UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| (Mark One) | |
| S | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| For the fiscal year endedJune 30, 2013 | |
| Or | |
| £ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| For the transition period from ___________ to ____________ | |
Commission file number0-12944
Zygo Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 06-0864500 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
| incorporation or organization) |
| Laurel Brook Road, Middlefield, Connecticut 06455-1291 | ||
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) | ||
| (860) 347-8506 | ||
| (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:) | ||
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | ||
| None | ||
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: | ||
| Common Stock, $.10 Par Value |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES£NOS
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
YES£NOS
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YESS NO£
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YESS NO£
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.S
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer | £ | Accelerated filer S | ||
| Non-accelerated filer | £ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company£ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES£ NOS
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates, based upon the closing price of the Common Stock on December 31, 2012, as reported by the NASDAQ National Market System, was $152,802,040. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock, based on filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, have been excluded since such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date.
18,689,893 Shares of Common Stock, $.10 Par Value, at August 30, 2013
Documents incorporated by reference: Specified portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement related to the registrant’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference into Part III (Items 10-14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company,” and “Zygo” refer to Zygo Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report regarding our financial performance, financial condition and operations and the business strategy, plans, anticipated revenues, bookings, market acceptance, growth rates, market opportunities and objectives of management of the Company for future operations are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements under “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors.” Forward-looking statements provide management’s current expectations or plans for the future operating and financial performance of the Company based upon information currently available and assumptions currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan(s),” “strategy,” “project,” “should” and other words of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of current or future operating or financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors such as those disclosed under “Risk Factors.” Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to the operations, results of operations and our growth strategy.
Any forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report speak only as of the date of this document. Zygo Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by law.
| 1 |
OVERVIEW
Zygo Corporation (“Zygo,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Company”) designs, develops, and manufactures ultra-high precision measurement solutions and top-tier optical sub-systems and components for original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) and end-user applications. We operate within two divisions. Our Metrology Solutions Division (also referred to herein as the “Metrology Solutions segment”) manufactures products to improve quality, increase productivity to improve our customers’ manufacturing yields, and decrease the overall cost of product development and manufacturing for high-technology companies. Our Optical Systems Division (also referred to herein as the “Optical Systems segment”) provides leading-edge product development and manufacturing services that leverage a variety of core technologies across semiconductor, defense, laser fusion research, life-sciences, and other industrial markets. The Metrology Solutions segment has manufacturing locations in Middlefield, Connecticut; Tucson, Arizona; Montreal, Canada; Shanghai, China, Germany and Tainan City, Taiwan. The Optical Systems segment has manufacturing locations in Middlefield, Connecticut; Tucson, Arizona; Costa Mesa, California; and Richmond, California.
We focus on markets around the world that are engaged in research and manufacture of high volume precision components used to support high technology applications in industries such as consumer electronics, automotive engineering, LED lighting, life-sciences, military and defense. We have expanded our geographic reach in recent years by continued investment in our joint venture in China and expansion of our office in Taiwan.
In May 2012, we purchased a 110,020 square-foot facility in Tucson, Arizona and essentially completed the renovation of the building and moved into the new location in July 2013.
In July 2012, we purchased the noncontrolling interest of our German subsidiary.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed a transaction with ASML US, Inc. (“ASML”) where we purchased substantially all the assets of ASML’s Richmond, California operation, including a 55,300 square-foot manufacturing facility. In addition, we hired key management and employees working at the former ASML Richmond facility and formed our Extreme Precision Optics group (“EPO”), which is included in our Optical Systems segment. With this acquisition, we considerably expanded and improved our optical manufacturing capabilities. EPO’s highly symbiotic capabilities that address new applications in semiconductor, defense and the life-sciences strengthened our leadership position in metrology, large flat optics production and electro-optical design and manufacturing.
Zygo was incorporated in 1970 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The address of our principal executive office is Laurel Brook Road, Middlefield, Connecticut, 06455-1291. Our telephone number at this address is (860) 347-8506. Our website address is www.zygo.com. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| 2 |
Business Segments & Products
The products and services in our two reportable segments are based on our core technologies, process knowledge and extensive experience in optical design, mechanical engineering, software and algorithms and optical fabrication. Most products are proprietary or incorporate proprietary technology in their design.
Metrology Solutions Segment
Our Metrology Solutions segment includes 3-dimensional surface metrology products, precision positioning systems and custom-engineered solutions. We offer a comprehensive line of metrology products and solutions to address requirements of precision manufacturing industries and advanced research. Our systems are commonly used to measure surface characteristics and critical parameters, including topography and roughness, shape, dimension, thickness, optical characteristics and defects.
Zygo metrology products provide precise measurements for quality control, process feedback and machine control. There are many applications in a variety of markets where precision and consistency are critical to the process or the enablement of advanced research and process development, including the automotive, consumer electronics, medical, defense/aerospace, materials research, optics, flat panel displays and semiconductor industries. The inherent precision, reliability and speed of Zygo’s metrology measurement technologies help to reduce cost of ownership, which is a significant factor for many users. Demand for our products is driven by advancement of next generation devices and technology, complex processing methods and tighter manufacturing tolerances across many industries.
The Metrology Solutions segment markets products under the Zygo and Zemetrics brand names. Each brand is targeted to a different customer segment, with the Zygo brand providing a high-end, feature-rich product offering and the Zemetrics brand addressing mid-level, industrial market needs. Products under the Zygo brand include New View™ andVeriFire™ family of products. Products under the Zemetrics brand include theZeGage™ andZeScope™ family of products. Both Zygo and Zemetrics products are often developed using common research and development and engineering resources. Both brands provide customers a progressive choice of products addressing their full range of metrology needs.
Zygo is considered to be a world leader in optical interferometry with a portfolio of approximately 470 patents issued worldwide, many of which are related to the broad field of interferometry. While there are numerous practical applications for our instruments in a wide variety of industries, the inherent precision involved in using the wavelength of light as our “ruler” has historically required our instruments to be placed in well-controlled environments. Much of our recent development efforts have focused on technology enhancements that allow our systems to move from the stable laboratory to the production floor. This provides our customers with real-time process feedback to reduce scrap/defects and improve productivity and yields.
For example, the newest member of theVeriFire™ laser interferometer family, the QPZ, was developed to bring high precision large aperture metrology to the production floor. By combining high speed acquisition with patented technology, the QPZ eliminates the effects of typical shop floor vibration and enables high precision metrology next to process equipment.
TheZeGage-2D-3D optical profiler family is designed to provide non-contact nanometer-level surface height measurements without requiring additional vibration isolation. The ZeGage provides unique capabilities designed for the industrial market segment using a combination of scanning white light interferometry and patent pending scanning methods to provide performance that is competitively positioned against contact stylus instruments traditionally used in the industrial machine tool market. The instrument also utilizesZeMaps™ software, and features a range of 2D and 3D surface parameters including form, step height and ISO/EN 25178 compliant surface roughness parameter standardization. The recently released motorized XY staging greatly expands the ZeGage profiler’s functionality by offering the ability to stitch adjacent images for evaluation over large areas/scan lengths. This product family is being marketed primarily to the industrial factory market, expanding the price range and customer base for the ZygoNewView™ line of products.
We also recently introduced theMini™ Compact Production Interferometer. Developed specifically to meet the growing demands of high volume, small optic manufacturing, theMini interferometer provides robust, quantitative optical surface metrology in a compact, industrial package. Traditionally, high volume optical manufacturing relied on qualitative, visual interpretation of surface quality. By combining patented and proprietary acquisition technology with a user-friendly touchscreen user interface, theMini interferometer eliminates the subjectivity of visual inspection and brings true process control capability to the production floor.
| 3 |
Markets
Automotive Industry
The automotive industry continually strives to improve fuel economy and decrease environmental pollution to meet customer demand and adhere to government regulation. Improving both requires more efficient engines, and our measurement-based process control and yield-enhancement systems are used in the development and high-precision manufacture of some of those engine components.
NewView™ Series 3D Optical Profilers
Our high precision metrology equipment is well suited for some engine components, which are ground or lapped to tolerances of one-hundred billionths of a meter. Our patented Fourier Domain Analysis data acquisition system for theNewView optical profiler meets these high-precision measurement requirements.
ZeGage™Optical Profiler
The ZeGage optical profiler addresses applications with the need to measure and visualize a wide variety of materials, including rubber, paper, metal, plastic and ceramics, further addressing the needs of the automotive market. We believe the ZeGage profiler price point has a broader appeal to first-time buyers of optical metrology.
Consumer Electronics
Consumer electronics, including tablets, smart phones, digital cameras, DVD and CD players, and optical computer drives, have significant optical content. Consumer electronics optics, which provide imaging and data storage, are manufactured in quantities in the hundreds of thousands to millions of components per year. These complex miniature optical systems require precise optical testing-from development to in-line process control, which our measurement-based process control and yield enhancement systems are designed to perform.
VeriFire™ Asphere System
TheVeriFire asphere system provides high resolution 3-dimensional surface metrology for aspheric-shaped surfaces using patented non-contact interferometric techniques for production and process control. Aspheres are important in consumer electronics products, cameras, military/defense optics, and commercial optics and represent a growing segment in the optics markets due to improved optical performance in these devices in comparison to traditional spherical lenses.
VeriFire™ Systems
The development of new optical systems for any application requires flexible and easy to use test equipment. The ZygoVeriFire systems are the latest products in our established product family that has improved optical testing and continues to evolve to meet changing requirements. Consumer electronics production applications for larger optics, greater than a 25 millimeter diameter, and research and development for any size application rely on these products for critical developmental data and process-control feedback in production. These products are widely used for Zygo’sMetroPro™ data analysis software and their configuration flexibility in hardware set ups.
Mini™ Compact Production Interferometer
The growing demands of high volume, small optic manufacturing require the need for production-floor measurement to be more timely and precise, eliminating the visual observation of surface quality. TheMiniinterferometer provides robust, quantitative optical surface metrology in a compact, industrial package designed for production floor use.
Defense/Aerospace
GPI™ and VeriFire™ Systems
Developing state-of-the-art optical designs and manufacturing technology for the defense/aerospace market also requires leading-edge metrology systems for manufacturing process control and development. Our VeriFire optical interferometers test the optical components as well as the systems for design compliance. Our VeriFire Asphere rapidly measures asphere-shaped optics in a production environment without the need for specialized tooling. OurVeriFire QPZ system continues our move to the production floor, providing laboratory-level results in a production environment. Using patented methods, theVeriFire QPZ system removes the degrading effects of vibration from the measurement without the need for additional expensive isolation hardware. This system is primarily used in qualification of optical elements during the production of military and commercial optics. We are also active in designing and manufacturing custom test systems for defense/aerospace applications, especially interferometers that operate at infrared wavelengths, which are unique to this market.
| 4 |
Semiconductor Products
The transistor and associated integrated circuit have transformed the way people work, live and play, creating several multi-billion dollar industries that thrive through innovation, technology, and ultra-large scale integration of micro/nano circuitry. These industries provide components used in everyday appliances, including the more modern mobile phones and wireless internet devices. State-of-the-art microprocessors may contain in excess of a billion transistors comprised of components that have physical dimensions as small as 22 nanometers.
Precision Positioning Systems
The layers of circuit patterns must overlay each other to nanometer precision during the wafer lithography process. Photolithography systems, mask and reticle writers and yield improvement metrology tools rely on displacement- measuring interferometers to provide precise feedback to control the position of the silicon wafer. Our Metrology Solutions segment’sZMI™ 7700 series precision positioning feedback systems are designed primarily for photolithography systems. They are also used in a broad range of semiconductor metrology and back-end process tools.
Printed Circuit Board Substrates
Printed circuit substrates interface integrated circuit flip chip packages to printed circuit boards. These substrates make the circuit connection via arrays of miniature solder bumps and balls, and Zygo manufactures several tools to measure these bump and ball arrays for process control and yield improvement. Several products serve this market, including theNano™ CSP2000 andNano2™ series, providing high-throughput, fully-automated 100% 2D/3D inspection of C4 bumps for chip scale packaging (CSPs) strips to support high-volume manufacturing and process yields.
Technology Development Projects
Photolithography scanners image the electronic circuit pattern through a precision projection lens. The optical performance of the lenses required for next-generation photolithography scanners often exceeds the capabilities of commercially available measurement systems. Our expertise in optical interferometer technology and the practical skills needed to apply this technology position us well to deliver custom solutions to leading photolithography equipment suppliers.
Optical Systems Segment
Zygo’s Optical Systems segment designs, develops and manufactures high precision optical components and electro-optical systems used in the semiconductor, defense/aerospace, life-sciences and research markets. Our optical components and systems are manufactured to high levels of precision and are intended to meet the demands of both internal and external customers. The primary value we bring to the market place is the ability to meet exacting specifications from our customers in a high volume production environment. Examples of our products include aspheric lenses, mirrors, objective assemblies, machined glass structures and windows used in applications ranging from semiconductor lithography to ophthalmic surgical devices to aerial reconnaissance. We provide products used across a broad spectral range including extreme ultra-violet (“EUV”), visible and mid-infrared that are fabricated from materials such as fused silica, sapphire, silicon, calcium fluoride and precision optical glasses. Representative programs and products include volume manufacturing of meter class laser fusion optics for the National Ignition Facility, development and manufacturing of high precision imaging lenses for military aerial reconnaissance and precision optics used in EUV semiconductor lithography equipment.
Markets
Defense/Aerospace
Defense and aerospace companies use optical technology in a broad range of applications that are often deemed mission critical and, therefore, have become a major component of military spending. Examples include tactical information gathering through the use of fixed wing and rotary aerial reconnaissance, fire-control systems used for targeting or threat detection and navigation systems necessary for all-weather combat readiness. We manufacture a variety of defense-related products, including lenses, windows, freeform optics and lens assemblies. These products have been integrated on several prominent platforms, including the Joint Strike fighter, Predator and Global Hawk drones, F/A-18C Distributed Mission Training system and the F16 Internal FLIR Targeting System. In addition to traditional defense applications, we are a leading manufacturer of meter class optical components used in high energy laser fusion development for the United States Department of Energy nuclear stockpile governance and a similar program for the French Atomic Energy Commission. We have become a major provider within this application space that consists of two of the largest optical programs ever created. We have also delivered electro-optical systems used in high resolution surveillance and protection of civilian targets, such as nuclear power reactors, airports and shipping ports.
| 5 |
Life-sciences
The life-sciences market continues to present a significant opportunity. Increased demand for high precision medical devices continues to be driven by an aging population and consumers’ desire to improve their quality of life. We address this demand with specialized design and assembly services tailored to producing high-precision research, diagnostic and surgical devices. Key application areas include ophthalmic, dental, diagnostics and DNA analysis. Product manufacturing strengths include high performance objectives used in laser delivery and fluorescent imaging systems, integration of full systems utilizing light sources, optics and detectors, and stand-alone medical devices built to customer specification. Examples of customer products include laser eye correction, cataract surgery and genomic analysis instruments. In addition, the group offers a variety of process control advantages considered critical to medical device customers. These include our ISO 13485:2003 and FDA registration as a medical-device manufacturer.
Semiconductor and Electronics
Semiconductor lithography demands, in many cases, the ultimate in optical manufacturing technology, a critical driver for meeting the industry demands of Moore’s law. With over 20 years of experience in extreme ultraviolet lithography and proceeding nodes, we routinely participate in the advancement and deployment of new lithographic platforms. As a supplier to the world’s leading semiconductor lithography companies and consortiums, we provide custom components and assemblies used in high precision stages, illumination optics and objectives. Our products are typically used in the manufacture of semiconductor chips for deployment in all types of computer-driven equipment. Zygo is currently developing and manufacturing EUV lithography optics for the fifth-generation micro-exposure tool (“MET-5”) at the State University of New York at Albany’s College of Nanoscale Science & Engineering’s (“CNSE”) Albany NanoTech Complex.
The MET-5 program is managed by the SEMATECH consortium, whose members and partners include leading semiconductor manufacturing companies worldwide, that performs research and development to advance chip manufacturing. The program is intended to extend semiconductor lithography resolution capability to less than 16 nanometers.
Our key manufacturing strengths include high precision machining used in the production of reticle and wafer stages, advanced polishing methods such as ion beam figuring of off-axis mirrors, and metrology necessary to meet specifications down to one nanometer in accuracy. In addition to semiconductor lithography, we also support customers involved in semiconductor metrology and electronics through the production of high precision objective assemblies and laser sub systems. These systems are often developed in collaboration with our customers who rely heavily on our optical engineering capabilities to achieve both performance and cost objectives.
Manufacturing Technology and Processes
Our strategic advantages in the market place derive heavily from the development of unique manufacturing technology and processes. Key areas of focus include deterministic polishing, high precision machining and grinding, coating, opto-mechanical assembly and metrology. Within these areas we have developed highly refined processes and equipment for the manufacture of meter class plano windows and mirrors, aspheric and free-form lenses, complex ceramic machining up to one meter and large aperture coating. The unique nature of our capabilities requires much of the equipment used in our manufacturing to be developed or modified internally. Our ability to provide accurate metrology in the final inspection, as well as for in-process control, is strategic to our success in manufacturing. In this regard, the Optical Systems segment works closely with the Metrology Solutions segment to produce unique metrology tools that improve the quality and yield of our products.
Sales, Marketing and Service
We market our full range of products throughout the United States and in most foreign markets. Our revenues are largely generated through our direct worldwide sales force, as well as through independent agents and distributors. We have sales and service centers positioned close to our major customers and business opportunities throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia. We believe that our business relationships with the major customers in all of our key markets are generally favorable, and that we are in a good position to respond promptly to customer requirements and technology trends.
| 6 |
We require our sales representatives to have technical expertise and a thorough understanding of the businesses of our customers and our prospective customers. In a typical sale process, one of our representatives will provide a potential customer with information about our products, including specifications and performance data, as well as a product demonstration using samples for testing and demonstration provided by the customer. The sales cycle for our systems typically ranges from three to twelve months, but can be longer for complex systems or when our customers are evaluating new applications of our technology.
Our products are supported by a global service organization of factory-trained technicians and engineers, and generally backed by a standard twelve month warranty. We also offer service contracts for our products of one year or more in duration after expiration of any warranty.
Competition
We participate in markets that are highly dynamic and globally competitive across all our segments. Additionally, many of the markets for our products are subject to constant change, due largely to evolving customer needs. As we attempt to respond to this change, the competitive landscape as well as the specific strategies of competitors may change. Moreover, one or more of our competitors might achieve a technological advancement that could put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Although there are no firms that compete with us across our full range of product lines and services, we face competition in each business segment in domestic and foreign markets. Certain of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do, or may be smaller regional producers with lower overhead costs and profit requirements, particularly in Asia. Our strategy is to offer technologically advanced products that are price competitive in our markets, and to link the product offerings with market knowledge and customer service. We believe this serves to differentiate our products in many markets. Due to the critical mass necessary to support our large installed base of systems, as well as the highly specialized nature of our products, competition can be more limited in our service business.
Our overall focus is typically on niche and value-added segments where we can differentiate our products from our competition’s products through technological and product value advantage. The following further discusses the competitive landscape in each of our strategic business segments.
Metrology Solutions Segment
Our principal competitors for the sale of metrology products and services include Bruker Corporation, Ametek, Agilent, KLA-Tencor and 4D Technology. We believe the key competitive factors are performance, range of features, reliability, price and service. We believe that we are competitive with respect to each of these factors, although we have faced increasing pressure on purchase price due to aggressive pricing practices of competitors. Our ability to remain competitive depends in part upon our success in developing new and enhanced systems, leveraging our intellectual property and introducing these systems at competitive prices on a timely basis. Intense price competition in the sale of metrology products in the past has adversely affected our profit margins.
Our Metrology Solutions segment offers products that we believe are leaders in most of the markets served, including semiconductor, flat panel displays, precision machining, research and optics. A key strategy in this segment is to continue to develop and produce precise 3D surface metrology products that are technology leaders in the markets where they participate, particularly as the demand increases for more advanced application use, and where adoption and volume is continuously growing. On a regional basis, this segment participates in North America, Europe and Asia. It faces competition in each of these locations from a wide variety of companies, from very large multinational manufacturers to much smaller, regional companies. Similar to our optical systems segment, this segment must address the continual threat of commoditization, particularly with respect to products that have matured in their life cycle.
Optical Systems Segment
Our Optical Systems segment offers precision optical products and integrated electro-optical systems that serve the critical needs of the defense/aerospace, medical and semiconductor markets. We have a strong reputation and presence worldwide, particularly in North America and Europe. Our business also includes government contract and consulting work. We have multiple competitors across our served markets. We typically compete on price, delivery and technology, as well as quality and service. Our experience in design and manufacture of complex optical systems is a core competence, and we are committed to protecting our intellectual property and designs, particularly in regions where such laws are not as strictly enforced. We also strive to continuously differentiate our product offerings, to help avoid commoditization of certain products. Competitors include, but are not limited to, L-3 Tinsley, Exotic Electro-Optics, Sagem, JenOptik and Berliner Glas.
| 7 |
Research and Development
We maintain our position as a market leader in metrology and optics through continuous and focused investment in research and development of new technology, products and applications. Research and development activities constitute an important and vital part of our overall business strategy, as the markets we serve are typically characterized by rapid technological changes and advances. Accordingly, the success of our strategy depends in part on our ability to develop market-leading products and solutions, which is primarily driven by close relationships with our customers, together with efforts in research and development.
Through continual investment in research and development, we seek to expand our leadership position in metrology products and optical sub-systems. In order to remain as a market leader in our core market segments, Zygo works with our customers to address their current needs, as well as their evolving requirements, so that we remain designed into their products during the entire product lifecycle. In addition, as part of our development efforts, we focus on lowering the production costs of our products.
We hold approximately 470 active patents worldwide and have additional patent applications on file related to both business segments. The patents are of varying duration and provide some protection from competition. Although we vigorously defend our patents, we believe that our patents are most valuable when combined with our products, technology, competencies and customer-focused, value-added solutions. On occasion, we also engage in joint research and development projects with some of our customers and other parties. We also own a number of registered and unregistered trademarks and have acquired certain technology that we believe to be of importance to our business. We believe that continued enhancement, development, and commercialization of new and existing products and systems are essential to maintaining and improving our position in the markets in which we operate.
Patents and Other Intellectual Property
Our success and ability to compete depend substantially on our technology. We have been developing a portfolio of intellectual property for over 40 years, and we rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and license agreements to establish and protect the proprietary rights for our products.
Since we introduced the first optical interferometer in 1972, we have had over 590 United States and foreign patents issued, of which approximately 470 are currently active. We also have approximately 120United States and foreign patent applications pending. In addition, we have a number of registered and unregistered trademarks. While we rely on patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws to protect our technology, we also believe that the technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, and reliable product maintenance are essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. We do not expect the expiration in the near future of various of our active patents to have a material effect on our business.
BACKLOG AND BOOKINGS
Backlog at June 30, 2013 was $89.8 million, an increase of $21.8 million compared with $68.0 million at June 30, 2012, of which $44.6 million, or 50%, was in the Metrology Solutions segment and $45.2 million, or 50%, was in the Optical Systems segment. Bookings for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 were $172.3 million and consisted of $116.6 million, or 68%, in the Metrology Solutions segment and $55.7 million, or 32%, in the Optical Systems segment. We expect to fill all orders.
Marketing and Sales
Our sales and marketing strategy is to establish and/or solidify strategic relationships with leading OEMs and end-users in targeted sectors within our markets. The selling process for our products is performed through our worldwide sales organization operating out of regional sales and service offices in California and Connecticut, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan. Supporting this core sales team are business development, marketing and engineering specialists representing our various optics and metrology units in Connecticut, Arizona, California and Canada. Product promotion is through trade shows, printed and e-business advertising and industry technical organizations.
| 8 |
The following table sets forth the percentage of our total revenue by region (based on shipping destination, including sales delivered through distributors) during the past three years:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Americas | 53 | % | 54 | % | 54 | % | ||||||
| Japan | 18 | % | 16 | % | 21 | % | ||||||
| China | 12 | % | 13 | % | 6 | % | ||||||
| Europe | 12 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | ||||||
| Pacific Rim | 5 | % | 5 | % | 7 | % | ||||||
| Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Customer service is an essential part of our business, since product up-time is critical given its effect on our customers’ production efficiency. As of June 30, 2013, our global sales, customer support and service organization consisted of 89 people skilled in sales, marketing, optical and electronic component repair, software, application and system integration, diagnostics and problem-solving capabilities.
Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Sources of Supply
Our principal manufacturing activities are conducted at our facilities in Middlefield, Connecticut; Richmond, California; and Tucson, Arizona. We also perform manufacturing activities in our Costa Mesa, California; Canada; Taiwan; German; and China facilities.
We maintain an advanced optical components manufacturing facility in Middlefield, Connecticut, specializing in the fabrication, polishing and coating of plano, or flat, optics for sales to third parties, as well as the manufacture of a wide variety of optics that are used in our metrology products. Our manufacturing activities for metrology products consist primarily of assembling and testing components and sub-assemblies supplied by us and third-party vendors, then integrating these components and sub-assemblies into our finished products.
Our optical assembly manufacturing activities are conducted in our Costa Mesa, California; Richmond, California; and Tucson, Arizona facilities. We integrate our optics, optics from third party vendors and mechanical sub-systems utilizing our metrology in these facilities.
Certain components and sub-assemblies incorporated into our systems are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. We routinely monitor limited-source supply parts, and we endeavor to ensure that adequate inventory is available to maintain manufacturing schedules should the supply of any part be interrupted. Although we seek to reduce our dependence on limited source suppliers, we have not qualified a second source for some of these products, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these sources could have a negative impact on our results of operations and damage customer relationships.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We make available free of charge through our website,www.zygo.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports may also be obtained without charge by contacting Investor Relations, Zygo Corporation, Corporate Headquarters, Laurel Brook Road, Middlefield, Connecticut 06455-1291, phone: (860) 347-8506. Our internet website and the information contained therein or incorporated therein are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549 or may obtain information by calling the SEC at 800-SEC-0330. Moreover, the SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, or other information regarding reports that we file electronically with them at http://www.sec.gov.
Employees
At June 30, 2013, we employed 637 people worldwide of which 17 were temporary or independent contractors. We employed 302 in manufacturing, 149 in research and development, 89 in sales and marketing and 80 in management and administration. Our employees are not represented by a labor union or a collective bargaining agreement. We regard our employee relations as good to excellent.
| 9 |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Chris L. Koliopoulos - age 60 - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Dr. Koliopoulos joined our Company in January 2010 and serves as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Previously he served as President and CEO of ADE Corporation from 2002 to 2006 and as a private investor, director and advisor to Zemetrics, Inc. from 2007 to 2010.
John P. Jordan - age 67 - Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Mr. Jordan joinedour Company in February 2011 andserves as our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Prior to joining Zygo, Mr. Jordan spent four years with Baldwin Technology Company, Inc., a manufacturer of accessories, controls and consumables for the printing industry, as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
John M. Stack - age 48 - President, Optical Systems Division
Mr. Stackjoined our Company in November 2006 andhas served as President of the Optical Systems Division since December 2006. Previously he spent 18 years with Edmund Optics Inc., a supplier of optics and optical components, where his most recent position was President and Chief Operating Officer from 2001 to 2006.
Anthony Allan - age 48 - Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations
Mr. Allan has served asSenior Vice President, Worldwide Operations since February 2013. Prior to Joining Zygo, Mr. Allan served as Chief Operating Officer of Masimo Corporation, a medical technology manufacturer from 2010 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Allan had been Vice President - Global Business Units, Instrumentation and Medical Sector, with Jabil Inc., an electronic manufacturing services and solutions company from 1995 to 2010.
John A. Tomich - age 55 - Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Mr. Tomich joined our Company in August 2010 as Vice President and General Counsel. In November 2010, Mr. Tomich was also appointed the Corporate Secretary of the Company. Prior to joining Zygo, Mr. Tomich was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary for Doctors Research Group, Inc., a medical device manufacturer, from 2008 to 2010, and Assistant Clinical Professor of Law and Supervising Patent Attorney for the University of Connecticut, School of Law from 2006 to 2008. Prior to teaching, Mr. Tomich was General Counsel and Secretary for CUNO Incorporated.
David F. Basila - age 54 - Vice President, Business Development
Mr. Basila has served as Vice President of Business Development since February 2010. Previously he served as Vice President of ADE Corporation from 2002 to 2006, and as a private investor and director of Zemetrics, Inc. from 2007 to 2010.
William H. Bacon - age 63 - Vice President, Corporate Quality and Support Services
Mr. Bacon has served as Vice President, Corporate Quality and Support Services since March 2003. Previously he served as our Vice President, Manufacturing from April 2002 to March 2003, Vice President, Metrology Manufacturing from April 2000 to April 2002 and Vice President, Corporate Quality from January 1996 to April 2000. From November 1993 to January 1996, Mr. Bacon was Director of Total Quality and also served as Manager of Instrument Manufacturing from June 1987 to November 1993.
Michael M. Vehlies - age 52 - Corporate Controller
Mr. Vehlies has served as Corporate Controller since June 2002. Prior to joining Zygo, Mr. Vehlies served as the Chief Financial Officer for Gunther International, Ltd from 1998 to 2002.
Under the by-laws, executive officers serve for a term of one year and until their successors are chosen and qualified unless earlier removed.
| 10 |
We are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, many of which are described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Any of the events or conditions described below could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Integration of manufacturing facilities may entail certain operational risk.
We regularly review our manufacturing operations to maximize the effectiveness and cost benefit of those operations. As our business evolves, it becomes necessary to rationalize our manufacturing facilities requirements. Securing additional manufacturing facilities or integrating existing manufacturing facilities involve certain risks. These risks include substantial cash expenditures and capital expenditures, potentially in excess of budgeted amounts; difficulties in assimilating or moving existing operations; loss of orders or customers due to the failure to obtain all necessary permits and regulatory approvals, including those that may be required by our customers; diverting management’s attention away from other business concerns; and disruption of manufacturing schedules and forecasted revenue which could adversely affect our results of operations. We are in the process of transitioning our existing Tucson operations into a recently purchased facility in Tucson.
General economic conditions and the related deterioration in the global business environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Global consumer confidence has eroded amid concerns over, among other things, declining asset values, inflation, volatility in energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, high unemployment and the stability and solvency of financial institutions, financial markets, businesses and sovereign nations. These concerns have slowed global economic growth in numerous countries, including many of those in North America, Europe and Asia, where the Company does substantially all of its business. In addition, the on-going European debt crisis and the downgrade of the United States’ long term sovereign credit rating have negatively affected the financial markets and could continue to weigh on the global business environment. As these economic conditions continue to persist, or if they worsen, a number of negative effects on our business could result, including customers or potential customers reducing or delaying orders, the insolvency of key suppliers which could result in production delays, the inability of customers to obtain credit and the insolvency of one or more customers, certain of which we have already experienced. Any of these effects could impact our ability to effectively manage inventory levels and collect receivables, create unabsorbed costs due to lower net revenues and ultimately decrease our net revenues and profitability, as well as cause us to write-down certain of our assets.
Zygo is dependent on the semiconductor industry which, as a whole, is volatile.
Our business is somewhat dependent on capital expenditures and component requirements for manufacturers in the semiconductor industry. This industry is cyclical and has historically experienced periods of oversupply, resulting in significantly reduced demand for capital equipment, including the products manufactured and marketed by us. For the foreseeable future, our operations will continue to be dependent on the capital expenditures in this industry, which in turn is largely dependent on the market demand in the semiconductor markets.
Zygo could suffer significant business interruptions.
Our customers, suppliers and operations may be vulnerable to interruption by natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons, or floods, or other disasters such as fires, explosions, acts of terrorism or war, disease or failures of our management information or other systems. If a business interruption occurs, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
Zygo is subject to environmental laws and regulations and may have liabilities arising from environmental matters.
Zygo is subject to a variety of environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used during our manufacturing processes. Any failure by us to comply with applicable regulations could subject us to future liabilities or the suspension of production. We are aware of certain levels of contamination on our property which is below reportable levels. In addition, we are aware of certain contamination on an adjacent property that we formerly owned. The future effect of environmental matters, including potential liabilities, is often difficult to estimate. We are unable to determine or reasonably estimate the amount of cost, if any, that we might incur or for which we may potentially be responsible to remediate the situation or for damages which may have resulted or result from the situation. In addition, environmental regulations could restrict our ability to expand our facilities or could require us to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses to comply with such regulations.
Zygo is subject to changes in senior management that could affect the operation of the Company.
Unforeseen or anticipated changes in senior management could adversely impact the Company due to a lack of historical knowledge and familiarity with all aspects of the Company’s business and operations by new senior management.
| 11 |
Zygo has been dependent on sales to two large customers; the loss of or a reduction in bookings from these customers would materially affect our revenue and profitability.
During fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, sales to Canon Inc., one of our largest customers in each of those periods, accounted for 9%, 10%, and 13% of our net revenues, respectively. We expect that sales to Canon will continue to represent a significant percentage of our net revenues for the near future. Canon is an original investor in our Company, the owner at June 30, 2013 of approximately 7% of outstanding shares of our common stock, and is a distributor of certain of our products in the Japanese market. During fiscal 2013, sales to another large customer accounted for 9% of our net revenues. A reduction or delay in orders from these customers, including reductions or delays due to market, economic, or competitive conditions in the industries which we or our customer serve, could have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations. Our customers, including these two customers, generally do not enter into long-term agreements obligating them to purchase our products.
Our substantial international revenues are subject to risk.
Zygo sells products internationally, primarily to customers in Japan, China and Europe. Net revenue from customers outside the United States accounted for approximately 47% of our net revenue in fiscal 2013 and 46% of our net revenue in each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and are expected to continue to account for a substantial percentage of our net revenue.
International revenue and foreign operations are subject to inherent risks. These risks include the economic conditions in various foreign countries and their trading partners, political instability, longer payment cycles, potential difficulty in accounts receivable collection, compliance with foreign laws, changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs or other barriers, difficulties in obtaining export licenses, staffing and managing foreign operations, exposure to currency exchange fluctuations, transportation delays and potentially adverse tax consequences.
Our revenue and costs are negotiated and paid primarily in U.S. dollars. However, changes in the values of foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar can render our products comparatively more expensive to the extent locally produced alternative products are available. Such conditions could negatively affect international revenues of our products and foreign operations, as would changes in the general economic conditions in those markets. Revenues that are recorded in local currency are exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations from the time customers are invoiced in local currency until collection occurs. For fiscal 2013, approximately 24% of our revenues were denominated in foreign currencies. We hedge certain intercompany transactions by entering into forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. In some cases, we design hedges such that they qualify for hedge accounting treatment. These contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures, generally three to fifteen months. Any gains and losses on the fair value of these contracts are expected to be largely offset by gains and losses on the underlying transactions unless they are qualify for hedge accounting treatment in which case the change in fair value will be charged to accumulated other comprehensive income.There can be no assurance that risks inherent in international revenues and foreign operations will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the future.
Zygo may have additional tax liabilities.
Zygo is subject to income taxes in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In recent years we recorded a valuation allowance on substantially all of our deferred tax assets, including federal net operating loss carryforwards in the United States. We no longer record a valuation allowance against the federal net operating loss carryforwards and substantially all of the deferred tax assets in the United States. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related tax liabilities could be materially different from our income tax provisions and accruals. The results of audits could have a material effect on our financial statements in the period or periods for which that determination is made. In previous years, we incorrectly recorded deferred tax asset balances. Tax planning strategies could be affected if our deferred tax assets or income tax provisions are misstated.
Zygo earns a significant amount of operating income from outside the United States, and any repatriation of funds currently held in foreign jurisdictions may result in higher effective tax rates for the company. A change in the mix of product sold into various jurisdictions or a change in the revenue or profit from foreign jurisdictions could have an adverse effect on the Company’s effective tax rate. In addition, there have been proposals to change U.S. tax laws that would significantly impact how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings. Although we cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed legislation may pass, if enacted it could have a material adverse impact on our tax expense and cash flow.
| 12 |
Acquisitions may entail certain operational and financial risks.
Our growth strategy includes expanding our products and services, and we may seek acquisitions or make internal investments to strategically expand our business. We regularly review potential acquisitions of businesses, technologies, or products complementary to our business and periodically engage in discussions regarding such possible acquisitions. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including some or all of the following: substantial cash expenditures and capital investments; potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities; incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities; amortization of certain intangible assets; difficulties in assimilating the operations and products of the acquired companies; diverting management’s attention away from other business concerns; risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no direct experience; the inability to manage the growth expected for various acquisitions; potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies in the process of integrating personnel with disparate business backgrounds; and combining different corporate cultures. In addition, we may spend considerable effort and resources to review potential acquisition candidates, which we may elect not to pursue, or we may not actually consummate the transaction.
We cannot provide assurance that any acquisition, including the acquisitions of Zemetrics, Solvision, Inc. and the assets of the ASML Inc. Richmond, California operation will result in long-term benefits to us, or that our management will be able to effectively manage the acquired businesses. We may also incorrectly judge the value or worth of an acquired company or business or of a line of business to which we devote internal resources and funding. We have previously disposed of or divested several companies or lines of business that previously were acquired by us or in which we internally invested at a significant net loss to us.
Our quarterly operating results fluctuate and may continue to fluctuate in the future.
Our quarterly and annual operating results have varied in the past and may vary significantly in the future depending on factors such as: budgeting cycles of our customers; the size, timing and recognition of revenue from significant orders; increased competition; our ability to develop innovative products; the timing of new product releases by us or our competitors; market acceptance of our products; changes in our and our competitors’ pricing policies; changes in operating expenses and personnel changes; the effect of our acquisitions and consequent integration; changes in our business strategy; and general economic factors.
Due to these and other factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. Our results for one quarter should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance. In future periods, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock would likely decrease. Current conditions in the domestic and global economies are uncertain. As a result, it is difficult to estimate the level of growth for the economy as a whole or of capital expenditures in the markets we serve, including the semiconductor capital equipment, industrial, bio-medical and scientific markets. Because various components of our budgeting and forecasting are dependent on estimates of spending within these markets, the prevailing economic uncertainty renders estimates of future revenue and expenses more difficult to make.
Our scheduled backlog may not result in future revenues.
We schedule the production of our systems based in part upon order backlog. Due to possible customer changes in delivery schedules and cancellations of bookings, our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual revenues for any succeeding period. There can be no assurance that amounts included in our backlog will ultimately result in future revenues. We have experienced push-outs and cancellations in the semiconductor capital equipment and electro-optics sectors. A reduction in backlog during any particular period, or the failure of our backlog to result in future revenues could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our lengthy revenue cycle could affect our manufacturing schedule and cause us to incur expenses without realizing sales.
Our lengthy and variable qualification and sales cycle makes it difficult to predict the timing of a sale or whether a sale will be made, which may cause us to have excess manufacturing capacity or inventory and negatively affect our operating results. As is typical in the industry, our customers generally expend significant efforts in evaluating and qualifying our products and manufacturing process. This evaluation and qualification process frequently results in a lengthy sales cycle, typically ranging from three totwelve months, but it can be longer for complex systems sales. While our customers are evaluating our products and before they place an order with us, we may incur substantial sales, marketing and research and development expenses, expend significant management efforts, increase manufacturing capacity and order long-lead-time supplies prior to receiving an order. Even after this evaluation process, it is possible that a potential customer will not purchase our products. In addition, product purchases are frequently subject to unplanned processing and other delays, particularly with respect to larger customers for whom our products represent a very small percentage of their overall purchasing activity.
| 13 |
If we increase capacity and order supplies in anticipation of an order that does not materialize, our gross margins may be negatively impacted, and we may have to carry or write off excess inventory. Even if we receive an order, the additional manufacturing capacity that we add to service the customer’s requirements may be underutilized in a subsequent quarter. Either situation could cause our results of operations to be adversely affected. Our long sales cycles also may cause our revenues and operating results to vary significantly and unexpectedly from quarter to quarter and make us more susceptible to the effects of general economic downturns.
Zygo is exposed to significant delays and additional costs if we do not receive adequate or timely supplies of raw materials and other supplies upon which we depend.
Zygo is dependent on suppliers for raw materials and various electrical, mechanical and optical supplies. Although we enter into purchase orders with our suppliers either directly or through our contract manufacturers based on our forecasts, we do not have any guaranteed supply arrangements with these suppliers. Moreover, as our demand for supplies increases, we may not be able to obtain these supplies in a timely manner. If any relationship with a key supplier is terminated or if a supplier fails or is unable to provide reliable services or equipment and we are unable to reach suitable alternative solutions quickly, we may experience significant delays and additional costs in the manufacture of our products. If our key suppliers cease manufacturing the supplies we require, if their manufacturing operations are interrupted for any significant period of time, or if they are unable or unwilling to supply us for any other reason, including capacity constraints, then we may be at least temporarily unable to obtain these supplies, thus exposing us to significant delays and additional costs. Currently there are only a limited number of companies that are capable of supplying optical materials in the quantity and of the quality we require. Although we seek to reduce our dependence on limited source suppliers, we may not have qualified a second source for some of these products, and the partial or complete loss of certain of these sources could have a negative impact on our results of operations and damage customer relationships.
We face risks associated with manufacturing forecasts.
If we fail to predict our manufacturing requirements accurately, we could incur additional costs or experience manufacturing delays, which could cause us to lose orders or customers and result in lower net revenues. We currently use a rolling 12-month forecast based primarily on our anticipated product orders and our product order history to help determine our requirements for components and materials. It is very important that we accurately predict both the demand for our products and the lead-time required to obtain the necessary components and raw materials. Lead times for materials and components that we order vary significantly and depend on factors such as the specific supplier, the size of the order, contract terms and demand for each component at a given time. If we underestimate our requirements, we may have inadequate manufacturing capacity or inventory, which could interrupt manufacturing of our products and result in delays in shipments and net revenues. If we overestimate our requirements, we could have excess inventory of parts. In addition, delays in the manufacturing of our products could cause us to lose orders or customers.
Our stock price may fluctuate significantly due to a variety of risks.
We believe that factors such as the announcement of new products or technologies by us or our competitors, market conditions in the semiconductor and industrial markets and quarterly fluctuations in financial results can be expected to cause the market price of our common stock to vary substantially. Further, our net revenues or results of operations in future quarters may be below the expectations of public market securities analysts and investors. In such event, the price of our common stock would likely decline. In addition, the stock market has historically experienced price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices for many high technology companies; these variations have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. The market volatility may adversely affect the market price of shares of our common stock. Furthermore, our common stock trading price may be more susceptible to market fluctuations due to the relatively small public float and trading volume of our stock and our dependence on a limited number of industries.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
We face competition from a number of companies in all our markets, many of which have greater manufacturing and marketing capabilities and greater financial, technological and personnel resources. In addition, we compete with the internal development efforts of our current and prospective customers, some of which may attempt to become vertically integrated. Our competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to introduce new products with competitive price/performance characteristics. Competitive pressures may necessitate price reductions, which can adversely affect results of operations. Although we believe that we have certain technical and other advantages over some of our competitors, maintaining such advantages will require a continued high level of investment by our Company in research and development and sales, marketing and service. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to continue to make such investments or that we will be able to make the technological advances necessary to maintain such competitive advantages. In addition, due to historical relationships and possible prior investments by potential customers in competitive product lines, it may be more difficult for us to realize certain of our growth strategies and initiatives. There can be no assurance that the basis of competition in the industries in which we compete will not shift.
| 14 |
Our inability to anticipate and keep pace with rapidly changing technological developments in the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology. Our future success will continue to depend upon our ability to enhance our current products and to develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological developments and evolving industry standards, respond to changes in customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. The development of new technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. With continuing advances in technology, potential product advancements require an increasing allocation of resources, including potentially more resources than we then would have available.
We commit significant financial and personnel resources on a continuous basis to redesign and enhance our instruments, systems and components and upgrade the proprietary software technology incorporated in our products. Any failure to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments and customer requirements, or any significant delays in product development or introduction, could have a material adverse effect on our business and impact our relationships with customers. This could have an impact on customers’ willingness to share proprietary information about their requirements and participate in collaborative efforts with us. There can be no assurance that our customers will continue to provide us with timely access to such information, that we will be successful in developing and marketing new products and services or product and service enhancements on a timely basis, or respond effectively to technological changes or new product announcements by others. In addition, there can be no assurance the new products and services or product enhancements, if any, which we developed will achieve market acceptance.
We may be unable to enforce or defend our ownership and use of proprietary technology.
Our success is heavily dependent upon our proprietary technology. There can be no assurance that the steps we take to protect our proprietary technology will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology by third parties or will be adequate under the laws of some foreign countries; those laws may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do laws of the United States. We have been experiencing an increased level of revenue in China and other foreign countries which historically have created concerns for various companies. In addition, the possibility remains that others will “reverse engineer” our products in order to determine their method of operation and introduce competing products, or that others will independently develop competing technology. Any such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our business depends on management and technical personnel who are in great demand.
Our success depends in large part upon the continued services of many of our highly skilled personnel involved in management, research, development and engineering, sales and marketing, manufacturing and support and upon our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified employees. Our employees may voluntarily terminate their employment with us at any time. At times, competition for these individuals from a variety of employers, including our competitors and companies in computer or technology-related industries, is intense. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to retain our existing personnel or attract and retain additional personnel.
Our products may contain defects that are undetected until after our products are installed, which may lead to a loss of reputation and customers.
Our products are deployed in large and complex systems and may contain defects that are not detected until after our products have been installed, which could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers. We design some of our products for deployment in large and complex optical networks. Because of the nature of these products, they can only be fully tested for reliability when deployed in networks for long periods of time. Our customers may discover defects in our products only after they have been fully deployed and operated under peak stress conditions. In addition, our products are combined with products from other vendors. As a result, should problems occur, it could be difficult to identify the source of the problem. These conditions increase the risk that we could experience, among other things: loss of customers; damage to our brand reputation; failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance; diversion of development and engineering resources; and legal actions by our customers. The occurrence of any one or more of the foregoing factors couldhave a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations, and damage customer relationships.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
We have received no written comments regarding our periodic or current reports from the staff of the SEC that were issued 180 days or more preceding the end of our fiscal year 2013 that remain unresolved.
| 15 |
We own our principal manufacturing facility and corporate headquarters, which is located on Laurel Brook Road in Middlefield, Connecticut. This facility consists of one 153,500 square-foot building on approximately 13 acres. In addition we own a 55,300 square-foot manufacturing facility, acquired as part of the ASML Richmond asset acquisition in fiscal 2011. In May 2012, we purchased a 110,020 square-foot facility in Tucson, Arizona, which will function as the manufacturing site for our Tucson operation. The following table sets forth information with respect to our facilities which are used by both of our operating segments, except as identified otherwise below:
| Square Footage | Owned / Leased | |||||||||
| Operation/Location | Manufacturing | Total | Expiration Date | |||||||
| Corporate Headquarters, Eastern Regional Sales Office and Metrology and Optics Manufacturing | ||||||||||
| Middlefield, Connecticut | 96,049 | 153,500 | Owned | |||||||
| Zygo Extreme Precision Optics Group | ||||||||||
| Richmond, California | 44,274 | 55,300 | Owned | |||||||
| Richmond, California | 0 | 13,230 | Leased - 07/31/15 | |||||||
| Zygo - Optical Systems | ||||||||||
| Tucson, Arizona | 25,300 | 110,020 | Owned | |||||||
| Tucson, Arizona- (1) | 14,560 | 22,560 | Leased - 10/31/13 | |||||||
| Zygo-Texas | ||||||||||
| Texas Office | 0 | 519 | Leased - 09/30/14 | |||||||
| Zygo-Massachusetts | ||||||||||
| Massachusetts Office | 0 | 400 | Leased - 06/30/15 | |||||||
| Zygo Lamda | ||||||||||
| China | 3,552 | 12,206 | Leased - 09/16/15 | |||||||
| China | 1,292 | 1,292 | Leased - 06/30/13 | |||||||
| Zygo Canada, Inc. | ||||||||||
| Canada | 3,000 | 7,026 | Leased - 07/31/16 | |||||||
| Zygo - Optical Systems | ||||||||||
| Costa Mesa, California | 6,500 | 13,714 | Leased - 04/30/14 | |||||||
| Western Regional Sales Office and R&D Center | ||||||||||
| Santa Clara, California | 0 | 4,000 | Leased - 06/30/16 | |||||||
| Zygo - Laser Technology Metrology (R&D) | ||||||||||
| Watsonville, California | 0 | 1,452 | Leased - 03/31/14 | |||||||
| Zygo PTE Ltd | ||||||||||
| Singapore | 0 | 2,174 | Leased - 12/31/15 | |||||||
| Zygo Taiwan | ||||||||||
| Sales and Service Office - Taiwan Branch | 0 | 992 | Leased - 04/30/14 | |||||||
| Taiwan Co., Ltd | 0 | 18,937 | Leased - 04/30/14 | |||||||
| ZygoLOT | ||||||||||
| Germany | 0 | 3,702 | Leased - 10/01/13 | |||||||
| Zygo KK | ||||||||||
| Japan | 0 | 1,705 | Leased - 08/01/15 | |||||||
| Demo Room | 0 | 500 | Leased - 03/31/15 | |||||||
| Total | 194,527 | 423,229 | ||||||||
(1) We plan to move this operation into the new Tucson location during fiscal 2014. Current lease will terminate in accordance with lease agreements with no penalty.
| 16 |
From time to time, we are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of our business. In the opinion of management, we are not party to any litigation that we believe could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
N/A.
| 17 |
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol ZIGO. The following table provides information about the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock by quarter for fiscal 2013 and 2012.
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 | Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
| First quarter | $ | 20.00 | $ | 17.03 | $ | 14.20 | $ | 9.54 | ||||||||
| Second quarter | $ | 19.02 | $ | 13.14 | $ | 18.42 | $ | 10.68 | ||||||||
| Third quarter | $ | 16.80 | $ | 14.15 | $ | 20.06 | $ | 16.36 | ||||||||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 16.92 | $ | 13.36 | $ | 20.15 | $ | 15.39 | ||||||||
These over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
The number of record holders of our common stock at August 30, 2013 was 388. The closing price for our stock price as of June 28, 2013 was $15.84.
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our capital stock and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
In August 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock. As of June 30, 2012, we repurchased outstanding common shares having an aggregate market value of $20.0 million (determined at the time of their respective repurchases). Repurchases may occur from time to time as market conditions warrant through transactions in the open market. The share repurchases are effected pursuant to a plan in conformity with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This rule allows public companies to adopt written, pre-arranged stock trading plans when they do not have material, non-public information in their possession. The adoption of this stock trading plan allows us to repurchase our shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods. There were no repurchases under this stock trading plan in fiscal 2013, 2012 or 2011.
We also at times grant restricted stock awards. These awards generally allow recipients to sell a portion of the stock award back to us, in order to cover tax liabilities resulting from the vesting of the award.
Common stock repurchases under our authorized purchase plan and restricted stock repurchases in connection with the surrender of shares to cover taxes upon vesting in each quarter of fiscal 2013 were as follows:
| Period | Total number of shares purchased | Average price paid per share | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | Aproximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (in millions) | ||||||||||||
| July 1, 2012 - September 30, 2012 | 56,677 | $ | 18.84 | — | $ | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| October 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012 | 201 | $ | 16.60 | — | $ | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013 | 6,126 | $ | 15.99 | — | $ | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| April 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013 | 2,858 | $ | 15.74 | — | $ | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| 18 |
Common stock repurchases under our authorized purchase plan and restricted stock repurchases in connection with the surrender of shares to cover taxes upon vesting in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 were as follows:
| Period | Total number of shares purchased | Average price paid per share | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (in millions) | ||||||||||||
| April 1, 2013 - April 30, 2013 | — | — | — | $ | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| May 1, 2013 - May 31, 2013 | — | — | — | $ | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| June 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013 | 2,858 | $ | 15.74 | — | $ | 5.0 | ||||||||||
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The Stock Price Performance graph below and related information shall not be deemed solicitating material or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent Zygo specifically incorporates this information by reference.
The graph below compares cumulative total return of our common stock with the cumulative total return of (i) the NASDAQ Composite and (ii) a group of peer companies weighted to reflect differing market capitalizations. Companies in the peer group are GSI Group Inc., Nanometrics, Inc., Rudolph Technologies, Inc., II-VI, Incorporated, Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., Faro Technologies, Inc., Cognex Corp., FEI Co. and Ultratech, Inc. The peer group consists of issuers selected primarily based on market capitalization and the markets they serve.
| 06/30/08 | 06/30/09 | 06/30/10 | 06/30/11 | 06/30/12 | 06/30/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ZYGO CORPORATION | 100.00 | 47.41 | 82.50 | 144.97 | 195.83 | 173.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NASDAQ COMPOSITE | 100.00 | 80.88 | 93.94 | 124.67 | 133.46 | 157.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
| PEER GROUP | 100.00 | 68.92 | 84.26 | 155.29 | 141.24 | 172.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 19 |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share, number of employees, percentages and ratio amounts)
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 149,395 | $ | 166,837 | $ | 150,126 | $ | 101,330 | $ | 114,734 | ||||||||||
| Gross profit | 65,691 | 81,710 | 70,793 | 41,969 | 32,433 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 44 | % | 49 | % | 47 | % | 41 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) from continuing operations | 8,980 | 45,071 | 20,592 | (2,668 | ) | (61,210 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | — | — | 91 | (2,669 | ) | (4,059 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest(s) | 8,980 | 45,071 | 20,683 | (5,337 | ) | (65,269 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(s) | 1,129 | 2,053 | 1,604 | 957 | 795 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 19,079 | $ | (6,294 | ) | $ | (66,064 | ) | ||||||||
| % of net revenue | 5 | % | 26 | % | 13 | % | -6 | % | -58 | % | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 18,988 | $ | (3,625 | ) | $ | (62,005 | ) | ||||||||
| % of net revenue | 5 | % | 26 | % | 13 | % | -4 | % | -54 | % | ||||||||||
| Basic - Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Zygo Corporation: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.43 | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.08 | ($ | 0.21 | ) | ($ | 3.68 | ) | ||||||||
| Discontinued operations | — | — | — | (0.16 | ) | (0.24 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.43 | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.08 | ($ | 0.37 | ) | ($ | 3.92 | ) | ||||||||
| Diluted - Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Zygo Corporation: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.41 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.05 | ($ | 0.21 | ) | ($ | 3.68 | ) | ||||||||
| Discontinued operations | — | — | — | (0.16 | ) | (0.24 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.41 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.05 | ($ | 0.37 | ) | ($ | 3.92 | ) | ||||||||
| Weighted average number of shares: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 18,454 | 18,014 | 17,639 | 17,183 | 16,843 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 19,106 | 18,711 | 18,140 | 17,183 | 16,843 | |||||||||||||||
| Research, development and engineering | $ | 18,697 | $ | 16,501 | $ | 14,990 | $ | 14,284 | $ | 23,234 | ||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | $ | 5,893 | $ | 8,542 | $ | 1,522 | $ | 1,441 | $ | 4,255 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 5,626 | $ | 5,720 | $ | 6,431 | $ | 6,125 | $ | 7,960 | ||||||||||
| June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
| Working capital | $ | 136,998 | $ | 127,697 | $ | 95,201 | $ | 72,485 | $ | 69,742 | ||||||||||
| Current ratio | 6.1 | 5.4 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 218,220 | $ | 210,021 | $ | 159,604 | $ | 125,165 | $ | 124,099 | ||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | $ | 183,841 | $ | 173,625 | $ | 124,720 | $ | 98,403 | $ | 98,583 | ||||||||||
| Price-earnings ratio | 39 | 8 | 13 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Number of employees at year-end | 637 | 609 | 537 | 454 | 484 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue per employee – average | $ | 235 | $ | 274 | $ | 280 | $ | 223 | $ | 237 | ||||||||||
| Book value per share | $ | 9.92 | $ | 9.52 | $ | 7.02 | $ | 5.63 | $ | 5.83 | ||||||||||
| Market price per share at year-end | $ | 15.84 | $ | 17.86 | $ | 13.22 | $ | 8.11 | $ | 4.66 | ||||||||||
| 20 |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures at the date of our consolidated financial statements. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, marketable securities, share-based compensation, warranty obligations, self-insured healthcare claims, income taxes, discontinued operations, contract revenue, economic hedges and long-lived assets. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and current market conditions and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts, discontinued operations, inventory valuation, valuation of marketable securities, share-based compensation, warranty costs, self-insured health insurance costs, accounting for income taxes, contract revenue and valuation of long-lived assets to be critical policies due to the estimates and judgments involved in each.
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We recognize revenue based on guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) pertaining to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, our price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on our standard products when title passes to the customer upon shipment. While our standard products generally require installation, the installation is considered a perfunctory performance obligation. Standard products do not have customer acceptance criteria. Generally, software is a component of our standard product and, as such, is not separately recognized as revenue. We have standard rights of return for defective products that we account for as a warranty provision under authoritative guidance of accounting for contingencies. We do not have any price protection agreements or other post shipment obligations. For custom equipment where customer acceptance is part of the sales agreement, revenue is recognized when the customer has accepted the product. In cases where custom equipment does not have customer acceptance as part of the sales agreement, we recognize revenue upon shipment as long as the system meets the specifications as agreed upon with the customer. Certain transactions have multiple deliverables, with the deliverables clearly defined. To the extent that the secondary deliverables are other than perfunctory, we recognize the revenue on each deliverable, if separable, or on the completion of all deliverables, if not separable, all in a manner consistent with SAB No. 104 and related authoritative guidance. Standalone software products are recognized as revenue when they are shipped.
Certain customer transactions include payment terms whereby we receive a partial payment of the total order amount prior to the related revenue being recognized in our financial statements. These advance payments are included in progress payments, deferred revenue and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings in the consolidated balance sheet. These progress payments relate to orders for custom equipment that require a lengthy build cycle and, in some cases, acceptance by the customer. We may negotiate payment terms with these customers on these particular orders and secure certain payments prior to or on shipment of the equipment. These payments remain in progress payments or deferred revenue until our applicable revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Certain contracts we enter into continue over an extended period of time. We review those contracts for possible revenue recognition as a long-term contract. If long-term contract accounting is appropriate, we then evaluate whether revenue should be recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Under the percentage-of-completion method, we develop estimates as a basis for contract revenue and costs in progress as work on the contract continues. Estimates are reviewed and revised as additional information becomes available. During fiscal 2013, changes in estimates under the percentage of completeness method were not material. Revenue recognized in excess of billings is included in revenue recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts in the consolidated balance sheet. Billings in excess of costs and earnings would be included in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts in the consolidated balance sheet. The percentage-of-completion method is used in circumstances in which all the following conditions exist:
| · | The contract includes enforceable rights regarding goods or services to be provided to the customer, the consideration to be exchanged, and the manner and terms of settlement |
| · | Both the Company and the customer are expected to satisfy all contractual obligations and |
| · | Reasonably reliable estimates of total revenue, total cost and the progress toward completion can be made. |
| 21 |
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a continuous review of customer accounts, payment patterns and specific collection issues. We perform on-going credit evaluations of our customers and do not require collateral from our customers. For many of our international customers, we require an irrevocable letter of credit from the customer before a shipment is made. If the financial condition of a customer were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of its ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Discontinued Operations
The Company classifies operations as discontinued when the operations have either ceased, or are expected to be disposed of in a sale transaction in the near term and the operations and cash flows of all discontinued operations have been eliminated or will be eliminated upon consummation of the expected sale transaction and the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the discontinued operations. Authoritative guidance related to the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets requires the calculation of estimated fair value less cost to sell long-lived assets for assets held for sale. The calculation of estimated fair value less cost to sell includes significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to: operating projections; discount rate; excess working capital levels; property values; and the anticipated costs involved in the selling process. As more fully described in Note 21, “Discontinued Operations”, of our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we discontinued the Singapore IC packaging operations of our vision systems product line, which was included in our Metrology Solutions segment, in September 2009.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of management’s estimated future usage, over a reasonable period of time, is written down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Contracts with fixed prices are evaluated to determine if estimated total costs will exceed revenue. A loss provision is recorded when the judgment is made that actual costs incurred plus estimated costs remaining to be incurred based on management’s estimates will exceed total revenue from the contract. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to current economic trends, future demand for our products and technological obsolescence. Management estimates future product sales and service requirements and evaluates technological changes and other possible uses to determine if inventory is excess or obsolete. If actual market conditions are different than those projected by management, additional inventory adjustments affecting earnings may be required.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Marketable Securities
Marketable securities have been primarily classified as held-to-maturity, which requires them to be carried at amortized cost. We also have certain securities that are classified as trading. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of marketable securities on a quarterly basis. Marketable securities with unrealized depreciation in fair value for twelve or more consecutive months and other securities with unrealized losses are reviewed to determine whether the decline in fair value is other than temporary. Investment ratings, company-specific events, general economic conditions and other reasons are evaluated in determining if the decline in fair value is other than temporary. If it is judged that a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the marketable security is valued at the current fair value and an impairment charge is reflected in earnings.
Share-Based Compensation
We calculate share-based compensation expense in accordance with authoritative guidance pertaining to share-based payments using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of share-based awards. The key assumptions for this valuation method include the expected term of an option grant, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The determination of these assumptions is based on history and future expectations and is subject to a high level of judgment. To the extent any of the assumptions were to change from year to year, the fair value of new option grants identical to those of prior years may vary significantly from the fair value of previously issued option grants.
Warranty Costs
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We consider historical warranty costs actually incurred together with specifically identified circumstances to establish the warranty liability. The warranty liability is reviewed on a quarterly basis. Should actual costs differ from management’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability may be required. A fifteen percent change in warranty liability would have an immaterial impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
| 22 |
Accounting for Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We must assess the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Management considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. In fiscal 2009, management determined that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future, and an adjustment to record a full valuation allowance was charged to income tax expense. In fiscal 2012, the Company reversed a substantial amount of the valuation allowance based on the cumulative earnings for the last three years and future projected income. Our effective tax rate may vary from period to period based on changes in pre-tax income among jurisdictions that have higher or lower tax rates, changes to federal, state, or foreign tax laws and deductibility of certain costs and expenses by jurisdiction.
Economic Hedges
We hedge certain intercompany transactions by entering into forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. In some cases, we design hedges such that they qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures, generally three to fifteen months. Any gains and losses on the fair value of the contracts are expected to be largely offset by gains and losses in the same period on the underlying transactions unless they qualify for hedge accounting treatment, in which case the change in fair value would be charged to accumulated other comprehensive income.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the FASB pertaining to accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, the carrying value of intangible assets and other long-lived assets is reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and externally, that may suggest impairment. Some factors we consider important, which could trigger the impairment review, include a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, a significant adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, an accumulation of costs for an asset in excess of the amount originally expected, a current period operating loss or cash flow decline combined with a history of operating loss or cash flow uses or a projection that demonstrates continuing losses and a current expectation that it is more likely than not that a long-lived asset will be disposed of at a loss before the end of its estimated useful life.
If one or more of such facts or circumstances exist, we evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to determine if an impairment exists based upon estimated undiscounted future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the assets and compare that value to the carrying value of the assets. If the carrying value of the assets is greater than the estimated future cash flows, the assets are written down to the estimated fair value. We determine the estimated fair value of the assets based on a current market value of the assets. If a current market value is not readily available, a projected discounted cash flow method is applied using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Our cash flow estimates contain management’s best estimates, using appropriate and customary assumptions and projections at the time.
Health Insurance
We are self-insured for the majority of our group health insurance. We rely on claims experience in determining an adequate liability for claims incurred, but not reported. To the extent actual claims exceed estimates, we may be required to record additional expense. We also carry catastrophic insurance to manage our health insurance liability which provides for specific dollar caps on our liability for both single claims and total annual claims. A six percent change in actual claims would have an immaterial impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Adoption of New Accounting Guidance
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.The objective of ASU No. 2013-02 is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). Entities are required to disclose changes in AOCI balances by component and significant items reclassified out of AOCI. The effective date for ASU No. 2013-02 for Zygo is the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 with early adoption allowed. We have decided to adopt this accounting guidance as of June 30, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
| 23 |
OVERVIEW
Zygo Corporation is a worldwide supplier of optical metrology instruments, precision optics and electro-optical design and manufacturing services, serving customers in the semiconductor capital equipment and industrial markets. Optical instruments products encompass non-contact optical measurement instruments. Optics products consist of high performance macro-optics components, optical coatings and optical system assemblies. We conduct the majority of our manufacturing in our 153,500 square-foot facility in Middlefield, Connecticut, our 55,300 square-foot facility in Richmond, California and a 22,560 square-foot leased facility in Tucson, Arizona. In May 2012, we purchased a 110,020 square-foot facility in Tucson, Arizona, which will function as the manufacturing site for our Tucson operation when we complete our transition to the new site.
Our net earnings in fiscal 2013 were $0.41 per diluted share compared with $2.30 per diluted share in fiscal 2012. The results in fiscal 2012, benefited from the reversal of a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets of $1.01 per diluted share. Net earnings in fiscal 2011 of $1.05 per diluted share included a gain on acquisition of $0.11 per diluted share.
Our effective tax rate increased as a result of the reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Previous years’ results benefitted from the offset effect of reversing valuation allowance against tax provision, essentially eliminating U.S. Federal income tax expense. The valuation allowance against U.S.-based deferred tax assets was eliminated at the end of fiscal 2012 due to improved operating performance and improved business outlook. Current year results reflect tax expense at the full effective tax rate, modified by amounts recorded to adjust prior period deferred tax asset balances as components of the fiscal 2013 year tax provision, as well as the inclusion of research and development credits in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 after passage of legislation in January 2013 extending the credit.
At the beginning of fiscal 2013, we purchased the remaining 40% in the ZygoLOT GmbH joint venture (“ZygoLOT”) for €2.5 million. For fiscal 2013 100% of the income from ZygoLOT was included in our consolidated statements of operations. Net Income per diluted share increased by $0.05 related to the increase in ownership percentage in ZygoLOT in fiscal 2013.
Our backlog at June 30, 2013 was $89.8 million, compared with $68.0 million at June 30, 2012. Net bookings for fiscal 2013 were $172.3 million compared with $172.8 million in fiscal 2012 with the Metrology Solutions segment accounting for 68% of the bookings received and the Optical Systems segment accounting for the remaining 32%.
| 24 |
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2013 Compared with Fiscal 2012
Net Revenue by Segment
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Total | Amount | Percentage of Total | |||||||||||||
| Metrology Solutions | $ | 93.6 | 63 | % | $ | 106.2 | 64 | % | ||||||||
| Optical Systems | 55.8 | 37 | % | 60.6 | 36 | % | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 149.4 | 100 | % | $ | 166.8 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Revenue for fiscal 2013 decreased 10% compared with the prior year period, reflecting decreases in the Metrology Solutions segment revenue of 12% and decreases in Optical Systems segment revenue of 8%. The decrease in the Metrology Solutions segment revenue was primarily due to volume decreases in instruments products of $8.2 million and volume decreases in semiconductor-related lithography revenue of $2.9 million, attributable to reduced capital spending across a number of industries, including automotive and semiconductor. The decrease in the Optical Systems segment revenue was primarily due to decreases in Optical components of $3.0 million and in contract manufacturing of $2.0 million.
We experienced revenue decreases across all of our geographical regions with the exception of the Japan region. The Americas region declined $10.8 million and the China region decreased $4.6 million, primarily due to volume decreases across most product lines.
No customer accounted for over 10% of revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Revenue from two customers individually accounted for 11% and 10% of the net revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Revenue from these customers was included in both of our segments.
Revenue denominated in U.S. dollars for fiscal 2013 and 2012 was 76% and 81% of total net revenue, respectively. The balance of revenue was denominated primarily in Euro, Yen and Yuan. Revenue based in foreign currency is exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations from the time customers are invoiced in foreign currency until collection occurs. Significant changes in the values of foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar, or in the general economic conditions in our export markets, could materially impact the revenue of our products in these markets and our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Gross Margin by Segment
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross Profit | Gross Margin | Gross Profit | Gross Margin | |||||||||||||
| Metrology Solutions | $ | 50.6 | 54 | % | $ | 61.5 | 58 | % | ||||||||
| Optical Systems | 15.1 | 27 | % | 20.2 | 33 | % | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 65.7 | 44 | % | $ | 81.7 | 49 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin for fiscal 2013 was 44%, which represents a decrease of five percentage points from the comparable prior year period. Within the Metrology Solutions segment, gross margin decreased to 54% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 compared with the prior year comparable period of 58%, primarily due to a decrease in volume of high margin custom systems within the instruments business and the negative effect of lower volumes on labor and overhead absorption.
Within the Optical Systems segment, the gross margin decreased to 27% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 compared with 33% in the comparable prior year period. The Optical Systems segment gross margin decrease was primarily due to product mix related to a large order with lower gross margins, a decrease in labor and overhead absorption on lower overall volumes and a one-time loss provision on a specific project.
| 25 |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||
| Amount | Net Revenue | Amount | Net Revenue | |||||||||||||
| $ | 34.9 | 23 | % | $ | 35.5 | 21 | % | |||||||||
SG&A decreased in fiscal 2013 by $0.6 million from the comparable prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in performance-based compensation expense, which decreased SG&A by $2.4 million, and lower external commissions, partially offset by increased employee costs and benefits. The increase in SG&A as a percentage of revenue was due to lower revenue in fiscal 2013.
Research, Development and Engineering Expenses (“RD&E”)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenue | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenue | |||||||||||||
| $ | 18.7 | 13 | % | $ | 16.5 | 10 | % | |||||||||
RD&E expense increased in fiscal 2013 by $2.2 million compared with the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to spending on several development projects in our instruments and lithography product lines and in our Extreme Precision Optics Group (“EPO”). RD&E spending as a percentage of net revenue increased to 13% for fiscal 2013 from 10% in fiscal 2012 due to increased spending and lower revenue in fiscal 2013.
Other Income (Expense)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenue | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenue | |||||||||||||
| $ | (0.2 | ) | — | $ | (0.5 | ) | — | |||||||||
Other income (expense) for fiscal 2013 was ($0.2) million for fiscal 2013 compared with other expense of ($0.5) million in fiscal 2012. The $0.3 million dollar decrease primarily related to net foreign exchange realized and unrealized losses.
| 26 |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Tax Rate Percentage | Amount | Tax Rate Percentage | |||||||||||||
| $ | 2.9 | 24 | % | $ | (15.8 | ) | 54 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense in fiscal 2013 was based on United States federal and state income tax and income taxes in foreign locations. Income tax expense in fiscal 2013 benefited from the inclusion of research and development tax credits as part of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 signed into law during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. Fiscal 2013 was also benefitted by $0.9 million to correct deferred tax asset balances as of June 30, 2012.
In fiscal 2012, we recognized a tax benefit of $18.9 million from the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance on our net United States-based deferred tax assets. Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in future periods. Through fiscal 2011, a predominant portion of the Company’s net deferred tax assets were reserved due to the uncertainty of realization through future earnings. In fiscal 2012, the Company determined that based upon all available evidence, positive and negative, including the Company’s taxable income over the past three fiscal years and expected future profitability, substantially all of its United States-based deferred tax assets were more likely than not to be realized through future earnings.
Net Earnings from Continuing Operations Attributable To Zygo Corporation
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenue | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenue | |||||||||||||
| $ | 7.9 | 5 | % | $ | 43.0 | 26 | % | |||||||||
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Zygo Corporation in fiscal 2013 was $7.9 million compared with $43.0 million in the prior year. Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Zygo Corporation per diluted share was $0.41 for fiscal 2013, compared with $2.30 per diluted share for fiscal 2012. The net earnings in fiscal 2013 included a tax benefit of $0.9 million to correct deferred tax asset balances as of June 30, 2012 primarily related to fixed assets recorded in an acquisition. The net earnings in fiscal 2012 included an income tax benefit of $18.9 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, related to the reversal of valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets and charges related to a terminated acquisition effort, net of tax, of $0.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted share. At the beginning of fiscal 2013, we purchased the remaining 40% in the ZygoLOT GmbH joint venture (“ZygoLot”) for €2.5 million euros. For fiscal 2013 we included 100% of the income from ZygoLOT in our consolidated statements of operations. Net Income per diluted share increased by $0.05 related to the increase in ownership percentage in ZygoLot in fiscal 2013.
Backlog
Backlog at June 30, 2013 was $89.8 million, an increase of $21.8 million from June 30, 2012. The year-end fiscal 2013 backlog consisted of $45.2 million, or 50%, in the Optical Systems segment and $44.6 million, or 50%, in the Metrology Solutions segment. Bookings for fiscal 2013 totaled $172.3 million. Bookings by segment for fiscal 2013 consisted of $116.6 million, or 68%, in the Metrology Solutions segment and $55.7 million, or 32%, in the Optical Systems segment.
| 27 |
Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011
Net Revenue by Segment
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Total | Amount | Percentage of Total | |||||||||||||
| Metrology Solutions | $ | 106.2 | 64 | % | $ | 92.9 | 62 | % | ||||||||
| Optical Systems | 60.6 | 36 | % | 57.2 | 38 | % | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 166.8 | 100 | % | $ | 150.1 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Revenue for fiscal 2012 increased 11% compared with the prior year period, reflecting increases in the Metrology Solutions segment revenue of 14% and the increase in Optical Systems segment revenue of 6%. The increase in the Metrology Solutions segment revenue was primarily due to volume increases in instruments of $16.0 million partially offset by volume decreases in lithography revenue of $4.1 million. We generated revenue increases across all of our regions with the exception of the Japan region. The China region contributed $9.5 million to the increase, primarily due to a number of large custom systems delivered, and the Americas region contributed $6.9 million to the increased instruments net revenue on a year over year basis. The decrease in lithography stage metrology revenue, which affected the Japan region, is attributable to the decline in semiconductor capital market expenditures.
The increase in the Optical Systems segment revenue was primarily due to an increase of $9.4 million of revenue from our EPO group. This increase in revenue was primarily due to a full year of operation for EPO, which included $5.6 million revenue from a large multi-year project received in fiscal 2012. This increase was partially offset by a $4.3 million decrease in contract manufacturing associated with the completion in fiscal 2011 of a large order and volume decreases in laser and optical components of $1.7 million.
Revenue from two customers individually accounted for 11% and 10% of the net revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Revenue from one of these customers accounted for 13% of the net revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. Revenue from these customers was included in both of our segments.
Revenue denominated in U.S. dollars for fiscal 2012 and 2011 was 81% and 77% of total net revenue, respectively. The balance of revenue was denominated in Euro, Yen and Yuan. Revenue based in foreign currency is exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations from the time customers are invoiced in foreign currency until collection occurs. Significant changes in the values of foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar, or in the general economic conditions in our export markets, could materially impact the revenue of our products in these markets and our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Gross Margin by Segment
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross Profit | Gross Margin | Gross Profit | Gross Margin | |||||||||||||
| Metrology Solutions | $ | 61.5 | 58 | % | $ | 50.9 | 55 | % | ||||||||
| Optical Systems | 20.2 | 33 | % | 19.9 | 35 | % | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 81.7 | 49 | % | $ | 70.8 | 47 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin for fiscal 2012 was 49%, which represents an increase of two percentage points from the comparable prior year period. Within the Metrology Solutions segment, gross margin increased to 58% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, compared with the prior year comparable period of 55%, due to increased volume and favorable product mix within the instruments business resulting primarily from shipment of a number of large custom systems during fiscal 2012.
Within the Optical Systems segment, the gross margin decreased to 33% for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, compared with 35% in the comparable prior year period. The Optical Systems segment gross margin decrease for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to product mix and, to a lesser extent, increased factory costs associated with the current volume and major contract awards.
| 28 |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | |||||||||||||
| $ | 35.5 | 21 | % | $ | 34.7 | 23 | % | |||||||||
SG&A increased in fiscal 2012 by $0.8 million from the comparable prior year period. The increase was primarily due to employee compensation expenses related to increased headcount, which accounted for $1.3 million, terminated acquisition costs of $0.8 million, increases in certain employee benefits of $0.7 million, and increased selling and commission expenses of $0.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in employee benefit costs related to performance-based compensation programs and a decrease in year-over-year acquisition costs. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of revenue was due to management’s continuing efforts to control expenses over a significant increase in the revenue base.
Research, Development and Engineering Expenses (“RD&E”)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | |||||||||||||
| $ | 16.5 | 10 | % | $ | 15.0 | 10 | % | |||||||||
RD&E expense increased in fiscal 2012 by $1.5 million compared with the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to spending in several development projects in our lithography product line and EPO group. Overall, spending as a percentage of net revenue was unchanged at 10% for fiscal 2012 and 2011.
Other Income (Expense)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | |||||||||||||
| $ | (0.5 | ) | — | $ | 0.8 | — | ||||||||||
Other income (expense) for fiscal 2012 was ($0.5) million for fiscal 2012 compared to income of $0.8 million in fiscal 2011. The $1.3 million dollar difference related primarily to the gain on acquisition recorded in fiscal 2011 on the purchase of substantially all the assets of ASML’s Richmond, California operation and the amortization of the future consideration associated with the acquisition and unrealized losses on marketable securities related to the deferred compensation program in fiscal 2012.
| 29 |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Tax Rate Percentage | Amount | Tax Rate Percentage | |||||||||||||
| $ | (15.8 | ) | 54 | % | $ | 1.3 | 6 | % | ||||||||
In fiscal 2012, we recognized a tax benefit of $18.9 million from the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets. Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in future periods. Through fiscal 2011, a predominant portion of the Company’s net deferred tax assets were reserved due to the uncertainty of realization. In fiscal 2012, the Company determined that based upon all available evidence, positive and negative, including the Company’s taxable income over the past three fiscal years and expected future profitability, substantially all of its deferred tax assets were more likely than not to be realized through future earnings.
In both fiscal 2012 and 2011, income tax expense was recorded for foreign and state income tax expense. In fiscal 2011, we also recognized $0.7 million of tax benefit from the adjustment of valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets associated with the Richmond asset purchase. Income tax expense in fiscal 2012 and 2011 was 10% and 9%, respectively, before reversal of the valuation allowances.
Net Earnings from Continuing Operations Attributable To Zygo Corporation
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | Amount | Percentage of Net Revenues | |||||||||||||
| $ | 43.0 | 26 | % | $ | 19.0 | 13 | % | |||||||||
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Zygo Corporation in fiscal 2012 was $43.0 million compared with $19.0 million in the prior year. Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Zygo Corporation per diluted share was $2.30 for fiscal 2012, compared with $1.05 per diluted share for fiscal 2011.
The net earnings in fiscal 2012 included an income tax benefit of $18.9 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, related to the reversal of valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets and charges related to a terminated acquisition effort, net of tax, of $0.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted share. Net earnings in fiscal 2011 included a gain on acquisition of $2.0 million, net of a related tax effect of $0.7, or $0.11 per diluted share.
Net earnings in fiscal 2012 also included the effects of the restoration of an employee 401k-match program of $0.7 million.
Backlog
Backlog at June 30, 2012 was $68.0 million, an increase of $6.0 million from June 30, 2011. The year-end fiscal 2012 backlog consisted of $45.3 million, or 67%, in the Optical Systems segment and $22.7 million, or 33%, in the Metrology Solutions segment. Bookings for fiscal 2012 totaled $172.8 million. Bookings by segment for fiscal 2012 consisted of $97.5 million, or 56%, in the Metrology Solutions segment and $75.3 million, or 44%, in the Optical Systems segment.
| 30 |
TRANSACTIONS WITH STOCKHOLDER
Sales to Canon, Inc., a stockholder representing approximately 7% ownership at June 30, 2013, and Canon Sales Co., Inc., a distributor of certain of our products in Japan and a subsidiary of Canon Inc. (collectively “Canon”), were $13.5 million (9% of net revenue), $16.8 million (10% of net revenue) and $19.7 million (13% of net revenue), for the years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Substantially all of these revenues occurred in the Metrology segment. Selling prices of products sold to Canon are based, generally, on the terms customarily given to distributors. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, there were, in the aggregate, $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of trade accounts receivable from Canon.
| 31 |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We assess our liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund our operating, investing and financing activities. Our principal source of liquidity is operating cash flows. In addition to operating cash flows, other significant factors that affect our overall liquidity include: capital expenditures, customer credit requirements, investments in businesses and the availability of bank lines of credit.
Fiscal 2013 Compared with Fiscal 2012
At June 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents were $83.1 million, a decrease of $1.0 million from $84.1 million at June 30, 2012, of which $16.3 million is located in foreign jurisdictions subject to repatriation restrictions. As of June 30, 2013, we have less than $0.1 million standby letters of credit outstanding. These letters of credit are used primarily overseas to cover certain warranty periods or to cover future product shipments, expiring at varying dates through January 2014. The cash equivalents balance in our money market account, which is invested primarily in U.S. government securities, was $23.7 million as of June 30, 2013. We do not believe there is any risk to liquidity in the money market account, nor are there currently any limits on redemptions.
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 was $9.9 million compared with $32.1 million in fiscal 2012. Cash flow provided by operating activities in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to net earnings, excluding non-cash expenses, and an increase in net billings in excess of revenue recognized on uncompleted contracts, partially offset by changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and taxes payable; inventories; prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes and other current assets; and receivables. Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the year ended June 30, 2012 of $32.1 million was primarily due to an increase in net earnings, excluding non-cash items, partially offset by changes in deferred income taxes; prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes and other current assets; and accounts payable, accrued expenses and taxes payable.
Cash used for investing activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 increased by $1.6 million compared with the prior year period. In fiscal 2013, we used cash of $3.2 million (€2.5 million) to purchase the noncontrolling interest of ZygoLOT, and $5.9 million to purchase property, plant and equipment. In fiscal 2012, we purchased $8.5 million of property, plant and equipment, which included $4.0 million for the purchase of a manufacturing building in Tucson, Arizona.
Cash used for financing activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 of $1.7 million was primarily due to dividend payments of $1.7 million to noncontrolling interests. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2012 of $1.0 million was primarily due to the receipt of proceeds from stock option exercises of $3.6 million, partially offset by dividend payments of $2.2 million to noncontrolling interests.
We currently have no debt or lines of credit. In the future, if the need for debt or credit lines arose, there is no assurance that we would be able to secure such financing. We believe we have sufficient operating flexibility and cash reserves to maintain adequate amounts of liquidity and to meet our future liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011
At June 30, 2012, cash and cash equivalents were $84.1 million, an increase of $24.1 million from $60.0 million at June 30, 2011, of which $15.3 million was located in foreign jurisdictions subject to repatriation restrictions. As of June 30, 2012, $1.3 million of standby letters of credit were outstanding. These letters of credit are used primarily overseas to cover certain warranty periods or to cover future product shipments. These letters of credit are expected to expire at varying dates through October 2012. The cash equivalents balance in our money market account invested primarily in U.S. government securities, was $19.9 million as of June 30, 2012. We do not believe there is any risk to liquidity in the money market account, nor were there any limits on redemptions.
Cash flow provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the year ended June 30, 2012 of $32.1 million was primarily due to an increase in net earnings, excluding non-cash items, partially offset by changes in deferred income taxes, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and accounts payable, accrued expenses and taxes payable.
Cash flow used for investing activities for the year ended June 30, 2012 decreased by $1.8 million compared with the prior year period. In fiscal 2011, we used cash of $7.1 million to purchase the assets of our EPO facility in Richmond, California, as well as $1.5 million to purchase property, plant and equipment. In fiscal 2012, we purchased $8.5 million of property, plant and equipment, which included $4.0 million for the purchase of a manufacturing building in Tucson, Arizona.
| 32 |
Cash flow provided by financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2012 of $1.0 million was primarily due to the receipt of proceeds from stock option exercises of $3.6 million, partially offset by dividend payments of $2.2 million to noncontrolling interests.
| 33 |
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at June 30, 2013 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.
| Payments Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | $ | 1.9 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 0.8 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| ZygoLOT service agreement | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Deferred compensation agreement | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consulting agreement | 0.1 | 0.1 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3.9 | $ | 2.0 | $ | 1.9 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
At June 30, 2013, we have a liability of $5.1 million for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 740: “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. Please refer to Note 16: Income Taxes of our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have not created and are not party to any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt, or operating parts of our business that are not consolidated in our financial statements. We have not guaranteed any obligations of a third party.
| 34 |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The following discussion about our market risk involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, changes in the investment grade of marketable securities and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We currently maintain a portfolio of cash equivalents consisting of an institutional money market fund and marketable securities consisting primarily of a mutual fund. The institutional money market fund, with a balance of $23.7 million, consists primarily of U.S. treasury securities. The mutual fund of $0.7 million, which is related to our deferred compensation program, consists of corporate securities. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly on our short-term instruments. There is little downward exposure on our interest income. To the extent interest rates increase or we change our investment strategy, there could be an increase in investment income.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
Approximately 76% of our fiscal 2013 net revenue was denominated in U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2013, our backlog included bookings in U.S. dollars of $54.5 million, or 61%, of the total backlog. Substantially all of our costs are negotiated and paid in U.S. dollars. Significant changes in the values of foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar can impact sales of our products in export markets as would changes in the general economic conditions in those markets. For our net revenue based in local currency, we are exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations from the time customers are invoiced in local currency until collection occurs.
We enter into forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. These forward contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures, generally three to fifteen months. Any gains and losses on the fair value of these contracts would largely offset corresponding losses and gains on the underlying transactions unless they are designated as cashflow hedges in which case the losses and gains are charged to other comprehensive income.The majority of our foreign currency transactions and foreign operations are denominated in the Yen and Euro. In the absence of a substantial increase in sales orders in currencies other than U.S. dollars, we believe a 5% appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Euro, Yen and Yuan would have an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial statements and supplementary data required pursuant to this item begin on Page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of Zygo’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(e)) to ensure that the information included in periodic reports filed with the SEC is processed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reported within the appropriate time periods. Based on that evaluation, and as discussed in more detail below, Zygo management has concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30, 2013, due to a material weakness that Zygo identified in its internal control over financial reporting specifically related to the accounting for income taxes.
| 35 |
Report of Management on Zygo Corporation’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Zygo management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(f)). Zygo’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management assessed the effectiveness of Zygo’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. During this assessment, management evaluated the efforts to remediate an existing material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, specifically related to accounting for income taxes. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of Zygo’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result of the evaluation of effectiveness of the remediation efforts of the material weakness described below, management has concluded that Zygo’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2013 based upon the COSO Framework.
On June 30, 2012, we reported that we had identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, specifically related to the accounting for income taxes. While significant actions have been taken during fiscal 2013 to remediate the material weakness, we continue the remediation process of designing and implementing effective internal controls around the accounting for income taxes.
Zygo’s processes, procedures and controls related to accounting for income taxes were not designed and did not operate effectively as of June 30, 2013, to ensure that amounts related to certain tax assets and liabilities and the current and deferred income tax expense were recorded in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Specifically, Zygo did not maintain effective controls over the preparation and review of the calculations and related supporting documentation for the tax accounts noted above. Zygo management has concluded that these internal control deficiencies continue to exist and constitute a material weakness in internal control, because there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not have been prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Remediation Plan for Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have been actively addressing the identified material weakness. Actions have been taken to improve internal controls over accounting for income taxes, and Zygo will take further steps to strengthen controls, including the following planned actions:
| ● | Continue to allocate additional resources, which may include the use of an independent consultant with sufficient expertise in accounting for income taxes and reporting, to assist in the preparation and review of accounting for income taxes, | |
| ● | Enhance policies and procedures relating to tax account reconciliation, analysis and review, and | |
| ● | Accelerate certain yearend tax analysis and reporting activities to periods earlier in the year, in order to provide additional analysis and reconciliation time. |
We anticipate that the actions described above and resulting improvements in controls will strengthen Zygo’s internal control over financial reporting and will, over time, address the related material weakness. However, because many of the controls in Zygo’s system of internal controls rely extensively on manual review and approval, the successful operation of these controls may be required for several quarters prior to management being able to conclude that the material weakness has been remediated.
| 36 |
Deloitte & Touche LLP, Zygo’s independent registered public accounting firm, issued the report below on the effectiveness of Zygo’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Zygo Corporation | |||
| September 13, 2013 | By: | /s/ Chris L. Koliopoulos | |
| Chris L. Koliopoulos | |||
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
| September 13, 2013 | By: | /s/ John P. Jordan | |
| John P. Jordan | |||
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| 37 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Zygo Corporation
Middlefield, Connecticut
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Zygo Corporation’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment:
| ● | The Company’s processes, procedures and controls related to accounting for income taxes were not designed and did not operate effectively as of June 30, 2013; to ensure that amounts related to certain tax assets and liabilities and the current and deferred income tax expense were recorded in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, the Company did not maintain effective controls over the preparation and review of the calculations and related supporting documentation for the tax accounts. |
This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013, of the Company, and this report does not affect our report on such consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule.
In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness identified above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013,based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
| 38 |
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013 of the Company and our report dated September 13, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
September 13, 2013
None.
| 39 |
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Except for the information concerning executive officers which is set forth in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, information required by this item will be included under the captions “Election of Board of Directors” and “Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for use in connection with our Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (referred to below as our “2013 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by this item will be included in our 2013 Proxy Statement under the captions “Compensation of Executive Officers” and “Corporate Governance” and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information required by this item will be included in our 2013 Proxy Statement under the captions “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by this item will be included in our 2013 Proxy Statement under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” “Election of Board of Directors” and “Corporate Governance” and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by this item will be included in our 2013 Proxy Statement under the caption “Relationship with Independent Public Accountants” and is incorporated herein by reference.
| 40 |
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: | |
| 1. and 2. | Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule: | |
| An index to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule filed is located on page F-1. | ||
| 3. | EXHIBITS | |
| 3.(i) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and amendments thereto (Exhibit 3.(i) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its year ended June 30, 1993) (1) | |
| 3.(ii) | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 3, 1996 (Exhibit 3.(ii) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K 405 for its year ended June 30, 1996) (1) | |
| 3.(iii) | By-laws of the Company (Exhibit (3)(b) to Registration No. 2-87253 on Form S-1 hereinafter “Registration No. 2-87253”) (1) | |
| 10.1 | Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement dated October 25, 1983, between the Company and Carl A. Zanoni (Exhibit (10)(b) to Registration No. 2-87253) (1) | |
| 10.2 | Agreement dated November 20, 1980, between the Company and Canon Inc. regarding exchange of information (Exhibit (10)(y) to Registration No. 2-87253) (1) | |
| 10.3 | Amended and Restated Zygo Corporation Profit Sharing Plan (Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K 405 for its year ended June 30, 1995) (1) | |
| 10.4 | Zygo Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan ratified and approved by the Company’s Stockholders on November 19, 1992 (Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its year ended June 30, 1993) (1) | |
| 10.5 | Zygo Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan ratified and approved by the Company’s Stockholders on November 17, 1994 (Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K 405 for its year ended June 30, 1995) (1) | |
| 10.6 | Zygo Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan ratified and approved by the Company’s Stockholders on November 17, 1999 (Exhibit to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its year ended June 30, 1999) (1) | |
| 10.7 | Subcontract B519044 between The Regents of The University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Zygo Corporation dated January 14, 2002 (Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its year ended June 30, 2002) (1) | |
| 10.8 | Zygo Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement. (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended September 30, 2005) (1) | |
| 10.9 | Zygo Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement. (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended September 30, 2005) (1) | |
| 10.10 | Employment contract dated November 20, 2006 between Zygo Corporation and John Stack. (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended December 31, 2006) (1) | |
| 10.11 | Agreement dated February 8, 2007 between Zygo Corporation and Carl A. Zanoni (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended March 31, 2007) (1) | |
| 41 |
| 10.12 | Employment Agreement dated November 19, 2007 between Zygo Corporation and Douglas J. Eccleston (Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2007) (1) | |
| 10.13 | Employment agreement amendments between Zygo Corporation, and John M. Stack, dated October 21, 2008 (Exhibit 10.3, to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 21, 2008) (1) | |
| 10.14 | Asset Transfer Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2009, by and between Zygo Corporation and Nanometrics Corporation(Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, dated December 23, 2009 for its year ended June 30, 2009) (1) (2) | |
| 10.15 | Supply Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2009, by and between Zygo Corporation and Nanometrics Corporation(Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, dated December 23, 2009 for its year ended June 30, 2009) (1) (2) | |
| 10.16 | Employment agreement amendment between Zygo Corporation and John M. Stack, dated September 1, 2009 (Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 4, 2009) (1) | |
| 10.17 | Employment agreement amendment between Zygo Corporation and John M. Stack, dated September 8, 2009 (Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2009) (1) | |
| 10.18 | Employment and Stock Option Agreement between Zygo Corporation and Dr. Chris L. Koliopoulos, dated January 18, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1 and 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2010) (1) | |
| 10.19 | Zemetrics, Inc. acquisition agreement between ZMI Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zygo Corporation, and Zemetrics, Inc., dated January 18, 2010 (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2010) (1) | |
| 10.20 | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among Zygo Corporation, Zygo Richmond, and ASML, US, Inc. (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ending December 31, 2010) (1) (2) | |
| 10.21 | Employment Agreement between Zygo Corporation and John P. Jordan, dated February 17, 2011 (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 22, 2011) (1) | |
| 10.22 | Zygo Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended effective as of November 16, 2006. (Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form S-8 dated March 16, 2012) (1) | |
| 10.23 | Zygo Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended as of August 24, 2011. (Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form S-8 dated March 16, 2012) (1) | |
| 10.24 | Zygo Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan dated as of August 24, 2011. (Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form S-8 dated March 16, 2012) (1) | |
| 10.25 | ZygoLot Share Purchase Agreement dated September 28, 2012. (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-Q for its quarter ending September 30, 2012) (1) | |
| 10.26 | Employment Agreement between Zygo Corporation and Anthony Allan, dated February 4, 2013 (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 4, 2013) (1) | |
| 14. | Zygo Corporation Code of Ethics (Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended March 26, 2004) (1) | |
| 21. | Subsidiaries of Registrant | |
| 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| 24. | Power of Attorney (included in the signature page) |
| 42 |
| 31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(a) or 15D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(a) or 15D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document (3) | |
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension (3) | |
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (3) | |
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase (3) | |
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase (3) | |
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase (3) |
Exhibit numbers 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.8, 10.9, 10.10, 10.12, 10.13, 10.16, 10.17, 10.18, 10.21, 10.22, 10.23, 10.24 and 10.26 are management contracts, compensatory plans or compensatory arrangements.
(1) Incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Confidential treatment had been requested for portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(3) Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
| 43 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ZYGO CORPORATION | |||||
| Registrant | |||||
| By | /s/ John P. Jordan | Date | September 13, 2013 | ||
| John P. Jordan Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |||||
Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Chris L. Koliopoulos and John P. Jordan, jointly and severally, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for each of them in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorney’s-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| /s/ Chris L. Koliopoulos | Chairman, President and Chief Executive | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Chris L. Koliopoulos | Officer (principal executive officer) and Director | ||||
| /s/ John P. Jordan | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and | September 13, 2013 | |||
| John P. Jordan | Treasurer (principal financial officer) | ||||
| /s/ Stephen D. Fantone | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Stephen D. Fantone | |||||
| /s/ Samuel H. Fuller | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Samuel H. Fuller | |||||
| /s/ Michael A. Kaufman | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Michael A. Kaufman | |||||
| /s/ Seymour E. Liebman | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Seymour E. Liebman | |||||
| /s/ Robert B. Taylor | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Robert B. Taylor | |||||
| /s/ Carol P. Wallace | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Carol P. Wallace | |||||
| /s/ Gary K. Willis | Director | September 13, 2013 | |||
| Gary K. Willis |
| 44 |
ZYGO CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
| F - 1 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Zygo Corporation
Middlefield, CT
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company listed on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their consolidated operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 13, 2013 expressed an adverse opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
September 13, 2013
| F - 2 |
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 83,056 | $ | 84,053 | ||||
| Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $272 and $760, respectively (notes 7 and 18) | 32,360 | 31,601 | ||||||
| Inventories (note 8) | 30,185 | 27,760 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes and other current assets | 5,429 | 2,851 | ||||||
| Revenue recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | 5,342 | 2,371 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes (note 16) | 7,261 | 8,004 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 163,633 | 156,640 | ||||||
| Marketable securities (note 5) | 662 | 729 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net (note 9) | 34,343 | 33,694 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes (note 16) | 14,967 | 13,760 | ||||||
| Intangible assets, net (note 10) | 4,615 | 5,198 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 218,220 | $ | 210,021 | ||||
| Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 7,170 | $ | 9,613 | ||||
| Progress payments and deferred revenue | 4,538 | 5,482 | ||||||
| Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | 6,481 | — | ||||||
| Accrued salaries and wages | 3,746 | 6,198 | ||||||
| Other accrued expenses (note 11 and 16) | 4,681 | 7,234 | ||||||
| Income taxes payable (note 16) | 19 | 416 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 26,635 | 28,943 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes (note 16) | 704 | 2,580 | ||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 4,997 | 2,518 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 32,336 | 34,041 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (note 12) | ||||||||
| Equity (notes 14 and 15): | ||||||||
| Common stock, $ .10 par value per share: | ||||||||
| 40,000,000 shares authorized; 20,858,158 shares issued (20,499,861 in 2012); 18,532,623 shares outstanding (18,239,941 in 2012) | 2,086 | 2,050 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 180,324 | 176,305 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 30,104 | 22,253 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
| Currency translation effects | (641 | ) | (186 | ) | ||||
| Unrealized loss on hedge (note 19) | (16 | ) | — | |||||
| Less treasury stock, at cost; 2,325,535 common shares (2,259,920 in 2012) | 28,016 | 26,797 | ||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity - Zygo Corporation | 183,841 | 173,625 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | 2,043 | 2,355 | ||||||
| Total equity | 185,884 | 175,980 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 218,220 | $ | 210,021 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F - 3 |
Consolidated Statements of OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 149,395 | $ | 166,837 | $ | 150,126 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 83,704 | 85,127 | 79,333 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 65,691 | 81,710 | 70,793 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 34,881 | 35,486 | 34,705 | |||||||||
| Research, development and engineering expenses | 18,697 | 16,501 | 14,990 | |||||||||
| Operating profit | 12,113 | 29,723 | 21,098 | |||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||
| Interest income | 17 | 61 | 26 | |||||||||
| Miscellaneous income (expense), net | (261 | ) | (540 | ) | 784 | |||||||
| Total other income (expense) | (244 | ) | (479 | ) | 810 | |||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense, including noncontrolling interest(s) | 11,869 | 29,244 | 21,908 | |||||||||
| Income tax benefit (expense) (note 16) | (2,889 | ) | 15,827 | (1,316 | ) | |||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations | 8,980 | 45,071 | 20,592 | |||||||||
| Net earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax (note 21) | — | — | 91 | |||||||||
| Net earnings including noncontrolling interest(s) | 8,980 | 45,071 | 20,683 | |||||||||
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest(s) | 1,129 | 2,053 | 1,604 | |||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 19,079 | ||||||
| Basic - Earnings per share attributable to Zygo Corporation: | ||||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.43 | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.08 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net earnings per share | $ | 0.43 | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.08 | ||||||
| Diluted - Earnings per share attributable to Zygo Corporation: | ||||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.41 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net earnings per share | $ | 0.41 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||
| Weighted average number of shares: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 18,454 | 18,014 | 17,639 | |||||||||
| Diluted | 19,106 | 18,711 | 18,140 | |||||||||
| Amounts Attributable to Zygo Corporation | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 18,988 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations, net of tax (note 21) | — | — | 91 | |||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 19,079 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F - 4 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Net income attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 19,079 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (417 | ) | (1,619 | ) | 2,318 | |||||||
| Changes in unrealized cash flow hedging | ||||||||||||
| Unrealized cash flow hedging gain (loss) arising during the period | 20 | — | — | |||||||||
| Less: Gain reclassified into revenue | 45 | — | — | |||||||||
| Unrealized cash flow hedging gain (loss) at the end of the period | (25 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Tax benefit | 9 | |||||||||||
| Changes in unrealized cash flow hedging | (16 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax (expense) benefit | (433 | ) | (1,619 | ) | 2,318 | |||||||
| Comprehensive income | 7,418 | 41,399 | 21,397 | |||||||||
| Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest(s) | 38 | (236 | ) | 393 | ||||||||
| Comprehensive income attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,380 | $ | 41,635 | $ | 21,004 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F - 5 |
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Amounts in thousands)
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-In | Treasury Stock | Retained Earnings (Accumulated | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | Total | Non-Controlling | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Shares | Amount | Deficit) | Income (Loss) | Zygo Corp. | Interest | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2010 | 17,480 | $ | 1,966 | $ | 163,052 | 2,183 | $ | (26,043 | ) | $ | (39,844 | ) | $ | (728 | ) | $ | 98,403 | $ | 2,193 | $ | 100,596 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | — | — | — | — | — | 19,079 | — | 19,079 | 1,604 | 20,683 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,925 | 1,925 | 393 | 2,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share based compensation | — | — | 3,965 | — | — | — | — | 3,965 | — | 3,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of restricted stock | 116 | 15 | (15 | ) | 39 | (330 | ) | — | — | (330 | ) | — | (330 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of employee stock options and related tax effect | 167 | 18 | 1,660 | — | — | — | — | 1,678 | — | 1,678 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (823 | ) | (823 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2011 | 17,763 | $ | 1,999 | $ | 168,662 | 2,222 | $ | (26,373 | ) | $ | (20,765 | ) | $ | 1,197 | $ | 124,720 | $ | 3,367 | $ | 128,087 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | — | — | — | — | — | 43,018 | — | 43,018 | 2,053 | 45,071 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,383 | ) | (1,383 | ) | (236 | ) | (1,619 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share based compensation | — | — | 4,128 | — | — | — | — | 4,128 | — | 4,128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of restricted stock | 111 | 15 | (15 | ) | 38 | (424 | ) | — | — | (424 | ) | — | (424 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of employee stock options and related tax effect | 366 | 36 | 3,530 | — | — | — | — | 3,566 | — | 3,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid and declared | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2,829 | ) | (2,829 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2012 | 18,240 | $ | 2,050 | $ | 176,305 | 2,260 | $ | (26,797 | ) | $ | 22,253 | $ | (186 | ) | $ | 173,625 | $ | 2,355 | $ | 175,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | — | — | — | — | — | 7,851 | — | 7,851 | 1,129 | 8,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized gain (loss) on hedge | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | — | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | (455 | ) | (455 | ) | 38 | (417 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share based compensation | — | — | 5,546 | — | — | — | — | 5,546 | — | 5,546 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of restricted stock | 169 | 23 | (23 | ) | 66 | (1,219 | ) | — | — | (1,219 | ) | — | (1,219 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee stock purchase | 4 | — | 65 | — | — | — | — | 65 | — | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of employee stock options and related tax effect | 120 | 13 | 1,208 | — | — | — | — | 1,221 | — | 1,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,101 | ) | (1,101 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest | — | — | (2,777 | ) | — | — | — | — | (2,777 | ) | (378 | ) | (3,155 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2013 | 18,533 | $ | 2,086 | $ | 180,324 | 2,326 | $ | (28,016 | ) | $ | 30,104 | $ | (657 | ) | $ | 183,841 | $ | 2,043 | $ | 185,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F - 6 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amounts in thousands)
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings including noncontrolling interest(s) | $ | 8,980 | $ | 45,071 | $ | 20,683 | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Earnings from discontinued operations | — | — | (91 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,626 | 5,720 | 6,431 | |||||||||
| Gain on acquisition | — | — | (1,296 | ) | ||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (1,217 | ) | (18,900 | ) | (780 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment and disposal of long term assets | (7 | ) | 69 | 553 | ||||||||
| Provision for doubtful accounts | (482 | ) | (458 | ) | (298 | ) | ||||||
| Dividends declared to noncontrolling interests | — | (641 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements | 5,546 | 4,128 | 3,965 | |||||||||
| Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | — | (173 | ) | ||||||||
| Other | 989 | 318 | (677 | ) | ||||||||
| Changes in operating accounts, excluding the effect of acquisition: | ||||||||||||
| Receivables | (1,484 | ) | (123 | ) | (10,381 | ) | ||||||
| Inventories | (2,477 | ) | 682 | (125 | ) | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes and other current assets | (2,337 | ) | (4,131 | ) | 1,494 | |||||||
| Net billings in excess of revenue recognized on uncompleted contracts | 3,510 | (2,371 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and taxes payable | (6,732 | ) | 2,779 | 1,340 | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations | 9,915 | 32,143 | 20,645 | |||||||||
| Net cash used for operating activities from discontinued operations | — | (281 | ) | (263 | ) | |||||||
| Cash used for investing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | (5,893 | ) | (8,542 | ) | (1,522 | ) | ||||||
| Purchase of marketable securities | — | (999 | ) | (1,998 | ) | |||||||
| Additions to intangibles and other assets | (299 | ) | (259 | ) | (906 | ) | ||||||
| Investments and acquisitions, excluding cash acquired | (3,155 | ) | — | (7,142 | ) | |||||||
| Proceeds from the sale and maturity of marketable securities | 183 | 2,173 | 2,136 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of other assets | 50 | 63 | 63 | |||||||||
| Net cash used for investing activities | (9,114 | ) | (7,564 | ) | (9,369 | ) | ||||||
| Cash provided by (used for) financing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Dividend payments to noncontrolling interests | (1,742 | ) | (2,188 | ) | (823 | ) | ||||||
| Employee stock purchase | 65 | — | — | |||||||||
| Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | — | 173 | |||||||||
| Repurchase of restricted stock | (1,219 | ) | (424 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||
| Exercise of employee stock options | 1,221 | 3,566 | 1,678 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | (1,675 | ) | 954 | 698 | ||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (123 | ) | (1,238 | ) | 1,792 | |||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (997 | ) | 24,014 | 13,503 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 84,053 | 60,039 | 46,536 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 83,056 | $ | 84,053 | $ | 60,039 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes was $5,273, $2,992, and $524, in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Dividend to noncontrolling interest of $641 declared at June 30, 2012, paid on December 18, 2012. Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable was $113, $436, and $200 in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F - 7 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Operations and Principles of Consolidation
Zygo Corporation is a worldwide supplier of optical metrology instruments, precision optics and electro-optical design and manufacturing services, serving customers in the semiconductor capital equipment, bio-medical, scientific and industrial markets. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of Zygo Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Zygo,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “Company”). All transactions and accounts with the subsidiaries have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interest related to our ownership interests of less than 100% is reported as noncontrolling interest in the consolidated balance sheets. Net earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest, net of tax, is reported as net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of operations.
Discontinued Operations
The Company classifies operations as discontinued when the operations have either ceased or are expected to be disposed of in a sale transaction in the near term, the operations and cash flows of all discontinued operations have been eliminated or will be eliminated upon the ceasing of operations or the consummation of an expected sale transaction, and the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the discontinued operations. Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets requires the calculation of estimated fair value less cost-to-sell of long-lived assets for assets held for sale. The calculation of estimated fair value less cost-to-sell includes significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to: operating projections; excess working capital levels; property values; and the anticipated costs involved in the selling process.
As more fully described in Note 21, “Discontinued Operations”, in fiscal 2009 we discontinued the Singapore Integrated Circuit (“IC”) packaging metrology operations of our vision systems product line, which was included in our Metrology Solutions segment.
Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements
Zygo’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is their local currency and amounts included in the consolidated statements of operations are translated at the weighted-average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, and resulting foreign exchange translation adjustments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Foreign Currency Transactions
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are remeasured into their respective functional currencies at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange gain or loss is included in our consolidated statements of operations as miscellaneous income (expense), net.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider cash and investments in securities with maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
Marketable Securities
We consider investments in securities with maturities at the date of purchase in excess of three months as marketable securities. Held-to-maturity investments are recorded at amortized cost. Trading investments are recorded at fair value and adjusted through the consolidated statements of operations.
| F - 8 |
Inventories
Inventories include the costs of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of management’s estimated future usage is written down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Management evaluates the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment on an ongoing basis, and makes adjustments when impairments are identified. Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets and is computed using the straight-line method ranging from 1-40 years.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include patents, trademarks, a covenant not-to-compete, acquired technology and customer lists. The cost of intangible assets is amortized on a straight-line basis, over estimated useful lives ranging from 5-17 years.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
The carrying values of intangible assets and other long-lived assets are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and externally, that may suggest impairment. Some factors considered important, which could trigger an impairment review, include a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, a significant adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, an accumulation of costs for an asset in excess of the amount originally expected, a current period operating loss or cash flow decline combined with a history of operating losses or cash flow uses or a projection that demonstrates continuing losses and a current expectation that, it is more likely than not, a long-lived asset will be disposed of at a loss before the end of its estimated useful life.
If any such facts or circumstances exist, the carrying values of long-lived assets are evaluated to determine if impairment exists based upon estimated undiscounted future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the assets and comparing that value to the carrying value of the assets. If the carrying value of the assets is greater than the estimated future cash flows, the assets are written down to the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the assets is based on a current market value of the assets. If a current market value is not readily available, a projected discounted cash flow method is applied using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Our cash flow estimates contain management’s best estimates, using appropriate and customary assumptions and projections at the time.During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we did not record any impairment charges. During fiscal 2011, we recorded an impairment charge on property, plant and equipment of $563 related to our vision systems product line in Canada.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by valuation allowances to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Uncertainty in income taxes is accounted for by applying a more likely than not threshold to the recognition and de-recognition of tax benefits. The calculation of the tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. We also recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on an estimate of whether it is more likely than not additional taxes will be due.
| F - 9 |
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We recognize revenue based on guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) pertaining to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, our price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on our standard products when title passes to the customer upon shipment. While our standard products generally require installation, the installation is considered a perfunctory performance obligation. Standard products do not have customer acceptance criteria. Generally, software is a component of our standard product and, as such, is not separately recognized as revenue. We have standard rights of return for defective products that we account for as a warranty provision under authoritative guidance of accounting for contingencies. We do not have any price protection agreements or other post shipment obligations. For custom equipment where customer acceptance is part of the sales agreement, revenue is recognized when the customer has accepted the product. In cases where custom equipment does not have customer acceptance as part of the sales agreement, we recognize revenue upon shipment as long as the system meets the specifications as agreed upon with the customer. Certain transactions have multiple deliverables, with the deliverables clearly defined. To the extent that the secondary deliverables are other than perfunctory, we recognize the revenue on each deliverable, if separable, or on the completion of all deliverables, if not separable, all in a manner consistent with SAB No. 104 and related authoritative guidance. Standalone software products are recognized as revenue when they are shipped.
Certain customer transactions include payment terms whereby we receive a partial payment of the total order amount prior to the related revenue being recognized in our financial statements. These advance payments are included in progress payments and deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheet. These advance payments relate to orders for custom equipment that require a lengthy build cycle and, in some cases, acceptance by the customer. We may negotiate payment terms with these customers on these particular orders and secure certain payments prior to or on shipment of the equipment. These payments remain in progress payments and deferred revenue until our applicable revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Certain contracts we enter into continue over an extended period of time. We review those contracts for possible revenue recognition as a long-term contract. If long-term contract accounting is appropriate, we then evaluate whether revenues should be recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Under the percentage-of-completion method, we develop estimates as a basis for contract revenue and costs in progress as work on the contract continues. Estimates are reviewed and revised as additional information becomes available. During fiscal 2013, changes in estimates under the percentage of completion method were not material. Revenue recognized in excess of billings is included in revenue recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts in the consolidated balance sheet. Billings in excess of costs and earnings would be included in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts in the consolidated balance sheet. The percentage-of-completion method is used in circumstances in which all the following conditions exist:
| — | The contract includes enforceable rights regarding goods or services to be provided to the customer, the consideration to be exchanged, and the manner and terms of settlement | |
| — | Both the Company and the customer are expected to satisfy all contractual obligations and | |
| — | Reasonably reliable estimates of total revenue, total cost, and the progress toward completion can be made. |
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a continuous review of customer accounts, payment patterns and specific collection issues. We perform on-going credit evaluations of our customers and do not require collateral from our customers. For many of our international customers, we require an irrevocable letter of credit from the customer before a shipment is made. If the financial condition of one or more of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. For fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, we expensed $12,832, $10,420 and $7,899 of research and development costs, respectively. Reimbursements from customers for research and development costs are recorded as offsets to the expenses. There were no reimbursed research and development costs in fiscal 2013, 2012 or 2011.
| F - 10 |
Earnings per Share
Basic Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding stock options and restricted stock units. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding | 18,454,476 | 18,014,325 | 17,638,635 | |||||||||
| Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units | 651,886 | 696,969 | 501,739 | |||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 19,106,362 | 18,711,294 | 18,140,374 | |||||||||
For fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, 263,564, 278,225 and 814,741, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure share-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize it as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting or service period, as applicable, of the share award using the straight line method.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We account for marketable securities and foreign currency hedges at fair value. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because they are short-term in nature.
Use of Estimates
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to allowances for bad debts, reserves for excess and obsolete inventories, impairments and recoverability of long-lived assets, share-based compensation, income taxes, contract revenues and warranty obligations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Economic Hedges
We hedge certain intercompany transactions by entering into forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. In some cases, we design hedges such that they qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures, generally three to fifteen months. Any gains and losses on the fair value of the contracts are expected to be largely offset by gains and losses on the underlying transactions unless they qualify for hedge accounting treatment, in which case the change in fair value will be charged to accumulated other comprehensive income.
Adoption of New Accounting Guidance
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.The objective of ASU No. 2013-02 is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). Entities are required to disclose changes in AOCI balances by component and significant items reclassified out of AOCI. The effective date for ASU No. 2013-02 for Zygo is the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 with early adoption allowed. We have decided to adopt this accounting guidance as of June 30, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
| F - 11 |
NOTE 2: Changes in Zygo Corporation Ownership Interest in Subsidiary
We purchased the outstanding noncontrolling interest in our German subsidiary, ZygoLOT, for $3,155 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The following table sets forth the effects on equity of changes in our ownership interest of ZygoLOT.
| Twelve Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Net income attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 7,851 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 19,079 | ||||||
| Transfers to the noncontrolling interest | ||||||||||||
| Decrease in Zygo Corporation paid in-capital for purchase of noncontrolling interest | 2,749 | — | — | |||||||||
| Net transfers to noncontrolling interest | 2,749 | — | — | |||||||||
| Change from net income attributable to Zygo Corporation shareholders and transfers to noncontrolling interest | $ | 5,102 | $ | 43,018 | $ | 19,079 | ||||||
Note 3: ACQUISITIONS
Richmond, California
On November 12, 2010, we completed a transaction with ASML US, Inc. (“ASML”) to purchase substantially all the assets of its Richmond, California operation, including a 55,300 square-foot manufacturing facility. This acquisition expanded our optical manufacturing capabilities. The assets were acquired for $12,475, of which $7,142 was in cash, and the balance was future consideration, with a net present value of $5,333 using a discount factor of 14%, based on the level of shipments to ASML over the subsequent three years beginning January 1, 2011. On the acquisition date, the future consideration was recorded as a liability, with $1,127 recorded as a current liability and $4,206 recorded as a long-term liability. The future consideration represented a supply agreement that was entered into with ASML that provided for a volume discount. In addition, we hired key management and employees working at the Richmond facility. These activities resulted in a newly formed operation known as the Extreme Precision Optics group (“EPO”) which is included in our Optical Systems segment. On June 30, 2011, we recorded a final valuation adjustment that increased both property, plant and equipment and gain on acquisition by $7.
This transaction met the conditions of a business combination as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 and, as such, is accounted for under ASC 805 using the acquisition method of accounting. ASC 805 defines the three elements of a business as Input, Process and Output. As a result of the acquisition of substantially all the Richmond facility assets, Zygo acquired the machinery and equipment utilized in the processes to manufacture product, the building that houses the entire operation and intellectual property needed in the process to manufacture the product. The ASML employees hired by Zygo in connection with the acquisition brought with them the skills, experience and know-how necessary to provide the operational processes that, when applied to the acquired assets, represent processes being applied to inputs to create outputs. Having met all three elements of a business as defined in ASC 805, we determined that the acquisition of substantially all the assets of ASML’s Richmond, California operation should be accounted for as a business acquisition.
The results of EPO are included in our consolidated statements of operations from the acquisition date. Zygo performed a preliminary fair value exercise to allocate the purchase price to the acquired assets and liabilities at November 12, 2010, which was completed on June 30, 2011. The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the business and the final fair values of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition:
| F - 12 |
| Final Fair Value as of June 30, 2011 | ||||
| Consideration: | ||||
| Cash | $ | 7,142 | ||
| Future consideration | 5,333 | |||
| Purchase price | $ | 12,475 | ||
| Assets Acquired: | ||||
| Inventories | $ | 2,399 | ||
| Property and equipment | 11,474 | |||
| Technology and customer relationships | 623 | |||
| Total assets | 14,496 | |||
| Less: gain on acquisition | 2,021 | |||
| Purchase price | $ | 12,475 | ||
In addition to recording the fair values of the assets acquired and the future consideration liability, we also recorded a gain on acquisition of $2,021 in the consolidated statement of operations within miscellaneous income in accordance with ASC 805 using the purchase method of accounting. The gain on acquisition was primarily due to the difference between market value of the acquired real estate and its book value and the desire of ASML to sell the assets. In addition, a deferred tax liability of $725 was recorded in the opening balance sheet, which had the effect of reducing the gain on acquisition to $1,296. On the date of purchase, we maintained a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets. Therefore, we recorded a tax benefit to reduce the valuation allowance to the net deferred tax asset balance. Prior to recording the gain, we reassessed whether we had correctly identified all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and we also reviewed the procedures used to measure the amounts of the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration transferred.
The purchased inventory consisted of raw materials and work in process. The fair value for work in process was $1,833, which was determined by considering the sales price of finished units to represent fair value. The fair value for the building and land was $6,080, which was determined by using the sales comparison approach to value the land and a combination of the sales and cost approach for the building and improvements. The fair value of the equipment was determined by the market approach to be $5,394. The fair value of customer relationships was determined to be $23 by using the multi-period excess earnings method. The fair value of technology was $600, which was determined using the relief from royalty method.
From the date of the acquisition through June 30, 2011, EPO contributed revenue and net earnings of $14,444 and $4,069, respectively. Acquisition-related expenses of $406 were recognized in administration expense in the twelve months ended June 30, 2011.
Proforma financial information of revenues and net earnings for the operation was impractical to provide. Prior to the acquisition, the Richmond operations were accounted for as a cost center within ASML. Therefore, revenues were not recorded at the Richmond level within ASML and separate financial statements for the Richmond operations were not prepared. While ASML provided financial information sufficient for Zygo to conclude that the acquisition was not significant under Regulation S-X rule 3-05, ASML did not provide and Zygo did not have access to financial information for the appropriate periods to present pro forma financial information.
The following table presents certain information regarding the intangible assets acquired from ASML as of June 30, 2011. All acquired intangible assets were valued by the multi-period excess earnings method and the relief from royalty method and are being amortized over their initial estimated useful lives of five years for both customer relationships and technology, in both instances with no estimated residual values. We review our intangible assets for impairment annually.
| Customer Relationships | Technology | Total | ||||||||||
| Balance at November 12, 2010 | $ | 23 | $ | 600 | $ | 623 | ||||||
| Accumulated amortization | (3 | ) | (76 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2011 | $ | 20 | $ | 524 | $ | 544 | ||||||
| F - 13 |
Note 4: Restructuring and related costs
During fiscal 2009 and 2010, we initiated and recorded costs for restructuring actions related to cost reduction efforts comprised of workforce reductions and the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Tucson, Arizona. There were no additional charges in fiscal 2013, 2012 or 2011.
The following table summarizes the accrual balances and utilization by cost type for fiscal 2012:
| June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Severance | Facility Consolidation Costs | Total | ||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2011 | $ | — | $ | 33 | $ | 33 | ||||||
| Payments | — | (33 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2012 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
The facility consolidation costs were related to the Optical Systems segment.
Note 5: Marketable Securities
Marketable securities consisted of a mutual fund investment consisting primarily of corporate securities as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 which is classified as a trading security. There were no held-to-maturity or available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2013 and 2012. Dividend and interest income is recognized when earned. Straight-line amortization related to discounts and premiums on the purchase of marketable securities is recorded in interest income. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.
There were no securities in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2013. In determining whether investment holdings are other than temporarily impaired, we consider the nature, cause, severity and duration of the impairment. We use analyst reports, credit ratings and other items as part of our review.
The trading security consists of a mutual fund investment corresponding to elections made in our deferred compensation program. In December 2010, we began quarterly distributions in accordance with the deferred compensation program agreement. The following table sets forth the beginning balance at July 1, 2012 and 2011, gross unrealized gains and losses, contributions, redemptions and fair value of the trading security at June 30, 2013 and 2012:
| Beginning Balance of Fiscal Year | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Contri- butions | Redemp- tions | Ending Balance of Fiscal Year | |||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mutual Fund | $ | 729 | $ | 116 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (183 | ) | $ | 662 | |||||||||||
| June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mutual Fund | $ | 980 | $ | 99 | $ | (177 | ) | $ | — | $ | (173 | ) | $ | 729 | ||||||||||
| F - 14 |
NOTE 6: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurement disclosures utilize a valuation hierarchy for determining the grouping of inputs used. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the management’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of its assets and liabilities included in Level 1. When quoted market prices are not available, the Company uses quotes from independent pricing vendors based on recent trading activity and other relevant information. The carrying value of other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximates fair value due to their short maturities.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013:
| Fair value measurements at June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total carrying value at June 30, 2013 | Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| Money market funds | $ | 23,736 | $ | 23,736 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Trading securities | 662 | 662 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency economic hedges | (7 | ) | — | (7 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 24,391 | $ | 24,398 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | — | |||||||
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2012:
| Fair value measurements at June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total carrying value at June 30, 2012 | Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| Money market funds | $ | 19,931 | $ | 19,931 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Trading securities | 729 | 729 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency economic hedges | (3 | ) | — | (3 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 20,657 | $ | 20,660 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | — | |||||||
| F - 15 |
Note 7: Receivables
At June 30, 2013 and 2012, receivables were as follows:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||
| Trade | $ | 32,570 | $ | 32,261 | ||||
| Other | 62 | 100 | ||||||
| 32,632 | 32,361 | |||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | (272 | ) | (760 | ) | ||||
| $ | 32,360 | $ | 31,601 | |||||
Note 8: Inventories
At June 30, 2013 and 2012, inventories were as follows:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||
| Raw materials and manufactured parts | $ | 14,411 | $ | 12,753 | ||||
| Work in process | 11,300 | 12,031 | ||||||
| Finished goods | 4,474 | 2,976 | ||||||
| $ | 30,185 | $ | 27,760 | |||||
Note 9: Property, Plant and Equipment
At June 30, 2013 and 2012, property, plant and equipment, at cost, were as follows:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | Estimated Useful Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Land and improvements | $ | 4,030 | $ | 4,030 | — | |||||||
| Building and improvements | 24,665 | 24,228 | 15-40 | |||||||||
| Machinery, equipment and office furniture | 60,905 | 58,259 | 3-8 | |||||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 1,009 | 964 | 1-5 | |||||||||
| Construction in progress | 1,525 | 1,625 | — | |||||||||
| 92,134 | 89,106 | |||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | (57,791 | ) | (55,412 | ) | ||||||||
| $ | 34,343 | $ | 33,694 | |||||||||
Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $4,768, $4,864 and $5,363, respectively. In fiscal 2011, due to our historical operating results, we utilized a future discounted cash flow model over five years to assess the net realizable value of our property, plant and equipment related to the vision systems product line and recorded an impairment charge of $563 in selling, general and administrative expenses in our Metrology Solutions segment.
| F - 16 |
Note 10: Intangible ASSETs
Intangible assets, at cost, at June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | Estimated Useful Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Patents | $ | 7,198 | $ | 6,934 | 5-17 | |||||||
| Customer relationships and technology | 2,051 | 2,163 | 3-7 | |||||||||
| Covenant not-to-compete | — | 851 | 4 | |||||||||
| 9,249 | 9,948 | |||||||||||
| Accumulated amortization | (4,634 | ) | (4,750 | ) | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,615 | $ | 5,198 | ||||||||
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $858, $857 and $1,070, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated to be approximately $830 in fiscal 2014 and approximately $819, $642, $503, and $381 annually in fiscal 2015-2018, respectively. Amortization expense related to patents is included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations. Amortization expense related to customer relationships, technology and covenant not-to-compete is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
NOTE 11: WARRANTY LIABILITY
We provide a limited warranty on our products for periods typically ranging from 3 to 12 months, and allowances for estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such allowances requires management to make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace products under warranty. If actual return rates or repair and replacement costs, or both, differ significantly from management’s estimates, adjustments to recognize additional expense may be required.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the accrued warranty liability, which is included in other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,188 | $ | 1,333 | ||||
| Reductions for payments made | (1,039 | ) | (1,016 | ) | ||||
| Changes in accruals related to warranties issued in the current period | 1,096 | 1,315 | ||||||
| Changes in accrual related to pre-existing warranties | (598 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||
| Ending balance | $ | 647 | $ | 1,188 | ||||
| F - 17 |
Note 12: Commitments and contingencies
From time to time, we are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of our business. At June 30, 2013, we did not have a reserve for any contingencies. We are not party to any litigation that we believe could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operation or liquidity.
We are aware of certain levels of contamination on our property in Connecticut which are below reportable levels. In addition, we are aware of certain contamination on an adjacent property that we formerly owned. The future effect of environmental matters, including potential liabilities, is often difficult to estimate. We are unable to determine or reasonably estimate the amount of costs, if any, that we might incur or for which we may ultimately become responsible. We will record a reserve if it is both probable that a liability has been incurred, and the amount of any liability can be reasonably estimated, whether or not a claim has been asserted.
We lease certain manufacturing equipment and facilities under operating leases, some of which include cost escalation clauses, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2018. Total lease expense, net, charged to operations was $1,404, $1,236 and $1,330 in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At June 30, 2013, the minimum future lease commitments under noncancellable leases payable over the remaining lives of the leases are as follows:
| Year ending June 30, | Minimum Future Gross Lease Commitments | |||
| 2014 | $ | 1,053 | ||
| 2015 | 530 | |||
| 2016 | 284 | |||
| 2017 | 25 | |||
| 2018 | 11 | |||
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 1,903 | ||
Note 13: Profit-Sharing Plan
We maintain the Zygo Corporation Profit Sharing Plan (“Plan”) in which substantially all full-time employees are eligible to participate. The Plan is comprised of a profit-sharing program and 401(k) tax deferred payroll deduction program. The profit- sharing program consists of cash distributions determined annually at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Within the 401(k) program, employees may contribute a tax-deferred amount of up to 60% of their compensation, as defined. Effective January 2012, we reinstated the 401(k) match up to 4% of an employee’s contributions. There was no company 401(k) match in the first half of fiscal 2012 or in fiscal 2011. Our aggregate expenses related to these programs for the years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $1,538, $1,947 and $2,526, respectively.
| F - 18 |
Note 14: SHare-Based Compensation plans
Share-Based Compensation Plans
The Zygo Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“2012 Plan”) permits the granting of stock options to purchase shares of common stock and the granting of restricted stock units. The Board of Directors may also amend the 2012 Plan to authorize the grant of other types of equity-based awards, without further action by our stockholders. We have 1,650,000 shares authorized for issuance under the 2012 Plan, of which 1,490,691 remain available for grant at June 30, 2013. The exercise price per share of common stock covered by an option may not be less than the fair market value per share on the date of grant. Options and grants of restricted stock units generally vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% each year.Restricted stock awards generally allow recipients to sell a portion of the stock award back to the Company, in order to cover tax liabilities resulting from the vesting of the award. Restricted stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2011 under the Zygo Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (“2002 Plan”), as amended in 2006, vest 50% after three years and 50% after four years. The 2002 Plan permitted the granting of stock options to purchase shares of common stock and the granting of restricted stock units. The 2002 Plan expired on August 27, 2012, and no further stock options or restricted stock units may be granted after that date.
As part of a director’s compensation for services to the Company, non-employee directors are granted 5,000 restricted shares which vest on an annual basis after one year and each new non-employee director is granted options to purchase 16,000 shares of common stock on his or her first day of service, at the market value per share on the date of grant. These options vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% each year. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to calculate the fair value of stock option awards. The key assumptions for this valuation method include the expected term of the option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, and exercise price. Under the assumptions indicated below, the weighted-average fair value of stock option grants for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $10.79, $7.21 and $5.68, respectively.
Share-based compensation expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 was $5,546, with a related tax benefit of $2,078. This increased cost of goods sold by $1,003, selling, general and administrative expenses by $4,010 and research, development and engineering expenses by $533. Share-based compensation expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 was $4,128, with a related tax benefit of $1,486. This increased cost of goods sold by $790, selling, general and administrative expenses by $2,708 and research, development and engineering expenses by $630. Share-based compensation expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 was $3,965, with a related tax benefit of $1,427. This increased cost of goods sold by $650, selling, general and administrative expenses by $2,416 and research, development and engineering expenses by $899.
The table below indicates the key assumptions used in the option valuation calculations for options granted in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, and a discussion of the methodology for developing each of the assumptions used in the valuation model:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Term | 7.3 Years | 6.6 Years | 4.1-5.1 Years | |||||||||
| Volatility | 59.2% | 59.5% | 45.7 - 57.1% | |||||||||
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.2-1.4% | 1.5% | 1.1-2.6% | |||||||||
Term – This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding. Options granted generally have a maximum term of ten years. An increase in the expected term would increase compensation expense.
Volatility – This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. Volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options of Zygo’s shares and historical volatility of Zygo’s shares. An increase in the expected volatility would increase compensation expense.
Risk-Free Interest Rate – This is the U.S. Treasury rate at the time of the grant having a term equal to the expected term of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate would increase compensation expense.
Dividend Yield – We did not make any dividend payments during the last five fiscal years and we have no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield would decrease compensation expense.
| F - 19 |
Stock Options
The following table summarizes information about the stock options granted under share-based compensation plans for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011. Included in the information below are outstanding options from the Zygo Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan which expired in fiscal 2003 and the 2002 Plan which expired in August 2012, in both instances, to the extent the options remain exercisable.
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares Covered by Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Shares Covered by Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Shares Covered by Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||||
| Options - Outstanding at beginning of year | 1,244,897 | $ | 11.03 | 1,436,240 | $ | 10.57 | 1,976,892 | $ | 20.14 | |||||||||||||||
| Granted | 172,934 | $ | 18.36 | 229,562 | $ | 12.47 | 100,000 | $ | 12.13 | |||||||||||||||
| Exercised | (120,219 | ) | $ | 10.05 | (365,642 | ) | $ | 9.79 | (166,852 | ) | $ | 10.05 | ||||||||||||
| Expired or cancelled | (20,309 | ) | $ | 11.71 | (55,263 | ) | $ | 12.87 | (473,800 | ) | $ | 51.07 | ||||||||||||
| Options - Outstanding at end of year | 1,277,303 | $ | 12.11 | 1,244,897 | $ | 11.03 | 1,436,240 | $ | 10.57 | |||||||||||||||
| Options vested or expected to vest | 479,548 | $ | 13.88 | 548,144 | $ | 11.20 | 1,402,221 | $ | 10.56 | |||||||||||||||
| Options - Exercisable at end of year | 785,024 | $ | 10.96 | 681,185 | $ | 10.87 | 925,990 | $ | 10.70 | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding options at June 30, 2013, had an intrinsic value of $5,254 with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 6.3 years. Exercisable options at the end of the year had an intrinsic value of $3,867 with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.1 years. Outstanding options at June 30, 2012, had an intrinsic value of $8,506 with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 6.4 years. Exercisable options at June 30, 2012 had an intrinsic value of $4,763 with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.8 years.
The following table summarizes information about our stock options granted under our share-based compensation plans as of June 30, 2013.
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Range of Exercise Prices | Number Outstanding as of June 30, 2013 | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number Exercisable as of June 30, 2013 | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 5.09 - $ 8.80 | 162,800 | 6.4 | $ | 6.91 | 117,800 | $ | 6.67 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 9.01 - $12.51 | 749,149 | 6.1 | $ | 11.10 | 503,899 | $ | 10.80 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 12.53 - $14.74 | 101,600 | 2.3 | $ | 13.51 | 101,600 | $ | 13.51 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 14.82 - $20.09 | 263,754 | 8.1 | $ | 17.65 | 61,725 | $ | 16.29 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 5.09 - $20.09 | 1,277,303 | 6.3 | $ | 12.11 | 785,024 | $ | 10.96 | ||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2013, there was $1,667 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $889, $2,823 and $449 and the total fair value of stock awards vested was $700, $803 and $959 during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Cash received from stock option exercises and the associated tax benefit for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $1,221, $2,629 and $1,834, respectively.
Restricted Stock
The following table summarizes information about restricted stock units granted under share-based compensation plans for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012, and 2011:
| F - 20 |
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non vested balance at beginning of year | 734,332 | $ | 9.92 | 713,975 | $ | 8.00 | 588,093 | $ | 9.04 | |||||||||||||||
| Granted | 162,901 | $ | 18.49 | 176,812 | $ | 13.78 | 362,500 | $ | 8.28 | |||||||||||||||
| Vested | (233,136 | ) | $ | 9.61 | (148,500 | ) | $ | 11.39 | (172,865 | ) | $ | 8.89 | ||||||||||||
| Forfeited | (10,186 | ) | $ | 10.69 | (7,955 | ) | $ | 6.43 | (63,753 | ) | $ | 9.06 | ||||||||||||
| Non vested balance at end of year | 653,911 | $ | 12.15 | 734,332 | $ | 9.92 | 713,975 | $ | 8.00 | |||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2013, there was $2,308 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock awards. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
At June 30, 2013, an aggregate of 1,490,691 shares remained available for future grants under our share-based compensation plans, which cover stock awards and stock options. We issue shares to satisfy stock option exercises and restricted stock awards, as applicable.
NOTE 15: EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), providing employees who elect to participate with the ability to purchase common stock at a 5% discount from the market value of such stock through payroll deductions of an amount between 1% and 10% of compensation. Previously, the ESPP provided for a 10% discount from market value and ceased being available for participation during fiscal 2009. The Company reinstated the amended ESPP effective July 1, 2012 with quarterly offerings to eligible employees. The total number of shares of common stock available under the ESPP is 530,198 as of June 30, 2013.
Note 16: Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | 2,571 | $ | — | $ | (725 | ) | |||||
| State | 317 | 670 | 259 | |||||||||
| Foreign | 1,218 | 2,403 | 1,782 | |||||||||
| 4,106 | 3,073 | 1,316 | ||||||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | (327 | ) | (15,977 | ) | — | |||||||
| State | (903 | ) | (2,918 | ) | — | |||||||
| Foreign | 13 | (5 | ) | — | ||||||||
| (1,217 | ) | (18,900 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,889 | $ | (15,827 | ) | $ | 1,316 | |||||
| F - 21 |
The income tax expense (benefits) for operations listed above were provided on the following pre-tax book income (loss) from continuing operations amounts:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Earnings (loss) from operations - U.S. | $ | 8,098 | $ | 22,625 | $ | 18,543 | ||||||
| Earnings from foreign operations | 3,771 | 6,619 | 3,365 | |||||||||
| $ | 11,869 | $ | 29,244 | $ | 21,908 | |||||||
The total income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amount computed by applying the applicable U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 to earnings from continuing operations before income taxes for the following reasons:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Computed “expected tax expense” | $ | 4,154 | $ | 10,235 | $ | 7,668 | ||||||
| Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from: | ||||||||||||
| State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | (697 | ) | 436 | 168 | ||||||||
| Uncertain tax positions | 1,369 | 1,223 | 855 | |||||||||
| Benefit related to gain on acquisition | — | — | (725 | ) | ||||||||
| Permanent items | 217 | 1,199 | 524 | |||||||||
| Foreign tax differential | (180 | ) | (317 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||||
| General business credits | (16 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Deferred tax asset valuation allowance and related adjustments to NOL | (1,958 | ) | (28,603 | ) | (6,775 | ) | ||||||
| $ | 2,889 | $ | (15,827 | ) | $ | 1,316 | ||||||
The Company has reclassified certain prior amounts from the Deferred tax asset valuation allowance and related adjustments to the NOL line into a separate line, Uncertain tax positions, to conform with the current year presentation within this table.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 are presented below:
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable | $ | 85 | $ | 289 | ||||
| Accrued liabilities and other | 1,251 | 1,669 | ||||||
| Inventory valuation | 3,388 | 3,117 | ||||||
| Stock award compensation | 4,434 | 3,583 | ||||||
| Intangible assets | 428 | 664 | ||||||
| Federal, foreign and state net operating loss carryforwards and credits | 15,328 | 14,192 | ||||||
| Capital losses | 434 | — | ||||||
| Deferred tax assets | 25,348 | 23,514 | ||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Intangible assets | (385 | ) | (542 | ) | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment | (286 | ) | (2,038 | ) | ||||
| Other deferred liabilities | (157 | ) | — | |||||
| Deferred tax liability | (828 | ) | (2,580 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance | 24,520 | 20,934 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance | (3,120 | ) | (1,750 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | 21,400 | $ | 19,184 | ||||
| F - 22 |
Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in future periods. Through fiscal 2011, the Company’s net deferred tax assets were substantially reserved due to the uncertainty of realization through future earnings. In fiscal 2012, the Company determined, based on all available evidence, positive and negative, including the Company’s taxable income over the past three fiscal years and expected future profitability, certain of its deferred tax assets were more likely than not to be realized through future earnings.
At June 30, 2013, our share of the cumulative undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries was $17,318. No provision has been made for U.S. or additional foreign taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, because we intend to continue to reinvest these earnings. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability associated with these earnings is not practicable.
At June 30, 2013, we have federal, state, and foreign net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards of approximately $16,157, $4,535, and $2,871, respectively, and various federal, state and foreign tax credit carry forwards of $7,419, $3,432 and $1,247, respectively. The federal net operating loss carryforwards for tax return purposes include approximately $3,700 of deductions related to the exercise of stock options. This amount represents an excess tax benefit and has not been included in the gross deferred tax asset reflected for net operating losses. This amount will be recorded as an increase in additional paid in capital on the consolidated balance sheet once the excess benefits are realized, in accordance with ASC 718. The federal NOL will expire from fiscal 2027 through fiscal 2030, while the state NOL and credits will expire from fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2033. The foreign NOL will begin to expire in fiscal 2028. We also have domestic credit carry forwards of $10,851 and foreign tax credits of $1,247 which are available to reduce federal income taxes, if any, through fiscal year 2033 and begin to expire in fiscal 2014. All deferred tax assets relating to Canadian NOLs and credits have been (and remain) fully reserved in the valuation allowance since June 30, 2009.
Due to our NOL carry forwards, we have accrued no interest or penalties for any unrecognized tax benefits; however, our policy is to recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. Penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. In the normal course of business, we provide for uncertain tax positions and adjust our unrecognized tax benefits accordingly. We do not anticipate any significant changes to our recognized tax benefits over the next twelve months.
The following table is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of unrecognized tax benefits. If our unrecognized benefits were to become recognized in the future, the ending balance for each respective year would then impact our effective tax rate at the time which the unrecognized benefits are ultimately recognized.
| Unrecognized tax benefit, June 30, 2010 | $ | — | ||
| Increases - tax positions of prior years | 855 | |||
| Unrecognized tax benefit, June 30, 2011 | 855 | |||
| Increases - tax positions of prior years | 2,639 | |||
| Increases - tax positions of current year | 123 | |||
| Unrecognized tax benefit, June 30, 2012 | 3,617 | |||
| Increases - tax positions of prior years | 1,873 | |||
| Increases - tax positions of current year | 777 | |||
| Unrecognized tax benefit, June 30, 2013 | $ | 6,267 |
We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audit or tax adjustments for years prior to June 30, 2008, except to the extent we have NOLs and credits arising from any of those earlier years. Those loss years remain subject to audit at the time the NOL or credit is utilized. We are no longer subject to state and foreign income tax audit or tax adjustments for years prior to June 30, 2008.
| F - 23 |
NOTE 17:Segment and Major Customer information
Our business is organized into two operating divisions – Metrology Solutions (Metrology Solutions segment) and Optical Systems (Optical Systems segment). Consistent with our business structure, we reported our segments as Metrology and Optics. Our Metrology Solutions segment includes 3-Dimensional surface metrology products, precision positioning systems and custom engineered solutions used in the semiconductor, research and industrial markets. Zygo’s Optical Systems segment designs, develops and manufactures high precision optical components and electro-optical systems used in the semiconductor, bio-medical and research markets. The chief operating decision-maker uses this information to allocate resources.
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Metrology Solutions | ||||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 93,568 | $ | 106,189 | $ | 92,947 | ||||||
| Gross profit | 50,619 | 61,523 | 50,913 | |||||||||
| Gross margin | 54 | % | 58 | % | 55 | % | ||||||
| Optical Systems | ||||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 55,827 | $ | 60,648 | $ | 57,179 | ||||||
| Gross profit | 15,072 | 20,187 | 19,880 | |||||||||
| Gross margin | 27 | % | 33 | % | 35 | % | ||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 149,395 | $ | 166,837 | $ | 150,126 | ||||||
| Gross profit | 65,691 | 81,710 | 70,793 | |||||||||
| Gross margin | 44 | % | 49 | % | 47 | % | ||||||
Separate financial information by segment for total assets, capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization is not available and is not evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker.
Substantially all of our operating assets, depreciation and amortization are U.S. based. Revenue by geographic area based on shipping destination is as follows:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Americas | $ | 79,506 | $ | 90,289 | $ | 81,710 | ||||||
| Japan | 26,396 | 26,084 | 31,648 | |||||||||
| China | 17,245 | 21,806 | 9,186 | |||||||||
| Europe | 18,192 | 19,499 | 17,983 | |||||||||
| Pacific Rim | 8,056 | 9,159 | 9,599 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 149,395 | $ | 166,837 | $ | 150,126 | ||||||
No customer accounted for over 10% of revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Two customers individually accounted for 11% and 10% of the revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Revenues from one of these customers accounted for 13% of the revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. Revenue from these customers was included in both of our segments.
| F - 24 |
NOTE 18:Transactions WITH STOCKHOLDER
Sales to Canon, Inc., a stockholder representing approximately 7% ownership at June 30, 2013, and Canon Sales Co., Inc., a distributor of certain of our products in Japan and a subsidiary of Canon, Inc. (collectively “Canon”), were $13,540 (9% of net revenues), $16,810 (10% of net revenues) and $19,697 (13% of net revenues), for the years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Substantially all of these revenues occurred in the Metrology Solutions segment. Selling prices of products sold to Canon are based, generally, on the terms customarily given to distributors. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, there were, in the aggregate, $1,771 and $1,604, respectively, of trade accounts receivable from Canon.
NOTE 19: ECONOMIC HEDGING ACTIVITIES
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes.
Most derivative contracts are used as hedges but are not designated or qualify as hedging instruments under authoritative guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These non-qualifying derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures from the point of shipment to the point of collection, generally three to six months and are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in miscellaneous income (expense). Any gains and losses on the fair value of these derivative contracts would largely offset corresponding losses and gains on the underlying transactions.
In the case of derivative contracts used as hedges for significant orders with shipping dates that may extend more than six months in the future, we may designate those derivative contracts as cash flow hedges that qualify as hedging instruments under authoritative guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These qualifying derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures from the order date through shipment and collection. For these cash flow hedges, any gains or losses on the fair value of these contracts would be charged to accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and subsequently relieved to net revenue upon shipment to the customer. In addition, at the point of shipment to the customer, the cash flow hedge will be de-designated, with any future gains or losses from that point forward being charged to miscellaneous income (expense) which would then largely offset corresponding losses and gains on the underlying transactions. In the case where a designated cash flow hedge is accounted for under the spot method, a portion of the otherwise AOCI adjustment would be charged to other miscellaneous income (expense) and not be offset by any corresponding gains or losses on an underlying transaction up to the point of shipment or revenue recognition.
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
As of June 30, 2013, we had eleven foreign currency forward contracts outstanding involving our Japanese and German operations with notional amounts aggregating $4,103. These foreign currency hedges are not designated as hedging instruments. Net unrealized gains and (losses) recognized from foreign currency forward contracts for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $151, $79 and ($12), respectively, included in miscellaneous income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses are substantially offset by foreign exchange losses and gains on intercompany balances recorded by our subsidiaries.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | Balance Sheet Location | |||||||||
| June 30, 2013 | Number of foreign exchange contracts: | 11 | Prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes and other current assets | $ | 147 | |||||
| June 30, 2012 | Number of foreign exchange contracts: | 9 | Prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes and other current assets | $ | 14 | |||||
| Other accrued expenses | $ | 17 | ||||||||
| June 30, 2011 | Number of foreign exchange contracts: | 6 | Other accrued expenses | $ | 82 | |||||
| F - 25 |
Derivative designated as a hedging instrument.
As of June 30, 2013, we had one foreign currency forward contract outstanding involving our Japanese operations with a notional amount of $26,183 to protect against foreign currency fluctuations for current transactions and longer term orders denominated in Japanese Yen.
This foreign currency hedge is designated as a hedging instrument qualifying as a cash flow hedge utilizing a window forward approach used in situations where multiple shipments occur over a period of time. The cash flow hedge is in effect for the period of April 2013 through June 30, 2014. The cash flow hedge is evaluated quarterly to ensure that hedge accounting treatment still applies.
This window forward approach allows for the use of the spot method to determine the amount that can be included in AOCI. This method requires current period expensing of the impact of changes to the forward rates while allowing the changes of the spot rates to be recorded in AOCI. At the time the various shipments occur, AOCI is relieved for a pro-rata amount of the basis and is reclassed to net revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Concurrently, that portion of the hedge related to current shipments is de-designated as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes and any future changes in fair value related to that portion of the hedge will be included in miscellaneous income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses from the de-designated portion of the hedge are substantially offset by foreign exchange losses and gains on balances recorded by our subsidiary.
Net unrealized losses recognized from the ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge for fiscal 2013 was $121 and the de-designated portion of the hedge for fiscal 2013 was $54 and both were included in miscellaneous income(expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. Amounts reclassified from AOCI based on revenue to customers resulted in a revenue increase of $45. The amounts in AOCI are forecasted to be reclassed into net revenue over the next twelve months
The following table summarizes the foreign exchange cash flow hedge value as of June 30, 2013:
| Foreign Currency Derivative designated as hedging instruments | Balance Sheet Location | |||||||||
| June 30, 2013 | Number of foreign exchange contracts: | 1 | Other accrued expenses | $ | 154 | |||||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | ($ | 25 | ) | |||||||
| F - 26 |
Note 20: QUARTERLY RESULTS (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly financial data:
| For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
| September 30 | December 31 | March 31 | June 30 | |||||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 40,206 | $ | 34,635 | $ | 34,533 | $ | 40,021 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 17,493 | $ | 15,283 | $ | 15,260 | $ | 17,655 | ||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 2,994 | $ | 1,682 | $ | 1,532 | $ | 2,772 | ||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 2,388 | $ | 1,579 | $ | 1,366 | $ | 2,518 | ||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation per basic common share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation per diluted common share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||
| For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| September 30 | December 31 | March 31 | June 30 | |||||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 43,992 | $ | 40,040 | $ | 38,472 | $ | 44,333 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 21,617 | $ | 19,642 | $ | 19,440 | $ | 21,011 | ||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 6,976 | $ | 6,757 | $ | 5,926 | $ | 25,412 | ||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation | $ | 6,469 | $ | 6,178 | $ | 5,407 | $ | 24,964 | ||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation per basic common share | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to Zygo Corporation per diluted common share | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
| F - 27 |
NOTE 21: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we determined to sell or otherwise close down the Singapore IC packaging metrology operations of our vision systems product line, included in our Metrology Solutions segment. As of September 30, 2009, operations had ceased at this location. The results of operations for the aforementioned operations are presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. There was no discontinued operations activity in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012.
The following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011:
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||
| 2011 | ||||
| Net revenue | $ | — | ||
| Cost of goods sold | — | |||
| Gross profit | — | |||
| Operating income, and other | (91 | ) | ||
| Asset impairment | — | |||
| Earnings before income taxes | 91 | |||
| Income tax expense | — | |||
| Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | 91 | ||
The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities of our discontinued operations included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company as of June 30, 2011:
| June 30, 2011 | ||||
| Receivables | $ | — | ||
| Other assets | — | |||
| Current assets of discontinued operations | $ | — | ||
| Accounts payable | $ | — | ||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 281 | |||
| Current liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 281 | ||
| Other long-term liabilities | $ | — | ||
| Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | — | ||
* * * * *
| F - 28 |
ZYGO CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Thousands)
| Description | Balance at Beginning of Year | Provision | Write-Offs and Other | Balance at End of Year | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 760 | $ | (482 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 272 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets | $ | 1,750 | $ | 179 | $ | 1,191 | $ | 3,120 | ||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 1,399 | $ | (463 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | $ | 760 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets | $ | 29,179 | $ | (27,380 | ) | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 1,750 | ||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 1,975 | $ | (299 | ) | $ | (277 | ) | $ | 1,399 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets | $ | 42,933 | $ | (5,920 | ) | $ | (7,834 | ) | $ | 29,179 | ||||||
| S - 1 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
| EXHIBIT TABLE NUMBER | |
| 21 | Subsidiaries of Registrant |
| 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| 31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension |
| 101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| 101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| 101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| 101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.