DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jan. 31, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Business Description and Accounting Policies [Text Block] | Description of business. The primary business of Fred's, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Fred's", “We”, “Our”, “Us” or “Company”) is the sale of general merchandise through its retail discount stores and full service pharmacies. In addition, the Company sells general merchandise to its 19 franchisees. As of January 31, 2015, the Company had 660 retail stores, 370 pharmacies, and 1 specialty pharmacy facility located in 15 states mainly in the Southeastern United States. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Fred's, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Amounts are in thousands unless otherwise noted. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subsequent Events, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Subsequent Events. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the financial statement issue date. Based on this evaluation, we are not aware of any events or transactions requiring recognition or disclosure in our consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fiscal year. The Company utilizes a 52 - 53 week accounting period which ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, as used herein, refer to the years ended January 31, 2015, February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively. Fiscal year 2012 had 53 weeks, and fiscal years 2014 and 2013 each had 52 weeks. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and cash equivalents. Cash on hand and in banks, together with other highly liquid investments which are subject to market fluctuations and having original maturities of three months or less, are classified as cash and cash equivalents. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Premiums Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Estimation Methodology, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company is reimbursed for drugs sold by its pharmacies by many different payors including insurance companies, Medicare and various state Medicaid programs. The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of receivables and additionally uses payor-specific information to assess collection risk, given its interpretation of the contract terms or applicable regulations. However, the reimbursement rates are often subject to interpretations that could result in payments that differ from the Company’s estimates. Additionally, updated regulations and contract negotiations occur frequently, necessitating the Company’s continual review and assessment of the estimation process. Senior management reviews accounts receivable on a quarterly basis to determine if any receivables are potentially uncollectible. The Company includes any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible in its overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance account. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Inventories. Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the retail first-in, first-out method for goods in our stores and the cost first-in, first-out method for goods in our distribution centers. The retail inventory method is a reverse mark-up, averaging method which has been widely used in the retail industry for many years. This method calculates a cost-to-retail ratio that is applied to the retail value of inventory to determine the cost value of inventory and the resulting cost of goods sold and gross margin. The assumption that the retail inventory method provides for valuation at lower of cost or market and the inherent uncertainties therein are discussed in the following paragraphs. |
|
In order to assure valuation at the lower of cost or market, the retail value of our inventory is adjusted on a consistent basis to reflect current market conditions. These adjustments include increases to the retail value of inventory for initial markups to set the selling price of goods or additional markups to adjust pricing for inflation and decreases to the retail value of inventory for markdowns associated with promotional, seasonal or other declines in the market value. Because these adjustments are made on a consistent basis and are based on current prevailing market conditions, they approximate the carrying value of the inventory at net realizable value (market value). Therefore, after applying the cost to retail ratio, the cost value of our inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market as is prescribed by GAAP. |
|
Because the approximation of net realizable value (market value) under the retail inventory method is based on estimates such as markups, markdowns and inventory losses (shrink), there exists an inherent uncertainty in the final determination of inventory cost and gross margin. In order to mitigate that uncertainty, the Company has a formal review by product class which considers such variables as current market trends, seasonality, weather patterns and age of merchandise to ensure that markdowns are taken currently, or a markdown reserve is established to cover future anticipated markdowns. This review also considers current pricing trends and inflation to ensure that markups are taken if necessary. The estimation of inventory losses (shrink) is a significant element in approximating the carrying value of inventory at net realizable value, and as such the following paragraph describes our estimation method as well as the steps we take to mitigate the risk of this estimate in the determination of the cost value of inventory. |
|
The Company calculates inventory losses (shrink) based on actual inventory losses occurring as a result of physical inventory counts during each fiscal period and estimated inventory losses occurring between yearly physical inventory counts. The estimate for shrink occurring in the interim period between physical counts is calculated on a store-specific basis and is based on history, as well as performance on the most recent physical count. It is calculated by multiplying each store’s shrink rate, which is based on the previously mentioned factors, by the interim period’s sales for each store. Additionally, the overall estimate for shrink is adjusted at the corporate level to a three-year historical average to ensure that the overall shrink estimate is the most accurate approximation of shrink based on the Company’s overall history of shrink. The three-year historical estimate is calculated by dividing the “book to physical” inventory adjustments for the trailing 36 months by the related sales for the same period. In order to reduce the uncertainty inherent in the shrink calculation, the Company first performs the calculation at the lowest practical level (by store) using the most current performance indicators. This ensures a more reliable number, as opposed to using a higher level aggregation or percentage method. The second portion of the calculation ensures that the extreme negative or positive performance of any particular store or group of stores does not skew the overall estimation of shrink. This portion of the calculation removes additional uncertainty by eliminating short-term peaks and valleys that could otherwise cause the underlying carrying cost of inventory to fluctuate unnecessarily. The methodology that we have applied in estimating shrink has resulted in variability that is not material to our financial statements. |
|
Management believes that the Company’s retail inventory method provides an inventory valuation which reasonably approximates cost and results in valuing inventory at the lower of cost or market. For pharmacy department inventories, which were approximately $43.5 million, and $40.4 million at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, respectively, cost was determined using the retail LIFO ("last-in, first-out") method in which inventory cost is maintained using the retail inventory method, then adjusted by application of the highly inflationary Producer Price Index published by the U.S. Department of Labor for the cumulative annual periods. The current cost of inventories exceeded the LIFO cost by approximately $39.9 million at January 31, 2015 and $35.2 million at February 1, 2014. The LIFO reserve increased by approximately $4.7 million and $4.5 million during 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
The Company has historically included an estimate of inbound freight and certain general and administrative costs in merchandise inventory as prescribed by U.S. GAAP. These costs include activities surrounding the procurement and storage of merchandise inventory such as merchandise planning and buying, warehousing, accounting, information technology and human resources, as well as inbound freight. The total amount of procurement and storage costs and inbound freight included in merchandise inventory at January 31, 2015 is $19.4 million compared to $21.6 million at February 1, 2014. |
|
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company established a reserve for inventory clearance of product that management identified as low-productive and does not fit our go-forward convenient and pharmacy healthcare services model. The Company recorded a below-cost inventory adjustment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 330, "Inventory," of approximately $12.5 million (including $1.6 million, for the accelerated recognition of freight capitalization expense) in cost of goods sold to value inventory at the lower of cost or market on inventory identified as low-productive, which the Company will be liquidating in accordance with our new strategy. To date, the Company has utilized $5.0 million of the reserve associated with goods sold in 2014, leaving $7.5 million in the reserve at January 31, 2015. |
|
The following table illustrates the inventory markdown reserve activity related to the low-productive inventory discussed in the previous paragraph (in millions): |
|
| | Balance at | | Additions | | Utilization | | Ending Balance | |
February 1, 2014 | January 31, 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory markdown on low-productive inventory | | $ | - | | $ | 10.9 | | $ | -3.9 | | $ | 7 | |
Inventory provision for freight capitalization expense | | $ | - | | $ | 1.6 | | $ | -1.1 | | $ | 0.5 | |
Total | | $ | - | | $ | 12.5 | | $ | -5 | | $ | 7.5 | |
|
The Company recorded $3.3 million of below-cost inventory adjustments during the year ended January 31, 2015, and no below cost inventory adjustments during the years ended February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013 in connection with planned store closures (see Note 12 - Exit and Disposal Activity). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and equipment. Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets and presented in selling, general and administrative expenses. Improvements to leased premises are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the initial term of the lease or the useful life of the improvement. Leasehold improvements added late in the lease term are amortized over the lesser of the remaining term of the lease (including the upcoming renewal option, if the renewal is reasonably assured) or the estimated useful life of the improvement. Gains or losses on the sale of assets are recorded at disposal. The following average estimated useful lives are generally applied: |
|
| Estimated Useful Lives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building and building improvements | 8 - 31.5 years | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 3 - 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | 3 - 10 years or term of lease, if shorter | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Automobiles and vehicles | 3 - 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Airplane | 9 years | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Assets under capital lease are amortized in accordance with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for owned assets or over the lease term (regardless of renewal options), if shorter, and the charge to earnings is included in depreciation expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Amortization expense on assets under capital lease for 2014 was $29 thousand. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Leases. Certain operating leases include rent increases during the initial lease term. For these leases, the Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease (which includes the pre-opening period of construction, renovation, fixturing and merchandise placement) and records the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts paid as a rent liability. Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which includes any rent holiday period. |
|
The Company recognizes contingent rental expense when the achievement of specified sales targets are considered probable in accordance with FASB ASC 840 “Leases”. The amount expensed but not paid was $0.9 million and $0.8 million at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, respectively, and is included in “Accrued expenses and other” in the consolidated balance sheet (See Note 2 - Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts). |
|
The Company occasionally receives reimbursements from landlords to be used towards construction of the store the Company intends to lease. The reimbursement is primarily for the purpose of performing work required to divide a much larger location into smaller segments, one of which the Company will use for its store. This work could include the addition or demolition of walls, separation of plumbing, utilities, electrical work, entrances (front and back) and other work as required. Leasehold improvements are recorded at their gross costs including items reimbursed by landlords. The reimbursements are initially recorded as a deferred credit and then amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the initial lease term. |
|
Based upon an overall analysis of store performance and expected trends, we periodically evaluate the need to close underperforming stores. When we determine that an underperforming store should be closed and a lease obligation still exists, we record the estimated future liability associated with the rental obligation on the date the store is closed in accordance with FASB ASC 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.” Liabilities are computed based at the point of closure for the present value of any remaining operating lease obligations, net of estimated sublease income, and at the communication date for severance and other exit costs, as prescribed by FASB ASC 420. The assumptions in calculating the liability include the timeframe expected to terminate the lease agreement, estimates related to the sublease of potential closed locations, and estimation of other related exit costs. If the actual timing and the potential termination costs or realization of sublease income differ from our estimates, the resulting liabilities could vary from recorded amounts. We periodically review the liability for closed stores and make adjustments when necessary. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Including Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Impairment of long-lived assets. The Company’s policy is to review the carrying value of all property and equipment as well as purchased intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. In accordance with FASB ASC 360, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review for impairment all stores open at least 3 years or remodeled for more than two years. Impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease, or 10 years for owned stores. Our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to management’s judgment and are difficult to predict. If a long-lived asset is found to be impaired, the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset’s fair value. The fair value is based on estimated market values for similar assets or other reasonable estimates of fair market value based upon using a discounted cash flow model. |
|
During fiscal 2014, in association with the planned closure of stores not meeting the Company's operational performance targets, we recorded a charge of $2.9 million in selling, general and administrative expense for the impairment of fixed assets and leasehold improvements. No impairments were recognized in 2013 or 2012. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue recognition. The Company markets goods and services through 641 company-owned stores and 19 franchised stores as of January 31, 2015. Net sales includes sales of merchandise from company-owned stores, net of returns and exclusive of sales taxes. Sales to franchised stores are recorded when the merchandise is shipped from the Company’s warehouse. Revenues resulting from layaway sales are recorded upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company also sells gift cards for which the revenue is recognized at time of redemption. The Company records a gift card liability on the date the gift card is issued to the customer. Revenue is recognized and the gift card liability is reduced as the customer redeems the gift card. The Company will recognize aged liabilities as revenue when the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed is remote. In the second quarter of 2014, the Company made a refinement to its revenue recognition policy concerning gift card breakage. Utilizing 10 years of gift card data provided by third party vendor Bank of America during the second quarter, a clear redemption and breakage trend emerged. Fred’s gift cards hit their redemption peak of approximately 87% by the end of third year of activation, resulting in a 13% breakage trend. In addition, Fred’s gift card liability is governed by Tennessee’s escheat laws which state that gift cards issued after 1998 are not considered abandoned property. Therefore, the Company revised the estimate of gift card breakage revenue during the second quarter of 2014. During 2014, we recognized $1.0 million of gift card revenue, or $0.02 per share, while not recognizing any gift card revenue in 2013 or 2012. |
|
In addition, the Company charges the franchised stores a fee based on a percentage of their purchases from the Company. These fees represent a reimbursement for use of the Fred's name and other administrative costs incurred on behalf of the franchised stores and are therefore netted against selling, general and administrative expenses. Total franchise income for 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $1.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Goods Sold [Policy Text Block] | Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold includes the purchase cost of inventory and the freight costs to the Company’s distribution centers. Warehouse and occupancy costs, including depreciation and amortization, are not included in cost of goods sold, but are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Sales, Vendor Allowances, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Vendor rebates and allowances. The Company receives rebates for a variety of merchandising activities, such as volume commitment rebates, relief for temporary and permanent price reductions, cooperative advertising programs, and for the introduction of new products in our stores. FASB ASC 605-50 “Customer Payments and Incentives” addresses the accounting and income statement classification for consideration given by a vendor to a retailer in connection with the sale of the vendor’s products or for the promotion of sales of the vendor’s products. Such consideration received from vendors is reflected as a decrease in prices paid for inventory and recognized in cost of sales as the related inventory is sold, unless specific criteria are met qualifying the consideration for treatment as reimbursement of specific, identifiable incremental costs. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company includes buying, warehousing, distribution, advertising, depreciation and amortization and occupancy costs in selling, general and administrative expenses. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Advertising. In accordance with FASB ASC 720-35 “Advertising Costs”, the Company charges advertising, including production costs, to selling, general and administrative expense on the first day of the advertising period. Gross advertising expenses for 2014, 2013 and 2012, were $23.4 million, $22.8 million and $24.0 million, respectively. Gross advertising expenses were reduced by vendor cooperative advertising allowances of $2.2 million, $2.8 million and $2.4 million, for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preopening Costs [Policy Text Block] | Preopening costs. The Company charges to expense the preopening costs of new stores as incurred. These costs are primarily labor to stock the store, rent, preopening advertising, store supplies and other expendable items. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible Assets, Finite-Lived, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Intangible assets. Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer lists associated with acquired pharmacies and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. After testing the retention rate of customers obtained in acquisitions over the last eight years, the Company changed the estimated life of customer lists associated with acquired pharmacies from five to seven years in the fourth quarter of 2013. Based on the Company's historical experience, seven years is a closer approximation of the actual lives of these assets. The change in estimate was applied prospectively. Expenses for the fourth quarter of 2013 were favorably impacted by approximately $1.5 million ($.03 per diluted share) as a result of this change. Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, totaled $79.6 million at January 31, 2015, and $54.6 million at February 1, 2014. Accumulated amortization at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014 totaled $66.4 million and $54.3 million, respectively. Amortization expense for 2014, 2013 and 2012, was $12.1 million, $12.1 million and $10.5 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the assets recognized as of January 31, 2015, in millions for each of the next 7 years is as follows: 2015 - $14.8 million, 2016 - $14.6 million, 2017 - $13.8 million, 2018 - $12.6 million, 2019 - $10.3 million and $13.5 million thereafter. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair value of financial instruments. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy, as defined below, gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. |
|
| ⋅ | Level 1, defined as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ⋅ | Level 2, defined as Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ⋅ | Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
At January 31, 2015, the Company did not have any outstanding derivative instruments. The recorded value of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and indebtedness, approximates fair value. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value of each class of financial instrument: (1) the carrying amounts of current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments and (2) the fair value of the Company’s indebtedness is estimated based on the current borrowing rates available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities. Most of our indebtedness is under variable interest rates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Self Insurance Reserve [Policy Text Block] | Insurance reserves. The Company is largely self-insured for workers compensation, general liability and employee medical insurance. The Company’s liability for self-insurance is determined based on claims known at the time of determination of the reserve and estimates for future payments against incurred losses and claims that have been incurred but not reported. Estimates for future claims costs include uncertainty because of the variability of the factors involved, such as the type of injury or claim, required services by the providers, healing time, age of claimant, case management costs, location of the claimant, and governmental regulations. These uncertainties or a deviation in future claims trends from recent historical patterns could result in the Company recording additional expenses or expense reductions that might be material to the Company’s results of operations. The Company’s worker's compensation and general liability insurance policy coverages run August 1 through July 31 of each fiscal year. Our employee medical insurance policy coverage runs from January 1 through December 31. The Company purchases excess insurance coverage for certain of its self-insured liabilities, or stop loss coverage. The stop loss limits for excessive or catastrophic claims for general liability remained at $350,000, worker’s compensation remained at $500,000 and employee medical remained at $175,000. The Company’s insurance reserve was $10.0 million and $10.5 million on January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, respectively. Changes in the reserve for the year ended January 31, 2015, were attributable to additional reserve requirements of $41.3 million netted with payments of $41.8 million. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation Related Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-based compensation. The Company uses the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, whereby the Company recognizes share-based payments to employees and directors in the Consolidated Statements of Income on a straight-line basis for shares that cliff vest and under the graded vesting attribution method for those that have graded vesting. |
|
Effective January 29, 2006, the Company elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in FASB ASC 718 for calculating the income tax effects of stock-based compensation. The alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in-capital pool (“APIC Pool”) related to the income tax effects of stock based compensation, and for determining the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and consolidated statements of cash flows of the income tax effects of stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of FASB ASC 718. |
|
FASB ASC 718 also requires the benefits of income tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. The impact of adopting FASB ASC 718 on future results will depend on, among other things, levels of share-based payments granted in the future, actual forfeiture rates and the timing of option exercises. |
|
Stock-based compensation expense, post adoption of FASB ASC 718, is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, and therefore has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant based on the Company’s historical forfeiture experience and will be revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income taxes. The Company reports income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Under FASB ASC 740, the asset and liability method is used for computing future income tax consequences of events, which have been recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements or income tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is the net change during the year in the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities (see Note 5 – Income Taxes). |
|
The Company also applies the guidance of FASB ASC 740-10-25, Income Taxes, Uncertain Tax Positions, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in the Company’s financial statements in accordance with FASB ASC 740 by defining the criterion that an individual tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. FASB ASC 740 requires that the tax effects of a position be recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained based solely on the technical merits as of the reporting date (see Note 5 – Income Taxes). |
|
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and magnitude of appropriate valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income, as well as successful implementation of various tax planning strategies. |
|
While Fred’s believes that these judgments and estimates are appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances, actual resolution of these matters may differ from recorded estimated amounts. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Business segments. The Company manages the business on the basis of one operating segment and therefore, has only one reportable segment. All operations are located in the United States. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Comprehensive income. Comprehensive income consists of two components, net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are recorded as an element of shareholders’ equity but are excluded from net income. The Company applies the guidance of FASB ASC 715 “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” to the accounting and disclosure requirements of accumulated other comprehensive income. See Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Reclassifications. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This guidance was effective in the first quarter of 2014. The amendments in this ASU state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The issuance of this guidance did not require a change in the current presentation of unrecognized tax benefits and as a result, did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial position. |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in the ASU are designed to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and develop a joint standard between U.S. GAAP and the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) that strive to remove reporting inconsistencies, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improve comparability across entities, provide more useful information to the users of financial statements and simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements an entity must refer to. The guidance in the ASU supersedes previous revenue recognition guidance in Topic 605: Revenue Recognition. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including the interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is still evaluating the impact the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated net earnings, cash flows and financial position. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |