Overview and Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES IPALCO is a holding company incorporated under the laws of the state of Indiana. IPALCO is owned by AES U.S. Investments ( 82.35% ) and CDPQ ( 17.65% ). AES U.S. Investments is owned by AES U.S. Holdings, LLC ( 85% ) and CDPQ ( 15% ). IPALCO owns all of the outstanding common stock of IPL. Substantially all of IPALCO’s business consists of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling of electric energy conducted through its principal subsidiary, IPL. IPL was incorporated under the laws of the state of Indiana in 1926. IPL has more than 500,000 retail customers in the city of Indianapolis and neighboring cities, towns and communities, and adjacent rural areas all within the state of Indiana, with the most distant point being approximately forty miles from Indianapolis. IPL has an exclusive right to provide electric service to those customers. IPL owns and operates four generating stations, all within the state of Indiana. IPL’s largest generating station, Petersburg, is coal-fired. The second largest station, Harding Street, uses natural gas and fuel oil to power combustion turbines. In addition, IPL operates a 20 MW battery energy storage unit at this location, which provides frequency response. The third station, Eagle Valley, is a CCGT natural gas plant. IPL took operational control and commenced commercial operations of this CCGT plant in April 2018. The fourth station, Georgetown, is a small peaking station that uses natural gas to power combustion turbines. As of September 30, 2019 , IPL’s net electric generation capacity for winter is 3,705 MW and net summer capacity is 3,560 MW. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying Financial Statements include the accounts of IPALCO, IPL and Mid-America Capital Resources, Inc., a non-regulated wholly-owned subsidiary of IPALCO. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated. The accompanying Financial Statements are unaudited; however, they have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for annual fiscal reporting periods. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for fair presentation have been included. The electric utility business is affected by seasonal weather patterns throughout the year and, therefore, the operating revenues and associated operating expenses are not generated evenly by month during the year. These unaudited Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in IPALCO’s 2018 Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction therewith. Use of Management Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period may also be affected by the estimates and assumptions that management is required to make. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Reclassifications Certain immaterial amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash amounts as shown on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: September 30, December 31, 2019 2018 (In Thousands) Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Cash and cash equivalents $ 48,413 $ 33,199 Restricted cash 400 400 Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 48,813 $ 33,599 Accounts Receivable The following table summarizes our accounts receivable balances at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 : September 30, December 31, 2019 2018 (In Thousands) Accounts receivable, net Customer receivables $ 96,919 $ 91,426 Unbilled revenue 66,670 68,893 Amounts due from related parties 4,949 5,720 Other 7,165 4,341 Provision for uncollectible accounts (3,027 ) (2,821 ) Total accounts receivable, net $ 172,676 $ 167,559 Inventories The following table summarizes our inventories balances at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 : September 30, December 31, 2019 2018 (In Thousands) Inventories Fuel $ 29,981 $ 32,457 Materials and supplies 61,999 67,211 Total inventories $ 91,980 $ 99,668 Financial Derivatives All derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheets and are measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value are recorded in earnings unless the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction or it qualifies for the normal purchases and sales exception. We use interest rate hedges to manage the interest rate risk of our variable rate debt. We use cash flow hedge accounting when the hedge or a portion of the hedge is deemed to be highly effective, which results in changes in the fair value being recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders' equity. We have elected not to offset net derivative positions in the Financial Statements. Accordingly, we do not offset such derivative positions against the fair value of amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under master netting agreements. See Note 3, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information. ARO During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 , IPL recorded adjustments to its ARO liabilities of $80.4 million primarily to reflect an increase to estimated ash pond closure costs, including groundwater remediation. The following is a roll forward of the ARO legal liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 (in thousands): Balance as of January 1, 2019 $ 129,451 Revisions to cash flow and timing estimates 80,406 Liabilities settled (8,373 ) Accretion expense 6,428 Balance as of September 30, 2019 $ 207,912 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income / (Loss) The changes in the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 are as follows: Gains and losses on cash flow hedges (In Thousands) Balance at January 1, 2019 $ — Other comprehensive loss (29,722 ) Balance at September 30, 2019 $ (29,722 ) New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2019 The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that had an impact on the Company’s Financial Statements. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or did not have a material impact on the Company’s Financial Statements. New Accounting Standards Adopted ASU Number and Name Description Date of Adoption Effect on the Financial Statements upon adoption 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities The standard updates the hedge accounting model to expand the ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components, reduce complexity, and ease certain documentation and assessment requirements. When facts and circumstances are the same as at the previous quantitative test, a subsequent quantitative effectiveness test is not required. The standard also eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. For cash flow hedges, this means that the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument will be recorded in other comprehensive income and amounts deferred will be reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item. Transition method: modified retrospective with the cumulative effect adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date. Prospective for presentation and disclosures. January 1, 2019 The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Financial Statements. 2016-02, 2018-01, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-20, 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842) See discussion of the ASUs below. January 1, 2019 See impact upon adoption of the standard below. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842 Leases and its subsequent corresponding updates (“ASC 842”). Under this standard, lessees are required to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases on the balance sheet, and recognize expenses in a manner similar to the current accounting method. For lessors, the guidance modifies the lease classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. The guidance eliminates previous real estate-specific provisions. Under ASC 842, fewer of our contracts contain a lease. However, due to the elimination of the real estate-specific guidance and changes to certain lessor classification criteria, more leases qualify as sales-type leases and direct financing leases. Under these two models, a lessor derecognizes the asset and recognizes a lease receivable. According to ASC 842, the lease receivable includes the fair value of the asset after the contract period, but does not include variable payments such as margin on the sale of energy. Therefore, the lease receivable could be significantly different than the carrying amount of the underlying asset at lease commencement. In such circumstances, the difference between the initially recognized lease receivable and the carrying amount of the underlying asset is recognized as a gain/loss at lease commencement. During the course of adopting ASC 842, the Company applied various practical expedients including: • The package of practical expedients (applied to all leases) that allowed lessees and lessors not to reassess: a. whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, b. lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and c. whether initial direct costs for any expired or existing leases qualify for capitalization under ASC 842. • The transition practical expedient related to land easements, allowing us to carry forward our accounting treatment for land easements on existing agreements, and • The transition practical expedient for lessees that allowed businesses to not separate lease and non-lease components. The Company applied the practical expedient to all classes of underlying assets when valuing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Contracts where the Company is the lessor were separated between the lease and non-lease components. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption and elected to continue to apply the guidance in ASC 840 Leases to the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption. Under this transition method, the Company applied the transition provisions starting at the date of adoption. The adoption of ASC 842 did not have a material impact on our Financial Statements. New Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that could have a material impact on the Company’s Financial Statements once adopted. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have no material impact on the Company’s Financial Statements. New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective ASU Number and Name Description Date of Adoption Effect on the Financial Statements upon adoption 2016-13, 2018-19, 2019-04, 2019-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments See discussion of the ASU below. January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted only as of January 1, 2019. The Company will adopt the standard on January 1, 2020; see below for the evaluation of the impact of the adoption on the standard on the Financial Statements. ASU 2016-13 and its subsequent corresponding updates will update the impairment model for financial assets measured at amortized cost, known as the Current Expected Credit Loss ("CECL") model. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit loses as it is done today, except that the losses will be recognized as an allowance rather than a reduction in the amortized cost of the securities. There are various transition methods available upon adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its Financial Statements; however, it is expected that the new current expected credit loss model will primarily impact the calculation of the Company's expected credit losses on $175.7 million |