Total System Services (TSS) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

☑ Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant toSection 240.14a-12

Total System Services, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☑ No fee required.

☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(4) and0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5) Total fee paid:

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1) Amount Previously Paid:

2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3) Filing Party:

4) Date Filed:

M. Troy Woods

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

March 14, 2018

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

First, thank you for putting your confidence and resources in TSYS. You are invited to attend our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the TSYS Riverfront Campus Auditorium, One TSYS Way, Columbus, Georgia where you can hear about our recent business performance in 2017 and our strategy for future long-term growth. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you can listen to it live and view the slide presentation by visiting our website at www.tsys.com.

In addition, I encourage you to review the proxy materials and 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders to learn more about our company and our commitment to not only delivering long-term value to our shareholders but also our commitment to our team members, customers, the communities in which we do business and diversity.

Your vote is very important to us. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, I encourage you to promptly submit your vote in advance by the Internet, telephone or mail to ensure that your shares are represented.

We value your feedback and thank you for your continued commitment to TSYS.

Sincerely,

M. Troy Woods

Total System Services, Inc.      •      Post Office Box 2506      •      Columbus, Georgia 31902-2506

Notice of The 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
TIME:	10:00 a.m. Eastern Time Thursday, April 26, 2018
PLACE:	TSYS Riverfront Campus Auditorium One TSYS Way Columbus, Georgia 31901
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:	(1)    To elect 12 directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
	(2)    To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as TSYS’ independent auditor for the year 2018.
	(3)    To approve, on an advisory basis, executive compensation.
	(4)    To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment thereof.
WHO MAY VOTE:	You may vote if you were a shareholder of record on February 16, 2018.
ANNUAL REPORT:	A copy of the Annual Report is enclosed.
PROXY VOTING:	Your vote is important. Please vote in one of these ways:
	(1)    Use the toll-free telephone number shown on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable;
	(2)    Visit the website shown on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, or scan the QR code shown with your mobile device;
	(3)    If you received paper copies of the proxy materials, mark, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided; or
	(4)    Submit a ballot at the Annual Meeting.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES PROMPTLY.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

March 14, 2018

G. Sanders Griffith, III

Secretary

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder

Meeting to be held on April 26, 2018

This Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available on our website at

http://annualreport.tsys.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY	1
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS	4
Corporate Governance Principles	4
Director Independence	4
Attendance at Meetings	4
Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors	4
Committees of the Board	5
Board Leadership Structure	6
Risk Oversight	7
Shareholder Engagement	8
Board and Committee Evaluations	8
Communicating with the Board	9
Board Composition	9
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	10
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION	12
PROPOSAL 1:    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	14
PROPOSAL 2:     RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR	19
Audit andNon-Audit Fees	19
Policy on Audit CommitteePre-Approval	19
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	21
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	22
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	23
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION:	24
Compensation Discussion And Analysis	24
Compensation Committee Report	38
2017 Summary Compensation Table	39
2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards	40
2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End	41
2017 Option Exercises and Stock Vested	42
2017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation	42
Potential Payments upon Termination orChange-in-Control	43
CEO Pay Ratio	44
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation	45
PROPOSAL 3:     APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	46
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS	47
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE	47
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING	48

PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please read the entire Proxy Statement before you vote.

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Date and Time: April 26, 2018,10:00 a.m. Eastern Time	Record Date: February 16, 2018
Place: TSYS Riverfront Campus Auditorium One TSYS Way Columbus, Georgia 31901	Meeting Webcast: www.tsys.com under “Investor Relations”—“Events, Webcasts and Presentations”

MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Management Proposals:	Board’s Recommendation	Page
Election of 12 Director Nominees	FOR all Director Nominees	14
Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Independent Auditor for 2018	FOR	19
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation	FOR	46

2017 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

TSYS delivered strong financial and business performance in 2017. Highlights include the following:

• Total revenues were $4.9 billion, an increase of 18.2% over 2016. Net revenue(non-GAAP), which excludes reimbursable items, interchange and payment network fees, was $3.4 billion, an increase of 11.8% over 2016.

• Net income attributable to TSYS common shareholders was $586.2 million, an increase of 83.4% over 2016, which includes $135.9 million of tax benefit from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were $3.16, an increase of 82.4% over 2016.

• Adjusted earnings(non-GAAP) were $624.2 million, an increase of 20.9% over 2016. Adjusted diluted EPS(non-GAAP) were $3.37, an increase of 20.2% over 2016.

• Quarterly dividend was increased by 30% from $0.10 to $0.13 per share.

• We returned over $361.7 million to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.

• Debt was reduced by $400 million bringing the total to $800 million over the past two years.

Adjusted diluted EPS and net revenue arenon-GAAP financial measures which are defined on page 25 of this Proxy Statement. These two metrics and relative total shareholder return were used as the performance metrics for our executive compensation program for 2017.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    1

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FACTS

Our Corporate Governance Policies Reflect Best Practices Including:

Annual Election of All Directors

Majority Voting and a Director Resignation Policy for Directors in Uncontested Elections

Independent Lead Director with Broad Authority and Responsibility

10 of 12 Directors are Independent

Executive Sessions ofNon-Management Directors held at each Regularly Scheduled Board Meeting

Board Participation in Executive Succession Planning

Board Oversight of Risk Management with a Focus on the Most Significant Risks Facing TSYS

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Limitation on Outside Board and Audit Committee Service

Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations

Shareholder Outreach Regarding General Governance Issues and Compensation Related Matters

No Hedging of Company Stock by Directors and Executive Officers and Restrictions on Pledging

No Poison Pill

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our executive compensation program aligns to long-term shareholder value creation and attracts, motivates and retains an exceptionally talented executive team with the skills and vision required for us to become the leading global payment solutions provider. Our executive compensation program links compensation to TSYS’ performance. Performance-based pay incentives focus our management on achieving our key financial, strategic and business goals. For 2017, approximately 85% and 72%, respectively, of our CEO’s and, excluding an executive who had announced his retirement, other named executive officers’ target total direct compensation opportunity was performance-based, with the actual amounts realized dependent upon our annual and long-term performance and our stock price. Performance-based pay includes the target 2017 Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”) cash award and Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”) opportunity (delivered in the form of stock options and performance shares).

Our Executive Compensation Program Reflects Best Practices Including:

Emphasis on Performance-Based Compensation

Clawback Policy on Incentive Compensation

Double-Trigger Provisions with Pro Rata Vesting of Equity Upon Change of Control

Significant Stock Ownership Guidelines

Retention of an Independent Compensation Consultant

Annual Shareholder“Say-on-Pay” Vote

No Hedging of Company Stock and Restrictions on Pledging

No Backdating or Repricing of Stock Options

No Excise TaxGross-Up Policy for New Agreements

No Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

We were gratified that over 93% of the votes cast in 2017 on the advisory vote on our executive officers’ compensation voted in support of the compensation paid to executive officers. Nevertheless, consistent with its strong interest in shareholder engagement, communication, and transparency, the Compensation Committee continued to examine our executive compensation program to assure alignment between the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

2    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 24 of this Proxy Statement for a detailed description of our executive compensation.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Please see “Additional Information About the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 48 for important information about the proxy materials, voting, the Annual Meeting, financial information and the deadlines to submit shareholder proposals for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    3

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Corporate Governance Principles

TSYS is committed to good corporate governance, which is designed to build long-term shareholder value, sustain our success, maintain internal checks and balances and foster responsible decision making and accountability.

TSYS has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other governance practices to provide a framework for the effective governance of TSYS. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and other governance practices are reviewed regularly by the Board and TSYS and modified as appropriate. The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees, each committee’s current charter, procedures for shareholders and other interested parties to communicate with the independent Lead Director or with thenon-management directors individually or as a group and procedures for reporting complaints and concerns about TSYS, including complaints concerning accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters can be found in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.tsys.com, under “Investor Relations” then “Corporate Governance.”

Governance is a continuing focus at TSYS, starting with the Board and extending to management and all employees. As such, the Board reviews TSYS’ policies and business strategies and advises and counsels the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers who manage our business.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that 10 of its 12 members are independent as defined by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. TSYS’ Board has determined that the following directors are independent: F. Thaddeus Arroyo, Kriss Cloninger III, Walter W. Driver, Jr., Sidney E. Harris, William M. Isaac, Mason H. Lampton, Connie D. McDaniel, Richard A. Smith, John T. Turner and Richard W. Ussery. James H. Blanchard and James D. Yancey, who retired as directors at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, were also determined by the Board to be independent directors for the period they served as directors during 2017. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no direct or indirect material relationship with TSYS. The Board has established guidelines for independence to assist it in determining director independence which are consistent with the independence requirements in the NYSE listing standards. In addition to applying these guidelines, which are set forth in Section 2 of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.tsys.com, under “Investor Relations” then “Corporate Governance,” the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination. The Board considered the transactions described under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” on page 10 and concluded that none of the transactions impaired any director’s independence under TSYS’ independence guidelines or NYSE listing standards.

Attendance at Meetings

The Board of Directors held nine meetings in 2017. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings held during their tenure during 2017, except Philip W. Tomlinson whose absences were attributable to his illness and the illness of an immediate family member. During each of the five prior years, Mr. Tomlinson’s attendance was 100%. The average attendance by directors at the aggregate number of Board and committee meetings they were scheduled to attend was 95%. Although TSYS has no formal policy with respect to Board members’ attendance at its annual meetings, it is customary for all Board members to attend the annual meetings. All of our directors attended the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

Thenon-management directors meet separately in executive session at least four times a year in conjunction with each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors. The independent directors meet in executive session at least once a year. The independent Lead Director presides at the meetings ofnon-management and independent directors. Kriss Cloninger III currently serves as our independent Lead Director.

4    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Committees of the Board

TSYS’ Board of Directors has five principal standing committees—an Audit Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Technology Committee and an Executive Committee.

Each committee has a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that complies with the listing standards of the NYSE pertaining to corporate governance. Copies of the committee charters are available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.tsys.com, under “Investor Relations” then “Corporate Governance.” The Board has determined that each member of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Compensation Committees is an independent director as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and satisfies the applicable SEC and NYSE additional independence requirements for the members of such committees. The following table shows the current membership of the various committees.

Name	Audit		Compensation		Corporate Governance and Nominating		Technology	Executive
F. Thaddeus Arroyo							✓
Kriss Cloninger III				Chair				Chair
Walter W. Driver, Jr.				✓
Sidney E. Harris		✓					Chair	✓
William M. Isaac				✓		✓
Mason H. Lampton							✓
Connie D. McDaniel		Chair				✓		✓
Richard A. Smith				✓
John T. Turner		✓				Chair		✓
Richard W. Ussery							✓
M. Troy Woods								✓
Number of Committee Meetings Held in 2017		12		7		4	4	0

Executive Committee

During the intervals between meetings of TSYS’ Board of Directors when the full Board is unable to meet in person or telephonically with respect to urgent, time sensitive matters, the Executive Committee possesses and may exercise any and all of the powers of the Board of Directors in the management and direction of the business and affairs of TSYS with respect to which specific direction has not been previously given by the Board of Directors unless Board action is required by TSYS’ governing documents, law or rule.

Audit Committee

The Report of the Audit Committee is on page 21. The Board has determined that all members of the Committee are independent under the rules of the NYSE and the SEC, financially literate under the rules of the NYSE and that Connie D. McDaniel is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC. The primary functions of the Audit Committee include:

• Monitoring the integrity of TSYS’ financial statements, TSYS’ systems of internal controls and TSYS’ compliance with regulatory and legal requirements;

• Selecting and monitoring the independence, qualifications and performance of TSYS’ independent auditor and internal auditing activities;

• Providing an avenue of communication among the independent auditor, management, internal audit and the Board of Directors; and

• Monitoring the effectiveness of management’s enterprise risk management process that monitors and manages key business risks facing TSYS.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The primary functions of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee include:

• Identifying qualified individuals to become Board members;

• Recommending to the Board the director nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders and director nominees to be elected by the Board to fill interim director vacancies;

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    5

• Overseeing the annual review and evaluation of the performance of the Board and its committees;

• Developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance guidelines; and

• Ensuring that procedures are in place for annual CEO performance reviews and annual reviews for succession planning and management development.

Compensation Committee

The Report of the Compensation Committee is on page 38. The primary functions of the Compensation Committee include:

• Establishing, reviewing and approving the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and reviewing and approving compensation amounts for all other executive officers;

• Overseeing TSYS’ equity compensation plans;

• Preparing the report on executive compensation to be included in TSYS’ annual proxy statement;

• Reviewing and assessing potential risk to TSYS from its compensation practices, policies and programs; and

• Monitoring TSYS’ management development and executive succession planning activities.

The Compensation Committee’s charter reflects these responsibilities and, except to the extent prohibited by NYSE rules or other applicable law or regulation, allows the Committee to delegate any matters within its power and responsibility to individuals or subcommittees when it deems appropriate. Information regarding TSYS’ processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, including the roles of TSYS’ executive officers and independent compensation consultant in the Committee’s decision making process, can be found under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 24.

Technology Committee

The primary functions of the Technology Committee include:

• Assisting the Board and Audit Committee in their oversight of TSYS’ management of risks regarding technology, information security, cybersecurity, disaster recovery and business continuity;

• Reviewing and discussing with management TSYS’ assessment and management of risks associated with its technology;

• Reviewing and discussing with management TSYS’ risk appetite and strategy and objectives relating to technology risks, as well as the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating such risks and strategy and objectives: and

• Making recommendations to the Audit Committee or the Board with respect to any of the above and other matters related to technology risks.

Board Leadership Structure

Under its charter, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee periodically reviews and recommends to the Board the leadership structure of the Board including whether to separate or combine the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman positions as well as whether to have a Lead Director. Our bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the Board with the flexibility to change the structure of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions as and when appropriate. In addition, since 2003, our Corporate Governance Guidelines have required the election by the independent directors of an independent Lead Director to serve during any period when there is no independent Chairman of the Board in order to ensure that there is effective oversight by an independent board.

Board Leadership Structure

•   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer: M. Troy Woods

•   Independent Lead Director: Kriss Cloninger III

•   Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Technology Committees led by independent directors

•   Active engagement and oversight by all directors

The Board believes this structure provides an effective balance between strong company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors.

6    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Responsibilities of the Independent Lead Director

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the responsibilities of the independent Lead Director include:

• providing leadership to ensure the Board works in an independent, cohesive fashion, which includes evaluating the CEO’s and Board’s performance on an ongoing and annual basis;

• serving as a liaison with TSYS’ shareholders;

• developing the agenda for Board meetings with the Chairman of the Board, Board and Corporate Secretary;

• having the authority to call meetings of the independent andnon-management directors, as needed;

• ensuring Board leadership in times of crisis;

• developing the agenda for and chairing executive sessions of the independent directors and executive sessions of thenon-management directors and acting as liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman of the Board on matters raised in such sessions;

• chairing Board meetings when the Chairman of the Board is not in attendance;

• working with the Chairman of the Board regarding meeting schedules to ensure the conduct of the Board meeting provides adequate time for serious discussion of appropriate issues and that appropriate information is made available to Board members on a timely basis;

• attending meetings of the committees of the Board, as necessary or at his/her discretion, and communicating regularly with the Chairs of the principal standing committees of the Board; and

• being available, upon request, for consultation and direct communication with major shareholders.

Meetings ofNon-Management Directors and Rationale for Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide thatnon-management directors will meet in executive session at least four times a year and that our independent directors will meet in executive session at least once a year. As noted above, our Lead Director chairs these executive sessions which allow the Board to review key decisions and to discuss matters in a manner that is independent of the Chief Executive Officer, and where necessary, critical of the Chief Executive Officer and senior management.

The Board believes that the leadership of both the Board and TSYS by Mr. Woods is in the best interests of TSYS and its shareholders as it enhances communication between the Board and management and allows Mr. Woods to more effectively execute TSYS’ business plans and confront its challenges. The Board believes that the appointment of a strong independent Lead Director and the use of regular executive sessions of thenon-management directors, along with the Board’s strong committee system and substantial majority of independent directors, allow it to maintain effective oversight of management.

Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight with a focus on the most significant risks facing TSYS. A fundamental part of risk oversight is not only understanding the material risks the company faces and the steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the company. The involvement of the Board of Directors in reviewing TSYS’ business strategy is an integral aspect of the Board’s assessment of management’s tolerance for risk and also its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for TSYS. The Board recognizes that it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk. In fact, thoughtful and appropriate risk-taking is essential for TSYS to remain competitive and to achieve itslong-term strategic objectives.

Oversight of Risk

•   The Board oversees risk management.

•   Board Committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board, play significant roles in carrying out the risk oversight function.

•   TSYS management is charged with managing risk, through robust internal processes and effective internal controls.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    7

The Board exercises its oversight responsibility for risk both directly and through the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Technology Committees. Management of TSYS, which is responsible forday-to-day risk management, maintains an enterprise risk management process. The enterprise risk management process is designed to identify and assess TSYS’ risks, and to develop steps to mitigate and manage risks. On at least an annual basis, our Chief Risk, Compliance and Privacy Officer presents a report to the full Board and the Board discusses the most significant risks that TSYS is facing and the steps management has taken or will take to mitigate those risks. In addition, the full Board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and related activities through regular reports from the committee chairs.

The Audit Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing TSYS’ enterprise risk management framework and programs. The Committee regularly discusses our major financial risk exposures, financial reporting, internal controls, key operational risks, market risks and compliance, and the enterprise risk management framework and programs. TSYS’ executive management engages with and/or reports to the Committee on a regular basis to address high priority risks.

The Technology Committee assists the Board and the Audit Committee in the oversight of TSYS’ management of risks regarding technology, information security, cybersecurity, disaster recovery and business continuity, including, but not limited to, risks in these five areas related to hardware, software, personnel, architecture, organizational structure, management, resource allocation, innovation, and research and development. The Committee oversees and reviews management’s assessment and management of these technology risks and regularly discusses with management TSYS’ risk appetite and strategy relating to these risks. In this regard, the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Information Security Officer and the Chief Technology Officer attend all meetings of the Committee and each periodically makes presentations to the full Board regarding technology risks. With respect to communications between the Committee and the Board, the Chairman of the Technology Committee is a member of the Audit Committee and regularly reports to the Audit Committee at its meetings regarding the Committee’s activities. In addition, as noted above, the full Board is kept informed of the Technology Committee’s risk oversight and related activities through regular reports from the Committee’s Chair.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees risks related to our overall corporate governance structure and processes, including board and committee composition, board size and structure, independence and risks arising from related party transactions.

The Compensation Committee oversees the risks associated with management resources, succession planning and management development and our compensation structure and programs, including evaluating and assessing risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees, as discussed further below.

Management recently conducted a risk assessment to evaluate the risks associated with TSYS’ compensation practices, policies and programs for all employees, including the named executive officers. Management’s analysis was reviewed with the Compensation Committee at its February 2018 meeting. Based on this review and assessment, we do not believe our compensation programs encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking that is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on TSYS.

Shareholder Engagement

We believe that building positive relationships with our shareholders is critical to TSYS’ long-term success. We value the views of our shareholders and we have bothface-to-face meetings and conference calls with them during the year on subjects such as capital allocation, our performance, the regulatory environment, corporate governance and executive compensation in an effort to ensure that management and the Board understand and consider the issues that matter most to our shareholders and to enable TSYS to attempt to address them effectively. In addition, our senior management participates in formal industry conferences andnon-deal road shows. We also host on an annual basis a TSYS Investor Day for institutional investors and equity analysts.

Board and Committee Evaluations

Our Board recognizes that a thorough, constructive evaluation process is an essential element of good corporate governance and enhances the Board’s effectiveness. Accordingly, each year our Board and committees conduct self-evaluations to, among other things, assess the composition of the Board, including the background, qualifications, attributes, skills and experience represented on the Board; to assess their effectiveness and adherence to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and committee charters; and to identify opportunities to improve Board and committee performance through feedback received during the evaluation process. Based on the evaluation results, changes in practices or procedures are considered and implemented, as appropriate. The

8    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the evaluation process and reviews the format of the evaluation process annually to ensure that actionable feedback is solicited on the operation and effectiveness of the Board and its committees.

Communicating with the Board

The Board provides a process for shareholders and other interested parties to communicate with one or more members of the Board, including the independent Lead Director, or thenon-management directors individually or as a group. Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing the Board of Directors, Total System Services, Inc., c/o General Counsel’s Office, One TSYS Way, Columbus, Georgia 31901 or by calling(888) 467-2881. These procedures are also available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.tsys.com, under “Investor Relations” then “Corporate Governance.” The process for handling shareholder and other communications to the Board has been approved by TSYS’ independent directors.

Board Composition

Nominating Process, Director Recruitment and Refreshment

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews potential director candidates and recommends nominees to the Board for approval. The Committee assesses the size and composition of the Board each year and seeks input from each director with respect to the current composition of the Board in light of TSYS’ current and future business strategies as a means to identify any backgrounds or skill sets that may be helpful in maintaining or improving alignment between Board composition and our business. In assessing Board composition and selecting and recruiting director candidates, the Committee believes it is important to have a mix of experienced directors with a deep understanding of TSYS and others who bring a fresh perspective. In this regard, the Committee recruited two new directors in 2014, one new director in 2016 and two new directors in 2017. The Committee is aware that a long-tenured board and/or long-tenured directors may be believed by some to contribute to a lack of diversity and fresh perspectives, and may also diminish a director’s independence. The Committee appreciates these concerns and has been focused on director refreshment and succession planning for several years, which focus has resulted in expanded qualifications and diversity represented on the Board. The Committee intends to continue its focus on director refreshment and is committed to continuing to increase the Board’s diversity, including through the nomination of additional female and minority candidates as Board members.

Director Qualifications

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership criteria considered by the Committee in recommending nominees for a position on TSYS’ Board. The Committee believes that, at a minimum, a director candidate must possess the personal qualities of personal and professional integrity, sound judgment and forthrightness. A director candidate must also have sufficient time and energy to devote to the affairs of TSYS, be free from conflicts of interest with TSYS, and be willing to make, and financially capable of making, the required investment in TSYS’ stock pursuant to our Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Committee considers, among other things, the following criteria when reviewing a director candidate and existing directors:

• The extent of the director’s/potential director’s business, educational, governmental,non-profit or professional acumen and experience;

• Whether the director/potential director assists in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background, perspective and experience, including with respect to age, gender, race, place of residence and specialized experience;

• Whether the director/potential director meets the independence requirements of the listing standards of the NYSE and our independence guidelines (where independence is desired);

• Whether the director/potential director has the financial acumen or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of TSYS’ business; and

• Whether the director/potential director, by virtue of particular technical expertise, experience or specialized skill relevant to TSYS’ current or future business, will add specific value as a Board member.

In addition, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, no person 75 years or older is eligible for election as a member of the Board.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    9

The Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. In addition to the criteria set forth above, the Committee considers how the skills and attributes of each individual candidate or incumbent director complement those of fellow director nominees to create a balanced Board with diverse viewpoints and deep expertise. Although the Board does not have a formal policy on diversity, the Board and the Committee believe that the background, attributes and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant mix of attributes, experience, knowledge and abilities that will contribute to Board diversity as the Board and Committee believe that a variety of points of view contribute to a more effective decision making process. The Committee actively considers diversity in recruitment and nominations of directors. In this regard, of the five most recent additions to the Board, two were female (one of whom no longer serves as a director), two are the youngest Board members and one is Hispanic. As noted under “Nominating Process, Director Recruitment and Refreshment” above, the Committee is committed to continuing to increase the Board’s diversity, including through the nomination of additional female and minority candidates as Board members.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees

The Committee has two primary methods for identifying director candidates (other than those proposed by TSYS’ shareholders, as discussed below). First, the Committee solicits ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources including members of the Board, TSYS executives and individuals personally known to the members of the Board. Second, the Committee may use its authority under its charter to retain at TSYS’ expense one or more search firms to identify candidates (and to approve such firms’ fees and other retention terms).

The Committee will consider all director candidates identified through the processes described above and will evaluate each of them, including incumbents, based on the same criteria. Director candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Committee and may be considered at any point during the year. If based on the Committee’s initial evaluation a director candidate continues to be of interest to the Committee, the Chair of the Committee and other Committee members will interview the candidate and communicate the evaluation to executive management. Additional interviews are conducted, if necessary, and ultimately the Committee will meet to finalize its list of recommended candidates for the Board’s consideration.

During 2017, the Committee sought to recruit additional Board members who align with TSYS’ long-term growth strategy. Following consideration of candidates, including a comprehensive review of the candidates’ abilities and qualifications, the Committee recommended that F. Thaddeus Arroyo and Richard A. Smith be elected to the Board. Mr. Arroyo and Mr. Smith were recommended by the Chief Executive Officer.

Shareholder Candidates

The Committee will also consider candidates for nomination as a director submitted by shareholders. Although the Committee does not have a separate policy that addresses the consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders, the Board does not believe that such a separate policy is necessary as our bylaws permit shareholders to nominate candidates and as one of the duties set forth in the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter is to review and consider director candidates submitted by shareholders. The Committee’s evaluation process does not vary based upon whether a candidate is recommended by a shareholder; provided, however, the procedural requirements set forth in our bylaws and the procedures described under “Shareholder Proposals and Nominations” on page 50 must be met.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Related Party Transaction Policy

The Board of Directors has adopted a written policy for the review, approval or ratification of certain transactions with related parties of TSYS, which policy is administered by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Transactions that are covered under the policy include any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which: (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year; (2) TSYS is a participant; and (3) any related party of TSYS (such as an executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director or greater than 5% beneficial owner of TSYS stock, or their immediate family members) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

In determining whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the Committee must consider, in addition to other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable to TSYS than terms

10    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

The policy does not apply to transactions which occurred, or in the case of ongoing transactions, transactions which began, prior to the date of the adoption of the policy by the Board.

Related Party Transactions

Mack Paul Daffin, Jr., theson-in-law of director Philip W. Tomlinson, was employed by TSYS as a group executive,e-servicing and loyalty marketing/products during 2017. Mr. Daffin received $397,743 in compensation during 2017. John Dale Hester, theson-in-law of director Richard W. Ussery, was employed by TSYS as a group executive, north america consumer account management during 2017. Mr. Hester received $314,616 in compensation during 2017. Roderick Cowan Hunter, theson-in-law of director James D. Yancey who retired as a director at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, was employed by TSYS as a senior procurement manager during 2017. Mr. Hunter received $224,436 in compensation during 2017. Charles D. Todd, the brother of Paul M. Todd, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TSYS, was employed by TSYS as a senior director, finance and accounting during 2017. Mr. Todd received $303,360 in compensation during 2017. None of the employees listed above is an executive officer of TSYS. The compensation received by the employees listed above is determined under the standard compensation practices of TSYS. The employment relationships described above did not require review, approval or ratification under TSYS’ Related Party Transaction Policy as they began prior to the adoption of the policy by the TSYS Board.

Other Information About Board Independence

In addition to the information set forth under the caption “Related Party Transactions” above, the Board also considered the following commercial relationships that were entered into on terms determined on anarm’s-length basis that were comparable to the terms provided by or to TSYS to similarly situated clients or vendors in evaluating the independence of our independent directors and determined that they do not constitute a direct or indirect material relationship with TSYS. An entity of which Mr. Cloninger served as an executive officer during 2017 made payments to TSYS for merchant processing services in the ordinary course of business during 2017, which payments were significantly less than the greater of two percent of the annual revenues for that entity or TSYS, or $1 million, and therefore satisfy the Board’s guidelines for independence. An entity of which Mr. Arroyo serves as an executive officer received payments from TSYS for communications services in the ordinary course of business during 2017, which payments were significantly less than the greater of two percent of the annual revenues for that entity or TSYS, or $1 million, and therefore satisfy the Board’s guidelines for independence.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    11

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board compensation programs fornon-employee directors, which review is conducted annually. TSYS does not pay directors who are employees for Board service in addition to their regular employee compensation. As part of its review of director compensation, the Committee periodically engages an outside consultant to report on director compensation practices and levels, but did not do so in 2017. In addition, from time to time, the Chief Executive Officer may make recommendations to the Committee about types and amounts of appropriate compensation for directors. During 2017, the annual Board retainer was increased by $10,000, the value of the annual equity award was increased by $5,000 and the Lead Director’s cash retainer was increased by $2,500. In addition, each director was given the flexibility to choose whether the director’s annual equity award would be in the form of fully vested stock options or in the form of fully vested shares or any combination thereof, as opposed to the prior practice of the award being in the form of 50% fully vested stock options and 50% fully vested shares.

The compensation program fornon-employee directors is designed to achieve the following goals: compensation should fairly pay directors for work required for a company of TSYS’ size; compensation should align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of shareholders; and the structure of the compensation should be simple, transparent and easy for shareholders to understand.

Cash Compensation of Directors

The annual cash retainer fornon-employee directors is $85,000. Compensation Committee and Technology Committee members receive an additional cash retainer of $10,000, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee members receive an additional cash retainer of $7,500 and Audit Committee members receive an additional cash retainer of $15,000. In addition, the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee receives a $7,500 cash retainer, the Chairpersons of the Compensation and Technology Committees receive a $10,000 cash retainer, the Chairperson of the Audit Committee receives a $15,000 cash retainer and the Lead Director receives a $22,500 cash retainer. In addition, directors may from time to time receive compensation for serving on special committees of the TSYS Board. Directors are not compensated for serving on the Executive Committee.

Deferral Program

Non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their cash compensation under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. The Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide directors with an “above market” rate of return. Instead, the deferred amounts are deposited into one or more investment funds at the election of the director. In so doing, the plan is designed to allow directors to defer the income taxation of a portion of their compensation and to receive an investment return on those deferred amounts. All deferred fees are payable only in cash. Mr. Driver deferred cash compensation under this plan during 2017.

Equity Compensation of Directors

Non-employee directors receive an annual equity award with a fixed value of $135,000, awarded in the form of fully vested stock options or in the form of fully vested shares or any combinations thereof at the director’s choice. These awards are designed to create equity ownership and to focus directors on the long-term performance of TSYS.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The equity awards tonon-employee directors assist and facilitate directors’ fulfillment of their stock ownership requirements. TSYS’ Corporate Governance Guidelines require all directors to accumulate over time shares of TSYS stock equal in value to at least three times the value of their annual retainer for Board service. Directors have five years to attain this level of total stock ownership but must attain a share ownership threshold of one times the amount of the director’s annual retainer within three years. These stock ownership guidelines are designed to align the interests of TSYS’ directors to that of TSYS’ shareholders and the long-term performance of TSYS. All directors currently comply with our ownership guidelines.

12    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

The following table summarizes the compensation paid tonon-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Director Compensation Table

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Option Awards ($)(2)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
F. Thaddeus Arroyo	$	47,500	$	33,791	$	33,750		—	$	115,040
James H. Blanchard.(3)		—		—		—		—		—
Kriss Cloninger III		127,500		135,048		—		—		262,548
Walter W. Driver, Jr.		95,000		135,048		—		—		230,048
Sidney E. Harris		120,000		135,048		—		—		255,048
William M. Isaac		102,500		135,048		—		—		237,548
Mason H. Lampton		95,000		108,050		27,005		—		230,054
Connie D. McDaniel		122,500		135,048		—		—		257,548
Richard A. Smith		47,500		67,509		—		—		115,009
Philip W. Tomlinson		85,000		135,048		—		—		220,048
John T. Turner		115,000		—		135,001		—		250,001
Richard W. Ussery		95,000		135,048		—		—		230,048
James D. Yancey(3)		—		—		—		—		—

(1) This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of fully vested shares awarded to thenon-employee directors during 2017 who elected to receive fully vested shares as all or a portion of their equity compensation calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Thenon-employee directors other than Mr. Arroyo and Mr. Smith who elected to receive fully vested shares were awarded fully vested shares on May 10, 2017 following their election to the board on April 27, 2017, and the fair values of those awards were calculated using the closing stock price on May 10, 2017 of $58.06. Mr. Arroyo and Mr. Smith, pursuant to their respective elections to receive all or a portion of their equity compensation in the form of fully vested shares, were awarded fully vested shares on November 17, 2017, following their election to the board on October 16, 2017, and the fair values of their awards were calculated using the closing stock price on November 17, 2017 of $73.78.

(2) This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of fully vested stock options awarded tonon-employee directors in 2017 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using a Black-Scholes valuation model. Mr. Lampton and Mr. Turner elected to receive fully vested stock options as all or a portion of their equity compensation and were awarded fully vested stock options on May 10, 2017 following their election to the board on April 27, 2017, the values of which were calculated using the closing stock price on May 10, 2016 of $58.06, which is the exercise price for the stock options. Mr. Arroyo elected to receive fully vested stock options as a portion of his equity compensation and was awarded fully vested stock options on November 17, 2017 following his election to the board on October 16, 2017, the values of which were calculated using the closing stock price on November 17, 2017 of $73.78, which is the exercise price for the stock options. For a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the values of the stock option awards reported in this column, see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in TSYS’ Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, Mr. Arroyo held 2,262, Mr. Cloninger and Mr. Driver each held 38,136, Mr. Harris held 22, 310, Mr. Isaac and Ms. McDaniel each held 21,117, Mr. Lampton held 40,464, and Mr. Tomlinson and Mr. Ussery each held 14,066 vested unexercised stock options that were awarded as director compensation. The stock options granted on May 10, 2017 expire on May 9, 2027 and the stock options granted on November 17, 2017 expire on November 16, 2027.

(3) Mr. Blanchard and Mr. Yancey did not stand for reelection at the 2017 Annual Meeting and as such did not receive any compensation in 2017.

Mr. Tomlinson’s Consulting Arrangement

As was described in our 2015, 2016 and 2017 Proxy Statements, we entered into certain agreements with Mr. Tomlinson in connection with his retirement as an executive officer of TSYS, one of which is a Consulting Agreement. The Consulting Agreement will commence upon Mr. Tomlinson’s retirement as a director. He has agreed to serve as a consultant to us for a period of two years following his retirement as a director, providing consulting services related to business development, maintenance of client relationships, executive and board development and such other matters as may be requested by the Chief Executive Officer. We will pay Mr. Tomlinson $500,000 per year during the term of the Consulting Agreement.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    13

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General Information

Our Board of Directors is pleased to present the 12 nominees listed on pages 14 through 18 of this Proxy Statement for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. All of the 12 nominees are currently serving on our Board and were elected by shareholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting, except Mr. Arroyo and Mr. Smith who were elected by the Board in October 2017. Our directors determine the size of the Board and for purposes of the Annual Meeting, the number is fixed at 12.

Nominees for Election as Directors

All nominees for director have been nominated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and approved by the Board for election as directors and, if elected, will hold office until the 2019 Annual Meeting. The Board believes that each director nominee will be able to stand for election. If any nominee becomes unable to stand for election, proxies in favor of that nominee will be voted in favor of any substitute nominee named by the Board upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. If you do not wish your shares voted for one or more of the nominees, you may so indicate on the proxy.

The 12 nominees for director were selected by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee based upon a review of the nominees and consideration of the director qualifications described under “Director Qualifications” on page 9. The Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole with the objective of recommending a group of directors that can best perpetuate the success of TSYS’ business and represent the long-term interests of shareholders.

The Committee believes that each director nominee possesses the personal qualities of personal and professional integrity, sound judgment and forthrightness; has sufficient time to dedicate to the affairs of TSYS; is free from conflicts of interest with TSYS; is able to work in a collegial manner; and is in compliance with the requirements of the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Committee also assessed the qualifications, attributes, skills and experience of each director nominee. To follow is certain information with respect to each director nominee, including information with respect to the specific qualifications, attributes, skills and experience that contributed to his or her selection as a member of our Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors Recommends That You Vote “FOR” All of the Following Nominees.

F. Thaddeus Arroyo

  Age 53   Director since 2017   Technology Committee Mr. Arroyo has served as Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Business, AT&T Inc., a telecommunications provider, since the beginning of 2017. From 2001 until 2017, Mr. Arroyo served in various capacities with AT&T, including Chief Executive Officer, AT&T Mexico, LLC. Mr. Arroyo served in various capacities with Sabre, Inc. from 1992 until 2001, including Senior Vice President, Information Technology Services. Mr. Arroyo is a board member of the National Center for Women in Technology and the Hispanic IT Executive Council, a Governance Fellow with the National Association of Corporate Directors and serves on the Southern Methodist University Cox School of Business Executive Advisory Board. Mr. Arroyo is a graduate of the University of Texas at Arlington and he earned a Masters degree in business administration from Southern Methodist University Cox School of Business. Mr. Arroyo’s technology innovation and execution expertise, his cybersecurity experience, his global business experience, his leadership skills and his mergers and acquisitions experience provide invaluable resources to the TSYS Board as TSYS expands its offering of payment services and manages technology risks.

14    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Kriss Cloninger III

  Age 70   Director since 2004   Lead Director   Compensation Committee Chair   Executive Committee Mr. Cloninger served as President and as a director of Aflac Incorporated, an insurance holding company, from 2001 until his retirement as an officer and director at the end of 2017. Mr. Cloninger also served as Chief Financial Officer of Aflac from the time he joined the company in 1992 until 2015. Mr. Cloninger also serves as Presiding Director of Tupperware Brands Corporation and is a member of its Compensation Committee. Mr. Cloninger’s business experience includes serving as a principal with KPMG LLP. Mr. Cloninger is a fellow of the Society of Actuaries and a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. Mr. Cloninger is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin and he earned a Masters degree in business administration from the University of Texas at Austin. In addition to Mr. Cloninger’s leadership skills, his risk management experience and his expertise in corporate strategy development, Mr. Cloninger’s experience as a principal financial officer of a public company with a strong international business provides an important perspective to the TSYS Board as TSYS expands internationally.

Walter W. Driver, Jr.

  Age 72   Director since 2002   Compensation Committee Mr. Driver has served as Chairman-Southeast of Goldman, Sachs & Co., an investment banking and securities firm, since 2006. Mr. Driver practiced law with the law firm of King & Spalding from 1970 until 2006, and served as Managing Partner or Chairman of the firm from 1999 until 2006. Mr. Driver’s law practice focused on many aspects of representation of financial institutions, including financing transactions. Mr. Driver also serves as a director of Equifax Inc. and is a member of its Governance Committee. Mr. Driver is a graduate of Stanford University and he earned a law degree from the University of Texas School of Law. In addition to Mr. Driver’s global business experience and his merger and acquisition experience, Mr. Driver’s legal training and experience, his negotiating skills, risk assessment skills and understanding of complex financial transactions benefit the TSYS Board in its discussion of strategic matters.

Sidney E. Harris

  Age 68   Director since 1999   Technology Committee Chair   Audit Committee   Executive Committee Mr. Harris served as a professor at Georgia State University from 1997 until his retirement in 2014. From 1997 until 2004, Mr. Harris also served as the Dean of the J. Mack Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. In 1987, Mr. Harris joined the faculty of the Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management at the Claremont Graduate School and served as Dean of Drucker from 1991 until 1996. His research has focused on strategy implementation, general management and the strategic use of information in the strategy, structure and culture of high performance organizations. He has lectured internationally at several universities, and served as a member of the board of the Society of International Business Fellows. Mr. Harris serves as a director of the Virtus Mutual Fund Family. Mr. Harris previously served as a director of the RidgeWorth Funds, the Multi-Manager Portfolio Funds, The ServiceMaster Company and Transamerica Investors, Inc. Mr. Harris is a graduate of Morehouse College and he earned a PhD in operations research at Cornell University. Mr. Harris’ knowledge of best practices in executive management, familiarity with international business practices and expertise in corporate strategy implementation, risk management and technology help the TSYS Board address challenges that TSYS encounters as it manages enterprise risk.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    15

William M. Isaac

  Age 74   Director since 2014   Compensation Committee   Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Mr. Isaac has served as Senior Managing Director of FTI Consulting (“FTI”) since 2011. Mr. Isaac founded The Secura Group, a leading financial institutions consulting firm, in 1986. The Secura Group was acquired by FTI in 2011. Prior to forming The Secura Group, Mr. Isaac served for almost eight years on the Board of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, serving as Chairman for nearly five years. Mr. Isaac serves as a director of GEE, Inc. and also serves as Chairman of Isaac Property Companies. Mr. Isaac’s business experience includes serving as the former Chairman of Fifth Third Bancorp, and as a former director of MPS Group, Trans Union Corporation, The Associates and Amex Centurion Bank. Mr. Isaac is a graduate of Miami University and he earned a law degree from The Ohio State University College of Law. Mr. Isaac’s experience in the financial services industry, including global business and merger and acquisition experience, exceeds 40 years of service in the role of lawyer, consultant, regulator and director which provides the TSYS Board with invaluable resources regarding the financial services industry.

Mason H. Lampton

  Age 70   Director since 1986   Technology Committee Mr. Lampton has served as Chairman of the Board of Standard Concrete Products, Inc., a privately held construction materials company, since 2004. From 1996 until 2004, Mr. Lampton served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Standard Concrete Products, which he founded in 1996. Prior to 1996, Mr. Lampton served as President and Chairman of the Board of The Hardaway Company, a construction company. Mr. Lampton previously served as a director of Synovus Financial Corp. (“Synovus”). His prior business experience also includes serving as a director and as a member of the Audit Committee of another public company, Citizens Fidelity Corporation. He has served as a member of the TSYS and Synovus Audit Committees, Executive Committees and Compensation Committees. Mr. Lampton is a graduate of Vanderbilt University. In addition to Mr. Lampton’s global business and merger and acquisition experience, Mr. Lampton’s skills in risk management and directing corporate strategy and his public company board expertise provide the TSYS Board with valuable insights as the Board oversees TSYS’ strategic development.

Connie D. McDaniel

  Age 59   Director since 2014   Audit Committee Chair   Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee   Executive Committee Ms. McDaniel served as Vice President and Chief of Internal Audit of The Coca-Cola Company, a beverage company, from 2009 until her retirement in 2013. Prior to 2009, Ms. McDaniel served for over 20 years in various capacities with The Coca-Cola Company, including Vice President Global Finance Transformation and Vice President and Controller. She also held finance leadership positions with The Coca-Cola Company in Operating Units in both Germany and Thailand. Ms. McDaniel serves as a director of the Virtus Mutual Fund Family. Ms. McDaniel has previously served as a director of the RidgeWorth Funds, and Chaired its Audit Committee. Ms. McDaniel is a graduate of Georgia State University. Ms. McDaniel’s experience as the chief audit executive of a public company, her financial expertise, her merger and acquisition experience and her international business experience provide valuable resources to the TSYS Board as TSYS expands internationally and manages financial reporting and enterprise risk.

16    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Richard A. Smith

  Age 64   Director since 2017   Compensation Committee Mr. Smith served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Realogy Holdings Corp. (“Realogy”), a residential real estate franchising company with company-owned real estate brokerage operations as well as relocation, title and settlement services, from 2012 until his retirement as an officer and director at the end of 2017. From 2006 until 2012, Mr. Smith served in various capacities with Realogy, including President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Smith served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Real Estate Services Division of Cendant Corporation from 1996 until 2006, when the Division was spun off to create Realogy. Mr. Smith is a graduate of Columbus State University and he earned a Masters of Science degree from Troy State University. Mr. Smith is a member of the Business Roundtable, serves on the executive committee of the Policy Advisory Board for Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies and previously served as a commissioner on the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Housing Commission. Mr. Smith’s experience as the chief executive officer of a public company, his merger and acquisition experience and his leadership experience are a valuable asset to the TSYS Board.

Philip W. Tomlinson

  Age 71   Director since 1982 Mr. Tomlinson was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TSYS in January 2006. He retired from his position as Chief Executive Officer in July 2014 and retired from his position as Chairman of the Board in April 2015. From 1982 until 2006, Mr. Tomlinson served in various capacities with TSYS, including Chief Executive Officer and President. Since TSYS’ incorporation in December 1982, Mr. Tomlinson has played a key role in almost every major relationship that has shaped TSYS’ development. Mr. Tomlinson serves as a director of Synovus and is a member of its Risk and Compensation Committees. Mr. Tomlinson is also a member of the Financial Services Roundtable, a graduate of Louisiana State University’s School of Banking of the South, former Chairman of the Columbus State University Board of Trustees and a member of the Board of Directors of the Georgia Department of Economic Development. Mr. Tomlinson’s leadership skills, his relationship-building and risk management skills, his global business and technology experience, his extensive knowledge of and years of experience with TSYS and his knowledge and understanding of the payment services and financial services industries provide invaluable resources to TSYS’ Board.

John T. Turner

  Age 61   Director since 2003   Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair   Audit Committee   Executive Committee Mr. Turner is a private investor and a director of the W.C. Bradley Co., a privately held consumer products goods company. Mr. Turner served for 20 years in various capacities with the W.C. Bradley Co. and/or its subsidiaries, including President of Bradley Specialty Retailing, Inc. Mr. Turner has for many years been actively involved in initiatives encompassing a variety of entrepreneurial, social and environmental interests. Mr. Turner is a graduate of Vanderbilt University. Mr. Turner’s experience in business management, corporate strategy development, including international business, mergers and acquisitions and risk assessment provide the TSYS Board with a valuable perspective on matters relating to TSYS’ strategic growth and enterprise risk management.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    17

Richard W. Ussery

  Age 70   Director since 1982   Technology Committee Mr. Ussery was elected as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TSYS in February 1992. He retired as an executive employee of TSYS in 2005 and served as anon-executive Chairman of the Board until 2006. Prior to 2005, Mr. Ussery served for over 40 years in various capacities with TSYS or Synovus’ subsidiary, Columbus Bank and Trust Company, including Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TSYS. His business experience includes serving as a director of the Georgia Power Company, an electric utility subsidiary company of Southern Company. Mr. Ussery is a graduate of Auburn University. Mr. Ussery’s leadership and risk management skills, extensive knowledge of and experience in the payment services and financial services industries and understanding of TSYS’ technology, business and historical development give him unique insights into our company’s challenges, opportunities and business.

M. Troy Woods

  Age 66   Director since 2003   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   Executive Committee Mr. Woods was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of TSYS in July 2014, and assumed the position of Chairman of the Board in April 2015. Mr. Woods stepped down as President in May 2016 and reassumed the office in October 2017. From 1987 until 2014, Mr. Woods served in various capacities with TSYS, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Woods is a graduate of Columbus State University, the University of Virginia’s Graduate School of Retail Bank Management and Louisiana State University’s School of Banking of the South. Mr. Woods is also a member of the Columbus State University Board of Trustees. Mr. Woods’ business experience includes service in the financial services industry in a variety of capacities, including as a senior vice president of consumer lending. Mr. Woods has been involved in directing TSYS’ international expansion, strategic planning activities, mergers and acquisitions, negotiations with major clients and the continual improvement of TS2, TSYS’ core payments engine, and TSYS’ technology innovation. Mr. Woods’ extensive knowledge of TSYS’ business, technology, operations and employees, risk management and negotiating skills, as well as his extensive experience in the payment services and financial services industries provide invaluable resources to TSYS’ Board.

18    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting. The Committee has appointed the firm of KPMG LLP as the independent auditor for TSYS for 2018. KPMG has served as our independent auditor since 1983. In accordance with SEC rules and KPMG’s policies, a new Lead Engagement Partner is designated at least every five years to provide a fresh perspective. A new Lead Engagement Partner was designated for 2014 in consultation with the Audit Committee.

The Committee annually reviews KPMG’s independence and performance in deciding whether to retain KPMG or engage another firm as our independent auditor. In the course of these reviews, the Committee considers, among other things, the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the independent auditor and KPMG’s historical and recent performance on the TSYS audit. Based on this review and discussions with senior management, the Committee believes that retaining KPMG is in the best interests of TSYS.

Representatives of KPMG will be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders present at the meeting. Although shareholder ratification of the appointment of TSYS’ independent auditor is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, we are submitting the selection of KPMG to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If not ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection, although the Audit Committee will not be required to select a different independent auditor for TSYS.

The Board of Directors Recommends That You Vote “FOR” the Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Independent Auditor.

Audit andNon-Audit Fees

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of TSYS’ annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG during those periods.

	2017		2016
Audit Fees(1)	$	2,891,813	$	2,812,894
Audit Related Fees(2)		2,784,675		3,228,109
Tax Fees(3)		7,856		99,640
All Other Fees		-0-		-0-
Total	$	5,684,344	$	6,140,643

(1) Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of TSYS’ financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, reviews of quarterly financial information and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings.

(2) Audit related fees consisted principally of certain agreed upon procedures engagements, employee benefit plan audits and assurance related services associated with data center reviews.

(3) Tax fees consisted of fees for tax compliance/preparation and tax consultation services.

Policy on Audit CommitteePre-Approval

The Audit Committee has established a policy topre-approve all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of these services does not impair the independent auditor’s independence. The Committee has considered whether the provision of thenon-audit services set forth in the table under “Audit andNon-Audit Fees” above is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence and has concluded that it is.

TSYS’ Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy addresses services included within the four categories of audit and permissiblenon-audit services, which include Audit Services, Audit Related Services, Tax Services and All Other

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    19

Services. The annual audit services engagement terms and fees are subject to the specificpre-approval of the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee must specificallypre-approve permissiblenon-audit services classified as All Other Services.

Prior to engagement, management submits to the Committee for approval a detailed list of the Audit Services, Audit Related Services and Tax Services that it recommends the Committee engage the independent auditor to provide for the fiscal year. Each specified service is allocated to the appropriate category and accompanied by a budget estimating the cost of that service. The Committee will, if appropriate, approve both the list of Audit Services, Audit Related Services and Tax Services and the budget for such services.

The Committee is informed at each Committee meeting as to the services actually provided by the independent auditor pursuant to thePre-Approval Policy. Any proposed service that is not separately listed in thePre-Approval Policy or any service exceeding thepre-approved fee levels must be specificallypre-approved by the Committee. The Audit Committee has delegatedpre-approval authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee. The Chair must report anypre-approval decisions made by her to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

20    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised of three directors, each of whom the Board has determined to be an independent director as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC. The duties of the Audit Committee are summarized in this Proxy Statement under “Committees of the Board” on page 5 and are more fully described in the Audit Committee charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

One of the Audit Committee’s primary responsibilities is to assist the Board in its oversight responsibility regarding the integrity of TSYS’ financial statements and systems of internal controls. Management is responsible for TSYS’ accounting and financial reporting processes, the establishment and effectiveness of internal controls and the preparation and integrity of TSYS’ consolidated financial statements. KPMG LLP, TSYS’ independent auditor, is responsible for performing an independent audit of TSYS’ consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of TSYS’ internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and issuing opinions on whether those financial statements are presented fairly in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the effectiveness of TSYS’ internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of KPMG. The function of the Audit Committee is not to duplicate the activities of management or the independent auditor, but to monitor and oversee TSYS’ financial reporting process.

In discharging its responsibilities regarding the financial reporting process, the Audit Committee:

• Reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG TSYS’ audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017;

• Discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees) as adopted by the PCAOB; and

• Received from KPMG the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG its independence.

Based upon the review and discussions referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in TSYS’ Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee

Connie D. McDaniel, Chair

Sidney E. Harris

John T. Turner

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    21

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the name, age and position with TSYS of each executive officer of TSYS.

Name	Age	Position with TSYS
M. Troy Woods(1)	66	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
G. Sanders Griffith, III(2)	64	Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Paul M. Todd(3)	47	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Patricia A. Watson(4)	51	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

(1) As Mr. Woods is also a director of TSYS, relevant information pertaining to his position with TSYS is set forth under the caption “Nominees for Election as Directors” on page 14.

(2) G. Sanders Griffith, III was elected as Senior Executive Vice President of TSYS in January 2008, Secretary of TSYS in 1995 and General Counsel of TSYS in 1988.

(3) Paul M. Todd was elected as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TSYS effective July 2014. From 2008 until 2014, Mr. Todd served as Executive Vice President of Strategy, Mergers and Acquisitions, Product and Marketing of TSYS.

(4) Patricia A. Watson was elected as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of TSYS in September 2015. From 2013 until 2015, Ms. Watson served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer of The Brink’s Company. From 2007 until 2012, Ms. Watson served as Senior Technology Executive with Bank of America’s Treasury, Credit and Payments division.

22    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth ownership of shares of TSYS stock by each director, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group as of December 31, 2017.

Name	Shares of TSYS Stock Beneficially Owned with Sole Voting and Investment Power as of 12/31/17		Shares of TSYS Stock Beneficially Owned with Shared Voting and Investment Power as of 12/31/17		Total  Shares of  TSYS Stock  Beneficially  Owned as of  12/31/17(1)(2)		Percentage of Outstanding Shares of TSYS Stock Beneficially Owned as of 12/31/17
F. Thaddeus Arroyo		458		—		2,720		*
Kriss Cloninger III		28,527		—		66,663		*
Walter W. Driver, Jr.		25,162		—		63,298		*
G. Sanders Griffith, III		164,512		1,683		285,420		*
Sidney E. Harris		22,063		—		44,373		*
William M. Isaac		12,096		—		33,213		*
Pamela A. Joseph(3)		12,798		—		12,798		*
Mason H. Lampton		33,131		14,827		88,422		*
Connie D. McDaniel		9,896		—		31,013		*
William A. Pruett		142,955		—		172,453		*
Richard A. Smith		915		—		915		*
Paul M. Todd		32,938		—		170,775		*
Philip W. Tomlinson		105,226		246,183		854,009		*
John T. Turner		14,389		1,293,330		1,357,493		*
Richard W. Ussery		224,029		—		238,095		*
Patricia A. Watson		17,730		—		48,394		*
M. Troy Woods		380,442		15,099		902,765		*
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 persons)		1,227,267		1,571,122		4,372,819		2.4

* Less than one percent of the outstanding shares of TSYS stock.

(1) The totals shown in the table above for thenon-employee directors include options for Mr. Arroyo to purchase 2,262 shares, for each of Mr. Cloninger and Mr. Driver to purchase 38,136 shares, for Mr. Harris to purchase 22,310 shares, for each of Mr. Isaac and Ms. McDaniel to purchase 21,117 shares, for Mr. Lampton to purchase 40,464 shares, for Mr. Tomlinson to purchase 502,600 shares, for Mr. Turner to purchase 49,774 shares and for Mr. Ussery to purchase 14,066 shares, and for each of the individuals listed below includes options to purchase the number of shares shown below. These options are all of the options held by TSYS’ directors and the named executive officers that were exercisable on, or became exercisable within 60 days after, December 31, 2017.

Name	Stock Options
G. Sanders Griffith, III		115,112
William A. Pruett		29,498
Paul M. Todd		137,837
Patricia A. Watson		30,664
M. Troy Woods		507,224
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 persons)		1,570,317

(2) The totals shown in the table above include the following number of shares of TSYS stock that were pledged, including shares held in a margin account: 2,274 shares for Ms. Watson. As of February 6, 2018, Ms. Watson held no pledged shares. Shares that are pledged are not included when calculating whether directors and executive officers are in compliance with director and executive officer stock ownership guidelines. The total shown in the table above for Mr. Griffith includes 4,113 shares for which he possessed sole voting power and no investment power.

(3) Ms. Joseph’s employment with TSYS terminated on September 30, 2017, and the number of shares reported in this table as beneficially owned by her is based on information available to TSYS as of such date. As of December 31, 2017, Ms. Joseph held no employee stock options to purchase TSYS shares.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    23

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis which follows explains TSYS’ executive compensation program applicable to the following “named executive officers” whose 2017 compensation information is provided in the series of tables following this discussion:

• M. Troy Woods, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;

• Paul M. Todd, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

• G. Sanders Griffith, III, Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary;

• Patricia A. Watson, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer;

• Pamela A. Joseph, Former President and Chief Operating Officer; and

• William A. Pruett, Former Senior Executive Vice President.

Ms. Joseph resigned from her employment with TSYS effective September 30, 2017. Mr. Pruett retired as Senior Executive Vice President effective April 1, 2017 and continued to serve as anon-executive employee until December 31, 2017.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

Overview

TSYS’ executive compensation programs align the interests of TSYS’ executives with those of our shareholders by tying a significant portion of their total compensation directly to our short-term and long-term business results. The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) reviews the program components, targets and payouts on an annual basis to ensure ourpay-for-performance alignment. Executive performance is evaluated against both short- and long-term goals with targets and metrics that are directly linked to our annual operational and long-term strategic goals. We believe that the design of our executive compensation program provides a clear link to shareholder value by focusing our executives on achieving key financial and strategic business objectives and rewarding them when those objectives are achieved.

2017Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

At our 2017 Annual Meeting, we asked shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for that meeting. Shareholders responded favorably with over 93% of the votes cast in favor of approval. The Board and the Committee appreciate and value the views of our shareholders. In considering the results of this advisory vote on executive compensation, the Committee concluded that the compensation paid to our named executive officers and our overall pay practices enjoy strong shareholder support.

In light of the strong shareholder support of the compensation paid to our executive officers evidenced by the results of this advisory vote, the Board and the Committee did not make any material changes to our executive compensation program for 2017 as a result of the 2017say-on-pay vote. Future advisory votes on executive compensation will serve as an additional tool to guide the Board and the Committee in evaluating the alignment of our executive compensation program with the interests of TSYS and its shareholders. The Board and the Committee intend to continue our annual shareholder outreach program pursuant to which we discuss, or offer to discuss, with all shareholders holding 1% or more of TSYS’ shares their views on general governance issues as well as compensation related matters or any concerns they may have concerning TSYS’ practices.

2017 Performance Highlights

TSYS delivered strong financial and business performance in 2017. Highlights include the following:

• Total revenues were $4.9 billion, an increase of 18.2% over 2016. Net revenue(non-GAAP), which excludes reimbursable items, interchange and payment network fees, was $3.4 billion, an increase of 11.8% over 2016.

24    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

• Net income attributable to TSYS common shareholders was $586.2 million, an increase of 83.4% over 2016, which includes $135.9 million of tax benefit from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Diluted EPS were $3.16, an increase of 82.4% over 2016.

• Adjusted earnings(non-GAAP) were $624.2 million, an increase of 20.9% over 2016. Adjusted diluted EPS(non-GAAP) were $3.37, an increase of 20.2% over 2016.

• Quarterly dividend was increased by 30% from $0.10 to $0.13 per share.

• We returned over $361.7 million to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.

• Debt was reduced by $400 million bringing the total to $800 million over the past two years.

For 2017, we used three performance metrics for our executive compensation program: adjusted diluted EPS, net revenue and relative total shareholder return which is our share performance compared to the companies in the S&P 500 (“Relative TSR”).⁽¹⁾

Key Performance Metrics

(1) Adjusted diluted EPS and net revenue arenon-GAAP financial measures. Adjusted diluted EPS is adjusted earnings divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding used for diluted EPS calculations. Adjusted earnings is net income excluding theafter-tax impact of share-based compensation expenses, amortization of acquisition intangibles, merger and acquisition expenses for completed acquisitions and litigation, claims, judgments or settlement expenses and related legal expenses. Net Revenue is total revenues less reimbursable items (such as postage) as well as merchant acquiring interchange and payment network fees charged by the card associations or payment networks that are recorded by TSYS as expense. For a reconciliation of thesenon-GAAP financial measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measure, see“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 24 of our consolidated financial statements included in our 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders accompanying this Proxy Statement and available on our web site at http://annualreport.tsys.com. TSR is cumulative stock price appreciation plus reinvestment of all dividends.

Compensation Components and Linking Pay with Performance

The primary components of our named executive officers’ total compensation are base salary, annual cash incentive awards through the Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”), annual equity-based awards through ourLong-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”) and retirement and other employee benefits.

• Base salary provides our named executive officers with fixed periodic cash payments.

• AIP provides cash awards to our named executive officers based on our performance against Committee-approvedpre-established short-term performance goals aligned with our annual operating plan. Our performance goals for the 2017 AIP are based on net revenue growth and adjusted diluted EPS growth.

• LTIP provides the following two forms of equity grants to our named executive officers:

- 40% is in the form of stock options, which align a significant portion of our named executive officers’ total pay to value created for our shareholders through increases in our stock price; and

- 60% is in the form of multi-year performance shares, which link an element of our named executive officers’ pay to achievement of three-year goals established for key performance metrics. Our performance goals for the 2017 LTIP are based on adjusted diluted EPS growth and Relative TSR.

We are focused on creating long-term value for our shareholders. Our executive compensation program is weighted considerably toward long-term equity awards. This practice creates a substantial retention incentive, encourages our executive officers to focus on TSYS’ long-term success and aligns with the long-term interests of

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    25

our shareholders. The Committee considers our annual operating plan and long-term strategic goals when establishing our AIP and LTIP performance measures and goals.

2017 Compensation Committee Actions and Results

• Base salaries for the named executive officers were increased approximately 3.5% taking into consideration the performance of each executive and their pay relative to our peer group, with the exception of Ms. Watson who received a base salary increase of approximately 5.3% after consideration of her performance and pay positioning verses benchmark data and other TSYS officers and Mr. Pruett who did not receive an increase in base pay as a result of his retirement as Senior Executive Vice President effective April 1, 2017.

• Based on our performance against the 2017 AIP performance goals for growth in net revenue and adjusted diluted EPS, AIP incentive awards were earned at 167.15% of the target award opportunity.

• Based on our performance against the LTIP performance goals of adjusted EPS and relative TSR for the2015-2017 performance period, performance shares were paid in TSYS shares at 200% of the target award opportunity.

• The metrics for the AIP were changed from revenues before reimbursable items and adjusted EPS to net revenue and adjusted diluted EPS to align the AIP metrics with the metrics that are used for purposes of communicating externally our earnings guidance.

Pay for Performance

The graphs below show the approximate percentage of the CEO’s and the other named executive officers’ 2017 target total direct compensation that is performance-based compensation and nonperformance-based compensation. For purposes of the graphs below, performance-based compensation is comprised of AIP incentive awards, stock options and performance shares. The percentage of performance-based compensation listed above each chart is calculated by dividing (i) the value of performance-based compensation at target by (ii) the amount of target total direct compensation, which includes performance-based compensation plus 2017 base salary. The mix of actual pay delivered to executives may vary significantly from the charts based on the level of achievement against AIP and LTIP performance goals.

(1) Excludes Mr. Pruett, as he retired as an executive officer effective April 1, 2017.

Best Practices

Our compensation practices embody good corporate governance and reflect best practices within executive compensation:

Emphasis on Performance-based Compensation:    A significant percentage, 85% for our CEO, of the target total direct compensation awarded to our executive officers is in the form of performance-based compensation that is tied to the achievement of performance goals or increase in share value.

Clawback Policy:    TSYS may recover incentive compensation paid or awarded to executive officers in certain circumstances.

Double-Trigger Change of Control Provisions:    Our change of control agreements and equity award agreements require both a change of control of TSYS and actual or constructive termination of employment before change in control benefits are triggered. In addition, our equity award agreements subsequent to 2011 provide for pro rata vesting.

26    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Stock Ownership Guidelines:    Our executives must hold a significant amount of TSYS stock. Our CEO and other executive officers exceed our guidelines.

Independent Compensation Consultant:    The Committee selects and directly engages its own executive compensation consultant. The Committee mustpre-approve the engagement by management of this executive compensation consultant for any other purpose, subject to a de minimis exception.

No TaxGross-Up Policy:    Agreements adopted or materially amended after December 2011 will not provide for taxgross-up payments to executive officers. If a change of control had taken place on December 31, 2017, only one executive officer would have received a taxgross-up payment if his employment was terminated.

No Backdating or Repricing of Stock Options:    Stock options are never backdated or issued withbelow-market exercise prices. Stock options are neverre-priced without shareholder approval.

No Hedging Policy and Restrictions on Pledging:    Our executive officers and directors may not engage in hedging transactions designed tooff-set decreases in the market value of TSYS stock. Our pledging policy prohibits any pledging of TSYS shares by directors and executive officers except in situations, and on conditions,pre-approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of TSYS.

No Employment Agreements:    None of our executive officers has an employment agreement.

No Discretionary Bonuses:    The Committee does not authorize discretionary bonuses except in exceptional circumstances.

Additional information with respect to the items listed above can be found in the following pages of this CD&A.

Elements of Compensation

The primary elements of compensation in TSYS’ executive compensation program are summarized in the table below.

Compensation Element	Objective	Key Features
Base Pay	To provide a fixed level of cash compensation for executive officers commensurate with their respective skills, responsibilities, experience and performance.	Reviewed annually and adjusted based on an executive’s performance and positioning relative to our Benchmarking Group.
AIP — performance-based cash annual incentive awards	To align executive officer compensation to specified financial results and to reward for successful execution of TSYS’ annual operating plan.	AIP incentive award payments are based on the achievement of Committee-approved performance goals.
LTIP — annual performance shares and stock options and special equity grants	To align interests of executive officers with shareholders and to reward executive officers for the achievement of the goals necessary to successfully implement TSYS’ strategic plan.	Target value of annual equity awards is a multiple of base pay. 40% of annual target value is granted in the form of stock options and 60% of annual target value is granted in the form of performance shares. Performance shares are subject to attainment of Committee-approved performance goals over a three-year period. Special equity grants are made only in exceptional circumstances and have varying features.
Retirement Savings Plan — a tax qualified plan that allows 401(k) deferrals	To provide retirement income for executive officers.	Broad-based retirement plan. TSYS may make discretionary contributions based on profits and provides 401(k) matching contributions. TSYS contributions are fully vested after two years of service.
Deferred Compensation Plan — a nonqualified plan	To provide additional retirement savings and income deferral opportunities for executive officers.	Executive officers can elect to defer a portion of their base salary and cash incentives under the AIP. TSYS contributes an amount equal to the amount that would have been contributed to the Retirement Savings Plan but for IRS limits, and matches deferrals at the same rate it matches 401(k) contributions.
Perquisites	To provide minimal personal benefits for executive officers to align our compensation program with competitive practices.	Represents an insignificant proportion of an executive’s total compensation.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    27

Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

TSYS’ executive compensation program aligns to shareholder value and attracts, motivates and retains an exceptionally talented executive team with the skills and vision required for us to become the leading global payment solutions provider. We structure our program to accomplish our key objectives by focusing on our core principles and aligning executive pay with TSYS’ performance.

Core Principles

Our executive compensation program reflects these core principles:

• align management’s interests with the long-term interests of shareholders;

• provide compensation on the basis of performance that supports key financial and strategic business outcomes;

• attract, motivate and retain top talent to lead our businesses;

• reinforce a culture of integrity through our corporate governance initiatives to support sustainable business growth;

• manage compensation risk in the context of our business strategies; and

• limit perquisites to those that are reasonable and appropriate.

We believe that our 2017 executive compensation program successfully implements these principles and incorporates best practices in executive compensation.

How We Make Compensation Decisions

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Committee is responsible to our Board for overseeing the development and administration of our compensation policies and program for executive officers. The Committee, which consists of four independent directors, is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of our executive compensation program. Among its duties, the Committee is responsible for establishing the compensation recommendations for our CEO and reviewing and approving all compensation recommendations for our executive officers, including:

• Review and approval of corporate incentive goals and objectives relevant to compensation;

• Evaluation of the competitiveness of each executive officer’s total compensation package; and

• Approval of any changes to the total compensation package, including, but not limited to, base salary, annual and long-term incentive award opportunities and payouts.

The Committee is supported in its work by the Chief Human Resource Officer, his staff and an independent executive compensation consultant, as described below.

The Committee’s charter, which sets out its duties and responsibilities and addresses other matters, can be found on our website at www.tsys.com, under “Investor Relations” then “Corporate Governance.”

Role of Management

Our CEO does not participate in the Committee’s deliberations or decisions with regard to his compensation. However, within the framework of the compensation programs approved by the Committee and based on management’s review of market competitive positions, each year our CEO provides input to the Committee regarding the performance and appropriate compensation of the other named executive officers. These recommendations are based upon his assessment of each executive officer’s performance, the performance of the individual’s respective business or function and employee retention considerations. The Committee reviews our CEO’s recommendations and approves any compensation changes affecting our executive officers as it determines in its sole discretion.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Committee is authorized to retain and terminate any consultant, as well as approve the consultant’s fees and other terms of retention. The Committee directly engaged Meridian Compensation Partners LLC (“Meridian”) in 2017 to advise on executive compensation matters. The Committee’s consultant provides general observations and market analysis on TSYS’ compensation programs, but it does not determine or recommend the amount of compensation for our named executive officers.

28    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Following is a description of the consultant’s duties:

• reviews and makes recommendations on the benchmarking peer group;

• provides executive compensation market benchmark information;

• provides an equity usage analysis compared to the peer group;

• provides executive tally sheets;

• attends meetings of the Committee;

• provides information, research and analysis pertaining to executive compensation;

• updates the Committee on market trends, changing practices and regulatory matters pertaining to executive compensation; and

• reviews TSYS’ executive compensation strategy and program to ensure appropriateness andmarket-competitiveness.

The Committee recognizes the benefit of receiving objective advice from its executive compensation consultant and has implemented apre-approval policy that requires the approval of the Committee before TSYS management can engage the executive compensation consultant for the Committee to provide additional services, other than the purchase of national and international compensation surveys for fees that do not exceed $25,000 in any fiscal year. During 2017, Meridian did not provide any services to TSYS other than its advice to the Committee on executive compensation issues.

The Committee considered the independence of Meridian in light of SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. The Committee requested and received a letter from Meridian addressing its independence, including the following factors: (1) other services provided to us by the consultant; (2) fees paid by us as a percentage of the consulting firm’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the consulting firm that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and a member of the Committee; (5) any company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the consulting firm or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The Committee considered these factors and determined that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Meridian from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee.

Role of Peer Companies and Benchmarking

The Committee uses publicly reported information from companies that we consider as peers when reviewing the compensation of the named executive officers and evaluating performance-based compensation plans. This process is often referred to as “benchmarking.” We believe that benchmarking should be a point of reference for measurement, not determinative of the named executive officers’ compensation or the performance-based plans.

The “Benchmarking Group” was selected after considering companies that compete with TSYS for executive talent within similar industries and with similar financial attributes and performance. Peer companies used by proxy advisors were also considered. The Benchmarking Group is reviewed annually. As part of ongoing efforts to ensure that appropriate companies are included in the Benchmarking Group, the Committee reviewed the Benchmarking Group for 2017. The Committee added First Data Corporation and PayPal Holdings, Inc. to the peer group in 2017 to reflect TSYS’ continued growth in revenue. Both of these additions to the peer group are business competitors of TSYS and competitors for executive talent. For 2017, the median revenue size of the Benchmarking Group was $3.62 billion.

Companies in the 2017 Benchmarking Group are:

Alliance Data Systems Corporation	Euronet Worldwide, Inc.	PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.	Paychex, Inc.
Convergys Corporation	First Data Corporation	Moneygram International, Inc.
CoreLogic, Inc.	Fiserv, Inc.	Vantiv, Inc.
DST Systems, Inc.	Global Payments Inc.	VeriFone Systems, Inc.
Equifax Inc.	Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.	The Western Union Company

TSYS used data derived from the 2017 Benchmarking Group to benchmark our executive officers’ base salaries, short-term incentive awards, long-term incentive awards and target total direct compensation. The Committee considered the market median when setting total compensation, but it did not target a specific market position and

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    29

used comparative market data at the 25^th, 50^th and 75^th percentiles only as reference points to guide its decision making of the type and amount of compensation based on its own evaluation.

Tally Sheets

The Committee reviews tally sheets for the named executive officers annually. Tally sheets present the dollar amount of each element of the named executive officer’s compensation package, including base salary, AIP incentive awards, current LTIP target award, perquisites, health and welfare benefits, contributions to the qualified Retirement Savings Plan and thenon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and outstanding equity awards. Tally sheets also provide estimates of the amounts payable to each executive upon the occurrence of potential future events, such as a change of control, retirement, death, disability, involuntary termination for cause and voluntary or involuntary termination without cause.

Tally sheets provide a summary of all elements of an executive’s compensation package, as well as information on wealth accumulation, so that the Committee can analyze both the individual elements of compensation (including the compensation mix) and the aggregate total amount of actual and projected compensation to determine whether the executive’s compensation is reasonable.

Elements of Compensation

The primary elements of compensation in TSYS’ executive compensation program are discussed below.

2017 Base Pay

Base pay provides our executives with a level of compensation commensurate with their respective skills, responsibilities, experience and performance. It is the amount paid to an executive for effectively performing his or her job on a daily basis.

To ensure that base pay is competitive, TSYS benchmarks an executive’s base pay against base pay paid by our Benchmarking Group. Each executive’s current base pay is compared to market information for that position, with an emphasis on the market median, using proxy statement information from our Benchmarking Group. For certain positions for which there is no clear market match in the benchmarking data, the Committee uses a blend of two or more positions from the benchmarking data. After reviewing the benchmarking data, the Committee establishes a competitive base salary for each executive. See “The Role of Peer Companies and Benchmarking” section on page 29 for a list of the companies in the Benchmarking Group and information on the process used to select these companies.

In addition to market comparisons of similar positions at our peer companies, individual performance may affect base pay. Comparison of an executive’s base pay to the base pay of other TSYS executives may also be a factor in establishing base pay, especially with respect to positions for which there is no clear market match in benchmarking data. Because of the process used to establish base pay, large increases generally occur only when an executive is promoted into a new position. Base pay is not directly related to TSYS’ performance, except over the long term, since revenues are used in benchmarking base pay against our Benchmarking Group

For 2017, the named executive officers received increases in base pay of approximately 3.5% effective April 1, 2017 based on each executive officer’s performance over the prior year and a review of base salaries among the Benchmarking Group, with the exception of Ms. Watson who received a base salary increase of approximately 5.3% and Mr. Pruett who did not receive an increase in base pay as a result of his retirement as Senior Executive Vice President effective April 1, 2017. Base pay for 2017 is set forth in the “Salary” column in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39.

Annual Incentive Program

Annual cash incentive awards through the AIP provide an incentive for our executives to meet short-term performance goals as reflected in our annual operating plan. In addition, given the prevalence of short-term incentive compensation in the marketplace, AIP incentive awards are necessary to provide a competitive compensation program. As Mr. Pruett resigned as Senior Executive Vice President effective April 1, 2017, he is not included in the following discussion of the 2017 AIP as he was not eligible to receive an AIP incentive award.

AIP 2017 performance measures for our named executive officers were based on growth in net revenue and adjusted diluted EPS, each of which is defined on page 25. The Committee believes the use of revenue and income measures continues to provide a balanced alignment to growth and profitability of TSYS. To discourage

30    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

growth in revenues that could be detrimental to earnings, the portion of the 2017 AIP payment based on growth in net revenue cannot exceed the portion of the AIP payment based on adjusted diluted EPS. In addition, the AIP does not reward executives for acquisitions unless those acquisitions are reflected in the annual operating plan. Metrics for the named executive officers are weighted as follows:

Executive	Net Revenue		Adjusted Diluted EPS
M. Troy Woods		50%		50%
Paul M. Todd		50%		50%
G. Sanders Griffith, III		50%		50%
Patricia A. Watson		50%		50%
Pamela A. Joseph		50%		50%

AIP incentive award target opportunities are expressed as a percentage of an executive’s base pay. The AIP incentive award target opportunity for each executive for 2017 was set taking into account data derived from our Benchmarking Group, as well as existing incentive targets, internal pay equity, individual performance and retention needs. See “The Role of Peer Companies and Benchmarking” section on page 29 for a list of the companies in our Benchmarking Group and information on the process used to select these companies.

The 2017 AIP incentive award target opportunities as a percentage of base pay and target values were:

Executive	Target as a Percent of Base Pay	Target Value(1)
M. Troy Woods	125%	$    1,115,313
Paul M. Todd	85%	$       436,475
G. Sanders Griffith, III	85%	$       456,450
Patricia A. Watson	85%	$       419,688
Pamela A. Joseph	100%	$       693,750

(1) 2017 salary increases were effective April 1, 2017. Target values reflect the target percent applied to 3/12ths of the 2016 salary and 9/12ths of the 2017 salary.

The amount of an AIP cash incentive award ranges from zero to 200% of the target based on achievement of performance goals established by the Committee for the year. For 2017, the Committee established the following performance goals for the AIP for our named executive officers:

Percent of Target AIP Incentive Award	Net Revenue (000’s)		Adjusted Diluted EPS
25%	$	3,285,226	$	2.991
50%	$	3,300,435	$	3.046
75%	$	3,315,645	$	3.084
100%	$	3,339,248	$	3.120
125%	$	3,361,273	$	3.155
150%	$	3,384,087	$	3.190
175%	$	3,406,901	$	3.225
200%	$	3,429,715	$	3.260

The financially based AIP metrics are derived from our financial statements. However, in determining actual performance for purposes of the 2017 AIP, the Committee made certain adjustments, both positive and negative, to our reportednon-GAAP results. These adjustments are intended to ensure that the AIP rewards underlying operational performance, disregarding factors that are beyond the control of our executives or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence. For purposes of the AIP incentive award earned percentage for 2017, the performance results were adjusted to exclude the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, specialone-time employee bonuses and the delay in the effectiveness of a rule that will impact our prepaid business. The adjustments to reported results may from year to year have a favorable or unfavorable impact on the AIP incentive awards earned by our named executive officers. The impact was unfavorable for 2017.

Results for 2017, after adjustments, were as follows:

Net Revenue (000’s)	Adjusted Diluted EPS	Percent of   Target AIP   Incentive Award
$3,369,717	$        3.3609	167.15%

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    31

The dollar amounts of AIP incentive awards paid, and earned and paid as percentages of base pay were:

Executive	AIP Incentive Award Paid		Earned and Paid as a     Percentage of Base Pay
M. Troy Woods	$	1,864,245	208.9%
Paul M. Todd	$	729,568	142.1%
G. Sanders Griffith, III	$	762,956	142.1%
Patricia A. Watson	$	701,508	142.1%
Pamela A. Joseph(1)	$	-0-	0%

(1) Ms. Joseph did not receive an AIP incentive award as a result of her resignation effective September 30, 2017; $525,000 of the total amount payable to Ms. Joseph under her separation agreement is attributable to a pro rata portion of her 2017 AIP incentive award. See “Separation Agreement” on page 35.

AIP incentive awards for 2017 also are set forth in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39. To ensure that the AIP incentive awards are deemed “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”), for 2017 the Committee established a funding pool for the AIP for the named executive officers. The funding pool for the AIP equaled 1.5% of TSYS’ EBITDA for 2017, provided that TSYS achieved a minimum 2017 EBITDA level of $400 million. The Committee also established individual award limits for each named executive officer expressed as a percentage of the funding pool. The funding pool effectively establishes, for Section 162(m) purposes, the maximum amount that may be paid to any named executive officer. However, the Committee may, in its discretion, adjust downward (but not upward) the amount actually paid to any named executive officer. The amount of AIP incentive awards actually paid to each named executive officer was determined by the Committee based on achievement of the AIP performance metrics discussed above, and in each case was less than the named executive officer’s allocable portion of the funding pool.

The exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid in 2018 to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

Despite the Committee’s efforts to structure the AIP incentive awards in a manner intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) and therefore not subject to its deduction limits, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief under the legislation repealing Section 162(m)’s exemption from the deduction limit, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 162(m) in fact will. Further, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with TSYS’ business needs.

Long-Term Incentive Program

LTIP Award Opportunities.    Equity awards under the LTIP provide an incentive for our executives to drive TSYS’ long-term performance by tying a significant portion of their compensation to the achievement of the goals necessary to successfully implement TSYS’ strategic plan. Equity awards also align the interests of our executives with our shareholders by awarding executives equity in TSYS. Given the prevalence of long-term incentive compensation in the marketplace, LTIP awards also are part of a competitive compensation program.

LTIP target award opportunities are expressed as a multiple of an executive’s base pay. LTIP award opportunities are set taking into account market data of our Benchmarking Group, as well as existing incentive targets, internal pay equity, individual performance and retention needs. See “The Role of Peer Companies and Benchmarking” section on page 29 for a list of the companies in our Benchmarking Group and information on the process used to select these companies.

32    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

The 2017 LTIP target award opportunities as a percentage of base pay were unchanged from 2016. As Mr. Pruett retired as Senior Executive Vice President effective April 1, 2017, he did not receive a 2017 LTIP target award. The 2017 LTIP target award opportunities as a percentage of base pay and target LTIP values were:

Executive	2017 LTIP Target as a Percent of Base Pay	LTIP Target Value(1)
M. Troy Woods	450%	$    4,015,125
Paul M. Todd	175%	$       898,625
G. Sanders Griffith, III	175%	$       939,750
Patricia A. Watson	175%	$       864,063
Pamela A. Joseph	250%	$    1,734,375

(1) 2017 salary increases were effective April 1, 2017. Target values reflect the target percent applied to 3/12ths of the 2016 salary and 9/12ths of the 2017 salary.

The target annual LTIP value in 2017 was granted 40% in stock options and 60% in performance shares. The Committee granted stock options and performance shares because both are forms of performance-based compensation.

Stock options provide value to our named executive officers only if our stock price increases over time from the date of grant. This aligns our executives’ interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Stock options generally vest in three equal annual installments on the anniversaries of the date of grant. The exercise price of a stock option is determined as of the date of grant but may not be less than our share price on the date of grant.

Performance shares are earned by our named executive officers over a three-year period only to the extent they achieve performance goals established by the Committee. The achievement of these performance goals will help to drive TSYS’ financial performance and share price; thereby aligning executives’ interests with the interests of shareholders. For the 2017 performance share awards, the Committee conditioned the awards on the achievement of performance goals relating to adjusted diluted EPS and Relative TSR for the performance period 2017-2019.

Named executive officers receive an initial target award of performance shares determined as of the date of grant. At the end of the three-year performance period, a named executive officer’s payout of his or her performance share award will range from zero to 200% of target based on achievement of thepre-established performance goals.

Because the Committee may take action to approve LTIP awards on or near the date that TSYS’ earnings are released, the Committee has established the last business day of the month in which earnings are released as the grant date for equity awards to executive officers to ensure that the earnings release has had time to be absorbed by the market before equity awards are granted and stock option exercise prices are established. However, if the date of the TSYS earnings release or the date the Committee takes action is within five business days of the last business day of the month, the grant date is postponed for five business days after the later of the TSYS earnings release or the date the Committee takes action. With respect to performance-based equity awards other than conventional stock options, awards vest on the date that the Committee certifies that the required performance goals have been attained.

2017 LTIP Award (2017-2019 Performance Period).    Each named executive officer received 40% of the 2017 LTIP award in the form of stock options. Stock options received by the named executive officers are included in the “All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options” column in the 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 40. Each named executive officer received 60% of the 2017 LTIP award in the form of performance shares. The closing price of TSYS stock on February 17, 2017 was used to determine the exercise price for the stock options and the number of performance shares awarded at target for each executive. Performance share awards at target are included in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” column in the 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 40.

Performance goals for payout of the performance share award portion of the 2017 LTIP are based on the metrics of adjusted diluted EPS and Relative TSR over the period 2017 to 2019, with adjusted diluted EPS weighted 70% and Relative TSR weighted 30%. Future payouts and the applicable performance levels will be reported after the end of the 2017 to 2019 performance period.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    33

For the 2017 to 2019 performance period, the Committee approved the following performance goals for the LTIP:

	Adjusted Diluted EPS
Percentage Earned	Required 2019 Level		CAGR*		Relative TSR**
50%	$	3.4299		7%		25th Percentile
100%	$	3.7265		10%		50th Percentile
150%		Interpolated		Interpolated		70th Percentile
200%	$	4.0398		13%		90th Percentile or above

* Reflects compound annual growth rate required to achieve 2019 results as compared to 2016 results.

** Payouts under the TSR component are capped at 100% if TSYS’ absolute TSR is negative regardless of TSYS’ ranking relative to the S&P 500.

2015 LTIP Award (2015-2017 Performance Period).    For the 2015 to 2017 performance period, the Committee approved the following performance goals for the LTIP:

	Adjusted EPS
Percentage Earned	Required 2017 Level		CAGR*		Relative TSR**
50%	$	2.3972		7%		30th Percentile
100%	$	2.6045		10%		50th Percentile
150%		Interpolated		Interpolated		70th Percentile
200%	$	2.8235		13%		90th Percentile or above

* Reflects compound annual growth rate required to achieve 2017 results as compared to 2014 results.

** Payouts under the TSR component are capped at 100% if TSYS’ absolute TSR is negative regardless of TSYS’ ranking relative to the S&P 500.

Adjusted EPS for the performance period was $3.4466 after adjustments to exclude the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the adoption of a new accounting standard by the FASB. Our Relative TSR for the performance period ranked at the 98^th percentile. Based on these achieved performance levels, TSYS met the performance goals required for payment of the 2015 LTIP award at 200% of target. Our TSR during the performance period was 138.7%.

As a result of certification of performance by the Committee on January 25, 2018, named executive officers received shares of TSYS stock in connection with the 2015 LTIP as follows:

Executive	TSYS Shares
M. Troy Woods	108,552
Paul M. Todd	25,973
G. Sanders Griffith, III	28,705
Patricia A. Watson	21,093
Pamela A. Joseph(1)	0
William A. Pruett	34,126

(1) Ms. Joseph did not receive any TSYS shares in connection with the 2015 LTIP as a result of her resignation effective September 30, 2017.

Qualified Plan and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

TSYS maintains a broad-based qualified retirement plan. Under the Retirement Savings Plan, TSYS can make discretionary contributions based on profits. TSYS also “matches” 401(k) contributions up to 4% of a participant’s eligible compensation. For 2017, all eligible participants, including each named executive officer except Ms. Joseph, received a matching contribution of 4% of eligible compensation under the Retirement Savings Plan. Contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan for 2017 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39.

TSYS also sponsors a nonqualified plan, the TSYS Deferred Compensation Plan. TSYS makes contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan in an amount equal to the benefits that cannot be contributed to the Retirement Savings Plan due to limits imposed by the IRS. In addition, participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect to contribute all or a portion of their base pay and cash bonuses under the AIP to the Deferred Compensation Plan, and TSYS matches the contribution at the same rate applicable under the Retirement Savings Plan. Assets of the Deferred Compensation Plan are held in a rabbi trust, which is subject to claims by TSYS’ creditors. Contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan for 2017 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column in

34    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39. Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan invest amounts held for their benefit among specified mutual funds that are substantially similar to the mutual funds offered under the Retirement Savings Plan.

Perquisites

Perquisites are a very small part of our executive compensation program. Our named executive officers are eligible to receive financial planning assistance, term life insurance like coverage, home security services and limited personal use of the corporate aircraft. In addition, Ms. Joseph was provided with the use of a corporate apartment in Columbus, Georgia during the term of her employment during 2017. The aggregate incremental cost to TSYS of providing perquisites to our CEO in 2017 was $54,163 and is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 39 and additional information is included in footnote (5) to the table. Considered both individually and in the aggregate, we believe that the perquisites we offer to our named executive officers are reasonable and appropriate.

Separation Agreement

On September 21, 2017, TSYS and Ms. Joseph entered into a Separation Agreement (“Separation Agreement”) in connection with Ms. Joseph’s resignation as President and Chief Operating Officer. The Separation Agreement provides for a separation payment of $2,275,000 to Ms. Joseph, payable as follows: (1) $360,000 in substantially equal monthly installments in accordance with TSYS’ customary payroll practices; (2) a lump sum of $1,375,000 on a date not later than March 15, 2018, which payment shall include an amount attributable to Ms. Joseph’s estimated 2017 AIP incentive award and other consideration; and (3) a lump sum of $540,000 on or around January 1, 2019 (collectively, the “Separation Pay”). Payment to Ms. Joseph of all amounts under the Separation Agreement are subject to Ms. Joseph’s continued compliance with the terms of the release, confidentiality,non-compete,non-solicitation andnon-disparagement covenants in the Separation Agreement. If Ms. Joseph breaches any these covenants, her rights to future Separation Pay payments are automatically forfeited, and Ms. Joseph is contractually obligated to repay to TSYS 90% of any Separation Pay previously received, excluding the portion of the Separation Pay attributable to her pro rata portion of her estimated 2017 AIP incentive award, which pro rata portion is $525,000. Additional information about amounts paid to Ms. Joseph under the Separation Agreement are set forth in the Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-In-Control table on page 43.

Forward-looking Statements

The performance goals described in this CD&A may be deemed to be forward-looking statements, are not assurances of the outcome and are subject to a variety of risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Causes for these potential differences include those described under “Risk Factors” in our Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Policies and Practices

Employment Agreements.    None of our named executive officers has an employment agreement.

Recoveries.    Under TSYS’ clawback policy, the Committee may direct that TSYS recover all or a portion of any incentive award granted or paid to a named executive officer if the incentive award is computed using materially misstated financial information or other performance metric criteria. The amount to be recovered is equal to the excess of the incentive award paid or granted over the incentive award that would have been paid or granted had the financial information or performance metric been fairly stated at the time the incentive award was paid or granted, or any greater or lesser amount (up to the entire incentive award) that the Committee determines.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.    To align the interests of our executives and directors with our shareholders, TSYS has stock ownership guidelines for our executives and directors. Executives are required to own a multiple of their base pay in TSYS stock. Our CEO is required to own TSYS stock with a value of six times base pay. Our President (if a different person than the CEO) is required to own TSYS stock valued at four times base pay and the other named executive officers are required to own TSYS stock valued at three times their base pay. Executives generally have a five-year grace period to comply with the guidelines, with an interim three-year goal. Until the guidelines are met, executives are required to retain all stock acquired by them through our equity compensation plans, net of taxes and transaction costs. In the event of a severe financial hardship, the guidelines permit the development of an alternative ownership plan by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Committee. Each of our executive officers exceeds these guidelines.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    35

Hedging.    Our directors and executive officers are prohibited from entering into speculative transactions in TSYS stock, including engaging in short sales of TSYS stock, trading in publicly traded options, puts, calls or other derivative securities related to TSYS stock and engaging in hedging transactions involving TSYS stock.

Pledging.    Our pledging policy prohibits any future pledging of TSYS shares by directors and executive officers except in situations, and on conditions,pre-approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of TSYS. Approvals will be based on the particular facts and circumstances of the request, including, but not limited to: (1) the percentage of the individual’s equity holdings that are currently pledged and that would be pledged following the requested pledge; (2) the percentage the collective number of shares pledged by directors and executive officers represents of TSYS’ outstanding shares; (3) the historical trading volume of TSYS’ shares; (4) the financial ability of the individual to repay the loan without resort to the pledged shares; and (5) the purpose for which the individual is pledging the shares. In addition, the policy provides that shares of TSYS stock that are pledged by directors and executive officers are not included when calculating whether the individual is in compliance with director and executive officer stock ownership guidelines.

No TaxGross-Up Policy.    Our no taxgross-up policy prohibits TSYS from making any taxgross-up payments to executive officers, and is applicable to new agreements and agreements that are materially amended subsequent to December 13, 2011. Accordingly, the change of control agreement for Ms. Watson does not provide for taxgross-up payments. In addition, in the event a change of control had taken place on December 31, 2017 and the executive officers were terminated the only executive officer that would have received a taxgross-up payment is Mr. Todd.

Post-Termination Compensation Philosophy.    TSYS believes that compensation should generally be earned by executives while they are actively employed (i.e., while contributing to TSYS’ performance). Although retirement benefits are paid following an executive’s retirement, the benefits are earned while employed. TSYS has entered into limited post-termination arrangements when appropriate, such as permitting equity to continue to vest in certain circumstances upon retirement as if the executive was still employed and the change of control agreements that are described under “Potential Payouts Upon Termination orChange-in-Control” on page 43. TSYS chose to enter into change of control arrangements with its executives to: (1) ensure the retention of executives and an orderly transition during a change of control; (2) ensure that executives would be financially protected in the event of a change of control so they continue to act in the best interests of TSYS while continuing to manage TSYS during a change of control; and (3) ensure a competitive compensation package because such arrangements are common in the market and it was determined that the agreements were important in recruiting and retaining executive talent.

No Backdating or Repricing of Stock Options.    Stock options are never backdated or issued with below-market exercise prices. Stock options are neverre-priced without shareholder approval.

Tax Considerations.    In connection with making decisions on executive compensation, the Committee takes into consideration the provisions of Section 162(m), which limits the deductibility by TSYS for federal income tax purposes of certain categories of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executive officers. It is TSYS’ policy to maximize the effectiveness of our compensation programs while also taking into consideration the requirements of Section 162(m). In that regard, the Committee intends to maintain the flexibility to take actions that it deems to be in the best interests of TSYS and its shareholders. Accordingly, although the Committee intends to preserve the deductibility of annual compensation to the extent consistent with the intent and spirit of our overall compensation policy, it reserves the authority to exercise its discretion and awardnon-deductible compensation as it deems appropriate.

The exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

With the exception of excise taxes that may be due with respect to change of control agreements with executive officers that were entered into prior to December 13, 2011, TSYS does not“gross-up” its named executive officers for taxes that are due with respect to their compensation.

Consideration of Risk.    TSYS’ executive compensation program provides payment opportunities related to different time periods (i.e., short and long-term components); however, TSYS does not offer incentives that promote short-term objectives at the expense of long-term shareholder value. Elements of compensation include current cash payments, deferred cash and equity awards. Payouts are based on a combination of financial metrics.

36    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

Amounts paid to executives under our program are reasonable compared to market, and the Committee retains significant discretion to limit performance-based compensation. The Committee considers the risks inherent in our executive compensation program, and the Committee has determined that our program is balanced and does not encourage executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks.

Accounting Considerations.    We account for all compensation paid in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The accounting treatment has generally not affected the form of compensation paid to the named executive officers.

Compensation Realized By Named Executive Officers for 2017

The 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39 provides compensation information for each named executive officer as required by SEC rules. However, the Summary Compensation Table includes amounts that were targeted but not necessarily realized by the executives in connection with the 2017 year. For example, the Summary Compensation Table reflects grant date fair values of equity awards (i.e., options and performance shares) for 2017 rather than the financial benefit realized by the executives for 2017 as a result of the exercise of stock options or the vesting of performance and restricted shares. This information is, however, set forth in the 2017 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table on page 42.

The following table reflects only compensation actually realized by each executive for 2017 and is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table. In addition, it is not part of the compensation tables that we are required by SEC rules to present in this Proxy Statement. Furthermore, it does not include a number of compensation opportunities that were made available in 2017. For example, the LTIP awards for 2017 are not included in the table because the awards did not vest during 2017. Detailed information on all compensation opportunities that were made available in 2017 and all compensation paid to or earned by the named executive officers during 2017 is included in this CD&A and the series of tables following this CD&A.

Although various compensation opportunities for the named executive officers are not included in the following table, the Committee considered all amounts paid to or earned by the named executive officers and all compensation opportunities in its determination that the compensation paid to or earned by each named executive officer in 2017 is reasonable, competitive, performance-oriented and designed to align with the successful implementation of our strategic plan. The Committee believes consideration of realized pay in relation to the performance of TSYS is an important element in evaluating pay for performance alignment among our executive compensation arrangements.

The following table reflects the components of the compensation realized by the named executive officers for 2017.

Name and Principal Position(1)	Base Pay(2)		Annual AIP Incentive Award(3)		Value Realized on Exercise of Options During 2017(4)		Value Realized on Vesting of Stock Awards During 2017(5)(6)		All Other Compensation(7)		Total
M. Troy Woods	$	892,250	$	1,864,245		—	$	9,582,971	$	161,437	$	12,500,903
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Paul M. Todd		513,500		729,568		—		2,829,895		41,394		4,114,357
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
G. Sanders Griffith, III		537,000		762,956	$	716,954		2,534,077		52,329		4,603,316
Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Patricia A. Watson		493,750		701,508		836,759		2,327,875		83,948		4,443,840
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

(1) Ms. Joseph and Mr. Pruett are not included in the table as neither individual was employed as an executive officer for the full year.

(2) Amount represents base salary earned during the year.

(3) Annual cash incentive award under the AIP for each executive.

(4) The value realized on exercise of stock options means the amount equal to the number of shares acquired upon exercise multiplied by the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of TSYS stock on the NYSE on the date of the stock option exercise for shares that were not sold by the executive upon the option exercise, or the weighted average selling price if same day sales occurred. For a complete list of each named executive officer’s outstanding options, see the Option Awards columns of the 2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End table on page 41.

(5) The value realized on vesting means the amount equal to the number of shares acquired upon vesting multiplied by the closing price of TSYS stock on the NYSE on the date of vesting. For a complete list of each named executive officer’s unvested shares, see the Stock Awards columns of the 2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End table on page 41.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    37

(6) Performance-based stock awards make up 100% of the values shown for each executive except Ms. Watson.

(7) The components of All Other Compensation for each named executive officer are set forth in footnotes (4) and (5) to the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39.

Conclusion

For the reasons described above, we believe that each element of compensation in our executive compensation program and the total compensation for each named executive officer in 2017 is reasonable, competitive, performance-oriented and designed to align with the successful implementation of our strategic plan.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in TSYS’ Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Compensation Committee

Kriss Cloninger III, Chair

Walter W. Driver, Jr.

William M. Isaac

Richard A. Smith

38    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

2017 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below summarizes the compensation for each of the named executive officers except Ms. Joseph for each of the last three fiscal years, and with respect to Ms. Joseph for 2016 and 2017 as 2016 is the year in which she became a named executive officer.

The named executive officers were not entitled to receive payments which would be characterized as “Bonus” payments for any of these fiscal years, except Ms. Watson who was hired in September 2015 and Ms. Joseph who was hired in May 2016. The short-term incentive amounts paid to the named executives except Ms. Watson in 2015 and Ms. Joseph in 2016 are set forth in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. TSYS’ methodology and rationale for short-term incentive compensation are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

The named executive officers did not receive any compensation that is reportable under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column because TSYS has no defined benefit pension plans and does not pay above-market interest on deferred compensation. The retirement plan contributions for the named executive officers are set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column.

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary          ($)		Bonus         ($)		Stock Awards           ($)(1)		Option Awards         ($)(2)			Non- Equity Incentive Plan Com- pensation                ($)(3)		Change in Pension Value and Nonquali- fied Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Com- pensation              ($)			Total($)
M. Troy Woods		2017		$892,250		—		$2,565,653		$1,566,505			$1,864,245		—		$161,437	(4)(5)		$7,050,090
Chairman, President and		2016		869,000		—		2,361,354		1,233,609			1,789,600		—		145,729			6,399,292
Chief Executive Officer		2015		843,000		—		2,097,109		1,134,125			1,995,100		—		122,533			6,191,867
Paul M. Todd		2017		513,500		—		574,113		350,517			729,568		—		41,394	(4)(5)		2,209,092
Senior Executive		2016		500,000		—		528,406		276,032			700,200		—		35,079			2,039,717
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2015		461,000		—		1,436,000		271,342			741,900		—		36,360			2,946,602
G. Sanders Griffith, III		2017		537,000		—		602,812		368,050			762,956		—		52,329	(4)(5)		2,323,147
Senior Executive		2016		525,000		—		554,817		289,831			735,200		—		43,688			2,148,536
Vice President, General		2015		509,500		—		554,569		299,888			819,900		—		44,295			2,228,152
Counsel and Secretary
Patricia A. Watson		2017		493,750		—		545,399		332,995			701,508		—		83,948	(4)(5)		2,157,600
Senior Executive Vice		2016		475,000		—		501,951		262,232			665,200		—		43,957			1,948,340
President and Chief		2015		142,195	$	550,000		1,570,540		287,898	��		—		—		—			2,550,633
Information Officer
Pamela A. Joseph		2017		518,750		—		1,107,185		676,001			—		—		742,775	(4)(5)		3,044,711
Former President and		2016		451,845		300,000		1,772,259		1,051,084			744,400		—		47,120			4,366,708
Chief Operating Officer
William A. Pruett		2017		546,000		—		—		—			—		—		41,610	(4)(5)		587,610
Former Senior Executive		2016		546,000		—		659,433		344,485			640,700		—		40,843			2,231,461
Vice President		2015		530,000		—		659,257		356,516			777,900		—		34,473			2,358,146

(1) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards reported in this column computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For stock awards that are subject to performance conditions, the value at the grant date is based upon the probable outcome of such conditions in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The values for the stock awards made to the named executive officers in 2017 include the value of performance share awards only for each executive. The values of the 2017 performance share awards assuming that the highest level of performance conditions are attained are $5,131,306, $1,148,226, $1,205,624, $1,090,798, $2,214,370 and $0 for Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Griffith, Ms. Watson, Ms. Joseph and Mr. Pruett, respectively. For a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the values of the awards reported in this column, see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in TSYS’ Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional information regarding the 2017 awards is set forth in the 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below.

(2) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards reported in this column computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the values of the awards reported in this column, see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in TSYS’ Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional information regarding the 2017 awards is set forth in the 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below.

(3) The amounts in this column represent the Annual Incentive Program cash awards paid.

(4) The amount for each executive except Ms. Joseph includes allocations to the qualified defined contribution plan of $10,800 and allocations to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan of $96,474, $7,200, $13,200, $35,558 and $13,200 for Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Griffith, Ms. Watson and Mr. Pruett, respectively. The amount in this column for Ms. Joseph includes $180,000 actually paid to Ms. Joseph in 2017 under the terms of her Separation Agreement plus $525,000, which is payable no later than March 15, 2018 and is attributable to the pro rata portion of her estimated 2017 AIP incentive award. See “Separation Agreement” on page 35.

(5) The amount includes the cost incurred by TSYS in connection with providing the perquisites of financial planning services for each executive, the actuarial value of providing term life insurance like coverage for Mr. Todd, Mr. Pruett and Mr. Griffith, the cost incurred by TSYS for providing home security services for each executive except Ms. Joseph and Mr. Pruett and the cost incurred by TSYS in connection with providing the rent-free use of an apartment in Columbus, Georgia for Ms. Joseph which is where TSYS’ headquarters are

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    39

located. The amount also includes the incremental cost to TSYS for personal use of the corporate aircraft for Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Griffith, Ms. Watson and Mr. Pruett. None of these perquisites individually exceeded $25,000 with the exception of the cost of providing the use of an apartment to Ms. Joseph in the amount of $28,910 and the incremental cost to TSYS for providing personal use of the corporate aircraft to Mr. Woods and Ms. Watson in the amounts of $47,362 and $25,115, respectively. The amount for the personal use of corporate aircraft was calculated by adding all incremental costs of such use, including fuel, maintenance, hanger and tie-down costs, landing fees, airport taxes, catering and crew travel expenses (food, lodging and ground transportation). The aggregate incremental cost incurred by TSYS in connection with providing perquisites was $54,163, $23,394, $28,329, $37,590, $37,775 and $17,610 for Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Griffith, Ms. Watson, Ms. Joseph and Mr. Pruett, respectively.

2017 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The table below sets forth the short-term incentive compensation (payable in cash) and equity awards granted to the named executive officers in 2017.

Name	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards									All Other  Stock  Awards:  Number of  Shares of Stock or Units  (#)	All Other  Option  Awards:  Number of  Securities  Underlying  Options  (#)(2)		Exercise  or Base  Price of  Option  Awards  ($/Sh)		Grant  Date Fair  Value of  Stock  and  Option  Awards(3)
			Threshold  ($)		Target  ($)		Maximum  ($)		Threshold  (#)			Target            (#)			Maximum  (#)
M. Troy Woods			$	278,828	$	1,115,313	$	2,230,626
		2/17/2017																		145,993	$	54.47	$	1,566,505
		2/17/2017								21,538	(4)		43,076	(4)		86,152	(4)							2,565,653
Paul M. Todd				109,119		436,475		872,950
		2/17/2017																		32,667		54.47		350,517
		2/17/2017								4,820	(4)		9,639	(4)		19,278	(4)							574,113
G. Sanders Griffith, III				114,113		456,450		912,900
		2/17/2017																		34,301		54.47		368,050
		2/17/2017								5,061	(4)		10,121	(4)		20,242	(4)							602,812
Patricia A. Watson				104,922		419,688		839,376
		2/17/2017																		31,034		54.47		332,995
		2/17/2017								4,579	(4)		9,157	(4)		18,314	(4)							545,399
Pamela A. Joseph(5)				173,438		693,750		1,387,500
		2/17/2017																		63,001		54.47		676,001
		2/17/2017								9,295	(4)		18,589	(4)		37,178	(4)							1,107,185
William A. Pruett(6)		—		—		—		—		—			—			—				—		—		—

(1) The amounts shown in these columns represent the threshold, target and maximum amounts payable under the Annual Incentive Program for 2017. Awards are paid in cash and are based upon the level of attainment of certain performance measures, based on growth in net revenue and growth in adjusted diluted EPS.

(2) These stock options for all executives other than Ms. Joseph vest in three installments ofone-third (1/3) each on February 17, 2018, February 17, 2019 and February 17, 2020, and expire on February 16, 2027.

(3) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock and option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the values of the awards reported in this column, see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in TSYS’ Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(4) The amounts shown represent the threshold, target and maximum payout amounts that were determined by the payout schedule approved by the Compensation Committee on February 17, 2017 for these performance share awards for the performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019. Vesting for all executives other than Ms. Joseph will occur upon the Committee’s certification subsequent to December 31, 2019 of the level of attainment of certain performance measures, based on TSYS’ total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 and adjusted diluted EPS. Dividend equivalents equal to cash dividends will be credited to these performance shares and will be paid out in the form of TSYS stock to the extent that the performance shares are earned.

(5) All of the awards shown in the table above for Ms. Joseph were forfeited upon her resignation from employment in 2017.

(6) As Mr. Pruett retired as Senior Executive Vice President effective April 1, 2017, he did not receive any grants of awards in 2017 under the Annual Incentive Program or the Long-Term Incentive Program.

40    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

2017 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	Option Grant Date(1)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(2)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
M. Troy Woods		4/1/2013		37,865		—	$	24.44		3/31/2023
		3/18/2014		127,901		—		30.83		3/17/2024
		8/1/2014		47,290		—		31.96		7/31/2024
		2/27/2015		94,626		46,610		38.20		2/26/2025
		2/26/2016		51,595		104,756		44.48		2/25/2026
		2/17/2017		—		145,993		54.47		2/16/2027
												26,780	(3)	$	2,118,014
												21,695	(4)		1,715,835
Paul M. Todd		3/15/2011		5,654		—		17.57		3/14/2021
		3/29/2012		14,401		—		22.91		3/28/2022
		4/1/2013		23,528		—		24.44		3/31/2023
		3/18/2014		26,244		—		30.83		3/17/2024
		2/27/2015		22,638		11,153		38.20		2/26/2025
		2/26/2016		11,545		23,440		44.48		2/25/2026
		2/17/2017		—		32,667		54.47		2/16/2027
												5,993	(3)		473,953
												4,855	(4)		383,948
												6,374	(5)		504,083
G. Sanders Griffith, III		3/18/2014		41,836		—		30.83		3/17/2024
		2/27/2015		25,020		12,326		38.20		2/26/2025
		2/26/2016		12,122		24,612		44.48		2/25/2026
		2/17/2017		—		34,301		54.47		2/16/2027
												6,292	(3)		497,643
												5,097	(4)		403,147
Patricia A. Watson		9/18/2015		—		9,122		46.31		2/26/2025
		2/26/2016		—		22,269		44.48		2/25/2026
		2/17/2017		—		31,034		54.47		2/16/2027
												5,693	(3)		450,224
												4,612	(4)		364,748
Pamela A. Joseph(6)				—		—		—		—		—			—
William A. Pruett		2/27/2015		—		14,654		38.20		2/26/2025
		2/26/2016		—		29,253		44.48		2/25/2026
												7,479	(3)		591,478

(1) For better understanding of this table, we have included an additional column showing the grant date of the stock options, which was the date that the Compensation Committee met and granted each stock option award shown in the table other than the stock option award to Mr. Woods on August 1, 2014, which was approved by the Compensation Committee on June 23, 2014.

(2) All of the stock options set forth in this column other than the stock options granted to Ms. Watson in 2015 are the remaining unvested portions of stock option grants that, under the terms of the grants, were to vest in three equal annual installments ofone-third each beginning on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The unvested stock options vest as follows: the stock options granted in 2015 to the executives other than Ms. Watson vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, the stock options granted in 2016 vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date and the stock options granted in 2017 vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The stock options granted to Ms. Watson in 2015 vest on February 27, 2018.

(3) These amounts represent the number of performance shares that will vest if the threshold level of performance is attained for the performance period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. Vesting will occur upon the Compensation Committee’s certification subsequent to December 31, 2018 of the level of attainment of certain performance measures, which measures are based on TSYS’ total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 and adjusted EPS from continuing operations. The performance shares were awarded to the named executive officers on February 26, 2016.

(4) These amounts represent the number of performance shares that will vest if the threshold level of performance is attained for the performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019. Vesting will occur upon the Compensation Committee’s certification subsequent to December 31, 2019 of the level of attainment of certain performance measures, which measures are based on TSYS’ total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 and adjusted diluted EPS. The performance shares were awarded to the named executive officers on February 17, 2017.

(5) This amount represents the number of remaining unvested performance shares originally awarded to Mr. Todd on August 5, 2015, in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer, that will vest if the threshold level of performance is attained upon the Compensation Committee’s certification after July 31, 2018

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    41

of the level of attainment of certain performance measures based on TSYS’ total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 for the performance period.

(6) Ms. Joseph’s unvested equity awards were forfeited upon her resignation from employment in 2017, and she exercised all of her vested stock options before December 31, 2017.

2017 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth the number and corresponding value realized during 2017 with respect to stock option exercises and performance shares and restricted stock that vested for each named executive officer.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2)
M. Troy Woods		—		—		108,552	$	9,582,971
Paul M. Todd		—		—		34,439		2,829,895
G. Sanders Griffith, III		18,472	$	716,954		28,705		2,534,077
Patricia A. Watson		29,485		836,759		28,111		2,327,875
Pamela A. Joseph		56,257		1,053,971		—		—
William A. Pruett		65,568		2,204,867		34,126		3,012,643

(1) The value realized on exercise of stock options means the amount equal to the number of shares of TSYS stock acquired upon exercise multiplied by the difference between: (a) the exercise price and (b) the closing price of TSYS stock on the NYSE on the option exercise date for shares that were not sold by the executive upon the option exercise, or the weighted average selling price ifsame-day sales occurred.

(2) The value realized on vesting of performance shares or restricted stock means the amount equal to the number of shares of TSYS stock acquired upon vesting multiplied by the closing price of TSYS stock on the NYSE on the vesting date. The amounts in this column for each named executive officer other than Ms. Joseph include the value of performance shares for which the performance period ended on December 31, 2017 and for which the Committee certified attainment of the performance measures on January 25, 2018. The amount for Mr. Todd includes the value of performance shares for which the performance period ended on July 31, 2017 and for which the Committee certified the performance measure on August 10, 2017. The amount for Ms. Watson includes the value of restricted stock awarded to her that vested on September 18, 2017.

2017 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

Name	Executive   Contributions in Last   FY   ($)			Registrant   Contributions in   Last FY   ($)(1)		Aggregate   Earnings in Last   FY   ($)		Aggregate   Withdrawals/   Distributions   ($)		Aggregate   Balance at Last   FYE   ($)(2)
M. Troy Woods	$	446,125	(3)	$	96,474	$	673,594	$	71,308	$	5,479,942
Paul M. Todd		—			7,200		25,200		—		174,267
G. Sanders Griffith, III		—			13,200		142,371		—		927,272
Patricia A. Watson		133,040	(4)		35,558		13,625		—		195,623
Pamela A. Joseph(5)		—			—		—		—		—
William A. Pruett		—			13,200		82,973		—		956,132

(1) The amount shown is reported in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table for 2017 as “All Other Compensation.”

(2) Of the balances reported in this column, the amounts of $3,024,167, $26,593, $88,076, $13,400, $0 and $483,289 with respect to Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Griffith, Ms. Watson, Ms. Joseph and Mr. Pruett, respectively, were reported in the Summary Compensation Table as “Salary” or “All Other Compensation” in previous years.

(3) The amount shown is reported in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table for 2017 as “Salary.”

(4) The amount shown is reported in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table for 2017 as“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

(5) Ms. Joseph forfeited all amounts held for her benefit under the Deferred Compensation Plan because she resigned from employment with less than two years of service.

The Deferred Compensation Plan replaces benefits lost by executives under the qualified Retirement Savings Plan due to IRS limits. Executives are also permitted to defer all or a portion of their base salary or short-term incentive award. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are deposited into a rabbi trust, and executives are permitted to invest their accounts in mutual funds that are substantially similar to the mutual funds available in the qualified Retirement Savings Plan. Deferred Compensation Plan participants may elect to withdraw their accounts as of a specified date or upon their termination of employment. Distributions can be made in a single lump sum or in annual installments over a2-10 year period, as elected by the executive.

42    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

POTENTIAL PAYOUTS UPON TERMINATION ORCHANGE-IN-CONTROL

None of our named executive officers has an employment agreement. We have entered into change of control agreements with our named executive officers except Ms. Joseph whose change in control agreement was terminated in connection with her resignation from employment in 2017. Under these agreements, benefits are payable upon the occurrence of two events (also known as a “double trigger”). The first event is a change of control and the second event is the actual or constructive termination of the executive within two years following the date of the change of control. “Change of control” is defined, in general, as the acquisition of 20% of TSYS’ stock for Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Pruett and Mr. Griffith, and 30% for Ms. Watson, by any “person” as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, turnover of more thanone-third of the Board of Directors of TSYS, a merger of TSYS with another company, or a reorganization, sale or similar transaction, unless the former shareholders of TSYS own more than 60% of the surviving entity for Mr. Woods, Mr. Todd, Mr. Pruett and Mr. Griffith, and 50% for Ms. Watson. For purposes of these agreements, a constructive termination is a voluntary termination for good reason when there is a material adverse reduction in an executive’s position, duties or responsibilities, relocation of the executive more than 35 miles from where the executive is employed, or a material reduction in the executive’s base salary, bonus or other employee benefits.

In the event payments are triggered under the agreements, each executive will receive three times his or her base salary as in effect prior to the termination, three times a percentage of his or her base salary equal to the average short-term incentive award percentage earned over the previous three calendar years prior to the termination, as well as a pro rata short-term incentive award calculated at target for the year of termination. These amounts will be paid to the executive in a singlelump-sum cash payment. Each executive will also receive health and welfare benefits for a three-year period following the second triggering event, or the equivalent value thereof. In addition, each executive except Ms. Watson will receive an amount that is designed to“gross-up” the executive for any excise taxes that are payable by the executive as a result of the payments under the agreement, but only if the total change of control payments to the executive exceed 110% of the applicable IRS cap. The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy pursuant to which it will no longer make taxgross-up payments to executive officers, which policy is applicable to new agreements and agreements that are materially amended, and as such Ms. Watson’s change of control agreement does not contain agross-up provision. In addition, our equity award agreements with named executive officers require actual or constructive termination of employment in addition to a change of control before acceleration of vesting is triggered and beginning in 2012 all award agreements provide for vesting on a pro rata basis. The following table quantifies the estimated amounts that would be payable under the change of control and equity award agreements, assuming the triggering events occurred on December 31, 2017.

	3x Base Salary		3-Years Short-Term Incentive Award		Pro Rata Target Short- Term Incentive Award		Health & Welfare Benefits		Stock Award Vesting(1)			Stock Option Vesting(2)			Excise Tax Gross-up		Total
M. Troy Woods	$	2,700,000	$	4,914,000	$	1,115,313	$	62,064	$	5,371,286	(3)	$	6,618,763	(3)		—	$	20,781,426
Paul M. Todd		1,554,000		1,926,960		436,475		62,064		1,166,018			1,038,639		$	2,128,687		8,312,843
G. Sanders Griffith, III		1,623,000		2,061,210		456,450		62,064		1,262,285	(3)		1,611,282	(3)		—		7,076,291
Patricia A. Watson		1,500,000		1,523,700		419,688		62,064		842,069			863,757			—		4,322,033	(4)
Pamela A. Joseph		—		—		—		—		—			—			—		705,000	(5)
William A. Pruett		1,638,000		1,998,360		464,100		62,064		1,181,000	(3)		1,611,648	(3)		—		6,955,172

(1) Estimated by multiplying the equity awards that vest upon termination in connection with a change of control by the fair market value of TSYS stock on December 31, 2017.

(2) Estimated by multiplying the number of options that vest upon termination in connection with a change of control by the difference in the fair market value of TSYS stock on December 31, 2017 and the exercise price.

(3) Vesting determined by applicable retirement vesting schedule (which can be more favorable than the vesting schedule in the event of a double trigger change of control) because executive was eligible to retire on date of assumed triggering events.

(4) Capped at maximum amount payable without incurring an excise tax under Section 4999 of the IRC.

(5) Under the terms of her Separation Agreement, Ms. Joseph may receive a total separation payment of up to $2,275,000. The amount in this column for Ms. Joseph includes $180,000 actually paid to Ms. Joseph in 2017 under the terms of her Separation Agreement plus $525,000, which is payable no later than March 15, 2018 and is attributable to the pro rata portion of her estimated 2017 AIP incentive award. Subject to Ms. Joseph’s compliance with the other terms of the Separation Agreement, she may receive an additional $1,570,000 in payments under the Separation Agreement in 2018 and 2019. See “Separation Agreement” on page 35.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    43

Executives who receive these benefits are subject to a confidentiality obligation with respect to secret and confidential information about TSYS. There are no provisions regarding a waiver of this confidentiality obligation. No perquisites or other personal benefits are payable under the change of control agreements.

The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table sets forth the amount and form of deferred compensation benefits that the named executive officers would be entitled to receive upon their termination of employment.

In addition to vesting upon actual or constructive termination of employment in connection with a change of control (on a pro rata basis beginning in 2012), outstanding stock options and performance share awards may vest when named executive officers terminate employment under other circumstances as follows:

• Stock options held by the named executive officers generally vest upon death or disability and continue to vest upon retirement after attaining age 65, or age 62 with 15 or more years of service; provided, however, that in certain circumstances the amount will be a pro rata portion based on the date of retirement; and

• Performance share awards vest at target upon death or disability and continue to vest in accordance with actual performance upon retirement after attaining age 65, or age 62 with 15 or more years of service; provided, however, that the amount paid will be a pro rata portion based on the date of death or disability and, in certain circumstances, the date of retirement.

The Committee also has discretionary authority to vest equity awards.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of M. Troy Woods, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (collectively, our “CEO”).

We have a global workforce, with employees in 14 countries. Approximately 74% of our employees are located in the United States. Approximately 97% of our entire workforce is located in the United States, Canada, the UK, India and Cyprus.

To identify the median employee and the annual total compensation of all our employees excluding our CEO, we took the following steps.

• We selected December 31, 2017, the last day of our 2017 payroll year, as the determination date for purposes of identifying the median employee.

• Our employee population as of December 31, 2017 was 11,336, which included all full-time and part-time employees and excluded contractors or persons employed through a third party provider. As permitted by SEC rules, we adjusted the employee population to exclude 319 employees in the Netherlands, Russia, Brazil, Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates, Germany and Italy. Our employee population, as adjusted, was 11,017 employees (“Adjusted Employee Population”).

• We chose “total cash compensation” (which included base salary or hourly wages plus cash bonuses) as our consistently applied compensation measure. We believe the use of total cash compensation for all employees is a consistently-applied compensation measure because we do not widely distribute annual equity to employees. For purposes of the pay ratio calculation, we converted all cash compensation paid in foreign currency to U.S. dollars using currency conversion rates consistent with our December 31, 2017 Income Statement. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the median employee.

• We identified the median employee by examining the 2017 total cash compensation for all employees, excluding our CEO, in the Adjusted Employee Population. We used actual compensation and did not make adjustments to total cash compensation for newly-hired employees hired during 2017.

• With respect to the annual total compensation of the median employee, we identified and calculated the elements of such median employee’s compensation using the same methodology reflected in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39, and then added $7,392. The difference between such employee’s cash compensation and the employee’s annual total compensation represents the estimated value of such employee’s health care benefits. This resulted in annual total compensation for our median employee of $62,146.

44    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

• With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the 2017 Summary Compensation Table on page 39, adjusted as follows. To maintain consistency between the annual total compensation of our CEO and the median employee, we added the estimated value of our CEO’s health care benefits (estimated for our CEO and our CEO’s eligible dependents at $7,392) to the amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table. This resulted in annual total compensation for purposes of determining the ratio in the amount of $7,057,482, which exceeds the amount reported for him in the Summary Compensation Table by $7,392.

Based on this information, for 2017 the estimated ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Woods, our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 114 to 1.

The CEO pay ratio disclosed above was calculated in accordance with SEC rules based upon our reasonable judgement and assumptions using the methodology described above. The SEC rules do not specify a single methodology for identification of the median employee or calculation of the CEO pay ratio, and other companies may use assumptions and methodologies that are different from those used by us in calculating their CEO pay ratio. Accordingly, the CEO pay ratio disclosed by other companies may not be comparable to our CEO pay ratio as disclosed above.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mr. Cloninger, Mr. Driver, Mr. Isaac and Mr. Smith served on the Compensation Committee during 2017. None of these individuals is or has been an officer or employee of TSYS. During 2017, no member of the Compensation Committee was an executive officer of another entity on whose compensation committee or board of directors any executive officer of TSYS served.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    45

PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are asking shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as described in the Executive Compensation section found on pages 24 to 45 of this Proxy Statement. As described above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation program to achieve the following key objectives:

Objective	How Our Executive Compensation Program Achieves This Objective
Pay for Performance	•  Tying a significant portion of each named executive officer’s targeted total direct compensation to the achievement of performance goals
Alignment with Shareholder Interests	•  Establishing performance metrics under our LTIP and AIP that are designed to focus executives on the strategic objectives of TSYS
Commitment to Compensation “Best Practices”	•  Minimal executive perquisites •  Clawback policy for incentive compensation awards •  Stock ownership requirements •  No taxgross-up policy for new agreements
Attract and Retain Top Talent	•  Competing effectively for the highest quality people who will determine our long-term success

We urge shareholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 24 of this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that our compensation policies and procedures are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our named executive officers reported in this Proxy Statement has contributed to TSYS’ long-term success.

We are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of TSYS approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of TSYS’ named executive officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative in this Proxy Statement for TSYS’ 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a“say-on-pay” resolution, isnon-binding on the Board. Although the advisory vote isnon-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and will continue to review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation program. In addition, the Board and the Committee intend to continue our annual shareholder outreach program pursuant to which we discuss, or offer to discuss, with all shareholders holding 1% or more of TSYS’ shares their views on compensation related matters so that we can also consider them when making future decisions about our executive compensation program. The Board has determined to hold annual advisory votes on executive compensation. Accordingly, the next advisory vote on executive compensation will occur at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, unless the Board modifies its policy on the frequency of holding such advisory votes.

The Board of Directors Recommends That You Vote “FOR” the Approval of the Advisory

Resolution Approving the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers.

46    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the number of shares of TSYS stock held by the only known holders of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of TSYS stock as of December 31, 2017. The share ownership shown in the table below was obtained from SEC Schedule 13G filings by each of the owners set forth in the table below.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares of TSYS Stock Beneficially Owned as of 12/31/17		Percentage of Outstanding Shares  of TSYS Stock Beneficially  Owned as of 12/31/17
BlackRock, Inc.		11,578,874(1)		6.3%
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055
Synovus Financial Corp.		13,512,443(2)		7.5%
1111 Bay Avenue, Suite 500
Columbus, Georgia 31901
The Vanguard Group		17,635,509(3)		9.6%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

(1) As of December 31, 2017, BlackRock, Inc. and its subsidiaries possessed sole voting power with respect to 9,952,334 TSYS shares and sole investment power with respect to 11,578,874 TSYS shares.

(2) As of December 31, 2017, Synovus and its subsidiaries possessed sole voting power with respect to 12,613,757 TSYS shares, shared voting power with respect to 33,326 TSYS shares, sole investment power with respect to 13,329,130 TSYS shares and shared investment power with respect to 183,223 TSYS shares.

(3) As of December 31, 2017, The Vanguard Group and its subsidiaries possessed sole voting power with respect to 240,257 TSYS shares, shared voting power with respect to 51,945 TSYS shares, sole investment power with respect to 17,345,803 TSYS shares and shared investment power with respect to 289,706 TSYS shares.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires TSYS’ officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of TSYS stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC.

To TSYS’ knowledge, based solely on its review of such reports submitted to TSYS, and written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, TSYS believes that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with, except that one transaction was reported late on one report for Mr. Turner.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    47

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Purpose

This Proxy Statement is being made available or mailed to TSYS shareholders beginning on or about March 14, 2018. The TSYS Board of Directors is soliciting proxies to be used at the 2018 Annual Meeting of TSYS Shareholders which will be held on April 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the TSYS Riverfront Campus Auditorium, One TSYS Way, Columbus, Georgia. Proxies are solicited to give all shareholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting.

Who Can Vote

You are entitled to vote if you were a shareholder of record of TSYS stock as of the close of business on February 16, 2018, the record date. Your shares can be voted at the meeting only if you are present or represented by a valid proxy.

Quorum and Shares Outstanding

A majority of the outstanding shares of TSYS stock must be present, either in person or represented by proxy, in order to conduct the Annual Meeting of TSYS Shareholders. On February 16, 2018, 181,725,568 shares of TSYS stock were outstanding.

Proxies

The Board has designated two individuals to serve as proxies to vote the shares represented by proxies at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you are a shareholder of record and properly submit a proxy card or submit a proxy by telephone or via the Internet but do not specify how you want your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted by the designated proxies:

• FOR the election of all of the director nominees (Proposal 1);

• FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as TSYS’ independent auditor for the year 2018 (Proposal 2); and

• FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of TSYS’ named executive officers (Proposal 3).

The designated proxies will vote in their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. At this time, we are unaware of any matters, other than as set forth above, that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

Voting of Shares

Each share of TSYS stock represented at the Annual Meeting is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting. All shares entitled to vote and represented in person or by valid proxies received by phone, Internet or mail will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on those proxies.

Required Votes

Election of Directors (Proposal 1)

Our bylaws provide a majority vote standard for uncontested director elections. To be elected, directors must receive a majority of the votes cast (the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee). If shareholders do not elect a nominee who is serving as a director, Georgia law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “hold over director.” Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, an incumbent director that is not elected is expected to tender, promptly following certification of the voting results, his or her resignation from the Board, which resignation may be conditioned on Board acceptance of the resignation. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board will

48    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

nominate for election and appoint to Board vacancies only those candidates who have agreed to tender, promptly following the failure to receive the required vote for election to the Board, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon Board acceptance of the resignation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the tendered resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board will act on the tendered resignation within 90 days from the certification of the voting results and promptly publicly disclose its decision. A director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the Committee’s recommendation or the Board action regarding whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation.

All Other Proposals

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is also needed to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as TSYS’ independent auditor for 2018 (Proposal 2) and approve the advisory vote on the compensation of TSYS’ named executive officers (Proposal 3).

Abstentions and BrokerNon-Votes

Under certain circumstances, banks, brokers or other nominees are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee (a “brokernon-vote”). In these cases, and in cases where the shareholder abstains from voting on a matter, those shares will be counted for the purpose of determining if a quorum is present, but will not be included as votes cast with respect to those matters. Whether a bank, broker or other nominee has authority to vote its shares on uninstructed matters is determined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. We expect that banks, brokers and other nominees will be able to exercise discretionary authority to vote on Proposal 2, but will not have discretion to vote on Proposals 1 and 3. As such, if you do not provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee, your bank, broker or other nominee may only vote your shares on Proposal 2. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of any of the Proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

How You Can Vote

If you hold shares in your own name, you may vote by proxy or in person at the meeting. If you wish to vote your shares in person at our Annual Meeting, you may either bring your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability to the meeting or request a ballot at the meeting. To vote by proxy, you may select one of the following options:

Vote By Internet

You can vote your shares on the Internet until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2018. The website for Internet voting is shown on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability, as applicable. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you do NOT need to return your proxy card if you received one.

You can also vote your shares on the Internet by scanning the QR code shown on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability, as applicable, with your mobile device.

Vote By Telephone

You can vote your shares by telephone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2018 by calling the toll-free telephone number (at no cost to you) shown on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability, as applicable. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate the shareholder by using individual control numbers. If you vote by telephone, you do NOT need to return your proxy card if you received one.

Vote By Mail

If you received your proxy materials by mail, simply mark your proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee that you must follow for your shares to be voted. Please follow their instructions carefully. Also, please note that if the holder of record of your shares is a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares and present that proxy and proof of identification at the Annual Meeting.

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    49

Revocation of Proxy

If you hold shares in your own name and vote by proxy, you may revoke that proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by: (1) signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us prior to the Annual Meeting; (2) voting again by telephone or on the Internet before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2018; or (3) attending the Annual Meeting in person and casting a ballot.

If your TSYS shares are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by the bank, broker or other nominee if you wish to change your vote.

Attending the Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the TSYS Riverfront Campus Auditorium, One TSYS Way, Columbus, Georgia. Directions to the auditorium can be obtained on our website at http://annualreport.tsys.com.

Shareholder Proposals and Nominations

In order for a shareholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in TSYS’ Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the written proposal must be received by the Corporate Secretary of TSYS at the address below. The Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal no later than November 14, 2018. The proposal will also need to comply with the SEC’s regulations under Rule14a-8 regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in company sponsored proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to:

Corporate Secretary

Total System Services, Inc.

One TSYS Way

Columbus, Georgia 31901

For a shareholder proposal that is not intended to be included in TSYS’ Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or if you want to nominate a person for election as a director, you must provide written notice to the Corporate Secretary at the address above. The Secretary must receive this notice not earlier than December 27, 2018 and not later than January 26, 2019. The notice of a proposed item of business must provide information as required in the bylaws of TSYS which, in general, require that the notice include for each matter a brief description of the matter to be brought before the meeting; the reason for bringing the matter before the meeting; your name, address, and number of shares you own beneficially or of record; any material interest you have in the proposal; and a representation that you are a shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting and that you intend to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to bring the matter before the meeting.

The notice of a proposed director nomination must provide information as required in the bylaws of TSYS which, in general, require that the notice of a director nomination include your name, address and the number of shares you own beneficially or of record; a representation that you are a shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting and that you intend to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons named in the notice; any arrangements between you and each proposed nominee and any other person pursuant to which the nomination is being made; the name, age, business address, residence address and principal occupation of the nominee; and the number of shares owned beneficially or of record by the nominee. It must also include the information that would be required to be disclosed in the solicitation of proxies for the election of a director under federal securities laws. You must submit the nominee’s consent to be elected and to serve. A copy of the bylaw requirements will be provided upon request to the Corporate Secretary at the address above.

Financial Information

Detailed financial information for TSYS and its subsidiaries for its 2017 fiscal year is included in TSYS’ 2017 Annual Report that is being provided to TSYS’ shareholders together with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report and this Proxy Statement are also posted to our website at http://annualreport.tsys.com.

Solicitation of Proxies

TSYS will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on behalf of TSYS by directors, officers or employees by mail, in person or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means. TSYS will reimburse brokerage

50    TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement

firms, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries for theirout-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. In addition, TSYS has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $12,500, plus reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses.

Householding

The SEC’s proxy rules permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers and banks, to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement to those shareholders. This method of delivery, often referred to as householding, should reduce the amount of duplicate information that shareholders receive and lower printing and mailing costs for companies. TSYS and certain intermediaries are householding proxy materials for shareholders of record in connection with the Annual Meeting. This means that:

• Only one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Proxy Statement and Annual Report will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless you notify us or your broker or bank to the contrary;

• You can contact TSYS by calling(706) 644-6081 or by writing Senior Director of Investor Relations, Total System Services, Inc., P.O. Box 2567, Columbus, Georgia 31902 to request a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report and Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting and for future meetings or, if you are currently receiving multiple copies, to receive only a single copy in the future or you can contact your bank or broker to make a similar request; and

• You can request delivery of a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Annual Report or Proxy Statements from your bank or broker if you share the same address as another TSYS shareholder and your bank or broker has determined to household proxy materials.

The above Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement are sent by Order of the TSYS Board of Directors.

M. Troy Woods

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

March 14, 2018

TSYS  -  2018 Proxy Statement    51

TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC. P.O. BOX 2506 COLUMBUS, GA 31902-2506

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by TSYS in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to TSYS, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E36627-Z71657-P01254             KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS — — — — — — — — — —  —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — —
	DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

1.

Election of 12 Nominees as Directors:

For

Against

Abstain

1a.    F. Thaddeus Arroyo

☐

☐

☐

For

Against

Abstain

1b.   Kriss Cloninger III

☐

☐

☐

1i.   Philip W. Tomlinson

☐

☐

☐

1c.    Walter W.Driver, Jr.

☐

☐

☐

1j.   John T. Turner

☐

☐

☐

1d.   Sidney E. Harris

☐

☐

☐

1k.  Richard W. Ussery

☐

☐

☐

1e.    William M. Isaac

☐

☐

☐

1l.   M. Troy Woods

☐

☐

☐

1f.    Mason H. Lampton 1g.   Connie D. McDaniel 1h.   Richard A. Smith

☐ ☐ ☐

☐ ☐ ☐

☐ ☐ ☐

2.

Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as TSYS’ independent auditor for the year 2018.

☐

☐

☐

3.

Approval of the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation.

☐

☐

☐

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

☐

The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of NOTICE of the ANNUAL MEETING and the PROXY STATEMENT and hereby revokes all Proxies previously given by the undersigned for the ANNUAL MEETING. Note:  Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the

Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at:

http://annualreport.tsys.com

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E36628-Z71657-P01254

TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 2506, COLUMBUS, GEORGIA 31902-2506 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF TSYS TO BE HELD APRIL 26, 2018 SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TSYS By signing on the reverse side, I hereby appoint Dorenda K. Weaver and Joseph J. Bialoncik as Proxies, each of them singly and each with power of substitution, to vote all shares of Common Stock of TSYS of the undersigned or with respect to which the undersigned is entitled to vote on February 16, 2018 at the ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS OF TSYS to be held on the 26th day of April, 2018, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters likely to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of TSYS, other than the matters listed herein. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in this Proxy or their substitutes will vote upon such other matters in accordance with their best judgment. This Proxy is revocable at any time prior to its use. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IN THE ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY POSTPONEMENT OR ADJOURNMENT THEREOF. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE BY PHONE OR OVER THE INTERNET, PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
		Address Changes/Comments:
	(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
	(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)