UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
[ x ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-16435
Vermont | 03-0284070 |
(State of Incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
4811 US Route 5, Derby, Vermont | 05829 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (zip code) |
| |
Registrant's Telephone Number: (802) 334-7915 |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file for such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ( X ) No ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ( X ) NO ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ( ) | Accelerated filer ( X ) |
Non-accelerated filer ( ) | Smaller reporting company ( X ) |
| Emerging growth company ( ) |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ( ) NO(X)
At November 02, 2018, there were 5,156,884 shares outstanding of the Corporation's common stock.
FORM 10-Q |
Index | | |
| | Page |
PART I | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| | |
Item 1 | | 3 |
Item 2 | | 30 |
Item 3 | | 50
|
Item 4 | | 50
|
| | |
PART II | OTHER INFORMATION | |
| | |
Item 1 | | 50
|
Item 1A | | 50
|
Item 2 | | 51
|
Item 6 | | 51
|
| | 52
|
| | 53
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following are the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the Company.
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Assets | | | |
Cash and due from banks | $11,133,208 | $10,690,396 | $13,655,114 |
Federal funds sold and overnight deposits | 29,264,467 | 31,963,105 | 16,064,422 |
Total cash and cash equivalents | 40,397,675 | 42,653,501 | 29,719,536 |
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value $50,960,000 at 09/30/18, | | | |
$48,796,000 at 12/31/17 and $54,571,000 at 09/30/17) | 50,801,832 | 48,824,965 | 53,882,287 |
Securities available-for-sale | 38,927,383 | 38,450,653 | 36,719,673 |
Restricted equity securities, at cost | 1,744,650 | 1,703,650 | 1,700,050 |
Loans held-for-sale | 460,597 | 1,037,287 | 687,100 |
Loans | 530,503,023 | 502,864,651 | 506,048,119 |
Allowance for loan losses | (5,641,227) | (5,438,099) | (5,436,313) |
Deferred net loan costs | 353,548 | 318,651 | 318,452 |
Net loans | 525,215,344 | 497,745,203 | 500,930,258 |
Bank premises and equipment, net | 9,699,740 | 10,344,177 | 10,542,790 |
Accrued interest receivable | 2,215,988 | 2,051,918 | 1,893,478 |
Bank owned life insurance | 4,790,593 | 4,721,782 | 4,697,837 |
Core deposit intangible | 0 | 0 | 68,166 |
Goodwill | 11,574,269 | 11,574,269 | 11,574,269 |
Other real estate owned | 198,235 | 284,235 | 324,235 |
Other assets | 8,473,251 | 7,653,955 | 8,799,392 |
Total assets | $694,499,557 | $667,045,595 | $661,539,071 |
| | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | | |
Liabilities | | | |
Deposits: | | | |
Demand, non-interest bearing | $117,735,114 | $117,245,565 | $115,930,899 |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | 144,505,290 | 132,633,533 | 127,426,517 |
Money market funds | 84,260,680 | 93,392,005 | 85,947,545 |
Savings | 98,664,688 | 97,516,284 | 99,439,616 |
Time deposits, $250,000 and over | 15,626,904 | 18,909,898 | 18,097,628 |
Other time deposits | 124,692,046 | 100,937,695 | 109,910,115 |
Total deposits | 585,484,722 | 560,634,980 | 556,752,320 |
| | | |
Borrowed funds | 1,550,000 | 3,550,000 | 3,550,000 |
Repurchase agreements | 30,678,830 | 28,647,848 | 27,458,927 |
Capital lease obligations | 296,391 | 381,807 | 409,147 |
Junior subordinated debentures | 12,887,000 | 12,887,000 | 12,887,000 |
Accrued interest and other liabilities | 2,710,699 | 3,008,106 | 3,260,937 |
Total liabilities | 633,607,642 | 609,109,741 | 604,318,331 |
| | | |
Shareholders' Equity | | | |
Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 20 and 25 shares | | | |
issued and outstanding in 2018 and 2017, respectively | | | |
($100,000 liquidation value) | 2,000,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 |
Common stock - $2.50 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized, | | | |
5,367,359 shares issued at 09/30/18, 5,322,320 shares issued | | | |
at 12/31/17 and 5,310,776 shares issued at 09/30/17 | 13,418,398 | 13,305,800 | 13,276,940 |
Additional paid-in capital | 32,303,813 | 31,639,189 | 31,434,250 |
Retained earnings | 16,745,737 | 13,387,739 | 12,711,488 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (953,256) | (274,097) | (79,161) |
Less: treasury stock, at cost; 210,101 shares at 09/30/18, | | | |
12/31/17 and 09/30/17 | (2,622,777) | (2,622,777) | (2,622,777) |
Total shareholders' equity | 60,891,915 | 57,935,854 | 57,220,740 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $694,499,557 | $667,045,595 | $661,539,071 |
| | | |
Book value per common share outstanding | $11.42 | $10.84 | $10.73 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary | Three Months Ended September 30, |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | |
(Unaudited) | | |
Interest income | | |
Interest and fees on loans | $6,835,452 | $6,244,899 |
Interest on debt securities | | |
Taxable | 228,497 | 171,880 |
Tax-exempt | 330,962 | 332,102 |
Dividends | 36,587 | 41,320 |
Interest on federal funds sold and overnight deposits | 85,524 | 29,964 |
Total interest income | 7,517,022 | 6,820,165 |
| | |
Interest expense | | |
Interest on deposits | 920,361 | 628,534 |
Interest on borrowed funds | 65,074 | 12,213 |
Interest on repurchase agreements | 60,049 | 20,564 |
Interest on junior subordinated debentures | 174,661 | 134,881 |
Total interest expense | 1,220,145 | 796,192 |
| | |
Net interest income | 6,296,877 | 6,023,973 |
Provision for loan losses | 210,000 | 150,000 |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 6,086,877 | 5,873,973 |
| | |
Non-interest income | | |
Service fees | 820,956 | 773,419 |
Income from sold loans | 212,105 | 185,844 |
Other income from loans | 232,485 | 222,026 |
Net realized (loss) gain on sale of securities AFS | (9,741) | 1,246 |
Other income | 286,988 | 266,712 |
Total non-interest income | 1,542,793 | 1,449,247 |
| | |
Non-interest expense | | |
Salaries and wages | 1,730,386 | 1,653,751 |
Employee benefits | 695,735 | 682,944 |
Occupancy expenses, net | 629,389 | 614,817 |
Other expenses | 1,818,822 | 1,890,604 |
Total non-interest expense | 4,874,332 | 4,842,116 |
| | |
Income before income taxes | 2,755,338 | 2,481,104 |
Income tax expense | 485,606 | 688,155 |
Net income | $2,269,732 | $1,792,949 |
| | |
Earnings per common share | $0.44 | $0.35 |
Weighted average number of common shares | | |
used in computing earnings per share | 5,146,817 | 5,091,283 |
Dividends declared per common share | $0.19 | $0.17 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | |
(Unaudited) | | |
Interest income | | |
Interest and fees on loans | $19,363,489 | $17,737,531 |
Interest on debt securities | | |
Taxable | 652,398 | 488,250 |
Tax-exempt | 953,606 | 992,831 |
Dividends | 96,135 | 117,979 |
Interest on federal funds sold and overnight deposits | 257,091 | 84,802 |
Total interest income | 21,322,719 | 19,421,393 |
| | |
Interest expense | | |
Interest on deposits | 2,326,812 | 1,734,432 |
Interest on borrowed funds | 90,199 | 92,492 |
Interest on repurchase agreements | 128,896 | 64,326 |
Interest on junior subordinated debentures | 481,486 | 388,855 |
Total interest expense | 3,027,393 | 2,280,105 |
| | |
Net interest income | 18,295,326 | 17,141,288 |
Provision for loan losses | 570,000 | 450,000 |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 17,725,326 | 16,691,288 |
| | |
Non-interest income | | |
Service fees | 2,401,769 | 2,293,773 |
Income from sold loans | 586,434 | 560,210 |
Other income from loans | 643,107 | 616,931 |
Net realized (loss) gain on sale of securities AFS | (19,977) | 4,647 |
Other income | 1,017,292 | 725,635 |
Total non-interest income | 4,628,625 | 4,201,196 |
| | |
Non-interest expense | | |
Salaries and wages | 5,260,388 | 5,068,626 |
Employee benefits | 2,092,039 | 2,016,923 |
Occupancy expenses, net | 1,961,859 | 1,963,543 |
Other expenses | 5,395,138 | 5,416,710 |
Total non-interest expense | 14,709,424 | 14,465,802 |
| | |
Income before income taxes | 7,644,527 | 6,426,682 |
Income tax expense | 1,389,598 | 1,720,003 |
Net income | $6,254,929 | $4,706,679 |
| | |
Earnings per common share | $1.20 | $0.91 |
Weighted average number of common shares | | |
used in computing earnings per share | 5,131,654 | 5,077,473 |
Dividends declared per common share | $0.55 | $0.51 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary | | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | | |
(Unaudited) | Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | |
Net income | $2,269,732 | $1,792,949 |
| | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | |
Unrealized holding loss on securities AFS arising during the period | (175,306) | (55,963) |
Reclassification adjustment for loss (gain) realized in income | 9,741 | (1,246) |
Unrealized loss during the period | (165,565) | (57,209) |
Tax effect | 34,772 | 19,451 |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (130,793) | (37,758) |
Total comprehensive income | $2,138,939 | $1,755,191 |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | |
Net income | $6,254,929 | $4,706,679 |
| | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: | | |
Unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities AFS arising during the period | (879,673) | 22,250 |
Reclassification adjustment for loss (gain) realized in income | 19,977 | (4,647) |
Unrealized (loss) gain during the period | (859,696) | 17,603 |
Tax effect | 180,537 | (5,985) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (679,159) | 11,618 |
Total comprehensive income | $5,575,770 | $4,718,297 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary | | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | |
(Unaudited) | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | |
Net income | $6,254,929 | $4,706,679 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by | | |
operating activities: | | |
Depreciation and amortization, bank premises and equipment | 736,352 | 772,344 |
Provision for loan losses | 570,000 | 450,000 |
Deferred income tax | (70,716) | 8,937 |
Net realized loss (gain) on sale of securities AFS | 19,977 | (4,647) |
Gain on sale of loans | (265,035) | (250,826) |
(Gain) loss on sale of bank premises and equipment | (260,013) | 1,580 |
Loss (gain) on sale of OREO | 2,397 | (143) |
Income from CFSG Partners | (429,786) | (314,572) |
Amortization of bond premium, net | 98,245 | 86,467 |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale | 8,702,602 | 11,163,180 |
Originations of loans held for sale | (7,860,877) | (11,599,454) |
Increase in taxes payable | 292,201 | 298,146 |
Increase in interest receivable | (164,070) | (74,968) |
Decrease in mortgage servicing rights | 62,413 | 97,661 |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | (775,983) | 1,013,781 |
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI | (68,811) | (72,431) |
Amortization of core deposit intangible | 0 | 204,525 |
Amortization of limited partnerships | 283,113 | 462,924 |
Increase in unamortized loan costs | (34,897) | (8,322) |
Increase in interest payable | 44,079 | 36,179 |
Increase in accrued expenses | 103,133 | 457,667 |
Decrease in other liabilities | (35,961) | (860,426) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 7,203,292 | 6,574,281 |
| | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | |
Investments - HTM | | |
Maturities and pay downs | 26,937,438 | 30,488,706 |
Purchases | (28,914,305) | (34,484,362) |
Investments - AFS | | |
Maturities, calls, pay downs and sales | 6,896,563 | 9,737,133 |
Purchases | (8,351,213) | (12,805,972) |
Proceeds from redemption of restricted equity securities | 1,147,500 | 1,055,800 |
Purchases of restricted equity securities | (1,188,500) | 0 |
(Decrease) increase in limited partnership contributions payable | (486,250) | 459,250 |
Investments in limited partnerships | 0 | (486,750) |
Increase in loans, net | (28,370,104) | (19,492,076) |
Capital expenditures net of proceeds from sales of bank | | |
premises and equipment | 168,098 | (486,158) |
Proceeds from sales of OREO | 333,503 | 399,123 |
Recoveries of loans charged off | 114,960 | 71,836 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (31,712,310) | (25,543,470) |
| | |
| | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | |
Net increase in demand and interest-bearing transaction accounts | 12,361,306 | 20,831,788 |
Net (decrease) increase in money market and savings accounts | (7,982,921) | 19,567,686 |
Net increase in time deposits | 20,471,357 | 11,617,814 |
Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements | 2,030,982 | (2,964,268) |
Net decrease in short-term borrowings | 0 | (30,000,000) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | 0 | 2,000,000 |
Repayments on long-term borrowings | (2,000,000) | 0 |
Decrease in capital lease obligations | (85,416) | (74,014) |
Redemption of preferred stock | (500,000) | 0 |
Dividends paid on preferred stock | (76,875) | (75,000) |
Dividends paid on common stock | (1,965,241) | (1,829,567) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 22,253,192 | 19,074,439 |
| | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (2,255,826) | 105,250 |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | |
Beginning | 42,653,501 | 29,614,286 |
Ending | $40,397,675 | $29,719,536 |
| | |
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Paid During the Period: | | |
Interest | $2,983,314 | $2,243,926 |
| | |
Income taxes, net of refunds | $885,000 | $950,000 |
| | |
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities: | | |
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities AFS | $(859,696) | $17,603 |
| | |
Loans transferred to OREO | $249,900 | $329,215 |
| | |
Common Shares Dividends Paid: | | |
Dividends declared | $2,820,056 | $2,586,973 |
Increase in dividends payable attributable to dividends declared | (77,593) | (44,507) |
Dividends reinvested | (777,222) | (712,899) |
| $1,965,241 | $1,829,567 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The interim consolidated financial statements of Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary are unaudited. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiary, Community National Bank (the Bank), contained herein have been made. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017 contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full annual period ending December 31, 2018, or for any other interim period.
Certain amounts in the 2017 unaudited consolidated income statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2018 presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior period net income or shareholders’ equity.
In addition to the definitions provided elsewhere in this quarterly report, the definitions, acronyms and abbreviations identified below are used throughout this Form 10-Q, including Part I. “Financial Information” and Part II. “Other Information”, and is intended to aid the reader and provide a reference page when reviewing this Form 10-Q.
ABS and OAS: | Asset backed or other amortizing security | FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
AFS: | Available-for-sale | FRB: | Federal Reserve Board |
Agency MBS: | MBS issued by a US government agency | FRBB: | Federal Reserve Bank of Boston |
| or GSE | GAAP: | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
ALCO: | Asset Liability Committee |
| in the United States |
ALL: | Allowance for loan losses | GSE | Government sponsored enterprise |
ASC: | Accounting Standards Codification | HTM: | Held-to-maturity |
ASU: | Accounting Standards Update | ICS: | Insured Cash Sweeps of the Promontory |
BIC: | Borrower-in-Custody |
| Interfinancial Network |
Board: | Board of Directors | IRS: | Internal Revenue Service |
BOLI | Bank owned life insurance | JNE: | Jobs for New England |
bp or bps: | Basis point(s) | Jr: | Junior |
CBLR: | Community Bank Leverage Ratio | MBS: | Mortgage-backed security |
CDARS: | Certificate of Deposit Accounts Registry | MPF: | Mortgage Partnership Finance |
| Service of the Promontory Interfinancial | MSRs: | Mortgage servicing rights |
| Network | NII: | Net interest income |
CDs: | Certificates of deposit | OCI: | Other comprehensive income (loss) |
CDI: | Core deposit intangible | OREO: | Other real estate owned |
CECL: | Current Expected Credit Loss | OTTI: | Other-than-temporary impairment |
CFSG: | Community Financial Services Group | PMI | Private mortgage insurance |
CFSG Partners: | Community Financial Services Partners, | RD: | USDA Rural Development |
| LLC | SBA | U.S. Small Business Administration |
Company: | Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary | SEC: | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
CRE: | Commercial Real Estate | SERP | Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan |
DDA or DDAs | Demand Deposit Account(s) | TDR: | Troubled-debt restructuring |
DTC: | Depository Trust Company | USDA: | U.S. Department of Agriculture |
DRIP: | Dividend Reinvestment Plan | VA: | U.S. Veterans Administration |
Exchange Act: | Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | 2017 Tax Act: | Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 |
FASB: | Financial Accounting Standards Board | 2018 | Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and |
FDIC: | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | Regulatory | Consumer Protection Act of 2018 |
FHLBB: | Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston | Relief Act: | |
Note 2. Recent Accounting Developments
The FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, in 2014 to replace the current plethora of industry-specific rules with a broad, principles-based framework for recognizing and measuring revenue. Due to the complexity of the new pronouncement and the anticipated effort required by entities in many industries to implement ASU No. 2014-09, FASB delayed the effective date. ASU 2014-09 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and has been applied prospectively.
FASB formed a Transition Resource Group to assist it in identifying implementation issues that may require further clarification or amendment to ASU No. 2014-09. As a result of that group’s deliberations, FASB has issued several amendments, which became effective concurrently with ASU No. 2014-09, including ASU No. 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations, which clarifies whether an entity should record the gross amount of revenue or only its ultimate share when a third party is also involved in providing goods or services to a customer. Since the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, the new guidance did not have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. This ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This guidance changes how entities account for equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting. This guidance also changes certain disclosure requirements and other aspects of current accounting principles. Public businesses must use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The impact of adopting this ASU was not material on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The ASU was issued to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. In July 2018, the FASB amended the updated guidance and provided an additional transition method for adoption of the guidance. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendments in the ASU is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements, but does not anticipate any material impact at this time.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Under the new guidance, which will replace the existing incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses, banks and other lending institutions will be required to recognize the full amount of expected credit losses. The new guidance, which is referred to as the current expected credit loss, or CECL model, requires that expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date that are accounted for at amortized cost be measured and recognized based on historical experience and current and reasonably supportable forecasted conditions to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. A modified version of these requirements also applies to debt securities classified as available for sale, which will require that credit losses on those securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than a write-down. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within such years. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements. The ASU may have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements upon adoption as it will require a change in the Company's methodology for calculating its ALL and allowance on unused commitments. The Company will transition from an incurred loss model to an expected loss model, which will likely result in an increase in the ALL upon adoption and may negatively impact the Company’s and the Bank's regulatory capital ratios. Additionally, ASU No. 2016-13 may reduce the carrying value of the Company's HTM investment securities as it will require an allowance for the expected losses over the life of these securities to be recorded upon adoption. The Company has formed a committee to assess the implications of this new pronouncement and transitioned to a software solution for preparing the ALL calculation and related reports that provides the Company with stronger data integrity, ease and efficiency in ALL preparation. The new software solution also provides numerous training opportunities for the appropriate personnel within the Company. The Company has gathered and will analyze the historical data to serve as a basis for estimating the ALL under CECL.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The ASU was issued to reduce the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment test. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, step two of the goodwill impairment test was eliminated. Instead, a Company will recognize an impairment of goodwill should the carrying value of a reporting unit exceed its fair value (i.e., step one). The ASU will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and will be applied prospectively.
The Company has goodwill from its acquisition of LyndonBank in 2007 and performs an impairment test annually or more frequently if circumstances warrant (see Note 6). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements, but does not anticipate any material impact at this time.
In February 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU was issued to allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the 2017 Tax Act to improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted for financial statements which have not yet been issued. The Company adopted the ASU for the December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements. See Note 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s December 31, 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements as part of its disclosure framework project. The standard is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements, but does not anticipate any material impact at this time.
Note 3. Earnings per Common Share
Earnings per common share amounts are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock issued during the period (retroactively adjusted for stock splits and stock dividends, if any), including Dividend Reinvestment Plan shares issuable upon reinvestment of dividends declared, and reduced for shares held in treasury.
The following tables illustrate the calculation of earnings per common share for the periods presented, as adjusted for the cash dividends declared on the preferred stock:
Three Months Ended September 30, | | |
| | |
Net income, as reported | $2,269,732 | $1,792,949 |
Less: dividends to preferred shareholders | 25,000 | 26,562 |
Net income available to common shareholders | $2,244,732 | $1,766,387 |
Weighted average number of common shares | | |
used in calculating earnings per share | 5,146,817 | 5,091,283 |
Earnings per common share | $0.44 | $0.35 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | | |
| | |
Net income, as reported | $6,254,929 | $4,706,679 |
Less: dividends to preferred shareholders | 76,875 | 75,000 |
Net income available to common shareholders | $6,178,054 | $4,631,679 |
Weighted average number of common shares | | |
used in calculating earnings per share | 5,131,654 | 5,077,473 |
Earnings per common share | $1.20 | $0.91 |
Note 4. Investment Securities
Securities AFS and HTM as of the balance sheet dates consisted of the following:
| | | | |
| | | | |
Securities AFS | | | | |
| | | | |
September 30, 2018 | | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $14,015,244 | $0 | $447,484 | $13,567,760 |
Agency MBS | 16,705,094 | 0 | 596,234 | 16,108,860 |
ABS and OAS | 1,988,699 | 0 | 21,831 | 1,966,868 |
Other investments | 7,425,000 | 0 | 141,105 | 7,283,895 |
| $40,134,037 | $0 | $1,206,654 | $38,927,383 |
| | | | |
December 31, 2017 | | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $17,308,229 | $0 | $149,487 | $17,158,742 |
Agency MBS | 16,782,380 | 11,144 | 180,187 | 16,613,337 |
Other investments | 4,707,000 | 165 | 28,591 | 4,678,574 |
| $38,797,609 | $11,309 | $358,265 | $38,450,653 |
| | | | |
September 30, 2017 | | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $15,316,323 | $9,140 | $68,619 | $15,256,844 |
Agency MBS | 16,568,291 | 29,716 | 89,963 | 16,508,044 |
Other investments | 4,955,000 | 11,831 | 12,046 | 4,954,785 |
| $36,839,614 | $50,687 | $170,628 | $36,719,673 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Securities HTM | | | | |
| | | | |
September 30, 2018 | | | | |
States and political subdivisions | $50,801,832 | $354,476 | $196,307 | $50,960,000 |
| | | | |
December 31, 2017 | | | | |
States and political subdivisions | $48,824,965 | $0 | $28,965 | $48,796,000 |
| | | | |
September 30, 2017 | | | | |
States and political subdivisions | $53,882,287 | $688,713 | $0 | $54,571,000 |
*Method used to determine fair value of HTM securities rounds values to nearest thousand.
Investments pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements consisted of U.S. GSE debt securities, Agency MBS, ABS and OAS, and CDs. These repurchase agreements mature daily. These investments as of the balance sheet dates were as follows:
| | |
| | |
| | |
September 30, 2018 | $40,134,037 | $38,927,383 |
December 31, 2017 | 38,797,609 | 38,450,653 |
September 30, 2017 | 36,839,614 | 36,719,673 |
The scheduled maturities of debt securities AFS as of the balance sheet dates were as follows:
| | |
| | |
September 30, 2018 | | |
Due from one to five years | $12,978,972 | $12,693,580 |
Due from five to ten years | 10,449,971 | 10,124,943 |
Agency MBS | 16,705,094 | 16,108,860 |
| $40,134,037 | $38,927,383 |
| | |
December 31, 2017 | | |
Due in one year or less | $3,749,956 | $3,739,512 |
Due from one to five years | 11,275,824 | 11,168,065 |
Due from five to ten years | 6,989,449 | 6,929,739 |
Agency MBS | 16,782,380 | 16,613,337 |
| $38,797,609 | $38,450,653 |
| | |
September 30, 2017 | | |
Due in one year or less | $2,250,000 | $2,245,258 |
Due from one to five years | 13,029,323 | 13,009,642 |
Due from five to ten years | 4,992,000 | 4,956,729 |
Agency MBS | 16,568,291 | 16,508,044 |
| $36,839,614 | $36,719,673 |
Because the actual maturities of Agency MBS usually differ from their contractual maturities due to the right of borrowers to prepay the underlying mortgage loans, usually without penalty, those securities are not presented in the table by contractual maturity date.
The scheduled maturities of debt securities HTM as of the balance sheet dates were as follows:
| | |
| | |
September 30, 2018 | | |
Due in one year or less | $26,373,125 | $26,373,000 |
Due from one to five years | 5,335,244 | 5,375,000 |
Due from five to ten years | 6,828,026 | 6,868,000 |
Due after ten years | 12,265,437 | 12,344,000 |
| $50,801,832 | $50,960,000 |
| | |
December 31, 2017 | | |
Due in one year or less | $24,817,334 | $24,817,000 |
Due from one to five years | 4,494,343 | 4,487,000 |
Due from five to ten years | 4,338,246 | 4,331,000 |
Due after ten years | 15,175,042 | 15,161,000 |
| $48,824,965 | $48,796,000 |
| | |
September 30, 2017 | | |
Due in one year or less | $28,773,116 | $28,773,000 |
Due from one to five years | 4,866,604 | 5,039,000 |
Due from five to ten years | 3,990,576 | 4,163,000 |
Due after ten years | 16,251,991 | 16,596,000 |
| $53,882,287 | $54,571,000 |
*Method used to determine fair value of HTM securities rounds values to nearest thousand.
Debt securities AFS and HTM with unrealized losses as of the balance sheet dates are presented in the table below.
| | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
September 30, 2018 | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $5,368,134 | $148,475 | $8,199,626 | $299,009 | 12 | $13,567,760 | $447,484 |
Agency MBS | 7,628,403 | 194,458 | 8,480,457 | 401,776 | 25 | 16,108,860 | 596,234 |
ABS and OAS | 1,966,868 | 21,831 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1,966,868 | 21,831 |
Other investments | 5,353,587 | 92,413 | 1,437,308 | 48,692 | 28 | 6,790,895 | 141,105 |
State and political subdivisions | 22,917,317 | 196,307 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 22,917,317 | 196,307 |
| $43,234,309 | $653,484 | $18,117,391 | $749,477 | 154 | $61,351,700 | $1,402,961 |
| | | | | | | |
December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $13,223,739 | $84,490 | $3,935,003 | $64,997 | 15 | $17,158,742 | $149,487 |
Agency MBS | 9,251,323 | 105,063 | 4,542,446 | 75,124 | 21 | 13,793,769 | 180,187 |
Other investments | 3,692,571 | 25,429 | 244,838 | 3,162 | 16 | 3,937,409 | 28,591 |
State and political subdivisions | 22,530,141 | 28,965 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 22,530,141 | 28,965 |
| $48,697,774 | $243,947 | $8,722,287 | $143,283 | 131 | $57,420,061 | $387,230 |
| | | | | | | |
September 30, 2017 | | | | | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $9,702,979 | $41,405 | $1,972,786 | $27,214 | 10 | $11,675,765 | $68,619 |
Agency MBS | 11,618,020 | 86,230 | 209,545 | 3,733 | 15 | 11,827,565 | 89,963 |
Other investments | 1,969,953 | 12,046 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1,969,953 | 12,046 |
| $23,290,952 | $139,681 | $2,182,331 | $30,947 | 33 | $25,473,283 | $170,628 |
The unrealized losses for all periods presented were principally attributable to changes in prevailing interest rates for similar types of securities and not deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer.
Management evaluates securities for OTTI at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions, or adverse developments relating to the issuer, warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the carrying value, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer's financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies or other adverse developments in the status of the securities have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer's financial condition. As of September 30, 2018, there were no declines in the fair value of any of the securities reflected in the table above that were deemed by management to be OTTI.
Note 5. Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality
The composition of net loans as of the balance sheet dates was as follows:
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Commercial & industrial | $89,120,826 | $77,110,747 | $77,604,260 |
Commercial real estate | 224,220,329 | 207,044,227 | 210,983,668 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 167,853,992 | 168,184,135 | 167,185,874 |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 44,549,279 | 45,256,862 | 43,962,578 |
Consumer | 4,758,597 | 5,268,680 | 6,311,739 |
Gross Loans | 530,503,023 | 502,864,651 | 506,048,119 |
Deduct (add): | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | 5,641,227 | 5,438,099 | 5,436,313 |
Deferred net loan costs | (353,548) | (318,651) | (318,452) |
Net Loans | $525,215,344 | $497,745,203 | $500,930,258 |
The following is an age analysis of loans (including non-accrual) as of the balance sheet dates, by portfolio segment:
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
September 30, 2018 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | $133,884 | $0 | $133,884 | $88,986,942 | $89,120,826 | $97,936 | $0 |
Commercial real estate | 463,307 | 195,354 | 658,661 | 223,561,668 | 224,220,329 | 1,869,717 | 0 |
Residential real estate | | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 1,134,943 | 1,926,540 | 3,061,483 | 164,792,509 | 167,853,992 | 1,959,124 | 1,075,393 |
- Jr lien | 312,418 | 385,253 | 697,671 | 43,851,608 | 44,549,279 | 420,624 | 103,298 |
Consumer | 30,418 | 8,631 | 39,049 | 4,719,548 | 4,758,597 | 0 | 8,631 |
| $2,074,970 | $2,515,778 | $4,590,748 | $525,912,275 | $530,503,023 | $4,347,401 | $1,187,322 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | $308,712 | $0 | $308,712 | $76,802,035 | $77,110,747 | $98,806 | $0 |
Commercial real estate | 1,482,982 | 418,255 | 1,901,237 | 205,142,990 | 207,044,227 | 1,065,385 | 0 |
Residential real estate | �� | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 4,238,933 | 2,011,419 | 6,250,352 | 161,933,783 | 168,184,135 | 1,585,473 | 1,249,241 |
- Jr lien | 156,101 | 168,517 | 324,618 | 44,932,244 | 45,256,862 | 346,912 | 0 |
Consumer | 80,384 | 1,484 | 81,868 | 5,186,812 | 5,268,680 | 0 | 1,484 |
| $6,267,112 | $2,599,675 | $8,866,787 | $493,997,864 | $502,864,651 | $3,096,576 | $1,250,725 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
September 30, 2017 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | $76,185 | $0 | $76,185 | $77,528,075 | $77,604,260 | $48,385 | $0 |
Commercial real estate | 1,186,687 | 228,621 | 1,415,308 | 209,568,360 | 210,983,668 | 714,720 | 15,011 |
Residential real estate | | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 1,366,466 | 1,823,490 | 3,189,956 | 163,995,918 | 167,185,874 | 1,511,891 | 725,581 |
- Jr lien | 454,613 | 261,256 | 715,869 | 43,246,709 | 43,962,578 | 450,192 | 64,292 |
Consumer | 53,597 | 2,777 | 56,374 | 6,255,365 | 6,311,739 | 0 | 2,777 |
| $3,137,548 | $2,316,144 | $5,453,692 | $500,594,427 | $506,048,119 | $2,725,188 | $807,661 |
For all loan segments, loans over 30 days past due are considered delinquent.
As of the balance sheet dates presented, residential mortgage loans in process of foreclosure consisted of the following:
| | |
| | |
September 30, 2018 | 8 | $625,328 |
December 31, 2017 | 10 | 791,944 |
September 30, 2017 | 7 | 443,099 |
Allowance for loan losses
The ALL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that future payments of a loan balance are unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
Unsecured loans, primarily consumer loans, are charged off when they become uncollectible and no later than 120 days past due. Unsecured loans to customers who subsequently file bankruptcy are charged off within 30 days of receipt of the notification of filing or by the end of the month in which the loans become 120 days past due, whichever occurs first. For secured loans, both residential and commercial, the potential loss on impaired loans is carried as a loan loss reserve specific allocation; the loss portion is charged off when collection of the full loan appears unlikely. The unsecured portion of a real estate loan is that portion of the loan exceeding the "fair value" of the collateral less the estimated cost to sell. Value of the collateral is determined in accordance with the Company’s appraisal policy. The unsecured portion of an impaired real estate secured loan is charged off by the end of the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due.
As described below, the allowance consists of general, specific and unallocated components. However, the entire allowance is available to absorb losses in the loan portfolio, regardless of specific, general and unallocated components considered in determining the amount of the allowance.
General component
The general component of the ALL is based on historical loss experience and various qualitative factors and is stratified by the following loan segments: commercial and industrial, CRE, residential real estate 1st lien, residential real estate Jr lien and consumer loans. The Company does not disaggregate its portfolio segments further into classes.
Loss ratios are calculated by loan segment for one year, two year, three year, four year and five year look back periods. Management uses an average of historical losses based on a time frame appropriate to capture relevant loss data for each loan segment in the current economic climate. During periods of economic stability, a relatively longer period (e.g., five years) may be appropriate. During periods of significant expansion or contraction, the Company may appropriately shorten the historical time period. The Company is currently using an extended look back period of five years.
Qualitative factors include the levels of and trends in delinquencies and non-performing loans, levels of and trends in loan risk groups, trends in volumes and terms of loans, effects of any changes in loan related policies, experience, ability and the depth of management, documentation and credit data exception levels, national and local economic trends, external factors such as competition and regulation and lastly, concentrations of credit risk in a variety of areas, including portfolio product mix, the level of loans to individual borrowers and their related interests, loans to industry segments, and the geographic distribution of CRE loans. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to revision as more information becomes available.
The qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. The Company has policies, procedures and internal controls that management believes are commensurate with the risk profile of each of these segments. Major risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment are as follows:
Commercial & Industrial – Loans in this segment include commercial and industrial loans and to a lesser extent loans to finance agricultural production. Commercial loans are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business, including trade assets and equipment. While not the primary collateral, in many cases these loans may also be secured by the real estate of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business. A weakened economy, soft consumer spending, unfavorable foreign trade conditions and the rising cost of labor or raw materials are examples of issues that can impact the credit quality in this segment.
Commercial Real Estate – Loans in this segment are principally made to businesses and are generally secured by either owner-occupied, or non-owner occupied CRE. A relatively small portion of this segment includes farm loans secured by farm land and buildings. As with commercial and industrial loans, repayment of owner-occupied CRE loans is expected from the cash flows of the business and the segment would be impacted by the same risk factors as commercial and industrial loans. The non-owner occupied CRE portion includes both residential and commercial construction loans, vacant land and real estate development loans, multi-family dwelling loans and commercial rental property loans. Repayment of construction loans is expected from permanent financing takeout; the Company generally requires a commitment or eligibility for the take-out financing prior to construction loan origination. Real estate development loans are generally repaid from the sale of the subject real property as the project progresses. Construction and development lending entail additional risks, including the project exceeding budget, not being constructed according to plans, not receiving permits, or the pre-leasing or occupancy rate not meeting expectations. Repayment of multi-family loans and commercial rental property loans is expected from the cash flow generated by rental payments received from the individuals or businesses occupying the real estate. CRE loans are impacted by factors such as competitive market forces, vacancy rates, cap rates, net operating incomes, lease renewals and overall economic demand. In addition, loans in the recreational and tourism sector can be affected by weather conditions, such as unseasonably low winter snowfalls. CRE lending also carries a higher degree of environmental risk than other real estate lending.
Residential Real Estate - 1st Lien – All loans in this segment are collateralized by first mortgages on 1 – 4 family owner-occupied residential real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, has an impact on the credit quality of this segment.
Residential Real Estate – Jr Lien – All loans in this segment are collateralized by junior lien mortgages on 1 – 4 family residential real estate and repayment is primarily dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, has an impact on the credit quality of this segment.
Consumer – Loans in this segment are made to individuals for consumer and household purposes. This segment includes both loans secured by automobiles and other consumer goods, as well as loans that are unsecured. This segment also includes overdrafts, which are extensions of credit made to both individuals and businesses to cover temporary shortages in their deposit accounts and are generally unsecured. The Company maintains policies restricting the size and term of these extensions of credit. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates, has an impact on the credit quality of this segment.
Specific component
The specific component of the ALL relates to loans that are impaired. Impaired loans are loan(s) to a borrower that in the aggregate are greater than $100,000 and that are in non-accrual status or are TDRs regardless of amount. A specific allowance is established for an impaired loan when its estimated impaired basis is less than the carrying value of the loan. For all loan segments, except consumer loans, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, in management’s estimation it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant or temporary payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management evaluates the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length and frequency of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis, by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Impaired loans also include troubled loans that are restructured. A TDR occurs when the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that would otherwise not be granted. TDRs may include the transfer of assets to the Company in partial satisfaction of a troubled loan, a modification of a loan’s terms, or a combination of the two.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer loans for impairment evaluation, unless such loans are subject to a restructuring agreement.
Unallocated component
An unallocated component of the ALL is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component reflects management’s estimate of the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
The tables below summarize changes in the ALL and select loan information, by portfolio segment, for the periods indicated.
As of or for the three months ended September 30, 2018
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
ALL beginning balance | $785,089 | $2,708,239 | $1,398,041 | $287,602 | $51,635 | $182,417 | $5,413,023 |
Charge-offs | 0 | 0 | (591) | (12,174) | (37,327) | 0 | (50,092) |
Recoveries | 34,818 | 0 | 17,353 | 260 | 15,865 | 0 | 68,296 |
Provision (credit) | (34,687) | 102,491 | (18,277) | 78,108 | 21,590 | 60,775 | 210,000 |
ALL ending balance | $785,220 | $2,810,730 | $1,396,526 | $353,796 | $51,763 | $243,192 | $5,641,227 |
As of or for the nine months ended September 30, 2018
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
ALL beginning balance | $675,687 | $2,674,029 | $1,460,547 | $316,982 | $43,303 | $267,551 | $5,438,099 |
Charge-offs | (131,273) | (124,645) | (79,025) | (36,174) | (110,715) | 0 | (481,832) |
Recoveries | 54,858 | 0 | 26,511 | 935 | 32,656 | 0 | 114,960 |
Provision (credit) | 185,948 | 261,346 | (11,507) | 72,053 | 86,519 | (24,359) | 570,000 |
ALL ending balance | $785,220 | $2,810,730 | $1,396,526 | $353,796 | $51,763 | $243,192 | $5,641,227 |
| | | | | | | |
ALL evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | |
Individually | $0 | $0 | $141,863 | $82,236 | $0 | $0 | $224,099 |
Collectively | 785,220 | 2,810,730 | 1,254,663 | 271,560 | 51,763 | 243,192 | 5,417,128 |
| $785,220 | $2,810,730 | $1,396,526 | $353,796 | $51,763 | $243,192 | $5,641,227 |
|
Loans evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | |
Individually | $62,879 | $1,879,008 | $4,509,626 | $369,591 | $0 | | $6,821,104 |
Collectively | 89,057,947 | 222,341,321 | 163,344,366 | 44,179,688 | 4,758,597 | | 523,681,919 |
| $89,120,826 | $224,220,329 | $167,853,992 | $44,549,279 | $4,758,597 | | $530,503,023 |
As of or for the year ended December 31, 2017
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
ALL beginning balance | $726,848 | $2,496,085 | $1,369,757 | $371,176 | $83,973 | $230,606 | $5,278,445 |
Charge-offs | (20,000) | (160,207) | (159,533) | (118,359) | (124,042) | 0 | (582,141) |
Recoveries | 27,051 | 230 | 26,826 | 465 | 37,223 | 0 | 91,795 |
Provision (credit) | (58,212) | 337,921 | 223,497 | 63,700 | 46,149 | 36,945 | 650,000 |
ALL ending balance | $675,687 | $2,674,029 | $1,460,547 | $316,982 | $43,303 | $267,551 | $5,438,099 |
| | | | | | | |
ALL evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | |
Individually | $0 | $69,015 | $125,305 | $26,353 | $0 | $0 | $220,673 |
Collectively | 675,687 | 2,605,014 | 1,335,242 | 290,629 | 43,303 | 267,551 | 5,217,426 |
| $675,687 | $2,674,029 | $1,460,547 | $316,982 | $43,303 | $267,551 | $5,438,099 |
| | | | | | | |
Loans evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | |
Individually | $98,806 | $1,306,057 | $4,075,666 | $300,759 | $0 | | $5,781,288 |
Collectively | 77,011,941 | 205,738,170 | 164,108,469 | 44,956,103 | 5,268,680 | | 497,083,363 |
| $77,110,747 | $207,044,227 | $168,184,135 | $45,256,862 | $5,268,680 | | $502,864,651 |
As of or for the three months ended September 30, 2017
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
ALL beginning balance | $695,663 | $2,530,215 | $1,363,324 | $374,364 | $51,295 | $359,517 | $5,374,378 |
Charge-offs | 0 | 0 | (84,098) | 0 | (35,825) | 0 | (119,923) |
Recoveries | 19,151 | 0 | 4,621 | 60 | 8,026 | 0 | 31,858 |
Provision (credit) | (41,481) | 113,047 | 136,764 | 11,115 | 28,115 | (97,560) | 150,000 |
ALL ending balance | $673,333 | $2,643,262 | $1,420,611 | $385,539 | $51,611 | $261,957 | $5,436,313 |
As of or for the nine months ended September 30, 2017
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
ALL beginning balance | $726,848 | $2,496,085 | $1,369,757 | $371,176 | $83,973 | $230,606 | $5,278,445 |
Charge-offs | 0 | (160,207) | (88,833) | (15,311) | (99,617) | 0 | (363,968) |
Recoveries | 23,469 | 231 | 14,838 | 180 | 33,118 | 0 | 71,836 |
Provision (credit) | (76,984) | 307,153 | 124,849 | 29,494 | 34,137 | 31,351 | 450,000 |
ALL ending balance | $673,333 | $2,643,262 | $1,420,611 | $385,539 | $51,611 | $261,957 | $5,436,313 |
| | | | | | | |
ALL evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | |
Individually | $0 | $65,150 | $153,570 | $119,224 | $0 | $0 | $337,944 |
Collectively | 673,333 | 2,578,112 | 1,267,041 | 266,315 | 51,611 | 261,957 | 5,098,369 |
| $673,333 | $2,643,262 | $1,420,611 | $385,539 | $51,611 | $261,957 | $5,436,313 |
|
Loans evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | |
Individually | $48,385 | $1,936,399 | $3,760,913 | $379,777 | $0 | | $6,125,474 |
Collectively | 77,555,875 | 209,047,269 | 163,424,961 | 43,582,801 | 6,311,739 | | 499,922,645 |
| $77,604,260 | $210,983,668 | $167,185,874 | $43,962,578 | $6,311,739 | | $506,048,119 |
Impaired loans, by portfolio segment, were as follows:
| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Related allowance recorded | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $72,073 | $0 |
Residential real estate | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 857,688 | 900,987 | 141,863 | 823,580 | 809,816 | 46,721 |
- Jr lien | 217,869 | 220,712 | 82,236 | 112,833 | 95,126 | 571 |
| 1,075,557 | 1,121,699 | 224,099 | 936,413 | 977,015 | 47,292 |
| | | | | | |
No related allowance recorded | | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 62,879 | 82,267 | | 129,979 | 135,944 | 0 |
Commercial real estate | 1,879,357 | 2,082,229 | | 1,972,312 | 1,642,662 | 56,857 |
Residential real estate | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 3,671,955 | 4,225,575 | | 3,607,829 | 3,505,936 | 180,255 |
- Jr lien | 151,731 | 152,678 | | 224,653 | 216,944 | 0 |
| 5,765,922 | 6,542,749 | | 5,934,773 | 5,501,486 | 237,112 |
| | | | | | |
| $6,841,479 | $7,664,448 | $224,099 | $6,871,186 | $6,478,501 | $284,404 |
(1) For the three months ended September 30, 2018
(2) For the nine months ended September 30, 2018
In the table above, recorded investment in impaired loans as of September 30, 2018 includes accrued interest receivable and deferred net loan costs of $20,375.
| | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Related allowance recorded | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | $204,645 | $225,681 | $69,015 | $210,890 | $0 |
Residential real estate | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 798,226 | 837,766 | 125,305 | 646,799 | 29,262 |
- Jr lien | 146,654 | 293,351 | 26,353 | 220,274 | 400 |
| 1,149,525 | 1,356,798 | 220,673 | 1,077,963 | 29,662 |
| | | | | |
No related allowance recorded | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 98,806 | 136,590 | | 75,868 | 72,426 |
Commercial real estate | 1,102,859 | 1,226,040 | | 1,105,030 | 237,792 |
Residential real estate | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 3,300,175 | 3,641,627 | | 1,930,108 | 133,732 |
- Jr lien | 154,116 | 154,423 | | 116,519 | 16,574 |
| 4,655,956 | 5,158,680 | | 3,227,525 | 460,524 |
| | | | | |
| $5,805,481 | $6,515,478 | $220,673 | $4,305,488 | $490,186 |
In the table above, recorded investment in impaired loans as of December 31, 2017 includes accrued interest receivable and deferred net loan costs of $24,193.
| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Related allowance recorded | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | $204,645 | $225,681 | $65,150 | $207,572 | $212,451 | $0 |
Residential real estate | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 1,071,713 | 1,108,286 | 153,570 | 1,055,232 | 608,943 | 20,535 |
- Jr lien | 224,957 | 293,638 | 119,224 | 254,291 | 238,679 | 305 |
| 1,501,315 | 1,627,605 | 337,944 | 1,517,095 | 1,060,073 | 20,840 |
| | | | | | |
No related allowance recorded | | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 48,385 | 62,498 | | 91,882 | 70,133 | 0 |
Commercial real estate | 1,735,982 | 2,305,028 | | 1,749,498 | 1,105,573 | 50,123 |
Residential real estate | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | 2,705,775 | 3,006,813 | | 2,630,926 | 1,587,592 | 87,720 |
- Jr lien | 154,839 | 154,918 | | 145,830 | 107,120 | 0 |
| 4,644,981 | 5,529,257 | | 4,618,136 | 2,870,418 | 137,843 |
| | | | | | |
| $6,146,296 | $7,156,862 | $337,944 | $6,135,231 | $3,930,491 | $158,683 |
(1) For the three months ended September 30, 2017
(2) For the nine months ended September 30, 2017
In the table above, recorded investment in impaired loans as of September 30, 2017 includes accrued interest receivable and deferred net loan costs of $20,822.
For all loan segments, the accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when the loan is delinquent 90 days and management believes, after considering collection efforts and other factors, that the borrower's financial condition is such that collection of interest is considered by management to be doubtful. Any unpaid interest previously accrued on those loans is reversed from income. Interest income is generally not recognized on specific impaired loans unless the likelihood of further loss is considered by management to be remote. Interest payments received on impaired loans are generally applied as a reduction of the loan principal balance. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are considered by management to be reasonably assured.
Credit Quality Grouping
In developing the ALL, management uses credit quality grouping to help evaluate trends in credit quality. The Company groups credit risk into Groups A, B and C. The manner the Company utilizes to assign risk grouping is driven by loan purpose. Commercial purpose loans are individually risk graded while the retail portion of the portfolio is generally grouped by delinquency pool.
Group A loans - Acceptable Risk – are loans that are expected to perform as agreed under their respective terms. Such loans carry a normal level of risk that does not require management attention beyond that warranted by the loan or loan relationship characteristics, such as loan size or relationship size. Group A loans include commercial purpose loans that are individually risk rated and retail loans that are rated by pool. Group A retail loans include performing consumer and residential real estate loans. Residential real estate loans are loans to individuals secured by 1-4 family homes, including first mortgages, home equity and home improvement loans. Loan balances fully secured by deposit accounts or that are fully guaranteed by the federal government are considered acceptable risk.
Group B loans – Management Involved - are loans that require greater attention than the acceptable risk loans in Group A. Characteristics of such loans may include, but are not limited to, borrowers that are experiencing negative operating trends such as reduced sales or margins, borrowers that have exposure to adverse market conditions such as increased competition or regulatory burden, or borrowers that have had unexpected or adverse changes in management. These loans have a greater likelihood of migrating to an unacceptable risk level if these characteristics are left unchecked. Group B is limited to commercial purpose loans that are individually risk rated.
Group C loans – Unacceptable Risk – are loans that have distinct shortcomings that require a greater degree of management attention. Examples of these shortcomings include a borrower's inadequate capacity to service debt, poor operating performance, or insolvency. These loans are more likely to result in repayment through collateral liquidation. Group C loans range from those that are likely to sustain some loss if the shortcomings are not corrected, to those for which loss is imminent and non-accrual treatment is warranted. Group C loans include individually rated commercial purpose loans and retail loans adversely rated in accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Uniform Retail Credit Classification Policy. Group C retail loans include 1-4 family residential real estate loans and home equity loans past due 90 days or more with loan-to-value ratios greater than 60%, home equity loans 90 days or more past due where the Bank does not hold first mortgage, irrespective of loan-to-value, loans in bankruptcy where repayment is likely but not yet established, and lastly consumer loans that are 90 days or more past due.
Commercial purpose loan ratings are assigned by the commercial account officer; for larger and more complex commercial loans, the credit rating is a collaborative assignment by the lender and the credit analyst. The credit risk rating is based on the borrower's expected performance, i.e., the likelihood that the borrower will be able to service its obligations in accordance with the loan terms. Credit risk ratings are meant to measure risk versus simply record history. Assessment of expected future payment performance requires consideration of numerous factors. While past performance is part of the overall evaluation, expected performance is based on an analysis of the borrower's financial strength, and historical and projected factors such as size and financing alternatives, capacity and cash flow, balance sheet and income statement trends, the quality and timeliness of financial reporting, and the quality of the borrower’s management. Other factors influencing the credit risk rating to a lesser degree include collateral coverage and control, guarantor strength and commitment, documentation, structure and covenants and industry conditions. There are uncertainties inherent in this process.
Credit risk ratings are dynamic and require updating whenever relevant information is received. The risk ratings of larger or more complex loans, and Group B and C rated loans, are assessed at the time of their respective annual reviews, during quarterly updates, in action plans or at any other time that relevant information warrants update. Lenders are required to make immediate disclosure to the Chief Credit Officer of any known increase in loan risk, even if considered temporary in nature.
The risk ratings within the loan portfolio, by segment, as of the balance sheet dates were as follows:
As of September 30, 2018
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Group A | $86,827,911 | $215,278,568 | $164,281,005 | $43,803,524 | $4,749,966 | $514,940,974 |
Group B | 81,835 | 472,925 | 247,891 | 33,515 | 0 | 836,166 |
Group C | 2,211,080 | 8,468,836 | 3,325,096 | 712,240 | 8,631 | 14,725,883 |
| $89,120,826 | $224,220,329 | $167,853,992 | $44,549,279 | $4,758,597 | $530,503,023 |
As of December 31, 2017
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Group A | $73,352,768 | $194,066,034 | $165,089,999 | $44,687,951 | $5,267,196 | $482,463,948 |
Group B | 617,526 | 4,609,847 | 282,671 | 37,598 | 0 | 5,547,642 |
Group C | 3,140,453 | 8,368,346 | 2,811,465 | 531,313 | 1,484 | 14,853,061 |
| $77,110,747 | $207,044,227 | $168,184,135 | $45,256,862 | $5,268,680 | $502,864,651 |
As of September 30, 2017
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Group A | $74,066,398 | $201,257,154 | $164,684,918 | $43,235,529 | $6,308,962 | $489,552,961 |
Group B | 277,046 | 877,021 | 0 | 154,942 | 0 | 1,309,009 |
Group C | 3,260,816 | 8,849,493 | 2,500,956 | 572,107 | 2,777 | 15,186,149 |
| $77,604,260 | $210,983,668 | $167,185,874 | $43,962,578 | $6,311,739 | $506,048,119 |
Modifications of Loans and TDRs
A loan is classified as a TDR if, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider.
The Company is deemed to have granted such a concession if it has modified a troubled loan in any of the following ways:
●
Reduced accrued interest;
●
Reduced the original contractual interest rate to a rate that is below the current market rate for the borrower;
●
Converted a variable-rate loan to a fixed-rate loan;
●
Extended the term of the loan beyond an insignificant delay;
●
Deferred or forgiven principal in an amount greater than three months of payments; or
●
Performed a refinancing and deferred or forgiven principal on the original loan.
An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in the amount of payments typically would not require the loan to be accounted for as a TDR. However, pursuant to regulatory guidance, any payment delay longer than three months is generally not considered insignificant. Management’s assessment of whether a concession has been granted also takes into account payments expected to be received from third parties, including third-party guarantors, provided that the third party has the ability to perform on the guarantee.
The Company’s TDRs are principally a result of extending loan repayment terms to relieve cash flow difficulties. The Company has only, on a limited basis, reduced interest rates for borrowers below the current market rate for the borrower. The Company has not forgiven principal or reduced accrued interest within the terms of original restructurings, nor has it converted variable rate terms to fixed rate terms. However, the Company evaluates each TDR situation on its own merits and does not foreclose the granting of any particular type of concession.
New TDRs, by portfolio segment, during the periods presented were as follows:
| Three months ended September 30, 2018 | | Nine months ended September 30, 2018 | |
| | | Pre- | | Post- | | | | Pre- | | Post- | |
| | | Modification | | Modification | | | | Modification | | Modification | |
| | | Outstanding | | Outstanding | | | | Outstanding | | Outstanding | |
| Number of | | Recorded | | Recorded | | Number of | | Recorded | | Recorded | |
| Contracts | | Investment | | Investment | | Contracts | | Investment | | Investment | |
Residential real estate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | | 1 | | $ | 49,108 | | $ | 50,814 | | | 8 | | $ | 947,671 | | $ | 1,054,280 | |
Year ended December 31, 2017 | | | Pre- | | Post- | |
| | | Modification | | Modification | |
| | | Outstanding | | Outstanding | |
| Number of | | Recorded | | Recorded | |
| Contracts | | Investment | | Investment | |
Residential real estate | | | | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | | 4 | | $ | 256,353 | | $ | 287,385 | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2017 | | Nine months ended September 30, 2017 | |
| | | Pre- | | Post- | | | | Pre- | | Post- | |
| | | Modification | | Modification | | | | Modification | | Modification | |
| | | Outstanding | | Outstanding | | | | Outstanding | | Outstanding | |
| Number of | | Recorded | | Recorded | | Number of | | Recorded | | Recorded | |
| Contracts | | Investment | | Investment | | Contracts | | Investment | | Investment | |
Residential real estate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- 1st lien | | 1 | | $ | 80,323 | | $ | 87,844 | | | 2 | | $ | 122,180 | | $ | 145,262 | |
The TDRs for which there was a payment default during the twelve month periods presented were as follows:
Twelve months ended September 30, 2018 | | |
| | |
| | |
Residential real estate – 1st lien | 3 | $479,652 |
Twelve months ended December 31, 2017 | | |
| | |
| | |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 1 | $87,696 |
Twelve months ended September 30, 2017 | | |
| | |
| | |
Residential real estate – 1st lien | 1 | $87,844 |
TDRs are treated as other impaired loans and carry individual specific reserves with respect to the calculation of the ALL. These loans are categorized as non-performing, may be past due, and are generally adversely risk rated. The TDRs that have defaulted under their restructured terms are generally in collection status and their reserve is typically calculated using the fair value of collateral method.
The specific allowances related to TDRs as of the balance sheet dates are presented in the table below.
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Specific Allocation | $142,767 | $197,605 | $216,939 |
As of the balance sheet dates, the Company evaluates whether it is contractually committed to lend additional funds to debtors with impaired, non-accrual or modified loans. The Company is contractually committed to lend on one SBA guaranteed line of credit to a borrower whose lending relationship was previously restructured.
Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
As a result of a merger with LyndonBank on December 31, 2007, the Company recorded goodwill amounting to $11,574,269. The goodwill is not amortizable and is not deductible for tax purposes.
The Company also initially recorded $4,161,000 of acquired identified intangible assets in the LyndonBank merger, representing the CDI which was subject to amortization as a non-interest expense over a ten year period and was fully amortized in 2017.
Management evaluates goodwill for impairment annually. As of the date of the most recent evaluation (December 31, 2017), management concluded that no impairment existed.
Note 7. Fair Value
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value to provide additional insight into the Company’s quality of earnings. The fair values of some of these assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis, with the determination based upon applicable existing accounting pronouncements. For example, securities AFS are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Other assets, such as MSRs, loans held-for-sale, impaired loans, and OREO are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis using the lower of cost or market methodology to determine impairment of individual assets. The Company groups assets and liabilities which are recorded at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement (with Level 1 considered highest and Level 3 considered lowest). A brief description of each level follows.
Level 1
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.
Level 2
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes MSRs, impaired loans and OREO.
Level 3
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value measurements and disclosures:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values. As such, the Company classifies these financial instruments as Level 1.
Securities AFS and HTM: Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar assets, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing models, or other model-based valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted prices such as yield curves, prepayment speeds and default rates. Level 1 securities would include U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 securities include federal agency securities and securities of local municipalities.
Restricted equity securities: Restricted equity securities are comprised primarily of FRBB stock and FHLBB stock. These securities are carried at cost, which is believed to approximate fair value, based on the redemption provisions of the FRBB and the FHLBB. The stock is nonmarketable, and redeemable at par value, subject to certain conditions. The Company classifies these securities as Level 2.
Loans and loans held-for-sale: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying amounts. The fair values for other loans (for example, fixed rate residential, CRE, and rental property mortgage loans, and commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics. Loan impairment is deemed to exist when full repayment of principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan is no longer probable. Impaired loans are reported based on one of three measures: the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; the loan’s observable market price; or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the fair value is less than an impaired loan’s recorded investment, an impairment loss is recognized as part of the ALL. Accordingly, certain impaired loans may be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Management has estimated the fair values of collateral-dependent loans using Level 2 inputs, such as the fair value of collateral based on independent third-party appraisals. All other loans are valued using Level 3 inputs.
The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based upon an actual purchase and sale agreement between the Company and an independent market participant. The sale is executed within a reasonable period following quarter end at the stated fair value.
MSRs: MSRs represent the value associated with servicing residential mortgage loans. Servicing assets and servicing liabilities are reported using the amortization method and compared to fair value for impairment. In evaluating the carrying values of MSRs, the Company obtains third party valuations based on loan level data including note rate, and the type and term of the underlying loans. The Company classifies MSRs as non-recurring Level 2. See Note 1 under the “Use of estimates” section to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s December 31, 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
OREO: Real estate acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure and bank properties no longer used as bank premises are initially recorded at fair value. The fair value of OREO is based on property appraisals and an analysis of similar properties currently available. The Company records OREO as non-recurring Level 2.
Deposits, repurchase agreements and borrowed funds: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (for example, checking accounts and savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying value of repurchase agreements approximates fair value due to their short term. The fair values for certificates of deposit and borrowed funds are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates and indebtedness to a schedule of aggregated contractual maturities on such time deposits and indebtedness. The Company classifies deposits, repurchase agreements and borrowed funds as Level 2.
Capital lease obligations: Fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow calculation using current rates. Based on current rates, carrying value approximates fair value. The Company classifies these obligations as Level 2.
Junior subordinated debentures: Fair value is estimated using current rates for debentures of similar maturity. The Company classifies these instruments as Level 2.
Accrued interest: The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values. The Company classifies accrued interest as Level 2.
Off-balance-sheet credit related instruments: Commitments to extend credit are evaluated and fair value is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit-worthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.
FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosures of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, if the fair values can be reasonably determined. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques using observable inputs when available. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Topic 825 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at the dates presented, segregated by fair value hierarchy, are summarized below. There were no Level 1 or Level 3 assets or liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of the balance sheet dates presented, nor were there any transfers of assets between Levels during 2018 or 2017.
Level 2 | | | |
Assets: (market approach) | | | |
U.S. GSE debt securities | $13,567,760 | $17,158,742 | $15,256,844 |
Agency MBS | 16,108,860 | 16,613,337 | 16,508,044 |
ABS and OAS | 1,966,868 | 0 | 0 |
Other investments | 7,283,895 | 4,678,574 | 4,954,785 |
| $38,927,383 | $38,450,653 | $36,719,673 |
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following table includes assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis that have had a fair value adjustment since their initial recognition. Impaired loans measured at fair value only include impaired loans with a related specific ALL and are presented net of specific allowances as disclosed in Note 5.
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at the dates presented, segregated by fair value hierarchy, are summarized below. There were no Level 1 or Level 3 assets or liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis as of the balance sheet dates presented, nor were there any transfers of assets between Levels during 2018 or 2017.
| | | |
Assets: (market approach) | | | |
MSRs (1) | $1,020,873 | $1,083,286 | $1,113,034 |
Impaired loans, net of related allowance | 129,043 | 135,630 | 0 |
OREO | 198,235 | 284,235 | 324,235 |
(1) Represents MSRs at lower of cost or fair value, including MSRs deemed to be impaired and for which a valuation allowance was established to carry at fair value as of the balance sheet dates presented.
The estimated fair values of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit were immaterial as of the dates presented in the tables below. The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments were as follows:
September 30, 2018 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |
Financial assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $40,398 | $40,398 | $0 | $0 | $40,398 |
Securities HTM | 50,802 | 0 | 50,960 | 0 | 50,960 |
Securities AFS | 38,927 | 0 | 38,927 | 0 | 38,927 |
Restricted equity securities | 1,745 | 0 | 1,745 | 0 | 1,745 |
Loans and loans held-for-sale, net of ALL | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 88,295 | 0 | 0 | 87,925 | 87,925 |
Commercial real estate | 221,306 | 0 | 0 | 218,670 | 218,670 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 166,842 | 0 | 0 | 163,511 | 163,511 |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 44,175 | 0 | 129 | 43,927 | 44,056 |
Consumer | 4,705 | 0 | 0 | 4,797 | 4,797 |
MSRs (1) | 1,021 | 0 | 1,438 | 0 | 1,438 |
Accrued interest receivable | 2,216 | 0 | 2,216 | 0 | 2,216 |
| | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | |
Deposits | | | | | |
Other deposits | 542,798 | 0 | 540,845 | 0 | 540,845 |
Brokered deposits | 42,687 | 0 | 42,627 | 0 | 42,627 |
Long-term borrowings | 1,550 | 0 | 1,403 | 0 | 1,403 |
Repurchase agreements | 30,679 | 0 | 30,679 | 0 | 30,679 |
Capital lease obligations | 296 | 0 | 296 | 0 | 296 |
Subordinated debentures | 12,887 | 0 | 12,808 | 0 | 12,808 |
Accrued interest payable | 145 | 0 | 145 | 0 | 145 |
(1) Reported fair value represents all MSRs for loans serviced by the Company at September 30, 2018, regardless of carrying amount.
December 31, 2017 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |
Financial assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $42,654 | $42,654 | $0 | $0 | $42,654 |
Securities HTM | 48,825 | 0 | 48,796 | 0 | 48,796 |
Securities AFS | 38,451 | 0 | 38,451 | 0 | 38,451 |
Restricted equity securities | 1,704 | 0 | 1,704 | 0 | 1,704 |
Loans and loans held-for-sale, net of ALL | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 76,394 | 0 | 0 | 76,799 | 76,799 |
Commercial real estate | 204,260 | 0 | 136 | 204,697 | 204,833 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 167,671 | 0 | 0 | 169,205 | 169,205 |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 44,916 | 0 | 0 | 45,207 | 45,207 |
Consumer | 5,223 | 0 | 0 | 5,425 | 5,425 |
MSRs(1) | 1,083 | 0 | 1,337 | 0 | 1,337 |
Accrued interest receivable | 2,052 | 0 | 2,052 | 0 | 2,052 |
| | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | |
Deposits | | | | | |
Other deposits | 509,686 | 0 | 508,407 | 0 | 508,407 |
Brokered deposits | 50,949 | 0 | 50,926 | 0 | 50,926 |
Long-term borrowings | 3,550 | 0 | 3,191 | 0 | 3,191 |
Repurchase agreements | 28,648 | 0 | 28,648 | 0 | 28,648 |
Capital lease obligations | 382 | 0 | 382 | 0 | 382 |
Subordinated debentures | 12,887 | 0 | 12,832 | 0 | 12,832 |
Accrued interest payable | 101 | 0 | 101 | 0 | 101 |
(1) Reported fair value represents all MSRs for loans serviced by the Company at December 31, 2017, regardless of carrying amount.
September 30, 2017 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |
Financial assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $29,720 | $29,720 | $0 | $0 | $29,720 |
Securities HTM | 53,882 | 0 | 54,571 | 0 | 54,571 |
Securities AFS | 36,720 | 0 | 36,720 | 0 | 36,720 |
Restricted equity securities | 1,700 | 0 | 1,700 | 0 | 1,700 |
Loans and loans held-for-sale, net of ALL | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 76,890 | 0 | 0 | 77,533 | 77,533 |
Commercial real estate | 208,232 | 0 | 0 | 209,648 | 209,648 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 166,366 | 0 | 0 | 168,903 | 168,903 |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 43,555 | 0 | 0 | 43,931 | 43,931 |
Consumer | 6,256 | 0 | 0 | 6,491 | 6,491 |
MSRs (1) | 1,113 | 0 | 1,289 | 0 | 1,289 |
Accrued interest receivable | 1,893 | 0 | 1,893 | 0 | 1,893 |
| | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | |
Deposits | | | | | |
Other deposits | 502,963 | 0 | 502,203 | 0 | 502,203 |
Brokered deposits | 53,789 | 0 | 53,786 | 0 | 53,786 |
Long-term borrowings | 3,550 | 0 | 3,219 | 0 | 3,219 |
Repurchase agreements | 27,459 | 0 | 27,459 | 0 | 27,459 |
Capital lease obligations | 409 | 0 | 409 | 0 | 409 |
Subordinated debentures | 12,887 | 0 | 12,844 | 0 | 12,844 |
Accrued interest payable | 109 | 0 | 109 | 0 | 109 |
(1) Reported fair value represents all MSRs for loans serviced by the Company at September 30, 2017, regardless of carrying amount.
Note 8. Loan Servicing
The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of the MSRs, included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, for the periods indicated:
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Balance at beginning of year | $1,083,286 | $1,210,695 | $1,210,695 |
MSRs capitalized | 74,415 | 109,297 | 82,686 |
MSRs amortized | (136,828) | (236,706) | (180,347) |
Balance at end of period | $1,020,873 | $1,083,286 | $1,113,034 |
There were no changes in the valuation allowance for the periods presented.
Note 9. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in litigation that is considered incidental to their business. Management does not expect that any such litigation will be material to the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Note 10. Subsequent Event
The Company has evaluated events and transactions through the date that the financial statements were issued for potential recognition or disclosure in these financial statements, as required by GAAP. On September 14, 2018, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per common share payable November 1, 2018 to shareholders of record as of October 15, 2018. This dividend has been recorded as of the declaration date, including shares issuable under the DRIP.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Period Ended September 30, 2018
The following discussion analyzes the consolidated financial condition of Community Bancorp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Community National Bank (the Bank), as of September 30, 2018, December 31, 2017, and September 30, 2017, and its consolidated results of operations for the three- and nine-month interim periods presented.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in its 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Capitalized terms, abbreviations and acronyms used throughout the following discussion are defined in Note 1 to the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding the results of operations, financial condition and business of the Company and its subsidiary. Words used in the discussion below such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "estimates," “projects”, "plans," “assumes”, "predicts," “may”, “might”, “will”, “could”, “should” and similar expressions, indicate that management of the Company is making forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They necessarily involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Examples of forward looking statements included in this discussion include, but are not limited to, estimated contingent liability related to assumptions made within the asset/liability management process, management's expectations as to the future interest rate environment and the Company's related liquidity level, credit risk expectations relating to the Company's loan portfolio and its participation in the FHLBB MPF program, and management's general outlook for the future performance of the Company or the local or national economy. Although forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations and estimates as of the date they are made, many of the factors that could influence or determine actual results are unpredictable and not within the Company's control.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities:
●
general economic or business conditions, either nationally, regionally or locally, deteriorate, resulting in a decline in credit quality or a diminished demand for the Company's products and services;
●
competitive pressures increase among financial service providers in the Company's northern New England market area or in the financial services industry generally, including competitive pressures from non-bank financial service providers, from increasing consolidation and integration of financial service providers, and from changes in technology and delivery systems;
●
interest rates change in such a way as to negatively affect the Company's net income, asset valuations or margins;
●
changes in laws or government rules, including the rules of the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the way in which courts or government agencies interpret or implement those laws or rules, increase our costs of doing business, causing us to limit or change our product offerings or pricing, or otherwise adversely affect the Company's business;
●
changes in federal or state tax laws or policy;
●
changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs;
●
changes in applicable accounting policies, practices and standards, including, without limitation, implementation of pending changes to the measurement of credit losses in financial statements under US GAAP pursuant to the CECL model;
●
changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and savings habits;
●
reductions in deposit levels, which necessitate increased borrowings to fund loans and investments;
●
the geographic concentration of the Company’s loan portfolio and deposit base;
●
losses due to the fraudulent or negligent conduct of third parties, including the Company’s service providers, customers and employees;
●
cybersecurity risks could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial performance or reputation and could result in financial liability for losses incurred by customers or others due to data breaches or other compromise of the Company’s information security systems;
●
higher-than-expected costs are incurred relating to information technology or difficulties arise in implementing technological enhancements;
●
changes to the calculation of the Company’s regulatory capital ratios which began in 2015 under the Basel III capital framework and which, among other things, requires additional regulatory capital, and changes the framework for risk-weighting of certain assets;
●
management’s risk management measures may not be completely effective;
●
changes in the United States monetary and fiscal policies, including the interest rate policies of the FRB and its regulation of the money supply; and
●
adverse changes in the credit rating of U.S. government debt.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements as they speak only as of the date they are made. The Company does not undertake, and disclaims any obligation, to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence or anticipated occurrence of events or circumstances after the date of this Report, except as required by applicable law. The Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Under SEC Regulation G, public companies making disclosures containing financial measures that are not in accordance with GAAP must also disclose, along with each non-GAAP financial measure, certain additional information, including a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the closest comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as a statement of the company’s reasons for utilizing the non-GAAP financial measure. The SEC has exempted from the definition of non-GAAP financial measures certain commonly used financial measures that are not based on GAAP. However, three non-GAAP financial measures commonly used by financial institutions, namely tax-equivalent net interest income and tax-equivalent net interest margin (as presented in the tables in the section labeled Interest Income Versus Interest Expense (Net Interest Income)) and core earnings (as defined and discussed in the Results of Operations section), have not been specifically exempted by the SEC, and may therefore constitute non-GAAP financial measures under Regulation G. We are unable to state with certainty whether the SEC would regard those measures as subject to Regulation G.
Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful in evaluating the Company’s financial performance and facilitate comparisons with the performance of other financial institutions. However, that information should be considered supplemental in nature and not as a substitute for related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
OVERVIEW
The Company’s consolidated assets on September 30, 2018 were $694,499,557, an increase of $27,453,962, or 4.1%, from December 31, 2017 and an increase of $32,960,486, or 5.0%, from September 30, 2017. Net loans increased $27,470,141, or 5.5%, since December 31, 2017 and $24,285,086, or 4.9%, since September 30, 2017. The year to date and year over year increases in the loan portfolio were primarily attributable to growth in commercial loans and were funded with both core deposits and an increase in borrowed funds. There were changes in both of the investment portfolios, with the HTM portfolio noting an increase of $1,976,867, or 4.1%, from December 31, 2017 and a decrease of $3,080,455, or 5.7%, from September 30, 2017, while the AFS portfolio increased $476,730, or 1.2% from December 31, 2017 and $2,207,710, or 6.0% from September 30, 2017.
Total deposits increased $24,849,742 or 4.4%, since December 31, 2017 with a notable increase in wholesale time deposits of $21,644,907, or 102.9%, and a decrease of $9,131,325, or 9.8%, in money market funds attributable primarily to seasonal fluctuation in municipal deposits. The increase in wholesale time deposits is predominantly due to the use of this funding source as an alternative to short term borrowing from the FHLBB. In the year over year comparison, deposits increased $28,732,402, or 5.2%, with significant increases noted for interest-bearing transactions accounts of $17,078,773, or 13.4%, and other time deposits of $14,781,931, or 13.5%.
Interest income increased $696,857, or 10.2%, for the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017, and $1,901,326, or 9.8%, for the first nine months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. Interest expense increased $423,953, or 53.3%, for the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017, and $747,288, or 32.8%, for the first nine months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in interest income year over year is due to the higher average loan balances, which exceeded the nine month comparison period by $20.4 million, or 4.1%, as well as the continued increases in short-term rates. While the increase in short-term rates is having a positive impact on interest income, it is also continuing to put upward pressure on interest rates paid on deposit accounts. During the first nine months of 2018, the increase in short-term rates, coupled with the increase in average interest-bearing deposit account balances, resulted in an increase in interest paid on deposit accounts of $592,380, or 34.2%, year over year.
Net interest income after the provision for loan losses improved by $212,904, or 3.6%, for the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017, and $1,034,038, or 6.2%, year over year, despite decreases in net spread of 15 bps and two bps, respectively. The charge to income for the provision for loan losses increased $60,000, or 40.0%, for the third quarter of 2018 and $120,000, or 26.7%, for the first nine months of 2018, compared to the same periods last year, in order to accommodate the continued increase in the loan portfolio. Please refer to the ALL and provisions discussion in the Credit Risk section for more information.
Net income for the third quarter of 2018 was $2,269,732, an increase of $476,783, or 26.6%, over net income of $1,792,949 for the third quarter of 2017. Net income for the first nine months of 2018 increased $1,548,250, or 32.9%, from $4,706,679 for 2017 to $6,254,929 for 2018. Net interest income contributed significantly to the Company’s increase in earnings in both periods. Increases in non-interest income of $93,546, or 6.5%, for the third quarter and $427,429, or 10.2%, for the first nine months of 2018 are also noted, while total non-interest expense increased slightly, by $32,216, or .7%, for the third quarter and $243,622, or 1.7%, for the first nine months of 2018. The increase in net income for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 20, 2018, also reflects the impact of the lower federal corporate tax rate under the 2017 Tax Act. Please refer to the Non-interest Income and Expense sections for more information.
On September 14, 2018, the Company's Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.19 per common share, payable on November 1, 2018 to shareholders of record on October 15, 2018.
There were two favorable legal developments during the second quarter of 2018 that management believes will help lighten the regulatory burden on community banks and other small public companies and will reduce the unproductive diversion of management resources resulting from excessive regulation. In May, Congress enacted the 2018 Regulatory Relief Act, which rolls back some of the regulatory excesses of the Dodd-Frank Act and contains provisions aimed specifically at relieving some of the regulatory burdens on community banks, including simplifying the calculation of regulatory capital. In addition, the SEC recently adopted regulations increasing the thresholds for companies to qualify as smaller reporting companies, which are permitted to utilize the SEC’s scaled disclosure requirements. The Company intends to avail itself of the opportunity to provide scaled disclosures where management and the Board deem it appropriate.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding the Company’s results of operations and financial condition because they require management to use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of the Company’s assets or liabilities and financial results, sometimes in material respects. These policies are considered by management to be critical because they require subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. The Company’s critical accounting policies govern:
● the ALL;
● OREO;
● valuation of residential MSRs;
● OTTI of investment securities; and
● the carrying value of goodwill.
These policies are described further in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” and in Note 1 (Significant Accounting Policies) to the audited consolidated financial statements. There were no material changes during the first nine months of 2018 in the Company’s critical accounting policies.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net income for the third quarter of 2018 was $2,269,732, or $0.44 per common share, compared to $1,792,949, or $0.35 per common share, for the same quarter of 2017. Net income for the first nine months of 2018 was $6,254,929, or $1.20 per common share, compared to $4,706,679, or $0.91 per common share, for 2017. Core earnings (net interest income) for the third quarter of 2018 increased $272,904, or 4.5%, compared to the same quarter in 2017, and $1,154,038, or 6.7%, year over year. The loan mix continued to shift in favor of higher yielding commercial loans, while the deposit mix experienced an increase in non-maturity deposits, both of which have benefitted the Company’s net interest income. Interest paid on deposits, which is the major component of total interest expense, increased $291,827, or 46.4%, for the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter of 2017, and $592,380, or 34.2%, year over year, reflecting the increases in short term rates and higher average interest-bearing deposit balances. The continuing increases in the prime rate also had an impact on the interest paid on the junior subordinated debentures, contributing to the increase in interest expense in both comparison periods. The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $210,000 for the third quarter of 2018 and $570,000 for the first nine months of 2018, compared to $150,000 and $450,000, respectively in 2017, reflecting the growth in the loan portfolio between periods.
Return on average assets, which is net income divided by average total assets, measures how effectively a corporation uses its assets to produce earnings. Return on average equity, which is net income divided by average shareholders' equity, measures how effectively a corporation uses its equity capital to produce earnings.
The following table shows these ratios annualized for the comparison periods.
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
Return on Average Assets | 1.38% | 1.09% |
Return on Average Equity | 14.99% | 12.53% |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
Return on Average Assets | 1.26% | 0.98% |
Return on Average Equity | 14.16% | 11.29% |
The following table summarizes the earnings performance and certain balance sheet data of the Company for the periods presented.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
Balance Sheet Data | | | |
Net loans | $525,215,344 | $497,745,203 | $500,930,258 |
Total assets | 694,499,557 | 667,045,595 | 661,539,071 |
Total deposits | 585,484,722 | 560,634,980 | 556,752,320 |
Borrowed funds | 1,550,000 | 3,550,000 | 3,550,000 |
Junior subordinated debentures | 12,887,000 | 12,887,000 | 12,887,000 |
Total liabilities | 633,607,642 | 609,109,741 | 604,318,331 |
Total shareholders' equity | 60,891,915 | 57,935,854 | 57,220,740 |
| | | |
Book value per common share outstanding | $11.42 | $10.84 | $10.73 |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
Operating Data | | |
Total interest income | $21,322,719 | $19,421,393 |
Total interest expense | 3,027,393 | 2,280,105 |
Net interest income | 18,295,326 | 17,141,288 |
| | |
Provision for loan losses | 570,000 | 450,000 |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 17,725,326 | 16,691,288 |
| | |
Non-interest income | 4,628,625 | 4,201,196 |
Non-interest expense | 14,709,424 | 14,465,802 |
Income before income taxes | 7,644,527 | 6,426,682 |
Applicable income tax expense(1) | 1,389,598 | 1,720,003 |
| | |
Net Income | $6,254,929 | $4,706,679 |
| | |
Per Common Share Data | | |
Earnings per common share (2) | $1.20 | $0.91 |
Dividends declared per common share | $0.55 | $0.51 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 5,131,654 | 5,077,473 |
Number of common shares outstanding, period end | 5,157,258 | 5,100,675 |
(1) Applicable income tax expense assumes a 21% and 34% tax rate for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2) Computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented.
INTEREST INCOME VERSUS INTEREST EXPENSE (NET INTEREST INCOME)
The largest component of the Company’s operating income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and other sources of funds (i.e., borrowings). The Company’s level of net interest income can fluctuate over time due to changes in the level and mix of earning assets and sources of funds (volume), and changes in the yield earned and costs of funds (rate). A portion of the Company’s income from municipal investments is not subject to income taxes. Because the proportion of tax-exempt items in the Company's portfolio varies from year-to-year, to improve comparability of information, the non-taxable income shown in the tables below has been converted to a tax equivalent basis. The Company’s corporate tax rate is 21% for 2018 and was 34% for previous years. Therefore, to equalize tax-free and taxable income in the comparison, we divide the tax-free income by 79% for 2018 and 66% for 2017, with the result that every tax-free dollar is equivalent to $1.27 and $1.52, in taxable income for the two periods, respectively.
The Company’s tax-exempt interest income of $330,962 and $332,102 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $953,606 and $992,831 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, was derived from municipal investments, which comprised the entire HTM portfolio of $50,801,832 at September 30, 2018, and $53,882,287 at September 30, 2017.
The following table shows the reconciliation between reported net interest income and tax equivalent, net interest income for the comparison periods presented.
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | |
Net interest income as presented | $6,296,877 | $6,023,973 |
Effect of tax-exempt income | 87,978 | 171,083 |
Net interest income, tax equivalent | $6,384,855 | $6,195,056 |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | |
Net interest income as presented | $18,295,326 | $17,141,288 |
Effect of tax-exempt income | 253,490 | 511,458 |
Net interest income, tax equivalent | $18,548,816 | $17,652,746 |
The following tables present average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities supporting earning assets. Interest income (excluding interest on non-accrual loans) is expressed on a tax equivalent basis, both in dollars and as a rate/yield for the comparison periods presented, utilizing an effective tax rate of 21% for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 34% for the 2017 comparison periods.
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Interest-Earning Assets | | | | | | |
Loans (1) | $530,888,833 | $6,835,452 | 5.11% | $506,853,347 | $6,244,899 | 4.89% |
Taxable investment securities | 37,311,866 | 228,497 | 2.43% | 35,519,175 | 171,880 | 1.92% |
Tax-exempt investment securities | 49,106,752 | 418,939 | 3.38% | 49,608,712 | 503,185 | 4.02% |
Sweep and interest-earning accounts | 15,736,866 | 85,524 | 2.13% | 10,355,461 | 29,964 | 1.15% |
Other investments (2) | 2,516,383 | 36,587 | 5.95% | 2,195,121 | 41,320 | 7.47% |
| $635,560,700 | $7,604,999 | 4.75% | $604,531,816 | $6,991,248 | 4.59% |
| | | | | | |
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | $129,329,266 | $165,856 | 0.51% | $115,801,161 | $91,951 | 0.32% |
Money market accounts | 84,309,511 | 283,388 | 1.33% | 84,791,867 | 187,889 | 0.88% |
Savings deposits | 100,816,941 | 35,870 | 0.14% | 99,061,882 | 32,277 | 0.13% |
Time deposits | 130,792,374 | 435,247 | 1.32% | 133,068,701 | 316,417 | 0.94% |
Borrowed funds | 11,699,457 | 58,759 | 1.99% | 4,535,815 | 3,644 | 0.32% |
Repurchase agreements | 30,096,655 | 60,049 | 0.79% | 27,263,645 | 20,564 | 0.30% |
Capital lease obligations | 306,646 | 6,315 | 8.24% | 418,393 | 8,569 | 8.19% |
Junior subordinated debentures | 12,887,000 | 174,661 | 5.38% | 12,887,000 | 134,881 | 4.15% |
| $500,237,850 | $1,220,145 | 0.97% | $477,828,464 | $796,192 | 0.66% |
| | | | | | |
Net interest income | | $6,384,854 | | | $6,195,056 | |
Net interest spread (3) | | | 3.78% | | | 3.93% |
Net interest margin (4) | | | 3.99% | | | 4.07% |
(1) Included in gross loans are non-accrual loans with an average balance of $4,185,018 and $2,596,724 for the three |
months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Loans are stated before deduction of unearned discount |
and ALL, less loans held-for-sale. |
(2) Included in other investments is the Company’s FHLBB Stock with an average balance of $1,167,654 and $1,219,971 |
for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and a dividend rate of approximately |
5.87% and 4.22%, respectively, per quarter. |
(3) Net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on average interest-earning assets and the average |
rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. |
(4) Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average earning assets. |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Interest-Earning Assets | | | | | | |
Loans (1) | $515,558,758 | $19,363,489 | 5.02% | $495,170,740 | $17,737,531 | 4.79% |
Taxable investment securities | 37,680,536 | 652,398 | 2.31% | 35,001,161 | 488,250 | 1.87% |
Tax-exempt investment securities | 48,169,647 | 1,207,096 | 3.35% | 51,924,841 | 1,504,289 | 3.87% |
Sweep and interest-earning accounts | 17,448,217 | 257,091 | 1.97% | 11,938,565 | 84,802 | 0.95% |
Other investments (2) | 2,287,439 | 96,135 | 5.62% | 2,545,091 | 117,979 | 6.20% |
| $621,144,597 | $21,576,209 | 4.64% | $596,580,398 | $19,932,851 | 4.47% |
| | | | | | |
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | $127,206,882 | $396,923 | 0.42% | $116,594,941 | $216,227 | 0.25% |
Money market accounts | 95,192,325 | 837,291 | 1.18% | 85,819,418 | 595,162 | 0.93% |
Savings deposits | 99,284,051 | 97,688 | 0.13% | 96,382,338 | 91,597 | 0.13% |
Time deposits | 118,247,883 | 994,910 | 1.12% | 125,015,108 | 831,446 | 0.89% |
Borrowed funds | 6,779,670 | 69,520 | 1.37% | 12,140,165 | 65,311 | 0.72% |
Repurchase agreements | 30,395,047 | 128,896 | 0.57% | 28,768,193 | 64,326 | 0.30% |
Capital lease obligations | 334,817 | 20,679 | 8.23% | 442,977 | 27,181 | 8.18% |
Junior subordinated debentures | 12,887,000 | 481,486 | 5.00% | 12,887,000 | 388,855 | 4.03% |
| $490,327,675 | $3,027,393 | 0.83% | $478,050,140 | $2,280,105 | 0.64% |
| | | | | | |
Net interest income | | $18,548,816 | | | $17,652,746 | |
Net interest spread (3) | | | 3.81% | | | 3.83% |
Net interest margin (4) | | | 3.99% | | | 3.96% |
(1) Included in gross loans are non-accrual loans with an average balance of $3,917,1283 and $2,565,181 for the nine |
months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Loans are stated before deduction of unearned discount |
and ALL, less loans held-for-sale. |
(2) Included in other investments is the Company’s FHLBB Stock with average balances of $1,246,025 and $1,569,941 |
respectively, and a dividend rate of approximately 5.92% and 4.19%, respectively, for the first nine months of |
2018 and 2017, respectively. |
(3) Net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on average interest-earning assets and the average |
rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. |
(4) Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average earning assets. |
The average volume of interest-earning assets for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 increased 5.1% and 4.1%, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Average yield on interest-earning assets for the third quarter increased 16 bps, to 4.75%, compared to 4.59% for the same period last year, and increased 17 bps for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, to 4.64%, from 4.47% for the same period last year.
The average volume of loans increased over the three- and nine-month comparison periods of 2018 versus 2017, by 4.7% and 4.1%, respectively, while the average yield on loans increased 22 bps for the third quarter, to 5.11%, compared to 4.89% for the third quarter of 2017, and 23 bps for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, to 5.02%, from 4.79% for the same period in 2017. These increases reflected a combination of the steadily increasing federal funds rate over the periods noted, and a shift in asset mix toward commercial loans; however, this has been partially offset by continued pressure on medium term (5-10 year) fixed rates. Interest earned on the loan portfolio as a percentage of total interest income increased slightly in both comparison periods, comprising 89.9% and 89.7% for the three- and nine-month comparison periods of 2018, versus 89.3% and 89.0%, respectively, for the comparison periods last year.
The average volume of the taxable investment portfolio (classified as AFS) increased 5.1% during the third quarter of 2018 and 7.7% year to date, compared to the same periods last year. These increases are due primarily to management’s continued effort to incrementally grow the investment portfolio as the balance sheet grows in order to provide additional liquidity and pledge quality assets. Average yields on the taxable investment portfolio increased 51 bps and 44 bps, respectively, during the three- and nine-month periods of 2018 compared to the same periods last year, due primarily to rising market rates, as the mix of the portfolio remained relatively stable. The average volume of the tax-exempt portfolio (classified as HTM and consisting entirely of municipal securities) decreased 1.0% during the third quarter of 2018 and 7.2% year to date, compared to the same periods last year, as competitive pressures for municipal loan and deposit relationships increase and market pricing has not yet fully reflected the effect of lower federal tax rates under the 2017 Tax Act. The average tax-equivalent yield on the tax-exempt portfolio decreased 64 bps during the third quarter of 2018, and 52 bps for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods last year, due to the effect of the lower tax rate on the existing tax-exempt portfolio.
The average volume of sweep and interest-earning accounts, which consists primarily of an interest-bearing account at the FRBB and two correspondent banks, increased 52.0% during the three-month period and 46.2% during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods last year, and the average yield on these funds increased 98 bps and 102 bps, respectively. These increases in average volume are attributable to a higher balance of cash periodically held on hand in anticipation of funding loan growth and other liquidity needs. The increases in average rate are directly related to the increases in the federal funds rate.
The average volume of interest-bearing liabilities for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 increased 4.7% and 2.6%, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased 31 bps during the third quarter of 2018 and 19 bps during the first nine months of 2018, compared to the same periods last year, reflecting the rising rate environment and competitive pressures in deposit pricing.
The average volume of interest-bearing transaction accounts increased 11.7% and 9.1%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2018, compared to the same periods last year, and the average rate paid on these accounts increased 19 bps and 17 bps, respectively. The average volume of money market accounts decreased 0.6% during the three-month period, while increasing 10.9% during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in 2017, and the average rate paid on these deposits increased 45 bps and 25 bps, respectively. The average volume of savings accounts increased 1.8% for the three-month period and 3.0% for the nine-month period of 2018 versus 2017. Some of the increase is due to the continued shift in product mix from retail time deposits to savings accounts as consumers anticipate higher rates in the near future. Following the most recent increase in short term rates, there has been more pressure for higher rates from the more rate sensitive deposit holders and the local market is now showing signs of a willingness to pay higher rates on deposit products. The brokered deposit market is still considered a beneficial source of funding to help smooth out the fluctuations in core deposit balances without the need to disrupt deposit pricing in the Company’s local markets. These funds can be obtained relatively quickly on an as-needed basis, making them a valuable alternative to traditional term borrowings from the FHLBB.
The average volume of borrowed funds increased $7,163,642, or 157.9%, and decreased $5,381,405, or 44.2%, respectively, for the three- and nine-month periods of 2018 versus the 2017 comparison periods. The average rate paid on these borrowings increased 167 bps for the three-month period, and 65 bps for the nine-month period in 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017. The increase in the average rate paid is attributable in part to an increase in the average volume of overnight funds during the three-month comparison period of 2018. In addition, the average volume of repurchase agreements increased 10.4% and 5.7%, respectively, for three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods in 2017, while the average rate paid on repurchase agreements increased 49 bps and 27 bps, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017.
Between the three-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the average yield on interest-earning assets increased 16 bps, while the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased 31 bps. Between the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the average yield on interest-earning assets increased 17 bps, while the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased 19 bps. Net interest spread for the third quarter of 2018 was 3.78%, a decrease of 15 bps from 3.93% for the same period in 2017, and 3.81% for the first nine months of 2018, a decrease of two bps, from 3.83% for the same period last year. Net interest margin decreased eight bps during the third quarter of 2018 compared to the third quarter of 2017, while increasing three bps during the nine-month comparison periods of 2018 and 2017.
The following table summarizes the variances in interest income and interest expense on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the periods presented for 2018 and 2017 resulting from volume changes in average assets and average liabilities and fluctuations in average rates earned and paid.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Average Interest-Earning Assets | | | | | | |
Loans | $294,304 | $296,249 | $590,553 | $895,525 | $730,433 | $1,625,958 |
Taxable investment securities | 47,941 | 8,676 | 56,617 | 126,673 | 37,475 | 164,148 |
Tax-exempt investment securities | (79,969) | (4,276) | (84,246) | (203,102) | (94,091) | (297,193) |
Sweep and interest-earning accounts | 38,836 | 15,599 | 55,560 | 133,140 | 39,149 | 172,289 |
Other investments | (9,657) | 6,049 | (4,733) | (11,014) | (10,830) | (21,844) |
| $291,455 | $322,297 | $613,751 | $941,222 | $702,136 | $1,643,358 |
| | | | | | |
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | $62,994 | $10,911 | $73,905 | $160,853 | $19,843 | $180,696 |
Money market accounts | 97,116 | (1,617) | 95,499 | 176,932 | 65,197 | 242,129 |
Savings deposits | 3,018 | 575 | 3,593 | 3,270 | 2,821 | 6,091 |
Time deposits | 126,404 | (7,574) | 118,830 | 220,153 | (56,689) | 163,464 |
Borrowed funds | 49,337 | 5,778 | 55,115 | 59,137 | (54,928) | 4,209 |
Repurchase agreements | 37,343 | 2,142 | 39,485 | 60,920 | 3,650 | 64,570 |
Capital lease obligations | 67 | (2,321) | (2,254) | 156 | (6,658) | (6,502) |
Junior subordinated debentures | 39,780 | 0 | 39,780 | 92,631 | 0 | 92,631 |
| $416,059 | $7,894 | $423,953 | $774,052 | $(26,764) | $747,288 |
| | | | | | |
Changes in net interest income | $(124,604) | $314,403 | $189,798 | $167,170 | $728,900 | $896,070 |
(1) Items which have shown a year-to-year increase in volume have variances allocated as follows: |
Variance due to rate = Change in rate x new volume |
Variance due to volume = Change in volume x old rate |
Items which have shown a year-to-year decrease in volume have variances allocated as follows: |
Variance due to rate = Change in rate x old volume |
Variances due to volume = Change in volume x new rate |
|
(2) Tax equivalent interest income is calculated utilizing an effective tax rate of 21% for 2018 and 34% for 2017. |
NON-INTEREST INCOME AND NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Non-interest Income
The components of non-interest income for the periods presented are as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Service fees | $820,956 | $773,419 | $47,537 | 6.15% | $2,401,769 | $2,293,773 | $107,996 | 4.71% |
Income from sold loans | 212,105 | 185,844 | 26,261 | 14.13% | 586,434 | 560,210 | 26,224 | 4.68% |
Other income from loans | 232,485 | 222,026 | 10,459 | 4.71% | 643,107 | 616,931 | 26,176 | 4.24% |
Net realized (loss) gain on sale of securities AFS | (9,741) | 1,246 | (10,987) | -881.78% | (19,977) | 4,647 | (24,624) | -529.89% |
Other income | | | | | | | | |
Income from CFSG Partners | 159,000 | 116,059 | 42,941 | 37.00% | 429,786 | 314,573 | 115,213 | 36.63% |
SERP fair value adjustment | 0 | (2,179) | 2,179 | -100.00% | 0 | 45,312 | (45,312) | -100.00% |
Rental income | 2,428 | 15,625 | (13,197) | -84.46% | 27,937 | 46,466 | (18,529) | -39.88% |
Gain on sale of property | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% | 263,118 | 0 | 263,118 | 100.00% |
Other miscellaneous income | 127,988 | 152,832 | (24,844) | -16.26% | 324,388 | 365,750 | (41,362) | -11.31% |
Total non-interest income | $1,542,793 | $1,449,247 | $93,546 | 6.45% | $4,628,625 | $4,201,196 | $427,429 | 10.17% |
Total non-interest income increased $93,546, or 6.5%, for the third quarter of 2018 and $427,429, or 10.2%, for the first nine months of 2018 versus the same periods in 2017, with significant changes noted in the following:
●
Service fees on deposit accounts increased $47,537, or 6.2%, for the third quarter and $107,996, or 4.7%, year over year due primarily to an increase in fee income from interchange income and overdraft charges.
●
A realized loss on sale of securities AFS of $9,741 for the third quarter of 2018 and $19,977 for the first nine months of 2018, compared to realized gains of $1,246 and $4,647, respectively, for the same periods in 2017 are the result of sales of low-yielding, short-duration securities held in the Company’s AFS portfolio which were replaced with higher-yielding investments available in the current market. Management expects that the higher interest income earned by the replacement securities will quickly recover any realized losses.
●
Income from CFSG Partners increased $42,941, or 37.0%, for the third quarter and $115,213, or 36.6%, year over year due to an increase in fee income, which is generally based on the market value of assets under management.
●
There were SERP fair value adjustments of $2,179 for the third quarter and $45,312 for the first nine months of 2017, with none during 2018. The final payment of SERP benefits to the last participant was made on July 1, 2017 and the related asset was liquidated shortly thereafter.
●
Rental income decreased $13,197, or 84.5%, for the third quarter and $18,529, or 39.9%, year over year due to the sale of the office condominium unit to CFSG.
●
Gain on sale of property of $263,118 during the first nine months of 2018 was directly related to the sale of an office condominium unit to the Company’s affiliate, CFSG, during the second quarter. Prior to the sale, CFSG had rented this unit from the Company since its formation in 2002.
Non-interest Expense
The components of non-interest expense for the periods presented are as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Salaries and wages | $1,730,386 | $1,653,751 | $76,635 | 4.63% | $5,260,388 | $5,068,626 | $191,762 | 3.78% |
Employee benefits | 695,735 | 682,944 | 12,791 | 1.87% | 2,092,039 | 2,016,923 | 75,116 | 3.72% |
Occupancy expenses, net | 629,389 | 614,817 | 14,572 | 2.37% | 1,961,859 | 1,963,543 | (1,684) | -0.09% |
Other expenses | | | | | | | | |
Service contracts - administrative | 133,177 | 116,863 | 16,314 | 13.96% | 380,338 | 313,526 | 66,812 | 21.31% |
Marketing expense | 138,501 | 135,498 | 3,003 | 2.22% | 415,503 | 382,996 | 32,507 | 8.49% |
Audit Fees | 95,751 | 73,774 | 21,977 | 29.79% | 299,128 | 259,764 | 39,364 | 15.15% |
Consultant services | 59,368 | 61,113 | (1,745) | -2.86% | 202,604 | 162,935 | 39,669 | 24.35% |
Collection & non-accruing loan expense | 25,755 | 15,455 | 10,300 | 66.65% | 119,254 | 36,165 | 83,089 | 229.75% |
Amortization of CDI | 0 | 68,175 | (68,175) | -100.00% | 0 | 204,525 | (204,525) | -100.00% |
Other miscellaneous expenses | 1,366,270 | 1,419,726 | (53,456) | -3.77% | 3,978,311 | 4,056,799 | (78,488) | -1.93% |
Total non-interest expense | $4,874,332 | $4,842,116 | $32,216 | 0.67% | $14,709,424 | $14,465,802 | $243,622 | 1.68% |
Total non-interest expense increased $32,216, or 0.7%, for the third quarter of 2018 and $243,622, or 1.7%, for the first nine months of 2018, compared to the same periods in 2017 with significant changes noted in the following:
●
Salaries and wages increased $76,635, or 4.6%, for the third quarter and $191,762, or 3.8%, year over year. These increases were mostly due to a one-time bonus paid to all employees, except the executive officers, as well as a $0.25 increase per hour to all employees, other than the executive officers. The bonus was paid, and the increase was effective, in September 2018.
●
Employee benefits increased $12,791, or 1.9%, for the third quarter and $75,116, or 3.7%, year over year due to increases in the cost of the employee health insurance plan.
●
Service contracts – administrative increased $16,314 or 14.0% for the third quarter of 2018 and $66,812, or 21.3%, year over year due to the increasing cost to support information technology and branch infrastructure.
●
Marketing expense increased $3,003, or 2.2%, for the third quarter and $32,507, or 8.5%, year over year due to the Company’s strategic decision to enhance marketing efforts, including a shift to television ads from paper and radio and marketing efforts to promote strategic initiatives.
●
Audit fees increased $21,977, or 29.8%, for the third quarter and $39,364, or 15.2%, year over year due to increased audit requirements on internal control over financial reporting as the Company transitioned to accelerated filer status for SEC reporting purposes.
●
Consultant services decreased $1,745, or 2.9%, for the third quarter while increasing $39,669, or 24.4%, year over year, mostly due to a contract with a consultant for technology related projects.
●
Collection & non-accruing loan expense increased $10,300, or 66.7%, for the third quarter and $83,089, or 229.8%, year over year. Expenses on non-performing loans are increasing due to the length of time it takes to go through the foreclosure process, contributing to the increase in both periods. The variance year over year is due primarily to non-recurring recovery of expenses of approximately $30,000 in the first quarter of 2017 compared to none in 2018.
●
The CDI from the 2007 acquisition of LyndonBank was fully amortized in 2017, accounting for the absence of a CDI amortization expense during 2018, compared to an expense of $68,175 and $204,525 for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, respectively.
APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes decreased in both periods, by $202,549, or 29.4%, to $485,606 for the third quarter of 2018 compared to $688,155 for the same period in 2017, and $330,405, or 19.2%, to $1,389,598 for the first nine months of 2018 compared to $1,720,003 for the same period in 2017. This decrease is due primarily to a decrease in the corporate tax rate from 34% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, resulting from passage of the 2017 Tax Act. Income before taxes increased $274,234, or 11.1%, for the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017, and $1,217,845, or 19.0%, for the first nine months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. Tax credits related to limited partnerships amounted to $100,140 and $106,599, respectively, for the third quarters of 2018 and 2017, and $300,420 and $319,797, respectively, for the first nine months of 2018 compared to 2017.
Amortization expense related to limited partnership investments is included as a component of income tax expense and amounted to $94,371 and $105,414, respectively, for the third quarter of 2018 and 2017, and $283,113 and $316,242 for the first nine months of 2018 and 2017, respectively. These investments provide tax benefits, including tax credits, and are designed to provide a targeted effective yield between 7% and 10%.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
The following table reflects the composition of the Company's major categories of assets and liabilities as a percentage of total assets or liabilities and shareholders’ equity, as the case may be, as of the dates indicated:
| | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Loans | $530,503,023 | 76.39% | $502,864,651 | 75.39% | $506,048,119 | 76.50% |
Securities AFS | 38,927,383 | 5.61% | 38,450,653 | 5.76% | 36,719,673 | 5.55% |
Securities HTM | 50,801,832 | 7.31% | 48,824,965 | 7.32% | 53,882,287 | 8.14% |
| | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | 117,735,114 | 16.95% | 117,245,565 | 17.58% | 115,930,899 | 17.52% |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | 144,505,290 | 20.81% | 132,633,533 | 19.88% | 127,426,517 | 19.26% |
Money market accounts | 84,260,680 | 12.13% | 93,392,005 | 14.00% | 85,947,545 | 12.99% |
Savings deposits | 98,664,688 | 14.21% | 97,516,284 | 14.62% | 99,439,616 | 15.03% |
Time deposits | 140,318,950 | 20.20% | 119,847,593 | 17.97% | 128,007,743 | 19.35% |
Long-term advances | 1,550,000 | 0.22% | 3,550,000 | 0.53% | 3,550,000 | 0.54% |
The Company's total loan portfolio at September 30, 2018 increased $27,638,372, or 5.5%, from December 31, 2017 and $24,454,904, or 4.8%, year over year. AFS securities increased $476,730 or 1.2%, year to date, and $2,207,710, or 6.0%, year over year. As assets have grown, management has sought to increase the AFS portfolio in order to maintain its size proportional to the overall asset base, as this portfolio serves an important role in the Company’s liquidity position. HTM securities increased $1,976,867 or 4.1%, year to date, while decreasing $3,080,455, or 5.7%, year over year. HTM securities consist entirely of investments from the Company’s municipal customers in its service areas. The moderate increase from year end 2017 and the decrease at September 30, 2018 compared to September 30, 2017 reflects the increasing competition for municipal relationships in our market.
Total deposits increased $24,849,742, or 4.4%, from December 31, 2017 to September 30, 2018, and $28,732,402, or 5.2%, year over year. Demand deposits increased $489,549, or 0.4%, year to date and $1,804,215, or 1.6%, year over year. Business checking accounts account for most of the fluctuations in balances with an increase in balances of $1,772,565 year to date, and an increase of $4,077,065 year over year. With the improving economy, the Company is seeing growth in the business customer base and improvements in financial health of existing business customers. Interest-bearing transaction accounts increased $11,871,757, or 9.0%, from December 31, 2017 and $17,078,773, or 13.4%, year over year. Interest-bearing DDAs are made up of both business and consumer accounts, and account for a good portion of the increase with increases of $6,388,305, or 10.1%, year to date and $3,793,684, or 5.7%, year over year. ICS DDAs increased $5,031,113 or 50.6%, year to date and $6,866,096, or 84.6% year over year. Money market accounts decreased $9,131,325, or 9.8%, year to date, and $1,686,865, or 2.0%, year over year. The year to date decrease is attributable to the seasonal municipal deposit decline. Savings deposits increased $1,148,404, or 1.2%, year to date, while decreasing $774,928, or 0.8%, year over year. Time deposits increased $20,471,357, or 17.1%, year to date and $12,311,207, or 9.6%, year over year. These increases were primarily driven by increases in wholesale time deposits of $21,644,907 year to date and $14,743,812 year over year, offset in part by decreases in retail time deposits of $1,173,550 and $2,432,605, respectively. There were no overnight purchases for any of the periods presented, but there were outstanding long-term advances from the FHLBB of $1,550,000 at September 30, 2018 and $3,550,000 at December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section for a discussion on the change in long-term advances during 2018.
Interest Rate Risk and Asset and Liability Management - Management actively monitors and manages the Company’s interest rate risk exposure and attempts to structure the balance sheet to maximize net interest income while controlling its exposure to interest rate risk. The Company's ALCO is made up of the Executive Officers and certain Vice Presidents of the Bank representing major business lines. The ALCO formulates strategies to manage interest rate risk by evaluating the impact on earnings and capital of such factors as current interest rate forecasts and economic indicators, potential changes in such forecasts and indicators, liquidity and various business strategies. The ALCO meets at least quarterly to review financial statements, liquidity levels, yields and spreads to better understand, measure, monitor and control the Company’s interest rate risk. In the ALCO process, the committee members apply policy limits set forth in the Asset Liability, Liquidity and Investment policies approved and periodically reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors. The ALCO's methods for evaluating interest rate risk include an analysis of the effects of interest rate changes on net interest income and an analysis of the Company's interest rate sensitivity "gap", which provides a static analysis of the maturity and repricing characteristics of the entire balance sheet. The ALCO Policy also includes a contingency funding plan to help management prepare for unforeseen liquidity restrictions, including hypothetical severe liquidity crises.
Interest rate risk represents the sensitivity of earnings to changes in market interest rates. As interest rates change, the interest income and expense streams associated with the Company’s financial instruments also change, thereby impacting NII, the primary component of the Company’s earnings. Fluctuations in interest rates can also have an impact on liquidity. The ALCO uses an outside consultant to perform rate shock simulations to the Company's net interest income, as well as a variety of other analyses. It is the ALCO’s function to provide the assumptions used in the modeling process. Assumptions used in prior period simulation models are regularly tested by comparing projected NII with actual NII. The ALCO utilizes the results of the simulation model to quantify the estimated exposure of NII and liquidity to sustained interest rate changes. The simulation model captures the impact of changing interest rates on the interest income received and interest expense paid on all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected on the Company’s balance sheet. The model also simulates the balance sheet’s sensitivity to a prolonged flat rate environment. All rate scenarios are simulated assuming a parallel shift of the yield curve; however further simulations are performed utilizing non-parallel changes in the yield curve. The results of this sensitivity analysis are compared to the ALCO policy limits which specify a maximum tolerance level for NII exposure over a 1-year horizon, assuming no balance sheet growth, given a 200 bps shift upward and a 100 bps shift downward in interest rates.
Under the Company’s interest rate sensitivity modeling, with the continued asset sensitive balance sheet, in a rising rate environment, interest income is expected to trend upward as the short-term asset base (cash and adjustable rate loans) quickly cycle upward. However, as rates continue to rise, the cost of wholesale funds increases and pressure to increase rates paid on the retail funding base is increasing, putting pressure on NII and reducing the benefit to rising rates. In a falling rate environment, NII is expected to trend slightly downward compared with the current rate environment scenario for the first year of the simulation as asset yield erosion is not fully offset by decreasing funding costs. Thereafter, net interest income is projected to experience sustained downward pressure as funding costs reach their assumed floors and asset yields continue to reprice into the lower rate environment. The recent increases in the federal funds rate have generated a positive impact to the Company’s NII as variable rate loans reprice; however the behavior of the long end of the yield curve will also be very important to the Company’s margins going forward, as funding costs continue to rise and the long end remains relatively anchored.
The following table summarizes the estimated impact on the Company's NII over a twelve month period, assuming a gradual parallel shift of the yield curve beginning September 30, 2018:
| |
| |
Down 100 bps | -1.6% |
Up 200 bps | 2.0% |
The amounts shown in the table are well within the ALCO Policy limits. However, those amounts do not represent a forecast and should not be relied upon as indicative of future results. While assumptions used in the ALCO process, including the interest rate simulation analyses, are developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, and expected future conditions, the Company cannot provide any assurances as to the predictive nature of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.
Credit Risk - As a financial institution, one of the primary risks the Company manages is credit risk, the risk of loss stemming from borrowers’ failure to repay loans or inability to meet other contractual obligations. The Company’s Board of Directors prescribes policies for managing credit risk, including Loan, Appraisal and Environmental policies. These policies are supplemented by comprehensive underwriting standards and procedures. The Company maintains a Credit Administration department whose function includes credit analysis and monitoring of and reporting on the status of the loan portfolio, including delinquent and non-performing loan trends. The Company also monitors concentration of credit risk in a variety of areas, including portfolio mix, the level of loans to individual borrowers and their related interest, loans to industry segments, and the geographic distribution of commercial real estate loans. Loans are reviewed periodically by an independent loan review firm to help ensure accuracy of the Company's internal risk ratings and compliance with various internal policies, procedures and regulatory guidance.
Residential mortgages represent 40.0% of the Company’s loan balances; that level has been on a gradual decline in recent years, with a strategic shift to commercial lending. The Company maintains a mortgage loan portfolio of traditional mortgage products and does not engage in higher risk loans such as option adjustable rate mortgage products, high loan-to-value products, interest only mortgages, subprime loans and products with deeply discounted teaser rates. Residential mortgages with loan-to-values exceeding 80% are generally covered by PMI. A 90% loan-to-value residential mortgage product without PMI is only available to borrowers with excellent credit and low debt-to-income ratios and has not been widely originated. Junior lien home equity products make up 21.0% of the residential mortgage portfolio with maximum loan-to-value ratios (including prior liens) of 80%. The Company also originates some home equity loans greater than 80% under an insured loan program with stringent underwriting criteria.
Consistent with the strategic focus on commercial lending, commercial & industrial and CRE loan demand continued through 2017 and into 2018 with the funding of construction projects and draws on lines of credit. The increase in CRE loans during 2018 is being driven by a combination of construction draws and new CRE term loans, while the rise in commercial & industrial loan balances is being driven by new loans and lines of credit in addition to seasonal draws on existing commercial lines of credit. Commercial & industrial and CRE loans together comprised 59.1% of the Company’s loan portfolio at September 30, 2018, 56.5% at December 31, 2017 and 57.0% at September 30, 2017. The increase in the absolute and relative size of the commercial loan portfolio has also increased geographic diversification, with much of the growth in commercial loans occurring along the I-89 corridor from White River Junction through Chittenden County, outside the Company’s primary banking markets.
The following table reflects the composition of the Company's loan portfolio, by portfolio segment, as a percentage of total loans as of the dates indicated:
| | | |
| | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | $89,120,826 | 16.80% | $77,110,747 | 15.33% | $77,604,260 | 15.33% |
Commercial real estate | 224,220,329 | 42.26% | 207,044,227 | 41.17% | 210,983,668 | 41.69% |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 167,853,992 | 31.64% | 168,184,135 | 33.45% | 167,185,874 | 33.04% |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 44,549,279 | 8.40% | 45,256,862 | 9.00% | 43,962,578 | 8.69% |
Consumer | 4,758,597 | 0.90% | 5,268,680 | 1.05% | 6,311,739 | 1.25% |
Total loans | 530,503,023 | 100.00% | 502,864,651 | 100.00% | 506,048,119 | 100.00% |
Deduct (add): | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | 5,641,227 | | 5,438,099 | | 5,436,313 | |
Deferred net loan costs | (353,548) | | (318,651) | | (318,452) | |
Net loans | $525,215,344 | | $497,745,203 | | $500,930,258 | |
Risk in the Company’s commercial & industrial and CRE loan portfolios is mitigated in part by government guarantees issued by federal agencies such as the SBA and RD. At September 30, 2018, the Company had $28,112,585 in guaranteed loans with guaranteed balances of $21,208,209, compared to $25,457,081 in guaranteed loans with guaranteed balances of $19,101,965 at December 31, 2017 and $26,557,438 in guaranteed loans with guaranteed balances of $19,693,638 at September 30, 2017.
The Company works actively with customers early in the delinquency process to help them to avoid default and foreclosure. Commercial & industrial and CRE loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is deterioration in the financial position of the borrower, payment in full of principal and interest is not expected, and/or principal or interest has been in default for 90 days or more. However, such a loan need not be placed on non-accrual status if it is both well secured and in the process of collection. Residential mortgages and home equity loans are considered for non-accrual status at 90 days past due and are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The Company obtains current property appraisals or market value analyses and considers the cost to carry and sell collateral in order to assess the level of specific allocations required. Consumer loans are generally not placed in non-accrual but are charged off by the time they reach 120 days past due. When a loan is placed in non-accrual status, the Company reverses the accrued interest against current period income and discontinues the accrual of interest until the borrower clearly demonstrates the ability and intention to resume normal payments, typically demonstrated by regular timely payments for a period of not less than six months. Interest payments received on non-accrual or impaired loans are generally applied as a reduction of the loan book balance.
The Company’s non-performing assets increased $1,101,422, or 23.8%, during the first nine months of 2018. The increase is attributable primarily to a combination of several residential real estate loans and several commercial real estate loans moving into non-accrual status. Claims receivable on related government guarantees were $189,719 at September 30, 2018 compared to $6,771 at December 31, 2017 and $0 at September 30, 2017, with numerous RD and SBA claims settled and paid throughout 2017, and three new claims pending settlement in 2018. Non-performing loans as of September 30, 2018 carried RD and SBA guarantees totaling $384,082, compared to $59,617 at December 31, 2017 and $49,153 at September 30, 2017.
The following table reflects the composition of the Company's non-performing assets, by portfolio segment, as a percentage of total non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
| | | |
| | | | | | |
Loans past due 90 days or more | | | | | | |
and still accruing (1) | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | $0 | 0.00% | $0 | 0.00% | 15,011 | 0.39% |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 1,075,393 | 18.76% | 1,249,241 | 26.97% | 725,581 | 18.81% |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 103,298 | 1.80% | 0 | 0.00% | 64,292 | 1.67% |
Consumer | 8,631 | 0.15% | 1,484 | 0.03% | 2,777 | 0.07% |
| 1,187,322 | 20.71% | 1,250,725 | 27.00% | 807,661 | 20.94% |
| | | | | | |
Non-accrual loans (1) | | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 97,936 | 1.71% | 98,806 | 2.14% | 48,385 | 1.25% |
Commercial real estate | 1,869,717 | 32.61% | 1,065,385 | 23.00% | 714,720 | 18.53% |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 1,959,124 | 34.17% | 1,585,473 | 34.23% | 1,511,891 | 39.20% |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 420,624 | 7.34% | 346,912 | 7.49% | 450,192 | 11.67% |
| 4,347,401 | 75.83% | 3,096,576 | 66.86% | 2,725,188 | 70.65% |
| | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | 198,235 | 3.46% | 284,235 | 6.14% | 324,235 | 8.41% |
| | | | | | |
| $5,732,958 | 100.00% | $4,631,536 | 100.00% | $3,857,084 | 100.00% |
(1) No commercial & industrial loans were past due 90 days or more and no consumer loans were in non-accrual status as of the consolidated balance sheet dates presented. In accordance with Company policy, delinquent consumer loans are charged off at 120 days past due.
The Company’s OREO portfolio consisted of two commercial properties at September 30, 2018, compared to one residential and one commercial property at December 31, 2017 and one residential and one commercial property at September 30, 2017. The residential properties were acquired through the normal foreclosure process, while the Company took control of the commercial properties. All properties in the current OREO portfolio are listed for sale.
The Company’s TDRs are principally a result of extending loan repayment terms to relieve cash flow difficulties. The Company has only infrequently reduced interest rates below the current market rate. The Company has not forgiven principal or reduced accrued interest within the terms of original restructurings. Management evaluates each TDR situation on its own merits and does not foreclose the granting of any particular type of concession.
The non-performing assets in the table above include the following TDRs that were past due 90 days or more or in non-accrual status as of the dates presented:
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Commercial & industrial | 1 | $24,685 | 1 | $24,685 | 1 | $48,385 |
Commercial real estate | 4 | 476,194 | 3 | 531,117 | 2 | 329,149 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 11 | 1,010,232 | 7 | 412,134 | 7 | 343,519 |
| 16 | $1,511,111 | 11 | $967,937 | 10 | $721,053 |
The remaining TDRs were performing in accordance with their modified terms as of the dates presented and consisted of the following:
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | 1 | $104,439 | 2 | $308,460 | 5 | $1,291,887 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 50 | 2,834,574 | 54 | 2,837,572 | 53 | 2,811,263 |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 1 | 7,484 | 1 | 8,358 | 1 | 8,645 |
| 52 | $2,946,497 | 57 | $3,154,389 | 59 | $4,111,795 |
As of the balance sheet dates, the Company evaluates whether it is contractually committed to lend additional funds to debtors with impaired, non-accrual or modified loans. The Company is contractually committed to lend on one SBA guaranteed line of credit to a borrower whose lending relationship was previously restructured.
Allowance for loan losses and provisions - The Company maintains an ALL at a level that management believes is appropriate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the measurement date (See Note 5 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements). Although the Company, in establishing the ALL, considers the inherent losses in individual loans and pools of loans, the ALL is a general reserve available to absorb all credit losses in the loan portfolio. No part of the ALL is segregated to absorb losses from any particular loan or segment of loans.
When establishing the ALL each quarter, the Company applies a combination of historical loss factors and qualitative factors to loan segments, including residential first and junior lien mortgages, commercial real estate, commercial & industrial, and consumer loan portfolios. The Company applies numerous qualitative factors to each segment of the loan portfolio. Those factors include the levels of and trends in delinquencies and non-accrual loans, criticized and classified assets, volumes and terms of loans, and the impact of any loan policy changes. Experience, ability and depth of lending personnel, levels of policy and documentation exceptions, national and local economic trends, the competitive environment, and concentrations of credit are also factors considered.
Specific allocations to the ALL are made for certain impaired loans. Impaired loans include all troubled debt restructurings regardless of amount, and all loans to a borrower that in aggregate are greater than $100,000 and that are in non-accrual status. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due, including interest and principal, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company will review all the facts and circumstances surrounding non-accrual loans and on a case-by-case basis may consider loans below the threshold as impaired when such treatment is material to the financial statements. See Note 5 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for information on the recorded investment in impaired loans and their related allocations.
The following table summarizes the Company's loan loss experience for the periods presented:
| As of or Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | |
Loans outstanding, end of period | $530,503,023 | $506,048,119 |
Average loans outstanding during period | $515,558,758 | $495,170,740 |
Non-accruing loans, end of period | $4,347,401 | $2,725,188 |
Non-accruing loans, net of government guarantees | $3,963,319 | $2,676,035 |
| | |
Allowance, beginning of period | $5,438,099 | $5,278,445 |
Loans charged off: | | |
Commercial & industrial | (131,273) | 0 |
Commercial real estate | (124,645) | (160,207) |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | (79,025) | (88,833) |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | (36,174) | (15,311) |
Consumer loans | (110,715) | (99,617) |
Total loans charged off | (481,832) | (363,968) |
Recoveries: | | |
Commercial & industrial | 55,858 | 23,469 |
Commercial real estate | 0 | 231 |
Residential real estate - 1st lien | 26,511 | 14,838 |
Residential real estate - Jr lien | 935 | 180 |
Consumer loans | 31,656 | 33,118 |
Total recoveries | 114,960 | 71,836 |
Net loans charged off | (366,872) | (292,132) |
Provision charged to income | 570,000 | 450,000 |
Allowance, end of period | $5,641,227 | $5,436,313 |
| | |
Net charge offs to average loans outstanding | 0.071% | 0.059% |
Provision charged to income as a percent of average loans | 0.111% | 0.091% |
Allowance to average loans outstanding | 1.094% | 1.098% |
Allowance to non-accruing loans | 129.761% | 199.484% |
Allowance to non-accruing loans net of government guarantees | 142.336% | 203.148% |
The provision increased $120,000, or 26.7%, for the first nine months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. The higher 2018 budgeted provision level is intended to support continued growth in the Company’s loan portfolio and to compensate for loan charge off activity. The first quarter 2018 provision supported higher losses driven by one particular CRE charge off and two commercial loan relationship charge offs. The reserve requirement remained relatively unchanged with a reduction in specific reserves as a result of those charge offs, a drop in unguaranteed pooled loan balances at first quarter-end, along with improvement in some qualitative factor adjustments. Net charge off activity tapered off in the second quarter followed by net recoveries of $18,204 experienced in the third quarter. The third quarter provision was increased by $30,000 to $210,000 to support strong commercial and CRE loan growth, landing the year-to-date provision at $570,000. Specific reserves at $224,099 were up by $93,605 during the third quarter, but remain lower year-over-year. With qualitative factors seeing modest improvement during the third quarter and historical loss factors relatively unchanged, the increase to required reserves was driven by loan portfolio growth and the increase to specific reserves.
The Company has an experienced collections department that continues to work actively with borrowers to resolve problem loans and manage the OREO portfolio, and management continues to monitor the loan portfolio closely.
The third quarter ALL analysis shows the reserve balance of $5,641,227 at September 30, 2018 is appropriate in management’s view to cover losses that are probable and estimable, with an unallocated reserve of $243,192 compared to $267,551 at December 31, 2017, and $261,957 at September 30, 2017. The reserve balance and unallocated amount continue to be directionally consistent with the overall risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio and credit risk appetite. The portion of the ALL termed "unallocated" is established to absorb inherent losses that exist as of the measurement date although not specifically identified through management's process for estimating credit losses. While the ALL is described as consisting of separate allocated portions, the entire ALL is available to support loan losses, regardless of category. Unallocated reserves are considered by management to be appropriate in light of the Company’s continued growth strategy and shift in the portfolio from residential loans to commercial and commercial real estate loans and the risk associated with the relatively new, unseasoned loans in those portfolios. The appropriateness of the ALL is reviewed quarterly by the risk management committee of the Board and then presented to the full Board for approval.
Market Risk - In addition to credit risk in the Company’s loan portfolio and liquidity risk in its loan and deposit-taking operations, the Company’s business activities also generate market risk. Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Declining capital markets can result in fair value adjustments necessary to record decreases in the value of the investment portfolio for other-than-temporary-impairment. The Company does not have any market risk sensitive instruments acquired for trading purposes. The Company’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its lending and deposit taking activities. During recessionary periods, a declining housing market can result in an increase in loan loss reserves or ultimately an increase in foreclosures. Interest rate risk is directly related to the different maturities and repricing characteristics of interest-bearing assets and liabilities, as well as to loan prepayment risks, early withdrawal of time deposits, and the fact that the speed and magnitude of responses to interest rate changes vary by product. As discussed above under "Interest Rate Risk and Asset and Liability Management", the Company actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk through the ALCO process.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and risk-sharing commitments on certain sold loans. Such instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. During the first nine months of 2018, the Company did not engage in any activity that created any additional types of off-balance sheet risk.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Managing liquidity risk is essential to maintaining both depositor confidence and stability in earnings. Liquidity management refers to the ability of the Company to adequately cover fluctuations in assets and liabilities. Meeting loan demand (assets) and covering the withdrawal of deposit funds (liabilities) are two key components of the liquidity management process. The Company’s principal sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and securities, maturities of investment securities, sales of loans available-for-sale, and earnings and funds provided from operations. Maintaining a relatively stable funding base, which is achieved by diversifying funding sources, competitively pricing deposit products, and extending the contractual maturity of liabilities, reduces the Company’s exposure to rollover risk on deposits and limits reliance on volatile short-term borrowed funds. Short-term funding needs arise from declines in deposits or other funding sources and from funding requirements for loan commitments. The Company’s strategy is to fund assets to the maximum extent possible with core deposits that provide a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds.
The Company recognizes that, at times, when loan demand exceeds deposit growth or the Company has other liquidity demands, it may be desirable to utilize alternative sources of deposit funding to augment retail deposits and borrowings. One-way deposits acquired through the CDARS program provide an alternative funding source when needed. At September 30, 2018, the Company had one-way CDARS outstanding totaling $6,643,027 compared to $12,258,265 at December 31, 2017 and $17,906,763 at September 30, 2017. In addition, two-way (that is, reciprocal) CDARS deposits, as well as reciprocal ICS money market and demand deposits, allow the Company to provide FDIC deposit insurance to its customers in excess of account coverage limits by exchanging deposits with other participating FDIC-insured financial institutions. Until recently these reciprocal deposits were considered a form of brokered deposits, which are treated less favorably than other deposits for certain purposes; however, a provision of the 2018 Regulatory Relief Act provides that reciprocal deposits held by a well-capitalized and well managed bank are no longer classified as brokered deposits. At September 30, 2018, the Company reported $5,559,260 in reciprocal CDARS deposits, compared to $2,817,715 at December 31, 2017 and $2,809,923 at September 30, 2017. The balance in ICS reciprocal money market deposits was $16,762,409 at September 30, 2018, compared to $17,137,985 at December 31, 2017 and $14,920,480 at September 30, 2017, and the balance in ICS reciprocal demand deposits as of those dates was $14,982,191, $9,951,078 and $8,116,095, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2018 the Company issued two blocks of DTC Brokered CDs totaling $30,000,000, with maturities in January 2019 and August 2020. Wholesale deposit funding through DTC is another important source of liquidity that has proven both efficient, flexible and cost-effective when compared with other borrowing methods.
At September 30, 2018, December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, borrowing capacity of $108,646,608, $109,726,508 and $111,755,897, respectively, was available through the FHLBB, secured by the Company's qualifying loan portfolio (generally, residential mortgage and commercial loans), reduced by outstanding advances and by collateral pledges securing FHLBB letters of credit collateralizing public unit deposits. The Company also has an unsecured Federal Funds credit line with the FHLBB with an available balance of $500,000 and no outstanding advances during any of the respective comparison periods. Interest is chargeable at a rate determined daily, approximately 25 bps higher than the rate paid on federal funds sold.
The following table reflects the Company’s outstanding FHLBB advances against the respective lines as of the dates indicated:
| | | |
| | | |
Long-Term Advances(1) | | | |
FHLBB term advance, 0.00%, due February 26, 2021 | $350,000 | $350,000 | $350,000 |
FHLBB term advance, 0.00%, due November 22, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
FHLBB term advance, 0.00%, due June 09, 2022 | 0 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 |
FHLBB term advance, 0.00%, due September 22, 2023 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 |
| 1,550,000 | 3,550,000 | 3,550,000 |
| | | |
| $1,550,000 | $3,550,000 | $3,550,000 |
(1)
As of September 30, 2018, the Company had borrowed a total of $3,550,000 under the FHLBB’s JNE program, a program dedicated to supporting job growth and economic development throughout New England. The FHLBB is providing a subsidy, funded by the FHLBB’s earnings, to write down interest rates to zero percent on advances that finance qualifying loans to small businesses. JNE advances must support small business in New England that create and/or retain jobs, or otherwise contribute to overall economic development activities. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company repaid a $2 million advance because the “qualifying loan” did not close as intended.
The Company has a BIC arrangement with the FRBB secured by eligible commercial loans, commercial real estate loans and home equity loans, resulting in an available credit line of $52,451,587, $45,305,894, and $43,495,159, respectively, at September 30, 2018, December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017. Credit advances under this FRBB lending program are overnight advances with interest chargeable at the primary credit rate (generally referred to as the discount rate), currently 275 bps. The Company had no outstanding advances against this credit line during any of the periods presented.
The Company has unsecured lines of credit with three correspondent banks with aggregate available borrowing capacity totaling $12,500,000 as of the balance sheet dates presented in this quarterly report. There were no outstanding advances against any of these lines during any of the respective comparison periods.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase provide another funding source for the Company. At September 30, 2018, December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, the Company had outstanding repurchase agreement balances of $30,678,830, $28,647,848 and $27,458,927, respectively. These repurchase agreements mature and are repriced daily.
The following table illustrates the changes in shareholders' equity from December 31, 2017 to September 30, 2018, including a partial redemption of the Company’s Series A non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, effective March 31, 2018:
Balance at December 31, 2017 (book value $10.84 per common share) | $57,935,854 |
Net income | 6,254,929 |
Issuance of stock through the DRIP | 777,222 |
Redemption of preferred stock | (500,000) |
Dividends declared on common stock | (2,820,056) |
Dividends declared on preferred stock | (76,875) |
Unrealized loss on securities AFS during the period, net of tax | (679,159) |
Balance at September 30, 2018 (book value $11.42 per common share) | $60,891,915 |
The primary objective of the Company’s capital planning process is to balance appropriately the retention of capital to support operations and future growth, with the goal of providing shareholders an attractive return on their investment. To that end, management monitors capital retention and dividend policies on an ongoing basis.
As described in more detail in Note 20 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the caption “LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES” in the MD&A section of that report, the Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies pursuant to which they must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Beginning in 2016, an additional capital conservation buffer was added to the minimum requirements for capital adequacy purposes, subject to a three year phase-in period. The capital conservation buffer will be fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 at 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. A banking organization with a conservation buffer of less than 2.5% (or the required phase-in amount in years prior to 2019) is subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital conservation buffer was 5.93% and 5.81%, respectively, at September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, both the Company and the Bank exceeded the required capital conservation buffer of 1.25% and on a pro forma basis would be compliant with the fully phased-in capital conservation buffer requirement.
Under the 2018 Regulatory Relief Act, these capital requirements will be simplified for qualifying community banks and bank holding companies (that is, institutions with less than $10 billion in assets). The Act requires the federal banking regulators to develop a new CBLR set at between 8% and 10% of unweighted assets. The CBLR will be determined by dividing tangible equity capital by average total consolidated assets. If a community bank exceeds the CBLR threshold, it will be considered to have met the risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements that would otherwise apply, as well as any applicable “prompt correction action” capital requirements to be considered well capitalized.
As of September 30, 2018, the Bank was considered well capitalized under the regulatory capital framework for Prompt Corrective Action and the Company exceeded currently applicable consolidated regulatory guidelines for capital adequacy.
The following table shows the Company’s actual capital ratios and those of its subsidiary, as well as currently applicable regulatory capital requirements, as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| |
September 30, 2018 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Common equity tier 1 capital | | | | | | |
(to risk-weighted assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $63,158 | 12.78% | $22,235 | 4.50% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $62,472 | 12.66% | $22,210 | 4.50% | $32,081 | 6.50% |
| | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $63,158 | 12.78% | $29,646 | 6.00% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $62,472 | 12.66% | $29,614 | 6.00% | $39,485 | 8.00% |
| | | | | | |
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $68,843 | 13.93% | $39,528 | 8.00% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $68,157 | 13.81% | $39,485 | 8.00% | $49,356 | 10.00% |
| | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $63,158 | 9.45% | $26,734 | 4.00% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $62,472 | 9.35% | $26,714 | 4.00% | $33,392 | 5.00% |
| | | | | | |
December 31, 2017: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Common equity tier 1 capital | | | | | | |
(to risk-weighted assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $59,523 | 12.75% | $21,003 | 4.50% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $58,920 | 12.64% | $20,972 | 4.50% | $30,293 | 6.50% |
| | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $59,523 | 12.75% | $28,004 | 6.00% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $58,920 | 12.64% | $27,963 | 6.00% | $37,284 | 8.00% |
| | | | | | |
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $65,005 | 13.93% | $37,338 | 8.00% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $64,401 | 13.82% | $37,284 | 8.00% | $46,605 | 10.00% |
| | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) | | | | | | |
Company | $59,523 | 9.05% | $26,304 | 4.00% | N/A | N/A |
Bank | $58,920 | 8.97% | $26,279 | 4.00% | $32,849 | 5.00% |
(1) Applicable to banks, but not bank holding companies.
The Company's ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is largely dependent on the Bank's ability to pay dividends to the Company. In general, a national bank may not pay dividends that exceed net income for the current and preceding two years regardless of statutory restrictions, as a matter of regulatory policy, banks and bank holding companies should pay dividends only out of current earnings and only if, after paying such dividends, they remain adequately capitalized.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company's management of the credit, liquidity and market risk inherent in its business operations is discussed in Part 1, Item 2 of this report under the captions "CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION", “COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS” and “LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES”, which are incorporated herein by reference. Management does not believe that there have been any material changes in the nature or categories of the Company's risk exposures from those disclosed in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. As of September 30, 2018, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2018 were effective in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed in the reports it files with the Commission under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.
For this purpose, the term “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of the Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in litigation that is considered incidental to their business. Management does not expect that any such litigation will be material to the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The Risk Factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, continue to represent the most significant risks to the Company's future results of operations and financial condition.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information as to the purchases of the Company’s common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2018, by the Company or by any affiliated purchaser (as defined in SEC Rule 10b-18). During the monthly periods presented, the Company did not have any publicly announced repurchase plans or programs.
| | |
| | |
For the period: | | |
| | |
July 1 - July 31 | 0 | $0.00 |
August 1 - August 31 | 0 | 0.00 |
September 1 - September 30 | 1,830 | 18.75 |
Total | 1,830 | $18.75 |
(1) All 1,830 shares were purchased for the account of participants invested in the Company Stock Fund under the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan by or on behalf of the Plan Trustee, the Human Resources Committee of the Bank. Such share purchases were facilitated through CFSG, which provides certain investment advisory services to the Plan. Both the Plan Trustee and CFSG may be considered affiliates of the Company under Rule 10b-18.
(2) Shares purchased during the period do not include fractional shares repurchased from time to time in connection with the participant's election to discontinue participation in the Company's DRIP.
The following exhibits are filed with this report:
Exhibit 31.1 - Certification from the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 31.2 - Certification from the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 32.1 - Certification from the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* Exhibit 32.2 - Certification from the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
Exhibit 101--The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the unaudited consolidated balance sheets, (ii) the unaudited consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month interim periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, (iii) the unaudited consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iv) the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows and (v) related notes.
* This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMMUNITY BANCORP.
DATED: November 08, 2018 | /s/Kathryn M. Austin | |
| Kathryn M. Austin, President | |
| & Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| | |
| | |
DATED: November 08, 2018 | /s/Louise M. Bonvechio | |
| Louise M. Bonvechio, Corporate | |
| Secretary & Treasurer | |
| (Principal Financial Officer) | |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
[ x ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018
COMMUNITY BANCORP.
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Certification from the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| Certification from the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| Certification from the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
| |
| Certification from the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
| |
| |
Exhibit 101 | The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the unaudited consolidated balance sheets, (ii) the unaudited consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month interim periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, (iii) the unaudited consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iv) the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows and (v) related notes. |
* This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.