granted to the extent otherwise required under the Merger Agreement) any approval action or (iii) require Sinclair or any of its subsidiaries to agree to take or consent to the taking of any approval action other than divestitures described in the prior paragraph and other approval actions (not involving the divestitures of stations or the modification or termination of any local marketing, joint sales, shared services or similar contract or related option agreements) that would not reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of Sinclair and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole (including, after the closing, Tribune and its subsidiaries) (an “approval material adverse effect”).
Moreover, Sinclair and Tribune have also agreed that in the event that the UHF discount, which was reinstated in the Order on Reconsideration adopted by the FCC on April 20, 2017 and published in the Federal Register on May 5, 2017 (the “Order on Reconsideration”), In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.3555(e) of the Commission’s Rules, National Television Multiple Ownership Rule (the “UHF discount”) is repealed, stayed, rendered inapplicable or otherwise not in full force and effect as of the closing (unless the FCC national cap has been increased or otherwise modified so that the impact of the FCC national cap is no less favorable to Sinclair and its subsidiaries than the impact of the national cap as in effect as of May 8, 2017 giving effect to the UHF discount), then the approval actions that would be required to be taken to obtain the FCC consent to the transactions would, in the aggregate, be deemed to reasonably be expected to result in an approval material adverse effect, and neither Sinclair nor any of its subsidiaries will be required to take or agree or consent to or approve such approval actions. A petition for judicial review of the Order on Reconsideration was filed at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on May 12, 2017 and is pending. Sinclair and Tribune, together with several other broadcasters, have intervened in the proceeding. On May 26, 2017, the petitioners in that case filed an emergency motion at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking a stay of the Order on Reconsideration pending judicial review. On June 1, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals entered an administrative stay of the Order on Reconsideration, which was to take effect on June 5, 2017, pending its review of the emergency stay motion. On June 15, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order dissolving the administrative stay and denying the emergency stay motion. The Order on Reconsideration became effective immediately upon release of the court’s order, as a result of which the UHF discount remains in effect. Petitioners filed their brief on the merits on September 25, 2017. The FCC filed its brief on November 7, 2017, and the Intervenors’ joint brief was filed on November 14, 2017. Petitioners’ reply brief is due December 5, 2017.
In addition, under the Merger Agreement, Sinclair and Tribune agreed that if the FCC precludes Sinclair or any of its subsidiaries from holding a customary option to acquire any station to be divested to comply with the FCC national cap, the divestiture would be deemed to reasonably be expected to result in an approval material adverse effect and neither Sinclair nor any of its subsidiaries will be required to divest or agree or consent to divest Tribune stations or Sinclair stations to comply with the FCC national cap.
Applications seeking FCC approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Applications”) were filed on June 26, 2017. On July 6, 2017, the FCC issued a Public Notice establishing procedures governing its review of the Applications. On July 14, 2017, the FCC issued a Protective Order governing the treatment of confidential and highly confidential information submitted to the record of the proceeding. Formal petitions to deny the Applications were filed on August 7, 2017 by DISH Network LLC, Steinman Communications, Inc., Public Knowledge, Common Cause, and United Church of Christ, OC Inc., NTCA—The Rural Broadband Association, Newsmax Media, Inc., American Cable Association, Competitive Carriers Association, and Free Press (collectively, the “Petitioners”); numerous other parties have filed comments and informal submissions supporting or opposing grant of the applications. Tribune and Sinclair jointly filed an opposition to the petitions to deny on August 22, 2017 (the “Joint Opposition”), and certain Petitioners and other parties filed replies to the Joint Opposition on August 29, 2017. By letter dated September 14, 2017, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued a Request for Information (“RFI”) to Sinclair and Tribune seeking additional information, documents and clarification of certain matters discussed in the Applications. Sinclair submitted a response to the RFI on October 5, 2017 (the “October 5 Response”). On October 18, 2017, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued a public notice pausing the FCC’s180-day transaction review “shot-clock” for 15 days (until November 2, 2017) to afford interested parties an opportunity to comment on the October 5
8