Net interest income is the Company’s single largest source of earnings, and represents the difference between interest and fees realized on earning assets, less interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. The following table summarizes German American Bancorp’s net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis, at an effective tax rate of 34%) for each of the periods presented herein (dollars in thousands):
Net interest income increased $93,000 or 1% (a decline of $112,000 or 1% on a tax-equivalent basis) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2003. For the first half of 2004, the net interest margin increased to 3.82% compared to 3.67% for the same period of 2003.
The Company’s increase in net interest income was largely attributable to an increase in the net interest margin that has been fueled by a decline in the Company’s cost of funds. The Company’s cost of funds has been lowered due to the historically low interest rate environment experienced throughout 2003 and 2004 and through the repayment of higher costing FHLB advances during 2003 in the Company’s mortgage banking segment.
As illustrated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s core banking segment net interest income increased by $134,000 during the second quarter 2004 compared with 2003. This increase was largely attributable to an increased level of earning assets driven by commercial loan growth and a stable net interest margin. The Company’s core banking segment net interest income declined by $217,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with 2003. This decline was largely attributable to the continued historically low interest rate environment which resulted in a decline in overall earning asset yields including both the loan and securities portfolios. The Company’s cost of funds has lowered significantly but has not sufficiently mitigated the decline in earning asset yield. The decline in net interest income was partially mitigated in the core banking segment by an increased level of earning assets driven by commercial loan growth.
In the second quarter of 2003, the Company’s mortgage banking segment repaid a maturing FHLB advance in the amount of $10.0 million with a rate of 7.27%. Late in the third quarter of 2003, the mortgage banking segment prepaid $20.0 million of FHLB advances with an average rate of 5.99%. These advances had stated maturities in the third quarter of 2004. Late in the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company’s mortgage banking segment prepaid an additional $20.0 million of FHLB advances with an average rate of 6.19%. These advances had stated maturities in the first quarter of 2005. During 2003, these advances were carried at negative interest rate spreads ranging from approximately 3% to 5% compared to the short-term investments that had been internally matched to the contractual repayment of these advances. The extinguishment of these borrowings positively impacted the net interest margin and net interest income during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods of 2003. As illustrated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the increase in net interest income for the mortgage banking segment totaled $287,000 and $452,000 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared with 2003.
Earning assets declined by $28.6 million during the second quarter of 2004 and $35.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods in 2003. These declines were largely attributable to a decreased residential mortgage loan portfolio and the repayment of FHLB advances within the mortgage banking segment. The decline in interest earning assets was also attributable, to a lesser degree, to the previously discussed self-tender offer and the purchase of Company Owned Life Insurance (COLI) during mid-2003.
Average loans increased by $4.8 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared with 2003. This increase was due in large part to commercial loan growth and a slowing of the refinance activity within the Company’s residential loan portfolio in 2004 compared with the refinance activity during 2003. Average loans declined during the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with 2003 by $3.6 million. The reduction in loans was attributable to the refinance activity in the residential loan industry throughout 2003 that was fueled by a historically low interest rate environment and the Company’s sale of a majority of residential loan production in the secondary markets.
Average residential mortgage loans declined $39.1 million or 26% and $45.3 million or 29% in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods of 2003. Partially mitigating the decline in average residential mortgage loans was growth in the commercial loan portfolio. Average commercial loans increased by $39.3 million or 11% and during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods of 2003.
The Company purchased $10.0 million of COLI during July 2003. COLI is an earning asset, however, for financial statement purposes is not considered an interest-earning asset. The increase in cash value on COLI is reported in the non-interest income section of the consolidated statements of income. Because this $10.0 million consisted of funds that were previously invested in interest bearing assets, this purchase had a detrimental effect on net interest income, but not necessarily on net income.
Provision For Loan Losses:
The Company provides for loan losses through regular provisions to the allowance for loan losses. The provision is affected by net charge-offs on loans and changes in specific and general allocations of the allowance. Provisions for loan losses totaled $838,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared with $265,000 in the second quarter of 2003. Provisions for loan losses totaled $1,240,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with $229,000 during the same period of 2003. The increased level of provision for loan losses was primarily the result of increased specific allocations on individual credits classified as substandard in previous quarters.
The provisions for loan losses made during the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 were made at a level deemed necessary by management to absorb estimated, probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. A detailed evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is completed quarterly by management, the results of which are used to determine provisions for loan losses. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors.
The Company’s allowance for loan losses and subsequent provisions for loan losses are typically analyzed at the individual affiliate bank level, the segment level, and finally at the consolidated level. During the second quarter of 2004, the core banking segment’s provision for loan losses totaled $838,000 while the mortgage banking segment had no provision for loan losses. These levels compare with a provision in the core banking segment of $390,000 and a negative provision of $125,000 in the mortgage banking segment during the quarter ended June 30, 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 the core banking segment’s provision for loan losses totaled $1,300,000 while the mortgage banking had a negative $60,000 provision for loan losses. These levels compare with a provision in the core banking segment of $670,000 and a negative provision of $441,000 in the mortgage banking segment during the six months ended June 30, 2003.
Net charge-offs totaled $318,000 or 0.20% of average loans outstanding during the second quarter of 2004 compared with $154,000 or 0.10% during the same period of 2003. Net charge-offs totaled $548,000 or 0.18% of average loans outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with a net recovery of $9,000 during the same period of 2003. Non-performing loans increased to $3,596,000 or 0.58% of total loans at June 30, 2004 compared with $2,779,000 or 0.45% of total loans at year-end 2003 and $3,160,000 or 0.52% of total loans at June 30, 2003.
The composition of the loan portfolio changed during the first half of 2004 compared with the same period of 2003, continuing a trend toward a greater concentration in commercial and agricultural loans and less concentration in residential mortgage loans. Commercial and agricultural loans represented 65% of the total loan portfolio as of June 30, 2004 compared with 63% at year-end 2003 and 59% at June 30, 2003. This trend has also contributed to the increased level of provision for loan losses.
16
Non-interest Income:
Non-interest income increased for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods of the prior year. Non-interest income increased $1,043,000 or 37% and $1,465,000 or 27% during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003. The increases in Trust and Investment Product Fees, Service Charges on Deposit Accounts, Insurance Revenues, and Other Operating Income were offset by a decline in Net Gains on Sales of Loans and Related Assets.
Trust and Investment Product Fees increased $72,000 or 16% and $172,000 or 21% during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003. The increases were the result of the expansion of the sales generated by the Company’s financial services subsidiary. Service Charges on Deposit Accounts increased $31,000 or 4% and $216,000 or 14% for the quarter and six months June 30, 2004. The increases were primarily attributable to the introduction of an overdraft protection service program during the second quarter of 2003.
Insurance Revenues increased $421,000 or 52% and $672,000 or 42% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003. The increased insurance revenues were primarily the result of property and casualty insurance agency acquisitions completed late in the third quarter of 2003.
Other Operating Income increased $925,000 and $1,184,000 for the quarter and six months June 30, 2004. The increase in Other Operating Income was predominately due to a recovery of mortgage servicing right impairment. The recovery of mortgage servicing right impairment totaled $300,000 and $183,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared with impairment charges of $456,000 and $693,000 for the same periods of 2003. Also contributing to the increase in Other Operating Income was the purchase of $10.0 million of Company Owned Life Insurance during the third quarter of 2003. The cash surrender value income on COLI increased $134,000 and $269,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods of 2003.
Net Gains on Sales of Loans and Related Assets decreased $406,000 or 53% and $761,000 or 58% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same periods of 2003. The decline was primarily attributable to lower levels of loan originations and sales of loans to the secondary market as compared to 2003. Loan sales totaled $17.5 million and $28.0 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared with $54.4 million and $101.5 million in 2003.
Non-interest Expense:
Non-interest expense increased $346,000 or 5% and $780,000 or 5% during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003. For both time periods the increase was primarily the result of increased Salaries and Employee Benefits, Professional Fees and Other Operating Expenses.
Salaries and Employee Benefits Expense increased $76,000 or 2% and $269,000 or 3% during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with 2003. The increase in Salaries and Employee Benefits Expense was primarily in the insurance and financial services segments. These increases were due to an increase in employees resulting from the acquisition of property and casualty insurance agencies completed late in the third quarter of 2003 and increased sales-related incentives from increased trust and investment product fees and increased property and casualty insurance revenues. These increases were mitigated by declines in the level of employees and corresponding salaries and benefits expense in the Company’s other segments during 2004 compared with 2003.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, Professional Fees Expense increased $161,000 or 50% and $243,000 or 40% compared with the same periods of 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to expenses associated with ensuring the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Other Operating Expense increased $88,000 or 9% and $213,000 or 12% during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with 2003. The increase in Other Operating Expense was primarily due to an increased level of intangible amortization resulting from the previously mentioned property and casualty insurance agency acquisitions.
17
Income Taxes:
The Company’s effective income tax rate approximated 20% and 17% of pre-tax income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 14% and 17% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. The higher effective tax rate during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared with the same period of 2003 was the result of a higher level of before tax net income and a lower level of tax-exempt investment income. The effective tax rate in all periods is lower than the blended statutory rate of 39.6%. The lower effective rates in both 2004 and 2003 primarily resulted from the Company’s tax-exempt investment income on securities and loans, income tax credits generated from investments in affordable housing projects, and income generated by subsidiaries domiciled in a state with no state or local income tax.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets at June 30, 2004 increased $5.4 million to $930.5 million compared with $925.9 million in total assets at December 31, 2003. Investment Securities decreased $5.6 million to $207.6 million at June 30, 2004 compared with $213.2 million at year-end. Loans, net of unearned income and allowance for loan losses, increased $8.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to commercial and agricultural loan growth.
Total Deposits at June 30, 2004 increased $4.9 million to $722.1 million compared with $717.1 in total deposits at December 31, 2003. Demand, savings, and money market accounts increased $17.9 million while time deposits declined $13.0 million. FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings increased $2.4 million to $114.9 million at June 30, 2004 compared with $112.6 million at year-end. The increase in borrowings was the result of increased usage of short-term variable rate FHLB advances and federal funds purchased.
Non-performing Assets:
The following is an analysis of the Company’s non-performing assets at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
| June 30, 2004
| December 31, 2003
|
---|
Non-accrual Loans | | | $ | 2,381 | | $ | 1,817 | |
Past Due Loans (90 days or more) | | | | 1,215 | | | 962 | |
Restructured Loans | | | | --- | | | --- | |
|
| |
| |
Total Non-performing Loans | | | | 3,596 | | | 2,779 | |
|
| |
| |
Other Real Estate | | | | 108 | | | 749 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Non-performing Assets | | | $ | 3,704 | | $ | 3,528 | |
|
| |
| |
|
Allowance for Loan Loss to Non-performing Loans | | | | 249.08 | % | | 297.41 | % |
Non-performing Loans to Total Loans | | | | 0.58 | % | | 0.45 | % |
Capital Resources:
Federal banking regulations provide guidelines for determining the capital adequacy of bank holding companies and banks. These guidelines provide for a more narrow definition of core capital and assign a measure of risk to the various categories of assets. The Company is required to maintain minimum levels of capital in proportion to total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet exposures such as loan commitments and standby letters of credit.
Tier 1, or core capital, consists of shareholders’ equity less goodwill, core deposit intangibles, and certain deferred tax assets defined by bank regulations. Tier 2 capital currently consists of the amount of the allowance for loan losses which does not exceed a defined maximum allowance limit of 1.25 percent of gross risk adjusted assets. Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.
The minimum requirements under these standards are generally at least a 4.0 percent leverage ratio, which is Tier 1 capital divided by defined “total assets”; 4.0 percent Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets; and, an 8.0 percent total capital to risk-adjusted assets ratios. Under these guidelines, the Company, on a consolidated basis, and each of its affiliate banks individually, have capital ratios that exceed the regulatory minimums.
18
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) requires federal regulatory agencies to define capital tiers. These are: well-capitalized, adequately-capitalized, under-capitalized, significantly under-capitalized, and critically under-capitalized. Under these regulations, a “well-capitalized” entity must achieve a Tier 1 Risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0 percent; a total capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent; and, a leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent, and not be under a capital directive. All of the Company’s affiliate banks are categorized as well-capitalized as of June 30, 2004.
At June 30, 2004, management is not under such a capital directive, nor is it aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have or are reasonably likely to have, a material effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources or operations.
The table below presents the Company’s consolidated capital ratios under regulatory guidelines:
| Minimum for Capital Adequacy Purposes
| To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions (FDICIA)
| At June 30, 2004
| At December 31, 2003
|
---|
Leverage Ratio | | 4 | .00% | 5 | .00% | 8 | .30% | 8 | .40% |
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-adjusted Assets | | 4 | .00% | 6 | .00% | 10 | .59% | 11 | .11% |
Total Capital to Risk-adjusted Assets | | 8 | .00% | 10 | .00% | 11 | .82% | 12 | .30% |
Shareholders’ equity totaled $80.5 million at June 30, 2004 or 8.7% of total assets, a decrease of $2.6 million from December 31, 2003. This decline was primarily attributable to a change in accumulated other comprehensive income related the change in market value of the Company’s available for sale investment security portfolio.
Liquidity:
The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows details the elements of change in the Company’s cash and cash equivalents. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, operating activities provided $5.0 million of available cash, which included net income of $4.3 million. In addition, cash outflows included $3.1 million in dividends paid to shareholders. The cash inflows from the maturities and sales of securities exceeded the cash outflows from purchases of securities by approximately $1.3 million. Total cash and cash equivalents remained relatively stable during the six months ended June 30, 2004 ending at $32.7 million compared with $32.5 at year-end 2003.
The Company does not have access at the parent-company level to the sources of funds that are available to its bank subsidiaries to support their operations. The Company derives most of its parent-company revenues from dividends paid to the parent company by its bank subsidiaries. These subsidiaries are subject to statutory restrictions on their ability to pay dividends to the parent company. Therefore, in conjunction with the closing of the purchase by the Company of its stock under the tender offer, the parent company on March 20, 2003, established a two-year $15.0 million revolving line of credit with Bank One, N.A., Chicago, Illinois. The parent company may borrow funds under this line of credit for the purpose of funding stock repurchases and parent company working capital needs. The Company drew $8.0 million on the line of credit on the date of establishment and an additional $1.5 million during the first quarter of 2004 and an additional $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2004. In the near-term, the Company plans to refinance this line of credit at maturity, while the Company’s longer-term plans continue to be to repay the credit line through dividends from its subsidiary banks.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company from time to time in its oral and written communications makes statements relating to its expectations regarding the future. These types of statements are considered “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company may include forward-looking statements in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), such as this Form 10-Q, in other written materials, and in oral statements made by senior management to analysts, investors, representatives of the media, and others. Such forward looking statements can include statements about the Company’s net interest income or net interest margin; adequacy of allowance for loan losses and the quality of the Company’s loans and other assets; simulations of changes in interest rates; litigation results; dividend policy; estimated cost savings, plans and objectives for future operations; and expectations about the Company’s financial and business performance and other business matters as well as economic and market conditions and trends. They often can be identified by the use of words like “expect,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe” or “anticipate,” or similar expressions. In Item 2 of this Quarterly Report, forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the statements in Management Overview regarding expectations with respect to future provisions for loan losses, and the statement in Liquidity that the Company’s long term plan is to utilize dividends from its subsidiary banks to repay amounts borrowed by the parent company from Bank One under its line of credit.
19
It is intended that these forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the forward-looking statement is made. Readers are cautioned that, by their nature, forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Actual results may differ materially from the expectations of the Company that are expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement.
The discussion elsewhere in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” lists some of the factors that could cause the Company’s actual results or experience to vary materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Other risks, uncertainties, and factors that could cause the Company’s actual results or experience to vary materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement include the unknown future direction of interest rates and the timing and magnitude of any changes in interest rates; effects of changes in competitive conditions; acquisitions of other businesses by the Company and costs of integrations of such acquired businesses; the introduction, withdrawal, success and timing of business initiatives and strategies; changes in customer borrowing, repayment, investment and deposit practices; changes in fiscal, monetary and tax policies; changes in financial and capital markets; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, resulting in, among other things, credit quality deterioration; the impact, extent and timing of technological changes; capital management activities; actions of the Federal Reserve Board and legislative and regulatory actions and reforms; and the continued availability of earnings and excess capital sufficient for the lawful and prudent declaration and payment of cash dividends by the Company and by its subsidiaries. Investors should consider these risks, uncertainties, and other factors, in addition to those mentioned by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and other SEC filings from time to time, when considering any forward-looking statement.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s exposure to market risk is reviewed on a regular basis by the Asset/Liability Committees and Boards of Directors of the holding company and its affiliate banks. Primary market risks which impact the Company’s operations are liquidity risk and interest rate risk.
The liquidity of the parent company is dependent upon the receipt of dividends from its bank subsidiaries, which are subject to certain regulatory limitations. The affiliate banks’ source of funding is predominately core deposits, maturities of securities, repayments of loan principal and interest, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank.
The Company monitors interest rate risk by the use of computer simulation modeling to estimate the potential impact on its net interest income under various interest rate scenarios, and by estimating its static interest rate sensitivity position. Another method by which the Company’s interest rate risk position can be estimated is by computing estimated changes in its net portfolio value (“NPV”). This method estimates interest rate risk exposure from movements in interest rates by using interest rate sensitivity analysis to determine the change in the NPV of discounted cash flows from assets and liabilities.
NPV represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the estimated market value of assets minus the estimated market value of liabilities. Computations are based on a number of assumptions, including the relative levels of market interest rates and prepayments in mortgage loans and certain types of investments. These computations do not contemplate any actions management may undertake in response to changes in interest rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. In addition, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of computing NPV. Should interest rates remain or decrease below current levels, the proportion of adjustable rate loans could decrease in future periods due to refinancing activity. In the event of an interest rate change, prepayment levels would likely be different from those assumed in the table. Lastly, the ability of many borrowers to repay their adjustable rate debt may decline during a rising interest rate environment.
20
The table below provides an assessment of the risk to NPV in the event of a sudden and sustained 2% increase and decrease in prevailing interest rates (dollars in thousands).
Interest Rate Sensitivity as of June 30, 2004 |
---|
| Net Portfolio Value | Net Portfolio Value as a % of Present Value of Assets |
---|
Changes In rates | $ Amount | % Change | NPV Ratio | Change |
---|
+2% | | $110,010 | | 2 | .02% | 12 | .10% | 54 b.p. | |
Base | | 107,833 | | | --- | 11 | .56 | --- | |
-2% | | 94,976 | | (11 | .92) | 10 | .00 | (155) b.p. | |
Item 3 includes forward-looking statements. See “Forward-looking Statements” included in Part I Item 2 of this Report for a discussion of certain factors that could cause the Company’s actual exposure to market risk to vary materially from that expressed or implied above. These factors include possible changes in economic conditions; interest rate fluctuations, competitive product and pricing pressures within the Company’s markets; and equity and fixed income market fluctuations. Actual experience may also vary materially to the extent that the Company’s assumptions described above prove to be inaccurate.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of June 30, 2004, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s second fiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
(e) The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s purchases of its common shares during each of the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Period
| Total Number Of Shares (or Units) Purchased
| Average Price Paid Per Share (or Unit)
| Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
| Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
|
---|
April 2004 | | | | | --- | --- | | | | --- | | 399,789 | | |
|
May 2004 | | | | | 26,000 | $15.91 | | | | 26,000 | | 373,789 | | |
|
June 2004 | | | | | 19,144(2) | $16.36 | | | | 18,000 | | 355,789 | | |
1. On April 26, 2001, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase program for up to 607,754 of its outstanding common shares, of which the Company had purchased 251,965 common shares through June 30, 2004. The Board of Directors established no expiration date for this program. The Company purchased 44,000 shares under this program during the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
2. During June 2004, 1,144 of the shares purchased were acquired by the Company from certain persons who held options (“optionees”) to acquire the Company’s common shares under its 1999 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”) in connection with the exercises by such optionees of their options during June 2004. Under the terms of the Plan, optionees are generally entitled to pay some or all of the exercise price of their options by delivering to the Company common shares that the optionee may already own, subject to certain conditions. The Company is generally obligated to purchase any such common shares delivered to it by such optionees for this purpose and to apply the market value of those tendered shares as of the date of exercise of the options toward the exercise prices due upon exercise of the options. Shares acquired by the Company pursuant to option exercises under the Plan are not made pursuant to the repurchase program described by Note 1 and do not reduce the number of shares available for purchase under that program.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 23, 2004. At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders elected the following Directors for three-year terms expiring in the year 2007:
Nominee | Votes Cast for | Votes Withheld/Abstained | Broker Non-Votes |
---|
William R. Hoffman | 8,334,929 | 432,774 | 0 |
J. David Lett | 8,384,149 | 383,554 | 0 |
Chet Thompson | 8,336,532 | 431,171 | 0 |
Item 5. Other Information
On June 30, 2004, the Company signed agreements to purchase up to 9.9% of the common stock of Bank of Evansville, N.A. Under one of the agreements, the company purchased 73,285 shares from existing shareholders on June 30, 2004 at $13.25 per share. Under a separate agreement, the Company agreed (subject to regulatory approval) to purchase directly from the Bank of Evansville (or its proposed new holding company, American Community Bancorp, Inc.) 83,375 newly issued shares for $12.625 per share. Closing of the purchase of the new shares is expected to occur promptly upon the receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals and the expiration of all applicable waiting periods. These contingencies are expected to be satisfied by late August or early September, 2004.
As a part of the latter agreement, the Company has certain rights, subject to certain conditions including closing of the additional investment, to designate a representative on the Board of Directors of Bank of Evansville and American Community Bancorp, Inc. The Company intends to designate its President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Schroeder, as its representative.
22
Bank of Evansville, N.A. is a full service commercial bank that opened on July 2, 2001, to provide community banking for businesses and consumers in Evansville, Indiana. At June 30, 2004, Bank of Evansville had total assets of approximately $147 million.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:
| 3.1 | Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 5, 2000. |
| 3.2 | Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended through April 22, 2004. |
| 4.1 | Rights Agreement dated April 27, 2000 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 5, 2000. |
| 4.2 | No long-term debt instrument issued by the Registrant exceeds 10% of consolidated total assets. In accordance with paragraph 4 (iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, the Registrant will furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission copies of long-term debt instruments and related agreements upon requests. |
| 4.3 | Terms of Common Shares and Preferred Shares of German American Bancorp found in Restatement of Articles of Incorporation are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to Registrant’s Current Report on From 8-K filed May 5, 2000. |
| 31.1 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 31.2 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer) |
| 32.1 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 32.2 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906 Certification for Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer) |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Registrant filed a Report on Form 8-K on April 29, 2004 to furnish under Item 12 its press release announcing its results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date August 5, 2004
| GERMAN AMERICAN BANCORP
By /s/ Mark A. Schroeder Mark A. Schroeder President and CEO
|
Date August 5, 2004
|
By /s/ Bradley M. Rust Bradley M. Rust Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer |
24
EXHIBIT INDEX
| 3.1 | Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 5, 2000. |
| 3.2 | Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended through April 22, 2004. |
| 4.1 | Rights Agreement dated April 27, 2000 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 5, 2000. |
| 4.2 | No long-term debt instrument issued by the Registrant exceeds 10% of consolidated total assets. In accordance with paragraph 4 (iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, the Registrant will furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission copies of long-term debt instruments and related agreements upon requests. |
| 4.3 | Terms of Common Shares and Preferred Shares of German American Bancorp found in Restatement of Articles of Incorporation are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to Registrant’s Current Report on From 8-K filed May 5, 2000. |
| 31.1 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 31.2 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer) |
| 32.1 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 32.2 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906 Certification for Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer) |
25