Graham Corporation Reports Fiscal 2019 First Quarter Results
August 3, 2018
Page 3 of 11
Graham believes that, when used in conjunction with measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, EBITDA and EBITDA margin (EBITDA as a percentage of sales), which arenon-GAAP measures, help in the understanding of its operating performance. Graham’s credit facility also contains ratios based on EBITDA.See the attached tables for additional important disclosures regarding Graham’s use of EBITDAand EBITDA margin as well as a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA.
Available Capital Provides Financial Flexibility
Cash, cash equivalents and investments at June 30, 2018 were $75.3 million, down $1.2 million from March 31, 2018. The decrease resulted primarily from timing of changes in working capital.
Cash provided by operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 was nominal, compared with$2.9 million in the prior-year quarter. The decrease was primarily attributable to timing of changes in working capital, net of higher net income.
Capital expenditures were $0.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 compared with$0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company continues to expect capital expenditures for fiscal 2019 to be between $2 million and $2.5 million, the majority of which are expected to be used for productivity enhancements.
Dividend payments were $0.9 million in the first quarters of both fiscal 2019 and 2018.
Graham had neither borrowings under its credit facility, nor any long-term debt outstanding, at June 30, 2018.
Orders and Backlog Support Growth
Total orders were $22.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, a strong improvement from the market trough level of $11.1 million in the prior-year first quarter. The increase was driven primarily by the chemical/petrochemical and refining industries in North America. In the fiscal 2019 first quarter, orders from U.S. customers were $19.5 million, or 89% of total orders, and orders from international markets were $2.5 million, or 11%. This compares with 77% from the U.S. and 23% from international markets in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.
Graham expects that the balance between domestic and international orders, as well as orders by industry, will continue to be variable between quarters.
Backlog at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2019 was $114.9 million, down slightly from the record level $117.9 at the end of the trailing quarter, and up from $72.9 million at the end of the prior-year quarter.
The Company continues to believe that its backlog mix by industry highlights the success of its diversification strategy to increase sales to the U.S. Navy. Backlog by industry at June 30, 2018 was approximately:
| • | | 56% for U.S. Navy projects |
| • | | 21% for refinery projects |
| • | | 11% for chemical/petrochemical projects |
| • | | 7% for power projects, including nuclear |
| • | | 5% for other industrial applications |
The expected timing for the Company’s backlog to convert to sales is as follows:
| • | | Within next 12 months: 55% to 60% |
| • | | Within 12 to 24 months: 20% to 25% |
| • | | Beyond 24 months: 15% to 25% |
-MORE-