Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation | ' |
|
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation |
|
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Immunomedics and its subsidiaries. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries in the condensed consolidated balance sheets represent minority stockholders’ proportionate share of the equity (deficit) in such subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Financial Instruments | ' |
|
Financial Instruments |
|
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, other current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. |
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
|
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company has categorized its financial assets, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as set forth below. The Company does not have any financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. |
|
|
|
Financial assets recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
| • | | Level 1 – Financial assets whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which the company has the ability to access at the measurement date (examples include active exchange-traded equity securities and most U.S. Government and agency securities). | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| • | | Level 2 – Financial assets whose value are based on quoted market prices in markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| • | | Level 3 – Financial assets whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ($ in thousands) | |
September 30, 2014 | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Money Market Funds | | $ | 1,264 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,264 | |
Marketable Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Bonds | | | 5,530 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,530 | |
U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies | | | 7,453 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,453 | |
Corporate Debt Securities | | | 13,559 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,559 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 27,806 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 27,806 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ($ in thousands) | |
June 30, 2014 | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Money Market Funds | | $ | 367 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 367 | |
Marketable Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Bonds | | | 8,537 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,537 | |
U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies | | | 7,457 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,457 | |
Corporate Debt Securities | | | 18,877 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,877 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 35,238 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 35,238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The money market funds noted above are included in cash and cash equivalents. |
Marketable Securities | ' |
|
Marketable Securities |
|
Marketable securities, all of which are available-for-sale, consist of corporate debt securities and municipal bonds. Marketable securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income, except for losses from impairments which are determined to be other-than-temporary. Realized gains and losses, and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in the determination of net (loss) income and are included in interest and other income (net), at which time the average cost basis of these securities are adjusted to fair value. Fair values are based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. Interest and dividends on available-for-sale securities are included interest and other income (net). |
Inventory | ' |
|
Inventory |
|
Inventory, which consists only of the finished product of LeukoScan®, is stated at the lower of cost (which approximates first-in, first-out) or market, and includes materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company has accounted for revenue arrangements that include multiple deliverables as a separate unit of accounting if both of the following criteria are met: a) the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis, and b) if the right of return exists, delivery of the undelivered items is considered probable and substantially in the control of the vendor. If these criteria are not met, the revenue elements must be considered a single unit of accounting for purposes of revenue recognition. The Company allocates revenue consideration, excluding contingent consideration, based on the relative selling prices of the separate units of accounting contained within an arrangement containing multiple deliverables. Relative selling prices are determined using vendor specific objective evidence, if it exists; otherwise third-party evidence or the Company’s best estimate of selling price is used for each deliverable. |
|
Payments received under contracts to fund certain research activities are recognized as revenue in the period in which the research activities are performed. Payments received in advance that are related to future performance are deferred and recognized as revenue when the research projects are performed. Upfront nonrefundable fees associated with license and development agreements where the Company has continuing involvement in the agreement are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized over the estimated service period. The Company estimates the period of continuing involvement based on the best evidential matter available at each reporting period. If the estimated service period is subsequently modified, the period over which the upfront fee is recognized is modified accordingly on a prospective basis. |
|
In order to determine the revenue recognition for contingent milestones, the Company evaluates the contingent milestones using the criteria as provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (“FASB”) guidance on the milestone method of revenue recognition, as explained in ASU 2010-17, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition”, at the inception of a collaboration agreement. The criteria requires that (i) the Company determines if the milestone is commensurate with either its performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of value resulting from the Company’s activities to achieve the milestone, (ii) the milestone be related to past performance, and (iii) the milestone be reasonable relative to all deliverable and payment terms of the collaboration arrangement. If these criteria are met then the contingent milestones can be considered as substantive milestones and will be recognized as revenue in the period that the milestone is achieved. Royalties are recognized as earned in accordance with the terms of various research and collaboration agreements. |
|
Revenue from the sale of diagnostic products is recorded when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable or collectability is reasonably assured. Allowances, if any, are established for uncollectible amounts, estimated product returns and discounts. Since allowances are recorded based on management’s estimates, actual amounts may be different in the future. |
Research and Development Costs | ' |
|
Research and Development Costs |
|
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred for clinical trials for patients and investigators are expensed as services are performed in accordance with the agreements in place with their clinical sites. |
Reimbursement of Research & Development Costs | ' |
|
Reimbursement of Research & Development Costs |
|
Research and development costs that are reimbursable under collaboration agreements are included as a reduction of research and development expenses. The Company records these reimbursements as a reduction of research and development expenses as the Company’s partner in the collaboration agreement has the financial risks and responsibility for conducting these research and development activities. |
Stock-Based Compensation | ' |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company has a stock incentive plan, the Immunomedics, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, that includes a discretionary grant program, a stock issuance program and an automatic grant program. The plan was established to promote the interests of the Company, by providing eligible persons with the opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company as an incentive to remain with the organization and to align the employee’s interest with our stockholders. This plan is described more fully in Note 7 the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014 and Note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, included elsewhere herein. |
|
The grant-date fair value of stock awards is based upon the underlying price of the stock on the date of grant. The grant-date fair value of stock option awards must be determined using an option pricing model. Option pricing models require the use of estimates and assumptions as to (a) the expected term of the option, (b) the expected volatility of the price of the underlying stock and (c) the risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula for determining the grant-date fair value of such awards. |
|
The expected term of the option is based upon the contractual term and expected employee exercise and expected post-vesting employment termination behavior. The expected volatility of the price of the underlying stock is based upon the historical volatility of the Company’s stock computed over a period of time equal to the expected term of the option. The risk free interest rate is based upon the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Pre-vesting forfeiture rates are estimated based upon past voluntary termination behavior and past option forfeitures. |
|
The following table sets forth the weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three-Month Period Ended September 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected dividend yield | | 0% | | 0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected option term (years) | | 5.07 | | 5.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected stock price volatility | | 61% | | 67% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 1.60% | | 1.56%-1.74% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Changes in any of these assumptions could impact, potentially materially, the amount of expense recorded in future periods related to stock-based awards. |
Income Taxes | ' |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes, including the recognition of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement amounts and their respective tax bases. The Company reviews its deferred tax assets for recovery. A valuation allowance is established when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s tax provision in the period of change. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2014. |
|
Income taxes were provided for profitable foreign jurisdictions at the estimated annual tax rate during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The Company’s U.S. operations reported a net loss for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, resulting in a tax benefit that was fully offset by a valuation allowance. |
|
The Company has no liability for uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2014. |
Net Loss Per Share Allocable to Common Stockholders | ' |
|
Net Loss Per Share Allocable to Common Stockholders |
|
Net loss per basic and diluted common share allocable to common stockholders is based on the net loss for the relevant period, divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For purposes of the diluted net loss per common share calculations, the exercise or conversion of all potential common shares is not included because their effect would have been anti-dilutive, due to the net loss recorded for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted per share calculation are 7,461,763 and 7,708,560 shares at September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Comprehensive Loss | ' |
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Comprehensive loss consists of net loss, unrealized loss on available for sale securities and foreign exchange translation adjustments and is presented in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. |
Reclassification | ' |
|
Reclassification |
|
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. |
Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
|
Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. This guidance clarifies that an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, and annual and interim periods thereafter, and early application is permitted. The Company is assessing ASU 2014-15’s impact and will adopt it when effective. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. This guidance clarifies that awards with these provisions should be treated as performance conditions that affect vesting, and do not impact the award’s estimated grant-date fair value. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2015, including interim periods, and early application is permitted. The Company is assessing ASU 2014-12’s impact and will adopt it when effective. |
|
|
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This ASU was initiated as a joint project by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. For a public company, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods, and early application is not permitted for public companies. The Company is assessing ASU 2014-09’s impact and will adopt it when effective. |