Washington, D.C. 20549
As of July 25, 2007, there were 2,775,431 common shares of the registrant outstanding.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Reference should be made to the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" of Investors Title Company’s (“the Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for a complete description of the Company’s significant accounting policies.
Principles of Consolidation – The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Investors Title Company and its subsidiaries (Investors Title Insurance Company, Northeast Investors Title Insurance Company, Investors Title Exchange Corporation, Investors Title Accommodation Corporation, Investors Title Management Services, Inc., Investors Title Commercial Agency, LLC, Investors Capital Management Company, and Investors Trust Company), and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2007.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions– The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions used.
Reclassification - Certain 2006 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2007 classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards –In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This statement, which is expected to expand fair value measurement, permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 159 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Note 2 - Reserves for Claims
Transactions in the reserves for claims for the six months ended June 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 36,906,000 | | | $ | 34,857,000 | |
Provision, charged to operations | | | 6,161,438 | | | | 7,405,211 | |
Payments of claims, net of recoveries | | | (2,507,438 | ) | | | (5,356,211 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | 40,560,000 | | | $ | 36,906,000 | |
The total reserve for all reported and unreported losses the Company incurred through June 30, 2007 is represented by the reserves for claims. The Company's reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses are established using estimated amounts required to settle claims for which notice has been received (reported) and the amount estimated to be required to satisfy incurred claims of policyholders which may be reported in the future. Despite the variability of such estimates, management believes that the reserves are adequate to cover claim losses which might result from pending and future claims for policies issued through June 30, 2007. The Company continually reviews and adjusts its reserve estimates to reflect its loss experience and any new information that becomes available. Adjustments resulting from such reviews may be significant.
Claims and losses paid are charged to the reserves for claims. Although claims losses are typically paid in cash, occasionally claims are settled by purchasing the interest of the insured or the claimant in the real property. When this event occurs, the Company carries assets at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value, net of any indebtedness on the property.
Note 3 - Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $789,180 and $3,569,700, respectively. Comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $3,006,726 and $5,980,623, respectively. Other comprehensive income is comprised of unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s available-for-sale securities and unrealized gains or losses related to postretirement benefit liabilities, net of taxes.
Note 4 - Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Company’s share-based compensation plans and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARS”), which is calculated based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of a stock option or SAR, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital, if any, when the stock option or SAR is exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. The incremental dilutive common share equivalents, calculated using the treasury stock method were 33,332 and 34,179 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 34,889 and 35,268 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 respectively.
Note 5 – Segment Information
Consistent with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company has aggregated its operating segments into two reportable segments: 1) title insurance services; and 2) tax-deferred exchange services.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 | | Title Insurance | | | Exchange Services | | | All Other | | | Intersegment Eliminations | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 19,112,832 | | | $ | 870,083 | | | $ | 855,171 | | | $ | (202,331 | ) | | $ | 20,635,755 | |
Investment income | | | 1,021,389 | | | | 6,501 | | | | 261,366 | | | | (17,501 | ) | | | 1,271,755 | |
Net realized gain on sales of investments | | | 165,589 | | | | - | | | | 34,434 | | | | - | | | | 200,023 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 20,299,810 | | | $ | 876,584 | | | $ | 1,150,971 | | | $ | (219,832 | ) | | $ | 22,107,533 | |
Operating expenses | | | 19,860,205 | | | | 349,246 | | | | 805,264 | | | | (202,331 | ) | | | 20,812,384 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 439,605 | | | $ | 527,338 | | | $ | 345,707 | | | $ | (17,501 | ) | | $ | 1,295,149 | |
Assets, net | | $ | 118,239,859 | | | $ | 788,769 | | | $ | 27,688,740 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 146,717,368 | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 | | Title Insurance | | | Exchange Services | | | All Other | | | Intersegment Eliminations | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 19,489,246 | | | $ | 1,908,357 | | | $ | 887,455 | | | $ | (175,943 | ) | | $ | 22,109,115 | |
Investment income | | | 910,548 | | | | 3,716 | | | | 138,042 | | | | (17,610 | ) | | | 1,034,696 | |
Net realized loss on sales of investments | | | (17,190 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (17,190 | ) |
Total revenues | | $ | 20,382,604 | | | $ | 1,912,073 | | | $ | 1,025,497 | | | $ | (193,553 | ) | | $ | 23,126,621 | |
Operating expenses | | | 16,477,592 | | | | 267,671 | | | | 912,794 | | | | (175,943 | ) | | | 17,482,114 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 3,905,012 | | | $ | 1,644,402 | | | $ | 112,703 | | | $ | (17,610 | ) | | $ | 5,644,507 | |
Assets, net | | $ | 110,626,511 | | | $ | 1,210,531 | | | $ | 22,448,488 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 134,285,530 | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | | Title Insurance | | | Exchange Services | | | All Other | | | Intersegment Eliminations | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 36,279,878 | | | $ | 2,115,562 | | | $ | 1,602,949 | | | $ | (404,652 | ) | | $ | 39,593,737 | |
Investment income | | | 2,024,719 | | | | 15,714 | | | | 475,931 | | | | (35,002 | ) | | | 2,481,362 | |
Net realized gain on sales of investments | | | 331,769 | | | | - | | | | 34,434 | | | | - | | | | 366,203 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 38,636,366 | | | $ | 2,131,276 | | | $ | 2,113,314 | | | $ | (439,654 | ) | | $ | 42,441,302 | |
Operating expenses | | | 36,113,238 | | | | 764,749 | | | | 1,701,604 | | | | (404,652 | ) | | | 38,174,939 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 2,523,128 | | | $ | 1,366,527 | | | $ | 411,710 | | | $ | (35,002 | ) | | $ | 4,266,363 | |
Assets, net | | $ | 118,239,859 | | | $ | 788,769 | | | $ | 27,688,740 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 146,717,368 | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 | | Title Insurance | | | Exchange Services | | | All Other | | | Intersegment Eliminations | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 36,650,655 | | | $ | 2,936,089 | | | $ | 1,569,124 | | | $ | (423,606 | ) | | $ | 40,732,262 | |
Investment income | | | 1,803,428 | | | | 11,413 | | | | 249,309 | | | | (35,400 | ) | | | 2,028,750 | |
Net realized gain on sales of investments | | | 544,457 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 544,457 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 38,998,540 | | | $ | 2,947,502 | | | $ | 1,818,433 | | | $ | (459,006 | ) | | $ | 43,305,469 | |
Operating expenses | | | 32,107,520 | | | | 548,828 | | | | 1,664,279 | | | | (423,606 | ) | | | 33,897,021 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 6,891,020 | | | $ | 2,398,674 | | | $ | 154,154 | | | $ | (35,400 | ) | | $ | 9,408,448 | |
Assets, net | | $ | 110,626,511 | | | $ | 1,210,531 | | | $ | 22,448,488 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 134,285,530 | |
Operating revenues represent net premiums written and other revenues.
Note 6 – Retirement and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
On November 17, 2003, ITIC entered into employment agreements with key executives that provide for the continuation of certain employee benefits upon retirement. The executive employee benefits include health insurance, dental insurance, vision insurance and life insurance. The plan is unfunded. The following sets forth the net periodic benefits cost for the executive benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | $ | 3,494 | | | $ | 3,557 | | | $ | 6,988 | | | $ | 7,114 | |
Interest cost | | 3,662 | | | | 3,515 | | | | 7,324 | | | | 7,030 | |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost | | 5,097 | | | | 5,097 | | | | 10,194 | | | | 10,194 | |
Amortization of unrecognized gains | | (651 | ) | | | (416 | ) | | | (1,302 | ) | | | (832 | ) |
Net periodic benefits costs | $ | 11,602 | | | $ | 11,753 | | | $ | 23,204 | | | $ | 23,506 | |
Note 7 – Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. This interpretation requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on an audit, based on the technical merits of the position. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company made a comprehensive review of its portfolio of uncertain tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established by FIN 48. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents the Company’s expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this review, the Company did not recognize any increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, nor did it reduce the January 1, 2007 balance in retained earnings for any additional liability.
The amount of unrecognized tax benefit or liability may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statute of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the additions or eliminations of uncertain tax positions.
The Company’s policy is to report interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits or liabilities in income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company, or one of its subsidiaries, files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local examinations by taxing authorities for years before 2004.
Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to their business. In the Company’s opinion, based on the present status of these proceedings, any potential liability of the Company or its subsidiaries with respect to these legal proceedings will not, in the aggregate, be material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition or operations.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company's 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with the following discussion since they contain important information for evaluating the Company's operating results and financial condition.
Overview
Title Insurance: Investors Title Company (the "Company") engages primarily in two segments of business. Its primary business activity is the issuance of title insurance through two subsidiaries, Investors Title Insurance Company ("ITIC") and Northeast Investors Title Insurance Company ("NE-ITIC"), which accounted for 91.6% of the Company’s operating revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2007. Through ITIC and NE-ITIC, the Company underwrites land title insurance for owners and mortgagees as a primary insurer. Title insurance protects against loss or damage resulting from title defects that affect real property.
There are two basic types of title insurance policies - one for the mortgage lender and one for the real estate owner. A lender often requires property owners to purchase title insurance to protect its position as a holder of a mortgage loan, but the lender's title insurance policy does not protect the property owner. The property owner has to purchase a separate owner's title insurance policy to protect their investment. When real property is conveyed from one party to another, occasionally there is an undisclosed defect in the title or a mistake or omission in a prior deed, will or mortgage that may give a third party a legal claim against such property. If a claim is made against real property, title insurance provides indemnification against insured defects. The title insurer has the option to retain counsel and pay the legal expenses to eliminate or defend against any title defects, pay any third party claims arising from errors in title examination and recording or pay the insured’s actual losses, up to policy limits, arising from errors in title as defined in the policy.
ITIC delivers title insurance coverage through a home office, branch offices and issuing agents. In North Carolina, ITIC issues policies primarily through a home office and 27 branch offices. ITIC also has branch offices in South Carolina and Nebraska. In other states, title policies are issued primarily through issuing agents. Issuing agents are typically real estate attorneys or subsidiaries of community and regional mortgage lending institutions, depending on local customs and regulations and the Company’s marketing strategy in a particular territory. The ability to attract and retain issuing agents is a key determinant of the Company’s growth in premiums written.
The Company's overall level of premiums written in the land title insurance industry is affected by real estate activity. In turn, real estate activity is affected by a number of factors, including the level of interest rates, the availability of mortgage funds, the level of real estate transactions and mortgage refinancing, the cost of real estate, employment levels, family income levels and general economic conditions. Generally, real estate activity declines as a result of higher interest rates or an economic downturn, thus leading to a corresponding decline in title insurance premiums written and profitability of the Company. The cyclical nature of the land title insurance industry has historically caused fluctuations in revenues and profitability and it is expected to continue to do so in the future. This segment also experiences seasonality in addition to cyclicality.
Revenues for this segment result from refinance activity, purchases of new and existing residential and commercial real estate, and certain other types of mortgage lending such as home equity lines of credit.
Volume is a key factor in the Company's profitability due to the existence of fixed costs such as personnel and occupancy expenses associated with the support of the issuance of title insurance policies and of general corporate operations. These expenses will be incurred by the Company regardless of the level of premiums written. The resulting operating leverage has historically tended to amplify the impact of changes in volume on the Company’s profitability.
Since the title insurance business generally is closely related to the overall level of real estate activity, and title insurance volumes generally fluctuate based on the effect changes in interest rates have on the level of real estate activity, any substantial increases in interest rates will likely have a negative impact on mortgage originations. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2007, therefore, should not be viewed as indicative of the Company’s future operating results. The Company continues to monitor and strives to manage operating expenses to offset the cyclical nature of the real estate market and with knowledge of the potential for further declines in title insurance revenues if interest rates continue to rise or the economy slows.
While timing and content are uncertain, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) continues to indicate that it would like to make modifications to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and associated regulations. In April 2007, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) released a report on the title insurance industry in which it recommended that HUD and state insurance regulators take actions to improve consumers’ ability to comparison shop for title insurance and strengthen the regulation and oversight of the title insurance market, among other measures. Based on the information known to management at this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of any of the GAO recommendations for the title insurance industry’s market and other matters, or the market’s response to them. However, any material change in the Company’s regulatory environment may have an adverse effect on its business.
Exchange Services: The Company's second business segment provides customer services in connection with tax-deferred real property exchanges through its subsidiaries, Investors Title Exchange Corporation ("ITEC") and Investors Title Accommodation Corporation ("ITAC"). ITEC serves as a qualified intermediary in like-kind exchanges of real or personal property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In its role as qualified intermediary, ITEC coordinates the exchange aspects of the real estate transaction with the closing agents. ITEC's duties include drafting standard exchange documents, holding the exchange funds between the sale of the old property and the purchase of the new property, and accepting the formal identification of the replacement property within the required identification period. ITAC serves as exchange accommodation titleholder in reverse exchanges. As exchange accommodation titleholder, ITAC offers a vehicle for accommodating a reverse exchange when the taxpayer must acquire replacement property before selling the relinquished property.
Factors that influence the title insurance industry will also generally affect the exchange services industry. In addition, the services provided by the Company’s exchange services are pursuant to provisions in the Internal Revenue Code. From time to time, these exchange provisions are subject to review and proposed changes.
On February 3, 2006, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) proposed new regulations which, if adopted, may negatively affect the ability of qualified intermediaries to retain a portion of the interest earned on exchange funds held during exchange transactions. If passed as proposed, these regulations would materially and adversely affect the exchange services segment and the Company’s net income, since a significant portion of the exchange segment’s revenues are based on retaining a portion of the interest income earned on deposits held by the Company. A public hearing on the proposed regulations was held on June 6, 2006, and as a result the IRS agreed to revise its initial regulatory flexibility analysis on the impact of the proposed regulations to small businesses. In March 2007, the IRS issued a revised regulatory flexibility analysis and requested more specific information to help in determining the impact the rules would have on small businesses.
Other Services: Other services include those offered by Investors Trust Company ("Investors Trust"), Investors Capital Management Company (“ICMC”), and Investors Title Management Services, Inc. (“ITMS”), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. In conjunction with Investors Trust, ICMC provides investment management and trust services to individuals, companies, banks and trusts. ITMS offers various consulting services to provide partners with the technical expertise to start and successfully operate a title insurance agency.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures surrounding contingencies and commitments. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company made no material changes in its critical accounting policies as previously disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Results of Operations
For the second quarter ended June 30, 2007, net premiums written decreased 2.6% to $18,626,179, investment income increased 22.9% to $1,271,755, total revenues decreased 4.4% to $22,107,533 and net income decreased 73.3% to $1,154,149, all compared with the second quarter of 2006. Net income per basic and diluted common share decreased 72.9% and 72.6%, respectively, to $0.46 and $0.46 compared with the prior year quarter. For the second quarter of 2007, the title insurance segment's operating revenues decreased 2.2% compared with the second quarter of 2006, while the exchange services segment's operating revenues decreased 54.4% for the second quarter of 2007, compared with the same quarter in 2006.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, net premiums written decreased 0.9% to $35,418,721, investment income increased 22.3% to $2,481,362, total revenues decreased 2.0% to $42,441,302 and net income decreased 51.7% to $3,476,363, all compared with the first six months of 2006. Net income per basic and diluted common share decreased 50.5% to $1.40 and $1.38, respectively, compared with the same six-month period ended June 30, 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the title insurance segment's operating revenues decreased 1.0% compared with the same period in 2006, while the exchange services segment's operating revenues decreased 27.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006.
Total revenues declined from the prior year period primarily due to less fee income generated in the Company’s exchange services segment and a decline in the Company’s net premiums written, resulting predominantly from lower levels of real estate activity and continued softening in the residential housing market. The exchange services segment experienced a steeper decline in revenue related to a decrease in demand and interest income earned on exchange funds. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in investment income. Net income was significantly impacted by an increase in the provision for claims resulting from the occurrence of two large claims. The Company’s effective income tax rate decreased to 18.5% from 23.6% of income before income taxes for the respective six month periods. The declines in the effective tax rates for the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2007 resulted primarily from a higher mix of tax-exempt investment income relative to taxable income. The reduction in taxable income primarily resulted from the increase in the provision for claims and commissions.
Operating revenues: Operating revenues include premiums written plus other fee income, exchange segment income as well as gains and losses on the disposal of fixed assets. Investment income and realized gains and losses are not included in operating revenues and are discussed separately following operating revenues.
Following is a breakdown of branch and agency premiums written for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | % | | | 2006 | | | % | | | 2007 | | | % | | | 2006 | | | % | |
Branch | | $ | 7,907,600 | | | 42 | | | $ | 9,004,581 | | | 47 | | | $ | 15,040,911 | | | 42 | | | $ | 16,730,965 | | | 47 | |
Agency | | | 10,718,579 | | | 58 | | | | 10,119,010 | | | 53 | | | | 20,377,810 | | | 58 | | | | 19,024,252 | | | 53 | |
Total | | $ | 18,626,179 | | | 100 | | | $ | 19,123,591 | | | 100 | | | $ | 35,418,721 | | | 100 | | | $ | 35,755,217 | | | 100 | |
Net premiums written from branch operations decreased 12.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same period in the prior year. Net premiums written from branch operations decreased 10.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from the same period in the prior year. Of the Company’s 29 branch locations that underwrite title insurance policies, 27 are located in North Carolina, and as a result, branch premiums written primarily represent North Carolina business.
Agency net premiums increased 5.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same period in the prior year. Agency net premiums increased 7.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same period in the prior year. Although total premiums written in North Carolina decreased, premiums written by North Carolina agents increased approximately $700,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same period in the prior year.
Following is a schedule of premiums written for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 in all states in which the Company’s two insurance subsidiaries ITIC and NE-ITIC currently underwrite insurance:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
State | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Alabama | | $ | 151,318 | | | $ | 330,545 | | | $ | 290,678 | | | $ | 574,181 | |
Florida | | | 461,498 | | | | 327,956 | | | | 1,290,045 | | | | 606,291 | |
Illinois | | | 460,531 | | | | 280,013 | | | | 849,488 | | | | 527,908 | |
Kentucky | | | 675,454 | | | | 583,539 | | | | 1,225,144 | | | | 1,157,037 | |
Maryland | | | 310,321 | | | | 407,905 | | | | 597,192 | | | | 781,674 | |
Michigan | | | 798,861 | | | | 881,521 | | | | 1,578,186 | | | | 1,758,830 | |
Minnesota | | | 150,535 | | | | 304,900 | | | | 269,217 | | | | 642,069 | |
Mississippi | | | 271,235 | | | | 167,225 | | | | 535,077 | | | | 301,677 | |
Nebraska | | | 203,768 | | | | 197,136 | | | | 377,092 | | | | 331,446 | |
New York | | | 658,675 | | | | 709,195 | | | | 1,165,434 | | | | 1,212,791 | |
North Carolina | | | 9,218,284 | | | | 9,773,452 | | | | 17,131,757 | | | | 18,214,934 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 406,236 | | | | 410,595 | | | | 732,890 | | | | 726,507 | |
South Carolina | | | 1,857,204 | | | | 1,536,781 | | | | 3,573,604 | | | | 2,938,854 | |
Tennessee | | | 732,461 | | | | 614,769 | | | | 1,381,851 | | | | 1,281,092 | |
Virginia | | | 1,572,652 | | | | 1,897,939 | | | | 3,133,156 | | | | 3,572,042 | |
West Virginia | | | 545,827 | | | | 640,423 | | | | 1,013,752 | | | | 1,095,841 | |
Other | | | 236,163 | | | | 158,281 | | | | 434,507 | | | | 238,844 | |
Direct Premiums | | | 18,711,023 | | | | 19,222,175 | | | | 35,579,070 | | | | 35,962,018 | |
Reinsurance Assumed | | | 4,737 | | | | - | | | | 11,667 | | | | 6,426 | |
Reinsurance Ceded | | | (89,581 | ) | | | (98,584 | ) | | | (172,016 | ) | | | (213,227 | ) |
Net Premiums | | $ | 18,626,179 | | | $ | 19,123,591 | | | $ | 35,418,721 | | | $ | 35,755,217 | |
According to data published by Freddie Mac, the quarterly average 30-year fixed mortgage interest rates in the United States decreased to 6.30% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared with 6.42% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Both net premiums written and the total number of policies and commitments issued in the six months ended June 30, 2007 declined. In the six months ended June 30, 2007 total policies and commitments issued decreased to 121,011, which is a decrease of 4.9% compared with 127,258 policies and commitments issued in the same period in 2006. Title insurance volumes fluctuate based on the effect that changes in interest rates have on the level of real estate activity. The continued slowdown in the residential housing and mortgage markets was the primary reason for the decline in volume. In addition, premium rates vary by the state in which the policies are written.
Operating revenues from the Company’s two subsidiaries that provide tax-deferred exchange services (ITEC and ITAC) decreased 54.4% compared with the second quarter of 2006. For the first six months ended June 30, 2007, operating revenues from ITEC and ITAC decreased 27.9% compared with the first six months of 2006. The decreases in 2007 were primarily due to lower levels of interest income earned on exchange fund deposits held by the Company due to a decrease in the average balances of deposits held and to a lesser extent, a decline in transaction volume. See overview for discussion of proposed IRS rules.
Other revenues primarily include investment management fee income and agency service fees, as well as search fee and other ancillary fees and income related to the Company’s other equity method investments. Other revenues increased 5.8% in the second quarter of 2007 compared with the second quarter of the prior year and 0.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006, primarily due to increases in investment management fee income generated by the Company’s Trust division and in the Company’s equity method investments.
Non-operating revenues: Investment income and realized gains and losses from sales of investments are included in non-operating revenues.
Investment income increased 22.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same period in 2006 and 22.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same period in 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in the average investment portfolio balance and to a lesser extent, to an increase in investments in taxable securities and higher rates of interest earned on short-term investments and cash balances.
Net realized gains on the sale of investment securities totaled $366,203 for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared with net realized gains of $544,457 for the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease was the result of capital gains realized on several equity securities sold during the first quarter 2006 primarily due to repositioning of the Company’s investment portfolio and in response to market changes.
Operating Expenses: The Company’s operating expenses consist primarily of commissions to agents, salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes, provision for claims and office occupancy and operations. Total operating expenses increased 19.0% and 12.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2006. The year-to-date increase was due primarily to increases in the provision for claims and commissions to agents. A summary by segment of the Company’s operating expenses is as follows for the three and the six months ended June 30:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | % | | | 2006 | | | % | | | 2007 | | | % | | | 2006 | | | % | |
Title insurance | | $ | 19,680,273 | | | 94 | | | $ | 16,358,539 | | | 94 | | | $ | 35,756,301 | | | 94 | | | $ | 31,766,899 | | | 94 | |
Exchange services | | | 335,748 | | | 2 | | | | 247,245 | | | 1 | | | | 735,437 | | | 2 | | | | 510,004 | | | 1 | |
All other | | | 796,363 | | | 4 | | | | 876,330 | | | 5 | | | | 1,683,201 | | | 4 | | | | 1,620,118 | | | 5 | |
Total | | $ | 20,812,384 | | | 100 | | | $ | 17,482,114 | | | 100 | | | $ | 38,174,939 | | | 100 | | | $ | 33,897,021 | | | 100 | |
Agent commissions represent the portion of premiums retained by agents pursuant to the terms of their respective agency contracts. Commissions to agents increased 7.4% from the prior six month period primarily due to an increasing percentage of premiums originating from agency operations in 2007 as noted previously. Although commissions paid to agents increased, the commissions as a percentage of agency premiums remained relatively stable in the second quarter and first six months of 2007 when compared with the respective previous year periods.
The provision for claims as a percentage of net premiums written was 23.4% for the second quarter of 2007, versus 10.6% for the same period in 2006. For the first six months of 2007 and 2006, the provision for claims as a percentage of net premiums written was 17.4% and 10.9%, respectively. The respective increases in the loss percentages in 2007 compared with 2006 reflect the negative impact of two large claims resulting from mortgage fraud and theft. The additional provision as a result of these two claims, in addition to the Company’s expected provision, was approximately $2.34 million. Currently, it is unknown to the Company if there will be any recovery related to these claims. If material occurrences of mortgage-related fraud and other similar types of claims continue, the Company’s ultimate loss estimates for recent policy years could increase. Loss provision rates are subject to variability and are reviewed and adjusted as claims experience develops.
Declining economic conditions and/or declines in transaction volumes have historically been factors in increased claim expenses due to increased mechanics liens, defalcations and other matters which may be discovered during property foreclosures. Title claims are typically reported and paid within the first several years of policy issuance. The provision reflects actual payments of claims, net of recovery amounts, plus adjustments to the specific and incurred but not reported claims reserves, the latter of which are actuarially determined based on historical claims experience. At June 30, 2007, the total reserves for claims were $40,560,000. Of that total, $8,250,362 was reserved for specific claims and $32,309,638 was reserved for claims for which the Company had no notice.
On a consolidated basis, salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes as a percentage of total revenues were 23.0% and 21.3% for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the first six months of the year, salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes as a percentage of total revenues were 24.4% and 22.9% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Personnel costs increased compared with the first six months of last year due to increases in salaries and related compensation expenses. The title insurance segment’s total salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes accounted for 86.3% and 85.1% of the consolidated total amount for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively and 85.4% and 86.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Overall office occupancy and operations as a percentage of total revenues was 6.6% and 5.5% for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively and 6.8% and 6.3% for the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. The three and six month increases in office occupancy and operations expense were due to an increase in various items, including depreciation expense.
Title insurance companies are generally not subject to state income or franchise taxes. However, in most states they are subject to premium and retaliatory taxes. Premium and retaliatory taxes as a percentage of premiums written were 2.4% and 1.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Professional and contract labor fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with the same periods in 2006 increased primarily due to an increase in contract labor fees incurred, mostly related to investments in infrastructure and technology.
Other expenses primarily include miscellaneous operating expenses of the Trust division and other miscellaneous expenses of the title segment.
Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes was 10.9% and 23.5% of income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the provision for income taxes was 18.5% and 23.6%, respectively, of income before income taxes. The declines in the effective tax rates for the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2007 resulted primarily from a higher mix of tax-exempt investment income relative to taxable income. The reduction in taxable income primarily resulted from the increase in the provision for claims.
Net Income: On a consolidated basis, the Company reported a decrease in net income of 51.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the prior year period. Operating expenses increased compared with the 2006 period primarily due to the increase in provision for claims and commissions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows: Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007, amounted to $4,915,735 compared with $9,165,913 for the six months ended June, 30, 2006. Cash flow from operations has been the primary source of financing for expanding operations, additions to property and equipment, dividends to shareholders and other requirements. The net decrease in net cash provided by operating activities is primarily the result of the decrease in net income and the decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by the increase in the provision for claims. The principal non-operating uses of cash and cash equivalents for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were additions to the investment portfolio.
Payment of dividends: The Company’s significant sources of funds are dividends and distributions from its subsidiaries, which are subject to regulation in the states in which they do business. These regulations, among other things, require prior regulatory approval of the payment of dividends and other intercompany transfers. The Company believes that amounts available for transfer from the insurance subsidiaries are adequate to meet the Company’s operating needs.
Liquidity: Due to the Company’s historical ability to generate positive cash flows from its operations, management believes that funds generated from operations will enable the Company to adequately meet its anticipated cash needs and is unaware of any trend or occurrence that is likely to result in adverse liquidity changes. The Company’s cash requirements include operating expenses, taxes, capital expenditures and dividends on its common stock declared by the Board of Directors.
In addition to operational liquidity, the Company maintains a high degree of liquidity within its investment portfolio in the form of short-term investments and other readily marketable securities. As of June 30, 2007, the Company held cash and cash equivalents of $3,169,702, short-term investments of $1,733,603 and various other readily marketable securities.
Capital expenditures: During 2007, the Company has plans for various capital improvement projects, including software development projects. The Company anticipates capital expenditures of approximately $900,000 during the remainder of 2007 in connection with these projects.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations: It is not the general practice of the Company to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements, nor is it the policy of the Company to issue guarantees to third parties. Off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under noncancelable operating leases, payments due under various agreements with third-party service providers, and unaccrued obligations pursuant to certain executive employment agreements.
The total reserve for all reported and unreported losses the Company incurred through June 30, 2007 is represented by the reserves for claims. Information regarding the claims reserve can be found in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-Q. Further information on contractual obligations related to the reserves for claims can be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Equity Investments: The Company’s equity investments are in public companies whose security prices are subject to volatility. Should the fair value of these investments fall below the Company’s cost bases and the financial condition or prospects of these companies deteriorate, the Company may determine in a future period that this decline in fair value is other than temporary, requiring that an impairment loss be recognized.
New Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This statement, which is expected to expand fair value measurement, permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Safe Harbor Statement
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material, press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect management’s current outlook for future periods. These statements may be identified by the use of words such as "plan," "expect," "aim," "believe," "project," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "should," "could" and other expressions that indicate future events and trends. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including statements about the Company's strategy for growth, product and service development, market share position, claims, expenditures, financial results and cash requirements, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties.
Actual future results and trends may differ materially from historical results or those projected in any such forward-looking statements depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following: varying demand for title insurance due to factors such as interest rate fluctuations, the availability of mortgage funds, the level of real estate transactions, mortgage refinance activity, the cost of real estate, consumer confidence, employment levels, family income levels and general economic conditions; changes to the insurance requirements of the participants in the secondary mortgage market; losses from claims may be greater than anticipated such that reserves for possible claims are inadequate; unanticipated adverse changes in securities markets including interest rates, resulting in material losses on the Company’s investments; the Company’s dependence on key management personnel, the loss of whom could have a material adverse affect on the Company’s business; the Company’s ability to develop and offer products and services that meet changing industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner; significant changes to applicable government regulations; state statutes requiring the Company’s insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum levels of capital, surplus and reserves and restricting the amount of dividends that the insurance subsidiaries may pay to the Company without prior regulatory approval; and the concentration of key accounting and information systems in a few locations. These and other risks and uncertainties may be described from time to time in the Company's other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For more details on factors that could affect expectations, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
No material changes in the Company’s market risk or market strategy occurred during the current period. A detailed discussion of market risk is provided in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act") was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Act, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2007. In reaching this conclusion, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer determined that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that such information was accumulated and communicated to the Company's management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) | The following table provides information about purchases by the Company (and all affiliated purchasers) during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act: |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan | | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | | | | | | | | | 323,330 | |
04/01/07– 04/30/07 | | | - | | | | | | | - | | | | 323,330 | |
05/01/07– 05/31/07 | | | 3,933 | | | $ | 48.51 | | | | 3,933 | | | | 319,397 | |
06/01/07– 06/30/07 | | | 1,909 | | | $ | 49.62 | | | | 1,909 | | | | 317,488 | |
Total: | | | 5,842 | | | $ | 48.87 | | | | 5,842 | | | | 317,488 | |
For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, ITC purchased an aggregate of 5,842 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the purchase plan (the “Plan”) that was publicly announced on June 5, 2000. In 2000, 2004 and 2005, the Board of Directors of ITIC and ITC approved the purchase by ITC of up to an aggregate of 500,000 and 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Plan. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Board of Directors, the Plan will expire when ITC has purchased all shares authorized for purchase thereunder. ITC intends to make further purchases under this Plan.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) | Investors Title Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 16, 2007. |
(c) | The voting results for the proposal to elect three Directors to the Company's Board of Directors, each for a three-year term, are as follows: |
Director | For | Against | Abstentions | Withheld | Broker Non-votes |
| | | | | |
J. Allen Fine | 2,110,330 | N/A | N/A | 68,941 | N/A |
David L. Francis | 2,109,650 | N/A | N/A | 69,621 | N/A |
A. Scott Parker III | 2,110,230 | N/A | N/A | 69,041 | N/A |
| 31(i) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
| 31(ii) | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| INVESTORS TITLE COMPANY |
| | |
| By: | /s/ James A. Fine, Jr. |
| | James A. Fine, Jr. |
| | President, Principal Financial Officer and |
| | Principal Accounting Officer |
| | |
| | |
Dated: August 7, 2007 | | |