We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus New York Tax Exempt Bond Fund, Inc., covering the six-month period from June 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Stocks and bonds advanced over the reporting period despite occasional bouts of volatility stemming from economic and political developments. In the wake of a robust market rally during the spring of 2016, a referendum in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union triggered heightened market turbulence in June. The market rally resumed over the summer as geopolitical concerns eased, and several broad measures of stock market performance climbed to record highs. Stock prices moderated prior to U.S. elections, but markets subsequently rallied to new highs in anticipation of changes in U.S. fiscal and tax policies. In the bond market, yields of high-quality sovereign bonds moved lower over much of the reporting period due to robust investor demand for current income, but yields surged higher after the election amid expectations of rising interest rates.
The transition to a new U.S. president and ongoing global economic headwinds suggest that volatility may persist in the financial markets over the foreseeable future. Some asset classes and industry groups seem likely to benefit from a changing economic and political landscape, while others probably will face challenges. Consequently, selectivity could become a more important determinant of investment success. As always, we encourage you to discuss the implications of our observations with your financial advisor.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period from June 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016, as provided by Thomas Casey and Daniel Rabasco, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2016, Dreyfus New York Tax Exempt Bond Fund achieved a total return of -3.76%.1 In comparison, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark index, which is composed of bonds issued nationally and not solely within New York, achieved a total return of -3.52% for the same period.2
Municipal bonds produced moderate losses, on average, amid heightened market volatility late in the reporting period. The fund lagged its Index, in part due to an emphasis on municipal bonds with longer maturities.
As of August 24, 2016, the fund’s benchmark, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index, was renamed the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks as high a level of current income exempt from federal, New York state, and New York City income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital. To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal, New York state, and New York City personal income taxes. The dollar-weighted average maturity of the fund’s portfolio normally exceeds 10 years, but the fund may invest without regard to maturity. The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. The fund may invest up to 20% of its assets in municipal bonds rated below investment grade (“junk” bonds) or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus.
The portfolio managers focus on identifying undervalued sectors and securities, and minimize the use of interest rate forecasting. The portfolio managers select municipal bonds by using fundamental credit analysis to estimate the relative value and attractiveness of various sectors and securities and to exploit pricing inefficiencies in the municipal bond market. The portfolio managers actively trade among various sectors, such as pre-refunded, general obligation, and revenue, based on their apparent relative values.
Supply-and-Demand Dynamics Fueled Market Volatility
The reporting period began in a constructive environment in which commodity prices were rebounding from depressed levels, U.S. monetary policymakers signaled that they would delay additional short-term rate hikes, and inflationary pressures remained muted. Meanwhile, income-oriented investors in a low interest rate environment reached for the competitive after-tax yields provided by municipal bonds. These factors generally supported municipal bond prices at the time.
However, changing supply-and-demand dynamics derailed the market rally later in the summer when issuers came to market with a flood of new municipal securities in anticipation of another rate hike before the end of 2016. Market declines accelerated in November as investor demand faltered in response to uncertainty surrounding changes in
3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
tax and fiscal policies from a newly elected presidential administration. By the end of the reporting period, municipal bonds more than gave back any previous gains.
Nonetheless, a growing U.S. economy continued to support sound credit conditions for most municipal bond issuers. Several states and municipalities face pressure from underfunded pension systems, but most — including New York state and New York city — have benefited from rising tax revenues and balanced operating budgets.
Longer Maturities Dampened Relative Results
The fund’s relative results were constrained to a modest degree by its interest rate strategies, including a relatively long average duration and overweighted exposure to bonds at the longer end of the market’s maturity spectrum. These strategies caused the fund to participate more fully in the market’s declines later in the reporting period. Some of the fund’s holdings also lagged market averages, including lower yielding securities backed by special taxes and revenues from essential municipal services such as water and sewer facilities.
On the other hand, the fund benefited during the reporting period from an emphasis on revenue-backed bonds over general obligation bonds. Relative performance was particularly bolstered by the fund’s positions in bonds backed by revenues from public power utilities, airports, and New York’s settlement of litigation with U.S. tobacco companies.
A More Opportunistic Investment Posture
As of the reporting period’s end, the municipal bond market remained volatile in light of political changes, expectations of another rate hike in December 2016, and the increase in municipal bond issuance volumes. Yet, we believe that recent market weakness may have been more severe than is warranted by underlying fundamentals, including growing U.S. and New York economies, an environment of generally strong municipal credit characteristics, and a continuing need among individual investors for tax-free income.
Therefore, we have adopted a more opportunistic investment posture, taking advantage of bouts of market weakness to purchase attractively valued revenue bonds in areas of the New York market that, in our analysis, are fundamentally strong and provide competitive yields.
December 15, 2016
Bonds are subject generally to interest rate, credit, liquidity, and market risks, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the fund’s prospectus. Generally, all other factors being equal, bond prices are inversely related to interest-rate changes, and rate increases can cause price declines.
High yield bonds are subject to increased credit risk and are considered speculative in terms of the issuer’s perceived ability to continue making interest payments on a timely basis and to repay principal upon maturity.
1 Total return includes reinvestment of dividends. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price, yield, and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Income may be subject to state and local taxes for non-New York residents. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable.
2 Source: Lipper Inc. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged, and geographically unrestricted total return performance benchmark for the long-term, investment-grade, tax-exempt bond market. Index returns do not reflect the fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund. Investors cannot invest directly in any index.
4
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus New York Tax Exempt Bond Fund, Inc. from June 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended November 30, 2016 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | | | | $3.59 | | | |
Ending value (after expenses) | | | | $962.40 | | | |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended November 30, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | | | | $3.70 | | | |
Ending value (after expenses) | | | | $1,021.41 | | | |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .73%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
5
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2016 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% | | | | | |
Build New York City Resource Corporation City University of New York,
Queens College, Revenue (Q Student Residences, LLC Project) | | 5.00 | | 6/1/38 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,115,690 | |
Build New York City Resource Corporation City University of New York,
Queens College, Revenue (Q Student Residences, LLC Project) | | 5.00 | | 6/1/43 | | 1,350,000 | | 1,494,814 | |
Dutchess County Local Development Corporation,
Revenue (Health Quest Systems, Inc. Project) | | 4.00 | | 7/1/41 | | 2,000,000 | | 1,930,040 | |
Glen Cove Local Economic Assistance Corporation,
Revenue (Garvies Point Public Improvement Project) | | 0.00 | | 1/1/45 | | 11,750,000 | a | 1,981,520 | |
Hempstead Local Development Corporation,
Revenue (Molloy College Project) | | 5.70 | | 7/1/29 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,387,250 | |
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation,
Hudson Yards Senior Revenue | | 5.75 | | 2/15/47 | | 5,500,000 | | 6,206,090 | |
Long Island Power Authority,
Electric System General Revenue | | 1.25 | | 11/1/18 | | 5,000,000 | b | 5,022,250 | |
Long Island Power Authority,
Electric System General Revenue | | 5.00 | | 9/1/34 | | 3,300,000 | | 3,638,118 | |
Long Island Power Authority,
Electric System General Revenue | | 5.00 | | 9/1/36 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,105,560 | |
Long Island Power Authority,
Electric System General Revenue | | 5.00 | | 9/1/45 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,268,080 | |
Long Island Power Authority,
Electric System General Revenue (Prerefunded) | | 6.00 | | 5/1/19 | | 7,000,000 | c | 7,755,090 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Dedicated Tax Fund Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/27 | | 12,000,000 | | 13,811,520 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Dedicated Tax Fund Revenue (Prerefunded) | | 5.50 | | 11/15/18 | | 4,500,000 | c | 4,879,125 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/1/27 | | 4,370,000 | | 4,974,415 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.25 | | 11/15/28 | | 6,680,000 | | 7,521,212 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/35 | | 10,000,000 | | 11,063,800 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.25 | | 11/15/36 | | 7,210,000 | | 8,107,357 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/37 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,311,820 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/41 | | 12,140,000 | | 13,413,729 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/43 | | 11,760,000 | | 12,986,098 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.25 | | 11/15/44 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,625,300 | |
6
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Transportation Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/46 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,917,700 | |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Rail Yards Trust,
Obligations Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/51 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,714,700 | |
Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation,
Revenue (University of Rochester Project) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/43 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,355,000 | |
Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation,
Revenue (University of Rochester Project) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/43 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,355,000 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 11/1/19 | | 5,000 | | 5,017 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/21 | | 10,000,000 | | 11,295,000 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/23 | | 11,020,000 | | 12,479,158 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.25 | | 9/1/25 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,264,440 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/27 | | 8,825,000 | | 9,797,780 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/27 | | 10,000,000 | | 11,648,500 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 3/1/29 | | 6,645,000 | | 7,523,535 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/29 | | 5,935,000 | | 6,664,411 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/30 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,399,420 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/31 | | 1,735,000 | | 1,954,634 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/32 | | 3,820,000 | | 4,284,436 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/32 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,241,580 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/32 | | 13,000,000 | | 14,793,220 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 10/1/32 | | 5,745,000 | | 6,409,122 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/34 | | 10,885,000 | | 12,117,726 | |
New York City,
GO | | 5.00 | | 8/1/37 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,606,150 | |
New York City Educational Construction Fund,
Revenue | | 6.50 | | 4/1/26 | | 4,220,000 | | 5,001,502 | |
New York City Industrial Development Agency,
PILOT Revenue (Yankee Stadium Project) (Insured; FGIC) | | 5.00 | | 3/1/31 | | 10,810,000 | | 10,833,350 | |
7
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
New York City Industrial Development Agency,
Senior Airport Facilities Revenue (Transportation Infrastructure Properties, LLC Obligated Group) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/28 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,313,500 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.00 | | 6/15/26 | | 7,250,000 | | 8,213,380 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.00 | | 6/15/31 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,586,250 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.00 | | 6/15/34 | | 20,000,000 | | 22,144,600 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.00 | | 6/15/39 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,561,250 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.25 | | 6/15/40 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,794,800 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.50 | | 6/15/40 | | 11,025,000 | | 11,972,158 | |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | 5.00 | | 6/15/44 | | 20,000,000 | | 22,267,400 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Building Aid Revenue | | 5.00 | | 7/15/40 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,561,900 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Building Aid Revenue | | 5.00 | | 7/15/43 | | 8,185,000 | | 9,016,023 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Building Aid Revenue (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.00 | | 7/15/22 | | 19,000,000 | | 19,091,960 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Building Aid Revenue (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.00 | | 1/15/24 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,048,400 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Building Aid Revenue (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.00 | | 7/15/27 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,048,400 | |
8
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Future Tax Secured Subordinate Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/1/26 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,769,950 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Future Tax Secured Subordinate Revenue | | 5.00 | | 8/1/30 | | 11,665,000 | | 13,450,795 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Future Tax Secured Subordinate Revenue | | 5.00 | | 2/1/33 | | 5,210,000 | | 5,895,428 | |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority,
Future Tax Secured Subordinate Revenue | | 5.00 | | 2/1/36 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,644,000 | |
New York Convention Center Development Corporation,
Revenue (Hotel Unit Fee Secured) (Credit Support Agreement; SONYMA) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/40 | | 3,250,000 | | 3,577,437 | |
New York Convention Center Development Corporation,
Senior Lien Revenue (Hotel Unit Fee Secured) | | 0.00 | | 11/15/47 | | 8,525,000 | a | 2,266,712 | |
New York Convention Center Development Corporation,
Senior Lien Revenue (Hotel Unit Fee Secured) | | 0.00 | | 11/15/50 | | 15,880,000 | a | 3,645,730 | |
New York Counties Tobacco Trust IV,
Tobacco Settlement Pass-Through Bonds | | 6.50 | | 6/1/35 | | 275,000 | | 275,000 | |
New York Counties Tobacco Trust VI,
Tobacco Settlement Pass-Through Bonds | | 5.00 | | 6/1/45 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,081,340 | |
New York Liberty Development Corporation,
Liberty Revenue (4 World Trade Center Project) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/44 | | 10,000,000 | | 11,006,900 | |
New York Liberty Development Corporation,
Liberty Revenue (7 World Trade Center Project) | | 5.00 | | 9/15/40 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,568,550 | |
New York Liberty Development Corporation,
Revenue (3 World Trade Center Project) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/44 | | 10,000,000 | d | 10,163,200 | |
New York Liberty Development Corporation,
Revenue (Goldman Sachs Headquarters Issue) | | 5.25 | | 10/1/35 | | 5,650,000 | | 6,619,144 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
LR (Municipal Health Facilities Improvement Program) (New York City Issue) | | 5.00 | | 1/15/25 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,404,700 | |
9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Mortgage Hospital Revenue (Hospital for Special Surgery) (Collateralized; FHA) | | 6.25 | | 8/15/34 | | 3,920,000 | | 4,370,996 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Barnard College) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/37 | | 1,010,000 | | 1,029,826 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Cornell University) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/37 | | 6,035,000 | | 6,635,362 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Fashion Institute of Technology Student Housing Corporation) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.25 | | 7/1/20 | | 4,490,000 | | 4,851,580 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Fordham University) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/41 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,325,916 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/40 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,166,740 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/36 | | 2,250,000 | | 2,484,202 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.75 | | 7/1/20 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,394,620 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) (Escrowed to Maturity) | | 0.00 | | 7/1/28 | | 18,335,000 | a | 13,756,934 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Mental Health Services Facilities Improvement) | | 6.75 | | 2/15/23 | | 5,700,000 | | 6,225,597 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Mount Sinai Hospital Obligated Group) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/26 | | 8,395,000 | | 9,167,844 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University) (Prerefunded) | | 5.50 | | 7/1/19 | | 9,000,000 | c | 9,916,920 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (New York University Hospitals Center) (Prerefunded) | | 5.50 | | 7/1/20 | | 1,500,000 | c | 1,700,265 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (New York University Hospitals Center) (Prerefunded) | | 5.63 | | 7/1/20 | | 3,500,000 | c | 3,982,440 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (New York University) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/45 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,653,170 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (New York University) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.75 | | 7/1/27 | | 33,625,000 | | 40,645,564 | |
10
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (North Shore - Long Island Jewish Obligated Group) | | 5.00 | | 5/1/43 | | 2,700,000 | | 2,909,331 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (North Shore - Long Island Jewish Obligated Group) (Prerefunded) | | 5.50 | | 5/1/19 | | 4,500,000 | c | 4,936,635 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (North Shore - Long Island Jewish Obligated Group) (Prerefunded) | | 5.75 | | 5/1/19 | | 7,880,000 | c | 8,691,246 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Orange Regional Medical Center Obligated Group) | | 6.13 | | 12/1/29 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,629,475 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Orange Regional Medical Center Obligated Group) | | 6.25 | | 12/1/37 | | 6,700,000 | | 7,049,807 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Orange Regional Medical Center Obligated Group) | | 5.00 | | 12/1/40 | | 1,200,000 | d | 1,268,928 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Pratt Institute) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/34 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,094,270 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Pratt Institute) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/39 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,627,905 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Pratt Institute) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/44 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,604,355 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (Rochester Institute of Technology) (Prerefunded) | | 6.25 | | 7/1/18 | | 7,500,000 | c | 8,087,025 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (State University of New York Dormitory Facilities) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/36 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,238,080 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (State University of New York Dormitory Facilities) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/37 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,118,250 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (State University of New York Dormitory Facilities) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/38 | | 6,300,000 | | 6,909,651 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (State University of New York Dormitory Facilities) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/40 | | 2,450,000 | | 2,726,213 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (The Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center) (LOC; TD Bank) | | 6.50 | | 8/15/30 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,440,400 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (The New School) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/36 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,185,440 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (The New School) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/40 | | 5,590,000 | | 6,111,603 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (The New School) (Prerefunded) | | 5.25 | | 7/1/20 | | 5,000,000 | c | 5,624,200 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (The Rockefeller University) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/38 | | 7,230,000 | | 8,059,064 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Revenue (The Rockefeller University) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/40 | | 16,000,000 | | 17,233,120 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) | | 5.25 | | 2/15/22 | | 9,965,000 | | 10,795,383 | |
11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) | | 5.00 | | 3/15/31 | | 8,620,000 | | 9,893,174 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) | | 5.25 | | 8/15/36 | | 2,625,000 | | 2,965,489 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) | | 5.00 | | 2/15/39 | | 3,840,000 | | 4,259,251 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) (Prerefunded) | | 5.25 | | 2/15/19 | | 5,000 | c | 5,420 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) (Prerefunded) | | 5.25 | | 2/15/19 | | 25,000 | c | 27,098 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose) (Prerefunded) | | 5.25 | | 2/15/19 | | 5,000 | c | 5,420 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Sales Tax Revenue | | 5.00 | | 3/15/23 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,826,500 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
State Sales Tax Revenue | | 5.00 | | 3/15/44 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,708,120 | |
New York State Dormitory Authority,
Third General Resolution Revenue (State University Educational Facilities Issue) | | 5.00 | | 5/15/29 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,397,650 | |
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,
PCR (New York State Electric and Gas Corporation Project) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 1.67 | | 4/1/34 | | 2,000,000 | b | 2,000,000 | |
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,
PCR (Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Project) (Insured; AMBAC) | | 1.34 | | 12/1/26 | | 8,000,000 | b | 7,760,000 | |
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,
PCR (Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation Project) (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 1.10 | | 8/1/32 | | 5,300,000 | b | 4,776,625 | |
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation,
State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue (New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects - Second Resolution Bonds) | | 5.00 | | 6/15/21 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,566,300 | |
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation,
State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue (New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects - Second Resolution Bonds) | | 5.00 | | 6/15/24 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,529,640 | |
12
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation,
State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue (New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects - Second Resolution Bonds) | | 5.00 | | 6/15/41 | | 15,000,000 | | 16,954,500 | |
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation,
State Revolving Funds Revenue (Master Financing Program) | | 5.00 | | 8/15/37 | | 4,025,000 | | 4,392,040 | |
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation,
State Revolving Funds Revenue (Master Financing Program) (Green Bonds) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/31 | | 6,000,000 | | 6,869,820 | |
New York State Housing Finance Agency,
Housing Revenue (Capitol Green Apartments) (Collateralized; FNMA) | | 4.38 | | 11/15/17 | | 260,000 | | 261,594 | |
New York State Mortgage Agency,
Mortgage Revenue | | 5.00 | | 4/1/28 | | 755,000 | | 786,151 | |
New York State Thruway Authority,
General Revenue | | 5.00 | | 1/1/42 | | 3,500,000 | | 3,781,505 | |
New York State Thruway Authority,
General Revenue Junior Indebtedness Obligations | | 5.00 | | 1/1/41 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,738,675 | |
New York State Thruway Authority,
Second General Highway and Bridge Trust Fund Bonds | | 5.00 | | 4/1/26 | | 17,500,000 | | 19,287,100 | |
New York State Urban Development Corporation,
State Facilities Revenue (Insured; National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | | 5.70 | | 4/1/20 | | 8,180,000 | | 8,823,193 | |
New York Transportation Development Corporation,
Special Facility Revenue (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project) | | 5.00 | | 8/1/21 | | 500,000 | | 542,865 | |
New York Transportation Development Corporation,
Special Facility Revenue (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport Project) | | 5.00 | | 8/1/31 | | 1,800,000 | | 1,829,304 | |
New York Transportation Development Corporation,
Special Facility Revenue (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment Project) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/46 | | 12,500,000 | | 12,727,625 | |
New York Transportation Development Corporation,
Special Facility Revenue (Terminal One Group Association, L.P. Project) | | 5.00 | | 1/1/23 | | 2,250,000 | | 2,535,907 | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Consolidated Bonds, 163rd Series) | | 5.00 | | 7/15/35 | | 10,000,000 | | 11,003,600 | |
13
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Consolidated Bonds, 178th Series) | | 5.00 | | 12/1/24 | | 4,465,000 | | 5,074,026 | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Consolidated Bonds, 183rd Series) | | 5.00 | | 12/15/26 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,829,600 | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Consolidated Bonds, 185th Series) | | 5.00 | | 9/1/32 | | 4,100,000 | | 4,514,223 | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Consolidated Bonds, 195th Series) | | 5.00 | | 10/1/35 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,428,450 | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Consolidated Bonds, 93rd Series) | | 6.13 | | 6/1/94 | | 15,000,000 | | 18,128,550 | |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
Special Project Bonds (JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project) | | 6.00 | | 12/1/36 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,669,350 | |
Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corporation,
Sales Tax Asset Revenue | | 5.00 | | 10/15/31 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,833,900 | |
Suffolk County Economic Development Corporation,
Revenue (Catholic Health Services of Long Island Obligated Group Project) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/22 | | 2,025,000 | | 2,256,538 | |
Suffolk County Economic Development Corporation,
Revenue (Catholic Health Services of Long Island Obligated Group Project) | | 5.00 | | 7/1/31 | | 2,370,000 | | 2,560,714 | |
Suffolk Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation,
Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | | 6.00 | | 6/1/48 | | 13,000,000 | | 13,053,690 | |
Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts (Series 2016-XM0367),
(New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue (The Rockefeller University)) Non-recourse | | 5.00 | | 7/1/18 | | 8,000,000 | d,e | 8,761,040 | |
Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts (Series 2016-XM0376),
(New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue (New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects)) Non-recourse | | 5.00 | | 6/15/21 | | 5,000,000 | d,e | 5,746,750 | |
Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts (Series 2016-XM0376-2),
(New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue (New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects)) Non-recourse | | 5.00 | | 6/15/21 | | 5,000,000 | d,e | 5,733,750 | |
14
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
New York - 99.0% (continued) | | | | | |
Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts (Series 2016-XM0381),
(New York State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax Revenue (General Purpose)) Non-recourse | | 5.00 | | 2/15/21 | | 16,000,000 | d,e | 17,838,080 | |
Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts (Series 2016-XM0383),
(New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue) Non-recourse | | 5.00 | | 6/15/21 | | 9,435,000 | d,e | 10,613,678 | |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
General Purpose Revenue (Prerefunded) | | 5.50 | | 1/1/22 | | 10,540,000 | c | 12,382,287 | |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
General Revenue (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/24 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,767,200 | |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
General Revenue (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | | 5.00 | | 1/1/28 | | 8,000,000 | | 9,031,040 | |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
General Revenue (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/28 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,340,950 | |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
General Revenue (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/30 | | 3,285,000 | | 3,679,069 | |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,
General Revenue (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | | 5.00 | | 11/15/33 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,148,920 | |
TSASC Inc. of New York,
Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | | 5.00 | | 6/1/26 | | 12,500,000 | | 12,417,875 | |
TSASC Inc. of New York,
Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | | 5.13 | | 6/1/42 | | 24,670,000 | | 22,918,677 | |
Utility Debt Securitization Authority of New York,
Restructuring Bonds | | 5.00 | | 12/15/35 | | 17,000,000 | | 19,357,220 | |
Utility Debt Securitization Authority of New York,
Restructuring Bonds | | 5.00 | | 12/15/41 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,640,600 | |
| | 1,117,878,266 | |
U.S. Related - 1.6% | | | | | |
A.B. Won International Airport Authority of Guam,
General Revenue | | 6.38 | | 10/1/43 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,459,090 | |
Guam,
Business Privilege Tax Revenue | | 5.00 | | 11/15/35 | | 6,200,000 | | 6,609,944 | |
15
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Long-Term Municipal Investments - 100.6% (continued) | Coupon
Rate (%) | | Maturity
Date | | Principal
Amount ($) | | Value ($) | |
U.S. Related - 1.6% (continued) | | | | | |
Guam,
Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue | | 6.00 | | 11/1/26 | | 3,325,000 | | 3,832,096 | |
Guam,
LOR (Section 30) | | 5.00 | | 12/1/46 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,155,000 | |
Guam Waterworks Authority,
Water and Wastewater System Revenue | | 5.00 | | 1/1/46 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,149,640 | |
| | 18,205,770 | |
Total Investments (cost $1,095,643,879) | | 100.6% | 1,136,084,036 | |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | | (0.6%) | (7,120,002) | |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | 1,128,964,034 | |
a Security issued with a zero coupon. Income is recognized through the accretion of discount.
b Variable rate security—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at period end.
c These securities are prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date.
d Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2016, these securities were valued at $60,125,426 or 5.33% of net assets.
e Collateral for floating rate borrowings.
| | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited) † | Value (%) |
Transportation Services | 21.5 |
Special Tax | 15.4 |
Education | 14.0 |
Utility-Water and Sewer | 12.6 |
Health Care | 6.6 |
Prerefunded | 6.0 |
City | 5.1 |
Utility-Electric | 4.0 |
Industrial | 2.5 |
Asset-Backed | 2.1 |
Resource Recovery | 1.8 |
State/Territory | 1.2 |
Lease | .9 |
Housing | .3 |
Other | 6.6 |
| | 100.6 |
† Based on net assets.
See notes to financial statements.
16
| | | | |
| |
Summary of Abbreviations (Unaudited) |
| |
ABAG | Association of Bay Area
Governments | ACA | American Capital Access |
AGC | ACE Guaranty Corporation | AGIC | Asset Guaranty Insurance Company |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond
Assurance Corporation | ARRN | Adjustable Rate
Receipt Notes |
BAN | Bond Anticipation Notes | BPA | Bond Purchase Agreement |
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty | COP | Certificate of Participation |
CP | Commercial Paper | DRIVERS | Derivative Inverse
Tax-Exempt Receipts |
EDR | Economic Development
Revenue | EIR | Environmental Improvement
Revenue |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty
Insurance Company | FHA | Federal Housing Administration |
FHLB | Federal Home
Loan Bank | FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation |
FNMA | Federal National
Mortgage Association | GAN | Grant Anticipation Notes |
GIC | Guaranteed Investment
Contract | GNMA | Government National Mortgage
Association |
GO | General Obligation | HR | Hospital Revenue |
IDB | Industrial Development Board | IDC | Industrial Development Corporation |
IDR | Industrial Development
Revenue | LIFERS | Long Inverse Floating
Exempt Receipts |
LOC | Letter of Credit | LOR | Limited Obligation Revenue |
LR | Lease Revenue | MERLOTS | Municipal Exempt Receipts
Liquidity Option Tender |
MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue | MFMR | Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue |
PCR | Pollution Control Revenue | PILOT | Payment in Lieu of Taxes |
P-FLOATS | Puttable Floating Option
Tax-Exempt Receipts | PUTTERS | Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts |
RAC | Revenue Anticipation Certificates | RAN | Revenue Anticipation Notes |
RAW | Revenue Anticipation Warrants | RIB | Residual Interest Bonds |
ROCS | Reset Options Certificates | RRR | Resources Recovery Revenue |
SAAN | State Aid Anticipation Notes | SBPA | Standby Bond Purchase Agreement |
SFHR | Single Family Housing Revenue | SFMR | Single Family Mortgage Revenue |
SONYMA | State of New York
Mortgage Agency | SPEARS | Short Puttable Exempt
Adjustable Receipts |
SWDR | Solid Waste Disposal Revenue | TAN | Tax Anticipation Notes |
TAW | Tax Anticipation Warrants | TRAN | Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes |
XLCA | XL Capital Assurance | | |
See notes to financial statements.
17
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
November 30, 2016 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | Cost | | Value | |
Assets ($): | | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | | 1,095,643,879 | | 1,136,084,036 | |
Interest receivable | | | | | 16,573,418 | |
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | | | | | 200 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | | | 18,905 | |
| | | | | 1,152,676,559 | |
Liabilities ($): | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | | | | | 681,134 | |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | | | | | 31,319 | |
Payable for floating rate notes issued—Note 4 | | | | | 21,715,000 | |
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | | | | | 1,064,810 | |
Interest and expense payable related to
floating rate notes issued—Note 4 | | | | | 116,961 | |
Accrued expenses | | | | | 103,301 | |
| | | | | 23,712,525 | |
Net Assets ($) | | | 1,128,964,034 | |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | | | 1,102,839,033 | |
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | | | | | 42,700 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | (14,357,856) | |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
on investments | | | | 40,440,157 | |
Net Assets ($) | | | 1,128,964,034 | |
Shares Outstanding | | |
(300 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock authorized) | | 78,141,601 | |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | | 14.45 | |
| | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | |
18
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended November 30, 2016 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Investment Income ($): | | | | |
Interest Income | | | 22,176,280 | |
Expenses: | | | | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | | | 3,584,042 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b) | | | 386,742 | |
Interest and expense related to floating rate notes issued—Note 4 | | | 169,011 | |
Professional fees | | | 75,061 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c) | | | 39,885 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(b) | | | 36,781 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | | | 16,735 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | | | 13,189 | |
Registration fees | | | 13,058 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 27,749 | |
Total Expenses | | | 4,362,253 | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(b) | | | (3,317) | |
Net Expenses | | | 4,358,936 | |
Investment Income—Net | | | 17,817,344 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 2,476,623 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | | (64,867,692) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | | | (62,391,069) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | (44,573,725) | |
| | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
19
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Six Months Ended
November 30, 2016 (Unaudited) | | | | Year Ended
May 31, 2016 | |
Operations ($): | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net | | | 17,817,344 | | | | 37,707,572 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | 2,476,623 | | | | 7,016,976 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
on investments | | (64,867,692) | | | | 28,174,230 | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations | (44,573,725) | | | | 72,898,778 | |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net | | | (17,774,644) | | | | (37,849,223) | |
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold | | | 33,614,329 | | | | 63,093,601 | |
Dividends reinvested | | | 14,068,091 | | | | 29,774,459 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (46,928,542) | | | | (117,563,612) | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
from Capital Stock Transactions | 753,878 | | | | (24,695,552) | |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (61,594,491) | | | | 10,354,003 | |
Net Assets ($): | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of Period | | | 1,190,558,525 | | | | 1,180,204,522 | |
End of Period | | | 1,128,964,034 | | | | 1,190,558,525 | |
Undistributed investment income—net | 42,700 | | | | - | |
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 2,205,512 | | | | 4,201,353 | |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | | | 928,164 | | | | 1,987,560 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (3,099,527) | | | | (7,859,537) | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 34,149 | | | | (1,670,624) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | | | | |
20
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions. These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
| | | | | | | |
| | |
Six Months Ended
November 30, 2016 | Year Ended May 31, |
(Unaudited) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value,
beginning of period | 15.24 | 14.79 | 14.87 | 15.30 | 15.47 | 14.57 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .23 | .48 | .51 | .55 | .54 | .56 |
Net realized and unrealized
gain (loss) on investments | (.79) | .45 | (.09) | (.43) | (.16) | .90 |
Total from
Investment Operations | (.56) | .93 | .42 | .12 | .38 | 1.46 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from investment
income—net | (.23) | (.48) | (.50) | (.55) | (.54) | (.56) |
Dividends from net realized
gain on investments | — | — | — | — | (.01) | — |
Total Distributions | (.23) | (.48) | (.50) | (.55) | (.55) | (.56) |
Net asset value, end of period | 14.45 | 15.24 | 14.79 | 14.87 | 15.30 | 15.47 |
Total Return (%) | (3.76)b | 6.41 | 2.87 | .94 | 2.44 | 10.22 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses
to average net assets | .73c | .73 | .72 | .73 | .72 | .74 |
Ratio of net expenses
to average net assets | .73c | .73 | .72 | .73 | .72 | .74 |
Ratio of interest and expense
related to floating rate notes
issued to average net assets | .03c | .01 | .02 | .02 | .01 | .01 |
Ratio of net investment income to
average net assets | 2.98c | 3.21 | 3.39 | 3.80 | 3.46 | 3.75 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 7.08b | 12.19 | 20.02 | 10.89 | 4.70 | 11.99 |
Net Assets,
end of period ($ x 1,000) | 1,128,964 | 1,190,559 | 1,180,205 | 1,199,217 | 1,368,096 | 1,422,395 |
a Based on average shares outstanding.
b Not annualized.
c Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus New York Tax Exempt Bond Fund, Inc. (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a non-diversified open-end management investment company. The fund’s investment objective is to seek as high a level of current income exempt from federal, New York state and New York city income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
22
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. Valuation techniques used to value the fund’s investments are as follows:
Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of the following: yields or prices of municipal securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. All of the preceding securities are generally categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Service is engaged under the general supervision of the Board.
When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board. Certain factors may be considered when fair valuing investments such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that
23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. These securities are either categorized within Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relevant inputs used.
For restricted securities where observable inputs are limited, assumptions about market activity and risk are used and are generally categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of November 30, 2016 in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | | |
| | Level 1 - Unadjusted Quoted Prices | Level 2 - Other Significant Observable Inputs | Level 3 -Significant Unobservable Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | | |
Municipal Bonds† | - | 1,136,084,036 | - | 1,136,084,036 |
Liabilities ($) | | | | |
Floating Rate Notes†† | - | (21,715,000) | - | (21,715,000) |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations.
†† Certain of the fund’s liabilities are held at carrying amount, which approximates fair value for financial reporting purposes.
At November 30, 2016, there were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when issued or delayed delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
The fund follows an investment policy of investing primarily in municipal obligations of one state. Economic changes affecting the state and certain of its public bodies and municipalities may affect the ability of issuers within the state to pay interest on, or repay principal of, municipal obligations held by the fund.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal
24
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax-exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each tax year in the three-year period ended May 31, 2016 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund is permitted to carry forward capital losses for an unlimited period. Furthermore, capital loss carryovers retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $17,004,079 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net realized capital gains, if any, realized subsequent to May 31, 2016. The fund has $2,552,817 of short-term capital losses and $14,451,262 of long-term capital losses which can be carried forward for an unlimited period.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 was as follows: tax-exempt income $37,849,223. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $810 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. Prior to October 5, 2016, the unsecured credit facility with Citibank, N.A. was $555 million. In
25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement (the “Agreement”) with Dreyfus, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .60% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. The Agreement provides that if in any fiscal year the aggregate expenses of the fund (excluding taxes, interest expense, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) exceed 1½% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets, the fund may deduct from the payment to be made to Dreyfus or Dreyfus will bear, such excess expense. During the period ended November 30, 2016, there was no expense reimbursement pursuant to the Agreement.
(b) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor at an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund was charged $205,594 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund has arrangements with the transfer agent and the custodian whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset transfer agency and custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, under a transfer agency agreement for providing transfer agency and cash management services for the fund. The majority of transfer agency fees are comprised of amounts paid on a per account basis, while cash management fees are related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund was charged $116,516 for transfer agency services and $7,315 for cash management services. These fees are included in Shareholder servicing
26
costs in the Statement of Operations. Cash management fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $3,315.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. These fees are determined based on net assets, geographic region and transaction activity. During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund was charged $36,781 pursuant to the custody agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a shareholder redemption draft processing agreement for providing certain services related to the fund’s check writing privilege. During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund was charged $4,847 pursuant to the agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credit of $2.
During the period ended November 30, 2016, the fund was charged $4,876 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer and his staff.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $570,466, Shareholder Services Plan fees $1,000, custodian fees $57,421, Chief Compliance Officer fees $6,501 and transfer agency fees $45,746.
(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended November 30, 2016, amounted to $89,449,671 and $83,151,588, respectively.
Inverse Floater Securities: The fund participates in secondary inverse floater structures in which fixed-rate, tax-exempt municipal bonds are transferred to a trust (the “Inverse Floater Trust”). The Inverse Floater Trust typically issues two variable rate securities that are collateralized by the cash flows of the fixed-rate, tax-exempt municipal bonds. One of these variable rate securities pays interest based on a short-term floating rate set by a remarketing agent at predetermined intervals (“Trust Certificates”). A residual interest tax-exempt security is also created by the Inverse Floater Trust, which is transferred to the fund, and is paid interest based on the remaining cash flows of the Inverse Floater Trust, after payment of interest on the other securities and various expenses of the Inverse Floater Trust. An inverse floater security may be collapsed without the consent of
27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
the fund due to certain termination events such as bankruptcy, default or other credit event.
The fund accounts for the transfer of bonds to the Inverse Floater Trust as secured borrowings, with the securities transferred remaining in the fund’s investments, and the Trust Certificates reflected as fund liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The fund may invest in inverse floater securities on either a non-recourse or recourse basis. These securities are typically supported by a liquidity facility provided by a bank or other financial institution (the “Liquidity Provider”) that allows the holders of the Trust Certificates to tender their certificates in exchange for payment from the Liquidity Provider of par plus accrued interest on any business day prior to a termination event. When the fund invests in inverse floater securities on a non-recourse basis, the Liquidity Provider is required to make a payment under the liquidity facility due to a termination event to the holders of the Trust Certificates. When this occurs, the Liquidity Provider typically liquidates all or a portion of the municipal securities held in the Inverse Floater Trust. A liquidation shortfall occurs if the Trust Certificates exceed the proceeds of the sale of the bonds in the Inverse Floater Trust (“Liquidation Shortfall”). When a fund invests in inverse floater securities on a recourse basis, the fund typically enters into a reimbursement agreement with the Liquidity Provider where the fund is required to repay the Liquidity Provider the amount of any Liquidation Shortfall. As a result, a fund investing in a recourse inverse floater security bears the risk of loss with respect to any Liquidation Shortfall.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the inverse floater structure during the period ended November 30, 2016 was approximately $21,715,000, with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.55%.
At November 30, 2016, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $40,440,157, consisting of $54,061,773 gross unrealized appreciation and $13,621,616 gross unrealized depreciation.
At November 30, 2016, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
28
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Directors held on November 7-8, 2016, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Management Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services (the “Agreement”). The Board members, a majority of whom are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from Dreyfus representatives. In considering the renewal of the Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below. The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board considered information provided to them at the meeting and in previous presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex (such as retail direct or intermediary, in which intermediaries typically are paid by the fund and/or Dreyfus) and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each intermediary or distribution channel, as applicable to the fund.
The Board also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructures.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board reviewed reports prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended September 30, 2016, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Broadridge as of the date of its analysis. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Broadridge used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be
29
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
applicable to the fund and comparison funds. They also noted that performance generally should be considered over longer periods of time, although it is possible that long-term performance can be adversely affected by even one period of significant underperformance so that a single investment decision or theme has the ability to affect disproportionately long-term performance. The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was below the Performance Group median for all periods except for the one-year period when it was above the median and that the fund’s total return performance was at or below the Performance Universe median in all periods except the one- and ten-year periods. The Board also noted that, while the fund’s yield performance was below the Performance Group median all ten one-year periods ended September 30th, it was at or above the Performance Universe median in six of the ten periods. The Dreyfus representatives noted the proximity of the fund’s yield performance to the Performance Group and/or Performance Universe median during certain periods when it was below median. Dreyfus also provided a comparison of the fund’s calendar year total returns to the returns of the fund’s Broadridge category average and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above the return of the average in seven of the ten years shown.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was above the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees (1) paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Broadridge category as the fund and (2) paid to Dreyfus or the Dreyfus-affiliated primary employer of the fund’s primary portfolio manager(s) for advising any separate accounts and/or other types of client portfolios that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness of the fund’s management fee.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and its affiliates and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund and the aggregate profitability percentage to Dreyfus and its affiliates for managing the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered and service levels provided by Dreyfus. The Board also had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
30
The Board considered, on the advice of its counsel, the profitability analysis (1) as part of its evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreement, considered in relation to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, supported the renewal of the Agreement and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. Dreyfus representatives also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
· The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
· The Board was somewhat concerned by the fund’s performance, but noted the improvement in the most recent period.
· The Board concluded that the fee paid to Dreyfus supported the renewal of the Agreement in light of the considerations described above.
· The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreement and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
In evaluating the Agreement, the Board considered these conclusions and determinations and also relied on its previous knowledge, gained through meetings and other interactions with Dreyfus and its affiliates, of the fund and the services provided to the fund by Dreyfus. The Board also relied on information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year relating to the operations of the fund and the investment management and other services provided under the Agreement, including information on the investment performance of the fund in comparison to similar
31
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
mutual funds and benchmark performance indices; general market outlook as applicable to the fund; and compliance reports. In addition, the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of prior or similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board’s conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years. The Board determined to renew the Agreement.
32
NOTES
33
Dreyfus New York Tax Exempt Bond Fund, Inc.
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Manager
The Dreyfus Corporation
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Custodian
The Bank of New York Mellon
225 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10286
Transfer Agent &
Dividend Disbursing Agent
Dreyfus Transfer, Inc.
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Distributor
MBSC Securities Corporation
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone Call your financial representative or 1-800-DREYFUS
Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144
E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com
Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at www.dreyfus.com
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (phone 1-800-SEC-0330 for information).
A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available at www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-DREYFUS.
| | |
© 2017 MBSC Securities Corporation
0980SA1116 | 
|
