COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation The medical device industry is characterized by frequent claims and litigation, and we are and may become subject to various claims, lawsuits and proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. Such claims include claims by current or former employees, distributors and competitors, claims concerning the marketing and promotion of our products and product liability claims. We are involved in a number of legal actions relating to the use of our Helium Plasma technology. The outcomes of these legal actions are not within our complete control and may not be known for prolonged periods of time. We believe that such claims are adequately covered by insurance; however, in the case of one of our carriers, we are in a dispute regarding the total level of coverage available. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the opinion of management, the Company has meritorious defenses and such claims are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material, adverse effect on our financial condition. However, in the event that damages exceed the aggregate coverage limits of our policies or if our insurance carriers disclaim coverage, we believe it is possible that costs associated with these claims could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In addition, as previously disclosed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed April 26, 2019, on April 17, 2019, a complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida by plaintiff Kyle Pritchard, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against the Company and Charles D. Goodwin (“Goodwin”), the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, alleging certain violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. On July 16, 2019, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff for the putative class and approved the lead plaintiff’s selection of counsel. On or about September 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) with the Court. The Amended Complaint seeks class action status on behalf of all persons and entities that acquired the Company’s securities between December 21, 2018 and April 1, 2019 and alleges violations by the Company and Goodwin of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, primarily related to certain public statements concerning the Premarket Notification 510(k) submission made to the US Food and Drug Administration for a new indication for the Company’s J-Plasma® technology for use in dermal resurfacing procedures. The Amended Complaint seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, an award of interest, reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees and other costs, and equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. On October 3, 2019, the Company and Goodwin filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was served on November 4, 2019. On March 11, 2020, the Court issued an order denying the Company’s motion to dismiss. The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests against the allegations contained in the complaint. Although the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined with certainty, the Company believes that the allegations stated in the Amended Complaint are entirely without merit. The Company and Goodwin intend to defend themselves vigorously in the suit. In the opinion of management, such claims are adequately covered by insurance, however, in the event that damages exceed the aggregate coverage limits of our policy or if our insurance carriers disclaim coverage, we believe it is possible that costs associated with this claim could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated earnings, financial position or cash flows. We initially accrued $500,000 for defense costs and upon the denial of the motion to dismiss, we accrued an additional $500,000 , which is our insurance deductible related to the matter. $820,000 of the $1,000,000 is still accrued as of March 31, 2020. We accrue a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these actions when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a known or probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount of the range is recorded. If a loss is reasonably possible, but not known or probable, and can be reasonably estimated, the estimated loss or range of loss is disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. In most cases, significant judgment is required to estimate the amount and timing of a loss to be recorded, actual results may differ from these estimates. Purchase Commitments At March 31, 2020 , we had purchase commitments totaling approximately $700,000 substantially all of which is expected to be purchased within the next six months. China Joint Venture In late 2019, we executed a joint venture agreement with our Chinese supplier. The agreement requires the Company to make a capital contribution into the newly formed entity of approximately $0.4M . We expect a portion of this capital contribution will be made by the end of 2020. |