Supplemental Balance Sheet Information | |
| 3 Months Ended
Dec. 03, 2009
USD / shares
|
Notes to the Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Receivables |
Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
Receivables
December 3,
2009
September 3,
2009
Trade receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5 million and $5 million, respectively) $ 884 $ 591
Related party receivables 53 70
Income and other taxes 62 49
Other 92 88
$ 1,091 $ 798
Related party receivables included $52 million and $69 million due from Aptina Imaging Corporation under a wafer supply agreement as of December 3, 2009 and September 3, 2009, respectively, and $1 million and $1 million, respectively, due from Inotera Memories, Inc. for reimbursement of expenses incurred under a technology transfer agreement.
As of December 3, 2009 and September 3, 2009, other receivables included $51 million and $29 million, respectively, due from Intel Corporation for amounts related to NAND Flash product design and process development activities. |
Inventories |
Inventories
December 3,
2009
September 3,
2009
Finished goods $ 298 $ 233
Work in process 629 649
Raw materials and supplies 110 105
$ 1,037 $ 987
The Companys results of operations for the first quarter of 2009 included a charge of $369 million to write down the carrying value of work in process and finished goods inventories of memory products (both DRAM and NAND Flash) to their estimated market values.
|
Intangible assets, net |
Intangible Assets
December 3, 2009
September 3, 2009
Gross
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Product and process technology $ 436 $ (183 ) $ 439 $ (181 )
Customer relationships 127 (54 ) 127 (50 )
Other 28 (20 ) 28 (19 )
$ 591 $ (257 ) $ 594 $ (250 )
During the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, the Company capitalized $7 million and $12 million, respectively, for product and process technology with weighted-average useful lives of 10 years.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $17 million and $22 million for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.Annual amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be $67 million for 2010, $63 million for 2011, $55 million for 2012, $50 million for 2013 and $42 million for 2014. |
Property, plant and equipment |
Property, Plant and Equipment
December 3,
2009
September 3,
2009
Land $ 96 $ 96
Buildings 4,471 4,463
Equipment 12,189 11,843
Construction in progress 49 47
Software 272 269
17,077 16,718
Accumulated depreciation (10,201 ) (9,629 )
$ 6,876 $ 7,089
Depreciation expense was $454 million and $569 million for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company, through its IM Flash joint venture, has an unequipped wafer manufacturing facility in Singapore that has been idle since it was completed in the first quarter of 2009.The Company has been recording depreciation expense for the facility since it was completed and its net book value was $617 million as of December 3, 2009.Utilization of the facility is dependent upon market conditions, including, but not limited to, worldwide market supply of and demand for semiconductor products, availability of financing, agreement between the Company and its joint venture partner and the Companys operations, cash flows and alternative capacity utilization opportunities.
As of December 3, 2009 and September 3, 2009, the Company had buildings and equipment of $68 million and $81 million, respectively, classified as held for sale assets and included in other noncurrent assets. |
Equity method investments |
Equity Method Investments
The Company has partnered with Nanya Technology Corporation (Nanya) in two Taiwan DRAM memory companies, Inotera Memories, Inc. (Inotera) and MeiYa Technology Corporation (MeiYa), which are accounted for as equity method investments.The Company also has an equity method investment in Aptina Imaging Corporation (Aptina), a CMOS imaging company.
DRAM joint ventures with Nanya:The Company has a partnering arrangement with Nanya pursuant to which the Company and Nanya jointly develop process technology and designs to manufacture stack DRAM products.In addition, the Company has deployed and licensed certain intellectual property related to the manufacture of stack DRAM products to Nanya and licensed certain intellectual property from Nanya.As a result, the Company is to receive an aggregate of $207 million from Nanya through 2010.During the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $26 million and $28 million, respectively, of license revenue in net sales from this agreement and had recognized $168 million of cumulative license revenue from May 2008 through December 3, 2009.In addition, the Company may receive royalties in future periods from Nanya for sales of stack DRAM products manufactured by or for Nanya.
The Company has concluded that both Inotera and MeiYa are variable interest entities because of the Inotera and MeiYa supply agreements with the Company and Nanya.Nanya and the Company are considered related parties under the accounting standards for consolidating variable interest entities.The Company reviewed several factors to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of Inotera and MeiYa, including the size and nature of the entities operations relative to Nanya and the Company, nature of the day-to-day operations and certain other factors.Based on those factors, the Company determined that Nanya is more closely associated with, and therefore the primary beneficiary of, Inotera and MeiYa.The Company accounts for its interests using the equity method of accounting and does not consolidate these entities.The Company recognizes its share of earnings or losses from these entities on a two-month lag.
Inotera:In the first quarter of 2009, the Company acquired a 35.5% ownership interest in Inotera, a publicly-traded entity in Taiwan, from Qimonda AG.On August 3, 2009, Inotera sold common shares in a public offering at a price equal to 16.02 New Taiwan dollars per common share (approximately $0.49 U.S. dollars on August 3, 2009).As a result of the share issuance, the Companys interest in Inotera decreased from 35.5% to 29.8% and the Company recognized a gain of $56 million in the first quarter of 2010.As of December 3, 2009, the ownership of Inotera was held 29.9% by Nanya, 29.8% by the Company and the balance was publicly held.On December 15, 2009, Inoteras Board of Directors approved the issuance of 640 million common shares.The issuance price was set on January 6, 2010 at 22.50 New Taiwan dollars per share ($0.70 U.S. dollars at January 6, 2010).The Company expects to purchase its allotted portion of the offering, estimated to be approximately 150 million shares.The actual number |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
December 3,
2009
September 3,
2009
Accounts payable $ 541 $ 526
Salaries, wages and benefits 172 147
Related party payables 129 83
Customer advances 90 150
Income and other taxes 40 32
Other 87 99
$ 1,059 $ 1,037
As of December 3, 2009 and September 3, 2009, related party payables consisted of amounts due to Inotera under the Inotera Supply Agreement, including $129 million and $51 million, respectively, for the purchase of trench DRAM products and $32 million for underutilized capacity as of September 3, 2009. (See Equity Method Investments DRAM joint ventures with Nanya Inotera note.)
As of December 3, 2009 and September 3, 2009, customer advances included $83 million and $142 million, respectively, for the Companys obligation to provide certain NAND Flash memory products to Apple Computer, Inc. (Apple) until December 31, 2010 pursuant to a prepaid NAND Flash supply agreement.As of December 3, 2009 and September 3, 2009, other accounts payable and accrued expenses included $21 million and $24 million, respectively, for amounts due to Intel for NAND Flash product design and process development and licensing fees pursuant to a product designs development agreement. |
Debt |
Debt
December 3,
2009
September 3,
2009
Convertible senior notes, stated interest rate of 1.875%, effective interest rate of 7.9%, net of discount of $282 million and $295 million, respectively, due June 2014 $ 1,018 $ 1,005
TECH credit facility, effective interest rates of 3.9% and 3.6% , respectively, net of discount of $3 million and $2 million, respectively, due in periodic installments through May 2012 497 548
Capital lease obligations, weighted-average imputed interest rate of 6.7%, due in monthly installments through February 2023 543 559
Convertible senior notes, interest rate of 4.25%, due October 2013 230 230
EDB notes, denominated in Singapore dollars, interest rate of 5.4%, due February 2012 217 208
Mai-Liao Power note, effective imputed interest rate of 12.1%, net of discount of $14 million and $18 million, respectively, due November 2010 186 182
Convertible subordinated notes, interest rate of 5.6%, due April 2010 70 70
Other notes -- 1
2,761 2,803
Less current portion (618 ) (424 )
$ 2,143 $ 2,379
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company adopted the FASBs new accounting standard for certain convertible debt.The new standard was applicable to the Companys 1.875% convertible senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.3 billion issued in May 2007 (the Convertible Notes) and requires the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes to be stated separately.(See Retrospective Adoption of New Accounting Standards note.)
The TECH credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of TECH (approximately $1,502 million as of December 3, 2009) and contains covenants that, among other requirements, establish certain liquidity, debt service coverage and leverage ratios, and restrict TECHs ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and acquire or dispose of assets.In the first quarter of 2010, the debt covenants were modified and as of December 3, 2009, TECH was in compliance with the covenants.In connection with the modification, the Company has guaranteed approximately 85% of the outstanding amount borrowed under TECHs credit facility and the Companys guarantee is expected to increase to 100% of the outstanding amount borrowed under the facility in April 2010.Under the terms of the credit facility, TECH had $60 million in restricted cash as of December 3, 2009.
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded $10 million in capital lease obligations with a weighted-average imputed interest rate of 9.2%, payable in periodic installments through February 2011.As of December 3, 2009, the Company had $42 million of capital lease obligations with covenants that require minimum levels of tangible net worth, cash and investments, and restricted cash of $24 million.The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of December 3, 2009.
On November 25, 2009, the Companys note with Nan Ya Plastics was replaced with a note from Mai-Liao Power Corporation, an affiliate of Nan Ya Plastics.Nan Ya Plastics and Mai-Li |
Contingencies |
Contingencies
The Company has accrued a liability and charged operations for the estimated costs of adjudication or settlement of various asserted and unasserted claims existing as of the balance sheet date, including those described below.The Company is currently a party to other legal actions arising out of the normal course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, results of operations or financial condition.
In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party.It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these types of agreements due to the conditional nature of the Companys obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.Historically, payments made by the Company under these types of agreements have not had a material effect on the Companys business, results of operations or financial condition.
The Company is involved in the following antitrust, patent and securities matters.
Antitrust matters:On May 5, 2004, Rambus, Inc. (Rambus) filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California (San Francisco County) against the Company and other DRAM suppliers alleging that the defendants harmed Rambus by engaging in concerted and unlawful efforts affecting Rambus DRAM (RDRAM) by eliminating competition and stifling innovation in the market for computer memory technology and computer memory chips.Rambuss complaint alleges various causes of action under California state law including, among other things, a conspiracy to restrict output and fix prices, a conspiracy to monopolize, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair competition.Rambus alleges that it is entitled to actual damages of more than a billion dollars and seeks joint and several liability, treble damages, punitive damages, a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from the conduct alleged in the complaint, interest, and attorneys fees and costs.Trial is scheduled to begin in January 2010.
At least sixty-eight purported class action price-fixing lawsuits have been filed against the Company and other DRAM suppliers in various federal and state courts in the United States and in Puerto Rico on behalf of indirect purchasers alleging price-fixing in violation of federal and state antitrust laws, violations of state unfair competition law, and/or unjust enrichment relating to the sale and pricing of DRAM products during the period from April 1999 through at least June 2002.The complaints seek joint and several damages, trebled, in addition to restitution, costs and attorneys fees.A number of these cases have been removed to federal court and transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for consolidated pre-trial proceedings.On January 29, 2008, the Northern District of California court granted in part and denied in part the Companys motion to dismiss plaintiffs second amended consolidated complaint.Plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion seeking certification |