Professional services expenses, which consist of costs associated with corporate legal services, litigation settlements, accounting and auditing services, consulting, and our Board of Directors, totaled $6.1 million and $11.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. The $11.7 million in professional services for the six months ended June 30, 2001 represented a $2.9 million or 33.6% increase over the comparable prior year period. The increase in professional services expenses reflects the extensive efforts undertaken by us to continue to build and support our infrastructure, as well as evaluate and pursue new business opportunities.
Occupancy, furniture and equipment expenses totaled $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, an increase of $1.6 million, or 32.4%, from the $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000. Occupancy, furniture and equipment expenses totaled $12.8 million and $8.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000. The increase in occupancy, furniture and equipment expenses in 2001, as compared to 2000, was primarily the result of our continued geographic expansion to develop and support new markets during 2000. Further geographic expansion is likely to slow for the remainder of 2001 as a result of the current economic slowdown in our marketplace.
Business development and travel expenses totaled $2.4 million and $5.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, an increase of $0.1 million, or 5.5%, and $0.7 million, or 13.9%, compared to $2.3 million and $4.7 million in the comparable 2000 periods. The increase in business development and travel expenses was largely attributable to overall growth in our business, including both an increase in the number of FTE personnel and expansion into new geographic markets.
Telephone expenses totaled $1.1 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, an increase of $0.4 million, or 49.2%, and $0.7 million, or 59.0%, compared to $0.7 million and $1.2 million in the comparable 2000 periods. The increase in telephone expense resulted from overall growth in our business, including both an increase in the number of FTE personnel and expansion into new geographic markets.
Trust preferred securities distributions totaled $0.8 million and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000. These amounts resulted from the issuance of $40.0 million in cumulative trust preferred securities during the second quarter of 1998. The trust preferred securities pay a fixed rate quarterly distribution of 8.25% and have a maximum maturity of 30 years.
Retention and warrant incentive plans expense totaled $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2001, a $2.5 million decrease from the $2.9 million incurred in the second quarter of 2000. Retention and warrant incentive plans expense totaled $0.8 million for the first six months of 2001, a $12.0 million decrease from the $12.8 million incurred in the first six months of 2000. Under the provisions of the retention and warrant incentive plans, employees are compensated with a fixed percentage of gains realized on warrant and certain venture capital fund and direct equity investments. The increase in retention and warrant plans expense was directly related to the increase in warrant, venture capital fund and direct equity investment gains over the comparable 2000 period.
Other noninterest expense totaled $3.5 million and $8.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, an increase of $1.6 million, or 88.0%, and $4.3 million, or 114.9%, compared to $1.9 million and $3.7 million for the respective 2000 periods. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to amortization of tax credit fund investments of $1.2 million. The six months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to the similar prior year period also includes a one-time $2.2 million operational loss related to a system issue associated with our off-balance sheet client funds incurred in the 2001 first quarter.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 36.9% and 38.4% for the second quarter and first half of 2001, respectively, compared to 40.2% and 40.7% for the equivalent three and six month prior year periods, respectively. The change in rate was primarily due to an increase in items giving rise to permanent tax benefits.
Financial Condition
Our total assets were $4.4 billion at June 30, 2001, a decrease of $1.2 billion, or 21.4%, compared to $5.6 billion at December 31, 2000.
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased Under Agreement to Resell
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell totaled a combined $387.9 million at June 30, 2001, a decrease of $1.0 billion, or 72.1%, compared to the $1.4 billion outstanding at December 31, 2000. This decrease was attributable to a decline in our clients’ deposit balances during the first half of 2001.
Investment Securities
Investment securities totaled $1.9 billion at June 30, 2001, a decrease of $251.3 million, or 11.9%, from the December 31, 2000 balance of $2.1 billion. This decrease resulted from a decline in our deposits during the first half of 2001, and primarily consisted of U.S. agency securities.
Based on July 31, 2001 market valuations, we had potential pre-tax warrant gains totaling $0.7 million related to 21 companies. We are restricted from exercising many of these warrants until the third and fourth quarters of 2001. As of June 30, 2001, we held 1,574 warrants in 1,203 companies, and had made investments in 227 venture capital funds and direct equity investments in 60 companies. Many of these companies are non-public. Thus, for those companies for which a readily determinable market value cannot be obtained, we value these equity instruments at cost less any identified impairment. Additionally, we are typically precluded from using any type of derivative instrument to secure the current unrealized gains associated with many of these equity instruments. Hence, the amount of income we realize from these equity instruments in future periods may vary materially from the current unrealized amount due to fluctuations in the market prices of the underlying common stock of these companies. Furthermore, we may reinvest some or all of the income realized from the disposition of these equity instruments in pursuing our business strategies.
Loans
Total loans, net of unearned income, at June 30, 2001, were $1.7 billion, a slight increase of $13.1 million compared to the balance at December 31, 2000. We continue to increase the number of client lending relationships in most of our technology and life sciences niche practices as well as in specialized lending products.
Credit Quality and the Allowance for Loan Losses
Credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss because other parties to the financial instrument fail to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. While we follow underwriting and credit monitoring procedures which we believe are appropriate in growing and managing the loan portfolio, in the event of nonperformance by these other parties, our potential exposure to credit losses could significantly affect our consolidated financial position and earnings.
Lending money involves an inherent risk of nonpayment. Through the administration of loan policies and monitoring of the loan portfolio, our management seeks to reduce such risks. The allowance for loan losses is an estimate to provide a financial buffer for losses, both identified and unidentified, in the loan portfolio.
We regularly review and monitor the loan portfolio to determine the risk profile of each credit, and to identify credits whose risk profiles have changed. This review includes, but is not limited to, such factors as payment status, the financial condition of the borrower, borrower compliance with loan covenants, underlying collateral values, potential loan concentrations, and general economic conditions. We identify potential problem credits and, based upon known information, we develop action plans.
We have established an evaluation process designed to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. This process attempts to assess the risk of losses inherent in the loan portfolio by segregating the allowance for loan losses into three components: "specific," "loss migration," and "general." The specific component is established by allocating a portion of the allowance for loan losses to individual classified credits on the basis of specific circumstances and assessments. The loss migration component is calculated as a function of the historical loss migration experience of the internal loan credit risk rating categories. The general component, composed of allocated and unallocated portions that supplements the first two components, includes: our management’s judgment of the effect of current and forecasted economic conditions on the borrowers' abilities to repay, an evaluation of the allowance for loan losses in relation to the size of the overall loan portfolio, an evaluation of the composition of, and growth trends within, the loan portfolio, consideration of the relationship of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans, net charge-off trends, and other factors. While this evaluation process uses historical and other objective information, the classification of loans and the establishment of the allowance for loan losses, relies, to a great extent, on the judgment and experience of our management.
The allowance for loan losses totaled $74.0 million at June 30, 2001, a slight increase of $0.2 million from the balance at December 31, 2000.
We incurred $9.0 million and $21.4 million in gross charge-offs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001.
We believe our allowance for loan losses is adequate as of June 30, 2001. However, future changes in circumstances, economic conditions or other factors could cause us to increase or decrease the allowance for loan losses as deemed necessary. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to make adjustments to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.
Nonperforming assets consist of loans that are past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest, loans on nonaccrual status and OREO and other foreclosed assets.
The table below sets forth certain relationships between nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets and the allowance for loan losses:
| June 30, | | December 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Nonperforming assets: | | | | |
Loans past due 90 days or more | $ | 305 | | $ | 98 | |
Nonaccrual loans | 24,321 | | 18,287 | |
|
| |
| |
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 24,626 | | $ | 18,385 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans | 1.4 | % | 1.1 | % |
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.6 | % | 0.3 | % |
| | | | |
Allowance for loan losses: | $ | 74,000 | | $ | 73,800 | |
| As a percentage of total loans | 4.3 | % | 4.3 | % |
| As a percentage of nonaccrual loans | 304.3. | % | 403.6 | % |
| As a percentage of nonperforming loans | 300.5 | % | 401.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Nonperforming loans totaled $24.6 million, or 1.4% of total loans, at June 30, 2001, an increase of $6.2 million, or 33.9%, from the prior year-end total of $18.4 million, or 1.1% of total loans. The increase in nonperforming loans was primarily due to one commercial credit, in our software niche, totaling $3.1 million. Our management believes nonperforming loans are adequately secured with collateral and reserves, and that any future charge-offs associated with these loans will not have a material impact on our future net income.
In addition to the loans disclosed in the foregoing analysis, we have identified three loans totaling $6.6 million, that, on the basis of information known to us, were judged to have a higher than normal risk of becoming nonperforming. We are not aware of any other loans where known information about possible problems of the borrower casts serious doubts about the ability of the borrower to comply with the loan repayment terms.
Deposits
Total deposits were $3.7 billion at June 30, 2001, a decrease of $1.2 billion, or 24.9%, from the prior year-end total of $4.9 billion. A significant portion of the decrease in deposits during the first half of 2001 was concentrated in our noninterest-bearing demand deposits and money market deposits, which decreased $566.4 million and $570.5 million, respectively. This decrease was explained by a slowdown in the capital markets and venture capital fundings which has reduced our clients’ liquidity levels.
Market Risk Management
Interest rate risk is the most significant market risk impacting us. Our monitoring activities related to managing interest rate risk include both interest rate sensitivity "gap" analysis and the use of a simulation model to measure the impact of market interest rate changes on the net present value of estimated cash flows from our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, defined as our market value of portfolio equity (MVPE). See our 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K for disclosure of the quantitative and qualitative information regarding the interest rate risk inherent in interest rate risk sensitive instruments as of December 31, 2000. There have been no changes in the assumptions used by us in monitoring interest rate risk as of June 30, 2001. Other types of market risk affecting us in the normal course of our business activities include foreign currency exchange risk and equity price risk. The impact on us, resulting from these other two types of market risks, is deemed immaterial. We do not maintain a portfolio of trading securities and do not intend to engage in such activities in the immediate future.
Liquidity
Another important objective of asset/liability management is to manage liquidity. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that funds are available in a timely manner to meet loan demand and depositors' needs, and to service other liabilities as they come due, without causing an undue amount of cost or risk, and without causing a disruption to normal operating conditions.
We regularly assess the amount and likelihood of projected funding requirements through a review of factors such as historical deposit volatility and funding patterns, present and forecasted market and economic conditions, individual client funding needs, and existing and planned business activities. Our asset/liability committee (ALCO) provides oversight to the liquidity management process and recommends policy guidelines, subject to board of directors approval, and courses of action to address our actual and projected liquidity needs.
The ability to attract a stable, low-cost base of deposits is our primary source of liquidity. Other sources of liquidity available to us include short-term borrowings, which consist of federal funds purchased, security repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowing arrangements. Our liquidity requirements can also be met through the use of our portfolio of liquid assets. Our definition of liquid assets includes cash and cash equivalents in excess of the minimum levels necessary to carry out normal business operations, federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements, investment securities maturing within six months, investment securities eligible and available for pledging purposes with a maturity in excess of six months, and anticipated near term cash flows from investments.
Our policy guidelines provide that liquid assets as a percentage of total deposits should not fall below 20.0%. At June 30, 2001, the Bank’s ratio of liquid assets to total deposits was 55.7%. This ratio is well in excess of our minimum policy guidelines. In addition to monitoring the level of liquid assets relative to total deposits, we also utilize other policy measures in liquidity management activities. As of June 30, 2001, we were in compliance with all of these policy measures.
Capital Resources
Our management seeks to maintain adequate capital to support anticipated asset growth and credit risks, and to ensure that Silicon and Silicon Valley Bank are in compliance with all regulatory capital guidelines. Our primary sources of new capital include the issuance of common stock and retained earnings.
In December 1999, we issued 2.8 million shares of common stock at $21.00 per share. In January 2000, we issued an additional 0.4 million shares at $21.00 per share in relation to the exercise of an over-allotment option by the underwriters for that offering. Proceeds from the sale of these securities in December 1999 and January 2000 totaled $63.3 million, net of underwriting commissions and other offering expenses. In August 2000, we issued an additional 2.3 million shares of common stock at $42.19 per share. We received proceeds of $91.0 million related to the sale of these securities, net of underwriting commissions and other offering expenses.
During the first half of 2001, the Company repurchased approximately 1,200,000 shares of common stock totaling approximately $30.0 million, in conjunction with the 5,000,000 share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors on April 5, 2001.
Stockholders’ equity totaled $655.0 million at June 30, 2001, an increase of $40.9 million, or 6.7%, from the $614.1 million balance at December 31, 2000. This increase was primarily due to net income of $57.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $8.3 million, partially offset by a repurchase of 1.2 million shares of common stock totaling approximately $30.0 million. We have not paid a cash dividend on our common stock since 1992, and we do not have any material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2001.
Both Silicon and Silicon Valley Bank are subject to capital adequacy guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board. Under these capital guidelines, the minimum total risk-based capital ratio and Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio requirements are 10.0% and 6.0%, respectively, of risk-weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet items for a well capitalized depository institution.
The Federal Reserve Board has also established minimum capital leverage ratio guidelines for state member banks. The ratio is determined using Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average total assets. The guidelines require a minimum of 5.0% for a well capitalized depository institution.
Both Silicon's and Silicon Valley Bank's capital ratios were in excess of regulatory guidelines for a well capitalized depository institution as of June 30, 2001, and December 31, 2000. Capital ratios for Silicon are set forth below:
| June 30, | | December 31, | |
| 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| |
Silicon Valley Bancshares: | | | | |
Total risk-based capital ratio | 19.3 | % | 17.7 | % |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 18.0 | % | 16.5 | % |
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 15.6 | % | 12.0 | % |
The increase in the total risk-based capital ratio and the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio from December 31, 2000 to June 30, 2001 was primarily attributable to an increase in Tier 1 capital. This increase was due primarily to internally generated capital, primarily net income of $57.5 million. The Tier 1 leverage ratio also increased between December 31, 2000 and June 30, 2001, due to a decrease in quarterly average total assets.
PART II - - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There were no legal proceedings requiring disclosure pursuant to this item pending at June 30, 2001, or at the date of this report.
ITEM 2 - CHANGES IN SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 3 - DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4 - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 19, 2001. Each of the persons named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee for director was elected; the amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of authorized; the amendment to the Company’s 1997 Equity Incentive Plan; and the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2001 was ratified. The following are the voting results on each of these matters:
Election of Directors | In Favor | | | | Withheld | |
|
| | | |
| |
| | | | | | |
Gary K. Barr | 43,770,210 | | | | 281,138 | |
James F. Burns, Jr. | 43,755,768 | | | | 295,580 | |
John C. Dean | 37,451,722 | | | | 6,599,626 | |
Alex W. Hart | 43,769,160 | | | | 282,188 | |
Stephen E. Jackson | 43,772,210 | | | | 279,138 | |
Daniel J. Kelleher | 43,768,321 | | | | 283,027 | |
James R. Porter | 43,741,816 | | | | 309,532 | |
Michela K. Rodeno | 43,770,385 | | | | 280,963 | |
Kenneth P. Wilcox | 37,014,960 | | | | 7,036,388 | |
| | | | | | |
Other Matters | In Favor | | Opposed | | Abstained | |
|
| |
| |
| |
The amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of authorized common stock, $0.001 par value per share, from 60,000,000 to 150,000,000 | 37,423,812 | | 6,584,304 | | 43,232 | |
| | | | | | |
Other Matters | In Favor | | Opposed | | Abstained | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
The amendment to the Company’s 1997 Equity Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 2,000,000 million shares of common stock for issuance thereunder was approved. | 36,363,445 | | 7,494,084 | | 193,819 | |
| | | | | | |
Other Matters | In Favor | | Opposed | | Abstained | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2001. | 42,745,998 | | 1,283,860 | | 21,490 | |
ITEM 5 - OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
10.48 Part-time Employment Agreement between Silicon Valley Bancshares and Christopher T. Lutes.
10.49 Silicon Valley Bancshares 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, Amended as of May 16, 2001.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2001.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | SILICON VALLEY BANCSHARES |
| | |
Date: August 14, 2001 | | /s/ Donal D. Delaney |
| |
|
| | Donal D. Delaney |
| | Controller |
| | (Principal Accounting Officer) |