UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 0-12853
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
| Oregon | | 93-0370304 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
| 13900 N.W. Science Park Drive, Portland, Oregon | | 97229 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 503-641-4141
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, without par value
Series A No Par Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the last sales price ($10.88) as reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market, as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (October 1, 2010) was $260,491,887.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of June 6, 2011 was 28,501,572 shares.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
The Registrant has incorporated into Part III of this Form 10-K, by reference, portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
2011 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below in Item 1A Risk Factors.
Where You Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (Exchange Act). You can inspect and copy our reports, proxy statements and other information filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains an Internet site atwww.sec.gov where you can obtain most of our SEC filings. We also make available, free of charge on our website atwww.esi.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. The information found on our website is not part of this Form 10-K. You can also obtain copies of these reports by contacting Investor Relations at (503) 641-4141.
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Saturday nearest March 31. Accordingly, our fiscal 2011 reporting period consisted of a 52-week period ending on April 2, 2011, our fiscal 2010 consisted of a 53-week period ending on April 3, 2010 and our fiscal 2009 reporting period consisted of a 52-week period ending on March 28, 2009. All references to years or quarters relate to fiscal years or fiscal quarters unless otherwise noted.
Business Overview
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (ESI) is a leading supplier of innovative laser-based manufacturing solutions for the microtechnology industry. Our advanced laser systems enable precise structuring and testing of micron to submicron features in components and devices which are used in a wide variety of end products in the consumer electronics, computer, communications and other industries. These features enable our customers to achieve functionality, or improve yield and productivity in their manufacturing processes that can be critical to their profitability. Founded in 1944, ESI is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, with global operations and subsidiaries in Asia, Canada, Europe and the United States.
Our advanced laser microengineering systems allow semiconductor, microelectronics, and other microtechnology manufacturers to physically alter select device features during high-volume production in order to increase performance and improve production yields. Laser microengineering comprises a set of precise micron-level processes, including advanced micromachining, via drilling, wafer scribing and dicing, material ablation, semiconductor memory-link cutting, electronic device trimming, and nano-level structuring to alter material characteristics such as color and texture. These processes require application-specific laser systems able to meet our customers’ exacting performance and productivity requirements. Our laser-based systems improve production yields or enable improved performance for semiconductor devices, flexible interconnect material, high-density interconnect (HDI) circuits, advanced semiconductor packaging, light emitting diodes (LEDs), flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and other high value components.
Additionally, we produce high-capacity test and optical inspection equipment that is critical to the quality control process during the production of multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs). Our equipment ensures that each component meets the electrical, physical and optical tolerances required to perform properly.
1
Industry Overview
The microelectronics and semiconductor industries continue to be driven by demand for advanced features and improved functionality in increasingly smaller and smarter consumer devices. The technologies for consumer-oriented electronics such as smart phones, tablets, personal computers, mobile computing devices, video games and high-definition televisions have developed rapidly as increasingly affordable products have been introduced that offer more functionality in smaller form factors. In addition, semiconductor and other advanced technologies are being used in a broadening set of markets and applications, including automotive, solar, medical and security.
These dynamics in turn are driving the need for faster, smaller, more complex, less expensive and higher-quality electronic devices and components. To achieve these performance, size and cost improvements, component and other device manufacturers are increasing the circuit densities in these devices and investing in new technologies.
For example, smaller and lighter semiconductor devices are driving the need to shrink the physical dimensions of the semiconductor packaging and the HDI circuit board on which they are mounted. Higher operating speeds of computers and communication products require more input and output channels within these packages and between the packages and the HDI circuit board. These trends require smaller, more accurate, and precisely tapered or shaped holes, known as vias, to create connections between layers and interconnecting devices.
The ability to shrink the dimensions of a device is becoming increasingly more difficult, and producers are investing in new technologies, such as stacking thin silicon wafers into advanced three dimensional (3D) chip packages. We believe this trend will drive additional applications for laser processing, including scribing and dicing of ultra-thin wafers and drilling of through silicon vias (TSV).
In addition, smaller and more compact consumer electronics are driving the need for increased flexible interconnect between printed circuit boards (PCBs) and other components. These flexible circuits require more accurate and smaller vias to create the connections between these devices.
As micro-electronics manufacturers work in smaller dimensions and more complex architectures, machine vision has emerged as a critical technology. Machine vision allows manufacturers to achieve increased equipment speed with fewer errors. This technology is integral to many applications and is utilized extensively for alignment and inspection within our systems.
In addition, as consumer devices become smaller and more complex, more capacitance is required to be designed into the circuit. This has resulted in a significant increase in the use of smaller, higher-capacitance passive components such as MLCCs. In calendar year 2010, estimated production of MLCCs was over 2 trillion units. These MLCCs must be tested electrically and optically to characterize performance and ensure reliability. Automated equipment to test these MLCCs in the manufacturing environment, like our high capacitance tester, can test and sort up to 750,000 parts per hour.
Variations of advanced semiconductor technologies and manufacturing processes are increasingly being employed in the production of other types of devices and components, including LEDs. For example, automated, laser-based systems, like our AccuScribe 2210 series, are used to scribe the sapphire wafer to separate individual devices in the production of LEDs. LEDs are increasingly utilized in electronics, display, automotive and general lighting applications.
A growing portion of our business is derived from specialized microengineering applications. Any material that can be cut, drilled, etched, or otherwise surface treated using a mechanical process can be micromachined with greater precision and accuracy using a laser-based solution. As the form factors of consumer electronics and
2
other products or devices become more compact, mechanical processes will not be able to meet the stringent specifications demanded by producers. We believe the capabilities of laser-based solutions for microengineering will enable our customers to move beyond the limitations of mechanical processes and generate significant growth for us in the future.
Our Solutions
We believe our products address the needs of semiconductor and microelectronics manufacturers by providing them with a high return on their investment due to measurable production benefits such as improved yield, increased throughput, higher performance, continued miniaturization and greater reliability.
Our core competencies enable us to design, manufacture, and market a variety of laser-based, integrated solutions for microengineering applications in high-volume manufacturing environments. These core competencies include a deep understanding of laser/material interaction, laser beam positioning, optics and illumination including image processing and optical character recognition, high-speed motion control, small parts handling and systems engineering. We combine this technology expertise with a thorough understanding of our customers’ processes and objectives to develop integrated solutions and products that address multiple markets and applications.
Our customers manufacture semiconductors, components, interconnect/packaging devices, LEDs or other parts that serve a wide range of electronic applications. Our systems enable the manufacturing of these components and devices. The largest end-market applications for our customers are consumer electronics, computers and mobile devices.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to leverage our core competencies to be a market leader across multiple new and existing markets and applications. These core competencies, combined with an understanding of our customers’ processes and the use of common platforms, enable us to address a broad range of laser-based microengineering applications and end markets. We intend to focus our efforts on businesses and applications where our differentiated capability enables us to be a market leader. The elements of our strategy are to gain share in our established markets and expand our addressable markets by entering adjacent applications within existing markets or by extending existing applications or technologies into adjacent markets. We will continue to invest in research and development to maintain our market leadership and increase the value of our products to global customers.
Gain share in existing markets
We intend to leverage our core competencies and existing technologies to grow our overall market position by serving manufacturers in semiconductor, advanced semiconductor packaging, flexible circuits, LED and passive components industries– all markets in which we currently maintain a leadership position. We intend to maintain and grow our leadership position by developing new products that have higher performance, throughput and reliability, thereby lowering the effective cost of ownership to our customers.
Expand our addressable markets
We plan to leverage our core competencies, customer collaboration, solutions expertise and common platforms to expand our addressable markets by entering into adjacent applications such as scribing, dicing, advanced micromachining and optical inspection of different types of materials and devices within our existing markets. In addition, we believe there are opportunities to extend these same types of applications to enable better performance or yield improvement of devices or components used in adjacent end markets such as solar, medical, industrial and security. We intend to expand our addressable markets through both internal and external business development.
3
Invest in research and development to maintain our technological leadership
We intend to further develop our technological leadership by maintaining a significant level of investment in research and development. Our key technological capabilities include laser/material interaction, laser beam positioning, optics and illumination, including image processing and optical character recognition, high-speed motion control systems, small parts handling systems and systems integration. We consider our continuing ability to develop intellectual property to be an important component of our future success.
Increase the value of our products to global customers
We are focused on improving our customers’ yield, throughput and productivity by utilizing our technology, global infrastructure, customer service and ability to integrate multiple technologies. We work with our market-leading, global customers through high-level, multi-disciplinary management and employee teams to define and produce the next generation of manufacturing systems. This requires confidential interaction between the customer and ESI, sharing technology and product roadmaps often looking out over a three- to five-year period. Embracing the industry trend toward globalization has enabled us to elevate our presence in key world markets, particularly in the Asia-Pacific market.
Our Products
We operate within one segment, high-technology manufacturing equipment, which is comprised of products grouped according to our three key target markets: semiconductor, interconnect/ micromachining and components.
Semiconductor Group (SG)
Our Semiconductor Group products address multiple applications that utilize laser energy to process materials on wafer based substrates. This includes traditional silicon wafers, LED wafers, and new ultrathin silicon wafers used in the 3D packaging applications.
Semiconductor Memory Yield Improvement Systems
Our semiconductor memory yield improvement products are designed to cost-effectively meet the production challenges faced by semiconductor manufacturers, including shrinking circuit sizes, material changes and increasing numbers of memory devices per wafer. As circuit densities in semiconductor memory devices such as dynamic random access memory (DRAM) have increased, manufacturers have built redundant cells into their memory designs and connected them with small electrical links on the device surface. During the manufacturing process, wafers with billions of individual memory cells are tested to identify defective cells. Our laser systems are then used to cut links that reprogram the device by disconnecting the paths to defective portions of the memory device and replacing them with functional redundant cells. This process enables significant post-repair yield improvements that are essential to our customers’ profitability.
Our semiconductor memory yield equipment is primarily used in the manufacture of DRAM memory devices.
Our 98XX series systems are designed specifically for the 300mm wafer processing market but can also handle 200mm wafers. Our systems can be configured for multiple wavelengths including infrared, green and ultraviolet (UV). With the introduction of our 9850TPIR+ Dual-Beam, Tailored-Pulse Laser Link-Processing system, we offer unmatched flexibility in processing complex, next generation fuse designs and materials. In addition, our dual-beam architecture provides significant throughput advantages compared to a single-beam repair tool. These high performance systems deliver increased manufacturing productivity, while minimizing capital requirements.
4
Ultra-Thin Silicon Wafer Processing
The advent of three-dimensional (3D) chip packaging technologies is driving the need for silicon wafers to become thinner in order to allow for stacking of wafers within the same packaging geometry. As wafers become thinner, they become more challenging to cut into discrete chips using traditional mechanical saws. Our new model 9900, introduced in fiscal 2011, uses a laser to dice ultra-thin silicon wafers, those with a thickness of 50 microns or below. The model 9900 also enables 3D packaging through its ability to process through-silicon vias that are key to electrically connecting the stacked wafers.
Thin Film Trimming
Our model 2100 thin-film-on-silicon trimming system enables manufacturers to improve the precision of the components they produce by trimming performance parameters to specific values for precision analog devices. It employs a unique prober-independent architecture and patented 1.3-micron wavelength process to deliver superior throughput and yield.
LED Wafer Scribing
Our AccuScribe line of sapphire wafer scribing systems is a key component in the manufacture of LEDs. During production, LEDs are created on a thin wafer of synthetic sapphire crystal that must be broken into individual units at the end of the process. The brittle nature of the sapphire wafer requires that it be carefully cut in order to prevent unwanted fractures and yield losses when the wafer is broken apart into discrete LEDs. The AccuScribe systems use a laser to scribe the wafer with a precise groove between individual LEDs. When mechanical force is applied to the wafer, it fractures along these grooves and allows the wafer to be split apart into discrete LEDs which results in higher production yields.
As requirements for the light output of LEDs increase, driven by high-bright backlit displays and general illumination, the challenges to scribe the wafer without damaging the device and impacting the light output become more difficult. We are investing in technologies that we believe will enable the scribing of these devices without impacting light output and will be capable of scribing the most advanced designs for general illumination applications.
LCD Repair
Our laser LCD repair systems are critical to improving yields in the manufacture of flat panel displays. For example, during production, individual pixels of a display may develop electrical defects that result in no light emission or the emission of only a steady white light. To correct these defects, flat panel display producers employ a laser repair process to isolate the electrical defects during production by cutting the inputs to the pixel. Our laser systems are primarily sold to the manufacturers of LCD repair tools as a key component of their products.
Interconnect/ Micromachining Group (IMG)
Our Interconnect/ Micromachining Group products address an expanding set of applications and materials on a broad set of substrates, including panels, continuous-feed reels, and three dimensional components or devices.
Interconnect Via Drilling
For electrical interconnect applications, our laser microvia engineering systems target applications that require the highest accuracy and smallest via (hole) dimensions to create electrical connections between layers in high-density circuit boards, flexible circuits and IC packages. Our microvia drilling technology addresses the rapidly changing applications in IC packages, multichip modules and HDI circuit boards. Our UV laser
5
processing systems employ state-of-the-art technology in lasers, optics and motion control. Our products include single-beam and multi-beam systems that produce high-quality vias with the best-in-class placement accuracy for improved yield of packages and substrates.
Advanced Micromachining
In addition, our systems can be configured with a variety of lasers and material handling devices that make them ideal for other advanced laser-based micromachining applications. As technologies enable shrinking sizes and the form factors of consumer electronics and other devices become more compact, mechanical processes are not able to meet the stringent specifications demanded by manufacturers. We offer several platforms that enable customers to perform precision drilling, scribing, etching, routing or nano-structuring in many different types of materials and devices including glass, metal, plastic, paint and ceramics. The processed material or device is used in many different end markets including microelectronics, computer, medical, energy and display. Our model ML5900 is a particularly versatile platform optimized for industrial production and includes integrated inspection and a rotary stage for parallel processing of devices. We also offer laser ablation systems that ablate material for identification and analysis applications, including forensics, mineral analysis and research. We believe the capabilities of laser-based solutions for micromachining will enable our customers to move beyond the limitations of mechanical processes.
In September 2010, we acquired PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc., a manufacturer of tailored-pulse fiber lasers. These lasers are used extensively in our memory repair systems. We believe this laser technology can also be utilized in solar and other micromachining applications.
Components Group (CG)
We design and manufacture products that combine high-speed small parts handling technology with real-time control systems to provide highly automated, cost-effective solutions for manufacturers of MLCCs and other passive components such as capacitor arrays, inductors, resistors, varistors and hybrid circuits. These components, produced in quantities of trillions of units per year, process analog, digital and high-frequency signals and are used extensively in nearly all electronic products.
We provide several types of products and solutions in this market. Our MLCC test systems employ high-speed handling and positioning techniques to precisely load, test and sort MLCCs based on their electrical energy storage capacity, or capacitance, and their electrical energy leakage, or dissipation factor. Our 35XX series is the most productive tester in the market today and continues to gain acceptance with major MLCC manufacturers that have traditionally developed and used their own in-house systems. Our optical inspection systems perform six-sided automated inspection of MLCCs and arrays for dimensional criteria and defects. Circuit fine-tuning systems are application-specific laser systems that adjust the electrical performance of a hybrid circuit, or that adjust an electronic assembly containing many circuits, by removing a precise amount of material from one or more circuit components. Finally, we produce consumable products such as carrier plates and termination belts, both of which are used to hold MLCCs during the manufacturing and testing process.
We are applying our proprietary handling technologies used for MLCC test to develop new products to perform high speed optical and visual test of packaged LEDs. Packaged LEDs are sorted by light output and color to enable the manufacturer to optimize price and color matching of the devices. We believe our technologies will provide superior yield and throughput from existing tools.
Customers
Our top ten customers for 2011, 2010 and 2009 accounted for approximately 62%, 56% and 50% of total net sales, respectively. One customer, Apple Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 24%, 30% and 21% of total net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Two other customers, Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd., each individually accounted for approximately 11% of total net sales in 2011. No other customer individually accounted for more than 10% of total net sales in 2011, 2010 or 2009.
6
See Note 23 “Product and Geographical Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for our net sales by geographic area.
Sales, Marketing and Service
We sell our products worldwide through direct sales and service offices, value-added resellers and independent representatives located around the world. ESI has direct sales and service personnel in Oregon, California and several other states; China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan in Asia; and France, Germany and the United Kingdom in Europe. We serve selected customers in the Americas, Europe, Israel and additional countries through manufacturers’ representatives.
We have a substantial base of installed products in use by leading worldwide semiconductor and microelectronics manufacturers. We emphasize strong working relationships with these customers to meet their needs for additional systems and to facilitate the successful development and sale of new products to these customers.
We generally employ service personnel wherever we have a significant installed base. We offer a variety of warranty, maintenance and parts replacement programs to service the requirements of a high-volume manufacturing environment.
Backlog
Backlog consists of purchase orders for products and spare parts that we expect to ship within 12 months and service contracts for performance generally within 24 months. Backlog does not include deferred system revenue. Backlog was $65.5 million at April 2, 2011 compared to $40.6 million at April 3, 2010, representing an increase of 61% driven by higher demand. The stated backlog is not necessarily indicative of sales for any future period, whether as a result of order cancellations or deferrals, shipping or acceptance delays, nor does backlog represent any assurance that we will realize a profit from filling the orders.
Research, Development and Technology
We believe that our ability to compete effectively depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and expand our expertise in core technologies and product applications. The primary emphasis of our research and development is to advance our capabilities in:
| | • | | lasers and laser/material interaction; |
| | • | | high-speed, micron-level motion control systems; |
| | • | | image processing and optical character recognition; |
| | • | | high-speed, small parts handling; |
| | • | | real-time production-line electronic measurement; |
| | • | | real-time operating systems; and |
Our research and development expenditures for 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $41.1 million (16% of net sales), $33.6 million (23% of net sales) and $38.2 million (24% of net sales), respectively.
7
Competition
Our markets are dynamic, cyclical and highly competitive. The principal competitive factors in our markets are product performance, cost of ownership, ease of use, reliability, service, technical support, a product improvement path, price, established relationships with customers, product familiarity and proprietary technology. We believe that our products compete favorably with respect to these factors. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering and manufacturing resources and larger distribution networks than we do. Some of our customers develop, or have the ability to develop, manufacturing equipment similar to our products. Competition in our markets may intensify and our technological advantages may be reduced or lost as a result of technological advances by competitors or customers or changes in electronic device processing technology.
The principal competitor for our Semiconductor Group is GSI Group Inc. Competitors for LED scribing include Disco Corporation, JP Sercel Associates, Inc. and Laser Solutions, Inc. LCD repair competitors include Quantel USA, Inc. and Hoya Corporation. Our Interconnect/ Micromachining Group competes with laser systems provided by Hitachi Via Mechanics, Ltd., LPKF Laser & Electronics AG, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and several local Chinese and Korean competitors. For the Components Group, our competitors include Daiichi Jitsugyo Co., Ltd., GSI Group Inc., Humo Laboratory, Ltd. and Tokyo Weld Co., Ltd. as well as component manufacturers that develop systems for internal use.
Manufacturing and Supply
Our primary production facilities are located in Portland, Oregon; Klamath Falls, Oregon; Fremont, California and Singapore. The Portland facility manufactures our SG products and the Klamath Falls facility manufactures CG consumable products. The Fremont facility manufactures our LED and laser ablation products. The Singapore facility manufactures certain IMG and CG systems. Our system manufacturing facilities are located in leased facilities in Singapore. As we move forward with efforts to streamline the organization and improve efficiencies, we expect a growing percentage of final systems will be shipped from Singapore.
We use qualified manufacturers to supply many components and sub-system modules for our products. Our systems use high-performance computers, peripherals, lasers and other components from various suppliers. Some of the components we use are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. An interruption in the supply of a particular component would have a temporary adverse impact on us. We believe our relationships with our suppliers are good.
Patents and Other Intellectual Property
We have a policy of seeking patents, when appropriate, on inventions relating to new products and improvements that are discovered or developed as part of our ongoing research, development and manufacturing activities. We own 175 United States patents and 366 patents issued outside of the United States as of April 2, 2011. Additionally, as of April 2, 2011, we had 115 patent applications pending in the United States and 609 patent applications pending outside of the United States. Although our patents are important, we believe that the success of our business also depends on the technical competence and innovation of our employees.
We rely on copyright protection for our proprietary software. We also rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, and we may be unable to meaningfully protect our trade secrets.
Employees
As of April 2, 2011, we employed 648 people. Many of our employees are highly skilled, and our success will depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain such employees, who are in great demand. We have never had a work stoppage or strike, and no employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good.
8
Environmental Compliance
During fiscal 2011, we achieved ISO 14001 certification for our environmental management system for our Portland, Oregon operations. We do not expect compliance with international, federal, state and local provisions that have been enacted or adopted related to the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to protection of the environment, to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
The statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation statements containing the words “believes,” “expects” and similar words, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. From time to time, we may make other forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to an inherent risk that actual results may differ materially. The following information highlights some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. Factors that may result in such variances include, but are not limited to, the following:
Risks Related to Our Competition and Customers
Volatility of Our Customers’ Industries
Our business is dependent upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers of microelectronics, semiconductors and LEDs used in consumer electronics, computers, wireless communications and other electronic products. The capital equipment market for semiconductor, microelectronics and consumer electronics manufacturers has historically been characterized by sudden and severe cyclical variations in product supply and demand due to a number of factors including capacity utilization, demand for customers’ products, inventory levels relative to demand and access to affordable capital. The timing, severity and duration of these market cycles are difficult or impossible to predict. As a result, business levels can vary significantly from quarter to quarter or year to year. Significant downturns in the market for semiconductor and microelectronics used in electronic devices or in the market for consumer electronics reduce demand for our products and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. For example, the economic slowdown that began in 2008 resulted in a decrease in orders for all of our product groups for each quarter throughout 2009, with virtually no orders for our memory repair systems throughout 2010. Additionally, some of our customers’ ability to access credit was adversely affected, limiting their ability to purchase our products. The degree of the impact of any downturn on our business depends on a number of factors, including: the strength and continuity of recovery in the US economy where many of the products produced by our customers are sold and the global economy in general; access to capital; the stability of financial systems; and the overall health of the semiconductor, microelectronics, LED and consumer electronics industries.
Highly Competitive Markets
We face substantial competition from established competitors throughout the world, some of which have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. Those competitors with greater resources may, in addition to other things, be able to better withstand periodic downturns, compete more effectively on the basis of price and technology, or more quickly develop enhancements to, and new generations of, products that compete with the products we manufacture and market. New companies may enter the markets in which we compete, or industry consolidation may occur, further increasing competition in those markets. We believe that to be competitive we must continue to expend significant financial resources in order to, among other things, invest in new product development and enhancements. We may not be able to compete successfully in the future and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share.
9
Increased Price Pressure
We have experienced and continue to experience price pressure in the sale of our products, from both competitors and customers. Pricing pressures typically have become more intense during cyclical downturns when competitors seek to maintain or increase market share, reduce inventory or introduce more technologically advanced products. In addition, we may agree to pricing concessions with our customers in connection with volume orders. Our business, financial condition, margins or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by competitive pressure and intense price-based competition.
Revenues are Largely Dependent on Few Customers
We depend on a few significant customers for a large portion of our revenues. In 2011, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 62% of total net sales, with one customer accounting for approximately 24% of total net sales. We anticipate that sales of our products to a relatively small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues. Consolidation between customers, changes in various partnership and technology arrangements between customers, customer bankruptcies or customer departures from their respective industries all may result in even fewer customers accounting for a high percentage of our revenue. Furthermore, none of our customers have any long-term obligation to continue to buy our products or services and may, therefore delay, reduce or cease ordering our products or services at any time. The cancellation, reduction or deferral of purchases of our products by even a single customer could significantly reduce our revenues in any particular quarter. If we were to lose any of our significant customers or suffer a material reduction in their purchase orders, revenue could decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Revenues are Largely Based on the Sale of a Small Number of Product Units
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of a relatively small number of products. Accordingly, our revenues, margins and other operating results could fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon a variety of factors in addition to those described above, including:
| | • | | changes in the timing and terms of product orders by our customers; |
| | • | | changes in the mix of products and services that we sell; |
| | • | | timing and market acceptance of our new product introductions; and |
| | • | | delays or problems in the planned introduction of new products, or in the performance of any such products following delivery to customers. |
As a result of these risks, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating results may not be meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance.
Risks Related to Our Supply Chain and Production
Variability of Production Capacity
To meet rapidly changing demand in the industries we serve, we must effectively manage our resources and production capacity. During periods of decreasing demand for our products, we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with prevailing market conditions and effectively manage our supply chain. Our ability to rapidly and effectively reduce our cost structure in response to such downturns is limited by the fixed nature of many of our expenses in the near term and by our need to continue our investment in next-generation product technology and to support and service our products. Conversely, when upturns occur in the markets we serve, we may have difficulty rapidly and effectively increasing our manufacturing capacity or procuring sufficient materials to meet sudden increases in customer demand that could result in the loss of business to our
10
competitors and harm to our relationships with our customers. If we are not able to timely and appropriately adapt to changes in our business environment, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Problems with Critical Suppliers
We use a wide range of components from numerous suppliers in the manufacture of our products, including custom electronic, laser, optical and mechanical components. We generally do not have guaranteed supply arrangements with our suppliers. We seek to reduce the risk of production and service interruptions and shortages of key parts by selecting and qualifying alternative suppliers for key parts, monitoring the financial stability of key suppliers and maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts. Although we make reasonable efforts to ensure that parts are available from multiple suppliers, some key parts are available only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers in the short term. In addition, some of the lasers we use in our products are difficult to manufacture, and as a result we may not receive an adequate supply of lasers in a timely fashion to fill orders. Operations at our suppliers’ facilities are subject to disruption or discontinuation for a variety of reasons, including changes in business relationships, competitive factors, financial difficulties, work stoppages, fire, natural disasters or other causes. Any such disruption or discontinuation to our suppliers’ operations could interrupt or reduce our manufacturing activities and delay delivery of our products, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, when markets recover from the recent economic downturn, there is a heightened risk that one or more of our suppliers may not be able to meet increased demand requirements, adversely impacting our ability to fulfill orders and win business with our customers.
Problems with Contract Manufacturers
We have arrangements with contract manufacturers to complete the manufacturing of certain of our products or product subcomponents. Any significant interruption in our contract manufacturers’ ability to provide manufacturing services to us as a result of contractual disputes with us or another party, labor disruptions, financial difficulties, natural disasters, delay or interruption in the receipt of inventory, customer prioritization or other causes could result in reduced manufacturing capabilities or delayed deliveries for certain of our products, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Charges for Excess or Obsolete Inventory
One factor on which we compete is the ability to ship products on schedules required by customers. In order to facilitate timely shipping, management forecasts demand, both in type and amount of products, and these forecasts are used to determine inventory to be purchased. We also order materials based on our technology roadmap, which represents management’s assessment of technology that will be utilized in new products that we develop. Certain types of inventory, including lasers and optical equipment, are particularly expensive and may only be used in the production of a single type of product. If actual demand is lower than forecast with respect to the type or amount of products actually ordered, or both, our inventory levels may increase. As a result, there is a risk that we may have to incur material accounting charges for excess and obsolete inventory if inventory cannot be used, which would negatively affect our financial results. Also, if we alter our technology or product development strategy, we may have inventory that may not be usable under the new strategy, which may also result in material accounting charges. For example, during 2009, we wrote-off $4.1 million of material from a research, development and engineering program due to a change in our product development strategy.
11
Risks Related to Our Organization
Operating a Global Business
International shipments accounted for 93% of net sales in 2011, with 89% of our net sales to customers in Asia. We expect that international shipments will continue to represent a significant percentage of net sales in the future. We also have significant foreign operations, including a Singapore manufacturing facility, research and development facilities in Taiwan and China, and sales and service offices in various countries. Under our globalization strategy, we intend to increase our foreign operations in the future. Our non-U.S. sales, purchases and operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, many of which are outside our control, including the following:
| | • | | periodic local or geographic economic downturns and unstable political conditions; |
| | • | | price and currency exchange controls; |
| | • | | fluctuation in the relative values of currencies; |
| | • | | difficulty in repatriating money, whether as a result of tax laws or otherwise; |
| | • | | difficulties protecting intellectual property; |
| | • | | compliance with labor laws and other laws governing employees; |
| | • | | shipping delays and disruptions; |
| | • | | unexpected changes in trading policies, regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers; and |
| | • | | difficulties in managing a global enterprise, including staffing, collecting accounts receivable, and managing suppliers, distributors and representatives. |
Our business and operating results could also be impacted, directly or indirectly, by natural disasters, outbreaks of infectious disease, military action, international conflicts, terrorist activities, civil unrest and associated political instability. Many of our facilities, including our Portland, Oregon headquarters are in areas with known earthquake risk. Any such events or circumstances may also result in heightened security concerns with respect to domestic and international travel and commerce, which may further affect our business and operating results. In particular, due to these uncertainties, we are subject to the following additional risks:
| | • | | future tightening of immigration controls may adversely affect the residence status of non-U.S. engineers and other key technical employees in our U.S. facilities or our ability to hire new non-U.S. employees in such facilities; |
| | • | | more frequent instances of shipping delays; |
| | • | | demand for our products may not increase or may decrease; and |
| | • | | our customers or suppliers may experience financial difficulties or cease operations. |
Implementation and Modification of Globalization Strategy
We are implementing our globalization strategy in which we are moving certain operational resources and capabilities to different countries in Asia to be closer to many of our significant customers and to reduce costs. We believe this strategy will enhance customer relationships, improve our responsiveness, and reduce our manufacturing costs for certain products. We opened a manufacturing facility in Singapore in the fourth quarter of 2010 for certain IMG and CG products.
12
Our globalization strategy is subject to a variety of complexities and risks, many of which we have little experience managing, and which may divert a substantial amount of management’s time. These risks include:
| | • | | challenges in designing new facilities that can be scaled for future expansion, replicating current processes and bringing new facilities up to full operation; |
| | • | | unpredictable costs, redundancy costs and cost overruns for developing new facilities and acquiring equipment; |
| | • | | building local management teams, technical personnel and other staff for functions that we have not previously conducted outside of the United States; |
| | • | | technical obstacles such as poor production or process yield and loss of quality control during the ramp of a new facility; |
| | • | | re-qualifications and other procedures that may be required by our customers; |
| | • | | our ability to bring up local suppliers to meet our quality and cycle-time needs; |
| | • | | our ability to reduce costs in the United States as we add costs in Asia; |
| | • | | rapidly changing business conditions that may require plans to be changed or abandoned before they are fully implemented; and |
| | • | | challenges posed by distance and by differences in language and culture. |
These and other factors could delay the development and implementation of our strategy, as well as impair our gross margins, delay shipments and deliveries, cause us to lose sales, require us to write off investments already made, damage our reputation and harm our business, financial condition and operating results. If we decide to change our current global regionalization strategy, we may incur charges for certain costs incurred.
Acquisitions and Divestitures
We may make acquisitions of, or significant investments in, other businesses with complementary products, services or technologies, such as our September 2010 acquisition of certain assets of PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, many of which are unpredictable and beyond our control, including:
| | • | | difficulties and increased costs in connection with integration of the personnel, operations, technologies and products of the merged businesses; |
| | • | | implementation of our enterprise resource planning (ERP) system into the acquired company’s operations; |
| | • | | diversion of management’s attention from other operational matters; |
| | • | | the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company; |
| | • | | lack of synergy or inability to realize expected synergies resulting from the acquisition; |
| | • | | acquired assets becoming impaired as a result of technological advancements or worse-than-expected performance by the acquired company; |
| | • | | difficulties establishing satisfactory internal controls at the acquired company; |
| | • | | risks and uncertainties relating to the performance of the combined company following the transaction; and |
| | • | | acquiring unanticipated liabilities for which we will not be indemnified. |
Furthermore, the accounting for an acquisition could result in significant charges resulting from amortization or write-off of intangible assets we acquire. Our inability to effectively manage these risks could
13
result in our inability to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition on a timely basis, or at all, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, all acquisition transaction costs must be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The means by which we finance an acquisition may also significantly affect our business or the value of the shares of our common stock. If we issue common stock to pay for an acquisition, the ownership percentage of our existing shareholders will be diluted and the value of the shares held by our existing shareholders could be reduced. If we use cash on hand to pay for an acquisition, the payment could significantly reduce the cash that would be available to fund our operations or to use for other purposes. If we borrow funds in connection with an acquisition, we would be required to use cash to service the debt and to comply with financial and other covenants.
We may from time to time also make strategic investments in development stage companies. Investments in development stage companies are subject to a high degree of risk. We cannot assure you that we will not lose all or a portion of our investment in any such company.
Hiring and Retention of Personnel
Our continued success depends in part upon the services of our key managerial, financial and technical personnel. The loss of key personnel, or our inability to attract, assimilate and retain qualified personnel, could result in the loss of customers, inhibit our ability to operate and grow our business and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We have previously had to, and may in the future have to, impose salary reductions on employees during economic downturns in an effort to maintain our financial position. These actions may have an adverse effect on employee loyalty and may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain key personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the industries in which we compete is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. We may incur significant costs in our efforts to recruit and retain key personnel, which could affect our financial position and results of operations.
Risks Related to Technology
Markets Characterized by Rapid Technological Change
The markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change and innovation, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. Our future performance will depend on the successful development, introduction and market acceptance of new and enhanced products that address technological changes and the requirements of current and potential customers. The development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process, requiring high levels of innovation and highly skilled engineering and development personnel, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify, develop, manufacture, market or support new or enhanced products successfully, if at all, or on a timely basis. The introduction by us or by our competitors of new or enhanced products, or alternative technologies, may cause our customers to defer, change or cancel orders for our existing products or cease purchasing our products altogether. For example, for many years the semiconductor memory industry has explored alternative redundancy technologies such as electrical redundancy technology. If our customers were to achieve sufficient yield improvement with one of these technologies, and adopt it into their manufacturing process, there would be a material adverse effect on the size of the addressable market of our memory yield improvement systems. Further, we cannot assure that our new products will gain market acceptance or that we will be able to respond effectively to product announcements by competitors, technology changes or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to develop new or enhanced products to address product or technology changes or new industry standards on a timely basis or at all, or if our new or enhanced products are not accepted by the market, or if our customers adopt alternative technologies, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
14
Need to Invest in Research and Development
Our industry is characterized by the need for continued investment in research and development. Because of intense competition in the industries in which we compete, if we were to fail to invest sufficiently in research and development, our products could become less attractive to our current and potential customers or obsolete, and our business and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. As a result of our need to maintain our spending levels in this area, our operating results could be materially harmed if our net sales decline. In addition, as a result of our emphasis on research and development and technological innovation, our operating costs may increase in the future, and research and development expenses may increase as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of net sales.
Products are Highly Complex
Our products are highly complex, and our extensive product development, manufacturing and testing processes may not be adequate to detect all defects, errors, failures and quality issues that could impact customer satisfaction or result in claims against us. As a result, we may have to replace certain components or provide remediation in response to the discovery of defects in products after they are shipped. The occurrence of any defects, errors, failures or quality issues could result in cancellation of orders, product returns, diversion of our resources, legal actions by our customers and other losses to us or to our customers. These occurrences could also result in the loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our products, loss of sales and increased expenses and warranty costs, which would harm our business and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Risks Related to Legal Matters
Protection of Proprietary Rights – Generally
Our success depends significantly upon the protection of our proprietary rights. We attempt to protect our proprietary rights through patents, copyrights, trademarks, maintenance of trade secrets and other measures, including entering into confidentiality agreements. We incur substantial costs to obtain and maintain patents and to defend our intellectual property rights. For example, we initiated litigation against All Ring Tech Co., Ltd. in Taiwan in August 2005 alleging that certain of our patent rights had been violated. We rely upon the laws of the United States and foreign countries where we develop, manufacture or sell our products to protect our proprietary rights. We may not be successful in protecting these proprietary rights, these rights may not provide the competitive advantages that we expect, or other parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent these rights.
Protection of Proprietary Rights – Foreign Jurisdictions
Our efforts to protect our intellectual property may be less effective in some foreign countries where intellectual property rights are not as well protected as in the United States. Many United States companies have encountered substantial problems in protecting their proprietary rights against infringement in foreign countries. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property in these countries, it could be easier for our competitors to sell competing products in foreign countries, which could result in reduced sales and gross margins.
Intellectual Property Infringement Claims
Several of our competitors hold patents covering a variety of technologies, applications and methods of use similar to some of those used in our products. While we attempt in our designs to avoid patent infringement, from time to time we and our customers have received correspondence from our competitors claiming that some of our products, as used by our customers, may be infringing one or more of these patents. Competitors or others have in the past and may in the future assert infringement claims against our customers or us with respect to current or future products or uses, and these assertions may result in costly litigation or require us to obtain a license to use intellectual property rights of others. If claims of infringement are asserted against our customers, those customers may seek indemnification from us for damages or expenses they incur.
15
If we become subject to infringement claims, we will evaluate our position and consider the available alternatives, which may include seeking licenses to use the technology in question or defending our position. These licenses, however, may not be available on satisfactory terms or at all. If we are not able to negotiate the necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms or successfully defend our position, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Tax Audits and Changes in Tax Law
We are periodically under audit by United States and foreign tax authorities and may have exposure to additional tax liabilities as a result. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income and other tax liabilities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits and the impact of changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws could result in material differences from what is reflected in historical income tax accruals. If additional taxes are assessed as a result of an examination, a material effect on our financial results, tax positions or cash flows could occur in the period or periods in which the determination is made.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings, including breach of contract and claims that involve possible infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights of third parties. It is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of litigation matters, and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in any litigation. For example, in December 2010, an arbitrator ruled that James Dooley, our former Chief Executive Officer, is entitled to severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. Although we are contesting this decision, we recorded approximately $1.4 million in legal settlement costs in 2011. Any litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of management’s attention, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in loss of our property rights, subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses from others or prevent us from manufacturing or selling our products, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Provisions Restricting Our Acquisition
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has also adopted a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” which would significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer. In addition, the Oregon Control Share Act and the Oregon Business Combination Act limit the ability of parties who acquire a significant amount of voting stock to exercise control over us. These provisions may have the effect of lengthening the time required for a person to acquire control of us through a proxy contest or the election of a majority of our Board of Directors, and may deter efforts to obtain control of us and may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by our shareholders.
Risks Related to Financial Matters
Unfavorable Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our sales and results of operations and we could experience losses with respect to forward exchange contracts into which we may enter. Unfavorable currency fluctuations could require us to increase prices to foreign customers, which could result in lower net sales by us to those customers. Alternatively, if we do not adjust the prices for our products in response to unfavorable currency fluctuations, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, some of our foreign sales are denominated in the currency of the country in which these products are
16
sold and the currency we receive in payment for such sales could be less valuable at the time of receipt as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. From time to time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge the value of accounts receivable primarily denominated in Japanese yen and other currencies. However, we cannot be certain that our efforts will be adequate to protect us against significant currency fluctuations or that such efforts will not expose us to additional exchange rate risks, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Fluctuations in Effective Tax Rate
As a global company, we are subject to taxation in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation from one period to the next because the income tax rates for each year are a function of many factors, including: (a) taxable income levels and the effects of a mix of profits (losses) earned by ESI and our subsidiaries in numerous tax jurisdictions with a broad range of income tax rates; (b) our ability to utilize deferred tax assets; (c) taxes, refunds, interest or penalties resulting from tax audits; (d) the magnitude of various credits and deductions as a percentage of total taxable income; and (e) changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws. Changes in the mix of these items may cause our effective tax rate to fluctuate between periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Impairment of Intangible Assets
We held a total of $10.1 million in acquired intangible assets (See Note 11 “Acquired Intangible Assets”) and $4.0 million in goodwill (See Note 10 “Goodwill”) at April 2, 2011. We review our acquired intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually. If such an adverse event occurred and had the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates related to the fair value of our intangible assets or goodwill, an impairment charge could result. For example, during 2009, as a result of a decrease in our market capitalization, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $17.4 million to write off all existing goodwill. Any such impairment charges may have a material negative impact on our financial condition and operating results.
Stock Price Volatility
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated widely. During fiscal 2011, our stock price fluctuated between a high of $17.44 per share and a low of $10.46 per share. Consequently, the current market price of our common stock may not be indicative of future market prices, and we may be unable to sustain or increase the value of an investment in our common stock. Factors affecting our stock price, many of which our outside of our control, may include:
| | • | | variations in operating results from quarter to quarter; |
| | • | | changes in earnings estimates by analysts or our failure to meet analysts’ expectations; |
| | • | | changes in the market price per share of our public company customers; |
| | • | | market conditions in the semiconductor and other industries into which we sell products; |
| | • | | general economic conditions; |
| | • | | political changes, hostilities or natural disasters; |
| | • | | low trading volume of our common stock; |
| | • | | the number of analysts covering our common stock; and |
| | • | | the number of firms making a market in our common stock. |
In addition, the stock market has recently experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations have particularly affected the market prices of the securities of high-technology companies like ours. These market fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
17
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
Our executive and administrative headquarters, which houses our primary engineering and marketing functions as well as some of our Semiconductor Group (SG) manufacturing facilities, are located in a four-building complex with 250,800 square feet of space on 15 acres in Portland, Oregon. Additionally, our Components Group (CG) consumable products are manufactured at a 53,000 square foot plant on 31 acres in Klamath Falls, Oregon. We own all of these buildings. We believe the productive capacity of these facilities to be adequate and suitable for the requirements of our business for the foreseeable future.
Our primary system manufacturing facilities are located in leased facilities in Singapore. We lease approximately 26,000 square feet of facilities in Singapore where we manufacture certain Interconnect/ Micromachining Group (IMG) and CG products. We also lease approximately 65,000 square feet of facilities in Fremont, California that are used for New Wave Research operations and product manufacturing. Additionally, we lease other office and facility space in various locations throughout the United States and various foreign countries.
Legal Settlement
In 2009, James Dooley, former Chief Executive Officer, initiated arbitration against us seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. On December 10, 2010, the arbitrator ruled that, despite having pled guilty to violating federal securities laws by willfully and knowingly making false statements to the Company’s accountants, Dooley’s actions did not satisfy the definition of cause under his employment agreement. As a result, the arbitrator determined that Dooley is entitled to severance benefits under his employment agreement, plus interest from June 2005. This proceeding was subject to binding arbitration under the terms of the employment agreement. Accordingly, we recognized approximately $1.4 million in legal settlement costs in 2011. On December 27, 2010, we filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. On May 17, 2011, the court ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley. On May 19, 2011, we filed a motion for the court to admit into evidence certain testimony of Mr. Dooley, arguing that the court was in error in not admitting it in the proceeding, and asking the court to reconsider its ruling based on that evidence. On June 14, 2011, the court ruled in favor of admitting the testimony into evidence, but also reaffirmed its original ruling upholding the arbitrator’s award.
All Ring Patent Infringement Prosecution
In August 2005, we commenced a proceeding in the Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan (the Court) directed against All Ring Tech Co., Ltd. (All Ring) of Taiwan. We alleged that All Ring’s Capacitor Tester Model RK-T6600 (the Capacitor Tester) infringes ESI’s Taiwan Patent No. 207469, entitled “Circuit Component Handler” (the 207469 patent). As part of this proceeding, the Court issued a Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in August 2005, restricting the use of some of All Ring’s assets. All Ring then filed a bond with the Court to obtain relief from the attachment of its assets. In July 2007, the Court issued a second PAO and approximately $6.0 million was restricted in All Ring’s accounts. The second PAO remains in effect and cannot be revoked.
In October 2005, we filed a formal patent infringement action against All Ring in the Court. Also in October 2005, the Court executed a Preliminary Injunction Order (PIO) that prohibits All Ring from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or using the Capacitor Tester until final judgment is entered in the formal patent infringement action. The Court dismissed All Ring’s application to revoke the PIO on January 18, 2008, and the PIO remains in place.
18
Pursuant to the Court’s PAO and PIO, we were required to post Taiwan dollar security bonds with the Court. In July 2009, we established a letter of credit as a partial substitution for the security bonds and received back $2.0 million from the Court. The letter of credit is collateralized by $2.4 million of restricted cash. In September 2009, we established an additional letter of credit and received back the remaining $7.1 million of the security bonds. This second letter of credit is collateralized by $8.4 million of restricted cash. The total restricted cash balance of $10.8 million is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 2, 2011 as a current asset.
On June 3, 2011 the Court orally announced its judgment, finding that All Ring had infringed the 207469 patent, ordering All Ring to pay ESI approximately $24 million plus interest accrued from November 4, 2005 through the payment date at a rate of 5%, and enjoining All Ring from selling any system infringing the 207469 patent. The written judgment was issued on June 13, 2011. All Ring has publicly indicated that it intends to appeal this judgment. See Note 25 “Subsequent Events” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional information.
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various other legal matters, either asserted or unasserted, and investigations. In the opinion of management, ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
19
PART II
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Common Stock Prices and Dividends
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol ESIO. There were 606 shareholders of record as of June 6, 2011, and on that date there were 28,501,572 common shares outstanding. The closing price on June 6, 2011 was $16.14.
The following table shows the high and low closing prices for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market for the fiscal quarters indicated:
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2011 | | High | | | Low | |
Quarter 1 | | $ | 14.87 | | | $ | 11.96 | |
Quarter 2 | | | 13.42 | | | | 10.46 | |
Quarter 3 | | | 16.77 | | | | 10.69 | |
Quarter 4 | | | 17.44 | | | | 14.93 | |
Fiscal 2010 | | High | | | Low | |
Quarter 1 | | $ | 12.08 | | | $ | 5.92 | |
Quarter 2 | | | 13.19 | | | | 10.55 | |
Quarter 3 | | | 14.36 | | | | 9.73 | |
Quarter 4 | | | 13.90 | | | | 10.19 | |
Consistent with historical practices, we have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock during the last two fiscal years. We intend to retain any earnings for our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Share Repurchase Transactions
On May 15, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program totaling $20.0 million to acquire shares of our outstanding common stock primarily to offset dilution from equity compensation programs. The repurchases are to be made at management’s discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and are subject to market conditions, share price and other factors. There is no fixed completion date for the repurchase program.
We did not repurchase any shares under this program during 2011. As of April 2, 2011, a total of 372,825 shares have been repurchased for $5.3 million under this authorization at an average price of $14.16 per share, calculated inclusive of commissions and fees. Any cash used to settle repurchase transactions is reflected as a component of cash used in financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Disclosures related to securities authorized for issuance under our Equity Compensation Plans are incorporated by reference into Item 12 of this annual report on Form 10-K , Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters, from our Proxy Statement for our fiscal 2011 annual meeting.
20
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative 58-month total return to holders of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. common stock with the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index for the same period. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. common stock and in each of the indices (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on June 3, 2006 and tracks it through April 2, 2011.
Historical stock price performance should not be relied upon as indicative of future stock price performance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Cumulative Total Return | |
| | | June 3,
2006 | | | June 2,
2007 | | | March 29,
2008 | | | March 28,
2009 | | | April 3,
2010 | | | April 2,
2011 | |
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. | | | 100.00 | | | | 104.91 | | | | 81.92 | | | | 31.80 | | | | 66.23 | | | | 86.28 | |
S&P 500 | | | 100.00 | | | | 121.51 | | | | 105.73 | | | | 67.32 | | | | 99.33 | | | | 114.59 | |
S&P Information Technology | | | 100.00 | | | | 121.62 | | | | 109.53 | | | | 77.84 | | | | 121.96 | | | | 136.21 | |
Copyright© 2011 Morningstar. All rights reserved. (www.performancegraph@morningstar.com)
21
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share data) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Statement of Operations Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales | | $ | 256,811 | | | $ | 148,893 | | | $ | 157,313 | | | $ | 247,155 | | | $ | 250,824 | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes3 | | | 390 | | | | (9,778 | ) | | | (13,627 | ) | | | 9,923 | | | | 11,103 | |
Net income (loss)1,2,3,4,5 | | | 7,934 | | | | (11,984 | ) | | | (51,050 | ) | | | 16,589 | | | | 23,524 | |
Net income (loss) per share—basic1,2,3,4,5 | | | 0.28 | | | | (0.44 | ) | | | (1.89 | ) | | | 0.59 | | | | 0.81 | |
Net income (loss) per share—diluted1,2,3,4,5 | | | 0.28 | | | | (0.44 | ) | | | (1.89 | ) | | | 0.59 | | | | 0.80 | |
| | | | | |
Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments and auction rate securities6,7,8,9 | | $ | 201,592 | | | $ | 171,320 | | | $ | 161,925 | | | $ | 160,905 | | | $ | 228,691 | |
Working capital | | | 259,739 | | | | 253,728 | | | | 246,910 | | | | 274,667 | | | | 327,288 | |
Net property, plant and equipment | | | 39,661 | | | | 40,590 | | | | 43,005 | | | | 47,962 | | | | 43,859 | |
Total assets | | | 440,167 | | | | 394,418 | | | | 384,247 | | | | 455,612 | | | | 465,668 | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | 362,299 | | | | 342,662 | | | | 343,523 | | | | 392,240 | | | | 408,330 | |
| 1. | Fiscal 2011 included pretax expenses of $1.4 million for legal settlement costs, $0.8 million for restructuring costs, $2.0 million for amortization of acquired intangible assets and a pretax benefit of $0.7 million from sale of previously impaired auction rate securities. Fiscal 2011 also included pretax expense of $9.3 million of share-based compensation expense. |
| 2. | Fiscal 2010 included a pretax benefit of $4.5 million for net merger termination proceeds, a charge of $1.3 million for other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities and pretax expense of $2.1 million for amortization of acquired intangible assets. Fiscal 2010 also included pretax expense of $7.7 million of share-based compensation expense. |
| 3. | Fiscal 2009 included pretax expenses of $17.4 million for a goodwill impairment charge, $13.6 million for other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities and $6.0 million for increases to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Fiscal 2009 also included pretax expenses of $2.3 million for amortization of acquired intangible assets, $4.0 million for restructuring costs, $4.1 million for the write-off of materials from an RD&E program due to a change in product development strategy and $4.4 million in share-based compensation expense. |
| 4. | Fiscal 2008, a ten month fiscal period, included a pretax charge of $3.3 million to record the fair value adjustments primarily related to acquired inventory and amortization of acquired intangibles, a charge of $2.8 million to record the write-off of acquired in-process research & development related to the acquisition of New Wave Research, Inc., and pretax expenses of $2.1 million for amortization of acquired intangible assets, $1.0 million of restructuring costs and $3.7 million in share-based compensation expense. |
| 5. | Fiscal 2007 included pretax gains of $1.3 million for an insurance recovery on fire-damaged demonstration systems and $1.0 million for an insurance settlement related to shareholder and derivative lawsuits. Fiscal 2007 also included pretax expense of $2.9 million in share-based compensation expense. |
| 6. | Fiscal 2011 included auction rate securities at a fair value of $5.2 million. |
| 7. | Fiscal 2010 included auction rate securities at a fair value of $5.0 million. |
| 8. | Fiscal 2009 included auction rate securities at a fair value of $6.0 million. |
| 9. | Fiscal 2008 included auction rate securities at a fair value of $15.7 million. |
22
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview of Business
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (ESI) is a leading supplier of innovative laser-based manufacturing solutions for the microtechnology industry. Our advanced laser systems enable precise structuring and testing of micron to submicron features in components and devices which are used in a wide variety of end products in the consumer electronics, computer, communications and other industries. These features enable our customers to achieve functionality, or improve yield and productivity in their manufacturing processes that can be critical to their profitability. Founded in 1944, ESI is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, with global operations and subsidiaries in Asia, Canada, Europe and the United States.
Our advanced laser microengineering systems allow semiconductor, microelectronics, and other microtechnology manufacturers to physically alter select device features during high-volume production in order to increase performance and improve production yields. Laser microengineering comprises a set of precise micron-level processes, including advanced micromachining, via drilling, wafer scribing and dicing, material ablation, semiconductor memory-link cutting, electronic device trimming, and nano-level structuring to alter material characteristics such as color and texture. These processes require application-specific laser systems able to meet our customers’ exacting performance and productivity requirements. Our laser-based systems improve production yields or enable improved performance for semiconductor devices, flexible interconnect material, high-density interconnect (HDI) circuits, advanced semiconductor packaging, light emitting diodes (LEDs), flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and other high value components.
Additionally, we produce high-capacity test and optical inspection equipment that is critical to the quality control process during the production of multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs). Our equipment ensures that each component meets the electrical, physical and optical tolerances required to perform properly.
Overview of Financial Results
Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Saturday nearest March 31. Accordingly, our fiscal 2011 reporting period consisted of a 52-week period ending on April 2, 2011, our fiscal 2010 reporting period consisted of a 53-week period ending on April 3, 2010 and our fiscal 2009 reporting period consisted of a 52-week period ending on March 28, 2009. All references to years or quarters relate to fiscal years or fiscal quarters unless otherwise noted.
The financial results of 2011 reflected a growth year for us with solid operational performance across all of our business groups. Our markets reflected healthy capital spending by dynamic random access memory (DRAM), LED and consumer electronics manufacturers. As a result, our total order volume of $284.6 million in 2011 increased approximately 64% compared to orders of $173.4 million in 2010.
Orders for our Semiconductor Group (SG) products increased approximately 171% during 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was primarily due to increased demand for our Memory Repair and LED Scribing systems. The demand for DRAM, especially mobile DRAM, has driven increased capacity requirements from our memory repair customers that created a significant recovery from the downturn experienced in 2009 and 2010. Additionally, increased demand for LEDs in backlit displays, high-definition televisions and general illumination drove higher orders for our LED wafer scribing products.
Orders for our Components Group (CG) products decreased approximately 4% during 2011 compared to 2010. This slight decrease reflected the timing of orders and the cycle for customers to purchase and absorb deliveries of our systems. Our MLCC customers continue to experience high utilization of existing capacity as demand for consumer electronics drives growth in MLCC consumption.
23
Orders for our Interconnect/ Micromachining Group (IMG) products increased by approximately 63% during 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was due to continued growth in both our flex interconnect and advanced micromachining businesses. The release of our new model 5330xi for via drilling has been quickly adopted by our flex circuit customers as they support the increasing demand for mobile electronics. Our model ML5900 has driven record orders for our advanced micromachining business with continued strong demand for new and existing applications.
Total shipments were $259.6 million in 2011 compared to $151.2 million in 2010 as a result of strong orders across all product lines. By product group, SG shipments increased by approximately 188% in 2011, CG shipments increased by approximately 58% and IMG shipments increased by approximately 40%. Backlog was $65.5 million as of April 2, 2011 compared to $40.6 million as of April 3, 2010.
Gross margins were 42.4% on net sales of $256.8 million in 2011 compared to 37.5% on net sales of $148.9 million in 2010. The increase in gross margin percentage was due largely to leveraging of higher production volume relative to fixed costs.
Net operating expenses of $101.5 million in 2011 increased $23.9 million from $77.6 million in 2010. This increase was primarily due to a $9.7 million increase in selling, service and administration (SS&A) costs, $7.5 million increase in research, development and engineering (RD&E) costs, a $1.4 million legal settlement cost and a $0.8 million increase in restructuring costs. In 2010, we recorded $4.5 million for net merger termination proceeds that partially reduced operating expenses. The increase in the SS&A and RD&E for 2011 was primarily attributable to higher compensation costs, including labor expense and variable pay, and higher project spending due to overall increases in business activity and improved operating results. In addition, we had initiated several temporary cost reduction measures in 2009 and 2010, including salary reductions, which were restored in late 2010.
Operating income was $7.4 million in 2011 compared to an operating loss of $21.8 million in 2010, an increase of $29.2 million. This improvement was primarily due to higher revenue and gross profit partially offset by the increase in operating expenses. Non-operating income was $0.9 million in 2011 compared to $0.01 million in 2010. The increase was primarily due to a gain of $0.7 million from the sale of previously impaired auction rate securities (ARS) and no additional impairment of ARS in 2011, compared to an other-than-temporary impairment charge for ARS of $1.3 million in 2010. Additionally, interest and other income declined approximately $1.2 million resulting from lower interest income yields and foreign currency fluctuations. Net income was $7.9 million in 2011 compared to a net loss of $12.0 million in 2010, primarily due to improved gross profit on higher revenues offsetting the impact of higher operating expenses.
24
Results of Operations
The following table presents results of operations data as a percentage of net sales for the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net sales | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of sales | | | 57.6 | | | | 62.5 | | | | 62.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | | 42.4 | | | | 37.5 | | | | 37.1 | |
Selling, service and administration | | | 22.7 | | | | 32.5 | | | | 32.6 | |
Research, development and engineering | | | 16.0 | | | | 22.6 | | | | 24.3 | |
Legal settlement costs | | | 0.5 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Restructuring costs | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | 2.5 | |
Merger (termination proceeds) transaction costs, net | | | — | | | | (3.0 | ) | | | 1.2 | |
Goodwill impairment charge | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 2.9 | | | | (14.6 | ) | | | (34.6 | ) |
Sale of previously impaired auction rate securities | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | (0.9 | ) | | | (8.6 | ) |
Interest and other income, net | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 2.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 3.3 | | | | (14.6 | ) | | | (41.2 | ) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | | 0.2 | | | | (6.6 | ) | | | (8.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 3.1 | % | | | (8.0 | )% | | | (32.5 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year Ended April 2, 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended April 3, 2010
Net Sales
The following table presents net sales information by product group:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | |
Semiconductor Group (SG) | | $ | 78,739 | | | | 30.7 | % | | $ | 28,525 | | | | 19.2 | % |
Components Group (CG) | | | 54,184 | | | | 21.1 | | | | 31,697 | | | | 21.3 | |
Interconnect/ Micromachining Group (IMG) | | | 123,888 | | | | 48.2 | | | | 88,671 | | | | 59.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 256,811 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 148,893 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales for 2011 increased $107.9 million or 72% over net sales for 2010. Sales increased in all three business groups, with significant dollar increases in SG and IMG.
SG sales for 2011 increased $50.2 million or 176% compared to 2010. The increase in SG revenues was primarily driven by recovery in the DRAM market and expansion of LED manufacturing in Asia. Strong prices for DRAM combined with increasing demand for Mobile DRAM for portable electronics drove additional demand for our memory repair systems. Additionally, with the release of our proprietary tailored pulse laser technology, we were able to increase our market share in laser-based memory repair.
CG sales for 2011 were up $22.5 million or 71% compared to 2010. This increase was due to deliveries of MLCC test systems and consumable parts on higher orders that began in the second half of 2010. Utilization levels of existing capacity have remained high as our customers satisfy the increasing demand for MLCCs in consumer electronics.
IMG sales for 2011 increased $35.2 million or 40% compared to 2010. The increase in IMG sales was driven by higher sales of our flex-circuit via drilling and advanced micromachining systems. Demand from the
25
flex-circuit and integrated circuit packaging segments of the market has continued to strengthen as a result of consumer demand for portable electronics. Additionally, demand continues to increase for advanced micromachining products with the development of new applications as well as follow-on orders to expand capacity for existing applications.
The following table presents net sales information by geographic region:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | |
Asia | | $ | 229,420 | | | | 89.3 | % | | $ | 124,078 | | | | 83.4 | % |
Americas | | | 15,647 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 14,189 | | | | 9.5 | |
Europe | | | 11,744 | | | | 4.6 | | | | 10,626 | | | | 7.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 256,811 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 148,893 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales for 2011 increased across all geographic regions compared to 2010, but primarily in Asia where net sales increased 85%. Sales increased in all three product groups in Asia as a result of a continued trend by our customers to source their high-volume manufacturing in that region.
Gross Profit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Gross Profit | | | % of Net Sales | | | Gross Profit | | | % of Net Sales | |
Gross Profit | | $ | 108,949 | | | | 42.4 | % | | $ | 55,865 | | | | 37.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit was $108.9 million for 2011, an increase of $53.1 million or 95% compared to 2010. Gross profit increased largely due to the higher sales discussed above, combined with the favorable impact of higher production utilizing the same fixed costs.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 42.4% for 2011 compared to 37.5% for 2010. This improvement was largely due to leveraging of higher production volume relative to fixed costs, and also improvements in product mix during the year.
Operating Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Expense | | | % of Net Sales | | | Expense | | | % of Net Sales | |
Selling, service and administration | | $ | 58,262 | | | | 22.7 | % | | $ | 48,536 | | | | 32.5 | % |
Research, development and engineering | | | 41,095 | | | | 16.0 | | | | 33,618 | | | | 22.6 | |
Legal settlement costs | | | 1,367 | | | | 0.5 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Restructuring costs | | | 797 | | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Merger termination proceeds, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,516 | ) | | | (3.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 101,521 | | | | 39.5 | % | | $ | 77,638 | | | | 52.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, Service and Administration
Selling, service and administration (SS&A) expenses primarily consist of labor and other employee-related expenses including share-based compensation expense, travel expenses, professional fees, sales commissions and facilities costs. SS&A expenses for 2011 increased $9.7 million compared to 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to overall increases in business activity and improved operating results driven by sustained
26
macroeconomic and electronics industry recoveries, which resulted in increased headcount and higher compensation costs. Other factors included an increase in share-based compensation expense of $1.4 million driven by incremental charges of our annual stock grant and an acquisition cost of $0.3 million resulting from a business acquisition in 2011. In addition, we initiated several temporary cost reduction measures in 2009 and 2010, including salary reductions, which were restored in late 2010. These increases in expenses were partially offset by acquisition settlement proceeds of $0.9 million received and lower purchase accounting expense in 2011.
Research, Development and Engineering
Research, development and engineering (RD&E) expenses are primarily comprised of labor and other employee-related expenses, professional fees, project materials, equipment costs and facilities costs. RD&E expenses for 2011 increased $7.5 million compared to 2010. This increase was primarily due to increased project expenses, headcount and compensation expense, including the restoration of higher levels of pay.
Share-Based Compensation
The preceding table of operating expense included $8.2 million and $6.7 million of share-based compensation expense for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Share-based compensation expense increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to the incremental charges from the annual stock grant in 2011.
Legal Settlement Costs
In 2009, James Dooley, former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, initiated arbitration against us seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. On December 10, 2010, the assigned arbitrator ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley and, as a result, we recognized approximately $1.4 million in legal settlement costs in 2011. On December 27, 2010, we filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. On May 17, 2011, the court ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley. On May 19, 2011, we filed a motion for the court to admit into evidence certain testimony of Mr. Dooley, arguing that the court was in error in not admitting it in the proceeding, and asking the court to reconsider its ruling based on that evidence. On June 14, 2011, the court ruled in favor of admitting the testimony into evidence, but also reaffirmed its original ruling upholding the arbitrator’s award.
Restructuring Costs
As part of our globalization strategy, during 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce our worldwide cost structure through transition of certain procurement and manufacturing activities to Asia. As a result of these planned actions, we recognized $0.8 million of restructuring costs in 2011.
Merger Termination Proceeds, net
No merger termination proceeds or merger transaction costs were received or incurred in 2011. Net merger termination proceeds for 2010 were $4.5 million, which represented the receipt of a $5.4 million merger termination fee offset by $0.9 million of merger transaction costs.
Non-operating Income and Expense
Sale of Previously Impaired Auction Rate Securities (ARS)
In 2011, we sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million, and recorded a gain of $0.7 million as the security was previously written down to zero value. See Note 5 “Fair Value Measurements” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for further discussion on the ARS.
27
Other-than-temporary Impairment of Auction Rate Securities (ARS)
There was no other-than-temporary impairment charge of ARS in 2011. In 2010, other-than-temporary impairment charges related to our ARS were $1.3 million. This charge was recorded during the fourth quarter due to the suspension of interest payments by the issuer of certain of our ARS and decreases in the credit quality of bond insurers of certain of our other ARS. See Note 5 “Fair Value Measurements” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for further discussion on the ARS.
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest and other income, net, consists of interest income and expense, market gains and losses on assets held in employees’ deferred compensation accounts, realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses, bank charges, investment management fees, ARS valuation fees and other miscellaneous non-operating items. Net interest and other income was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Interest
and Other
Income, net | | | % of Net Sales | | | Interest
and Other
Income, net | | | % of Net Sales | |
Interest and other income, net | | $ | 188 | | | | 0.1 | % | | $ | 1,358 | | | | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In 2011, interest and other income, net, was $0.2 million, compared to $1.4 million in 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to the lower interest income due to market-driven decreases in yields, foreign currency losses due to appreciation of the Chinese Yuan, higher hedging costs of the Korean Won and increased bank fees due to higher banking activity in 2011.
Income Taxes
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Income Tax
Provision | | | Effective
Tax Rate | | | Income Tax
Benefit | | | Effective
Tax Rate | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | $ | 390 | | | | 4.7 | % | | $ | (9,778 | ) | | | 44.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The income tax provision for 2011 was $0.4 million on pretax income of $8.3 million, an effective rate of 4.7%. For 2010, the income tax benefit was $9.8 million on pretax loss of $21.8 million, an effective rate of 44.9%. In 2011, our effective tax rate was favorably impacted by the increased tax advantages from growth in our Singapore manufacturing operations, benefits from the extension of the research and development tax credit benefit and the recognition of domestic production activities benefit.
Our effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation based upon the mix of income and relative tax rates between jurisdictions, and the occurrence and timing of numerous discrete events such as changes in tax laws or their interpretations, extensions or expirations of research and experimentation credits, closure of tax years subject to examination, finalization of income tax returns, the relationship of fixed deductions to overall changes in estimated and actual pretax income or loss and the tax jurisdictions where income or loss is generated. Based on currently available information, we are not aware of any further discrete events which are likely to occur that would have a material effect on our financial position, expected cash flows or results of operations. We anticipate no significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months as the result of examinations or lapsed statutes of limitation.
28
Net Income (Loss)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Net Income | | | % of Net Sales | | | Net Loss | | | % of Net Sales | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 7,934 | | | | 3.1 | % | | $ | (11,984) | | | | (8.0) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As a result of the factors discussed above, net income for 2011 was $7.9 million, or $0.28 per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss of $12.0 million, or $0.44 per basic share for 2010.
Fiscal Year Ended April 3, 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 28, 2009
Net Sales
The following table presents net sales information by product group:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | |
Semiconductor Group (SG) | | $ | 28,525 | | | | 19.2 | % | | $ | 44,855 | | | | 28.5 | % |
Components Group (CG) | | | 31,697 | | | | 21.3 | | | | 29,243 | | | | 18.6 | |
Interconnect/ Micromachining Group (IMG) | | | 88,671 | | | | 59.5 | | | | 83,215 | | | | 52.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 148,893 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 157,313 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales for 2010 decreased $8.4 million or 5% over net sales for 2009. A significant decrease in SG net sales was partially offset by increases in IMG and CG.
SG sales for 2010 decreased $16.3 million or 36% compared to 2009. The reduction in SG revenues was primarily attributable to the weakness in memory markets that began in early 2009 and continued to impact sales through 2010 as our customers absorbed existing production capacity. The slow recovery of the memory markets was partially offset by increased sales of our LED wafer scribing and LCD repair products during 2010 as consumer demand for LED-backlit displays and televisions in turn drove improved markets for these products.
CG sales for 2010 were up $2.5 million or 8% compared to 2009. This increase was primarily due to increased capacity utilization by our MLCC manufacturing customers. In 2009, the global economic slowdown led to excess production capacity; however, in 2010, increasing demand for consumer electronics drove stronger capacity utilization and additional capital investment by our customers.
IMG sales for 2010 increased $5.5 million or 7% compared to 2009. The increase in IMG sales was primarily driven by demand for our advanced micromachining products from new applications, including a large order for our new model ML5900 which led revenue in the fourth quarter of 2010. Additionally, demand in the flex-circuit and integrated circuit packaging segments of the market remained strong as a result of consumer demand for smart phones and other hand-held devices.
The following table presents net sales information by geographic region:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | | | Net Sales | | | % of Net Sales | |
Asia | | $ | 124,078 | | | | 83.4 | % | | $ | 110,114 | | | | 70.0 | % |
Americas | | | 14,189 | | | | 9.5 | | | | 30,637 | | | | 19.5 | |
Europe | | | 10,626 | | | | 7.1 | | | | 16,562 | | | | 10.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 148,893 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 157,313 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29
Net sales to Asia for 2010 increased $14.0 million or 13% compared to 2009. The increase in net sales reflects improvement in customer spending on electronic equipment combined with a continued trend by our customers to source their high-volume manufacturing in Asia.
Net sales to the Americas for 2010 declined $16.4 million or 54% compared to 2009. This decrease was due to reduced capital investment primarily by our semiconductor customers as they utilize existing capacity from purchases in prior years.
Net sales to Europe for 2010 declined $5.9 million or 36% compared to 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in SG sales in the region, reflecting the impact of the global economic downturn on key customers in that region, including the bankruptcy of Qimonda AG.
Gross Profit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Gross Profit | | | % of Net Sales | | | Gross Profit | | | % of Net Sales | |
Gross Profit | | $ | 55,865 | | | | 37.5 | % | | $ | 58,418 | | | | 37.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit was $55.9 million for 2010, a decrease of $2.6 million or 4% compared to 2009. The net dollar decrease was primarily caused by decreased revenue levels, partially offset by a favorable shift in product mix.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 37.5% in 2010 compared to 37.1% in 2009. This improvement reflects a favorable product mix in 2010 compared to 2009.
Operating Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
(In thousands, except percentages) | | Expense | | | % of Net Sales | | | Expense | | | % of Net Sales | |
Selling, service and administration | | $ | 48,536 | | | | 32.5 | % | | $ | 51,260 | | | | 32.6 | % |
Research, development and engineering | | | 33,618 | | | | 22.6 | | | | 38,179 | | | | 24.3 | |
Goodwill impairment charge | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17,396 | | | | 11.1 | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,011 | | | | 2.5 | |
Merger (termination proceeds) transaction costs, net | | | (4,516 | ) | | | (3.0 | ) | | | 1,850 | | | | 1.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 77,638 | | | | 52.1 | % | | $ | 112,696 | | | | 71.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, Service and Administration
SS&A expenses for 2010 were $2.7 million lower than 2009. Excluding the impact of a $2.6 million increase in share-based compensation expense, primarily driven by incremental charges for our annual stock grant, the decrease was $5.3 million. This decrease was the result of cost savings realized through restructuring actions initiated during 2009 and temporary cost reduction measures, including salary reductions, during the first three quarters of 2010.
Research, Development and Engineering
RD&E expenses for 2010 were $4.6 million lower than 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.1 million charge taken in 2009 to write off material from an RD&E program due to a change in our product development strategy. Excluding the impact of this charge, RD&E expenses declined $0.5 million. This decrease was due to our lower cost structure following the restructuring actions initiated in 2009 and the temporary cost reduction measures that were in effect during most of 2010, partially offset by an increase in share-based compensation expense and higher project spending related to new-product investment.
30
Share-Based Compensation
The preceding table of operating expenses included $6.7 million and $3.7 million of share-based compensation expense for 2010 and 2009, respectively. Share-based compensation expense increased in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due to a higher number of grants awarded in 2010 to counteract the effect of the economic downturn and increase employee retention over the longer term. Additionally, 2009 included a reduction in expense due to the impact of termination-related forfeitures during 2009.
Goodwill Impairment Charge
No goodwill impairment charges were incurred during 2010. During 2009, a $17.4 million charge was incurred due to declines in our stock price and market capitalization.
Restructuring Costs
No restructuring costs were incurred during 2010 compared to $4.0 million incurred during 2009. The 2009 costs were incurred as the result of actions taken in response to weakness in memory markets and reductions in capital spending driven by the global economic recession. See Note 24 “Restructuring and Cost Management Plans” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional information.
Merger (Termination Proceeds) Transaction Costs, net
Net merger termination proceeds for 2010 were $4.5 million, which represented the receipt of a $5.4 million merger termination fee offset by $0.9 million of merger transaction costs. Merger transaction costs were $1.9 million for 2009, which represented expenses incurred in connection with the terminated merger.
Non-operating Income and Expense
Other-than-temporary Impairment of Auction Rate Securities (ARS)
Other-than-temporary impairment charges related to our ARS were $1.3 million for 2010 and $13.6 million for 2009, a decrease of $12.2 million. The $1.3 million charge for 2010 was recorded during the fourth quarter due to the suspension of interest payments by the issuer of certain ARS and decreases in the credit quality of bond insurers of certain of our other ARS. The $13.6 million of charges for 2009 were incurred due to the impact of instability in the global financial markets on the estimated fair values of our ARS. See Note 5 “Fair Value Measurements” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for further discussion.
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest and other income, net, was $1.4 million in 2010 compared to $3.2 million in 2009. This $1.8 million decrease was primarily due to a decline in interest income that was largely due to market-driven decreases in yields.
Income Taxes
The income tax benefit recorded for 2010 was $9.8 million on pretax loss of $21.8 million, an effective rate of 44.9%. For 2009, the income tax benefit was $13.6 million on pretax loss of $64.7 million, an effective tax rate of 21.1%. The lower effective tax rate for 2009 was primarily related to the $17.4 million goodwill impairment charge recorded during 2009, which was not deductible for US tax purposes, and an increase in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to our ARS during 2009. In 2010, our rate was favorably impacted by a reduction in reserves associated with uncertain tax positions, certain permanent differences and other discrete adjustments.
31
Net Loss
As a result of the factors discussed above, net loss for 2010 was $12.0 million, or $0.44 per basic share, compared to net loss of $51.0 million, or $1.89 per basic share for 2009.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
At April 2, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents of $116.4 million, short-term investments of $69.2 million and accounts receivable of $44.1 million. We also held $10.8 million in restricted cash which represented collateral for commercial letters of credit. At April 2, 2011, we had a current ratio of 4.8 and held no long-term debt. Working capital of $259.7 million was up slightly compared to April 3, 2010 balance of $253.7 million. We also held approximately $8.1 million of non-current investments at April 2, 2011.
In 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program totaling $20.0 million to acquire shares of our outstanding common stock primarily to offset dilution from equity compensation programs. Repurchases under the program are to be made at management’s discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and are subject to market conditions, share price and other factors. We did not repurchase any shares under this program during 2011. As of April 2, 2011, a total of 372,825 shares have been repurchased under this authorization for $5.3 million at an average price of $14.16 per share, calculated inclusive of commissions and fees. Cash used to settle repurchase transactions is reflected as a component of cash used in financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. There is no fixed completion date for the repurchase program.
As of April 2, 2011, we held a total of $10.7 million invested in ARS at par value. Additionally, we held $4.0 million of par value ARS which were converted by the bond issuer to its preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009. These securities were recorded at an estimated fair value of $5.2 million as of April 2, 2011. The contractual maturities of these securities range up to calendar year 2050, and several securities and the preferred stock do not have stated maturities. These securities previously provided short-term liquidity through a Dutch auction process that reset the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 to 35 days. As a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, our ARS began to experience failed auctions during fiscal 2008. Since that time, none of our ARS have traded through the auction process and the credit quality of the counterparties has deteriorated.
During the fourth quarter of 2011, we sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million. As a result, we recorded a gain of $0.7 million in 2011 as the security was previously written down to zero value.
Subsequent to the year ended April 2, 2011, we sold the remaining ARS with a total par value of $14.7 million for approximately $6.4 million. We will record a total gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2012 including $1.4 million in reclassification of previously recorded unrealized net gains out of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Net cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $50.6 million for 2011 due to $26.7 million from net income and non-cash items and $23.9 million from net changes within working capital. The primary sources of cash from working capital consisted of $22.7 million from increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $3.1 million from decrease in inventories, $2.8 million from increases in deferred revenue and $2.2 million from decreases in other current assets, partially offset by increases in trade receivables of $5.8 million and increases in shipped systems pending acceptance of $1.2 million.
32
In 2011, net cash provided by investing activities of $24.0 million primarily resulted from $509.9 million of proceeds from sales and maturities of investments, partially offset by $471.1 million of purchases of investments, $8.1 million for acquisition of certain assets of PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc., and $6.6 million of purchases of property, plant and equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities of $1.5 million was primarily due to proceeds from stock plan activity.
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are adequate to fund our operations, share repurchase program and contractual obligations for at least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
The contractual commitments and obligations below represent our estimates of future payments under fixed contractual obligations and commitments. The actual payments may differ from these estimates due to changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions, and other factors. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing of the payment schedule and the amounts of payments.
The following table summarizes our contractual commitments and obligations as of April 2, 2011, by the fiscal year in which they are due:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Total | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | Thereafter | |
Purchase commitments | | $ | 32,361 | | | $ | 32,359 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Derivative financial instruments, net | | | 5,556 | | | | 5,556 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Operating leases | | | 5,328 | | | | 2,544 | | | | 2,091 | | | | 598 | | | | 88 | | | | 7 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 43,245 | | | $ | 40,459 | | | $ | 2,093 | | | $ | 598 | | | $ | 88 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This table does not include $8.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows as of April 2, 2011. We are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities and the total amounts of income tax payable and the timing of such tax payments may depend on the resolution of current and future tax examinations which cannot be estimated.
Derivative financial instruments represent various forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions. Amounts are presented above in U.S. dollars, translated at exchange rates on April 2, 2011 and are a net presentation of amounts expected to be received and paid upon settlement of these contracts. Purchase commitments represent obligations under open purchase orders, primarily for inventory, issued in the normal course of business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Our estimates are based on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional information.
Our critical accounting policies and estimates include the following:
| | • | | product warranty reserves; |
33
| | • | | allowance for doubtful accounts; |
| | • | | share-based compensation; |
| | • | | income taxes including the valuation of deferred tax assets; |
| | • | | fair value measurements; |
| | • | | valuation of auction rate securities (ARS); |
| | • | | valuation of cost method equity investments; |
| | • | | valuation of long-lived assets; and |
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss generally pass to the customer at the time of delivery of the product to a common carrier. Revenue is recognized upon such delivery, provided that fulfillment of acceptance criteria can be demonstrated prior to shipment. Where the acceptance criteria cannot be demonstrated prior to shipment, or in the case of substantially new products, revenue is deferred until acceptance has been received. For multiple element arrangements, the fair values of any undelivered elements are deferred until the elements are delivered and acceptance criteria are met. Revenues are recorded net of taxes collected which are required to be submitted to government authorities. Installation services are not essential to the functionality of the delivered equipment and installation revenue is deferred until installation is complete. Historically, neither the costs of installation accrued nor the fair value of installation service revenue deferred has been material.
Revenues associated with sales to customers under local contracts in Japan are recognized upon title transfer, which generally occurs upon customer acceptance. Revenues related to spare parts and consumable sales are generally recognized upon shipment. Revenues related to maintenance and service contracts are recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.
Inventory Valuation
We regularly evaluate the value of our inventory based on a combination of factors including, but not limited to, the following: forecasted sales or usage, historical usage rates, estimated service period, product end-of-life dates, estimated current and future market values, service inventory requirements and new product introductions. Purchasing requirements and alternative uses for the inventory are explored within these processes to mitigate inventory exposure. Raw materials with quantities in excess of forecasted usage are reviewed quarterly for obsolescence by our engineering and operating personnel. Raw material obsolescence write-downs are typically caused by engineering change orders or product end-of-life adjustments in the market.
Research and development product costs are generally expensed as incurred. Engineering materials that are expected to provide future value are generally classified as raw materials inventory. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a $4.1 million charge to write off material from an RD&E program due to a change in our product development strategy. This charge was recorded as engineering project expense.
Finished goods are reviewed quarterly by product marketing and operating personnel to determine if inventory carrying costs exceed market selling prices. When necessary, we record inventory write-downs as an increase to cost of sales based on the above factors and take into account worldwide quantities on hand and forecasted demand into our analysis. If circumstances related to our inventories change, our estimates of the value of inventory could materially change.
34
Product Warranty Reserves
We evaluate obligations related to product warranties quarterly. A standard one-year warranty is provided on most products. Warranty charges are comprised of costs to service the warranty, including labor to repair the system and replacement parts for defective items, as well as other costs incidental to the repairs. Warranty charges are recorded net of any cost recoveries resulting from either successful repair of damaged parts or from warranties offered by our suppliers for defective components. Using historical data, we estimate average warranty cost per system or part type and record the provision for such charges as an element of cost of goods sold upon recognition of the related revenue. Additionally, the overall warranty accrual balance is separately analyzed using the remaining warranty periods outstanding on systems and items under warranty, and any resulting changes in estimates are recorded as an adjustment to cost of sales. If circumstances change, or if a significant change in warranty-related incidents occurs, the impact of the change in the warranty accrual could be material. Accrued product warranty is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of accrued liabilities.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Credit limits are established by reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. Where appropriate, we obtain credit rating reports and financial statements of the customer to establish and modify their credit limits. On certain foreign sales, we require letters of credit. We regularly evaluate the collectability of our trade receivable balances based on a combination of factors. When a customer’s account becomes past due, we talk with the customer to determine the cause. If we determine that a customer will be unable to fully meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or other material events impacting its business, we record a specific reserve for bad debt to reduce the related receivable to the amount we expect to recover given all information then available. If circumstances related to specific customers change, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could materially change. We record estimated bad debt expense as an increase to selling, service and administration expenses. As of April 2, 2011, our allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $0.4 million and we did not incur bad-debt expense during 2011.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted to our employees and directors, including employee stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), non-vested restricted stock units and purchases under the employee stock purchase plan, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the grant date. We use the Black-Scholes valuation model as our method of valuation for stock option and SAR awards.
The use of the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of stock option and SAR awards requires us to make assumptions regarding the risk-free interest rate, expected dividend yield, expected term and expected volatility over the expected term of the award. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates based on our historical data, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the recognition of expense could be materially different in the future.
Compensation expense is only recognized on awards that are estimated to ultimately vest. Therefore, based on historical forfeiture rates and patterns, the estimated future forfeitures are factored into the compensation expense to be recognized over the vesting period. We update our forfeiture estimates at least annually and recognize any changes to accumulated compensation expense in the period of change. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Income Taxes
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in numerous foreign jurisdictions and in the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is
35
uncertain. We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to the unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those assets and liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. When management determines that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be fully realized, a valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Should management’s assumptions and expectations be inaccurate, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected in future periods. At April 2, 2011, our net deferred tax assets totaled $40.7 million, which was net of a valuation allowance of $10.5 million.
Fair Value Measurements and Valuation of Auction Rate Securities (ARS)
Effective March 29, 2009, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 pertaining to nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We had adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 pertaining to financial assets and liabilities as of March 30, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. SFAS No. 157 was incorporated into Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC Topic 820).
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASC Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASC ASU 2010-06). ASC ASU 2010-06 requires various additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements, including the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3, and a gross basis of presentation for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 activity rollforward. The ASC became effective for the fourth quarter of 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 activity rollforward, which will be effective for the first quarter of 2012. Our adoption of the ASC did not have a material impact on our financial statements, nor will the adoption of the remaining provisions of the ASC.
Because none of our ARS have traded through the auction process, estimated fair values were based primarily upon the income approach using a discounted cash flow model which took into account the following: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates that reflect current market conditions; (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default, restructuring or redemption by the issuer (trigger events); (iv) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of default for each security; (v) the financial condition, results, ratings of and financial claims on the bond insurers and issuers; and (vi) the underlying trust assets of the securities.
Valuation of Cost Method Equity Investments
As of April 2, 2011, minority equity investments included $6.0 million invested in Series D Preferred Stock and $3.0 million invested in Series E Preferred Stock of OmniGuide, Inc., representing an 11% interest. At each reporting period, we determine whether events or circumstances have occurred that are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments. If there are no events or circumstances identified that would adversely affect the fair value of the investments, the fair values of the investments are not calculated as it is not practicable to do so. As of April 2, 2011, we had not identified any events or circumstances that indicated the investments were impaired; therefore, the full carrying value of $9.0 million was included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
36
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, principally property and equipment and identifiable intangibles held and used by us, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. We evaluate recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to estimated future net undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. There were no events or circumstances during 2011 that would indicate the carrying value of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable.
Valuation of Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. Fair value is determined based on a method that compares our market capitalization against the net book value of our assets. We tested goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2011 utilizing a fair value comparison method, and it was determined that there was no impairment as of April 2, 2011.
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
We maintain a short-term and long-term investment portfolio consisting of commercial paper, U.S. government agency notes, corporate bonds and auction rate securities (ARS). These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. The majority of these securities are classified as available for sale securities; therefore, the impact on fair value of interest rate changes is reflected as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Due to the short duration of our investment portfolio, an immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair value of our invested assets.
Investment Risk
As of April 2, 2011, we held a total of $10.7 million invested in ARS at par value. Additionally, we held $4.0 million of par value ARS which were converted by the bond issuer to its preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009. The ARS are comprised predominately of securities issued by insurance companies to raise funds to meet regulatory capital reserve requirements and the ARS assume the credit ratings of the bond insurers who guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest on these insured securities. At the time of purchase in fiscal 2007, these ARS were rated AAA and AA. The contractual maturities of these securities range up to calendar year 2050, and several securities and the preferred stock do not have stated maturities. These securities previously provided short-term liquidity through a Dutch auction process that reset the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 to 35 days. This mechanism previously allowed existing investors to either retain or liquidate their holdings by selling such securities at par. As a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, our ARS began to experience failed auctions during fiscal 2008.
Since that time, none of our ARS have traded through the auction process. Additionally, the bond insurers that guarantee the ARS experienced credit rating downgrades and the issuer of the preferred stock suspended dividend payments. Consequently, it was determined that the declines in fair value of these securities during fiscal 2009 represented other-than-temporary impairments in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the cost bases of these securities were written down to their estimated fair values with an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.3 million for 2010 and $13.6 million for 2009.
During the fourth quarter of 2011, we sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million and recorded a gain of $0.7 million in 2011 as the security was previously written down to zero value. The $5.2 million estimated fair value of our remaining ARS is classified as a non-current asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 2, 2011, consistent with the classification at April 3, 2010.
37
Subsequent to the year ended April 2, 2011, we sold the remaining ARS with a total par value of $14.7 million for approximately $6.4 million. We will record a total gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2012 including $1.4 million in reclassification of previously recorded unrealized net gains out of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We purchase derivative financial instruments on a limited basis and do not use them for trading purposes. We do, however, use derivatives to manage well-defined foreign currency risks. We enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge the value of material non-functional currency monetary asset and liability balances. The net effect of an immediate 10% change in exchange rates on the forward exchange contracts and the underlying hedged positions would not be material to our financial position or the results of our operations.
The table below summarizes, by currency, the notional amounts of our forward exchange contracts in U.S. dollars as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010. The “bought” amounts represent the net U.S. dollar equivalents of commitments to purchase foreign currencies, and the “sold” amounts represent the net U.S. dollar equivalents of commitments to sell foreign currencies. The foreign currency amounts have been translated into a U.S. dollar equivalent value using the exchange rates at the reporting date.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Bought (Sold) | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Japanese Yen | | $ | 11,360 | | | $ | 4,719 | |
Taiwan Dollar | | | — | | | | 1,985 | |
Korean Won | | | (4,565 | ) | | | (2,324 | ) |
British Pound | | | (3,064 | ) | | | (2,087 | ) |
Euro | | | 1,825 | | | | 504 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,556 | | | $ | 2,797 | |
| | | | | | | | |
38
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 2, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 2, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated June 14, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
| /s/ KPMG LLP |
|
| Portland, Oregon |
| June 14, 2011 |
39
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 116,412 | | | $ | 39,335 | |
Restricted cash | | | 10,769 | | | | 10,824 | |
Short-term investments | | | 69,245 | | | | 116,140 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash, restricted cash and investments | | | 196,426 | | | | 166,299 | |
| | |
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $429 and $697 | | | 44,100 | | | | 38,061 | |
Inventories | | | 65,362 | | | | 72,090 | |
Shipped systems pending acceptance | | | 5,289 | | | | 4,106 | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 9,892 | | | | 7,232 | |
Other current assets | | | 6,784 | | | | 8,677 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 327,853 | | | | 296,465 | |
Non-current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Auction rate securities | | | 5,166 | | | | 5,021 | |
Non-current investments | | | 8,097 | | | | — | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 39,661 | | | | 40,590 | |
Non-current deferred income taxes, net | | | 30,822 | | | | 31,079 | |
Goodwill | | | 4,014 | | | | — | |
Acquired intangible assets, net | | | 10,035 | | | | 8,255 | |
Other assets | | | 14,519 | | | | 13,008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 440,167 | | | $ | 394,418 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 18,650 | | | $ | 14,607 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 33,425 | | | | 14,937 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 16,039 | | | | 13,193 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 68,114 | | | | 42,737 | |
Non-current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes payable | | | 9,754 | | | | 9,019 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 18 and 21) | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, without par value; 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, without par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 28,299 and 27,665 issued and outstanding | | | 153,189 | | | | 142,369 | |
Retained earnings | | | 207,420 | | | | 199,486 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income related to auction rate securities | | | 1,445 | | | | 1,301 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), other | | | 245 | | | | (494 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 362,299 | | | | 342,662 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 440,167 | | | $ | 394,418 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
40
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net sales | | $ | 256,811 | | | $ | 148,893 | | | $ | 157,313 | |
Cost of sales | | | 147,862 | | | | 93,028 | | | | 98,895 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 108,949 | | | | 55,865 | | | | 58,418 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, service and administration | | | 58,262 | | | | 48,536 | | | | 51,260 | |
Research, development and engineering | | | 41,095 | | | | 33,618 | | | | 38,179 | |
Legal settlement costs | | | 1,367 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Restructuring costs | | | 797 | | | | — | | | | 4,011 | |
Merger (termination proceeds) transaction costs, net | | | — | | | | (4,516 | ) | | | 1,850 | |
Goodwill impairment charge | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17,396 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating expenses | | | 101,521 | | | | 77,638 | | | | 112,696 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 7,428 | | | | (21,773 | ) | | | (54,278 | ) |
Non-operating income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sale of previously impaired auction rate securities | | | 708 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | (1,347 | ) | | | (13,593 | ) |
Interest and other income, net | | | 188 | | | | 1,358 | | | | 3,194 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-operating income (expense) | | | 896 | | | | 11 | | | | (10,399 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 8,324 | | | | (21,762 | ) | | | (64,677 | ) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | | 390 | | | | (9,778 | ) | | | (13,627 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 7,934 | | | $ | (11,984 | ) | | $ | (51,050 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share—basic | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | (1.89 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share—diluted | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | (1.89 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares—basic | | | 28,045 | | | | 27,449 | | | | 27,079 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares—diluted | | | 28,608 | | | | 27,449 | | | | 27,079 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
41
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common Stock | | | Retained
Earnings | | | Accumulated
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | | | Total
Shareholders’
Equity | |
(In thousands) | | Shares | | | Amount | | | | |
Balance at March 29, 2008 | | | 27,112 | | | $ | 131,417 | | | $ | 262,135 | | | $ | (1,312 | ) | | $ | 392,240 | |
Share repurchases | | | (308 | ) | | | (4,724 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,724 | ) |
Stock plans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock plans | | | 380 | | | | 7,178 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,178 | |
Tax impact of stock options exercised | | | — | | | | (63 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (63 | ) |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | (51,050 | ) | | | — | | | | (51,050 | ) |
Net unrealized loss on securities (net of tax of $22) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | (39 | ) |
Reclassification of unrealized loss on auction rate securities (net of tax of ($1,407)) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,496 | | | | 2,496 | |
Cumulative translation adjustment (net of tax of $1,455) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,587 | ) | | | (2,587 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income related to benefit plan obligations (net of tax of ($41)) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 72 | | | | 72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (51,108 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 28, 2009 as previously reported | | | 27,184 | | | | 133,808 | | | | 211,085 | | | | (1,370 | ) | | | 343,523 | |
Cumulative-effect adjustment related to auction rate securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 385 | | | | (385 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 29, 2009 as adjusted | | | 27,184 | | | | 133,808 | | | | 211,470 | | | | (1,755 | ) | | | 343,523 | |
Share repurchases | | | (65 | ) | | | (555 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (555 | ) |
Stock plans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock plans | | | 546 | | | | 9,116 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,116 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | (11,984 | ) | | | — | | | | (11,984 | ) |
Net unrealized loss on securities (net of tax of $7) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (13 | ) |
Net unrealized gain on auction rate securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,004 | | | | 2,004 | |
Reclassification of unrealized gain on auction rate securities to earnings (net of tax of $178) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (317 | ) | | | (317 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustment (net of tax of ($541)) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 962 | | | | 962 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to benefit plan obligations (net of tax of $42) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (74 | ) | | | (74 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (9,422 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at April 3, 2010 | | | 27,665 | | | | 142,369 | | | | 199,486 | | | | 807 | | | | 342,662 | |
Stock plans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock plans | | | 634 | | | | 10,568 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,568 | |
Tax impact of stock options exercised | | | — | | | | 252 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 252 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,934 | | | | — | | | | 7,934 | |
Net unrealized gain on securities (net of tax of ($15)) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27 | | | | 27 | |
Net unrealized gain on auction rate securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 144 | | | | 144 | |
Cumulative translation adjustment (net of tax of ($449)) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 715 | | | | 715 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to benefit plan obligations (net of tax of $4) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at April 2, 2011 | | | 28,299 | | | $ | 153,189 | | | $ | 207,420 | | | $ | 1,690 | | | $ | 362,299 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
42
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 7,934 | | | $ | (11,984 | ) | | $ | (51,050 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 10,317 | | | | 10,002 | | | | 10,343 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | | 1,964 | | | | 2,149 | | | | 2,393 | |
Share-based compensation expense | | | 9,309 | | | | 7,696 | | | | 4,378 | |
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts | | | (150 | ) | | | (31 | ) | | | 491 | |
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | | | 106 | | | | 15 | | | | 96 | |
Other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities | | | — | | | | 1,347 | | | | 13,593 | |
Goodwill impairment charge | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17,396 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (2,752 | ) | | | (9,937 | ) | | | (11,167 | ) |
Changes in operating accounts, net of acquisition: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in trade receivables, net | | | (5,755 | ) | | | (19,110 | ) | | | 38,935 | |
Decrease in inventories | | | 3,108 | | | | 11,918 | | | | 16,567 | |
(Increase) decrease in shipped systems pending acceptance | | | (1,183 | ) | | | (2,034 | ) | | | 511 | |
Decrease (increase) in other current assets | | | 2,228 | | | | 1,802 | | | | (3,462 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 22,706 | | | | 8,999 | | | | (19,930 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | | | 2,758 | | | | 2,023 | | | | (1,332 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 50,590 | | | | 2,855 | | | | 17,762 | |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of investments | | | (471,112 | ) | | | (282,058 | ) | | | (870,612 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments | | | 509,935 | | | | 169,613 | | | | 870,935 | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | | | (6,556 | ) | | | (3,195 | ) | | | (3,094 | ) |
Purchase of equipment and intellectual property | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,250 | ) |
Cash paid to acquire the assets of Pyrophotonics Lasers, Inc. | | | (8,075 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Minority equity investment | | | (782 | ) | | | (193 | ) | | | (876 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of minority equity investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,884 | |
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash | | | 55 | | | | (10,824 | ) | | | — | |
Decrease in other assets | | | 487 | | | | 7,702 | | | | 1,445 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | 23,952 | | | | (118,955 | ) | | | 432 | |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock plans | | | 1,259 | | | | 1,377 | | | | 2,800 | |
Excess tax benefit of share-based compensation | | | 252 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Share repurchases | | | — | | | | (555 | ) | | | (4,724 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 1,511 | | | | 822 | | | | (1,924 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 1,024 | | | | 1,075 | | | | (3,791 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | 77,077 | | | | (114,203 | ) | | | 12,479 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | 39,335 | | | | 153,538 | | | | 141,059 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 116,412 | | | $ | 39,335 | | | $ | 153,538 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | — | | | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | — | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | (2,026 | ) | | $ | (2,167 | ) | | $ | (3,259 | ) |
Income tax refunds received | | $ | 3,360 | | | $ | 4,239 | | | $ | 2,893 | |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
43
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. The Company
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) is a leading supplier of innovative laser-based manufacturing solutions for the microtechnology industry. The Company’s advanced laser systems enable precise structuring and testing of micron to submicron features in components and devices which are used in a wide variety of end products in the consumer electronics, computer, communications and other industries. These features enable the Company’s customers to achieve functionality, or improve yield and productivity in their manufacturing processes that can be critical to their profitability. Founded in 1944, the Company is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, with global operations and subsidiaries in Asia, Canada, Europe and the United States.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation, with no effect on previously reported earnings or cash flows. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Saturday nearest March 31. Accordingly, the fiscal 2011 reporting period consisted of a 52-week period ending on April 2, 2011, the fiscal 2010 reporting period consisted of a 53-week period ending on April 3, 2010 and the fiscal 2009 reporting period consisted of a 52-week period ending on March 28, 2009. All references to years or quarters relate to fiscal years or fiscal quarters unless otherwise noted.
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Management believes that the estimates used are reasonable. Significant estimates made by management include: revenue recognition; inventory valuation; product warranty reserves; allowance for doubtful accounts; share-based compensation; income taxes including the valuation of deferred tax assets; fair value measurements; valuation of auction rate securities (ARS); valuation of cost method equity investments; valuation of long-lived assets; and valuation of goodwill.
Risks and Uncertainties
The Company uses financial instruments that potentially subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, available-for-sale marketable securities, trade receivables and financial instruments used in hedging activities. The Company invests cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and readily marketable securities. Investments are placed with high credit quality financial institutions and the credit exposure from any one institution or instrument is minimized. Additionally, the Company holds investments in ARS. See Note 5 “Fair Value Measurements” for further discussion on these investments.
The Company sells a significant portion of its products to a small number of large semiconductor and microelectronics manufacturers. The top ten customers accounted for approximately 62%, 56% and 50% of total
44
net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. One consumer electronics manufacturer accounted for approximately 24%, 30% and 21% of total net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Two other customers individually accounted for approximately 11% of total net sales in 2011. No other customer individually accounted for more than 10% of total net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009. The Company’s operating results may be adversely affected if the financial condition and operations of these key customers decline.
The Company uses qualified manufacturers to supply many components and sub-system modules of its products. The systems that the Company manufactures use high-performance computers, peripherals, lasers and other components from various suppliers. The Company obtains some of the components from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. An interruption in the supply of a particular component would have a temporary adverse impact on the Company’s operating results.
The Company’s net investment exposure in foreign subsidiaries translated into U.S. dollars using the period-end exchange rates at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was approximately $39.7 million and $27.1 million, respectively. The potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates would be approximately $4.0 million and $2.7 million at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. The Company currently has no plans to dispose of any of its foreign subsidiaries, and therefore, foreign exchange rate gains or losses on foreign investments are reflected as a cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax, and do not affect the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s operations involve a number of other risks and uncertainties including but not limited to those relating to the cyclicality of the semiconductor and microelectronics markets, the effect of general economic conditions, rapid changes in technology and international operations.
Cash Equivalents and Investments
All highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments reflect marketable securities that have maturities of less than one year or are subject to immediate pre-payment or call provisions. These securities consist primarily of marketable debt securities and are classified as “available for sale” and recorded at fair market value. Unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within shareholders’ equity. To determine whether any existing impairment is other-than-temporary and requires recognition of an impairment loss in the results of operations, the Company evaluates its marketable securities based on the nature of the investments and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the securities until the securities are no longer in an unrealized loss position.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash which collateralizes commercial letters of credit substituted for a cash bond previously held by the Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan. See Note 21 “Legal Proceedings” below for further discussion.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect and do not bear interest. Credit limits are established by reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. Where appropriate, the Company obtains credit rating reports and financial statements of the customer to establish or modify credit limits. On certain foreign sales, letters of credit are required. The collectability of trade receivable balances is regularly evaluated based on a combination of factors such as customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends, and changes in customer payment terms. If it is determined that a customer will be unable to fully meet its financial obligation, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or other material events impacting its business, a specific reserve for bad debt is recorded to reduce the related receivable to the amount expected to be recovered.
45
Inventories
Inventories are principally valued at standard costs, which approximate the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Costs utilized for inventory valuation purposes include material, labor and manufacturing overhead.
Shipped Systems Pending Acceptance
Shipped systems pending acceptance relate to systems that have been ordered and shipped to the customer, but have been deferred in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Shipped systems pending acceptance are recognized as cost of sales once all criteria for revenue recognition have been met and revenue is recorded. Shipped systems pending acceptance are valued at standard costs, which approximate the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Costs utilized in the valuation of shipped systems pending acceptance include material, labor and manufacturing overhead and exclude costs of installation.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are expensed as incurred. Major improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included as a component of operating expenses.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment
Long-lived assets, principally property, plant and equipment and identifiable definite-lived intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to estimated future net undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
The Company’s purchased patents are amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally ten to seventeen years.
Other purchased intangible assets with definite useful lives are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization expense is recognized on either a straight-line or sum-of-the-years digits method over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets, which range from one to seven years.
Goodwill Impairment
The Company accounts for goodwill pursuant to ASC Topic 350. ASC Topic 350 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at least annually. Goodwill was tested for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2011 utilizing a fair value comparison method, and it was determined that there was no impairment as of April 2, 2011. Consistent with historical practices, the estimation of fair value was determined based on a method that compares the Company’s market capitalization against the net book value of the Company’s assets.
Other Assets
Other assets include consignment, demonstration (demo) and training equipment, minority equity investments and long-term deposits.
Consignment, demo and training equipment are recorded at the lower of standard costs or estimated market values, until the assets are sold.
46
As of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, the Company had a $9.0 million and an $8.2 million minority equity investment in preferred stock of OmniGuide, Inc. (OmniGuide), respectively. As of April 2, 2011, the minority equity investment of $9.0 million included $6.0 million of Series D Preferred Stock and $3.0 million of Series E Preferred Stock. As of April 3, 2010, the minority equity investment of $8.2 million included $6.0 million of Series D Preferred Stock and $2.2 million of Series E Preferred Stock.
These investments are accounted for as cost method investments as the Company does not have the ability to significantly influence OmniGuide. At each reporting period end, the Company determines whether events or circumstances have occurred that are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investments. If there are no identified events or circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investments, the fair value of the investments are not calculated as it is not practicable to do so. As of April 2, 2011, management had not identified any events or circumstances that indicated the investments were impaired, therefore the full carrying value of $9.0 million was included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these financial instruments. Current and non-current marketable securities are recorded at fair market value. See Note 5 “Fair Value Measurements” for additional information.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company’s primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage currency risk. The Company’s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether they meet the Company’s criteria for designation as hedging transactions, either as cash flow or fair value hedges. A hedge of the exposure to variability in the cash flows of an asset or a liability, or of a forecasted transaction, is referred to as a cash flow hedge. A hedge of the exposure to changes in fair value of an asset or a liability, or of an unrecognized firm commitment, is referred to as a fair value hedge. The criteria for designating a derivative as a hedge include the instrument’s effectiveness in risk reduction and, in most cases, a one-to-one matching of the derivative instrument to its underlying transaction.
Valuation of Auction Rate Securities (ARS)
Estimated fair values of ARS are based primarily upon the income approach using a discounted cash flow model which takes into account the following: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates that reflect current market conditions; (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default, restructuring or redemption by the issuer (trigger events); (iv) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of default for each security; (v) the financial condition, results, ratings of and financial claims on the bond insurers and issuers; and (vi) the underlying trust assets of the securities.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss generally pass to the customer at the time of delivery of the product to a common carrier. Revenue is recognized upon such delivery, provided that fulfillment of acceptance criteria can be demonstrated prior to shipment. Where the acceptance criteria cannot be demonstrated prior to shipment, or in the case of substantially new products, revenue is deferred until acceptance has been received. For multiple element arrangements, the fair value of any undelivered elements is deferred until the
47
elements are delivered and acceptance criteria are met. Revenues are recorded net of taxes collected which are required to be submitted to government authorities. Installation services are not essential to the functionality of the delivered equipment and installation revenue is deferred until installation is complete. Neither the costs of installation accrued nor the fair value of installation service revenue deferred has been material.
Revenues associated with sales to customers under local contracts in Japan are recognized upon title transfer, which generally occurs upon customer acceptance. Revenues related to spare parts and consumable sales are generally recognized upon shipment. Revenues related to maintenance and service contracts are recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.
Product Warranty
The Company evaluates obligations related to product warranties quarterly. A standard one-year warranty from the date of acceptance is provided on most products. Warranty charges are comprised of costs to service the warranty, including labor to repair the system and replacement parts for defective items, as well as other costs incidental to the repairs. Warranty charges are recorded net of any cost recoveries resulting from either successful repair of damaged parts or from warranties offered by the Company’s suppliers for defective components. Using historical data, the Company estimates average warranty cost per system or part type and records the provision for such charges as an element of cost of goods sold upon recognition of the related revenue. Additionally, the overall warranty accrual balance is separately analyzed using the remaining warranty periods outstanding on systems and items under warranty, and any resulting changes in estimates are recorded as an adjustment to cost of sales. If circumstances change, or if a significant change in warranty-related incidents occurs, the impact of the change in the warranty accrual could be material. Accrued product warranty is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of accrued liabilities.
Research and Development
Research and development costs, which include labor and related employee expenses, patent maintenance fees, project materials, project subcontractors, depreciation of engineering equipment, building costs and other administration expenses, are generally expensed as incurred. Engineering materials that are expected to provide future value are included in inventories.
Taxes on Unremitted Foreign Income
The Company provides for income taxes on its foreign subsidiaries’ taxable income based on the effective income tax rate in each respective jurisdiction. The Company provides for deferred taxes on the undistributed earnings of a subsidiary, except to the extent that the income is intended to be indefinitely reinvested or remitted in a tax-free liquidation. The only foreign jurisdiction where the Company is permanently reinvested is Singapore. The cumulative amount of earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided was $13.6 million as of April 2, 2011 and $5.9 million as of April 3, 2010. The unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings was $4.2 million as of April 2, 2011 and $2.6 million as of April 3, 2010.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and “other comprehensive income,” which includes charges or credits to equity that are not the result of transactions with shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) within these consolidated financial statements includes primarily cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale. The cumulative translation adjustment included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was $0.3 million and $(0.4) million, respectively.
48
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed utilizing the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS also considers common stock equivalents, such as stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) shares and restricted stock units, to the extent that they are not antidilutive.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes expense related to the fair value of its share-based compensation awards. The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of all share-based compensation awards on the date of grant, except for unvested restricted stock units, which are valued at the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of award. The Company recognizes the compensation expense for options, SARs and unvested restricted stock units on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.
Segment Reporting
The Company complies with ASC Topic 280 “Segment Reporting” (ASC Topic 280). ASC Topic 280, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products, major customers and the geographies in which the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. An operating segment is defined as a component that engages in business activities whose operating results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker and for which discrete financial information is available. Based on the provisions of ASC Topic 280, the Company has determined that it operates in one segment. The Company manages its resources and assesses its performance on an enterprise-wide basis.
Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has an employee savings plan under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. During 2011 and 2009, contributions to the plan by the Company were $0.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The Company did not make contributions to the plan during 2010.
The Company has defined benefit retirement plans at certain of its foreign subsidiaries. The Company accounts for these plans based on the provisions of ASC Topic 715 “Compensation-Retirement Benefits”.
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASC Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13 “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (ASC ASU 2009-13). ASC ASU 2009-13 addresses how arrangement consideration should be allocated to deliverables in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement. ASC ASU 2009-13 will become effective for the Company’s first quarter of 2012. The adoption of ASC ASU 2009-13 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASC ASU 2009-14 “Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements” (ASC ASU 2009-14). ASC ASU 2009-14 modifies the scope of Software Revenue Recognition to exclude non-software components of tangible products and software components of tangible products that are sold, licensed, or leased with tangible products when the software components and non-software components of the tangible product function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality. ASC ASU 2009-14 will become effective for the Company’s first quarter of 2012. The adoption of ASC ASU 2009-14 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
49
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASC ASU 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASC ASU 2010-06). ASC ASU 2010-06 requires various additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements, including the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3, and a gross basis of presentation for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 activity rollforward. ASC ASU 2010-06 became effective for the Company’s fourth quarter of 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 activity rollforward, which will be effective for the Company’s first quarter of 2012. The Company’s adoption of ASC ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows, nor will the adoption of the remaining provisions of ASC ASU 2010-06.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (ASC ASU 2011-04). ASC ASU 2011-04 will result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). These disclosures include: (a) information about transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; (b) information about the sensitivity of a fair value measurement categorized within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to changes in unobservable inputs and any interrelationships between those unobservable inputs; and (c) the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, but for which the fair value of such items is required to be disclosed. ASC ASU 2011-04 will become effective for the Company’s fourth quarter of 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of ASC ASU 2011-04 will have on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
4. Share-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes expense related to the fair value of its share-based compensation awards using the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of awards on the date of grant, except for unvested restricted stock unit awards, which are valued at the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of award. The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.
Stock Plans
In October 2004, the shareholders approved the adoption of the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan) that replaced various stock compensation plans that were previously approved by the shareholders or the Board of Directors (the Replaced Plans), except with respect to options and other awards previously outstanding. Outstanding options and awards remained subject to the terms of the Replaced Plans under which they were originally granted. At that time, the shareholders also approved the reservation of 3,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2004 Plan. These shares are in addition to any shares of common stock that, at the time the 2004 Plan was approved by shareholders, were available for grant under the Replaced Plans or that may subsequently become available for grant under any of the Replaced Plans through the expiration, termination, forfeiture or cancellation of grants. In January 2005, the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the 2004 Plan. These amendments prohibit grants of stock options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs) with an exercise price less than fair market value, require that time-based restricted stock awards have a minimum vesting period of at least three years, with the subject shares vesting no more quickly than one-third annually over the three-year period, and expressly prohibit the reservation of additional shares under the 2004 Plan without shareholder approval. In April 2005, the Board of Directors approved another amendment to the 2004 Plan extending the period during which an option may be exercised following termination of employment or service if an optionee dies within the 90-day exercise period following termination. In October 2007, the shareholders approved an additional amendment to the 2004 Plan to permit awards to non-employee service providers and implement certain claw-back provisions.
The 2004 Plan allows for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses (including restricted stock units), restricted stock and performance-based awards. Stock options and SARs outstanding
50
under the 2004 Plan and the Replaced Plans vest over variable periods determined at the grant date, generally with terms of immediate vesting or up to four years, and expire ten years from the date of grant. Options and SARs issued under the 2004 Plan and the Replaced Plans are exercisable at prices not less than fair market value on the date of the grant. The 2004 Plan prohibits repricing of options and SARs granted without prior shareholder approval. Certain restricted stock units awarded under the 2004 Plan vest based on performance criteria that are tied to the Company’s results of operations, personal performance criteria, and, in certain cases, length of service.
In September 1990, the shareholders approved the adoption of the 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended in September 1998, October 2003, October 2004, January 2008 and August 2009 (the ESPP), pursuant to which 3,400,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance to participating employees. Eligible employees may elect to contribute up to 15 percent of their base wage and commissions during each pay period. The ESPP provides for separate overlapping twenty-four month offerings starting every three months. Each offering has eight purchase dates occurring every three months on designated dates. The offerings under the ESPP commence on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each calendar year. Any eligible employee may participate in only one offering at a time and may purchase shares only through payroll deductions permitted under the ESPP. At the end of each three-month purchase period, the purchase price is determined and the accumulated funds are used to automatically purchase shares of common stock. The purchase price per share is equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on (a) the first day of the offering period or (b) the date of purchase. The ESPP also provides that if the fair market value of the common stock on the first day of the new offering period is less than or equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the first date of any ongoing offering, employees participating in any such ongoing offering will be automatically withdrawn from it and enrolled in the new offering.
The Company granted SARs starting in the first quarter of 2010. SARs grant the right to receive shares of the Company’s stock equivalent to the increase in stock value of a specified number of shares over a specified period of time, divided by the stock price at the time of exercise. The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of SARs. Similar to options, SARs are recorded at the fair value of the award at grant date and the expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The Company did not grant any stock options during 2011 and did not grant any SARs prior to the first quarter of 2010.
Share-based compensation expense was included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Cost of sales | | $ | 1,084 | | | $ | 1,059 | | | $ | 712 | |
Selling, service and administration | | | 6,688 | | | | 5,306 | | | | 2,749 | |
Research, development and engineering | | | 1,554 | | | | 1,355 | | | | 917 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total share-based compensation expense | | $ | 9,326 | | | $ | 7,720 | | | $ | 4,378 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The total amount of cash received from the stock plan awards was $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $2.8 million for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. All stock plan awards are settled with newly issued shares.
No share-based compensation costs were capitalized during 2011. As of April 2, 2011, the Company had $11.5 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.
51
Valuation Assumptions
The Black-Scholes option pricing model is utilized to determine the fair value of options and SARs granted. The following weighted average assumptions were used in calculating the fair value during the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 2.08 | % | | | 2.63 | % | | | 3.50 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
Expected lives | | | 5.5 years | | | | 5.6 years | | | | 4.6 years | |
Expected volatility | | | 47 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 41 | % |
The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of ESPP shares issued during the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 0.34 | % | | | 0.43 | % | | | 1.27 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
Expected lives | | | 1.1 years | | | | 1.1 years | | | | 1.1 years | |
Expected volatility | | | 44 | % | | | 60 | % | | | 50 | % |
The risk-free rates used are based on the U.S. Treasury yields over the expected terms. The expected term and forfeiture estimates for stock options and SARs are based on an analysis of actual exercise behavior. The expected term for the ESPP is the weighted average length of the purchase periods. The Company uses its historical volatility over the estimated expected term as the expected volatility.
At April 2, 2011, the Company had 9,381,709 shares of its common stock reserved for issuance under all of the above plans combined. Of those shares, 4,688,358 are subject to issuance under currently outstanding stock options, SARs and stock awards and 4,693,351 shares, including 1,061,387 shares available for issuance under the ESPP, are available for future grants. The weighted-average fair-value of share-based compensation awards, including stock option and SAR awards granted and vested during the period, unvested restricted stock unit awards granted during the period and the intrinsic value of stock options and SARs exercised during the period were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share data) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Stock-Option and SAR Awards: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grant date fair value per share | | $ | 6.35 | | | $ | 3.88 | | | $ | 6.86 | |
Total fair value of options and SARs granted | | $ | 1,220 | | | $ | 3,412 | | | $ | 968 | |
Total fair value of options and SARs vested | | $ | 1,322 | | | $ | 526 | | | $ | 1,285 | |
Total intrinsic value of options and SARs exercised | | $ | 444 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 105 | |
Unvested Restricted Stock Unit Awards: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grant date fair value per share | | $ | 14.18 | | | $ | 8.46 | | | $ | 16.19 | |
Total fair value of awards granted | | $ | 7,766 | | | $ | 4,187 | | | $ | 5,614 | |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grant date fair value per share | | $ | 2.76 | | | $ | 2.17 | | | $ | 3.21 | |
Total grant date fair value | | $ | 1,109 | | | $ | 773 | | | $ | 979 | |
52
Share-Based Payment Award Activity
Information with respect to stock option and SAR activity was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | | | Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | | Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In thousands) | |
Outstanding at April 3, 2010 | | | 3,747,740 | | | $ | 20.86 | | | | | | | | | |
Granted | | | 192,000 | | | | 13.97 | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (78,273 | ) | | | 8.37 | | | | | | | | | |
Expired or forfeited | | | (315,996 | ) | | | 34.33 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at April 2, 2011 | | | 3,545,471 | | | $ | 19.56 | | | | 4.61 | | | $ | 7,167 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and expected to vest at April 2, 2011 | | | 3,475,016 | | | $ | 19.75 | | | | 4.53 | | | $ | 6,669 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at April 2, 2011 | | | 2,673,106 | | | $ | 22.51 | | | | 3.43 | | | $ | 1,345 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Information with respect to unvested restricted stock unit awards activity was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | | Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | | Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In thousands) | |
Outstanding at April 3, 2010 | | | 928,437 | | | $ | 14.70 | | | | | | | | | |
Awarded | | | 547,522 | | | | 14.18 | | | | | | | | | |
Vested | | | (272,784 | ) | | | 16.70 | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (60,288 | ) | | | 13.51 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at April 2, 2011 | | | 1,142,887 | | | $ | 14.04 | | | | 1.54 | | | $ | 19,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5. Fair Value Measurements
Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value
Fair value is defined under ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC Topic 820) as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include the following:
| | • | | Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
| | • | | Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities that are either directly or indirectly observable; and |
| | • | | Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. |
53
The Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2, 2011 | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Money market securities | | $ | 5,261 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,261 | |
Commercial paper | | | — | | | | 97,332 | | | | — | | | | 97,332 | |
Government agencies | | | — | | | | 63,667 | | | | — | | | | 63,667 | |
Forward purchase or (sale) contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Japanese Yen | | | — | | | | 135 | | | | — | | | | 135 | |
Taiwan Dollar | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Korean Won | | | — | | | | 98 | | | | — | | | | 98 | |
Euro | | | — | | | | (26 | ) | | | — | | | | (26 | ) |
British Pound | | | — | | | | (23 | ) | | | — | | | | (23 | ) |
Auction rate securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,166 | | | | 5,166 | |
Preferred stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | |
April 3, 2010 | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Money market securities | | $ | 4,244 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,244 | |
Government agencies | | | — | | | | 73,130 | | | | — | | | | 73,130 | |
Commercial paper | | | — | | | | 41,992 | | | | — | | | | 41,992 | |
U.S. treasuries | | | — | | | | 17,089 | | | | — | | | | 17,089 | |
Forward purchase or (sale) contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Japanese Yen | | | — | | | | 165 | | | | — | | | | 165 | |
Taiwan Dollar | | | — | | | | (10 | ) | | | — | | | | (10 | ) |
Korean Won | | | — | | | | 15 | | | | — | | | | 15 | |
Euro | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | — | | | | 6 | |
British Pound | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 5 | |
Auction rate securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,021 | | | | 5,021 | |
Preferred stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
For Level 1 assets, the Company utilized quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
For Level 2 assets, exclusive of forward contracts, the Company utilized quoted prices in active markets for similar assets. For forward contracts, spot prices at April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 were utilized to calculate fair values.
The Level 3 assets consisted of ARS and preferred stock acquired through the conversion of ARS. As none of the Company’s ARS have traded through the auction process, estimated fair values were based primarily upon the income approach using a discounted cash flow model which took into account the following: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates that reflect current market conditions; (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default, restructuring or redemption by the issuer (trigger events); (iv) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of default for each security; (v) the financial condition, results, ratings of and financial claims on the bond insurers and issuers; and (vi) the underlying trust assets of the securities.
As of April 2, 2011, the Company held ARS with a total estimated fair value of $5.2 million. These ARS consisted of $10.7 million par value ARS and $4.0 million par value ARS which were converted by the bond issuer to its preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009. The contractual maturities of these securities range up to calendar year 2050, and several securities and the preferred stock do not have stated maturities. These securities previously provided short-term liquidity through a Dutch auction process that reset the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 to 35 days. As a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, the Company’s ARS began to experience failed auctions during fiscal 2008.
54
Since that time, none of the Company’s ARS have traded through the auction process and the credit quality of the counterparties has deteriorated. Consequently, it was determined that the declines in fair value of these securities in 2010 and 2009 represented other-than-temporary impairments in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the Company recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.3 million and $13.6 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. There were no other-than-temporary impairments of ARS in 2011.
As of the beginning of 2010, in accordance with the adoption of ASC Topic 320 “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities” (ASC Topic 320), the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to increase the opening balance of retained earnings by $0.4 million, which represented the non-credit portion of the ARS loss previously recorded as an other-than-temporary impairment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The credit portion of the ARS loss was determined by direct estimation of the change in fair value attributable to market movements. The Company utilized market indices representing investments of constant credit quality over time and measured the index yield, which is considered attributable to non-credit related factors, at the beginning and end of the period. The effect of this change in yield on the value of the security was measured and subtracted from the total change in fair value to arrive at the estimated change in value attributable to changes in credit quality.
As of April 2, 2011, the estimated fair value of the Company’s ARS of $5.2 million included $1.4 million of total net unrealized gains. These unrealized gains have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company’s ARS are classified as non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million. The Company recorded a gain of $0.7 million in 2011 as the security was previously written down to zero value. During 2010, the Company sold certain ARS with a par value of $1.9 million pursuant to a tender agreement with the parent company of the securities’ original issuer. The Company received approximately $1.4 million on the sale of the ARS, which had an estimated fair value of $1.6 million prior to the quarter in which it was sold. As a result of the sale in 2010, the Company reclassified $0.3 million of the previously recorded unrealized net gain out of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Subsequent to the year ended April 2, 2011, the Company sold the remaining ARS with a total par value of $14.7 million for approximately $6.4 million. The Company will record a total gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2012 including $1.4 million in reclassification of previously recorded unrealized net gains out of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The following table illustrates the activity related to credit loss on ARS from March 28, 2009 to April 2, 2011:
| | | | |
(In thousands) | | Credit Loss | |
Balance at March 28, 2009 | | $ | (13,206 | ) |
Other-than-temporary impairment recognized as credit loss | | | (1,347 | ) |
Sale of ARS | | | 573 | |
| | | | |
Balance at April 3, 2010 | | | (13,980 | ) |
Other-than-temporary impairment recognized as credit loss | | | — | |
Sale of ARS | | | 3,001 | |
| | | | |
Balance at April 2, 2011 | | $ | (10,979 | ) |
| | | | |
55
The following table illustrates Level 3 activity from March 28, 2009 to April 2, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Auction Rate
Securities | | | Preferred
Stock | �� | | Total | |
Fair Value, March 28, 2009 | | $ | 5,627 | | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 6,007 | |
Adjustment to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains | | | 2,643 | | | | — | | | | 2,643 | |
Unrealized losses | | | (639 | ) | | | — | | | | (639 | ) |
Other-than-temporary impairment | | | (967 | ) | | | (380 | ) | | | (1,347 | ) |
Sales | | | (1,643 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,643 | ) |
Purchases, issuances and settlements | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Net transfers into (out of) Level 3 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, April 3, 2010 | | | 5,021 | | | | — | | | | 5,021 | |
| | | |
Adjustment to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains | | | 858 | | | | — | | | | 858 | |
Unrealized losses | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Other-than-temporary impairment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Sales | | | (713 | ) | | | — | | | | (713 | ) |
Purchases, issuances and settlements | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Net transfers into (out of) Level 3 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, April 2, 2011 | | $ | 5,166 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,166 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company invested an additional $0.8 million in Series E Preferred Stock of OmniGuide, Inc. As of April 2, 2011, the Company had $6.0 million invested in Series D Preferred Stock and $3.0 million invested in Series E Preferred Stock of OmniGuide, Inc., representing an 11% interest. At each reporting period end, the Company determines whether events or circumstances have occurred that are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments. If there are no events or circumstances identified that would adversely affect the fair value of the investments, the fair values of the investments are not calculated as it is not practicable to do so. As of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, management had not identified any events or circumstances that indicated the investments were impaired; therefore, as presented in Note 12 “Other Assets”, the full carrying value of $9.0 million and $8.2 million were included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively.
56
Investments
Certain information regarding the Company’s investments at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Unrealized | | | | |
April 2, 2011 | | Cost | | | Gain | | | Loss | | | Fair Value | |
Available-for-sale securities (current): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial paper | | $ | 97,330 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 97,332 | |
Government agencies | | | 55,550 | | | | 20 | | | | — | | | | 55,570 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 152,880 | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 152,902 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities (non-current): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government agencies | | $ | 8,087 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,097 | |
Auction rate securities | | | 10,700 | | | | 1,445 | | | | (6,979 | ) | | | 5,166 | |
Preferred stock | | | 4,000 | | | | — | | | | (4,000 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 22,787 | | | $ | 1,455 | | | $ | (10,979 | ) | | $ | 13,263 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | Unrealized | | | | |
April 3, 2010 | | Cost | | | Gain | | | Loss | | | Fair Value | |
Available-for-sale securities (current): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government agencies | | $ | 73,141 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | 73,130 | |
Commercial paper | | | 41,992 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41,992 | |
U.S. treasuries | | | 17,088 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 17,089 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 132,221 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | 132,211 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities (non-current): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Auction rate securities | | $ | 13,700 | | | $ | 1,301 | | | $ | (9,980 | ) | | $ | 5,021 | |
Preferred stock | | | 4,000 | | | | — | | | | (4,000 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 17,700 | | | $ | 1,301 | | | $ | (13,980 | ) | | $ | 5,021 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other than the sale of ARS discussed above, the Company had no sales of available-for-sale securities during 2011 and 2009. During 2010, the Company sold $2.0 million of current available-for-sale securities, which resulted in an insignificant net gain.
For purposes of determining gross realized gains and losses and reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. Net unrealized holding gains and losses on current available-for-sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were insignificant as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010.
Underlying maturities of investments at April 2, 2011 were $152.9 million within one year, $8.1 million between one to five years and $5.2 million beyond 10 years.
6. Business Acquisition
In September 2010, the Company acquired certain assets of PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc. (PyroPhotonics), a manufacturer of tailored-pulse fiber lasers, for approximately $8.1 million in cash plus acquisition related costs of approximately $0.3 million. The purchase price was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. Analyses supporting the purchase price allocation included a valuation of assets and liabilities as of the closing date, an analysis of intangible assets and a detailed review of the opening balance sheet to determine other significant adjustments required to recognize assets and liabilities at fair value.
57
The following table presents the allocation of the purchase price of $8.1 million to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values (in thousands):
| | | | |
Inventory | | $ | 395 | |
Prepaid expense and other current assets | | | 20 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 84 | |
Patents(1) | | | 410 | |
In-process research and development(1) | | | 3,204 | |
Goodwill | | | 4,014 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (52 | ) |
| | | | |
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired | | $ | 8,075 | |
| | | | |
| (1) | See Note 11 “Acquired Intangible Assets” for additional discussion. |
The acquisition was an investment to integrate PyroPhotonics’ technology into certain of the Company’s product groups, which supported the premium paid over the fair market value of the individual assets. As a result, the Company recorded $4.0 million of goodwill. A portion of the goodwill amount is deductible for tax purposes.
As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $3.6 million of identifiable intangible assets including $3.2 million of in-process research and development (IPR&D) at the date of the acquisition. The IPR&D program consisted of three laser platforms with primary focus on PyroFlex-25. The PyroFlex-25 is a unique pulse-programmable fiber laser platform designed to serve a broad range of industrial applications. The PyroFlex-25 is currently in the final stages of development, aimed towards a full production release slated for second half of calendar year 2011.
In determining the value of in-process research and development, the Company applied the excess earnings method. The key value drivers under the excess earnings method are as follows: (a) projected revenue and earnings generated by the assets; (b) expected economic life of the asset; (c) contributory asset charges that would be paid to the requisite operating assets; and (d) a discount rate which reflects risk associated with receiving future cash flows. Forecasted sales and expenses were projected individually for these three laser platforms including PyroFlex-25. The selected discount rate for the IPR&D was 25.6%. In applying a discount rate for the IPR&D, the Company considered the overall weighted average cost of capital of PyroPhotonics.
The operating results of this acquisition are included in the Company’s results of operations since the date of acquisition. The acquisition is not significant, as defined in Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission, compared to the Company’s overall financial position. Accordingly, pro forma financial statements of the combined entities are not presented.
7. Inventories
The components of inventories at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Raw materials and purchased parts | | $ | 45,650 | | | $ | 47,636 | |
Work-in-process | | | 11,274 | | | | 10,731 | |
Finished goods | | | 8,438 | | | | 13,723 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 65,362 | | | $ | 72,090 | |
| | | | | | | | |
58
8. Other Current Assets
Other current assets at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Prepaid expenses | | $ | 3,840 | | | $ | 4,286 | |
Value added tax receivable | | | 2,481 | | | | 1,179 | |
Income tax refund receivable | | | — | | | | 3,017 | |
Other | | | 463 | | | | 195 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,784 | | | $ | 8,677 | |
| | | | | | | | |
9. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Estimated
Useful Lives | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Land | | | n/a | | | $ | 3,110 | | | $ | 3,086 | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 3 to 40 years | | | | 39,814 | | | | 40,225 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 3 to 10 years | | | | 57,564 | | | | 52,328 | |
Computer equipment and software | | | 1 to 7 years | | | | 31,507 | | | | 29,373 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 131,995 | | | | 125,012 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | | | | | (92,334 | ) | | | (84,422 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 39,661 | | | $ | 40,590 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense totaled $10.3 million, $10.0 million and $10.3 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
10. Goodwill
As of April 2, 2011, the Company had $4.0 million in goodwill which was the result of the PyroPhotonics acquisition in 2011. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $3.6 million of identifiable intangible assets and $4.0 million of goodwill. See Note 6 “Business Acquisition” for additional discussion.
The Company had no goodwill balance as of April 3, 2010 because of an impairment charge of $17.4 million in 2009. Due to decreases in the Company’s market capitalization during 2009, the Company reviewed the recoverability of goodwill as of the end of the third quarter of 2009. Consistent with historical practices, the estimation of the fair value was determined based on a method that compares the Company’s market capitalization against the net book value of the Company’s assets. Based on the results of the review, it was determined that the fair value of the Company’s goodwill was less than the carrying value. Accordingly, as of the end of the third quarter of 2009, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $17.4 million, of which $16.0 million related to the acquisition of New Wave Research, Incorporated.
59
11. Acquired Intangible Assets
Acquired intangible assets as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except years) | | Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(In years) | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Developed technology | | | 7 | | | $ | 8,100 | | | $ | 8,100 | |
Customer relationships | | | 6 | | | | 2,700 | | | | 2,700 | |
Customer backlog | | | 1 | | | | 700 | | | | 700 | |
Trade name and trademarks | | | 3 | | | | 400 | | | | 400 | |
Fair value of below-market lease (non-current portion) | | | 3.8 | | | | 310 | | | | 311 | |
Change of control agreements | | | 1 | | | | 100 | | | | 100 | |
Patents | | | 13.1 | | | | 3,427 | | | | 2,978 | |
In-process research and development(1) | | | Indefinite | | | | 3,204 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 18,941 | | | | 15,289 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | | | | | (8,906 | ) | | | (7,034 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current acquired intangible assets | | | | | | | 10,035 | | | | 8,255 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of below-market lease (current portion) | | | | | | | 110 | | | | 110 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | | | | | (91 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total acquired intangible assets | | | | | | $ | 10,054 | | | $ | 8,365 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | See Note 6 “Business Acquisition” for additional discussion. |
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets has been recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Cost of sales | | $ | 1,157 | | | $ | 1,155 | | | $ | 1,157 | |
Selling, service and administration | | | 576 | | | | 798 | | | | 1,175 | |
Research, development and engineering | | | 231 | | | | 196 | | | | 61 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,964 | | | $ | 2,149 | | | $ | 2,393 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The estimated amortization expense for acquired intangible assets in future years is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Year | | Amortization | |
2012 | | $ | 1,907 | |
2013 | | | 1,935 | |
2014 | | | 1,806 | |
2015 | | | 966 | |
2016 | | | 610 | |
Future years | | | 2,220 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 9,444 | |
| | | | |
The above table excludes estimated amortization expense on certain in-process research and development assets as the project completion dates are not known as of April 2, 2011.
60
12. Other Assets
Other assets consisted of the following as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Minority equity investment | | $ | 8,966 | | | $ | 8,184 | |
Consignment and demo equipment, net | | | 4,624 | | | | 3,957 | |
Other | | | 929 | | | | 867 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 14,519 | | | $ | 13,008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
13. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax balances of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those assets and liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes resulting from a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. When management determines that it is not more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be fully realized, a valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Net deferred tax assets at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation and warranty costs | | $ | 6,632 | | | $ | 5,612 | |
Receivables and other current assets | | | (246 | ) | | | (268 | ) |
Payroll-related accruals | | | 683 | | | | 654 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 2,467 | | | | 390 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 3,691 | | | | 2,625 | |
Other | | | (813 | ) | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current deferred tax assets | | | 12,414 | | | | 9,026 | |
Valuation allowance, current | | | (2,522 | ) | | | (1,794 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net current deferred tax assets | | $ | 9,892 | | | $ | 7,232 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-current | | | | | | | | |
Deferred compensation | | $ | 4,795 | | | $ | 3,538 | |
Intangible assets and investments | | | 3,957 | | | | 4,031 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 705 | | | | 475 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,019 | | | | 1,027 | |
Other comprehensive (income) loss | | | (324 | ) | | | 137 | |
Tax loss and credit carryforwards | | | 25,209 | | | | 28,234 | |
Other | | | 2,431 | | | | 1,347 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-current deferred tax asset | | | 38,792 | | | | 38,789 | |
Valuation allowance, non-current | | | (7,970 | ) | | | (7,710 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net non-current deferred tax assets | | $ | 30,822 | | | $ | 31,079 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax assets | | $ | 51,206 | | | $ | 47,815 | |
Total valuation allowance | | | (10,492 | ) | | | (9,504 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax assets | | $ | 40,714 | | | $ | 38,311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
61
As of April 2, 2011 the Company had approximately $25.2 million in tax assets resulting from federal, state and foreign net operating losses and tax credits. A detailed breakdown of the net operating loss carryforwards (tax-effected) and tax credits at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Federal net operating losses | | $ | 1,251 | | | $ | 2,021 | |
State net operating losses | | | 3,003 | | | | 3,364 | |
Foreign operating losses and tax credits | | | 1,860 | | | | 8,157 | |
Federal research credits | | | 12,952 | | | | 10,294 | |
State research credits | | | 3,740 | | | | 2,759 | |
Federal minimum tax credit | | | 1,246 | | | | 1,246 | |
Federal capital losses | | | 1,157 | | | | 393 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 25,209 | | | $ | 28,234 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The federal net operating losses expire in fiscal 2012. The state net operating losses expire on various dates through fiscal 2030. The majority of the foreign tax credits expire on various dates through fiscal 2021. The federal and most of the state research credits expire on various dates through fiscal 2030. Certain state research credits and the federal minimum tax credits are available indefinitely.
A valuation allowance of $10.5 million and $9.5 million was recorded as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. The valuation allowance increased by $1.0 million in 2011, decreased by $1.7 million in 2010, and increased by $6.0 million in 2009. The increase in the valuation allowance in 2011 was primarily due to higher state research credits. Future adjustments to the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets may be recorded with changes in future forecasts of taxable income. Based upon historical and future expectations of taxable income, the Company believes that its valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is adequate and that it is more-likely-than-not that the net deferred tax assets of $40.7 million at April 2, 2011 will be realized within the applicable carryforward periods.
The components of income before income taxes and the provision for (benefit from) income taxes, all from continuing operations, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | $ | (1,118 | ) | | $ | (20,139 | ) | | $ | (62,614 | ) |
Foreign | | | 9,442 | | | | (1,623 | ) | | | (2,063 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 8,324 | | | $ | (21,762 | ) | | $ | (64,677 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. federal and state | | $ | 1,579 | | | $ | (1,169 | ) | | $ | (4,297 | ) |
Foreign | | | 1,214 | | | | 784 | | | | 3,671 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,793 | | | | (385 | ) | | | (626 | ) |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. federal and state | | | (2,024 | ) | | | (9,045 | ) | | | (13,283 | ) |
Foreign | | | (379 | ) | | | (348 | ) | | | 282 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (2,403 | ) | | | (9,393 | ) | | | (13,001 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | $ | 390 | | | $ | (9,778 | ) | | $ | (13,627 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
62
The portion of the tax benefit derived from stock-based compensation that is allocated as common stock was $0.3 million in 2011 and $0.1 million in 2009, respectively. No tax benefits associated with share-based compensation were allocated to common stock during 2010.
A reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate to the United States federal statutory income tax rate was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | | | 0.1 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.0 | |
Tax credits | | | (12.1 | ) | | | 4.4 | | | | 2.7 | |
Domestic production and export tax incentives | | | (2.4 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Non-U.S. income taxed at different rates | | | (23.3 | ) | | | 5.9 | | | | 3.7 | |
Changes in unrecognized tax benefits | | | 4.6 | | | | 0.2 | | | | (1.9 | ) |
Goodwill impairment | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12.5 | ) |
Change in valuation allowance | | | (0.4 | ) | | | — | | | | (6.5 | ) |
Stock compensation | | | 2.5 | | | | (2.6 | ) | | | (1.1 | ) |
Other, net | | | 0.7 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 4.7 | % | | | 44.9 | % | | | 21.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
During 2011, the company performed a carryback of 2010 net operating losses to its 2008 income tax returns resulting in a tax refund of $2.6 million and the recovery of research and development and foreign tax credits previously claimed.
During 2010, the Internal Revenue Service completed its audit for 2008. This resulted in an incremental tax liability of $0.3 million. The Company also performed a carryback of 2009 net operating losses to its 2008 and 2007 income tax returns, resulting in a tax refund of $3.2 million and the recovery of research and development and foreign tax credits previously claimed.
The Company currently benefits from a Pioneer Tax Incentive in Singapore. The incentive commenced on July 1, 2006 and will continue through June 30, 2016 assuming the Company is able to achieve specified future requirements. The Company is currently in compliance with the requirements and as a result profits generated from its Singapore operations are subject to a reduced tax rate.
The Company operates globally but considers its significant tax jurisdictions to include Canada, China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the United States. As of April 2, 2011, the following tax years remained subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions indicated:
| | |
Major Jurisdictions | | Open Tax Years |
Canada | | 2011 |
China | | 2001 and forward |
Japan | | 2004 and forward |
Korea | | 2006 and forward |
Singapore | | 2007 and forward |
Taiwan | | 2006 and forward |
United Kingdom | | 2007 and forward |
United States | | 2004 and forward |
63
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the consolidated liability for unrecognized income tax benefits for the years ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Beginning unrecognized tax benefits balance | | $ | 7,540 | | | $ | 7,645 | |
Gross increases for tax positions of prior years | | | 25 | | | | — | |
Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years | | | — | | | | (375 | ) |
Gross increases for tax positions for current year | | | 451 | | | | 270 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Ending unrecognized tax benefits balance | | $ | 8,016 | | | $ | 7,540 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The unrecognized tax benefits, along with the related accrued interest and penalties, were presented as long-term income taxes payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010. The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $8.0 million as of April 2, 2011 and $7.5 million at April 3, 2010. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax positions in the provision for income taxes. Gross accrued interest and penalties were $2.3 million and $1.9 million as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. The gross amount of interest and penalties incurred during 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $0.3 million, $0.1 million, $0.6 million, respectively. The Company expects the annual increases and decreases to unrecognized tax benefits to be consistent with prior years and does not anticipate any significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months as the result of examinations or lapse of statutes of limitation.
14. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Payroll-related liabilities | | $ | 13,486 | | | $ | 5,727 | |
Customer deposits | | | 5,499 | | | | 1,020 | |
Product warranty accrual | | | 4,415 | | | | 2,576 | |
Pension benefit liabilities | | | 1,808 | | | | 1,415 | |
Professional fees payable | | | 1,653 | | | | 1,327 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 1,540 | | | | 801 | |
Legal settlement costs payable | | | 1,208 | | | | — | |
Value added taxes payable | | | 1,028 | | | | 16 | |
Purchase order commitments and receipts | | | 922 | | | | 1,352 | |
Restructuring costs payable | | | 711 | | | | 60 | |
Other | | | 1,155 | | | | 643 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 33,425 | | | $ | 14,937 | |
| | | | | | | | |
15. Product Warranty
The following is a reconciliation of the changes in the aggregate product warranty accrual for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Product warranty accrual, beginning | | $ | 2,576 | | | $ | 2,057 | | | $ | 3,740 | |
Warranty charges incurred, net | | | (6,818 | ) | | | (4,040 | ) | | | (6,546 | ) |
Provision for warranty charges | | | 8,657 | | | | 4,559 | | | | 4,863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product warranty accrual, ending | | $ | 4,415 | | | $ | 2,576 | | | $ | 2,057 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
64
Net warranty charges incurred include labor charges and costs of replacement parts for system repairs under warranty. These costs are recorded net of any estimated cost recoveries resulting from either successful repair of damaged parts or from warranties offered by the Company’s suppliers for defective components. The provision for warranty charges reflects the estimate of future anticipated net warranty costs to be incurred for all products under warranty at fiscal year end and is recorded to cost of sales.
16. Deferred Revenue
The following is a reconciliation of the changes in deferred revenue for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Deferred revenue, beginning | | $ | 13,193 | | | $ | 11,251 | | | $ | 12,583 | |
Revenue deferred | | | 37,120 | | | | 27,774 | | | | 23,763 | |
Revenue recognized | | | (34,274 | ) | | | (25,832 | ) | | | (25,095 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred revenue, ending | | $ | 16,039 | | | $ | 13,193 | | | $ | 11,251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
17. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company enters into derivative financial instruments on a limited basis and does not use them for trading purposes. It does, however, use derivatives to manage well-defined foreign currency risks. The Company hedges material non-functional currency monetary asset and liability balances. Foreign exchange contract gains and losses are recognized at the end of each fiscal period in the Company’s results of operations. Such gains and losses are typically offset by the corresponding changes to the related underlying hedged item. Cash flows from derivative financial instruments are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items hedged.
At April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, the Company had net forward exchange contracts to purchase foreign currencies totaling $5.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively. In general, these contracts mature in less than six months and the counterparties are large, highly rated banks; therefore, the Company believes that the risk of loss as a result of nonperformance by the banks is minimal.
The table below summarizes, by currency, the notional amounts of forward exchange contracts in U.S. dollars as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010. The “bought” amounts represent the net U.S. dollar equivalents of commitments to purchase foreign currencies, and the “sold” amounts represent the net U.S. dollar equivalents of commitments to sell foreign currencies. The foreign currency amounts have been translated into a U.S. dollar equivalent value using the exchange rates as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Bought (Sold) | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Japanese Yen | | $ | 11,360 | | | $ | 4,719 | |
Taiwan Dollar | | | — | | | | 1,985 | |
Korean Won | | | (4,565 | ) | | | (2,324 | ) |
British Pound | | | (3,064 | ) | | | (2,087 | ) |
Euro | | | 1,825 | | | | 504 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,556 | | | $ | 2,797 | |
| | | | | | | | |
65
18. Commitments and Contingencies
The aggregate minimum commitment obligation under operating leases beyond April 2, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Year | | Operating
Leases | |
2012 | | $ | 2,544 | |
2013 | | | 2,091 | |
2014 | | | 598 | |
2015 | | | 88 | |
2016 | | | 7 | |
Thereafter | | | — | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 5,328 | |
| | | | |
The Company leases certain equipment, automobiles, manufacturing and office space under operating leases, which are non-cancelable and expire on various dates through fiscal 2016. Rental expense for all operating leases was $2.3 million, $1.9 million and $2.1 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company agrees to indemnify customers with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed, under certain conditions, to hold these third parties harmless against specified losses, such as those arising from other third party claims that the Company’s products, when used for their intended purposes, infringe the intellectual property rights of such other third parties. To date, the Company has not recorded any material charges related to these types of obligations.
19. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share data) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 7,934 | | | $ | (11,984 | ) | | $ | (51,050 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares used for basic earnings per share | | | 28,045 | | | | 27,449 | | | | 27,079 | |
Incremental diluted shares | | | 563 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares used for diluted earnings per share | | | 28,608 | | | | 27,449 | | | | 27,079 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss)—basic | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | (1.89 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss)—diluted | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | (1.89 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Awards of options, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) representing an additional 2.9 million, 4.5 million and 4.3 million shares of stock for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.
20. Share Repurchase Program
On May 15, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program totaling $20.0 million to acquire shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock primarily to offset dilution from equity compensation programs. The repurchases are to be made at management’s discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and are subject to market conditions, share price and other factors. There is no fixed completion date for the repurchase program.
66
The Company did not repurchase any shares under this program during 2011. As of April 2, 2011, a total of 372,825 shares have been repurchased for $5.3 million under this authorization at an average price of $14.16 per share, calculated inclusive of commissions and fees. Cash used to settle repurchase transactions is reflected as a component of cash used in financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
21. Legal Proceedings
Legal Settlement
In 2009, James Dooley, former Chief Executive Officer, initiated arbitration against the Company seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. On December 10, 2010, the arbitrator ruled that, despite having pled guilty to violating federal securities laws by willfully and knowingly making false statements to the Company’s accountants, Dooley’s actions did not satisfy the definition of cause under his employment agreement. As a result, the arbitrator determined that Dooley is entitled to severance benefits under his employment agreement, plus interest from June 2005. This proceeding was subject to binding arbitration under the terms of the employment agreement. Accordingly, the Company recognized approximately $1.4 million in legal settlement costs in 2011. On December 27, 2010, the Company filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. On May 17, 2011, the court ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley. On May 19, 2011, the Company filed a motion for the court to admit into evidence certain testimony of Mr. Dooley, arguing that the court was in error in not admitting it in the proceeding, and asking the court to reconsider its ruling based on that evidence. On June 14, 2011, the court ruled in favor of admitting the testimony into evidence, but also reaffirmed its original ruling upholding the arbitrator’s award.
All Ring Patent Infringement Prosecution
In August 2005, the Company commenced a proceeding in the Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan (the Court) directed against All Ring Tech Co., Ltd. (All Ring) of Taiwan. The Company alleged that All Ring’s Capacitor Tester Model RK-T6600 (the Capacitor Tester) infringes ESI’s Taiwan Patent No. 207469, entitled “Circuit Component Handler” (the 207469 patent). As part of this proceeding, the Court issued a Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in August 2005, restricting the use of some of All Ring’s assets. All Ring then filed a bond with the Court to obtain relief from the attachment of its assets. In July 2007, the Court issued a second PAO and approximately $6.0 million was restricted in All Ring’s accounts. The second PAO remains in effect and cannot be revoked.
In October 2005, the Company filed a formal patent infringement action against All Ring in the Court. Also in October 2005, the Court executed a Preliminary Injunction Order (PIO) that prohibits All Ring from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or using the Capacitor Tester until final judgment is entered in the formal patent infringement action. The Court dismissed All Ring’s application to revoke the PIO on January 18, 2008, and the PIO remains in place.
Pursuant to the Court’s PAO and PIO, the Company was required to post Taiwan dollar security bonds with the Court. In July 2009, the Company established a letter of credit as a partial substitution for the security bonds and received back $2.0 million from the Court. The letter of credit is collateralized by $2.4 million of restricted cash. In September 2009, the Company established an additional letter of credit and received back the remaining $7.1 million of the security bonds. This second letter of credit is collateralized by $8.4 million of restricted cash. The total restricted cash balance of $10.8 million is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 2, 2011 as a current asset.
On June 3, 2011 the Court orally announced its judgment, finding that All Ring had infringed the 207469 patent, ordering All Ring to pay the Company approximately $24 million plus interest accrued from November 4, 2005 through the payment date at a rate of 5%, and enjoining All Ring from selling any system infringing the 207469 patent. The written judgment was issued on June 13, 2011. All Ring has publicly indicated that it intends to appeal this judgment. See Note 25 “Subsequent Events” for additional information.
67
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in various other legal matters, either asserted or unasserted, and investigations. In the opinion of management, ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
22. Shareholder Rights Plan
The Company has a shareholder rights plan, under which each share of common stock carries with it an associated right (a “Right”). Each Right entitles the holder to purchase 1/100 of a share of Series A No Par Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $60, subject to adjustment. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights and, until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on the Company’s earnings. The Rights expire on May 18, 2019 and may be redeemed by the Company for $0.001 per Right.
The Rights are not presently exercisable and will only become exercisable following the occurrence of certain specified events, including the following: (a) a person or group acquires or commences a tender offer that would result in beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of outstanding common stock; (b) any person becomes a beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of outstanding common stock and is determined by the Board of Directors to be an “Adverse Person”; or (c) a person or group acquires, or obtains the right to acquire, 15 percent of the outstanding Common Stock. If either of the events described in clause (b) or (c) above occurs, each Right will thereafter entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise and in lieu of Series A No Par Preferred Stock, Common Stock (or in certain circumstances, cash, property or other securities of the Company) having a value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right. If, after the Rights become exercisable as described above, the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination, each Right will thereafter entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise and in lieu of capital stock of the Company, common stock of the acquiring company having a value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right.
23. Product and Geographic Information
Net sales by product type were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Semiconductor Group (SG) | | $ | 78,739 | | | $ | 28,525 | | | $ | 44,855 | |
Components Group (CG) | | | 54,184 | | | | 31,697 | | | | 29,243 | |
Interconnect/ Micromachining Group (IMG) | | | 123,888 | | | | 88,671 | | | | 83,215 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 256,811 | | | $ | 148,893 | | | $ | 157,313 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales by geographic area, based on the location of the end user, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Asia | | $ | 229,420 | | | $ | 124,078 | | | $ | 110,114 | |
Americas | | | 15,647 | | | | 14,189 | | | | 30,637 | |
Europe | | | 11,744 | | | | 10,626 | | | | 16,562 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 256,811 | | | $ | 148,893 | | | $ | 157,313 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-lived assets, exclusive of investments, ARS and deferred tax assets, by geographic area were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Americas | | $ | 62,955 | | | $ | 56,914 | |
Asia | | | 5,165 | | | | 4,851 | |
Europe | | | 109 | | | | 88 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 68,229 | | | $ | 61,853 | |
| | | | | | | | |
68
24. Restructuring and Cost Management Plans
Due to the economic downturn which started in the latter part of 2008, the Company took restructuring actions during fiscal 2009 in response to the market conditions in order to mitigate the impact of lower business levels to its results from operations. These actions included reductions in workforce, office consolidations in foreign subsidiary locations, the closure of a small research and development facility, suspension of the Company’s 401(k) match, temporary pay reductions, company-wide furloughs and plant shutdowns. The temporary salary reduction program was discontinued in the latter part of fiscal 2010. The suspension of the Company’s 401(k) match was partially reinstated in the fourth quarter of 2011. During 2009, these actions resulted in $4.0 million of total restructuring costs, substantially all of which related to employee severance and related benefits. No additional restructuring costs were incurred during 2010.
During 2011, as part of the Company’s globalization strategy, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to reduce its worldwide cost structure through transition of certain procurement and manufacturing activities to Asia. As a result of the planned actions, the Company recognized $0.8 million of restructuring costs in 2011 and a corresponding liability was included in Accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This liability was reduced by $0.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 primarily for the severance and related benefits payout. At April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, the amount included in accrued liabilities was $0.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
25. Subsequent Events
On June 3, 2011, the Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan (the Court) orally announced its judgment with respect to the All Ring litigation described in Note 21 “Legal Proceedings”, finding that All Ring had infringed the Company’s Taiwan Patent No. 207469, entitled “Circuit Component Handler”, ordering All Ring to pay ESI approximately $24 million plus interest accrued from November 4, 2005 through the payment date at a rate of 5%, and enjoining All Ring from selling any system infringing the patent. The Company must post a letter of credit of approximately $10 million with the Court to enforce the judgment, in addition to the letters of credit already posted with the Court by the Company. All Ring may file an appeal within 20 days of the Court issuing its written judgment. In order to stay the judgment, All Ring is required to post a cash security bond with the Court of approximately $24 million. All Ring has made public statements that it intends to appeal. On June 13, 2011, the Company posted the letter of credit with the Court, which will be reflected as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the first quarter of 2012. The Company is unable say when or if it will be able collect the judgment from All Ring, and, if All Ring appeals, whether the Company will prevail in the appeals process.
69
26. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share data) | | 1st Quarter | | | 2nd Quarter | | | 3rd Quarter | | | 4th Quarter | |
Year ended April 2, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 58,471 | | | $ | 59,554 | | | $ | 67,209 | | | $ | 71,577 | |
Gross profit | | | 21,473 | | | | 26,001 | | | | 30,027 | | | | 31,448 | |
Net operating expenses1 | | | 23,056 | | | | 25,263 | | | | 27,520 | | | | 25,682 | |
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes | | | (1,726 | ) | | | 1,536 | | | | 117 | | | | 463 | |
Net income (loss)2 | | | 201 | | | | (611 | ) | | | 2,351 | | | | 5,993 | |
Basic net income (loss) per share | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | 0.08 | | | | 0.21 | |
Diluted net income (loss) per share | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | 0.08 | | | | 0.21 | |
| | | | |
Year ended April 3, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 22,603 | | | $ | 27,638 | | | $ | 39,048 | | | $ | 59,604 | |
Gross profit | | | 5,961 | | | | 9,426 | | | | 14,817 | | | | 25,661 | |
Net operating expenses3 | | | 14,910 | | | | 18,796 | | | | 20,703 | | | | 23,229 | |
Benefit from income taxes | | | (3,077 | ) | | | (2,893 | ) | | | (3,104 | ) | | | (704 | ) |
Net (loss) income4 | | | (5,530 | ) | | | (6,120 | ) | | | (2,413 | ) | | | 2,078 | |
Basic net (loss) income per share | | | (0.20 | ) | | | (0.22 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | 0.08 | |
Diluted net (loss) income per share | | | (0.20 | ) | | | (0.22 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | 0.07 | |
The sum of the quarterly data presented in the table above for fiscal 2011 and 2010 may not equal annual results due to rounding.
| 1. | In the third quarter of 2011, net operating expenses included pretax expenses of $1.4 million in legal settlement costs and $0.8 million in restructuring costs. |
| 2. | In the fourth quarter of 2011, net income included a gain of $0.7 million related to a sale of previously impaired auction rate securities. |
| 3. | In the first quarter of 2010, net operating expenses included a pretax benefit of $4.5 million for net merger termination proceeds. |
| 4. | In the fourth quarter of 2010, net income included a charge of $1.3 million for other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities. |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Attached to this annual report as exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the certifications of our President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO) required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This “Controls and Procedures” section of our annual report on Form 10-K is our disclosure of the conclusions of our management, including our CEO and our CFO, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on management’s evaluation of those disclosure controls and procedures. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This controls evaluation was performed
70
under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our CEO and CFO. Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of disclosure controls includes an evaluation of some components of our internal control over financial reporting. We also perform a separate annual evaluation of internal control over financial reporting for the purpose of providing the management report below.
The evaluation of our disclosure controls included a review of their objectives and design as well as their effect on the information generated for use in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This type of evaluation is performed on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions of management, including the CEO and CFO, concerning the effectiveness of the disclosure controls can be reported in our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K. Many of the components of our disclosure controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by our finance organization. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor our disclosure controls and to modify them as necessary. We intend to maintain the disclosure controls as dynamic systems that we adjust as circumstances merit.
Based on the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted in (c) below, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that material information relating to the Company is made known to management, including the CEO and the CFO, particularly during the time when our periodic reports are being prepared.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2011 based on the guidelines established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of April 2, 2011.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has performed an independent assessment on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as referenced in their report included in (e) below.
(c) Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part
71
upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
(d) Changes in Internal Control
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
72
(e) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.:
We have audited Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in Item 9A(b). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 2, 2011, and our report dated June 14, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
June 14, 2011
73
| Item 9B. | Other Information |
None.
PART III
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
The information required by this item, including information about the Company’s audit committee, is included under the headings “Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” “Board Committees,” “Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted the ESI Code of Conduct, a code of ethics and business practices with which every person who works for the Company is expected to comply. In addition, the Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Managers applicable to the chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and any other person performing similar functions on behalf of the Company. The ESI Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Financial Managers are publicly available on the Company’s website under “Corporate Governance” in the Investors Section (athttp://investors.esi.com/governance.cfm). This website address is intended to be an inactive, textual reference only; none of the materials on this website are part of this report. If any waiver is granted, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics for Financial Managers, the Company will disclose the nature of such waiver on that website or in a report on Form 8-K.
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
The information required by this item is included under the headings “Board Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters |
Certain information required by this item is included under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
The information required by this item is included under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Independence” in our Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
The information required by this item is included under “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” in our Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
74
PART IV
| Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a)(1) and (a)(2) Financial Statements and Schedules
The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the reports thereon of our independent registered public accounting firm, are included on the pages indicated below:
| | | | |
| | | Page | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | 39 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 | | | 40 | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 | | | 41 | |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 | | | 42 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 2, 2011, April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 | | | 43 | |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | | | 44 | |
There are no schedules required to be filed herewith.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed herewith and this list is intended to constitute the exhibit index. An asterisk (*) beside the exhibit number indicates the exhibits containing a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement, which are required to be identified in this report.
| | | | |
| | 3.1 | | | Third Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2010. |
| |
| | 3.2 | | | 2009 Amended and Restated Bylaws. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2009 (the “May 19 8-K”). |
| |
| | 4.1 | | | Rights Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2009, between Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the May 19 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.1 | * | | 2000 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-F of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2000. |
| |
| | 10.2 | * | | 2000 Stock Option Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. |
| |
| | 10.3 | * | | Employment Agreement between the Company and Nicholas C. Konidaris, dated January 7, 2004. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2004. |
| |
| | 10.4 | * | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of January 25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2005 (the “January 31 8-K”). |
| |
| | 10.5 | * | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated November 12, 2008, between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2008. |
| |
| | 10.6 | * | | Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, between Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Nicholas Konidaris. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2009. |
75
| | | | |
| | 10.7 | * | | Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of January 25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the January 31 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.8 | * | | Form of Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of January 25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
January 31 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.9 | * | | Form of Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of January 25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the
January 31 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.10 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of January 25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the January 31 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.11 | * | | 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. |
| |
| | 10.12 | * | | Deferred Compensation Plan 2008 Restatement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2008 (the “2008 10-K”). |
| |
| | 10.13 | * | | Amendment No. 1 to Deferred Compensation Plan 2008 Restatement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the 2008 10-K. |
| |
| | 10.14 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Option Terms and Conditions (Incentive Stock Options) (for awards made prior to July 20, 2005). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2004 (the “October 21 8-K”). |
| |
| | 10.15 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Option Terms and Conditions (Non-Qualified Stock Options) (for awards made prior to July 20, 2005). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the October 21 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.16 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Terms and Conditions (non-directors) (for awards made on July 20, 2005). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2005 (the “July 26 8-K”). |
| |
| | 10.17 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Terms and Conditions (directors) (for awards made on July 20, 2005). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
July 26 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.18 | * | | Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (for awards made prior to July 19, 2006). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the January 31 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.19 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (for awards made prior to July 19, 2006). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the January 31 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.20 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Option Terms and Conditions (Non-Qualified Stock Options granted to Non-Directors) (for awards made on
May 24, 2006). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 30, 2006 (the “May 30 8-K”). |
| |
| | 10.21 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Option Terms and Conditions (Non-Qualified Stock Options granted to Directors) (for awards made in May 2006). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the May 30 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.22 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of October 4, 2006. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2006. |
76
| | | | |
| | 10.23 | * | | Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Company and each of Robert DeBakker and Paul Oldham. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 26, 2006. |
| |
| | 10.24 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for awards made on or after July 19, 2006 and prior to February 2008). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 25, 2006 (the “July 25 8-K”). |
| |
| | 10.25 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for directors. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the July 25 8-K. |
| |
| | 10.26 | * | | Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and related Terms and Conditions (for awards made after February 2008). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the 2008 10-K. |
| |
| | 10.27 | * | | Form of Amended and Restated Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for July 2006 awards). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the 2008 10-K. |
| |
| | 10.28 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for awards made after February 2008 and prior to May 2010). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the 2008 10-K. |
| |
| | 10.29 | * | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for awards made on or after July 2007 and prior to May 2010). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the 2008 10-K. |
| |
| | 10.30 | * | | Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (for awards made prior to May 2010). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 26, 2009. |
| |
| | 10.31 | * | | Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and certain officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2010. |
| |
| | 10.32 | * | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (for awards made on May 13, 2010). |
| |
| | 10.33 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement (for awards made on May 13, 2010). |
| |
| | 10.34 | * | | Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (for awards made on May 13, 2010). |
| |
| | 10.35 | * | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of May 13, 2010. |
| |
| | 10.36 | * | | Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of May 13, 2010. |
| |
| | 10.37 | * | | Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Konidaris, dated as of May 13, 2010. |
| |
| | 10.38 | | | Voting Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2008, among Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and The D3 Family Fund, L.P., The D3 Family Bulldog Fund, L.P., The D3 Family Canadian Fund, L.P., The DIII Offshore Fund, L.P., Nierenberg Investment Management Company, Inc., Nierenberg Investment Management Offshore, Inc. and David Nierenberg. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company’s Current Report on form 8-K filed December 9, 2008. |
| |
| | 21 | | | Subsidiaries of the Company |
| |
| | 23 | | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| |
| | 24.1 | | | Power of Attorney for Frederick Ball |
| |
| | 24.2 | | | Power of Attorney for Richard J. Faubert |
| |
| | 24.3 | | | Power of Attorney for Edward C. Grady |
77
| | | | |
| | 24.4 | | | Power of Attorney for Barry L. Harmon |
| |
| | 24.5 | | | Power of Attorney for W. Arthur Porter |
| |
| | 24.6 | | | Power of Attorney for Gerald F. Taylor |
| |
| | 24.7 | | | Power of Attorney for David Nierenberg |
| |
| | 24.8 | | | Power of Attorney for Jon D. Tompkins |
| |
| | 24.9 | | | Power of Attorney for Robert R. Walker |
| |
| | 31.1 | | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| | 31.2 | | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| | 32.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| | 32.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
78
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
Date: June 14, 2011 | | | | ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| | | |
| | | | By: | | /S/ NICHOLAS KONIDARIS |
| | | | | | Nicholas Konidaris |
| | | | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on June 14, 2011.
| | | | |
Signature | | Title |
| |
/S/ NICHOLAS KONIDARIS Nicholas Konidaris | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
/S/ PAUL OLDHAM Paul Oldham | | Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer) |
| |
/S/ KERRY MUSTOE Kerry Mustoe | | Vice President, Corporate Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
| |
*FREDERICK A. BALL Frederick Ball | | Director |
| |
*RICHARD J. FAUBERT Richard J. Faubert | | Director |
| |
*EDWARD C. GRADY Edward C. Grady | | Director |
| |
*BARRY L. HARMON Barry L. Harmon | | Director |
| |
*W. ARTHUR PORTER W. Arthur Porter | | Director |
| |
*GERALD F. TAYLOR Gerald F. Taylor | | Director |
| |
*DAVID NIERENBERG David Nierenberg | | Director |
| |
*JON D. TOMPKINS Jon D. Tompkins | | Chairman of the Board |
| |
*ROBERT R. WALKER Robert R. Walker | | Director |
| | |
| *BY: | | /S/ PAUL OLDHAM Paul Oldham,Attorney-in-fact | | |
79
