Asset Quality | Note 3 Asset Quality Asset Quality We closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk. Trends in delinquency rates may be a key indicator, among other considerations, of credit risk within the loan portfolios. The measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. Loan delinquencies exclude loans held for sale, pu rchased impaired loans, nonperforming loans and loans accounted for under the fair value option which are on nonaccrual status, but include government insured or guaranteed loans and accruing loans accounted for under the fair value opti on. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases , OREO and foreclosed assets , and nonperforming TDRs. Nonperforming loans are those loans accounted for at amortized cost whose credit quality has deteriorated to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. Interest income is not recognized on these loans. Loans accounted for under the fair value option are reported as performing loans as these loans are accounted for at fair value. However , when nonaccrual crite ria is met, interest income is not recognized on these loans. Additionally, certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are not reported as nonperforming loans and continue to accru e interest . Purchased impaired loans are excluded from nonperforming loans as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. See Note 4 Purchased Loans for further information. See Note 1 Accounting Poli cies for additional delinquency, nonperforming, and charge-off information. The following tables display the delinquency status of our loans and our nonperforming assets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively. Table 55: Analysis of Loan Portfolio (a) Accruing Current or Less 30-59 60-89 90 Days Total Fair Value Option Purchased Total Than 30 Days Days Days Or More Past Nonperforming Nonaccrual Impaired Loans Dollars in millions Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Due (b) Loans Loans (c) Loans (d) (e) September 30, 2015 Commercial Lending Commercial $ 96,952 $ 56 $ 39 $ 36 $ 131 $ 301 $ 43 $ 97,427 Commercial real estate 25,671 32 17 49 212 161 26,093 Equipment lease financing 7,635 2 2 7 7,644 Total commercial lending 130,258 90 56 36 182 520 204 131,164 Consumer Lending Home equity 30,124 69 31 100 1,029 1,753 33,006 Residential real estate (f) 10,691 146 58 585 789 571 $ 231 2,210 14,492 Credit card 4,523 26 18 30 74 3 4,600 Other consumer (g) 21,149 177 102 239 518 54 21,721 Total consumer lending 66,487 418 209 854 1,481 1,657 231 3,963 73,819 Total $ 196,745 $ 508 $ 265 $ 890 $ 1,663 $ 2,177 $ 231 $ 4,167 $ 204,983 Percentage of total loans 95.99 % .25 % .13 % .43 % .81 % 1.06 % .11 % 2.03 % 100.00 % December 31, 2014 Commercial Lending Commercial $ 96,922 $ 73 $ 24 $ 37 $ 134 $ 290 $ 74 $ 97,420 Commercial real estate 22,667 23 2 25 334 236 23,262 Equipment lease financing 7,672 11 1 12 2 7,686 Total commercial lending 127,261 107 27 37 171 626 310 128,368 Consumer Lending Home equity 31,474 70 32 102 1,112 1,989 34,677 Residential real estate (f) 9,900 163 68 742 973 706 $ 269 2,559 14,407 Credit card 4,528 28 20 33 81 3 4,612 Other consumer (g) 22,071 214 112 293 619 63 22,753 Total consumer lending 67,973 475 232 1,068 1,775 1,884 269 4,548 76,449 Total $ 195,234 $ 582 $ 259 $ 1,105 $ 1,946 $ 2,510 $ 269 $ 4,858 $ 204,817 Percentage of total loans 95.32 % .28 % .13 % .54 % .95 % 1.23 % .13 % 2.37 % 100.00 % (a) Amounts in table represent recorded investment and exclude loans held for sale. (b) Past due loan amounts exclude purchased impaired loans, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. (c) Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population. (d) Net of unearned income, net deferred loan fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and purchase discounts and premiums totaling $1.5 billion and $1.7 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. (e) Future accretable yield related to purchased impaired loans is not included in the analysis of loan portfolio. (f) Past due loan amounts at September 30, 2015 include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate mortgages totaling $62 million for 30 to 59 days past due, $40 million for 60 to 89 days past due and $558 million for 90 days or more past due. Past due loan amounts at December 31, 2014 include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate mortgages totaling $68 million for 30 to 59 days past due, $43 million for 60 to 89 days past due and $719 million for 90 days or more past due. (g) Past due loan amounts at September 30, 2015 include government insured or guaranteed Other consumer loans totaling $119 million for 30 to 59 days past due, $80 million for 60 to 89 days past due and $224 million for 90 days or more past due. Past due loan amounts at December 31, 2014 include government insured or guaranteed Other consumer loans totaling $152 million for 30 to 59 days past due, $93 million for 60 to 89 days past due and $277 million for 90 days or more past due. At September 30, 2015 , we pledged $ 18.9 billion of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and $ 54.2 billion of residential real estate and other loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) as collateral for the contingent ability to borrow, if necessary. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2014 were $ 19.2 billion and $ 52.8 billion, respectively. In the normal course of business, we originate or purchase loan products with contractual characteristics that, when concentrated, may increase our exposure as a holder of those loan products. Possible product features th at may create a concentration of credit risk would include a high original or updated LTV ratio, terms that may expose the borrower to future increases in repayments above increases in market interest rates, and interest-only loans, among others. We origi nate interest-only loans to commercial borrowers. Such credit arrangements are usually designed to match borrower cash flow expectations (e.g., working capital lines, revolvers). These products are standard in the financial services industry and product fe atures are considered during the underwriting process to mitigate the increased risk that the interest-only feature may result in borrowers not being able to make interest and principal payments when due. We do not believe that these product features creat e a concentration of credit risk. Table 56: Nonperforming Assets September 30 December 31 Dollars in millions 2015 2014 Nonperforming loans Total commercial lending $ 520 $ 626 Total consumer lending (a)(b) 1,657 1,884 Total nonperforming loans (c) 2,177 2,510 OREO and foreclosed assets Other real estate owned (OREO) 293 351 Foreclosed and other assets 20 19 Total OREO and foreclosed assets 313 370 Total nonperforming assets $ 2,490 $ 2,880 Nonperforming loans to total loans 1.06 % 1.23 % Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets 1.21 1.40 Nonperforming assets to total assets .69 .83 (a) Excludes most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on nonperforming status. (b) The recorded investment of loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in process of foreclosure was $.6 billion and $.8 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, which included $.3 billion and $.5 billion, respectively, of loans that are government insured/guaranteed. (c) Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans. Nonperforming loans also include certain l oans whose terms have bee n restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties . In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, these loans are considered TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies and the TDR section of Note 3 in our 2014 Form 10-K for additional information. Total nonperforming loans in the nonperforming assets table above include TDRs of $ 1.2 billion at September 30, 2015 and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2014 . TDRs that are performing, in cluding credit card TDR loans, totaled $1.2 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and are exc luded from nonperforming loans. T hese include TDRs that are not placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance. No nperforming TDRs are returned to accrual and classified as performing after demonstrating a period of at least six months of consecutive performance under the restructured terms. Loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through C hapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation s to PNC and loans to borrowers not currently obligated to make both principal and interest payments under the restructured terms are not returned to accrual status . Additional Asset Quality Indicators We have two overall portfolio segments – Commercial Lending and Cons umer Lending. Each of these two segments is comprised of multiple loan classes. Classes are characterized by similarities in initial measurement, risk attributes and the manner in which we monitor and assess credit risk. The C ommercial Lending segment is comprised of the commercial, commercial real estate, equipment lease financing, a nd commercial purchased impaired loan c lasses . The Consumer Lending segment is comprised of the home equity, reside ntial real estate, credit card, other consumer, and consumer purchased impaired loan c lasses. Commercial Lending Asset Classes Commercial L oan Class For commercial loans, we monitor the performance of the borrower in a disciplined and regular manner based upon the level of credit risk inherent in the loan. To evaluate the level of credit risk, we assign an internal risk rating reflecting the borrower’s PD and LGD. This two-dimensional credit risk rating methodology provides granularity in the risk monitoring process on an ongoing basis. These ratings are reviewed and updated, generally at least once per year. Additionally, no less frequently than on an annual basis, we review PD rates related to each rating grade based upon internal historical data. These rates are updated as needed and augmented by market data as deemed necessary. For small balance homogenous pools of commercial loans, mort gages and leases, we apply statistical modeling to assist in determining the probability of default within these pools. Further, on a periodic basis, we update our LGD estimates associated with each rating grade based upon historical data. The combinatio n of the PD and LGD ratings assigned to a commercial loan, capturing both the combination of expectations of default and loss severity in event of default, reflects the relative estimated likelihood of loss for that loan at the reporting date. In general, loans with better PD and LGD tend to have a lower likelihood of loss compared to loans with worse PD and LGD. The loss amount also considers an estimate of exposure at date of default, which we also periodically update based upon historical data. Based upon the amount o f the lending arrangement and our risk rating assessment, we follow a formal schedule of written periodic review. Quarterly, we conduct formal reviews of a market's or business unit's entire loan portfolio, focusing on those loans which we perceive to be o f higher risk, based upon PDs and LGDs, or loans for which credit quality is weakening. If circumstances warrant, it is our practice to review any customer obligation and its level of credit risk more frequently. We attempt to proactively manage our loans by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan, including ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal. Commercial Real Estate Loan Class We manage credit risk associated with our commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD. Additionally, risks connected with commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities tend to be cor related to the loan structure and collateral location, project progress and business environment. As a result, these attributes are also monitored and utilized in assessing credit risk. As with the commercial class, a formal schedule of periodic review is also performed to assess market/geographic risk and business unit/industry risk. Often as a result of these overviews, more in-depth reviews and increased scrutiny are placed on areas of higher risk, including adverse changes in risk ratings, deterioratin g operating trends, and/or areas that concern management. These reviews are designed to assess risk and take actions to mitigate our exposure to such risks. Equipment Lease Financing Loan Class We manage credit risk associated with our equipment lease fi nancing loan class similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD. Based upon the dollar amount of the lease and of the level of credit risk, we follow a formal schedule of periodic review. Generally, this occurs quarterly, although we have establish ed practices to review such credit risk more frequently if circumstances warrant. Our review process entails analysis of the following factors: equipment value/residual value, exposure levels, jurisdiction risk, industry risk, guarantor requirements, and r egulatory compliance. Commercial Purchased Impaired Loan Class Estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the valuation of commercial purchased impaired loans. Commercial cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items, which include but are not limited to: estimated collateral value, receipt of additional collateral, secondary trading prices, circumstances of possible and/or ongoing liquidation, capital availability, business operations and payment patterns. We attempt to proactively manage these factors by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan. These procedures include a review by our Special Asset Committee (SAC), ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal. See Note 4 Purchased Loans for additional information. Table 57: Commercial Lending Asset Quality Indicators (a)(b) Criticized Commercial Loans Pass Special Total In millions Rated Mention (c) Substandard (d) Doubtful (e) Loans September 30, 2015 Commercial $ 92,334 $ 1,971 $ 2,962 $ 117 $ 97,384 Commercial real estate 25,224 203 478 27 25,932 Equipment lease financing 7,375 75 189 5 7,644 Purchased impaired loans 7 164 33 204 Total commercial lending $ 124,933 $ 2,256 $ 3,793 $ 182 $ 131,164 December 31, 2014 Commercial $ 92,884 $ 1,984 $ 2,424 $ 55 $ 97,347 Commercial real estate 22,066 285 639 35 23,025 Equipment lease financing 7,518 73 93 2 7,686 Purchased impaired loans 4 280 26 310 Total commercial lending $ 122,468 $ 2,346 $ 3,436 $ 118 $ 128,368 (a) Based upon PDs and LGDs. We apply a split rating classification to certain loans meeting threshold criteria. By assigning a split classification, a loan's exposure amount may be split into more than one classification category in the above table. (b) Loans are included above based on the Regulatory Classification definitions of "Pass", "Special Mention", "Substandard" and "Doubtful". (c) Special Mention rated loans have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects at some future date. These loans do not expose us to sufficient risk to warrant a more adverse classification at this time. (d) Substandard rated loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the collection or liquidation of debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. (e) Doubtful rated loans possess all the inherent weaknesses of a Substandard loan with the additional characteristics that the weakness makes collection or liquidation in full improbable due to existing facts, conditions, and values. Consumer Lending Asset Classes Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Loan Classes We use several credit quality indicators, including delinquency information, nonperforming loan information, updated credit scores, originated and updated LTV ratios, and geography, to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes. We evaluate mortgage loan performance by source originators and loan servicers. A summary of asset quality indicators follows: Delinquency/De linquency Rates : We monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real estate loans. See the Asset Quality section of this Note 3 for additional information. Nonperforming Loans : We monitor trending of nonperforming lo ans for home equity and residential real estate loans. See the Asset Quality section of this Note 3 for additional information. Credit Scores : We use a national third-party provider to update FICO credit scores for home equity loans and lines of credit a nd residential real estate loans at least quarterly. The updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports, which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes. LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions) : At least annually, we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated LTV ratio. For open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values, m ore frequent valuations may occur. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes. Historically, we used, and we continue to use, a combination of original LTV and updated LTV for internal risk management and reporting purposes ( e.g. , line management, loss mitigation strategies). In addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are estimates, given certain data limitations it is important to note that updated LTVs may be based upon ma nagement’s assumptions ( e.g. , if an updated LTV is not provided by the third-party service provider, home price index (HPI) changes will be incorporated in arriving at management’s estimate of updated LTV). Geography : Geographic concentrations are monito red to evaluate and manage exposures. Loan purchase programs are sensitive to, and focused within, certain regions to manage geographic exposures and associated risks. A combination of updated FICO scores, originated and updated LTV ratios and geographic location assigned to home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans is used to monitor the risk in the loan classes. Loans with higher FICO scores and lower LTVs tend to have a lowe r level of risk. Conversely, loans with lower FICO scores, higher LTVs, and in certain geographic locations tend to have a higher level of risk. Consumer Purchased Impaired Loan Class Estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the valuation of consumer purchased impaired loans. Consumer cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items, which include, but are not limited to: estimated real estate values, payment patterns, updated FICO scores, the current economic environm ent, updated LTV ratios and the date of origination. These key factors are monitored to help ensure that concentrations of risk are managed and cash flows are maximized. See Note 4 Purchased Loans for additional information. Table 58: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Balances September 30 December 31 In millions 2015 2014 Home equity and residential real estate loans - excluding purchased impaired loans (a) $ 42,582 $ 43,348 Home equity and residential real estate loans - purchased impaired loans (b) 3,853 4,541 Government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages (a) 953 1,188 Difference between outstanding balance and recorded investment in purchased impaired loans (c) 110 7 Total home equity and residential real estate loans (a) $ 47,498 $ 49,084 (a) Represents recorded investment. (b) Represents outstanding balance. (c) Outstanding balance represents the balance on the loan servicing system for active loans. It is possible for the outstanding balance to be lower than the recorded investment for certain loans due to the use of pool accounting. Table 59: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Excluding Purchased Impaired Loans (a) (b) Home Equity Residential Real Estate September 30, 2015 - in millions 1st Liens 2nd Liens Total Current estimated LTV ratios (c) Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 $ 300 $ 1,050 $ 315 $ 1,665 Less than or equal to 660 (d) (e) 44 208 72 324 Missing FICO 1 7 5 13 Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 703 1,892 607 3,202 Less than or equal to 660 (d) (e) 98 317 113 528 Missing FICO 2 6 6 14 Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 780 1,569 660 3,009 Less than or equal to 660 101 228 96 425 Missing FICO 1 3 8 12 Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 14,069 7,650 8,770 30,489 Less than or equal to 660 1,276 899 576 2,751 Missing FICO 32 17 101 150 Total home equity and residential real estate loans $ 17,407 $ 13,846 $ 11,329 $ 42,582 Home Equity Residential Real Estate December 31, 2014 - in millions 1st Liens 2nd Liens Total Current estimated LTV ratios (c) Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 $ 333 $ 1,399 $ 360 $ 2,092 Less than or equal to 660 (d) (e) 57 273 92 422 Missing FICO 1 9 8 18 Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 839 2,190 772 3,801 Less than or equal to 660 (d) (e) 118 383 153 654 Missing FICO 1 5 12 18 Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 891 1,703 755 3,349 Less than or equal to 660 103 271 118 492 Missing FICO 2 3 5 10 Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 13,878 7,874 7,703 29,455 Less than or equal to 660 1,319 995 573 2,887 Missing FICO 27 14 109 150 Total home equity and residential real estate loans $ 17,569 $ 15,119 $ 10,660 $ 43,348 (a) Excludes purchased impaired loans of approximately $4.0 billion and $4.5 billion in recorded investment, certain government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages of approximately $1.0 billion and $1.2 billion, and loans held for sale at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. See the Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators - Purchased Impaired Loans table below for additional information on purchased impaired loans. (b) Amounts shown represent recorded investment. (c) Based upon updated LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions). Updated LTV is estimated using modeled property values. These ratios are updated at least semi-annually. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models (AVMs), broker price opinions (BPOs), HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. We generally utilize origination lien balances provided by a third-party, where applicable, which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of these calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon lien balances held by others, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we enhance our methodology. (d) Higher risk loans are defined as loans with both an updated FICO score of less than or equal to 660 and an updated LTV greater than or equal to 100%. (e) The following states had the highest percentage of higher risk loans at September 30, 2015: New Jersey 15%, Pennsylvania 13%, Ohio 11%, Illinois 11%, Florida 7%, Maryland 7% and Michigan 5%. The remainder of the states had lower than 4% of the higher risk loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 31% of the higher risk loans. The following states had the highest percentage of higher risk loans at December 31, 2014: New Jersey 14%, Illinois 12%, Pennsylvania 12%, Ohio 12%, Florida 8%, Maryland 6%, Michigan 5%, and North Carolina 4%. The remainder of the states had lower than 4% of the high risk loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 28% of the higher risk loans. Table 60: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Purchased Impaired Loans (a) Home Equity (b) (c) Residential Real Estate (b) (c) September 30, 2015 - in millions 1st Liens 2nd Liens Total Current estimated LTV ratios (d) Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 $ 8 $ 195 $ 182 $ 385 Less than or equal to 660 8 92 89 189 Missing FICO 7 6 13 Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 12 355 201 568 Less than or equal to 660 10 158 131 299 Missing FICO 9 7 16 Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 9 170 137 316 Less than or equal to 660 7 82 81 170 Missing FICO 4 3 7 Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 110 337 649 1,096 Less than or equal to 660 94 179 461 734 Missing FICO 1 12 28 41 Missing LTV and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 1 10 11 Less than or equal to 660 3 5 8 Total home equity and residential real estate loans $ 263 $ 1,600 $ 1,990 $ 3,853 Home Equity (b) (c ) Residential Real Estate (b) (c) December 31, 2014 - in millions 1st Liens 2nd Liens Total Current estimated LTV ratios (d) Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 $ 8 $ 243 $ 276 $ 527 Less than or equal to 660 9 125 144 278 Missing FICO 8 6 14 Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 15 426 272 713 Less than or equal to 660 12 194 200 406 Missing FICO 11 5 16 Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 12 207 186 405 Less than or equal to 660 9 93 123 225 Missing FICO 5 3 8 Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 102 339 626 1,067 Less than or equal to 660 109 200 515 824 Missing FICO 1 12 15 28 Missing LTV and updated FICO scores: Greater than 660 1 14 15 Less than or equal to 660 4 10 14 Missing FICO 1 1 Total home equity and residential real estate loans $ 282 $ 1,863 $ 2,396 $ 4,541 (a) Amounts shown represent outstanding balance. See Note 4 Purchased Loans for additional information. (b) For the estimate of cash flows utilized in our purchased impaired loan accounting, other assumptions and estimates are made, including amortization of first lien balances, pre-payment rates, etc., which are not reflected in this table. (c) The following states had the highest percentage of purchased impaired loans at September 30, 2015: California 16%, Florida 14%, Illinois 11%, Ohio 9%, North Carolina 7%, and Michigan 5%. The remainder of the states had lower than a 4% concentration of purchased impaired loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 38% of the purchased impaired portfolio. The following states had the highest percentage of purchased impaired loans at December 31, 2014: California 17%, Florida 15%, Illinois 11%, Ohio 8%, North Carolina 7% and Michigan 5%. The remainder of the states had lower than a 4% concentration of purchased impaired loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 37% of the purchased impaired portfolio. (d) Based upon updated LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions). Updated LTV is estimated using modeled property values. These ratios are updated at least semi-annually. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models (AVMs), broker price opinions (BPOs), HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. We generally utilize origination lien balances provided by a third-party, where applicable, which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of these calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon lien balances held by others, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we enhance our methodology. Credit Card and Other Consumer Loan Classes Table 61: Credit Card and Other Consumer Loan Classes Asset Quality Indicators Credit Card (a) Other Consumer (b) % of Total Loans % of Total Loans Using FICO Using FICO Dollars in millions Amount Credit Metric Amount Credit Metric September 30, 2015 FICO score greater than 719 $ 2,729 59 % $ 9,396 65 % 650 to 719 1,295 28 3,501 24 620 to 649 197 4 509 4 Less than 620 211 5 580 4 No FICO score available or required (c) 168 4 423 3 Total loans using FICO credit metric 4,600 100 % 14,409 100 % Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics (b) 7,312 Total loan balance $ 4,600 $ 21,721 Weighted-average updated FICO score (d) 733 745 December 31, 2014 FICO score greater than 719 $ 2,717 59 % $ 9,156 64 % 650 to 719 1,288 28 3,459 24 620 to 649 203 4 528 4 Less than 620 239 5 619 4 No FICO score available or required (c) 165 4 557 4 Total loans using FICO credit metric 4,612 100 % 14,319 100 % Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics (b) 8,434 Total loan balance $ 4,612 $ 22,753 Weighted-average updated FICO score (d) 732 744 (a) At September 30, 2015, we had $31 million of credit card loans that are higher risk (i.e., loans with both updated FICO scores less than 660 and in late stage (90+ days) delinquency status). The majority of the September 30, 2015 balance related to higher risk credit card loans was geographically distributed throughout the following areas: Ohio 17%, Pennsylvania 16%, Michigan 9%, New Jersey 8%, Florida 7%, Illinois 7%, Indiana 5%, Maryland 5% and North Carolina 4%. All other states had less than 4% individually and make up the remainder of the balance. At December 31, 2014, we had $35 million of credit card loans that are higher risk. The majority of the December 31, 2014 balance related to higher risk credit card loans was geographically distributed throughout the following areas: Ohio 17%, Pennsylvania 16%, Michigan 9%, Illinois 7%, New Jersey 7%, Indiana 6%, Florida 6% and North Carolina 4%. All other states had less than 4% individually and make up the remainder of the balance. (b) Other consumer loans for which updated FICO scores are used as an asset quality indicator include non-government guaranteed or insured education loans, automobile loans and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Other consumer loans for which other internal credit metrics are used as an asset quality indicator include primarily government guaranteed or insured education loans, as well as consumer loans to high net worth individuals. Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, geography or other factors. (c) Credit card loans and other consumer loans with no FICO score available or required generally refers to new accounts issued to borrowers with limited credit history, accounts for which we cannot obtain an updated FICO score (e.g., recent profile changes), cards issued with a business name, and/or cards secured by collateral. Management proactively assesses the risk and size of this loan portfolio and, when necessary, takes act |