SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
[ ] Confidential, For Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
NOLAND COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
__________________________________________________________________
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
__________________________________________________________________
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
__________________________________________________________________
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
__________________________________________________________________
(5) Total fee paid:
__________________________________________________________________
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
__________________________________________________________________
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
__________________________________________________________________
(3) Filing Party:
__________________________________________________________________
(4) Date Filed:
__________________________________________________________________
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
N O L A N D
NOLAND COMPANY
80 29th Street, Newport News, Virginia 23607
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be held at 10:00 A.M. on May 6, 2005
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Noland Company, a Virginia corporation (the Corporation), will be held, in accordance with the Bylaws of the Corporation, on Friday May 6, 2005, at 10:00 A.M. (Local Time) at the principal office of the Corporation, 80 29th Street, Newport News, Virginia, for the following purposes:
1. to elect six Directors to serve for the ensuing year;
2. to approve an amendment to the Noland Company Restricted Stock Plan;
3. to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2005; and
4. to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2005, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
James E. Sykes Jr.
Secretary
April 4, 2005
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
YOU ARE URGED TO DATE, SIGN AND PROMPTLY RETURN YOUR PROXY SO THAT YOUR SHARES MAY BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR WISHES AND IN ORDER THAT A QUORUM MAY BE ASSURED. THE PROMPT RETURN OF YOUR SIGNED PROXY, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU HOLD, WILL AID THE CORPORATION IN AVOIDING THE EXPENSE OF ADDITIONAL PROXY SOLICITATION. THE GIVING OF SUCH PROXY DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE IN PERSON IN THE EVENT YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. ANY PERSON GIVING A PROXY MAY REVOKE IT BEFORE IT IS VOTED BY DELIVERING ANOTHER PROXY, OR WRITTEN NOTICE OF REVOCATION, TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION.
NOLAND COMPANY
(a Virginia corporation)
80 29th Street
Newport News, Virginia 23607
Proxy Statement
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held at 10:00 A.M., May 6, 2005
Approximate date of mailing .. April 4, 2005
SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXY
The proxy accompanying this statement is solicited by the Board of Directors on behalf of the Corporation. All proxies in the accompanying form that are properly executed by Stockholders and returned to the Secretary will be voted. Any proxy delivered pursuant to this solicitation is revocable at the option of the person executing the same at any time before it is exercised.
The cost of soliciting proxies, including the cost of preparing and mailing the proxy materials, will be borne by the Corporation. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited, personally or by telephone, by regular employees of the Corporation.
A copy of the Corporation's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, which includes consolidated financial statements, is furnished concurrently with this Proxy Statement.
PURPOSES OF MEETING
The purposes of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be (1) to elect six Directors to serve for the ensuing year; (2) to approve an amendment to the Noland Company Restricted Stock Plan; (3) to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Corporation for the ensuing year; and (4) to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof.
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF
As of March 14, 2005, there were outstanding 3,384,386 shares of Common Stock, the sole class of voting securities of the Corporation. Holders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to one vote for each share.
The following are, to the knowledge of the Corporation, beneficial owners as of March 14, 2005, of over 5% of the Corporation's Common Stock:
Name and Address | Title and Class of Voting Security | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent Of Class |
Jane K. Noland, Lloyd U. Noland III, Susan C. Noland, and Anne N. Edwards individually and as trustees of The L. U. Noland 1982 Trust and Lloyd U. Noland Jr. 80 29th Street Newport News, VA 23607 |
Common Stock |
2,082,125(1) shares |
61.52% |
Blackfriars Corp. (formerly Edmundson International, Inc.) 31356 Via Colinas Westlake Village, CA 91362 | Common Stock | 609,825 shares |
18.02% |
The Burton Partnership, Limited Partnership and The Burton Partnership (QP), Limited Partnership P.O. Box 4643 Jackson, WY 83001 | Common Stock | 188,883 shares | 5.58% |
(1) The trustees of The L. U. Noland 1982 Trust are Mr. Lloyd U. Noland Jr.'s wife, Jane K. Noland, and his three children: Lloyd U. Noland III, Susan C. Noland and Anne N. Edwards. The trust assets include 906,996 shares of Common Stock of the Corporation and a majority of the outstanding voting stock of Basic, Inc., which, in turn, owns 893,967 shares of the Corporation's Common Stock. Since the trustees have the sole power to vote and to dispose of shares held in the L. U. Noland 1982 Trust, each trustee may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of 1,800,963 shares of the Corporation's Common Stock (including the shares owned by Basic, Inc.). The trustees share the power to vote and direct the disposition of such shares. Each trustee owns the following additional shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, with sole power to vote and dispose of all of such shares except for 155,138 shares attributed to Jane K. Noland, but owned by her husband, Lloyd U. Noland Jr.; 1,095 shares attributed to A nne N. Edwards, but owned by her husband; and 2,190 shares attributed to Lloyd U. Noland III but owned by his wife and one of his children:
Jane K. Noland 182,270
Lloyd U. Noland III 49,425
Susan C. Noland 26,736
Anne N. Edwards 21,831
Lloyd U. Noland III also has voting power only over 4,900 shares of unvested restricted stock. All of such shares are included in the above table. As a group, the Noland family may be deemed to be the owners of an aggregate of 2,082,125 shares or 61.52% of the outstanding Common Stock.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Based solely on its review of the forms required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that have been received by the Corporation, the Corporation believes there has been compliance with all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and beneficial owners of greater than 10% of the Corporation's Common Stock.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS STANDING COMMITTEES
The Corporation is managed under the direction of a six member Board of Directors and by the Chairman of the Board and other officers to whom authority has been delegated. Because the Noland Family owns 61.52% of the Common Stock, the Corporation is considered a "controlled corporation" under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. and, accordingly, is exempt from the requirement to have a majority of independent directors and from the requirement that the Executive Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee consist solely of independent directors. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Allen, Gambill and Pleasants are "independent directors" as defined in NASDAQ Rule 4200.
In 2004, each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during 2004 and (ii) the total number of meetings of all Board committees on which the Director served. Directors are strongly encouraged to attend each annual meeting of the Corporation's stockholders. All directors attended last year's annual meeting.
During 2004, the Board of Directors met four times. On five occasions, the Board acted by written consent. Members of the Board who are employees of the Corporation serve without compensation. Each non-employee Director receives a deferred award of Noland Company Common Stock having an aggregate fair market value of $3,750 each quarter (see compensation of Executive Officers and Directors), plus $1,000 per Committee Meeting ($500 if attended via telephone).
The Board elected an Executive Committee consisting of Messrs. Noland III, King and Henderson. When the Board is not in session, the Executive Committee generally has the authority of the Board except that the Virginia Stock Corporation Act prohibits certain actions by committees. During 2004, the Executive Committee met seven times.
The Board appointed an Executive Compensation Committee consisting of Messrs. Allen, Gambill, Goolsby, and Pleasants, with Mr. Pleasants acting as chairman. The Committee's primary responsibility is to oversee the performance and compensation of the chief executive officer, to develop and oversee the implementation of the Corporation's philosophy with respect to the cash- and equity-based incentive compensation for the principal officers and other key employees and to review and make recommendations concerning the administration of certain benefit plans. During 2004, the Executive Compensation Committee met one time.
The Board appointed an Audit Committee consisting of Messrs. Allen, Gambill, and Pleasants, with Mr. Gambill acting as chairman. The Board of Directors has determined that each member meets NASDAQ's financial literacy requirement and the independence requirements contained in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(b)(1). In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Mark Gambill meets the SEC criteria for "audit committee financial expert". The Audit Committee oversees the preparation of the Corporation's financial statements, approves the engagement and compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approves professional services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews the adequacy of the Company's disclosure controls and internal accounting controls. During 2004 the Audit Committee met five times.
The Board appointed a Nominating and Governance Committee consisting of Messrs. Allen, Gambill, Goolsby and Pleasants. Mr. Allen serves as chairman. The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends qualified nominees for election as directors; recommends directors to serve on Committees of the Board of Directors, and recommends corporate governance guidelines for the Corporation. The Committee identifies candidates for election to the Board of Directors on its own as well as by considering recommendations from stockholders, other members of the Board, officers and employees and other sources that the Committee deems appropriate. Stockholders should submit any such recommendations to the Nominating and Governance Committee through the method described on page 12. In addition, in accordance with the Corporation's bylaws, any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors may nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors if such stockholder complies with the procedur es set forth in the bylaws and summarized in "Proposals for 2006 Annual Meeting" on page 13. During 2004 the Nominating and Governance Committee met one time.
The Committee Charters, corporate governance guidelines, Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, code of ethics for all directors, officers and employees, procedures pertaining to audit and non-audit services rendered by the Corporation's independent public accountants, the hiring of employees or former employees of the Corporation's independent public accountants and the receipt, treatment and retention of complaints concerning questionable accounting, internal control or auditing matters are posted on the Corporation's web site at www.noland.com and each is available in print to any stockholder who requests it.
The Corporation's independent directors met as a group in executive session twice in 2004. The Chair for these sessions rotates from meeting to meeting among the Chairmen of the Executive Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee.
The Corporation's corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board of Directors shall conduct an annual evaluation to determine, among other matters, whether the Board and the Committee are functioning effectively. The Audit Committee, Executive Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee each is also required to conduct an annual self-evaluation.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
It is intended that proxies in the accompanying form will be voted by the persons named therein (unless authority is withheld) in favor of the nominees named for Directors for the term of one year or until their successors are elected and qualified. In case any of such nominees is unexpectedly unable to serve, the proxies will be voted for the election of the others so named and may be voted for substitute nominees. The election of each nominee for Director requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock cast in the election of Directors.
Votes that are withheld and shares held in street name ("Broker Non-Votes") that are not voted in the election of Directors will not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Mr. Kenneth C. King, reelected April 29, 2004, for a one-year term, resigned from the Board April 1, 2005, concurrent with his retirement from the Corporation after 42 years of service. The number of directors was reduced from seven to six upon Mr. King's retirement.
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR
There are no family relationships among any of the nominees and any officer or director; nor is there any arrangement or understanding between any nominee and any other person pursuant to which the nominee was selected. Each of the nominees for the office of Director is a member of the present Board of Directors.
Mr. Gambill, Mr. Goolsby, Mr. Henderson, Mr. Pleasants, and Mr. Noland III have served in the respective positions shown for more than five years.
Name, Age, Position and Directorships | |||
Thomas N. Allen ' Age 66, Director since 1995, Chairman, The Clovelly Corp. (Real estate and investment company), since 2001. Previously Chairman of East Coast Oil Corp. (Retail gasoline/convenientstores); Director of Overnite Corporation | |||
Mark M. Gambill ' Age 54, Director since 2001, Managing partner ' Cary Street Partners (Financial advisory and wealth management firm) since September 1999. Director of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. | |||
Allen C. Goolsby ' Age 65, Director since 1989, Partner, Hunton & Williams (Attorneys) | |||
Arthur P. Henderson Jr. ' Age 61, Director since 1983, Vice President-Finance | |||
C. Edward Pleasants ' Age 64, Director since 1999, Retired Chairman of Pleasants Hardware Company (Architectural door and hardware distributor) | |||
Lloyd U. Noland III ' Age 61, Director since 1979, Chairman of the Board and President; Director of Wachovia Corporation |
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS | ||
The following table sets forth as of March 14, 2005, the beneficial ownership of the Corporation's common stock of each director, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and of all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. | ||
Name of Beneficial Owner or Number of Persons in Group | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned on March 14, 2005 | Percent of Class(1) |
Thomas N. Allen | 1,000 | - |
Mark M. Gambill | 4,100 | - |
Allen C. Goolsby | 350 | - |
Arthur P Henderson, Jr. | 8,200 | 0.24% |
Kenneth C. King | 7,449 | 0.22% |
Lloyd U. Noland, III(2) | 1,851,288 | 54.70% |
C. Edward Pleasants | 4,000 | - |
Jean F. Preston | 6,910 | - |
Benjamin A. Williams, III | 1,975 | - |
All officers and directors of the Corporation as a group (17 persons) | 1,905,794 | 56.31% |
(1) Less than .2 % except as indicated.
(2) See Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof on page 1.
Except as described on page 3 with respect to shares held by the Noland family, each Director and Officer has the sole power to vote the shares of Common Stock attributed to him in this table.
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
The Corporation is in the ninth year of a ten-year agreement to lease its corporate headquarters office building. The building is owned by Basic, Inc. (see Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof). The Corporation pays an annual rental fee of approximately $290,000 and bears the direct costs of utilities and real estate taxes. The terms of the lease were based on an evaluation by an independent real estate firm.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table presents information relating to total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the four next most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation. | Long'TermCompensation | ||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Restricted Stock Awards(1) | All OtherCompensation(2) | ||
Lloyd U. Noland III | 2004 | $207,500 | $195,000 | $41,400 | $17,694 | ||
Chief Executive Officer | 2003 | $182,500 | $100,000 | $41,500 | $12,888 | ||
2002 | $153,750 | $75,000 | $30,280 | $8,669 | |||
Kenneth C. King | 2004 | $149,000 | $175,000 | $41,400 | $14,829 | ||
Vice President-Marketing | 2003 | $146,000 | $90,000 | $41,500 | $11,743 | ||
and Branch Operations | 2002 | $143,000 | $70,000 | $30,280 | $8,393 | ||
Arthur P. Henderson Jr. | 2004 | $108,317 | $130,000 | $32,200 | $13,622 | ||
Vice President-Finance | 2003 | $100,800 | $65,000 | $31,125 | $10,852 | ||
2002 | $ 97,800 | $42,750 | $22,710 | $7,751 | |||
Jean F. Preston | 2004 | $108,250 | $120,000 | $32,200 | $12,960 | ||
Vice President- | 2003 | $100,000 | $65,000 | $31,125 | $10,312 | ||
Corporate Data | 2002 | $ 96,250 | $41,000 | $22,710 | $7,291 | ||
Benjamin A. Williams III | 2004 | $154,500 | $110,000 | $32,200 | $15,160 | ||
Chairman and President- | 2003 | $151,125 | $60,000 | $ - | $11,914 | ||
Noland Properties, Inc. | 2002 | $150,000 | $40,000 | $ - | $8,572 | ||
(1) Restricted stock awards valued at market price per share of $46.00, $41.50, and $30.28 per share on December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Recipients have the right to receive dividends and vote the restricted shares.
(2) Profit sharing allocation, life insurance and expense reimbursement.
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Payments by the Corporation to the Improved Retirement Plan for Employees of Noland Company (the Plan) are made based on recommendations by the Plan's actuary. The Plan is a defined benefit "Career Average" plan. Annual retirement benefits are computed by adding, for each year of credited service, the sum of 1.333% of compensation (up to "Covered Compensation") and 1.933% of compensation over "Covered Compensation." Covered Compensation is generally the average of the Social Security wage bases over a working career.
The amounts shown below do not include Social Security benefits and are not subject to any reductions on account of such benefits. Estimated annual benefits (assuming continued employment to age 65 on a life-only annuity basis) accrued to date and payable at age 65 to Lloyd U. Noland III, Kenneth C. King, Arthur P. Henderson, Jr., Jean F. Preston and Benjamin A. Williams, III are $65,083, $58,563, $54,807, $94,103 and $29,600, respectively.
BOARD COMPENSATION
Non-employee Directors are compensated in accordance with the 1999 Outside Directors Stock Plan (the Plan). The Plan provides each non-employee Director with a deferred award of whole and fractional shares of Noland Company Common Stock with an aggregate fair market share of $3,750 each quarter. To satisfy its obligations under the Plan, the Corporation created the Noland Company Common Stock Benefit Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a "grantor trust" as defined in section 671 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Corporation contributes to the Trust Noland Company Common Stock that will be held by the Trust until paid to participants and beneficiaries of the Plan as soon as practicable after the participant ceases to be a member of the Board. In addition, each outside Director is paid $1,000 for each Committee meeting attended ($500 if attended via telephone).
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Executive Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Allen, Gambill, Goolsby, and Pleasants. Mr. Goolsby is a member of the law firm Hunton & Williams, which has provided legal services to the Corporation for many years.
REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Executive Compensation Committee (the Committee) is charged with the responsibility of making an initial determination regarding any changes in executive compensation policy and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to compensation of the Corporation's executive officers.
The Committee believes that the Corporation's compensation program should provide competitive overall compensation for executive officers, including base salaries and short and long-term incentives. The Committee has concluded that the close link between the Corporation's business and the cyclical building and construction industry make it prudent for the Corporation to maintain a conservative approach to base compensation while at the same time providing competitive total pay opportunities to its executive officers through long and short-term incentives. Targeted bonuses range from 20% of base compensation for certain key employees to 50% of base compensation for the principal executive officer. Early in 2004, the Committee added an additional incentive in the form of an enhanced allocation to the bonus pool for pre-tax, pre-LIFO, pre-bonus profits in excess of $20,000,000.
The base compensation for the Corporation's executive officers reflects the Committee's conservative approach. With the exception of J.F. Preston, whose compensation was increased significantly to reflect his new position as Vice President of Marketing and Branch Operations, the average increase in base compensation of the executive officers for 2005 will be about 4.3%. Reflecting the strong overall performance in 2004, total cash bonus awards for 2004 of $1,323,000 were approximately twice as large as the awards made in 2003. Bonus awards were made to 16 key employees and officers nominated by the Chief Executive Officer. In determining executive bonuses for 2004, the Committee focused primarily on revenues; profit margins; profits before LIFO inventory adjustments, extra compensation and income taxes, and each executive officer's performance for the year against previously established targets. The Committee did not assign a specific value to each factor.
Mr. Noland's base compensation for 2004 was fixed at $207,500. His base compensation for 2005 will be $217,500. For 2004 Mr. Noland was awarded a cash bonus of $195,000, which was significantly more than his 2003 bonus of $100,000. The Committee believes that Mr. Noland has been the leader in effecting substantial improvements in the Corporation's operations, particularly with respect to improvements in the Corporation's revenues, profit margins and earnings, as well as the skill levels of the Corporation's managers and the contribution to revenues from the Corporation's real estate holdings. In establishing the 2004 bonus, the Committee did not assign a specific value to any one factor, but concluded that, along with the other participants, Mr. Noland should receive a significantly higher bonus than for 2003 to reflect the Corporation's record performance. Mr. Noland also received a restricted stock award of 900 shares of the Corporation's common stock.
Overall, the Committee believes that its compensation plan provides meaningful incentives to the executive officers and other key employees to improve performance and stockholder return.
Because none of the Corporation's executive officers receives annual compensation in excess of $1 million, the Corporation has not taken any position with respect to the cap on tax deductibility of compensation in excess of that amount established under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.
C. Edward Pleasants, Chairman
Thomas N. Allen
Mark M. Gambill
Allen C. Goolsby
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return AmongNoland Company, NASDAQ Market Value Index and Hughes Supply, Inc.
(Assumes $100 Invested on January 1, 1999)
(Assumes Dividend Reinvested)
A performance graph appears here. The following chart is the information presented in the graph.
Data points are as follows:
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | |
Noland Company | $100.00 | $ 93.31 | $168.53 | $177.25 | $245.18 | $273.75 |
Hughes Supply, Inc. | $100.00 | $ 84.84 | $148.54 | $132.76 | $244.25 | $321.34 |
NASDAQ Market Index | $100.00 | $ 62.85 | $ 50.10 | $ 34.95 | $ 52.55 | $ 56.97 |
The return for Hughes Supply, Inc. has been adjusted to reflect differences in market capitalization.
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE NOLAND COMPANY RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
At the annual meeting, the Board of Directors will offer a resolution to approve an amendment to the Noland Company Restricted Stock Plan (the Plan) to extend the duration of the Plan until April 30, 2010, and to increase the number of shares of the Corporation's common stock covered by the Plan from 100,000 shares to 150,000 shares. Under the Plan the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the authority to issue to certain executives of the Company and its subsidiary an aggregate of up to 10,000 restricted shares each year. Restricted shares vest over a seven year period. The approval of the amendment requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the common stock. Abstentions and Broker Shares voted as to any matter at the meeting will not be included in determining the number of votes cast in favor of this amendment to the Plan.
REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of three independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee approves the selection of the Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm subject to stockholder ratification. Management is responsible for the Corporation's disclosure controls, internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and to report to the Board thereon. In this context, the Audit Committee has met privately with management and KPMG LLP, the Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, all of whom have unrestricted access to the Commit tee.
The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, (Codification of Statement on Accounting Standards), including the scope of the auditors' responsibilities, significant accounting adjustments and any disagreements with management.
The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP relating to the independence of that firm, and has discussed with KPMG LLP that firm's independence from the Corporation.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and KPMG LLP. Based on this review and these discussions, the representation of management that the consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the report of KPMG LLP to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee also reviews with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the results of the independent registered public accounting firm's review of the unaudited financial statements that are included in the company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the provision of audit services and permitted non-audit services by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Company's chief financial officer has primary responsibility to the Audit Committee for administration and enforcement of this policy and for reporting non-compliance. Under the policy the chief financial officer is responsible for presenting the Audit Committee an annual budget and plan for audit services and for any proposed audit-related, tax or other non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The presentation must be in sufficient detail to define clearly the services included. Any services included within the budget and plan that the audit committee approves requires no further Committee approval for that budget year. All other audit and permissible non-audit engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee.
Mark M. Gambill, Chairman
Thomas N. Allen
C. Edward Pleasants
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will offer a resolution to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Corporation for the year 2005. KPMG LLP, a nationally known firm of independent registered public accountants, has audited the Corporation's financial statements for four years. The Corporation has been advised by KPMG LLP that neither that firm nor any of its partners has any direct financial interest or material indirect financial interest in the Corporation other than as public accountants and auditors. KPMG LLP will be represented at the stockholders' meeting. The firm's representative will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if desired.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, KPMG LLP provided services consisting of the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements of the Corporation, review of the quarterly financial statements, accounting consultations and consents and other services related to SEC filings filed by the Corporation and other pertinent matters. KPMG LLP provided tax services related to a condemnation gain on real property during the year ended December 31, 2004. KPMG LLP did not perform any financial information systems design and implementation services for the Corporation for the two years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP's independence. The Audit Committee approves all audit and non-audit related services to be provided by the Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm and the fees to be paid therefore.
Type of Service and Fee | 2004 | 2003 |
Audit Fees Audit Related Fees All Other Fees Total Fees | $285,950 59,000 9,775 $354,725 | $282,100 79,450 - $361,550 |
ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATERIALS
The Noland Company 2004 Annual Report to stockholders, portions of which are incorporated by reference into the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, accompanies this proxy statement. Stockholders may obtain, without charge, a copy of the Corporation's Form 10-K by forwarding a written request to R. L. Welborn, Assistant Vice President - Finance, Noland Company, 80 29th Street, Newport News, Virginia 23607.
The Corporation's Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct and the charters of the Audit, Executive Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees are available on the Corporation's Internet website at http://www.noland.com, and are available in print to any stockholder upon request by writing to R. L. Welborn, Assistant Vice President-Finance, Noland Company, 80 29th Street, Newport News, Virginia 23607.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS TO THE DIRECTORS
Stockholders may send communications to one or more members of the Board of Directors by sending written correspondence to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee at Noland Company, 80 29th Street, Newport News, Virginia 23607, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating the materiality of each stockholder communication and determining its disposition.
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING AND EVALUATING DIRECTOR CANDIDATES
The Committee will evaluate all candidates for election to the Board of Directors, regardless of the source from which the candidate was first identified, based upon the totality of the merits of each candidate and not based upon minimum qualifications or attributes. In considering the individual nominees, the Committee will take into account the qualifications of other Board members to ensure that a broad variety of skill sets and experience beneficial to the Corporation and its business are represented on the Board of Directors. The Committee also will ensure that the Board is composed of a sufficient number of independent directors to satisfy the NASDAQ listing requirements. In addition, the Committee will seek to assure that Audit Committee members satisfy the NASDAQ financial and accounting experience requirements and the heightened independence standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that at least one of such members qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" (as define d by the Securities and Exchange Commission). There are no differences in the manner in which the committee evaluates director candidates based on whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder. The Nominating and Governance Committee did not receive any recommendations from any stockholders in connection with the annual meeting.
PROPOSALS FOR 2006 ANNUAL MEETING
Any stockholder desiring to make a proposal to be acted upon at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must present such proposal to the Corporation at its principal office in Newport News, Virginia, not later than December 2, 2005, in order for it to be considered for inclusion in the Corporation's Proxy Statement relating to the 2006 meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
The Company's bylaws provide that a stockholder of the Corporation entitled to vote for the election of directors may nominate persons for election to the Board by delivering written notice to the Secretary of the Corporation with respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, such notice generally must be delivered not later than the close of business on the ninetieth day nor earlier than the close of business on the one-hundred twentieth day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting.
The stockholder's notice must include
In order for a stockholder to bring other business before a stockholder meeting, timely notice must be received by the Corporation within the time limits described in the immediately preceding paragraph. The stockholder's notice must contain:
GENERAL
Unless contrary instructions are indicated on the proxy, all shares of Common Stock represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation (and not revoked before they are voted) will be voted FOR the election of the nominees for Director named herein, FOR the amendment to the Noland Company Restricted Stock Plan and FOR the proposal to approve the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The Board of Directors knows of no business other than that set forth above to be transacted at the meeting, but if other matters requiring the vote of the Stockholders arise, the persons designated as proxies will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by the proxies in accordance with their judgment on such matters. If a stockholder specifies a different choice on
the proxy, his or her shares of Common Stock will be voted in accordance with the specification so made.
By order of the Board of Directors,
James E. Sykes Jr.
Secretary
Newport News, Virginia
April 4, 2005
NOLAND COMPANY
PROXY 80 29th Street
Newport News, Virginia 23607
Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 6, 2005
This Proxy solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints L. U. Noland III and A. P. Henderson Jr. or either of them, Proxies, with full power of substitution in each to vote all shares of the capital stock of Noland Company held of record by the undersigned on March 14, 2005, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 6, 2005, or at any adjournment thereof:
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | FOR all nominees listed below (except as marked below to the contrary) □ | WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below □ |
Thomas N. Allen, Mark M. Gambill, Allen C. Goolsby, Arthur P. Henderson Jr., Lloyd U. Noland III, C. Edward Pleasants (Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s) write that nominee's name(s) in the space provided below).
2. Approve the amendment to the Noland Company Restricted Stock Plan.
□ FOR | □ AGAINST | □ ABSTAIN |
3. RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Corporation.
□ FOR | □ AGAINST | □ ABSTAIN |
4. Vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder.
If no specification is made, this proxy will be voted FOR items 1, 2, and 3.
(continued) Please date and sign on reverse
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Continued from other side (Side 2)
Dated:, 2005
Signature
Signature if held jointly
(Stockholder's signature should conform exactly to the
name printed hereon. When shares are held by joint
tenants, both should sign. When signing as Attorney,
Executor, Administrator, Trustee or Guardian, please
give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign
in full corporate name by president or other authorized
officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by authorized person).
Please mark, sign, date and return the proxy card promptly
using the enclosed envelope.
