4
PROPOSAL ELECTION OF THREE DIRECTORS The DST By-laws classify the DST Board into three classes and stagger the three-year terms of each class to expire in consecutive years. The term of office of one class of directors expires each year in rotation so that at each annual meeting of stockholders one class is up for election for a full three-year term. The terms of the three Board Nominees identified below are expiring at this Annual Meeting. Directors elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office for a three-year term expiring in 2006 or until their successors are elected and qualified. The Board Nominees are Thomas A. McCullough, William C. Nelson and Travis E. Reed. They are currently directors of DST, have indicated that they are willing and able to continue serving as directors if elected and have consented to being named as nominees in this Proxy Statement. If any of the Board Nominees should for any reason become unavailable for election, the Proxy Committee will vote for such other nominee as may be proposed by the Nominating Committee of the DST Board or, alternatively, the DST Board may reduce the number of directors to be elected at the meeting. Thomas A. McCullough, age 60, has served as a director of DST since 1990. He has served as Executive Vice President of DST since April 1987 and as COO since May 2001. His responsibilities include full-service mutual fund processing, remote service mutual fund client servicing, Automated Work Distributor products, information systems, securities transfer, product sales and marketing, and DST’s Winchester Data Center. Since September 2000, he has served as Chairman and CEO of Boston Financial Data Services, Inc. (“BFDS”), which is a joint venture of State Street Corporation (“State Street”) and DST. BFDS performs shareowner accounting services for mutual fund companies and remittance and proxy processing, teleservicing and class action administration services. William C. Nelson, age 65, has served as a director of DST since January 1996. In March 2001, he became Chairman of George K. Baum Asset Management, which provides investment services to individual investors, companies, and charitable organizations. In March 2000, Mr. Nelson retired from his positions as President, Kansas City Region, of Bank of America, N.A. and as Chairman of Bank of America Mid-West. Mr. Nelson had served since June 1988 as an executive officer of banks acquired by Bank of America. He is a director of Great Plains Energy, Inc. Travis E. Reed, age 68, has served as a director of DST since July, 2002. Mr. Reed is founder of Reed Investment Corporation, which purchases equity interests in various businesses, and has served as its President since 1977. THE DST BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE BOARD NOMINEES
5
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Information About Present Directors. In addition to the Board Nominees, who are described under the section Proposal herein, the following individuals are also on the DST Board for a term ending on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders in the year indicated. Directors Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2004 A. Edward Allinson, age 68, has served as a director of DST from 1977 to November 1990 and from September 1995 to present. He was Executive Vice President of State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street Bank”) and Executive Vice President of State Street, the parent company of State Street Bank, from March 1990 through December 1999. State Street is a financial services corporation that provides banking, trust, investment management, global custody, administration and securities processing services. From December 1999 through his retirement in October 2000, Mr. Allinson served as CEO and Chairman of the Board of EquiServe Limited Partnership, a stock transfer agent for publicly listed corporations. EquiServe Limited Partnership has become EquiServe, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DST. Mr. Allinson is also a director of Kansas City Southern (“KCS”). Michael G. Fitt, age 71, has served as a director of DST since September 1995. He was CEO and Chairman of GE Employers Reinsurance Corporation (“ERC”), a reinsurance company, from 1980 through 1992 and its President from 1979 through October 1991. He retired from ERC in 1992. Mr. Fitt is also a director of KCS. Directors Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2005 Thomas A. McDonnell,age 57, has served DST as a director since 1971, as CEO since October 1984, and as President since January 1973 (except for a 30-month period from October 1984 to April 1987). He served as Treasurer of DST from February 1973 to September 1995 and as Vice Chairman of the Board from June 1984 to September 1995. He is a director of BHA Group Holdings, Inc., Blue Valley Ban Corp., Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Computer Sciences Corporation, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Garmin Ltd. M. Jeannine Strandjord, age 57, has served as a director of DST since January 1996. Since January 1, 2003, she has served as Senior Vice President of Financial Services for Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”), a telecommunications company. Prior to holding such office, she served since November 1998 as Senior Vice President of Finance for Sprint’s Global Markets Group. She had previously served from 1985 to 1990 as Vice President of Finance and Distribution at AmeriSource, Inc., a Sprint subsidiary, and from 1990 to November 1998 as Senior Vice President and Treasurer for Sprint. She is a director of Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and six registered investment companies which are part of American Century Funds. Board of Directors’ Meetings and Standing Committees Meetings. The DST Board met eight times in 2002. The DST Board has established three standing committees: the DST Audit Committee, the DST Compensation Committee, and the DST Nominating Committee. During 2002, the DST Audit Committee held six meetings and the DST Compensation Committee held twelve meetings. The DST Nominating Committee did not hold formal meetings in 2002 but did recommend Mr. Reed’s nomination to the DST Board. DST Audit Committee. The DST Audit Committee is comprised of directors who meet the NYSE’s standards of independence. The DST Audit Committee’s primary responsibilities are to oversee the internal and external audit functions of DST and to meet with and consider suggestions from members of management, the internal audit staff, and DST’s independent accountants concerning the financial operations of DST. The DST Audit Committee also reviews audited financial statements of DST and appoints, and approves the fee arrangement with, independent accountants and auditors for audit, advisory, and consulting services. The responsibilities and functions of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written charter of the DST Audit Committee adopted by the DST Board. Members of the DST Audit Committee are Ms. Strandjord
6
and Messrs. Fitt, Nelson and Reed. The DST Board appoints the members of the DST Audit Committee to serve staggered three-year terms. The DST Audit Committee Report is set forth herein. DST Compensation Committee. The DST Compensation Committee’s primary responsibilities are to make determinations with respect to salaries and bonuses of and other compensation arrangements with DST officers and to administer DST compensation and benefit plans, including the DST Systems, Inc. 1995 Stock Option and Performance Award Plan (“Stock Award Plan”). Members of the DST Compensation Committee are Ms. Strandjord and Messrs. Fitt, Nelson and Reed. The DST Board appoints the members of the DST Compensation Committee to serve one-year terms. The DST Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation is set forth herein. DST Nominating Committee. The DST Nominating Committee’s primary responsibility is to recommend to the DST Board nominees to serve on the DST Board. Members of the DST Nominating Committee are Ms. Strandjord and Messrs. Allinson, Fitt, Nelson and Reed. The DST Board appoints the members of the DST Nominating Committee to serve one-year terms. The Nominating Committee will consider nominees for director timely proposed by stockholders in a written proposal notice as described in the “Other Matters” section of this Proxy Statement. Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation; Certain Business Relationships. Thomas A. McCullough, Director and Executive Vice President and COO, serves on the Board of Directors of BFDS and as a member of that board’s Executive Committee. Since September 2000, Mr. McCullough has also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BFDS. Although the BFDS Board of Directors Executive Committee performs certain functions equivalent to those of a compensation committee, Mr. McCullough does not receive compensation from BFDS for serving as an officer or director of BFDS. BFDS uses DST’s mutual fund system and services as a remote client of DST. Certain subsidiaries of DST provide printing, mailing and other services to BFDS. For 2002, DST and its subsidiaries had revenues of $118,823,372 from BFDS and its subsidiaries. Compensation of Outside Directors. Members of the DST Board who are not employees of DST or its affiliates (“Outside Directors”) receive a fee of $4,000 for each meeting of the DST Board that they attend in person and a fee of $500 for each board meeting in which they participate by telephone. Outside Directors who are members of a DST Board committee receive a fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the committee that they attend in person and a fee of $500 for each committee meeting in which they participate by telephone. Outside Directors are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses in attending a meeting. Outside Directors may defer their compensation under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan adopted September 19, 1995. Under the plan, directors who receive fees from DST may make an annual election to defer all or a part of any fees earned during the next calendar year. Each participant’s account will be credited with the amount of fees deferred. The account will be adjusted monthly by a rate of return on a hypothetical investment selected by the participant among certain participant-elected investment choices allowed by the plan, or, if investment choices are not elected as to all or a portion of the account, by an interest factor equal to a rate of return selected by the DST Board as provided in the plan. The benefits become distributable after termination of service as a director or in certain other circumstances as approved by the DST Compensation Committee. Fees to some directors previously deferred under an earlier plan, which terminated effective August 31, 1995, continue to be deferred and adjusted and will be distributed in accordance with such earlier plan. Each Outside Director receives under the Stock Award Plan grants of DST Common Stock (“Automatic Stock Grants”) and options to purchase DST Common Stock (“Automatic Options”). The Automatic Stock Grants and Automatic Options are made when the director first takes a position on the DST Board and on the date of each annual stockholders’ meeting if he or she will continue to serve as a director immediately following such meeting. The Stock Award Plan gives the DST Compensation Committee the discretion to determine from time to time the size of the grants. The Automatic Options become exercisable as follows: 50% on the day preceding the date of the first annual stockholders’ meeting after the date of grant of the option; an additional 25% on the day preceding the date of the second annual stockholders’ meeting after the date of grant of the option; and the remaining 25% on the day preceding the third annual stockholders’ meeting after the date of grant of the option, subject to earlier exercisability upon death, disability, retirement from the DST Board (after age 60 and five years service on the DST Board), or change in control of DST (as defined in the Stock Award Plan). In 2002,
7
each Outside Director other than Mr. Reed received an Automatic Stock Grant of 500 shares and Automatic Options for 5,000 shares, and Mr. Reed, when he took a position on the DST Board during 2002, received an Automatic Stock Grant of 1,000 shares and Automatic Options for 10,000 shares. Automatic Options granted after April 2001 have a reload feature, which means replacement options (“Director Replacement Options”) are granted on the underlying options if the following conditions (“Director Reload Conditions”) occur (a) the underlying options are exercised by surrendering shares of DST Common Stock, (b) by the date of exercise of the underlying options the fair market value of DST Common Stock has increased by a certain percentage over the exercise price, (c) upon exercise of the underlying options the director has continuously served on the DST Board since the option grant date, and (d) for underlying options granted after September 2002, DST has not made certain changes to the accounting treatment of options and reload options. Beginning February 28, 2001, and continuing through September 30, 2003, Outside Directors may receive grants of options to purchase DST Common Stock (“Matching Options”) under the Matching Stock Option Grant Program described in the DST Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation herein. The DST Compensation Committee bases the grant of Matching Options to Outside Directors on the same factors considered in making grants to other participants. Director Replacement Options are granted to Outside Directors on Matching Options if Director Reload Conditions occur. The vesting, change of control and term provisions of the Matching Options are the same as the Matching Options granted to other participants in the program. The options terminate early if a director ceases board membership for reasons other than death, disability or retirement from the DST Board.
8
AUDIT MATTERS DST Audit Committee Report The DST Audit Committee reviewed and discussed DST’s consolidated financial statements with management and DST’s independent accountants. The DST Audit Committee received management’s representation and the opinion of the independent accountants that DST’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The DST Audit Committee also discussed with DST’s independent accountants matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended. DST’s independent accountants provided the DST Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and the DST Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants the independence of their firm. Based upon such review and discussions, the DST Audit Committee recommended that the DST Board include the audited consolidated financial statements in DST’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). THE DST AUDIT COMMITTEE Michael G. Fitt William C. Nelson Travis E. Reed M. Jeannine Strandjord
9
DST’s Independent Accountants. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) served as DST’s independent accountants as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. As such, PwC performed professional services in connection with the audit of the consolidated financial statements of DST and the review of reports filed with the SEC. In addition, PwC reviewed control procedures of the mutual fund processing system of DST and provided certain other accounting, auditing and tax services to DST and certain of its subsidiaries. PwC fees during 2002 and 2001 were as follows: Audit Fees. Fees for financial statement audits were approximately $977,537 during 2002 and $827,151 during 2001. Audit Related Fees. Audit related fees were approximately $550,352 during 2002 and $655,079 during 2001. Of the 2002 amount, approximately $426,753 was related to attest services relating to Statement of Auditing Standards No. 70 reports and other controls reviews, approximately $52,200 was for financial statement audits of employee benefit plans, and approximately $71,399 was related to transaction due diligence. Of the 2001 amount, approximately $463,944 was related to attest services relating to Statement of Auditing Standards No. 70 reports and other controls reviews, approximately $27,200 was for financial statement audits of employee benefit plans, and approximately $163,935 was related to transaction due diligence.The DST Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC. Tax Fees. Tax fees were approximately $1,176,036 during 2002 and $939,228 during 2001. Of the 2002 amount, approximately $334,945 was for tax compliance services, approximately $133,116 was related to expatriate and other employee tax preparation services, and approximately $707,975 was for tax planning and advice. Of the 2001 amount, approximately $108,914 was for tax compliance services, approximately $137,020 was related to expatriate and other employee tax preparation services, and approximately $693,294 was for tax planning and advice. The DST Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC. All Other Fees. Fees related to all other services were approximately $130,665 during 2002 and $427,437 during 2001. Of the 2002 amount, approximately $101,323 was for non-attest services related to other controls reviews and approximately $29,342 was for consulting services related to a capital investment. Of the 2001 amount, approximately $259,437 was related to consulting for financial system selection and approximately $168,000 was related to consulting on general controls development.The DST Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC. The DST Audit Committee has established procedures that prohibit the Committee from engaging an independent auditor to perform any service that the independent auditor is prohibited by the securities laws from providing. Such procedures require the Committee to pre-approve the auditor’s annual audit of the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. They allow the Committee or the Committee Chairman to pre-approve or reject any other audit or non-audit services. The Committee has directed that the Chairman, with the assistance of DST’s Chief Financial Officer, present and describe at regularly scheduled Committee meetings all such pre-approved services. The Committee has established maximum periods in advance of the commencement of audit or non-audit services that such services should be presented for pre-approval. The Committee regularly examines whether the fees for auditor services exceed estimates. The Committee procedures recognize that pre-approval is not required under securities law regulations for certain non-audit services the aggregate amount of which does not exceed certain amounts paid by DST to its independent auditor (“DeMinimis Waiver”), and the procedures require the Chairman or the Committee to approve prior to completion of the audit any services subject to the DeMinimis Waiver. No such waiver has been applied to a non-audit service.
10
The DST Audit Committee has appointed PwC to serve as independent accountants to audit the consolidated financial statements of DST as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Although the DST Audit Committee has selected PwC, it nonetheless may, in its discretion, retain another independent accounting firm at any time during the year if it concludes that such change would be in the best interest of DST and its stockholders. Representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
11
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MATTERSDST Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation Compensation Principles. The DST Compensation Committee determined the base salaries for DST executive officers (the “DST Officers”) on the basis that such salaries be fair, reasonable and competitive. The DST Compensation Committee based other components of the compensation packages for the DST Officers on the principles that compensation for DST officers should be competitive and that such executive officers should be encouraged to have long-term ownership in DST and should be rewarded if DST stockholders experience an increase in the value of DST Common Stock. Overview of 2002 Compensation. The compensation of DST Officers for 2002 consisted of base salary and awards issued pursuant to the Stock Award Plan. The Stock Award Plan allows the granting of restricted stock, stock options, cash bonuses and other forms of incentive compensation to DST Officers. For 2002, the awards granted to DST Officers under the Stock Award Plan included cash bonuses, options to purchase DST Common Stock, and restricted DST Common Stock (“Restricted Stock”) issued under the DST Systems, Inc, Executive Incentive Plan (the “Executive Incentive Plan”, which was adopted pursuant to, and as an implementation of, the Stock Award Plan). The DST Officers also participated during 2002 in certain other benefits available generally to DST officers and employees so that their base compensation packages for 2002 were competitive with compensation packages of other companies. Determination of 2002 Compensation. In determining target levels of base salary and of total cash compensation and the types of awards to grant, the DST Compensation Committee considered the recommendations of an independent compensation consultant and analyzed data provided by the consultant. The consultant updated earlier surveys of comparable position compensation data and of proxy statement executive compensation data. The proxy statement data were from fourteen companies, eight of which are in the Current Peer Group shown in the Stock Performance Graph contained in this Proxy Statement, and the remainder of which the compensation consultant and the DST Compensation Committee believed were comparable in size, scope or complexity to DST or were in industries or businesses in which DST competes for customers or from which it would typically recruit executives. The DST Compensation Committee focused on the information in the surveys about officers with positions and responsibilities similar to each DST Officer. The DST Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to each component of the compensation packages: Base Salaries. With the advice of the independent compensation consultant, the DST Compensation Committee has set the target for the base salary of each DST Officer other than Mr. Kenney to be in approximately the 50th percentile of compensation levels for comparable positions shown in the surveys. Mr. Kenney’s base salary was determined prior to DST’s acquisition of EquiServe. The DST Compensation Committee has increased base salaries of certain DST Officers whose base salaries fell below the 50th percentile based on the updated survey data. The DST Compensation Committee has also examined the responsibilities of individual DST Officers in relation to the market and to each other and has made adjustments where it deemed appropriate. In some instances, base salaries vary from the 50th percentile of survey compensation levels. Cash Bonuses and Equity Awards. As described in the section Other Compensation Plans and Arrangements herein, Mr. Winn received a cash bonus for 2002, the amount of which was tied to DSTi’s pre-tax earnings. The bonuses for other DST Officers were made under the Executive Incentive Plan. For all participants in the plan other than employees of EquiServe or of the Customer Management or Output Solutions business segments, the bonuses under such plan were based on a percentage of salary and depended 50% on the achievement of three-year cumulative threshold, target or maximum consolidated diluted DST earnings per share goals (“DST Cumulative Goals”) and 50% on the achievement of 2002 threshold, target or maximum consolidated diluted DST earnings per share goals. For participants in the plan who are employees of EquiServe, the bonuses were based on a percentage of salary and depended 50% on the achievement of 2002 threshold, target or maximum consolidated diluted DST earnings per share goals and 50% on the achievement of separate 2002 EquiServe threshold, target or maximum pre-tax income goals. For participants in the plan who are employees of the 12
Customer Management business segment, the bonuses were based on a percentage of salary and depended 25% on the achievement of DST Cumulative Goals and 75% on the achievement of 2002 Customer Management segment threshold, target or maximum pre-tax income goals. For participants in the plan who are employees of the Output Solutions business segment, the bonuses were based on a percentage of salary and depended 50% on the achievement of DST Cumulative Goals and 50% on 2002 Output Solutions segment threshold, target or maximum pre-tax income goals. The DST Compensation Committee established all such goals (collectively, the “Goals”). The DST Compensation Committee determined the percentage of each DST Officer’s salary (other than Mr. Winn) to be awarded as a bonus for 2002 at each level of Goals met by DST. The range of minimum percentages of base salary which could be awarded to officers other than Mr. McDonnell for 2002 if Goals were met was from 40% to 70%, and the range of maximum percentages was 120% to 210%. In establishing the ranges, the DST Compensation Committee set the target for each DST Officer’s total base salary and incentive compensation to be in the 75th percentile of the updated survey information, if DST met certain performance criteria. Under the Executive Incentive Plan for all DST Officers other than Mr. Winn, incentive compensation awarded if DST exceeds the threshold Goal consists of a combination of cash and an award (“Equity Award”) in the form of either Restricted Stock or stock options (“Equity Award Options”), as selected by each DST Officer. If the threshold Goal is met but not exceeded, all of the incentive bonus is paid in cash; for that portion of the bonus attributable to performance above the threshold Goal, 50% of the bonus is paid in cash and 50% is paid in the form of one of the two types of Equity Award. If Restricted Stock is selected by the DST Officer, the number of shares of Restricted Stock is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the portion of the bonus to be paid in the form of an Equity Award by the average of the highest and lowest reported sales of DST Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant. If Equity Award Options are selected, the number granted is three times the number of shares of Restricted Stock that would have been granted to the DST Officer had he or she selected such stock for the Equity Award. Restricted Stock is subject to forfeiture if the DST Officer’s employment is terminated (for reasons other than retirement, disability, death or termination of employment by DST without cause) by DST prior to the first day of the fourth fiscal year after the plan year for which the incentive award was granted, on which day the restrictions are released. The restrictions are earlier released upon retirement, disability, death, termination of employment without cause by DST or change in control of DST (as defined in the Executive Incentive Plan). Equity Award Options become exercisable on the last day of the third calendar year following the calendar year for which the bonus allocated to the option was earned, subject to becoming exercisable earlier on retirement, death, disability, termination of employment without cause by DST, or change of control of DST (as defined in the Stock Award Plan). The options terminate early upon voluntary termination of employment by the DST Officer or termination of employment with cause by DST. Equity Award Options have a reload feature, which means replacement options (“Replacement Options”) are granted on the underlying Equity Award Options if the following conditions (“Reload Conditions”) occur: (a) the underlying options are exercised by surrendering shares of DST Common Stock, (b) by the date of exercise of the underlying options the fair market value of the DST Common Stock has increased by a certain percentage over the exercise price, (c) upon exercise of the underlying options the optionee has been continuously employed by DST or an affiliate of DST as described in the Stock Award Plan since the option grant date and (d) for underlying options granted after September 2002, DST has not made certain changes to the accounting treatment of options and reload options. The Executive Incentive Plan provides that no participant may receive an incentive award greater than 300% of such participant’s base salary as of the beginning of the plan year. Additionally, the aggregate value of all incentive awards for a calendar year under the Executive Incentive Plan may not exceed 10% of DST’s pre-tax income for that year. Other Stock Options. Messrs. McDonnell and McCullough received Replacement Options during 2002 as a result of Reload Conditions occurring with respect to certain of their options. In addition to any Replacement Options and Equity Award Options DST Officers received for 2002 compensation, DST Officers (other than Mr. Kenney) also continued participation in the Matching Stock Option Grant Program. The program is under the Stock Award Plan and allows participants to become eligible for grants of Matching Options if they acquire and hold DST Common Stock. The acquisitions of DST Common Stock upon which Matching Options are granted must be through either exercises of non-reloadable options or open market purchases. Each grant is at the discretion of the DST Compensation Committee which considers the history of a participant’s acquisition and retention of DST Common Stock from the date the program applied to
13
the participant through the date the grant is considered. The number of Matching Options granted is based on the number of shares of DST Common Stock acquired (“Newly Acquired Shares”), and vesting is tied to retention of the Newly Acquired Shares for a three-year period. Replacement Options are granted to DST Officers on Matching Options if Reload Conditions occur. The Matching Stock Option Grant Program began in May 2000 and (except for the Outside Directors) ended in January 2003. In February 2000, DST Officers (other than Mr. Kenney) received upfront grants of options to purchase DST Common Stock (“Upfront Options”) in lieu of three years (2000, 2001 and 2002) of annual option grants that the DST Compensation Committee had traditionally granted. Replacement Options are granted on Upfront Options if Reload Conditions occur. The vesting and term of the Upfront Options were tied to a DST earnings per share goal. The number of Upfront Options granted was based on the number of options granted in 1999 (“Base Amount”). With advice from an independent compensation consultant, the DST Compensation Committee had derived the Base Amount for 1999 by analyzing the application of option pricing models and other valuation techniques to stock option data in the surveys of the independent compensation consultant and by considering the responsibility level of each officer receiving an option award and the total number of options previously granted to each such officer. For purposes of the upfront grant, the Base Amount for each DST Officer was multiplied by three (because the grant replaces for three years traditional annual grants) and then such number was reduced at the recommendation of the consultant to take into account the benefits of the Matching Stock Option Grant Program and of the reload feature of Matching and Upfront Options. In April 2001, following DST’s acquisition of a controlling equity interest in EquiServe, Mr. Kenney received an upfront grant of options (“Kenney Upfront Options”) to purchase DST Common Stock to replace for three years (2001, 2002, and 2003) the annual option grant that the DST Compensation Committee has traditionally granted DST Officers. The number of Kenney Upfront Options was based on the terms of an EquiServe offer of employment to Mr. Kenney, and the DST Compensation Committee believes the number reflects Mr. Kenney’s level of responsibility. The DST Compensation Committee believes that Replacement Options, Matching Options, Upfront Options and Kenney Upfront Options, and the reload features of each, encourage equity ownership in DST by DST Officers. DST Officers are incented to increase the value of DST Common Stock because (a) they are likely to increase their ownership and retention of DST Common Stock as a result of the Matching Stock Option Grant Program, (b) the vesting and term of Upfront Options is tied to achieving an earnings per share goal, and (c) the granting of Replacement Options is tied to an increase in the fair market value of DST Common Stock. As part of compensation for years subsequent to 2002, the DST Officers received upfront options with a grant date of November 1, 2002 (“New Upfront Options”). The DST Compensation Committee intends the grants to be in lieu of three years (2003, 2004 and 2005) of annual option grants for DST Officers other than Mr. Kenney and two years (2004 and 2005) of annual option grants for Mr. Kenney. The vesting and term of the New Upfront Options are tied to a DST earnings per share goal. The DST Compensation Committee determined the number of New Upfront Options by considering the responsibility levels of DST Officers and utilizing survey data provided by an independent compensation consultant. Compensation of the CEO. The DST Compensation Committee determined Mr. McDonnell’s base salary of $575,000 in the same manner it determined the salaries of other DST Officers. McDonnell’s base salary is currently below the 50th percentile of survey compensation levels. Under the Executive Incentive Plan, Mr. McDonnell’s threshold, target and maximum incentive awards for 2002 were set at 85%, 170% and 255% of his base salary, respectively, if DST attained its threshold, target or maximum Goals. In establishing such ranges, the DST Compensation Committee set the targets for Mr. McDonnell’s total base salary and incentive compensation to be in the 75th percentile of updated survey information, if DST meets certain performance criteria. The number of options Mr. McDonnell received for 2002 compensation was determined as follows: (a) the number of Upfront Options Mr. McDonnell received in 2000 in part for his 2002 compensation were determined as described above (in the second paragraph under “Other Stock Options”); (b) the number of Matching Options he received in 2002 was based on his Newly Acquired Shares; and (c) the number of Reload Options he received in 2002 was based on the number of
14
underlying options exercised to fulfill Reload Conditions. The terms of all such options are the same as those awarded the other DST Officers. Deductibility of Compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code contains a limitation (“162(m) Limitation”) of a public company’s deductions for federal income tax purposes of compensation expenses in excess of $1 million paid to the executive officers named in the company’s summary compensation table, which are the CEO and the four DST executive officers other than the CEO receiving the highest totals of salary and cash bonus for 2002 (“Named Officers”). Performance-based compensation which meets the requirements of Section 162(m) is excluded from the compensation subject to the 162(m) Limitation. The DST Compensation Committee believes DST has taken the steps required to exclude from calculation of the 162(m) Limitation any performance-based awards granted under the Stock Award Plan to the Named Officers. THE DST COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Michael G. Fitt William C. Nelson Travis E. Reed M. Jeannine Strandjord
15
Stock Performance Graph The following graph shows the changes in value since December 31, 1997 of an assumed investment of $100 in: (i) DST Common Stock; (ii) the stocks that comprise the S&P 400 MidCap index1; (iii) the stocks that comprise a current peer group of companies (“Current Peer Group”)2, and (iv) the stocks that comprise the peer group of companies for the Stock Performance Graph in DST’s 2002 proxy statement (“2002 Peer Group”) 3. The table following the graph shows the dollar value of those investments as of December 31, 2002. The value for the assumed investments depicted on the graph and in the table has been calculated assuming that cash dividends, if any, are reinvested at the end of each quarter in which they are paid. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c690/4c690bb843c1151b5d849ebe9c4295c9c9a8c277" alt=""
|