UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-31616
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
California (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 22-3059110 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 3400 Los Angeles, California (Address of principal executive offices) | | 90067 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(310) 788-1999
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filerþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of July 31, 2007, there were 45,267,723 shares of Common Stock, no par value, outstanding.
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
ASSETS
|
Cash, including interest bearing accounts of $134,765 (June 30, 2007) and $154,812 (December 31, 2006) | | $ | 140,553 | | | $ | 157,120 | |
Current income taxes | | | 587,478 | | | | 448,343 | |
Notes receivable, net of allowance, and net investment in finance leases | | | 397,769 | | | | 431,944 | |
Flight equipment under operating leases | | | 51,593,118 | | | | 47,200,028 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | 9,553,221 | | | | 8,724,079 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 42,039,897 | | | | 38,475,949 | |
Deposits on flight equipment purchases | | | 603,056 | | | | 1,077,444 | |
Lease receivables and other assets | | | 492,453 | | | | 476,670 | |
Derivative assets | | | 918,608 | | | | 738,620 | |
Variable interest entities assets | | | 117,780 | | | | 124,734 | |
Deferred debt issue costs — less accumulated amortization of $99,862 (June 30, 2007) and $83,977 (December 31, 2006) | | | 109,882 | | | | 104,704 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 45,407,476 | | | $ | 42,035,528 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
Accrued interest and other payables | | $ | 509,657 | | | $ | 417,424 | |
Tax benefit sharing payable to AIG | | | 245,000 | | | | 245,000 | |
Debt financing, net of deferred debt discount of $36,169 (June 30, 2007) and $33,105 (December 31, 2006) | | | 30,527,667 | | | | 27,860,242 | |
Subordinated debt | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,000,000 | |
Foreign currency adjustment related to foreign currency denominated debt | | | 798,834 | | | | 677,402 | |
Security deposits on aircraft, overhauls and other | | | 1,251,431 | | | | 1,281,833 | |
Rentals received in advance | | | 256,832 | | | | 223,313 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 3,996,872 | | | | 3,747,141 | |
Variable interest entities liabilities | | | 7,999 | | | | 8,175 | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Market Auction Preferred Stock, $100,000 per share liquidation value; Series A and B each having 500 shares issued and outstanding | | | 100,000 | | | | 100,000 | |
Common stock—no par value; 100,000,000 authorized shares, 45,267,723 issued and outstanding | | | 1,053,582 | | | | 1,053,582 | |
Paid-in capital | | | 592,270 | | | | 591,757 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 13,565 | | | | 2,718 | |
Retained earnings | | | 5,053,767 | | | | 4,826,941 | |
| | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 6,813,184 | | | | 6,574,998 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 45,407,476 | | | $ | 42,035,528 | |
| | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-2-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | |
Rental of flight equipment | | $ | 1,133,056 | | | $ | 1,002,643 | |
Flight equipment marketing | | | 2,220 | | | | 20,776 | |
Interest and other | | | 21,993 | | | | 22,216 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 1,157,269 | | | | 1,045,635 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | | 411,070 | | | | 364,417 | |
Effect from derivatives, net of change in hedged items due to changes in foreign exchange rates | | | 344 | | | | (9,848 | ) |
Depreciation of flight equipment | | | 434,169 | | | | 385,451 | |
Flight equipment rent | | | 4,500 | | | | 4,500 | |
Provision for overhauls | | | 66,437 | | | | 67,967 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 46,192 | | | | 56,760 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 962,712 | | | | 869,247 | |
| | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | 194,557 | | | | 176,388 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 69,180 | | | | 56,744 | |
| | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 125,377 | | | $ | 119,644 | |
| | | | | | |
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | |
Rental of flight equipment | | $ | 2,202,512 | | | $ | 1,916,953 | |
Flight equipment marketing | | | 4,817 | | | | 39,589 | |
Interest and other | | | 40,616 | | | | 42,164 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 2,247,945 | | | | 1,998,706 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | | 792,828 | | | | 696,623 | |
Effect from derivatives, net of change in hedged items due to changes in foreign exchange rates | | | 12,577 | | | | (73,858 | ) |
Depreciation of flight equipment | | | 839,701 | | | | 749,246 | |
Flight equipment rent | | | 9,000 | | | | 9,967 | |
Provision for overhauls | | | 128,410 | | | | 121,106 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 83,375 | | | | 100,325 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 1,865,891 | | | | 1,603,409 | |
| | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | 382,054 | | | | 395,297 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 137,518 | | | | 127,577 | |
| | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 244,536 | | | $ | 267,720 | |
| | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
-3-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 125,377 | | | $ | 119,644 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX | | | | | | | | |
Net changes in cash flow hedges (net of taxes of $(14,194) (2007) and $8,615 (2006)) | | | 26,360 | | | | 15,998 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation on securities available for sale (net of taxes of $(106) (2007) and $818 (2006)) | | | 197 | | | | (1,519 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | 26,557 | | | | 14,479 | |
| | | | | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | | $ | 151,934 | | | $ | 134,123 | |
| | | | | | |
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 244,536 | | | $ | 267,720 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX | | | | | | | | |
Net changes in cash flow hedges (net of taxes of $(5,876) (2007) and $6,853 (2006)) | | | 10,913 | | | | 12,727 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation on securities available for sale (net of taxes of $36 (2007) and $803 (2006)) | | | (66 | ) | | | (1,491 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | 10,847 | | | | 11,236 | |
| | | | | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | | $ | 255,383 | | | $ | 278,956 | |
| | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
-4-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 244,536 | | | $ | 267,720 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation of flight equipment | | | 839,701 | | | | 749,246 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 243,890 | | | | 248,054 | |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments | | | (163,199 | ) | | | (472,015 | ) |
Foreign currency adjustment of non-US$ denominated debt | | | 122,725 | | | | 372,653 | |
Amortization of deferred debt issue costs | | | 15,885 | | | | 15,346 | |
Other, including foreign exchange adjustments on foreign currency denominated cash | | | 483 | | | | (15,334 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Lease receivables and other assets | | | 34,378 | | | | (86,731 | ) |
Change in current income taxes | | | (139,135 | ) | | | (123,465 | ) |
Increase in accrued interest and other payables | | | 88,021 | | | | 14,251 | |
Increase in rentals received in advance | | | 33,519 | | | | 36,697 | |
Change in unamortized debt discount | | | (3,064 | ) | | | (7,079 | ) |
Other | | | 6,565 | | | | 9,156 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 1,324,305 | | | | 1,008,499 | |
| | | | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of flight equipment for operating leases | | | (3,880,514 | ) | | | (4,433,997 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in deposits and progress payments | | | (256,778 | ) | | | 260,016 | |
Proceeds from disposal of flight equipment — net of gain | | | 27,783 | | | | 253,466 | |
Advances on notes receivable | | | — | | | | (48,616 | ) |
Collections on notes receivable and finance leases | | | 21,412 | | | | 34,337 | |
Other | | | 1,729 | | | | 3,968 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (4,086,368 | ) | | | (3,930,826 | ) |
| | | | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net change in commercial paper | | | 1,440,177 | | | | 1,343,499 | |
Proceeds from debt financing | | | 3,398,989 | | | | 3,499,100 | |
Payments in reduction of debt financing | | | (2,169,970 | ) | | | (1,896,859 | ) |
Debt issue costs | | | (21,063 | ) | | | (22,547 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in customer and other deposits | | | 112,506 | | | | (6,273 | ) |
Payment of common and preferred dividends | | | (17,710 | ) | | | (20,548 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 2,742,929 | | | | 2,896,372 | |
| | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | | | (19,134 | ) | | | (25,955 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 2,567 | | | | 4,857 | |
Cash at beginning of period | | | 157,120 | | | | 157,960 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 140,553 | | | $ | 136,862 | |
| | | | | | |
(Table continued on following page)
-5-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | (Unaudited) |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | |
Interest (excluding interest capitalized of $19,638 (2007) and $25,389 (2006)) | | $ | 723,420 | | | $ | 641,479 | |
Income taxes, net | | | 32,763 | | | | 2,013 | |
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
2007
Certain credits from aircraft and engine manufacturers in the amount of $37,340 reduced the basis of Flight equipment under operating leases and increased Lease receivables and other assets.
2006
Certain credits from aircraft and engine manufacturers in the amount of $37,042 reduced the basis of Flight equipment under operating leases and increased Lease receivables and other assets.
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-6-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
International Lease Finance Corporation (“the Company,” “ILFC,” “management,” “we,” “our,” “us”) is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”). AIG is a holding company, which through its subsidiaries is primarily engaged in a broad range of insurance and insurance-related activities in the United States and abroad. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts, accounts of all other entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, as well as accounts of variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” All material intercompany accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2006 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2007 presentation. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We use derivatives to manage exposures to interest rate and foreign currency risks and we account for derivatives in accordance with SFAS 133. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded the following for the derivative instruments and related hedged items in earnings:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30 | | | June 30 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
(Income) loss related to derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments with no hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133 (a) | | $ | (17,546 | ) | | $ | (238,123 | ) | | $ | 53 | | | $ | (100,620 | ) |
Offsetting change in value of foreign denominated debt related to contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133 | | | 33,572 | | | | 164,264 | | | | (50 | ) | | | 89,235 | |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments accounted for as fair value hedges | | | — | | | | (52,827 | ) | | | — | | | | (33,686 | ) |
Offsetting change in value of foreign denominated debt related to fair value hedges | | | — | | | | 54,379 | | | | — | | | | 35,223 | |
Ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges | | | 298 | | | | (1,551 | ) | | | (307 | ) | | | — | |
Reclassification of Other Comprehensive Income related to derivative instruments de-designated from hedges | | | (3,747 | ) | | | — | | | | 648 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss (income) related to derivative instruments and related economically hedged items | | $ | 12,577 | | | $ | (73,858 | ) | | $ | 344 | | | $ | (9,848 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | In the second quarter of 2007, we redesignated four swaps for hedge accounting under SFAS 133, previously outstanding but did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133. Subsequent to the redesignation, all derivatives qualified as hedges under SFAS 133. |
In addition, $59.1 and $87.9 million of foreign currency adjustments related to foreign denominated hedged items were reclassified to OCI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. $162.4 million and $198.2 million were reclassified for the same periods ended June 30, 2006.
-7-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
JUNE 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
We recorded increases in lease revenue related to derivatives for the following periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | | Three Months Ended |
| | June 30 | | June 30 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | $ | 2,092 | | | $ | 7,520 | | | $ | 595 | | | $ | 3,057 | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, $48.0 million (net) and $24.8 million (net) were reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense when interest was paid or received on our qualifying SFAS 133 cash flow hedges, respectively. We estimate that within the next twelve months, we will amortize into earnings approximately $37.2 million of the pre-tax balance in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) under cash flow hedge accounting in connection with our program to convert debt from floating to fixed interest rates. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of ineffectiveness.
C. | | Related Party Transactions |
We are party to cost sharing agreements with AIG. Generally, these agreements provide for the allocation of corporate costs based upon a proportional allocation of costs to all subsidiaries. We also pay AIG a fee related to management services provided for certain of our foreign subsidiaries. We earned management fees from two trusts consolidated by AIG for the management of aircraft we have sold to the trusts.
Our financial statements include the following amounts involving related parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allocation of corporate costs from AIG | | $ | 6,736 | | | $ | 5,182 | | | | | |
Management services paid to AIG | | | 26 | | | | 48 | | | | | |
Management fees received from trusts | | | (4,839 | ) | | | (4,812 | ) | | | | |
Asset (liability): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxes benefit sharing payable to AIG | | $ | (245,000 | ) | | | | | | $ | (245,000 | ) |
Accrued corporate costs payable to AIG | | | (2,550 | ) | | | | | | | (1,805 | ) |
Income taxes receivable from AIG | | | 587,478 | | | | | | | | 448,343 | |
Medium term notes | | | (200,000 | ) | | | | | | | (200,000 | ) |
Receivable from trusts | | | 107 | | | | | | | | 444 | |
All of our derivative contracts are entered into with AIG Financial Products Corp., a related party. The fair market value is disclosed separately on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. SeeNote B – Derivative Activitiesfor amounts included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
D. | | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
Fin 48
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, additional disclosures and transition. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. On the date of adoption we did not record any adjustment for uncertain tax liabilities. Therefore, our adoption of FIN 48 had no effect on our financial statements.
Interest and penalties, when applicable, are included in the provision for income taxes.
-8-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
JUNE 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
As of the date of adoption of FIN 48, the total amount of uncertain tax liabilities was $54.8 million (including interest of $16.4 million), which was already recognized. This amount relates to proposed tax return adjustments for the years 1991 to 2003, which have been agreed with, but not yet finalized by, the relevant taxing authorities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, these recognized uncertain tax liabilities were reduced by $23.9 million (including interest of $10.1 million) as a result of settlement of a portion of such liabilities with AIG, and were increased by $1.6 million, reflecting additional tax return adjustments and interest. In addition, $22.8 million in uncertain tax benefits related to Foreign Sales Corporation (“FSC”) benefits or Extraterritorial Income (“ETI”) exclusions would, if recognized for financial reporting purposes, reduce our effective tax rate. We estimate additional unrecognized tax benefits of an amount ranging from $45.0 million to $60.0 million over the next twelve months.
AIG continually evaluates proposed adjustments by taxing authorities. The tax years 1991 through 2006 remain subject to examination by tax authorities in the jurisdictions to which we are subject (principally in the United States).
SFAS 157
In September 2006, FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurement that require or permit fair value measurements. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the effect of implementing this statement.
SFAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain other items that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value for designated items will be required to be reported in earnings in the current period. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements for similar types of assets and liabilities measured at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the effect of implementing this guidance, which depends on the nature and extent of items elected to be measured at fair value, upon initial application of the standard on January 1, 2008.
SOP 07-1
In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position No. 07-1 (SOP 07-1), ''Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide ‘Audits of Investment Companies’ and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies.’’ SOP 07-1 amends the guidance for when an entity may apply the provisions of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies (the Guide). Investment companies that are within the scope of the Guide report all investments at fair value regardless of the nature of the investment or the level of ownership. SOP No. 07-1 also establishes new requirements for when we can retain specialized investment company accounting in its consolidated financial statements for subsidiaries and equity method investees that are within the scope of the Guide. SOP No. 07-1 is effective for us on January 1, 2008. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
-9-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains or incorporates statements that constitute forward-looking statements. Those statements appear in a number of places in this Form 10-Q and include statements regarding, among other matters, the state of the airline industry, the Company’s access to the capital markets, the Company’s ability to restructure leases and repossess aircraft, the structure of the Company’s leases, regulatory matters pertaining to compliance with governmental regulations and other factors affecting the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions, are used in many cases to identify these forward-looking statements. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company or industry results to vary materially from the Company’s future results, performance or achievements, or those of the industry, expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the risk factors described and referred to in the sections titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview and Industry Conditions,” “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”and “Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors,” in this Form 10-Q and in the section titled“Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors”in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and general industry economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, affect demand for aircraft, availability and creditworthiness of current and prospective lessees, lease rates, availability and cost of financing and operating expenses, governmental actions and initiatives, and environmental and safety requirements. The Company will not update any forward-looking information to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking information.
-10-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Overview and Industry Condition
International Lease Finance Corporation (“the Company”, “management”, “ILFC,” “we”, “our”, “us”) primarily acquires new jet transport aircraft from The Boeing Company, or Boeing, and Airbus S.A.S., or Airbus, and leases these aircraft to airlines throughout the world. In addition to our leasing activity, we sell aircraft from our leased aircraft fleet primarily to other leasing companies, financial services companies and airlines. In some cases, we provide fleet management services to investors and/or owners of aircraft portfolios for a management fee. From time to time we provide asset value guarantees and loan guarantees to the buyers of aircraft or to the lenders for a fee. Additionally, we remarket and sell aircraft owned or managed by others for a fee.
As of June 30, 2007, we owned 894 aircraft, had nine aircraft in the fleet that were classified as finance leases, and provided fleet management services for 104 aircraft. We have contracted with Airbus and Boeing to buy 246 new aircraft for delivery through 2017 with an estimated purchase price of $20.9 billion, 12 of which will deliver during the remainder of 2007. We anticipate the purchases to be financed in part by operating cash flows and in part by incurring additional debt.
Our sources of revenue are principally from scheduled and charter airlines and companies associated with the airline industry. The airline industry is cyclical, economically sensitive and highly competitive. Airlines and related companies may be affected by political or economic instability, terrorist activities, changes in national policy, competitive pressures, fuel prices and shortages, labor stoppages, insurance costs, recessions, and other political or economic events adversely affecting world or regional trading markets. Our revenues and income will be affected by our customers’ ability to react to and cope with the volatile competitive environment in which they operate, as well as our own competitive environment.
Despite rising fuel prices which significantly impacted the airline industry during 2006, and continue to impact it in 2007, overall industry trends have shown continued improvement. Aircraft demand is strong, and as a result, we continue to see a strengthening of lease rates. Although lease rates strengthened through June 30, 2007, there is a lag between changes in market conditions and their impact on our results, as contracts signed during times of lower lease rates are still in effect, including a number of new aircraft that were delivered in 2007. Therefore, the improvement in the airline industry has yet to be completely reflected in our financial performance. We believe we are well positioned in the current industry environment with signed lease agreements or letters of intent for all of our remaining 2007 and all but three of our 2008 deliveries of new aircraft. All aircraft in our existing fleet were leased to customers at June 30, 2007. We are also experiencing an increased level of interest from third party investors and debt and equity providers regarding the purchase of aircraft from our fleet. Although we only sold one aircraft to a third party during the first six months of 2007, we are in negotiations to sell additional aircraft. We expect to finalize these sales during the remainder of the year.
Our income before income taxes increased for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the same period in 2006, in spite of an increase in losses related to derivatives and foreign exchange mark-to-spot on our economically hedged debt. We obtained hedge accounting in the second quarter of 2007 for all our existing eligible swap agreements. This resulted in reduced volatility in period earnings.
We had aircraft on lease to Swissair at the time they filed for bankruptcy in 2001. We had made claims to the Swissair estates in liquidation for losses related to those leases and the repossession of those aircraft. During the second quarter, we started negotiations to sell those claims to a third party. On August 3, 2007, we received $24.1 million for the sale of a portion of the claims.
Prior to 2007, we have received tax benefits under the Foreign Sales Corporation law and its successor regime, the Extraterritorial Income Act (“ETI”). In October 2004, Congress passed a bill, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, repealing the corporate export tax benefits under the ETI, after the World Trade Organization ruled the export subsidies were illegal. Under the bill, ETI export tax benefits for corporations ceased to exist for the year 2007. Our effective tax rate has risen to a rate consistent with the expected statutory rate.
We derive approximately 90% of our revenues from airlines outside the United States. A key factor in our success has been a concentrated effort to maximize our lease placements in regions that are strengthening, such as in Asia, Europe and the Middle East, and to minimize placements in regions that are under stress.
-11-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
On June 9, 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in favor of various Canadian airport authorities and NAV Canada against aircraft owners of Canada 3000’s (“C3”) fleet, for charges incurred but not paid by C3 prior to its bankruptcy in November 2001. In January 2007, we settled those charges for an amount approximately equal to the liability we accrued in 2006.
In 2005, ILFC and Airbus signed a purchase agreement covering A350 aircraft. Airbus has advised us of delays and a redesign of the A350 aircraft. We are currently in contract discussions with Airbus concerning conversion or amendment of the existing A350 contract to the newly designed A350XWB.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim periods. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue, depreciation, overhaul reserves, and contingencies. The estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies can have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position and financial statement disclosures, and may require subjective and complex estimates and judgments:
| • | | Lease Revenue |
|
| • | | Flight Equipment Marketing |
|
| • | | Flight Equipment |
|
| • | | Provision for Overhauls |
|
| • | | Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
| • | | Income Taxes |
For a detailed discussion on the application of these accounting policies, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Financial Condition
We borrow funds to purchase new and used flight equipment, including funds for progress payments during aircraft construction, and to pay off maturing debt obligations. These funds are borrowed principally on an unsecured basis from various sources. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we borrowed $3.4 billion (excluding commercial paper) and $1.3 billion was provided by operating activities. As of June 30, 2007, we have committed to purchase 246 new aircraft from Airbus and Boeing at an estimated aggregate purchase price of $20.9 billion for delivery through 2017. We currently expect to fund expenditures for aircraft and to meet liquidity needs from a combination of available cash balances, internally generated funds and financing arrangements.
-12-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Our borrowing strategy will, over time, result in approximately 15% or less of our debt, excluding commercial paper, maturing in any one year. Management continues to explore new funding sources and ways to diversify our investor base. Our debt financing was comprised of the following at the following dates:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Public bonds and medium-term notes | | $ | 22,417,479 | | | $ | 21,317,011 | |
Bank and other term debt | | | 3,948,533 | | | | 3,818,688 | |
Subordinated debt | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,000,000 | |
| | | | | | |
Total public debt, bank debt and subordinated debt | | | 27,366,012 | | | | 26,135,699 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commercial paper | | | 4,197,824 | | | | 2,757,647 | |
Deferred debt discount | | | (36,169 | ) | | | (33,104 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total debt financing | | $ | 31,527,667 | | | $ | 28,860,242 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Selected interest rates and ratio: | | | | | | | | |
Composite interest rate including the effect of all derivative instruments | | | 5.27 | % | | | 5.24 | % |
Composite interest rate excluding the effect of derivative instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133 (a) | | | 5.27 | % | | | 5.00 | % |
Percentage of total debt at fixed rates | | | 75.34 | % | | | 78.88 | % |
Composite interest rate on fixed rate debt | | | 5.16 | % | | | 5.12 | % |
Bank prime rate | | | 8.25 | % | | | 8.25 | % |
| | |
(a) | | At June 30, 2007, all derivatives qualified for, and were designated as, hedges under SFAS 133. |
The above amounts represent the anticipated settlement of our currently outstanding debt obligations and includes cumulative foreign exchange adjustments in the amount of $56.6 million at June 30, 2007, and $55.3 million at December 31, 2006, related to debt that we have not hedged through derivative instruments, but for which we have mitigated our foreign exchange exposure by offsetting Euro denominated lease payments. Certain adjustments required to present currently outstanding economically hedged debt obligations have been recorded and presented separately on the balance sheet, including adjustments related to foreign currency and interest rate hedging activities. We have eliminated the currency exposure arising from foreign currency denominated notes by either economically hedging the notes through swaps or through the offset provided by operating lease payments denominated in the related currency. Foreign currency denominated debt is translated into US dollars using exchange rates as of each balance sheet date. The foreign exchange adjustment for the foreign currency denominated debt economically hedged with derivative contracts was an increase of $798.8 million at June 30, 2007, and an increase of $677.4 million at December 31, 2006. Composite interest rates and percentages of total debt at fixed rates reflect the effect of derivative instruments.
-13-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Public Debt(Exclusive of the Commercial Paper Program)
The interest on most of the public debt is effectively fixed for the terms of the notes. We have the ability to borrow under various public debt financing arrangements as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maximum | | Sold as of | | Sold as of | | Sold as of |
| | Offering | | December 31, 2006 | | June 30, 2007 | | July 23, 2007 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Registration statement dated August 16, 2006 (including $10.0 billion Medium-Term Note Program) | | Unlimited(a) | | $ | 1,900 | | | $ | 4,350 | | | $ | 4,350 | |
Registration statement dated December 20, 2002 (including $2.88 billion Medium-Term Note Program and $1.0 billion Retail Medium-Term Note Program) | | $ | 6,080 | (b) | | | 5,782 | | | | 5,838 | | | | 5,854 | |
Euro Medium-Term Note Programme dated September 2005 (c)(d) | | | 7,000 | | | | 4,276 | | | | 4,276 | | | | 4,276 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Includes $645 million, which was incorporated into the registration statement from a prior registration statement. As a result of the Company’s Well Known Seasoned Issuer (“WKSI”) status, we have an unlimited amount of debt securities registered for sale. |
|
(b) | | Includes $1.08 billion, which was incorporated into the registration statement from a prior registration statement, increasing the maximum offering from $5.0 billion to $6.08 billion. |
|
(c) | | We have economically hedged the foreign currency risk of the notes through derivatives or through the offset provided by operating lease payments denominated in the related currency. |
|
(d) | | This is a perpetual program. As a bond matures, the principal amount becomes available for new issuances under the program. |
Bank Term Debt
In January 1999, we entered into an Export Credit Facility for up to a maximum of $4.3 billion for aircraft delivered through 2001. The facility was used to fund 85% of each aircraft’s purchase price. This facility is guaranteed by various European Export Credit Agencies. We financed 62 aircraft using $2.8 billion under this facility over ten years with interest rates from 5.753% to 5.898%. We have collateralized the debt by a pledge of the shares of a subsidiary which holds title to the aircraft financed under the facility. At June 30, 2007, $0.8 billion was outstanding under the facility and the net book value of the related aircraft was $2.7 billion.
We have an Export Credit Facility for up to a maximum of $3.64 billion for Airbus aircraft to be delivered through May 31, 2008. The facility is used to fund 85% of each aircraft’s purchase price. This facility becomes available as the various European Export Credit Agencies provide their guarantees for aircraft based on a six-month forward-looking calendar. The financing is for a ten-year fully amortizing loan per aircraft at an interest rate determined through a bid process. We have collateralized the debt by a pledge of the shares of a subsidiary which holds title to the aircraft financed under this facility. As of June 30, 2007, 36 aircraft were financed under this facility and $2.0 billion was outstanding. The net book value of the related aircraft was $2.6 billion.
From time to time, we enter into funded bank financing arrangements. As of June 30, 2007, we had a total of $1.1 billion outstanding, which have varying maturities through February 2012. The interest rates are LIBOR based with spreads ranging from 0.300% to 1.625%.
Subordinated Debt
In December of 2005, we entered into two tranches of subordinated debt totaling $1.0 billion. Both mature on December 21, 2065, but each tranche has a different call option. The $6e00 million tranche has a call date of December 21, 2010, and the $400 million tranche has a call date of December 21, 2015. The tranche with the 2010 call date has a fixed interest rate of 5.90% for the first five years. The tranche with the 2015 call date has a fixed interest rate of 6.25% for the first ten years. Both tranches have interest rate adjustments if the
-14-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED
call option is not exercised. If the call option is not exercised, the new interest rate will be a floating quarterly reset rate based on the initial credit spread plus the highest of(i)3 month LIBOR;(ii)10-year constant maturity treasury; and(iii)30-year constant maturity treasury.
Commercial Paper
We currently have a $6.0 billion Commercial Paper Program. Under this program, we may borrow in minimum increments of $100,000 for periods from one day to 270 days. It is our intention to only sell commercial paper to a maximum amount of 75% of the total amount of the backup facilities available (seeBank Commitments). The weighted average interest rate of our commercial paper outstanding was 5.29% at June 30, 2007, and 5.30% at December 31, 2006.
Bank Commitments
As of June 30, 2007, we had committed revolving credit agreements with an original group of 35 banks aggregating $6.5 billion, consisting of a $2.0 billion five-year tranche that expires in October 2009, a $2.0 billion five-year tranche that expires in October 2010, and a $2.5 billion five-year tranche that expires in October 2011. These revolving credit agreements provide for interest rates that vary according to the pricing option in effect at the time of borrowing. Pricing options include prime, a range from .25% over LIBOR to 1.85% over LIBOR based upon utilization, or a rate determined by a competitive bid process with the banks. The credit agreements are subject to facility fees of up to .10% of amounts available. This financing is used as backup for our maturing debt and other obligations. We expect to replace or extend these credit agreements on or prior to their expiration dates. At June 30, 2007, we had not drawn on our revolving loans and lines of credit.
Other Variable Interest Entities
We have sold aircraft to entities owned by third parties, and from time to time we have issued asset value guarantees or loan guarantees related to the aircraft sold. We have determined that ten such entities, each owning one aircraft, are Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) in which we are deemed the primary beneficiary, as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R (“FIN 46R”). In accordance with FIN 46R, we consolidate these entities. The assets and liabilities of these entities are presented separately on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We do not have legal control over and we do not own the assets, nor are we directly obligated for the liabilities of these entities.
We have not established any other unconsolidated entities for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes. We have, however, from time to time established subsidiaries, entered into joint ventures or created other partnership arrangements with the limited purpose of leasing aircraft or facilitating borrowing arrangements.
Derivatives
In the normal course of business, we employ a variety of derivative products to manage our exposure to interest rates risks and foreign currency risks. We enter into derivative transactions only to economically hedge interest rate risk and currency risk and not to speculate on interest rates or currency fluctuations. These derivative products include interest rate swap agreements and currency swap agreements. At June 30, 2007, we had interest rate derivative contracts and foreign exchange derivative contracts that we accounted for as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133,“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,”as amended and interpreted (“SFAS 133”). We had four foreign exchange derivative contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 at March 31, 2007. At the beginning of the second quarter, we redesignated those contracts and at June 30, 2007, all our derivative contracts were accounted for as cash flow hedges, as defined by SFAS 133.
When interest rate and foreign currency swaps are effective as cash flow hedges under the technical requirements of SFAS 133, they offset the variability of expected future cash flows, both economically and for financial reporting purposes. We have historically used such instruments to effectively mitigate foreign currency and interest rate risks. The effect of our ability to apply hedge accounting for the swaps is that changes in their fair values are recorded in other comprehensive income instead of in earnings each reporting period. As a result, reported net income will not be directly influenced by changes in interest rates and currency rates.
-15-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The counterparty to our derivative instruments is AIG Financial Products Corp. (“AIGFP”), a related party. The derivatives are subject to a bilateral security agreement which, in certain circumstances, may allow one party to the agreement to require the second party to the agreement to provide collateral. Failure of the instruments or counterparty to perform under the derivative contracts would have a material impact on our results of operations.
Market Liquidity Risk
We are in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in our credit agreements. Further, we do not have any rating downgrade triggers that would automatically accelerate the maturity dates of any debt. However, a downgrade in our credit rating could adversely affect our ability to borrow on, renew existing, or obtain access to new financing arrangements and would increase the cost of such financing arrangements. For example, a downgrade in credit rating could reduce our ability to issue commercial paper under our current program.
While we have been able to borrow the funds necessary to finance operations in the current market environment, turmoil in the airline industry or political environment could limit our ability to borrow funds from our current funding sources. Should this occur we would seek alternative sources of funding, including securitizations, manufacturers’ financings, drawings upon our revolving credit agreements or additional short-term borrowings. If we were unable to obtain sufficient funding, we could negotiate with manufacturers to defer deliveries of certain aircraft.
The following summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, 2007:
Existing Commitments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commitments Due by Fiscal Year | | | | |
| | Total | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | Thereafter | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
Public and Bank Term Debt | | $ | 26,366,012 | | | $ | 3,825,699 | | | $ | 4,550,759 | | | $ | 4,092,751 | | | $ | 4,408,032 | | | $ | 4,796,861 | | | $ | 4,691,910 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial Paper | | | 4,197,824 | | | | 4,197,824 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subordinated Debt | | | 1,000,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,000,000 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Payments on Debt Outstanding (a)(b) | | | 8,184,205 | | | | 727,167 | | | | 1,263,093 | | | | 1,041,686 | | | | 814,626 | | | | 585,653 | | | | 3,751,980 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Leases | | | 80,930 | | | | 4,490 | | | | 9,303 | | | | 9,594 | | | | 9,969 | | | | 10,367 | | | | 37,207 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension Obligations (c) | | | 4,226 | | | | 637 | | | | 658 | | | | 678 | | | | 712 | | | | 753 | | | | 788 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax Benefit Sharing Agreement Due to AIG | | | 245,000 | | | | 160,000 | | | | — | | | | 85,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase Commitments | | | 20,927,500 | | | | 889,800 | | | | 4,115,000 | | | | 2,649,700 | | | | 1,286,000 | | | | 1,159,400 | | | | 10,827,600 | | | | | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 61,005,697 | | | $ | 9,805,617 | | | $ | 9,938,813 | | | $ | 7,879,409 | | | $ | 6,519,339 | | | $ | 6,553,034 | | | $ | 20,309,485 | | | | | |
| | |
-16-
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Contingent Commitments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contingency Expiration by Fiscal Year |
| | Total | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | Thereafter |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
Put Options (d) | | | 343,550 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 343,550 | |
|
Asset Value Guarantees (d) | | | 166,818 | | | | — | | | | 35,452 | | | | 16,150 | | | | — | | | | 27,841 | | | | 87,375 | |
|
Loan Guarantees (d) | | | 33,659 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 33,659 | |
|
Lines of Credit | | | 50,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50,000 | | | | — | |
| | |
|
Total | | $ | 594,027 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 35,452 | | | $ | 16,150 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 77,841 | | | $ | 464,584 | |
| | |
| | |
(a) | | Future interest payments on floating rate debt are estimated using floating interest rate in effect at June 30, 2007. |
|
(b) | | Includes the effect of interest rate and foreign currency derivative instruments. |
|
(c) | | Our pension obligations are part of intercompany expenses, which AIG allocates to us on an annual basis. The amount is an estimate of such allocation. The column “2007” consists of total estimated allocations for 2007 and the column “Thereafter” consists of the 2012 estimated allocation. The amount allocated has not been material to date. |
|
(d) | | From time to time, we participate with airlines, banks and other financial institutions to assist in financing aircraft by providing asset guarantees, put options, or loan guarantees collateralized by aircraft. As a result, should we be called upon to fulfill our obligations, we would have recourse to the value of the underlying aircraft. |
Results of Operations- Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus 2006.
Revenues from rentals of flight equipment increased 13.0% to $1,133.1 million in 2007 from $1,002.6 million in 2006. The number of aircraft in our fleet increased to 894 at June 30, 2007, compared to 813 at June 30, 2006. Revenues from rentals of flight equipment increased(i)$137.9 million due to the purchase of aircraft after April 1, 2006, and earning revenue during the entire period, or part thereof, in 2007 compared to no or partial earned revenue for the same period in 2006 and(ii)$6.2 million related to aircraft that were redelivered or had lease rates changes during the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. The increases were offset by a $14.4 million decrease related to aircraft deployed during the period ended June 30, 2006, and sold prior to June 30, 2007. Overhaul revenue increased $0.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006 due to an increase in leases, which include overhaul provisions, resulting in a modest increase in the aggregate number of hours flown on which we collect overhaul revenue.
All aircraft in our fleet were subject to a signed lease agreement or a signed letter of intent at June 30, 2007.
In addition to leasing operations, we engage in the marketing of our flight equipment throughout the lease term, as well as the sale of third party owned flight equipment on a principal and commission basis. Revenues from flight equipment marketing decreased to $2.2 million in 2007 compared to $20.8 million in 2006. We did not sell any aircraft during the second quarter of 2007, compared to three aircraft and two engines sold during the same period in 2006.
Interest and other revenue remained relatively constant between the periods and consists mainly of interest income on notes receivable, management fees, and lease-related fees.
Interest expense increased to $411.1 million in 2007 compared to $364.4 million in 2006 as a result of (i) an increase in average debt outstanding (excluding the effect of debt discount and foreign exchange adjustments), primarily borrowed to finance aircraft acquisitions, to $30.8 billion in 2007 compared to $28.2 billion in 2006 and (ii) an increase in interest rates.
The income effect related to derivatives was a $0.3 million expense in 2007 compared to a $9.8 million gain in 2006. The low income effect in the second quarter of 2007 is because we began applying hedge accounting to all our eligible swap contracts at the beginning of the second quarter. At June 30, 2006, we had four contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting (seeNote B.ofNotes to Condensed Consolidated
-17-
| | |
ITEM 2. | | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Financial Statements). Our composite borrowing rates in the second quarters of 2007 and 2006, which include the effect of derivatives, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | Increase |
Beginning of Quarter | | | 5.23 | % | | | 5.12 | % | | | 0.11 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
End of Quarter | | | 5.27 | % | | | 5.24 | % | | | 0.03 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average | | | 5.25 | % | | | 5.18 | % | | | 0.07 | % |
Depreciation of flight equipment increased 12.6% to $434.2 million in 2007 compared to $385.5 million in 2006 due to the increased cost of the fleet.
Flight equipment rent expense relates to two sale-leaseback transactions we entered into in the first quarter of 2006.
Provision for overhauls remained relatively constant, as a direct result of hours flown staying relatively constant for the two periods.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $46.2 million in 2007 compared to $56.8 million in 2006 due to(i)a decrease due to a one-time charge in the amount of $9.6 million taken in 2006 related to a Canadian court ruling;(ii)a decrease due to a charge of $8.5 million taken in 2006 related to notes receivable from Varig, which had filed for bankruptcy protection; and(iii)a decrease of $1.9 million in consulting and professional fees. The lower expenses were offset by(i)higher operating expenses to support our growing fleet in the amount of $4.0 million;(ii)an increase of $1.5 million in 2007 salaries and employee related expenses compared to 2006, primarily due to an increase in employee benefit charges from AIG; and(iii)a $3.9 million one-time charge taken related to a joint venture aircraft.
We typically contract to re-lease aircraft before the end of the existing lease term. For aircraft returned before the end of the lease term, we have generally been able to re-lease aircraft within two to three months of their return. We have not recognized any impairment charges related to our fleet, as we have been able to re-lease aircraft without diminution in lease rates to an extent that would warrant an impairment write-down.
Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30 increased from 32.2% in 2006 to 35.5% in 2007. The increase is due to a complete phase out of the Extraterritorial Income Act benefit exclusion as of December 31, 2006 as a result of the 2004 enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act and a complete phase out of Foreign Sales Corporation benefits. The result of the phase out was an increase in the provision of $6.0 million for the period ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Other comprehensive income was $26.6 million in 2007 compared to $14.5 million in 2006. The increase was primarily due to changes in the market value on derivatives qualifying for and designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133.
Results of Operations- Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus 2006.
Revenues from rentals of flight equipment increased 14.9% to $2,202.5 million in 2007 from $1,917.0 million in 2006. The number of aircraft in our fleet increased to 894 at June 30, 2007, compared to 813 at June 30, 2006. Revenues from rentals of flight equipment increased(i)$270.6 million due to the purchase of aircraft after January 1, 2006, and earning revenue during the entire period, or part thereof, in 2007 compared to no or partial earned revenue for the same period in 2006 and(ii)$15.2 million related to aircraft that were redelivered or had lease rates changes during the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. The increases were offset by a $29.3 million decrease related to aircraft deployed during the period ended June 30, 2006, and sold prior to June 30, 2007. Overhaul revenue increased $29.0 million in 2007 compared to 2006 due to an increase in leases which include overhaul provisions resulting in an increase in the aggregate number of hours flown, on which we collect overhaul revenue.
All aircraft in our fleet were subject to a signed lease agreement or a signed letter of intent at June 30, 2007.
-18-
| | |
ITEM 2. | | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
In addition to leasing operations, we engage in the marketing of our flight equipment throughout the lease term, as well as the sale of third party owned flight equipment on a principal and commission basis. Revenues from flight equipment marketing decreased to $4.8 million in 2007 compared to $39.6 million in 2006. We sold one aircraft during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to three aircraft and two engines sold during the same period in 2006.
Interest and other revenue decreased to $40.6 million in 2007 compared to $42.2 million in 2006, due to lower gains related to sale of marketable securities in the amount of $2.8 million and other minor decreases in the amount of $0.4 million. The decreases were offset by(i)higher fee revenue due to non-performance by customers in the amount of $0.8 million and(ii)higher revenue from our VIEs in the amount of $0.8 million.
Interest expense increased to $792.8 million in 2007 compared to $696.6 million in 2006 as a result of (i) an increase in average debt outstanding (excluding the effect of debt discount and foreign exchange adjustments), primarily borrowed to finance aircraft acquisitions, to $30.2 billion in 2007 compared to $27.6 billion in 2006 and (ii) an increase in interest rates.
We recorded a $12.6 million net charge related to derivatives and foreign exchange gains related to the economically hedged items for the period ended June 30, 2007. The net charge consisted of derivative gains of $21.0 million and foreign exchange losses of $33.6 million. For the same period 2006, we recorded a net gain of $73.9 million. The net gain consisted of derivative gains of $292.5 million and foreign exchange losses of $218.6 million. We began applying hedge accounting for all our swap contracts at the beginning of the second quarter. At June 30, 2006, we had four contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting (seeNote B.ofNotes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our composite borrowing rates for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, which include the effect of derivatives, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | Increase |
Beginning of Six Months | | | 5.24 | % | | | 5.00 | % | | | 0.24 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
End of Six Months | | | 5.27 | % | | | 5.24 | % | | | 0.03 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average | | | 5.26 | % | | | 5.12 | % | | | 0.14 | % |
Depreciation of flight equipment increased 12.1% to $839.7 million in 2007 compared to $749.2 million in 2006 due to the increased cost of the fleet.
Flight equipment rent expense relates to two sale-leaseback transactions we entered into in the first quarter of 2006.
Provision for overhauls increased to $128.4 million in 2007 compared to $121.1 million in 2006 due to an increase in expected overhaul related expenses due to an increase in leases which include overhaul provisions.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $83.4 million in 2007 compared to $100.3 million in 2006 due to(i)a decrease of $17.3 million in charges related to lessees who had filed for bankruptcy protection in 2006;(ii)a decrease due to a one-time charge in the amount of $9.6 million taken in 2006 related to a Canadian court ruling; and(iii)a decrease of $2.6 million in consulting and professional fees. The decrease was offset by(i)an increase of $3.7 million in 2007 salaries and employee related expenses compared to 2006, primarily due to an increase in employee benefit charges from AIG;(ii)an increase of $3.8 million in operating expenses to support our growing fleet;(iii)a $3.9 million one-time charge taken related to a joint venture aircraft; and(iv)other minor increases in the amount of $1.2 million.
We typically contract to re-lease aircraft before the end of the existing lease term. For aircraft returned before the end of the lease term, we have generally been able to re-lease aircraft within two to three months of their return. We have not recognized any impairment charges related to our fleet, as we have been able to re-lease aircraft without diminution in lease rates to an extent that would warrant an impairment write-down.
Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30 increased from 32.3% in 2006 to 36.0% in 2007. The increase is due to a complete phase out of the Extraterritorial Income Act benefit exclusion as of December 31, 2006 as a result of the 2004 enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act and a complete phase out of
-19-
| | |
ITEM 2. | | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Foreign Sales Corporation benefits. The result of the phase out was an increase in the provision of $16.2 million for the period ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Other comprehensive income was $10.8 million in 2007 compared to $11.2 million in 2006. The decrease was primarily due to changes in the market value on derivatives qualifying for cash flow hedges under SFAS 133.
-20-
| | |
ITEM 3. | | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Value at Risk
Measuring potential losses in fair values is performed through the application of various statistical techniques. One such technique is Value at Risk (“VaR”), a summary statistical measure that uses historical interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices and which estimates the volatility and correlation of these rates and prices to calculate the maximum loss that could occur over a defined period of time given a certain probability.
Management believes that statistical models alone do not provide a reliable method of monitoring and controlling market risk. While VaR models are relatively sophisticated, the quantitative market risk information generated is limited by the assumptions and parameters established in creating the related models. Therefore, such models are tools and do not substitute for the experience or judgment of senior management.
We are exposed to market risk and the risk of loss of fair value and possible liquidity strain resulting from adverse fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange prices. We statistically measure the loss of fair value through the application of a VaR model on a quarterly basis. In this analysis, our net fair value is determined using the financial instrument and other assets. This includes tax adjusted future flight equipment lease revenues and financial instrument liabilities, which includes future servicing of current debt. The estimated impact of current derivative positions is also taken into account.
We calculate the VaR with respect to the net fair value by using historical scenarios. This methodology entails re-pricing all assets and liabilities under explicit changes in market rates within a specific historical time period. In this case, the most recent two quarters of historical information for interest rates and foreign exchange rates were used to construct the historical scenarios at June 30, 2007, and the most recent five quarters were used to construct the scenarios at December 31, 2006. For each scenario, each financial instrument is re-priced. Scenario values for us are then calculated by netting the values of all the underlying assets and liabilities. The final VaR number represents the maximum adverse deviation in net fair value incurred under these scenarios with 95% confidence (i.e. only 5% of historical scenarios show losses greater than the VaR figure). A one month holding period is assumed in computing the VaR figure. The table below presents the average, high and low VaRs on a combined basis and of each component of market risk for us for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The decrease in the VaR is due to an increase in lease revenue and a decrease in the U.S. Dollar yields and yield volatilities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ILFC Market Risk |
| | Six Months Ended | | Year Ended |
| | June 30, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
| | Average | | High | | Low | | Average | | High | | Low |
Combined | | $ | 84.8 | | | $ | 102.3 | | | $ | 71.6 | | | $ | 151.5 | | | $ | 208.7 | | | $ | 102.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate | | | 84.5 | | | | 102.2 | | | | 71.8 | | | | 151.3 | | | | 208.0 | | | | 102.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency | | | 0.8 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 0.3 | |
-21-
| | |
|
ITEM 4T. | | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(A) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer (collectively the “Certifying Officers”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including the Certifying Officers, recognizes that any set of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Based on our evaluation as of June 30, 2007, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Variable Interest Entities
At June 30, 2007, our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included assets and liabilities of $117.8 million and $8.0 million, respectively, related to Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”). At December 31, 2006, the balances were $124.7 million and $8.2 million. In addition, we recorded a net loss of $2.0 million and a net loss of $5.2 million for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to those VIEs. Our assessment of disclosure controls and procedures, as described above, includes the Variable Interest Entities. Each of the VIEs has a discrete number of assets and we, as lender and guarantor to the VIEs, have been provided sufficient information to conclude that our procedures with respect to these VIEs are effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us relating to these entities is reconciled, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, management has been unable to assess the effectiveness of internal controls at those entities due to our inability to dictate or modify the control over financial reporting of those entities, or to assess those controls.
(B) Identification of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness existed in our internal control over financial reporting with respect to accounting for derivative instruments as of December 31, 2006 and was remediated in the first quarter of 2007. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As of December 31, 2006, we did not maintain effective controls over the valuation, presentation and disclosure of derivative transactions. Specifically, we did not maintain adequate documentation regarding the effectiveness of certain derivative transactions used to hedge interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risk and did not select the correct methodology to measure the ineffectiveness in the hedging relationships of two cross currency swaps. This control deficiency resulted in a misstatement to the financial statement line items (Derivative assets, Derivative liabilities, Accumulated other comprehensive income and Interest expense) and resulted in a restatement of our annual financial statements for the years ended 2001 through 2005 and our 2005 and 2006 interim financial statements. Accordingly, management had concluded this control deficiency constituted a material weakness. This material weakness was remediated as of March 31, 2007; see Item4(C) —Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
We believe that our Consolidated Financial Statements fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented and that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains no material inaccuracies or omissions of material fact and contains the information required to be included in accordance with the Exchange Act.
-22-
ITEM 4T.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(CONTINUED)
(C) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we took the following actions to remediate the material weakness:
| • | | We established enhanced procedures performed by accounting personnel over documentation with respect to hedge accounting. |
|
| • | | We established reviews of ineffectiveness measures by qualified personnel to ensure acceptable methods are used. |
Accordingly, management has concluded that this material weakness was remediated as of March 31, 2007.
There have been no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
-23-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, as described below and in the sections titled“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview and Industry Conditions”and“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
We operate as a supplier and financier to airlines. The risks affecting our airline customers are generally out of our control and impact our customers to varying degrees. As a result, we are indirectly impacted by all the risks facing airlines today. Our customers’ ability to compete effectively in the market place and manage these risks has a direct impact on us and our operating results.
Risks directly or indirectly affecting our business include:
| • | | Overall Airline Industry Risk |
| Ø | | Demand for air travel |
|
| Ø | | Competition between carriers |
|
| Ø | | Fuel prices and availability |
|
| Ø | | Labor costs and stoppages |
|
| Ø | | Maintenance costs |
|
| Ø | | Employee labor contracts |
|
| Ø | | Air traffic control infrastructure constraints |
|
| Ø | | Airport access |
|
| Ø | | Insurance costs and coverage |
|
| Ø | | Security, terrorism and war |
|
| Ø | | Worldwide health concerns |
|
| Ø | | Equity and borrowing capacity |
|
| Ø | | Environmental concerns |
|
| Ø | | Government regulation |
|
| Ø | | Interest rates |
|
| Ø | | Overcapacity |
| • | | Airframe, Engine and Other Manufacturer Risk |
|
| • | | Borrowing Risks |
| Ø | | Liquidity |
| Ø | | Interest rate risk |
| Ø | | Residual value |
| Ø | | Obsolescence |
| Ø | | Key personnel |
| Ø | | Foreign currency exchange rate risk |
| Ø | | Relationship with AIG |
| Ø | | Accounting pronouncements |
For a detailed discussion of risk factors affecting us, see“Item 1A. Risk Factors”in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
-24-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
| | |
a) Exhibits | | |
| | |
3.1 | | Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended through December 9, 1992, filed November 3, 1993 (filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement No. 33-50913 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.2 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series A Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed December 9, 1992 as an exhibit to Registration Statement No. 33-54294 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.3 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series B Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed December 9, 1992 as an exhibit to Registration Statement 33-54294 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.4 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series C Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.5 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series D Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.6 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series E Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.7 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series F Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.8 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series G Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.9 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series H Market Auction Preferred Stock (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.10 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Preferred Stock of the Company (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.11 | | By-Laws of the Company, including amendment thereto dated August 31, 1990 (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.12 | | Unanimous Written Consent of Sole Stockholder of the Company, dated January 2, 2002, amending the Bylaws of the Company (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
12. | | Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification under 18 U.S.C., Section 1350 |
-25-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION | | | | |
| | | | |
August 6, 2007 | | /S/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY | | |
| | Chairman of the Board and
| | |
| | Chief Executive Officer | | |
| | | | |
August 6, 2007 | | /S/ Alan H. Lund ALAN H. LUND | | |
| | Vice Chairman and | | |
| | Chief Financial Officer | | |
-26-
INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | |
Exhibit No. | | |
12. | | Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification under 18 U.S.C., Section 1350 |
-27-