UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended | March 31, 2005 |
or
£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from | to |
Commission File Number | 0-12944 |
ZYGO CORPORATION |
---|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter) |
Delaware | 06-0864500 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Laurel Brook Road, Middlefield, Connecticut | 06455 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(860) 347-8506 |
---|
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code |
N/A |
---|
|
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed from last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ YES £ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
þ YES £ NO
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
17,975,821 shares of Common Stock, $.10 Par Value, at April 29, 2005
1
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report regarding our financial position, business strategy, plans, anticipated growth rates, and objectives of management for future operations (as well as these factors as they may apply to our customers, suppliers, and others with whom we have critical business relationships) are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are intended to provide management’s current expectations or plans for the future operating and financial performance based upon information currently available and assumptions currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plans,” “strategy,” “project,” and other words of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors. Among the important factors that could cause actual events to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are fluctuations in capital spending of our customers, fluctuations in net sales to our major customer, manufacturing and supplier risks, dependence on new product development, rapid technological and market change, risks in international operations, dependence on proprietary technology and key personnel, length of the sales cycle and environmental regulations. Further information on potential factors that could affect our business is described in our reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.
2
PART I — Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands, except per share amounts)
| Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Net sales | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ 28,245 | | $ 23,425 | | $ 87,658 | | $ 66,996 | |
Development services | | 5,442 | | 5,008 | | 9,614 | | 13,338 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 33,687 | | 28,433 | | 97,272 | | 80,334 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cost of goods sold | |
Products | | 16,812 | | 14,878 | | 53,005 | | 42,050 | |
Development services | | 3,745 | | 4,153 | | 6,766 | | 10,718 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 20,557 | | 19,031 | | 59,771 | | 52,768 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | 13,130 | | 9,402 | | 37,501 | | 27,566 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 5,498 | | 5,358 | | 16,880 | | 16,802 | |
Research, development, and engineering expenses | | 3,809 | | 2,725 | | 10,689 | | 9,344 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating profit | | 3,823 | | 1,319 | | 9,932 | | 1,420 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other income: | |
Interest income | | 189 | | 219 | | 543 | | 638 | |
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | | (133 | ) | 138 | | 81 | | 213 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total other income | | 56 | | 357 | | 624 | | 851 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Earnings from continuing operations | |
before income taxes and minority interest | | 3,879 | | 1,676 | | 10,556 | | 2,271 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
Income tax expense | | (1,217 | ) | (637 | ) | (3,621 | ) | (863 | ) |
Minority interest | | (287 | ) | (71 | ) | (684 | ) | (175 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Earnings from continuing operations | | 2,375 | | 968 | | 6,251 | | 1,233 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Discontinued TeraOptix operations, net of tax | | (100 | ) | (340 | ) | (210 | ) | (1,221 | ) |
Charges and adjustments on the disposal of | |
TeraOptix, net of tax | | 11 | | (327 | ) | (107 | ) | (1,520 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Loss from discontinued operations | | (89 | ) | (667 | ) | (317 | ) | (2,741 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net earnings (loss) | | $ 2,286 | | $ 301 | | $ 5,934 | | $(1,508 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Basic—Earnings (loss) per share: | |
Continuing operations | | $ 0.13 | | $ 0.05 | | $ 0.35 | | $ 0.07 | |
Discontinued operations | | $ — | | $ (0.03 | ) | $ (0.02 | ) | $ (0.15 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net earnings (loss) | | $ 0.13 | | $ 0.02 | | $ 0.33 | | $ (0.08 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted—Earnings (loss) per share: | |
Continuing operations | | $ 0.13 | | $ 0.05 | | $ 0.35 | | $ 0.07 | |
Discontinued operations | | $ — | | $ (0.03 | ) | $ (0.02 | ) | $ (0.15 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net earnings (loss) | | $ 0.13 | | $ 0.02 | | $ 0.33 | | $ (0.08 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |
Basic shares | | 17,974 | | 17,858 | | 17,942 | | 17,775 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted shares | | 18,226 | | 18,422 | | 18,140 | | 18,248 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars, except share amounts)
| March 31, 2005
| June 30, 2004
|
---|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 16,793 | | $ | 17,462 | |
Marketable securities | | | | 9,694 | | | 8,428 | |
Receivables, less allowance of $653 and $707 | | | | 28,162 | | | 26,338 | |
Inventories | | | | 33,730 | | | 21,547 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | | 2,142 | | | 1,915 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | | 3,783 | | | 3,999 | |
Assets of discontinued unit held for sale | | | | — | | | 2,012 | |
|
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | | 94,304 | | | 81,701 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
Marketable securities | | | | 7,605 | | | 8,503 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | | | 30,850 | | | 27,433 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | | 29,712 | | | 31,738 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | | 5,425 | | | 4,999 | |
Other assets | | | | 981 | | | 1,078 | |
|
| |
| |
Total assets | | | $ | 168,877 | | $ | 155,452 | |
|
| |
| |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | |
Current liabilities: | | |
Payables | | | $ | 11,733 | | $ | 10,384 | |
Deferred revenue and advance payments | | | | 6,263 | | | 615 | |
Accrued salaries and wages | | | | 4,740 | | | 5,794 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | | 3,885 | | | 4,389 | |
Income taxes payable | | | | 3,435 | | | 2,038 | |
|
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | | 30,056 | | | 23,220 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
Other long-term liabilities | | | | 151 | | | 350 | |
Minority interest | | | | 1,796 | | | 1,238 | |
|
| |
| |
Total liabilities | | | | 32,003 | | | 24,808 | |
|
| |
| |
Stockholders' equity: | | |
Common Stock, $.10 par value per share: | | |
40,000,000 shares authorized; | | |
18,422,626 shares issued (18,332,933 at June 30, 2004); | | |
17,975,421 shares outstanding (17,885,728 at June 30, 2004) | | | | 1,842 | | | 1,833 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | | 142,088 | | | 141,151 | |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | | | | (62 | ) | | (5,996 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): | | |
Currency translation effects | | | | (1,744 | ) | | (1,119 | ) |
Net unrealized gain on marketable securities | | | | 37 | | | 62 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | 142,161 | | | 135,931 | |
Less treasury stock, at cost (447,205 shares) | | | | 5,287 | | | 5,287 | |
|
| |
| |
Total stockholders' equity | | | | 136,874 | | | 130,644 | |
|
| |
| |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | | $ | 168,877 | | $ | 155,452 | |
|
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars)
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | | | $ | 5,934 | | $ | (1,508 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to cash | | |
provided by (used for) operating activities: | | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | | 317 | | | 2,741 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | 4,379 | | | 4,271 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | | 2,420 | | | 629 | |
Other, net | | | | 259 | | | 520 | |
Changes in operating accounts: | | |
Receivables | | | | (1,705 | ) | | (7,086 | ) |
Inventories | | | | (11,903 | ) | | (2,684 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | | | | (208 | ) | | 559 | |
Payables and accrued expenses | | | | 5,917 | | | 2,003 | |
Minority interest | | | | 558 | | | 175 | |
|
| |
| |
Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations | | | | 5,968 | | | (380 | ) |
Net cash used for discontinued operations | | | | (420 | ) | | (1,852 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | | | | 5,548 | | | (2,232 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities: | | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment, net | | | | (7,718 | ) | | (5,521 | ) |
Purchase of marketable securities | | | | (4,763 | ) | | (4,941 | ) |
Additions to intangibles and other assets | | | | (868 | ) | | (743 | ) |
Proceeds from the sale or maturity of marketable securities | | | | 4,325 | | | 11,226 | |
|
| |
| |
Net cash (used for) provided by continuing operations | | | | (9,024 | ) | | 21 | |
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | | | | 1,918 | | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities | | | | (7,106 | ) | | 21 | |
|
| |
| |
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities: | | |
Dividend payments to minority interest | | | | — | | | (235 | ) |
Employee stock purchase | | | | 677 | | | 578 | |
Exercise of employee stock options | | | | 212 | | | 863 | |
|
| |
| |
Net cash provided by continuing operations | | | | 889 | | | 1,206 | |
Net cash used for discontinued operations | | | | — | | | (11,374 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | | | | 889 | | | (10,168 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | | (669 | ) | | (12,379 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | | 17,462 | | | 31,209 | |
|
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | | $ | 16,793 | | $ | 18,830 | |
|
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation
Zygo Corporation is a worldwide supplier of optical metrology instruments, precision optics, and electro-optical design and manufacturing services for customers in the semiconductor capital equipment and industrial markets. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Zygo Corporation and its subsidiaries (“ZYGO,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “Company”). All material transactions and accounts with the subsidiaries have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
The Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2005, the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004 are unaudited but, in management’s opinion, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our June 30, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, including items incorporated by reference therein.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue based on guidance provided in Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, our price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on our standard products when title passes to the customer upon shipment. While our standard products generally require installation, the installation is considered a perfunctory performance obligation. The standard products do not have customer acceptance criteria. We have standard rights of return that we account for as a warranty provision under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” We do not have any price protection agreements or other post shipment obligations. We also sell custom equipment and do have situations where customer acceptance is part of the sales agreement. In these situations, revenue is not recognized until the customer has accepted the product. In cases where custom equipment does not have customer acceptance as part of the sales agreement, we recognize revenue upon shipment, as long as the system meets the specifications as agreed upon with the customer. Certain transactions have multiple deliverables, with the deliverables clearly defined. To the extent that the secondary deliverables are other than perfunctory, we recognize the revenue on each deliverable, if separable, or on the completion of all deliverables, if not separable, all in a manner consistent with SAB No. 104 and EITF 00-21. Generally, software is a component of our standard product and, as such, is not separately recognized as revenue. Standalone software products are recognized as revenue when they are shipped.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.”
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
| Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | | | | 17,973,834 | | | 17,858,346 | | | 17,942,028 | | | 17,774,599 | |
Dilutive effect of stock options | | | | 252,156 | | | 563,322 | | | 197,737 | | | 473,561 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | | | 18,225,990 | | | 18,421,668 | | | 18,139,765 | | | 18,248,160 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
6
Stock Compensation Plans
As of March 31, 2005, we have two stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. A third stock-based compensation plan expired in September 2002. We apply Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for our plans. Since all options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant, no compensation cost has been recognized for our fixed option plans. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” which requires that the information be determined as if we have accounted for our stock options granted in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1994 under the fair value method of the Statement.
The Zygo Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan permits the granting of non-qualified options to purchase a total of 620,000 shares (adjusted for splits) of common stock at prices not less than the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of the Plan, as amended on September 24, 1999, each new non-employee director (other than a person who was previously an employee of ZYGO or any of our subsidiaries) was granted an option to purchase 8,000 shares of common stock, generally, on his or her first day of service as a non-employee director; and each other non-employee director was granted an option to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock on an annual basis. All options were fully exercisable on the date of grant and have a 10-year term. The Plan, as amended, will expire on November 17, 2009. The Company does not intend to grant further options under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
The Zygo Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan permits the granting of restricted stock and stock options to purchase shares of common stock up to a total of 1,500,000 shares. The exercise price per share of common stock covered by an option may not be less than the par value per share on the date of grant, and in the case of an incentive stock option, the exercise price may not be less than the market value per share on the date of grant. These options generally vest over a four year period in quarterly increments (except for the annual option grants to directors as discussed below). The Plan will expire on August 27, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Board of Directors may also amend the Plan to authorize the grant of other types of equity-based awards, without further action by our stockholders. Non-employee directors are now granted fully exercisable options to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock on an annual basis and each new non-employee director is granted fully exercisable options to purchase 12,000 shares of common stock, generally, on their first day of service, in all instances at the market value per share on the date of grant.
The Zygo Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan permitted the granting of non-qualified options to purchase a total of 4,850,000 shares (adjusted for splits) of common stock at prices not less than the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options generally became exercisable at the rate of 25% of the shares each year commencing one year after the date of grant. The Plan, as amended, expired on September 3, 2002.
The fair value of options at date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes model. Our pro forma information is as follows:
| Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Net earnings (loss), as reported | | | $ | 2,286 | | $ | 301 | | $ | 5,934 | | $ | (1,508 | ) |
Deduct: Total stock-based employee | | |
compensation expense determined | | |
under fair value based method | | |
for all awards, net of | | |
related tax effects | | | | (474 | ) | | (1,446 | ) | | (2,110 | ) | | (4,272 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Pro forma net earnings (loss) | | | $ | 1,812 | | $ | (1,145 | ) | $ | 3,824 | | $ | (5,780 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net earnings (loss) per share | | |
Basic - as reported | | | $ | 0.13 | | $ | 0.02 | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | (0.08 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Basic - pro forma | | | $ | 0.10 | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.21 | | $ | (0.33 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted - as reported | | | $ | 0.13 | | $ | 0.02 | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | (0.08 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Diluted - pro forma | | | $ | 0.10 | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.21 | | $ | (0.32 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Our total comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
| Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Net earnings (loss) | | | $ | 2,286 | | $ | 301 | | $ | 5,934 | | $ | (1,508 | ) |
Unrealized loss on marketable | | |
securities, net of tax | | | | (5 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (63 | ) |
Unrealized gain on swap | | |
agreement, net of tax | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 337 | |
Reclassification adjustment | | |
for loss on swap agreement | | |
included in net loss, | | |
net of tax | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 577 | |
Foreign currency translation | | |
effect | | | | (696 | ) | | (212 | ) | | (625 | ) | | 573 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | $ | 1,585 | | $ | 73 | | $ | 5,284 | | $ | (84 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. At March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, inventories were as follows:
| March 31, 2005
| June 30, 2004
|
---|
Raw materials and manufactured parts | | | $ | 16,519 | | $ | 11,155 | |
Work in process | | | | 15,477 | | | 9,794 | |
Finished goods | | | | 1,734 | | | 598 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | $ | 33,730 | | $ | 21,547 | |
|
| |
| |
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Management evaluates, on an ongoing basis, the carrying value of our property, plant, and equipment and makes adjustments when impairments are identified. Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets and is computed using the straight-line method. At March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, property, plant, and equipment were as follows:
| March 31, 2005
| June 30, 2004
| Estimated Useful Life (Years)
|
---|
Land | | | $ | 615 | | $ | 615 | | | — | |
Building and improvements | | | | 14,802 | | | 11,941 | | | 15-40 | |
Machinery, equipment, and office furniture | | | | 43,835 | | | 40,602 | | | 3-8 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | | 720 | | | 657 | | | 1-5 | |
Construction in progress | | | | 4,295 | | | 3,917 | | | — | |
|
|
| | | |
| | | | 64,267 | | | 57,732 | | | | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | | (33,417 | ) | | (30,299 | ) |
|
|
| | | |
| | | $ | 30,850 | | | $27,433 | | | | |
|
|
| | | |
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004 was $1,207 and $1,131, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004 was $3,964 and $3,917, respectively.
8
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include patents, trademarks, and a license agreement. Costs incurred in obtaining patents and trademarks are capitalized and the license agreement is valued at the actual dollar amount paid to obtain the license. The cost of intangible assets is amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 4-20 years. Costs incurred in maintaining patents and trademarks are expensed as incurred. If management determines that a patent or trademark is no longer a useful asset, the remaining unamortized balance is written off immediately. Intangible assets, at cost, at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 were as follows:
| March 31, 2005
| June 30, 2004
|
---|
Patents | | | $ | 6,131 | | $ | 5,319 | |
Trademarks | | | | 52 | | | 90 | |
License agreement | | | | 1,350 | | | 1,350 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | 7,533 | | | 6,759 | |
Accumulated amortization | | | | (2,108 | ) | | (1,760 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Intangible assets, net | | | $ | 5,425 | | $ | 4,999 | |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Intangible amortization expense was $146and $110 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004, respectively. Intangible amortization expense was$370 and $322 for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004, respectively. Amortization expense related to certain intangible assets is included in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Warranty
A limited warranty is provided on our products for periods ranging from 3 to 12 months and allowances for estimated warranty costs are recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such allowances requires management to make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace products under warranty. If actual return rates or repair and replacement costs, or both, differ significantly from management’s estimates, adjustments to the expense may be required.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our accrued warranty liability, which is included in the “Other accrued liabilities” line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Beginning balance | | | $ | 1,486 | | $ | 1,215 | |
Reductions for payments made | | | | (917 | ) | | (1,894 | ) |
Changes in accruals related to warranties | | |
issued in the current period | | | | 520 | | | 1,216 | |
Changes in accruals related to pre-existing | | |
warranties | | | | (40 | ) | | 757 | |
|
| |
| |
Ending balance | | | $ | 1,049 | | $ | 1,294 | |
|
| |
| |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Interest payments on debt were $480 for the nine months ended March 26, 2004. There were no interest payments for the nine months ended March 31, 2005. We also paid $1,109 in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 in connection with the settlement of an interest rate swap agreement. Income tax payments, less income tax refunds, amounted to $482 and $92 for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and March 26, 2004, respectively.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts included in the consolidated financial statements for the prior year have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.
9
NOTE 2: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95.” This statement requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all share based payments based on their fair value. The standard becomes effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS No. 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 123R on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
The FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs: an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, June 1953.” This statement eliminates the “so abnormal” criteria in Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43 and replaces it with a requirement that “abnormal freight, handling costs, and amounts of wasted materials (spoilage)” should be treated as current-period costs. The standard becomes effective for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 in fiscal 2006 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 3: DIVESTITURES AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In September 2002, we committed to a planned disposition of our TeraOptix business unit (“TeraOptix”) which included recording impairment charges for the facility and equipment. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we took an additional impairment charge on the facility of $1,193 million, net of tax of $1,111, based on the then current fair value based on an appraisal from an independent third party. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, management changed the marketing of the facility to a general purpose manufacturing facility from clean room space. We received offers on the building during the fourth quarter from two separate independent third parties. Based on the offers, management determined that the fair value of the vacant facility was $2,012. An impairment charge of $4,862, net of tax of $2,641, was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, we recorded an additional impairment charge and adjustments of $107, net of tax of $60, to reflect the fair value based on final negotiations of a pending sale. The sale of the facility was completed in March 2005 for $1,918, net of selling expenses.
In fiscal 2004, we paid off the mortgage debt of $10,955 on the facility. The mortgage debt had carried interest at 7.5% per annum at the time of repayment, and required monthly principal payments of $70, plus interest, until April 2007 and a balloon payment of $8,200 in May 2007. In connection with the debt repayment, the Company also paid the balance of a related interest rate swap agreement of $1,109. This payment resulted in an additional charge to discontinued TeraOptix operations, recorded net of tax. Prior to the payment, in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended, the swap liability was recorded with a corresponding debit, net of tax, to stockholders’ equity. The aggregate payment of $12,064 on the mortgage debt ($10,955) and swap agreement ($1,109) was funded from the Company’s available cash and marketable securities.
The results and loss on disposal of the TeraOptix business unit have been presented as separate line items in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Discontinued TeraOptix operations, net of tax,” for all periods presented. The components of cash flow from discontinued operations are as follows:
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| | March 26, 2004
|
---|
Cash flow from operating activities from discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | $ | (317 | ) | $ | (2,741 | ) |
Loss on sale and impairment of assets | | | | 94 | | | 2,304 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | | (178 | ) | | (1,413 | ) |
Other, net | | | | (19 | ) | | (2 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net cash used for operating activities from discontinued operations | | | | (420 | ) | | (1,852 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | |
Proceeds from the sale of assets | | |
| | | | 1,918 | | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | |
| | | | 1,918 | | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Cash flow from financing activities from discontinued operations: | | |
Payment of long-term debt | | | | — | | | (11,374 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net cash used for financing activities from discontinued operations | | | | — | | | (11,374 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations | | | $ | 1,498 | | $ | (13,226 | ) |
|
| |
| |
10
NOTE 4: SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate in two principal business segments globally: Semiconductor and Industrial. The segment data is presented below in a manner consistent with management’s internal measurement of the business. The segments are determined based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s business. We evaluate our performance based on the gross profit achieved in each segment. The accounting policies for both reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Selling, general and administrative, and research and development expenses consistently support both segments and are not allocated between these two business segments. Our two product categories, metrology and optics, are sold into each of these segments. Metrology products include optical interferometers for optical surface and figure measurements and optical surface profilers for nano-technology applications, both of which are sold into the semiconductor and industrial segments. Metrology products also include displacement measuring interferometers that are sold primarily in the semiconductor segment. ZYGO’s optics products consist of high precision optical components, optical coatings, and optical assemblies, all of which are sold into both business segments.
| Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Semiconductor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | | $ | 18,733 | | $ | 18,027 | | $ | 53,362 | | $ | 46,401 | |
Gross profit | | | | 7,250 | | | 6,289 | | | 21,109 | | | 15,388 | |
Gross profit as a % of sales | | | | 39% | | | 35% | | | 40% | | | 33% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Industrial | | |
Sales | | | $ | 14,954 | | $ | 10,406 | | $ | 43,910 | | $ | 33,933 | |
Gross profit | | | | 5,880 | | | 3,113 | | | 16,392 | | | 12,178 | |
Gross profit as a % of sales | | | | 39% | | | 30% | | | 37% | | | 36% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total | | |
Sales | | | $ | 33,687 | | $ | 28,433 | | $ | 97,272 | | $ | 80,334 | |
Gross profit | | | | 13,130 | | | 9,402 | | | 37,501 | | | 27,566 | |
Gross profit as a % of sales | | | | 39% | | | 33% | | | 39% | | | 34% | |
Separate financial information by segment for total assets, capital expenditures, and depreciation and amortization is not available and is not evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker.
Substantially all of our operating expenses, assets, and depreciation and amortization are U.S. based. Sales by geographic area were as follows:
| Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
| March 31, 2005
| March 26, 2004
|
---|
Domestic | | | $ | 12,742 | | $ | 6,567 | | $ | 32,774 | | $ | 21,136 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Far East: | | |
Japan | | | | 14,929 | | | 16,342 | | | 44,379 | | | 43,736 | |
Pacific Rim | | | | 1,799 | | | 3,624 | | | 8,400 | | | 10,491 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total Far East | | | | 16,728 | | | 19,966 | | | 52,779 | | | 54,227 | |
Europe and Other (primarily Europe) | | | | 4,217 | | | 1,900 | | | 11,719 | | | 4,971 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | | $ | 33,687 | | $ | 28,433 | | $ | 97,272 | | $ | 80,334 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
11
NOTE 5: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND MAJOR CUSTOMER
Sales to Canon Inc., one of our significant stockholders, and Canon Sales Co., Inc., a distributor of certain of our products in Japan and a subsidiary of Canon Inc., amounted to $12,839 (38% of net sales) and $38,189 (39% of net sales) for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005, as compared with $16,057 (56% of net sales) and $40,892 (51% of net sales) for the comparable prior year periods. These sales include revenues generated from the development agreements referenced below. Selling prices of products sold to Canon Inc. and Canon Sales Co., Inc. are based, generally, on the terms customarily given to distributors. Revenues generated from the development agreements are recorded on a cost-plus basis. At March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, there were, in the aggregate, $10,319 and $10,913, respectively, of trade accounts receivable from Canon Inc. and Canon Sales Co., Inc.
In September 2002, we entered into a contract with Canon Inc. related to the development of certain interferometers. In March 2004, we signed a preliminary agreement to begin further add-on work; the definitive agreement for this additional work was signed in December 2004. In February 2005, we entered into two additional agreements with Canon Inc. related to the development of prototype production tools and accessories. During the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized revenue of $5,442 and $9,615, respectively, for the original contract and subsequent add–on work compared with $5,008 and $13,338, respectively, for the comparable prior periods.
NOTE 6: HEDGING ACTIVITIES
During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. These contracts are not designated as cash flow, fair value, or net investment hedges under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, and therefore, are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. These contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures, generally three to six months. Any gains and losses on the fair value of these contracts would be largely offset by gains and losses on the underlying transactions.
As of March 31, 2005, we had three foreign currency forward contracts outstanding. Net recognized gainsfrom foreign currency forward contracts for both the three and nine month months ended March 31, 2005 was $34, and are included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. These gains are substantially offset by foreign exchange losses on intercompany balances recorded by our subsidiaries. We did not enter into any derivative instruments to hedge foreign currency exposure prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
Zygo Corporation is a worldwide supplier of optical metrology instruments, precision optics, and electro-optical design and manufacturing services for customers in the semiconductor capital equipment and industrial markets. Optical instruments products encompass non-contact optical measurement instruments. Optics products consist of high performance macro-optics components, optical coatings, and optical system assemblies. We conduct the majority of our manufacturing in our 153,500 square foot facility in Middlefield, Connecticut.
We also perform development services for our largest customer, Canon, a related party, which have produced a significant amount of our revenue over the past two years. In September 2002, we entered into a development services agreement with Canon for work on the development of certain interferometers. In March 2004, we signed a preliminary agreement to begin further add-on work, with an amendment to the original contract signed in December 2004. In February 2005, we entered into two additional agreements with Canon related to the development of prototype production tools and accessories. In the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we recognized $5.4 million of revenue from these development services agreements as compared with $5.0 million in the prior year comparable quarter. We anticipate revenues of approximately $29.5 millionfrom these follow-on agreements over the next 12 to 18 months. To the extent that we do not receive additional development agreements from any customers for services beyond that period, future period over period comparable sales would be significantly affected. The Canon development services revenues have historically carried a lower gross profit as a percentage of sales than our product sales.
Semiconductor manufacturers have become more cautious in their capital spending outlooks for the remainder of the 2005 calendar year. In the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we experienced a decline in product sales to Canon; however, this effect was offset by development services revenue returning to expected levels and by increasing sales to other semiconductor customers. We expect certain product sales to Canon to be below historical levels in the near term. While this decline in product sales to Canon was marginal, Canon sales as a percent of total net sales was significantly lower on a year over year basis. Canon represented 38% and 56% of total net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, and for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, sales to Canon represented 39% and 51%, respectively. These year over year decreases were the primary result of increased sales in other areas of our business, including new initiatives in the flat panel market and growth in optical business systems.
We achieved an order level for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 of $37.7 million, as compared with $31.6 million for third quarter of fiscal 2004. Orders in the semiconductor segment were $23.6 million, an increase of $4.7 million, or 25%, as compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2004, primarily due to increases in flat panel display metrology and stage optics orders of $2.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively. In the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we continued a strong order rate in the industrial segment, with aggregate orders of $14.1 million. Orders in this business segment increased by $1.4 million, or 11%, as compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The industrial orders were highlighted by continued orders of $2.1 for the production of optics used in laser surgery systems. The order flow boosted backlog to $68.9 million as of March 31, 2005, up $4.0 million, or 6%, from the second quarter of fiscal 2005, and up $19.9 million, or 41%, from the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
We discontinued our telecommunications TeraOptix business unit during fiscal 2003. Accordingly, the results of TeraOptix have been presented as a separate line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Discontinued TeraOptix operations, net of tax”, for all periods presented. In addition, the charges on the disposal of TeraOptix, net of tax, have been recorded as a separate line item for all periods presented. All continuing operations line items presented exclude TeraOptix results. In August 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our former telecommunications facility located in Westborough, Massachusetts. In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we recorded an additional impairment charge and adjustments of $0.2 million to reflect the fair value based on final negotiations. The sales transaction was completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 and generated approximately $1.9 million of cash, net of selling expenses. We do not expect any additional charges for discontinued operations related to the TeraOptix business unit.
Continuing Operations
We recorded earnings from continuing operations for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 of $2.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, as compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2004 of $1.0 million, or $0.05 per diluted share. For the first nine months of
13
fiscal 2005, we recorded earnings from continuing operations of $6.2 million as compared with $1.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The increase period over period for both the third quarter and the nine month period reflects higher sales levels leveraging stable operating costs and overheads.
Net sales of $33.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 increased by $5.3 million, or 19%, as compared with the prior year period. For the nine month period of fiscal 2005, net sales of $97.3 million increased by $17.0 million, or 21.%, as compared with $80.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Our net sales for the third quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2005 included $5.4 million and $9.6 million, respectively, from development services for Canon Inc.
Net sales by segment and geographic regions are as follows:
Net Sales By Segment and Geographic Regions
(In millions) | Three Months Ended
| Nine Months Ended
|
| March 31, 2005
| Net Sales %
| March 26, 2004
| Net Sales %
| March 31, 2005
| Net Sales %
| March 26, 2004
| Net Sales %
|
---|
Segment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Semiconductor | | | $ | 18.7 | | | 55 | % | $ | 18.0 | | | 63 | % | $ | 53.4 | | | 55 | % | $ | 46.4 | | | 58 | % |
Industrial | | | | 15.0 | | | 45 | % | | 10.4 | | | 37 | % | | 43.9 | | | 45 | % | | 33.9 | | | 42 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | | | 33.7 | | | 100 | % | | 28.4 | | | 100 | % | | 97.3 | | | 100 | % | $ | 80.3 | | | 100 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Geographic | | |
Domestic | | | | 12.8 | | | 38 | % | | 6.6 | | | 23 | % | | 32.8 | | | 34 | % | | 21.1 | | | 26 | % |
Europe/Other | | | | 4.2 | | | 13 | % | | 1.9 | | | 7 | % | | 11.7 | | | 12 | % | | 5.0 | | | 6 | % |
Japan | | | | 14.9 | | | 44 | % | | 16.3 | | | 57 | % | | 44.4 | | | 45 | % | | 43.7 | | | 55 | % |
Pacific rim | | | | 1.8 | | | 5 | % | | 3.6 | | | 13 | % | | 8.4 | | | 9 | % | | 10.5 | | | 13 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | | $ | 33.7 | | | 100 | % | $ | 28.4 | | | 100 | % | $ | 97.3 | | | 100 | % | $ | 80.3 | | | 100 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2005, net sales in the semiconductor sector increased $0.7 million, or 4%, and $7.0 million, or 15%, respectively, as compared with the same periods in the prior year. The increase for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 was due almost exclusively to volume increases to lithography customers. The increase for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 was due primarily to an increase in sales volume to our lithography customers partially offset by a decrease of $3.7 million in development sales. The increase in sales to lithography customers was primarily attributable to an increase in number of units sold in Europe and Japan. The year over year decline in development services revenue of $3.7 million is primarily attributable to the winding down of the initial development agreement with Canon and a slower than anticipated start on the further add-on work under the follow-up agreements signed in December 2004 and February 2005.
Sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 in the industrial segment increased $4.6 million, or 44%, as compared with the same period in the prior year. Sales in the industrial segment for the nine month period of fiscal 2005 increased by $10.0 million, or 29%, over the same period in the prior year. The increase in industrial segment sales for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2005 was due primarily to a volume increase in large order optical components deliveries of $1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively, and medical system sales of $1.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
Sales in U.S. dollars for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $27.1 million, or 80%, of total net sales for the period. For the first nine months of fiscal 2005, sales in U.S. dollars were $78.7 million, or 81%, of total net sales for the period. The majority of our foreign currency transactions and foreign operations are in the euro and Japanese yen. Management believes the percentage of sales in foreign currencies may increase in the coming year due to an increase in sales denominated in yen to Japanese customers. For our sales which are based in foreign currency, we are exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations from the time customers are invoiced in foreign currency until collection occurs. Significant changes in the values of foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar can impact the sales of our products in export markets, as would changes in the general economic conditions in those markets. In the absence of a substantial increase in sales orders in currency other than U.S. dollars, we believe a 10% appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro and yen would have an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes on various intercompany foreign receivables. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes.
14
Gross profit for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 totaled $13.1 million, an increase of $3.7 million, or 39%, from $9.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the third quarters of fiscal 2005 and 2004 were 39% and 33%, respectively. Approximately two percentage points in the quarter over quarter increase is attributable to a reduction in our quality costs, which include rework, scrap, and warranty expenses. Another approximately two percentage points of the increase in the gross profit as a percentage of sales was a result of increased margins on development services. Increased volume in our optical assembly center helped to reduce unabsorbed costs, and increased volume in Europe with high margins also contributed to the increase. Gross profit for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 was $37.5 million, an increase of $9.9 million, or 36%, as compared with the prior year period. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004 was 39% and 34%, respectively. The gross profit as a percentage of sales was helped by increased margins on development services. This contributed two percentage points to the gross profit as a percentage of sales. In addition, approximately one percentage point of the increase in the first nine months is attributable to a reduction in our quality costs, which include rework, scrap, and warranty expenses.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 amounted to $5.5 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 2%, from $5.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. For the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, SG&A remained relatively consistent at $16.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 as compared with $16.8 in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 was 16% and 19%, respectively. For the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, SG&A as a percentage of sales was 17% and 21%, respectively. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of sales for both periods of fiscal 2005 was due to the costs remaining stable on a higher sales volume.
Research, development, and engineering expenses (“R&D”) for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 totaled $3.8 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 41%, from $2.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. For the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, R&D expenses were $10.7 million and $9.3 million, respectively. Our major initiatives this fiscal year are in the semiconductor segment, most notably for flat panel metrology. R&D as a percentage of sales for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2005 was 11%. For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2004, R&D as a percentage of sales was 10% and 12%, respectively.
The income tax expense from continuing operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 totaled $1.2 million, or31% of pre-tax earnings, as compared with an income tax expense of $0.6 million, or 38% of pre-tax income, in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company’s tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 was lower than the expected effective rate of 36% mainly due to an increased deduction on the June 30, 2004 tax return for foreign trade income that was realized in the third quarter. The income tax expense from continuing operations for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 totaled $3.6 million, or 34% of pre-tax earnings, as compared with an income tax expense of $0.9 million, or 38% of pre-tax income, for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Our overall effective tax rate, including discontinued operations, was 36% for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 as compared with 29% in the comparable prior year period. The increase in the overall effective tax rate is primarily due to an increase in the percentage of pre-tax income from foreign operations, which has a higher effective tax rate than income from domestic operations, and reductions in research and development tax credits. Research and development credits, which have historically been included in our effective tax rate calculation, were excluded in the fiscal 2005 rate calculation due to certain statutory limitations.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In September 2002, we entered into a contract with Canon Inc. related to the development of certain interferometers (refer to Note 5 of our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information). In March 2004, we signed a preliminary agreement to begin further add-on work, with a definitive agreement signed on December 20, 2004. In February 2005, we entered into two additional agreements with Canon Inc. related to the development of prototype production tools and accessories. Our net sales for the third quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2004 included $5.4 million and $9.6 million, respectively, from these development services for Canon Inc.
15
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2005, working capital was$64.2 million, an increase of $5.7million from $58.5 million at June 30, 2004. We maintained cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities at March 31, 2005 totaling $34.1million, as compared with $34.4 million at June 30, 2004. The increase in working capital was primarily the result of an increase in inventory of $12.2 due to increased orders partially offset by an increase in deferred revenue and advance payments of $5.6 million due primarily to flat panel revenue recognition accounting. There were no borrowings outstanding under our $3.0 million bank line of credit at March 31, 2005.
During fiscal 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our vacant Westborough, Massachusetts, facility. The sale transaction was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and generated approximately $1.9 million in cash, net of selling expenses.
Acquisitions of property, plant, and equipment were $1.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, which includes $0.7million for the construction of an addition to our existing Middlefield, Connecticut, facility. The building addition was completed during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. The additional space is being used primarily for manufacturing.
Management believes that cash generated from operations, together with the liquidity provided by existing cash balances, will be sufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements for the next 12 months.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, SIGNIFICANT JUDGMENTS, AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures at the date of our consolidated financial statements. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, warranty obligations, income taxes, and long-lived assets. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and current market conditions and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, warranty costs, accounting for income taxes, and valuation of long-lived assets to be critical policies due to the estimates and judgments involved in each.
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We recognize revenue based on guidance provided in SEC SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and in accordance with EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, our price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on our standard products when title passes to the customer upon shipment. While our standard products generally require installation, the installation is considered a perfunctory performance obligation. The standard products do not have customer acceptance criteria. We have standard rights of return that we account for as a warranty provision under SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” We do not have any price protection agreements or other post shipment obligations. We also sell custom equipment and do have situations where customer acceptance is part of the sales agreement. In these situations, revenue is not recognized until the customer has accepted the product. In cases where custom equipment does not have customer acceptance as part of the sales agreement, we recognize revenue upon shipment as long as the system meets the specifications as agreed upon with the customer. Certain transactions have multiple deliverables, with the deliverables clearly defined. To the extent that the secondary deliverables are other than perfunctory, we recognize the revenue on each deliverable, if separable, or on the completion of all deliverables, if not separable, all in a manner consistent with SAB No. 104 and EITF 00-21. Generally, software is a component of our standard product and, as such, is not separately recognized as revenue. Standalone software products are recognized as revenue when they are shipped.
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a continuous review of customer accounts, payment patterns, and specific collection issues. We perform on-going credit evaluations of our customers and do not require collateral from our customers. For many of our international customers, we require an irrevocable letter of credit to be issued by the customer before a shipment is made. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required.
16
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a monthly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of management’s estimated future usage is written down to estimated market value, if less than its cost. Contracts with fixed prices are evaluated to determine if estimated total costs will exceed revenues. A loss provision is recorded when the judgment is made that actual costs incurred plus estimated costs remaining to be incurred will exceed total revenues from the contract. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to current economic trends, future demand for our products, and technological obsolescence. Significant management judgments must be made when providing for obsolete and excess inventory and losses on contracts. If actual market conditions are different than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs and loss accruals may be required.
Warranty Costs
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We consider historical warranty costs actually incurred and specifically identified circumstances to establish the warranty liability. The warranty liability is reviewed on a quarterly basis. Should actual costs or revised estimated costs differ from management’s prior estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an estimated realizable amount based on historical and forecasted results. While management has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event management were to determine that ZYGO would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should management determine that ZYGO would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. Our effective tax rate may vary from period to period, generally based on changes in estimated taxable income or loss, changes to the valuation allowance, changes in pre-tax income between jurisdictions that have higher or lower tax rates, changes to federal, state or foreign tax laws, and deductibility of certain costs and expenses by jurisdiction.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the carrying value of intangible assets and other long-lived assets is reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and externally, that may suggest impairment. Some factors we consider important, which could trigger the impairment review, include a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, a significant adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, an accumulation of costs for an asset in excess of the amount originally expected, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection that demonstrates continuing losses, and a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life.
If such circumstances exist, we evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to determine if impairment exists based upon estimated undiscounted future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the assets and comparing that value with the carrying value of the assets. If the carrying value of the assets is greater than the estimated future cash flows, the assets are written down to the estimated fair value. We determine the estimated fair value of the assets based on a current market value of the assets. If a current market value is not readily available, a projected discounted cash flow method is applied using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Our cash flow estimates are based upon management’s best estimates, using appropriate and customary assumptions and projections at the time.
17
Health Insurance
Beginning in January 2004, we became self-insured for the majority of our group health insurance. We rely on claims experience in determining an adequate liability for claims incurred, but not reported. To the extent actual claims exceed estimates, we may be required to record additional expense. A one percent change in actual claims would have an annual impact of approximately $25,000 on our financial condition and results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt, or operating parts of our business that are not consolidated into our financial statements. We have not guaranteed any obligations of a third party.
18
RISK FACTORS THAT MAY IMPACT FUTURE RESULTS
Risk factors that may impact future results include those disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no material changes that have occurred in our quantitative and qualitative market risk disclosures during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. In the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we began hedging certain intercompany transactions by entering into forward contracts to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations on earnings associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative purposes. These contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the currency transaction exposures, generally three to six months. Generally, any gains and losses on the fair value of these contracts are expected to be largely offset by gains and losses on the underlying transactions.
For discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7a., “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”, presented in our Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
ZYGO maintains “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined under Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We have carried out an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information relating to ZYGO is made known to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer by others within our Company during the period in which this report was being prepared.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
19
PART II — Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) | Exhibits: | |
---|
| 10.1 | Development Agreement Amendment dated February 26, 2005, between Zygo Corporation and Canon Inc. (1) |
| 10.2 | Development Agreement dated February 23, 2005, between Zygo Corporation and Canon Inc. (1) |
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Rule 13a-14(a) |
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Rule 13a-14(a) |
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
(1) | Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for an order granting confidential treatment by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omitted non-public information has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
20
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Zygo Corporation (Registrant) |
| |
| /s/ J. Bruce Robinson J. Bruce Robinson President, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| /s/ Walter A. Shephard Walter A. Shephard Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer |
| |
Date: May 6, 2005
21