Organization and Description of Business and Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jan. 03, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Organization and Description Of Business [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Organization and Description of Business |
|
STAAR Surgical Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in 1982 for the purpose of developing, producing, and marketing intraocular lenses (“IOLs”) and other products for minimally invasive ophthalmic surgery. Principal products are IOLs and implantable Collamer lenses (“ICLs”). IOLs are prosthetic intraocular lenses used to restore vision that has been adversely affected by cataracts, and include the Company’s lines of silicone and Collamer IOLs and the Preloaded Injector (a silicone or acrylic IOL preloaded into a single-use disposable injector). ICLs, consisting of the Company’s ICL and Toric implantable collamer lenses (“TICL”), are intraocular lenses used to correct refractive conditions such as myopia (near-sightedness), hyperopia (far-sightedness) and astigmatism. |
|
As of January 3, 2014, the Company’s significant subsidiaries consisted of: |
|
| · | STAAR Surgical AG, a wholly owned subsidiary formed in Switzerland to develop, manufacture and distribute certain of the Company’s products worldwide including ICLs. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | STAAR Japan, a wholly owned subsidiary that markets and distributes Preloaded IOLs and ICLs. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company operates as one operating segment, the ophthalmic surgical market, for financial reporting purposes (see Note 16). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of STAAR Surgical and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fiscal Year and Interim Reporting Periods |
|
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Friday nearest December 31 and each of the Company’s quarterly reporting periods generally consists of 13 weeks. Fiscal year 2013 is based on a 53-week period, while fiscal years 2012 and 2011 are based on a 52-week period. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Foreign Currency |
|
The functional currency of the Company and its Japanese subsidiary is the local currency. The functional currency of the Company’s Swiss subsidiary, STAAR Surgical AG, is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at rates of exchange in effect at the close of the period. Sales and expenses are translated at the weighted average of exchange rates in effect during the period. The resulting translation gains and losses are deferred and are shown as a separate component in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss). During 2013 and 2012, the net foreign translation losses were $1,327,000 and $689,000, respectively, and in 2011 a net foreign translation gain of $211,000. Net foreign currency transaction gains, included in the consolidated statements of operations under other income (expense) were, $39,000, $111,000, and $86,000, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes revenue when realized or realizable and earned, which is when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred; the sale price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company records revenue from non-consignment product sales when title and risk of ownership has been transferred, which is typically at shipping point, except for the STAAR Japan subsidiary, which is typically recognized when the product is received by the customer. STAAR Japan does not have significant deferred revenues as of January 3, 2014 as delivery to the customer is generally made within the same or the next day of shipment. The Company presents sales tax it collects from its customers on a net basis (excluded from revenues). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company’s products are marketed to ophthalmic surgeons, hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers or vision centers, and distributors. IOLs may be offered to surgeons and hospitals on a consignment basis. The Company maintains title and risk of loss of consigned inventory and recognizes revenue for consignment inventory when the Company is notified that the IOL has been implanted. |
|
ICLs are sold only to certified surgeons who have completed requisite training or for use in scheduled training surgeries. As a result, STAAR partially mitigates the risk that the revenue it recognizes on shipment of ICLs would need to be reversed because of a surgeon’s failure to qualify for its use. |
|
The Company sells certain injector parts to an unrelated customer and supplier (collectively referred to as “supplier”) whereby these injector part sales are either made as a final sale to the supplier or, are sold to be reprocessed by the supplier into finished goods inventory (a preloaded acrylic IOL). These finished goods are then sold back to the Company at an agreed upon, contractual price. The Company makes a profit margin on either type of sale with the supplier and each type of sale is made under separate purchase and sales orders between the two parties resulting in cash settlement for the orders sold or repurchased. For parts that are sold as a final sale, the Company recognizes a sale consistent with its routine revenue recognition policies as disclosed in Note 1 and those sales are included as part of other sales in total net sales. For the injector parts that are sold to be reprocessed into finished goods, the Company does not recognize revenue on these sales in accordance with ASC 845-10, Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty. Instead, the Company records the transaction at its carrying value, deferring any profit margin in inventory, until the finished good inventory is sold to an end-customer (not the supplier) at which point the Company records the sale and the related cost of sale, including the release of the deferred cost of sale in inventory, related to these finished goods. |
|
For all sales, the Company is considered the principal in the transaction as the Company, among other factors, is the primary obligor in the arrangement, bears general inventory risk, credit risk, has latitude in establishing the sales price, is responsible for authorized and general sales returns risk and therefore, sales and cost of sales are reported separately in the statement of operations instead of a single, net amount. Cost of sales includes cost of production, freight and distribution, royalties, and inventory provisions, net of any purchase discounts. |
|
The Company generally permits returns of product if the product is returned within the time allowed by its return policies and records an allowance for estimated returns at the time revenue is recognized. The Company’s allowance for estimated returns considers historical trends and experience, the impact of new product launches, the entry of a competitor, availability of timely and pertinent information and the various terms and arrangements offered, including sales with extended credit terms. Sales are reported net of estimated returns. |
|
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based on customer payment history and credit worthiness, as determined by the Company’s review of its customers’ current credit information. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses and uncollectible accounts based upon its historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. Amounts determined to be uncollectible are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, as such, include amounts based on significant estimates and judgments of management with consideration given to materiality. significant estimates used include determining valuation allowances for uncollectible trade receivables, sales returns reserves, obsolete and excess inventory, deferred income taxes, and tax reserves, including valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, pension liabilities, evaluation of asset impairment, in determining the useful life of depreciable and definite-lived intangible assets, and in the variables and assumptions used to calculate and record stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash deposits with major banks which from time to time may exceed federally insured limits. The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions and believes that the risk of any loss is minimal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Concentration of Credit Risk and Revenues |
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk principally consist of trade receivables. This risk is limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base, and their geographic dispersion. As of January 3, 2014 and December 28, 2012, there were no customers with trade receivables balances that represented 10% or more of consolidated trade receivables. Ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition are performed and, generally, no collateral is required. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses and such losses, in the aggregate, have not exceeded management’s expectations. |
|
A single customer has accounted for 11%, 11%, and 13% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in each of the last three fiscal years, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measures, the following hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation methodologies used to measure fair value: |
|
| ⋅ | Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ⋅ | Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ⋅ | Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable; that reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would make and significant to the fair value. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The carrying values reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, prepaids and other current assets, accounts payable, other current liabilities and line of credit approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Inventories, Net |
|
Inventories, net are valued at the lower of cost, determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. Inventories include the costs of raw material, labor, and manufacturing overhead, work in process and finished goods. The Company provides estimated inventory allowances for excess, expiring, slow moving and obsolete inventory as well as inventory whose carrying value is in excess of net realizable value to properly reflect inventory at the lower of cost or market. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation on property, plant, and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as noted below. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease term. Major improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. |
|
Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets: |
|
Machinery and equipment | | 5-10 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and equipment | | 3-7 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Computer and peripherals | | 2-5 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | (a) | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| (a) | Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the term of the associated leases. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Goodwill |
|
Goodwill, which has an indefinite life, is not amortized but instead is tested for impairment on an annual basis or between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is done at the reporting unit level. Reporting units can be one level below the operating segment level, and can be combined when reporting units within the same operating segment have similar economic characteristics. The Company has determined that its reporting units have similar economic characteristics, and therefore, can be combined into one reporting unit for the purposes of goodwill impairment testing. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company performed its annual impairment test and determined that its goodwill was not impaired. As of January 3, 2014 and December 28, 2012, the carrying value of goodwill was $1.8 million. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Long-Lived Assets |
|
The Company reviews property and equipment and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying value of such assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows the assets are expected to generate. When the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the assets’ fair value and their carrying value. A review of long lived assets was conducted as of January 3, 2014 and no impairment was identified. |
|
Amortization is computed on the straight-line basis, which is the Company’s best estimate of the pattern of economic benefits over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range from 3 to 20 years for patents, certain acquired rights and licenses, 10 years for customer relationships, and 3 to 10 years for developed technology. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Research and Development Costs |
|
Expenditures for research activities relating to product development and improvement are charged to expense as incurred. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advertising Cost, Policy, Expensed Advertising Cost [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Advertising Cost |
|
Advertising costs, which are included in marketing and selling expenses, are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were $2,100,000, $1,810,000, and $1,306,000 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities, net operating loss and credit carryforwards, and uncertainty in income taxes, on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Valuation allowances, or reductions to deferred tax assets, are recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset may not be realized or realizable in the jurisdiction in which they arise. The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, are applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period of enactment. |
|
The Company recognizes the income tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that, based on technical merits, the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes. The amount of tax benefit recorded, if any, is limited to the amount that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement with the taxing authority (that has full knowledge of all relevant information). Accrued interest, if any, related to uncertain tax positions is included as a component of income tax expense, and penalties, if incurred, are recognized as a component of operating income or loss. The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions as of any of the periods presented. The Company did not incur significant interest and penalties for any period presented. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
|
The Company has only one class of common stock and no participating securities which would require the two-class method of calculating basic earnings per share. Basic per share information is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, net of unvested restricted stock, during the period. Diluted per share information is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the effects of potentially dilutive common stock, which are comprised of outstanding warrants, stock options, unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units, during the period, using the treasury-stock method. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Postemployment Benefit Plans, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Employee Defined Benefit Plans |
|
The Company maintains a passive pension plan (the “Swiss Plan”) covering employees of its Swiss subsidiary. The Swiss Plan conforms to the features of a defined benefit plan. |
|
The Company also maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan which covers substantially all of the employees of STAAR Japan. |
|
The Company recognizes the funded status, or difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations of the pension plan on the statement of financial position, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. If the projected benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets, then that difference or unfunded status represents the pension liability. The Company records a net periodic pension cost in the consolidated statement of operations. The liabilities and annual income or expense of both plans are determined using methodologies that involve several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of asset return (asset returns and fair-value of plan assets are applicable for the Swiss Plan only). The fair values of plan assets are determined based on prevailing market prices (see Note 10). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Stock Based Compensation |
|
Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted is based on the grant-date fair value. The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term of three to four years (see Note 11). |
|
The Company also issues restricted stock to its executive officers and Board of Directors (the Board), which are restricted and unvested common shares issued at fair market value on the date of grant. For the restricted shares issued to the Board, the restricted stock vests over a one-year service period and are subject to forfeiture (or acceleration, depending upon the circumstances) until vested or the service period is completed. The Company has also issued performance accelerated restricted stock (PARS) to its executive officers which carry a three year service condition and a performance condition such that if the Company meets or exceeds certain predetermined performance metrics set by the Directors, up to one third of the grant vesting may be accelerated annually. If the performance metrics are not achieved, the restricted stock vests after three years. Restricted stock compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of one to three years for the Board and PARS grants, respectively, based on the grant-date fair value of the stock. Restricted stock is considered legally issued and outstanding on the grant date (see Notes 11 and 15). |
|
The Company issues restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2013 RSU Plan (see Note 11), which is a performance contingent restricted stock award based upon the Company exceeding an internally established annual revenue target which is above the established annual revenue plan. The RSUs contain both a performance and a service condition such that they vest after calculating the total financial performance for fiscal year 2013, at which time, if the internally established revenue target is met or exceeded and the grantee is still employed with the Company on the measurement date, which is one year after the grant date, the RSUs will become fully vested. The Company recognizes compensation cost for the RSUs if and when the Company concludes that it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved, net of an estimate of pre-vesting forfeitures, over the requisite service period based on the grant-date fair value of the stock. The Company reassesses the probability of vesting at each reporting period and adjusts compensation cost based on its probability assessment. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Once the RSUs are vested, equivalent common shares will be issued or issuable to the grantee and therefore the RSUs are not included in total common shares issued and outstanding until vested (see Notes 11 and 15). |
|
The Company accounts for options granted to persons other than employees and directors under Equity –Based Payments to Non-Employees. The fair value of such options is re-measured each reporting period using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and income or expense is recognized over the vesting period for changes to the fair value for the unvested options. As the options vest, no such re-measurement is necessary or performed. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounting For Warrants [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Accounting for Warrants |
|
The Company has issued certain warrants under an agreement that expressly provides that if the Company fails to satisfy continuous registration requirements the Company will be obligated only to issue additional common stock as the holder’s sole remedy, with no possibility of settlement in cash. The Company accounts for these warrants as equity because additional shares are the only form of settlement available to the holder. These warrants are only valued on the issuance date and not subsequently revalued. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as the valuation model to estimate the fair value of all warrants. See Note 11. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
The Company presents comprehensive income (loss) in two separate but not consecutive consolidated financial statements, the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). Total comprehensive income (loss) includes, in addition to net income (loss), changes in equity that are excluded from the consolidated statements of operations and are recorded directly into a separate section of stockholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the changes in the accumulated balances for each component of AOCI attributable to the Company for the years ended January 3, 2014, December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 (in thousands): |
|
| | Foreign | | Defined | | Defined | | Accumulated | |
Currency | Benefit | Benefit | Other |
Translation | Pension Plan- | Pension Plan- | Comprehensive |
| Japan | Switzerland | Income |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | $ | 2,584 | | $ | 642 | | $ | -1,126 | | $ | 2,100 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 211 | | | -219 | | | 403 | | | 395 | |
Tax effect | | | - | | | - | | | -90 | | | -90 | |
Balance, December 30, 2011 | | | 2,795 | | | 423 | | | -813 | | | 2,405 | |
Other comprehensive loss | | | -689 | | | -127 | | | -11 | | | -827 | |
Tax effect | | | - | | | - | | | 2 | | | 2 | |
Balance, December 28, 2012 | | | 2,106 | | | 296 | | | -822 | | | 1,580 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | -861 | | | -126 | | | 280 | | | -707 | |
Tax effect | | | -466 | | | -63 | | | -62 | | | -591 | |
Balance, January 3, 2014 | | $ | 779 | | $ | 107 | | $ | -604 | | $ | 282 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Prior Year Reclassifications |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior financial statement information to conform to current presentation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (Topic 740)” (ASU 2013-11), which states that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company plans to adopt this guidance during its quarter ending March 28, 2014 and is assessing the impact, if any, to the consolidated financial statements. |
|
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, “Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or an investment in a Foreign Entity (Topic 830)” (ASU 2013-05), which provides guidance on releasing cumulative translation adjustments when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. In addition, these amendments provide guidance on the release of cumulative translation adjustments in partial sales of equity method investments and in step acquisitions. This new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted and early adoption is permitted. The Company plans to adopt this guidance during its quarter ending April 4, 2014 and does not expect the adoption to have any significant impact to its consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |