”) and the Income Tax Rules (Tax Relief for Issuance of Shares to Employees), 2003 (“Section 102 Rules”) to Israeli Employees and Directors of the Company or any of its affiliates (provided such Employee or Director does not control the Company, as such term is defined in Section 102 (respectively the “Israeli Award” and “Israeli Awardee”). Except as detailed below, all other provisions, definitions, terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue to be valid and in full force and effect.
14.1 | Trust Arrangement and Holding Period |
The Company may grant Israeli Awards to Israeli Awardees under the provisions of one of three tax tracks provided for in Section 102 as detailed below (“Tax Track”).
(a) Trustee Tax Tracks
If the Company elects to grant an Israeli Award through (i) the Capital Gains Track Through a Trustee, or (ii) the Income Tax Track Through a Trustee, then, in accordance with the requirements of Section 102, the Company shall appoint a Trustee who will hold in trust on behalf of each Awardee the Israeli Award.
The holding period (the “Holding Period”) for the Israeli Award will be as follows:
(i) The Capital Gains Tax Track Through a Trustee - if the Company elects to grant the Israeli Award according to the provisions of this track, then the Holding Period will be 24 months from the end of the tax year
43
in which the Israeli Award was allocated to the Trustee on behalf of the Israeli Awardee, or such shorter period as may be legislated or approved by the Israeli Authorities.
(ii) The Income Tax Track Through a Trustee - if the Company elects to grant the Israeli Award according to the provisions of this track, then the Holding Period will be 12 months from the end of the tax year in which the Options were allocated to the Trustee on behalf of the Israeli Awardee, or such shorter period as may be legislated or approved by the Israeli Authorities.
Subject to Section 102, Israeli Awardees shall not be able to receive from the Trustee, nor shall they be able to sell or dispose of shares issued upon exercise of Stock Options (the “Underlying Shares”) before the end of the applicable Holding Period. However, if an Israeli Awardee sells or removes the Israeli Award or the Underlying Shares form the Trustee before the end of the applicable Holding Period (“Breach”), the Israeli Awardee shall pay all applicable taxes imposed on such Breach by rule 7 of the Section 102 Rules.
In the event of a distribution of rights, including an issuance of bonus shares, in connection with the Israeli Award originally allocated to the Trustee (the “Additional Rights”), all such Additional Rights shall be allocated and/or issued to the Trustee for the benefit of Israeli Awardee and shall be held by the Trustee for the remainder of the Holding Period applicable to the Israeli Award originally allocated. Such Additional Rights shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Tax Track.
(b) Income Tax Track Without a Trustee
If the Company elects to grant an Israeli Award according to the provisions of this track, then the Israeli Award will not be subject to a Holding Period.
The Company, in its sole discretion, shall elect under which of above three Tax Tracks each Israeli Award is granted and shall notify the Israeli Awardee in the Grant Agreement or the Stock Option Agreement (as the case may be), which Tax Track applies to each Israeli Award.
14.3 | Concurrent Conditions |
The Holding Period, if any, is in addition to any vesting period specified in the Plan or the Grant Agreement. The Holding Period and vesting period may run concurrently, but neither is a substitute for the other, and each are independent terms and conditions for Israeli Awards.
The terms and conditions applicable to the trust relating to the Tax Track selected by the Company, as appropriate, shall be set forth in an agreement signed by the Company and the Trustee (the “Trust Agreement”).
Israeli Awards shall be governed by, and shall conform with and be interpreted so as to comply with, the requirements of Section 102 and any written approval from the Israeli Tax Authorities. All tax consequences under any applicable law (other than stamp duty) which may arise from the award of Israeli Awards, from the exercise thereof or from the holding or sale of Underlying Shares (or other securities issued under the Plan) by or on behalf of the Israeli awardee, shall be borne solely on the Israeli Awardee. The Israeli Awardee shall indemnify the Company and/or Affiliate and/or Trustee, as the case may be, and hold them harmless, against and from any liability for any such tax or any penalty, interest or indexing.
If the Company elects to grants Israeli Awards according to the provisions of the Income Tax Track Without a Trustee (Section 14.1(b) of this Plan), and if prior to the exercise of any and/or all of this Israeli Award, such Israeli Awardee ceases to be an employee, director, or officer of the Company or Affiliate, the Israeli Awardee shall deposit with the Company a guarantee or other security as required by Section 102, in order to ensure the payment of applicable taxes upon the exercise of such Israeli Award.
44
Whenever an amount with respect to withholding tax relating to Israeli Awards granted to a Israeli Awardees and/or Underlying Shares due from the Israeli Awardee and/or the Company and/or an Affiliate and/or the Trustee, the Company and/or an Affiliate and/or the Trustee shall have the right to demand from an Israeli Awardee such amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable withholding tax requirements related thereto, and whenever Shares or any other non-cash assets are to be delivered pursuant to the exercise of an Israeli Award, or transferred thereafter, the Company and/or an Affiliate and/or the Trustee shall have the right to require the Israeli Awardee to remit to the Company and/or to the Affiliate, or to the Trustee an amount in cash sufficient to satisfy any applicable withholding tax requirements related thereto, and if such amount is not timely remitted, the Company and/or the Affiliate or the Trustee shall have the right to withhold or set-off (subject to Law) such Shares or any other non-cash assets pending payment by the Israeli Awardee of such amounts.
Until all taxes have been paid in accordance with Rule 7 of the section 102 Rules, Israeli Awards, Underlying Shares and Additional Rights may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, encumbered, or otherwise willfully hypothecated or disposed of, and no power of attorney or deed of transfer, whether for immediate or future use may be validly given. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Israeli Awards, Underlying Shares and Additional Rights may be validly transferred in a transfer made by will or laws of descent, provided that the transferee thereof shall be subject to the provisions of Section 102 and the Section 102 Rules as would have been applicable to the deceased Israeli Awardee were he or she to have survived.
14.7 | Israeli Awardee Undertakings |
By accepting an Israeli Award, the Israeli Awardee (1) agrees and acknowledges that he or she have received and read the Plan and the Grant Agreement or Stock Option agreement (as the case may be); (2) undertakes all the provisions set forth in: Section 102 (including provisions regarding the applicable Tax Track that the Company has selected), the 102 Rules, the Plan, the Grant Agreement and the Trust Agreement; and (3) undertakes not to sell or release the Shares from trust before the end of the Holding Period, subject to the provisions of Section 102 and the Rules.
| PHARMOS CORPORATION
/s/ GAD RIESENFELD Gad Riesenfeld President and Chief Operating Officer |
45
APPENDIX D
Amendment to Section FOUR of 2000 Stock Option Plan
The first paragraph of Section FOUR shall be replaced by the following paragraph:
SECTION 4. STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN.
(a) Basic Limitation. Shares offered under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares. The aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan (either directly or upon exercise of Options or other rights to acquire Shares) shall not exceed 2,700,000 Shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 8. The number of Shares that are subject to Options or other rights outstanding at any time under the Plan shall not exceed the number of Shares that then remain available for issuance under the Plan. The Company, during the term of the Plan, shall at all times reserve and keep available sufficient Shares to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.
(b) Additional Shares. In the event that any outstanding Option or other right for any reason expires or is canceled or otherwise terminated, the Shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option or other right shall again be available for the purposes of the Plan. In the event that Shares issued under the Plan are reacquired by the Company pursuant to any forfeiture provision, right of repurchase or right of first refusal, such Shares shall again be available for the purposes of the Plan, except that the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs shall in no event exceed 2,700,000 Shares (subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 8).
46
PHARMOS CORPORATION
99 Wood Avenue South - Suite 311
Iselin, New Jersey 08830
(732) 452-9556
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Annual Meeting of Stockholders - September 20, 2005
The undersigned, as stockholder of Pharmos Corporation (the “Company”) hereby appoints Haim Aviv and Gad Riesenfeld and each of them, with full power of substitution, the true and lawful proxies and attorneys in fact of the undersigned, to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card, the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled to vote, as fully and with the same effect as the undersigned might do if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at 11:00 AM. on September 20, 2005 at the Hilton New York, 1335 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019, and any adjournments thereof on the following matters as set forth in the Proxy Statement and Notice dated August 5, 2005.
(To be Signed on Reverse Side)
|X| Please mark your votes as in this example.
The board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” both nominees listed in the following item:
1. Election of Directors of the Company
| FOR both nominees listed at right (except as marked to the contrary)
[__]
| | WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for both nominees listed at right [__]
| | NOMINEES:
Elkan Gamzu Lawrence F. Marshall |
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, PRINT that nominee’s name on the line below)
____________________________________________________________The board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” the following items (2 through 4):
2. Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase number of authorized shares to 60,000,000 (Item No. 2 in the Proxy Statement).
| FOR [_]
| | AGAINST [_]
| | ABSTAIN [_] |
| | | | | |
3. Amendment of 2000 Stock Option Plan (Item No. 3 in the Proxy Statement).
| FOR [_]
| | AGAINST [_]
| | ABSTAIN [_] |
| | | | | |
4. Ratification of selection of independent registered public accounting firm (Item No. 4 in the Proxy Statement).
| FOR [_]
| | AGAINST [_]
| | ABSTAIN [_] |
5. In the discretion of such proxies upon all other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
47
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted for the election of the nominees to the board of directors identified above, for all other proposals listed above and, in the discretion of the proxies named, on such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
This proxy is revocable at any time, and the undersigned reserves the right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. The undersigned hereby revokes any proxy heretofore given in respect of the shares of the Company.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS URGES THAT YOU FILL IN, SIGN AND DATE THE PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY BY MAIL IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE IS NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
CORRECT ADDRESS IF NECESSARY
Signature(s) __________________________________
Date __________________
Note: Please sign exactly as name(s) appear on your Stock Certificate. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If more than one name is shown, as in the case of joint tenancy, each party must sign. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by the president or other authorized officer.
48